SOUTHERN ONTARIO ORCHID SOCIETY NEWS February 2015, Volume 50, Issue 2 Celebrating 50 Years SOOS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SOUTHERN ONTARIO ORCHID SOCIETY NEWS February 2015, Volume 50, Issue 2 Celebrating 50 Years SOOS SOUTHERN ONTARIO ORCHID SOCIETY NEWS February 2015, Volume 50, Issue 2 Celebrating 50 years SOOS Web site: www.soos.ca ; Member of the Canadian Orchid Congress; Affiliated with the American Orchid Society, the Orchid Digest and the International Phalaenopsis Alliance. Membership: Annual Dues $30 per calendar year (January 1 to December 31 ). Surcharge $15 for newsletter by postal service. Membership secretary: Liz Mc Alpine, 189 Soudan Avenue, Toronto, ON M4S 1V5, phone 416-487-7832, renew or join on line at soos.ca/members Executive: President, Laura Liebgott, 905-883-5290; Vice-President, John Spears, 416-260-0277; Secretary, Sue Loftus 905-839-8281; Treasurer, John Vermeer, 905-823-2516 Other Positions of Responsibility: Program, Mario Ferrusi; Plant Doctor, Doug Kennedy; Meeting Set up, Yvonne Schreiber; Vendor and Sales table coordinator, Diane Ryley;Library Liz Fodi; Web Master, Max Wilson; Newsletter, Peter and Inge Poot; Annual Show, Peter Poot; Refreshments, Joe O’Regan. Conservation Committee, Susan Shaw; Show table, Synea Tan . Honorary Life Members: Terry Kennedy, Doug Kennedy, Inge Poot, Peter Poot, Joe O’Regan, Diane Ryley, Wayne Hingston, Mario Ferrusi. Annual Show: February 14-15, 2015 Next Meeting Sunday, January 25 , in the Floral Hall of the Toronto Botanical Garden, Sales 12 noon, Cultural snapshots will return at the March meeting. Program at 1 pm: Jay Norris and Terry Kennedy on what you need to do to enter plants into our show. Terry has many years experience preparing and entering plants at orchid shows, Jay is in charge of clerking at our show. Both are AOS judges and have grown and shown orchids for many years. Terry is currently the Chair of the Toronto Judging Centre and Jay is the award photographer. They will have tips on what classes to enter your plants in. Renew your Membership now at the membership desk, or you can renew at our website www.soos.ca Don’t miss our 50th anniversary 1 President’s Remarks Welcome Orchid purchase a set of books on miniature orchids called 'A Compendium of Miniature Orchid Species Volumes 1 Lovers. Once again, winter has reared its head. and 2'. These are terrific books from England. The price We don't know what each day will bring. What a way to is approximatly $88.00 per volume. To order them, th start our 50 year. I do know that this month, we are please contact Terry Kowalczuk at having an anniversary draw. Make sure you are there. [email protected] You will have to make the financial arrangements with Terry. This offer has been Thank you members (A through B) for supplying the extended until the second last week of February. The th treats for the January 4 meeting. They were delicious. books purchased will then be distributed at the meeting. th Treats for the January 25 meeting, will be from members whose last names begin with the letters C Looking forward to our next meeting. through D. (Note the date please) Laura Liebgott This brings us to the next reminder. Our “February” Questions or comments: Please contact me at: th meeting will actually be January 25 as we are heading [email protected] or 905 883 5290 into our show. At this meeting, our speakers Jay Norris and Terry Kennedy will walk you through the process of getting your plants ready for display at the show and how to register them for judging. Coming Events Our show will take place Valentine's weekend (February 2015 th th 14 and 15 ). We still are in need volunteers. Be sure to JANUARY sign up for one of the volunteer positions on January 25, SOOS meeting, Toronto Botanical Garden, sales th 25 , if you haven't already. 12 noon, program 1 pm. Preparing for Show Don Wyatt and Kyla Foti will be the main designers for FEBRUARY the SOOS exhibit. If you would like to get your fingers 14-15 SOOS Show+TJC Monthly judging, into the display, please come along and help these two Toronto Botanical Garden. out. Don has asked for plants to come in no later than 8 21, Montreal Judging Centre judging Jardin pm Friday February 13th. It takes a substancial amount botanique de Montreal of time to organize and reorganize the plants to show 21, Jump on Spring, 10am-4pm Toronto them off to their best advantage so.... the sooner you get Botanical Garden. them in, the earlier the group will be able to complete the 28, Mar 1 RBG Show + TJC Monthly Judging, Royal display. Botanical Gardens, Burlington. This starts the show season. MARCH February 28th — March 1st is the RGB's show — Don 8, SOOS meeting, Toronto Botanical Garden, will be organizing the SOOS display. sales 12 noon, program 1 pm. Tom Shields et al March 21st — March 22nd is London's show — I will be on Conservation. organizing the SOOS display. 14, Montreal Judging Centre judging Jardin March 28th — March 29th is the Montreal French show — botanique de Montreal. Don Wyatt will be organizing the SOOS display. 14-15, Genesee Region Orchid Show, Rochester, These are just a few shows in the near future. With your NY. plants, we can create a masterpiece! 21-22 London Orchid Show 20-22 Manitoba Orchid Show, Winnipeg. Some of our future speakers will be: *26-29 Saskatoon Orchid Show and Canadian th January 25 Jay Norris and Terry Kennedy Topic: Orchid Congress Annual Meeting, Saskatoon. Getting ready for the SOOS show 28-29 Les Orchidophiles de Montreal Show, March 8th Tom Shields Topic: Conservation th Montreal. April 12 Ron Burch Topic: Cypripediums May 3rd To be announced APRIL June 7th Fred Clark Topic to be announced 4 , Toronto Judging Centre, Monthly Judging, 1 pm Toronto Botanical Garden Our cultural snapshots will be returning for the March 12, SOOS meeting, Toronto Botanical Garden, sales meeting. Once again Wayne Hingston and Alexsi 12 noon, program 1 pm. Ron Burch on Cypripediums. Antanaitis will be delivering the topics. Please stay 11-12 Toronto Artistic Orchid Show, Toronto. tuned. There will be a list of the topics in the March 11- 12 Quebec City Orchid Show newsletter. 18-19 Ottawa Orchid Sodiety Show and MJC judging *29- May 3 AOS Trustees Meeting – Portland OR For those of you who were at the meeting on January th 4 , we had Terry Kowalczuk offer the society a chance to May Laeliocattleya City Life HCC-AOS 75 points, Joe 2, Toronto Judging Centre, Monthly Judging, 1 DiCiommo pm Toronto Botanical Garden Laeliocattleya City Life HCC-AOS 75 points, Joe 3, SOOS meeting, Toronto Botanical Garden, DiCiommo sales 12 noon, program 1 pm. Lepanthes aristata ‘Shooting Stars’ CBR-AOS, Ed Cott. 23, TJC Business Meeting, Jardin Botanique de (Mormodia [Mo.] Lime Tiger x Catasetum expansum) Montreal. Montreal judging. HCC-AOS 78 points, Lynda Vuurman. 23, MtlJC Monthly Judging, JbMtl Note! The next judging will be held at the Toronto Botanical Gardens, Saturday, January 14 after ribbon judging of the SOOS show. AOS Judging is a service of the American Orchid Society and is open to all! Plants SOOS Annual Valentine Orchid Show, for AOS judging do not have to be entered into the show. February 14 – 15, 2015 at the Toronto Botanical Garden. We Need you to Plant of the Month volunteer to help us with the Show. Please sign up. Our show date is fast approaching, are you ready? Participation gets you free entry to the show. We will need your flowering plants for the SOOS display in the show. This year in honour of our 50th anniversary there will be a trophy for the best orchid in the SOOS display. So start grooming your potential winners. Our show also features an exhibition of orchid art and photography. Contact Judy Palmer ([email protected] ) for the rules and to reserve Mario Ferrusi won the honour this month with space. his lovely two lead plant of Fredclarkeara Enter We need you to volunteer to help with setup and Night AM-AOS. It had been awarded the day teardown, kitchen food and drink distribution, show before at the Toronto Judging Centre Meeting supervision (security), plant and coat check, show and had received an 87 point AM. It had three tours, clerking and judging. Sign up sheets for these inflorescences with 9, 10 and 11 big, dark wine jobs with the details are at each of our meetings. Please flowers respectively, the flowers enhanced by sign up, we need you to pre-register yourself so we can prepare name badges. colourful spotted lips. Mario grows the plant in his usual mix of bark, Thank you for your help. Peter Poot, show chair. crumbled Styrofoam and chopped sphagnum. He gives it cattleya light all year. He keeps it For a list of Vendors selling at our show see dry in winter but gives it as much water and our previous Newsletter. fertilizer as possible in the summer growing period. A wonderful plant, beautifully grown! Congratulations! AOS Judging Results Please note, all of these awards are provisional until published by the American Orchid Society. Toronto Judging Centre January 3, 2015: Inge’s Programme Notes: Dendrochilum bicallosum ‘Pink Coral’CCM-AOS 83 points, Doug and Terry Kennedy. Last month Jean Allen Ikeson gave us a great Fredclarkeara Enter Night AM-AOS 87 points, Mario and talk about the genus Conni Ferrusi. Sarcochilus. Cycnodes James Davidson ’B-C’ AM-AOS 80 points, Bernie Butts and Chuck Lefaive. 3 This mostly Australian genus consists of about of the flower and has been nick-named the 24 species. They are epiphytes (grow on trees poached egg orchid! trunks) or lithophytes (grow on rocks) or twig Last but not least, S.
Recommended publications
  • Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006
    Queensland Nature Conservation Act 1992 Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 Current as at 1 September 2017 Queensland Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 Contents Page Part 1 Preliminary 1 Short title . 5 2 Commencement . 5 3 Purpose . 5 4 Definitions . 6 5 Scientific names . 6 Part 2 Classes of native wildlife and declared management intent for the wildlife Division 1 Extinct in the wild wildlife 6 Native wildlife that is extinct in the wild wildlife . 7 7 Declared management intent for extinct in the wild wildlife . 8 8 Significance of extinct in the wild wildlife to nature and its value 8 9 Proposed management intent for extinct in the wild wildlife . 8 10 Principles for the taking, keeping or use of extinct in the wild wildlife 9 Division 2 Endangered wildlife 11 Native wildlife that is endangered wildlife . 10 12 Declared management intent for endangered wildlife . 10 13 Significance of endangered wildlife to nature and its value . 10 14 Proposed management intent for endangered wildlife . 11 15 Principles for the taking, keeping or use of endangered wildlife . 12 Division 3 Vulnerable wildlife 16 Native wildlife that is vulnerable wildlife . 13 17 Declared management intent for vulnerable wildlife . 13 18 Significance of vulnerable wildlife to nature and its value . 13 19 Proposed management intent for vulnerable wildlife . 14 20 Principles for the taking, keeping or use of vulnerable wildlife . 15 Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 Contents Division 4 Near threatened wildlife 26 Native wildlife that is near threatened wildlife . 16 27 Declared management intent for near threatened wildlife . 16 28 Significance of near threatened wildlife to nature and its value .
    [Show full text]
  • Australia Lacks Stem Succulents but Is It Depauperate in Plants With
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Australia lacks stem succulents but is it depauperate in plants with crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM)? 1,2 3 3 Joseph AM Holtum , Lillian P Hancock , Erika J Edwards , 4 5 6 Michael D Crisp , Darren M Crayn , Rowan Sage and 2 Klaus Winter In the flora of Australia, the driest vegetated continent, [1,2,3]. Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), a water- crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), the most water-use use efficient form of photosynthesis typically associated efficient form of photosynthesis, is documented in only 0.6% of with leaf and stem succulence, also appears poorly repre- native species. Most are epiphytes and only seven terrestrial. sented in Australia. If 6% of vascular plants worldwide However, much of Australia is unsurveyed, and carbon isotope exhibit CAM [4], Australia should host 1300 CAM signature, commonly used to assess photosynthetic pathway species [5]. At present CAM has been documented in diversity, does not distinguish between plants with low-levels of only 120 named species (Table 1). Most are epiphytes, a CAM and C3 plants. We provide the first census of CAM for the mere seven are terrestrial. Australian flora and suggest that the real frequency of CAM in the flora is double that currently known, with the number of Ellenberg [2] suggested that rainfall in arid Australia is too terrestrial CAM species probably 10-fold greater. Still unpredictable to support the massive water-storing suc- unresolved is the question why the large stem-succulent life — culent life-form found amongst cacti, agaves and form is absent from the native Australian flora even though euphorbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Selected Literature and Epiphyte Classification
    --------- -- ---------· 4 CHAPTER 1 REVIEW OF SELECTED LITERATURE AND EPIPHYTE CLASSIFICATION 1.1 Review of Selected, Relevant Literature (p. 5) Several important aspects of epiphyte biology and ecology that are not investigated as part of this work, are reviewed, particularly those published on more. recently. 1.2 Epiphyte Classification and Terminology (p.11) is reviewed and the system used here is outlined and defined. A glossary of terms, as used here, is given. 5 1.1 Review of Selected, Relevant Li.terature Since the main works of Schimper were published (1884, 1888, 1898), particularly Die Epiphytische Vegetation Amerikas (1888), many workers have written on many aspects of epiphyte biology and ecology. Most of these will not be reviewed here because they are not directly relevant to the present study or have been effectively reviewed by others. A few papers that are keys to the earlier literature will be mentioned but most of the review will deal with topics that have not been reviewed separately within the chapters of this project where relevant (i.e. epiphyte classification and terminology, aspects of epiphyte synecology and CAM in the epiphyt~s). Reviewed here are some special problems of epiphytes, particularly water and mineral availability, uptake and cycling, general nutritional strategies and matters related to these. Also, all Australian works of any substance on vascular epiphytes are briefly discussed. some key earlier papers include that of Pessin (1925), an autecology of an epiphytic fern, which investigated a number of factors specifically related to epiphytism; he also reviewed more than 20 papers written from the early 1880 1 s onwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Orchid Society South Australia
    Journal of the Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc Thelymitra Print Post Approved .Volume 32 Nº 10 PP 543662/00018 November 2008 NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA PO BOX 565 UNLEY SA 5061 www.nossa.org.au. The Native Orchid Society of South Australia promotes the conservation of orchids through the preservation of natural habitat and through cultivation. Except with the documented official representation of the management committee, no person may represent the Society on any matter. All native orchids are protected in the wild; their collection without written Government permit is illegal. PRESIDENT SECRETARY Bill Dear: Cathy Houston Telephone 8296 2111 mob. 0413 659 506 telephone 8356 7356 Email: [email protected] VICE PRESIDENT Bodo Jensen COMMITTEE Bob Bates Thelma Bridle John Bartram John Peace EDITOR TREASURER David Hirst Marj Sheppard 14 Beaverdale Avenue Telephone 8344 2124 Windsor Gardens SA 5087 0419 189 188 Telephone 8261 7998 Email: [email protected] LIFE MEMBERS Mr R. Hargreaves† Mr. L. Nesbitt Mr H. Goldsack† Mr G. Carne Mr R. Robjohns† Mr R Bates Mr J. Simmons† Mr R Shooter Mr D. Wells† Mr W Dear Conservation Officer: Thelma Bridle Registrar of Judges: Les Nesbitt Field Trips Coordinator: Bob Bates 83429247 or 0402 291 904 or [email protected] Trading Table: Judy Penney Tuber bank Coordinator: Jane Higgs ph. 8558 6247; email: [email protected] New Members Coordinator: John Bartram ph: 8331 3541; email: [email protected] PATRON Mr L. Nesbitt The Native Orchid Society of South Australia, while taking all due care, take no responsibility for loss or damage to any plants whether at shows, meetings or exhibits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intergeneric Crossing of Phalaenopsis Sp. and Vanda Tricolor
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sebelas Maret Institutional Repository Journal of Biotechnology and Biodiversity, March 2010; 1(1): 32 -36 ISSN: 2087-0183 RESEARCH The intergeneric crossing of Phalaenopsis sp. and Vanda tricolor Sri Hartatia* aDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Sebelas Maret University, Jl. Ir. Sutami no 36A, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia Received : 5 August 2009 Accepted: 27 August 2009 Abstract To study the intergeneric crossing between orchids of Phalaenopsis sp. and Vanda tricolor, three species of Phalaenopsis sp. (Phalaenopsis Joane Kileup June, Phalaenopsis Pinlong Cinderella, and (Phal. Fortune Buddha x Phal. Princess Kaiulani) were crossed reciprocally with Vanda tricolor in time-different value (within the first, second and third week after full opened flower). The crossing of Phalaenopsis sp. and Vanda tricolor was compatible, and the use of Phalaenopsis sp. as male parent had better probability in producing fruits rather than the opposite. The crossing which was done at the first and the second weeks after blooming produced more fruit than the crossing at the third week after blooming, even though it did not affect the success of crossing, time of fruit formation, and duration of fruit hanging. Key words: Intergeneric Crossing, Orchids, Phalaenopsis sp., Vanda tricolor INTRODUCTION One strategy to make a new-hybrid compatible to Doritis pulcherrima var. cultivars of orchids is by crossing between the Champornensis (Hartati, unpublished results). orchid-parents having different characters. To assess the effect of time of crossing (week Orchid hobbyist usually prever to collect after blooming) in order to make new hybrid hybrid resulted from crossing orchids, orchids with more attractive flower characters because the hybrided orchids have more to the fruit formation in, Phalaenopsis sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Orchid Society South Australia
    Journal of the Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc Arachnorchis cardiochila Print Post Approved .Volume 31 Nº 10 PP 543662/00018 November 2007 NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA POST OFFICE BOX 565 UNLEY SOUTH AUSTRALIA 5061 www.nossa.org.au. The Native Orchid Society of South Australia promotes the conservation of orchids through the preservation of natural habitat and through cultivation. Except with the documented official representation of the management committee, no person may represent the Society on any matter. All native orchids are protected in the wild; their collection without written Government permit is illegal. PRESIDENT SECRETARY Bill Dear: Cathy Houston Telephone 8296 2111 mob. 0413 659 506 telephone 8356 7356 Email: [email protected] VICE PRESIDENT Bodo Jensen COMMITTEE Bob Bates Thelma Bridle John Bartram John Peace EDITOR TREASURER David Hirst Marj Sheppard 14 Beaverdale Avenue Telephone 8344 2124 Windsor Gardens SA 5087 0419 189 188 Telephone 8261 7998 Email [email protected] LIFE MEMBERS Mr R. Hargreaves† Mr. L. Nesbitt Mr H. Goldsack† Mr G. Carne Mr R. Robjohns† Mr R Bates Mr J. Simmons† Mr R Shooter Mr D. Wells† Mr W Dear Conservation Officer: Thelma Bridle Registrar of Judges: Les Nesbitt Field Trips Coordinator: Trading Table: Judy Penney Tuber bank Coordinator: Jane Higgs ph. 8558 6247; email: [email protected] New Members Coordinator: John Bartram ph: 8331 3541; email: [email protected] PATRON Mr L. Nesbitt The Native Orchid Society of South Australia, while taking all due care, take no responsibility for loss or damage to any plants whether at shows, meetings or exhibits.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Conservation Priorities and Assessing Impacts and Trade‐Offs of Potential Future Development in the Lower Hunter Valley in New South Wales
    Identifying conservation priorities and assessing impacts and trade-offs of potential future development in the Lower Hunter Valley in New South Wales A report by the NERP Environmental Decisions Hub Heini Kujala, Amy L. Whitehead and Brendan A. Wintle The University of Melbourne The Environmental Decisions Hub is supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Research Program www.environment.gov.au/nerp and involves researchers from the University of Western Australia (UWA), The University of Melbourne (UM), RMIT University (RMIT), The Australian National University (ANU), The University of Queensland (UQ) and CSIRO . Identifying conservation priorities and assessing impacts and trade‐offs of potential future development in the Lower Hunter Valley in New South Wales. ISBN: 978‐07340‐5140‐0 (PDF) Hub Research Theme: 4.4 Regional Sustainability Plans (Hunter) Enquiries to: [email protected] © The University of Melbourne This work is copyright. It may be produced in whole or in part for study or training purposes subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source. It is not intended for commercial sale or use. Reproduction for other purposes other than those listed above requires the written permission from the authors. For permission to reproduce any part of this document, please approach the authors. Please cite the report as follows: Kujala H, Whitehead AL & Wintle BA (2015) Identifying conservation priorities and assessing impacts and trade‐offs of potential future development in the Lower Hunter Valley in New South Wales. The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria. Pp. 100 Purpose of the Report This report describes the framework and tools used to identify areas of high conservation priority in the Lower Hunter, and to assess the individual and cumulative impacts of potential future development scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Phalaenopsis
    Chapter 23 Phalaenopsis Chia-Chi Hsu, Hong-Hwa Chen, and Wen-Huei Chen Abstract Phalaenopsis is one of the most popular cultivated orchids worldwide. So far, 92 native species and 34,112 hybrids of Phalaenopsis have been registered in the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS), but only 18 native species are frequently used for breeding. In Phalaenopsis market, large flowers with various colors are most popular. Phal. amabilis and Phal. aphrodite are the major species used for breeding the white-and-large-flower hybrids. The colored hybrids include pink, red- to- purple, green, yellow-to-orange, and black colors, as well as distinct colors in tepals with red lip. For large-and-red flowers,Phal. schilleriana and Phal. sanderiana are the major parent species, whereas Phal. equestris and Phal. pulcherrima are important for the development of the small- and medium-sized red flowers. Members of the subgenusPolychilos are the most important ancestors for yellow-to-orange flowers. More recently, there is an increased interest in plants with white, pink, or yellow colors with red stripes and/or spots. These traits are introduced from Phal. lindenii, Phal. stuartiana, and Phal. amboinensis. Furthermore, harlequin flowers which have clown-like spots and very complicated color patterns are released in the market, as well as hybrids with peloric and Bigfoot flowers. Besides color, scent and (a)biotic stress resistance are becoming important targets in Phalaenopsis breeding. Keywords Bigfoot · Breeding · Harlequin · Orchids · Peloric · Phalaenopsis C.-C. Hsu Department of Life Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan H.-H. Chen Department of Life Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan Orchid Research and Development Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan e-mail: [email protected] W.-H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intergeneric Crossing of Phalaenopsis Sp. and Vanda Tricolor
    Journal of Biotechnology and Biodiversity, March 2010; 1(1): 32 -36 ISSN: 2087-0183 RESEARCH The intergeneric crossing of Phalaenopsis sp. and Vanda tricolor Sri Hartatia* aDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Sebelas Maret University, Jl. Ir. Sutami no 36A, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia Received : 5 August 2009 Accepted: 27 August 2009 Abstract To study the intergeneric crossing between orchids of Phalaenopsis sp. and Vanda tricolor, three species of Phalaenopsis sp. (Phalaenopsis Joane Kileup June, Phalaenopsis Pinlong Cinderella, and (Phal. Fortune Buddha x Phal. Princess Kaiulani) were crossed reciprocally with Vanda tricolor in time-different value (within the first, second and third week after full opened flower). The crossing of Phalaenopsis sp. and Vanda tricolor was compatible, and the use of Phalaenopsis sp. as male parent had better probability in producing fruits rather than the opposite. The crossing which was done at the first and the second weeks after blooming produced more fruit than the crossing at the third week after blooming, even though it did not affect the success of crossing, time of fruit formation, and duration of fruit hanging. Key words: Intergeneric Crossing, Orchids, Phalaenopsis sp., Vanda tricolor INTRODUCTION One strategy to make a new-hybrid compatible to Doritis pulcherrima var. cultivars of orchids is by crossing between the Champornensis (Hartati, unpublished results). orchid-parents having different characters. To assess the effect of time of crossing (week Orchid hobbyist usually prever to collect after blooming) in order to make new hybrid hybrid resulted from crossing orchids, orchids with more attractive flower characters because the hybrided orchids have more to the fruit formation in, Phalaenopsis sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchitheek 1 Uitgave: Nederlandse Orchideeën Vereniging
    Nederlandse Orchideeën Vereniging – Orchitheek 1 Uitgave: Nederlandse Orchideeën Vereniging. Auteursrechten voorbehouden Phalaenopsis hieroglyphica Rchb.f. Sectie Zebrinae Syn. Phalaenopsis lueddemanniana ssp. Hieroglyphica Deze plant werd gevonden door P. Micholitz in het jaar 1890 op de zuidelijke eilanden van de Filippijnen in het Sulu-gebied, en werd overgebracht naar de Fa. Low en Co in Engeland. Ze werd door F. Reichenbach beschreven en gepubliceerd in de Gardeners’ Chronicle als Ph.lueddemanniana ssp. hieroglyphica. Deze naam is waarschijnlijk ontleend aan de kleur en tekening van de bloem. Verspreiding Het verspreidingsgebied is de groep zuidelijke eilanden in de Sulu-archipel (Filippijnen), waar de planten op bomen groeien die langs riviertjes staan in het laagland op een hoogte van 500 m. Beschrijving De planten groeien in een horizontale, lichtelijk omhoog gerichte stand tegen de bomen, of in humusnesten in de vorken van takken in de bomen. Zij hebben geen schijnknollen of bulben; de bladeren ontspruiten uit het hart van de wortelstok dicht opeen, zijn langwerpig, puntig aan het uiteinde, met een nerf in het midden. De kleur is effen grasgroen; bladeren stevig, niet vlezig en dik. De planten vormen niet meer dan 1 nieuw blad per groeiseizoen; het zijn uitgesproken trage groeiers. De wortels zijn zilverachtig en rond, vertakken zich en zijn 5 mm in dwarsdoorsnede. De bloemtakken ontwikkelen zich aan de onderkant van de wortelstok en tussen de onderste, oudste bladeren. Ze worden ongeveer 30 cm lang en jaar na jaar worden op dezelfde bloemtak bloemen geproduceerd. Naarmate de plant ouder wordt, neemt het aantal bloemen toe. Zoals exemplaren van andere ondersoorten van Ph.lueddemanniana wel doen, produceren zij geen jonge planten aan de bloemtakken.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Survey Guidelines for Australia's Threatened Orchids
    SURVEY GUIDELINES FOR AUSTRALIA’S THREATENED ORCHIDS GUIDELINES FOR DETECTING ORCHIDS LISTED AS ‘THREATENED’ UNDER THE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT 1999 0 Authorship and acknowledgements A number of experts have shared their knowledge and experience for the purpose of preparing these guidelines, including Allanna Chant (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Allison Woolley (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment), Andrew Brown (Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation), Annabel Wheeler (Australian Biological Resources Study, Australian Department of the Environment), Anne Harris (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), David T. Liddle (Northern Territory Department of Land Resource Management, and Top End Native Plant Society), Doug Bickerton (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), John Briggs (New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage), Luke Johnston (Australian Capital Territory Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate), Sophie Petit (School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia), Melanie Smith (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Oisín Sweeney (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), Richard Schahinger (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment). Disclaimer The views and opinions contained in this document are not necessarily those of the Australian Government. The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and while reasonable care has been taken in its compilation, the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document.
    [Show full text]
  • Asgap Indigenous Orchid Study Group Issn 1036-9651
    ASGAP INDIGENOUS ORCHID STUDY GROUP ISSN 1036-9651 Group Leaders: Don and Pauline Lawie P.O. Box 230, BABINDA 4861 Phone: 0740 671 577 Newsletter 53 December 2005 MAJORS MOUNTAIN - A WALK TO PARADISE FOR A NATIVE ORCHID GROWER t~r; I1 -&d by Mark Nowochatko In Mid August 2005 the Atherton Tablelands Branch of SGAP conducted a field day at Major's Mountain, just east of Ravenshoe on the Evelyn Tableland in North Queensland. A group of 20 plus diehard SGAP enthusiasts met at the trailhead and undertook the walk of approximately 3 km one way. With the first 2.1 km easy going, the balance is a strenuous climb to an elevation of around 1,100 metres. II I1 Moving from the main track to the Major's Mountain goat trail, the orchids started with a Plectorrhiza tridentata and several Bulbophyllurns. Shortly after the steep climbing starts the orchid zone is reached. The pace slowed considerably as everyone explored this wonderful orchid habitat, and the difficulty of the walk faded away. Dendrobium adae in bloom greeted the walkers; some flowers with a significant amount of red on the back of the tepals caught the interest of several people. Amongst the orchids in bloom visible at eye level was Sarcochilusfalcatus. The plants are small with flowers nearly as large as the plants. A stunning Sarcochilus borealis (olivaceous) on a tree trunk barely 100 mm off the ground tested the determination of several photographers. (Mind you the ground was sloping up at over 50°.*) Several plants of Taeniophyllum were found carrying seed pods, but without the flowers positive identification of the species was not possible.
    [Show full text]