DOCSLIB.ORG

Australian Orchid Registered Hybrid List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Australian Orchid Registered Hybrid List At 1st January 2018 An alphabetical hybrid list within genus Produced by the Australasian Native Orchid Society Inc. Page 1 Australian Orchid Registered Hybrid List at 1 January 2018 Australian Orchid Registered Hybrid List Introduction An Australian native orchid species is defined as a species found growing within the boundaries of Australia. Where a species occurs both within and outside Australia, a plant of that species shall be regarded as an Australian species unless its provenance (or the provenance of one of its ancestors in the case of a line bred species), is known to be outside Australia. An Australian native orchid hybrid is defined as an orchid which is the progeny of Australian native orchid species or their hybrids. Generally, only names that are accepted on World Checklist of Selected Plant Families (WCSPF) are used in registering hybrids. Breeders should consult the list before registering hybrids with the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS), Kew. In the past, some parents not on the current accepted list have been used, and in the interests of nomenclatural stability, resulting grexes are NOT altered when names change. Over time, accepted names may change following new information and taxonomic reviews. Hybrid Listing The RHS hybrid list is a complex historical record reflecting species recognised at the time of registration, and it contains some errors and repetitions. The lists of registered hybrids below are as supplied by the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS), and are annotated to indicate where species used in original crosses are no longer accepted. The RHS list does not use taxa below the level of species. The nomenclature generally follows the WCSPF, using only accepted generic and species names as parents. Current synonyms (earlier alternative names) of accepted names are listed in WCSPF. Other international and Australian lists may differ from the WCSPF for some taxa, and lists will change over time. Accepted names may change when evidence becomes available to relegate a taxon to synonymy or elevate it to an accepted species. There may be a delay of up to several years in this process, resulting in the registration of some hybrid names (grexes) when breeders have used a parent that is later listed as a synonym. When names originally used by breeders are no longer accepted, the grex name is NOT rescinded, but only accepted parental names will be used from that time point. A note is made in the listings to indicate changes in accepted names or whether a grex name is a synonym. e.g. D. Aussie Tracey* = D. johannis x D. phalaenopsis† *synonym of D. David Baver = D. johannis x D. bigibbum (Baver 1956) †synonym of current accepted name D. bigibbum e.g. Crossings of varieties of D. teretifolium, made when they were accepted as species e.g. D. calamiforme, D. fairfaxii and D. dolichophyllum, are currently regarded as D. teretifolium. Occasionally a cross has been registered under two different grex names using the same parents e.g. D. Suzanne (Willersdorf 1965) and the synonym D. Peewee (Cannon 1979) for the hybrid D. tetragonum x D. bigibbum. The earlier registration D. Suzanne is the correct name and D. Peewee is a synonym. Dendrobium bigibbum Lindl. Classification and Hybrids RHS and WCSFP recognise the Dendrobium bigibbum Lindl. complex as a single species with four varieties - D. bigibbum var. bigibbum, D. bigibbum var. superbum, D. bigibbum var. compactum and D. bigibbum var. schroederianum. Therefore, all these taxa are treated as one species, D. bigibbum, irrespective of whether they were once considered as separate species. Uncertain provenance does not allow registered hybrids to be referred retrospectively to particular subtaxa of D. bigibbum. Past hybrid names have not been changed, even though it is understood that a number of parents recorded would now be recognised as D. bigibbum. The following are examples of early registered hybrid names that are crosses between varieties of D. bigibbum: Hybrid Species Parents Registrant and Year D. Boisseyense D. bigibbum x D. schroederianum Vacherot-Lecoufle 1926 D. Helen Banks D. Helen Fukumura x D. phalaenopsis Palmer (Fernandez) 1963 D. Helen Fukumura D. Lady Constance x D. schroederianum Fukumura 1952 D. Lady Constance D. Orchidwood x D. phalaenopsis Weber 1947 D. Lehua D. Lady Constance x D. Helen Fukumura Fukumura 1957 D. Lovely Hawaii D. Orchidwood x D. Lady Constance McCoy 1959 D. Myola D. Lady Constance x D. bigibbum D'Bush 1982 D. Orchidwood D. bigibbum x D. phalaenopsis Orchidwood 1934 Australian Orchid Registered Hybrid List at 1 January 2018 Page 2 Symbols Used in List * = synonymous with ....... - or ( ) = originator of the cross if not the registrant, o/u = originator is unknown X = natural hybrid Persons and dates listed refer to the registrant of a cross and the date of registration. Revisions and Updates This online production is produced and maintained by the Australasian Native Orchid Society Inc. It has the advantage of easy updating and correction, not possible in a hard copy. It will be continuously updated and corrected as necessary. A version may be printed at any time. Please send any corrections to the webmaster, contactable on our website (anos.org.au). Contents of the List Genus Abbrev. Intergeneric Description Page Bulbophyllum Bulb. 4 Caladenia Calda. 4 Calassodia Calsd. Caladenia x Glossodia 4 Calomitra Cmta. Calochilus x Thelymitra 4 Chiloglottis Chil. 4 Cymbidium Cym. 4 Dendrobium Den. 4 Diuris Diuris 44 Elythodia Etha. Glossodia x Elythranthera 44 Papillochilus Pic. Papillilabium x Sarcochilus 44 Peristerchilus Prschs. Peristeranthus x Sarcochilus 44 Phaius Phaius 44 Plectochilus Plchs. Plectorrhiza x Sarcochilus 44 Pomatochilus Pmtls. Pomatacalpa x Sarcochilus 45 Pterostylis Ptst. 45 Rhinochilus Rhincs. Rhinerrhiza x Sarcochilus 46 Russellara Rsl. Rhinochilus x Plectorrhiza 46 Sarcochilus Sarco. 46 Sarconopsis Srnps. Sarcochilus x Phalaenopsis 63 Sarcoschisotylus Schy. Sarcochilus x Schistotylus 63 Thelymitra Thel. 63 Page 3 Australian Orchid Registered Hybrid List at 1 January 2018 Orchid name Seed parent x Pollen parent Registration Bulbophyllum Bulb. Alpha = longiflorum x baileyi 1985 Upton W.T. Bulb. Ochre Arches = bracteatum x elisae 2011 Walsh G.F. Caladenia Calda. X ericksonae = cairnsiana x filamentosa 1969 Nicholls R. Calda. Fairy Children = latifolia x reptans 1998 Nesbitts Calda. Fairy Floss = rigida x latifolia 1986 Nesbitts Calda. Fairy Princess = Fairy Floss x tentaculata 1998 Nesbitts Calda. Harlequin = flava x latifolia 1997 Nieuwenhoven G. (Bates) Calda. Spiderman = latifolia x tentaculata 1999 Nesbitts Calda. X triangularis = flava x patersonii 1927 Rogers R.S. Calda. X variabilis = patersonii x cardiochila 1982 Clements xCalassodia (Intergeneric: Caladenia x Glossodia ) Calsd. Nossa = Caladenia latifolia x Glossodia major 1999 Beyrle H. Calsd. X tutelata = Glossodiamajor x Caladenia deformis 1907 Rogers R.S. xCalomitra (Intergeneric: Calochilus x Thelymitra ) Cmta. Memoria Jack Warcup = Calochilus robertsonii x Thelymitra nuda 1998 Beyrle H. Chiloglottis Chil. X pescottiana = trapeziformis x gunnii 1918 Rogers R.S. Cymbidium Cym. Aussie Trio = canaliculatum x Kuranda 2003 Western K. Cym. Ayara = Kuranda x suave 2008 Santa Barbara Cym. James Webeck = suave x canaliculatum 1989 Webeck E. Cym. Kuranda = madidum x suave 1972 Greenoaks Cym. Little Black Sambo = canaliculatum x madidum 1996 Cooper B.P. (Bronsdon) Dendrobium Den. A Song = King-Wong x Zip 2008 Edwards L.A. Den. Abilene = Vicstu x Aussie Victory 2014 Down Under N.O. Den. Agnes Cheok * = Anouk x Lady Constance 1958 Woodlawn *synonym of Rubicon Den. Aileen = Nunkumbil x Susan 1991 Skillicorn W. Den. Airy Alowana = Hybrid Ignota x canaliculatum 2014 Reitano R.P. (Air Orch) Den. Alan Printer = Andrew Persson x kingianum 1969 Jupp V.&N. Den. Albanense * = X superbiens x discolor 1948 Sanders *synonym of Dang Toi Den. Albertine = bigibbum x antennatum 1940 Nagrok Den. Alice Frampton = X gracillimum x Hot Shot 1996 Rex G. (Frampton V.) Den. Alick Dockrill = Maron x speciosum 1995 Florafest Den. Alien Glow = Golden Glory x Ellen 1992 Harris R.E. Den. Alijane = Coote x Rudkin 2005 Down Under N.O. Den. Alisha Staff = Pauline Rankin x kingianum 1992 Maxwell T. (Young H.G.) Den. Alkina = Karani x Hilda Poxon 1992 Harris R.E. Den. Allara = Graham Hewitt x Hilda Poxon 1990 Roper N. Den. Allstar = Star of Dawn x Star of Gold 1995 Mitchell N. (Batchelor S.) Australian Orchid Registered Hybrid List at 1 January 2018 Page 4 Orchid name Seed parent x Pollen parent Registration Den. Allyn Brook = Barry Simpson x speciosum 2017 Perrin W.A. Den. Allyn King = Allyn Sands x discolor 1984 Jupp V.&N. Den. Allyn Prince = Rachelle Simpson x discolor 1984 Jupp V.&N. Den. Allyn River = Red River x Allyn Star 2011 Cannon, David Den. Allyn Sands = Lowana Nioka x johannis 1977 Jupp V.&N. Den. Allyn Star = X gracillimum x tetragonum 1977 Jupp V.&N. Den. Allyn Supreme = Allyn Sands x Rachelle Simpson 1984 Jupp V.&N. Den. Alpha Centauri = falcorostrum x jonesii 1990 Lynch D.B. Den. Always a Lady = Fantasy Land x Lady Gem 2008 Gibbard A. (Littman D.) Den. Amaroo = mortiii x falcorostrum 1986 Brandon C. Den. Amber = Peter x tetragonum 1987 Crawford D. & M. Den. Amber Banks = Sunglow x speciosum 1995 Banks, David Den. Amy Moloney = Gloucester Sands x johannis 1988 Jarvis J. Den. Andrew Persson = speciosum x falcorostrum 1960 Slade G.H. (Persson) Den. Andrew Rinke = Gillieston Aura x Hamilton 2002 Rinke B. (Woolf J.) Den. Andrew Upton = Judy Leroy x Star of Gold 1982 Upton W.T. Den. Andrew's Falcon = falcorostrum x Andrew Persson 2016 Mills E.C. (o/u) Den. Andrew's Summit = Colonial Summit x Andrew Persson 2008 Zietsch J. Den. Angel Glow = Angellene x Ellen Glow 2002 Down Under N.O. Den. Angellene = Aussie Angel x Ellen 1993 Roper N. Den. Angus = Tyabb x speciosum 2010 Edwards L.A. Den. Anita Spencer = Tosca Starburst x Hilda Poxon 2017 Clarke F.
Recommended publications
  • Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006

    Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006

    Queensland Nature Conservation Act 1992 Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 Current as at 1 September 2017 Queensland Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 Contents Page Part 1 Preliminary 1 Short title . 5 2 Commencement . 5 3 Purpose . 5 4 Definitions . 6 5 Scientific names . 6 Part 2 Classes of native wildlife and declared management intent for the wildlife Division 1 Extinct in the wild wildlife 6 Native wildlife that is extinct in the wild wildlife . 7 7 Declared management intent for extinct in the wild wildlife . 8 8 Significance of extinct in the wild wildlife to nature and its value 8 9 Proposed management intent for extinct in the wild wildlife . 8 10 Principles for the taking, keeping or use of extinct in the wild wildlife 9 Division 2 Endangered wildlife 11 Native wildlife that is endangered wildlife . 10 12 Declared management intent for endangered wildlife . 10 13 Significance of endangered wildlife to nature and its value . 10 14 Proposed management intent for endangered wildlife . 11 15 Principles for the taking, keeping or use of endangered wildlife . 12 Division 3 Vulnerable wildlife 16 Native wildlife that is vulnerable wildlife . 13 17 Declared management intent for vulnerable wildlife . 13 18 Significance of vulnerable wildlife to nature and its value . 13 19 Proposed management intent for vulnerable wildlife . 14 20 Principles for the taking, keeping or use of vulnerable wildlife . 15 Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 Contents Division 4 Near threatened wildlife 26 Native wildlife that is near threatened wildlife . 16 27 Declared management intent for near threatened wildlife . 16 28 Significance of near threatened wildlife to nature and its value .
  • Bulletin of the Orchid Society of Canberra, Inc

    Bulletin of the Orchid Society of Canberra, Inc

    Bulletin of the Orchid Society of Canberra, Inc. GPO Box 612, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia Volume 17, Number 4 July-August 2002 Regular monthly meetings 10-11 August National Cymbidium Show. Douglas Mawson TAFE Institute, Port Adelaide. Monthly meetings of the Society are held on the first 16-18 August. Sapphire Coast Orchid Society Autumn Tuesday of each month (except January) in Room 1, Show. Twyford Hall, Merimbula. Griffin Centre, Bunda Street, Civic. Meetings commence at 8:00pm with the library and trading table open from 16-18 August. St Ives Orchid Fair & Show. St Ives 7:30pm. Showground, Mona Vale Rd, St Ives. Admission $4. Vendors include Bighton Orchid Nursery, Dark Star Coming events Orchids, Dendi Orchids, Down Under Native Orchids, Easy Orchids, Robertson Orchids, Royale Orchids, 2 July OSC general meeting: Mark Fraser will speak on Stackers Orchids, Tinonee Orchid Nursery. Give your deciduous orchids. Sometimes when the leaves fall off, name to Brian Leedham if you're interested in going and it's not a disaster, but what you do next could be! Hear we'll organise car pools again. about why some orchids are deciduous and how to care for them in their leafless state. 16-18 August. The Melbourne Orchid Spectacular. Collectors Corner, Gardenworld. 810 Springvale Rd, 6 August OSC general meeting: We are hoping that Braeside. Deane Johnson from Johnson's Orchids will be able to speak to us (we are in process of confirming the ****Members please note**** arrangement now). Johnson's Orchids is well known for its outstanding large phalaenopsis, but sells other kinds of orchids too.
  • Australia Lacks Stem Succulents but Is It Depauperate in Plants With

    Australia Lacks Stem Succulents but Is It Depauperate in Plants With

    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Australia lacks stem succulents but is it depauperate in plants with crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM)? 1,2 3 3 Joseph AM Holtum , Lillian P Hancock , Erika J Edwards , 4 5 6 Michael D Crisp , Darren M Crayn , Rowan Sage and 2 Klaus Winter In the flora of Australia, the driest vegetated continent, [1,2,3]. Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), a water- crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), the most water-use use efficient form of photosynthesis typically associated efficient form of photosynthesis, is documented in only 0.6% of with leaf and stem succulence, also appears poorly repre- native species. Most are epiphytes and only seven terrestrial. sented in Australia. If 6% of vascular plants worldwide However, much of Australia is unsurveyed, and carbon isotope exhibit CAM [4], Australia should host 1300 CAM signature, commonly used to assess photosynthetic pathway species [5]. At present CAM has been documented in diversity, does not distinguish between plants with low-levels of only 120 named species (Table 1). Most are epiphytes, a CAM and C3 plants. We provide the first census of CAM for the mere seven are terrestrial. Australian flora and suggest that the real frequency of CAM in the flora is double that currently known, with the number of Ellenberg [2] suggested that rainfall in arid Australia is too terrestrial CAM species probably 10-fold greater. Still unpredictable to support the massive water-storing suc- unresolved is the question why the large stem-succulent life — culent life-form found amongst cacti, agaves and form is absent from the native Australian flora even though euphorbs.
  • Review of Selected Literature and Epiphyte Classification

    Review of Selected Literature and Epiphyte Classification

    --------- -- ---------· 4 CHAPTER 1 REVIEW OF SELECTED LITERATURE AND EPIPHYTE CLASSIFICATION 1.1 Review of Selected, Relevant Literature (p. 5) Several important aspects of epiphyte biology and ecology that are not investigated as part of this work, are reviewed, particularly those published on more. recently. 1.2 Epiphyte Classification and Terminology (p.11) is reviewed and the system used here is outlined and defined. A glossary of terms, as used here, is given. 5 1.1 Review of Selected, Relevant Li.terature Since the main works of Schimper were published (1884, 1888, 1898), particularly Die Epiphytische Vegetation Amerikas (1888), many workers have written on many aspects of epiphyte biology and ecology. Most of these will not be reviewed here because they are not directly relevant to the present study or have been effectively reviewed by others. A few papers that are keys to the earlier literature will be mentioned but most of the review will deal with topics that have not been reviewed separately within the chapters of this project where relevant (i.e. epiphyte classification and terminology, aspects of epiphyte synecology and CAM in the epiphyt~s). Reviewed here are some special problems of epiphytes, particularly water and mineral availability, uptake and cycling, general nutritional strategies and matters related to these. Also, all Australian works of any substance on vascular epiphytes are briefly discussed. some key earlier papers include that of Pessin (1925), an autecology of an epiphytic fern, which investigated a number of factors specifically related to epiphytism; he also reviewed more than 20 papers written from the early 1880 1 s onwards.
  • Native Orchid Society South Australia

    Native Orchid Society South Australia

    Journal of the Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc Thelymitra Print Post Approved .Volume 32 Nº 10 PP 543662/00018 November 2008 NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA PO BOX 565 UNLEY SA 5061 www.nossa.org.au. The Native Orchid Society of South Australia promotes the conservation of orchids through the preservation of natural habitat and through cultivation. Except with the documented official representation of the management committee, no person may represent the Society on any matter. All native orchids are protected in the wild; their collection without written Government permit is illegal. PRESIDENT SECRETARY Bill Dear: Cathy Houston Telephone 8296 2111 mob. 0413 659 506 telephone 8356 7356 Email: [email protected] VICE PRESIDENT Bodo Jensen COMMITTEE Bob Bates Thelma Bridle John Bartram John Peace EDITOR TREASURER David Hirst Marj Sheppard 14 Beaverdale Avenue Telephone 8344 2124 Windsor Gardens SA 5087 0419 189 188 Telephone 8261 7998 Email: [email protected] LIFE MEMBERS Mr R. Hargreaves† Mr. L. Nesbitt Mr H. Goldsack† Mr G. Carne Mr R. Robjohns† Mr R Bates Mr J. Simmons† Mr R Shooter Mr D. Wells† Mr W Dear Conservation Officer: Thelma Bridle Registrar of Judges: Les Nesbitt Field Trips Coordinator: Bob Bates 83429247 or 0402 291 904 or [email protected] Trading Table: Judy Penney Tuber bank Coordinator: Jane Higgs ph. 8558 6247; email: [email protected] New Members Coordinator: John Bartram ph: 8331 3541; email: [email protected] PATRON Mr L. Nesbitt The Native Orchid Society of South Australia, while taking all due care, take no responsibility for loss or damage to any plants whether at shows, meetings or exhibits.
  • The Intergeneric Crossing of Phalaenopsis Sp. and Vanda Tricolor

    The Intergeneric Crossing of Phalaenopsis Sp. and Vanda Tricolor

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sebelas Maret Institutional Repository Journal of Biotechnology and Biodiversity, March 2010; 1(1): 32 -36 ISSN: 2087-0183 RESEARCH The intergeneric crossing of Phalaenopsis sp. and Vanda tricolor Sri Hartatia* aDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Sebelas Maret University, Jl. Ir. Sutami no 36A, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia Received : 5 August 2009 Accepted: 27 August 2009 Abstract To study the intergeneric crossing between orchids of Phalaenopsis sp. and Vanda tricolor, three species of Phalaenopsis sp. (Phalaenopsis Joane Kileup June, Phalaenopsis Pinlong Cinderella, and (Phal. Fortune Buddha x Phal. Princess Kaiulani) were crossed reciprocally with Vanda tricolor in time-different value (within the first, second and third week after full opened flower). The crossing of Phalaenopsis sp. and Vanda tricolor was compatible, and the use of Phalaenopsis sp. as male parent had better probability in producing fruits rather than the opposite. The crossing which was done at the first and the second weeks after blooming produced more fruit than the crossing at the third week after blooming, even though it did not affect the success of crossing, time of fruit formation, and duration of fruit hanging. Key words: Intergeneric Crossing, Orchids, Phalaenopsis sp., Vanda tricolor INTRODUCTION One strategy to make a new-hybrid compatible to Doritis pulcherrima var. cultivars of orchids is by crossing between the Champornensis (Hartati, unpublished results). orchid-parents having different characters. To assess the effect of time of crossing (week Orchid hobbyist usually prever to collect after blooming) in order to make new hybrid hybrid resulted from crossing orchids, orchids with more attractive flower characters because the hybrided orchids have more to the fruit formation in, Phalaenopsis sp.
  • Phalaenopsis

    Phalaenopsis

    Chapter 23 Phalaenopsis Chia-Chi Hsu, Hong-Hwa Chen, and Wen-Huei Chen Abstract Phalaenopsis is one of the most popular cultivated orchids worldwide. So far, 92 native species and 34,112 hybrids of Phalaenopsis have been registered in the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS), but only 18 native species are frequently used for breeding. In Phalaenopsis market, large flowers with various colors are most popular. Phal. amabilis and Phal. aphrodite are the major species used for breeding the white-and-large-flower hybrids. The colored hybrids include pink, red- to- purple, green, yellow-to-orange, and black colors, as well as distinct colors in tepals with red lip. For large-and-red flowers,Phal. schilleriana and Phal. sanderiana are the major parent species, whereas Phal. equestris and Phal. pulcherrima are important for the development of the small- and medium-sized red flowers. Members of the subgenusPolychilos are the most important ancestors for yellow-to-orange flowers. More recently, there is an increased interest in plants with white, pink, or yellow colors with red stripes and/or spots. These traits are introduced from Phal. lindenii, Phal. stuartiana, and Phal. amboinensis. Furthermore, harlequin flowers which have clown-like spots and very complicated color patterns are released in the market, as well as hybrids with peloric and Bigfoot flowers. Besides color, scent and (a)biotic stress resistance are becoming important targets in Phalaenopsis breeding. Keywords Bigfoot · Breeding · Harlequin · Orchids · Peloric · Phalaenopsis C.-C. Hsu Department of Life Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan H.-H. Chen Department of Life Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan Orchid Research and Development Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan e-mail: [email protected] W.-H.
  • SOUTHERN ONTARIO ORCHID SOCIETY NEWS February 2015, Volume 50, Issue 2 Celebrating 50 Years SOOS

    SOUTHERN ONTARIO ORCHID SOCIETY NEWS February 2015, Volume 50, Issue 2 Celebrating 50 Years SOOS

    SOUTHERN ONTARIO ORCHID SOCIETY NEWS February 2015, Volume 50, Issue 2 Celebrating 50 years SOOS Web site: www.soos.ca ; Member of the Canadian Orchid Congress; Affiliated with the American Orchid Society, the Orchid Digest and the International Phalaenopsis Alliance. Membership: Annual Dues $30 per calendar year (January 1 to December 31 ). Surcharge $15 for newsletter by postal service. Membership secretary: Liz Mc Alpine, 189 Soudan Avenue, Toronto, ON M4S 1V5, phone 416-487-7832, renew or join on line at soos.ca/members Executive: President, Laura Liebgott, 905-883-5290; Vice-President, John Spears, 416-260-0277; Secretary, Sue Loftus 905-839-8281; Treasurer, John Vermeer, 905-823-2516 Other Positions of Responsibility: Program, Mario Ferrusi; Plant Doctor, Doug Kennedy; Meeting Set up, Yvonne Schreiber; Vendor and Sales table coordinator, Diane Ryley;Library Liz Fodi; Web Master, Max Wilson; Newsletter, Peter and Inge Poot; Annual Show, Peter Poot; Refreshments, Joe O’Regan. Conservation Committee, Susan Shaw; Show table, Synea Tan . Honorary Life Members: Terry Kennedy, Doug Kennedy, Inge Poot, Peter Poot, Joe O’Regan, Diane Ryley, Wayne Hingston, Mario Ferrusi. Annual Show: February 14-15, 2015 Next Meeting Sunday, January 25 , in the Floral Hall of the Toronto Botanical Garden, Sales 12 noon, Cultural snapshots will return at the March meeting. Program at 1 pm: Jay Norris and Terry Kennedy on what you need to do to enter plants into our show. Terry has many years experience preparing and entering plants at orchid shows, Jay is in charge of clerking at our show. Both are AOS judges and have grown and shown orchids for many years.
  • The Intergeneric Crossing of Phalaenopsis Sp. and Vanda Tricolor

    The Intergeneric Crossing of Phalaenopsis Sp. and Vanda Tricolor

    Journal of Biotechnology and Biodiversity, March 2010; 1(1): 32 -36 ISSN: 2087-0183 RESEARCH The intergeneric crossing of Phalaenopsis sp. and Vanda tricolor Sri Hartatia* aDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Sebelas Maret University, Jl. Ir. Sutami no 36A, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia Received : 5 August 2009 Accepted: 27 August 2009 Abstract To study the intergeneric crossing between orchids of Phalaenopsis sp. and Vanda tricolor, three species of Phalaenopsis sp. (Phalaenopsis Joane Kileup June, Phalaenopsis Pinlong Cinderella, and (Phal. Fortune Buddha x Phal. Princess Kaiulani) were crossed reciprocally with Vanda tricolor in time-different value (within the first, second and third week after full opened flower). The crossing of Phalaenopsis sp. and Vanda tricolor was compatible, and the use of Phalaenopsis sp. as male parent had better probability in producing fruits rather than the opposite. The crossing which was done at the first and the second weeks after blooming produced more fruit than the crossing at the third week after blooming, even though it did not affect the success of crossing, time of fruit formation, and duration of fruit hanging. Key words: Intergeneric Crossing, Orchids, Phalaenopsis sp., Vanda tricolor INTRODUCTION One strategy to make a new-hybrid compatible to Doritis pulcherrima var. cultivars of orchids is by crossing between the Champornensis (Hartati, unpublished results). orchid-parents having different characters. To assess the effect of time of crossing (week Orchid hobbyist usually prever to collect after blooming) in order to make new hybrid hybrid resulted from crossing orchids, orchids with more attractive flower characters because the hybrided orchids have more to the fruit formation in, Phalaenopsis sp.
  • Orchitheek 1 Uitgave: Nederlandse Orchideeën Vereniging

    Orchitheek 1 Uitgave: Nederlandse Orchideeën Vereniging

    Nederlandse Orchideeën Vereniging – Orchitheek 1 Uitgave: Nederlandse Orchideeën Vereniging. Auteursrechten voorbehouden Phalaenopsis hieroglyphica Rchb.f. Sectie Zebrinae Syn. Phalaenopsis lueddemanniana ssp. Hieroglyphica Deze plant werd gevonden door P. Micholitz in het jaar 1890 op de zuidelijke eilanden van de Filippijnen in het Sulu-gebied, en werd overgebracht naar de Fa. Low en Co in Engeland. Ze werd door F. Reichenbach beschreven en gepubliceerd in de Gardeners’ Chronicle als Ph.lueddemanniana ssp. hieroglyphica. Deze naam is waarschijnlijk ontleend aan de kleur en tekening van de bloem. Verspreiding Het verspreidingsgebied is de groep zuidelijke eilanden in de Sulu-archipel (Filippijnen), waar de planten op bomen groeien die langs riviertjes staan in het laagland op een hoogte van 500 m. Beschrijving De planten groeien in een horizontale, lichtelijk omhoog gerichte stand tegen de bomen, of in humusnesten in de vorken van takken in de bomen. Zij hebben geen schijnknollen of bulben; de bladeren ontspruiten uit het hart van de wortelstok dicht opeen, zijn langwerpig, puntig aan het uiteinde, met een nerf in het midden. De kleur is effen grasgroen; bladeren stevig, niet vlezig en dik. De planten vormen niet meer dan 1 nieuw blad per groeiseizoen; het zijn uitgesproken trage groeiers. De wortels zijn zilverachtig en rond, vertakken zich en zijn 5 mm in dwarsdoorsnede. De bloemtakken ontwikkelen zich aan de onderkant van de wortelstok en tussen de onderste, oudste bladeren. Ze worden ongeveer 30 cm lang en jaar na jaar worden op dezelfde bloemtak bloemen geproduceerd. Naarmate de plant ouder wordt, neemt het aantal bloemen toe. Zoals exemplaren van andere ondersoorten van Ph.lueddemanniana wel doen, produceren zij geen jonge planten aan de bloemtakken.
  • Draft Survey Guidelines for Australia's Threatened Orchids

    Draft Survey Guidelines for Australia's Threatened Orchids

    SURVEY GUIDELINES FOR AUSTRALIA’S THREATENED ORCHIDS GUIDELINES FOR DETECTING ORCHIDS LISTED AS ‘THREATENED’ UNDER THE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT 1999 0 Authorship and acknowledgements A number of experts have shared their knowledge and experience for the purpose of preparing these guidelines, including Allanna Chant (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Allison Woolley (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment), Andrew Brown (Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation), Annabel Wheeler (Australian Biological Resources Study, Australian Department of the Environment), Anne Harris (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), David T. Liddle (Northern Territory Department of Land Resource Management, and Top End Native Plant Society), Doug Bickerton (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), John Briggs (New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage), Luke Johnston (Australian Capital Territory Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate), Sophie Petit (School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia), Melanie Smith (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Oisín Sweeney (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), Richard Schahinger (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment). Disclaimer The views and opinions contained in this document are not necessarily those of the Australian Government. The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and while reasonable care has been taken in its compilation, the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document.
  • Asgap Indigenous Orchid Study Group Issn 1036-9651

    Asgap Indigenous Orchid Study Group Issn 1036-9651

    ASGAP INDIGENOUS ORCHID STUDY GROUP ISSN 1036-9651 Group Leaders: Don and Pauline Lawie P.O. Box 230, BABINDA 4861 Phone: 0740 671 577 Newsletter 53 December 2005 MAJORS MOUNTAIN - A WALK TO PARADISE FOR A NATIVE ORCHID GROWER t~r; I1 -&d by Mark Nowochatko In Mid August 2005 the Atherton Tablelands Branch of SGAP conducted a field day at Major's Mountain, just east of Ravenshoe on the Evelyn Tableland in North Queensland. A group of 20 plus diehard SGAP enthusiasts met at the trailhead and undertook the walk of approximately 3 km one way. With the first 2.1 km easy going, the balance is a strenuous climb to an elevation of around 1,100 metres. II I1 Moving from the main track to the Major's Mountain goat trail, the orchids started with a Plectorrhiza tridentata and several Bulbophyllurns. Shortly after the steep climbing starts the orchid zone is reached. The pace slowed considerably as everyone explored this wonderful orchid habitat, and the difficulty of the walk faded away. Dendrobium adae in bloom greeted the walkers; some flowers with a significant amount of red on the back of the tepals caught the interest of several people. Amongst the orchids in bloom visible at eye level was Sarcochilusfalcatus. The plants are small with flowers nearly as large as the plants. A stunning Sarcochilus borealis (olivaceous) on a tree trunk barely 100 mm off the ground tested the determination of several photographers. (Mind you the ground was sloping up at over 50°.*) Several plants of Taeniophyllum were found carrying seed pods, but without the flowers positive identification of the species was not possible.