FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 30 * NUMBER 97 Thursday, May 20, 1965 • Washington, D.C

FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 30 * NUMBER 97 Thursday, May 20, 1965 • Washington, D.C. Pages 6831—6898

Agencies in this issue— The President Agricultural Research Service Atomic Energy Commission Civil Aeronautics Board Civil Service Commission Consumer and Marketing Service Federal Aviation Agency Federal Communications Commission Federal Maritime Commission Federal Power Commission Fish and Wildlife Service Food and Drug Administration General Services Administration Housing and Home Finance Agency Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau Maritime Administration National Park Service Securities and Exchange Commission Small Business Administration Tariff Commission Detailed list of Contents appears inside. Volume 78 UNITED STATES STATUTES AT LARGE

[88th Cong , 2d Sess.l

Contains laws and concurrent resolu merical listing of bills enacted into tions enacted by the Congress during public and private law, and a guide 1964, the twenty-fourth amendment to the legislative history of bills en to the Constitution, and Presidential acted into public law. proclamations. Included is a nu-

Price: $8.75

Published by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration

Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402

Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, o FEDERAL®REGISTER on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, Nation Area Code 202 Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration (mail address Nat;iori»i tonno’' Phone 963-3261 Archives Building, Washington, D.C. 20408), pursuant to the authority contained in Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1935 (49 , Stat. 500, as______amended; ______44 U.S.C.,| ch. ___ 8B), under regulations prescribed by the Admi - istrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President (1 CFR Ch. X). Distribution is made only by the S u p e rin ten of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. T h e F ederal R egister will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 per month or $15.00 per year, payable m advance. The charge for individual copies (minimum 15 cents) varies in proportion to the size of the issue. Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. v The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the Code op F ederal R egulations, which is published, under 50 titles. P suant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended. The Code op F ederal R egulations is sold by the Superintenden Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements are listed in the first F ederal R egister issue of each month. t io n s There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the F ederal R egister or th e Code of F ederal R egula Contents

Proposed Rule Making HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND THE PRESIDENT Control zone, transition area and WELFARE DEPARTMENT PROCLAMATION control area extension; altera tion, désignation and révoca See Food and Drug Administra Prayer for peace, Memorial Day, tion ______6872 tion. 1965 ______6835 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS HOUSING AND HOME EXECUTIVE AGENCIES COMMISSION FINANCE AGENCY Notices AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Rules and Regulations Satellite communications; owner Regional Administrator, Region SERVICE ship and operation of initial III (Atlanta) ; delegation of au thority______6889 Rules and Regulations earth stations______6862 UHF television channels; ex Enforcement of Federal Insecti INTERIOR DEPARTMENT cide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide panded use------6869 Act; interpretation of require Notices See Fish and Wildlife Service; ments with respect to directions Hearings, etc.: Land Management Bureau; Na for use.,______6857 American Telephone and Tele tional Park Service. graph Co______6885 AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT Smiles of Virginia, Inc., and INTERSTATE COMMERCE See Agricultural Stabilization and Petersburg Broadcasting Co., COMMISSION In c ______6888 Conservation Service; Consumer Notices and Marketing Service. FEDERAL MARITIME Fourth section applications for relief______6895 ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION COMMISSION Motor carrier applications and Notices Notices certain other proceedings___ 6892 New York State; memorandum of American Export Isbrandtsen Motor carrier transfer proceed understanding______6883 Lines, Inc., and First Atomic ings______6896 Ship Transport Inc.; agree ments filed for approval.____ 6888 LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD Independent ocean freight for Notices warder applications; revision— 6888 Notices Air Traffic Conference of America; Alaska; amendment of public land deferring action on agreement 6884 FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION order______6881 Nevada; filing of protraction dia International Air Transport Assn.; Notices specific commodity rates___ 1 6884 grams (2 documents)______6881 Hearings, etc.: Proposed withdrawal and reserva Atlantic Seaboard Corp___— __ 6879 tion of lands: CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Haun, W. G., et a l._ .______6874 New Mexico (2 documents). 6881, 6882 Rules and Regulations Sumiton, Ala______6880 Oregon (2 documents)______6882 Excepted service: Walsh, Frank H., et al------6873 Health, Education, and Welfare FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE MARITIME ADMINISTRATION Department______6857 Notices Small Business Administration. 6857 Rules and Regulations Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.; Sport fishing in Montana: application______6883 COMMERCE DEPARTMENT Charles M. Russell National See Maritime Administration. Wildlife Refuge______6871 Medicine Lake National Wild NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CONSUMER AND MARKETING life Refuge______6871 Rules and Regulations Ninepipe National Wildlife Ref Glacier National Park, Montana; SERVICE uge______6871 eating, drinking and lodging Rules and Regulations Pablo National Wildlife Refuge. 6871 establishments on 'p rivate Pood stamp program; participa FOOD AND DRUG lands______6861 tion of retail food stores; whole- ADMINISTRATION Notices sale food concerns and banks. _ 6859 Catoctin Mountain Park, Md., Peaches, fresh, in Georgia; ex Rules and Regulations Job Corps Conservation Center penses and rate of assessment_ 6858 Food additives; food starch- Director and Administrative Of modified______6837 ficer; delegation of authority__ 6883 FEDERAL a v ia t io n a g e n c y Rules and Regulations GENERAL SERVICES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Airworthiness directives : ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION Beech Model 23 aircraft_____ 6837 Rules and Regulations Lockheed Models, certain___ !.. 6837 Notices Controlled zone; alteration..___ 6838 Rules of Board of Contract Ap Hearings, etc. : Control zone and transition area; peals; appeal file___i___ _ 6837 Continental Vending Machine alteration.__.______.___ 6838 Notices Corp______.*__..____ 6889 standard instrument approach Standing interagency committëes General Public Utilities Corp__ 6889 procedures______6839 chaired by GSA; establishment Public Service Company of Transition area designation; cor or extension during fiscal years Oklahoma.______6890 rection-----____:_____ '____ _ 6838 1964 and 1965______. 6888 (Continued on next page) 6833 6834 CONTENTS

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Notices Delegations to Managers relating to financial assistance functions: La Crosse, Wis______6891 Prairie du Chien, Wis______6891 Disaster area declarations : M innesota______6890 Missouri_:______6890 Nebraska______6891 TARIFF COMMISSION Notices Safety pins; report to Presi dent______6891

List of CFR Parts Affected

(Codification Guide)

The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date, appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1965, and specifies how they are affected.

3 CFR 14 CFR 41 CFR P roclamation : 39 (2 documents)______6837 5-60______6837 3657______6835 71 (3 documents)______6838 97______— 6839 5 CFR P r o po sed R u l e s : 47 CFR 213 (2 documents)______6857 71______.___ 6872 25______Z______6862 73__ 6869 21 CFR 7 CFR 121______6837 362__ 6857 918______,______6858 36 CFR 50 CFR 1602______j ______6859 7______6861 33 (4 documents)______6871 Presidential Documents

Title 3— THE PRESIDENT Proclamation 3657 PRAYER FOR PEACE, MEMORIAL DAY, 1965 By the President of the United States of America A Proclamation On this Memorial Bay, May 30, we will pay homage to our honored dead who gave their lives that this country might live in peace and freedom. Their numbers are legion, their deeds valorous, their mem ories hallowed. They fought in the valleys of Pennsylvania, in the trenches at Verdun, and in the foxholes at Guadalcanal. Now America’s sons are again making the highest sacrifice to protect for this and future generations the liberty won in past struggles. Man possesses now the capacity txrend war and preserve peace. We are able to eliminate poverty and share abundance, to overcome dis ease and illiteracy, and to bring to all our fellow citizens the fulfillment of their dream of a better life. We have the means to achieve these victories; now we need only the will. We are a people with an abiding faith in a merciful God and in His goodness. It is not only fitting but necessary that we seek His guidance and help in the pursuit of these tasks. For this purpose the Congress, in a joint resolution approved May 11,1950 (64 Stat. 158), requested the President to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe each Memorial Bay as a day of prayer for permanent peace: NOW, THEREFORE, I, LYNBON B. JOHNSON, President of the United States of America, do hereby designate Memorial Bay, Sunday, May 30, 1965, as a day of prayer for permanent peace, and I call upon the people of the Nation to pray for a lasting peace in which all mankind may reap the fruits of His blessing. I designate the hour beginning in each locality at eleven o’clock in the morning of that day as the time for all Americans to join in prayer. I also urge the press, radio, television, and all other media of information to cooperate in this observance. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the United States of America to be affixed. BONE at the City of Washington this fifteenth day of May in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and sixty-five, and of the [ seal] Independence of the United States of America the one hundred and eighty-ninth. L y n d o n B . J o h n so n By the President: G eorge W. B all, Acting Secretary of State. [F.R. Doc. 65-5348 ; Filed, May 18,1965 ; 2:12 p.m.]

Rules and Regulations

dride. Therefore, pursuant to the pro Model 23 aircraft was published in 30 visions of the Federal Food, Drug, and F.R. 2469. Title 41— PUBLIC CONTRACTS Cosmetic Act (sec. 409(c)(1), 72 Stat. Interested persons have been afforded 1786; 21 U.S.C. 348(c)(1)), and under an opportunity to participate in the AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT the authority delegated to the Commis making of the amendment. No objec Chapter 5— General Services sioner by the Secretary of Health, Edu tions were received. Administration cation, and Welfare (21 CFR 2.90), In consideration of the foregoing, and § 121.1031(f) is amended by adding pursuant to the authority delegated to PART 5-60— CONTRACT APPEALS alphabetically an additional treatment, me by the Administrator (25 F.R. 6489), as follows: § 39.13 of Part 39 (14 CFR Part 39), is Subpart 5-60.2— Rules of the General hereby amended by adding the following Services Administration Board of § 121.1031 Food starch-modified. new airworthiness directive: * * * * * Contract Appeals B e e c h . Applies to Model 23 aircraft Serial ( j) * * * Numbers M-l through M-334 except A pp e a l F il e / * * * * * M—62. The following material revises the Limitation Compliance required within 100 hours’ time in service after the effective date of Rules of the General Services Adminis E pich lo ro h y d rin , n o t to exceed 0 . 3 ------percent, and succinic anhydride, this AD, unless already accomplished. tration Board of Contract Appeals to To prevent water from entering the static not to exceed 4.0 percent. extend the period of time within which lines through the fuselage static air ports an appeal file must be submitted by the ***** and causing a system malfunction, accom Contracting Officer to the Board of Con Any person who will be adversely af plish the following or an FAA-approved tract Appeals from 30 to 45 days. equivalent: fected by the foregoing order may at any (a) Remove the tee flitting from the static Section 5-60.204-1 is amended to read time within 30 days from the date of its as follows: line connection just aft of the rear cabin publication in the F ederal R e g is t e r file b u lk h ead . § 5-60.204-1 Request, preparation, and. with the Hearing Clerk, Department of (b) Connect a 52-inch length of 0.25-inch submission. Health, Education, and Welfare, Room O.D. by 0.040-inch wall polyethylene tubing The contracting officer will submit to 5440, 330 Independence Avenue SW., to the static line running under the floor Washington, D.C., 20201, written objec board with a 262-Funion. the Board through the Central Office (c) Place the pack nut and plastic ferrule service or staff office concerned and tions thereto, preferably in quintuplicate. not used with the union on the other end through the Office of the General Counsel Objections shall show wherein the person of the tubing and connect the tee fitting. the following documents and information filing will be adversely affected by the (d) Remove the clips which originally se (herein referred to as the “appeal file”) order and specify with particularity the cured the static lines to the cabin bulkhead as promptly as possible after receipt of provisions of the order deemed objection and use one to attach the static line to the able and the grounds for the objections. top of the bulkhead just aft of the cabin the Board’s request therefor, and in any bulkhead Station 239.00. event so as to reach the Board within 45 If a hearing is requested, the objections must state the issues for the hearing. A (e) Shorten the tubing from each static days after such receipt. port to provide gentle curves and to prevent hearing will be granted if the objections (Sec. 205(c), 63 S ta t. 390; 40 TJ.S.C. 4 8 6 (c)) any low places in the line that could trap are supported by grounds legally suffi water between the static ports and the tee. Effective date. This regulation is ef cient to justify the relief sought. Objec Reconnect the two shortened static port fective May 18, 1965. tions may be accompanied by a memo lines to the tee fitting using either the origi randum or brief in support thereof. nal plastic ferrules and pack nuts or new Dated: May 12, 1965. like parts. Effective date. This order shall be ef (Beech Service Bulletin No. 7 covers this L a w s o n K n o t t , B. Jr., fective on the date of its publication in same subject.) Acting Administrator the F ederal R e g is t e r . of General Services. This amendment shall become effec (Sec. 409(c)(1), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 U8.C. tive June 19, 1965. [PR. Doc. 65-5308; Filed, May 19, 1965; 3 4 8 (c )(1 )) 8:48 a.m .] (Sec. 313(a), 601, 603, Federal Aviation Act Dated: May 4,1965. of 1958; 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423) G e o . P. L a r r ic k , Issued in Washington, D.C., on May Commissioner of Food and Drugs. 13,1965. Title 21— FOOD AND DRUGS [F.R. Doc. 65-5326; Filed, May 19, 1965; G . S . M o o r e , 8:49 a.m .] Director, Chapter I— Food and Drug Adminis Flight Standards Service. tration, Department of Health, Ed [F.R. Doc. 65-5281; Filed, May 19, 1965; ucation, and Welfare 8:46 a jn .] SUBCHAPTER B— FOOD AND FOOD PRODUCTS Title 14-AERONAUTICS AND PART 121— FOOD ADDITIVES SPACE [Docket No. 6650; Amdt. 39-68] Subpart D— Food Additives Permitted Chapter I— Federal Aviation Agency PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS in Food for Human Consumption DIRECTIVES [Docket No. 6490; Amdt. 39—67] F ood S t a r c h -M o d if ie d Lockheed Models 1049C, 1049E, PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS The Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 1049G, and 1049H Series Aircraft having evaluated the data in a petition DIRECTIVES There have been several malfunctions (FAP 4A1190) filed by National Starch Beech Model 23 Aircraft and Chemical Corp., 1700 West Front of a radio transfer switch assembly on Street, Plainfield, N.J., 07063, and other A proposal to amend Part 39 of the Lockheed Models 1049C, 1049E, 1049G, relevant material, has concluded that Federal Aviation Regulations to include and 1049H series aircraft caused by the an amendment should issue to provide an airworthiness directive requiring re presence of wire clippings within the as for the safe use of a food starch-modi- routing of the static lines to prevent sembly. Such a malfunction could cause ned by treatment with not more than water from entering the static lines erratic indication of the aircraft radio 0 3 percent epichlorohydrin and not through the fuselage static air ports and navigation equipment. Since this condi hfore than 4.0 percent succinic anhy causing a system malfunction on Beech tion is likely to exist or develop in other 6837 6838 RULES AND REGULATIONS products of the same type design, an air within 2 miles each side of the 262° bearing amended effective 0001 e.s.t., July 22, worthiness directive is being issued to from the Bemidji Municipal Airport, extend 1965, as hereinafter set forth. ing from the 5-mile radius zone to 8 miles W require a visual inspection of each switch of the airport, excluding the portion 9 miles In § 71.171 (29 F.R. 17627), the NAAS assembly, and removal of any wire clip SE of and parallel to the Bemidji VOR 024° Ream Field, Calif., control zone is pings found. and 204° radiais. This control zone shall be amended as follows: As a situation exists which demands effective during the times established by a I m pe r ia l B e a c h , Ca l if. immediate adoption of this regulation, Notice to Airmen and published continuously it is found that notice and public pro in the Airmen’s Information Manual. W ith in a 3 -m ile ra d iu s of NAAS Ream cedure hereon are impracticable and F ield ( la titu d e 32°34'00” ^T., longitude 117°. 2. In § 71.181 (29 F.R. 17643) the 06'50'' W.); that airspace W of Ream Field good cause exists for making this amend Bemidji, Minn., transition area is within the arc of a 6-mile radius circle cen ment effective in less than 30 days. amended to read: tered on Ream TACAN, extending counter In consideration of the foregoing, and clockwise from a line 2 miles N of and par B e m id j i, M i n n . pursuant to the authority delegated to allel to the Ream TACAN 288° radial to the me by the Administrator (25 F.R. 6489), That airspace extending upward from 700 United States/Mexican Flight Information § 39.13 of Part 39 of the Federal Aviation feet above the surface within a 6-mile radius Region boundary, excluding the portion un Regulations is amended by adding the of Bemidji Municipal Airport (latitude der the jurisdiction of Mexico; and that air 47°30'35" N., longitude 94°55'50" W.), and space E of Ream Field within the arc of a following new airworthiness directive: within 2 miles each side of the 316° and 136° 6-mile radius circle centered on Ream L o c k h e e d . Applies to Models 1049C, 1049E, radiais extending from the 6-mile radius area TACAN, extending clockwise from a line 2 1049G, and 1049H series aircraft equipped to 8 miles NW of the VOR, within 2 miles miles N of and parallel to the Ream TACAN with Lockheed radio transfer switch each side of the 'Bemidji VOR 135° radial 065° radial to the United States/Mexican assembly, P/N 319122. extending from the 6-mile radius area to 17 B order. Compliance required within the next 300 miles SE of the VOR, within 5 miles N and (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, hours’ time in service after the effective date 8 miles S of the 262° bearing from the. as amended; 72 Stat. 749; 49 U.S.C. 1348) of this AD unless already accomplished. Bemidji Municipal Airport, extending from Disassemble each radio transfer switch the airport to 12 miles W of the airport; Issued in Los Angeles, Calif., on May assembly, P/N 319122, without unsoldering and that airspace extending upward from 12,1965. the wiring and visually inspect each part of 1,200 feet above the surface within 5 miles L ee E . W arren, the switch assembly for wire clippings. Re NE and 8 miles SW of the Bemidji VOR 136° move any clippings found and reassemble and 316° radiais, extending from 4 miles Acting Director, Western Region. the switch assembly before further flight. SE to 13 miles NW of the VOR, and within [F.R. Doc. 65-5284; Filed, May 19, 1965; 5 miles SW and 8 miles NE of the Bemidji N o t e : During the inspection required by 8:46 a.m .] VOR 135° radial, extending from 7 miles SE this AD, particular attention should be given to the switch wafers. of the VOR to 22 miles SE of the VOR. (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958;, [Airspace Docket No. 64-CE-81] ‘This amendment becomes effective 49 U.S.C. 1348) May 20, 1965. Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on May 11, PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL (Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, Federal Aviation Act 1965. AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, of 1958; 49 Ü.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423) AND REPORTING POINTS Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 14, K ir b y L . B r a n n o n , 1965. Acting Director, Central Region. Transition Area Designation; C. W. W a l k e r , [F.R. Doc. 65-5283; Filed, May 19, 1965; Correction Acting Director, 8:46 a.m .] . On March 12, 1965, Federal Register Flight Standards Service. Document 65-2522 was published in the [F.R. Doc. 65-5282; Filed, May 19, 1965; [Airspace Docket No. 65-WE-13] F ederal R e g is t e r (30 F.R. 3350) and 8:46 a.m .] amended, in part, § 71.181 of the Federal PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL Aviation Regulations. Therein, the AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, Sterling, 111., transition area was desig [Airspace Docket No. 65-CE-12] AND REPORTING POINTS nated in part as that airspace “within 2 miles each side of the Polo, 111., VOR- PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL Alteration of Control Zone TAC 029° radial”. The correct designa AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, On February 10, 1965, a notice of pro tion is “within 2 miles each side of the AND REPORTING POINTS posed rule making was published in the Polo, HI., VORTAC 209° radial”. Action is taken herein to correct this discrep Alteration of Control Zone and F ederal R e g is t e r (30 F.R. 1875), stat ing that the Federal Aviation Agency ancy. Transition Area proposed to alter the NAAS Ream Field, Since this amendment is editorial in On March 12, 1965, a notice of pro Calif., control zone. nature, and imposes no additional bur posed rule making was published in the Interested persons were afforded an den on any person, notice and public pro F ederal R e g is t e r (30 F.R. 3356) stating opportunity to participate in the rule cedure hereon are unnecessary, and the that the Federal Aviation Agency pro making through submission of com effective date of the final rule, as initially posed to alter controlled airspace in the ments. Due consideration was given to adopted, may be retained. Bemidji, Minn., terminal area. all revelant matters presented. In consideration of the foregoing, ef Interested persons were afforded an Comments regarding the proposal were fective immediately, Federal Register opportunity to participate in the rule received from the city and Chamber of Document 65-2522 is altered as follows: making through submission of comments. Commerce, Chula Vista, Calif., Breise & In the designation of the Sterling, 111., All comments received were favorable. Johnson Flying Service, Inc., and the transition area where “within 2 miles In consideration of the foregoing, Part city of San Diego, expressing concern each side of the Polo, 111., VORTAC 029 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is that the eastern limits of the Ream Field radial” appears, it is changed to read, amended, effective 0001 e.s.t., July 22, control zone extension, as proposed, “within 2 miles each side of the Polo, 1965, as hereinafter set forth. would unduly restrict future flight op 111., VORTAC 209° radial”. 1. In § 71.171 (29 F.R. 17581) the erations at Brown Field. Action is being (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958; Bemidji, Minn., control zone is amended taken to modify prescribed instrument 49 U.S.C. 1348) to read: approach procedures established east of Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on May U, B e m id j i, M i n n . NAAS Ream Field by reducing the 4 n.m. TACAN arc to 3.5 n.m., so that the 1965. W ithin a 5-mile radius of the Bemidji Mu K ir b y L. B rannon, nicipal Airport (latitude 47°30'35" N., longi proposed control zone extension may be Acting Director, Central Region. tude 94°55'50'' W.), within 2 miles each side proportionately reduced by 0.5 n.m. of the Bemidji VOR 136° radial, extending In consideration of the foregoing, Part [F.R. Doc. 65-5285; Filed, May 19, l965- from the 5-mile radius zone to the VOR and 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is 8:46 a.m .] Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6839

[Reg. Docket No. 6608; Arndt. 427] PART 97— STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES Miscellaneous Amendments The amendments to the standard instrument approach procedures contained herein are adopted to become effective when indicated in order to promote safety. The amended procedures supersede the existing procedures of the same classifi cation now in effect for the airports specified therein. For the convenience of the users, the complete procedure is republished in this amendment indicating the changes to the existing procedures. As a s itu a tio n exists which demands immediate action in the interests of safety in air commerce, I find that compliance with the notice and procedure provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act is impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective within less than 30 days from publication. In view of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (24 F.R. 5662), Part 97 (14 CFR Part 97) is amended as follows: 1. By amending the following low or medium frequency range procedures prescribed in § 97.11(a) to read: L FR Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feetMfSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with these established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Celling and visibility minimums

2-engtne or less More than Course and Minimum From— To— altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 27 MAY 1965. City, Bakersfield; State, Calif.; Airport name, Meadows Field; Elev., 488'; Fac. Class., SBMRAZ; Ident., "BC;Trocedure No. 1, Arndt. 10 ; Eff. date, 3 Oct. 64; Sup. Arndt. No; 9; Dated, 18 Apr. 64

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 27 MAY 1965. City, Ellensburg; State, Wash.; Airport name, Ellensburg Municipal; Elev., 1766'; Fac. Class., SBMRAZ; Ident., EL; Procedure No. I, Arndt. 10; Eff. date, 21 Nov. 64; Bup. Arndt. No. 9; Dated, 8 Apr. 61

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 27 MAY 1965. City, Ephrata; State, Wash.; Airport name, Ephrata Municipal; Elev., 1272'; Fac. Class., BMRLZ; Ident., EH; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 8; Eff. date, 26 Dec. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 7; Dated, 15 Sept. 62

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 27 MAY 1965. City, Eugene; State, Oreg.; Airport name, Mahlon Sweet Field; Elev., 365'; Fac. Class., SBRAZ; Ident., EO; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 11; Eff. date, 1 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 10; Dated, 22 June 63

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 27 MAY 1966. City, Klamath Falls: State, Oreg.; Airport name, Kingsley Field; Elev., 4092'; Fac. Class., 8BRAZ; Ident., KL; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 11; Eff. date, 21 Nov. 64; Sup. Arndt; No. 10; Dated, .15 Sept. 62

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 27 MAY 1965. City, Medford; State, Oreg.; Airport name, Medford Municipal; Elev., 1330'; Fac. Class., SBRAZ; Ident., ME; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 10; Eff. date, 21 Nov. 64; Sup. Arndt; No. 9; Dated, 2 May 64

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 27 MAY 1965. City, Palmdale; State, Calif.; Airport name, Air Force Plant No. 42; Elev., 2549'; Fac. Class., SBMRAZ; Ident., PL; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 2; Eff. date, 23 Jan. 65; Sup.’ Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 27 Feb. 60

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 27 MAY 1965. City, Portland; State, Oreg.; Airport name, Portland International; Elev., 23'; Fac. Class., SABRAZ; Ident., PO; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 10; Eff. date, 24 Aug. 63; Sup. Arndt No. 9; Dated, 6 Apr. 63

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 27 MAY 1965. City, Toledo; State, Wash.; Airport name, Toledo-Winlock Municipal; Elev., 371'; Fac. Class., BMRLZ; Ident., TDO; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 4; Eff. date, 20 Feb. 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 3; Dated, 28 Dec. 63

No. 97----- 2 6840 RULES AND REGULATIONS 2. By amending the following automatic direction finding procedures prescribed in § 97.11(b) to read: ADF Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure Bearings headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles , ...... __ ...... , , If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following Instrument approach procedure nniftss an aDDroach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum From— To— altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

■RTTTi v o r LOM...... V...... -...... Direct______2400 T-dn%...... 300-1 300-1 200-H LOM ______Direct...... 3000 C-dn...... 500-1 500-1 600-ÍW T.OM ffinal) ______Direct______2000 S-dn-30R_____ 500-1 500-1 500-1 Direct______6500 A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 LOM...... Direct______4000

Procedure turn S* side of crs, 119° Outbnd, 299° Inbnd, 2400' within 10 miles of LOM. Beyond 10 miles not authorized. \ Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 299°—4.5 miles. , T . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.5 miles after passing LOM, climb to 3000' on 299" crs from LOM within 20 miles or, when directed by ATC, (1) climb via BFL VOR R-227 to McKittrick Int at 30007; (2) climb direct to BFL VOR, then via R-322 to Delano Int at 3000'. Other change: Deletes transition from BC LFR. ♦All turns S side of crs, high terrain N. . ... %E and southbound (015° thru 210°) IF R departures must comply with pubhshed Bakersfield SID’s. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 0O0M)90°—8700'; 090°-180°—8100*; 180°-270°—6100'; 270°-360°—5300'. w Citv. Bakersfield; State, Calif.; Airport name, Meadows Field; Elev., 488'; Fac. Class., LOM; Ident., BF; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 5; Efl. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 4; Dated, 14 Nov. 64

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 27 MAY 1965. Citv. Blvthe: State, Calif.; Airport name, Blythe; Elev., 397'; Fac. Class., SABH; Ident., BLH; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 1; Eff. date, 31 Aug. 63; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 18 Aug. 62

Burton Int 3000 T-dn______600-1 500-1 500-1 Lofall Int.. 3000 C-dn...... ' 600-1 600-1 600-1M SEA VOR Direct______3000 A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring using Seattle-Takoma radar authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn W side crs, 187° Outbnd, 007° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles. Facility on airport. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, UOu. . „ . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile after passing PWT RBn, make immediate right turn, climb to 2000' on crs, 187° from Kitsap RBn within 10 miles. Caution: 1761' terrain, 2.5 miles N of airport. Other change: deletes transition from SJ LFR. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2100'; 090°-180°—2000'; 180°-270°—7700'; 270°-360°—8800'. City, Bremerton; State, Wash.; Airport name, Kitsap County; Elev., 482'; Fac. Class., MHW; Ident., PWT; Procedure No. 1; Arndt. 3; Efl. date 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 2; Dated, 26 Dec. 64

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 27 MAY 1965. City. Casper; State, Wyo.; Airport name, Casper Air Terminal; Elev., 5348'; Fac. Class., H-SAB; Ident., CPR; Procedure No. 2, Arndt. 3; Efl. date, 26 Dec. 64; Sup. Arndt. NO. 2; Dated, 17 Oct. 63

Paradise In t... flVR RRn 2600 T-dn______300-1 300-1 NA Bucktown Int. CVE RBn Direct 2800 O-dn______500-1 500-1 NA S-dn-11...... 500-1 500-1 NA A-dn______800-2 800-2 NA

Procedure turn S side of final approach crs, 292° Outbnd, 112° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1400'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 112°—3.0 miles. _ . „ r,aht If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.0 miles after passing Coatesville »un, mase a ns**»- climbing turn to 2600', returning to Coatesville RBn. Hold W, 1-minute right turns, 112° Inbnd. MSA within 26 miles of the facility: 000°-270°—2100'; 270°-360°—2400'. City, Coatesville; State, Pa.; Airport name, Chester County Area; Elev., 623'; Fac. Class. MHW; Ident., CVE; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 1; Efl. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. Orig.; Dated, 26 Jan. 63

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 27 MAY 1965. City, Daggett; State, Calif.; Airport name, Municipal; Elev., 1927'; Fac. Class., BH; Ident., DAG; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. Orig.; Efl. date, 26 Oct. 63

DAB VOR___ T.OM 1500 300-1 300-1 200-K Barberville Int. T.OM 1600 C-dn...... 400-1 600-1 m - m 400-1 400-1 Lake Helen Int T.OM __ 1600 S-dn-6...... 400.1 800-2 Smyrna Int___ T.OM Direct ...... - 1500 A-dn______800-2 800-2 Woodruff In t... LOM (final)...... Direct______1400

Procedure turn N side of crs, 245° Outbnd, 065° Inbnd, 1400' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1400'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 065°—4.7 miles. , f 1fflw on crg of If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.7 miles after passing LOM, ciuno io iow 065 ’, make left turn, proceed to Daytona Beach V O R via R-140 or, when directed by ATC, make right turn, climb to 1500', and return direct to LOM. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—1400'; 090°-180°—1500'; 180°-270°—2100'; 270“-360°—1200'. City, Daytona Beach; State, Fla.; Airport name, Daytona Beach Municipal; Elev., 34'; Fac. Class., LOM; Ident., DA; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 7; Efl. date, 29 May 65, Sup Amdt. No. 6; Dated, 11 May 63 .

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 27 MAY 65. City, Elko; State, Nev.; Airport name, Elko Municipal; Elev., 5135'; Fac. Class!, SABH; Ident., EKO; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 2; Efl. date, 1 Aug.;. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 1; Dated, 16 June 62 Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6841

ADF Standard I nstrument A pproach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minlpnim More than Course and 2-engine, From— To— altitude Condition distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 06 knots

LMTVOE--.--.------LFA RBn_____ Direct. 7500 T-dn% 400-1 400-1 400-}$ Mt. Dome VHF Int- LFA RBn...... Direct 7600 C-dn... 1600-1 1600-1 1600-1}$ LMT VOR R-16120-mile DME Fix LFA RBn...... Direct 7600 A-dn... 1600-2 1600-2 1600-2 LFA RBn------MT LMM (final) Direct. 5700

Procedure turn not authorized. Final approach from holding pattern at LFA RBn. Final approach crs, 318° from LFA RBn. Minimum altitude over OM on final approach crs, 5700'; over LMM, 5600'. Crs and distance, LFA RBn to airport, 318°—10.5 miles; OM to airport, 318°—5.8 miles; MT LMM to airport, 318°—0.6 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.6 mile after passing MT LMM, turn left, climb to 7800' in a 1-minute right turn holding pattern on 250° bearing from MT LMM. Caution: High terrain all quadrants. Other change: Deletes aircraft equipment requirement note. Deletes departure procedures having reference to KL LFR. %Takeoffs all runways: Climb via SE crs LMT ILS localizer southeastbound to cross LFA RBn at or above 6700', thence turn right heading 250° magnetic to intercept R-161 LMT VOR, thence turn right, climb direct LMT VO R so as to cross LMT VO R at or above 7000'. Takeoffs all runways: Climb southeastbound on R-140 LMT VOR to cross LFA RBn/ll-mile DME Fix at or above 5700', thence turn right heading 250° magnetic to in- ferceDt R-161 LMT VOR, thence turn right, climb direct LMT VOR so as to cross LMT VOR at or above 7000'. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—8300'; 090°-180°—7600'; 180°-270°—8500'; 270°-360°—9300'. Citv Klamath Falls; State, Oreg.; Airport name, Kingsley Field; Elev., 4092'; Fac. Class., LMM; Ident., MT; Procedure No. 2, Arndt. 2; Eft. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 21 Nov. 64

Little Root VORTAG T.OM Direct...... 1800 T-dn______300-1 300-1 *200-}$ LOM...... Direct______1800 C-dn...... 600-1 600-1 600-1}$ LOM (final)...... Direet______1500 S-dn-4...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 040° bearing to LOM______;. 010°-2.3 miles.___ 1800 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar transitions authorized, in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn N side SW crs, 220° Outbnd, 040° Inbnd, 1800' within 10 miles. (Nonstandard due to traffic.) Minimum altitude over LOM Inbnd final, 1500'; over LMM# Inbnd final, 900'. Crs and distance, LOM to airport, 040°—4.6 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to, authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.6 miles after passing LOM, climb to 2000' on crs, 040° from LOM within 20 miles or, when directed by ATC, turn right, climb to 1500' and proceed to LIT RBn. *300-1 required for takeoff Runways 17,35, and 32. #Descent below 900'not authorized unless MM or LMM received. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—1800'; 090-180°—3100'; 180°-270°—2200'; 270°-360°—3300'. City, Little Rock; State, Ark.; Airport name, Adams Field; Elev., 257'; Fac. Class., LOM; Ident.-,, LI; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 7; Eft. date, 29 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 6; Dated, 26 Sept. 64

Mobile VOR__ T.OM 1500 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 m - H Brookley. VOR, T.OM 1500 C-dn______400-1 600-1 500-1}$ S-dn-14______400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn W side of crs, 319° Outbnd, 139° Inbnd, 1500' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1500'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 139°—4.5 miles. . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.5 miles after passing LOM make right turn, climb to 1800' on 180° crs from LOM within 20 ¿files or, when directed by ATC, make right turn, proceed direct to MOB VOR climbing to 1800' and enter VOR holding pattern. N ote: Aircraft executing missed approach may, after being reidentified, be radar controlled. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000®-090°—2400'; 090°-180°—2400'; 180°-270°—1500'; 270°-360°—1600'. City, Mobile; State, Ala.; Airport name, Bates Field; Elev., 218'; Fac. Class., LOM; Ident., MO; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 16; Efl. date, 29 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 16; Dated, 16, Jan. 65

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 27 MAY 65. City, Ogden; State, Utah; Airport name, Ogden Municipal; Elev., 4455'; Fac. Class., SABHZ; Ident., OGD; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 4; Eff. date, 3 Oct. 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 3; Dated, 18 July 64

Warrington Int.. TNO RBn 2200 T-d 300-1 NA NA Pottstown VOR INO RBn , Direct, 2200 C^d 600-1 NA NA Fraser Int___ IN G RBn (final)______Direct. . 1200 A-d NA NA NA

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved Philadelphia approach control radar patterns, procedure turn N side of crs, 241° Outbnd, .061° Inbnd, 2200' within 10 miles. . Minimum altitude over facility oniinaJ approach crs, 1200'. ws and. distance, facility to airport, 061°—0.8 mile. tn .contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.8 mile after passing IN G RBn, climb on crs, 061° 0 miles, then make left-climbing turn, returning to IN G RBn at 2200'. Hold SW, one-minute left turns, Inbnd crs, 061°. wote: ING RBn operational daily from 0700 to 2100 local time, other change: Deletes transition from Hi-Line Int. MbA within 25 miles of the facility: 0003-090°—2000'; 090°—180 —2400'; 180°-270°—2000'; 270°-360°—2500'. ty, Philadelphia (Ambler); State, Pa.; Airport name, Wings Field; Elev., 320'; Fac. Class., MHW; Ident., ING; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 2; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 10 Oct. 64

Imperial VOR McKeesport RBn : TRT, R-117 3000 T -dn.._____. . . 300-1 300-1 200-}$ Scottdale Int 3000 C-dn______600-1 600-1 600-1}$ Allegheny VOR McKeesport RBn______...... 3000 S-dn-27______600-1 600-1 600-1 QP L O M ..,...^ McKeesport RBn _ 3000 A-dn____ ,...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 Greensburg McKeesport RBn 3000 The following minimums apply if AGC OM is received: McKeesport RBn Jeannette Int______3000 C-dn______I 600-1 I 500-1 | 500-1}$ Jeannette Int__ McKeesport RBn ifinali Direct______2700 S-dn-27...__ . . . 400-1 400-1 400-1

Pm^i.Yeclor^ ^ a,^ orized accordance with approved patterns. MiniTnnr*? j s*de of crs> Outbnd, 275° Inbnd, 3000' within 10 miles. Nonstandard due to traffic. nri o i!^ -aitltude over facility on final approach crs, 2700'. . • If visual W* RBn to airport. 275°—5.5 miles; OM to airport, 275°—4.2 miles. 3000' Drnpoo/nXPi1! . established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.5 miles after passing McKeesport RBn, climb to MSA w £ gt£ A(i C RBn- Hold W, right turns 1 minute, 082° Inbnd. _ a wunin 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2600'; 090-180°—3700'; 180°-360°—3100'. V. Pittsburgh; State, Pa.; Airport name, Allegheny County; Elev., 1252'; Fac. Class;, MHW; Ident., MKP; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 13; Eff. date, 29 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 12; Dated, 23 Jan. 65 6842 RULES AND REGULATIONS

ADF Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— Course and To— distance altitude Condition 2-engine, (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

PIH VOR...... LOM...... T-dn% 7000 300-1 300-1 200-H LOM...... 7000 C-dn* 500-1 500-1 500-1U 400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn„______800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn N side of ers, 018° Outbnd, 198° Intend, 7000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 5600'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 207°—3.7 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.7 miles after passing LOM climb to 6500' on 23P crs from PI LOM within 15 miles. Caution: High terrain SE through SW of airport. Other change: Deletes transition from PH LFR. * Circling not authorized S of airport. % Takeoff all runways: Shuttle climb on the 234° radial of the PIH VO R within 20 miles to minimum crossing altitude required for direction of flight. All turns N side of 234° radial. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—10,300'; 090M800—10,300'; 180°-270°—8500'; 270°-360°—6500'. City, Pocatello; State, Idaho; Airport name, Pocatello Municipal; Elev., 4448'; Fac. Class., LOM; Ident., PI; Procedure No. 1, Amdt.fi; Eft. date, 27 May 65- Sup Arndt No 5‘ Dated, 18 Apr. 64 . • . .,

Portland VOR...... -...... SVY RBn...... 3200 T-dn* 300-1 300-1 200-H NewbergVOR______SVY RBn...... 3200 n —dn# 700-1 700-1 700-1H North Plains VHF Int...... SVY RBn...... _...... 3200 800-2 800-2 800-2 Scappoose VHF Int______SVY RBn (final)...... 3000

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn S side of crs, 278° Outbnd, 098° Inbnd, 3200' within 10 miles of Sauvies Island RBn. Minimum altitude over SVY RBn on final approach crs, 3000'; over OM, 1100'; over LMM, 900'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 098°—9.5 miles; OM to airport, 098“—4.0 miles; LMM to airport, 098°—0.6 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.6 mile after passing LMM, climb direct to IA LOM. continue climb to 3700' in a 1-minute left turn holding pattern E of IA LOM. Other changes: Deletes transitions from Woodland FM, LaCenter FM, Portland LFR, and Willamette FM. #Caution: 664' terrain, 1.8 miles SE of airport. *200-H authorized on Runways 10R and L/28 R and L only. 700-2 required on Runways 2 and 20. MSA within 25 milesof facility: 000°-090°—5400'; 090°-180°—2500'; 180°-270°—4500'; 270°-360°—3100'. City, Portland; State, Oreg; Airport name, Portland International; Elev., 26'; Fac. Class., MHW; Ident., SVY; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 13; Eft. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 12; Dated, 21 Mar. 64

Groves VHF Int______IA LOM______j 5400 T-dn* 300-1 300-1 200-H PDX V O R ...... IA LOM...... 3700 C-dn# I.. 700-1 700-1 700-1H Oswego VHF Int______IA LOM...... 3700 800-2 800-2 800-2 Mt. Scott VHF Int...... IA LOM...... 3700

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 27 MAY 1965. City, Prescott; State, Ariz.; Airport name, Prescott Municipal; Elev., 5042'; Fac. Class., BH; Ident., PRC; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 1; Efl. date, 16 Nov. 63; Sup. Amdt. No. Orig.; Dated, 24 Aug. 63

RES VOR. LOM...... 9200 T-dn% . 300-1 300-1 200-H C-dn.."...... 700-1 700-1 700-1H A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn N side of crs, 074“ Outbnd, 254° Inbnd, 9200' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 8600'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 254°—3.9 miles. , If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.9 miles after passing LOM, climb to 10,000 on 254 crs from LOM within 10 miles. Other change: Deletes transition from Point of Rocks FM. %Takeoff all runways: Shuttle climb on the 243° radial of the Rock Springs VO RTAC within 15 miles to minimum crossing altitude required for direction of flight. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°~090°—9100'; 090°-180°-H9700'; 180 -270°—9700'; 270°-360°—9700'. City, Rock Springs; State, Wyo.; Airport name, Rock Springs Municipal; Elev., 6752'; Fac. Class., LOM; Ident., RE; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 1; Efl. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. Orig.; Dated, 5 Oct. 63 Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6843

ADF Standard I nstrum ent Approach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum 2-engine, From— To— altitude Condition distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

Direct______5000 T-dn%...... 300-1 300-1 *300-1 Gayiota vuxw—— ------Direct...... 4000 C -dn...... 800-1 800-1 800-1)4 Direct...... 3000 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2 Lobster lut - —----- —-— Halibut Int______;______Direct______3000 Naples Int/LOM...... Direct...... 4000 Direct______5000 Naples Int/OM (final). ______Direct- ______2100

Procedure turn S side of final approach crs, 253° Outbnd, 073° Inbnd, 3200' within 10 miles of Naples Int/OM. Minimum altitude over Naples Int/OM Inbnd, 2100'. ' Crs and distance, Naples Int/OM to airport, 073°—5.5 miles; LMM to airport, 073 —0.5 mile. , , , Tf visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished at LMM, climb straight ahead to 1000', turn right to 240 hoadine intercept and proceed via 184° crs from LMM or SB A VOR R-195 to Goleta Int at 2600', or when directed by ATC, (1) climb straight ahead to 1000', turn right, climb via 253^’crs from LMM to Naples Int/OM at 2500', (2) climb straight ahead to 1000', turn right and climb via VTU VOR R-279 or 099° crs from SB A LMM to channel Int at 2 jjote: Simultaneous use of ADF and VOR receivers necessary for execution of this approach. Final approach from holding pattern at Naples Int/QM not authorized. Procedure turn required. Caution: All maneuvering must be accomplished S of final approach crs. High terrain N. Other change: Deletes straight-in minimums. *300-M authorized on Runways 25,16. . _ _ . _ . OTTN, %Northbound (260° thru 080 ) IF R departures must comply with published Santa Barbara SID s. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 090°-180°—3700'; 180°-270°—4500'; 270°-090°—7900'. City Santa Barbara; State, Calif.; Airport name, Santa Barbara Municipal; Elev., 14'; Fac. Class., LMM; Ident., BA; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 2; Efl. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 20 Jan. 62

QEQ VOR- GE LOM ...... - Direct______4500 T-dn%...... 300-1 300-1 200-Ji C-dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-1)4 S-dn-21______400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. When used in lieu of procedure turn, alignment on final approach heading within 10 miles of LOM Is required. Procedure turn N side of crs, 025° Outbnd, 205° Inbnd, 4500' within 10 miles. Not authorized beyond 10 miles. Shuttle descent to 4500' in a 170-175 KT 1-minute right turn, holding pattern NE of GE LOM. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 3600'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 205°—3.9 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or If landing not accomplished within 3.9 miles after passing GE LOM, climb to 4000' direct QEG VO R, continue climb on R-207 within 10 miles of GE G VOR or, when directed by ATC, turn right, dimb direct to GE LOM, thence continue climb to 4500' in a 170-175 KT 1-minute right turn, holding pattern NE of GE LOM. Caution: High terrain N and E of airport. 3188' tower, 4.8 miles SE of GE LOM, Terrain and tower 6031'—16 miles NE of LOM; 4549' TV tower, 9.2 miles E of airport. Other change: Deletes transition from Rockford VHP Int. %Takeofls all runways: Climb direct GEG VOR, thence continue climb on R-207 GEGVOR within 10 miles so as to oross GEG VOR at or above; eastbound V-2 3200'; Northeastbound V-2N 3200'; southeastbound V2S 5000'. LF departures: Climb on the 205° bearing from E G LMM within 10 miles to ME A for direction of flight. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090®—7100'; 090°-180°—6300'; 180°-270°—4100'; 270®-360°—5100'. City, Spokane; State, Wash.; Airport name, Spokane International; Elev., 2372'; Fac. Class., LOM; Ident., GE; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 6; Efl. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 5; Dated, 20 Feb. 65

Utica VOR.. 3300 300-1 300-1 200-Ji Vernon ¿at.. B K O R.Rn 3000 C-dn ... 400-1 500-1 500-1J4 Lakeport fnt. Direct..!______2600 H-dn-IB______400-1 400-1 400-1 Westlake Int. R K C R.RnT(final) 2600 A-dn 800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring and transitions by Griffis RAPCON authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn W side of crs, 329° Outbnd, 149° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2600'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 149°—5.7 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.7 miles after passing BKG RBn, climb straight ahead to 3200' direct to UTI RBn. Hold SE of UTI RBnL329° Inbnd, 1-minute right turns. Other change: Deletes transition from Sherrill Int to BKG RBn. MSA within 25 miles of BKG RBn: 000°-090°—1000'; 090°-180°—3500'; 180°-270°—3500'; 270®-360°—3000'. City, Utica; State, N.Y.; Airport name, Oneida County; Elev., 742'; Fac. Class., MHW; Ident., BKG; Procedure No. 2, Arndt. 2; Efl. date, 27 May 65; Sup Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 13 Feb. 65

PROCEDURE CANCELLED EFFECTIVE 27 MAY 1965. City, Winslow; State, Ariz.; Airport name, Municipal; Elev., 4937'; Fac. Class., SABH; Ident INW; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 3; Efl. date, 22 Dec, 62; Sup. Arndt. No. 2; Dated, 17 Nov. 62

Hampton Int. THV RRn 2900 T-dn 400-1 400-1 NA Delroy Int. THV RBn______2900 C-dn__ 700-1 700-4 NA S-dn...... NA NANA A-dn______NA NA NA

Procedure turn E side of final approach crs, 344® Outbnd, 164°lnbnd,'2900' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2000'. j^rs and distance, facility to airport, 164®—3.6 miles. ®9n*a®lf n°t established upon descent to authorized landing .minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.6 miles after passing RBn make immediate left- wa* tuT?J° 2900 and return to York RBn. Hold N York RBn, 1-minute left turns, Inbnd crs, 164®. within 25 miles of the facility: 180®-090°—2700'; 090®-180°—2300'. ity, York; State, Pa.; Airport name, York; Elev., 480'; Fac. Class., MHW; Ident., THV; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 2; Efl. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 31 Oct. 64 6844 RULES AND REGULATIONS

3. By amending the following very high frequency omnirange (VOR) procedures prescribed in § 97.11(c) to read: VOR Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSB. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approach« shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below w u es

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— Course and 2-engine, To— distance altitude Condition (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

Romeo Tnt ...... ALS VOR...... 10,100 T-dn# 600-1 600-1 200-H Blanca Int_ _ . ADS VOR 10,100 C-dn .. 600-1 600-1 60O-1& A-dn%...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn N side of crs, 113° Outbnd, 293° Inbnd, 10,100' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 9200'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 320°—6.6 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minim urns or if landing not accomplished within 5.6 miles after passing ALS VOR, climb to 10,000'on ALS VOR R-320 within 15 miles. N otes: Voice communications with Denver ARTCC and Trinidad FSS. Caution: High terrain all quadrants. Procedure not wholly within controlled airspace. %TTse as an alternate authorized only while Alamosa weather bureau is in operation from 0400 to 2000 MST. #IFR departures: Climb in holding pattern oh ALS VOR R-326, right turns, to sufficient altitude to cross ALS VOR at 9800' eastbound on V83-210; 10,700' southwestbound on V210S; 8400' northwestbound on V484; 9200' southbound on V83; and 9600' southwestbound on V210. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—16,400'; 090°-180°—12,200'; 180°-360°—13,600'. City, Alamosa; State, Colo.; Airport name, Alamosa Municipal; Elev., 7535'; Fac. Class., H-BVORTAC; Ident., ALS; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 1; Eff. date, 29 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 8 Feb. 64

Wasco VHF In t...... BFL VOR (final)...... 1500 T-dn% 300-1 300-1 200-U Woody In t... _ ...... _ BFL VOR...... 4000 C -d n ” 500-1 500-1 500-1 u S-dn-12L...... 500-1 600-1 500-1' A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn E* side of prs, 322° Outbnd, 142° Inbnd, 2800* within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1500'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 131°—3.4 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.4 miles after passing BFL VOR, turn right, W and climb to 3000' cm R-322 to Delano Int. or when directed by ATC, climb to 3000' on R-227 to McKittrick Int. N otes: (1) Final approach from holding pattern at BFL VOR not authorized. Procedure turn required. (2) When authorized by ATC, DME may be used at 9 miles from BFL VOR at 3000' from BFL R-121 to R-352 to position aircraft on final approach crs for a straight-in approach with the elimination of procedure turn. Other change: Deletes transition from Bakersfield LFR. *A11 turns E side of crs, traffic restrictions W. %E and southbound (015° thru 210°) IF R departures must comply with published Bakersfield SID’s. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 0006-090°—8600'; 090°-180°—7700’; 180°-360°—3500'. City, Bakersfield; State, Calif.; Airport name, Meadows Field; Elev., 488'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., BFL; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 9; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 8; Dated, 3 Oct. 64

T-d%...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 T -n...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 C-dn___ _ _ 1100-2 1100-2 1100-2 A-dn______1100-2 1100-2 1100-2

Procedure turn S side of crs, 212° Outbnd, 032° Inbnd, 3100' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2300'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 032°—1.9 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 1.9 miles after passing VOR, make right-climbing turn to 4000' on R-156 within 20 miles of VO R. Caution: 1160' terrain, 2 miles WNW of airport and rising rapidly to 3100'. Air Carrier N ote: Reduction in visibility by sliding scale or local conditions not authorized. %Westbound (180° thru 040°) and eastbound (070° thru 095°) climh direct to BLH VOR, climb via R-130 within 15 miles to recross BLH VOR at 2500' minimum, then via assigned route. Procedure turn W of crs. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—4500'; 090°-180°—3800'; 180“-360°—5000'. City, Blythe; State, Calif.; Airport name, Blythe; Elev., 397'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., BLH; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 3; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. 2; Dated, 31 Aug. 63

T-dn%*...... 2000-4 2000-4 2000-4 C-dn...... 2000-4 2000-4 2000-4 A-dn______2000-4 2000-4 2000-4

Procedure turn N side crs, 042° Outbnd, 222° Inbnd, 6000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 4000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 224”—11.6 miles. .. . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or If landing not accomplished within 6.0 miles after passing DAG-VOR, turn right, cumD to 6000' on R-230 to Daggett VOR. N ote: Final approach from holding pattern at DAG VOR not authorized. Procedure turn required. *500-1 authorized for takeoff on Runways 3 and 7. , . %Northbound (290° thru 010°) and southbound (100° thru 240°) after reaching 700 feet (base controlled airspace) climb direct DAG VORTAC, then via assigned rouie. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—5400'; 090°-270°—8000'; 270°-360°—6200'. City, Daggett; State, Calif.; Airport name, Baxstow-Daggett; Elev., 1927'; Fac. Class., L-BVORTAC; Ident., DAG; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 3; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. 2; Dated, 7 Sept. 63 Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6845

VOR S tandard I n st r u m e n t A ppr o a c h P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum From— To— altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 66 knots

T-d%...... 300-1 300-1 200-H C-d...... 1000-1 1000-1 1000-1)4 A-d...... NA NANA

Procedure turn N side of crs, 030° Qulbnd, 210° Inbnd, 8100' within 10 miles. Not authorized beyond 10 miles. Minimum altitude oyer facility on final approach crs, 8000', Crs and distance, facility to airport, 014°—1.1 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimnms or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile of FBR VOR, turn right, climb to 10,000' on R-330 within 20 miles. Other change: Deletes transition from FBR RBn. %Departure procedures: None required. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—8200'; 090°-1808—12,000'; 1808-270°—11,500'; 2708-360°—0300'. ■City, FortBridger; State, Wyo.; Airport name, Fort Bridger; Elev., 7016'; Fac. Class., BVOR; Ident., FBR; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 4; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 3; Dated, 6 Apr. 63

H A R VOR ...... 3000 T-dS 500-1 500-1 600-1 HAR VOR______3000 T-n# 600-2 500-2 500-2 C -dn___ . . 1200-2 1200-2 1200-2 A-dn______1200-2 1200-2 1200-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn S side of crs, 288° Outbnd, 108° Inbnd, 3000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 108°—7.5 miles. If visual contact hot established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 7.5 miles after passing Harrisburg VOR, climb to 3000' on HAR VOR R -lll to Steelton Int. Hold E 1-minute left turns, Inbnd crs, 291°. Air Carrier N ote: Landing on Runway 2 authorized only during daylight hours with ceiling of 1600' or better. N ote: Takeoff on Runway 20 not authorized. #Takeoff minimums of 300-1 authorized for Runways 8-26 only. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-2708—2800'; 270o-360°—3200'. City, Harrisburg; State, Pa.; Airport name, Harrisburg-York State; Elev., 347'; Fac. Class.. BVORTAC; Ident., HAR; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 8; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 7; Dated, 31 Oct. 64

T-dn% ______300-1 300-1 200-)4 C -d______1000-1)$ 1000-1)4 1000-2 C -n...... 1000-2 1000-2 1000-2 A -dn------1000-3 1000-3 1000-3

Procedure turn N side of crs, 086° Outbnd,'266° Inbnd, 4700' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 4000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 296°—10.1 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimnms or if landing not accomplished withih 7.5 miles after passing PMD VO R, make climbing right turn, climb via R-295 to VOR, then via R-067 to 5000' within 10 miles. N ote: Final approach from holding pattern at PMD VOR not authorized. Procedure turn required. Other change: Deletes transition from,PL LFR. %Southhound (100° thru 270°) after reaching 700' (base of control area), climb on the Palmdale VOR R-283 between the station and a point 15 miles N W to sufficient altitude to cross PMD VOR at minimum crossing altitude for direction of flight. Procedure turn/tums N of crs. MCA’s: 100°-205°—6000'; 206°-270°—4500'. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—4700'; 090°-180°—10,400'; 1808-360°—7700'. City, Lancaster; State, Calif.; Airport name, Gen. William J. Fox Airfield; Elev.,2349'; Fac. Class., H-BVORTAC; Ident., PMD; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 2; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. 1; Dated, 28 Nov. 64

T-dn%...... 3500-3 3500-3 3600-3 C-dn______3500-3 3600-3 3500-3 A-dn,. ..T_ - ,. 4000-4 4000-4 4000-4

Procedure turn S side of crs, 273° Outbnd, 093° Inbnd, 9500' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over .facility on final approach crs, 9000'. ^ sa n d distance, facility to airport, 088°—7.5 miles. «u_i ’. ,^®L®?ntact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 6.0 miles after passing MLD VOR, turn left, and Climb to 11,000' on R-273 within 20 miles. * k*5rri0,N: High terrain all quadrants. O teehinge; Deletes transition from Malad City LFR. %l akeoff all runways: Climb clear of clouds over Malad City Airport to 8000'; continue climb direct MLD VOR. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—10,300'; 090°-180°—9400'; 180°-270°—10,000'; 270°-360°—10,000'. City, Malad City; State, Idaho; Airport name, Malad City; Elev., 4503'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., MLD; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 3; Eff. date, 27 May 66; Sup. Amdt. No. 2; Dated, 17 Nov. 62

T-dn...... 300-1 300-1 200-)4 C-d ______500-1 500-1 500-1)4 C-n______500-2 600-2 500-2 S-d-9...... 600-1 600-1 600-1 S-n-9______500-2 500-2 500-2 A-dn______.... 800-2 800-2 800-2 If aircraft has operating ADF or DME receivers and Lake Int is identified, the following minimums are authorized: C-dn______400-1 500-1 600-1)4 S-dn-9______400-1 400-1 400-1

p.a. ^ vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. M i ? side of crs> 2880 Outbnd, 108° Inbnd, 1800' within 10 miles, rvo rii!?1?-a'titude over facility on final approach crs, 1800'; over Lake Int, 700'. If yiqriQl sta ni. c e, ,7 facility «7 to «nairport, pwi «j AW108°—6.3 U>U UlUvDfmiles; AACWVvLake AllbInt toIU allairport, pUl b, 1UO108°—3. 0.0 3 HlllCO.miles. to 1800'11 Visual on COntaof __ uP°n______descent__a ato___ authorizedU i___!_j tlanding__ J- _ __minimumsILj ______or if landing not accomplished within 6.3 miles after passing MOB VOR, turn right, climb Notfs- m nruOR % 180 within 20 miles or, when directed by ATC, turn left, climb to 1800' on MOB VOR R-059 within 20miles. (2) Aircraft o;Lwi?en authorized by ATC, DME may bemused within 20 miles at 1800' to position aircraft for a straight-in approach with the elimination of a procedure turn. ■>.»Ma a. nrf+ifcuJjn8.m‘ss®d ** executing TTllSKAil ODTimiiapproachpH may,mair after oftor beingVininrr vnirlnntifinrlreidentified, be Kn radarrn/lni* controlled, within 25 miles of the facility: 0008-090°—1900'; 090°-1808—1900'; 180°-270°—1600'; 270°-360°—1600'. City, Mobile; State, Ala.; Airport name, Bates Field; Elev., 218'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., MOB; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 14; Eff. date, 29 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. 13; Dated, 26 Dec. 64 6846 RULES AND REGULATIONS

VOR S tandard I n str u m e n t A ppro a c h P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimum.,

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— Course and To— distance . altitude Condition 2-engine, (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

T-dn%...... 300-1 300-1 200-H C-dn*______500-1 500-1 500-1Û 8-dn-3______500-1 600-1 600-1 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn N side of crs, 234® Outbnd, 054® Inbnd, 6800' within 10 miles. All turns N side of crs; high terrain S. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 5400'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 032®--3.1 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.1 miles .after passing PIH VOR, climb to 7000' on R-016 within 15 miles. N ote: Pinal approach from holding pattern at PIH VOR not authorized, procedure to n required. Caution: High terrain located SE through SW of airport. Other change: Deletes transition from PH LFR. •Circling not authorised 8 of airport. %Takeofl all runways; Shuttle climb on the 234° radial of the PIH VOR within 20 miles to minimum crossing altitude required for direction of flight. All turns N side of ramai. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—10,300'; 090°-180°—10,300'; 180°-270°—8500'; 270°-360°—6500'. City, Pocatello; State, Idaho; Airport name, Pocatello Municipal; Elev., 4448'; Fac. Class., BVOR; Ident., PIH; Procedute No. 1, Amdt. 5; Efl. date, 27 May 65- Sun Arndt No. 4; Dated, 18 Apr. 64 '

T-dn%* 800-2 800-2 800-2 C-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 A-dn___ 1000-2 1000-2 1000-2

Procedure turn N side of crs, 289° Outbnd, 109° Inbnd, 7500' within 10 miles. Nonstandard due to high terrain S. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 6600'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 112°—4.1 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.1 miles after passing PRC-VOR. make immPiikte left-climbing turn and retoivto PRC VOR; continue climb to 8000' on R-289 within 20 miles or, when directed by ATC, make immediate left turn and climb to 9000' on R-080 within 15 miles of PRC VOR. Beyond 15 miles not authorized. N otes: (1) Final approach crs is to NE side of airport. (2) Circling and maneuvering W and S not authorized. Other change: Deletes transition from Prescott RBn. *600-2 authorized for takeoff on Runways 3 and 21. 30 climb direct to PRC VOR; Runway 12 turn left, Runway 21 turn right, climb direct to PRO VOR, then climb NW viaPRC VOR R-289 to recross PRC VOR at minimum crossing altitudes for direction of flight. MCA’s; PRC VOR R-050 to R-180—5800'; PRC VOR R-181 to R-258—7200'. Northbound (259° through 049°) on-course climb authorized. MSA within 26 miles of facility: 000 -090°—8800'; 090°-180°—9000'; 180°-270°—8600'; 270°~360°—8300'. City, Prescott; State, Ariz.; Airport name, Prescott Municipal; Elev., 5042'; Fac. Class., H-BVORTAC; Ident., PRC; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 13; Efl. date. 27 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. 12; Dated, 20 Feb. 65

T-dn%______300-1 300-1 200-M C-dn*...... 700-1 700-1 700-W A-dn______1200-2 1200-2 1200-2

Procedure t o n N side of crs, 081° Outbnd, 261° Inbnd, 9200' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over Salt Int on final approach crs, 8600'; over VOR, 8000'. Crs and distance, Salt Int to VOR, 261°—2.1 miles; VOR to airport, 267°—1.9 miles. R-268 wftMn°20 mil 8°* establislied upon descent t0 authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 1.9 miles after passing RKS VOR, climb to 10,000' on N ote: If Salt Int is used, ADF equipment required. *If Salt Int not received, minimums of 1200-1 apply. %Takeofl all runways: Shuttle chmb on the 243 radial of the Rock Springs VORTAC within 15 miles to minimum crossing altitude required for direction of flight. MSA within 26 miles of facility: 000°-090°—9100'; 090°-180°—9700'; 180°-270°—9700'; 270°-360°—9700'. 6 City, Rock Springs; State, Wyo.; Airport name, Rock Springs Municipal; Elev., 6752'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., RKS; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 7; Efl. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. 6; Dated, 18 Apr. 64

T-dn______300-1 300-1 200-H C-dn...... 600-1 600-1 600-1H S-dn-11______400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn N* side crs, 300° Outbnd, 120° Inbnd, 7000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 6000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 107°—3.7 miles. on R ^ 9 ^ M n t15CiidlMeStabllShed UP°n descent to aathorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3,7 miles after passing VO R, turn left, climb to 7000' Shuttle: To 8000' on crs, 300° Outbnd, 120° Inbnd within 20 miles of INW VOR. Other change: Deletes transition from Winslow RBn. •All turns N side of crs, high terrain, S. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 270°-090°—7600'; 090°-270°—8000'. City, Winslow; State, Ariz.; Airport name, Winslow Municipal; Elev., 4937'; Fac. Class., H-BVORTAC; Ident., INW; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 6; Efl. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. 5; Dated, 8 Aug. 64 Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6847 4. By amending the following terminal very high frequency omnirange (TerVOR) procedures prescribed in § 97.13 to read: T erminal VÓR Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure ■Roarines hid in g s courses and radiais are magnate. Elevations and altitudes are In feet MSL. Ceilings are In feet above airport elevation. Distances are In nautical h«7 ^ 1ass otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. , „ . „■- . . ... * , , joiies u n i^ procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, , is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches toUbemadeover specified routes Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-englne or less More than Course and 2-engine, From— T o - altitude Condition more than distance (feet) 65 knots More than or less 65 knots 65 knots

EUG VOR ...... Direct______3000 T-dn...... 300-1 300-1 200-% EÚG VOR ...... Direct______3000 C-dn...... 800-1 800-1 800-1% EÙG VOR ...... Direct.______3000 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2 If aircraft equipped to receive VOR and ADF simul taneously or equipped with DME and Junction City Int identified, the following minimums apply:* C-rln 1 500-1 1 500-1 1 500-1% S-dn-16#...... 400-1 400-1 400-1

Procedure turn W side of crs, 347° Outbnd, 167° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles. Final approach from holding pattern at EUG VOR not authorized, procedure turn required. Minimum altitude over Junction City Int on final approach crs, 12007; over EUG VOR, 800. Crs and ffisfcmcm Junction City Int to airport, 167°—3.8miles; breakoff point to approach end of Runway 16,159°—0 6 (LMM). _ _ _ Ii visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile after passing EUG VO R, turn right, climb to 2300' on R-347 within 10 miles, or when directed by ATC, turn right and climb to 3000' on R-250 EUG VOR within 10 miles of EUG VOR. Note: ° W ^ au th o ri^d \^ A T C , DME may be used between R-326 EUG VOR clockwise to R-010 EUG VOR within 10 miles at 2300' to position aircraft for straight-in approach with elimination of the procedure turn. *If Junction City Int not identified, authorized minimum over EUG VOR is 1200 . #400-% authorized, except for 4-engine turbojet aircraft, with operative high-intensity runway lights. #400-% authorized, except for 4-engine turbojet aircraft, with operative ALS. MSA within 28 miles of facility: 000°-090°—4500'; 090°-180°—4800'; 180°-270°—3800'; 270°-360°—4500'. City, Eugene; State, Oreg.; Airport name, Mahlon Sweet Field; Elev., 365'; Fac. Class., L-BVORTAC; Ident., EUG; Procedure No. VOR-16, Arndt. 8; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 7; Dated, 1 May 65

300-1 300-1 200-% 800-1 800-1 800-1% 800-2 800-2 800-2 Aircraft equipped with VOR and DME and Lincoln Int identified or radar Fix obtained in lieu of Lincoln Int m inimums are: | C-dn...... 1 500-1 500-1 500-1%

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Aircraft will be released for final approach without procedure turn Inbnd on final approach crs, 7 miles from VOR. Procedure turn E side of crs, 038° Outbnd, 218° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1600'. Facility on airport, crs and distance, breakoff point to approach end of Runway 22,224°—0.5 mile...... , . 1 If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile of FWA VOR, climb to 2600 southwestbound on radial, 218° and proceed to Rock Creek Ipt, or when directed by ATC, climb to 2100', make left turn and proceed direct to FW LOM. . N otes: (1) Aircraft executing missed approach may be radar controlled after radar identification. (2) When authorized by ATC, 10-miles DME arc at 260u may be used between FWA VOR R-280° clockwise to R-150° to position aircraft for straight-in approach with elimination of procedure turn. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 315°-045°—2700'; 045°-315°—2200'. City, Fort Wayne; State, Ind.; Airport name, Baer Field; Elev., 801'; Fac. Class., H-BVORTAC; Ident., FWA; Procedure No. Ter VOR-22, Arndt. Orig; Eft. date, 27 May 65

T-dn%...... 400-1 400-1 400-% C-dn...... 1500-1 1500-1 1500-1% A-dn____ ... __ 1500-2 1500-2 1500-2 If aircraft equipped to receive VOR and DME, and Canal Int identified, the following minimums apply: C-dn...... 1 800-1 I 800-1 I 800-1%

Procedure turn E side of crs, 150° Outbnd, 330° Inbnd, 7500' within 14 miles. Minimum altitude over Canal Int on final approach crs, 5600'; over LMT VOR, 4900'. Facility on airport, crs and distance, Canal Int to VO R, 330°—2.5 miles; breakoff point to runway, 318°—0.4 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile of LMT VO R turn left, climb to 7500 on R- 255 m a 1-minute left turn holding pattern, all turns N side of crs. Caution: High terrain all quadrants. Other change: Deletes departure procedures having reference to KL LFR. . %Takeoffs all runways: Climb southeastbound on R-140 LMT VOR to cross LFA RBn/ll-mile DME Fix at or above 5700', thence turn right heading 250° magnetic to lntereept R-161 LMT VOR, thence turn right, climb direct LMT VOR so as to cross LMT VOR at or above 7000'. Takeoffs all runways: Climb via SE crs LMT ILS localizer southeastbound to cross LFA RBn/ll-mile DME Fix, LMT VOR at or above 5700', thence turn right heading *0 to intercept R-161 LMT VOR, thence turn right, climb direct LMT VOR so as to cross LMT VOR at or above 7000'. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—8300'; 090°-180°—7600'; 180°-270°—8500'; 270°-360°—9300'. City, Klamath Falls; State, Oreg.; Airport name, Kingsley Field; Elev., 4092'; Fac. Class., L-BVORTAC; Ident., LMT; Procedure No. Ter VOR-32, Arndt. 3; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 2; Dated, 21 Nov. 64

Cong Beach VOR 3000 T -dn...... 300-1 300-1 200-% Downey RBn/FM 3000 C-dn...... 500-1 600-1 600-1% CAX VOR.. 2400 S-dn-25R_____ 500-1 500-1 500-1 Canal Int. 1800 A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 If aircraft equipped with operating dual V( and Holly Int received, the following apply: S-dn______400-1 400-1

vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. rrocedure turn S side of crs, 066° Outbnd, 246° Inbnd, 2400' within 10 miles of Speedway Int. Nonstandard due to traffic restrictions N of final approach crs. Mimmum altitude over Speedway Int on final approach crs, 1800'. ^rs ana distance, Speedway Int to airport, 246°—5.8 miles. Breakoff point to runway, 248°—0.5 mile, vio contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.8 miles after passing Speedway Int, climb to 2000' MQ? V »-248 within 20 miles. within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—7200'; 090°-180°—2500'; 180°-270°—2400'; 270°-360°—5200'. City, Los Angeles; State, Calif.; Airport name, Los Angeles; Elev., 126'; Fac. Class., H-BVORTAC; Ident., LAX; Procedure No. TerVOR-25R, Arndt. 2; Eff. date, 29 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. 1; Dated, 18 Apr. 64 No. 97------3 6848 RULES AND REGULATIONS

T erminal VOS Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimi,ma

2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and From— T o - altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

T-dn%**._____ 300-1 300-1 200-H C-dn#...... 400-1 500-1 500-1H A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn S* side of crs, 030° Outbnd, 210° Inbnd, 4700' within 10 miles. " Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2949'. Frvisua^contSV ot establishéd upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile of PMD VOS, make right-climbing turn, climb via PMD R-067 to 5000' within 10 miles. Note: Military aerodrome—Prior permission required. Other change: Deletes transition from PL LFR. #No lights Runways 4-22. Night operations this runway not authorized. •Traffic restrictions N of crs. ■ " **600-2 required for takeoff on Runway 22. , _ , , . . . . . t> „ %Southbound (100° thru 270°) takeoff all runways: Turn N immediately after takeoff, intercept and climb Outbnd on PMD R-283 between the station and a point 15 miles NW to sufficient altitude to cross PMD VOR at minimum crossing altitude for direction of flight. Procedure turn N of crs. MCA’s: 100°-205°—6000'; 206°-270°—4500'. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—4700'; 090°-180o—10,400'; 180°-360°—7700'. City, Palmdale; State, Calif.; Airport name, Palmdale Air Force Plant No. 42; Elev., 2549'; Fac. Class., H-BVORTAC; Ident., PMD; Procedure No. VOR-22, Amdt. 5; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. 4; Dated, 23 Jan. 65

OOD VOR Via radar vectors*. 2400 T-dn______300-1 300-1 200-H Via radar vectors*. 2400 C-dn...... 700-1 700-1 700-1M Taylor VHP Tnt. ______Via radar vectors*. 2400 S-dn-6______700-1 700-1 700-1 Taylor VH F Int PNF, VOR (final) . _ ___ Vectors 064°_____ 800 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectors authorized in accordance with approved Philadelphia patterns. / Procedure turn not authorized. Facility on airport. Crs and distance breakoff point to runway, 058°—0.5 mile...... '■ „ ...... If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile of PNE VO R, climb on R-064 to 1500 within 6 miles. Then make left-climbing turn to 2400'. Proceed direct PNE VOR. Hold SW, 1-minute right turns, Inbnd crs, 064®. Other change: Deletes transitions from Hi-Line Int and Ardmore Int. •Radar vectors to final approach Fix are required. Final approach radial, 244°. MSA within 25 miles of the facility: 000°-180°—1500'; 180°-360°—2400'. City, Philadelphia; State, Pa.; Airport name, North Philadelphia; E lev.,120'; Fac. Class., T-VOR; Ident., PNE; Procedure No. Ter VOR-6, Amdt. 1; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. Orig.; Dated, 15 Aug. 64

T-dn______300-1 300-1 NA C-dn______700-1 700-1 NA S-dn-13______700-1 700-1 NA A-dn*.. _____ 800-2 800-2 NA

Procedure turn W side of crs, 311° Outbnd, 131° Inbnd, 2800' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2000'. ^visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile of Y EN VOR, make right-climbing turn to ^ ^ N ote: When1 weather^below 1000-2, aircraft departing eastbound, flight below 2600' prohibited between radiais 010° to 140° inclusive of the YEN VO R due to 2100' tower, 2.4 miles E of airport...... ' . , .... , Air Carrier N ote: Alternate minimums authorized 24 hours daily for air carriers with weather reporting service available at the airport. •Alternate minimums authorized only during hours of control zone operation. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-360°—3100'. City, Yankton; State, S. Dak.; Airport name, Yankton Municipal; Elev., 1282'; Fac. Class., L-VOR; Ident., YEN; Procedure No. TerVOR-13, Amdt. Orig.; Eff. date, 27 May 66 Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6849 5 By amending the following very high frequency omnirange-distance measuring equipment (VOR/DME) procedures described in § 97.15 to read: • VOR/DME S tandard I n str u m e n t A ppro a c h P rocedure Hearings headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miioamiless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. m Tf an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, ni«*« an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches toUbe niade over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and 2-engine, From— T o - altitude Condition distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

Direct...... 2500 T-dn______300-1 300-1 20043 C-dn______600-1 600-1 600-1Hi S-dn-22______600-1 600-1 600-1 A-dn*...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

When authorized by ATC, JVL DME may be used to position aircraft for straight-in approach at 2600' between R-330 clockwise to R-110° via 16-mile DME arc with the elimination of procedure turn. _ Procedure turn N side of crs, 036® Outbnd, 215° Inbnd, 2500' between 10- and 20-mile DME F u R-035. Minimum altitude over 10-mile DME Fix R-035 on final approach crs, 2200'. Crs and distance, 10-mile DME Fix R-036 to airport, 215®—4.8 miles. . _ - ___„ . ' n , If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished at 5.2-mile DME Fix R-035, climb to 2400' on 236 radial of JVL VORTAC within 10 miles. N ote: Approach control available through Rockford, 111., control tower. •Alternate minimum« authorized only during hours of control zone operation. Alternate minimums authorized 24 hours daily for air carriers with weather reporting serv ice at the airport. . . . MSA within 25 miles of facility- 000®~090®—2200'; 090®-180®—2400'; 180®-270°—2600'; 270®-360°—2400'. City Janesville; State, Wis.; Airport name, Rock County; Elev., 808'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., JVL; Procedure No. VOR/DME No. 1, Amdt. Orig.; Eft. date, 27 May 65

T-dn%*...... 300-1 300-1 200-H C-dn#...... 400-1)3 500-1)3 500-2 S-dn 25...... 400-1)3 400-1H 400-lH A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn Teardrop, right turn, 044® Outbnd, 244° Inbnd, 4700' within 10 miles. | Minimum altitude over 8.0-müe DME Fix R-064,4300'. Minimum altitude over 5.0-mile DME Fix R-064 on final approach crs, 3800'. Crs and distance, 5.0-mile DME Fix R-064, to airport, 244 —5.5 miles; breakoff point to runway, 251°—1.6 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minim um s or if landing not accomplished at 1.1 miles before VO RTAC, make right-climbing turn and climb via R-067 to 6000' within 10 miles. Note: Military airport authorized for military use only, except by prior arrangement. Other change: Deletes transition from PMD RBn. #No lights Runways 4-22. Night operations this runway not authorized. *600-2 required for takeoff on Runway 22. %Southbound (100° thru 270°) takeoff all runways: Turn N immediately after takeoff, intercept and climb Outbnd on PMD R-283 between the station and a point 15 miles NW to sufficient altitude to cross PMD VOR at minimum crossing altitude for direction of flight. Procedure turn N of crs. MCA’s: 100°-205°—6000'; 206°-270°—4500'. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—4700'; 090°-180°—10,400'; 180°-360®—7700'. City, Palmdale; State, Calif.; Airport name, Palmdale Air Force Plant No. 42; Elev., 2549'; Fac. Class., H-BVOR/TAC; Ident., PMD; Procedure No. VOR/DME No. 1, Amdt. 2; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. 1; Dated, 23 Jan. 65

10-mile DME Fix R-059 PDX VOR ...... 4000 T-dn*...... 300-1 300-1 20043 10-mile DME Fix R-328 PDX VOR (final) . . 3000 C-d...... 900-1 900-1 900-1)3 10-mile DME Fix R-074 PDX VOR 4000 C-n...... 900-2 900-2 900-2 Groves Int______P O T VOR 5400 A-dn______1000-2 1000-2 1000-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn W side of crs, 328° Outbnd, 148° Inbnd, 4000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 3000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 159°—9.2 miles. ■ If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 9.2 miles after passing PDX VO R, turn left and return direct to PDX VO R climbing to 4000'. Caution: 664' terrain, 1.8 miles SE of airport. Note: When authorized by ATC, DME may be used between R-160 clockwise to R-328 within 15 miles at 4000' to position aircraft for straight-in approach with elimination oi the procedure turn. Other changes: Deletes transitions from Woodland FM and LaCenter FM. -200-K authorized on 10 R and L/28R and L. 700-2 required on Runways 2 and 20. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 090°-180°—5100'; 180°-270°—3100'; 270°-090°—5600'. City, Portland; State, Oreg.; Airport name, Portland International; Elev., 26'; Fac. Class., H-BVORTAC; Ident., PDX; Procedure No. VOR/DME No. 1, Amdt. 3; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. 2; Dated, 26 Sept. 64

10-mile DME Fix PRC-R-289 PRC VOR (final)...... ' ...... 6600 T-dn*%...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 C-dn¿...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 A-dn...... 1000-2 1000-2 1000-2

Procedure turn Teardrop, 309° Outbnd, turn left, 109° Inbnd, 7500' within 10 miles. . Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 6600'. ws and distance, facility to airport, 112°—4.1 miles. o i^ i vlsual ^utact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished at 4.1 miles after passing PRC VOR, make immediate left- miUo>lnlTturn and return to PRC VOR, climb to 8000' on R-289 within 15 miles or, when directed by ATC, make immediate left turn, and climb to 9000' on R-080 within 15 at« authorized beyond 15 miles. m jijOTEs: (l) When authorized by ATC, DME may be used at 10 miles at 9100' altitude from PRC R-237 to R-258 and at 8000' altitude between PRC R-258 and R-348 to t?r a straight-in approach with the elimination of the procedure turn. (2) Final approach crs is to NE side of airport, f.authorized for takeoff on Runways 3 and 21. sSjT‘fingjW and S not authorized. _ Von n no«. 311 runways: Runways 3 and 30 climb direct to PRC VOR, Runway 12 turn left, Runway 21 turn right, climb direct to PRC VOR, then climb NW via PRC to recross PRC VOR at minimum crossing altitudes for direction of flight. MH * S:..?RC VOR R-050 to R-180—5800'; PRC VOR R-181 to R-258—7200'; northbound (259° through 049°) on crs climb authorized. m&a within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—8800'; 090°-180°—9000'; 180°-270°—8600'; 270°-360°—8300'. City, Prescott; State, Ariz.; Airport name, Prescott Municipal; Elev., 5042'; Fac. Class., H-BVORTAC; Ident., PRC; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 2; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. 1; Dated, 20. Feb. 65 6850 RULES AND REGULATIONS

VOR/DME S tandard I n str u m e n t Appr o a c h P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimum.

2-engine or less Minimum Course and More than From— To— distance altitude Condition 2-engine, (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

7-mile TIME Fix R-081 9200 T-dn%___ 300-1 300-1 200-Ji 8100 C-dn _ 400-1 600-1 RgfiV O H fflnsb Direct______7300 B-dn-25______400-1 400-1 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn N side of crs, 081° Outbnd, 261° Inbnd, 9200' within 10 miles. , Crs and distance, facility to airport, 267°—1.9 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished at 1.9-mile DME Fix R-267, climb to 10,000' on R-268 within 20 miles. N ote: When authorized by ATC, DME may be used within 16 miles between radials 010° clockwise to 081° at 9500' to position aircraft for final approach, with the elimina tion of a procedure turn. %Takeofl all runways: Shuttle climb on the 243° radial of the Rock Springs VORTAC within 15 miles to minimum crossing altitude required for direction of flight. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—9100'; 090°-180°—9700'; 180°-270°—9700'; 270°-360°—9700'. City, Rock Springs; State, Wyo.; Airport name, Rock Springs Municipal; Elev., 6752'; Fac. Class., BVORTAC; Ident., RKS; Procedure No. VOR/DME No. 1, Arndt. 4; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 3; Dated, 18 Apr. 64

9ft-ml1e TIME EIy R-073 11-mile DME Fix R-073 . Direct__ . 5500 T-dn%______300-1 300-1 200-l<2 11-mile DME Fix R-073 . C E O VOR. 4200 500-1 500-1 690 ÌU S-dn-3#.______400-1 400-1 m - r A-dri._____ .... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar transitions and vectoring utilizing Spokane radar authorized in accordance with approved radar patterns. When used in Heu of procedure tufrTT’alignment on final approach heading within 10 miles of VO R is required. Procedure turn S side of crs, 207° Outbnd, 027° Inbnd, 4000' within 10 miles. ' Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 3700'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 027°—4.4 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.4 miles after passing GE G VO R, climb on R-028 to GE LOM, thence continue climb to 4500' in a 1-minute right turn holding pattern on R-026 NE of GE LOM or, when directed hy ATC, make left-climbing turn and climb to 4500' on R-271 within 20 miles, all turns Sside H-271, or make left-climbing turn and return to VO R, climbing to 4000'. . Other change: Deletes transitions from Rockford, Williams, Amber, Tyler, Edwall, and Corsky Ints. N ote: When authorized by ATC, DME may be used within 9 miles at 4000' to position aircraft for straight-in approach with elimination of the procedure turn. C aution: 'Terrain and tower, 6031'—16 miles N E of LOM; high terrain N through E of airport; 3188' tower, 4.8 miles SB of GE LOM; 4549' TV tower, 9.2 miles E of airport #400-% authorized, except for 4-engine turbojet aircraft, With operative high-intensity runway lights. %Takeofls all runways: Climb direct GEG VOR, thence continue climb on R-207 GEG VOR within 10 miles so as to cross GEGVOR at or above eastboundV-2 3200'; northeastbound V-2N 3200'; southeastbound V-2S 5000'. LF departures: Climb on the 205° bearing from EG LMM within 10 miles to ME A for direction of flight. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090“—6300'; 090°-180°—5000'; 180°-270°—4100'; 270°-360°—6100', City, Spokane; State, Wash.; Airport name, Spokane International; Elev., 2372'; Fac. Class., H-BVORTAC; Ident., GEG; Procedure No. VOR/DME No. 1, Aindt. 5; Eft. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 4; Dated, 20 Feb. 65

T-dn______300-1 300-1 200-H C-dn...... 600-1 600-1 600-1H S-dn-11______400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn N* side of crs, 300° Outbnd, 120° Inbnd, 7000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 6000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 107°—3,7 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.7 miles after passing INW VOR, turn left, climb to 7000'on R-079 within 15 miles. Shuttle: To 8000' on cars, 300° Outbnd, 120° Inbnd within 20 miles. N ote: When authorized by ATC, DME may be used at 6 miles at 7000' to position aircraft for straight-in approach with elimination of procedure turn. Other Change: Deletes transition from INW RBn. ♦All turns N side of crs, high terrain, S. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 270°-090°—7600'; 090°-270°—8000'. City, Winslow; State, Ariz.; Airport name, Winslow Municipal; Elev., 4937'; Fac. Class., H-BVORTAC; Ident., INW; Procedure No. VOR/DME No. 1, Arndt. 1; Efl. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 8 Aug. 64 Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6851 6. By amending the following instrument landing system procedures prescribed in § 97.17 to read: ILS Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radlals are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. U If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— To— Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

Int of FLW R-029 and BFL Localizer Direct______4000 T-dn%...... 300-1 300-1 200-)$ B.C. C-dn______500-1 500-1 500-1)$ Int of PTV R-183 and BFL Localizer Direct...... 3000 S-dn-12L#...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn...... _. 800-2 800-2 800-2 Int of BFL R-322 and PTV R-183...... Int of PTV R-183 and BFL Localizer Direct...... 3000 Bup. Int of FLW R-029 and BFL Localizer B.C .. Lerdo Int (final)...... -...... Direct...... 2000 Int of PTV R-183 and BFL Localizer B.C. Lerdo Int (final)...... Direct...... 2000

Procedure turn not authorized. Minimum altitude over Lerdo Int on final approach crs, 2000'. Crs and distance, Lerdo Int to airport, 119°—4.6 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.6 miles after passing Lerdo Int, climb straight ahead to 1500' within 6 miles, turn right, climb via localizer crs to Lerdo Int at 3000' or, when directed by ATC, climb to McKittrick Int via R-227 at 3000'. N ote: When authorized by ATC, DME may be used at 9 miles bom BFL VOR at 3000' from BFL R-121, CW R-352 to position aircraft on BFL R-296/localizer back crs for a straight-in approach with the elimination of the procedure turn. #400-)$ authorized, except for 4-engine turbojet aircraft, with operative high-intensity runway lights. %E and southbound (015° thru 210°) IFR departures must comply with published Bakersfield SID’s. City, Bakersfield; State, Calif.; Airport name, Meadows Field; Elev. 488'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-BFL; Procedure No. ILS-12L (back crs), Arndt. 2; Eff. date, 27 May 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 19 Dec. 64

BFL VOR.. LOM...... Direct. 2400 T-dn%...... 300-1 300-1 200-}$ Maricopa Int. LOM...... Direct. 3000 C-dn...... 500-1 600-1 500-1H River Int__ LOM...... Direct. 2400 S-dn-30R#____ 200-)$ 200-)$ 2004$ Arvin Int__ LOM (final). Direct. 2000 A-dn...... 600-2 600-2 600-2 Lamont Int.. Arvin In t... Direct. 65(H) Woody Int__ LOM...... Direct. 4000

Procedure turn S* side SE crs, 119° Outbnd, 299° Inbnd, 2400' within 10 miles of OM. Beyond 10 miles not authorized. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd. 2000'. Descent** to 1985' at LOM authorized after glide slope intercept on localizer crs. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 1985'—4.5 miles; at MM, 713'—0.6 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb direct BFL VOR, then via R-322 to Delano Int at 3000' or, when directed by ATC, climb via BFL VOR R-277 to McKittrick Int at 3000'. N ote: When authorized by ATC, DME may be used at 17 miles at 2400', from BFL VOR R-227 counterclockwise R-122 to position aircraft on BFL R-122/localizer front crs for a straight-in approach with the elimination of the procedure turn. Other change: Deletes transition from BC LFR. •All turns S side of crs, higb terrain, N. #400-)$ required with glide slope inoperative. 400-)$ authorized, except for 4-engine turbojet aircraft, with operative ALS. / %E and southbound (015° thru 210°) IFR departures must comply with published Bakersfield SID’s. City, Bakersfield; State, Calif.; Airport name, Meadows Field; Elev., 488'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-BFL; Procedure N6. ILS-30R, Arndt. 16; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup, " Arndt. No. 16; Dated, 14 Nov. 64

DAB VOR...... LOM...... 1500 300-1 300-1 200-)$ Barberville Int __ LOM...... 1600 C-dn . 400-1 500-1 500-1)$ Lake Helen I n t.. LOM...... 1600 S-dn-6* 200-)$ 200-)$ 200-)$ Smyrna Int...... LOM...... 1500 600-2 600-2 600-2 Woodruff Int LOM (final)...... 1400

Procedure turn N side of crs, 245° Outbnd, 065° Inbnd, 1400' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 1400'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 1378'—4.7' miles; at MM, 238'—0.6 mile, r “ visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb to 1500' on NE crs ILS, make left turn and proceed to U T®® via the R-140 or, when directed by ATC, climb to 1500' on NE crs ILS, make right turn and proceed direct to LOM. 400-)$ required with glide slope inoperative. 400-)$ authorized, except for 4-engine turbojet aircraft, with operative ALS. City, Daytona Beach; State, Fla.; Airport name, Daytona Beach Municipal; Elev., 34'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-DAB; Procedure No. ILS-6, Arndt. 6; Eft. date, 29 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 5; Dated, 11 May 63

Harrisburg LFR LOM______2700 T -d ... 500-1 500-1 500-1 Harrisburg VOR LOM...... 2700 T -n . 500-2 500-2 C-dn...... 1000-2 1000-2 1000-2 S-d-8...... 600-1)$ 000-1)$ 600-1)$ S-n-8______600-2 600-2 600-2 A-dn______1000-2 1000-2 1000-2

Radar transitions authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn N side of W crs, 259° Outbnd, 079° Inbnd, 2700' within 10 miles. If vie tim ^ ta d ® over LOM, 2700'. No glide slope. Distance to approach end of runway at OM, 7.1 miles, at MM, 1.8 miles, hnrv V A n n ,1!. n°t established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 7.1 miles after passing LOM, climb to 3000' on Harris- Are r R~ln steelton Int. Hold E 1-minute left turns, Inbnd crs, 291°. NivrM4Ri?!m N otes: Landing on Runway 2 authorized only during daylight hours with ceiling 1500' or better. C n- v 0^ minimums of 300-1 authorized for Runways 8-26 only. (2) Takeoff on Runway 20 not authorized. (3) ADF approach not authorized. Catttta " minimums do not provide standard clearance over 1136' ridge and tower, 1.6 miles 8 of airport. CAimnM.' ^¡mnstandard instrument landing system. Approaches not authorized with any commissioned component inoperative. ution: Course vagaries and/or flag indications may be encountered below 6000' beyond 10' miles of localizer antenna when more than 15° 8 of the localizer crs. City, Harrisburg; State, Pa.; Airport name, Harrisburg-York State; Elev., 347'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-HAR; Procedure No. ILS-8, Amdt. 9; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. 8; Dated, 14 July 62 6852 RULES AND REGULATIONS

ILS S tandard I n str u m e n t Appro a c h P rocedure—Co n tin u ed

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Course and Minimum More than From— To— distance altitude Condition 2-engine, (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

LMT VOR . .. LFA RBn Direct... 7500 T-dn%__ 400-1 400-1 400-% Mt. Dome VHF In t______LFA RBn Direct...... 7500 C-dn . 800-1 800-1 800-1)6 LFA RBn 7600 S-dn-32* 400-% 400-% 400-% 1000-2 1000-2 1000-2

Procedure turn not authorized. Pinal approach from holding pattern at LPA RBn. Final approach crs, 318° from LFA RBn. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception, 7500'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at LFA RBn, 7500'—10.5 miles; at OM, 5970'—5.8 miles; at MM, 4350'—0.6 mile. If visual contact hot established upon descent to authorized landing minimum's or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile after passing MT LMM,'climb to 7500' direct to LMT VOR, thence turn left, continue climb in a 1-minute left turn holding pattern on R-255 of LMT VOR. C aution: High terrain all quadrants. Other change: Deletes departure procedures having reference to KL LFR. •All components of the ILS including LFA RBn and all related airborne equipment must be in satisfactory operating condition when executing this approach. The ALS is not considered a component of this ILS. %Takeofls all runways: Climb via SE crs LMT ILS localizer southeastbound to cross LFA RBn at or above 5700'; thence turn right heading 250° magnetic to intercept R-161 LMT VOR, thence turn right, climb direct LMT VOR so as to cross LMT VOR at or above 7000'. Takeoffs all runways: Climb southeastbound on R-140 LMT VOR to cross LFA RBn/ll-miles DME Fix at or above 5700', thence turn right heading 250° magnetic to in tercept R-161 LMT VOR, thence turn right, climb direct LMT VOR so as to cross LMT VOR at or above 7000'. City, Klamath Falls; State, Oreg.; Airport name, Kingsley Field; Elev., 4092'; Fac. Class., ILS: Ideiit., I-LMT; Procedure No. ILS-32, Arndt. 5; Efl. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 4; Dated, 21 Nov. 64

LOM 2000 300-1 300-1 *200-% RW crs TLR 1800 C-dn 600-1 600-1 600-1% LOM (finall...... 1800 R-dn-4** 200-% 200-% 200-% A-dn______600-2' 600-2' 600-2

Radar vectoring authroized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn N side of crs, 220° Outbnd, 040° Inbnd 1800' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 1800'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at LOM, 1800'—4.6 miles, at LMM, 500—0.6 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing mini-minus or if landing not accomplished climb to 2000' on N E crs, ILS (040°) within 20 miles or, when directed by ATC, (1) turn right, climb to 2000' and proceed to VORTAC, or (2) turn right, climb to 2000' on R-055 within 20 miles. *300-1 required for takeoff Runways 17, 35, 32. **500-1 required when glide slope not utilized. City, Little Rock; State, Ark.; Airport name, Adams Field; Elev., 257'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-LIT; Procedure No. ILS-4, Arndt. 8; Efl. date, 29 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 7; Dated, 12 Oct. 63

Medford VOR MF LOM ...... Direct 6500 T -d n % .______300-1 300-1 200-% Odd Hitt Tnt. MF LOM Direct.__ . __ 6500 C-dn. 700-1 700-1 700-1% MF LOM ______... ______Direct______8000 S-dn-14...... 200-% 200-% 200-% MF LOM Direct______8000 A-dn . .. 1000-2 1000-2 1000-2 15-mile DME Fix and N crs MFR L o c..... Evans Creek FM (final)...... Direct...... 6500*

Procedure turn E side N crs, 319° Outbnd, 139° Inbnd, 6500' within 10 miles of Evans Creek FM. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 6000'. Altitude of glide ¿ope and distance to approach end of runway at Evans Creek, 6000'—14.6 miles; at OM, 2860'—4.7 miles; at MM, 1550'—0.6 mile. . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized-landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, make immediate climbing right turn, climbing direct to MF LOM, thence continue climb to 6500'm a 1-minute right turn, holding pattern S of MF LOM on the localizer crs. _ , N ote-; (1) Evans Creek FM and aU components ofthe ILS and related airborne equipment must be fully operational and used when executing this approach. Evans Creek FM and procedure turn may be eliminated provided VFR On-top is maintained to MF LOM, and further, the aircraft must be able to arrive over MF LOM at 2860 on-top. (2) When authorized by ATC, DME may be used between R-215MFR VOR clockwise to R-347 MF R VOR within 15 miles at 6500' to position aircraft for straight-in approach with elimination of procedure turn. Caution: High terrain all quadrants. Major change: Deletes transition from Medford LFR. •Descent on glide slope to cross Evans Creek FM at 6000' is authorized. : ~ %A11 IF R departures must comply with published Medford SID’s. City, Medford; State, Oreg.; Airport name, Medford Municipal; Elev., 1330'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-MFR; Procedure No. ILS-14, Amdt. 8; Efl. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. 7; Dated, 10 Apr, 65

TDM (final) 2200 T-dn*______300-1 800-1 200-% FGT VOR...... -,______LOM.___:...... Direct______2300 C-dn...... 500-1 500-1 soo-i% Direct______2200 S-dn-4$**...... 200-% 200-% 200-% 'MSP V O R .: - ...... -______LOM _ ■ Direct.... 2500 A -dn...... 600-2 600-2 600-2 M SP RBn LOM ...... D irect...... 2300

Radar vectoring to final approach crs authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure tarn S side of crs, 219° Outbnd, 039° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd 2200'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 2088'—4.5 miles; at MM, 1035'—0.6 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimnms or if landing not accomplished, climb to 2500' on NE crs ILS within 15 miles. N ote: Aircraft executing missed approach may be radar controlled after radar identification. . . ol $400-1 required when glide slope not utilized. 400-% authorized, except for 4-engine turbojet aircraft, with operative high-intensity runway lights, 4UO-% auuioiu. , except for 4-engine turbojet aircraft, with operative ALS...... _ . . •’ ■' H . •Runway visual range, 2400' also authorized for takeoff on Runway 4 in lieu of 200-% when 200-% authorized, providing high-intensity runway lights are operational. ** Runway visual range, 2400' is also authorized for landing on Runway 4; provided, that all components of the ILS, high-intensity runway lights, approacnugni« condenser discharge flashers, outer compass locator and all related airborne equipment are operating satisfactorily. Descent below 1040' shall not be made unless visual to with approach lights has been established or the aircraft is clear of clouds. City, Minneapolis; State, Minn.; Airport name, Minneapolls-St. Paul International (Wold-Chamberlain Field); Elev., 840'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-APL; Procedure No. ILS-4, Amdt. 8; Efl. date, 29 May 65; Sup. Amdt. No. 7; Dated, 9 Jan. 65 Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6853

ILS Standard I n str u m en t Appro a c h P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— To— Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

Mobile VOR... LOM. Direct. 1500 T-dn___ 300-1 300-1 200-54 Brookley VOR. LOM. Direct. 1500 C-dn___ 400-1 500-1 500-1)4 S-dn-14*. 200-54 200-M 200-54 A-dn___ 600-2 600-2 600-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn W side of crs, 319° Outbnd, 139° Inbnd, 1500' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 1500'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 1500'—4.5 miles; at MM, 424'—0.6 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, make right turn, climb to 1800' on 180° crs from LOM within 20 miles or, when directed by ATC, make right turn, proceed direct to MOB VOR climbing to 1800' and enter VOR holding pattern. N ote: Aircraft executing missed approach may, after being reidentified, be radar controlled. *400-54 required when glive slope not utilized. 400-54 authorized, except for 4-engine turbojet aircraft, with operative ALS. City, Mobile; State, Ala.; Airport name, Bates Field; Elev., 218'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-MOB; Procedure No. ILS-14, Arndt. 15; Eft. date, 29 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 14; Dated, 16 Jan. 65

PTTT VOR LOM...... 7000 T-dn%______300-1 300-1 200-J4 LOM...... 7000 C-dn*** 500-1 500-1 500-1)4 IP A VOR 7400 8-dn-21*_ 300-Ji 300-54 300-54' A-dn______600-2' 600-2' 600-2"

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn N side of NE crs, 027° Outbnd, 207° Inbnd, 7000' within 10 miles. Not authorized beyond 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 7000'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 5610'—3.7 miles; at MM, 4660'—0.6 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb to 6500' on R-234 PIH VO R within 15 miles or, when directed by ATC, climb to 6500' on 231° crs from PI LOM within 15 miles. Caution: High terrain, SE through SW of airport. Other change: Deletes transition from PH LFR. *400-54 required when glide slope not utilized. 400-54 authorized, except for 4-engine turbojet aircraft, with operative SALS. ♦•Maintain 7400' until interception of glide slope, descend on glide slope to cross LOM at 5610'. ♦’♦Circling not authorized S of airport. %Takeofl all runways: Shuttle climb on the 234° radial of the PIH VORrwithin 20 miles to minimum crossing altitude required for direction of flight. All turns N side of 234° radial. ~ City, Pocatello; State, Idaho; Airport name, Pocatello Municipal; Elev., 4448'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-PIH; Procedure No. ILS-21, Arndt. 6; Efl. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 5; Dated, 21 Mar. 64

13.8-mile DME Fix R-328 PDX VOR...... SVY RBn...... Direct______3200 T-dn***...... 300-1 300-1 200-54 Scappoose VH F In t...... SVY RBn (final) 3000 C-dn% 700-1 700-1 700-1)4 UBO VOR...... SVY RBn 3200 S-dn-10R###___ 200-54 200-54 200-J4 PDX VOR...... SVY RBn Direct. 3200 700-2' 700-2’ 700-2 15-mile DME Fix R-175 PDX VOR...... SVY RBn...... Direct...... !___ 3200

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn S side of crs, 278° Outbnd, 098° Inbnd, 3200' within 10 miles. Beyond 10 miles not authorized. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 3000'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at SVY RBn, 3000'—9.5 miles; at OM, 1357'—4.0 miles; at MM, 280'—0.6 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb direct to IA LOM, continue climb to 3700' in a 1-minute left turn, holding pattern E of IA LOM or, when directed by ATC, proceed direct to PDX VOR, climbing to 4000'. Other change: Deletes transitions from Woodland FM, Willamette FM and PO LFR. ♦200-)4 authorized Runways 10R/L and 28R/L only. 700-2 required on Runways 2 and 20. #500-% required when glide slope not utilized. %Caution: 664' terrain, 1.8 miies SE of airport. ♦♦Runway visual range, 2400' also authorized for takeoff on Runway 10R in lieu of 200-)4 when 200-)4 authorized; provided high-intensity runway lights are operational. ##Runway visual range, 2400' also authorized for landing on Runway 10R provided all components of the ILS, high-intensity runway lights, approach lights, condenser discharge flashers, outer compass locator, and all related airborne equipment are operating satisfactorily. Descent below 226' shall not be made unless visual contact with ap proach lights has been established or the aircraft is clear of the clouds. City, Portland; State, Oreg.; Airport name, Portland International;Elev., 26'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-PDX; Procedure No. ILS-10R, Arndt. 15; EfT. date, 27 May 65: Sud. Arndt. No. 14; Dated, 27 Feb. 65 1

PDX VOR. Levee I n t...... 3200 T-dn* 300-1 300-1 200-M UBG VOR. Levee I n t...... 3200 C-dn# 700-1 700-1)4 Pearson Int. Levee Int______3200 S-dn-10L 600-1 600-1 600-1 Buxton Int.. Levee Int (final)...... 2900 800-2 800-2 800-2

> Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn 8 side of crs, 278° Outbnd, 098° Inbnd, 3200* within 10 miles of Levee Int. Minimum altitude over Levee Int on final approach crs, 2900'; over Portal Int, 1000'. Ors and distance, Levee Int to airport, 098°—-9.8 miles; Portal Int to airport, 098°—4.4 miles. No glide slope. (Back crs). T (Sm Vlsui^ contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.4 miles after passing_ Portal Int, climb direct to IA A-uM continue climb to 3700* in a 1-minute left turn, holding pattern E of IA LOM or, when directed by ATC, turn left, climb to 4000' direct t

IL S Standard I n str u m e n t A ppro a c h P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— To— attitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

LA LOM...... Direct______— 6400 T-dn** *...... 300-1 300-1 20043 PDX VOR IA LOM...... - ...... D irect..______3700 C-dn#...... 700-1 700-1 700-1Û Mt. Scott VHF Int IA LOM...... Direct______3700 S-dn-28R## %- - 20043 1 20043 20043 LA LOM...... Direct______3700 A-dn______700-2 700-2 700-2

Radar transitions and vectoring using Portland radar authorized in accordance with approved radar patterns. Procedure turn S side of crs, 098° Outbnd, 278° Inbnd, 3700' within 10 miles. Pinal approach from holding pattern at LA. LOM not authorized, procedure turn required. Minimum altitude at glide dope interception Inbnd, 1700'. Altitude of glide dope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 1676'—6.0 miles; at MM, 284'—0.6 mile. < , . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimnms or If landing not accomplished, climb to 3200' direct to SV Y RBn, or when directed by ATC, turn right, climb to 4000' direct to PDX VOR. Other change: Deletes transition from PO L FR . Deleted requirement for radar alignment on final approach. *200-J3 authorized Runways 10R/L and 28R/L only. 700-2 required on Runways 2 and 20. %700-l required when glide slope not used...... ,, . . . „ ,, **Runway visual range, 2400' also authorized for takeoff on Runway 28R in lieu of 20043 when 20043 authorized; provided high-intensity runway lights are operational; ##Runway visual range, 2400' also authorized for landing on Runway 28R provided all components of the ILS, high-intensity runway lights, approach lights, condenser discharge flashers, outer compass locator, and all related airborne equipment are operating satisfactorily. Descent below 226' shall not be made unless visual contact with approach lights has been established or the aircraft is clear of the clouds. ^Caution: 664' m.s.l. terrain, 1.8 miles SE of airport. Terrain rises to 11)246' within 35 miles of LOM. City, Portland; State, Oreg.; Airport name, Portland International; Elev., 26'; Tac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-IAP; Procedure No. ILS-28R, Arndt. 1; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 22 June 63

T,flM ______Direct______2900 T-dn*__...... 300-1 300-1 20043 LOM (final)...... Direct______2100# C-dn...... 600-2 800-2 800-2 LOM.i__ 1______Direct______2900 S-dn-36**.__... 400-1 400-1 400-1 T.OM . _____ Direct.:______2900 A-dn______. 1000-2 1000-2 1000-2

Procedure turn E side S crs, 181° Outbnd, 001° Inbnd, 2100' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2100'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 1631—3.9 miles, at MM 641—0.5 mile. . *i ' . . . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landingminlmums or if landing not accomplished, climb to 3000' on crs of 001 from the RD G LO M to intercept the 321° radial of the Pottstown VOR direct to Auburn Int and hold SW on R-261 ETX VOR, 1-minute pattern left turns. ' Air Carrier N ote: Neither sliding scale nor any reduction in takeoff minimums authorized on Runways 31 or 36. Other change: Deletes transitions from Int SW crs, Allentown LFR and S crs, ILS, and from Rainholds Int. „ . ,, __ *300-1 required for takeoff on Runways 31 and 36; takeofl on Runways 18 and 13, make right turn as soon as practical, to avoid towers, 1236' and high terrain, 2S Rules bis of airport. **600-rrequired with glide slope inoperative. ‘ #After interception of localizer crs Inbnd, descent on glide slope to cross outer marker at 1631' on final approach Is authorized. City, Reading; State, Pa.; Airport name, General Carl A. Spaatz Field; Elev., Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-RDG; Procedure No. ILS- 6, Arndt. 10; Eff. date, 27 May 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 9; Dated, 14 Nov. 64

Haflville DME Int*. LOM (final) 8600 T-dn%...... 300-1 300-1 20043 RKS VOR...... m u 9200 C -d n # ...... - 400-1 500-1 600-1J3 S-dn-25#...... 30043 30043 300-53 A-dn______600-2 600-2 600-2

Procedure turn N side E crs, 074° Outbnd, 254° Inbnd, 9200' within 10 miles of LOM. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 8600'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM 7850'—3.9 miles, at MM, 6950'—0.6 mile. u ____ ... „ /w v - a —uu n m If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished climb to 10,000' on W crs of localizer, 254 OutDna wunm xu miles of LOM or, when directed by ATC, climb to 10,000' on R-268 RKS-VOR within 20 miles. Air Carrier N otes: Sliding scale not authorized. C aution: Without glide slope, maintain 8600' until over OM Inbnd. _ . , , ,__ N ote: When authorized by ATC, DME may be used within 20 miles at 9700' to position aircraft over Hallville DME Int for final approach with the elimination of procedure turn. ‘Maintain 8600' until interception of glide slope, descend on glide slope to cross LOM at 7860'. #If glide slope not used, 700' minimums apply; straight-in minimums not authorized. , , . ,. .. . %Takeoff all runways: Shuttle climb on the 243° radial of the Rock Springs VO RTAC within 15 miles to minimum crossing altitude required for direction oi nigni. City, Rock Springs; State, Wyo.; Airport name, Rock Springs Municipal; Elev., 6752'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-RKS; Procedure No. ILS-25; Arndt. 13; Efl. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 12; Dated, 16 Nov. 63

8RÀ VOR LMM Direct______5000 T-dn%...... 300-1 300-1 #300-1 RRÀ LMM Direct______4000 C-dn...... 700-1 700-i 700-43 300-53 80043 LMM____...... Direct______4500 S-dn-7*...... S0043 800-2 o y o VOR R-163...... 3200 A-dn______800-2 800-2 Direct______3000 Direct______3000 Direct______1500 Goleta Inti___ i ___i______Direct.. ______4000

Procedure turn S side W crs, 253° Outbnd, 073° Inbnd, 3200' within 10 miles of Naples Int/OM. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2100'. Altitude of glide slope at Naples Int/OM, 1500'; at MM, 195'; at Halibut Int, 3200'. Distance to approach end of runway from Naples Int/OM, 5.5 miles; from MM, 0.5 mile, from Halibut Lit, 11.9 miles. onA, _ . . tnr„ 040° heading, If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb straight ahead to 800', make ngnt turn A intercept and proceed via SBA VOR R-195 or 184° crs from LMM to Goleta Int at 2500' or when directed by ATC, (1) climb straight ^ a d to W . turn right, cnmD v i ^ ^ ILS W crs to Naples Int/OM at 2500', or (2) climb straight ahead to 800', make climbing right turn and climb via VTU VOR R-279 or 099 crs from SBA LMM to l at 2000'. ^ N ote: Final approach from holding pattern at Naples Int/OM not authorized. Procedure turn required. Caution: All maneuvering must be accomplished S of localizer crs. High terrain to the N. #30043 authorized on Runways 26,16. , %Northbound (260° thru 080°) IFR departures must comply with published Santa Barbara SID’s. ___ „ . , 0 i/vun: authorized, except *400-1 required with glide slope inoperative. 40043 authorized, except for 4-engine turbojet aircraft, with operative high-intensity runway lights. 4UU4 $ for 4-engine turbojet aircraft, with operative ALS. g,.. City, Santa Barbara; State, Calif.; Airport name, Santa Barbara Municipal; Elev., 14'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-SBA; Procedure No. ILS-7, Arndt. 12, Efl. date, 27 7 Sup. Arndt. No. 11; Dated, 2 Mar. 63 Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6855

ILS Standard in s t r u m e n t A ppro a c h P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum 2-engine, From— To— altitude Condition distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

GE LOM ...... Direct______5500 T-dn%*...... 300-1 300-1 200-% GE LOM...... Direct______4500 C-dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-1% S-dn-21**...... 200-% 200-% 200-% A-dn______600-2 600-2 600-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. When used in lieu of procedure turn, alignment on final approach heading within 10 miles of LOM is requhed^dure turn si,je 0f NE ors, 025° Outbnd, 205° Inbnd, 4500' within 10 miles. Beyond 10 miles not authorized. Shuttle descent to 4500' in a 170-175 KT 1-minute right turn, holding pattern NE of GE LOM on NE ors of ILS localizer. Minimum altitude at glide slope Interception Inbnd, 3600'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at LOM, 3527'—3.9 miles; at LMM, 2560'—0.6 m ile ...... - ' If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb straight ahead to the GE G VO R and chmb to 4000 on R-207 within 10 miles of GEG VOR or, when directed by ATC, turn right, climb direct to GE LOM, thence continue climb to 4500' in a 170-175 KT 1-minute right turn, holding pattern NE of GE LOM on the localizer crs. Other change: Deletes transition from Rockford VHP Int. , „ Caution- Terrain and tower, 6031'—16 miles NE of LOM; high terrain, N through E of airport; 3188* tower, 4.8 miles 8E of GE LOM; 4549' TV tower, 9.2 miles E of airport. »Runway visual range, 2400' also authorized for takeoff on Runway 21 in lieu of 200-% when 200-% is authorized provided high-intensity runway lights are operational. »»Runway visual range, 2400' also authorized for landing on Runway 21, provided all components of the ILS, high-intensity runway lights, approach lights, condenser dis charge flashers, outer compass locator, and all related airborne equipment are operating satisfactorily. Descent below 2572' shall not be made unless visual contact with approach lights has been established or the aircraft is clear of the clouds. . , %Takeofts all runways: Climb direct GEG VOR, thence continue climb on R-207 GEG VOR within 10 miles so as to cross GEG VOR at or above eastbound V-2 3200 , northeastbound V-2N 3200'; southeastbound V-2S 5000'. LF departures: Climb on the 205° bearing from EG LMM within 10 miles to ME A for direction of flight. Citv. Spokane; State, Wash; Airport name, Spokane International; Elev., 2372'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-GEG; Procedure No. ILS-21, Arndt. 9; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 8; Dated, 20 Feb. 65 - 7. By amending the following radar procedures prescribed in § 97.19 to read:

R adar Standard I n str u m e n t A ppro a c h P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet, MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If a radar instrument approach is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitude(s) shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below. Positive identification must be estab lished with the radar controller. From initial contact with radar to final authorized landing minimums, the instructions of the radar controller are mandatory except when (A) visual contact is established on final approach at or before descent to the authorized landing minimums, or (B) at pilot’s discretion if it appears desirable to discontinue the approach, except when the radar controller may direct otherwise prior to final approach, a missed approach shall be executed as provided below when (A) communication on final approach is lost for more than 5 seconds during a precision approach, or for more than 30 seconds during a surveillance approach; (B) directed by radar controller; (C) visual contact is not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums; or (D) if landing is not accomplished.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— To— Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

r ~ Within: s iirveillance approach 000°...... 360° ...... 2000 000°...... 3fin° 2100 T-dn______300-1 300-1 200-% 000°..-. . 3fi0® 30 miles...... 2500 C-dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-1% 000°... . 360® .. 2800 S-dn-28,33*.-- 400-1 400-1 400-1 S-dn-22.1...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 S-dn-10,15...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, Runways 28, 22, 33: Climb to 2000' direct to BAL LOM. Hold W, 102® Inbnd, 1-minute right turns. Runways IQ, 15: Climb to 2000' direct to Bodkin Int. Hold E R-105,1-minute left turns. *400-% authorized, except for 4-engine turbojet aircraft, with operative high-intensity runway lights. City, Baltimore; State, Md.; Airport name, Friendship International; Elev., 146'; Fac. Class,, Baltimore; Ident., RADAR; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 2; Eft. date, 29 May 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 6 June 64

No. 97- 4 6856 RULES AND REGULATIONS

R adar Standard I n str u m e n t A ppro a c h P rocedure— Continued

Radar terminal area maneuvering sectors and altitudes1 Ceiling and visibility, minimums

2-engine or less More than From To Dist. Alt. Dist. Alt. Dist. Alt; Dist. Alt. Dist. Alt. Dist. Alt. Condition 2-engine, 65 knots More than more than s or less 65 knots 65 knots

110 195 20 5600 15 4000 Surveillance approach 195 035 20 , 3300 15 3200 060 110 20 30Ò0 15 2400 T-d-All*@— 500-1 500-1 500-1 T-n-All*®-. 500-2 500-2 600-2 C-dn-8/30%. 1100-2 1100-2 1100-2 C-dn-26%... 1000-2 1000-2 100Ó-2 S-dn-8/30__ 1100-2 1100-2 1100-2 ? S-dn-26___ 600-1)4 600-1)4 600-1« A-dn-8/30... 1100-2 1100-2 1100-2 A-dn-26__ £■ 1000-2 1000-2 1000-2

All sectors within 10 miles 2400'. All bearings are from the radar site with sector azimuths progressing clockwise. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, Runway 30: Make climbing left turn to 3000', proceed direct to E A R VOR. Hold W, EA R VOR 1-minute right turns Inbnd crs, 101°. Runway 26: Make climbing right turn to 3000 , proceed direct to HAR VOR. Hold W, HAR VOR 1-minute right turns, Inbnd crs, 101°, Runway 8: climb to 3000' on E A R VOR R -lll to Steelton Int. Hold E 1-minute left turns, Inbnd crs, 291°. C aution: Towers, 1689'—7.5 miles NW and lS^O*—7.9 miles N of airport. N ote: Landing on Runway 2 authorized only during daylight hours with ceiling 1500' or better. •Takeoff minimums of 300-1 authorized for Runways 8-26 only. ^ @ Takeoff on Runway 20 not authorized. % Circling minimums do not provide standard clearance over 1136' ridgeand tower, 1.6 miles 8 of airport. City, Harrisburg: State, Pa: Airport name, Harrisburg-York State; Elev., 347'; Fac. Class., Harrisburg; Ident., Radar; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 3; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup, Arndt. No. 2; Dated, 31 Oct. 64

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than From— To— Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

r • 1 000®...... - 360°...... -...... -...... Within 30 miles__ 6000 Precision approach T-dn*#...... 300-1 300-1 200-H C-dn...... 700-1 700-1 700-1)4 S-dn-10R##...... 200-)4 200-M 200-J4 A-dn...... 700-2 700-2 700-2 Surveillance a pproach T-dn*...... 300-1 300-1 200-H C-dn...... 800-1 800-1 800-1)4 S-dn-28R/10R$ . 700-1 700-1 700-1 S-dn-20— ____ 800-1 800-1 800-1 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, all runways: Climb to 3000' direct to PDX VOR or, when directed by ATC, Runway 10R; climb to 3200' direct to IA LOM; Runway 28R; climb to 3200' direct to Sauvies Island RBn. Air Carrier N ote: Sliding scale for landing not authorized Runway 20. Caution: 664' terrain, 1.8 miles SE airport. •200-H authorized for Runways 10R-L and 28R-L only. 700-2 required for Runways 2 and 20. . #Runway visual range, 2400' ¿so authorized for takeoff on Runway 10R in lieu of 200-H when 200-J4 is authorized providing high-intensity runway lights are operationau ##Runway visual range, 2400' also authorized for landing on Runway 10R provided that all components of the PAR, high-intensity runway lights, approach lights, condenser discharge flashers, outer compass locator, and all related airborne equipment are in satisfactory operating condition. Descent below 226' shall not be made unless visual contact with the approach lights has been established or the aircraft is clear of clouds. $Minimum altitude oyer 3-mile Radar Fix Inbnd on final to Runway 10R, 900'. City, Portland; State, Oreg.; Airport name, Portland International; Elev., 26'; Fac. Class;, Portland; Ident., Radar; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 10; Eff. date, 27 May 65; Sup. Arndt. No. 9; Dated, 3 Apr. 65 These procedures shall become effective on the dates specified therein. (Secs. 307(c), 313(a), 601, Federal Aviation Act of 1958; 49 U.S.C. 1848 (c), 1354(a), 1421; 72 Stat. 749,752,775) Issued in Washington, D.C., on April 23,1965. C. W. W alker, Acting Director, Flight Standards Service. [FJt. Doc. 65-4520; Filed, May 19,1965; 8:45 ajn.] Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6857 362.3) under the Federal Insecticide, (ii) The label clearly shows that the Title 5— ADMINISTRATIVE Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. product is intended for use only in man 135-135k), Interpretation 7 with respect ufacturing processes; PERSONNEL to directions for use (7 CFR 362.105) is (iii) Adequate information such as hereby amended to read as follows : technical data sheets or bulletins is avail Chapter I— Civil Service Commission § 362.105 Interpretation of require able to the trade specifying the type of PART 213— EXCEPTED SERVICE ments with respect to directions for pesticide involved and its proper use in use. manufacturing processes; Department of Health, Education, and (iv) The economic poison will not Welfare (a) Requirements of the Act. The come into the hands of the general pub Act and the regulations require that lic except after incorporation into such Section 213.3316 is amended to show every economic poison which is subject the exception under Schedule C of the finished products; and to their provisions must be properly la (v) In the opinion of the Director, position of Director, Office of Economic beled including directions for use which and Social Analysis. Effective on publi such directions are not necessary for the may be necessary and, if complied with, protection of the public. cation in the F ederal R egister, subpara adequate to protect the public. graph (24) is added to paragraph (a) of (b) Contents of directions. The ex Detailed directions for use are not con § 213.3316 as set out below. tent of detailed information required in sidered necessary in such cases since such § 213.3316 Department of Health, Ed the directions for use will vary, depend uses are highly specialized and usually ucation, and Welfare. ing upon the nature of the proposed use, well-known to the manufacturer. Ex (a) Office of the Secretary. * * * general knowledge of the economic poi amples of such products would be those (24) Director, Office of Economic and son and its uses, and possible hazards intended for use during the manufactur Social Analysis. involved. In general, directions should ing processes in treating leather, wool, * * * * * include: other fabrics, paints, building materials, (BA. 1753, sec. 2, 22 Stat. 403, as amended; (1) The site of application of the eco and other materials for protection 5 U.S.C. 631, 633; E.O. 10577, 19 F.R. 7521, nomic poison including such factors as against any pest. 3 CFR, 1954-58 Comp., p. 218) the crops, animals, areas, or objects to (3) Detailed directions for use may be treated; be omitted from the labeling of economic United S tates Civil S erv poisons for which sale is limited to phy ice Commission, (2) The rate of application to each sicians, veterinarians, or druggists; Pro [seal] Mary V. W enzel, site; Executive Assistant to (3) Instructions on timing applica vided: the Commissioners. tions to obtain best results and to avoid (i) Option 1 of the ingredient state ment is followed; [PR. Doc. 65-5307; Filed, 'May 19, 1965; adverse effects; 8:48 am.] (4) Any necessary limitation or re (ii) The label clearly states that the striction such as the time required be product is for use only by physicians or tween application and harvest of food veterinarians, or for use as prescribed by PART 213— EXCEPTED SERVICE crops, warning against use on certain physicians or veterinarians; and Small Business Administration crops, animals, objects, or in certain (iii) In the opinion of the Director, areas; and such directions are not necessary for the Section 213.3332 is amended to show (5) Any other pertinent information protection of the public. the redesignation of the position of which in the opinion of the Director is An example of such products would be Special Assistant to the Administrator necessary for the protection of the (ARA) as Director, Office of Area Rede benzyl benzoate to be used by, or its use public. prescribed by physicians or veterinarians velopment Loans, because of the modi (c) When directions are required. fication and expansion of that position. for use against the itch mite or mange Directions for use are required whenever mite. Effective on publication in the F ederal they are necessary for the protection of Register, paragraph (r) of § 213.3332 is (4) Detailed directions for use may be the public. The public includes all per omitted from the labeling of economic amended as set out below. sons who may be affected by the han § 213.3332 Small Business Administra poisons which are intended for use only dling, storage, or use of the economic poi by distributors or formulators in pre tion. son. Directions for use are necessary in * * * * paring economic poisons for sale to the the labeling of all products which are public; Provided: (r) Director, Office of Area Redevelop sold for use as economic poisons with the ment Loans. following exceptions: (i) Option 1 of the ingredient state ***** (1) Detailed directions for use may bement is followed; (R.S. 1753, sec. 2, 22 Stat. 403, as amended; omitted from the labeling of well known (ii) There is readily available to the 5 U.S.C. 631, 633; E.O. 10577, 19 F.R. 7521, economic poisons which are sold in con trade, information on the composition, 3 CFR, 1954-58 Comp., p. 218) tainers of 100 pounds or more of a solid toxicity, methods of use, applicable re strictions or limitations, and effective United S tates Civil S erv intended primarily for use undiluted, 50 pounds or more of a solid intended pri ness of the product for economic poison ice Com m ission, purposes; [seal] M ary V. W enzel, marily for use after dilution, 55 gallons (iii) The label clearly states that the Executive Assistant to or more of a liquid intended primarily the Commissioners. for use undiluted, or 20 gallons or more product is intended for use only in man of a liquid intended primarily for use ufacturing, formulating, mixing, or re [F.R. Doc. 65-5311; Filed, May 19, 1965; packing for use as economic poisons; and 8:48 a.m.] after dilution; Provided: (1) There is readily available general (iv) In the opinion of the Director, knowledge of the composition, methods such directions are not necessary for the of use, and effectiveness of the product protection of the public. Title 7— AGRICULTURE for economic poison purposes ; Examples of such products are 50 per Chapter III— Agricultural Research (ii) Option 1 of the ingredient state cent DDT and concentrated 2,4-dichloro- ment is followed; and Service, Department of Agriculture phenoxyacetic acid intended for use by (iii) In the opinion of the Director, distributors or formulators in preparing [Interpretation 7, Revision I] such directions are not necessary for the economic poisons of a lower concentra PART 362— REGULATIONS FOR EN protection of the public. tion for sale to the public. FORCEMENT OF FEDERAL INSECTI (2) Detailed directions for use may be (d) Where directions shall appear. omitted from the labeling of economic The directions for use shall appear on CIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTI- poisons (as defined in Interpretation 3, the labeling of the economic poison. CIDE ACT Revision I) which are intended for use The labeling includes the label which is Interpretation of Requirements With only by manufacturers of products other affixed to the product plus all printed Respect to Directions for Use than economic poisons in their regular or graphic matter which accompanies manufacturing processes; Provided: the product at any time. Directions for bvP^rqi!fn^ the authority vested in me (i) Option 1 of the ingredient stateuse may appear on the label or on ac y S ¿62.3 of the regulations (7 CFR ment is followed; companying leaflets or circulars. 6858 RULES AND REGULATIONS (1) Directions for use may be placed < ii) Directions for use of well-known, (h) Responsibility for claims. The on any part of the label; Provided: standardized economic poisons which will shipper or guarantor of an economic (1) They are conspicuous enough to be be applied by professional pest control poison is responsible for the accuracy of easily read by the user of the economic operators, may be more general in na all claims made for it, including those in poison. ture, giving sites of application, pests to the directions for use. Therefore, only (2) Directions for use may appear on be controlled, and rates and methods of those claims which have been proven to printed or graphic matter which ac application, be accurate, in that effective pest con companies the economic poison; Pro (iii) Directions for use of new or un trol is accomplished without injury to vided: usual economic poisons shall be given living man, beneficial plants or beneficial (1) Such printed or graphic matter is in full detail, since information or ad animals, should appear in the directions securely attached to eaeh package of the vice on the use of the product from for use. economic poison, or placed within the other sources is not likely to be available. Effective date. This revision of In outside wrapper or bag, so that it will not (f) Applicability of directions. Direc terpretation 7 shall become effective under normal condition be lost during tions for use in the labeling of eco upon its publication in the Federal Reg shipment, storage, or handling, nomic poisons will be considered to ap ister, when it shall supersede Interpre (ii) The label bears a reference to thé ply in all parts of the country in which tation 7. directions for use on accompanying leaf the product is marketed unless the la lets or circulars, such as “See directions beling makes a direct, statement to the Done this 14th day of May 1965. on the enclosed circular,” and Contrary. ‘It has been found that some J ustus C.W ard, Directions for use of economic (3) Claims for sterilization in the case notice, and engage in public rule-making poisons which are likely to be applied by of germicides when the product will not procedure, and good cause exists for no householders or small gardeners, cattle kill resistant spores under the specified postponing the effective date hereof unt raisers, etc., shall be sufficiently detailed conditions of use. 30 days after publication in the Federal (4) Claims implyinjg effectiveness of R egister (5 U.S.C. 1001-1011) in that (l) to give full information on usage. They shipments of fresh peaches have already must include methods of application, the economic poison under all conditions of use if it is not effective under all such begun; (2) the relevant provisions of saia time of application, rate of application, conditions. When a product is not ef amended marketing agreement and tn dilutions, any necessary limitations or fective under certain conditions, as for part require that rates of assessme restrictions and when necessary they example, in the presence of dirt, at low fixed for a particular marketing year shall provide for repeated treatments. temperatures, or in the presence of other shall be applicable to all assessaD The directions for use shall be consist chemicals, the directions should make it peaches from the beginning of such P ' ent with the warning or caution state clear that such conditions are to be riod; and (3) the current fiscal period ments on the label. avoided. began March 1, 1965, and the rat Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6859 assessment herein fixed will automati poses of the Program. If C&MS deter is clearly identified on the package as cally apply to all assessable peaches be mines that a firm does not qualify for being imported shall not be exchanged ginning with such date. participation in the Program, a notice for coupons. Coupons shall be accepted (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. to that effect shall be issued to the firm. for eligible food items at the same prices 601-674) Such notice shall be delivered by certi and on the same terms and conditions fied mail or personal service. If such applicable to cash purchases of the same Dated: May 17, 1965. firm is aggrieved by such action, it may foods at the same store: Provided, how Paul A. N icholson, seek administrative review of such action ever, That nothing in this part shall be Deputy Director, Fruit and Veg as provided in § 1602.8. construed as authorizing C&MS to spec etable Division, Consumer and (e) C&MS may from time to time, but ify the prices at which food may be sold Marketing Service. not more frequently than once each by retail food stores. [F.R. Doc. 65-5326; Piled, May 19, 1965; Federal fiscal year, require all authorized (c) No retail food store authorized to 8:49 a.m.] firms within a project area to submit receive coupons shall accept coupons new applications if such firms wish to marked “paid” or “cancelled”, coupons continue to participate in the Program: marked with the name or authorization Chapter XVI— Consumer and Market Provided, however, That any individual number of any other retail food store ing Service (Food Stamp Program), firm may be required to submit a new or wholesale food concern, coupons Department of Agriculture application at any time C&MS receives bearing the name of any bank, or coupons new or additional information with re of other than 50-cent denomination PART 1602— PARTICIPATION OF RE spect to such firm, relating to any of the which have been detached from the cou TAIL FOOD STORES, WHOLESALE criteria set forth in paragraph (b) of this pon book prior to the time of purchase FOOD CONCERNS AND BANKS section. C&MS shall review the new ap of eligible food. Coupons shall not plication and within 30 days of receipt, knowingly be accepted from persons who This revised Part 1602 contains regu make a determination as to whether the have no right to possession of such cou lations relating to the participation of firm’s continued participation serves to pons for such use. If a retailer has any retail food stores, wholesale food con effectuate the purposes of the Food cause to believe that a person presenting cerns and banks. Revised Part 1600— Stamp Program. Applications received coupons has no right to possession General Information and Definitions, and under this paragraph shall be considered thereof, such retailer should request such revised Part 1601—Participation of State by C&MS under the same criteria and person to show the identification card of Agencies and Eligible Households, were subject to the same rights of administra the head of the household to establish published in 30 F.R. 4315. tive review as provided in this section the right of such person to possession Sec. for initial applications. of coupons. 16021 Approval of retail food stores and (f) The filing of any application con (d) Change in cash shall not be given wholesale food concerns. taining false information may result in for coupons, but an authorized retail food 1602.2 Participation of retail food stores. the denial or withdrawal of approval to store may use for the purpose of making 1602.3 Participation of wholesale food con participate in the Program and may sub change, those uncancelled and unen cerns. ject the firm and persons responsible to 1602.4 Procedure for redeeming coupons. dorsed coupons having a denomination of 1602.5 Participation of banks. civil or criminal action under applicable 50 cents which were previously ac 1602.6 Disqualification of retail food stores provisions of the law. C&MS may also cepted in exchange for eligible foods. If and wholesale food concerns. deny or withdraw approval to participate change in an amount of less than 50 cents 1602.7 Determination and disposition of where information regarding the firm’s is required, the eligible household shall claims—retail food stores and business integrity and reputation be have the option of paying in cash or wholesale food concerns. comes available which, in the opinion 1602.8 Administrative review—retail food receiving credit from the authorized re of C&MS, indicates the firm is not willing tail food store for future delivery of an stores and wholesale food con or does not have the ability to abide by cerns. equivalent value of eligible foods. At the provisions of this part. Any such no time may credit returned as change Authority ; The provisions of this Part withdrawal or denial of authorization to 1602 issued under Public Law 88-525, 78 to eligible households be in excess of 49 Stat. 703. participate in the Program shall be sub cents. ject to administrative review under the (e) An authorized food retailer shall § 1602.1 Approval of retail food stores provisions of § 1602.8. The contents of not retain custody of any unexpended and wholesale food concerns. applications or other information fur nished by firms under the provisions of coupons of eligible households or use or (a) Pood retailers or food wholesalers this section shall not be used or disclosed adopt any trick, scheme, or device to pre desiring to participate in the Program to anyone except for purposes directly vent an eligible household from using shall file an application with C&MS, in connected with the administration and unexpended coupons in other authorized such form as C&MS may prescribe. enforcement of the provisions of the Food retail food stores. (b) An applicant shall provide suffi- Stamp Act of 1964 and the provisions of (f) Coupons shall not be accepted by « d a t a on the nature and scope of this part. an authorized retail food store in pay the firm’s business for C&MS to deter- ment for any eligible foods purchased in jhine whether such applicant’s participa § 1602.2 Participation of retail food or delivered by such store prior to the tion will effectuate the purposes of the stores. time at which the coupons are tendered nmoam' In malcing such determination (a) ; Authorized retail food stores shall in payment for eligible foods. shall consider: (1) The nature post in the store the “Official Food List” (g) Authorised retail food stores which rtn + j^.ex^en* business con- issued by C&MS or a notice of similar receive coupons in accordance with the n ff j the aPPlicant; (2) the volume import. provisions of this part, shall be entitled lood stamp business which may be (b) Coupons shall be accepted by an to receive payment for the face value of reasonabiy expected to be done by the authorized retail food store only in ex such coupons upon presentation through J^kcant; (3) the business integrity change for eligible foods, as defined in the banking system or through author ,,5* rePUtation of the applicant; and § 1600.2(j) of this chapter. A food re ized wholesale food concerns. suca other factors as C&MS consid- tailer shall not knowingly accept coupons i'nno?ir ilien*; to the application under for any imported meat or meat products. § 1602.3 Participation of wholesale food consideration. The acceptance of coupons for meat or concerns. an(S,f?Pon aPProval, C&MS will issue meat products which are labeled or can (a) An authorized wholesale food con dn authorization card to the firm. Such be identified as imported when they are cern may accept endorsed coupons for tu ™ ? ation card shall be retained by delivered to the retail food store or to a redemption only from authorized retail surrpt1ith0i?zed flrm until superseded, central warehouse, a distribution center food stores, and only when coupons are this pa?tred °r revoked M Provided in or meat fabricating facility, operated by presented with the authorized retail food the food retailer shall be deemed to have store’s properly executed, signed redemp anvfi deny the application of been done with knowledge of the fact that tion certificate, and when such coupons X L K ? H It determines that such firm’s such meat or meat products were im have not been marked “paid” or Pation will not effectuate the pur ported. Any other food product which “cancelled”. 6860 RULES AND REGULATIONS (b) An authorized wholesale food constamp. A portion of a coupon consisting the event such coupons have not been cern which has received coupons in ac of less than three-fifths (%) of a whole redeemed by C&MS as provided in this cordance with the provisions of this part coupon shall not be accepted for redemp paragraph, claims or demands relative shall be entitled to receive payment tion by banks. Banks who are members thereto may be mailed to the local C&MS through the banking system for the face of the Federal Reserve System and non Food Distribution Field Office for the value of such coupons, upon presentation member clearing banks may forward project area involved. cancelled coupons directly to Federal Re of the coupons together with (1) the au § 1602.6 Disqualification of retail food thorized retail food store’s properly exe serve Banks for payment in accordance stores and wholesale food concerns. cuted, signed redemption certificate for with applicable regulations or instruc such coupons, and (2) the authorized tions of the Federal Reserve Banks. (a) Any authorized retail food store wholesale food concern’s properly exe Other banks may forward cancelled cou or authorized wholesale food concern cuted, signed redemption certificate. pons through ordinary collection chan may be disqualified from further partici nels. § 1602.4 Procedure for redeeming cou pation in the Program by C&MS for a pons. (b) Federal Reserve Banks, acting as reasonable, definitely stated period of fiscal agents of the United States, are time, not to exceed three years, as C&MS (a) Coupons accepted by a retail food authorized to receive cancelled coupons may determine, if such retail food store store or wholesale food concern prior to from member banks of the Federal Re or wholesale food concern fails to comply the receipt by such firm of an authoriza serve System and non-member clearing with the Food Stamp Act of 1964 or the tion card from C&MS shall not be pre banks for collection as cash items and to provisions of this part. sented for redemption under the pro charge such items to the general account (b) Any retail food store or wholesale cedure set forth in this section, except of the Treasurer of the United States. food concern considered for disqualifi that within the first 90 days of the open (c) While in the course of shipment cation under paragraph (a) of this sec ing of any project area, the Pood Dis cancelled coupons shall be considered to tion shall have full opportunity to submit tribution Officer-in-Charge, in accord- be at the risk of the Department, if the to C&MS information, explanation, or ancg with instructions issued by C&MS, bank transmitting such coupons has ex evidence concerning any instances of may approve the redemption under this ercised due diligence and taken ordi non-compliance before a final deter section of coupons accepted by such firm nary care in making the shipment. Re mination is made by C&MS as to the prior to the receipt of an authorization ports of loss, destruction, or damage shall administrative action to be taken. Prior card from C&MS if such firm applies for be given promptly on discovery to all of to such determination, the retail food and receives authorization to participate the following: C&MS; the nearest Secret store or wholesale food concern shall be in the Program. Service Office; and the Post Office or sent a letter of charges by the appro (b) Each authorized retail food store other carrier; and the Secretary of the priate Director, Area Office, Food Dis or authorized wholesale food concern Treasury, Bureau of Accounts. Claim tribution, specifying the violations or shall stamp or otherwise indicate its au for replacement or credit in the event of actions which C&MS believes constitute thorization number or the name of such loss, damage or destruction of any ship a basis for disqualification. Such letter store or concern on each coupon prior to ment of coupons shall be filed in writing shall inform the food retailer or food the time such coupons are presented for with C&MS and shall be supported by the wholesaler that he may respond either redémption under the procedure pro redemption certificates received from the orally or in writing to the charges con vided in this part. retail food stores or wholesale food con tained therein within ten days of the (c> Authorized retail food stores and cerns, relating to the coupons included mailing date thereof, which response authorized wholesale food concerns will in the particular shipment involved in shall set forth a statement of evidence, be provided by C&MS with redemption such claim. information, or explanation pertaining certificates which shall be used in pre (d> Notwithstanding any provisions of to the specified violations or acts. Such senting coupons to commercial banks for this chapter to the contrary, coupons response, if any, shall be made to the credit or for cash. Authorized retail may be issued to persons authorized by Director, Area Office, Food Distribution, food stores shall also use such certificates C&MS for use in examining and inspect who issued the letter of charges. If no in presenting coupons to authorized ing program operations, compliance with response is made to the letter of charges, wholesale food concerns for redemption. program regulations, and for other pur C&MS will deem the charges to have poses determined by C&MS to be required been admitted. § 1602.5 Participation of banks. for proper administration of the Pro (c) The letter of charges, the re (a) Banks may accept coupons for regram. Such coupons which have been so sponse, and such other information as demption from authorized retail food issued and used, as well as any Coupons may be available to C&MS shall be re stores and authorized wholesale food con which C&MS believes may have been viewed and considered by the Director, cerns in accordance with the provisions issued, transferred, negotiated, used, or Food Stamp Division, who shall then pf this part and the instructions of the received in violation of any provisions of issue his detèrmination. Federal Reserve Banks. Coupons sub this chapter or of any applicable statute, (d) The determination of the Director, mitted to banks for credit or for cash shall, at the request of authorized rep Food Stamp Division, shall be final and must be properly endorsed in accordance resentatives of C&MS and on issuance of not subject to further administrative or with § 1602.4 and shall be accompanied a receipt therefor by such representa judicial review unless a written request by a properly executed redemption cer tives, be released and turned over to for review is filed within ten days in ac tificate. No bank shall knowingly accept C&MS by the bank receiving such cou cordance with § 1602.8. coupons used by ineligible persons or pons, or by any other person to whom (e) The mailing by certified mail or transmitted for collection by unauthor such request is addressed, together with delivery by personal service of any no ized retail food stores, wholesale food the certificate(s) of redemption accom tice required of C&MS by this part wul concerns, or any other unauthorized in panying such coupons, if any. Any such constitute notice to the addressee of its dividuals, partnerships, corporations, or coupons so requested shall not thereafter contents. other legal entities. Banks may require be eligible for redemption through Fed § 1602.7 Determination and disposition persons presenting coupons for redemp eral Reserve Banks or other collection tion to show their authorization card. of claims— retail food stores and channels: Provided, however, That wholesale food concerns. The redemption certificates shall be held C&MS may redeem such coupons from by the receiving bank until final credit any such bank or person by payment of (a) If C&MS determines that a retail has been given by the Federal Reserve the face amount thereof upon determina food store or wholesale food concern ac Bank, after which they shall be for tion by C&MS that such direct redemp cepted coupons in violation of the pro warded by the receiving banks to the tion of coupons is warranted under all visions of the Food Stamp Act of 1964 or Food Distribution Field Office. Coupons of the circumstances of the examina the provisions of this part, C&MS may accepted for deposit or for payment in tion or inspection in which such cou deny the claim for redemption of sucn cash must be cancelled by or for the pons were used. Coupons received by •coupons. In the event such coupons first bank receiving the coupons by in C&MS Tinder this paragraph (d) shall have been' redeemed, C&MS may asse delibly marking “paid” or “cancelled” to be held by C&MS for such disposition as a claim against such firm for the iac gether with the name of the bank, or its may be determined by C&MS on com value of the coupons involved m sucn routing symbol transit number, on the pletion of the examination or inspection violations and may collect such cla coupons by means of an appropriate in which such coupons were used. In by setoff of the amount against oinei Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6861 claims for redemption of coupons sub with any Federal law or any regulation mitted by the firm. Title 36— PARKS, FORESTS, promulgated by the Secretary of the (b) In addition to the procedure set Interior for governing the Park, or with forth in § 1602.4 for the redemption of AND MEMORIALS the conditions imposed by the permit, coupons, C&MS may redeem coupons re will be grounds for revocation of the ceived by unauthorized retail food stores Chapter I— National Park Service, permit. or wholesale food concerns if the fol Department of the Interior (6) The applicant or permittee may lowing conditions exist: (1) The cou PART 7— SPECIAL REGULATIONS RE appeal to the Régional Director, Midwest pons were received in accordance with Region, National Park Service, from any the provisions of this part governing LATING TO PARKS AND MONU final action of the Superintendent, re acceptance of coupons except the pro MENTS fusing, conditioning, or revoking a per visions requiring that the firm be au Glacier National Park, Mont.; Eating, mit. Such an appeal, in writing, shall thorized before acceptance; (2) the be filed within 30 days after receipt of coupons were accepted by the firm in Drinking, and Lodging Establish notice by the applicant or permittee of good faith, and without any intent to ments on Private Lands the action appealed from. Any final circumvent the provisions of this part; On page 3712 of the F ederal R egister decision of the Regional Director may and (3) the firm applies for and receives of March 20, 1965, there was published be appealed to the Director, National authorization to participate in the Pro a notice and text of a proposed amend Park Service, within 30 days after re gram. Firms seeking to redeem coupons ment to § 7.3 of Title 36, Code of Federal ceipt of notice by the applicant or per as provided in this paragraph shall pre Regulations. The purpose of this mittee of the Regional Director's de sent a claim in writing for redemption of amendment is to provide a method of in cision. During the period in which an such coupons to the local Food Distri suring that eating, drinking, and lodg appeal is being considered by the Re bution Field Office. This claim shall be ing establishments located on private gional Director or the Director, the accompanied by a notarized affidavit lands in Glacier National Park are meet establishment for which a permit has containing a full statement of the cir ing substantive requirements of State been denied or revoked shall not be cumstances surrounding the acceptance laws and county ordinances with regard operated. of the coupons. The affidavit shall also to public health and sanitation. (7) The revocable permit for eating, include a certification that the coupons Interested persons were given 30 days drinking, and lodging establishments were accepted in good faith, and without within which to submit written com issued by the Superintendent shall con any intent to circumvent the require ments, suggestions, or objections with re tain general regulatory provisions as ments of this part. hereinafter set forth, and will include (c) If a claim under the provisions spect to the proposed amendment. Sug gestions and objections have been con such reasonable special conditions relat of this section is denied in whole or in sidered, and it has been determined that ing in the health and safety of visitors part, notification of such action shall be both to the park and to the establish sent to the firm by certified mail or per the amendment should be and is hereby adopted as set forth below. The amend ments as the Superintendent may deem sonal service. If the firm is aggrieved necessary to cover existing local circum by such action, it may seek administra ment shall become effective upon publi tive review as provided in § 1602.8. cation in the F ederal R egister in order stances, and shall be in a form substan that establishments affected by the regu tially as follows: § 1602.8 Administrative review— retail lation may be inspected prior to the (Front of Permit) food stores and wholesale food con commencement of the visitor season. cerns. A new paragraph (j) is added to § 7.3 U n it e d S tates to read as follows : D e pa r t m e n t o f t h e I n t er io r (a) A food retailer or food wholesaler N a tio n a l P a r k S ervice aggrieved by administrative action under §7.3 Glacier National Park. REVOCABLE PERMIT FOR OPERATION OF EATING the provisions of §§ 1602.1, 1602.6 and * * * * * OR DRINKING AND LODGING ESTABLISHMENTS 1602.7 may within ten days of the date of (j) Eating, drinking, and lodging es delivery to the firm of notice of such Permission is hereby granted______tablishments. (1) No eating, drinking, who resides at »______to operate during administrative action, file a written re or lodging establishment offering food, the period o f ______19__ t o ______quest for review of such administrative drink, or lodging for sale may be operated 19__ inclusive, a ______action with the Food Stamp Review Of on any privately owned lands within (Specify type of establishment) ficer. On receipt of such request for re Glacier National Park unless a permit within Glacier National Park on lands view, the questioned administrative ac for the operation thereof has first been privately owned or controlled’ by him (her) tion shall be stayed pending disposition obtained from the Superintendent. over which the United States exercises ex of such request for review by the Food clusive jurisdiction. This permit is subject Stamp Review Officer. (2) The Superintendent will issue a to the general provisions and any special con permit only after an inspection of the ditions stated on the reverse hereof. (b) The request for review shall be premises and a determination that the Issued at Glacier National Park, Mont., filed with the Food Stamp Review Officer, premises comply with the substantive t h is _____ day o f ______19__. United States Department of Agricul requirements of state and county health ture, Washington, D.C., 20250. and sanitary laws and ordinances and ( Superintendent ) (c) The procedure for food stamp re rules and regulations promulgated pur views, to be published at a later date in suant thereto which would apply to the Part 1603 of this chapter, will be avail premises if the privately owned lands I, ------the permittee named herein, able upon request from the Food Stamp were not subject to the jurisdiction of accept this permit subject to the terms, Review Officer. the United States. covenants, obligations, and reservations ex pressed or implied. Note: The reporting and/or record-keep- (3) No fee will be charged for the ng requirements contained herein have been issuance of such a permit. Co-partnership—permittees sign as “Mem approved by the Bureau of the Budget in (4) The Superintendent or his duly bers of firm”. ^cordance with the Federal Reports Act of authorized representative shall have the Corporation—the officer authorized to execute right of inspection at all reasonable times contracts, etc., should sign, with title, the sufficiency of such signature being attested The provisions of this part shall be- for the purpose of ascertaining that the by the Secretary, with corporate seal in come effective as provided in § 1600.5(d) premises are being maintained and lieu of witnesses. of this chapter. operated in compliance with State and county health laws and ordinances and (Permittee) R oy W . L ennartson, rules and regulations promulgated pur Witness: Associate Administrator. suant thereto. Approved: May 17,1965. (5) Failure of the permittee to com (Name) ply with all State and county substantive George L. M ehren, (Address) Assistant Secretary. laws and ordinances, and rules and regu lations promulgated pursuant thereto (Name) (p R. Doc. 65-5305; Filed, May 19, 1965; applicable to the establishment for which 8:48 a.m.] a permit is issued, or failure to comply (Address) 6862 RULES AND REGULATIONS (Reverse of Permit) global commercial satellite system. After (j) The manner and method of the GENERAL REGULATORY PROVISIONS OF THIS carefully considering the petition and proposed operation. PERMIT statements filed in opposition and sup (4) Set forth in detail the functions to 1. Permittee shall exercise this privilege port thereof, the Commission, on Decem be performed by the earth station includ subject to the supervision of the Superin ber 9, 1964, instituted the above entitled ing those necessary for connection to ter tendent of the Park and shall comply with proceeding through issuance of a notice restrial services. the regulations of the Secretary of the In of proposed rule making or formulation 4. Those parties advocating the estab terior governing the Park. of general policy. lishment of procedures for processing 2. Any building or structure used for the purpose of conducting the business herein 2. In the notice, the Commission ex individual applications on a case by case permitted shall be kept in a safe, and sightly panded the scope of the original rule basis were asked to show how such proce condition. making proposed by ComSat and insti dures would best serve the public interest, 3. Permittee shall dispose of all refuse from tuted a much broader proceeding. Such and specifically: the business herein permitted as required expansion was based on the belief that a. How the necessary research and de by the Superintendent. we should not confine ourselves to a con velopment reasonably may be expected to 4. Permittee, his agents, and employees sideration of only one of the several ap be instituted and continue under such a shall be responsible for the preservation of proaches available to us. In our view, course; good order within the vicinity of the business b. How site selection and building of operations herein permitted. three possible courses of action are avail 5. Failure of the permittee to comply with able, namely: (a) The handling of indi the station(s) can proceed expeditiously; all State and county substantive laws and vidual applications for specific earth sta c. When applications reasonably may ordinances and rules and regulations pro tions, (b) the adoption of rules limiting be perfected for filing; mulgated pursuant thereto applicable to eligibility to file applications, and (c) d. How processing of applications and eating, drinking, and lodging establishments the adoption of a general policy to govern possible hearings can be completed in or to comply with any law or any regulation the processing of applications. Accord time to assure that a completed station of the Secretary of the Interior governing ingly, this proceeding was instituted and * will be available when the satellites of the Park, or with the conditions imposed by this permit, will be grounds for revocation of designed to afford interested parties thé the basic system are ready for launch. this permit. opportunity to advance full and detailed 5. Comments were filed by American 6. This permit may not be transferred or arguments concerning the merits of the Communications Association (ACA), assigned without the consent, in writing, of foregoing alternatives and to advocate Aeronautical Radio, Inc. (ARINC), and the Superintendent. the course which would enable us best to RCA Communications, Inc. (RCA). 7. Neither Members of, nor Delegates to serve the requirements of the public Comments and reply comments were Congress, or Resident Commissioners, officers, interest. filed by American Telephone and Tele agents, or employees of the Department of 3. To this end, the notice solicited the graph Co. (A.T. & T .)f Communications the Interior, shall be admitted to any share Satellite Corp. (ComSat), Hawaiian Tele or part of this permit or derive, directly or views of interested parties who favor indirectly, any pecuniary benefit arising either the adoption of rules or a general phone Co. (Hawaiian), ITT World Com therefrom. policy statement with respect to the fol munications, Inc. (ITT), United States 8. Standard Equal Employment Provision lowing questions : Independent Telephone Association to be set out in full as provided for by Execu (1) Who should be eligible to file appli (USITA), and Western Union Interna tive Orders 10925 and 11114. cations under such a rule or general pol tional, Inc. (WUI). Reply comments 9. The following special provisions are icy statement, only were filed by Columbia Broadcasting made a part of this permit: (a) ComSat alone; System (CBS), Philco Corp. (Philco), (b) A communications carrier alone; and Westrex Communications Division, (c) ComSat and one or more carriers Litton Systems, Inc. (Westrex). jointly; 6. With the exception of ITT and (d) One or more carriers jointly; ACA, who favor an individual-applica (60 Stat. 238; 5 TJ.S.C. 1003, 89 Stat. 535; (e) Any other alternatives possible tion approach, and ARINC and CBS who 16 11.8.0. 3) under section 201(c) (7) of the Act? - take no position on the issue of earth K eith Neilson, (2) For what period of time should station ownership, the parties recom Superintendent, such a rule or general policy statement be mend the adoption by the Commission Glacier National Park. effective? of a general policy or rule to govern the [F.R. Doc. 65-5292; Filed, May 19, 1965; (3) Each entity responding to one of issuance of earth station authorizations. 8:47 a.m.] the courses set forth above should show how its recommendations would: Legal Issue (a) Provide uniform and nondiscrimi- 7. We turn now to the position taken natory access to the satellite system; by I.T. & T., and generally supported by Title 47— TELECOMMUNICATION (b) Affect the expeditious establish ACA, that the only course of action ment of the system; available to the Commission, in imple Chapter I— Federal Communications (c) Affect the cost per voice channel; menting the provisions of section 201(c) Commission (d) Provide for the most efficient use of (7) of the Communications Satellite Act, [Docket No. 15735; FCC 65-401] the available frequencies; is the institution of individual licensing (e) Affect the capability of the system proceedings. Section 201(c)(7) of the PART 25— SATELLITE to adapt to technical changes and ex Communications Satellite Act of 1962 COMMUNICATIONS pansion of the system to meet global needs; (Satellite Act) provides: Definitions (f) Affect the existing competitive sit (c) the Federal Communications Com In the matter of amendment of Part uation in providing service to the public; mission, in its administration of the pro 25 of the Commission’s rules and regu (g) Affect the ability of ComSat to dis visions of the Communications Act of 1934, lations with respect to ownership and charge its statutory obligations as well as amended, and as supplemented by this operation of initial earth stations in the as those under the Agreement Establish Act, shall— United States for use in connection with ing Interim Arrangements for a Global the proposed global commercial commu Communications Satellite System, signed • (7 )'Grant appropriate authorizations io nication-satellite system, Docket No. by the United States on August 20, 1964, the construction and operation of eac*V^te " 15735, RM-644. and the Special Agreement signed by lite terminal station, either to the Corpo 1. On August 13, 1964, the CommuniComSat as the United States designated ration [ComSat] or to one or more autnor- cations Satellite Corp. (ComSat) filed a signatory on the same date ; ized carriers or to the corporation and on more such carriers Jointly, as will best s petition for rule making requesting the (h) Affect the ability of the carriers to the public interest, convenience, and neces Commission to institute a rule making discharge their duty to provide worldwide sity. In determining the public bit* . proceeding looking toward the adoption and national service at reasonable convenience, and necessity the Commi of a rule which would limit to ComSat charges; shall authorize the construction ana pe the ownership and operation of the ini (i) Affect the cost and efficiency in ation of such stations by communications tial earth stations in the United States controlling the space segment of the common carriers or the corporation, w for use in connection with the proposed system; preference to either; Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6863 8. Basically, it is contended that the ing out the provisions of section 201(c) thorized to apply for and obtain earth language and legislative history of sec (7), is confined to the establishment of station licenses. Accordingly, we will tion 201(c)(7) manifest an intent of procedures for processing individual ap apply the basic principles set forth above Congress that each satellite earth station plications for specific earth stations. as a test of the efficacy of the positions authorization shall be issued by the Com 12. In view of the fact that we have advanced by the respondents in favor of mission on a case-by-case, station-by found there are no legal restrictions on the particular proposals they advocate station basis. Accordingly, it is main the choice of the courses of action avail to determine which course of action will tained that the hearing requirements of able to us, namely, (a) the handling of best achieve the results we believe most sections 308 and 309 of the Communica individual applications for specific earth in the public interest. tions Act of 1934, as amended (Com stations, (b) the adoption of rules limit 17. We turn now to the question of munications Act), and section 5 of the ing eligibility to file applications, and whether we should make no policy de Administrative Procedure Act (APA), (c) the adoption of a general policy con cisions as a result of this proceeding, but are applicable. It is urged that de cerning the filing of applications, we rather provide for the issuance of earth terminations by the Commission relating shall now consider which of such courses station authorizations through the proc to earth station authorizations must be of action would best serve the public in essing of individual applications. The made within the context of a quasi terest. time pressures and the need to fix re adjudicatory hearing. 13. In our judgment, certain control sponsibility for carrying forward the 9. In our judgment these arguments ling public interest factors underlie the satellite program without the risk of overlook the scope of the policy and rule ultimate choice to be made among the freezing the ownership and control of the making authority vested in the Commis three possible courses of action. First, initial stations during the interim period, sion under the Communications Act, as the most important consideration is the convince us that it is not practical, feasi supplemented by the Satellite Act. Un need to insure, so far as it is possible, ble, or in the public interest to follow the der section (4) (j) of the Communica that the earth stations will be available usual application procedures which tions Act, the Commission has broad for use with the space segment of the would seriously delay the research, de discretion to adopt such procedures, system in order to provide global satel sign, and construction of such stations. policies and application requirements as lite service at the earliest practicable Accordingly, we believe that use of con will best conduce to the proper dispatch date. It is the enunciated policy of the ventional application procedures for the of its business and to the ends of justice. Congress that the global system shall be issuance of earth station authorizations Moreover, under section 303 of the Com established as expeditiously as practi would not serve the public interest. munications Act, the Commission, among cable and that the new services are to 18. While the adoption of rules might other things, may classify radio [earth] be made available as promptly as pos tend to accomplish the purposes and ob stations, prescribe the nature of the sible (Satellite Act* sec. 102 (a) and (b)). jectives attainable under a general in services to be rendered by each class, de-, The United States has exercised leader terim policy, we believe that the chang termine their location and impose such ship in this field and has invited all in ing and dynamic nature of the situation other requirements relating to their op terested nations of the world to join with with which we are confronted does not eration. This broad grant of policy and ComSat in an international consortium readily lend itself to this approach. In rule making authority is supplemented to provide communication services via light of this situation, it would be neither by section 201(c) (11) of the Satellite Act satellite. Other nations are now plan realistic nor meaningful, at this time, to which directs the Commission to make ning and will construct earth stations establish rules intended to have long rules and regulations to carry out the for global satellite communications. We range applicability. On the other hand, provisions thereof (see also sec. 303 (r) must conduct our affairs in such fashion the adoption of an interim licensing of the Communications Act). In addi as to enable whatever entity or entities policy will serve the public interest by tion, the Commission may delineate ele are to be authorized to build earth sta fixing now the responsibility for carrying ments of the public interest which ap tions in the United States to meet the forward the satellite program during the plicants for station licenses must meet need for global satellite communications critical early stages of development of and may dismiss or reject, without hear consistent with the foregoing national the system. Therefore, we believe that ing, such applications which fail to meet policy and objectives. Hence, it is im our policy should be an interim one and such requirements (NBC v. U.S., 319 U.S. perative that the procedures governing should, by its terms, terminate at a fixed 190; U.S. v. Storer Broadcasting Co., 351 the issuance of earth station authoriza date, unless it is determined the public U.S. 192).1 There is also no indication tions should be designed to serve the need interest would be served by extending that Congress in any way specified a for expeditious action. it. We believe it reasonable to. expect particular procedure to be followed in 14. Second, we believe any such course that technological advances and the making the requisite public interest must give due recognition to the existing experience gained during two years of judgments under section 201(c)(7), or state of technology, particularly the pres station operation will provide a firmer that it withdrew from the Commission ent limitation on the number of earth basis for more definitive determinations. any particular procedure, e.g., the adop stations which can be utilized effectively Accordingly, we shall reassess such tion of a general policy or the issuance during the initial stage of development policy at the end of such period. of rules and regulations. and operation of the system. The fact 19. Turning now to the essential fea 10. On the contrary, it appears reason that only a limited number of earth sta tures which a general licensing policy ably clear that Congress left to the in- tions simultaneously can use a satellite should contain, we note that in essence discretion of the Commission, the without considerable reduction of chan three distinct types of ownership of ini method and procedures best designed to nel ' capacity effectively restricts the tial earth stations are advocated: * make the requisite judgments in imple number of stations which now may be (a) ComSat advocates exclusive own menting section 201(c) (7), provided that authorized. This so-called problem of ership and operation by it; such judgments are based upon, and rep “multiple-access” requires the applica resent a fair and impartial evaluation of, tion of measures which do not adversely (b) WUI and RCA advocate joint car an relevant public interest considerations affect the economic operation of the sys rier ownership, after ComSat plans, de tem or the quality of service to be pro signs, and builds the station; are conducive to the establishment (c) A.T. & T., Hawaiian and USITA of the systems as expeditiously as prac- vided. 15. Third, whatever course we adopt advocate joint ComSat-carrier owner mablê. We believe that this proceeding ship with primary responsibility and au affords us the means of making such an should be for an interim period and should be applied only to the stations ini thority in ComSat to plan, design, build, evaluation consistent with the intent of tially required for the basic global sys operate, and manage the stations. Congress. tem. 20. Under ComSat’s proposed policy it ^j11 view of the foregoing, we must 16. Finally, any action we take should alone would be designated to plan, build, reject the argument that the only lawful be conditioned so as to prevent any un urse of action available to us, in carry- due advantage to any entity which may *In view of the position of I.T. & T. and ACA that earth stations may be authorized secure earth station authorizations dur only through quasi-adjudicatory proceed fm- *° be n°ted that parties may petition ing the interim period, and avoid any ings on individual applications, they ex a hPnHVer and U a ProPer basis is presented disadvantages to other legally competent 8 rearing will be held. pressed no views with respect to the other entities which, in the future, may be au possible courses of action. No. 97 -----5 6864 RULES AND REGULATIONS design, own and operate the initial sta responding identity of interest should plications pursuant thereto. Finally, tions. ComSat maintains that the ex exist in the United States during the the policy would reserve for future con peditious establishment of the system initial stage of development. sideration the question of ownership and would be assured by the adoption of its 23. Under the joint carrier ownership operation of stations beyond those ini proposal. It reasons that a sound sys policy advanced by WUI and RCA, Com tially required. Hawaiian’s proposal is tem of coordination is required in the Sat would be licensed to construct the substantially similar to the foregoing, design, construction and day-to-day initial stations and operate them during except that- Hawaiian is concerned only operation of the earth stations and the the experimental phase. However, un with an earth station which may be lo space segment of the system. Such co der WUI's proposal ComSat would be cated in Hawaii and would limit owner ordination will be required, particularly required to make available to all author ship in such station to those carriers au during the initial period of development, ized carriers jointly, the whole of its in thorized to provide service to th at area. where the making of prompt decisions terest in the license and station facilities 27. A.T. & T. and Hawaiian contend and the utilization of flexible operating when the system becomes operational. that under their proposal the placing of procedures in the administration and The terms and conditions of the transfer primary control in ComSat for the de control of the stations will be essential. would be determined by the Commission sign, construction and operation of the It insists that a policy permitting joint following consideration of the views of stations would eliminate any delay in the ownership would jeopardize the develop interested parties. RCA makes allow establishment of the system or confusion ment of- a sound system of coordination, ance for possible ComSat ownership of in the operation of the stations. Addi add to the administrative and technical such portion of the stations which the tionally, it is urged that by providing for complexities of the system and thereby carriers may choose not to acquire. The carrier ownership of the station facilities delay its expeditious establishment by time limit of the policy would be flexible incentive among the carriers to use the introducing unnecessary compromises in in order to accommodate technological system will be enhanced which will con the design, construction, operation, site advances and not preclude authorized tribute to the economic viability of the location,' etc. of the earth stations. carriers from individually owning earth system and generally foster competition These difficulties, it maintains, would stations at such time as the public in in the field of international telecom-. also impede technical changes and ex terest requires. munications. Conversely, it is argued pansion of the system. 24. Such a policy, it is contended, that exclusive ownership and operation 21. Further, it argues that the fulfill would enable ComSat to proceed by ComSat will stifle competition by ment of its statutory mission to achieve promptly toward the design and con placing it in a position to furnish com global coverage depends upon encourag struction of the initial stations free from munication satellite services directly to ing and achieving optimum use of the any conflicting private interests and the public and thereby exclude the car system by all authorized carriers. Thus, would enhance the capability of the sys riers from performing any meaningful it will be both obligated and motivated to tem to meet technical changes during function in providing such services. provide uniform and nondiscriminatory the experimental and testing period. These parties further assert th a t direct access to the system. Moreover, it main On the other hand, it is urged that tech ownership participation, by the carriers tains that it will be exclusively con nical changes and required expansions will add to the capability of the system cerned with the successful establishment of the system, during the operational to meet technical changes and expand and use of the system on an impartial period, would be assured through carrier ing requirements because of the acquired and objective basis since it will have no station ownership because of the long knowledge and experience of the car conflicting interest in alternative forms standing knowledge and experience of riers in providing communications serv of international communications with the carriers in providing communications ices to the-public. which the satellite system will compete. services directly, to the public. In addi 28. While USITA proposes the adop Hence, earth station ownership by it will tion, RCA and WUI argue that the joint tion of rules, its proposal is equally carrier ownership policy proposed will adaptable to a general policy approach. widen the ownership interest in interna Under its proposal the Commission tional communications facilities and foster competition by permitting the car thus provide a healthy competitive en riers to own the facilities with which would permit the filing of one applica vironment in the field of international they will provide satellite communica tion for each station by either ComSat tions services to the public and that such itself, or by ComSat and one or more telecommunications. Conversely, it ar carriers jointly. Each initial license gues that carrier ownership of earth sta an arrangement in turn will stimulate incentive among the carriers to use satel would be so conditioned as to require the tions would result in cumulative carrier transfer, at some future time, of all or participation in ComSat in view of the lite facilities along with other modes of communications and thereby generally part of the ownership of an earth station fact that the carriers in the aggregate to one or more carriers upon findings now hold 50 percent of the stock of the promote a healthy economic climate in Corporation. the field of international communica made at a hearing upon written aPPjj®a‘ tions. Conversely, it is argued that ex tion of an authorized carrier. Further, 22. Finally, ComSat argues that, ab the initial licensee would receive no prei- sent earth station ownership and opera clusive ownership and operation by Com Sat will stifle competition by placing it erence in any such proceeding by reason tion, its statutory mission under the of having been granted the initial au Satellite Act and its role as the United in a position to furnish communication satellite services directly to the public thorization. The foregoing conditions States participant in the global system are intended to reserve for the future will be rendered relatively ineffective. and thereby exclude the carriers from performing any meaningful function in use of evidentiary hearings involving tne In this connection it recites that the re reassignment of the initial licenses search and development program carried providing such services. 25. Although differing in some re the issuance of authorizations for, out by it pursuant to section 305 of the additional stations beyond those initial y Act, and the implementation of national spects, the proposals of A.T. & T., Hawaiian and USITA may be character required. . policy toward the establishment of a 29. Before attempting an evaluation global system (sec. 102) have resulted ized as favoring a mixed ownership policy under which ComSat and the car of the merits of the foregoing proposals, in interim arrangements under which an we believe it pertinent to reiterate our international consortium of communica riers would jointly own the initial stations. basic responsibility in this matter; name tion entities will own and operate the ly, to effectuate the policy of Congress space segment of the system;* Under the 26. Specifically, A.T. & T. favors the adoption of a policy authorizing ComSat that the global system be established as terms of the Interim Agreement, Com expeditiously as practicable and that Sat will represent the United States on to design, construct and operate the ini tial stations. Authorized carriers would services via satellite be available to the Interim Committee of the consortium general public as promptly as practicable. which will be responsible for the design, be permitted to share in the ownership to the extent of approximately 50 per (Satellite Act, sec. 102 (a) and (. > development, construction, establish also paragraphs 13,14,15, and 16s P • ment and operation of the space segment. cent of each station, subject to periodic adjustments based on their respective use In order to discharge the foregoing In addition, ComSat will act as man sponsibility, we must see to it tha ager of the space segment. Since partic of such stations. The policy would ipating foreign entities will own and op apply for a period of 2 years, subject to development and availability of erate earth stations in their respective termination and modification should States earth stations keep pace with bo countries, ComSat believes that a cor ComSat fail diligently to prosecute ap the space segment program and Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6865 earth station programs of the foreign the program of the foreign participants. building the stations, recognize that participants in the system. Further With respect to the latter consideration, ComSat should have primary, if not sole, more, the existing state of technology we recognize that the interest of the responsibility for performing these func limits the number of earth stations which communications common carriers who tions. may be effectively utilized and gives rise will use the system to serve the public 32. In reaching the judgment that to various problems in making available requires close coordination with their ComSat should be given responsibility the facilities to the largest number of foreign correspondents. Thus, interna for planning, construction, operation and nations without unduly degrading the tional business arrangements will con control of the initial stations during the quality and quantity of circuits available. tinue to be made directly between com critical early period, we have of course In addition, we are on the threshold of munications common carriers and their considered the various carrier proposals numerous developments in technology, foreign correspondents.* While this is for ownership of the initial stations. system design, and other relevant factors a consideration which might support di WUI and RCA would give ComSat sole that can have a significant impact upon rect carrier participation in the earth responsibility for the design, construc the operations of the satellite system. station facet of the operation, it is not tion, and experimental operation of the Considerations such as the foregoing controlling under the circumstances. initial earth stations, but would require underline the need for centralized ad First of all, as set forth more fully in that ComSat transfer the licenses and ministrative control and close technical paragraph 33 infra, the interim policy facilities to the carriers when the system coordination between the earth station which we are adopting allows for sub becomes operational. Such arrange and space segment programs. This is stantial carrier participation. Secondly, ments would be inconsistent with the true not only with respect to internal for the reasons stated, we believe that criteria for coordination and control set operations and planning in this country, the need for, and the advantages to be forth above. In our view, the reasons but is equally true with respect to rela gained from the closest possible coordi supporting the designation of ComSat to tions between United States participants nation between the designers and opera design and construct the initial stations and the foreign participants in the glob tors of the earth and space segments are (reasons which are fully recognized by al system. During the period when vital at this initial stage more important than RCA and WUI), apply with equal force to decisions concerning the establishment, any possible advantages which might be ComSat maintaining sole control during capacity and initial operation of the gained from direct participation in the the system’s early operational stages. basic global system are to be made, the operation of the earth stations by the Further, the adoption of a policy of com interests of all participants, foreign and carriers. We should also stress that this plete carrier earth station ownership and domestic, in the space segment and the determination, like all determinations we operation would complicate the installa earth stations, must be viewed as essen are making herein, relates solely to the tion and operation of facilities for com tial parts of a single unit. Each of these initial earth stations and is interim in mand and control of the space segment factors convince us that there is a press nature. It may well be that upon review and might require ComSat to build a ing need during this crucial formative of this policy, which we will undertake separate earth station for this purpose, period to provide a mechanism for (i) after an appropriate period, we may find thus increasing overall costs consider efficient and expeditious planning, con that the foregoing considerations should ably. Such a policy, particularly if struction, operation and control of the be viewed from a different perspective adopted without benefit of operational limited number of initial earth stations or possibly that other considerations are experience with a commercial system, which are feasible; (ii) for resolving in controlling. Finally, ComSat will be in would run the risk of degrading the a prompt and orderly manner all of the a position to expedite resolution of the quality and efficiency of satellite service problems which are sure to arise; and technical and administrative problems which depend so greatly upon close co (iii) for effective coordination of United which will arise during this period of ordination between the earth stations States efforts relating to both the space evolving satellite technology. and the space segment of the system. segment and earth stations with foreign 31. Aside from the foregoing, we noteMoreover, if ComSat is completely ex participants in the entire system. In that ComSat is an entity whose entire cluded from the ownership and operation summary, we believe it is essential that, effort is devoted exclusively to satellite of the initial earth stations, it might well to the extent possible, diffusion of re communications and which has been be prevented from fully discharging its sponsibility, with the risk of delays or charged with responsibility of fulfilling obligations as our space segment licensee compromises which could adversely ..af the interests of the United States in the during this critical period of inception of fect the efficiency of not only the earth space segment. Moreover, it is the desig the basic global system. Certainly it stations in the United States but also nated United States representative on would appear in the public interest that of the system as a whole, must be avoided. the Interim Committee with all obliga the space segment licensee be the opera Any failure on our part to provide the tions pertaining thereto under domestic tor of the initial earth stations during organizational or administrative struc law and under the Interim Agreements. the early stages of development when ture essential during this critical period Its ability to discharge its obligations in station operation bears so importantly could compromise the orderly develop all these respects in this crucial, forma on the coordination of the total system. ment of the system as well as its prompt tive period will be strengthened by our 33. We now address ourselves to the availability to the greatest number of interim policy. Hence, it will be able to proposals for joint ownership of the ini countries interested in utilizing its serv represent the United States more effec tial stations by ComSat and the carriers. ices. Thus, the policy we are adopting tively on the Interim Committee during This proposal, whatever merit it may is designed to meet a present crucial this.early period, particularly in view of have at a later stage, is not conducive need when the system is in its initial the fact that, almost without exception, to serving the public interest at this time. stages and will be limited only to the its fellow members on such Committee interim period. Initially we note that the carriers now have similar joint responsibility for the have a significant voice and interest in 30. In our judgment, the public inspace segment and the earth stations in the corporate affairs of ComSat through terest considerations set forth above can their respective countries. Finally, we their stock ownership (50 percent of the best be served during the critical interim note that with one exception, all of the stock of the Corporation) and their right Period by centralizing in ComSat re carriers which addressed themselves to to elect 40 percent of the directors. Un sponsibility for the design, construction, the question of planning, designing, and and operation of the initial earth sta der this arrangement, the international carriers have an effective means of pre tions. Therefore, ComSat should be the 8 Article 11(b) of the Agreement Establish senting their views on all important sole earth station licensee with undivided ing Interim Arrangements provides: “* * * responsibility for the earth stations dur that administrations and communications facets of commercial satellite communi ing the interim period. It will thus be carriers will, subject to the requirements of cations. Accordingly, it does not appear m a position to make the many necessary their applicable domestic law, negotiate and to us that carrier station ownership, in complex decisions regarding the con enter directly into such traffic agreements as addition to the foregoing stock ownership struction and operation of the stations may be appropriate with respect to their use and right to elect directors, is necessary of channels of communication provided by in order to afford them an opportunity to Promptly and will be in a unique posi the system tobe established under this Agree tion to provide the essential coordination ment, services to be furnished to the public, contribute their knowledge and experi ^ e cr^ cal developmental period facilities, divisions of revenues and related ence or to adequately protect their in with the space segment program and with business arrangements.” terests with respect to the initial ground 6866 RULES AND REGULATIONS stations. They can, instead, through 35. We recognize that we have, on oc eastern and northwestern parts of the corporate board action, contribute their casion, favored joint ownership of inter conterminous United States and in knowledge and expertise to the formula national communications facilities by a Hawaii if its proposal is adopted. In tion of policy with respect to significant consortium of carriers4 and, indeed, we addition, it states that a fourth station matters affecting the establishment and do not rule out adoption of such a scheme may be necessary in the event a medium operation of the earth stations. Indeed, for earth stations at some time in the altitude system is selected for the basic we would expect that such contributions future. However, the circumstances system. ComSat does not propose to file can be made not only through the car under which we have authorized such an application for such fourth station rier representation on the ComSat Board joint ownership are in sharp contrast to until the basic system choice is made. but also through appropriate liaison, the unsettled conditions and critical basic A.T. & T. agrees with the view that a consultation and coordination between problems with which we will be faced maximum of four stations will be re ComSat and the carriers, particularly in the immediate future with respect to quired to meet foreseeable service re with respect to technical and operational earth stations and the communications quirements but doubts whether all four problems that will arise. Our expecta satellite system as a whole.6 stations will in fact be required at the tion is based on the fact that the carriers 36. Thus, we believe that our proposal outset, particularly one located in the will be users of the system during this will provide for effective carrier partici southeastern part of the conterminous initial period and ComSat can be ex pation during the initial period, which United States. WUI and RCA do not pected to seek appropriate advice and as is highly desirable, without the risk of address themselves to the question of the sistance from those entities upon which delay, uncertainty and Compromise number or location of the stations ini it must depend for its revenues. which would be involved if the carriers tially required. Hawaiian is concerned 34. The joint ownership proposals forwere to have a direct ownership interest only with the interim policy insofar as the initial earth stations in effect seek and a voice in the management deci it applies to a station in Hawaii and does carrier participation, over and above the sions. Insofar as incentive to use the not address itself to the question of what foregoing participation, during this crit system is concerned, the carriers have other stations might be required or where ical beginning period. This is clearly so substantial ownership interests in they should be located. I.T. & T. does in the case of the proposals to allow the ComSat, and they have indicated a seri not specify the number or location of carriers 50 percent ownership (or nega ous interest in the use of space satellite the stations which it believes to be re tive control) of the initial earth stations. techniques for international communi quired. It indicates that it has been It is also the case with respect to joint cations. We believe that the interim “investigating potential areas of site im ownership arrangements whereby par policy we are adopting is best calculated plementation in several parts of the ticular carriers would h§rve substantial to serve the public interest, and is con United States”. In addition, I.T. & T. interests (but not more than 49 percent) sistent with carrier needs and-objectives states that it is in a position to submit in particular earth stations, since such in satellite communications. We again a detailed application “for one or more substantial interests would have a cor emphasize that our policy is not designed earth stations to be located in the United respondingly substantial voice in the var to establish a permanent ownership ar States and/or its possessions * * ious decisions made with respect to that rangement for either the initial earth 39. In view of the time pressure, which earth station during the initial period stations or any additional stations that is a basic reason for our interim policy, (over and beyond the carrier’s voice in may be authorized in the future. Rather, existing traffic requirements, and the the ComSat corporate board or through it is a temporary measure applicable only technical factors involved, we believe appropriate liaison or consultation). to the initial stations, designed to maxi that authorization is now required for But we believe that this increased par mize the opportunity to initiate an three stations during the interim pe ticipation at the earth station level by efficient system as expeditiously as prac riod, and that the regional station site the carriers is undesirable during the ticable in light of existing technology. deployment proposed by ComSat for ini initial period as it would appear to run After the basic global system and the in tial construction offers a sound and rea counter to the policy considerations itial earth stations are established and sonable basis upon which to establish a which have led to our conclusion that operational experience is obtained, there global system. Accordingly, our interim there is a crucial need for centralized likely will be different or additional fac policy shall be applicable to the three authority to take prompt effective action tors and conditions, both of a technical stations, one each to be located in the to resolve the many varied problems sure and policy nature, which will have to be northeastern and northwestern parts of to arise during the initial period. Indeed, carefully considered when we re-examine the conterminous United States and in as a practical matter, we believe that any our interim policy with respect to earth Hawaii. If any interested entity in the arrangement calling for a substantial station ownership. future can demonstrate that an addi ownership interest on the part of the 37. In addition to the factors con tional station is required, for example, carriers, however effectively it may func sidered above, we have not overlooked in the southeastern United States or else tion, involves the risk of diluting respon the important public interest considera where, we will entertain appropriate ap sibility, with resultant risk of possible tions affecting (a) uniform and nondis- plications for any such other stations delays and undesirable compromises in criminatory access to the system, and upon a showing that: the decisions affecting the stations and (b) efficient use of the available fre (a) Such station is required to provide the system during the interim period. quencies. In our judgment, based upon needed global coverage not available via We think this will be particularly true all of the data now available, each of the aforementioned three stations; and if, as has been suggested, the carriers these important public interest consid (b) Is otherwise justified by economic, were to have 50 percent ownership of the erations would be served at least as well technical and other relevant considera earth stations. Further, the joint sta under the policy we have decided to tions. tion ownership would require some type adopt as under the joint ownership 40. In substance, under our policy of temporary or ad hoc arrangement, the proposals. ComSat will assume the sole responsibil formulation and functioning of which 38. We now turn to the question of the ity for the design, construction, and op could involve unnecessary delays, uncer number and location of the stations to eration of the three initial stations. In tainties, and possible conflicts among the which our interim policy is to apply. order to expedite matters we are r6QJ^r" parties greatly out of proportion to the ComSat states that it would be prepared ing that applications for the three initial temporary conditions it is designed to to complete and file applications stations should be filed within 60 days meet. In short, we believe that any joint promptly for three stations in the north- from the date this Report is published. station ownership during the initial If applications are not filed within sucn period involves certain risks and disad * See, for example, our Memorandum Opin time, the Commission will consider what vantages which far outweigh any possible ion and Order, adopted Mar. 17, 1964, with modifications it should make in the po- gains to be derived; and here we again respect to TAT 4, FCC 64-217. icy in order to expedite the prompt pia " take into account that, to a significant 5 Our policy there was enunciated in con ning and construction of the needed nection with the fourth trans-Atlantic cable stations. For the reasons set forth aoove degree, the carriers will be able to con after several years of experience with sole- tribute their knowledge and experience ownership of the United States share by one (see par. 18), the policy will remain in and protect their vital interests through carrier and was designed to serve entirely effect for 2 years from the date tne the means described above. different purposes. first station license is granted unless Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6867 amended, terminated, or extended by 309 when it granted one application and contribution of know-how and experi the Commission for good cause. There designated a mutually exclusive one for ence; assure that stations adequately fore, subject to the limitations set forth hearing, stated (at p. 332) : “Legal theory meet carrier needs; provide for uniform above, licenses issued under the policy is one thing. But the practicalities are and nondiscriminatory access to the sys will be limited to a term of 2 years, and different.” We think that that state tem ; make possible economical operation thereafter we will consider what action ment is especially pertinent here. For and efficient use of the available fre should be taken in light of conditions we are not dealing here with the usual quency spectrum; and, in no way then found to obtain. We wish to make situation where there are two or more prejudice the position of any legally it clear that in all future licensing actions applicants for a broadcast permit and the competent entity in future licensing no entity will be given a preference or be grant of one effectively puts the other proceedings. prejudiced because of any actions we at a practical disadvantage. If ComSat take under the policy we are adopting were to lose out in any proceeding, it Other Matters herein. would not be out of business and have 46. The views of Philco and Westrex 41. We recognize that in this area, as lost its investment. Rather, there could relate primarily to the question of main in other areas of Commission action, in be a simple direction to transfer the sta taining competition in the procurement terested entities may disagree with our tion, on assumption of the appropriate of equipment and services required to policy determinations and desire to chal costs, to the successful applicant in the establish the system and the earth sta lenge them, or the carriers may choose comparative proceeding. Such action tions. In this connection, these respond to file applications which do not accord would create no hardship among the ents believe that if carriers with equip with the interim policy. If any inter parties to the comparative proceeding ment manufacturing affiliates are ested party wishes to challenge our pol and indeed would be consistent with the authorized to construct and operate the icy, we are setting forth the procedures views of the majority of the respondent stations they would tend to favor their which should be followed to minimize to this proceeding which recognize that own suppliers and thereby adversely af delay and assure the availability of the ComSat should be designated and en fect competition in procurements. I.T. earth stations when needed: couraged to assume the responsibility of & T. objects to the comments of both (a) We would expect ComSat to make going forward with the design and con Philco and Westrex on the grounds that timely filing for the earth stations; struction of the initial stations. they are irrelevant and nonresponsive (b) We shall process the applications 44. Finally, we believe that we have and therefore should not be admitted to expeditiously and take into account any the statutory authority to employ the the record of this proceeding. We have objections made during the 30-day statu above procedure, if necessary. The Act considered these comments for the lim tory period; bestows upon the Commission compre ited purpose of noting that Part 25, Sub (c) Unless we are persuaded that the hensive, not niggardly, powers to deal part B of the Commission’s rules and public interest would not be served with the dynamic and changing field of regulations covering communications thereby, we would grant ComSat author radio. See National Broadcasting Co., satellite procurements (47 CFR 25.151 ization to commence construction, sub v. U.S., 319 U.S. 190. Thus, the Com et seq.) provide adequate and reasonable ject to the requirements of our interim mission is empowered to “perform any assurance against favoritism in the pro policy or any modifications thereof we and all acts, make such rules and regula curement of equipment and services re find in the public interest after consider tions, and issue such orders, not incon quired for the construction, operation, ing objections to the ComSat applications sistent with this Act, as may be necesary and maintenance of the satellites and and also subject to the outcome of any in the execution of its functions” (sec. earth stations. However, should the need proceeding we may hold; 4(i) ). See also section 4(j). In addi arise, the Commission is prepared to con (d) We would then immediately take tion to these general provisions section sider amendments to the procurement up any matters in petitions to deny which 201(c) (7) of the Satellite Act specifically rules through the institution of a pro have not been disposed of, or institute authorizes the Commission to “grant ap ceeding designed for such purpose. a proceeding to consider whether the propriate authorizations for the con 47. CBS is concerned solely with the public interest would be served by a grant struction and operation of each satellite possible impact of the Commission’s de of a competing application (s). We terminal station * * * as will best serve cision in this proceeding on the interpre would determine, upon examination of the public interest * * and section tation of the concept of “authorized us the pleadings, whether to adhere to the 102(a) sets out the policy of the United ers”. It maintains that sections 102(c), interim policy, or whether some further States to “establish * * * as expediti 305(a) (2) and 305(b) (4) of the Satellite procedural steps are needed, including ously as practicable a commercial com Act, when read together, authorize Com oral argument or an evidentiary hearing. munications satellite system.” That Sat to deal directly with noncarrier com In the latter event, we would hold an policy is clearly of an overriding nature.® munication entities and CBS regards it expedited hearing- (see sec. 409(a) (b) 45. In our judgment, the interim pol self as eligible to become an “authorized of the Communications Act). icy adopted herein (pars. 40, 41) is called user." It suggests, therefore, that rules 42. We believe that the foregoing pro for in the public interest and has been and regulations should be established to cedures meet the requirements of the arrived at on a sound basis. Moreover, govern assignment of requests for use of public interest in this vitally important there is no indication or showing that facilities to insure that all ultimate users situation. Since, in any event, ComSat our task of formulating policy would be have equitable access to the system. will be permitted to undertake immediate significantly aided by an evidentiary 48. I.T. & T-. objects to the inclusion in steps for the design and construction of hearing at this time. We believe this the record of CBS’s statement on the the ground stations, the possibility of policy will assure prompt construction; grounds that it is irrelevant and imma serious delay in such design and con necessary centralization in planning, de terial to the issues in the proceeding. struction is eliminated and the Con sign and management; adequate flexi We have considered the views of CBS gressional policy of “establishing * * * bility for change and improvement; pro for the limited purpose of pointing out as expeditiously as practicable a com vide ComSat with adequate mpans of dis that the policy we have adopted is de mercial communications satellite system” charging its responsibilities ; induce car signed solely to govern the issuance of can be implemented (sec. 102(a), Satel rier use of the system; permit carrier authorizations for, and the disposition lite Act). Further, it affords interested of ownership interests in, communica parties the opportunity fully and fairly «For example, it would override any in tions satellite earth stations pursuant to to challenge the interim policy and con consistent provision in the Communications section 201(c)(7) of the Satellite Act. test for the earth station authorizations. Act. See sec. 401 of the Satellite Act (“* * * Whenever the application of the provisions Hence, our action should not be con 43. We recognize here the Ashbacker of this Act shall be Inconsistent with the strued to, in any way, affect or prejudice holding (326 U.S. 327) where the Court, application of the provisions of the Com the question involving the authorization m finding that the Commission contra munications Act, the provisions of this Act of carriers and such other entities to pro vened the hearing provisions of section shall govern.”) vide service via the system or to use it. 6868 RULES AND REGULATIONS With respect to the views of ARINC, we earth stations must be determined on the modulation best suited for satellite com intend to make certain threshold deter basis of the following important public munications Consistent with interna minations in the near future dealing with interest considerations. Foremost, it Is, tional standards. Under this arrange the application of space radio communi essential that the operator of the earth ment, the earth station plant can be cation techniques in the Aeronautical stations should be in a position to assure operated as a relay point and as such Radio Service. that all authorized users have equitable there will be no necessity for processing access to the system as required by the the traffic there. As a result there should E quipment and F unction of E arth Satellite Act. In addition, such operator be a reduction in (a) the system com Stations must be able to furnish channels of com plexity, (b) total equipment requirements 49. The respondents are in general munication to users of the earth station and (c) overall system noise. Further, agreement that the telemetry and com facilities. The earth station licensee by placing the channel deriving (multi mand, and the assignment of satellites also must have undivided responsibility plex) equipment under the control of the for optimum traffic management are for the proper handling of all satellite earth station licensee, it will facilitate functions which should be performed by traffic. Finally, the earth station equip the furnishing of channels of communi the space segment manager. It is also ment and functions must be so planned cation to all authorized users. And generally agreed that the earth station as to promote the efficient use of the finally, there should be need for only antenna and associated equipment available frequency spectrum. one or a minimum number of microwave should be included within the earth sta 52. With these public interest con facilities required to link the message tion. complex under the control of the siderations in mind, the Commission be center with the earth station, an ar licensee. However, varying views are lieves the following facilities—in addition rangement which should contribute to expressed with respect to the extent to to the physical station plant and the an the efficient use of the available domestic which the following communications tennas with the associated equipment— frequency spectrum.8 equipment should be included within the should be under the direction and control 54. In view of the foregoing, and, on the communications satellite earth station of the earth station licensee: (1) The basis of the public interest, convenience, complex under the control of the licensee, terrestrial facilities (wire, radio, cable) and necessity, the Commission hereby namely: used to transport the satellite traffic to adopts the policy governing the issuance (1) Land-line facilities (wire, cable, and from the earth station site and a of authorizations for communication sat radio) used to transport the traffic be pl&ce in close proximity to the central ellite earth stations as set forth in this tween the earth station site and the point at which international traffic nor Report. terrestrial communications networks; mally is processed for overseas handling, 55. Further, the Commission finds that (2) Communications terminal equip (2) the channel deriving (multiplex) the public interest, convenience, and ment; and, equipment which processes traffic re necessity will be served by the adoption (3) Channel deriving (multiplex) ceived from terrestrial facilities for of the rules defining equipment and func equipment. transmission via satellite, and (3) equip tion of earth stations, as set forth in the 50. Generally, the carrier respondents ment which receives the traffic from the Appendix below. Accordingly, pursuant maintain that itejn (1) above should not satellite and after transmission via ter to the authority contained in sections be included witnin the earth station restrial facilities to the nearest point of 201(c) (7> and 201(c) (11) of the Com equipment and that such equipment interface processes it prior to transfer munications Satellite Act of 1962, and should be owned, maintained and op to the carriers.7 sections 4(i) and 4(j) and 303 of the erated by the carriers. In addition, 53. Under the foregoing classification Communications Act of 1934, as amend A.T. & T. proposes that the commu of earth station equipment and functions ed: It is ordered, This 12th day of May nications terminal and channel de the carriers may use existing terrestrial 1965, that Part 25 of the Commission’s riving (multiplex) equipment (items facilities to transport traffic to the point Rules and Regulations is amended by 2 and 3 above) should not be in of interface and existing terminal equip adding to Subpart A the rules set forth cluded within the earth station complex ment to interconnect with the terminal in the Appendix below, effective June 22, under the control and operation of the equipment of the earth station complex 1965. licensee. ComSat proposes to accept for transmission via satellite. Such an (Secs. 4, 201, 303, 48 Stat. 1066, as amended, outgoing traffic in any conventional form arrangement provides a ready and ac 76 Stat. 419, 48 Stat. 1082, as amended; 47 selected by the terrestrial common car ceptable means of connection to the U.S.C. 154, 721, 303) riers and is prepared to process such satellite system and thereby promotes traffic to any extent necessary for effi the objective of equitable access. At the Released: May 13,1965. same time, by permitting the interface to cient transmission via the satellite. F ederal Communications " Further, traffic received from the satel be placed in close proximity to existing lite would be converted by ComSat to a message centers where international Commission,* form suitable for terrestrial transmis traffic is now normally processed, the [seal] Ben F. Waple, sion. Westrex believes that placing the earth station licensee would have un Secretary. channel deriving (multiplex) equipment divided control over satellite traffic from 8 Attachment 1 Is Intended to illustrate the under the control of ComSat would re the point of interface to the earth station functions of equipment at the message center sult in a more efficient operation. plant, and would have greater freedom in and the earth station described in par. 52. 51. After careful consideration of the determining and employing the type of •Dissenting statement of Commissioners various views of the parties, we believe Hyde and Lee filed as part of original docu that the equipment and functions of the 7 See appendix. ment. Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6869

Appendix [Docket No. 14229 (RM-454, RM-290).; FCC the hearing may go forward unclouded 65-412] Section 25.103 is amended by the ad by a tentative channel assignment. dition of new paragraphs (d), (e), and PART 73— RADIO BROADCAST Toledo, Ohio (f) as follows: SERVICES 4. Three applications were originally § 25.103 Definitions. Fostering Expanded Use of UHF filed for Channel 79 in Toledo, Ohio, and were designated for hearing on February * * * * * Television Channels 5, 1964, in Dockets No. 15326, 15327, and (d) Communications satellite earth Supplement No. 3 to the Third Report 15328. Pursuant to an agreement be station complex. The term communica and Order. 1. Pursuant to the policy tween the parties, two of the applications tions satellite earth station complex in announced in the Third Report and Or have been dismissed. The remaining cludes transmitters, receivers, and com der in the above-entitled matter, the fol applicant, D. H. Overmyer, in a letter to munications antennas at the earth sta lowing cases require prompt action prior the Commission dated October 30, 1964, tion site, the terrestrial facilities used to to the conclusion of the overall revision requested that Channel 24 be substituted transport the traffic between the earth of the Table of Assignments for UHF for Channel 79 in Toledo, and that any station site and the point of interface, television channels (§ 73.606 of the Com authorization that it may receive for and associated multiplex and demodula mission rules). Channel 79 be modified to substitute tion equipment. P aterson, N.J. Channel 24. An Initial Decision looking (e) Communications satellite earth toward grant of a construction permit station complex functions. The com 2. By Commission order of May 28, to D. H. Overmyer was released on Jan munications satellite earth station com 1963 (FCC 63-490), three applicants for uary 19, 1965, and became final March plex processes- traffic to be transmitted Channel 37 at Paterson, N.J., were desig 10, 1965. to and received from a satellite, performs nated for hearing in Dockets 15089, 5. Retention of Channel 79 in Toledo the transmission and reception func 15091, and 15092. The hearing order afid the authorization of new construc tions, and transports such traffic between stated that pursuant to final action on tion on that channel would be prejudi the earth station site and the point of pending petitions to set aside Channel cial to the proceedings in Docket No. interface. 37 for use by Radio Astronomy interests, 15201 concerning the allocation of UHF (f) Interface. The point of intercon it might be necessary to substitute a channels for regular airborne educa nection between two distinct but adja channel other than Channel 37 for use tional TV operation and to the Commis cent communications systems having at Paterson. Channel 37 was subse sion’s investigation into the possible u§e different functions. The ' interface in quently reserved for Radio Astronomy of the upper UHF channels for a low the communications satellite service is use until 1974 and in the second notice powered Community TV service. Pur that point where communications ter of proposed rule making in Docket No. suant to discussions with representatives minal equipment of the terrestrial com 14229, Channel 66 was proposed at Pat of the Department of Transport of Can mon carriers interconnects with the ter erson. The parties to the Paterson pro ada, they have agreed to make certain minal equipment of the communications ceeding agreed to amend their applica channel assignment changes in Windsor satellite earth station complex. The tions to specify Channel 66 or such other and Sarnia, Ontario, which will make interface in the communications satellite channel as might be assigned to Pat possible the use of Channel 24 at To service shall be located in close proxim erson. ledo. This assignment is consistent with ity to the central point at which inter 3. In the revised UHF assignment the efficiency criteria used in the devel national traffic is normally processed for plan, Channel 41 has been found to be a opment of the overall assignment plan overseas handling. more efficient assignment than Channel for UHF channels. In order to avoid [PR. Doc. 65-5260; Filed, May 19, 1965; 66 for Paterson. Accordingly, that as delay in the construction of the newly 8:45 a.m.] signment is now being made final so that authorized UHF television station at 6870 RULES AND REGULATIONS Toledo, the assignment is being adopted Georgia communities for use by educa 16. It is further ordered: herein. tional TV stations. This proceeding (a) That the construction permit S aginaw, Mich. originated as the result of a petition BPCT-3039 held by Kaiser Broadcasting 6. Lake Huron Broadcasting Corp. is (RM-290) by the Georgia State Board Corp. for construction of a new tele the present licensee of WKNX-TV, of Education to provide reserved chan vision station in Burlington, N.J., is Channel 57, Saginaw, Mich. On June 25, nels for the establishment of a statewide modified to specify construction on 1963, they filed a petition for rule mak educational network. The petition in Channel 48 in lieu of Channel 41, sub ing (RM-454) requesting the substitu cluded a request for a channel at Drake- ject to the conditions enumerated below; tion of a lower UHF channel for their use town, Ga. However, we were unable to (b) That the construction permit at Saginaw. Channel 25 was suggested. make an assignment at Draketown with (BPCT-3173, Docket No. 15327), held by The petition was caught up in the pro in the framework of the existing assign D. H. Overmyer for construction of a ceedings in Docket No. 14229 concerning ments at that time. new television station in Toledo, Ohio, an overall revision of the Table of As 12. When the present proceedings in is modified to specify construction on signments for UHF channels. Docket No. 14229 were initiated the pro Channel 24 in lieu of Channel 79, sub 7. We have recently been advised that posed revised Table of Assignments for ject to the conditions enumerated below; the transmitting apparatus now em UHF channels included the .assignment (c) That the license of Lake Huron ployed at WKNX-TV urgently needs re of Channel 27 to Draketown. Draketown Broadcasting Corp. for Station WKNX- placement because of its age and result was included on the basis of claims by the TV, Saginaw, Mich., is modified to spec ing unreliable performance and that in Georgia State Board of Education that ify operation on Channel 25 in lieu of view of the substantial investment in it was a key location in its contemplated Channel 57, subject to the conditions volved, the licensee would like a decision statewide plan. A review of'the initial enumerated below; with respect to its petition. The assign proposal on the basis of the efficiency 17. The above modifications of au ment of Channel 25 to Saginaw is con criteria used for the development of an thorizations -are subject to the following sistent with the efficiency criteria used in overall UHF assignment plan shows that conditions : the development of the overall assign Channel 24 at Draketown is a more effi (a) That in each case the licensee or ment plan for UHF channels. Accord cient assignment than Channel 27. The permittee shall advise the Commission ingly, in order to permit Lake Huron Georgia State Board of Education has in writing by June 1, 1965, of its accept Broadcasting Corp. to proceed promptly advised us that they are now prepared to ance of the modification of its authori with the urgently needed replacement of seek Federal funds for the construction zation; equipment, we are adopting the assign and operation of an education UHF (b) That in each case of modification ment of Channel 25 to Saginaw herein. television broadcast station at Drake of construction permit to specify a dif town but cannot do so until a reserved ferent channel the permittee shall submit B urlington, N.J. • assignment is provided for Draketown. to the Commission by June 1, 1965, all 8. On July 8, 1964, the Commission For that reason, we are adopting herein necessary information for the prepara granted construction permit BPCT-3093 the assignment of Channel 24 at Drake tion of modified authorization to con to Kaiser Broadcasting Corp. for the town. struct and operate on the newly specified construction and operation of a new Other Changes in the T able channel with transmitting facilities UHF television broadcast station on meeting all requirements of the Commis Channel 41 at Burlington, N.J. Channel 13. The action taken herein requires sion’s rules and regulations for operation 41 is assigned" to Trenton, N.J., in the the deletion of certain channels appear on that channel; and present Table of Assignments in § 73.606 ing in the present Table of Assignments (c) That in each case of modification of Commission rules and is available in § 73.606 of the rules, in order to re of license the licensee may continue op to Burlington under the “15 mile rule”. move conflicts. Substitute channels are eration temporarily on the previously The permittee specified a transmitter available and will be assigned in the specified channel in accordance with the site in the northern part of Philadelphia forthcoming revised overall assignment ternis and conditions of the current li and requested a waiver of the mileage plan if such action is consistent with the cense until the following requirements -separation rules with respect to Channel principles upon which the revised plan is have been satisfied : 55 at Lancaster, Pa. based. j (1) In each case the licensee must 9. Because of the pending proceeding 14. These actions are being taken prior submit by June 1, 1965, all information in Docket No. 14229, which looked toward to the conclusion of the overall revision necessary to comply with applicable an overall revision of the Table of As of the assignment plan on the basis of rules, executed in triplicate, for the prep signments for UHF channels, the Com representations that the parties are pre aration of the modified authorization to mission was unwilling to concur in a pared to proceed promptly with the con cover the operation of the licensed sta short-spaced assignment since an as struction and operation of UHF broad tion on the newly specified channel; signment meeting the required separa casting stations on the channels assigned (2) The construction looking to a tions could probably be found. Accord herein. Lack of diligence may result in change to the newly specified channel is ingly, the construction permit issued to the assignment of some other channel or not to commence until specifically au Kaiser permitted the commencement of if necessary the deletion of the channel, thorized by the Commission after the construction with respect to all proposed upon the conclusion of the proceedings information in (1) above is submitted. facilities except those specifically de in Docket No. 14229. (3) Upon completion of construction signed for operation on Channel 41. We 15. In the light of the foregoing: It is of the new fàcilities in accordance with are now advised that the permittee is hereby ordered, That effective June 28, the terms of the modified authorization, prepared to place an order for the trans 1965, § 73.606 of the Commission rules is proof of performance measurement data mitter and antenna and must supply a amended, insofar as the communities adequate to demonstrate compliance with specific channel number. named below are concerned, to read as the applicable technical performance re 10. On the basis of the efficiency cri follows: quirements of the rules and of the type teria used for the development of the normally required to be furnished in an revised overall assignment plan for UHF City Add Delete application for a television license shall channels, Channel 48 has been found to be submitted, in triplicate, at least ten be the preferred assignment for Burling *24- (10) days prior to the date on which it is 55 ton. In order to avoid delay in the con 48— desired to begin program operation. struction and operation of the newly *24- Program operation on the newly specified 24+ authorized UHF television station at Griffin, Ga 39+ channel shall not be commenced until Burlington, N.J., we are adopting that East, Lansing, Mi oh *24— specifically authorized by the Commis Midland, Mich-.______25— assignment herein. Saginaw, Micb______25- 57- sion after its evaluation of such data. Burlington, N..T D raketown, Ga. 48- (d) All of the above assignments re Paterson, N.J______41+ 37+ Trenton,'N..T 41+ main subject to change in accordance 11. On August 2, 1.962, the Commission Albanv, N Y 41 adopted a Report and Order in Docket 24- 79 with the final outcome of Docket No. No. 14409 amending the Table of As 63 14229. 56+ signments in § 73.606 of the rules to pro Cookeville, Tenn _ _ 24 18. Authority for the actions taken vide UHF television channels in several herein is contained in sections 4(i), 303, Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6871

and 307(b) of the Communications Act PART 33— SPORT FISHING to fishing. This open area, comprising of 1934, as amended. 1,900 acres, is delineated on maps avail Ninepipe National Wildlife Refuge, (Sec. 4, 48 Stat. 1066, as amended; 47 U.S.C. able at the refuge headquarters, Na 154; interpret or apply secs. 303, 307, 48 Montana tional Bison Range, Moiese, Mont., 59824, Stat. 1082, 1083; 47 U.S.C. 303, 307) The following special regulation is is and from the office of the Regional Di rector, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Adopted: May 12,1965. sued and is effective on date of publica tion in the F ederal R egister. Wildlife, 1002 Northeast Holladay Street, Released: May 14,1965. Portland, Oreg., 97208. Sport fishing § 33.5 Special regulations; sport fish shall be in accordance with all applicable F ederal Communications ing; for individual wildlife refuge State regulations, subject to the following Commission,1 areas. special conditions: [ s e a l ] Ben F. Waple, Montana Open season: The north and east Secretary. shorelines from the inlet canal to the NINEPIPE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE [F.R. Doc. 65-5322; Filed, May 19, 1965; south end of the main dike are open 8:49 a.m.] Sport fishing on the Ninepipe National from July 15, 1965, through February 28, Wildlife Refuge, Mont., is permitted only 1966, except during the migratory water- on the area designated by signs as open fowl hunting season. to fishing. This open area, comprising The provisions of this special regula 2,062 acres, is delineated on maps avail tion supplement the regulations which Title 50— WILDLIFE AND able at the refuge headquarters and from govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas the office of the Regional Director, Bu generally, which are set forth in Title FISHERIES reau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 50, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33, Chapter I— Bureau of Sport Fisheries 1002 Northeast Holladay Street, Port and are effective to May 1, 1966. land, Oreg., 97208. Sport fishing shall P aul T. Quick, and Wildlife, Fish and Wildlife be in accordance with all applicable Service, Department of the Interior Regional Director, Bureau of State regulations, subject to the follow Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. ing special conditions: PART 33— SPORT FISHING Area No. 1. North shore from north May 14,1965. Medicine Lake National Wildlife end of main dike to the south end of the [F.R. Doc. 65-5320; Filed, May 19, 1965; Allentown bridge, and that portion of the 8:48 a.m.] Refuge, Montana refuge lying east of Highway 93, open all The following special regulation is year, except closed September 8, 1965, issued and is effective on date of publi to the end of the migratory waterfowl PART 33— SPORT FISHING cation in the F ederal R egister. hunting season. Area No. 2. South shore from south Charles M. Russell National Wildlife § 33.5 Special regulations; sport fish end of main dike to south end of the Range, Montana ing; for individual wildlife refuge Allentown bridge open from July 15, The following special regulation is is areas. 1965, through February 28, 1966, except sued and is effective on date of publica M o n t a n a closed from September 8,1965, to the end tion in the F ederal R egister. MEDICINE LAKE NATIONAL W ILDLIFE REFUGE of the migratory waterfowl hunting season. § 33.5 Special regulations; sport fish Sport fishing on the Medicine Lake Area No. 3. The area of the main dike ing; for individual wildlife refuge National Wildlife Refuge, Mont., is per open all year, except closed during the areas. mitted only on the area designated by migratory waterfoul hunting season. Montana signs as open to fishing. This open area, The provisions of this special regula CHARLES M. RUSSELL NATIONAL WILDLIFE comprising 750 acres, is delineated on tion supplement the regulations which RANGE maps available at the refuge head govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas Sport fishing on the Charles M. Russell quarters, Medicine Lake, Mont., 59247, generally, which are set forth in Title 50, and from the office of the Regional Di National Wildlife Range, Mont., is per Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33, mitted only on the area designated by rector, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and and are effective to May 1,1966. Wildlife, 1002 Northeast Holladay Street, signs as open to fishing. This open area, Portland, Oreg., 97208. Sport fishing Paul T. Quick, comprising the Missouri and Musselshell shall be in accordance with all applica Regional Director, Bureau of Rivers and Fort Peck Reservoir, is de ble State regulations, subject to the fol Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. lineated on maps available at the refuge headquarters, Post Office Box 110, Lew- lowing special conditions : May 14,1965. (1) The sport fishing season on the istown, Mont., and from the office of the [F.R. Doc. 65-5319; Filed, May 19, 1965; Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Fish refuge extends from July 1 through Sep 8:48 a.m.] tember 15, 1965, and from November 15, eries and Wildlife, 1002 Northeast Holla 1965, through March 31, 1966. day Street, Portland, Oreg., 97208. Sport (2) Boats with or without motors may fishing -shall be in accordance with all be used for fishing. PART 33— SPORT FISHING applicable State regulations, subject to The provisions of this special regula the following special conditions: Pablo National Wildlife Refuge, The wildlife range is open to sport tion supplement the regulations which Montana govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas fishing the year round. generally which are set forth in Title 50, The following special regulation is is The provisions of this special regula Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33, sued and is effective on date of publica tion supplement the regulations which and are effective to April 1, 1966. tion in the F ederal R egister. govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas generally, which are set forth in Title 50, Paul T. Quick, § 33.5 Special regulations; sport fish Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33, ing; for individual wildlife refuge and are effective to May 22, 1966. Regional Director, Bureau of areas. Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. P aul T. Quick, Montana May 14,1965. Regional Director, Bureau of PABLO NATIONAL W ILDLIFE REFUGE Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. [PR. Doc. 65-5318; Filed, May 19, 1965; • . • 8:48 a.m.] Sport fishing on the Pablo National May 13,1965. Wildlife Refuge, Mont., is permitted only [F.R. Doc. 65-5321; Filed, May 19, 1965; 1 Commissioner Wadsworth absent. on the area designated by signs as open 8:49 am.] No. 97----- 6 Proposed Rule Making

localizer W course extending from the of the ADF 2 and VOR/DME 2 instru FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY 5-mile radius zone to 8 miles W of the ment approach procedures and pre OM and within 2 miles each side of the scribed holding patterns at the Rapelje, [ 14 CFR Part 71 1 Billings VORTAC 095° and 267° radials Ryegate, and Musselshell Intersections. [Airspace Docket No.65—CE-61] extending from 12 miles E to 8 miles W The floors of the airways that traverse of the VORTAC. the transition area proposed herein CONTROL ZONE, TRANSITION AREA 2. Designate the Billings, Mont., transi would automatically coincide with the AND CONTROL AREA EXTENSION tion area as that airspace extending up floors of the transition area. Proposed Alteration, Designation and ward from 700 feet above the surface Certain minor revisions to prescribed within an 8-mile radius of Logan Field, instrument procedures would be effected Revocation Billings, Mont, (latitude 45°48'23" N., in conjunction with the actions proposed . The Federal Aviation Agency is con longitude 108°31'54" W.) ; and within 2 herein, but operational complexity would sidering amendments to Part 71 of the miles each side of the 071° bearing from jciot be increased nor would aircraft per Federal Aviation Regulations to alter the Billings RBN extending from the 8- formance or landing minimums be ad controlled airspace in the Billings, Mont., mile radius area to 8 miles E of the RBN ; versely affected. terminal area. and within 5 miles N and 8 miles S of the Specific details of the changes to pro The following controlled airspace is Billings VORTAC 267° radial extending cedures that would be required may be presently designated in the Billings, from the 8-mile radius area to 12 miles examined by contacting the Chief, Air Mont., terminal area: W of the VORTAC; and within 5 miles N space Branch, Air Traffic Division, Cen 1. The Billings, Mont., control zone is and 8 miles S of the Billings ILS localizer tral Region, Federal Aviation Agency, designated within a 5-mile radius of W course extending from the 8-mile 4825 Troost Avenue, Kansas City, Mo., Logan Field, Billings, Mont, (latitude radius area to 12 miles W of the OM; and 64110. 45°48'23" N„ longitude 108°31'54" W.), that airspace extending upward from Interested persons may submit such and within 2 miles either side of the 1200 feet above the surface within a 21- written data, views or arguments as they 071° bearing from the Billings RBN ex mile radius of the Billings VORTAC ex may desire. Communications should be tending from the 5-mile radius zone to tending clockwise from V-2 W of Billings submitted in triplicate to the Director, 12 miles NE of the RBN. to V-19 SE of Billings; and within 10 Central Region, Attention: Chief, Air 2. The Billings, Mont., control area miles SW and 7 miles NE of the Billings Traffic Division, Federal Aviation Agency, extension is designated within a 25-mile VORTAC 301° radial extending from 20 4825 Troost Avenue, Kansas City, Mo., radius of the Billings VORTAC extend miles NW of the VORTAC to 49 miles 64110. All communications received ing clockwise from V-2 W of Billings to NW of the VORTAC; and within 10 miles within 45 days after publication of this V-19 SE of Billings; within 12 miles W SW and 7 miles NE of the Billings notice in the F ederal R egister will be and 8 miles E of the Billings VORTAC VORTAC 317° radial extending from the considered before action is taken on the 347° radial extending from the 25-mile 21-mile radius area to 45 miles NW of proposed amendment. No public hear radius area to 46 miles N of the the VORTAC; and within 10 miles W ing is contemplated at this time, but VORTAC; and within 12 miles SW and and 7 miles E of the Billings VORTAC arrangements for informal conferences 8 miles NE of the Billings VORTAC 301° 347° radial extending from the 21-mile with Federal Aviation Agency officials radial extending from V-2 and the 25- radius area to 42 miles N of the VORTAC. may be made by contacting the Regional mile radius area to 53 miles NW of the 3. Revoke the Billings, Mont., control Air Traffic Division Chief. Any data, V O R T A C ; including the airspace area extension in its entirety. views, or arguments presented during bounded on the N by V-2, on the E by The proposed control zone would pro such conferences must also be submitted V-187, and on the SW by a line extend vide controlled airspace for aircraft ex in writing in accordance with this notice ing from the S boundary of V-2 through ecuting prescribed instrument arrival in order to become part of the record latitude 45°43'00" N., longitude 108°48'- and departure procedures during their for consideration. The proposal con 00" W., and latitude 45°42'30" N., longi flight below 1,000 feet above the surface. tained in this notice may be changed in tude 108°44'00" W. to the W boundary The proposed control zone extensions to the light of comments received. of V-167. the east and west of the Logan Field The public Docket will be available for The Federal Aviation Agency, having will provide protection for aircraft ex examination by interested persons in the completed a comprehensive review of the ecuting the VOR and ILS approaches to office of the Regional Counsel, Federal terminal airspace structural require Logan Field. Aviation Agency, 4825 Troost Avenue, ments in the Billings, Mont., terminal The proposed 700-foot floor transition Kansas City, Mo., 64110. area, including studies attendant to the area would provide controlled airspace This amendment is proposed under implementation of the provisions of protection for the procedure turn areas the authority of section 307 (a) of the Amendments 60-21 (26 F.R. 570) and of the prescribed instrument approach Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 60-29 (27 F.R. 4012) of Part 60 of the procedures, the final approach of the 1348). Civil Air Regulations, proposes the fol lowing airspace actions: ADF 2 approach procedure, and the por Issued at Kansas City, Mo., on May 11, 1. Redesignate the Billings, Mont., contion of the departure procedures during 1965. trol zone within a 5-mile radius of Logan their climb from 1,000 feet to 1,500 feet K irby L. Brannon, Field, Billings, Mont, (latitude 45° 48'23" above the surface. The proposed 1,200- Acting Director, Central Region. N., longitude 108°31'54" W .); and within foot floor transition area would provide [P.R. Doc. 65-5286; Piled, May 19, 1945; 2 miles each side of the Billings ILS protection for the procedure turn areas 8:47 a.m.] 6872 Notices

is unwilling to accept such condition the unnecessary for Applicants to appear or FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION application will be set for formal hearing. be represented at the hearing. [Docket Nos. G-5077 etc.] Under the procedure herein provided J oseph H. G tjtride, for, unless otherwise advised, it will be FRANK H. WALSH ET AL. Secretary. Notice of Applications for Certificates, Docket No. and date filed Price per Pres Abandonment of Service and Peti Applicant Purchaser, field, and location Mcf sure base tions To Amend Certificates 1 G-6077...... Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co., 7.0 16.4 May 11,1965. E 6-5-65 sneu oil co.). Post Offi Inc., Yenter Field, Logan County, 30, Sterling, Colo. Colo. Take notice that each of the Applicants G-5145____ Humble Oil & Refinini El Paso Natural Gas Co., Spraberry Assigned listed herein has filed an application or D 5-3-65 Post Office Box 2180, He Field, Reagan County, Tex. petition pursuant to section 7 of the Tex., 77001. G-5374___... Skelly Oil Co., Post Offi< Northern Natural Gas Co., Eunice Natural Gas Act for authorization to sell 4-19-65 > 1650, Tulsa 2, Okla. lLO 14.65 G-9792...... Plant No. 2, Lea County, N. Mex. natural gas in interstate commerce or Cities Service Oil Co. (sutv^oou. Cities Service Gas Co., Medicine »13.0 14.65 E 4-28-65 to Imperial Oil of Kansas, Lodge Field, Barber County. to abandon service heretofore authorized Inc.), Cities Service Bldg., Kans. as described herein, all as more fully Bartlesville, Okla. G-16139__ described in the respective applications Gulf Oil Corp., Post Office Transwestem Pipeline Co.. Pan (») D 5-3-65 1589, Tulsa, Okla., 74102. handle Area, Roberts County, and amendments which are on file with Tex. CI61-385.... the Commission and open to public Cities Service Oil Co. (succe^. Northern Natural Gas Co., acreage 12.0 14.66 E 4-29-65 to Imperial Oil of Kansas, in Finney County, Kans. inspection. Inc.), Cities Service Bldg., Bartlesville. Okla. Protests or petitions to intervene may CI61-392... Forest Oil Corp., et al., 1300 El Paso Natural Gas Co., Clear 17.0 14.65 be filed with the Federal Power Com 3-29-65 « National Bank of Commerce Lake Field, Beaver County, Okla. mission, Washington, D.C., 20426, in ac Bldg., San Antonio, Tex., 78205. cordance with the rules of practice and CI61-1589... Texaco Inc., Post Office Box Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co., Lassa- 12.9983 14 65 procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or C 4-36-65 52332, Houston, Tex., 77052. ter Field, Marion County, Tex. C163-125__ before June 2,1965. Sohio Petroleum Co. (successor Northern Natural Gas Co., East 16.5 14 65 E 4-13-65 to Prado Oil and Gas Co.), 970 Camrick Field, Beaver County. Take further notice that, pursuant to First National Office Bldg., Okla. Oklahoma City, Okla., 73102. the authority contained in and subject to CI63-126__ -----do...... Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of Amer- * 16.8 14 65 the jurisdiction conferred upon the Fed E 4-13-65 ica, Southeast Camrick Field, eral Power Commission by sections 7 Beaver County, Okla. CI63-265—. and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the Forest Oil Corp., et al., 1300 Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co., 15.0+ B.t.u. 14.66 3-22-65« National Bank of Commerce Woodward Area, Major and Adjustment Commission’s rules of practice and pro Bldg., San Antonio, Tex., Woodward Counties, Okla. 78205. cedure, a hearing will be held without CI63-1110__ H. J. Mosser, Operator, 1315 The Altex Corp., Tom Graham 13.8452 14 65 further notice before the Commission on A 3-4-63 Bank of the Southwest Bldg., Field, Jim Wells County, Tex. all applications in which no protest or C 11-19-63 Houston 2, Tex. petition to intervene is filed within the CI63-1376-... Sohio Petroleum Co. (successor Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of Ameri- •12.0 14.65 time required herein, if the Commission E 4-13-65 to Prado Oil & Gas Co.), 970 ca, Camrick Field, Beaver Coun First National Office Bldg., ty, Okla. on its own review of the matter believes Oklahoma City, Okla., 73102. CI64-672__ that a grant of the certificates or the Cities Service Oil Co. (successor Northern Natural Gas Co., acreage 16.0 14.65 E 4-28-65 to Robert L. Williams, d.b.a. in Meade County, Kans. authorization for the proposed abandon Imperial Oil Co. (Operator), ment is required by the public conven et al.), Gities Service Bldg., ience and necessity. Where a protest or Bartlesville, Okla. CI64-1451... Cities Service Oil Co. (successor El Paso Natural Gas Co., Monahans 14.189 14.65 petition for leave to intervene is timely E 4-29-65 to Ashmun & Hilliard No. 5, Field, Ward and Winkler Coun filed, or where the Commission on its Ltd. (Operator), et al.), Cities ties, Tex. Service Bldg., Bartlesville, own motion believes that a formal hear Okla. ing is required, further notice of such CI65-560__... The California Co., a division Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of Amer A 12-11-64 » 20.625 15.025 hearing will be duly given: Provided, of California Oil Co., 1111 ica, West Cameron Blocks 17-49 19.0 15.025 4-28-65 » Tulane Ave., New Orleans, Field Area, Offshore Cameron however, That pursuant to § 2.56, Part 2, La., 70112. Parish, La. CI65-767____ Statement of General Policy and Inter Southern Union Production El Paso Natural Gas Co., acreage 13.0 15.025 C 5-3-65 Co., Fidelity Union Tower, in San Juan County, N. Mex. pretations, Chapter I of Title 18 of the Dallas, Tex., 75201. CI65-1032___ Code of Federal Regulations, as amended, Bridwell Oil Co., Post Office United Gas Pipe Line Co., Willa- n 13.4196 14 65 A 4-19-65 » Drawer 1830, Wichita Falls, man Field, San Patrioio County, nil permanent certificates of public con 4-27-65 » Tex. Tex. venience and necessity granting applica CI65rl042... True Oil Co., Post Office Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co., Uneconomical tions, filed after April 15, 1965, without B 4-19-65 Drawer 1612, Casper, Wyo. Inc., Minto Field, Logan County, further notice, will contain a condition Colo. CI65-1144... Turnbull & Zoch Drilling Co. United Gas Pipe Line Co., Fox 13.0 U 1465 Precluding any filing of an increased F 4-28-65 (Operator), et al. (successor to Field, Refugio County, Tex. Union Producing Co.), 521 rate at a price in excess of that desig Wilson Tower, Gorpus Christi, nated for the particular area of produc Tex. 065-1145... Pan American Petroleum Corp., Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co., Wil- 15.0 1465 tion for the period prescribed therein A 4-29-65 Post Office Box 591, Tulsa, burton Field, Latimer and Pitts unless at the time of filing such certifi Okla., 74102. burg Counties, Okla. CI65-1146... Fairman Drilling Co., Box 288, Consolidated Gas Supply Corp.,u 27.6 15.325 cate application, or within the time fixed A 4-29-65 DuBois, Pa., 15801. Big Run Pool, Gaskill Township, erein for the filing of protests or peti- Jefferson County, Pa. CI65-1147—. Shell Oil Co., 50 West 50th St., The Manufacturers Light & Heat Depleted 10ns to intervene the Applicant indicates B 4-28-65 New York, N.Y., 10020. Co., Caledonia-Pike Area, Elk writing that it is unwilling to accept and Clearfield Counties, Pa. Filing code: A—Initial service. ueh a condition, in the event Applicant B—Abandonment. C—Amendment to add acreage. D—Amendment to delete acreage. dnt ^ iS,notice does not provide for cons« E—Succession. covurorti?1 Scaring of the several matt F—Partial succession. fcu herein, nor should it be so constru See footnotes at end of table. 6873 6874 NOTICES

[Docket Nos. G-3609 etc.] Docket No. and Price per Pres date filed Applicant Purchaser, field, and location Mcf sure W. G. HAUN & LEE DRILLING CO base ET AL. CI65-1148...... The Superior Oil Co., Post Florida Gas Transmission Co., Depleted Findings and Order After Hearing B 4-27-65 Office Box 1521, Houston, Tex. Oblate Field, Hidalgo County, Tex. CI65-1I49...... Anadarko Production Co., Post Northern Natural Gas Co., North- 17.0 14.65 May 11,1965. A 4-30-65 Office Box 351, Liberal, Kans. east Dower Field, Beaver County, In the Matter of Findings and Order Okla. CI65-1150-...... Sinclair Oil& Gas Co., Post Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co., 17.0 14.65 After Statutory Hearing Issuing Certifi A 4-29-65 Office Box 591, Tulsa, Okla. Gageby Creek Field, Wheeler cates of Public Convenience and Neces 74102. County, Tex. CI65-1151...... Lab Oil Company, et aL, Box Costal States Gas Producing Co., Depleted sity, Amending Certificates, Permitting B 4-30-65 1391, Corpus Cbristi, Tex. A & H Field, Duval County, Tex. and Approving Abandonment of Service, CI65-1152_____ Frank H. Walsh (successor to Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co., 7.0 16.4 Terminating Certificates, Substituting F 4-26-65 Shell OU Co.), Post Office Box Inc., Elm Grove and Key Fields, 30, Sterling, Colo. Logan County, Colo. Respondents, Redesignating Proceeding, CI65-1153_____ Sohio Petroleum Co., 970 First Tennessee Gas Transmission Co., 23.6 15.025 Accepting Agreements and Undertakings A 5-3-65 National Gffice Blag., Okla South Pass Block 24 Field, homa City, Okla., 73102. Plaquemines Parish, La. for Filing, Accepting Related Rate CI65-1155...... The Waverly Oil Works Co., Equitable Gas Co., Otter District, 25.0 15.325 Schedules and Supplements for Filing A 5-3-65 4403 Centre Ave., Pittsburgh, Braxton County, W. Va. and Permitting Withdrawal of Interven Pa., 15213. C165-1156...... Hal M. Stierwalt & Max W. El Paso Natural Gas Co., Tapicito 12.0 15.025 tions. A 5-3-65 CoU, II, Post Office Box 1818, Picture Cliffs, Rio Arriba Coun Each of the Applicants listed herein Roswell, N. Mex. ty, N. Mex. CI65-1157...... The Ballard

CI60-175 Pubco Petroleum Corp. El Paso Natural Gas Co., Supplemental agree 13 16 CI65-444.__ Butter & Co.. Ltd., et El Paso Natural Gas Co., Contract 2-4-64. 2 1965 20, May C 3-22-65 (Operator), et al. Basin Dakota Field, ment 3-1-66.» m »» A 11-10-64 al. Spraberry Trend Area, Statement 11-24-64 »».__ 2 1 Rio Arriba County, 11-27-64 82 Glasscock County, Tex. N. Mex. CI65-461___ Sinclair Oil & Oas C o - El Paso Natural Gas Co., Supplemental Agree- 333 1 CI60-358...... Burnett Corp. (Oper Panhandle Eastern Pipe H. N. Burnett, FPC 12 2 C 3-19-66 Basin Dakota Field, ment 2-4-65.»» 3» E 3-19-65 ator), et al. (successor Line Co., acreage in GRS No. 10. San Juan County, N. to H. N. Burnett). Carson and Hutchinson Supplement Nos. 1-2__ 2 1-2 Mex. Counties, Tex. Notice of succession CI65-620.__ Hydrocarbon Chemi Cumberland & Allegheny Contract 12-19-60 u ...... 15 3-17-65.18 A 8-13-64 cals, Inc. Gas Co., Washington Contract 12-19-60 »31___ 16 Effective date; 7-1-64. (0-2972)8* and Buckhannon Dis CI60-442_____ Dorsey Buttram (suc El Paso Natural Gas Co., Buttram Texhoma. Co., 2 (0-2973)8* tricts, Upshur County, E 2-9-65cessor to Buttram Red Wasa Unit, FPC GRS No. 1. (0-6597)85 W. V a. REGISTER FEDERAL Texhoma Co.). Uintah County, Colo. Supplement Nos. 1-3__ 2 1-3 0165-736__ William V. Montin. El Paso Natural Gas Co., Contract 12-10-64 »» 1 Notice of succession A 1-26-65 Basin Dakota Field, 2-5-65. > San Juan County, N. Assignment 2-1-65____ 2 4 Mex. Effective date: 2-1-65... CI65-739___ Shell 0Ü Co. American Louisiana Pipe 314 CT61-1147 Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Amendatory agreement 211 12 A 1-26-65 Line Co., Kings Bayou C 3-22-65 Line Co., Woodward 2-16-65.il i* Field, Cameron Parish, Area, Woodward La. County, Okla. 0165*775___ Earl A. Benson, Estate. El Paso Natural Gas Co., Contract 12-14-64 »»___ 1 CT62-I1ftn Supplemental agree 220 3 A 2-5-65 Basin Dakota Field, C 3-11-65 Doyle Field.-Stephens ment 5-21-64. San Juan County, N. County, Okla. Amendatory agreement 220 4 Mex. 9-22-64.il « A CI65-793.. United Engineering Trunkline Gas Co., Contract 1-23-62 »«____ i CT62-1221 Carl E. Gungoll, et al—. Cities Service Gas Co., Supplemental agreement 1 4 (CI62-1345) Service, Inc. Heard Ranch Field, Assignment 11-9-64 »__ 1 1 C 3-17-65 Northeast Waynoka 3-l-65.li F 2-11-65 Bee County, Tex. Assignment 11-9-64 «»... 1 2 Field, Woods County, Okla. A CI65-822.. Bolin Oil Co. El Paso Natural Gas Co., Contract. 3-10-52 ...... 2 CI63-201...... Continental Oil Co.17__ Panhandle Eastern Pipe Ratification Agreement 234 (CI62-851) South Blanco Field, Letter agreement 2 1 A 8-13-62 Line Co., Elk City 3-16-62.18 F 2-19-65 Rio Arriba County, ,1 9-17-52. Hoxbar Sand Conglom- Contract 3-23-60 u...... 234 i N. Mex. Letter agreement 2 2 erate Unit, Beckham 10-25-52. and Washita Counties, Amendment 3-19-52___ 2 3 Okla. Assignment 6-1-59____ 2 4 CI63-601...... W. H. Mossor, d.b.a. Equitable Gas Co., Letter Agreement 55 2 Letter agreement 7-5-60. 2 5 Ç 3-4-65 . Boilon Oil & Gas Co. Butchers Fork District, 1-29t65.ii Assignment 9-26-62 •»__ 2 6 Gilmer County, W. Va. CI63-996 Humble Oil & Refining Arkansas Louisiana Gas Assignment 11-18-641*_. 331 10 CI65-826__ Edward Mike Davis, Kansas-N ebraska Natural 1 D 12-28-64 Co. Co., North Cooper Letter agreement 11- 331 11 A 2-23-65 d.b.a. Tiger Oil Co. Gas Co., Inc., Stem Field, Blaine County, 25-64.8 so (Operator), et al. Field, Washington Okla. County, Colo. CI64-38 21 Lab Oil Co. (Oper Hydrocarbon Trans- Contract 5-15-63...... , U A CI65-875. CWM and VLM Trust El Paso Natural Gas Co., 1 A 7-8-63 ator), et al. mission Co., North Amendment 2-18- 11 1 (CI63-65) (successor to C. W. Basin Dakota Field, Letter agreement 1 1 A.S.O.G. Field, Jim 651123 F 3-3-65 Murchison). San Juan County, 6-26-62.« Wells County, Tex. N. Mex. Supplement agreement 1 2 CI64r-223 2i...... Hydrocarbon Trans- The Altex Corp., North Contract 1-3-63______2 12-6-63.8 A 8-19-63 mission Co. (Oper- A.S.O.G. Field, Jim Amendment 3-9-65 »» 23.. 2 1 Supplement agreement 1 3 ator). Wells County, Tex. 1-21-65.*» A CI64-554 John Franks 28...... United Gas Pipe Line Contract 11-24-542i____ 13 Assignment 2-1-65 *»___ 1 4 (G-11821) 2* Co., Maxie-Pistol Ridge Assignment 10-21-63 38.. 13 1 F 11-4-63 Field, Forrest County, Effective date: 10-21-63. A 0165-884.... Forest Oil Corp. Texas Eastern Transmis Contract. fi-2S-R5 *« 33 Miss. (0-10280) *» sion Corp., Dallas Letter agreement 33 1 OT64-14R1 The Algas Co...... United Gas Pipe Line- (21)...... 1 F 3-8-65 Husky Field, Goliad 2-4-60.** 2-18-65 2? Co., Rowe Field, Jim County, Tex. Assignment 12-28-64 «_ 33 2 Wells County, Tex. Assignment 12-28-64 *».. 33 3 CT64-1470 Shell Oil Co. (Oper Montana-Dakota Utili- Letter Agreement 1-28- 309 12 C 3-22-65 ator), et al: ties Co., Wind River 65.1» CI65-896—. Cequin Corp. (Opera Gas Transport, Inc., 1 Basin Area, Fremont A 3-10-65 tor), et al. Raveniwood Field, County, Wyo. Grant District, Jackson CT65-11 Geological Exploration Lone Stär Gas Co., acre- Assignment 8-12-64 8»___ 2 1 County, W. Va. C 2-12-65 28 Co. (Operator), et al. age in Rusk County, CI65-897... The Atlantic Refining Cities Service Gas Co., 295 Tex. A 3-11-65 Co. (Operator), et al. Northwest Lovedale Continental Oil Co'CI65-187...... El Paso Natural Gas Co., Supplemental agree 287 2 Field, Harper County, C 3-22-65 San Juan Basin Field, ment 11-1-64.» u Okla. San Juan County, N. CI65-899__ DeKalb Oil & Oas Equitable Gas Co., Salt 1 Mex. A 3-11-65 Development Co. Lick District, Braxton OTM-358 Texaco Tne...... Panhandle Eastern Pipe Amendment 2-10-65 »».. 344 1 County, W. Va. C 3-15-65 Line Co., Northwest CI65-900__ Virgil E. Daugherty, Consolidated Gas Supply 4 Eva Field, Texas A 3-11-65 Agent for Jack Arnold, Corp. (formerly Hope County, Okla. Jr., et al. Natural Gas Co.), CT65-406 Gulf Oil Corp. (Opera Cities Service Gas Co., (81)...... 280 Center District, Gilmer 3-17-65 «o tor), et al. Northwest Lovedale County, W. Va. Field, Harper County, Okla. 6877 See footnotes at end of table. * Eliminates Favored Nations Clause and indefinite pricing provisions of basic contract as it pertains to the 6878 FPC rate schedule to be accepted additional acreage. Docket No. Purchaser, field, and * Assigns interest from Watson Oil * Gas Co., Inc., to Applicant. and Applicant location o Assigns interest from Earl S. Goodwin, et al., to Applicant. date filed Description and date Supp. 7 Deletes 160 acres, well on subject properties does not meet contract reserve requirements. No. s Effective date: Date of this order. of document * Production limited to Dakota Formation for the added acreage. 10 Adds acreage and deletes indefinite pricing provision and minimum guarantee for liquids from basic contract CTfi5-90l Consolidated Gas Supply 9 insofar as it pertains to the additional acreage. A 3-11-65 - Corp. (formerly Hope u Effective date: Date of initial delivery. Natural Gas Co.), Sher . iJ 10.0 cents per Mcf effective rate as of date of transfer. Rate increase to 11.0 cents per Mcf filed Nov. 16,1964 man and Center Dis was originally proposed to take effect Jan. 1,1966. By amendment filed concurrently with the notice of succession it tricts, Calhoun and is now proposed to take effect May 1, 1965. Gilmer Counties, W. Va. i> Includes description of assignments whereby Applicant acquired its interest in the properties involved. CI05-9O2...... P & S Oil and Gas Corp. Consolidated Gas Supply Notice of cancellation 6 ! 1 11 Basic contract provided for 19.6 cents plus upward B.t.u. adjustment, however, Applicant states its willingness (G-13867J Corp. (formerly Hope 3-9-65.8 89 to accept authorization for the additional acreage at 17.0 cents conditioned similarly to the certificates issued in B 3-11-6B Natural Gas Co.), Elk Opinion No. 363. and Union Districts, u Omit. Kanawha and Clay u Deletes indefinite pricing provisions in basic contract insofar as it pertains to the May 21,1964, supplemental Counties, W. Va. agreement (Supp. No. 3). C165-903...... Consolidated Gas Supply 4 17 By letter dated May 2,1963, Applicant advised willingness to accept a permanent certificate at 16.0 cents con A 3-11-65 Corp. (formerly Hope ditioned similarly to the certificates issued in Opinion No. 350. Natural Gas Co.), 74 Adopts and ratifies contract dated Mar. 23,1960, between Shell OU Co. and Panhandle Eastern (Supp. No. 1). Sherman District, Cal u Assignment of acreage to Amax Petroleum Corp. houn County, W. Va. w Releases assigned acreage in Sec. 10-8N-10W from the Humble contract dated Dec. 22, 1960. Amax dedi- C165-904...... Ramsey Associated Consolidated Gas Supply 1 cated such acreage to a similar contract between Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. and buyer and received a certificate in Docket A 3-11-65 Petroleum, Ltd. Corp. (formerly Hope No. C165-551. Natural Gas Co.), Glen- *1 Temporary certificate issued accepting basic contract conditioned upon elimination of impermissible pricing ville and Otter Districts, provisions. Gilmer and Braxton 88 Amends contract pricing provisions by eliminating pricing provisions which are impermissible under Order No. Counties, W. Va. 242. : 1. CT65-012W. H. Mossor, Agent Equitable Gas Co., Union Contrant 2-11-65 11 8 88 Applicant proposes to make the subject sale subject to all the conditions of the predecessors companywide settle A 3-12-65 for Joseph S. Grass. District, Ritchie ment approved by Commission order dated June 28,1962, The Ohio Oil Co. (now Marathon), Docket Nos. RI60-92, County, W. Va. et al. OT65-913 8 88 The predecessor’s certificate issued in Docket No. G-11821 was amended to reflect the deletion of the assigned A 3-15-65 ginia, Inc., Santee Field, acreage by order issued Mar. 2,1964, in Docket Nos. G-10289, et al. Monongalia County, 8» Contract executed by The Ohio Oil Co. (now Marathon Oil Co.) currently on file as Marathon Oil Co. (Opera W. Va. tor), et al., FPC GRS No. 16. CI65-914...... Pan American Petro- Tennessee Gas Transmis- Notice of cancellation 95 4 8« Conveys acreage from Marathon Oil Co. to John Franks. (G-7525) leum Corp. sion Co., LaRosa Field, 3-12-65.8 »0 87 Amendment to the certificate to reflect the price at a total initial rate of 14.6856 cents per Mcf in lieu of 13.6728 B 3-15-65 Refugio County, Tex. cents. No related rate filing. NOTICES CI65-916 126 88 Applicant requests that its certificate application be amended to reflect designation to (Operator), et al. A 3-15-65 Corp. Co., Ozona Area, Crock- Contract 9-18-64______126 1 8» Conveys interest to various co-owners; assignment previously accepted. ett County, Tex. Letter agreement 2-4- 126 2 8° Amendment to the certificate filed to cover the interest of co-owners in Units operated by Applicant. 65.81 n 11 Rate filing consists of letters from co-owners (Christine Berg, Flagg Oil Corp., and Baruch-Easter Corp.) author A CI65-917...... Gulf Oil Corp. (suc Michigan Wisconsin Pipe 291 izing Gulf to file for them. Letters made interest statements to Gulf’s rate schedule. (G-13209) cessor to Union Texas Line Co., Laverne Assignment 6-6-61____ 291 1 88 Amendment to the application filed to reflect a proposed rate of 16.0 cents per Mcf in lieu of the original proposed F 3-15-65 82 Petroleum, a division of Field, Harper County, Effective date: 6-6-61... rate of 16.96 cents per Mcf. Allied Chemical Corp). Okla. 88 Finwood Corp. is also signatory to the agreement. Sinclair’s filing does not cover Finwood’s interest. Fin- CI65-919...... Cities Service Co. (Op- Texas Eastern Transmis- Notice of cancellation 40 2 wood’s interest represents.only a production payment. (CI64-341) erator), et al. sion Corp., London 3-12-65.« »O 88 Supersedes Cameron Oil & Gas Co., FPC GRS No. 5 (Docket No. G-2972) and Cameron Producing Co., FPC B 3-15-65 Field, Nueces County, GRS No. 2 (Docket No. G-2973). Docket Nos. G-2972 and G-2973 will be terminated in this order. Tex. *8 Supersedes Watson Oil& Gas Co., FPC GRS No. 1 (Docket No. G-6597), Docket No. G-6597 will be terminated CI65-920...... Carrillo Petroleum Valley Gas Transmission, 1 in this order. A 3-15-65 Corp. Inc., Buena Suerta Field, 88 Contract executed by J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., et al., currently on file as J. Ray McDermott & Cosine., Duval County, Tex. (Operator), et al., FPC GRS No. 16. CI65-921...... Socony Mobil Oil Co., Lone Star Gas Co., Doyle Notice of cancellation 14 7 87 Conveys acreage from J. Ray McDermott, et al., to United Engineering Service, Inc. (G-11868) Inc. (Operator), et al. Field, Stephens County, 3-12-65.8 «« 7 88 Assigns interest of Candado Production Co. covered as an et al. party under International Oil & Gas Corp. B 3-15-65 Okla. (Operator), et al., FPC GRS No. 5 to Bolin Oil Co. CI65-923...... The British-American El Paso Natural Gas Co., 65 *9 Basic contract between C. W. Murchison and El Paso; on file as C. W. Murchison FPC GRS No. 1. A 3-17-65 Oil Producing Co. Payton (Deep) Field, « Deletes indefinite pricing provisions of basic contract dated May 10,1962. Pecos County, Tex. Supplemental agreement dedicates additional acreage to C. W. Murchison FPC GRS No. 1 (Murchison did not CI65-924...... Steve Gose (Operator), Fort Smith Gas Corp., 2 file for this acreage) and deletes indefinite pricing provisions and minimum guarantee for liquids insofar as they A 3-17-65et al. Spira Field, Le Flore Contract 8-28-64 “8____ 2 1 pertain to acreage added by supplemental agreement of January 21, 1965. County, Okla. <8 Assigns interest from C. W. Murchison to CWM and VLM Trust. 0165-925 Oil and Gas Property Panhandle Eastern Pipe 23 88 Rowe submitted rate filings to delete the assigned acreage from his related rate schedule. . A 3-17-65 Management, Inc. Line Co., acreage in 88 Basic contract between W. Earl Rowe, et al., and Wilcox Trend Gathering System, Inc. (predecessor of Texas (Operator), et al. Kiowa County, Kans. Eastern). On file as W. Earl Rowe, FPC GRS No. 3. CI65-926...... Samedan Oil Corp. Natural Gas Pipeline Co., 19 8» Deletes favored nations provisions from basic contract. A 3-17-65 (Operator), et al. of America, Hugoton 88 Conveys acreage from Rowe, et ah, to Samuel L. Fly, to be effective as of October 1,1964. (Morrow) Field, Texas 8T Conveys acreage from Samuel L. Fly to Forest Oil Corp. County, Okla. 88 Acreage ig applicable only to Bera Sand Gas and Oriskany Sand Gas and below. CI65-928...... The Atlantic Refining Transcontinental Gas Notice of cancellation 43 8 89 Production of gas no longer economically feasible. (G-3894) «» Co. Pipe Line Corp., Odem 3-13-65.8 so 89 Source of gas depleted. B 3-19-65 Field, San Patricio 8> Provides for wellhead sale until Gasoline Plant is operational. County, Tex. 88 Partial succession to Union Texas Petroleum, a division of Allied Chemical Corp., FPC GRS No. 44. *8 Contract executed by Steve Gose, et al. 88 Contract executed by “Oxley Group”. i From Armer to W. G. Haun. >' Docket No. G-3894 will be terminated in part only, other sales covered under this docket. 7 From Armer to Lee Drilling Co. * Adds acreage. [F.R.DOC. 65-5182; Filed, May 19,1965; 8:45 a.m.] Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6879 [Docket No. RP65-49] upon such acceptance by the Commission that unless the tariff is made effective because suspension and concomitant col without suspension, “the proposed tariff ATLANTIC SEABOARD CORP. lection of monies subject to refund would will be withdrawn.” Order Providing for Hearing and Sus expose it to the possibility of over-collec It appears that the proposed tariff fil pending Proposed Revised Tariff tion from some customers and under ing is a major rate change within the collection from others. It alleges that meaning of § 154.63(a) (2), and Seaboard May 13, 1965. exposure to loss would be so great that should have submitted therewith the Atlantic Seaboard Corp. (Seaboard) on it could not undertake the proposed material required under § 154.63(b)(3). March 31,1965, tendered for filing Eighth changes if they are suspended. It also Seaboard’s failure to comply with those Revised Volume No. 1 xto its PPC Gas asserts that no useful purpose would be requirements renders its filing subject to Tariff, with the request that it be per served by suspension since the new tariff rejection as provided in § 154.63(c)(4). mitted to become effective as of May 1, would result in reductions in the average However, as indicated in that rule, 1965. By letter filed April 29, 1965, Sea cost of gas to all customers. whether a filing is to be rejected is a board postponed the effective date to Five of Seaboard’s distributor-custom matter within our discretion. We are May 15, 1965. ers filed responses which are either of the view that it is in the public inter The proposed revised tariff would su favorable, or which do not object to the est that in lieu of rejection of this pro persede the existing tariff and would adjustment in level of demand-com posed filing we take the action herein set make the following basic changes: (1) modity charges in the CDS and CDS-PR forth. Such waiver is not to be construed The rate for contract demand service rate schedules or to the new Winter as relieving Seaboard from the burden of (Rate Schedules CDS and CDS-PR) is Service rate schedule. These customers proof obligation under section 4(e) of substantially increased in the demand are Baltimore Gas and Electric Co. the Act, or from the obligation to sub component and correspondingly reduced (Baltimore), City of Charlottesville, Va., mit and serve the data and studies pre in the commodity (volume) component; Commonwealth Natural Gas Corp., scribed by § 154.63(b) (3) of our regu (2) a new class of service is offered, iden Lynchburg Gas Co., and Roanoke Gas lations. tified as “Winter Service” (WS), to meet Co. The last three companies named, All of Washington’s other contentions customers’ peaking requirements sup however, object to the proposed CDS respecting the proposed filing, including Partial Requirements (PR) rate sched its assertion that the increased demand plied from Seaboard’s storage capacity; ules. (3) the minimum billing demand 90 per charges and corresponding reductions cent ratchet provisions are eliminated Washington Gas Light Co. (Washing in commodity charges in the CDS rate from CDS and CDS-PR rate schedules; ton), Seaboard’s largest customer, filed schedules constitute “nullification” of (4) the existing Authorized Over-run a protest on April 19, 1965, and the Pub our decision on rate design in Opinion (AOS) rate schedule is eliminated and lic Service Commission of the District No. 430, are more appropriately matters replaced with new Excess Gas Service of Columbia (PSC-DC) filed a protest which may require dismissal of the fil (EX) and new Emergency Service (ES) on April 16, 1965, strongly urging that ing depending upon the record evidence. rate schedules; and (5) the restrictions we reject Seaboard’s proposed tariff fil Our action herein provides for oppor on sales of gas for boiler fuel use are ing on the ground that it would nullify tunity for all parties to present evi eliminated. the Commission’s decision on rate design dence upon such issues. Panhandle In support of its proposed tariff filing, issued in Opinion No. 430 and 430-A Eastern Pipe Line Co. y. F.P.C., 236 F. 2d Seaboard states that its net effect will without any showing of changed circum 606 (1956). United Gas Pipe Line Co., stances to support the requested modifi Docket No. RP65-1, order issued October be to bring about an estimated annual 22,1964. reduction to all customers amounting to cation of the CDS rate design.2 approximately $2.6 million for the 12 In addition, Washington urges that Seaboard represents that service under months ending April 30, 1966, and ap the proposed filing be rejected because its proposed tariff, when taken on a proximately $2.1 million for the calendar it is not supported by the required cost “package” basis will result in annual re study for a major rate increase as re duced costs to its customers accruing year 1966. Additionally, Seaboard states quired by § 154.63 of the Commission’s from the date such tariff becomes effec that the rate filing accommodates to the regulations. Washington states that un- tive. Seaboard contends that its filing maximum extent possible the requests of .der the proposed CDS rate schedules its constitutes a “comprehensive revision of several wholesale customers who have cost of gas would be increased by a net its tariff structure” and such it must expressed the need for a lower CD com amourît of $1.7 million annually. It also be considered as a “total package that modity rate level in order to meet indus states that this increase would not be seeks to solve not one problem but many trial market competition, the requests of offset by lower cost of WS gas because problems”. Obviously there is a differ other wholesale customers who have re it has not signed a new service agreement ence of opinion at least between Sea quested a Winter Service rate so as to for such service, and it has not tenta board and Washington as to the nature alleviate the high cost of meeting winter tively agreed to do so, as Seaboard’s filing of the problems and whether the pro peak loads resulting from space heating, implies. posed filing does in fact present a solu and the requests of customers that the tion thereto. restrictions on sales for boiler fuel use In further support for its request that eliminated. However, Seaboard also the proposed tariff filing be rejected, Our review indicates^that the proposed admits that if a CDS customer does not Washington contends that Seaboard has filing does raise a number of issues which sign up for WS service the CDS rates made a conditional filing by its state can be resolved only on a record made being proposed will result in increased ments that the ability to effectuate the during hearing. However since a rate charges to such customers.1 new tariff is dependent upon its accept reduction is available to the customers Seaboard requests that the Commis- ance without suspension and suspension under the proposed filing, we deem it in swn permit the proposed filing to become exposes it to so great a loss that it could the public interest to enable those cus effective without suspension. It states not undertake the proposed changes if tomers desiring to take the new “pack that its ability to effectuate the new they are suspended. Washington inter age” to have the benefit of such reduction ariff and rate reductions is dependent prets Seaboard’s statements as asserting as quickly as possible. In taking this that Seaboard will not file the motion action we do not of course express any opinion that the proposed reduction is Seaboard’s customers (except Washington pursuant to section 4(e) of the Act to uas Light Co.) support the proposed filing make the rate changes effective at the sufficient to render Seaboard’s rates just kw •*M’esuinahly those customers would sign end of the suspension period. Washing and reasonable or that the manner of „ / y^Jtgrecments to purchase under CDS ton claims that the conditions sought such reduction is a reasonable one. nrvT Wr rate schedules in substantially the to be imposed by Seaboard are improper. It is our view that the public interest se1; forth in the appendix to Sea- will best be served by suspension of the l&K sTietter of transmittal dated March 31, Baltimore’s petition in support of the . • However, no service agreements have proposed filing states that it is “advised” proposed revised tariff for one day and hna ®uhmltted indicating that any customer expedited hearing thereon. Our sus ia°t signed up for service under the 2 Opinion No. 430, issued June 2, 1964, and pension action contemplates that Sea schedule* package of CDS and w s rate Opinion No. 430-A, issued October 14, 1964, board will file the necessary motion to in Docket No. G-20270, et al., 32 F.P.C. —. make that tariff effective immediately No. 97----- 7 6880 NOTICES after the suspension period has run. It Unless Seaboard is advised to the con (F) If Seaboard shall, In conformity is our further view that the service agree trary within fifteen days after the date with the terms and conditions of its ments under this tariff, which have not of filing such agreement and undertak agreement and undertaking, make the yet been filed, shall be for an interim ing, the agreement and undertaking shall refunds as may be required by order of term not exceeding two years. Such be deemed to have been accepted. the Commission in this proceeding, the interim limited term will minimize the (C) A prehearing confereh.ee before undertaking shall be discharged, other risks, if any, under the new tariff, both the Presiding Examiner shall commence wise it shall remain in full force and for Seaboard p,nd its customers and at at 10 a.m., e.d.t., on May 19, 1965, to effect. the same time afford all parties an op afford Seaboard its customers and in (G) Presiding Examiner Howell Pur portunity to fully try the issues in this terested State commissions, an oppor due or any other officer designated by proceeding and any related rate or cer tunity to present their views and the the Chief Examiner for that purpose (see tificate proceedings presently pending. support thereof concerning the concur Delegation of Authority, 18 CFR 3.5(d)) Accordingly, the parties are hereby put rent, continued use of the presently ef shall prescribe other relevant procedural on notice that any service agreements fective rate schedules, as discussed here matters not herein provided; preside at filed under the proposed revised tariff inabove. The record of such prehearing the prehearing conferences and at the for a longer term than two years will conference shall be certified to the Com hearing in this matter, and control the be suspended. mission by the Presiding Examiner im proceeding until the completed record is It is also appropriate that the parties mediately upon conclusion of such con certified to the Commission, pursuant to be given an opportunity to present their ference. the Commission’s rules of practice and views as to whether the presently effec (D) Seaboard shall refund at such procedure, and as further provided by tive rate schedules or a modification times and in such amounts to persons en this order. thereof to reflect the overall level of rate titled thereto, and in such manner as (H) Seaboard, the Commission Staff reduction being offered by the present may be required by filial order of the and interveners shall serve their direct filing should not be made available for Commission, the portion of rates and testimony and exhibits upon the Presid those customers which might prefer not charges found by the Commission in this ing Examiner and all other parties as to enter into service agreements under proceeding not justified, together with follows: Seaboard on or before June 9, the proposed tariff even for the interim interest thereon at the rate of 7 percent 1965, Staff on or before September 9, period. For such purposes we are pre per annum from the date of payment to 1965, and interveners on or before Sep scribing an immediate prehearing con Seaboard until refunded ; shall bear all tember 20,1965. ference at which each of the parties may costs of any such refunding ; shall keep (I) Pursuant to § 1.18 of the Commis set forth its views on this matter and the accurate /accounts in detail of all sion’s rules of practice and procedure, a supporting reasons therefor. amounts received by reason of the tariff prehearing conference before the Pre The Commission finds: sheets made effective as of May 16, 1965, siding Examiner shall commence at 10 (1) It is necessary and proper in the and each billing period, specifying by a.m., e.d.t., on September 27, 1965, in a public interest and to aid in the enforce whom and in whose behalf such amounts hearing room of the Federal Power Com ment of the provisions of the Natural were paid, and shall report (original and mission, 441 G Street NW., Washington, Gas Act that the Commission enter upon four copies) in writing and under oath, D.C., for the purpose of reaching such a hearing concerning the lawfulness of to the Commission monthly, for each agreements as will expedite the deter the rates, charges, classifications and billing period and for each purchaser, the mination herein, including, but not lim services contained in Seaboard’s FPC billing determinants of natural gas sales ited to, stipulation of facts, narrowing Gas Tariff, as proposed to be amended by to such purchasers, and the revenues re and defining of issues, and establishment Eighth Revised Volume No. 1, and that sulting therefrom as computed under the of dates for service of rebuttal testimony said proposed revised tariff be suspended tariff sheets in effect immediately prior and for cross-examination of all testi and the use thereof deferred as herein to May 16, 1965, and under the tariff mony. after provided. sheets herein allowed to become effec (J) The cross-examination, when (2) It is necessary and proper in the tive, together with the differences in the commenced, shall be continuous as to all public interest and to aid in the enforce revenues so computed. witnesses to be presented, unless the ment of the provisions of the Natural (E) As a condition of this order, Sea Presiding Examiner finds that extraordi Gas Act that the proposed changes in board shall execute and file in triplicate nary circumstances preclude such pro rates and charges contained in Sea with the Secretary of this Commission, cedure. board’s Eighth Revised Volume No. 1, be its written agreement and undertaking (K) Notices of intervention and peti made effective as hereinafter provided to comply with the terms of paragraph tions to intervene may be filed with the and that Seaboard be required to file a (D) hereof, signed by a responsible of Federal Power Commission, Washington, motion and an undertaking as herein ficer of the corporation, evidenced by D.C., 20426, in accordance with the Com after ordered and conditioned. proper authority from the Board of Di mission’s rules of practice and procedure, The Commission orders: rectors, and accompanied by a certificate §§ 1.8 and 1.37(f) (18 CFR 1.8 and 1.37 (AX Pursuant to the authority of the (f)), on or before May 28, 1965. Natural Gas Act, particularly sections 4 showing service of copies thereof upon all purchasers under the tariff sheet in By the Commission. and 15 thereunder, the Commission’s volved as follows: rules of practice and procedure and the [seal] J oseph H. Gutride, regulations under the Natural Gas Act Agreement and Undertaking of Atlantic Secretary. Seaboard Corporation to comply with the (18 CFR Ch. I ), a public hearing be held Terms and Conditions of paragraph (D) of [F.R. Doc. 65-5290; Filed, May 19, 1965; on a date fixed by notice from the Pre Federal Power Commission’s Order issued 8:47 a.m.] siding Examiner as hereinafter provided, 1965, in Docket No. RP65-49. concerning the lawfulness of the rates, In conformity with the requirements of charges, classifications and services con the order issued ______.__ _ 1965, in Docket [Docket No. CP65-353] tained in Seaboard’s FPC Gas Tariff, as No. RP65-49, Atlantic Seaboard Corp. hereby proposed to be amended by Eighth Re agrees and undertakes to comply with the TOWN OF SUMITON, ALA. terms and conditions of paragraph (D) of vised Volume No. 1. Notice of Application (B) Pending such hearing and decisaid order, and has caused this agreement and undertaking to be executed and sealed May 13, 1965. sion thereon, Seaboard’s proposed re in its name by its officers, thereupon duly vised tariff, identified in paragraph (A) authorized in accordance with the terms of Take notice that on May 6, 1965, the above, hereby is suspended and its use the resolution of its Board of Directors, a Town of Sumiton, Ala. (Applicant), filed deferred until May 16, 1965; Providéd, certified copy of which is appended hereto in Docket No. CP65-353 an application however, That, within twenty days from t h is _____ day of C_____ .___ , 1965. pursuant to section 7(a) of the Natural the date of this order, Seaboard shall file Atlantic Seaboard Corp., Gas Act for an order of the Commission a motion as required by section 4(e) of By directing Southern Natural Gas Co. the Natural Gas Act and concurrently (President) (Southern), to establish physical con execute and file with the Secretary of the Attest : nection of its natural gas transmission Commission the agreement and under facilities with the facilities proposed to taking described in paragraph (E) below. (Secretary) be constructed by Applicant, and to sen Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6881

and deliver natural gas to Applicant for eral Regulations, these protractions will No. 179 resale and distribution in Sumiton, Ala., become the basic record for describing T. 3 S., R. 60 E. and environs, all as more fully set forth the land for all authorized purposes. T. 3 S., R. 61 E. in the application on file with the Com Until this date and time the diagrams No. 180 mission and open to public inspection. have been placed In open files and are T.4N., R. 51 E. Applicant seeks physical connection of available to the public for information T. 4 N., R. 52 E. its proposed lateral transmission facili only. T. 5 N., R. 52 E. ties with Southern’s pipeline located ap T. 4 N., R. 53 E. proximately 10.83 miles south of Sumi N evada P ro traction D iagram s N o s . 172 T h r o u g h 176 T. 5 N., R. 53 E. ton and to sell the following estimated No. 181 MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN peak-day and annual natural gas re T.4N ..R . 49% E. quirements during the first 3 years of NO. 172 T. 5 N., R. 49% E. operations: T. 2 N., R. 60 E. T. 4 N., R. 50 E. T. 3 N„ R. 60 E. T. 5 N., R. 50 E. T. 2 N., R. 61 E. First Second Third T.1N., R. 51% E. year year year T. 3 N„ R. 61 E. T.2N.,R. 51% E. T. 2 N., R. 62 E. T. 1 N., R. 52 E. No. 173 T. 2 N., R. 52 E. 67,115 72,087 76,802 T. 1 N., R. 59 E. No. 182 '895 962 1,025 T. 1 N., R. 60 E. No. 174 T. 3 N., R. 50 E. The total estimated cost of Applicant’s T. 1 N., R. 61 E. T. 3% N„ R. 50 E. T. 1 N„ R. 62 E. T. 3 N., R. 51 E. proposed construction of transmission T. 3% N., R. 51 E. and distribution facilities is $490,000, T. 1 N„ R. 63 E. No. 175 T.3 N.,R.51% E. which will be financed from the sale of T. 3 N., R. 65 E. T. 3% N., R. 51% E. revenue bonds. T. 2 N„ R. 66 E. T. 2% N., R. 52 E. Protests or petitions to intervene may T. 3 N., R. 66 E. T. 3 N., R. 52 E. be filed with the Federal Power Commis-. No. 176 Copies of these diagrams are for sale sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in accord T. 4 N., R. 62 E. ance with the rules of practice and pro T. 5 N., R. 62 E. at one dollar ($1.00) each by the Nevada cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10), on or before T. 4 N„ R. 63 E. Land Office, Bureau of Land Manage June 11, 1965. T. 5 N., R. 63 E. ment, Post Office Box No. 1551, Reno, T. 4 N., R. 64 E. Nev. J oseph H. Gutride, T. 5 N., R. 64 E. D aniel P. B aker, Secretary. Land Office Manager. [F.R. Doc. 65-5291; Filed, May 19, 1965; Copies of these diagrams are for sale at 8:47 a.m.] one dollar ($1.00) each by the Nevada [F.R. Doc. 65-5296; Filed, May 19, 1965; Land Office, Bureau of Land Manage 8:47 a.m.] ment, Post Office Box No. 1551, Reno, Nev. NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR "Donald I. B ailey, Acting Manager, Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and Bureau of Land Management Nevada Land Office. Reservation of Lands ALASKA [F-R. Doc. 65-5295; Filed, May 19, 1965; 8:47 a.m.] May 14,1965. Notice of Amendment of Proposed The Forest Service, United States De Amendment of Public Land Order partment of Agriculture has filed appli 1600 NEVADA cation, Serial No. New Mexico 0556995 May 13, 1965. for the withdrawal of lands described In F.R. Doc. 65—4645 of the issue for Notice of Filing of Protraction below. The lands were conveyed to the May 4,1965, the following changes should Diagrams United States pursuant to section 8 of be made: the Taylor Grazing Act. They lie within May 13,1965. the exterior boundaries of the Cibola Na I On page 6227, paragraph 4 should read : Notice is hereby given that effective at tional Forest. They have not been open ‘ The authorized officer of the Bureau of and after 10 a.m„ June 21, 1965, the to entry under the public land laws. The Land Management will prepare a report following protraction diagrams are applicant desires the lands for the addi for consideration by the Secretary of the officially filed of record in the Nevada tion to, and the consolidation with Na Interior who will determine whether or Land Office. In accordance with Title tional Forest Lands to permit more not the withdrawal will be amended as 43 Code of Federal Regulations, these efficient administration thereof in the requested by the U.S. Weather Bureau.” protractions will become the basic record conservation of national resources. The last line of the description should for describing the land for all authorized For a period of 30 days from the date read : “The area described aggregates ap purposes. Until this date and time the of publication of this notice, all persons proximately 369,711 square feet.” diagrams have been placed in open files who wish to submit comments, sugges Ross A. Y oungblood, and are available to the public for in tions, or objections in connection with Manager, Fairbanks District formation only. the proposed withdrawal may present and Land Office. N evada P ro tra c tio n D iagram s N o s . 177 their views in writing to the undersigned [F.R. Doc. 65-5294; Filed, May 19, 1965; T h r o u g h 182 officer of the Bureau of Land Manage 8:47 am.] ment, Department of the Interior, Man MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN ager, Post Office Box 1449, Santa Fe, No. i77 N. Mex., 87501. NEVADA T. 1 S., R. 59 E. The authorized officer of the Bureau T. 2 S., R. 59 E. of Land Management will undertake such Notice of Filing of Protraction T. 1 S., R. 60 E. investigations as are necessary to deter Diagrams T. 2 S., R. 60 E: T. 1 S., R. 61 E. mine the existing and potential demand May 12, 1965. T. 2 S„ R. 61 E. for the lands and their resources. He will also undertake negotiations with the Notice is hereby given that effective at No. 178 and after 10 a.m., June 14, 1965, the fol- T. 1 S„ R. 62 E. applicant agency with the view of ad owrng protraction diagrams are officially T. 2 S., R. 62 E. justing the application to reduce the area T. 1 S., R. 63 E. to the minimum essential to meet the «led of record in the Nevada Land Office. T. 2 S., R. 63 E. applicant’s needs, to provide for the max n accordance with Title 43 Code of Fed T. 3 S., R. 63 E. imum concurrent utilization of the lands 6882 NOTICES for purposes other than the applicant’s adjusting the application to reduce the lands for purposes other than the appli to eliminate lands needed for purposes area to the minimum essential to meet cant’s, to eliminate lands needed for pur more essential than the applicant’s, and the applicant’s needs, to provide for the poses more essential than the applicant’s, to reach agreement on the concurrent maximum concurrent utilization of the and to reach agreement on the concur management of the lands and their re lands for purposes other than the appli rent management of the lands and their sources. cant’s, to eliminate lands needed for pur resources. He will also prepare a report for con poses more' essential than the applicant’s, He will also prepare a report for con sideration by the Secretary of the In and to reach agreement on the concur sideration by the Secretary of the In terior who will determine whether or rent management of the lands and their terior who will determine whether or not not the lands will be withdrawn as re resources. the lands will be withdrawn as requested quested by the Forest Service. He will also prepare a report for con by the Forest Service. The determination of the Secretary on sideration by the Secretary of the In The determination of the Secretary on the application will be published in the terior who will determine whether or not the application will be published in the F ederal R e g is t e r . A separate notice will the lands will be withdrawn as requested F ederal R e g is t e r . A separate notice will be sent to each interested party of record. by the Forest Service. be sent to each interested party of record. If circumstances warrant it, a public The determination of the Secretary on If circumstances warrant it, a public hearing will be held at a convenient time the application will be published in the hearing will be held at a convenient time and place, which will be announced. F ederal R e g is t e r . A separate notice will and place, which will be announced. The lands involved in the application be sent to each interested party of record. The lands involved in the application are: If circumstances warrant it, a public are: N e w M exic o P r in c ip a l M e r id ia n , N . M e x . hearing will be held at a convenient time O regon and place, which will be announced. WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN T. 1N„R. HE., The lands involved in the application Sec. 32, Ni/2SW%, Wy2SEV4. UMATILLA NATIONAL FOREST T. 9 N., R. 11 W., are: Sec. 19, lots 1, 2 ,4, E%,E%W%; N e w M ex ic o P r in c ip a l M e r id ia n , N . M ex . Long Prairie Spring Campground Secs. 20 to 26, inclusive; T. 7 S., R. 24 E„ Sec. 27,Ny2, Ni/2S%, SE&SE&; T. 12 N., R. 4 E., Sec. 1, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, SWi/4 I n sec. 1. Secs. 28 and 29; Total—10 acres. Sec. 30, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, Ey2, Ey2Wy2; NE&, Sy2NW% SW%; W % SE]4 ;■ Sec. 31, lots 1, 2,3, 4, Ey2. Ey2W&; Sec. 2, lots 1, 2, 3, sy2NE^, SE^NW ^, Crawford Spring Campground Secs. 32 and 33; Ny¡SEÍ4, SE % SE 14; Sec. 34, Ey2NEi/4, W%NW%, SE&NW^, Sec. 12, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, W ^NE^, NW&; T. 7 S., R. 24 E., sy2; Sec. 14, lots 5, 6, 7, NE%NE%. I n sec. 12. Secs. 35 and 36. T. 12 N., R. 5 E., Total—10 acres. T. 10 N., R. 11 W„ Sec. 6, lots 9,10,13,17,18,19; Government Spring Campground Sec. 7, NW14. Sec. 34, SE%; T. 6 S., R. 26 E., Sec. 35. The areas described aggregate 1869.70 T. 1 S., R. 11 E., I n sec. 26. Sec. 5, S%SE%; acres. Total—10 acres. Sec. 8, N&NE^. M ic h a e l T . S o la n , Willow Spring Campground Manager. The areas described aggregate 12,- T. 7 S., R. 26 E., 367.74 acres. [F.R. Doc. 65-5298; Filed, May 19, 1965; In Sec. 10. 8:47 a.m.] Total—30 acres. M ic h a e l T. S o l a n , Manager. [Oregon. 016434] Swale Spring Campground [F.R. Doc. 65-5297; Piled, May 19, 1965; T. 6 S., R. 28 E., 8:47 a.m.] OREGON I n Sec. 4. Total—10 acres. Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and [New Mexico 0557005] Reservation of Land Biscuit Spring Campground NEW MEXICO T. 4 S., R . 29 E., M ay 11, 1965.* I n sec. 32. ; Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and The Forest Service, U.S. Department Total—10 acres. Reservation of Lands of Agriculture, has filed an application, Oriental Campground Serial Number Oregon 016434, for the M a y 14,1965. withdrawal of the lands described below, T. 7 S., R . 33 E., In sec. 10. The Forest Service, U.S. Department from all forms of appropriation under the Total—10 acres. of Agriculture, has filed an application, U. S. Mining Laws (Ch. 2, 30 U.S.C.), but Total area in Uinatilla National Forest— Serial Number New Mexico 0557005, for not from leasing under the mineral 90 acres. the withdrawal of lands described below, leasing laws. from location and entry under the gen The applicant desires the land to pro SISKIYOU NATIONAL FOREST eral mining laws but not the mineral tect areas for public recreational use. Lower Rogue River Recreational Area leasing laws. The applicant desires the For a period of 30 days from the date Addition land for protection of the Bernalillo of publication of this notice, all persons T. 36 S., R. 13 W., Watershed in Cibola National Forest, who wish to submit comments, sugges In secs. 1,2, and 3. N. Mex. tions, or objections in connection with Total—240 acres—in Siskiyou National For a period of 30 days from the date the proposed withdrawal may present F orest. of publication of this notice, all persons their views in writing to the undersigned The total area aggregates 330 acres. who wish to submit comments, sugges officer of the Bureau of Land Manage D ouglas E. H e n r iq u e s, tions, or objections in connection with ment, Department of the Interior, 710 Land Office Manager. the proposed withdrawal may present Northeast Holladay, Portland, Oreg., their views in writing to the undersigned 97232. [F.R. Doc. 65-5299; Filed, May 19, 1965; officer of the Bureau of Land Manage The authorized officer of the Bureau of 8:47 a.m .] ment, Department of the Interior, Man Land Management will undertake such ager, Post Office Box 1449, Santa Fe, investigations a§. are necessary to deter [Oregon 016435] N. Mex., 87501. mine the existing and potential demand OREGON The authorized officer of the Bureau of for the lands and their resources. He Land Management will undertake such will also undertake negotiations with the Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and investigations as are necessary to de applicant agency with the view of ad Reservation of Land termine the existing and potential de justing the application to reduce the M ay 11, 1965. mand for the lands and their resources. area to a minimum essential to meet the He will also undertake negotiations with applicant’s needs, to provide for the The Forest Service, United States De the applicant agency with the view of maximum concurrent utilization of the partment of Agriculture, has filed an ap- Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6883 plication, Serial Number Oregon 016435, National Park Service Subsidy Board determines that petitions for the withdrawal of the lands de for leave to intervene filed within the scribed below, from all forms of appro [O rder 1, A m dt. 1] specified time do not demonstrate suffi priation under the United States Mining CATOCTIN MOUNTAIN PARK, MD.; cient interest to warrant a hearing, the Laws (Chap. 2, 30 U.S.C.), but not from JOB CORPS CONSERVATION CEN Maritime Subsidy Board will take such leasing under the mineral leasing laws. TER DIRECTOR AND ADMINISTRA action as may be deemed appropriate. The applicant desires the land for pro Dated: May 14,1965. tection of aesthetic values of roadside TIVE OFFICER zones. Delegation of Authority By order of the Maritime Subsidy For a period of 30 days from the date Board. of publication of this notice, all persons Sec. 2. The Job Corps Conservation J a m es S. D a w s o n , Jr. who wish to submit comments, sug Center Director and Administrative Secretary. gestions, or objections in connection with Officer may issue purchase orders not to [F.R. Doc. 65-5306; Filed, May 19, 1965; the proposed withdrawal may present exceed $2500 for supplies, materials and 8:48 a.m .] their views in writing to the undersigned equipment in conformity with applicable officer of the Bureau of Land Manage regulations and statutory authority and ment, Departmefit of the Interior, 710 subject to availability of funds. Northeast Holladay, Portland, Oreg., (National Park Service Order No. 14 (19 FJt. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION 97232. 8824), as amended; 39 Stat. 535, 16 U.S.C., The authorized officer of the Bureau of sec., 2; National Capital Region Order No. 1 NEW YORK Land Management will undertake such (28 F.R. 1811)) investigations as are necessary to deter P aul L . W e b b , Memorandum of Understanding mine the existing and potential demand Superintendent. Notice is hereby given that Chairman for the lands and their resources. He A p r il 30, 1965. Glenn T. Seaborg, on behalf of the will also undertake negotiations with the [F.R. Doc. 65-5293; Filed, May 19, 1965; Atomic Energy Commission, and the applicant agency with the view of ad 8:47 a.m .] Honorable Nelson A. Rockefeller, Gover justing the application to reduce the area nor of the State of New York, have to the minimum essential to meet the signed the Memorandum of Understand applicant’s needs, to provide for the max ing, below, to implement certain pro imum concurrent utilization of the lands DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE visions contained in the Agreement be for purposes other than the applicant’s, Maritime Administration tween the U.S. Atomic Energy Com to eliminate lands needed for purposes mission and the State of New York, more essential than the applicant’s, and MOORE-McCORMACK LINES, INC. effective October 15, 1962. That agree to reach agreement on the concurrent ment provided for the discontinuance of management of the lands and their Notice of Application certain Commission regulatory authority resources. Notice is hereby given that Moore-Mc- and responsibility within the State pur He will also prepare a report for con Cormack Lines, Inc., has filed applica suant to section 274 of the Atomic sideration by the Secretary of the In tion to amend its Operating-Differential Energy Act of 1954, as amended. terior who will determine whether or not Subsidy Agreement, Contract No. FMB- the lands will be withdrawn as requested Dated at Washington, D.C., this 13th 48 (Rev.) to permit 18 additional sail day of May 1965. by the Forest Service. ings per annum on its subsidized freight The determination of the Secretary service on Trade Route No. 6 between For the Atomic Energy Commission. on the application will be published in United States Atlantic ports and ports in the F ederal R e g is t e r . A separate notice W. B. McCool, Scandinavia. No increase is requested in Secretary. will be sent to each interested party of the number of sailings which may now record. call at ports in Belgium and The Nether M e m o r a n d u m o f U nderstanding If circumstances warrant it, a public lands. Memorandum of Understanding between hearing will be held at a convenient time Any person, firm or corporation hav the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and the and place, which will be announced. ing any interest in such application and State of New York for implementation of The lands involved in the application certain provisions contained in Agreement are: desiring a hearing under section 605(c) between the U.S. Atomic Energy Commis O reg o n of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as sion and the State of New York, effective on amended, 46 U.S.C. 1175 should by the October 15, 1962, for discontinuance of WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN close of business on May 25, 1965, notify certain Commission regulatory authority and ROGUE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST the Secretary, Maritime Subsidy Board responsibility within the State pursuant to in writing in triplicate, and file petition section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, Crater Lake Park Highway Zone and Rogue as amended. Riverside and Recreation Zone Addition for leave to intervene in accordance with the rules of practice and procedure of The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission T.29S..R.4E., the Maritime Subsidy Board. (hereinafter referred to as the “Commis Sec. 16, SE14SW /4SW 14. sion”) and the State of New York (herein T.28S..R.5E, In the event a hearing is ordered to be after referred to as the “State”) entered Sec. 34, S& N E % . held on the application under section 605 into the above-described Agreement on Total-—90 acres. (c>, the purpose thereof will be to receive October 15,1962. evidence relevant to (1) whether the ap The Commission and the State recognized, WALLOWA-WHITMAN NATIONAL FOREST plication is one with respect to a vessel in Article VII of that Agreement, that the limits on their respective rights, powers and Lostine River Roadside and Riverfront Zone to be operated on a service, route or line responsibilities under the U.S. Constitution, Addition served by citizens of the United States with respect to protection against radia T. 3 S., R. 43 e ., which would be in addition to the exist tion hazards arising out of the activities Sec. 24, Wi/2Wi/2NWy4, ing service, or services, and if so, whether licensed by the Commission within the State, Sec. 25, SE ^N W i/4 , the service already provided by vessels of are not precisely clear. Sec. 36, Ei/2N W ^ . United States registry in such service The Commission and the State agreed, Total—160 acres. route or line is inadequate, and (2) among other things, in Article VII to work whether in the accomplishment of the together to define, within a reasonable time, The total area aggregates 250 acres. the limits of, and to provide mechanisms purposes and policy of the Act additional for accommodating, such responsibilities of D ouglas E . H e n r iq u e s , vessels should be operated thereon. both parties. Land Office Manager. If no request for hearing and petition The Commission and the State have now [PR. Doc. 65-5300; Filed, May 19, 1965; for leave to intervene is received within agreed upon certain mechanisms for accom 8:48 a.m.] the specified time, or if the Maritime modating their interests. 6884 NOTICES

In view of the foregoing, it is agreed be surveying by State representatives of levels the Act, provided that approval thereof tween the Commission and the Governor of radiation and radioactive contamination is conditioned as hereinafter ordered. of the State, acting in behalf of the State, as will not substantially interfere with or as follows : interrupt any activities licensed by the Com Accordingly, it is ordered: (1) The Commission will furnish promptly mission, (iv) routing and scheduling of ma That Agreement CAB 18169, R^12 and to the State, without charge, one copy of terial in transit, and (v) access by State rep R»—13, be approved, provided that such each of the below-described documents (ex resentatives to facilities of Commission li approval shall not constitute approval cept those documents the disclosure of which censees in order to accomplish the foregoing. of the specific commodity descriptions would be contrary to law and except those (5) Nothing in this Memorandum of Un contained therein for purposes of tariff documents which are excluded from the derstanding shall be construed as defining or publication. Commission’s public records pursuant to affecting the respective rights and powers Part 9 of the Commission’s rules and regu of the Commission or the State under the Any air carrier party to the agreement, lations) relating to activities authorized or U.S. Constitution, nor as affecting in any or any interested person, may, within sought to be authorized within the State way the rights and privileges of any third 15 days from the date of service of this under a specific license from the Commis party. In view of the mechanisms provided order, submit statements in writing con sion: (a) Specific licenses issued by the in this Memorandum of Understanding for taining reasons deemed appropriate, to Commission; and (b) with respect only to accommodating the interests of the parties, gether with supporting data, in support production or utilization facilities and ac the Commission and the State consider any of, or in opposition to, the Board’s ac tivities involving the receipt of waste radio attempt to define the limits of the rights active material from other persons for the and powers of the parties to be unnecessary. tion herein. An original and 19 copies of purpose of packaging, storage or disposal, (6) Either the Commission or the State the statement should be filed with the (!) filings in Commission proceedings, (ii) may, with or without cause, terminate this Board’s Docket Section. The Board may, correspondence between the Commission and Memorandum of Understanding, either in upon consideration of any such state its licensees or license applicants regarding whole or in part, by 30 days’ written notice ments filed, modify or rescind its action the issuance, denial, amendment, interpre to the other party. herein by subsequent order. tation, enforcement, transfer, renewal, modi (7) This Memorandum of Understanding This order will be published in the shall become effective thirty (30) days after fication, suspension, or revocation of a Com F ederal R e g is t e r . mission license, and (iii) notices filed in signature of both parties and shall remain the Commission’s Public Document Room to in effect unless and until such tim e as it is By the Civil Aeronautics Board. the effect that other documents have not terminated pursuant to paragraph (6). [ se a l ] H arold R . S anderson, been filed therein. The Commission will also Done at Washington, District of Columbia, furnish to the State, without charge, one in triplicate, this 14th day of April 1965. Secretary. copy of such other documents, relating to [F.R. Doc. 65-5315; FUed, May 19, 1965; activities authorized or sought to be author For the United States Atomic Energy Com 8 :4 8 a.m .] ized within the State under a specific license m ission. from the Commission, as may be reasonably G l e n n T . S eaborg, requested by the State and the disclosure Chairman. [Docket No. 16111; Order E-22168] of which to the State is not contrary to law Done at Albany, State of New York, in or the public interest. triplicate, this 7th day of May 1965. AIR TRAFFIC CONFERENCE (2) Representatives of the Commission’s OF AMERICA regulatory staff and the State will meet from F or th e S ta te of New Y ork. time to time to advise and consult, and to N e l s o n A. R o c k e f e l l e r , Order Deferring Action on Agreement exchange information, concerning produc Governor. tion or utilization facilities, and activities Agreement among the members of the involving the receipt of waste radioactive [F.R. Doc. 65-5317; Filed, May 19, 1965; Air Traffic Conference of America, material from other persons for the purpose 8:48 a.m .] Docket 16111, Agreement CAB 5044— of packaging, storage or disposal, author A113; relating to travel agents. ized or sought to be authorized within the Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics State under Commission license. Oppor tunity will be given to representatives of the Board at its office in Washington, D.C., State for at least one meeting with the Com CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD on the 14th day of May 1965. mission’s regulatory staff prior to Commis [Docket No. 15353; Order E-22166] The members of the Air Traffic Con sion publication in the F ederal R e g ist er of ference of America (ATC) filed with the a notice scheduling a hearing, or of a notice INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT Board on April 27, 1965, under section of proposed action in nonhearing cases, on 412 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, applications for a construction permit or ASSN. as amended (the Act), an agreement es license for such a facility or activity, and for tablishing for ATC approved sales agents such additional meetings as the State may Order Relating to Specific Commodity reasonably request. Rates a new commission structure and rules (3) The Commission will notify the State governing their operation of sales loca immediately of any theft or loss of material Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics tions on the premises of commercial cus within the State reported to the Commission Board at its office in Washington, D.C. tomers, i.e., in-plant facilities.1 The by a Commission licensee. The Commission on the 14th day of May 1965. agreement, quoted in Appendix A hereto,1 will also notify the State immediately of any There has been filed with the Board, is not to become effective unless ap incident within the State, reported to the pursuant to section 412(a) of the Federal proved by the Board.8 Commission by a Commission licensee, for Aviation Act of 1958 (the Act) and Part The proposed rules and procedures which immediate notification is required to 261 of the Board’s Economic Regulations, obviously are of substantial importance be made by the licensee to the Commission an agreement between various air car under the Commission’s rules and regu to both carriers and agents and un latio n s. riers, and other carriers, embodied in the doubtedly are of significance to com- (4) It is a mutual objective of the Com resolutions of Joint Conferences 1-2,3-1,' mission and the State to avoid dual regula and 1-2-3 of the International Air Trans 1 The agreement stems in part from an tion for purposes of protection against radia port Association (IATA), and adopted earlier resolution of the carriers prohibiting tion hazards of activities licensed by either pursuant to the provisions of Resolution agents’ in-plant locations (Agreement CAB party within the State. Accordingly, and in 590 dealing with specific commodity 5044—A102, Docket 15455). The latter agree view of paragraph (5) and the other pro rates. ment was approved by the Board on January visions of this Memorandum of Understand 27, 1965 (O rder E -21726), for 120 days (May ing: (a) The State will use its best efforts to The agreement adopted pursuant to 27, 1965), with the proviso "that if w ithin exempt activities licensed by the Commis unprotested notices to the carriers and such period the members of ATC file with t e sion from State regulations which are di promulgated in IATA Status Reports Board a resolution permitting u n d e r pre rected toward protection against radiation Nos. 15 and 17 as set forth in the at scribed rules arrangements of the nature hazards from those radiation sources which tachment hereto,1 (1) names rates un that Agreement CAB 5044-A102 w ould pre are regulated by the Commission; (b) the der new descriptions, and (2) names ad clude, such filing shall automatically extena foregoing undertaking shall not apply to ditional specific commodity rates. the approval herein until the B oard ac reasonable State requirements for (i) access The Board, acting pursuant to sections finally on such new resolution.” The insta by State representatives to records which 102, 204(a), and 412 of the Act, does not filing is deemed to be such a resolution. Commission licensees are required to main 2 Filed as part of original document. tain pursuant to the Commission’s rules find the subject agreement to be adverse 8 A general comparison of the present an and regulations or the provisions of a Com to the public interest or in violation of proposed commission structure is set mission license, (ii) sampling of effluents by in Appendix B which is filed as p a rt State representatives, (iii) such measuring or 1 Filed as part of original document. original document. Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6885 panies concerned with having agents certain revisions of American Telephone 4. California, GT&E, and USITA also provide in-plant services. In this con and Telegraph Co. Tariff FCC No. 133 state that confusion and delay would nection, the Board notes that on May 5, filed on November 16, 1964, relating to result because conflicts of substantive 1965, ATC, on behalf of certain of its station and supplemental equipment fur and procedural nature between State member carriers, filed an Explanatory nished in connection with teletypewriter regulatory authorities and this Commis Statement outlining the reasons under exchange service. The Commission also sion would arise in attempting to resolve lying various aspects of the agreement. ordered that the issues of its investiga the inherent complex rate issues. It is The Board has not had an opportunity tion into the lawfulness of A.T. & T.’s pointed out that intrastate rate increases to review carefully the information in teletypewriter exchange service tariff be in California do not become effective the Statement but, in any event, it de enlarged to include inquiry into: without approval of the California Com sires thè views of all interested persons (1) Whether it is practicable to es mission. It is urged that the likelihood before proceeding with further consider tablish separate interstate and intrastate of securing concurrent initial and con ation of the matter. Therefore, the schedules of charges for items, of station tinuing approval of the various juris Board has decided to defer action and and supplemental equipment used in fur dictions would be remote. USITA also provide an opportunity for those con nishing teletypewriter exchange service; states that it would not be “feasible to cerned to file written statements in sup (2) If it would not be practicable to have a single flat charge filed in both the port of, or in opposition to approval of establish separate interstate and intra intrastate and the interstate tariff.” the agreement. In addition to whatever state schedules of charges, whether the After stating that separate interstate and further comments the carriers may wish single schedule of charges for such equip intrastate charges for items of station to submit, the Board would expect agents ment should be filed with the Commission and supplemental equipment would not to submit information showing specif in accordance with the provisions of sec be practicable if based on proportionate ically in what respects they either favor tion 203 of the Communications Act interstate-intrastate usage, A.T. & T. or oppose the various provisions of the of 1934. states that it would be practicable to file agreement, including the economic ef The order provided parties to the investi in the interstate tariff the monthly fect of the proposed commission rate gation proceedings and other interested charge for basic TWX service, including structure on their overall revenues. persons an opportunity to submit written “basic station equipment,” and to file Similarly, thè Board would be interested data, views, or arguments for considera in the intrastate tariffs charges for sup in the views of commercial firms, par tion by the Commission in the determina plemental equipment including station ticularly with respect to the provisions tion of the new issues. Comments or equipment “other than the basic sta of the agreement relating to the estab statements have been filed by American tions.” It argues that the existing prac lishment of in-plant services. Telephone and Telegraph Co., California, tice for TWX service, wherein only a Accordingly, it is ordered: GT&E Service Corp., the Western Union basic monthly fixed charge appears in 1. That further action on Agreement Telegraph Co., and United States Inde the interstate tariff and all equipment CAB 5044-A113 be and it hereby is de pendent Telephone Association. The charges are filed in intrastate tariffs, ferred; and problems considered here arise becaúse tends to justify the filing methods urged 2. That any interested person desiring the carrier offers, in connection with its above. to file comments with respect to Agree teletypewriter exchange service, station, 5. A.T. & T.’s suggestion of filing ment CAB 5044-A113 shall file such and supplemental equipment which is charges in the interstate tariff for “basic comments within 30 days after the date usable interchangeably between inter equipment” and of filing charges in the of service of this order. Statements in state and intrastate service. Carriers intrastate tariffs for all other station reply thereto may be filed within 15 days have substantial investment in this equipment does not meet the question after the date fixed for the filing of such equipment, and economic and efficient under consideration. Since all of the initial comments. All such filings shall operations tend to justify making the items involved may be used interchange conform to the general requirements of same equipment available for combined ably for both interstate and intrastate the Board’s rules of practice in economic interstate and intrastate service. service, the filing of some in an interstate proceedings, and should be submitted in 2. In its comments Western Union tariff and some in the States’ tariffs triplicate to the Board’s Docket Section. takes the position that the first question does not resolve the jurisdictional ques This order shall be published in the posed by the Commission must be ini tion. The question under consideration F ederal R e g is t e r . tially answered by A.T. & T. and has concerns whether, for a given item of By the Civil, Aeronautics Board. declined to comment thereon. equipment, it is practicable to have sepa 3. California, GT&E, and USITA each rate charges listed in both the intrastate [seal] H arold R . S a n d er so n , and interstate tariffs. Secretary. state that it is not practicable to establish separate interstate and intrastate sched 6. It is clear from this summary of the [F.R. Doc. 65-5316; P iled, M ay 19, 1965; ules of charges for items of station and comments and statements filed in re 8:48 a.m .] supplemental equipment. California and sponse to our order referred to above USITA both assert that it would be im that the parties which have responded practicable to base separate charges on do not consider it practicable to establish the proportionate use of the equipment separate interstate and intrastate sched fed er a l communications in interstate and intrastate communica ules of charges for items of station and tion services. Generally, A.T. & T. also supplemental equipment used in con COMMISSION, takes this view although it concludes nection with interstate teletypewriter exchange service. We agree with this [Docket No. 15011; FCC 65-402] ' that separate schedules are1 practicable under a method that will be discussed conclusion. more fully below. It is asserted by 7. With regard to the second issue, the AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND position of California is that this Com TELEGRAPH CO. A.T. & T. and by California that inter state charges based on the interstate mission has jurisdiction by virtue of sec Memorandum Opinion and Order usage in each State may have to be dif tions 2(b)(1) and 221(b) of the Com munications Act of 1934 over only TWX Terminating Proceedings ferent in each State, resulting in non- uniform rates for the one service on file interstate connection (message) charges. fri the matter of American Telephone with this Commission. Or, if the inter It argues that charges for equipment and Telegraph Co., Docket No. 15011; state schedule contained a nationally used in intrastate communications must charges, practices, classifications, and uniform rate based on the nationwide be filed with the State authorities; and regulations for and in connection with average of percentage of interstate usage, an interstate tariff covering intrastate teletypewriter Exchange Service. then the varying percentage of intra services would not be lawful. Cali 1. By Memorandum Opinion and state usage within each State would re fornia’s reliance on section 221(b) is rder PCC 65-66, published on Febru sult in total charges to the subscriber based on an assumption that TWX is a ary 11, 1965, at 30 F.R. 1955, the Com- which may be above or below the total “telephone exchange service” exempted mission denied a request of the Public revenue requirement depending upon the thereby from the jurisdiction of this utilities Commission of the. State of Cali- percentage of intrastate usage for the Commission. Thus, California argues rrua (California), asking rejection of States. that only interstate connection (mes- 6886 NOTICES sage) charges are to be filed in the in 12. The provisions of the Communica and regulations used in the rendition of the terstate tariff. tions Act of 1934 “apply to all interstate service, and regulation of such service must 8. GT&E’s position on question two is and foreign communications by wire or be able to deal with all or any matters so that, to the extent items of station and radio * * *” ,(47 U.S.C. sec. 2(a)), with involved if it is to be effective. This is clearly the purport of the comprehensive supplemental equipment are used for in exemptions. “Communication” as de common carrier provision of the Communi trastate service, rates and charges ap fined in the act includes “all instrumen cations Act. See M atter of Hotel Surcharges plicable thereto are beyond the scope of talities, facilities, apparatus, and services (10 FCC 252 (1943)); Ambassador, Inc. v! the jurisdiction of this Commission by * * * incidental to * * *” the trans United States, 325 U.S. 317 [footnote virtue of section 2(b) (1) of the Com mission of communications (47 U.S.C. om itted]. 11 FCC 1033 at 1047. munications Act of 1934, and that there secs. 3(a) and 3(b)). The act also pro 15. The question of the Commission’s is nothing in that act which would re vides that a common carrier shall file jurisdiction over charges for communi lieve carriers from continuing the pres with this Commission “schedules show cation facilities and services used inter ent situation of filing rates for such ing all charges for itself and its con changeably for both interstate and intra equipment for intrastate service with necting carriers for interstate and for state communications was also presented State authorities. Thus, GT&E con eign wire or radio communication * * * in relation to telephone answering de cludes that it would seem appropriate for and showing the classifications, prac vices in Jordaphone Corporation of the schedule of charges for such equip tices, and regulations affecting such America v. American Telephone and ment to be filed with appropriate State charges,” (47 U.S.C. sec. 203(a)) and Telegraph Company, FCC 54-594 authorities. Under GT&E’s position that no carrier “shall engage or partici (Dockets 9383 and 9701, May 7, 1954). charges for all items of TWX station pate in such communication unless In the Jordaphone case, the contention equipment would be filed in intrastate schedules have been filed and published was there made that, because tariff reg tariffs. in accordance with the provisions of this ulations prohibiting the use of customer- 9. USITA’s position on the second Act * * * and no carrier shall * * * owned automatic answering devices question is that charges for equipment extend to any person any privileges or affected intrastate and exchange tele used interchangeably between interstate facilities, in such communications, * * * phone service, the Commission was with and intrastate service should be filed in except as specified in such schedule.” out jurisdiction to entertain a complaint intrastate tariffs. USITA urges that the (47 U.S.C. sec. 203(c).) alleging the unreasonableness of such reasons justifying the filing of telephone 13. It is clear to the Commission that regulations. This contention was re terminal equipment in intrastate tariffs charges for teletypewriter station and jected by the Commission as follows: applies with equal force in the TWX supplemental equipment are charges for and in connection with wire or radio We also reject the contention of the de service. USITA argues that the only sta fendant telephone companies that this Com tion equipment charges which should be communications. The Commission has mission does not have jurisdiction to enter filed in the interstate tariff are the jurisdiction under the Communications tain the complaints. The defendant tele charges for equipment used exclusively Act of 1934 to regulate charges for all phone companies operate extensive nation in interstate service. interstate and foreign communication w ide telep h o n e facilitie s a n d m aintain more 10. A.T. & T. apparently recognizes service, with certain exceptions not ap than 35,000,000 telephones interconnected that this Commission has jurisdiction plicable here. We conclude that charges th ro u g h m ore th a n 8,000 cen tral offices and for station and supplemental equipment handle approximately 140,000,000 calls per over schedules of charges for station day. During 1950, approximately 98.8 per equipment used interchangeably in inter collected for and in connection with use cent of all telephone messages transmitted state communication service and intra of interstate teletypewriter exchange over the facilities of the Bell System Com state communication service. But A.T. & communication service are charges over panies were exchange and intrastate calls T. argues that the Commission has the which this Commission has regulatory and approximately 1.2 percent were inter authority to forbear to exercise its juris jurisdiction under the Act and for which s ta te o r fo reig n to ll m essage calls. Despite diction over supplemental equipment schedules of charges must be filed with the fact that the individual telephone in this Commission pursuant to 47 U.S.C. stallation is used more extensively for intra used in both interstate and intrastate s ta te telep h o n e com m unications th an for communications. A.T. & T. finds this au section 203. in te rs ta te a n d foreign to ll telephone service, thority to forbear to exercise jurisdic 14. This Commission has previously it is clear that this Commission, pursuant tion in the phrase “unless otherwise pro held that it has jurisdiction over facili to sections 1 and 2(a) of the Communica vided by or under authority of this Act” ties which are used for and in connec tions Act of 1934, as amended (47 U.S:C. in section 203(c) of the Communications tion with interstate and foreign com 151, 192(a)), has Jurisdiction insofar as the Act of 1934. A.T. & T. argues that the munications even though not used exclu 1.2 percent interstate and foreign toll mes current TWX tariff arrangement, where sively in interstate and foreign com sage calls are concerned. This 1.2 percent munications. In Use of Recording De a m o u n te d to som e 500,000,000 telephone calls by a basic monthly charge appears in the in 1950 (para. 3 of Conclusions). interstate tariff and all other equip vices, 11 FCC 1033 (1947), the carrier ment charges are filed in intrastate tar argued that “the jurisdiction of the Thus the Commission exercised its juris iffs, amounts to such forbearance. Commission to make an order regulating diction over the tariff regulations insofar A.T. & T. also points to the Commission’s the use of recorders is limited to use in as they applied to interstate service by decision not to regulate interstate use of connection with facilities which are ex finding them to be unlawful and by re automatic telephone answering devices clusively interstate.” 11 FCC 1033 at quiring the carriers to file revised regula in connection with toll telephone serv 1046. The Commission, however, re tions permitting the interstate use of ice, Jordaphone Corporation of America jected this argument, stating: such devices where permitted by local or v. American Telephone and Telegraph * * * the Commission is of the opinion State authorities. The tariff provision Company, FCC 54-594 (Dockets 9383 that it clearly has jurisdiction to act with filed pursuant to our prescription states: and 9701, May 7,1954). respect to the matter of the use of record ing devices in connection with interstate The [general foreign attachments pro 11. Western Union’s position is that and foreign message toll telephone service. vision] may not be interpreted to pre “the entire schedule of charges should be The foregoing argument of the [carrier] has clude the installation and use in connec filed with this Commission in accord obvious fallacies: It ignores entirely the tion with facilities furnished by this Com ance with the provisions of section 203 basic grant of jurisdiction to this Commis pany of automatic telephone answering of the Communications Act of 1934.” sion over interstate and foreign communi devices not furnished by this Company in any Western Union argues that the jurisdic cation by wire or radio (see Communica community or state in which the use of such tion of the Commission does not turn on tions Act, secs. 1 and 2(a)), and it pays devices is authorized by the appropriate whether or not it is practicable to estab no heed to the facts of operation of tele local regulatory agency or State commission. lish separate interstate and intrastate phone recording devices. 11 FCC at 1047. It is clear, therefore, that the Jorda schedules, and that it would be error for We there noted that the recording de phone case is not a precedent for for the Commission not to exercise the juris vices could be switched on and off per bearance by the Commission in the diction conferred on it by the act. West mitting nonuse of the device during in exercise of its jurisdiction, as is con ern Union argues further that TWX is trastate communication when desirable. tended by A.T. & T. Rather, the Jorda essentially and predominately an inter But TWX service, just as toll telephone phone case supports our conclusions that state service and that the equipment in service, section 203 of the Act requires the earner question is used in the provision of that * * * necessarily involves all the facilities, to file with the Commission its schedule service. charges, classifications, practices, services, of charges for station and supplémenta Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6887 equipment used for and in connection implications Act of 1934. Section 2(b) “telephone exchange service.” . Section with interstate teletypewriter exchange (1) provides: 3(r) of the Act defines “telephone ex change service. Subject to the provisions of section 301, change service” as: 16. The items of station and supple nothing in this Act shall be construed to * * * service within a telephone exchange, mental equipment in question are offered apply or to give the Commission jurisdic or within a connected system of telephone by the carrier for use for and in connec tion with respect to (1) charges, classifica exchanges within the same exchange area tion with interstate teletypewriter com tions, practices, services, facilities, or regula operated to furnish to subscribers intercom munication service. What services and tions for or in connection with intrastate municating service of the character ordinarily facilities the carrier will offer for use for communications service by wire or radio of furnished by a single exchange and which and in connection with its interstate a n y ca rrie r * * *. is covered by the exchange service charge. teletypewriter exchange service must be It is argued that, since the regulation of Teletypewriter exchange service does governed by a reasonable schedule of intrastate communications does not rest not come within the above definition. charges initiated by the carrier. Cf. in the jurisdiction of this Commission, The interstate TWX service with which Ambassador, Inc. v. United States, 325 the Commission may not, or ought not, we are concerned here is not covered by U.S. 317, 326 (1945). We conclude that regulate facilities used in interstate com an “exchange service Gharge” within the the statute requires that the carrier file munication service which are also used meaning of that section. And further, with this Commission its schedule of in intrastate service. We find nothing the fact that TWX service, in some as charges for whatever services and facil in section 2(b) (1) which imposes any pects, makes use of exchange facilities in ities, including station and supplemental limitation upon our full authority over common with telephone exchange serv equipment, the carrier offers for use for interstate communication service. For ice does not convert TWX service into and in connection with its interstate us to conclude that, because the facilities telephone exchange service. Further, we teletypewriter exchange service. or instrumentalities are used in intrastate cannot agree with USITA’s argument 17. Such a conclusion is supported by as well as in interstate communications that the reasons justifying the filing of the decision of the Supreme Court of the service, we do not have jurisdiction, or message toll telephone terminal equip United States that the Interstate Com that We should not exercise it, would ment charges in intrastate tariffs applies merce Commission has power to au leave a substantial portion of the inter with equal force to the TWX service. thorize abandonment for both interstate state communication service unregulated. Substantial material differences exist be and intrastate traffic of a railroad branch We do not believe the Congress so in tween the tariff rate structure applicable line lying wholly within one State. In tended. See Use of Recording Devices, to interstate message toll telephone serv Colorado v. United States, 271 U.S. 153 11 FCC, 1033, 1046 (1947). See also, ice and the service in question here. The (1926), suit was brought by Colorado to. Hush-A-Phone Corp. v. American Tele principal difference is that the interstate enjoin and set aside in part an order of phone and Telegraph Co. FCC 55-1242 tariff for message toll telephone service the Interstate ' Commerce Commission (Docket 9189, Dec. 23, 1955), order set provides that the toll service charge certifying that present and future con aside and remanded on other grounds, specified in the tariff includes payment venience and necessity permitted the Hush-A-Phone Corp. v. United States, for all service furnished between the abandonment by a carrier of a branch 238 F. 2d 266 (D.C. Cir. 1956). calling and called telephones which in line located wholly within Colorado. On 19. A.T. & T. argues that the phrase cludes the interstate use of all station or appeal from a dismissal of the suit, the “unless otherwise provided by or under terminal equipment. In the case of Supreme •. Court affirmed. In rejecting authority of this Act” in section 203(e) TWX, to the contrary, the per message the contention of the State that the gives the Commission authority to for charges do not purport to cover the Commission lacked power to authorize bear to exercise jurisdiction and to per charges to the user for the interstate use the abandonment,,as affecting intrastate mit A.T. & T. to file its schedule of of the station equipment, which is a sep traffic, a part of the line wholly within charges for items of station and supple arate chargeable unit of interstate Colorado, the Court concluded: mental equipment only with State au service. The exercise of Federal power in authoriz thorities. Section 203 (c) begins with an 21. In summary it appears that on the ing abandonment is not an invasion of a all inclusive “No carrier * * The basis of statements and comments pre field reserved to th e S ta te * * *. B ecause phrase A.T. & T. relies upon modifies that sented herein by the parties, it is not the same instrumentality serves both [inter beginning, for instance, in order to allow practicable to establish separate inter state and intrastate commerce], - Congress carriers the exemptions provided by sec state and intrastate schedules of charges has power to assume not only some control, but paramount control, insofar as interstate tion 221(b) concerning interstate tele for items of station and supplemental commerce is involved * * *. 271 U.S. 153 at phone exchange services. These exemp equipment used in furnishing teletype 165. tions do not relieve a carrier from the writer exchange service. Further, we general requirement imposed by section conclude that A.T. & T. and its concur The Court found that this power had 203 to file schedules of charges for inter ring carriers are required by section 203 been conferred on that Commission by state communications services, nor do of the Act to file with this Commission a the Interstate Commerce Act, section 1, they permit the Commission to grant schedule of charges for items of station pars. 18-20, as amended by the Trans exception to that general requirement. and supplemental equipment used in portation Act of 1920, section 402, pur In Jordaphone, supra, the Commission connection with interstate teletypewriter suant to which the certificate had been did not relieve the carrier of its duty to exchange service and that the revised issued. The carrier here, like the rail file a schedule of charges or the regula schedule of charges for teletypewriter road in that case, undertakes— tions applicable thereto for interstate exchange service which have been filed to engage in both intrastate and interstate service, but rather the Commission or here by A.T. & T. purport to contain all commerce. The same instrumentality serves dered A.T. & T. to modify the interstate such charges. Therefore, we conclude both. The two services are inextricably in tariffs on file to conform to the Com that the inquiry into' new issues in this tertwined. The extent and manner in which mission’s conclusion that the general for proceeding initiated by FCC 65-66, 30 on® “ performed necessarily affects the eign attachments provision should not be F.R. 1955, may be terminated, and that performance of the other * * *. 271 U.S. at 164. construed by the company to prevent the no further proceedings are required in use of telephone answering devices where regard to the statements and comments To the extent the carrier provides station permitted by local and State regulatory submitted by the parties. equipment for use in connection with authorities. See also A.T. & T. and West 22. I t should be stated that our con both interstate and intrastate communi ern Union Private Line Cases, 34 FCC clusions on the requirement of filing a cation the Commission has authority to 244, 363-368 (1961).. Moreover, even if schedule of charges with this Commission we were not bound by the statutory re does not purport to touch upon the other regulate the charges for interstate use of quirement, sound regulatory policy re regulatory questions regarding the law those facilities in order to insure lawful quires that charges for a service such fulness of the charges, classifications, Performance of the interstate service. as TWX, which is so predominantly in practices, regulations, etc., contained in 18. The objections to filing schedulesterstate in its use, should be contained such schedule. Whatever questions may • Charges for station and supplemental in tariffs on file with this Commission. exist concerning the lawfulness of the equipment with this Commission rest 20. The Commission rejects Califor proposed rates for equipment used in neavily upon section 2(b) (1) of the Com- nia’s contention that TWX service is a connection with interstate TWX serv- No.97------8 6888 NOTICES ice may properly be handled at public Interested parties may inspect and ob Notice is hereby given that the follow hearings as a part of the investigation tain a copy of the agreement at the ing applicants have filed with the Fed of A.T. & T.’s TWX rates initiated by our Washington office of the Federal Mari eral Maritime Commission, applications order of March 19, 1963, FCC 63-261, time Commission, 1321 H Street NW., for licenses as independent ocean freight 28 F.R. 2873. Room 301; or may inspect agreements at forwarders, pursuant to section 44(a) of Accordingly, it is ordered, That there the offices of the District Managers, New the Shipping Act, 1916 (75 Stat. 522 and shall be no further proceedings regard York, N.Y., New Orleans, La., and San 46 U.S.C. 841(b) ). ing the issues initiated by the Commis Francisco, Calif. Comments with refer Persons knowing of any reason why sion’s order FCC 65-66, 30 F.R. 1955, and ence to an agreement including a request any of the following applicants should the proceeding instituted by such order for hearing, if desired, may be submitted not receive a license are requested to is terminated and closed, without affect to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Com communicate with the Director, Bureau ing in any manner the proceeding in mission, Washington, D.C., 20573, within of Domestic Regulation, Federal Mari Docket 15011 as it existed prior to such 20 days after publication of this notice time Commission, Washington, D.C., order. in the F ederal R egister. A copy of any 20573. Protests received within 60 days Adopted: May 12, 1965. such statement should also be forwarded from the date of publication of this no to the party filing the agreement (as in tice in the F ederal R egister will be Released: May 14, 1965. dicated hereinafter) and the comments considered. F ederal Communications should indicate that this has been done. I n te rn a tio n a l Traffic & T rade Specialists, Commission, Notice of agreement filed for approval Inc., 85 Hillside Avenue, New RocheUe, [seal] B en F. W aple, by: N.Y.; Anthony G. Guiliano, president: Secretary. Mr. James N. Jacobi, Kurrus and Jacobi, 2000 Barbara A. Guiliano, secretary and treas K Street NW., Washington, D.C., 20006. u re r. [F.R. Doc. 65-5323; FUed, May 19, 1965; Norman R. W ittkamp, d.b.a., Shipco, 1300 8:49 aon.] Agreement 9451, between American Texas, Post Office Box 60459, Houston, Tex,; Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc. (AEIL), Norman R. Wittkamp, owner. Florida-Panama Forwarders, Inc., 844 Bis- [Docket Nos. 15877, 15878; FCC 65M-613] and First Atomic Ship Transport Inc. (FAST), a wholly owned subsidiary of cayne Boulevard, Miami, Fla.; Mario Saenz, SMILES OF VIRGINIA, INC., AND president and director; Gustavo Saenz, vice AEIL covers an arrangement for the in p re sid e n t a n d d irecto r; Nelly E. Fresnedo, PETERSBURG BROADCASTING CO., tegration of the vessel NS “Savannah,” secretary and director. INC. chartered to FAST by U.S. Department of International Export Packers, Inc., 5908 Commerce (Maritime Administration), Seminary Road, Bailey’s Crossroads, Va.; Order Continuing Prehearing in the commercial freighter liner opera Ja c k K agan, p resid en t; M elvin A. Kuit, Conference tions of AEIL in its U.S. North Atlantic/ vice p resid en t; C. M. Trem back, secretary United Kingdom, Continental Europe and treasurer. In re applications of Smiles of Virginia, and Mediterranean services. FAST will C h a n g e o f O ffic er s Inc., Petersburg, Va., Docket No. 15877, be in charge of the operation and navi E rsk in e F re ig h t F orw arding Co., 24 State File No. BPH-4641; Petersburg Broad gation of the vessel, and AEIL will act as casting Co., Inc., Petersburg, Va., Docket Street, New York, N.Y.; Mr. Edward L, General Agents for the vessel under O’ReiUy, president. No. 15878, File No. BPH-4700; for con terms and conditions set forth in the J. R. M ichels, Inc., P o st Office Box 53150, struction permits. agreement. Houston, Tex.; R. A. Chapman, president; The Chief Hearing Examiner having Byron K. Wilson, vice president. Dated: May 17, 1965. under consideration a petition in behalf Notice is hereby given of the change of Smiles of Virginia, Inc., filed May 13, By the Federal Maritime Commission. of addresses and names of the following 1965, for continuance of the prehearing Thomas Lis i, Licensed Independent Ocean Freight conference in the above-entitled pro Forwarders. ceeding which heretofore was scheduled Secretary. for May 25, 1965; [F.R. Doc. 65-5312; Filed, May 19, 1965; Address C h a n g e It appearing, that the petition is sup 8:48 a.m .] Horizon Forwarders, Inc., 38 Pearl Street, New ported by a showing of good and sufficient York, N.Y.; License No. 106. cause and is not opposed by any of the INDEPENDENT OCEAN FREIGHT Federal Storage and Forwarding Co., 1701 parties to the proceeding ; Florida Avenue NW., Washington, D.C.; FORWARDER APPLICATIONS License No. 548. It is ordered, This 14th day of May Carson M. Simon & Co., Carson Maynard 1965, that the petition is granted; and Notice of Revision S im on, d.b.a., 209-211 C h estn u t Street, that the prehearing conference sched Philadelphia, Pa.; License No. 502. uled to be held May 25, 1965, in the Notice is hereby given of changes in the folloVing applications for independ C h a n g e o f N am e above-entitled proceeding is continued to ent ocean freight forwarder licenses filed July 14, 1965. P oseidon F re ig h t F orw arders to Hector Illes- pursuant to section 44, Shipping Act, 1916 cas, d.b.a., Poseidon Freight Forwarders, Released: May 14, 1965. (75 Stat. 522 and 46 U.S.C. 841 (b)). 25 California Street, San Francisco, Calif. F ederal Communications G r a n d fa th er Ap p l ic a n t s W . J . B row ning to W. J . Browning, Inc., Roysters Building, Norfolk, Va. Commission, Mr. Jenario Emilio Gonzalez-Colon, Box [ seal] B en F. W aple, 10526, Caparra Heights, San Juan, P.R.; Dated: May 17,1965. Secretary. application No. 166, cancelled April 26, 1965. T h o m a s L is i, [F.R. Doc. 65-5324; Filed, May 19, 1965; Central Shipping Co., David Swed, d.b.a., 575 Secretary. 8:49 a.m .] Riverdale Avenue, Brooklyn, N.T.; appli [F.R. Doc. 65-5313; Filed, May 19, 1965; cation No. 584, withdrawn Mhy 26, 1965. 8:48 a m .] Wm. V. Cady, 17 Battery Place, New York, N.Y.; application No. 256, cancelled April FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 7, 1965. AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN N ongrandfather Ap p l ic a n t GENERAL SERVICES ADMINIS LINES, INC., AND FIRST ATOMIC Marjes Forwarding Corp., 300 Maspeth Ave SHIP TRANSPORT, INC. nue, Brooklyn, N.Y.; application, with TRATION drawn April 28,1965. Notice of Agreement Filed for STANDING INTERAGENCY COMMIT Approval Notice is hereby given of changes in the following independent ocean freight TEES CHAIRED BY GENERAL SERV Notice is hereby given that the follow forwarder licenses issued pursuant to ICES ADMINISTRATION ing agreement has been filed with the section 44, Shipping Act, 1916 (75 Stat. Establishment or Extension During Commission for approval pursuant to 522 and 46 U.S.C. 841(b)). Fiscal Years 1964 and 1965 section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, as Intercon Forwarding, Inc., 82 Beaver Street, amended (39 Stat. 733, 75 Stat. 763, 46 New York, N.Y.; License No. 984, cancelled Bureau of the Budget Circular No* U.S.C. 814). April 20,1965. A-63 of March 2, 1964, requires that Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6889

notice of the establishment or extension lanta) and Region IV (Chicago), is mod All interested persons are referred to the of standing interagency committees be ified accordingly. declaration, as previously amended and published in the F ederal R egister “in or (62 Stat. 1283 (1948), as amended by 64 Stat. as now amended, on file at the office of der to facilitate convenient and per 80 (1950), 12 U.S.C. 1701c) the Commission, for a statement of the manent reference by Federal agencies, transaction therein proposed which is unless this would be inconsistent with Effective as of the 14th day of May summarized as follows: law or regulations, or where such publi 1965. On June 5, 1964, the. Commission en cation would not be in the national in [seal] Robert C. Weaver, tered an order, pursuant to sections 6(a) terest.” In compliance with this re Housing and Home Finance and 7 of the Act, authorizing GPU to quirement the following information is Administrator. issue and sell to banks, from time to time provided relating to standing interagency [F.R. Doc. 65-5314; Filed, May 19, 1965; not later than June 30, 1965, promissory committees chaired by the General Ser 8:48 a.m .] notes maturing in ten months from the vices Administration. dates of issue, bearing interest at the A. S tanding committees established prime rate for commercial borrowing in during fiscal year 1964: New York City at the issue dates, and in Interdepartmental Disposal Subcommittee SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE an aggregate principal amount not in of the Interdepartmental Disposal Com excess of $20,000,000 to be outstanding mittee, Office of Emergency Planning. COMMISSION at any one time (Holding Company Act Release No. 15082). In said post-effec B. Standing committees extended be [File No. 1-3421] yond June 30,1964 : tive amendment GPU states that, for the CONTINENTAL VENDING MACHINE reasons noted below, only $11,000,000 Administrative Committee of the Federal CORP. principal amount of such notes had been Register. issued and were outstanding at the date Federal Fire Council. Interagency Advisory Committee on Dis Order Suspending Trading in of the post-effective amendment; and posal of Natural Rubber. Securities requests that the authority to issue the Interagency Advisory Committee on Se original amount of $20,000,000 notes be curity Equipment. May 14,1965. extended for 1 year, to June 30, 1966, on Interagency Committee for the Review of The common stock, 10 cents par value, the same terms and to the same banks, Fédéral Supply Schedules. of Continental Vending Machine Corp., and for the same purposes, as heretofore Interagency Procurement Policy Committee. being listed and registered on the Ameri authorized in the order of June 5, 1964. Interagency Transportation and Traffic Man can Stock Exchange and having unlisted agement Committee. It is further stated that at the time of Interagency Utilities Committee. trading privileges on the Philadelphia- the original declaration, it was contem National Archives Trust Fund Board. Baltimore-Washington Stock Exchange, plated that the proceeds from the sale National Historical Publications Commission. and the 6 percent convertible subordi of the notes would be used by GPU nated debentures due September 1, 1976, principally to make additional invest C. Standing committees abolished being listed and registered on the Ameri ments and capital contributions to its during fiscal year 1965: can Stock Exchange, pursuant to pro subsidiary companies, and that GPU General Services Advisory Council. visions of the Securities Exchange Act would pay the notes out of proceeds D. Standing committees extended be of 1934; and to be derived from the sale of addi yond June 30, 1965: It appearing to the Securities and Ex tional shares of its common stock in change Commission that the summary 1965. One of GPU’s subsidiary com Region 2, Wax Testing Committee. suspension of trading in such securities panies, Jersey Central Power & Light Dated: May 12,1965. on such exchanges and otherwise than Co. (“JCP&L), has since arranged to on a national securities exchange is re sell part of its interest in two gen Lawson B. K nott, Jr., quired in the public interest and for the erating stations to a nonaffiliate pur Acting Administrator protection of investors. suant to declarations filed with the Com of General Services. It is ordered, Pursuant to sections mission (File Nos. 70-4243 and 70-4252), [F.R. Doc. 65-5309; F iled, M ay 19, 1965; 15(c)(5) and 19(a)(4) of the Securities of which one is pending and the other 8:48 a.m .] Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in has been authorized by order of the Com such securities on the American Stock mission dated May 10, 1965 (Holding Exchange, the Philadelphia-Baltimore- Company Act Release No. 15237). GPU Washington Stock Exchange and other states that this has resulted in a substan HOUSING AND HOME wise than on a national securities ex tial reduction in JCP&L’s capital require change be summarily suspended, this ments for 1965, and, in turn makes it FINANCE AGENCY order to be effective for the period May unnecessary and inadvisable for GPU to 17, 1965, through May 26, 1965, both issue and sell additional shares of its Office of the Administrator dates inclusive. common stock in 1965. Accordingly, HHFA REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR, By the Commission. GPU anticipates that all notes issued REGION III (ATLANTA) pursuant to the extension of authority [seal] Orval L. D uBois, requested in its post-effective amendment Delegation of Authority With Respect Secretary. will be paid from the proceeds of a com to Urban Planning Grant Program— [F.R. Doc. 65-5287; Filed, May 19, 1965; mon stock financing by GPU in 1966. Project No. Ind. P-28, Within Por 8:47 a.m .] Notice is further given that any inter ested person may, not later than June 7, tion of Louisville Metropolitan Area 1965, request in writing that a hearing in Indiana [File No. 70-4211] be held on such matter, stating the na The Regional Administrator of the GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. ture of his interest, the reasons for such housing and Home Finance Agency, request, and the issues of fact or law i e®n ni (Atlanta), is hereby author- Notice of Proposed One-Year Exten raised by said amended declaration which zed to administer the provisions of sec- sion of Authorization To Issue Notes he desires to controvert; or he may re of the Housing Act of 1954, as to Banks quest that he be notified if the Com mended (40 U.S.C. 461), with respect May 14,1965. mission should order a hearing thereon. to Project No. Ind. P-28 within that por- Notice is hereby given that General Any such request should be addressed: J?1? the Louisville metropolitan area Public Utilities Corp. (“GPU”), 80 Pine Secretary, Securities and Exchange Com which is in Indiana. Street, New York 5, N.Y., a registered mission, Washington, D.C., 20549. A copy k*16 delegation with respect to the holding company, has filed with this of such request should be served per Planning grant program, repub- Commission a post-effective amendment sonally or by mail (air mail if the per usned October 14, 1960 (25 F.R. 9874), to its declaration in this matter pursuant son being served is located more than as amended, as it applies to the HHFA to sections 6(a) and 7 of the Public Util 500 miles from the point of mailing) regional Administrator, Region in (Ât- ity Holding Company Act of 1935 (“Act”) • upon the declarant at the above-stated 6890 NOTICES address, and proof of service (by affidavit expenditures which are estimated at Whereas, after reading and evaluating or, in case of an attorney at law, by $23,220,000 in 1965 and $32,100,000 in reports of such conditions, I find that certificate) should be filed contempo 1966. The company will apply the net the conditions in such areas constitute raneously with the request. At any time proceeds from any permanent financing a catastrophe within the purview of the after said date, the declaration, as effected prior to the maturity of the pro Small Business Act, as amended. amended by said post-effective amend posed notes in reduction of, or in total Now, therefore, as Executive Adminis ment, may be granted as provided in payment of, such notes outstanding, and trator of the Small Business Administra rule 23 of the general rules and regula the remaining amount, if any, which may tion, I hereby determine that: tions promulgated under the Act, or the be borrowed pursuant to this authoriza 1. Applications for disaster loans under Commission may grant exemption from tion shall be reduced by the amount, if the provisions of section 7(b) (1) of the such rules as provided in rules 20(a) and any, by which such proceeds exceed the Small Business Act, as amended, may be 100 thereof or take such other action as amount of such outstanding notes. received and considered by the Offices it may deem appropriate. The filing states that expenses to be below indicated from persons or firms For the Commission (pursuant to dele incurred in connection with the proposed whose property, situated in the aforesaid gated authority). transactions are estimated at $400, and State and areas adjacent thereto, suf that $1,000 represents a reasonable allo fered damage or destruction resulting [seal] O rval L. D uB ois, cation of counsel’s annual retainer with from tornadoes and accompanying con Secretary. respect to the services rendered in this ditions occurring on or about May 6 and [F.R. Doc. 65-5288; Filed, May 19, 1965; matter. It is further stated that no 7, 1965. 8:47 a.m .] State or Federal commission, other than O f f ic e this Commission, has jurisdiction over Small Business Administration Regional Of the proposed issuance of notes. fice, 603 Second Avenue South, Minne [File No. 70-4277] Notice is further given that any inter apolis, Minn., 55402. ested person may, not later than June 8, PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF OKLAHOMA 2. Temporary offices will be established 1965, request in writing that a hearing be as are necessary, addresses to be an Notice of Proposed Issuance and Sale held on such matter, stating the nature nounced locally. of Notes to Banks of his interest, the reasons for such re quest, and the issues of fact or law raised 3. Applications for disaster loans under M ay 14, 1965. by said declaration which he desires to the authority of this Declaration will not be accepted subsequent to November 30, Notice is hereby given that Public Serv controvert; or he may request that he be 1965. ice Co. of Oklahoma (“Public Service”), notified if the Commission should order a 600 South Main Street, Tulsa, Okla., hearing thereon. Any such request Dated: May 7, 1965. should be addressed: Secretary, Securi 74102, an electric utility subsidiary com Ross D. Davis, pany of Central and South West Corp., ties and Exchange Commission, Wash Executive Administrator. a registered holding company, has filed ington, D.C., 20549. A copy of such re a declaration with this Commission pur quest should be served personally or by [F.R. Doc. 65-5276; Filed, May 19, 1965; suant to the Public Utility Holding Com mail (air mail if the person being served 8:45 a m .] pany Act of 1935 (“Act”), designating is located more than 500 miles from the sections 6 and 7 thereof as. applicable point of mailing) upon the declarant at [D eclaratio n of D isaster Area 528] the above-stated address, and proof of to the proposed transactions. All inter MISSOURI ested persons are referred to the declara service (by affidavit or, in case of an at tion, on file at the office of the Commis torney at law, by certificate) should be Declaration of Disaster Area sion, for a statement of the transactions filed contemporaneously with the request. At any time after said date, the declara Whereas, it has been reported that therein proposed which are summarized during the month of April 1965, because below. tion, as filed or as it may be amended, may be permitted to become effective as of the effects of certain disasters, dam Public Service proposes to issue and age resulted to residences and business sell, from time to time commencing in provided in rule 23 of the general rules and regulations promulgated under the property located in the State of Missouri; June 1965 and in varying amounts as Whereas, the Small Business Adminis funds are required for construction pur Act or the Commission may grant exemp tion from such rules as provided in rules tration has investigated and has received poses, its unsecured promissory notes to other reports of investigations of condi banks in an aggregate face amount not 20(a) and 100 thereof or take such other action as it may deem appropriate. tions in the areas affected; exceeding $20,000,000. The banks and Whereas, after reading and evaluat their respective commitments are as For the Commission (pursuant to dele ing reports of such conditions, I find that follows: gated authority). the conditions in such areas constitute a The First National Bank of Chi the [seal] O rval L. D uB o is, catastrophe within the purview of cago, Chicago, 111______$6, 500,000 Secretary. Small Business Act, as amended. Bankers Trust Co., New York, Now, therefore, as Executive Adminis N.Y. ______5, 000,000 [FH. Doc. 65-5289; Filed, May 19, 1965; trator of the Small Business Administra Harris Trust & Savings Bank, 8:47 a.m .] Chicago, 111______3, 200, 000 tion, I hereby determine that: The First National Bank & Trust 1. Applications for disaster loans under Co. of Tulsa, Tulsa, Okla-____ 2, 900, 000 the provisions of section 7(b)(1) of the National Bank of Tulsa, Tulsa, Small Business Act, as amended, may be O kla______2, 000, 000 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRA received and considered by the Offices First National Bank in Bartles below indicated from persons or firms ville, Bartlesville, Okla______400,000 TION whose property, situated in the afore said State and areas adjacent thereto, T o ta l ______$20,000,000 [Declaration of Disaster Area 526] suffered damage or destruction resulting The notes are to be dated as of the date from floods and accompanying conditions of issuance, are to mature on a date not MINNESOTA occurring on or about April 6,1965. more than 12 months from the date of Declaration of Disaster Area O f f ic e the first borrowing, and are to bear in terest at the prime rate (currently 4J& Whereas, it has been reported that dur Small Business Administration Regional percent per annum) in effect at The First ing the month of May 1965, because of the Office, 1520 Market Street, St. Louis, Mo., National Bank of Chicago on the date of effects of certain disasters, damage re 63103. each borrowing. The notes may be pre sulted to residences and business prop 2. Temporary offices will be established paid in whole at any time or in part from erty located in the State of Minnesota; at Hannibal, Missouri, and such other time to time without premium or penalty. Whereas, the Small Business Adminis areas as are necessary, addresses to be Public Service proposes to use the pro tration has investigated and has received announced locally. ceeds from the sale of the proposed notes other reports of investigations of condi 3. Applications for disaster loans un to finance partially its construction tions in the areas affected; der the authority of this Declaration win Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6891 not be accepted subsequent to November 2. To execute loan authorizations for 30, 1965. Washington and Regional Office ap TARIFF COMMISSION proved loans and for disaster loans ap Dated: May 10, 1965. proved under delegated authority, said SAFETY PINS L. B. Hendricks, execution to read as follows: Report to the President Acting Executive Administrator. (Name), Administrator, May 17,1965. [F.R. Doc. 65-5277; P iled, M ay 19, 1965; B y —...... The Tariff Commission today released 8:45 a.m .] H arold P . S t e v e n s , Manager, Disaster Field Office. a report in which it informs the Presi dent of its judgment of the probable eco [Declaration of Disaster Area 527] 3. To cancel, reinstate, modify and nomic effect of the reduction or termina amend authorization for disaster loans tion of the increase in duty on safety pins NEBRASKA approved under delegated authority. that was imposed in 1957 under the 4. To disburse unsecured disaster loans. escape-clause procedure. The Commis Declaration of Disaster Area 5. To extend the disbursement period sioners held divergent views on the im Whereas, it lias been reported that on disaster loan authorizations or undis pact of reduced duty rates on the safety during the month of May 1965, because bursed portions of disaster loans. pin industry. of the effects of certain disasters, dam II. The authority delegated herein may Commissioners Dorfman, Fenn, and age resulted to residences and business not be redelegated. Culliton state in the report that “resto property located in Boone. County in the HI. All authority delegated herein ration of the trade-agreement rate of State of Nebraska; may be exercised by any SBA employee duty would tend to place a ceiling on Whereas, the Small Business Admin designated as Acting Manager of the dis domestic prices and would have a slightly istration has investigated and has re aster field office. negative impact on domestic produc ceived other reports of investigations of Effective date. May 3, 1965. tion.” They indicate that there prob conditions in the area affected; ably would be no serious effects on either Whereas, after reading and evaluating Lawrence J. Hayes, overall corporate profits or employment. reports of such conditions, I find that the Regional Director, The major corporations engaged in the conditions in such area constitute a Madison, Wis. production of safety pins have great flex catastrophe within the purview of the [P.R. Doc. 65-5279; Piled, May 19, 1965; ibility in product mix and in their use of Small Business Act, as amended. 8:45 a.m .] personnel because of the wide range of Now, therefore, as Executive Adminis products they manufacture, and they trator of the Small Business Administra could be expected to make the necessary tion, I hereby determine that : [Delegation of Authority 30, Madison adjustments gradually and successfully. 1. Applications for disaster loans under Regional Office, Disaster 2-65] Commissioners Talbot and Sjitton state that “a reduction or termination the provisions of section 7(b) (1) of the MANAGER, DISASTER FIELD OFFICE, Small Business Act, as amended, may be of the increase in duty on safety pins received and considered by the Offices PRAIRIE DU CHIEN, WIS. would probably result in a decline at below indicated from persons or firms least of selected import prices, a resultant Delegation Relating to Financial increase in imports, depressed profits, whose property, situated in the aforesaid Assistance Functions County and areas adjacent thereto, suf and a decline in domestic production fered damage or destruction resulting 1. Pursuant to the authority delegated accompanied by commensurate unem from tornado and accompanying condi to the Regional Director by Delegation of ployment.” tions occurring on or about May 8, 1965. Authority No. 30 (Madison, Wis.), 30 The report concludes an investigation P.R. 3252, there is hereby redelegated to (No. TEA-IA-6) instituted by the Com O f f ic e the Manager of Prairie du Chien, Wis mission, upon request of the President, Small Business Administration Regional consin Disaster Field Office the following under section 351(d)(2) of the Trade Office, 215 N o rth 17th S tre et, O m aha, Nebr., authority. Expansion Act of 1962. Under that act, 68102. A. Financial assistance. 1. To approve the Commission’s advice is to be taken 2. A temporary office will be established and decline disaster loans in an amount into account by the President before he at Primrose, Nebraska, address to be an not exceeding $20,000.00. determines whether or not to reduce or nounced locally. 2. To execute loan authorizations for terminate an increase in duty imposed 3. Applications for disaster loans under Washington and Regional Office ap under the escape-clause procedure. A the authority of this Declaration will not proved loans and for disaster loans ap reduction in duty on safety pins from be accepted subsequent to November 30, proved under delegated authority, said 35 percent to 22% percent ad valorem 1965. execution to read as follows: was made in 1948 pursuant to a con cession granted by the United States in Dated: May 11, 1965. (Name), Administrator, B y ------the General Agreement on Tariffs and L. B. Hendricks, J a m es D. G ib s o n , Trade. The preconcession rate of 35 Acting Executive Administrator. Manager, Disaster Field Office. percent was restored in 1957 under the escape-clause provisions of the Trade [F.R. Doc. 65-5278; P iled, M ay 19, 1965; 3. To cancel, reinstate, modify and 8:45 a.m .] Agreements Extension Act of 1951. amend authorization for disaster loans Certain portions of the report to the approved under delegated authority. President may not be made public since 4. To disburse unsecured disaster [Delegation of Authority 30, Madison they contain information that would re Regional Office, Disaster 1-65] loans. veal the operations of individual con 5. To extend the disbursement period cerns. The Commission, therefore, is m a n a g e r , d is a s t e r f ie l d o f f ic e , on disaster loan authorizations or undis releasing the report to the public with LA CROSSE, WIS. bursed portions of disaster loans. those portions omitted. II. The authority delegated herein may Copies of the public report (the release Delegation Relating to Financial not be redelegated. of which was authorized by the Presi Assistance Functions IH. All authority delegated herein may dent) are available upon request as long be exercised by any SBA employee desig as the limited supply lasts. Address ■ *:*>ursuarit to the authority delegated nated as Acting Manager of the disaster requests to the Secretary, U.S. Tariff rtf a ¿J^e?*onal Director by Delegation field office. Commission, Eighth and E Streets NW,, Pn y No. 30 (Madison, Wis.), 30 Effective date. May 11,1965. Washington, D.C., 20436. tti?'»i252, ^ ere I® hereby redelegated to of La Cross, Wis., Disaster Lawrence J. Hayes, By direction of the Commission. la Office the following authority. Regional Director, [ seal] D onn N. B ent, a nrK ^ in^nc^ asstetance. 1. To approve Madison, Wis. Secretary. a decline disaster loans in an amount [F.R. Doc. 65-5280; Piled, May 19, 1965; [F.R. Doc. 65-5310; P iled, M ay 19, 1965; not exceeding $20,000.00. 8:46 a.m .] 8:48 a.m .] 6892 NOTICES

RATED, 4848 Cordell Avenue, Washing santo Co., at or near Trenton, Mich., to INTERSTATE COMMERCE ton 14, D.C. Applicant's attorney: Akron, Ohio, limited to shipments of two William P. Sullivan, 1825 Jefferson Place or more types of phosphates. An order, COMMISSION NW., Washington, D.C., 20036. Author Operating Rights Board No. 1, dated ity sought to operate as a common car April 28, 1965, served May 6, 1965, finds [Notice 768] rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular that the present and future public con MOTOR CARRIER APPLICATIONS AND routes, transporting: Dry chemicals, in venience and necessity require operation CERTAIN OTHER PROCEEDINGS bulk, from points in Mason County, W. by applicant, in interstate or foreign Va., to points in Delaware, Maryland, commerce as a common carrier by motor M ay 14,1965. New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsyl vehicle, over irregular routes, of sodium The following publications are gov vania, South Carolina, Virginia, and the tripoly phosphate and tetra sodium pyro erned by the new Special Rule 1.247 of District of Columbia. phosphate, in bulk, from the plant site the Commission’s rules of practice, pub N o t e : The purpose of this republication of the Monsanto Co., located at Trenton, lished in the F ederal R egister, issue of is to show hearing information set forth Mich., to Akron, Ohio; that because it is December 3,1963, which became effective below . possible that other parties may have an January 1, 1964. interest in and would be prejudiced by HEARING: June 7,1965, at the Offices the lack of proper notice of the author Applications Assigned for Oral H earing of the Interstate Commerce Commission, ity described in the findings in this order, Washington, D.C., before Examiner a notice of the authority actually granted MOTOR CARRIERS OF PROPERTY Theodore M. Tahan. will be published in the F ederal Register No. MC 64932 (Sub-No. 374), filed No. MC 119097 (Sub-No. 3), filed Au and issuance of a certificate in this pro May 10, 1965. Applicant: ROGERS gust 22, 1963. Applicant: JOHNNY’S ceeding will be withheld for a period of CARTAGE CO., a corporation, 1439 West AUTO & TRUCK TOWING, INC., 1122 30 days from the date of such publica 103d Street, Chicago, 111. Applicant’s Sweitzer Street, Akron, Ohio. Authority tion, during which period any proper attorney: David Axelrod, 39 South La sought to operate as a common carrier, party in interest may file an appropriate Salle, Chicago, HI., 60603. Authority by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, protest or other pleading. sought to operate as a common carrier, transporting: Motor and other highway No. MC 117344 (Sub-No. 130) (THE by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, vehicles designed for general highway MAXWELL CO.—EXTENSION-CHER transporting: Chemicals, dry, in bulk, in transportation, which are wrecked, dis RIES IN BRINE) (REPUBLICATION), abled, abandoned, repossessed, stolen, or tank and hopper-type vehicles, from filed June 25, 1964, published Federal embezzled, with or without cargo, by points in Mason County, W. Va., to points R egister, issues of July 8, 1964, and in United States, excluding Alaska and wrecker equipment only, and dollies April 14, 1965, and republished this Hawaii. where said vehicles are in such condi issue. Applicant: THE MAXWELL HEARING: June 7,1965, at the Offices tion that the vehicles cannot be towed; CO., Cincinnati, Ohio. Notice: On of the Interstate Commerce Commission, also replacement vehicles and equip March 24, 1965, the above-entitled pro Washington, D.C., before Examiner ment from wrecked or disabled ve ceeding was reopened for further pro Theodore M. Tahan. hicles, by wrecker service only, between ceedings solely for the purpose of de No. MC 110698 (Sub-No. 301) (RE- points in Cuyahoga, Medina, Portage, termining whether the transportation, in PUBLICATION), filed April 7, 1965, Stark, Summit, and Wayne Counties, interstate or foreign commerce, of cher published F ederal R egister issue April Ohio, on the one hand, and on the other, ries, in brine, is exempt from economic 28, 1965, and republished this issue. points in New York, New Jersey, Mary regulation by the Commission under the Applicant: RYDER TANK LINE, INC., land, and the District of Columbia. provisions of section 203(b) (6) of the Post Office Box 8418, Greensboro, N.C. HEARING: June 18, 1965, at the New Post Office Building, 85 Marconi Boule Interstate Commerce Act, as amended. Applicant’s attorney: Francis W. Mc- Interested persons were invited to pre Inemy, 1000 16th Street NW., Washing vard, Columbus, Ohio, before Examiner William J. O’Brien, Jr. sent their views through appropriate ton, D.C., 20036. Authority sought to pleadings to be filed prior to May 17, operate as a common carrier, by motor No. MC 124125 (Sub-No. 3), filed May 1965. At the request of interested per vehicle, over irregular routes, transport 10, 1965. Applicant: A & P EQUIP MENT & SUPPLY .CORP., Morton Boule sons, including E. J. Brach & Sons, the ing: Dry chemicals, in bulk, from points time for filing such pleadings is extended in Mason County, W. Va., to points in the vard, Kingston, N.Y. Applicant’s repre sentative : Charles H. Trayford, 220 East to June 15,1965. United States (except Alaska and No. MC 126586 (Sub-No. 1) (REPUB Hawaii). 42d Street, New York 17, N.Y. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, LICATION), filed December 18, 1964, N o t e : Common control may be involved. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, published F ederal R egister, issue of The purpose of this republication is to show January 13, 1965, and republished after hearing information as set forth below. transporting: Precast or prestressed con crete products, from the plant site of order of Commission. Applicant: WIL HEARING: June 7,1965, at the Offices Spancrete Northeast, Inc., at or near LIAM J. SCHROEDER, doing business of the Interstate Commerce Commission, South Bethlehem, N.Y., to points in Con as WILLIAM J. SCHROEDER TRANS Washington, D.C., before Examiner The necticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New FER, New Orleans, La: By application odore M. Tahan. Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, filed December 18, 1964, applicant seeks No. MC 113678 (Sub-No. 134), filed Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Ver a permit authorizing operations, in in April 22, 1965. Applicant: CURTIS, mont. terstate or foreign commerce, as a con INC., 770 East 51st Avenue, Denver, Colo., HEARING: May 26,1965, at the Offices tract carrier by motor vehicle of meats, 80216. Applicant’s attorney: Duane W. of the Interstate Commerce Commission, meat products, meat byproducts, and Acklie, Post Office Box 2028, Lincoln, Washington, D.C., before Examiner dairy products, as defined in Descrip Nebr. Authority sought to operate as a James Anton. tions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 common carrier, by motor vehicle, over No. MC 50069 (Sub-No. 307) (REPUB ^M.C.C. 209, 766, in vehicles equipped with irregular routes,, transporting: Baby LICATION) , filed November 2,1964, pub temperature control devices, for the ac foods and baby supplies, from the plant lished F ederal R egister, issue of Novem count of John Morrell & Co., in pool car site of Gerber Products Co., located at ber 25, 1964, and republished this issue shipments having a prior rail movement, Fort Smith, Ark., to points in New Mexico after order of Commission. Applicant: (1) from New Orleans, La., to Venice, and Colorado. REFINERS TRANSPORT & TERMINAL La., over Louisiana Highway 23, serving HEARING: June 1, 1965, in the Greer CORPORATION, Chicago, HI. By ap all intermediate points, (2) from New Room No. 2, Hilton Hotel, 125 Second plication filed November 2, 1964, as Orleans to Des Allemands, La., over U.S. Avenue, Albuquerque, N. Mex., before amended, applicant seeks a certificate of Highway 90, serving all intermediate Examiner William R. Tyers. public convenience and necessity author points, and (3) from New Orleans to No. MC 113828 (Sub-No. 82) (REPUB izing operation, in interstate or foreign Barataria and Lafitte, La., over Louisi LICATION) , filed April 7,1965, published commerce, as a common carrier by motor ana Highway 45, serving all intermediate F ederal R egister issue April 28, 1965, vehicle, over irregular routes, of phos points, and returned shipments of the and republished this issue. Applicant: phates, in bulk, in compartmented ve above-described commodities in (1), (2), O’BOYLE TANK LINES, INCORPO hicles, irom the plant site of the Mon and (3) above, on return. Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6893 An order, Operating Rights Board No. to the remaining portion of the certifi pleading, consisting of an original and 1 dated April 23, 1965, served April 29, cate having to do with the handling of six copies each. 1965, finds that operation by applicant, similar commodities in secondary move No. MC 124944 (PETITION TO in interstate or foreign commerce, as a ments: Automobiles, trucks, chassis, and MODIFY PERMIT), filed May 3, 1965. contract carrier by motor vehicle, over parts thereof, new, used, unfinished, Petitioner: ROBERT DIBBLE, Kingston, irregular routes, of meats, meat prod and/or wrecked, automobile show dis Mich. Petitioner’s attorney: William B. ucts, meat byproducts and dairy prod plays, restricted to secondary movements, Elmer, 1800 Buhl Building, Detroit, Mich. ucts! as described in sections A and B in truckaway service, and bodies and Petitioner states that it operates as a con of Appendix I to the report in Descrip cabs, with the territorial portion remain tract carrier by motor vehicle, transport tions in Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 ing unchanged. By the instant petition, ing pickles, sauerkraut and peppers, from M.C.C. 209, 766, in vehicles equipped petitioner requests the Commission to Bridgeport, Mich., to points in Illinois, with mechanical refrigeration, from modify and reissue its certificate so that Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, points in Iowa New Orleans, La., to points in Jefferson, the effect will be that the restrictive ex on and east of U.S. Highway 63, points Plaquemines, and St. Charles Counties, pressions, “in initial movements”, “in in New York on and west of U.S. Highway La., restricted to the transportation of secondary movements”, and "in truck 11, points in Pennsylvania on and west shipments having an immediately prior away service” shall not apply to the of U.S. Highway 219, points in West Vir movement by rail, under a continuing transportation of “bodies” and “cabs” as ginia on and west of U.S. Highway 119, contract with John Morrell & Co., of authorized in said certificate. Any per Roanoke and Salem, Va„ and Atlanta, Sioux Falls, S. Dak., will be consistent son or persons desiring to participate in Ga., limited to a transportation service with the public interest and the national this proceeding, may, within 30 days to be performed under a continuing con transportation policy; and that because from the date of this publication, file an tract or contracts with Crown Foods, it is possible that other parties, who have appropriate pleading, consisting of an Inc., of Bridgeport, Mich. By the instant relied upon the notice of the application original and six copies each. petition, petitioner states that on or as published, may have an interest in No. MC 115162 (Sub-No. 8), and No. about March 29,1965, Crown Foods, Inc., and would be prejudiced by the lack of MC 115162 (Sub-No. 16) (PETITION TO became merged with and a part of proper notice of the authority described MODIFY OR AMEND CERTIFICATES), Vlasic Food Products Co. of Detroit, in the findings in this order, a notice of filed May 3, 1965. Petitioner: WALTER Mich. Petitioner requests that an order the authority actually granted will be POOLE, doing business as POOLE be issued modifying its permit and au published in the F ederal R egister and TRUCK LINE, Evergreen, Ala. Peti thorizing it to engage in the same op issuance of a permit in this proceeding tioner’s representative: Robert E. Tate, erations for Vlasic Food Products Co. will be withheld for a period of 30 days 2031 Ninth Avenue, South, Birmingham, that it is now authorized to perform for from the date of such publication, during Ala. Petitioner is authorized in No. MC Crown Foods, Inc. Any person or per which period any proper party in interest 115162 (Sub-No. 8), to transport: New sons desiring to participate in this pro may file an appropriate protest or other furniture, uncrated, as described in Ap ceeding, may, within 30 days from the pleading. pendix n to the report in Descriptions in date of this publication in the F ederal Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 MCC 209, R egister, file an appropriate pleading, Notice of F iling of P etitions from Frisco City, Ala., to points in Ar consisting of an original and six copies No. MC 113436 (PETITION FOR kansas, .Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indi ea£h. MODIFICATION OF CERTIFICATE BY ana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Applications Under Sections 5 and DELETION OF THE PHRASES, “IN Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missis 210a(b) INITIAL MOVEMENTS”, “IN SECOND sippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, ARY MOVEMENTS”, AND “IN TRUCK- New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, The following applications are gov AWAY SERVICE”, INSOFAR AS THE North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South erned by the Interstate Commerce Com TRANSPORTATION OF “BODIES” Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, West Vir mission’s Special Rules governing notice AND “CABS” IS INVOLVED), filed ginia, Wisconsin, and Virginia, with no of filing of applications by motor carriers May 5,1965. Petitioner: AUTOMOBILE transportation for compensation on re of property or passengers under sections CARRIERS, INC., 3401 North Dort High turn except as otherwise authorized. In 5(a) and 210a(b) of the Interstate Com way, Flint, Mich. Petitioner’s attor Docket No. MC-115162 (Sub-No. 16), merce Act and certain other proceedings neys: James W. Wrape and Louis I. petitioner is authorized to transport: with respect thereto (49 CFR 1.240). Dailey, 2111 Sterick Building, Memphis, New furniture, uncrated, as described in Tenn. Petitioner states that it trans Appendix H to the report in Descriptions MOTOR CARRIERS OF PROPERTY ports automobiles, trucks, chassis, parts in' Motor Carrier Certificates, 61 MCC No. MC-F-9110. Authority sought for thereof, automobile show displays, bodies, 209, from Frisco City, Ala., to points in purchase by NATIONAL TRAILER CON and cabs, in initial and secondary move Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecti VOY, INC., 1925 National Plaza, Tulsa, ments, in truckaway service, and that cut, Delaware, Idaho, Maine, Massachu Okla., 74151, of the operating rights of Sheet 1 of its Certificate No. MC 113436, setts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, FLAGSTAFF TRAILER SALES, INC., issued November 16, 1964, it holds au New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Post Office Box 2546, Flagstaff, Ariz., and thority as follows: New automobiles, new Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Washington, for acquisition by LEASE PLAN INTER trucks, new bodies, new cabs, new chassis, Wyoming, and the District of Columbia, NATIONAL CORP., 9 Chelsea Place, and parts thereof, restricted to initial with no transportation for compensation Great Neck, Long Island, N.Y., of control movements, in truckaway service, from on return except as otherwise authorized. of such rights through the purchase. Ap Flint, Mich., to Lincoln, Nebr., and Petitioner has been requested by this plicants’ attorney and representative: Points in Alabama, Illinois, Georgia, same shipper to apply for or to have its R. Y. Schureman, 1010 Wilshire Boule Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Missouri, certificates amended and modified so vard, Los Angeles, Calif., 90017, and Tennessee, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Ken that this shipper could ship crated new Richard K. Mangum, Post Office Box 10, tucky, except that parts thereof of the furniture along with or in separate Flagstaff, Ariz. Operating rights sought above-specified commodities may not be straight truckloads from Frisco City, to be transferred: Buildings, assembled, transported to points in Alabama, Ala., to the same destination territory. partially assembled, or unassembled, as Georgia, and Tennessee, and to points in By the instant petition, petitioner re a common carrier over irregular routes, Kentucky other than those on the Ohio between points in Arizona, California, quests that the commodity description Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah. RE River, with no transportation for com and the origin point and the destinations pensation on return except as otherwise STRICTION : The authority granted utnorized. In line with the decision of remain the same and requesting that the herein is restricted against the transpor îvision l in the Matson, Inc., Case, terminology “uncrated” be removed from tation of trailers or mobile homes desig this portion of the certificate its Certificates, or the terminology nated to be drawn by passenger auto hii0U^ ^ chan§ed to read : New automo- “crated or uncrated” be added. Any mobiles and oilfield and industrial thfS’ *ew trucks, new chassis, and parts person or persons desiring to participate buildings. Vendee is authorized to op ereof, in truckaway service, and new in this proceeding, may, within 30 days erate as a common carrier in all States wuies and new cabs. The same pro from the date of this publication in the in the United States (except Hawaii), mue can easily be followed with respect F ederal R egister, file air appropriate and the District of Columbia. Applica- 6894 NOTICES tion has not been filed for temporary LINES, INC., 3324 U.S. Highway 75 No. MC-F-9115. Authority sought authority under section 210a(b). North, Sioux City, Iowa, of BEAR for control by THOMAS W. DORAN, 296 No. MC-F-9111. Authority sought for MOUNTAIN MOTOR EXPRESS, INC., Connecticut Street, Buffalo, N.Y 14213 purchase by BRUCE CARTAGE, INCOR 200 Pearl Street, Sioux City, Iowa, and Of BUFFALO CONSOLIDATED CART- PORATED, 3460 East Washington Road, for acquisition by RAYMOND C. AGE, INC., 296 Connecticut Street, Buf Saginaw, Mich., of the operating rights HIRSCHBACH, also of 3324 U.S. High falo, N.Y., 14213. Applicant’s attorney of EDWIN P. BREEN, doing business as way 75 North, Sioux City, Iowa, of con Clarence E. Rhoney, 94 Oakwood Avenue BREEN’S DELIVERY SERVICE, 411-13 trol of BEAR MOUNTAIN MOTOR EX North Tonawanda, N.Y. Operating Schribner Street NW., Grand Rapids, PRESS, INC., through the acquisition by rights sought to be controlled: In pend Mich., and for acquisition by CHARLES HIRSCHBACH MOTOR LINES, INC. ing Docket No. MC-98730 Sub 1 seeking D. BRUCE, JR., also of Saginaw, Mich., Applicants’ attorney: Donald E. Leonard, a certificate of registration, covering the of control of such rights through the Box 2028, Lincoln, Nebr. Operating transportation of general commodities, purchase. Applicants’ attorney: William rights sought to be controlled: Bananas, as a common carrier, in intrastate com D. Parsley, 117 West Allegan Street, Lan as a common carrier, over irregular merce, within the State of New York. sing, Mich., 48933. Operating rights routes, from New Orleans, La., to Lincoln, THOMAS W. DORAN holds no authority sought to be transferred: In pending Hastings, and Omaha, Nebr., Casper, from this Commission. Application has Docket No. MC-98154 Sub-2, seeking a Wyo., and Rapid City, S. Dak. RE not been filed for temporary authority certificate of registration, covering the STRICTION : The above-described serv under section 2l0a(b). transportation of property, as a common ice to Omaha, Nebr., is restricted to the Note: See also MC-F-9116, published this carrier, in intrastate commerce, within plant site of Pacific-Gamble-Robinson same issue, which is interrelated. the State of Michigan. Vendee holds Co.; from Gulfport, Miss., to points in no authority from this Commission. Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Ne No. MC-F-9116. Authority sought However, its controlling stockholder, braska, South Dakota, and Wyoming, for control by THOMAS J. C. DORAN, CHARLES D. BRUCE, JR., does business from New Orleans, La., to Scottsbluff, Exchange and Hamburg Streets, Buffalo! as BRUCE CARTAGE COMPANY, 3460 McCook, and Holdrege, Nebr., and To N.Y., of INDUSTRIAL TRUCK LINEs! East Washington Road, Saginaw, Mich., peka and Salina, Kans., from Mobile, INC., Exchange and Hamburg Streets! which is authorized to operate as a com Ala., to Topeka and Salina, Kans., Lin Buffalo, N.Y. Applicants’ attorney: mon carrier in the State of Michigan. coln, Hastings, Omaha, Scottsbluff, Mc Clarence E. Rhoney, 94 Oakwood Avenue, Application has not been filed for tem Cook, and Holdrege, Nebr., Rapid City, North Tonawanda, N.Y. Operating porary authority under section 210a(b). S. Dak., Salt Lake City, Utah, and Cas rights sought to be controlled: In pend No. MC-F-9112. Authority sought for per, Wyo. RESTRICTION: Service to ing Docket No. MC-97877 Sub 1, seeking purchase by MOTOR FREIGHT EX Omaha, Nebr., is limited to the plant a certificate of registration, covering the PRESS, Arsenal Road and Toronita site at the Pacific-Gamble-Robinson Co. transportation of general commodities, Street, York, Pa., of the operating rights HIRSCHBACH MOTOR LINES, INC., is as a common carrier, in intrastate com and property of CLEVELAND-PITTS- authorized to operate as a common car merce, within the State of New York. BURGH FREIGHT LINE, INC., 3515 rier in Kansas, Missouri, Arkansas, Ten THOMAS J. C. DORAN holds no author Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio, and nessee, Mississippi, Louisiana, Nebraska, ity from this Commission. Application for acquisition by MERCHANTS TER Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, has not been filed for temporary author MINAL CORPORATION, 501 North Oklahoma, Iowa, Alabama, Illinois, Mon ity under section 210a(b). tana, Texas, Arizona, California, Flor Kresson Street, Baltimore, Md., and in Note: See also MC-F-9115, published this turn by HOFFBERGER FOUNDATION, ida, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, and same issue, which is interrelated. INC., 215 North Calvert Street, Balti Washington. Application has been filed more, Md., of control of such rights and for temporary authority under section No. MC-F-9117. Authority sought for property through the purchase. Appli 210a(b). purchase by SARTAIN TRUCK LINE, cants’ attorneys: Robert H. Griswold, No. MC-F-9114. Authority sought for INC., 1354 North Second Street, Memphis Post Office Box 432, Harrisburg, Pa., purchase by RINGLE EXPRESS, INC., 7, Tenn., of a portion of the operating 17108, and Nowell F. George, 44 East 405 South Grant Avenue, Fowler, Ind., rights of MEADOR’S MOTOR LINES, Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio, 43215. of a portion of the operating rights of INC., 141 West Carolina Avenue, Mem Operating rights sought to be trans CONTRACT CARRIERS, INC., 2425 phis 6, McKellar Station, Tenn., and for ferred: General commodities, excepting, Walton Street, Anderson, Ind., and for acquisition by W. D. SARTAIN, also of among others, household goods and com acquisition by ROBERT L. McGRIFF, 1354 North Second Street, Memphis, modities in bulk, as a common carrier Route 1, Box 335, Moline, 111., of control Tenn., of control of such rights through over regular routes, between Cleveland, of such rights through the purchase. the purchase. Applicants’ attorney: Ohio, and Pittsburgh, Pa., serving cer Applicants’ attorney: Robert C. Smith, Edward G. Grogan, Suite 2020, First tain intermediate and off-route points, 512 Illinois Building, Indianapolis, Ind., National Bank Building, Memphis, Tenn, between Cleveland, Ohio, and junction 46204. Operating rights sought to be Operating rights sought to be trans U.S. Highway 21 and Ohio Highway 18, transferred: Wire, bale ties, nails, staples, ferred: Under a certificate of registration serving all intermediate points and the steel fence and steel fence materials, in Docket No. MC-114391 (Sub-No. 3), off-route point of West Richfield, Ohio. pipe, sheet steel, steel ridge rolls, and covering the transportation of property, RESTRICTION: The service authorized steel rods, as a common carrier, over ir as a common carrier, in intrastate com herein shall be restricted solely to the regular routes, from Kokomo, Ind., to merce, in Certificate No. 585-G, from interchange of traffic, at terminals of points in Illinois; iron or steel bars, iron Memphis, Tenn., to the Tennessee River, connecting'line motor carriers; three or steel bars, reinforcement, with or with closed doors between Memphis and alternate routes for operating conven without accompanying bar chairs, bar Bells, Tenn., serving all intermediate ience only; general commodities, with ex spacers, bar ties, bar supports, clips points between Bells and the Tennessee ceptions as specified above, over irregu screed chairs, stirrups, tie chairs or bar River, via Tennessee Highway 1 to Bells, lar routes, between the above terminal' chairs and spacers combined, iron or Tenn., Highway 20 to A lam o, Tenn., steel cloth or fabric, and iron or steel Highway 54 to Bradford, via Tennessee and intermediate and off-route points in Highways 43 and 76 to T rezevan t or via Ohio, on the one hand, and, on the other, mesh, bar or wire, concrete or plaster reinforcement, from Kokomo, Ind., to unnumbered highway between Bradford certain points in Pennsylvania and West and Trezevant, via Tennessee Highways Virginia, between points in Cuyahoga points in Illinois (except Chicago Heights 105, 77, and 1 to the Tennessee River County, Ohio. Vendee is authorized- to and points in Chicago, 111., commercial zone as defined by the Commission); with closed doors between Bradford ana operate as a common carrier in New Trezevant, Tenn.; and Certificate wo. York, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jer and iron and steel articles, from Kokomo, Ind., to points in Kentucky. Vendee is 585-J, between Trenton, Tenn. and Brad sey, Maryland, Virginia, and the District authorized to operate as a common car ford, Tenn., over U.S. 45W via Dyer &n of Columbia. Application has not been rier in all States in the United States (ex Rutherford, and an unnumbered Stave filed for temporary authority under sec cept Alaska and Hawaii), and the Dis road from Rutherford to Bradford, serv tion 210a(b). trict of Columbia. Application has not ing all intermediate points. Vendee: No. MC-F-9113. Authority sought for been filed for temporary authority un authorized to operate as a common ca control by HIRSCHBACH MOTOR der section 210a(b). rier in the State of Tennessee. App Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6895

cation has not been filed for temporary Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, and the north of Canal Winchester, Ohio, and authority under section 210a(b). District of Columbia. Application has junction new U.S. Highway 33 and old No. MC-F-9118. Authority sought for been filed for temporary authority under U.S. Highway 33 located just south of purchase by RUSSELL BEVERLEY section 210a(b). Carroll, Ohio, serving all intermediate t r u c k i n g c o m p a n y , in c o r p o Note: Docket No. MC-84212 Sub 28 is a points. LAKE SHORE SYSTEM, INC. r a t e d , 4923 Old Midlothian Pike, Post matter directly related. holds no authority from this Commission. Office Box 8811, Richmond, Va., 23225, of Application has not been filed for tem the operating rights and property of MOTOR CARRIERS OF PASSENGERS porary authority under section 210a(b). MORTON SCHNEIDER, doing business No. MC-F-9119. Authority sought for By the Commission. as MORTON TRANSFER, Post Office control and merger by LAKE SHORE Box,21, Fourth and Maury Streets, Rich SYSTEM, INC., 714 East Broad Street, [ se a l ] B e r t h a F . A r m e s , mond, Va., and for acquisition by RUS Columbus, Ohio, 43215, of the operating Acting Secretary. SELL S. BEVERLEY, also of Post Office rights and property of (A) THE MUS [F.R. Doc. 65-5254; Filed, May 19, 1965; Box 8811, Richmond, Va., of control of KINGUM VALLEY TRANSIT COM 8:45 a.m.] such rights and property through the PANY, doing business as LAKE SHORE purchase. Applicants’ representative: SYSTEM, 714 East Broad Street, Colum Russell S., Beverley. Operatihg rights bus, Ohio, 43215, and (B) THE LAKE FOURTH SECTION APPLICATIONS sought to be transferred: General com SHORE COACH COMPANY, doing busi FOR RELIEF modities, excepting, among others, ness as LAKE SHORE SYSTEM, 714 East household goods and commodities in Broad Street., Columbus, Ohio, 43215, M ay 17,1965. bulk, as a common carrier, over irregular and for acquisition by OHIO RAPID Protests to the granting of an appli routes, between Richmond, Va., and the TRANSIT, INC., 714 East Broad Street, cation must be prepared in accordance United States Airport, approximately 4 Columbus, Ohio, 43215, and in turn by with Rule 1.40 of the general rules of miles southwest of Richmond, Va., be R. S. THOMASSON, 714 East Broad practice (49 CFR 1.40) and filed within tween Richmond, Va., and Ampthill, Va.; Street, Columbus, Ohio, 43215, of control 15 days from the date of publication of in pickup and delivery service, between of such rights and property through the this notice in the F ederal R e g is t e r . points in Richmond; serving Ampthill transaction. Applicants’ attorney and and Richmond Deep Water Terminal, representative: George C. McConnau- L o n g - and-S h o r t H a u l Va., as additional points in connection ghey, Jr., 50 West Broad Street, Colum FSA No. 39775—Liquid caustic soda with the immediately above-described bus, Ohio, and R. S. Thomasson, 714 East from LeMoyne, Ala. Filed by O. W. pickup and delivery operation at Rich Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio. Operat South, Jr., agent (No. A4687), for inter mond, Va.; between Richmond, Va., and ing rights sought to be controlled and ested rail carriers. Rates on liquid caus the Richmond General Depot, near merged: (A) Passengers and their bag tic soda, in tank carloads, from LeMoyne, Ampthill, Va.; meats, meat products, gage, and express, newspapers, and mail, Ala., to Kingsport, Tenn. meat byproducts, and dairy products as in the same vehicle with passengers, as Grounds for relief—Market competi described in Appendix I to the report in a common carrier over regular routes, be tion. Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certifi tween Columbus, Ohio, and Zanesville, Tariff—Supplement 187 to Southern cates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, in vehicles Ohio, between Columbus, Ohio, and New Freight Association, agent, tariff I.C.C. equipped for mechanical refrigeration, ark, Ohio, between Zanesville, Ohio, and S—194. from Richmond, Va., to points in Virginia Marietta, Ohio, between Pittsburgh, Pa., FSA No. 39776—Substituted service— within 65 miles thereof; candy and con and Columbus, Ohio, between Bames- D&S, et at., for Pilot Freight Carriers, fectionary, in vehicles equipped with ville, Ohio, and Morristown, Ohio, serv Inc. Filed by Southern Motor Carriers mechanical refrigeration, from Rich ing all intermediate points; passengers Rate Conference, agent (No. 112), for mond, Va., to points in Virginia, within and their baggage, and express and news interested carriers. Rates on property 65 miles of Richmond, Va.; and food papers, in the same vehicle with passen loaded in trailers and transported on stuffs, in vehicles equipped with me gers, between junction U.S. Highway 40 railroad freight cars, between Durham, chanical refrigeration, from Richmond and Ohio Highway 8, and Barnesville, Fayetteville, Hamlet, Raleigh, and Rocky and Norfolk, Va., to points in North Ohio, serving all intermediate points. Mount, N.C., and Georgetown, S.C., on Carolina on and east of U.S. Highway 1. (2) Passengers and their baggage, andthe one hand, and Baltimore, Md., Nor Vendee is authorized to operate as a express, newspapers, and mail, in the folk and Richmond, Va., Kearny, N.J., common carrier in Maryland, Virginia, same vehicle with passengers, as a com and Philadelphia, Pa., on the other, on Pennsylvania, North Carolina, South’ mon carrier, over regular routes, between traffic originating at or destined to such Carolina, New Jersey, New York, Dela Columbus, Ohio, and Jackson, Ohio, points or points beyond as described in ware, and the District of Columbia. Ap serving all intermediate points and the the application. plication has been filed for temporary off-route points of Sugar Grove and Grounds for relief—Motor-truck com authority under section 210a(b). Brice, Ohio, between Columbus, Ohio, and petition. No. MC-F-9120. Authority sought for Chillicothe, Ohio, between Circleville, Tariff—Supplement 5 to Southern Purchase by DORN’S TRANSPORTA Ohio, and junction Ohio Highway 159 Motor Carriers Rate Conference, agent, TION, INC., Railroad Avenue Extension, and U.S. Highway 23, between South tariff MF—I.C.C. 1333. Albany, N.Y., of the operating rights and Bloomfield, Ohio, and Circleville, Ohio, FSA No. 39777—Liquid caustic soda to property of NORTHEASTERN TRANS between Logan, Ohio, and Pomeroy, Ohio, La Grange, Ga. Filed by Southwestern PORTATION CO., INC., 175 Stafford between Basil, Ohio, and Buckeye Lake, Freight Bureau, agent (No. B-8725), for Street, Springfield, Mass., and for ac Ohio, between junction U.S. Highway 23 interested rail carriers. Rates on liquid quisition by FRED DORN, also of Al- and South Bloomfield-Reynoldsburg caustic soda, in tank carloads, from oany, N.Y., of control of such rights and Road, and junction Little Walnut Road points in Texas, also Baldwin, Ark., and Property through the purchase. Ap and U.S. Highway 23, between junction Lake Charles, La., to La Grange, Ga. plicants’ attorney: Irving Klein, 280 U.S. Highway 23 and Miller Road, and Grounds for relief—Market competi «roadway, New York, N.Y., 10007. Op junction Miller Road and Circleville- tion. erating rights sought to be transferred: Kingston Road, between Circleville, Ohio, Tariffs—Supplements 78, 180, and 76 naer a certificate of registration, in and junction County Highway and U.S. to Southwestern Freight Bureau, agent, docket No. MC-121444 Sub 1, covering Highway 22 (at a point north of Stouts- tariffs I.C.C. 4529, 4450, and 4534, tne transportation of general commodi- ville, Ohio), between junction U.S. High respectively. ies, as a common carrier, in intrastate way 33 and Ohio Highway 796, north of By the Commission. ommerce, within the State of Massa- Rockbridge, Ohio, and junction U.S. usetts. Vendee is authorized to oper- Highway 33 and Ohio Highway 796, south [ s e a l ] B er t h a F . A r m e s , as a common carrier in New York, of Rockbridge, Ohio, between junction Acting Secretary. onnecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, old U.S. Highway 33 and new U.S. High [F.R. Doc. 65-5302; Filed, May 19, 1965; unsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, way 33, located approximately 1.5 miles 8:48 a.m.] No. 97— 1-9 6896 NOTICES

[Notice 1176] north of U.S. Highway 322, to ports of to Nicholas C. Conteas, doing business MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER ontry on the United States-Canada as California Auto Transport, Santa Fe boundary line at or near Buffalo, N.Y.; Springs, Calif., authorizing transporta PROCEEDINGS and cement, in bulk, in dump vehicles, tion in interstate or foreign commerce May 17,1965. from ports of entry on the United States- corresponding in scope to the service au Synopses of orders entered pursuant Canada boundary line at or near Buffalo, thorized by Certificate of Public Con to section 212(b) of the Interstate Com N.Y., to Saint Marys, Bradford, Kane, venience and Necessity granted in De merce Act, and rules and regulations pre Warren, Tionesta, and Erie, Pa. Miss cision No. 45990, dated July 24, 1951, as scribed thereunder (49 CFR Part 179), Wilhelmina Boersma, 2850 Penobscot amended and transferred in Decision appear below: Building, Detroit, Mich., 48226, attorney No. 47925, and No. 64662, dated Decem As provided in the Commission’s spe for applicants. ber 18, 1962, issued by the Public Utilities cial rules of practice any interested No. MC-FC-67671. By order of May Commission of the State of California. person may file a petition seeking recon 13, 1965, the Transfer Board approved Ivan McWhinney, 639 South Spring sideration of the following numbered the transfer to Eugene Cramphin, Eaton, Street, Los Angeles, Calif., 90014, attor proceedings within 20 days from the date N.Y., of the operating rights in Certifi ney for applicants. of publication of this notice. Pursuant cate No. MC-2766, issued June 23, 1958, No. MC-PC-67791. By order of May to section 17(8) of the Interstate Com to Mahlon E. Koslow, doing business as 13, 1965, the Transfer Board approved merce Act, the filing of such a petition Bartlett Motor Express, 411 West Belden the transfer to Atwood Truck Line, Inc,, will postpone the effective date of the Avenue, Syracuse, N.Y., authorizing the Fort Morgan, Colo., of Certificates Nos order in that proceeding pending its transportation, over regular routes, of MC-5267, MC-5267 (Sub-No. 8), MC- disposition. The matters relied upon by general commodities, excluding house 5267 (Sub-No. 9), MC-5267 (Sub-No. 11), petitioners must be specified in their hold goods, commodities in bulk, and and MC-5267 (Sub-No. 13), issued July petitions with particularity. other specified commodities, between 16, 1954, May 11, 1964, March 10, 1959, No. MC-FC-67208. By order of May Syracuse, N.Y., and Cazenovia, N.Y. April 8, 1960, and December 3, 1959, to 13, 1965, the Transfer Board approved No. MC-PC-67672. By order of May William R. Brumfield and Olivet Atwood on reconsideration, the transfer to A. C. 13, 1965, the Transfer Board approved Brumfield, a partnership, doing business Miller Trucking Co., Ltd., Rodney, On the transfer to Grace Lee Corbett, doing as Atwood Truck Line, Fort Morgan, tario, Canada, of Permits Nos. MC-115952 business as R. A. Corbett Transport, Colo., over irregular routes, of farm ma and MC-115952 (Sub-No. 1), and Certifi Lufkin, Tex., of the operating rights in chinery, feed, potatoes, livestock, aggre cate No. MC-124077 (Sub-No. 1), issued Certificates Nos. MC-105387 (Sub-No. 5), gates, cement, irrigating pipe, machin February 12, 1957, February 3, 1959, and MC-105387 (Sub-No. 18), MC-105387 ery, equipment, materials and supplies September 18,1963, respectively, to A. C. (Sub-No. 19), and MC-105387 (Sub-No. used in, or in connection with, the in Miller, Rodney, Ontario, Canada, author 22), issued May 25, 1948, January 23, stallation or construction of irrigating izing the transportation as a contract 1950, May 18, 1950, and March 12, 1953, pipe systems, limestone, limestone prod carrier of rough lumber from points in respectively, to R. A. Corbett, doing busi ucts, and limestone byproducts, in bulk, Michigan, except Detroit and points in ness as R. A. Corbett Transport, Lufkin, cement products, between, from, and to, the Detroit commercial zone, to ports of Tex., authorizing the transportation of and between points and areas, in the entry on the United States-Canada petroleum products, in bulk, in tank States of Iowa, Nebraska, Colorado, and boundary line near Detroit and Port trucks, over irregular routes, from and Wyoming, varying with the commodities Huron; from specified points in Pennsyl to specified points in Texas and Louisi transported. Alvin J. Meiklejohn, Jr., vania, Ohio, Indiana, New York, West ana, petroleum products, in bulk, in 420 Denver Club Building, Denver, Colo., Virginia, and Louisville, Ky., to ports of tank vehicles, over irregular routes, from 80202, attorney for applicants. entry on the United States-Canada specified points in Texas to specified No. MC-FC-67809. By order of May boundary line near Detroit, Port Huron, points in Arkansas and Louisiana, petro 12, 1965, the Transfer Board approved and Buffalo, restricted to the pickup leum products, in bulk, in tank vehicles, the transfer to Grafton-Milwaukee of shipment originating at points not over irregular routes, from specified Transportation Line, Inc., Grafton, Wis., served by rail; lumber, between ports of points in Texas to specified point? in of the certificate in No. MC-85247, issued entry on the United States-Canada Texas and Louisiana, and lacquer thin March 13, 1942, to Fred W. Port, doing boundary line at or near Detroit and Port ner, in bulk, in tank vehicles, over ir business as Grafton-Milwaukee Trans Huron, Mich., and Buffalo, N.Y., on the regular routes, from Houston, to Shreve portation Line, Grafton, Wis., authoriz one hand, and, on the other; points in port, New Orleans, and Baton Rouge, La., ing the transportation of: General com New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, El Dorado, and Hope, Ark., Wichita, modities, excluding household goods, and Louisville, Ky.; from the ports of Kans., Tulsa, Okla., Kansas City, Mo., commodities in bulk, and other specified entry on the United States-Canada Memphis, Tenn., and Birmingham, Ala. commodities, between Grafton, Wis., and boundary line at or near Detroit and Port Ewell H. Muse, Jr., 415 Perry Brooks Milwaukee, Wis., serving specified inter Huron, Mich., to points in Michigan (ex Building, Austin, Tex., 78701, attorney mediate points. Richard C. Bonner, cept Detroit, Mich., and points in the for applicants. 1211 Bridge Street, Grafton, Wis., attor Detroit, Mich., commercial zone, as de No. MC-FC-67734. By order of May ney for applicants. fined by the Commission); and as a com 13, 1965, the Transfer Board approved mon carrier of coal, in bulk, in dump ve the transfer to Complete Auto Transport, [ s e a l ] B er t h a F. A r m e s , hicles, from points in Elk County, Pa., a corporation, Santa Fe Springs, Calif., Acting Secretary. on and west of U.S. Highway 219, and of Certificate of Registration in No. MC- [F.R. Doc. 65-5303; Filed, May "19, 1965; points in Clarion County, Pa., on and 96915 (Sub-No. 1), issued May 7, 1965, 8:48 a.m.] Thursday, May 20, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 6897

CUMULATIVE LIST OF CFR PARTS AFFECTED— MAY

The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during May.

3 CFR Page 7 CFR—Continued page 14 CFR—Continued Page Proclamations: 864______i ______6248 97______6151, 6329, 6714, 6839 1713 (superseded in part by 905______6638, 6770 99______6242 Proc. 3656)______U*- 6571 908 ______6148,6429, 6681, 6771 121______- ______6432, 6725 3172 (superseded by Proc. 909 ______6430 127-__ _;______6432 3655)— —____ i__ — 6467 910 ______6148, 6430, 6479, 6681, 6712 P r o po se d R u l e s : 3399 (superseded by Proc. 918______6431, 6858 39______—______.— 6188, 6274 3655)______6467 944___ — ______6638 67 — ___ .______6188 3655---- r— 6467 965______6338 71______6189, 3656— —______— ______— 6571 970______6479 6225,6397,6399,6400,6402,6443, 3657— ______- 6835 1002______6639 6588, 6589, 6735, 6736, 6793-6795, Executive O r d e r : 1138— ___ 6573 6872. Apr. 19, 1892 (revoked in part 1421______6338, 6511, 6681 73______6402, 6444, 6736 by PLO 3656)______6437 1468—______6383 75— ___ - ______6443 823 (see EO 11220)______—_ 6425 1472______6383 91______6541 10530 (revoked in part by EO 1483______6771 129______6541 11222)______6469 1487 __ 6639 399______6650 10784 (superseded by 1488 ______6249 EO 11223)______— _ 6635 1602______—______6859 15 CFR 201______6748 10845 (superseded by P roposed R u les: EO 11223)______6635 28______6255 16 CFR 10939 (revoked by EO 11222) — 6469 31___ 6350 P r o po se d R u l e s : 11071 (superseded in part by 33______6782 303______6275 EO 11224)______—— 6679 51___ 6658 11125 (revoked by EO 11222)_ 6469 70____ — ______6395 17 CFR 11126 (amended by EO 11221) - 6427 777______6686 240—______6642 11219 ___ ï.______6381 Ch. IX—______6355,6438,6523 18 CFR 11220 ______6425 930______,______6255 157____ 6518 11221 ______-______6427 993__ 6782 11222 ______6469 1008______6659 19 CFR 11223 ______6635 1040— ______6163 10— ______6149 11224 __ 6679 1042______6163 P r o po se d R u l e s : Presidential D o c u m e n t s O t h e r 1097____ 6534 13_____—______6686 T han P roclamations and E x e c u 1102______a.______6534 tive O r d er s: 1108______;______6534 21 CFR Memorandum of July 20, 1961 1138______... 6538 121------6215, (revoked by EO 11222)___ . 6469 6339, 6389, 6433, 6477, 6478, 6579, Memorandum of May 2, 1963 8 CFR 6643, 6732, 6837. (revoked by EO 11222)_ 6469 214------_____ 6479 133------i______6475 4 CFR 231----- — _____ 6776 144______6389 251_------6776 P r o po se d R u l e s : 52______6429 8______6490, 6733-6735 5 CFR 9 CFR 121______6588, 6689 318----- 6731 213-...... —---6215, 141a___ *______6795 6241, 6337, 6478, 6637, 6765, 6857 P roposed R ules : 332------6337 201______6360 25 CFR 131------'______6579 591...... I ------— ____ 6511 10 CFR P r o po se d R u l e s : 6 CFR 30------6575 1------6438 73_____. 6573 12 CFR 221------6523 7 CFR 12------6160 26 CFR 28,__ ------6637 204------______6339 1------6216, 6340, 6480 29______6573 206------6731 170------6769 51— _ —_____ 6711 561_.------6517 250------6217 54.______6207 P roposed R u l es: ~ P r o po se d R u l e s : 55 ______6141, 6207 261------6275 1------6222, 6349, 6486, 6488 56 ______6207 262______6275 31------6222 58.__ 563------6544 301------6222 70______6637 81.__" ______6207 13 CFR 29 CFR ______6207 210— 121------___. 6778 ____ 6207, 6479 50------6249 301. 6243,6245, 6770 14 CFR 604------6218 354______6429 606------6218 362_ 39—----- 6150, 6431, 6577, 6639, 6640, 6837 690------6482 707. ------6857 61------6577 ______6246 71------,------6150, P r o po se d R u l e s : 717. 657------6224 719.. ______6144 6215, 6241, 6384-6387, 6478, 6577------6511 6579, 6640-6642, 6682, 6765, 6838 697------6225 722. 1501 ------6397 724. ------6712 73------6242, 6387, 6388 6144, 6146, 6207 75------6150, 6241, 6242, 6432, 6642 1502 ------6397 842. 1503 ------6397 862. ______6338 77------6713 863. ______6247 91—------6388 32 CFR ______6248 95------6766 163------6161 6898 FEDERAL REGISTER

32 CFR—Continued Page 38 CFR—Continued Page 43 CFR— Continued Page 175______6682 3— „ ______6649 P u b l ic L and O rders— Continued 180______6682 14______6392 36 57------:------6586 516______6341 815______j______6343 39 CFR 45 CFR 130------6393 882______6343 4______— 6436 33 CFR 36______— ______6436 46 CFR 80______1 ______6433 37 ____ 6436 25------1...... 6517 82____ 6434 43__ 6436 137------6713 86__ 6434 47 CFR 95______643441 CFR 1-3— ______6581 0------— ...... 6250,6778 135-______6434 1_------6778,6780 203 ______6161, 6388 5-60______„______6837 2 ------6219,6388 204 ______6043 9-1______6483, 6519 15------6250 205 ______.I. 6644 9-3______— 6683 25------6862 207______6161,9-4______6644 6519 73------:------6251, 6519, 6520,6869 401______6580 9-6— ______6519 9-7______-______6519 83------6778 36 CFR 9-8— ______6585 P r o po se d R u l e s : 2______6682 9-9______6684 . 2------6226 7______6861 9-54______6684 15------__ 6541,6689 211______6345 101-5______6684 73______,6274, 6275, 6543, 6590,6651 311______— 6161 101-44— 4 9 CFR 502_____ 6482 ______6649 l— 6485 37 CFR 42 CFR 95_ 6220 1______6391, 6644P r o po se d R u l e s : 97_ 6394 3______6644 73-..... 6795 141 6162 P r o po sed R u l e s : 50 CFR 2------6687 43 CFR 26______„ ...... 6587 4______6687 P u b l ic L and O r d e r s : 33______6344, 6521,6587,6871 38 CFR 3638______6585 60______— ______6149 1______- 6435 3655— ______6392 P r o po se d R u l e s 2 ______6392 3656- .,______-___ 6437 32______6224

Know Your Government The United States Government Organization Manual is the official guide to the functions of the Federal Government. $ f-7 5 JL per copy. Popes bound, with charts

Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402