DOCSLIB.ORG

ANNUAL REPORT 2013 - Romania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ANNUAL REPORT 2013 - Romania Authors: Silvia-Antoaneta Berbec (Ch. 1, 2, 9.3 and 9.5) Ágnes Csonta (Ch. 3) Mihaela Manole (Ch. 4) Iustina Ionescu (Ch. 5, 6 and 9.4) Delia Niţă (Ch. 7 and 10) Adela Dumbrăvan (Ch. 8, 9.1 and 9.2) Georgiana Fusu Plăiaşu (Ch. 11) Senior Expert: Lucian Bojin National Focal Point: Centre for Legal Resources The collection of data and information contained in this report were commissioned in 2013 by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights as background material for the Agency’s comparative analysis that feeds into its annual report. All opinions and views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not represent in any way the official position of the FRA. The FRA Annual report: Fundamental rights: challenges and achievements in 2013 is available online at: www.fra.europa.eu 1 1 ASYLUM, IMMIGRATION AND INTEGRATION 1.1 Monitoring of forced returns The 2011 amendments1 to the Aliens Act2 provided that national and international organizations and entities in the field of migration will have the possibility of monitoring the removal of aliens from the national territory.3 The general legal provisions in the field specify the categories of aliens who can be placed in public custody (administrative detention) until their removal from the territory4, what is the maximum period of public custody as well as the conditions for judicial control of the public custody measure,5 the requirements for granting a temporary permission to remain in Romania (known as toleration),6 and the rights of aliens in public custody.7 The monitoring system of forced returns established in 2011 by the NGO Romanian National Council for Refugees (NRCR) (Consiliul Naţional Român pentru Refugiaţi, CNRR) continued under the project “Improving the implementation and monitoring of forced returns“ until June 2013. The project was financed by the European Commission’s Return Fund, 2011 Annual Program. During this project’s implementation the organization provided legal counseling and assistance, as well as material, psychological and medical support to migrants in public custody and monitored the forced return operations. Starting with August 2013 CNRR will continue until June 2014 to monitor forced returns under escort as a result of a new project “ Assistance for migrants forcefully returned under escort” financed by the European Commission’s Return Fund, 2012 Annual Program.8 As in the case of the previous project, the organization will provide legal counseling, material assistance and will monitor forced returns under escort operations. Comparing with the project “Improving the implementation and monitoring of forced returns” when total amount of budget was of 870.638 Romanian Lei the equivalent of 194.882,59 Euro ( EC contribution 1 Romania, Law no. 157/2001 regarding the modification of several laws relating to the regime of foreigners in Romania (Legea nr. 157/2011 pentru modificarea si completarea unor acte normative privind regimul strainilor in Romania), 11 July 2011. 2 Romania, Government Emergency Ordinance no. 194/2002 regarding the aliens’ regime in Romania, (Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 194 din 12 decembrie 2002 privind regimul străinilor în România), 12 December 2002 3 Romania, Government Emergency Ordinance no. 194/2002 regarding the aliens’ regime in Romania, (Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 194 din 12 decembrie 2002 privind regimul străinilor în România), 12 December 2002, Article 91 paragraph 6. 4 Romania, Government Emergency Ordinance no. 194/2002 regarding the aliens’ regime in Romania, (Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 194 din 12 decembrie 2002 privind regimul străinilor în România), 12 December 2002, Article 97. 5 Romania, Government Emergency Ordinance no. 194/2002 regarding the aliens’ regime in Romania, (Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 194 din 12 decembrie 2002 privind regimul străinilor în România), 12 December 2002, Article 97. 6 Romania, Government Emergency Ordinance no. 194/2002 regarding the aliens’ regime in Romania, (Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 194 din 12 decembrie 2002 privind regimul străinilor în România), 12 December 2002, Article 103. 7 Romania, Government Emergency Ordinance no. 194/2002 regarding the aliens’ regime in Romania, (Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 194 din 12 decembrie 2002 privind regimul străinilor în România), 12 December 2002, Article 99-100. 8 Romania, General Inspectorate for Immigration (Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrari), Projects ongoing and implemented by beneficiaries financed from the European Return Fund Annual Program 2012 (Proiecte in derulare si implementate de beneficiari finantate din Fondul European pentru Returnare Programul Anual 2012) available at http://ori.mai.gov.ro/detalii/pagina/ro/Fondul-European-de-Returnare/183. 2 75%, 652.987,50 Romanian Lei, the equivalent of 146.161,94 Euro calculated at infoeuro exchange rate from the month in which project started to be implemented, June 2012) for the new project “Assistance for migrants forced returned under escort” the total budget is slightly lower 808.296,19 Romanian Lei, the equivalent of 184.172,48 Euro ( EC contribution 75%, 606.222,14 Romanian Lei, the equivalent of 138.129,36 Euro calculated at infoeuro exchange rate from the month in which project started to be implemented, August 2013). The information presented in the table bellow was obtained from the Romanian National Council for Refugees an NGO which is tasked with return monitoring. Unitil June 2013 the NGP implemented the project “Improving the implementation and monitoring of forced returns” and in August 2013 started a new project “Assistance for migrants forced returned under escort” until June 2014 both financed through the European Return Fund.9 1. Organisation appointed 1.1 Which is/are the national organisation(s) Romanian National Council for Refugees tasked with return monitoring? (Consiliul National Roman Pentru Refugiati) 1.2. Indicate the legal basis in domestic law Emergency Ordinance no. 194/ 2002 on the and provide the link. status of aliens in Romania, article 91, par 6, added by Law 157/2011 for the modification and completion of certain legal norms regarding the regime of aliens in Romania, Article I, point 127.10 2. Monitoring of removals 2.1 Has the organisation (indicated under No. The NGO’s staff was involved just in 1.1 above) accompanied actual removals by monitoring of 55 return actions of migrants being on the aircraft or vessel in 2013? held in public custody or removed in 24 hours from the discovery moment of their illegal stay. The staff did not accompany actual removals. Origin countries of the returned migrants were Morroco, Tunisia, Algeria, Pakistan, Nigeria, Republic Moldova, China, India, Afghanistan. 2.2 If yes, how often and to which N/A destinations? 2.3 Did it include Frontex-coordinated N/A returns? 2.4 If the reply to question 2.3 is yes, how N/A many and to which destinations? 2.5 Briefly describe which standards the ONLY UPDATE THIS FIELD IF THERE monitor compares his/her observation with HAVE BEEN CHANGES IN 2013 (indicate if tools, such as guidelines or From the information gathered no changes 9 Letter no. 1019 of 13 January 2014 from Romanian National Council for Refugees to the Centre for Legal Resources, on file with the NFP. 10 Romania, Law 157/2011 for the modification and completion of certain legal norms regarding the regime of aliens in Romania (Legea 157 din 11 iulie 2011 pentru modificarea şi completarea unor acte normative privind regimul străinilor în România), available at http://www.lege-online.ro/lr-LEGE-157-2011-%28130383%29.html. 3 checklists, exist) were registered in 2013 3. Funding 3.1 Was the monitoring of forced return co- Yes funded by the European Return Fund in 2013? 3.2 If yes, what portion (% and amount in For the project”Improving the EUR and local currency) was covered by implementation and monitoring of forced EU funding? returns” implemented between 29.06.2012 – 30.06. 2013 the proportion covered by EU funding was of 75% (652.987,50 RON, 146.163,96 EUR) For the project „Assistance for forced returned migrants under escort” that is implemeted between 27.08.2013 – 30.06.2014 the proportion covered by EU funding is of 75% (606.222,14 RON, 138.129,36 EUR)11 4. Reporting 4.1. Has the monitor issued public reports? It is estimated that until the end of the projects the National Romanian Council for Refugees will finish to elaborate a summary report regarding monitoring of forced returns which will be published on the NGO’s website. 4.2. If yes, briefly describe the key issues N/A raised and provide a link to the document. 5. Any other comments 5.1. Include here any other comments on - monitoring on forced returns that occurred in 2013 that you may have. According with the information provided by the Romanian General Inspectorate for Immigration (RGII) (Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări, IGI)12 this institution was involved during 2013 in 3 Frontex- coordinated return flights. With this occasion 4 people (2 Nigerians and 2 Pakistanis) were returned to their origin countries Nigeria and Pakistan. 11 Romania, General Inspectorate for Immigration (Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrari), Projects ongoing and implemented by beneficiaries financed by the European Return Fund Annual Program 2012 ( Proiecte in derulare si implementate de beneficiari finantate din Fondul European pentru Returnare Programul Anual 2012) available at http://ori.mai.gov.ro/detalii/pagina/ro/Fondul-European-de-Returnare/183. 12Letter no. 2594615 of 8 January 2014 of General Inspectorate for Immigration to the Centre for Legal Resources, on file with the NFP. 4 1.2 Immigration detention and alternatives to detention Provide the urls where official statistical data on immigration detention and on the use of alternatives to detention are provided. Include a brief explanatory note clarifying what can be found where.
Recommended publications
  • A Fish Fauna from the Lowermost Bartonian of the Transylvanian Basin, Romania

    A Fish Fauna from the Lowermost Bartonian of the Transylvanian Basin, Romania

    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org A fish fauna from the lowermost Bartonian of the Transylvanian Basin, Romania Nicolae Trif, Vlad Codrea, and Viorel Arghiuș ABSTRACT A fish fauna newly discovered in the middle Eocene marine sediments cropping out near the village of Luna de Sus, Romania, completes the fossil record of the East- ern European region. Teeth belonging to 15 species of Chondrichthyes and two spe- cies of Actinopterygii are herein recorded from the lowermost Bartonian deposits. These Paleogene fish document a marine tropical environment of medium deep waters in the northwestern area of the Transylvanian Basin. The vertical distributions of extant equivalent taxa allow a sea depth estimation of 100 to 200 m. The warm climate is doc- umented by both the present faunal assemblage and previous palynological studies. It is important to note the presence of the scarcely known and poorly understood pycno- dont species Phacodus punctatus and of the oldest representative of Labridae from this Carpathian area. The diversity of the fauna was found to be average compared to some areas from Western Europe or North Africa, but it falls within the regional diver- sity range of the Eastern European localities. Nicolae Trif. Department of Geology, Faculty of Biology-Geology, Babeş-Bolyai University, 1 Kogălniceanu St., 400084, Cluj-Napoca, Romania and Brukenthal National Museum, Natural History Museum, Sibiu, Romania, 1 Cetății St., Sibiu, 550160, Romania. [email protected] Vlad Codrea. Department of Geology, Faculty of Biology-Geology, Babeş-Bolyai University, 1 Kogălniceanu St., 400084, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. [email protected] Viorel Arghiuș. Environmental Sciences Department, Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Babeş-Bolyai University, 30 Fântânele St., 400294, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • Methods to Estimate the Structure and Size of the “Neet” Youth

    Methods to Estimate the Structure and Size of the “Neet” Youth

    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Economics and Finance 32 ( 2015 ) 119 – 124 Emerging Markets Queries in Finance and Business Methods to estimate the structure and size of the "neet" youth Mariana Bălan* The Institute of National Economy, Casa Academiei Române, Calea 13 Septembrie nr. 13, Bucharest, 050711, Romania Abstract In 2013, in EU-27, were employed only 46.1% of the young people aged 15-29 years, this being the lowest figure ever recorded by Eurostat statistics. In Romania, in the same year, were employed only 40.8% of the young people aged 15-29 years. According to Eurostat, in 2013, in Europe, over 8 million young people aged 15-29 were excluded from the labour market and the education system. This boosted the rate of NEET population, aged 15-29, from the 13% level recorded in 2008 to 15.9% in 2013, with significant variations between the Member States: less than 7.5% in the Netherlands, more than 20% in Bulgaria, Croatia, Italy, Greece and Spain. In Romania, under the impact of the financial crisis, the rate of NEET population increased from 13.2% in 2008 to 19.1% in 2011 and 19.6% in 2013. This paper presents a brief analysis of the labour market in the European Union and the particularities of the youth labour market in Romania. It analyses, for the pre-crisis period and under its impact, the structure, the education and the gender composition of NEET groups. Some stochastic methods are used to estimate the structure and size of the NEET rates and of the youth unemployment rate in Romania.
  • Full Proposal

    Full Proposal

    FUNDING APPLICATION FOR YOUNG RESEARCH TEAMS - PN-II-RU-TE-2014-4 This document uses Times New Roman font, 12 point, 1.5 line spacing and 2 cm margins. Any modification of these parameters (excepting the figures and their captions), as well as exceeding the maximum number of pages set for each section will lead to the automatic disqualification of the application. The imposed number of pages does not contain the references; these will be written on additional pages. The black text must be kept, as it marks the mandatory information and sections of the application. CUPRINS B. Project leader ................................................................................................................................. 3 B1. Important scientific achievements of the project leader ............................................................ 3 B2. Curriculum vitae ........................................................................................................................ 5 B3. Defining elements of the remarkable scientific achievements of the project leader ................. 7 B3.1 The list of the most important scientific publications from 2004-2014 period ................... 7 B3.2. The autonomy and visibility of the scientific activity. ....................................................... 9 C.Project description ....................................................................................................................... 11 C1. Problems. ................................................................................................................................
  • HIV/AIDS Surveillance in Europe 2013

    HIV/AIDS Surveillance in Europe 2013

    SURVEILLANCE REPORT HIV/AIDS surveillance in Europe 2013 www.ecdc.europa.eu www.euro.who.int HIV/AIDS surveillance in Europe 2013 HIV/AIDS surveillance in Europe 2013 SURVEILLANCE REPORT Suggested citation for full report: The European Centre for Disease Prevention and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control/ Control (ECDC) and the WHO Regional Office for Europe WHO Regional Office for Europe. HIV/AIDS surveillance would like to thank the nominated national operational in Europe 2013. Stockholm: European Centre for contact points for HIV/AIDS surveillance from EU/EEA Disease Prevention and Control; 2014. Member States and the national HIV/AIDS surveillance focal points from other countries of the WHO European Tables and figures should be referenced: Region for providing data and valuable comments on European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control/ this report. WHO Regional Office for Europe. HIV/AIDS surveillance in Europe 2013. The report was coordinated by Anastasia Pharris (ECDC) and Annemarie Stengaard (WHO Regional Office for This publication follows the ECDC terminological prac- Europe). Report review and production support were tice which reflects the European Union Interinstitutional provided by Andrew J. Amato-Gauci, Martin Donoghoe, Style Guide with regard to names and designations of Nedret Emiroglu, Guenael Rodier, Valentina Lazdina, countries. The names and designations of countries Mike Catchpole, Julien Beauté, Marc Rondy, Phillip used in this publication should not be understood as an Zucs. endorsement by WHO of the terminology used in this publication. The maps are reproduced with the permission of the WHO Regional Office for Europe. The designations employed and the presentation of this material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries.
  • BADULESCU Claudia Thesis

    BADULESCU Claudia Thesis

    MASTER IN ADVANCED E UROPEAN AND INTERNAT IONAL STUDIES ANGLOPHONE BRANCH 2013 – 2014 The paradox of Europe’s borders An analysis of Romania’s state of play in the Schengen accession process Author: Claudia Badulescu Thesis advisor: MATTHIAS WAECHTER Istanbul – Nice – Berlin 2014 The paradox of Europe’s borders An analysis of Romania’s state of play in the Schengen accession process Author: CLAUDIA BADULESCU Thesis advisor: MATTHIAS WAECHTER Abstract: One of the most serious challenges to the European unity is represented by the increased structural, political and implementation diversity brought up by the new EU members. The prospects of enlarging the continent’s borders by fully integrating Romania and Bulgaria in the Schengen area ignited controversial debates that questioned the practicability of EU’s motto “Unity in diversity”. This paper analyses the unique political dynamics that accompanied Romania in the Schengen accession process. Since 2011 Romania has been caught in an indeterminate state between having fulfilled the technical requirements and becoming a fully-fledged Schengen member. The contradictory behaviour of the Council combined with the vague explanations given by the EU officials regarding the decision to delay Romania’s accession signal an urgent need to overcome the internal mistrust in the EU’s institutions. Therefore, the aim of this thesis was to analyse the legal grounds of the reasons invoked for denying Romania’s accession to the Schengen zone. I concluded the paper with essential recommendations for both the Romanian and the European administration that could be used to find a solution to this political deadlock. Keywords: Schengen, borders, technical criteria, corruption, identity, populism, Roma’s malintegration, migration, coupled accession, mistrust, securitization, structural reforms, development 1 Table of contents List of Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................
  • The Mineral Industries of Europe and Central Eurasia in 2013

    The Mineral Industries of Europe and Central Eurasia in 2013

    2013 Minerals Yearbook EUROPE AND CENTRAL EURASIA U.S. Department of the Interior December 2016 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUSTRIES OF EUROPE AND CENTRAL EURASIA By Alberto Alexander Perez, Elena Safirova, Sinan Hastorun, Karine M. Renaud, Lin Shi, Yadira Soto-Viruet, Glenn J. Wallace, David R. Wilburn, and Sean Xun The region of Europe and Central Eurasia as defined in this A Customs Union agreement among Belarus, Kazakhstan, and volume encompasses territory that extends from the Atlantic Russia went into effect on January 1, 2010. According to this coast of Europe to the Pacific coast of the Russian Federation. agreement, the countries form a joint customs territory where no It includes the British Isles, Iceland, and Greenland (a self- customs duties or other economic restrictions on the movement governing part of the Kingdom of Denmark). of goods among the three countries apply. Each of the members The European Union (EU) is a supranational entity that at of the Customs Union applies the same customs rates and yearend 2013 comprised the following 28 countries: Austria, trade regulations for goods traded with countries outside of Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, the Customs Union. The members of the Customs Union were Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, projected to save more than $400 billion by 2015 owing to Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the reduced shipping times. Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan expressed Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, their interest in joining the Customs Union in the future but, as Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Croatia joined the of the end of 2013, no decisions had been made.
  • Romania's Integration in the European Union. Opportunities & Challenges

    Romania's Integration in the European Union. Opportunities & Challenges

    Romania’s Integration in the European Union. Opportunities & Challenges Theoretical and Applied Economics. Supplement 4 România în Uniunea Europeană. Potenţialul de convergenţă 4 Contents Forward / 9 Strategic Milestones of Romania’s Integration to the European Union Process Efficiency Gheorghe Zaman / 11 Context Vision and the Ultimatum Modernization Marin Dinu / 19 Internal Rating Approach in SMEs Evaluation Mario G.R. Pagliacci / 31 Economic and Social Evolution of Romania during 1.I-28.II.2007 Period Vergil Voineagu / 47 Romania’s Real Convergence to EU - Dream or Reality? Cristian Socol, Aura Gabriela Socol / 61 The Banking System and Integration Challanges Nicolae Dănilă / 73 Theoretical Delimitations: the Europeanization of Public Administration and its Institutional Levers Lucica Matei, Diana-Camelia Iancu / 93 The Economic Situation of Romania by the Time of the Adhesion to the European Union Constantin Anghelache / 111 Effects of Integration and Globalisation on Labour Market Valentina Vasile / 141 Advantages for the Republic of Moldova to Join European Union, and the Disadvantages of its Remaining within CIS Mihai Pătraş / 149 4 Romania’s Integration in the European Union. Opportunities & Challenges Specific Features Concerning the Market Risk Management Gabriela Anghelache / 163 The Basis of the Change through Creativity, Responsibility and Hope Viorel Lefter, Elvira Nica / 183 The Role of Human Capital in the Development of the European Market Marina Luminiţa Sârbovan / 193 The Integration of the Romanian e-services
  • Entrepreneurship and Smes Innovation in Romania

    Entrepreneurship and Smes Innovation in Romania

    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Economics and Finance 16 ( 2014 ) 512 – 520 21st International Economic Conference 2014, IECS 2014, 16-17 May 2014, Sibiu, Romania Entrepreneurship and SMEs Innovation in Romania Nelu Eugen Popescu a,* aLucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, 17 Dumbrăvii Avenue, Sibiu 550324, Romania Abstract The aim of this article is to present some theoretical connections between entrepreneurship, innovation and small and medium medium-sized enterprises highlighting the role of these business for the economic recovery. It will provide a brief overview of the CNIPMMR study pointing out data about Romanian SMEs innovation activities and use of information technology in such enterprises. Some recommendations for public policies are presented at the end of the paper. © 20142014 TheThe Authors.Authors. PublishedPublished by by Elsevier Elsevier B.V. B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (Selectionhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ and/or peer-review under responsibility ).of Scientific Committee of IECS 2014. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Scientific Committe of IECS 2014 Keywords: Entrepreneurship, Innovation, SMEs (Small and medium enterprises) 1. Introduction Entrepreneurship is a term that does not have an general accepted definition, the concept evolved over time from Cantillon (1775), to whom the first academic mention are attributed, to Schumpeter and its creative destruction theory to recent and more modern theories. Peter Drucker argued that “entrepreneurs innovate and innovation is the specific instrument of entrepreneurship. He defined entrepreneurship as “an act of innovation that involves endowing existing resources with new wealth-producing capacity” (Drucker, 1985) Innovation is usually associated with doing something new or different (Garcia & Calantone, 2002).
  • Milk Market After Abolition of Milk Quotas

    Milk Market After Abolition of Milk Quotas

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Iurchevici, Lidia Conference Paper Milk market after abolition of milk quotas Provided in Cooperation with: The Research Institute for Agriculture Economy and Rural Development (ICEADR), Bucharest Suggested Citation: Iurchevici, Lidia (2016) : Milk market after abolition of milk quotas, In: Agrarian Economy and Rural Development - Realities and Perspectives for Romania. 7th Edition of the International Symposium, November 2016, Bucharest, The Research Institute for Agricultural Economy and Rural Development (ICEADR), Bucharest, pp. 202-208 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/163374 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available
  • Grassland Conservation Through CAP Instruments - a Transylvanian Case Study

    Grassland Conservation Through CAP Instruments - a Transylvanian Case Study

    Grassland conservation through CAP instruments - A Transylvanian case study 2010 and 2011 summary report of the Mozaic Project Authors: Inge Paulini, Marius Bărbos, Andrei Crişan, Ionel Mugurel Jitea, Valentin Mihai, Aura Moldovan, Roxana Negoiţă, Rudolf Poledna, László Rákosy, Mircea Troc, Wolfgang Schumacher Cluj-Napoca, 20.12.2011 www.mozaic-romania.org This is a report of the Mozaic Project, a collaboration between the Rheinische Friedrich- Wilhelms Universität Bonn (Germany) and the Babeş-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca (Romania). The project is part-funded by the German Federal Foundation for Environment (DBU; project no. 27559) and the European Forum on Nature Conservation and Pastoralism (EFNCP) through its DG Environment funded 2010 and 2011 work programmes. It does not necessarily reflect the views of the collaborating Universities, the DBU, the European Commission or EFNCP. All rights reserved. The authors would like to thank the mayors and town hall staff of Borşa, Dâbăca, Aşchileu Mare and Vultureni, who kindly shared their detailed knowledge about ownership, land use and subsidies with us. Sincere thanks also to the APIA officers involved. An important source of information but also of motivation for our work are the inhabitants of Borşa and Dâbăca communes, whom we want to thank for their inspiring openness and hospitality. Last but not least we want to express our gratitude to our colleagues from the Mozaic Project for their support and to Gwyn Jones of EFNCP for adding important aspects to our work, as well as for his inspiration and encouragement. The Authors Inge Paulini PhD student in ecology & nature conservation, University of Bonn, Faculty of Agriculture.
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 30 November 1999

    General Assembly Distr.: General 30 November 1999

    United Nations A/AC.254/22 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 November 1999 Original: English Ad Hoc Committee on the Elaboration of a Convention against Transnational Organized Crime Sixth session Vienna, 6-17 December 1999 Analytical study on serious crime Report by the Secretariat I. Introduction 1. At its second session, held in Vienna from 8 to 12 March 1999, the Ad Hoc Committee on the Elaboration of a Convention against Transnational Organized Crime requested the Secretariat to carry out an analytical study on provisions of national laws V.99-90212 (E) A/AC.254/22 concerning serious offences punishable by deprivation of liberty, in relation to article 2 bis (b) of the draft Convention (see A/AC.254/11, para. 18). Pursuant to that request, the Secretariat asked States to provide information on the following: (a) What provisions were contained in their national laws relevant to the draft Convention concerning offences punishable by deprivation of liberty, with an indication of the number of years of imprisonment; (b) Whether their legislation qualified offences as serious and, if so, what criteria were used for such qualification and which crimes fell into that category. 2. As at 15 October 1999, the Secretariat had received responses from 45 States. The present analytical study is based on the information provided by those States. II. Analysis A. National laws concerning offences punishable by deprivation of liberty 3. In response to the first question, many States listed examples of offences punishable by deprivation of liberty and provided information on the number of years of imprisonment imposed for such offences.
  • Space Ii - 2018

    Space Ii - 2018

    Persons under the supervision of Probation Agencies SPACE II - 2018 Marcelo F. Aebi Yuji Z. Hashimoto Strasbourg, 20 December 2018 pc-cp\space\documents\pc-cp (2018)13 PC-CP (2018) 13 Updated on 21 May 2019 This report has been written by Marcelo F. Aebi and Yuji Z. Hashimoto on behalf of the Council for Penological Cooperation (PC-CP) of the Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France. The report has been prepared under a contract with the Action against Crime Department, Information Society and Action against Crime Directorate, DGI - Directorate General Human Rights and Rule of Law of the Council of Europe. It has also received support from the University of Lausanne, Switzerland. Country based information on persons under the supervision of Probation Agencies was collected through the SPACE II 2018 questionnaire (Ref: PC-CP (2018) 13) and analysed by the authors of this report. The opinions expressed in this work are the responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Council of Europe. Cover picture: Migrant European Robin (Erithacus rubecula), by Lucas Nicolás Muñoz. ©Lucas Nicolás Muñoz. Reproduction authorized for this publication by the author. Suggested citation [APA norms]: Aebi, M. F., & Hashimoto, Y. Z. (2018). SPACE II – 2018 – Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Persons under the supervision of Probation Agencies. Strasbourg: Council of Europe © Council of Europe & University of Lausanne, 2018 Reproduction is authorised, except for commercial purposes, provided that the source is acknowledged. Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics – SPACE II – 2018 1 FINAL DRAFT REPORT: NOT FOR CIRCULATION – UNDER EMBARGO UNTIL 21 MAY 2019 Key points of SPACE II 2018 The participation rate in the 2018 SPACE II Survey was satisfactory: 44 out of the 52 Probation Agencies (or equivalent institutions) of the 47 Council of Europe Member States answered the questionnaire.