Sequedex Documentation Release 1.0-Rc1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sequedex Documentation Release 1.0-Rc1 Sequedex Documentation Release 1.0-rc1 Joel Berendzen, Judith Cohn, Nicolas Hengartner, Mira Dimitrijevic, Benjamin McMahon January 06, 2016 Contents 1 Copyright notice 1 2 Introduction to Sequedex 3 2.1 What is Sequedex?............................................3 2.2 What does Sequedex do?.........................................3 2.3 How is Sequedex different from other sequence analysis packages?..................4 2.4 Who uses Sequedex?...........................................4 2.5 How is Sequedex used with other software?...............................5 2.6 How does Sequedex work?........................................5 2.7 Sequedex’s outputs............................................8 3 Installation instructions 15 3.1 System requirements........................................... 16 3.2 Downloading and unpacking for Mac.................................. 16 3.3 Downloading and unpacking for Linux................................. 17 3.4 Downloading and unpacking for Windows 7 or 8............................ 17 3.5 Using Sequedex with Cygwin installed under Windows......................... 19 3.6 Installation and updates without network access............................. 20 3.7 Testing your installation......................................... 20 3.8 Running Sequedex on an example data file............................... 20 3.9 Obtaining a node-locked license file................................... 21 3.10 Installing new data modules and upgrading Sequedex - User-installs.................. 21 3.11 Installing new data modules and upgrading Sequedex - System-installs................ 21 4 Getting started 23 4.1 Running Sequescan........................................... 23 4.2 Output files - stats............................................ 25 4.3 Graphical output: Sequinator...................................... 26 4.4 Output files - Who?........................................... 27 4.5 Output files - What?........................................... 28 4.6 Output files - Who does what?...................................... 29 4.7 Obtaining annotated reads: Analysis of E. coli proteome........................ 30 4.8 Analysis of multiple files in parallel with the GUI............................ 31 4.9 The virus1252 data module....................................... 32 4.10 Alternative data modules and memory usage.............................. 32 4.11 Running Sequedex from the command line............................... 33 4.12 The Sequedex configuration utility and sequescan.conf......................... 34 4.13 Directory structures for data, output files, and analysis......................... 35 i 5 Initial analysis with Sequedex: Phylogenetic and functional profiles 37 5.1 Acquiring data files............................................ 38 5.2 Phylogenetic rollups........................................... 39 5.3 Functional rollups............................................ 44 5.4 Normalized functional profiles...................................... 47 6 Using Sequestat 53 6.1 Visualizing phylogenetic data with Sequestat.............................. 53 6.2 Reading Life2550 output files into Sequestat:.............................. 56 6.3 Reading virus1252 output files into Sequestat:............................. 57 6.4 Decomposing mixture into components with Sequestat......................... 58 7 Functional analysis 63 7.1 Visualizing SEED functional profiles with Sequestat.......................... 63 7.2 Top 100 functional categories...................................... 66 7.3 Identifying enriched functions...................................... 73 7.4 Visualizing distribution of functions................................... 74 7.5 Profiling Chlorella kinases........................................ 74 8 Comparing Samples 75 8.1 Scalar product of profiles......................................... 77 8.2 Principal component analysis...................................... 77 8.3 Ploting significant differences between two profiles........................... 78 8.4 ANalysis Of VAriance.......................................... 78 8.5 Clustering multiple profiles with R................................... 79 8.6 Visualizing the clusters with R...................................... 81 8.7 Niche determinants, gulf oil....................................... 82 9 Annotated reads 85 9.1 Obtaining annotated reads........................................ 85 9.2 Phylogenetic filtering and assemblies of genomes............................ 86 9.3 Functional filtering............................................ 86 9.4 Translated reads............................................. 86 9.5 Gene-specific BLAST databases..................................... 86 9.6 Placing reads into a multiple sequence alignment: conserved part of RNAP.............. 86 9.7 Obtaining specific genes......................................... 86 9.8 Targeted assemblies of genes....................................... 86 9.9 Nucleotide alignments.......................................... 86 9.10 Obtaining ribosomal (and tRNA) reads................................. 86 9.11 Aligning to a reference genome..................................... 86 10 Reference 87 10.1 Command line options for sequescan.................................. 87 10.2 Environmental variables......................................... 88 10.3 Configuration options.......................................... 89 11 Additional software tools and resources for use in conjunction with Sequedex 91 11.1 Graphing and sorting with Excel..................................... 91 11.2 How to install Cygwin and what to include................................ 92 11.3 The command line with standard tools (Linux, Mac, Cygwin for Windows).............. 92 11.4 Exploring trees with Archaeoptrix, FigTree, or NJPlot......................... 93 11.5 Comparing and annotating phylogenetic and functional profiles with Gnuplot............. 93 11.6 Statistical analysis and graphing with R and R Studio.......................... 94 11.7 Obtaining reference data from NCBI.................................. 95 11.8 Creating synthetic data.......................................... 95 ii 11.9 Comparing functional profiles to KEGG................................. 95 11.10 The Ribosomal Database Project..................................... 96 11.11 Bergey’s manual............................................. 96 11.12 Phylogeny vs. taxononomy - MEGAN and Krona plots......................... 96 11.13 Removal of duplicate reads with CD-HIT................................ 96 11.14 BioPython, BioPerl, and EMBOSS utilities............................... 96 11.15 BioEdit and reference alignments.................................... 96 11.16 BLAST and nr / nt databases....................................... 97 11.17 HMMER and Pfam............................................ 98 11.18 Muscle.................................................. 98 11.19 Velvet and de-novo assembly...................................... 98 11.20 Tree building with phyML or FastTree................................. 98 11.21 p-values and Pplacer........................................... 99 11.22 BWA and BowTie2............................................ 99 11.23 Samtools and Bamtools......................................... 99 11.24 The Integrated Genomics Viewer.................................... 99 12 Tree of Life, 2550 taxa 101 12.1 Bacteroidetes, et al............................................. 102 12.2 Alpha proteobacteria, et al......................................... 108 12.3 Beta and Gamma Proteobacteria..................................... 117 12.4 Actinobacteria.............................................. 128 12.5 Firmicutes, et al.............................................. 134 12.6 Cyanobacteria.............................................. 147 12.7 Archaea.................................................. 149 12.8 Eukaryotes................................................ 153 13 Definition of functional classifications 157 13.1 Amino Acids and Derivatives...................................... 157 13.2 Carbohydrates.............................................. 158 13.3 Cell Division and Cell Cycle....................................... 161 13.4 Cell Wall and Capsule.......................................... 161 13.5 Clustering-based subsystems....................................... 162 13.6 Cofactors, Vitamins, Prosthetic Groups, Pigments........................... 165 13.7 DNA Metabolism............................................ 166 13.8 Dormancy and Sporulation........................................ 167 13.9 Fatty Acids, Lipids, and Isoprenoids................................... 168 13.10 Iron acquisition and metabolism..................................... 169 13.11 Membrane Transport........................................... 169 13.12 Metabolism of Aromatic Compounds.................................. 170 13.13 Miscellaneous.............................................. 172 13.14 Motility and Chemotaxis......................................... 172 13.15 Nitrogen Metabolism........................................... 173 13.16 Nucleosides and Nucleotides....................................... 173 13.17 Phages, Prophages, Transposable elements, Plasmids.......................... 174 13.18 Phosphorous Metabolism........................................ 174 13.19 Photosynthesis.............................................. 175 13.20 Potassium metabolism.......................................... 175 13.21 Protein Metabolism..........................................
Recommended publications
  • Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011
    SGR 129 Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY AND APPLIED NUTRITION OFFICE OF FOOD SAFETY Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – April 2011 Additional copies may be purchased from: Florida Sea Grant IFAS - Extension Bookstore University of Florida P.O. Box 110011 Gainesville, FL 32611-0011 (800) 226-1764 Or www.ifasbooks.com Or you may download a copy from: http://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances You may submit electronic or written comments regarding this guidance at any time. Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations. gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (240) 402-2300 April 2011 Table of Contents: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance • Guidance for the Industry: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance ................................ 1 • CHAPTER 1: General Information .......................................................................................................19 • CHAPTER 2: Conducting a Hazard Analysis and Developing a HACCP Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Understudied Archaeal and Bacterial Populations of Yellowstone National Park: from Genes to Genomes Daniel Colman
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Biology ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 7-1-2015 Diversity of understudied archaeal and bacterial populations of Yellowstone National Park: from genes to genomes Daniel Colman Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/biol_etds Recommended Citation Colman, Daniel. "Diversity of understudied archaeal and bacterial populations of Yellowstone National Park: from genes to genomes." (2015). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/biol_etds/18 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Daniel Robert Colman Candidate Biology Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Cristina Takacs-Vesbach , Chairperson Robert Sinsabaugh Laura Crossey Diana Northup i Diversity of understudied archaeal and bacterial populations from Yellowstone National Park: from genes to genomes by Daniel Robert Colman B.S. Biology, University of New Mexico, 2009 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Biology The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico July 2015 ii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this dissertation to my late grandfather, Kenneth Leo Colman, associate professor of Animal Science in the Wool laboratory at Montana State University, who even very near the end of his earthly tenure, thought it pertinent to quiz my knowledge of oxidized nitrogen compounds. He was a man of great curiosity about the natural world, and to whom I owe an acknowledgement for his legacy of intellectual (and actual) wanderlust.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Genetic Manipulation System for the Antarctic Archaeon, Halorubrum Lacusprofundi: Investigating Acetamidase Gene Function
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Developing a genetic manipulation system for the Antarctic archaeon, Halorubrum lacusprofundi: Received: 27 May 2016 Accepted: 16 September 2016 investigating acetamidase gene Published: 06 October 2016 function Y. Liao1, T. J. Williams1, J. C. Walsh2,3, M. Ji1, A. Poljak4, P. M. G. Curmi2, I. G. Duggin3 & R. Cavicchioli1 No systems have been reported for genetic manipulation of cold-adapted Archaea. Halorubrum lacusprofundi is an important member of Deep Lake, Antarctica (~10% of the population), and is amendable to laboratory cultivation. Here we report the development of a shuttle-vector and targeted gene-knockout system for this species. To investigate the function of acetamidase/formamidase genes, a class of genes not experimentally studied in Archaea, the acetamidase gene, amd3, was disrupted. The wild-type grew on acetamide as a sole source of carbon and nitrogen, but the mutant did not. Acetamidase/formamidase genes were found to form three distinct clades within a broad distribution of Archaea and Bacteria. Genes were present within lineages characterized by aerobic growth in low nutrient environments (e.g. haloarchaea, Starkeya) but absent from lineages containing anaerobes or facultative anaerobes (e.g. methanogens, Epsilonproteobacteria) or parasites of animals and plants (e.g. Chlamydiae). While acetamide is not a well characterized natural substrate, the build-up of plastic pollutants in the environment provides a potential source of introduced acetamide. In view of the extent and pattern of distribution of acetamidase/formamidase sequences within Archaea and Bacteria, we speculate that acetamide from plastics may promote the selection of amd/fmd genes in an increasing number of environmental microorganisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Eelgrass Sediment Microbiome As a Nitrous Oxide Sink in Brackish Lake Akkeshi, Japan
    Microbes Environ. Vol. 34, No. 1, 13-22, 2019 https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse/jsme2 doi:10.1264/jsme2.ME18103 Eelgrass Sediment Microbiome as a Nitrous Oxide Sink in Brackish Lake Akkeshi, Japan TATSUNORI NAKAGAWA1*, YUKI TSUCHIYA1, SHINGO UEDA1, MANABU FUKUI2, and REIJI TAKAHASHI1 1College of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University, 1866 Kameino, Fujisawa, 252–0880, Japan; and 2Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Kita-19, Nishi-8, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060–0819, Japan (Received July 16, 2018—Accepted October 22, 2018—Published online December 1, 2018) Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a powerful greenhouse gas; however, limited information is currently available on the microbiomes involved in its sink and source in seagrass meadow sediments. Using laboratory incubations, a quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of N2O reductase (nosZ) and ammonia monooxygenase subunit A (amoA) genes, and a metagenome analysis based on the nosZ gene, we investigated the abundance of N2O-reducing microorganisms and ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes as well as the community compositions of N2O-reducing microorganisms in in situ and cultivated sediments in the non-eelgrass and eelgrass zones of Lake Akkeshi, Japan. Laboratory incubations showed that N2O was reduced by eelgrass sediments and emitted by non-eelgrass sediments. qPCR analyses revealed that the abundance of nosZ gene clade II in both sediments before and after the incubation as higher in the eelgrass zone than in the non-eelgrass zone. In contrast, the abundance of ammonia-oxidizing archaeal amoA genes increased after incubations in the non-eelgrass zone only. Metagenome analyses of nosZ genes revealed that the lineages Dechloromonas-Magnetospirillum-Thiocapsa and Bacteroidetes (Flavobacteriia) within nosZ gene clade II were the main populations in the N2O-reducing microbiome in the in situ sediments of eelgrass zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Interaction Between Fish Pathogens and Host Aquatic Animals
    K. Tsukamoto, T. Kawamura, T. Takeuchi, T. D. Beard, Jr. and M. J. Kaiser, eds. Fisheries for Global Welfare and Environment, 5th World Fisheries Congress 2008, pp. 277–288. © by TERRAPUB 2008. Molecular Interaction between Fish Pathogens and Host Aquatic Animals Laura L. Brown* and Stewart C. Johnson National Research Council of Canada Institute for Marine Biosciences 1411 Oxford Street Halifax, NS, B3H 3Z1, Canada Present address: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Pacific Biological Station 3190 Hammond Bay Road Nanaimo, NS, V9T 6N7, Canada *E-mail: [email protected] We have studied the host-pathogen interactions between Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and Aeromonas salmonicida. Sequencing the genome of the bacterium allowed us to investigate virulence factors and other gene products with potential as vaccines. Using knock-out mutants of A. salmonicida, we identified key virulence factors. Proteomics studies of bacterial cells grown in a variety of media as well as in an in vivo implant system revealed differential protein production and have shed new light on bacterial proteins such as superoxide dismutase, pili and flagellar proteins, type three secretion systems, and their roles in A. salmonicida pathogenicity. We constructed a whole ge- nome DNA microarray to use in comparative genomic hybridizations (M-CGH) and bacterial gene expression studies. Carbohydrate analysis has shown the variation in LPS between strains and reveals the importance of LPS in viru- lence. Salmon were challenged with A. salmonicida and tissues were taken to construct suppressive subtractive hybridization libraries to investigate differ- ential host gene expression. We constructed an Atlantic salmon cDNA microarray to investigate the host response to A.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Metagenomic Survey Reveals a New Bacterial Candidate Phylum in Geothermal Springs
    ARTICLE Received 13 Aug 2015 | Accepted 7 Dec 2015 | Published 27 Jan 2016 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10476 OPEN Global metagenomic survey reveals a new bacterial candidate phylum in geothermal springs Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh1, David Paez-Espino1, Jessica Jarett1, Peter F. Dunfield2, Brian P. Hedlund3, Anne E. Dekas4, Stephen E. Grasby5, Allyson L. Brady6, Hailiang Dong7, Brandon R. Briggs8, Wen-Jun Li9, Danielle Goudeau1, Rex Malmstrom1, Amrita Pati1, Jennifer Pett-Ridge4, Edward M. Rubin1,10, Tanja Woyke1, Nikos C. Kyrpides1 & Natalia N. Ivanova1 Analysis of the increasing wealth of metagenomic data collected from diverse environments can lead to the discovery of novel branches on the tree of life. Here we analyse 5.2 Tb of metagenomic data collected globally to discover a novel bacterial phylum (‘Candidatus Kryptonia’) found exclusively in high-temperature pH-neutral geothermal springs. This lineage had remained hidden as a taxonomic ‘blind spot’ because of mismatches in the primers commonly used for ribosomal gene surveys. Genome reconstruction from metagenomic data combined with single-cell genomics results in several high-quality genomes representing four genera from the new phylum. Metabolic reconstruction indicates a heterotrophic lifestyle with conspicuous nutritional deficiencies, suggesting the need for metabolic complementarity with other microbes. Co-occurrence patterns identifies a number of putative partners, including an uncultured Armatimonadetes lineage. The discovery of Kryptonia within previously studied geothermal springs underscores the importance of globally sampled metagenomic data in detection of microbial novelty, and highlights the extraordinary diversity of microbial life still awaiting discovery. 1 Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA. 2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Pultorak, Elizabeth Lauren
    ABSTRACT PULTORAK, ELIZABETH LAUREN. The Epidemiology of Lyme Disease and Bartonellosis in Humans and Animals. (Under the direction of Edward B. Breitschwerdt). The expansion of vector borne diseases in humans, a variety of mammalian hosts, and arthropod vectors draws attention to the need for enhanced diagnostic techniques for documenting infection in hosts, effective vector control, and treatment of individuals with associated diseases. Through improved diagnosis of vector-borne disease in both humans and animals, epidemiological studies to elucidate clinical associations or spatio-temporal relationships can be assessed. Veterinarians, through the use of the C6 peptide in the SNAP DX test kit, may be able to evaluate the changing epidemiology of borreliosis through their canine population. We developed a survey to evaluate the practices and perceptions of veterinarians in North Carolina regarding borreliosis in dogs across different geographic regions of the state. We found that veterinarians’ perception of the risk of borreliosis in North Carolina was consistent with recent scientific reports pertaining to geographic expansion of borreliosis in the state. Veterinarians should promote routine screening of dogs for Borrelia burgdorferi exposure as a simple, inexpensive form of surveillance in this transitional geographic region. We next conducted two separate studies to evaluate Bartonella spp. bacteremia or presence of antibodies against B. henselae, B. koehlerae, or B. vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii in 296 patients examined by a rheumatologist and 192 patients with animal exposure (100%) and recent animal bites and scratches (88.0%). Among 296 patients examined by a rheumatologist, prevalence of antibodies (185 [62%]) and Bartonella spp. bacteremia (122 [41.1%]) was high.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information
    Supporting Information Lozupone et al. 10.1073/pnas.0807339105 SI Methods nococcus, and Eubacterium grouped with members of other Determining the Environmental Distribution of Sequenced Genomes. named genera with high bootstrap support (Fig. 1A). One To obtain information on the lifestyle of the isolate and its reported member of the Bacteroidetes (Bacteroides capillosus) source, we looked at descriptive information from NCBI grouped firmly within the Firmicutes. This taxonomic error was (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/lproks.cgi) and other related not surprising because gut isolates have often been classified as publications. We also determined which 16S rRNA-based envi- Bacteroides based on an obligate anaerobe, Gram-negative, ronmental surveys of microbial assemblages deposited near- nonsporulating phenotype alone (6, 7). A more recent 16S identical sequences in GenBank. We first downloaded the gbenv rRNA-based analysis of the genus Clostridium defined phylo- files from the NCBI ftp site on December 31, 2007, and used genetically related clusters (4, 5), and these designations were them to create a BLAST database. These files contain GenBank supported in our phylogenetic analysis of the Clostridium species in the HGMI pipeline. We thus designated these Clostridium records for the ENV database, a component of the nonredun- species, along with the species from other named genera that dant nucleotide database (nt) where 16S rRNA environmental cluster with them in bootstrap supported nodes, as being within survey data are deposited. GenBank records for hits with Ͼ98% these clusters. sequence identity over 400 bp to the 16S rRNA sequence of each of the 67 genomes were parsed to get a list of study titles Annotation of GTs and GHs.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Variation and Symbiotic Associations in Phenotypically Diverse Sea Urchin Strongylocentrotus Intermedius
    DNA variation and symbiotic associations in phenotypically diverse sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius Evgeniy S. Balakirev*†‡, Vladimir A. Pavlyuchkov§, and Francisco J. Ayala*‡ *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2525; †Institute of Marine Biology, Vladivostok 690041, Russia; and §Pacific Research Fisheries Centre (TINRO-Centre), Vladivostok, 690600 Russia Contributed by Francisco J. Ayala, August 20, 2008 (sent for review May 9, 2008) Strongylocentrotus intermedius (A. Agassiz, 1863) is an economically spines of the U form are relatively short; the length, as a rule, does important sea urchin inhabiting the northwest Pacific region of Asia. not exceed one third of the radius of the testa. The spines of the G The northern Primorye (Sea of Japan) populations of S. intermedius form are longer, reaching and frequently exceeding two thirds of the consist of two sympatric morphological forms, ‘‘usual’’ (U) and ‘‘gray’’ testa radius. The testa is significantly thicker in the U form than in (G). The two forms are significantly different in morphology and the G form. The morphological differences between the U and G preferred bathymetric distribution, the G form prevailing in deeper- forms of S. intermedius are stable and easily recognizable (Fig. 1), water settlements. We have analyzed the genetic composition of the and they are systematically reported for the northern Primorye S. intermedius forms using the nucleotide sequences of the mitochon- coast region (V.A.P., unpublished data). drial gene encoding the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I and the Little is known about the population genetics of S. intermedius; nuclear gene encoding bindin to evaluate the possibility of cryptic the available data are limited to allozyme polymorphisms (4–6).
    [Show full text]
  • Detection and Partial Molecular Characterization of Rickettsia and Bartonella from Southern African Bat Species
    Detection and partial molecular characterization of Rickettsia and Bartonella from southern African bat species by Tjale Mabotse Augustine (29685690) Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MAGISTER SCIENTIAE (MICROBIOLOGY) in the Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences University of Pretoria Pretoria, South Africa Supervisor: Dr Wanda Markotter Co-supervisors: Prof Louis H. Nel Dr Jacqueline Weyer May, 2012 I declare that the thesis, which I hereby submit for the degree MSc (Microbiology) at the University of Pretoria, South Africa, is my own work and has not been submitted by me for a degree at another university ________________________________ Tjale Mabotse Augustine i Acknowledgements I would like send my sincere gratitude to the following people: Dr Wanda Markotter (University of Pretoria), Dr Jacqueline Weyer (National Institute for Communicable Diseases-National Health Laboratory Service) and Prof Louis H Nel (University of Pretoria) for their supervision and guidance during the project. Dr Jacqueline Weyer (Centre for Zoonotic and Emerging diseases (Previously Special Pathogens Unit), National Institute for Communicable Diseases (National Heath Laboratory Service), for providing the positive control DNA for Rickettsia and Dr Jenny Rossouw (Special Bacterial Pathogens Reference Unit, National Institute for Communicable Diseases-National Health Laboratory Service), for providing the positive control DNA for Bartonella. Dr Teresa Kearney (Ditsong Museum of Natural Science), Gauteng and Northern Region Bat Interest Group, Kwa-Zulu Natal Bat Interest Group, Prof Ara Monadjem (University of Swaziland), Werner Marias (University of Johannesburg), Dr Francois du Rand (University of Johannesburg) and Prof David Jacobs (University of Cape Town) for collection of blood samples.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Candidatus Phytoplasma Solani' (Quaglino Et Al., 2013)
    ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’ (Quaglino et al., 2013) Synonyms Phytoplasma solani Common Name(s) Disease: Bois noir, blackwood disease of grapevine, maize redness, stolbur Phytoplasma: CaPsol, maize redness phytoplasma, potato stolbur phytoplasma, stolbur phytoplasma, tomato stolbur phytoplasma Figure 1: A ‘dornfelder’ grape cultivar Type of Pest infected with ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma Phytoplasma solani’. Courtesy of Dr. Michael Maixner, Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI). Taxonomic Position Class: Mollicutes, Order: Acholeplasmatales, Family: Acholeplasmataceae Genus: ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma’ Reason for Inclusion in Manual OPIS A pest list, CAPS community suggestion, known host range and distribution have both expanded; 2016 AHP listing. Background Information Phytoplasmas, formerly known as mycoplasma-like organisms (MLOs), are pleomorphic, cell wall-less bacteria with small genomes (530 to 1350 kbp) of low G + C content (23-29%). They belong to the class Mollicutes and are the putative causal agents of yellows diseases that affect at least 1,000 plant species worldwide (McCoy et al., 1989; Seemüller et al., 2002). These minute, endocellular prokaryotes colonize the phloem of their infected plant hosts as well as various tissues and organs of their respective insect vectors. Phytoplasmas are transmitted to plants during feeding activity by their vectors, primarily leafhoppers, planthoppers, and psyllids (IRPCM, 2004; Weintraub and Beanland, 2006). Although phytoplasmas cannot be routinely grown by laboratory culture in cell free media, they may be observed in infected plant or insect tissues by use of electron microscopy or detected by molecular assays incorporating antibodies or nucleic acids. Since biological and phenotypic properties in pure culture are unavailable as aids in their identification, analysis of 16S rRNA genes has been adopted instead as the major basis for phytoplasma taxonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S5. the Information of the Bacteria Annotated in the Soil Community at Species Level
    Table S5. The information of the bacteria annotated in the soil community at species level No. Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species The number of contigs Abundance(%) 1 Firmicutes Bacilli Bacillales Bacillaceae Bacillus Bacillus cereus 1749 5.145782459 2 Bacteroidetes Cytophagia Cytophagales Hymenobacteraceae Hymenobacter Hymenobacter sedentarius 1538 4.52499338 3 Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadales Gemmatimonadaceae Gemmatirosa Gemmatirosa kalamazoonesis 1020 3.000970902 4 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas indica 797 2.344876284 5 Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Streptococcaceae Lactococcus Lactococcus piscium 542 1.594633558 6 Actinobacteria Thermoleophilia Solirubrobacterales Conexibacteraceae Conexibacter Conexibacter woesei 471 1.385742446 7 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas taxi 430 1.265115184 8 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas wittichii 388 1.141545794 9 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas sp. FARSPH 298 0.876754244 10 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sorangium cellulosum 260 0.764953367 11 Proteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria Myxococcales Polyangiaceae Sorangium Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 260 0.764953367 12 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas panacis 252 0.741416341
    [Show full text]