EUROCONTROL

Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) ROMANIA

Year 2013 ­­­‑ Level 1

DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET

LSSIP for ROMANIA

Infocentre Reference: 14/01/07-33

Document Identifier Edition: Year 2013

LSSIP Year 2013 ROMANIA Edition Date: 07/04/14

E-mail: LSSIP Focal Point - Alin George DIACONU Romanian CAA [email protected]

LSSIP Contact Person - Ana Paula E-mail: ana-paula. Senior Expert FRANGOLHO [email protected] DSS/EIPR

Status Intended for

Working Draft  General Public 

Draft  Agency Stakeholders 

Proposed Issue  Restricted Audience 

Released Issue 

Accessible via: Internet (www.eurocontrol.int)

Path: X:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Romania (RO)\Year 2013\Released\LSSIP Year 2013_RO Releasedl.doc

LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

1. LSSIP Guidance Material: http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/guidance-material 2. ESSIP Plan Edition 2013: www.eurocontrol.int/pepr 3. ESSIP Report 2012: www.eurocontrol.int/pepr 4. STATFOR Forecasts: http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor 5. Acronyms and abbreviations: http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries 6. European ATM Master Plan: https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ 7. LSSIP Documents: http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip 8. AIP Romania: www.aisro.ro 9. National Performance Plan for Air Navigation Services 2012 – 2014 – Romania, edition 01 / 27.06.2011 and revision 01 / 21.12.2011: https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/single- sky/pru/performance-plans/ro-pp.pdf and https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/single-sky/pru/performance-plans/ro- romania-revised-pp-2012-2014.pdf

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania Released Issue

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ...... 1 Introduction ...... 4 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment ...... 5 1.1 Geographical Scope ...... 5 1.1.1 International Membership ...... 5 1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s) ...... 5 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation ...... 7 1.1.4 Free Route Airspace ...... 7 1.2 National Stakeholders ...... 8 1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s) ...... 9 1.2.2 ROMATSA ...... 12 1.2.3 Airports ...... 14 1.2.4 Military Authorities ...... 15 1.2.5 Accident/incident Investigation Body ...... 17 Chapter 2 - En-route Traffic and Capacity ...... 18 2.1 Evolution of traffic in Romania ...... 18 2.2 BUCHAREST ACC ...... 19 2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2009-2018/19 ...... 19 2.2.2 Summer 2013 performance ...... 19 2.2.3 Planning Period 2014-2018/19 - Summer ...... 19 Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations ...... 21 Chapter 4 - National Projects ...... 23 Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination ...... 26 5.1 FAB Co-ordination ...... 26 5.2 FAB Projects ...... 28 5.3 Other regional coordination projects ...... 30 Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation ...... 32

ANNEXES

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania Released Issue

Executive Summary

State Context Romania is a EU Member State since the 1st January 2007 and a NATO Member State since the 29th March 2004. The Romanian airspace plays a significant role in the European transportation network of the South-East Europe (SEE), region which acts as a bridge between North, South, East and West Europe. While air traffic has been steadily increasing, forecasts predict further higher traffic demand driven by the economic growth in the region, by the on-going political changes (the EU political enlargement process, the emergence of new areas of cooperation and commitment – ECAA, the European Common Aviation Area Multilateral Agreement, ratified by Romania through Law no.328/22.11.2007 published in the Official Journal of Romania Part 1 no.48/22.01.2008) as well as by the traditional European tourism and business travellers. The separation between the regulatory and the ATM service provider functions is effectively in place in Romania since many years now. The target operational concept established by the Government Decree no. 536/2000, aiming at further reducing the en-route physical locations to a single one in Bucharest, has been finalised in 2012. As a consequence starting 18th October 2012 ROMATSA operates the en-route control from the facilities of Bucuresti ACC which is located in Bucharest. Also, a new APP unit has been implemented in Arad at the same date.

ESSIP Objective Implementation As presented in the summarizing table below, part of the objectives are completed, some are partially completed and some are late. It should be noted that the "late" status of one objective (AOP04.1) is due to the fact that Romania joined later the applicability area of this airport related objective. No special difficulties were encountered in the implementation of the objectives during the reporting period.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 1 Released Issue

* FOC Date LSSIP 2013 - Romania █ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)

State-related ESSIP Objectives 2013 2014 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 <=2007 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air [IDP] AOM13.1 Traffic (GAT) handling [E] * [IDP] AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management [E] * AOM20 Implement ATS Route Network (ARN) - Version 7 [E] * [IDP] AOM21 Implementation of Free Route Airspace [E] *

AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions * Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict ATC02.2 [E] Alert (STCA) - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity ATC02.5 [E] Warning - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe ATC02.6 [E] Altitude Warning - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path ATC02.7 [E] Monitor - level 2 * ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools [E] * Implement automated support for conflict detection and ATC12 [E] conformance monitoring * Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange [IDP] ATC15 mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic [E] * AMAN operations

ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 * Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller [IDP] ATC17 during Coordination and Transfer [E] * Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks COM09 [IDP] or services to the Internet Protocol (IP) *

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS * Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in COM11 ATM * FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services [E] * [IDP] FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning [E] * [IDP] FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1 [E] * [IDP] FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP [E] *

INF04 Implement integrated briefing * Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical ITY-ADQ [E] information * [IDP] ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 [E] * Implement air-ground voice channel spacing requirements ITY-AGVCS2 below FL195 * Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination ITY-COTR [E] processes *

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 2 Released Issue * FOC Date LSSIP 2013 - Romania █ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) [IDP] *

ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability * NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV [E] * [IDP] NAV10 Implement APV procedures [E] * Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations SAF10 caused by airspace infringements *

SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions * Implementation of Safety Oversight of Changes to ATM by SRC-CHNG National Supervisory Authorities (NSA) * Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory SRC-RLMK Requirements (ESARRs) *

SRC-SLRD Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies *

Airport-related ESSIP Objectives 2013 2014 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 <=2007

LROP-Bucharest Implement airside capacity enhancement method and best AOP01.2 practices based on Eurocontrol capacity and efficiency * implementation manual Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and AOP04.1 [E] Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 * Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and AOP04.2 Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 * [IDP] AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) [E] * Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) ENV01 [IDP] techniques for environmental improvements * Implement Collaborative Environmental Management ENV02 (CEM) at Airports *

Understanding the Table

Objective Completed No Plan

Objective Partly Completed Missing Data

Objective Planned Not Applicable (Romania does not participate in this obj.)

Late

NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the ‘Implementation Completion Date’ as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 3 Released Issue

Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a five-year plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document – Year 2013 describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2013.

The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them:

 Chapters 1 to 5 present the key players in the State, and sets the institutional and geographical scenes to help the reader understand the specifics of the State and interpret the rest of the document correctly. It also presents a short description of the main national and regional projects in which the national Stakeholders are involved.

 Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 4 Released Issue

Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment

1.1 Geographical Scope

1.1.1 International Membership Romania is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since ECAC  1991 EUROCONTROL  1996 European Union  2007 European Common Aviation Area (If not EU member) - - EASA  2007 ICAO  1965 JAA  2000 NATO  2004

1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses the Bucuresti FIR. The following Tables list the ACC and TMA in the Romanian airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP 2013 edition. Note that the number of sectors, as indicated in the ACC Table below, is the actual number of civil control sectors that are operated simultaneously by the units.

BUCURESTI FIR Number of sectors En-Route En-Route En-Route En-Route En-Route sectors sectors sectors sectors sectors

ATC sector during 2009 during 2010 during 2011 during 2012 during 2013 APP sectors physical 1 ACC in 3 1 ACC in 2 1 ACC in 2 1 ACC in 1 1 ACC in 1

locations physical physical physical physical physical locations locations locations location location ARAD 4 4 2 NIL NIL 1 ARAD TMA

9 9 BUCURESTI BUCURESTI 9 12 7 1 TMA

4 (1 sector – CONSTANTA CONSTANTA DANUB – is NIL NIL NIL NIL 1 also TMA providing APP control)

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 5 Released Issue TERMINAL AIRSPACE / AIRPORT CATEGORY CONTROLLED BY

Henri Coanda International - Bucuresti Bucuresti TMA/APP Aurel Vlaicu International - Bucuresti Constanta TMA/APP Mihail Kogalniceanu International - Constanta Arad International – Arad Arad TMA/APP Traian Vuia International - Timisoara

The following Airports are concerned by this LSSIP:  LROP- Henri Coanda International - Bucuresti),

The map in the paragraph below shows the geographical situation of the Bucuresti FIR. The geographical scope of this document addresses the Bucuresti FIR. Bucuresti FIR is surrounded by FIRs of 5 States, namely, Ukraine (L’viv, Odesa, Simferopol FIR’s), Moldova (Chisinau FIR), Bulgaria (Sofia FIR), Serbia (Beograd FIR) and Hungary (Budapest FIR).

Bucuresti FIR (14 November 2013)

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 6 Released Issue 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation ICAO airspace classification is applied within Bucuresti FIR. In compliance with the EUROCONTROL Airspace Strategy for ECAC States (OI 1A), the current status of the Airspace classification is: 1. Between FL 105 and FL 660 - ICAO Class C airspace, according to EUROCONTROL Airspace Strategy for ECAC States (OI 1A) requirements. This classification is applicable since Nov. 2003 through joint MoT- MoD order no 693 – M173/ 2003, published in the Official Journal of Romania no. 165/ 2004. 2. Below FL 105 The ICAO airspace classification of Class C airspace below FL 105 is implemented in Romania by joint MoT – MoD Order 53/ 22.01.07 and M20/ 30.01.07, published in the Official Journal of Romania no. 107/13.02.2007.

1.1.4 Free Route Airspace In the context of the constant effort of the Romanian Air Traffic Services Administration (ROMATSA) for achieving the aim to provide safest, most efficient and environmental friendly air navigation services in South-Eastern Europe, as from the 14th of November 2013 within Bucuresti FIR has been implemented the Night Free Route Airspace (FRA) Concept.

A consultation coordinated by ICAO EUR/NAT Office has been also successfully made at States level, in accordance with the provisions of Annex 11, paragraph 2.2.2 and the established procedure for the amendment of the European Air Navigation Plan.

General principles of Free Route Airspace operations: a. Horizontal and vertical limits of the implementation area: - The Free Route Airspace Concept encompasses the horizontal boundaries of Bucuresti FIR in their full extent, as published in AIP Romania, ENR 2.1. The vertical limits of FRA Concept application are from FL105 to FL660.

b. Class of airspace - FRA has been implemented in Class C airspace, with the exception of TMA areas and CTR.

c. FRA Operating hours - Free Route Airspace is available from 2300 to 0400 UTC during the winter time period and from 2200 to 0300 UTC during the summer time period.

d. Planning aspects - During the Free Route Airspace operating hours eligible flights may plan inserting DCT between IFR significant points and en-route radio navigation aids published in AIP Romania, subsections ENR 4.4 and ENR 4.1, without reference to the published ATS route network. Also, the ATS fixed route network remains available during FRA operating hours.

- Insertion in the flight plan of DCT across the Bucuresti FIR boundaries (cross-border) are not allowed.

- The access from/ to TMA / CTR areas are effected using the fixed ATS route network, using dedicated connection points published in AIP România.

e. Reference materials within the national Aeronautical Information Publication: - IFR significant points and en-route radio navigation aids are published in AIP Romania, subsections ENR 4.4 and ENR 4.1.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 7 Released Issue

Free Route Airspace (14 November 2013)

1.2 National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Romania are the following:

1. Ministry of Transport – Directorate General Air-Naval Transport (DGTAN) incorporating Directorate of Civil Aviation and Airspace (MoT - DCA) 2. Ministry of Transport – Aeronautical Security Unit within DCA (MoT - ASU) 3. Civil Aviation Safety Investigation and Analysis Centre (CIAS) 4. Romanian Civil Aeronautical Authority (RCAA as NSA for all matters, except security) 5. Ministry of National Defence 5.1 Air Force Staff 5.2 National Military Command Centre 5.3 Air Operations Centre 6. Romanian Air Traffic Services Administration (ROMATSA) 7. AIS Department – “BIA” (certified AIS Provider within RCAA, functionally separated from the departments involved in NSA activities). 8. Romanian Airports 9. Airspace Users (National and International Air Carriers, other operators) Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 8 Released Issue In accordance with the provisions of HG 645/2013, since 1 January 2014 the NSA responsible for security matters from MoT was transferred to RCAA and concurrently the AIS provider from RCAA was transferred to ROMATSA, the national ANSP.

1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s)

1.2.1.1 General information According to the basic civil aviation act (the Civil Air Code of Romania, issued in 1997 by Government Ordinance and approved by Parliament Law no. 130/2000, further modified by Law 399/2005), the regulatory responsibility for civil ATM (ATFM included) and ANS belongs to the state civil aeronautical authority, the Ministry of Transport (subsequently referred to as ‘MoT’). Art. 10 of the same law establishes the joint regulatory responsibility of MoT and MoD (the Ministry of National Defence) for all airspace organisation and management (ASM) matters. It should be noted in this context that all GAT is serviced exclusively by civil ANS Provider. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarized in the table below. The Romanian CAA is further detailed in the following sections.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 9 Released Issue

Activity in ATM/ANS: Organisation Legal Basis responsible Rule-making MoT – DCA Air Code Art. 4 MoT - ASU Government Decree 24/2013 Art. 2 Certification of ANSPs RCAA & MoT-DCA Air Code Art. 5, Art. 12 and Art. 62, MoT Order no. 1185/ 2006 and MoT Order 11/2008 approving RACR-SSNA ed. 02/2008 Since 1 January 2014, the NSA responsible for security matters was transferred from MoT to RCAA, through Government Decree 645/2013. Safety Oversight RCAA Designated by MoT Order no. 1185/ 2006 also as SES-NSA except Security matters, which remains to MoT - DCA. Since 1 January 2014, the NSA responsible for security matters was transferred from MoT to RCAA, through Government Decree 645/2013. Establishment of Tolerable RCAA, ANSP MoT Order no. 1185/ 2006 Safety Levels MoT Order no. 617/2004 for approval of RACR- ESARR 4 Performance Monitoring, RCAA MoT Order no. 1185/ 2006 and MoT Order no. including Safety Performance 75/2011 Monitoring Enforcement actions in case of RCAA OMT no. 11/2008 for approval of RACR SSNA Ed.2 non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements Airspace MoT/ RCAA, ANSP and Air Code, Art. 9, 10 MoD Economic MoT & Ministry of Public Government Ordinance 46/1998(r1) Art. 4 Finance / RCAA as MoT Order 1102/2009 TANC approval NSA MoT Order 313/2010 RANC approval MoT Order 1560/2012 TANC application

Environment MoT & Ministry of Air Code, Art. 55, 57 Environment and Climate Change Security MoT- ASU Regulation (EC) no. 300/2008, Regulation (EU) no. 185/2010, Decision (UE) No. 774/2010, Regulation (EC) no. 2096/2005, Chapter 4, Security Government Ordinance no. 17 from 2011 concerning quality control in the field of civil aviation security, approved by the Law no. 149 from 2012, Government Decision no. 1193 from 2012 for approval of the National Civil Aviation Security Programme - NCASP, Government Decision no. 1869 from 2005 for approval of the National Civil Aviation Security Quality Control Programme (NCASQCP), as amended by the Government Decision no.1077 from 2009, Order of the Minister of Transport and Infrastructure no. 326 from 2012, for approval of the National Civil Aviation Security Training Programme (NCASTP), Order of the Minister of Transport and Infrastructure no. 879 from 2009, for approval of the methodology of quality control procedures in civil aviation security. Since 1 January 2014, the NSA responsible for security matters was transferred from MoT to RCAA, through Government Decree 645/2013.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 10 Released Issue State Safety Programme was released. Specific procedures will be issued and afterwards the state safety levels will be set up taking into consideration the safety levels already established by the ANSP, taking into account the ECAC level overall safety minima of 1,55 x 10-8 accidents per flight/hour, set in RACR- ESARR 4. Safety performance monitoring was performed during 2013 according to the applicable SES requirements (Regulation (UE) no. 1034/2011), and national regulation RACR-REAC transposing (EC) Directive 2003/42. At national level, the Civil Aviation Safety Investigation and Analysis Centre shall publish each year a report containing the civil aviation occurrence information collected through the mandatory/voluntary reporting system with a view to informing the general public about the level of safety in civil aviation. Twice per year, ROMATSA Safety Committee has to assess safety performance of ROMATSA based on reports issued by Safety and Quality Directorate. The safety data have been collated and reported to EUROCONTROL in terms of yearly high level safety indicators, as provided in the Annual Safety Template (AST). The main strategic action is to improve regular safety performance monitoring and analysis of incidents trends by:  Implementation of an Automated Safety Reporting System. The system will facilitate the process of reporting, investigation and dissemination by means of an intranet network using ECCAIRS software. The project (SMART Project) started in 2005 and it is still under development. ECCAIRS is also being used at the moment accordingly.  Implementation of an Automated Safety Monitoring Tool as a complementary system to the actual human reporting system.

1.2.1.2 MoT – DCA/RCAA Two departments within MoT are dedicated to civil aviation, including ATM:  The Directorate of Civil Aviation (DCA), included in the Directorate General of Air-Naval Transport and headed by the Director of Civil Aviation, who manages the regulatory responsibilities, including for ATM. These include drawing up high level policies, regulations and supervision for the security issues and regulatory supervision of all delegated tasks. Economic regulation is performed with participation of MoT’s Economic & Administrative Directorate. It should be noted that the ASU within MoT/DCA is acting also as the NSA in the field of civil aviation security based on the provisions set in Regulation (EC) no. 300/2008, Regulation (EU) no. 185/2010, Decision (UE) No. 774/2010, Regulation (UE) no. 1035/2011, Chapter 4, Security, the Aviation Act, Government Ordinance no. 17/2011 concerning quality control in the field of civil aviation security, approved by the Law no. 149 from 2012 and in the Romanian Government Decision No. 1869/2005 for the approval of National Quality Control Programme on civil aviation security, as amended by the Government Decision no. 1077 from 2009. Since 1 January 2014, the NSA responsible for security matters was transferred from MoT to RCAA, through Government Decree 645/2013.  By Law No.55/2010 for approval and modification of the Government Ordinance No.26/2009, the Department of Air Transport Investigation, part of the General Directorate of Control and Accident Transport Investigation (GDoCATI) from MoT has been transformed into the Civil Aviation Safety Investigation and Analysis Centre (CIAS), public institution with legal personality, subordinated to MoT. CIAS is the independent body responsible for technical investigations of the civil aviation accidents and serious incidents, having its own budget. CIAS has become functional with the promulgation of the Government Decision No.1013/2010 which approved the Regulation of organization and functioning of the CIAS. The main activity of CIAS is based on Regulation (EU) 996/2010 (for the Civil Aviation Safety Investigation) and Directive 2003/42/EC (for civil aviation occurrence reporting).

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 11 Released Issue

According to Art. 5 of the Aviation Act, Government Decree 405/1993 (establishing the Romanian Civil Aeronautical Authority (RCAA) as an autonomous, independent from ATM service provision and self- financed organisation) and to some other specific regulations promulgated by MoT after 1998, most of MoT’s safety regulatory responsibilities were delegated in the remit of the RCAA, such as drafting national regulations (up to the approval of the national specific regulations, which is undertaken by MoT), issuing specific procedures and instructions to apply the national regulations and the day-to-day safety supervisory tasks pertaining to ANS provided to GAT. MoT retains and applies regulatory supervision of all delegated regulatory tasks (the RCAA operates under the authority of MoT). It should also be noted that economic regulation of ANS is retained by MoT. However, the amendment by Law 399/2005 of the Civil Air Code has introduced the supervisory function in the national regulatory framework, as required by (EC) Regulation No. 549/2004 laying down the framework for the creation of the Single European Sky. This enables that the RCAA is designated by MoT as the NSA for Romania for all specific tasks laid down by SES legislation except the security matters. Since 1 January 2014, the NSA responsible for security matters was transferred from MoT to RCAA, through Government Decree 645/2013. The RCAA was established by Government Decree 405/1993 as national safety oversight and licensing authority. It is an autonomous self-financed, 100% state owned organisation. Following the promulgation in 1997 of the current basic legislation, several MoT Orders confirmed the role of the RCAA as the delegated national safety oversight authority and licensing authority, thus correlating the provisions of the new basic legislation with the safety regulatory responsibilities bestowed on the RCAA in 1993. The Law 399/ 2005 amending the Air Code of Romania entered into force since 1st of July 2006 and starting with July 2006 RCAA has been designated as NSA for Romania by MoT Order no. 1185/2006, published in the Official Journal of Romania Part I no. 602/12.07.2006. According to this MoT Order, RCAA is designated to perform the roles and responsibilities of a NSA in compliance with SES legislation, except those related to aviation security. Starting August 2005 several organisational changes have been implemented within the RCAA, including the full separation (at functional level) of RCAA’s AIS Department (providing aeronautical information services falling under the SARPs of ICAO Annex 15 - the whole integrated package of aeronautical information except for the PIBs) from the RCAA departments which fulfill the role and tasks of the NSA. Since 1 January 2014, the AIS department from RCAA, responsible for providing the IAIP except PIB was transferred from RCAA to ROMATSA, through Government Decree 645/2013.In Romania, as EU Member State, all EC Regulations are entirely binding and directly applicable, including SES legislation which is in force for the time being. Subsequently, all the ESARRs provisions transposed at Community level are now directly applicable The Romanian Civil Air Code (established by law) provides the general requirements concerning the safety regulatory approval and oversight of all ATM systems and organisations, and for personnel licensing. The RCAA covers a wide area of activities, including certification, such as:  Certification of the ANS service providers in compliance with the SES certification processes required by the EC regulations. During 2006, RCAA developed an audit programme consistent with the ANSP certification process within SES as required by the SES (EC) Regulations (No. 549-552/2004) and the Commission’s Regulation (EC) No. 2096/2005 laying down the Common Requirements for the provision of air navigation services. At the end of 2006 RCAA issued for ROMATSA the Certificate no 01/ 2006 for air navigation services provision, with revision number 1 applicable from 1 January 2007. Further, revision number 2 applicable from 1 January 2010, and revision number 3 applicable from 5th of November 2011 were issued. A second certificate no. CN 07/2012 was issued which replaces the previous one and is valid until 15.12.2018. For the AIS Dept. within RCAA the following certificates were issued: in June 2007 the Certificate no. 02/ 2007, in June 2008 the Certificate no. 03/2008, in June 2009 the Certificate no. 04/2009, in June 2011 the Certificate no. 05/2011, in June 2012 the Certificate no. 06/2012, and in July 2013 the Certificate no. 08/2013. Since January 2007, RCAA has started to annually monitor the ongoing compliance of the air navigation service providers with all the applicable requirements and conditions attached to their certificates.  for procedures (acceptance by RCAA as NSA of all safety arguments associated with procedures related to either new functional systems or changes to existing functional systems is necessary before actual implementation),  for the ANS personnel (licensing of air traffic controllers and of some safety significant categories of ATM technical and engineering personnel, licensing of MET and AIS personnel), and  for ATM systems/constituents (acceptance by RCAA as NSA of all safety arguments related to either a new functional system or changes to existing functional systems is necessary before actual implementation).

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 12 Released Issue Information on the RCAA as NSA can be accessed on site www.caa.ro. Information on the AIS services provided by BIA can be accessed on site www.aisro.ro. The MoT website: www.mt.ro

Annual N Report published:

1.2.2 ROMATSA Civil Air Navigation Services are provided by the Romanian Air Traffic Services Administration to all GAT-IFR. ROMATSA is an autonomous, self-financing public enterprise under the authority of the Ministry of Transport. The tasks of ROMATSA are based on Government Decrees No.74 - dated 1991, No. 731 - dated 1993, No. 75 - dated 2005, No.1090 - dated 2006, No.1251 - dated 2007 and No.741 - dated 2008. Flight Information Services within Bucuresti FIR are provided by Bucuresti FIC and by ACC, APP and TWR units in their area of responsibility. For the provision of air traffic services ROMATSA operates the en-route control from the facilities of Bucuresti ACC which is located in Bucharest and all the civil Aerodrome Control Towers and the Approach Control units within Bucuresti FIR. ROMATSA also provides Aeronautical Information Services (partly as of 31.12.2013) and Meteorological Services for civil aviation. ROMATSA also provides the technical services for the Air Traffic Services equipment at the airports and at the en-route facilities. As of 31.12.2013 the AIS Unit within RCAA provides aeronautical information services falling under the SARPs of ICAO Annex 15 (the whole integrated package of aeronautical information except for the PIBs that are provided by ROMATSA). According to the Government Decision no. 645/2013 amending Government Decision no. 405/1993 for the creation of the Romanian CAA, the responsibilities for AIS are to be transferred in the administration of ROMATSA. This legislative act stipulates that within a 6 month deadline from the date of the entry into force of the act (latest 21 February 2014) ROMATSA has to take over from the Romanian CAA the responsibilities for the provision of aeronautical information services. According to the transfer plan approved by the RCAA and ROMATSA 01.01.2014 has been set up as the date of transfer. Alerting service is provided by all ROMATSA ATS units. SAR coordination is provided by the Aeronautical Search and Rescue Coordination Centre located at ROMATSA headquarters – Bucharest. An Administrative Council performs the high level management roles and tasks of ROMATSA and also approves strategic decisions. Current management decisions within the frame of ROMATSA responsibilities remain at the Board of Directors of ROMATSA. The Air Force Staff, through the Air Operations Centre and the military aerodrome units, provides air traffic services for military OAT within national airspace and within aerodrome control zones and approach control zones of the civil/military airports and military airports. The Air Force Staff does not provide ATS to GAT. The Air Force Staff provides aeronautical information services and meteorological services for military aviation. The Air Force Staff also provides the technical support for the military air traffic services.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 13 Released Issue

Name of the ANSP: Regia Autonoma Romanian Air Traffic Services Administration – ROMATSA Governance: Regia Autonoma Ownership: Regia Autonoma Self financed autonomous According to the Romanian Law a administration under the “Regia Autonoma” is the owner of all its authority of MoT assets Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route Y - ATC approach Y - ATC Airport(s) Y - AIS Y PIB only (starting 01.01.2014 ROMATSA will provide AIS in full) CNS Y - MET Y - ATCO training Y - SAR Y - aeronautical SAR missions coordination Others Additional information: - Provision of services in N - other State(s):

Annual Report published: Y Annual Report 2012 - ROMATSA

The website address of ROMATSA is www.romatsa.ro. A reference to organisation chart is depicted in annex B.

1.2.2.1 ATC system in use

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: SELEX Sistemi Integrati Upgrade1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2015

ROMATSA contracted a new ATM system during 2013 and is now in the process of undergoing a major Air Traffic Management (ATM) development project with the objective of renewing the current ATM system with a new one, fully compliant with the SESAR standards and European Commission Regulations. The “ATM2015+ System” project addresses the systems and procedures for air traffic services, in particular flight data processing systems, surveillance data processing systems and human- machine interface systems.

1 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 14 Released Issue

1.2.2.2 ATC units

The ATC units in the Romanian airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:

ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks En-route TMA ACC 9 - Bucuresti  9 geographical sectors which may Bucharest be split & collapsed into more than 100 possible sector configurations according to traffic demand and complexity  one physical location in Bucharest (reduced from two locations, in 2012) APP - 1 Bucuresti Bucharest APP Constanta - 1 Bucuresti APP Arad - 1 Bucuresti 16 TWR units - - Bucuresti  Including Henri Coanda airport

1.2.3 Airports

1.2.3.1 General information Romania’s airport network consists of 16 controlled civil aerodromes – published in the AIP Romania, ensuring a good coverage of all the territory. From administrative point of view, 4 airports (Bucuresti Henri Coanda Intl. Airport, Bucuresti Baneasa- Aurel Vlaicu Intl. Airport, Timişoara – Traian Vuia Intl. Airport and Constanta – Mihail Kogalniceanu Intl. Airport) are considered airports of national interest and are owned by the State, represented by MoT. The other 12 airports are of local interest and are owned by the local county authorities. All romanian aerodromes are placed under RCAA’s safety oversight. All Romanian civil airports are authorized/certified in accordance with ICAO requirements in force (Airport Manual, SMS). These requirements are included in the national regulation RACR – AD – AADC: Civil aerodromes authorization (Issue no. 1 / 2003 approved by Order of MoT no. 744 / 2003).

1.2.3.2 Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

The airport covered in this LSSIP is Bucharest “Henri Coanda“ International Airport (AIHCB).

1.2.4 Military Authorities The Ministry of National Defence (MoD) represents the State authority for the Air Forces and, in co-operation with the MoT, ensures the air traffic and the national airspace management at levels 1, 2 and 3. Starting from July 2002 after approval of the new Civil / Military Regulation (Aeronautical Civil / Military Romanian Regulation – Airspace Management / Flexible Use of Airspace), concerning the Airspace Management (ASM) implementation of the Flexible Use of Airspace concept (FUA) in Romania, the Airspace Management Council (Romanian acronym: CMSA) was set up, having the responsibility of policy establishment and airspace management at national strategic level. The Romanian Air Force Staff (ROU AF) represents the main regulatory body (National Military Aeronautical Authority).

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 15 Released Issue The AOC (Air Operations Centre) is the military air traffic services provider for military OAT flights and is responsible for the provision of separation between OAT and GAT flights. There is a continuous level 2 (pre-tactical) coordination between Airspace Management Cell of AOC and ROMATSA regarding the air traffic and the management of the national airspace. Tactical coordination is provided through the Military Coordination Offices collocated within the civil ACC facilities. The AOC includes the Air Defence (AD) and military ATC/ATM entities. The AOC provides ATS only for the operational air traffic and coordinates the military SAR participation. Foreign military aircraft may operate within the Romanian Airspace but not on a regular basis and only for training purposes, based upon bi-lateral agreements. The military ATC units provide control only to the military OAT and coordination between military OAT and GAT flights and do not provide air traffic control to the GAT flights. The Civil/Military Coordination is organized at:  Strategic Level – by the Airspace Management Council (CMSA);  Pre-Tactical Level – by the Airspace Management Cell;  Tactical Level – through the Military Coordination Offices collocated with the civil ACC/APP units. The Military Authorities in Romania consist in the Air Force Staff (ROU AF), which was designated as National Military Aeronautical Authority. ROU AF reports to the Ministry of National Defence. Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below. A reference to organisation chart is depicted in annex B.

1.2.4.1 Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rule-making

OAT GAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military N by national legal provisions? governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: State Law, Ministerial Level of such legal provision: N/A Decree, Air Force Regulation Authority signing such legal provision: Prime Minister, Authority signing such legal provision: N/A Minister of National Defence, Chief of Air Force Staff These provisions cover: These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT N OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y OAT/GAT Co-ordination N ATCO Training Y ATCO Training N ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing N ANSP Certification Y ANSP Certification N ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision N Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability N Aircrew Licensing Y

Means used to inform airspace users (other than Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: military) about these provisions: National AIP Y National AIP N National Military AIP Y National Military AIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N Other: N Other:

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 16 Released Issue

Oversight

OAT GAT National oversight body for OAT: Ministry of National NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services Defence provided by the military: N/A Additional information: N/A Additional information: N/A

1.2.4.2 Service Provision role

OAT GAT Services Provided: Services Provided: En-Route Y It is provided by MIL En-Route N Approach/TMA Y It is provided by MIL Approach/TMA N Airfield/TWR/GND Y It is provided by MIL Airfield/TWR/GND N AIS Y It is provided by MIL AIS N MET Y It is provided by MIL MET N SAR Y It is provided by MIL SAR N TSA/TRA monitoring Y It is provided by MIL FIS N Other: N/A Other: N/A Additional Information: Additional Information:

Military ANSP providing GAT N If YES, since: N/A Duration of the N/A services SES certified? Certificate: Certificate issued by: N/A If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in Y accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information:

1.2.4.3 User role

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft OAT only - GAT only - Both OAT and GAT Y can fly?

If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only Y Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y Within a special OAT route system N Under radar advisory service Y

If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements N Exemption from Route Charges Y Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF N CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Y Mode S N ACAS Y Others:

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 17 Released Issue

1.2.4.4 Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

Military in Romania applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y FUA Level 1 implemented: Y FUA Level 2 implemented: Y FUA Level 3 implemented: Y

FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005 are already implemented in Romania, except for the specific requirements related to the cooperation between Member States that are in progress to be implemented in the context of Danube FAB implementation and military agreements (Art 4.1 h and Art 4.1 k - for Strategic Airspace Management Level 1, Art 5.2 - for Pre-tactical Airspace Management Level 2, and Art 6.5 - for Tactical Airspace Management Level 3). ASM Handbook was transposed into the national legislation through the MoT Order no. 1328/2013 published into the Official Journal in February 2014.

1.2.5 Accident/incident Investigation Body

1.2.5.1 Technical investigations As an EU member State, Romania applies the Regulation (EU) 996/2010; subsequently, the safety investigations following accidents and/or incidents are carried out by the CIAS. In compliance with Regulation (EU) 996/2010, this body performs its functions independently, reporting only to the Minister. The website address of CIAS is www.cias.gov.ro A reference to organisation chart is depicted in annex B

1.2.5.2 Collection, Evaluation & Processing of Data As an EU member State, Romania has transposed into national legislation the Directive 2003/42/EC by RACR-REAC; therefore CIAS performs the collection, evaluation, process and storing of all information related to accidents, incidents and occurrences, as well as making this information available to the other EU States according to the above Directive. In order to carry out this function, CIAS uses the tools developed in the frame of the programme for the “European Co-ordination Centre for Aviation Incidents Reporting System” (ECCAIRS).

1.2.5.3 Civil-Military Accidents/Incidents Civil and military investigate separately and when the investigation is completed there are a series of common meetings in order to analyse contributory factors and elaborate the best recommendations.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 18 Released Issue Chapter 2 - En-route Traffic and Capacity

2.1 Evolution of traffic in Romania

Romania - Annual IFR Movements 800000 Romania - Distribution (Ref. year 2012)

700000

600000 Overflights 73% 500000

400000

IFR flights IFR IFR movements - Actuals 300000 International IFR movements - Baseline forecast Domestic Dep/Arr 200000 flights 4% IFR movements - High forecast 23%

100000 IFR movements - Low forecast

0 2009 A 2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 F 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F A = Actual F = Forecast

STATFOR Medium-Term Forecast (September 2013) IFR flights yearly growth 2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 F 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F H 4,8%6,0%5,9%5,7%5,4%5,7%5,6% Romania B 8,2%3,8%0,0%4,3%4,0%3,9%4,0%3,6%3,9%4,0% L 3,8%2,1%1,9%2,4%2,0%2,2%2,2% ESRA B 0,8% 3,1% -2,4% -0,9% 1,4% 2,6% 2,7% 2,2% 2,5% 2,5%

2013 Traffic in Romania increased by 7.0% during Summer 2013 (May to October), when compared to Summer 2012.

2014-2018/19

The STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual traffic growth between 2.1% and 5.7% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 3.9%.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 19 Released Issue 2.2 BUCHAREST ACC

2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2009-2018/19

LRBBCTA - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2500 1.0

0.9

) 2000 0.8

0.7

1500 0.6

0.5

1000 0.4

0.3 IFR flights (Daily Average (Daily flights IFR

500 0.2 flight) per (minutes Delay Enroute

0.1

0 0.0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Peak Day Traffic 1825 1874 1945 1982 2057 Summer Traffic 1385 1520 1588 1566 1676 Yearly Traffic 1186 1284 1333 1308 1367 Summer Traffic Forecast 1721 1799 1876 1940 2010 2088 High Traffic Forecast - Summer 1756 1872 1985 2074 2152 2254 Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 1688 1717 1768 1804 1842 1884 Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

2.2.2 Summer 2013 performance

En-route Delay (min/flight) Capacity Traffic Evolution 2013 Capacity Baseline Optimum All reasons Without weather gap

+7.0% 183 (0%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 No Average enroute ATFM delay per flight remained at zero in Summer 2013, the same as in Summer 2012. Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Comments ATS route network and sectorisation improvements Maximum configuration: 20 sectors 13 sectors sufficient Summer 2013 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2012. It was calculated with NEVAC, giving the potential capacity of the ACC. During the measured period, the peak 1 hour demand was 123 flights and the peak 3 hour demand was 115, indicating that the ACC had sufficient capacity to meet the demand with spare capacity in the system.

2.2.3 Planning Period 2014-2018/19 - Summer The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. The 2014-2018/19 summer capacity profile and delay breakdown has been derived according to the following parameters:  2014: capacity requirement profiles based on the delay breakdown per ACC as provided in January 2011  2015-2018/19: Reference value based on the breakdown of a yearly European delay target of 0.5 min/flight

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 20 Released Issue

En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values LRBBCTA 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Annual 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Summer 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

Capacity Profiles 2013 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) ACC baseline 2014 2015 20162017 2018 2019 H 183 0% 183 0% 183 0% 183 0% 183 0% 183 0% Ref. 183 0% 183 0% 183 0% 183 0% 183 0% 183 0% LRBB 183 L 183 0% 183 0% 183 0% 183 0% 183 0% 183 0% C/R 183 0% 183 0% 183 0% 183 0% 183 0% 183 0%

Capacity Plan Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

ATS route network and sectorisation improvements Measures planned

Significant Events Max sectors 20 20 20 20 20 20

Capacity Sufficient capacity to meet demand increase Reference 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% profile Additional information

LRBBCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

Capacity profile (movements per hour) 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2014-2019 Reference Capacity Profile 183 183 183 183 183 183 Capacity Profile - Current Routes 183 183 183 183 183 183 Capacity Profile - High 183 183 183 183 183 183 Capacity Profile - Low 183 183 183 183 183 183 Capacity Baseline 183 183 2014 - 2019 Plan 183 183 183 183 183 183

2014-2018/19 Planning Period Outlook No problems are foreseen for Bucharest ACC in the current planning cycle

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 21 Released Issue Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations

Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2012 applicable to RO for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.

Number Recommendation Ownership RO feedback

Stakeholder’s representatives were To ensure that all Stakeholders report the informed during LSSIP REC-2012-03 expected completion dates as defined in their All States Kick Off event and National business plans. through ESSIP Report about this REC. To ensure correct application of LSSIP guidance The REC is taken into REC-2012-05 material and to implement the results of All States account. mandatory LSSIP in-cycle check. RO implemented all the priority capabilities BE, UK, SE, specified in the ESSIP NO, FI, LV, objectives FCM03 except States to ensure that appropriate actions are PL, HU, UA, for providing AFP taken for overcoming present delays in the AM, TR, MK, REC-2012-11 message for a change of implementation of priority capabilities specified in FR, PT, MT, requested cruising level the ESSIP objective FCM03. RO, HR, BA, AL, SI, IT, CZ, (FCM03-ASP09) which is MAS, CY. planned to be implemented before the SLoA deadline. Interim Deployment Programme View

Number Recommendation Ownership RO feedback

The ATC system is able States are encouraged to speed up the AFP to provide AFP message REC-2012-22 implementation and to schedule AFP testing All States in ADEXP format and with Network Manager. needs to be validated by the NM. Stakeholders View

Number Recommendation Ownership RO feedback

Due to the fact that ESSP does not ensure the required APV-I signal over the entire Romanian ANSPs are encouraged to publish more APV All ECAC REC-2012-40 airspace, the routes. ANSPs implementation of APV procedures depends on the availability of this signal. FAB View

Number Recommendation Ownership RO feedback

To update the FABs plans and establish a more The DANUBE FAB appropriate roadmap to improve the current lack REC-2012-41 FAB States Strategi c Program and of coordination and ensure a common response the respective Annual to deployment needs. Plan and Report ensure

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 22 Released Issue the coordination process The ANSPs should coordinate system of the infrastructure deployment (including system upgrades) and deployment. The REC-2012-42 capabilities implementation plans with FAB FAB States harmonised reporting is partner first, and then follow on with part of the process. coordination to adjacent FABs and ANSPs.

Ongoing work to harmonise reporting culture REC-2012-43 between States in the FAB should be continued FAB States to ensure alignment of reporting principles.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 23 Released Issue Chapter 4 - National Projects

Performance of the local ATM system will also be improved by the implementation of the following national Projects:

Romanian Target Operational Concept For the provision of air traffic services ROMATSA operates the en-route facilities of Bucuresti ACC and all the civil Aerodrome Control Towers and the Approach Control units within Bucuresti FIR. The reduction of the Bucuresti ACC physical locations from five to three that was achieved in November 2003 by means of a new integrated and highly interoperable ATM system significantly increased the capacity of Bucuresti ACC. Phases II and III of this project were finalized for pending and additional operational requirements implementation. Further reduction of the en-route centres from three to two was achieved in 2010. The target concept established by the Government Decree no. 536/2000, to further reduce the en-route physical locations to a single one in Bucharest, was finalised in 2012. Also, a new APP unit was implemented in Arad in 2012. The Constanta APP unit was implemented in 2010. The above rationalisation is connected to the existing of appropriate and safe contingency measures. The implementation of the Romanian Target Operational Concept consists of the following main objectives: . Constanta APP unit located in Constanta and the associated Constanta TMA (done) . Arad APP unit located in Arad and the associated Arad TMA (done) . Transfer the en-route ATC activities from Constanta location to Bucharest location (done) . Transfer the en-route ATC activities from Arad location to Bucharest location (done) . Provision of approach ATS for Cluj TMA from Bucharest APP Unit, associated with the implementation of Cluj TMA (2014) . Upgrade of the Flight Information Centre in Bucharest (done) . Development of Contingency Room 1 in Bucharest (done) . Development of Contingency Room 2 outside Bucharest location (2014)

A project list and the associated planning are shown in the following table.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 24 Released Issue

Name Schedule Description – Scope Status Link with Expected Contribution to the Key European Master Performance Areas2 Plan. Provision of From: Apr/2007 Concentration of activities into one centre according to Planned ESSIP/LSSIP Increased capacity and safety level in terminal approach ATS To: October/2014 the operational concept AOM19 areas. Improved approach procedures for Cluj TMA preventing environmental issues. IDP from Bucharest Improved cost-efficiency by locating the APP WP2.1 APP Unit centre in the same building with the ACC Definition and From: Apr/2007 Improvement of civil military coordination. Planned ESSIP/LSSIP Increased capacity and safety level in terminal implementation To: October/2014 P-RNAV SID\STARs implementation for 3 airports. AOM19 areas. Improved approach procedures of a new Cluj preventing environmental issues. Safety improvement IDP TMA WP2.1 Contingency From: July/2012 Safety improvement Under development EC Regulation Improved safety Room 2 by To: March/2014 1035/2011 agreement with the Ministry of National Defence (outside Bucharest location) ATM System From: Aug/2010 Modernization/replacement of flight data processing In progress: call for tender for ESSIP/LSSIP Increased traffic capacity and improved flight ROMATSA To: End 2015 systems (FDPS), radar data processing systems (RDPS) the development and AOM19 safety for En-Route and Terminal Traffic 2015+ and human-machine interface (CWP/HMI). implementation of ATM ATC07.1 System ROMATSA 2015+ ATC15 ATC17 FCM03 ITY-ADQ ITY-AGDL ITY-COTR IDP WP2.1 WP5.2 WP1.1 WP4.1 WP4.2 WP4.3 Mode S radar From: Jan/2008 Replacement of MSSR sensors with Mode S sensors Completed EC Regulation Increased traffic capacity and improved flight installation To: End 2016 Note: Minimum requirements 1207/2011 safety for En-Route and Terminal Traffic; cost-

2 Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment – as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 25 Released Issue to comply with the schedule efficiency (lower maintenance costs comparing of ITY-SPI objective were to the MSSR sensors) completed end 2012 with the installation of the first batch of Mode S sensors. The project continues up to 2016 with the Mode S upgrade of the existing radars. Implementation From: Oct/2007 Implementation of A-SMGCS at Otopeni TWR Under contract starting end of ESSIP/LSSIP Increase the operational capacity of the airport of level 2 A- To: 12/2014 2010. Operational by 12/2014 AOP04.1* and the safety of aircrafts operation on the SMGCS airport movement area. AOP04.2 * Romania joined the applicability area of these objectives at a later date DATALINK From: Oct/2007 Data Link CPDLC will reduce the workload on the VHF- Planned ESSIP/LSSIP Capacity, Cost-efficiency CPDLC To: Feb/2015 Voice spectrum and will facilitate the work of pilots and ITY-AGDL controllers by reducing voice communications IDP Note: ATM system capabilities included in the “ATM WP4.1 System ROMATSA 2015+”. Data Link communication services are subject to separate procurement. WP4.2 WP4.3 ADS-B System From: Jan/2011 ADS-B System will provide increased traffic capacity and Pilot Project under EC Regulation Capacity To: End 2016 improved flight safety for En-Route traffic development 1207/2011 Safety WIDE AREA From: Jan/2009 The supply, installation, setting up and commissioning of Completed EC Regulation Capacity MULTILATERA- To: End 2015 a WAM (Wide Area Multilateration) system to be Note: Basic WAM 1207/2011 Safety TION installed in order to cover operational requirements accomplished by end 2012. regarding the assurance of the surveillance coverage for Subsequent upgrades for the Cluj TMA. The WAM will contribute to the Mode S enhancement of the coverage surveillance coverage. area continues up to 2015.

VCSS From: Jan/2012 Replacement of the actual system in order to meet Planned ESSIP/LSSIP Capacity Replacement To: End 2014 Voice Over IP requirements (IP2 CTE-C9) COM11 Safety Cost-efficiency

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 26 Released Issue Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination

5.1 FAB Co-ordination

The DANUBE FAB is currently under phase 4 – FAB Implementation phase. The State Agreement on the establishment of the DANUBE FAB between the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania was signed in December 2011 and was ratified by both governments in 2012. The Agreement entered into force on 16 November 2012 following the diplomatic exchange of letters between both States, thus ensuring the legal basis for the FAB ahead of the SES deadline.

DANUBE FAB project phases

The State Agreement establishes new governing structures of the FAB: Governing Council, ANSP Board and NSA Board. In order to fulfil their tasks, the governing bodies established specialized Standing Committees (Strategy and Planning Standing Committee; Operational Standing Committee; Safety, Quality, Security and Environment Standing Committee). The new structure created after the December 4, 2012 will ensure successful implementation of the DANUBE FAB.

DANUBE FAB Governance

Following the entry into force of the DANUBE FAB State Agreement, the governance takes place under the oversight of the DANUBE FAB Governing Council, supported by cooperation arrangements at the ANSP and NSA level, signed as elements of the regulatory framework for establishment of the DANUBE FAB. These agreements ensure continued cooperation in the provision of air navigation services within the DANUBE FAB airspace.

The DANUBE FAB was approved for financial aid by the European Commission (EC) with Decision C(2013) 7573 under the 2012 Trans-European Transport Networks (TEN-T) Multi-Annual Call Programme, for activities to support the implementation of the IDP within DANUBE FAB. The aim of the Action is the deployment of the initial set of SESAR solutions at DANUBE FAB level, concretely the air ground data link and airspace management (free routes). As such, it addresses the priorities of the Interim Deployment Programme (IDP), which describes the implementation activities of essential ATM operational changes as identified by the European Air Traffic Management Master Plan and which details short-term implementation activities. The total amount of the grant is over €1,394,000, representing 50% of the total eligible requested costs.

A step forward towards the implementation of the DANUBE FAB was taken at the beginning of 2013 by developing the “DANUBE FAB Strategic Program 2013-2017 and beyond” document. This Strategic Program has been developed in accordance with Article 10.5.a) of the DANUBE FAB State Agreement by a dedicated Task Force with due consideration of individual Stakeholder Plans (for example the ANSP

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 27 Released Issue

Business Plans required by Regulation (EU) 1035/2011) and with input from the NSAs and Military. The purpose of this Strategic Program is to set out the intentions and goals i.e. ‘strategic objectives’ of DANUBE FAB and to set out a high level overview of how and when these objectives are to be achieved.

The Program includes short-medium term objectives and it presents a view of how DANUBE FAB should develop in the medium and long-term. In fulfilling its purpose, the Strategic Program ensures a coherent and consistent approach that does not duplicate the existing processes of planning of the individual stakeholders. It is also consistent with the relevant European Union requirements applicable to service provision, interoperability and airspace in a FAB framework – as reflected through the ESSIP/LSSIP process.

There are nine strategic objectives (SOs). Five of them cover the Performance Scheme Areas as defined by the amended Regulation (EU) 691/2010, namely: Safety, Environment, Capacity, Cost Efficiency and Flight Efficiency (see expected contribution to the key performance in the table below and section 5.2 FAB Projects). In addition, other four SOs have been identified as beneficial areas of strategic cooperation. These are in the following three areas: FAB Organisational Excellence, Security and Interoperability.

STRATEGIC AREAS STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES [SO1] Continuous improvement of the DANUBE FAB organisational FAB excellence, by focusing on a holistic business-oriented approach in ORGANISATIONAL meeting the needs and expectations of customers and other EXCELLENCE stakeholders in a balanced and objective way. [SO2] Improvement of current levels of safety so that the number of accidents, serious or risk bearing incidents induced by air SAFETY navigation services does not increase and, whenever possible, decreases. [SO3] Minimize the environmental impact in all domains of activities, ENVIRONMENT while keeping safety as a priority over commercial, operational, environmental and social pressures. [SO4] Provide optimum capacity in order to meet airspace user demand, CAPACITY allowing consistent approach to meeting expected performance targets and delivering continuous safety improvement. COST EFFICIENCY [SO5] Apply charging policy considering European Union wide targets. [SO6] Improving the efficiency of flight operations. It will contribute as well FLIGHT EFFICIENCY to achieving the Environment strategic objective. [SO7] Protection of vital facilities, operational data and personnel in order SECURITY to prevent acts of unlawful interference against air navigation systems. [SO8] Draw benefits from interoperability of systems and share technical services throughout the DANUBE FAB INTEROPERABILITY [SO9] Deployment of SESAR through ATM Master Plan in coordination with the Deployment Manager.

High level ‘Strategic Objectives’ of DANUBE FAB

Following the approval of the DANUBE FAB Strategic Program, a dedicated Task Force developed the DANUBE FAB Annual Plan for 2013, in order to detail the features of the Strategic Program and describe any modifications to it. The Annual Plan is entirely based on the high level provisions set in the DANUBE FAB Strategic Program 2013-2017 and beyond. The following deliverables supporting the establishment of the DANUBE FAB were also released in 2013: ‐ DANUBE FAB Data Link Services Concept of Operations, 31.05.2013 ‐ DANUBE FAB Annual Plan 2013, 15.05.2013 ‐ DANUBE FAB Interim Report on the Implementation of the DF SP/AP 2013, Oct 2013 ‐ DANUBE FAB Project Management Plan Implementation Phase, Sep 2013 ‐ Procedure for Cross Border Sector Establishment , Oct 2013

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 28 Released Issue

‐ DANUBE FAB ANSPs ATM Security Policy, Nov 2013 ‐ DANUBE FAB Quality Policy, Dec 2013 ‐ DANUBE FAB Environmental Policy, Dec 2013 ‐ DANUBE FAB Quality and Environmental Objectives, Dec 2013 ‐ DANUBE FAB Selection, Training, Assessment and Development Policy, Dec 2013 ‐ DANUBE FAB Common Training Board Terms of References, Dec 2013

During 2013, a number of key activities were developed towards implementation of the DANUBE FAB:  Develop and implement cross-border sectors(s) at DANUBE FAB level - The Cross border implementation procedure was elaborated and agreed.  Two Cross Border Scenarios were agreed, the subsequent Implementation Plan accepted for implementation in December 2014.  FRA actions undertaken as part of TEN-T initiative – all activities are in progress according to the plan. Both ANSPs implemented FRA Step I (Implementation of night Free Route operations within national boundaries) on 14th November 2013.  Cooperation with other FABs – A review of possible Inter-FAB coordination with BLUEMED FAB and FABCE is in progress in order to establish a coordination mechanism. Emphasis will be put on the coordination issues between the neighbouring ANSPs, based on the principles to reduce the administrative burden.

For more details, please visit the DANUBE FAB website: http://www.danubefab.eu.

5.2 FAB Projects

Name Schedule FAB Partner Status Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas3 and link to ESSIP

Activities to 01.01.2012 / Republic of Project The project is aimed at the SES support the 31.12.2015 Bulgaria management High Level Goals and supports achievement of the EU-wide implementati Romania activities are in on of the IDP progress. targets established under the within SES Performance Scheme, in DANUBE particular: FAB 2012- · EU-wide capacity target: The EU-40003-S introduction of AGDL in Europe TEN-T is estimated to have a 10% net benefit on en-route capacity and is therefore a key enabler of the EU-wide capacity target of en- route ATFM delay of lower than 0.5 minutes per flight. Given the low level of delay in the DANUBE FAB, this investment is not necessary for the achievement of the local target, but the nature of AGDL is that the benefit will be accrued in the core-European airspace where delays are in excess of the national targets. · EU-wide environmental target: The introduction of FRA

3 Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment – as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 29 Released Issue

will enable the DANUBE FAB to deliver direct routes for the en- route segment and hence contribute fully to the EU-wide target of en-route horizontal flight efficiency.

Ref. to ESSIP objectives AOM21 (presently completed for Night FRA at state level), ITY-AGDL, ATM Master Plan: OI – AOM-0401 OI – AOM-0402 Airspace 10.10.2013/ Republic of Develop necessary The implementation of cross- Management 04.12.2014 Bulgaria supporting border activities will allow further documentation for optimization of the available Develop and Romania the implementation route network structure. This will implement of cross-border bring significant benefits of fuel cross-border sector(s) – The and emission savings and will sectors(s) at Cross border support achievement of the EU- DANUBE implementation wide capacity and FAB level procedure was environmental targets elaborated and

agreed. Ref. to ESSIP objective AOM21 FTS of the initial (presently completed for Night cross-border FRA at state level) activities proposal completed. ATM Master Plan: OI – AOM-0401 OI – AOM-0402 Strategy and 2013-2017 Republic of Cooperation with Planning Bulgaria other FABs – A

Romania review of possible Identify, Inter-FAB coordinate coordination and develop between DANUBE new FAB and opportunities BLUEMED FAB is for the FAB in progress in order to establish a coordination mechanism. Emphasis will be put on the operational coordination issues between the neighbouring ANSPs, based on the principles to reduce the administrative burden Coordination with FABCE was initiated since 2010 through HUNGAROCONTR

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 30 Released Issue

OL, part of FAB CE. Further developments are in progress. Route 10.07.2012 Republic of Implementation of Phase II – “Implementation of Implementati – 2020+ Bulgaria night Free Route night Free Route operations at on and Romania operations within DANUBE FAB level” (planned Improvement national boundaries 2016) and Phase III – “Extension Free Routing completed 11.2013 of Free Route operations outside the night period (daytime FRA)” (envisaged 2020+) will enable full benefit and contribution to the EU-wide environmental target.

Ref. to ESSIP objective AOM21 (presently completed for Night FRA at state level) ATM Master Plan: OI – AOM-0401 OI – AOM-0402

5.3 Other regional coordination projects Events

On the 9th of October 2008, HungaroControl and ROMATSA agree to join in the Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) and to commonly work towards the following objectives:  establish a plan and maintain the required radar coverage to meet the operational needs;  set up working structures (airspace design and architecture group) to address operational and technical issues;  review the possibility and establish a plan for OLDI exchange development and other technical cooperation and improvements, in line with the interoperability regulation;  exchange experience on the Civil-Military cooperation to identify possible improvement areas based on best practices.

Major events in 2010: In order to achieve co-ordination of the airspace design and to develop a common airway structure, it was started the work with the scope of proposing new routes at the common interface, and to improve air traffic flows, over Bucharest – Budapest common FIR border. With a view to improve the continuity, quality and track position accuracy of multi radar trackers in Romania and Hungary, on the 11th of January 2010 a joint bilateral meeting between ROMATSA and HungaroControl was held in Bucharest at ROMATSA’s premises Subsequent to this meeting, two agreements were signed for radar data sharing from Manastur/RO and Puspokladany/HU respectively, for the purpose of improving radar coverage and radar data availability in the two FIRs. Major events in 2011: With a view to improve the airspace interface and the cooperation in technical domain, in October 2011 a joint bilateral operational and technical meeting was held in Bucharest at ROMATSA’s premises between ROMATSA and HungaroControl. Subsequent to this meeting, important bilaterally decisions have been taken regarding some major improvements of the ATS routes at the common interface, and of the air traffic flows, over Bucharest – Budapest common FIR border, which entered into force in April 2012. Major events in 2012: In order to improve the cooperation between ANSPs at regional level, an operational and technical meeting was held in Chisiniau in September 2012 between ROMATSA, UkSATE and MOLDATSA. The meeting gave an overview of the existing ATM systems and plans for the future, of the existing

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 31 Released Issue institutional arrangements and aviation legislation and of the route network development and free route airspace. Planning has been made regarding AMHS and OLDI testing between MOLDATSA and ROMATSA and between MOLDATSA and UkSATSE, additional radar data exchange, LoAs amendment resulting from OLDI implementation in the Moldavian ATM system in the near future. Major events in 2013: On 6th of November 2013 a strategic cooperation agreement on establishing a regional cooperation platform was signed in Sofia by the CEO's of the ANSPs of Austria, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Croatia, Poland, Lithuania, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia. Bosnia-Herzegovina ANSP will become a party of this Agreement during the next meeting in January/February 2014. The purpose of the strategic alliance GATE ONE, covering the area of three functional airspace blocks (Baltic FAB, Danube FAB and the prevailing part of FAB CE) is to promote the efficiency of European Air Traffic Management through an enhanced cooperation among the participating service providers, to ensure a more powerful and coordinated role of the countries of the region in the European decision-making processes.

Moldavian representatives (at state and ANSP level) attended as observers the meetings of the DANUBE FAB Steering Committee in the pre-implementation phase and the first meeting of the Governing Council in the implementation phase. Presently the Moldavian transport authorities are undergoing a process for receiving an Observer Status in the DANUBE FAB, considering the new legal framework that entered into force on 16 November 2012

Radar Data Sharing Radar data sharing is currently carried out based on bilateral agreements, with Bulgaria, Hungary, Serbia and Moldova. ROMATSA receives radar data from Vitosha and Varbica MSSRs (Bulgaria), Puspokladany PSR/MSSR (Hungary), Kosevac MSSR (Serbia) and Chisinau MSSR (Moldova) and sends data to Bulgaria from Buciumeni MSSR and Topolog MSSR, to Hungary from Manastur MSSR and to Moldova from Bacau MSSR.

Regional Route Network Developments Further improvements of ATS network in South-East Europe have been addressed during the RNDSG, SEERM and RDGE meetings. The main objectives are to review the route network improvement proposals raised by States, IATA, IACA, ERA and EUROCONTROL. Within the context of these proposals, Romania is currently improving cooperation on regional route network development with all its neighbours, as follows: Bulgaria (BULATSA), Hungary (HungaroControl), Serbia (SMATSA), Ukraine (UkSATSE) and Moldova (MOLDATSA). The interface with Bulgaria is subject to regional and bi-lateral meetings. The implementation of interface improvements with Bulgaria has been done before the summer season 2009 and is currently taken into consideration under the Danube FAB.

Regional Communication Network Currently, the regional network covers Sofia, Varna, Budapest, Bratislava, Bucharest, and Chisinau ACC centres. The joining of Simferopol ACC/Istanbul ACC/Ankara ACC has been completed in 2007/2008. There is a tendency to improve the network with Beograd, Lviv, Odessa and Simferopol ACCs.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 32 Released Issue

Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation

Conventions Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective ‘box’: o one colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder.

Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-State SloAs) Obj. Progress (**) State’s high level progress statement State Impl. Date REG APO. Progress (**) REG high level progress statement (By:mm-yyyy) APO Impl. Date ASP ASP. Progress (**) ASP high level progress statement (By:mm-yyyy) ASP Impl. Date MIL MIL. Progress (**) MIL high level progress statement (By:mm-yyyy) MIL Impl. Date APO APO. Progress (**) APO high level progress statement (By:mm-yyyy) APO Impl. Date

(*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC Completed No Plan EU+ Partly Completed Not Applicable Multi-N Planned Missing Data APT Late

Partly Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air [IDP] AOM13.1 Completed Traffic (GAT) handling (By:12/2018) [Essential]

Rules and procedures are in place including facility for OAT transit. 12/2018 REG Completed Rules and procedures are in place including facility for OAT transit. (By:12-2018) 12/2011 ASP Procedures are in place. A procedures revision was performed in 2013. Completed (By:12-2018) ATCOs were trained for applicable procedures for OAT‐IFR transit. 12/2013 GAT/OAT procedures are in place. A procedures revision was performed in Partly Completed 2013. Part of ATC personnel have been qualified to provide ATS to OAT‐IFR MIL flights in accordance with national regulations. Update of National Point Of (By:12-2018) 12/2018 Contact (POC) to be forwarded once the MIL reorganisation is completed (MIL authority fully in place).

Partly [IDP] AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management (By:12/2016) Completed [Essential]

Most of the ASP lines of actions are either completed or partly completed. Two of the MIL lines of actions 12/2015 partially completed. For the rest of the MIL lines of actions there is not yet an approved action plan. Most of the ASP lines of actions are either completed or partly completed Partly Completed ASP with one line of action being planned according to EUROCONTROL ADR (By:12-2015) 12/2015 development. The whole objective is under review, two lines of actions partially Partly Completed completed. For the rest of the lines of actions there is not yet an approved MIL action plan. In December 2013 was completed the training course for all (By:12-2015) 12/2015 ADMIN, housekeepers, supervisors and users of the 2.2 version of LARA system The LARA system will be operational by December 2014.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 33 Released Issue

Implement ATS Route Network (ARN) - Version 7 Completed AOM20 (By:10/2013) [Essential] The airspace structure changes, in accordance with ARN v.7 has been performed on regular basis on approved planned schedule. The amendments of route improvements are published in AIP Romania in 10/2013 conformance with AIRAC cycle. For reference see the published "Released of RNDSG Airspace Improvements Synopsis" (RAIS). The airspace structure changes, in accordance with ARN v.7 has been Completed performed on regular basis on approved planned schedule. The ASP amendments of route improvements are published in AIP Romania in (By:10-2013) 10/2013 conformance with AIRAC cycle. For reference see the published "Released of RNDSG Airspace Improvements Synopsis" (RAIS). The military authorities are involved in the design, planning and approval Not Applicable MIL activities regarding the new ATS Route Network (ARN) within the Romanian (By:10-2013) ‐ airspace and DANUBE FAB airspace.

[IDP] Completed AOM21 Implementation of Free Route Airspace (By:12/2017) [Essential] Night FRA within FIR Bucuresti was implemented in November 2013. 11/2013 A formal notification of acceptance for the implementation of night free Completed REG route airspace within Bucuresti FIR was issued and communicated to the (By:12-2017) 11/2013 ANSP. ASP Completed Night FRA within FIR Bucuresti was implemented in November 2013. (By:12-2017) 11/2013 MIL Night FRA within FIR Bucuresti was implemented in November 2013. The Completed (By:12-2017) military personnel involved has been trained accordingly. 11/2013

Implement airside capacity enhancement method and Not Applicable AOP01.2 best practices based on Eurocontrol capacity and

efficiency implementation manual (By:12/2013) LROP - Bucharest (Outside Applicability Area) Romania is not in the applicability area of the objective. ‐ ASP Not Applicable Not in the applicability area. (By:12-2011) ‐ APO Not Applicable Not in the applicability area. (By:12-2011) ‐

Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions Late AOP03 (By:12/2013) It has been implemented for Bucharest‐Henri Coanda airport. Related actions are in progress to implement the recommendations contained in the European Action Plan for Prevention of Runway 12/2015 Incursions (EAPPRI) Ed. 2.0 that have not been yet implemented. REG Completed Regulatory specific actions were implemented. (By:12-2013) 12/2013 Most of the recommendations contained in the European Action Plan for Late Prevention of Runway Incursions ( EAPPRI) Ed. 2.0 have been already ASP implemented. Related actions are in progress to implement the (By:12-2013) 12/2015 recommendations contained in the EAPPRI Ed. 2.0 that have not been yet implemented. It has been implemented for civil‐military operations at Bucharest‐Henri Late MIL Coanda airport. Actions are in place for the implementation of the (By:12-2013) 12/2015 objective on time. APO Completed It has been implemented for Bucharest‐Henri Coanda airport. (By:12-2013) 10/2012

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 34 Released Issue

Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Late AOP04.1 Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 (By:12/2011) [Essential] LROP - Bucharest The A‐SMGCS is currently under implementation. The status is late because Romania has joined the 12/2014 applicability area in 2011. REG All lines of action are currently under implementation. The status is late Late (By:12-2010) because Romania has joined the applicability area in 2011. 12/2014 ASP All lines of action are currently under implementation. The status is late Late (By:12-2011) because Romania has joined the applicability area in 2011. 12/2014 MIL Not Applicable MIL are using dedicated aprons (platforms). (By:12-2010) ‐ APO All lines of action are currently under implementation. The status is late Late (By:12-2010) because Romania has joined the applicability area in 2011. 12/2014

Partly Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and AOP04.2 Completed Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 (By:12/2017)

LROP - Bucharest The A‐SMGCS Level 2 is currently under implementation. 12/2014 REG Partly Completed Objective under implementation. (By:12-2017) 12/2014 All lines of action are currently under implementation. A‐SMGCS control Partly Completed ASP equipment installed by end 2012. Tuning has started on 08/2013 and will (By:12-2017) 12/2014 be finished by 03/2014. APO The system implemented is Level 2 by design. Working positions for Apt. Partly Completed (By:12-2017) Administration will provide required control functions. 06/2014

Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) [IDP] Not Applicable AOP05 (By:01/2016) [Essential] LROP - Bucharest (Outside Applicability Area) Romania is not in the applicability area of the objective. ‐ ASP Not Applicable Not in the applicability area. (By:01-2016) ‐ MIL Not Applicable Not applicable (By:01-2016) ‐ APO Not Applicable Not applicable (By:01-2016) ‐

Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Completed ATC02.2 Alert (STCA) - level 2 (By:01/2013) [Essential] The objective has been completed as appropriate, including Terminal Air Traffic control. RCAA has accepted the introduction of STCA L2 in accordance with EUROCONTROL specifications. Safety oversight 01/2013 for the change was performed and formal acceptance issued by the NSA. RCAA has accepted the introduction of STCA L2 in accordance with Completed REG EUROCONTROL specifications. Safety oversight for the change was (By:01-2013) 01/2013 performed and formal acceptance issued by the NSA. ASP Completed The objective has been completed, including Terminal Air Traffic control. (By:01-2013) 07/2012 MIL The objective has been completed as appropriate, including Terminal Air Completed (By:01-2013) Traffic control. 01/2013

Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Completed ATC02.5 Warning - level 2 (By:12/2016) [Essential] Ground systems have been upgraded to support the DAIW function which is in operational use. 12/2013 Ground systems have been upgraded to support the DAIW function which Completed ASP is in operational use. The training plans have been updated and a training (By:12-2016) package has been developed for the use of DAIW function (Safety Nets 12/2013 tool). MIL Not Applicable MIL does not provide the required service. (By:12-2016) ‐

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 35 Released Issue

Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Completed ATC02.6 Altitude Warning - level 2 (By:12/2016) [Essential] Ground systems have been upgraded to support the MSAW function which is in operational use. 12/2013 Ground systems have been upgraded to support the MSAW function which Completed ASP is in operational use. The training plans have been updated and a training (By:12-2016) 12/2013 package has been developed for the use of MSAW. MIL Not Applicable MIL does not provide the required service. (By:12-2016) ‐

Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path No Plan ATC02.7 Monitor - level 2 (By:12/2016) [Essential] There is no yet a defined or approved implementation plan and budget for the objective. ‐ ROMATSA has reviewed the SLoAs and has not yet a defined or approved No Plan ASP implementation plan and budget to implement APM function but has (By:12-2016) ‐ intention to implement it. MIL Not Applicable MIL does not provide the required service. (By:12-2016) ‐

Planned ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools (By:12/2015) [Essential] Arrival management tools planned to be implemented in due time. 12/2015 ASP Planned Arrival management tools planned to be implemented in due time. (By:12-2015) 12/2015

Implement automated support for conflict detection and Completed ATC12 conformance monitoring (By:12/2016) [Essential] MTCD was introduced by ROMATSA and approved by RCAA. 12/2013 REG RCAA approved the introduction of MTCD concurrently with other Completed (By:12-2016) upgrades developed for ROMATSA's ATM system. 12/2013 ASP MTCD and MONA functions have been completed with the latest software Completed (By:12-2016) development, documented and are in operational use. 03/2013

Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange [IDP] Planned ATC15 mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic [Essential] AMAN operations (By:12/2017) The objective is planned to be implemented in the future version of the Romanian ATM System. 12/2017 REG Planned The objective is planned to be implemented. (By:12-2017) 12/2017 ASP The objective is planned to be implemented in the future version of the Planned (By:12-2017) Romanian ATM System. 12/2017

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Planned ATC16 (By:12/2015) The objective is planned to be implemented due to the fact that the aircraft operators did not implement 12/2015 ACAS II requirements. The objective is planned to be implemented in accordance with the Planned REG deadline established by the (EU) Regulation no. 1332/2011. SLoAs not (By:12-2015) performed due to the fact that aircraft operators did not implement ACAS II 01/2015 requirements so far. The objective is completed. Training plan and package developed and all Completed ASP concerned personnel trained. A monitoring of the performance of ACAS in (By:03-2012) 03/2012 the ATC environment is in place. Train aircrews of tactical aircraft completed. Actual state transport aircrafts Completed MIL are ACAS II (TCAS II version 7.0) compliant. The fleet renewal programme is (By:12-2015) 03/2012 completed and there are no plans to upgrade the equipment to version 7.1.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 36 Released Issue

Partly Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to [IDP] ATC17 Completed Controller during Coordination and Transfer (By:12/2018) [Essential]

PAC function documented, implemented, and in operational use. The rest of the functions are documented and implemented, not yet in operational use. Operational use is pending and depends on the 12/2018 agreement with neighbouring ACCs and availability of the functions in their ATC systems. REG Completed NSA has issued an acceptance of the change mentioned. (By:12-2018) 10/2012 PAC function documented, implemented, and in operational use. The rest Partly Completed ASP of the functions are documented and implemented, not yet in operational (By:12-2018) use. Operational use is pending and depends on the agreement with 12/2018 neighbouring ACCs and availability of the functions in their ATC systems.

Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data Partly [IDP] COM09 networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP) Completed

(By:12/2014) ROMATSA data network is already IP capable both for internal and international services. Migration was 12/2014 already performed with most of the neighbouring countries. REG Completed Relevant NSA's lines of action were completed. (By:12-2010) 12/2014 ROMATSA data network is already IP capable both for internal and Partly Completed ASP international services. Migration was already performed with most of the (By:12-2014) 12/2014 neighbouring countries. Military stakeholder data network is already IPv4 capable both for internal Partly Completed MIL and international services. IPv6 FOC for MIL stakeholder is planned. Actual (By:12-2014) 12/2014 National/NATO plans FOC deadline is beyong 12/2014.

Partly

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS (By:12/2014) Completed

The new AFTN/CIDIN/AMHS system is operational from 2010. The enhanced AMHS is planned for 2014. 12/2014 The new AFTN/CIDIN/AMHS system is operational from 2010. Most of the Partly Completed ASP lines of action are either completed or partly completed. The enhanced (By:12-2014) 12/2014 AMHS is planned for 2014. MIL Partly Completed MIL stakeholder is client to the same AMHS system. (By:12-2014) 12/2014

Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in Planned COM11 ATM (By:12/2020) Plans are in place for the implementation of ASP lines of action in due time. 12/2020 REG Planned Planned in accordance with ANSP's plans. (By:12-2018) 12/2018 ASP Planned Plans are in place for the implementation of ASP lines of action in due time. (By:12-2020) 12/2020 Currently MIL capability (ground air ground communication) is ensured Planned MIL over IP network. Radio stations with VoIP capability are planned to be (By:12-2020) 12/2018 installed by 2018.

Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) [IDP] Late ENV01 techniques for environmental improvements (By:12/2013) LROP - Bucharest CDA is applied to the tactical phase; further study on publishing CDA procedures is under development. 12/2015 CDA approach is authorized on pilots' request. CDA is applied to the tactical phase; further study on publishing CDA Late ASP procedures is under development. CDA approach is authorized on pilots' (By:12-2013) 12/2015 request. Late APO CDA trials have been performed at Henri Coanda International Airport. CDA (By:12-2013) approach is authorized on pilots' request. There are no published 12/2015 procedures.

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 37 Released Issue

Implement Collaborative Environmental Management Not Applicable ENV02 (CEM) at Airports (By:12/2016) LROP - Bucharest (Outside Applicability Area) Romania is not in the applicability area of the objective. ‐ ASP Not Applicable Romania is not in the applicability area of the objective. (By:12-2016) ‐ MIL Not Applicable Romania is not in the applicability area of the objective. (By:12-2015) ‐ APO Not Applicable Romania is not in the applicability area of the objective. (By:12-2016) ‐

Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Completed FCM01 (By:12/2006) [Essential] First System Activation (FSA) and CPR are already sent to CFMU. FSA for holding has been implemented 03/2013 and needs to be validated by the CFMU. ASP First System Activation (FSA) and CPR are already sent to CFMU. FSA for Completed (By:12-2006) holding has been implemented and needs to be validated by the CFMU. 03/2013 MIL Not Applicable Military ATC units do not provide services to GAT. (By:12-2001) ‐

Partly [IDP] FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning (By:12/2015) Completed [Essential]

Automatic receiving and processing of ICAO FPL/RPL IFPS data is already in use. Actions are in progress for its full implementation in the framework of a contract with the supporting 12/2015 Company. Automatic receiving and processing of ICAO FPL/RPL IFPS data is already in Partly Completed ASP use. (By:12-2015) Actions are in progress for full implementation in the framework of a 12/2015 contract with the supporting Company. MIL Not Applicable Military ATC units do not provide services to GAT. (By:12-2015) ‐

Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1 [IDP] Not Applicable FCM04 (By:12/2015) [Essential] (Outside Applicability Area) Romania is not in the applicability area. ‐ REG Not Applicable Romania is not in the applicability area. (By:12-2015) ‐ ASP Not Applicable Romania is not in the applicability area. (By:12-2015) ‐

[IDP] Planned FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP (By:12/2016) [Essential] The objective is planned to be implemented. 12/2016 REG Planned Planned in accordance with stakeholders timetable. (By:12-2016) 12/2016 ASP Planned LARA tools under development. (By:12-2016) 12/2016 MIL Planned LARA tools under development. (By:12-2016) 12/2016 APO Planned The objective is planned to be implemented. (By:12-2016) 12/2016

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 38 Released Issue

Late INF04 Implement integrated briefing (By:12/2012)

In house development for Integrated Briefing in progress. Currently the application has a trial status. Based on the input received from the end‐users the application is expected to be improved before starting operations. 10/2014 For MIL stakeholders the objective is under review and further consideration based on civil‐military cooperation with ROMATSA. In house development for Integrated Briefing in progress. Currently the Late ASP application has a trial status. Based on the input received from the end‐ (By:12-2012) users the application is expected to be improved before starting 10/2014 operations. MIL For MIL stakeholders the objective is under review and further No Plan (By:12-2012) consideration based on civil‐military cooperation with ROMATSA. ‐

Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical Planned ITY-ADQ information (By:07/2017) [Essential] For the time being the NSA verifies during audits to ANS providers specific requirements concerning data quality which are also to be found in Regulation 73/2010. Clarifications needed for several provisions of 07/2017 Regulation 73/2010 implementation. REG NSA verifies during audits to ANS providers specific requirements Planned (By:07-2017) concerning data quality which are also to be found in Regulation 73/2010. 07/2014 ASP Lines of action associated to the objective will be implemented in Planned (By:07-2017) accordance with the provisions of Regulation 73/2010. 07/2017 MIL The whole objective is under review in accordance with Regulation No Plan (By:07-2017) 73/2010. 07/2017 APO All lines of action associated to the objective will be implemented in Planned (By:07-2017) accordance with the provisions of Regulation 73/2010. 07/2017

Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 [IDP] Planned ITY-AGDL (By:02/2015) [Essential] Communication infrastructure to handle AGDL services will be deployed by February 2015 to comply with the provisions set in the Commission Regulation 29/2009 (Part B, Annex I). Detailed requirements for 02/2015 AGDL services have been included in the new ATM system Functional Specifications. Budgeted plans are in place to implement AGDL services in due time. REG Planned For the time being, this objective is planned to be implemented. (By:02-2015) 02/2015 Communication infrastructure to handle AGDL services will be deployed by Planned February 2015 to comply with the provisions set in the Commission ASP Regulation 29/2009 (Part B, Annex I). Detailed requirements for AGDL (By:02-2015) services have been included in the new ATM system Functional 02/2015 Specifications. Budgeted plans are in place to implement AGDL services in due time. MIL No Plan The whole objective is under further consideration and review. (By:-) ‐

ITY- Implement air-ground voice channel spacing Planned AGVCS2 requirements below FL195 (By:12/2020) Associated lines of action specific for this objective are planned to be implemented in due time. 12/2018 The lines of action necessary to be completed during 2013 and specific for Partly Completed REG RCAA were accomplished. Remaining actions will be conducted within the (By:12-2018) 12/2018 timeframe of the objective. ASP Associated lines of action for ASP are planned to be implemented in due Planned (By:12-2018) time. 12/2018 Actual and future acquisitions plans for ground and airborne Not Applicable MIL communication systems were built taking into consideration 8.33 (By:12-2020) ‐ requirement. However 25 KHz is still need it for old a/c in service. APO Associated lines of action for APO are planned to be implemented in due Planned (By:12-2018) time. 12/2018

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 39 Released Issue

Partly Implementation of ground-ground automated co- ITY-COTR Completed ordination processes (By:02/2015) [Essential]

Objective is partially implemented. Full implementation is planned. The current ATM systems at Bucharest ACC, Constanta APP and Arad APP are capable of sending and 02/2015 receiving a complete set of basic OLDI messages (ACT, LAM, PAC, REV, MAC ABI, BFD, CFD). The implementation of LOF and NAN messages is planned with the new ROMATSA ATM2015 system. REG Safety oversight of the change was undertaken by Romanian CAA, and a Completed (By:12-2012) formal acceptance was issued. 12/2012 Objective is currently partly implemented. Full implementation is planned. Partly Completed The current ATM systems at Bucharest ACC, Constanta APP and Arad APP ASP are capable of sending and receiving a complete set of basic OLDI messages (By:02-2015) 02/2015 (ACT, LAM, PAC, REV, MAC ABI, BFD, CFD). The implementation of LOF and NAN messages is planned with the new ROMATSA ATM2015 system. MIL The Basic Flight Data process and the Change of the Basic Flight Data Completed (By:12-2012) process are implemented. 12/2012

Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) [IDP] Completed ITY-FMTP (By:12/2014) The national data communication network has got such a capability. The operational ATM system is FMTP capable and FMTP is implemented between Arad, Bucharest, Constanta systems with one adjacent 12/2013 country (Belgrade ATM system). Coordination with other adjacent ANSPs is in progress, subject to adjacent ANSPs similar capabilities. The verification activities related to the implementation of FMTP were Completed REG successfully undertaken. A formal acceptance of the change was issued by (By:12-2014) 12/2013 Romanian CAA. The national data communication network has got such a capability. The Completed operational ATM system is FMTP capable and FMTP is implemented ASP ROMATSA between Arad, Bucharest, Constanta systems with one adjacent country (By:12-2014) Operational 04/2013 (Belgrade ATM system). Coordination with other adjacent ANSPs is in Concept progress, subject to adjacent ANSPs similar capabilities. MIL is using ROMATSA system. The communication equipment has been Not Applicable MIL upgrated for AOC. The decision for further implementation on the millitary (By:12-2014) bases will be taken into consideration pending on the opening for GAT ‐ traffic.

Partly Surveillance performance and interoperability ITY-SPI Completed (By:12/2019)

The objective if fully completed for all stakeholders except MIL. Interoperability of surveillance data is already ensured. Safety assessment for changes introduced to the surveillance infrastructure as well as 12/2018 training of personnel performed. Formal NSA acceptance of the safety assessment reports communicated to the ANSP. REG The objective if fully completed. Formal NSA acceptance of the safety Completed (By:12-2013) assessment reports communicated to the ANSP. 09/2012 The objective if fully completed. Interoperability of surveillance data is Completed ASP already ensured. Safety assessment for changes introduced to the (By:02-2015) 03/2012 surveillance infrastructure as well as training of personnel performed. There are no plans to equip with MODE S the old State aircraft fleet. Partly Completed MIL However this requirement was inserted as mandatory for the new (By:12-2019) acquisition process and the new transport aircraft C 27 J already in service 12/2018 is equipped with MODE S Elementary Surveillance.

Completed NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV (By:12/2012) [Essential] SLoAs are completed. 12/2010 REG Completed The SLoAs for REG are completed. (By:01-2005) 01/2005 ASP Completed The lines of action are completed. (By:12-2012) 01/2010 MIL Although the MIL stakeholder does not provide the required service, the Completed (By:12-2012) MIL aircrews have completed the training in RNAV TMA procedures. 12/2012

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 40 Released Issue

[IDP] Planned NAV10 Implement APV procedures (By:12/2016) [Essential] Lines of action are planned in coordination with all stakeholders. 12/2016 Actions are planned in coordination with all stakeholders. Currently, ESSP Planned REG does not ensure the required APV‐I signal over the entire Romanian (By:04-2016) 04/2016 airspace. The lines of action for this objective are under planning at ASP and REG Planned ASP level. GPS utilisation is not authorised in Romania. EGNOS full coverage (By:12-2016) 12/2016 expected to be provided in 2014. There is no intention to implement the SLoAs because it is not justified in Not Applicable MIL terms of the ratio cost‐benefit: the transport state aircraft have just been (By:12-2016) ‐ renewed.

Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft Completed SAF10 operations caused by airspace infringements (By:12/2011) The objective is fully implemented. The appropriate parts of the European Action Plan ‐ Airspace Infringement Risk Reduction were implemented and the airspace infringement risk reduction measures 12/2012 monitored. The objective is fully implemented. The appropriate parts of the European Completed REG Action Plan ‐ Airspace Infringement Risk Reduction were implemented and (By:12-2011) 12/2010 the airspace infringement risk reduction measures monitored. The objective is fully implemented. Action Plan to reduce the Airspace Completed ASP Infringement Risk for overall safety improvement developed. Risk reduction (By:12-2011) 12/2012 for Airspace Infringement are in place (DAIW). MIL The objective is fully completed. Action Plan to reduce the Airspace Completed (By:12-2011) Infringement Risk for overall safety improvement developed and is in place. 12/2011

Partly Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions SAF11 Completed (By:01/2018)

Most of lines of action are implemented. Only few of them are under implementation. 01/2018 REG The applicable measures contained in the European Action Plan for the Partly Completed (By:01-2018) Prevention of Runway Excursion are partially implemented. 01/2018 Most o the applicable measures of the European Action Plan for the Partly Completed Prevention of Runway Excursions have been already implemented. Related ASP actions are in progress to implement the appropriate parts of the European (By:12-2014) 12/2014 Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions that have not been yet implemented. Most o the applicable measures of the European Action Plan for the Partly Completed Prevention of Runway Excursions have been already implemented for civil‐ MIL military airport Henry Coanda. Related actions are in progress to implement (By:01-2018) 12/2014 the appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions that have not been yet implemented. APO Most of lines of action are implemented. Few remaining ones will be timely Partly Completed (By:12-2014) implemented. 12/2014

Implementation of Safety Oversight of Changes to ATM by Not Applicable SRC-CHNG National Supervisory Authorities (NSA) (By:12/2010) (Outside Applicability Area) Romania is not in the area of applicability. ‐ REG Not Applicable ‐ (By:12-2010) ‐ MIL Not Applicable ‐ (By:12-2010) ‐

Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Not Applicable SRC-RLMK Requirements (ESARRs) (By:12/2010) (Outside Applicability Area) Romania is not in the area of applicability. ‐ REG Not Applicable ‐ (By:12-2010) ‐ MIL Not Applicable ‐ (By:12-2010) ‐

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 41 Released Issue

Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies (By:12/2010) Not Applicable SRC-SLRD (Outside Applicability Area) Romania is not in the area of applicability. ‐ REG Not Applicable ‐ (By:12-2010) ‐ MIL Not Applicable ‐ (By:12-2010) ‐

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 42 Released Issue

Annexes

Annex A – Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process

LSSIP Co-ordination

LSSIP National Coordinator RCAA Alin George DIACONU LSSIP Focal Point – MoT MoT - DCA Răzvan IONESCU LSSIP Focal Point - ROMATSA ROMATSA Mihai BRANIŞTE LSSIP Focal Point - RAF Romanian Air Force Siminel STEREA LSSIP Focal Point – CNAB "Bucharest Airports" National Ruxandra CAPOTA Company LSSIP Contact Person for Romania EUROCONTROL Ana Paula FRANGOLHO

ESSIP Objective Implementation ESSIP EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL National Stakeholder Specialist(s) Objective EIPR Objective Coordinator

AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, E. O. CIOARA Georgel ZAHARIA REUBER Daniel HAREA AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI O. CIOARA Daniel HAREA AOM20 R. BUCUROIU O. CIOARA Daniel HAREA AOM21 O. CIOARA Daniel HAREA R. BUCUROIU Georgel ZAHARIA AOP01.2 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC N/A AOP03 P. VRANJKOVIC Alin George DIACONU T. LICU Radu MANZAT AOP04.1 P. VRANJKOVIC Alin George DIACONU P. ADAMSON Mihai BRANISTE AOP04.2 P. VRANJKOVIC Alin George DIACONU P. ADAMSON Mihai BRANISTE AOP05 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC N/A ATC02.2 I. FEIJT Alin George DIACONU B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI Daniel HAREA Daniel HAREA Eduard ACUJBOAEI ATC02.5 I. FEIJT Daniel HAREA B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI Eduard ACUJBOAEI ATC02.6 I. FEIJT Daniel HAREA B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI Eduard ACUJBOAEI ATC02.7 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Catalin MARINCA ATC07.1 N. GAUTIER L. DELL’ORTO Catalin MARINCA ATC12 L. DELL’ORTO Alin George DIACONU N. GAUTIER Daniel HAREA Eduard ACUJBOAEI ATC15 N. GAUTIER L. DELL’ORTO Alin George DIACONU

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 43 Released Issue

ESSIP EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL National Stakeholder Specialist(s) Objective EIPR Objective Coordinator Daniel HAREA Catalin MARINCA ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI L. DELL’ORTO Alin George DIACONU ATC17 L. DELL’ORTO Alin George DIACONU N. GAUTIER Claudiu CRUCEANU COM09 O. ALFARO Bogdan SERBANESCU B. GASZTYCH, J. POUZET Dan ALBEANU Cosmin DUMITRESCU COM10 A. KOKONA Bogdan SERBANESCU B. GASZTYCH, J. POUZET Romulus HARDA Constantin BOTOLAN COM11 A. KOKONA Bogdan SERBANESCU B. GASZTYCH, J. POUZET Dan ALBEANU Cosmin DUMITRESCU ENV01 P. ADAMSON B. HILL Dan NICU ENV02 S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL N/A FCM01 O. CIOARA Andreea STRAT H. KOOLEN Eugen MIHAESCU FCM03 O. CIOARA Andreea STRAT S. SMIDT Eugen MIHAESCU FCM04 M. RICHARD O. CIOARA N/A FCM05 O. CIOARA Daniel HAREA N. AGACDIKEN Adrian STEFAN INF04 P. MATERN A-P. FRANGOLHO Harald ERSCH ITY-ADQ A-P. FRANGOLHO Valentin STOIAN M. UNTERREINER Dorinel VISOIU ITY-AGDL A. KOKONA Bogdan SERBANESCU E. CERASI, S. DISSING Marcel TABACU ITY-AGVCS2 O. ALFARO Bogdan SERBANESCU J. ROCA Dan ALBEANU ITY-COTR L. DELL’ORTO Bogdan SERBANESCU N. GAUTIER Claudiu CRUCEANU ITY-FMTP O. ALFARO Bogdan SERBANESCU B. GASZTYCH, J. POUZET Claudiu CRUCEANU ITY-SPI A-P. FRANGOLHO Andreea CALINA M. BORELY, R. STEWART George PINTILIE NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC A. KOKONA Valentin STOIAN NAV10 A. KOKONA Valentin STOIAN R. FARNWORTH, F. PAVLICEVIC Dan NICU SAF10 T. LICU I. FEIJT Alin George DIACONU SAF11 I. FEIJT Radu MANZAT S. LAWRENCE Valentin MIROIU SRC-CHNG M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA N/A SRC-RLMK M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA N/A SRC-SLRD M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA N/A

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 44 Released Issue

Annex B – National Stakeholders Organisation Charts (31.12.2013)

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 45 Released Issue

CIAS ORGANIGRAMME

MANAGEMENT BOARD

INTERNAL PUBLIC GENERAL DIRECTOR AUDIT FINANCIAL DIVISION DIVISION

LOGISTICS/ FINANCE AND SECRETARIAT AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE PRESS DIVISION DIVISION OFFICE

LEGAL AND IT – MEDIA DIVISION HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION

ANALYSIS INVESTIGATIONS FOREIGN COOPERATION DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT

DATABASE FLIGHT AIRFRAME AND FLYING EDITING DIVISION ANALYSIS DIVISION ENGINE EXPERTISE EXPERTISE DIVISION DIVISION AERONAUTICAL SAFETY REGULATION AND RECOMMENDATION INTERNATIONAL DIVISION FLIGHT DATA AVIONICS AND ATS AFFAIRS DIVISION DECODING, SPECIAL EQUIPMENT EXPERTISE PROCESSING AND EXPERTISE DIVISION SIMULATION DIVISION DIVISION

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 46 Released Issue

RCAA ORGANIGRAMME

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 47 Released Issue

ROMATSA ORGANIGRAMME

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 48 Released Issue

MILITARY AVIATION ORGANIGRAMME

MINISRY OF AIRSPACE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTS AND MANAGEMENT NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL (CMSA) DEFENCE

NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND CENTRE AIR FORCE STAFF

NATIONAL MILITARY AIR OPERATION SAFETY SECTION PERSONNEL AERONAUTICAL CENTRE SERVICE AUTHORITY MILITARY ATC UNITS

CONTROL AND REPORT CENTRE

AIRSPACE MANAGEMENT OFFICE

OTHER ATC UNITS

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 49 Released Issue

AIR FORCE STAFF ORGANIGRAMME

CHIEF OF STAFF

DEPUTY

TRAINING & RESOURCES AIR OPERATION COMMAND Director of Romanian DOCTRINE CENTRE GROUP National Military Aeronautical Authority (RNMAA) TRAINING HUMAN CONTROL AND SAFETY RESOURCES REPORT CENTRE SECTION

DOCTRINE COMMS & IT AIRSPACE MANAGEMENT OFFICE

LOGISTICS

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 50 Released Issue

Annex C – Glossary of Abbreviations

Specific abbreviations for this State.

ACC Area Control Centre A/G Air/Ground (communication) AC Assistant Controller ACAS Airborne Collision Avoidance System AFS Air Force Staff AFTN Aeronautical Fixed Telecommunication Network AIC Aeronautical Information Circular AIP Aeronautical Information Publication AIS Aeronautical Information Services AM Area Manager AMC Airspace Management Cell AMHS Aeronautical Messages Handling System ANS Air Navigation Services AOM Airspace Organization and Management APP Approach ARN ATS Route Network ASM Airspace Management A-SMGCS Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System ASTERIX All purpose STructured EUROCONTROL Radar Information eXchange format ATC Air Traffic Control ATCC Air Traffic Control Centre ATFM Air Traffic Flow Management ATM Air Traffic Management ATS Air Traffic Services B-RNAV Basic - Area Navigation CAMOS Centralised ARTAS Maintenance and Operational Support CDM Collaborative Decision-Making CEAC Committee for European Airspace Co-ordination CFDS Central Flight Data Suite (PALLAS system) CNS Communications, Navigation and Surveillance CODA Central Office of Delay Analysis COM Communications COO COOrdinator CMSA Romanian acronym for "Airspace Management Council" CRCO Central Routes Charges Office CWP Controller Working Position DAIW Danger Area Infringement Warning DBMS Data Base Management System

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 51 Released Issue

DMAN Departure Manager DME Distance Measuring Equipment DPS Data Processing Systems EAD European AIS Data base EAG European ATFM Group EANPG FMG European Air Navigation Panel Group Frequency Management Group EATM European Air Traffic Management EC European Commission ECAC European Civil Aviation Conference ECG European Communication Gateway EDPD Environmental Data Processing and Distribution EFAS Effort Accounting System EFDP European Flight Data Processing EFPS External Front Processing System (PALLAS system) ENPRM European Notice of Proposed Rule-Making ETFMS Enhanced Tactical Flow Management System EUR EURopean region FCM Flow Control Management FDDI Fiber optical Digital Data Interchange FDE-ICD Flight Data Exchange - Interface Control Document FDPD Flight Data Processing and Distribution FDPS Flight Plan Processing System FIC Flight Information Centre FIR Flight Information Region FL Flight Level FM Frequency Modulation FMG Frequency Management Group FMP Flow Management Position FMS Flight Management System FPPS Flight Plan Processing System FRA Free Route Airspace FUA Flexible Use of Airspace(Concept) G/G Ground/Ground (communication) GAT General Air Traffic GDLP Ground Data Link Processor (mode S) GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System H High ATC complexity area HMI Human Machine Interface Ho Head of HRM Human Resources Management

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 52 Released Issue

HUM Human Domain IANS Institution Air Navigation Services ICA Inspectorate of Civil Aviation ICAO International Civil Aviation Organisation IDS Information Display System IFPS (Integrated) Initial Flight Plan Processing System IFR Instrument Flight Rules ILS Instrument Landing System INF Aeronautical Information ISO International Organisation for Standardisation ITU International Telecommunications Union JAA Joint Aviation Authorities LAM Logical Acknowledgement Message (OLDI) LAN Local Area Network LAW Legal Framework: Law LSSIP Local Single Sky ImPlementation LM Low and Medium ATC complexity area LoA Line of Action LoA Letter of Agreement MAOC Main Air Operation Centre MASP Minimum Aviation Specification Performance MASPS Minimum Aircraft System Performance Specification MATSE ECAC Transport Ministers’ meeting on the Air Traffic System in Europe MET Meteorology MET Meteorological Data MFC Multi Frequency Coding, EUROCONTROL signalling system MIL Military MM Man Missions MMC Man Mission Cost MoD Ministry of Defence MoT Ministry of Transport, Constructions and Tourism MRT Multi Radar Tracking MoU Memorandum of Understanding MSAW Minimum Safe Altitude Warning MSL Mean Sea Level MSSR Monopulse Secondary Surveillance Radar MTCA Medium Term Conflict Alert NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation NAV Navigation NAVAIDS NAVigation AIDS OAT Operational Air Traffic ODS Operational Display System OJT On the Job Training

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 53 Released Issue

OLDI On-line Data Interchange (standard) OOP Outline Operational Plan OPQ Operational Requirements ORCAM Originating Region Code Assignment Method OSI Open Systems Interconnection PAC Preliminary Activation message (OLDI) PANS Procedures for Air Navigation Services (ICAO) PDP Polar Diagram Plotter PE Pan European PLC PLanning Controller PM Project Manager PMP Project Management Plan PRC Performance Review Commission PRU Performance Review Unit PSR Primary Surveillance Radar PTT National Telecommunication Organisation QA Quality Assurance QM Quality Management R&D Research and Development R/T Radio Telephone RASS Radar Analysis Support System RC Radar Controller RCAA Romanian Civil Aviation Authority RDIF Radar Data Interface Format RMCDE Radar Message Conversion and Distribution Equipment RNAV Area Navigation RNDSG Route Network Development SubGroup RNP Required Navigational Performance ROMATSA Romanian ATS Administration RVSM Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum SAF SAFety SAR Search and Rescue SARPs Standards and Recommended Practices SARPs Standards And Recommended Practices (ICAO) SASS-C Surveillance Analysis Support System - Centre SASS-S Surveillance Analysis Support System - Sensor SATCOM Satellite Communications SDPD Surveillance Data Processing and Distribution SFPL System Flight Plan SID Standard Instrument Departure SMAN Surface Management System SMGCS Surface Movement Guidance and Control System SMR Surface Movement Radar

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 54 Released Issue

SR Status Report SSR Secondary Surveillance Radar STCA Short-Term Conflict Alert ST-ICD Short Term Interface Control Document SUR Surveillance TAR Terminal Area Radar TCAS Traffic Alert and Collision-Avoidance System TMA Terminal Control Area TMCS Technical Monitoring and Control System TWR Tower UAC Upper Area Control Centre UHF Ultra High Frequency UIR Upper Flight Information Region UTC Universal Time Co-ordinated VCS Voice Communication System VFR Visual Flight Rules VHF Very High Frequency VL Very Low ATC complexity area VOLMET Meteorological information for aircraft in flight VOR VHF Omni-directional Radio Range WP Work Package WRC World Radio Conference

LSSIP Year 2013 Romania 55 Released Issue