This Article Was Originally Published in Issue 4.3 Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Regulamin Odznaki „Korona Gór Europy” I
REGULAMIN ODZNAKI „KORONA GÓR EUROPY” I. Postanowienia wstępne. 1. Odznaka „Korona Gór Europy” została ustanowiona w 2019 r., przez Hutniczo-Miejski Oddział PTTK w Krakowie. Nadzór nad nią sprawuje Hutniczo-Miejski Oddział PTTK w Krakowie. Celem odznaki jest zaktywizowanie turystów górskich do zdobywania bardziej wymagających szczytów i poznawania piękna naszego kontynentu. 2. Odznaka „Korona Gór Europy” obejmuje wszystkie najwyższe szczyty w poszczególnych 47. państwach Europy, zgodnie z załączonym wykazem. II. Zasady zdobywania odznaki. 1. Odznakę może zdobyć każdy, bez względu na obywatelstwo, wiek, członkostwo w organizacji turystycznej. 2. Odznaka posiada trzy stopnie: a) brązowa – przyznawana za zdobycie 16. różnych szczytów, dowolnie wybranych z załączonego wykazu, przy czym trzy szczyty muszą mieć wysokość powyżej dwóch tysięcy metrów; b) srebrna – przyznawana za zdobycie 32. różnych szczytów, dowolnie wybranych z załączonego wykazu, przy czym sześć szczytów musi mieć wysokość powyżej dwóch tysięcy metrów; c) złota – przyznawana za zdobycie wszystkich 47. szczytów z załączonego wykazu. 3. Podczas weryfikowania odznaki uwzględniane są szczyty zdobyte od 1.01.2000 r. Czas zdobywania kolejnych szczytów jest nieograniczony. 4. Wyznaczone szczyty mogą być zdobywane indywidualnie lub zespołowo i w ramach zdobywania innych odznak turystycznych. 5. Podczas wędrówek należy przestrzegać zasad bezpiecznego i racjonalnego uprawiania turystyki górskiej, przestrzegać zasad i odnośnych przepisów prawa obowiązujących w poszczególnych państwach -
120 Godina »Hrvatskog Planinara« 1898
120 godina »Hrvatskog planinara« 1898. – 2018. ISSN 0354-0650 ČASOPIS HRVATSKOGA RUJAN GODIŠTE PLANINARSKOG SAVEZA 110 izlazi od 1898. godine 9 2018 IMPRESUM ČASOPIS HRVATSKOGA PLANINARSKOG SAVEZA »Hrvatski planinar« časopis je Hrvatskoga planinarskog saveza. Prvi je broj izašao 1. lip nja 1898. Od 1910. do 1913. tiskao se kao podlistak naziva »Planinarski list« u časopisu »Vijenac«. Od 1915. do 1921. i od 1945. do 1948. časopis nije izlazio, a Pretplata od 1949. do 1991. godine izlazio je pod imenom »Naše planine«. Časopis izlazi u jedanaest brojeva godišnje (za srpanj i kolovoz kao dvobroj). Godišnja pretplata za Hrvatsku iznosi 150 kuna. Pretplata se uplaćuje na žiro-račun Nakladnik Glavni i odgovorni urednik Hrvatskoga planinarskog saveza Hrvatski Alan Čaplar HR4123600001101495742, pri planinarski savez Palmotićeva 27, 10000 Zagreb čemu na uplatnici ili u obrascu za Kozarčeva 22 e-mail: [email protected] plaćanje putem interneta, u rubrici 10000 Zagreb tel.: 091/51-41-740 »Poziv na broj«, treba biti upisan OIB 77156514497 Vaš pretplatnički broj. Urednički odbor Pretplata i informacije Darko Berljak Godišnja pretplata za Ured Hrvatskoga Vlado Božić inozemstvo iznosi 35 eura, a planinarskog saveza Goran Gabrić uplaćuje se na račun BIC tel. 01/48-23-624 Ivan Hapač ZABA-HR2X 25731-3253236, tel./fax 01/48-24-142 prof. dr. Darko Grundler uz poziv na pretplatničk i broj. e-mail: [email protected] Faruk Islamović http://www.hps.hr Krunoslav Milas Cijena pojedinačnog primjerka Radovan Milčić je 15 kuna (+ poštarina). Uredništvo prof. dr. Željko Poljak E-mail adresa Robert Smolec Vaš pretplatnički broj otisnut je za zaprimanje članaka: Damir Šantek uz Vašu adresu, koja je nalijepljena [email protected] Klara Jasna Žagar na omotnici za slanje časopisa. -
Hvannadalshnúkur 2110 M
LIETUVOS ALPINIZMO ČEMPIONATAS ĮKOPIMO ATASKAITA 10 Europos viršūnių Lietuvos 100 – mečiui Hvannadalshnukur 2110 m–aukščiausias kalnas Islandijoje ir antras pagal aukštį Skandinavijoje po Galdhøpiggen 2465 m. Nuostabus kalnas norint kažkiek suprasti, kas yra „arktinės“salygos ( foto 1) Viršūnėje šalies, kuri pirmoji pasaulyje pripažino atkurtą Lietuvos nepriklausomybę 1991 vasario 11 d. Vidmantas Kmita, Gintaras Černius ir Vytautas Bukauskas 2017 balandžio 21 d. ant Islandijos „stogo“. Iliuzija, kad stovime sniego lauke, bet tai piramidinė viršūnė ir stovime ant stataus skardžio (foto 2 ). Tai rodo staiga lūžtantys šešėliai. Hvannadalshnúkur 2110 m 2017 metai Bendrieji duomenys Įkopimo data: 2017.04.21 ţiemos sezonas Klasė: Techninė Valstybė, kalnų rajonas: Islandija, Öræfajökull vulkano ŠV kraterio žiedo dalis. Viršūnės pavadinimas ir aukštis: Hvannadalshnukur 2110 m – aukščiausias kalnas Islandijoje. Dalyviai: Vytautas Bukauskas Shahshah 2940 m. (1986), Ostryj Tolbaček 3682 m (1988), Ploskij Tolbaček 3085 m (1988), Bezimianij 2885 m (1988), Gamčen 2576 m (1988), Tiatia 1819 m (1989), Žima 1214 m, (1990), Kala Patthar 5644 m. ( 1991), Island Peak 6189 m, (1992) Kilimandžaras 5895 m. ( 2004), Suphanas 4058 m ( 2004), Araratas 5137 m. ( 2004, 2006), Damavendas 5671 m, ( 2005) Apo 2954 m. ( 2006), Ras Dašenas 4600 m.( 2007), Mayonas 2462 m ( 2007), Stanley / Margarita 5109 m., ( 2009) Mt. Rinjani 3700 m (2009), Pic Boby 2658 m ( 2011), , Fudzijama 3776 m. ( 2010, 2011, 2015), Toubkal 4167 m ( 2012), Iztaccíhuatl 5230 m ( 2012) , Tajamulko 4219 m ( 2012), Halasan 1950 m, ( 2013) Yushan 3952 m, ( 2013), Coma Pedrosa 2946 m, ( 2014), Aneto 3404 m. ( 2014), Mulhacen 3482 m ( 2014), Kamerūnas 4095 m. ( 2014), Karthala 2361 m. ( 2015), Cormo Grande 2912 m ( 2015), Korab 2864 m ( 2015), Deravica 2656 m ( 2015), Dinara 1913 m (2015), Teide 3718 m, ( 2015) Titlis 3236 m ( 2016), Pico 2351 m ( 2016), Carrauntoohil 1038 m ( 2016), Ben Nevis 1344 m ( 2016), Triglav 2864 m. -
FIND out MORE Webinar Active School Flag Is a Department of Education Initiative Supported by Healthy Ireland We Value YOUR FEEDBACK
FIND OUT MORE Webinar Active School Flag is a Department of Education initiative supported by Healthy Ireland We Value YOUR FEEDBACK Please complete the Find Out More questionnaire that we will email to you after this webinar www.activeschoolflag.ie Presenters Karen Cotter National Coordinator ASF Caitriona Cosgrave ASF Support Team Jamie Mc Gann DCU Research Team Chat @Karen @Caitriona @Jamie Specific queries should be emailed to [email protected] Watch Video 20180313 ASF BANNER.indd 1 13/03/2018 09:19:07 Active School Flag aims to get more schools, more active, more often An Active School Physical Physical Active Education Activity Partnerships School Week Delivers a broad Promotes inclusive Works in Organises an and balanced PE physical activity partnership with Active School curriculum throughout the others to promote Week every year school day a physically active school culture www.activeschoolflag.ie All ASF activities during 20/21 must comply with COVID-safety guidelines Physical Education “Schools will need to re-orientate their work with the curriculum especially during the initial weeks of the first term as they give greater time and attention to areas such as Social, Personal and Health Education (SPHE), Physical Education (PE), Language and Mathematics. Pupils’ physical education is a central part of their wellbeing: it should form a significant component of timetabled programmes upon returning to school.” Source: Returning to School – Curriculum Guidance for Primary School Leaders and Teachers. www.activeschoolflag.ie www.activeschoolflag.ie The children now view exercise as a fun and enjoyable activity that you can do anytime, anywhere! As teachers, we have identified huge benefits. -
Interdependence of Biodiversity and Development Under Global Change
Secretariat of the CBD Technical Series No. 54 Convention on Biological Diversity 54 Interdependence of Biodiversity and Development Under Global Change CBD Technical Series No. 54 Interdependence of Biodiversity and Development Under Global Change Published by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity ISBN: 92-9225-296-8 Copyright © 2010, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity concern- ing the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views reported in this publication do not necessarily represent those of the Convention on Biological Diversity. This publication may be reproduced for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holders, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The Secretariat of the Convention would appreciate receiving a copy of any publications that use this document as a source. Citation Ibisch, P.L. & A. Vega E., T.M. Herrmann (eds.) 2010. Interdependence of biodiversity and development under global change. Technical Series No. 54. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal (second corrected edition). Financial support has been provided by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development For further information, please contact: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity World Trade Centre 413 St. Jacques Street, Suite 800 Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2Y 1N9 Phone: +1 514 288 2220 Fax: +1 514 288 6588 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cbd.int Typesetting: Em Dash Design Cover photos (top to bottom): Agro-ecosystem used for thousands of years in the vicinities of the Mycenae palace (located about 90 km south-west of Athens, in the north-eastern Peloponnese, Greece). -
Ecdyonurus Nigrescens (Klapálek, 1908) (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae) – Neotype Designation, Taxonomical and Nomenclature Notes
A N N A L E S Z O O L O G I C I (Warszawa), 2008, 58(4): 799-817 ECDYONURUS NIGRESCENS (KLAPÁLEK, 1908) (EPHEMEROPTERA: HEPTAGENIIDAE) – NEOTYPE DESIGNATION, TAXONOMICAL AND NOMENCLATURE NOTES ROMAN J. GODUNKO1* and MAŁGORZATA KŁONOWSKA-OLEJNIK2 1*State Museum of Natural History, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Teatralna 18, Lviv 79008, Ukraine and Biology Centre of the Academy of Science of the Czech Republic, Institute of Entomology, Branišovská 31, CZ-37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 2Department of Hydrobiology, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Kraków, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.— The neotype of Ecdyonurus nigrescens (Klapálek, 1908) has been designated, basing on male imago reared from larva, collected in the Chornohora Range (the Ukrainian Carpathians). The male imago of this species is redescribed; male subimago, female imago and subimago, larvae and the structure of egg chorion are described and illustrated for the first time. Critical diagnostic characters distinguishing this species from other representatives of the Ecdyonurus helveticus species-group are discussed. The type locality is defined in accordance with the Article 76.3 and Recommendation 76A of ICZN as follows Ukraine: Zakarpattia Region, Carpathian Biosphere Reserve, the Chornohora Range, Polonyna Brebeneska district, mountain valley between SW slope of Gutyn Tomnatek Mt. and NW slope of Brebeneskul Mt., upper section of the Brebeneskul stream (left-bank tributary of the Hoverla stream, Tysa river-basin), 1450 m. a.s.l. The data on the original syntype series and type locality are discussed in detail. -
Alpine Tundra of the Krkonoše and Carpathian Mountains
ALPINE TUNDRA OF THE KRKONOŠE AND CARPATHIAN MOUNTAINS Report on study tour funded by Alfred Toepfer Natural Heritage Scholarship 2016 by Dr. Tymur Bedernichek, M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden (Ukraine) Text: Tymur Bedernichek Photos: most of the photos were taken by Tymur Bedernichek; except for those listed below: fig. 6 credit to the British Museum fig. 7 & 13 credit to Robert Erik fig 10 & 11 credit to censor.net.ua fig. 12 credit to vorobus.com fig. 14 credit to podstudnicnou.cz fig. 16 credit to Roman Cherepanyn Sponsorship: this report is the result of study tour funded by Alfred Toepfer Foundation and EUROPARC Federation © EUROPARC Federation, 2017 © Alfred Toepfer Foundation, 2017 2 Acknowledgements I am extremely grateful to EUROPARC Federation and Alfred Toepfer Foundation for the Scholarship. It was not only a very timely support, but also a key that opened many doors. It entailed many pleasant and useful contacts and lucky coincidences, and in the end, I managed to do much more than I had planned. Several people significantly helped me during the study tour: Prof. Natalia Zaimenko, Dr. Blanka Skočdopolová, Dr. Irena Kholová and Prof. Zofia Rączkowska. They were my colleagues, friends and sometimes, even guardian angels. Without their support, I probably would not have been able to complete the project. I would also like to thank Erika Stanciu. Six years ago, she made a presentation at RAPPAM workshop in Ukraine, which I attended with other PhD students. She told us about various funding opportunities for nature conservationists, including Alfred Toepfer Natural Heritage Scholarship, and emphasized how important it is to prepare a strong application. -
New Heights of the Highest Peaks of Polish Mountain Ranges
remote sensing Communication New Heights of the Highest Peaks of Polish Mountain Ranges Krystian Kozioł and Kamil Maciuk * Faculty of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-12-617-22-59 Received: 8 April 2020; Accepted: 29 April 2020; Published: 2 May 2020 Abstract: The idea to verify the height of the highest peaks (summits) in the Crown of Polish Mountains arose after analyzing sources regarding the date and method of measuring the height of these mountain peaks. Our investigations revealed that this type of material is not usually available, and the first mention of height values is most often noted in the inter-war period, and occasionally before WWI (when Poland did not exist as an independent state); most of these values are still in use to this day. The problem of accurate measurement of the height of mountain peaks concerns not only the peaks analyzed by the authors, but also almost all mountain peaks worldwide. Therefore, as part of this work, several trips were organized to the highest peaks of several dozen mountain ranges in the territory of Poland. Measurement was made using a precise geodetic GNSS receiver an accuracy of within 10 cm and a DTM model based on ALS (airborne laser scanning). The results showed that commonly published heights can differ by up to several meters from the actual ones. The most important element of this work consists of the establishment of new measurements of the heights of the highest peaks of all mountain ranges in Poland, which may result in an alteration of the officially recorded heights based on this article. -
Our Fleet List
Our Fleet List Vessels (Circa 2021) Year Flag DWT (MT) Ore P.A. (MT) Berge Everest 2011 Isle of Man 388,138 1,500,000 Berge Aconcagua 2012 Isle of Man 388,138 1,500,000 Berge Jaya 2012 Isle of Man 388,079 1,500,000 Berge Neblina 2012 Isle of Man 388,079 1,500,000 Berge Stahl 1986 Isle of Man 364,767 1,775,130 Berge Logan 2019 Isle of Man 300,000 1,500,000 Berge Mafadi 2019 Isle of Man 300,000 1,500,000 Berge Blanc 2012 Isle of Man 297,160 1,580,302 Berge Fuji 1996 Isle of Man 268,025 1,000,000 Berge Kangchenjunga 1994 Isle of Man 263,237 1,000,000 Berge K2 2015 Isle of Man 262,000 2,096,000 Berge Makalu 2016 Isle of Man 262,000 2,096,000 Berge Cho Oyu 2017 Isle of Man 262,000 2,096,000 Berge Annapurna 2017 Isle of Man 262,000 2,096,000 Berge Tai Shan 2015 Isle of Man 216,656 1,720,000 Berge Heng Shan 2015 Isle of Man 216,461 1,720,000 Berge Zugspitze 2016 Isle of Man 210,000 1,680,000 Berge Grossglockner 2017 Isle of Man 210,000 1,680,000 Berge Toubkal 2017 Isle of Man 210,000 1,680,000 Berge Mulhacen 2017 Isle of Man 210,000 1,680,000 Berge Olympus 2018 Isle of Man 210,000 1,680,000 Berge Kenya 2020 Isle of Man 210,000 1,680,000 Berge Moldoveanu 2020 Isle of Man 210,000 1,680,000 TBN Berge Meru 2021 Isle of Man 210,000 1,680,000 TBN Berge Bobotov 2021 Isle of Man 210,000 1,680,000 Berge Daisen 2014 Panama 207,872 1,616,000 Berge Dachstein 2020 Isle of Man 207,600 1,660,800 Berge Lygnor 2009 Panama 206,330 1,971,609 Berge Odel 2007 Panama 206,330 1,052,108 Berge Kuju 2006 Isle of Man 206,312 1,052,000 Berge Bimberi 2006 Liberia 203,153 1,625,224 Berge Dinara 2005 Liberia 203,000 1,624,000 Berge Sarstein 2017 Isle of Man 182,200 1,792,547 Berge Ishizuchi 2011 Panama 181,458 1,174,112 Berge Tsurugi 2010 Panama 181,403 1,408,000 Berge Kosciuszko 2014 Panama 181,394 1,174,112 Berge Matterhorn 2010 Isle of Man 180,323 1,408,000 Berge Rosa 2006 Isle of Man 180,230 1,297,600 Berge Atlas 2008 Panama 180,180 1,440,000 Berge Song Shan 2010 Isle of Man 180,154 1,440,000 Berge Stanley 2011 Liberia 180,145 1,440,000 The Berge Bulk Fleet List Cont. -
Europe Disclaimer
World Small Hydropower Development Report 2019 Europe Disclaimer Copyright © 2019 by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization and the International Center on Small Hydro Power. The World Small Hydropower Development Report 2019 is jointly produced by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) and the International Center on Small Hydro Power (ICSHP) to provide development information about small hydropower. The opinions, statistical data and estimates contained in signed articles are the responsibility of the authors and should not necessarily be considered as reflecting the views or bearing the endorsement of UNIDO or ICSHP. Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information herein, neither UNIDO, its Member States nor ICSHP assume any responsibility for consequences that may arise from the use of the material. This document has been produced without formal United Nations editing. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. Designations such as ‘developed’, ‘industrialized’ and ‘developing’ are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of firm names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. This document may be freely quoted or reprinted but acknowledgement is requested. -
Geographical Characteristics of the Timberline in the Carpathians
GPol.0014 Geographia Polonica 2015, Volume 88, Issue 2, pp. 35-54 http://dx.doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0014 INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY AND SPATIAL ORGANIZATION POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES www.igipz.pan.pl www.geographiapolonica.pl GEOGRAPHICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TIMBERLINE IN THE CARPATHIANS Barbara Czajka1 • Adam Łajczak2 • Ryszard J. Kaczka1 1 Faculty of Earth Sciences University of Silesia in Katowice Będzińska 60, 41-200 Sosnowiec: Poland e-mails: [email protected] • [email protected] 2 Institute of Geography Pedagogical University of Krakow Podchorążych 2, 30-084 Krakow: Poland e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The pattern of timberline distribution on mountain ranges world-wide is related to global factors. The basic factor is temperature and the amount of radiation, which falls with increasing distance from the equator. Additionally, this basic relationship is overlaid by the specific features of the type of climate on the massif (de- gree of continentality or oceanity) and the mass-elevation effect. In the Carpathians, the mass elevation effect seems to have bigger impact on the location of timberline (R2 = 0.71, p = 0.00) than their latitudinal location (R2 = 0.56, p = 0.00). The timberline altitude changes by 70 m a.s.l. (±20 m) with each degree of latitude. The in- fluence of the type of the climate is complex and it is not clearly visible due to past and recent human impact. Key words timberline • global factors • latitude influence • mass-elevation effect • the Carpathians Introduction Hemisphere the timberline descends 110m with each degree of latitude, disappearing A timberline ecotone (TE), as an azonal ef- totally at about 70°N (Daubenmire 1954; fect of the change in climatic conditions, Körner 1998). -
Carrauntoohil 1038 M - Aukščiausia Airijos Viršūnė ( Foto 1) 6 Valandų Neklasikinis Maršrutas Labai Įdomus, O Apylinkės Nusagstytos Mažais Kalnų Ežeriukais
LIETUVOS ALPINIZMO ČEMPIONATAS ĮKOPIMO ATASKAITA Carrauntoohil 1038 m - aukščiausia Airijos viršūnė ( foto 1) 6 valandų neklasikinis maršrutas labai įdomus, o apylinkės nusagstytos mažais kalnų ežeriukais 5 metrų aukščio metalinis kryžius žymi Airijos aukščiausią viršūnę ( foto 2) Karauntuhilas ( Carrauntoohil ) 1038 m. 2016 metai Bendrieji duomenys Įkopimo data: 2016.06.17 vasaros sezonas Klasė: Techninė Valstybė, kalnų rajonas: Airija, Macgillycuddy's Reeks kalnynas, Juodosios viršūnės Viršūnės pavadinimas ir aukštis: Carrauntoohil 1038 m–aukščiausias Airijos kalnas. Dalyviai: Vytautas Bukauskas: Shahshah 2940 m. (1986), Ostryj Tolbaček 3682 m (1988), Ploskij Tolbaček 3085 m (1988), Bezimianij 2885 m (1988), Gamčen 2576 m (1988), Tiatia 1819 m (1989), Žima 1214 m, (1990), Kala Patthar 5644 m. ( 1991), Island Peak 6189 m, (1992) Kilimandžaras 5895 m. ( 2004), Suphanas 4058 m ( 2004), Araratas 5137 m. ( 2004, 2006), Damavendas 5671 m, ( 2005) Apo 2954 m. ( 2006), Ras Dašenas 4600 m.( 2007), Mayonas 2462 m ( 2007), Stanley / Margarita 5109 m., ( 2009) Mt. Rinjani 3700 m (2009), Pic Boby 2658 m ( 2011), , Fudzijama 3776 m. ( 2010, 2011, 2015), Toubkal 4167 m ( 2012), Iztaccíhuatl 5230 m ( 2012) , Tajamulko 4219 m ( 2012), Halasan 1950 m, ( 2013) Yushan 3952 m, ( 2013), Coma Pedrosa 2946 m, ( 2014), Aneto 3404 m. ( 2014), Mulhacen 3482 m ( 2014), Kamerūnas 4095 m. ( 2014), Karthala 2361 m. ( 2015), Cormo Grande 2912 m ( 2015), Korab 2864 m ( 2015), Deravica 2656 m ( 2015), Dinara 1913 m (2015), Teide 3718 m, ( 2015) Titlis 3236 m ( 2016), Pico 2351 m ( 2016), Carrauntoohil 1038 m ( 2016), Ben Nevis 1344 m ( 2016), Triglav2864 m. ( 2016), Olimpas ( Mitikas) 2919 m ( 2016), Gerlochovskij štit 2655 m. ( 2016) Salomėja Jasinskaitė: Elbrusas 5642 m.