DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Evaluation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Evaluation APPENDIX D BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION FOR PHASE III MOSS MINE EXPANSION AND EXPLORATION PROJECT Prepared for: 2440 Adobe Road – Bullhead City, Arizona 86442 Project Number: 1203.05 March 13, 2020 WestLand Resources, Inc. 4001 E. Paradise Falls Drive Tucson, Arizona 85712 5202069585 Biological Evaluation for Phase III Moss Mine Expansion and Exploration Project Golden Vertex Corp TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 2. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ................................................................................ 1 3. ANALYSIS AREA DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................... 8 3.1. Physiographic Setting ....................................................................................................................... 9 3.2. Surface Water Features .................................................................................................................... 9 3.3. Abandoned Mine Features ............................................................................................................ 12 3.4. Soils ................................................................................................................................................... 12 3.5. Vegetation ........................................................................................................................................ 13 3.6. Wildlife ............................................................................................................................................. 16 3.7. Wildlife Linkages ............................................................................................................................. 17 3.8. Land Use .......................................................................................................................................... 17 4. SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES SCREENING ANALYSIS METHODS ..................................... 18 4.1. Special-Status Species Identification ............................................................................................ 18 4.2. Special-Status Species Screening ................................................................................................... 18 5. EFFECTS ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................... 19 5.1. Surface Disturbance ....................................................................................................................... 19 5.2. Lighting ............................................................................................................................................ 20 5.3. Noise and Vibration ....................................................................................................................... 20 5.4. Dust .................................................................................................................................................. 21 5.5. Traffic ............................................................................................................................................... 21 5.6. Groundwater Pumping .................................................................................................................. 22 5.7. Pit Lake............................................................................................................................................. 22 6. SPECIAL-STATUS AND BLM REQUESTED SPECIES SCREENING RESULTS ............. 23 6.1. Effects to Species Known to Occur within the Analysis Area ................................................ 38 6.1.1. Desert Bighorn Sheep ........................................................................................................ 38 6.1.2. Desert Tortoise .................................................................................................................... 39 6.1.3. Cavern Obligate Bats .......................................................................................................... 41 6.1.4. Migratory Birds .................................................................................................................... 41 7. REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................................... 44 TABLES Table 1. Proposed Disturbance by Land Status ................................................................................ 3 Table 2. Plant Species Observed in the Analysis Area during Field Reconnaissance ................ 14 Table 3. Screening Analysis: Potential for Occurrence of ESA Listed Species within the Analysis Area ...................................................................................................... 24 Table 4. Screening Analysis: Potential for Occurrence of BLM Sensitive Species within the Analysis Area ...................................................................................................... 26 Table 5. Screening Analysis: Potential for Occurrence of BLM Requested Species within the Analysis Area ...................................................................................................... 34 Table 6. Screening Analysis: Potential for Occurrence of Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act Species within the Analysis Area ............................................................. 37 WestLand Resources, Inc. ii Q:\Jobs\1200's\1203.05\ENV\Moss Mine BE\20200313_Submittal\20200313_Moss Mine_BE.docx Biological Evaluation for Phase III Moss Mine Expansion and Exploration Project Golden Vertex Corp FIGURES (follow text) Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Analysis Area Figure 3. Springs in the Vicinity of the Analysis Area Figure 4. Mount Perkins-Warm Springs Wildlife Linkage and Proposed Phase III Moss Mine footprint Figure 5. Bighorn Sheep Habitat Categories in the Vicinity of the Analysis Area Figure 6. BLM Desert Tortoise Habitat Categories and Observations in the Vicinity of the Analysis Area APPENDICES Appendix A. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Information for Planning and Consultation Report Online Query Results Appendix B. Bureau of Land Management, Arizona – Bureau Sensitive Species List (February 2017) Appendix C. Representative Photographs of Analysis Area Appendix D. Arizona Game and Fish Department Heritage Data Management System Online Query Results Appendix E. HabiMap Arizona Breeding Bird Atlas Species Appendix F. Special Status Species that are Unlikely or Have No Potential to Occur within the Analysis Area Appendix G. Custom Soil Resource Report for Mohave County, Arizona, Southern Part Golden Vertex Moss Mine Biological Analysis Area WestLand Resources, Inc. iii Q:\Jobs\1200's\1203.05\ENV\Moss Mine BE\20200313_Submittal\20200313_Moss Mine_BE.docx Biological Evaluation for Phase III Moss Mine Expansion and Exploration Project Golden Vertex Corp 1. INTRODUCTION Golden Vertex Corp (Golden Vertex) is proposing to expand exploration activities and mining operations onto lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) as part of the Moss Mine Phase III Project (the Project). The Moss Mine is situated east of Bullhead City in Mohave County, Arizona (Figure 1). WestLand Resources, Inc. (WestLand), was retained by Golden Vertex to develop a Biological Evaluation (BE) for the Project to evaluate the potential for special-status species to occur within the vicinity of the Project and determine the potential effects of proposed activities on biological resources. The Analysis Area is approximately 7,500 acres and includes the proposed mining and exploration activities of the Moss Mine Project plus a buffer of at least 500 feet (152 meters [m]) surrounding proposed areas of surface disturbance. For the purpose of this report, special-status species is defined as species designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as Endangered, Threatened, Proposed for listing, or Candidate for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) (Appendix A), those species designated as sensitive by the BLM Colorado River District (Appendix B), species protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, and species recently identified by the BLM as being of conservation and management interest in the vicinity of the Project. The following sections: provide a description of the Project (Section 2), identify and describe the current conditions of the Analysis Area for the BE (Section 3), describe the methods used to analyze potential effects to special-status species (Section 4), determine the potential for special-status species to occur within the Analysis Area and the potential effects of the Project on special-status species (Section 5), discuss the effects to species known to occur within the Analysis Area (Section 6), and list the references cited (Section 7). 2. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Moss Mine is an existing open pit gold and silver operation located in Mohave County, Arizona (latitude: 35° 06’ 00” N/longitude: 114° 26’ 52” W), 9 miles east of the Colorado River on the western slope of the Black Mountains. The mine is approximately 8 miles east of State Highway 95, and approximately 4 miles east of the city limits of Bullhead City, Arizona. The town of Oatman, Arizona is located 8 miles southeast of the mine. Moss Mine lies within portions of Sections 19, 20, 29 and 30 of Township 20
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Subalpine Meadows of Mount Rainier • an Elevational Zone Just Below Timberline but Above the Reach of More Or Less Continuous Tree Or Shrub Cover
    Sub-Alpine/Alpine Zones and Flowers of Mt Rainier Lecturer: Cindy Luksus What We Are Going To Cover • Climate, Forest and Plant Communities of Mt Rainier • Common Flowers, Shrubs and Trees in Sub- Alpine and Alpine Zones by Family 1) Figwort Family 2) Saxifrage Family 3) Rose Family 4) Heath Family 5) Special mentions • Suggested Readings and Concluding Statements Climate of Mt Rainier • The location of the Park is on the west side of the Cascade Divide, but because it is so massive it produces its own rain shadow. • Most moisture is dropped on the south and west sides, while the northeast side can be comparatively dry. • Special microclimates result from unique interactions of landforms and weather patterns. • Knowing the amount of snow/rainfall and how the unique microclimates affect the vegetation will give you an idea of what will thrive in the area you visit. Forest and Plant Communities of Mt Rainier • The zones show regular patterns that result in “associations” of certain shrubs and herbs relating to the dominant, climax tree species. • The nature of the understory vegetation is largely determined by the amount of moisture available and the microclimates that exist. Forest Zones of Mt Rainier • Western Hemlock Zone – below 3,000 ft • Silver Fir Zone – between 2,500 and 4,700 ft • Mountain Hemlock Zone – above 4,000 ft Since most of the field trips will start above 4,000 ft we will only discuss plants found in the Mountain Hemlock Zone and above. This zone includes the Sub-Alpine and Alpine Plant communities. Forest and Plant Communities of Mt Rainier Subalpine Meadows of Mount Rainier • An elevational zone just below timberline but above the reach of more or less continuous tree or shrub cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Release of the Leaf-Feeding Moth, Hypena Opulenta (Christoph)
    United States Department of Field release of the leaf-feeding Agriculture moth, Hypena opulenta Marketing and Regulatory (Christoph) (Lepidoptera: Programs Noctuidae), for classical Animal and Plant Health Inspection biological control of swallow- Service worts, Vincetoxicum nigrum (L.) Moench and V. rossicum (Kleopow) Barbarich (Gentianales: Apocynaceae), in the contiguous United States. Final Environmental Assessment, August 2017 Field release of the leaf-feeding moth, Hypena opulenta (Christoph) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), for classical biological control of swallow-worts, Vincetoxicum nigrum (L.) Moench and V. rossicum (Kleopow) Barbarich (Gentianales: Apocynaceae), in the contiguous United States. Final Environmental Assessment, August 2017 Agency Contact: Colin D. Stewart, Assistant Director Pests, Pathogens, and Biocontrol Permits Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Rd., Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action.
    [Show full text]
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • MARCH, 1950 35 CENTS a Modern Moulting Set with Sparkling Gems of RUTILE RAINBOW DIAMONDS Is the Answer to Your Gift Problem
    MARCH, 1950 35 CENTS A Modern Moulting Set With Sparkling Gems of RUTILE RAINBOW DIAMONDS Is the answer to your gift problem. One of these magnificent gems set in a lovely gold or palladium ring will be a gift that will be worn and cherished for years to come. RUTILE IS THE GEM OF THE HOUR — IT IS NOW A REALITY After years of experiments, synthetic RUTILE is now available in cut gems of breathtaking beauty. This magnificent substance has been given the name of "TITANIA". "TITANIA IS QUEEN OF ALL KNOWN GEMS" Titania gems have more fire than the diamond. Be the first in your community to own one of these beautiful new Rainbow Diamonds DEALERS INQUIRIES SOLICITED Everyone to whom you show this new gem will wish to purchase one or more of them. Our SUPERCATALOG tells you of our discount plan that will permit you to own one of these new gems at no cost to yourself. Our new SUPERCATALOG described below gives you all the facts about TITANIA GEMS and ILLUSTRATES mountings especially selected for them. An article tells the story behind this amazing discovery. The 1950 Revised Edition of Grieger's "Encyclopedia and Super Catalog of the Lapidary and Jewelry Arts" $1.00 Per Copy This is a 192-page book 9"xl2" in size. There are at least 60 pages of in- structive articles by authors of national fame. There are new articles by EMIL KRONQUIST and LOUIS WIENER on jewelry making. The 15-page article on jewelry casting by the LOST WAX METHOD using the new KERR HOBBY- CRAFT CASTING UNIT is alone worth $1.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Stace Edition 4: Changes
    STACE EDITION 4: CHANGES NOTES Changes to the textual content of keys and species accounts are not covered. "Mention" implies that the taxon is or was given summary treatment at the head of a family, family division or genus (just after the key if there is one). "Reference" implies that the taxon is or was given summary treatment inline in the accounts for a genus. "Account" implies that the taxon is or was given a numbered account inline in the numbered treatments within a genus. "Key" means key at species / infraspecific level unless otherwise qualified. "Added" against an account, mention or reference implies that no treatment was given in Edition 3. "Given" against an account, mention or reference implies that this replaces a less full or prominent treatment in Stace 3. “Reduced to” against an account or reference implies that this replaces a fuller or more prominent treatment in Stace 3. GENERAL Family order changed in the Malpighiales Family order changed in the Cornales Order Boraginales introduced, with families Hydrophyllaceae and Boraginaceae Family order changed in the Lamiales BY FAMILY 1 LYCOPODIACEAE 4 DIPHASIASTRUM Key added. D. complanatum => D. x issleri D. tristachyum keyed and account added. 5 EQUISETACEAE 1 EQUISETUM Key expanded. E. x meridionale added to key and given account. 7 HYMENOPHYLLACEAE 1 HYMENOPHYLLUM H. x scopulorum given reference. 11 DENNSTAEDTIACEAE 2 HYPOLEPIS added. Genus account added. Issue 7: 26 December 2019 Page 1 of 35 Stace edition 4 changes H. ambigua: account added. 13 CYSTOPTERIDACEAE Takes on Gymnocarpium, Cystopteris from Woodsiaceae. 2 CYSTOPTERIS C. fragilis ssp. fragilis: account added.
    [Show full text]
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source
    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
    [Show full text]
  • ADOT Herbicide Treatment Program on Bureau of Land Management Lands in Arizona
    October 2015 BLM DOI-BLM-AZ-0000-2013-0001-EA ADOT Herbicide Treatment Program on Bureau of Land Management Lands in Arizona Final Environmental Assessment Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation ADOT Herbicide Treatment Program on Bureau of Land Management Lands in Arizona DOI-BLM-AZ-0000-2013-0001-EA Bureau of Land Management Arizona State Office One North Central Avenue, Suite 800 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4427 October 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. iii Acronym List ................................................................................................................................... iv Section 1 – Proposed Action, Purpose and Need, and Background Information ........................... 1 1.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Proposed Action Overview ............................................................................................... 3 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IP Athos Renewable Energy Project, Plan of Development, Appendix D.2
    APPENDIX D.2 Plant Survey Memorandum Athos Memo Report To: Aspen Environmental Group From: Lehong Chow, Ironwood Consulting, Inc. Date: April 3, 2019 Re: Athos Supplemental Spring 2019 Botanical Surveys This memo report presents the methods and results for supplemental botanical surveys conducted for the Athos Solar Energy Project in March 2019 and supplements the Biological Resources Technical Report (BRTR; Ironwood 2019) which reported on field surveys conducted in 2018. BACKGROUND Botanical surveys were previously conducted in the spring and fall of 2018 for the entirety of the project site for the Athos Solar Energy Project (Athos). However, due to insufficient rain, many plant species did not germinate for proper identification during 2018 spring surveys. Fall surveys in 2018 were conducted only on a reconnaissance-level due to low levels of rain. Regional winter rainfall from the two nearest weather stations showed rainfall averaging at 0.1 inches during botanical surveys conducted in 2018 (Ironwood, 2019). In addition, gen-tie alignments have changed slightly and alternatives, access roads and spur roads have been added. PURPOSE The purpose of this survey was to survey all new additions and re-survey areas of interest including public lands (limited to portions of the gen-tie segments), parcels supporting native vegetation and habitat, and windblown sandy areas where sensitive plant species may occur. The private land parcels in current or former agricultural use were not surveyed (parcel groups A, B, C, E, and part of G). METHODS Survey Areas: The area surveyed for biological resources included the entirety of gen-tie routes (including alternates), spur roads, access roads on public land, parcels supporting native vegetation (parcel groups D and F), and areas covered by windblown sand where sensitive species may occur (portion of parcel group G).
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Plant Palette: Horseshoe Canyon
    Section Twelve HORSESHOE CANYON HORSESHOE CANYON APPROVED PLANT LIST Zone Legend N = Native Nt = Native Transition S = Semi-Private P = Private TREES Botanical Name Common Name Zones Acacia abyssinica Abyssinian Acacia S,P Acacia aneura Mulga S,P Acacia berlandieri Berlandier Acacia S,P Acacia constricta Whitethorn Acacia S,P Acacia greggii Catclaw Acacia N,Nt,S,P Acacia pendula Pendulous Acacia S,P Acacia roemeriana Roemer Acacia S,P Acacia saligna Blue-Leaf Wattle S,P Acacia schaffneri Twisted Acacia S,P Acacia smallii (farnesiana) Sweet Acacia Nt,S,P Acacia willardiana Palo Blanco Nt,S,P Bauhinia congesta Anacacho Orchid Tree S,P Caesalpinia cacalaco Cascalote S,P Caesalpinia mexicana Mexican Bird of Paradise Nt,S,P Canotia holacantha Crucifi xion Thorn N,Nt,S,P Cercidium ‘Desert Museum’ Hybrid Palo Verde S,P Cercidium fl oridum Blue Palo Verde N,Nt,S,P Cercidium microphyllum Foothills Palo Verde N,Nt,S,P Cercis canadensis v. mexicana Mexican Redbud S,P Chilopsis linearis Desert Willow Nt,S,P Cordia boissieri Anacahuita S,P Forestiera neomexicana Desert Olive S,P Fraxinus greggii Littleleaf Ash P Leucaena retusa Golden Ball Lead Tree S,P Lysiloma microphylla v. thornberi Desert Fern Nt,S,P Olneya tesota Ironwood N,Nt,S,P Pithecellobium fl exicaule Texas Ebony S,P Pithecellobium mexicanum Mexican Ebony Nt,S,P Prosopis alba Argentine Mesquite S,P Prosopis chilensis Chilean Mesquite S,P Prosopis glandulosa v. glandulosa Texas Honey Mesquite Nt,S,P Prosopis pubescens Screwbean Mesquite Nt,S,P Prosopis velutina Velvet Mesquite N,Nt,S,P Quercus gambelii Gambel Oak P Robinia neomexicana New Mexico Locust S,P Sophora secundifl ora Texas Mountain Laurel S,P Ungnadia speciosa Mexican Buckeye S,P Vitex angus-castus Chaste Tree S,P The Horseshoe Canyon Approved Plant List is subject to change without notification.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket 07-Afc-5
    DOCKET 07-AFC-5 DATE SEP 24 2008 RECD. SEP 24 2008 Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (ISEGS) (07-AFC-5) Supplemental Data Response, Set 1D (Responses to: Biological Resources) Submitted to the California Energy Commission Submitted by Solar Partners I, LLC; Solar Partners II, LLC; Solar Partners IV, LLC; and Solar Partners VIII, LLC September 24, 2008 With Assistance from 2485 Natomas Park Drive Suite 600 Sacramento, CA 95833 Introduction Attached are supplemental responses (Set 1D) by Solar Partners I, LLC; Solar Partners II, LLC; Solar Partners IV, LLC; and Solar Partners VIII, LLC (Applicant) to the California Energy Commission (CEC) Staff’s data requests for the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (Ivanpah SEGS) Project (07-AFC-5). These data requests are the result of the workshop discussion held at Primm, Nevada on June 23, 2008.Within each discipline area, the responses are presented in alphabetical order and are numbered for tracking and reference convenience. New graphics or tables are numbered in reference to the Supplemental Data Request number. For example, if a table were used in response to Data Request AQ-1, it would be numbered Table AQ1-1. The first figure used in response to Data Request AQ-1 would be Figure AQ1-1, and so on. AFC figures or tables that have been revised have “R1” following the original number, indicating revision 1. Additional tables, figures, or documents submitted in response to a supplemental data request (supporting data, stand-alone documents such as plans, folding graphics, etc.) are found at the end of a discipline-specific section and may not be sequentially page-numbered consistently with the remainder of the document, though they may have their own internal page numbering system.
    [Show full text]
  • THE JEPSON GLOBE a Newsletter from the Friends of the Jepson Herbarium
    THE JEPSON GLOBE A Newsletter from the Friends of The Jepson Herbarium VOLUME 29 NUMBER 1, Spring 2019 Curator’s column: Don Kyhos’s Upcoming changes in the Con- legacy in California botany sortium of California Herbaria By Bruce G. Baldwin By Jason Alexander In early April, my Ph.D. advisor, In January, the Northern California Donald W. Kyhos (UC Davis) turns 90, Botanists Association hosted their 9th fittingly during one of the California Botanical Symposium in Chico, Cali- desert’s most spectacular blooms in fornia. The Consortium of California recent years. Don’s many contributions Herbaria (CCH) was invited to present to desert botany and plant evolution on upcoming changes. The CCH be- in general are well worth celebrating gan as a data aggregator for California here for their critical importance to our vascular plant specimen data and that understanding of the California flora. remains its primary purpose to date. Those old enough to have used Munz’s From 2003 until 2017, the CCH grew A California Flora may recall seeing in size to over 2.2 million specimen re- the abundant references to Raven and cords from 36 institutions. Responding Kyhos’s chromosome numbers, which to requests from participants to display reflect a partnership between Don and specimen data from all groups of plants Peter Raven that yielded a tremendous Rudi Schmid at Antelope Valley Califor- and fungi, from all locations (including body of cytogenetic information about nia Poppy Reserve on 7 April 2003. Photo those outside California), we have de- our native plants. Don’s talents as a by Ray Cranfill.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Gap Ranch Biological Resource Evaluation
    RED GAP RANCH BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE EVALUATION Prepared for: Southwest Ground-water Consultants, Inc. Prepared by: WestLand Resources, Inc. Date: February 14, 2014 Project No.: 1822.01 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................ 1 2. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT AND BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................................................... 2 2.1. Approach ...................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2. Physical Environment ................................................................................................................... 2 2.3. Biological Environment and Resources ....................................................................................... 3 3. SCREENING ANALYSIS FOR SPECIES OF CONCERN ................................................................ 5 3.1. Approach ...................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2. Screening Analysis Results .......................................................................................................... 7 3.2.1. USFWS-listed Species ...................................................................................................... 7 3.2.2. USFS Coconino National Forest Sensitive Species ........................................................ 15 3.2.3. USFS Management Indicator Species ............................................................................
    [Show full text]