New Skin for the Old Ceremony: Ritual in Post-War American Existentialism
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
NEW SKIN FOR THE OLD CEREMONY: RITUAL IN POST-WAR AMERICAN EXISTENTIALISM by MICHIAL FARMER (Under the Direction of Reginald McKnight) ABSTRACT This dissertation will examine the role of the religious impulse, belief, and ritual in American fiction—specifically that fiction heavily influenced by existentialist philosophy— in the decades following World War II. The six writers I examine—Saul Bellow, J.D. Salinger, Flannery O’Connor, John Updike, Walker Percy, and Frederick Buechner— typically follow one of two routes as regards ritual and belief: Either they present the ritual as an end unto itself, with belief as an unnecessary afterthought, or else their characters have a deep and personal faith in God that cannot be expressed through the potentially outdated rites of traditional Judaism and Christianity. In the former scenario, the ritual remains intact, even though belief has rotted away beneath it; in the latter, belief is as strong as ever, but the rituals have had to change to keep from destroying it. An examination of the ways fiction writers navigate these issues will tell us important things about human beings’ relationship to religion, ritual, and belief. INDEX WORDS: Existentialism, Judaism, Christianity, ritual, Saul Bellow, J.D. Salinger, Flannery O’Connor, John Updike, Walker Percy, Frederick Buechner NEW SKIN FOR THE OLD CEREMONY: RITUAL IN POST-WAR AMERICAN EXISTENTIALISM by MICHIAL FARMER B.A., Toccoa Falls College, 2004 M.A., University of Nebraska-Omaha, 2007 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ATHENS, GA 2013 © 2013 Michial Farmer All Rights Reserved NEW SKIN FOR THE OLD CEREMONY: RITUAL IN POSTWAR AMERICAN EXISTENTIALISM by MICHIAL FARMER Major Professor: Reginald McKnight Committee: Douglas Anderson Hugh Ruppersburg Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2013 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dedicated to the memory of Russell Owens, who generously gave me his library and who demonstrated how a Christian existentialist lives in grace, dignity, and kindness. The world is a little colder for his absence from it. This project would not be possible without the support of my wife, Victoria Reynolds Farmer, who always believed that I would finish it eventually—and wouldn’t let me give up on it. I love you. Thanks also to my colleagues, former colleagues, students, and former students at Crown College, who knew when to ask me how it was coming along and when to keep their questions to themselves. I was foolish to try to take on this project while teaching a full course load—but I wouldn’t trade my experiences with you for anything. Thanks to my committee for their conversations and suggestions; especially thanks to Reginald McKnight, who provided the encouragement I needed to finish the project. Finally, thanks to my friends and partners at The Christian Humanist Podcast, who always push me in directions I don’t see coming and who have enriched my intellectual and spiritual lives simply by being who they are: models of Aristotelian friendship. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………..iv CHAPTER 1 EXISTENTIALISM AND THE RELIGIOUS IMPULSE…………………...…….1 2 ‘LONG LIVE REGIMENTATION’: SAUL BELLOW’S MODERN RITUALS……………………………………………………………………... 14 Stalemate: Dangling Man……………………………………………………... 17 Checkmate: Henderson the Rain King………………………………………... 34 3 THE NEW AGNOSTICS AND J.D. SALINGER’S SPIRITUAL SPECIFICITY………………………………………………………………… 54 4 ‘NEVER THE RIGHT FOOD’: THE PHYSICAL AND SPIRITUAL WORLDS IN FLANNERY O’CONNOR’S ‘WISE BLOOD’ AND JOHN UPDIKE’S ‘RABBIT, RUN’…………………………………………………. 79 Wise Blood: Breaking the Spell………………………………………………. 82 Rabbit, Run: Remaking the Spell……………………………………………... 99 5 EROS IN WALKER PERCY’S ‘THE LAST GENTLEMAN’………………… 112 6 THE MOVE TO AGAPE IN ‘THE SECOND COMING’………………………148 7 ‘SEE ME! SEE ME!’: VIRGINITY, CURIOSITY, STASIS, AND ATHEISM IN FREDERICK BUECHNER’S ‘LION COUNTRY’……………………... 179 WORKS CITED……………………………………………………………………………210 1 CHAPTER 1 EXISTENTIALISM AND THE RELIGIOUS IMPULSE “Who in her lovely slip? Who by barbituate? Who in these realms of love? Who by something blunt? And who by avalanche? Who by powder? Who for his greed? Who for his hunger? And who shall I say is calling?” - Leonard Cohen, “Who by Fire” The religions of the book have practiced theodicy as long as they have existed. Job, the oldest book in the Hebrew Bible, attempts to reconcile a loving God with one man’s shattered world, and the conclusion it comes to amounts to a big question mark hanging over the issue. Job, having lost his children, his property, and his physical health, endures the unsatisfactory explanations his friends offer up for several dozen chapters and then demands—quite reasonably, in the eyes of the modern reader, if not the ancient Hebrews— an explanation from his God. The answer is not what he expected: God descends from heaven in a whirlwind and barrages Job with questions: Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge? Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer thou me. Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it? (Job 38:2-5, KJV) God continues in this fashion for 124 more verses, until Job can only apologize for questioning the One from Whom “no thought can be withholden” (42:2). The rather 2 unpleasant moral of the story seems to be that human beings have no business conducting theodicies, that instead they must put their faith in a God who could at any moment allow them to suffer atrocities they do not deserve to undergo. The twentieth century is rich with such atrocities, often on a staggeringly global stage, and religious believers are apt to feel like Job’s friends watching something like the Holocaust unfurl. What theodicy can survive something so horrible? What faith can survive? What explanation can possibly be given? Did God and Satan have a deal for the lives of every man, woman, and child at Auschwitz? Were the gas chambers and the mass graves part of a chess game on a cosmic scale? The pawns in the game recoiled at the thought: There is a story that one day at Auschwitz a group of Jews put God on trial. They charged him with cruelty and betrayal. Like Job they found no consolation in the usual answers to the problem of evil and suffering in the midst of this current obscenity. They could find no excuse for God, no extenuating circumstances, so they found him guilty and, presumably, worthy of death. (Armstrong, History 376) And why not? How many of the millions of Jews sent to Auschwitz would, after all, escape to tell the tale? Job may have received a new family and new wealth in return for his much- vaunted patience, but that did little to soothe the terror of his sons and daughters, torn to pieces by the whirlwind. God might be interested in building heaven on the tears of the destroyed, but one hardly faults Dostoevsky’s Ivan Karamazov for his refusal to countenance such a world. “It’s not God that I don’t accept,” he tells his saintly brother Alyosha, after a chapter full of description of the most horrible abuses ever committed. “Only I most respectfully return Him the ticket” (Brothers 226). Can an honest man do anything else? 3 So it is hard to blame the Auschwitz prisoners for convicting and sentencing God. But what happened after the trial is even more interesting: “The Rabbi pronounced the verdict. Then he looked up and said that the trial was over: it was time for the evening prayer” (Armstrong, History 376). At this point, we see clearly and dramatically that ritual and rite can exist separately from belief and faith. Immediately after God’s trial and execution at Auschwitz, the hangmen knelt and prayed the prayers written to God. Judaism, then, survived the Holocaust, even if God’s survival is up in the air. The Law of Moses made it to 1945, even if the Lawgiver suffocated in the clouds of Zyklon B. Judaism thus ends up being something beyond a religion, at least in as much as a religion involves faith in a higher power; the ritual itself defines a certain sort of Judaism after the Holocaust. This division is most visible in the largely American movement called Reconstructionist Judaism, which Rebecca T. Alpert and Jacob J. Staub call “Perhaps the only truly indigenous attempt to solve the problem of modernity for American Jewry” (2-3). The movement was spearheaded by Rabbi Mordecai Kaplan in the first third of the twentieth century but picked up a good deal of steam after World War II. Its central innovation comes in its definition of Judaism not as a religion or a culture but as a civilization; this definition encompasses religious faith, nationality, and ethnic identity but substantially broadens the traditional definition of what it means to be Jewish. As Alpert and Staub note, the “civilization” definition of Judaism suggests a cultural totality and includes “art, culture, philosophy, language, law, ethics, celebrations, patterns of eating and dressing, and sancta” (10). Under this schema, the specifics of doctrine become far less important, and Reconstructionist Jews are free to conceive of God in new ways: 4 Although religion is paramount in the Reconstructionist definition of Jewish civilization, conspicuously absent from our definition of Judaism is any mention of God. This is no accident. Reconstructionists believe that it is the Jewish people that is the constant which runs through all the various stages in the evolution of Jewish civilization.