EXILE in HOMERIC EPIC by Timothy Peter John Perry a Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EXILE in HOMERIC EPIC by Timothy Peter John Perry a Thesis EXILE IN HOMERIC EPIC by Timothy Peter John Perry A thesis in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Classics University of Toronto © Copyright by Timothy Perry 2010 Exile in Homeric Epic Timothy Peter John Perry Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Classics University of Toronto 2010 ABSTRACT This dissertation examines exile in Homeric epic and in particular the relationship between exile as a narrative motif and the thematic significance of exile in specific contexts. The Homeric exile motif is defined and found to include four stock elements involving the causes of exile, the role of compulsion in exile, the permanence of exile, and the possible outcomes of exile. The more thematic issues surrounding exile are also considered, especially in the light of ancient and modern theoretical discussions of exile. Three examples of exile in the Iliad and the Odyssey are then analyzed. In each case, close attention is paid to the way in which the exile narrative fits into the immediate context and is thematically relevant to it. The exile narrative delivered by Phoenix to Achilles in Iliad 9 is interpreted as an attempt to dissuade Achilles from carrying out his threat to abandon the expedition against Troy. More precisely, it is argued that Phoenix uses the parallels between his own exile and the situation facing Achilles to suggest that in abandoning the expedition Achilles would become something close to an exile himself, thereby compromising his heroic standing. It is argued that the ghost of the unburied Patroclus uses his exile narrative to Achilles in Iliad 23 to present his experience of death as a parallel to his experience of exile in life and does so in order to persuade Achilles to ii provide him with ‘hospitality’ in the form of burial, just as Achilles’ family provided Patroclus with hospitality as an exile. Finally, the false exile narrative delivered by Odysseus to Athena (disguised as a shepherd) in Odyssey 13 is interpreted as a reaction to Odysseus’ uncertainty as to whether or not he has reached Ithaca. It is argued that Odysseus uses his exile narrative to contrast the possibility that he is finally home with the possibility that he is still a nameless wanderer. The exile motif is found to be flexible enough to be adapted to the thematic requirements of the contexts in which these three exile narratives occur. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis could not have been written without the help of a large number of people. I gladly take the opportunity to express my deep gratitude to my supervisor Professor Jonathan Burgess, without whose enthusiasm and insight at every stage the completion of this project would have been impossible. Professors Martin Revermann and Victoria Wohl, as members of my committee, improved the thesis in innumerable ways, big and small, and have constantly challenged me to push my thinking in profitable new directions. I also thank Professor Erwin Cook, my external examiner, for his careful reading of the final draft and his many interesting and useful comments. I must also thank the many friends with whom I shared life as a graduate student. Special thanks go to Vicki Ciocani, Jody Cundy, Carl Hope, George Kovacs, Kathryn Mattison, Laura Mawhinney, Cillian O’Hogan, Lee Sawchuk, Eirene Seiradaki, and Donald Sells, whose capacity to encourage and distract at just the right moments has proved indispensable. To the former residents of Manning House I also owe a great debt of gratitude, especially for the many conversations, by turns stimulating and ridiculous. My parents, my brother George, and my sister Diana have been a constant source of guidance and inspiration throughout my doctoral studies, and their support (although form afar) has made all the difference. Finally, it is impossible adequately to express all that I owe to Mariapia Pietropaolo, who has made an incalculable contribution to this project from its earliest stages to its final completion. Her encouragement and patience have been both unwavering and boundless. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Exile in Homeric Epic 1 The Exile Motif 2 The Causes of Exile – Homicide and Dispute 6 Compulsion 10 Permanence 18 Dependence – Integration and Wandering 19 Theoretical Perspectives 29 Exile and Home 30 Exile and Identity 37 The Ambiguity of Exile 40 Methodology 44 CHAPTER ONE – PHOENIX Introduction 46 Achilles and Heroism 48 Phoenix and Achilles in Exile 53 Levels of Narrative 61 The Home of Achilles 64 Achilles’ Response to Phoenix 68 Conclusion 71 CHAPTER TWO – PATROCLUS Introduction 73 Achilles’ Forgetfulness 75 Patroclus’ Appeal to Emotion 76 Patroclus’ Death as Exile 82 Achilles as a Dead-Man-Walking 89 Levels of Narrative 96 Achilles’ Response to Patroclus 100 Conclusion 102 CHAPTER THREE – ODYSSEUS Introduction 104 All ‘Cretans’ are Liars 104 Odysseus’ Uncertain νόστος 107 Odysseus’ Exile Narrative as a Soliloquy 113 Odysseus’ Claim to Exilic Status 126 Levels of Narrative 133 Athena’s Response to Odysseus 138 Conclusion 143 v CONCLUSION 144 APPENDIX A – Cases of Exile in the Iliad and the Odyssey 152 APPENDIX B – The Liminal Status of the Unburied Dead 154 BIBLIOGRAPHY 158 vi INTRODUCTION Exile in Homeric Epic Exile, as Seneca so succinctly puts it, is simply a loci commutatio, a ‘change of place’ (ad Helviam 6.1).1 Seneca is well aware, however, that his definition runs the risk of ‘narrowing the force’ (angustare…vim, ad Helviam 6.1) of exile, for this change of place at times turns out to be surprisingly complex. Both the simplicity and complexity of exile are on full display in Homeric epic. Sometimes exile is indeed nothing more than a simple explanation for an individual’s change of place. On a number of occasions, however, exile is given a greater significance – a significance that goes beyond the purely spatial – and becomes something more: a powerful tool of persuasion (or dissuasion), a metaphor, or even a temptation. Despite exile’s potential for complexity – not to mention its versatility – it is a theme that has been largely ignored in the scholarship on Homeric epic. Perhaps this is because none of the major protagonists of the Iliad and the Odyssey – Agamemnon, Achilles, Hector, Odysseus, Telemachus etc. – is an exile. And yet, exile is never far away in Homeric epic. In the Iliad, Achilles in particular seems to be surrounded by exiles and, significantly, to attract tales of exile; three exiles in the house of Achilles’ father Peleus – Phoenix, Patroclus, and the more minor figure Epeigeus – are members of the contingent led by Achilles at Troy, and Phoenix and Patroclus both relate their experiences of exile to Achilles in the course of the poem. Moreover, in a famous simile 1 For all quotations from ancient authors I have used the most recent OCT edition, unless otherwise noted. All translations are my own. 1 2 the Trojan king Priam is compared to an exile when he enters Achilles’ hut seeking the return of the body of his son Hector. In the Odyssey, Odysseus himself falsely claims to be an exile at one point and Telemachus is accompanied by the exile Theoclymenus when he returns to Ithaca from the mainland. And these are only the most prominent examples of exile in the Iliad and the Odyssey – there is, in addition, a number of more minor cases of exile in each poem. The thematic significance of three of the most important instances of exile in Homeric epic – the exile narratives of Phoenix, Patroclus, and Odysseus – will be analyzed in detail in the later chapters of this dissertation. First, however, it will be necessary in this introductory chapter to provide a foundation for such an analysis by clarifying what is meant by exile in Homeric epic and by discussing some of the broader conceptual issues surrounding exile, especially as they relate to the Iliad and the Odyssey. The Exile Motif Our first task, then, is to ascertain exactly what is meant by exile, for as Forsdyke points out, “exile has many forms.”2 On the one hand, it can be defined in terms of its cause, which allows for distinctions to be made between, for example, “political exile, religious exile, judicial exile, economic exile.” On the other hand, it can be defined in terms of its result, in which case it ranges from exile in a strict sense as “physical separation from the place where one previously lived” to “‘internal exile,’ in which an individual or group is removed from the immediate surroundings but not expelled from the country altogether,” 2 Forsdyke (2005) 7; the quotations in this paragraph are all from Forsdyke’s discussion of the types of exile at Forsdyke (2005) 7-8. 3 and even “‘inner exile’ as a way of describing the alienation of a writer or artist from his native community.” Fortunately, the causes and results of exile in the Iliad and the Odyssey are not hard to identify, though they may be complicated. This is because exile in Homeric epic takes the form of a distinct motif – a fixed and recurring narrative sequence. Many critics have noted the existence of the exile motif in Homeric epic. Janko, for example, describes exile as a “traditional topos,”3 and both he and Richardson refer to it as a “common motif.”4 In a similar vein, Hoekstra speaks of exile as “a frequent theme in Homer.”5 This list of passing references could easily be extended. Somewhat surprisingly, however, no real attempt has been made to provide a comprehensive analysis of the structure of the motif. The few, brief studies that focus on Homeric exile seem to take its status as a motif for granted and make little effort to describe it or define its parameters.
Recommended publications
  • The Hellenic Saga Gaia (Earth)
    The Hellenic Saga Gaia (Earth) Uranus (Heaven) Oceanus = Tethys Iapetus (Titan) = Clymene Themis Atlas Menoetius Prometheus Epimetheus = Pandora Prometheus • “Prometheus made humans out of earth and water, and he also gave them fire…” (Apollodorus Library 1.7.1) • … “and scatter-brained Epimetheus from the first was a mischief to men who eat bread; for it was he who first took of Zeus the woman, the maiden whom he had formed” (Hesiod Theogony ca. 509) Prometheus and Zeus • Zeus concealed the secret of life • Trick of the meat and fat • Zeus concealed fire • Prometheus stole it and gave it to man • Freidrich H. Fuger, 1751 - 1818 • Zeus ordered the creation of Pandora • Zeus chained Prometheus to a mountain • The accounts here are many and confused Maxfield Parish Prometheus 1919 Prometheus Chained Dirck van Baburen 1594 - 1624 Prometheus Nicolas-Sébastien Adam 1705 - 1778 Frankenstein: The Modern Prometheus • Novel by Mary Shelly • First published in 1818. • The first true Science Fiction novel • Victor Frankenstein is Prometheus • As with the story of Prometheus, the novel asks about cause and effect, and about responsibility. • Is man accountable for his creations? • Is God? • Are there moral, ethical constraints on man’s creative urges? Mary Shelly • “I saw the pale student of unhallowed arts kneeling beside the thing he had put together. I saw the hideous phantasm of a man stretched out, and then, on the working of some powerful engine, show signs of life, and stir with an uneasy, half vital motion. Frightful must it be; for supremely frightful would be the effect of any human endeavour to mock the stupendous mechanism of the Creator of the world” (Introduction to the 1831 edition) Did I request thee, from my clay To mould me man? Did I solicit thee From darkness to promote me? John Milton, Paradise Lost 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Sons and Fathers in the Catalogue of Argonauts in Apollonius Argonautica 1.23-233
    Sons and fathers in the catalogue of Argonauts in Apollonius Argonautica 1.23-233 ANNETTE HARDER University of Groningen [email protected] 1. Generations of heroes The Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius brings emphatically to the attention of its readers the distinction between the generation of the Argonauts and the heroes of the Trojan War in the next genera- tion. Apollonius initially highlights this emphasis in the episode of the Argonauts’ departure, when the baby Achilles is watching them, at AR 1.557-5581 σὺν καί οἱ (sc. Chiron) παράκοιτις ἐπωλένιον φορέουσα | Πηλείδην Ἀχιλῆα, φίλωι δειδίσκετο πατρί (“and with him his wife, hold- ing Peleus’ son Achilles in her arms, showed him to his dear father”)2; he does so again in 4.866-879, which describes Thetis and Achilles as a baby. Accordingly, several scholars have focused on the ways in which 1 — On this marker of the generations see also Klooster 2014, 527. 2 — All translations of Apollonius are by Race 2008. EuGeStA - n°9 - 2019 2 ANNETTE HARDER Apollonius has avoided anachronisms by carefully distinguishing between the Argonauts and the heroes of the Trojan War3. More specifically Jacqueline Klooster (2014, 521-530), in discussing the treatment of time in the Argonautica, distinguishes four periods of time to which Apollonius refers: first, the time before the Argo sailed, from the beginning of the cosmos (featured in the song of Orpheus in AR 1.496-511); second, the time of its sailing (i.e. the time of the epic’s setting); third, the past after the Argo sailed and fourth the present inhab- ited by the narrator (both hinted at by numerous allusions and aitia).
    [Show full text]
  • The Marriage of Peleus & Thetis
    The Marriage of Peleus & Thetis [Groton & May, Chapter 18] Peleus Thetis m. was a mortal man, the son was a sea nymph, one of of Endeis and Aeacus, king the fifty daughters of of Aegina. As a young Nereus, termed Nereids, Achilles man, Peleus and his described by Homer as, brother, Telemon were “silver-footed.” involved in the murder of their half-brother, Phocus. In exile, he married Antigone, then accidentally killed her father, Eurytion. After Antigone killed herself, Peleus again went into exile Portrait of Achilles from a Greek Black-figure vase, c. 530 BC where he met his next wife. The Nuptials The wedding was planned by Zeus (Jupiter) himself and took place on Mt. Pelion. Mortals and immortals alike were invited and all were required to bring gifts. Poseidon (Neptune) gave Peleus a pair of immortal horses, named Balius & Xanthus. The wedding is described by the Greek playwright, Euripides, in “Iphigenia at Aulis” and by the Latin poet, Catullus in poem 64. Discordia [Greek, Ερισ] The goddess of discord and the personification of strife, Discord was the only immortal not invited to the wedding of Peleus and Thetis. Angered, she threw out a golden apple inscribed with the words, “For the Fairest.” Three goddesses, Hera (Juno), Aphrodite (Venus), and Athena (Minerva), immediately begin to quarrel over the apple. Jupiter handed the decision over to the Trojan, Paris, who awards the apple to Aphrodite. Venus in turn offers him the golden apple Helen, wife of Menelaus, King of Sparta. created by Jessica Fisher, 2007 .
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Penelope and Molly: an Intertextual Analysis
    Reading Penelope and Molly: An Intertextual Analysis A thesis submitted to the Miami University Honors Program in partial fulfillment of the requirements for University Honors By Michelle L. Mitchell May 2004 Oxford, OH ii Abstract Reading Penelope and Molly: An Intertextual Analysis by Michelle L. Mitchell This thesis takes an intertextual approach to Homer’s Odyssey and James Joyce’s Ulysses. Intertextual analysis goes beyond examining the ways Joyce adopts Homer’s themes and characters in his own modern epic to also consider the ways in which a reading of Ulysses can affect one’s understanding of the Odyssey. Examining the reader’s role in the production and consumption of texts allows for a more realistic examination of how texts are actually processed. The focus of my interetextual analysis of both works is on the representation of women, particularly Penelope and Molly Bloom. iii iv An Intertextual Analysis of the Representations of Women in Homer’s Odyssey and Joyce’s Ulysses by Michelle L. Mitchell Approved by: _____________________________________, Advisor Judith de Luce _____________________________________, Reader Madelyn Detloff _____________________________________, Reader Kathleen Johnson Accepted by: _____________________________________, Director, University Honors Program v vi Acknowledgements Many thanks to my advisor, Judith de Luce, for her encouragement and guidance. Thanks also to Madelyn Detloff and Kathleen Johnson, my readers, for their suggestions. I would also like to thank the Office for the Advancement of
    [Show full text]
  • Penelope, Odysseus, and the Teleologies of the Odyssey
    Putting an End to Song: Penelope, Odysseus, and the Teleologies of the Odyssey Emily Hauser Helios, Volume 47, Number 1, Spring 2020, pp. 39-69 (Article) Published by Texas Tech University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hel.2020.0001 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/765967 [ Access provided at 28 Dec 2020 07:35 GMT from University of Washington @ Seattle ] Putting an End to Song: Penelope, Odysseus, and the Teleologies of the Odyssey EMILY HAUSER Abstract Book 1 of the Odyssey presents us with the first bard-figure of the poem, singing what in many ways is an analogue to the Odyssey with “the return of the Greeks”; yet when Penelope appears, it is to attempt to put an end to his song. I use this scene as a starting point to suggest that Penelope is deeply implicated in narrative endings in the Odyssey. Looking at the end or τέλος of the poem through a system- atic study of its “closural allusions,” I argue that a teleological analysis of Penelope’s character in relation to endings may both resolve some of the issues in her inter- pretation thus far, and open up new avenues for the reading of the Odyssey as a poem informed by endings. I. Introduction Penelope’s first appearance in the Odyssey (1.325–144) is to make a request of Phe- mius the bard, who is singing the tale of the Greeks’ return from Troy, the Ἀχαιῶν νόστος (1.326). Phemius’s song of the Greek νόστος (return), of course, mirrors the plot of the Odyssey itself, which has opened only a few hundred lines before with the plea to the Muse to sing of Odysseus and his companions’ return (νόστος, 1.5) from Troy.1 Penelope, however, interrupts the narrative flow and asks the bard to cease singing because of the pain his tale is causing her (1.340–342): ‘ταύτης δ᾽ ἀποπαύε᾽ ἀοιδῆς λυγρῆς, ἥ τέ μοι αἰεὶ ἐνὶ στήθεσσι φίλον κῆρ τείρει .
    [Show full text]
  • Pausanias' Description of Greece
    BONN'S CLASSICAL LIBRARY. PAUSANIAS' DESCRIPTION OF GREECE. PAUSANIAS' TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH \VITTI NOTES AXD IXDEX BY ARTHUR RICHARD SHILLETO, M.A., Soiiii'tinie Scholar of Trinity L'olltge, Cambridge. VOLUME IT. " ni <le Fnusnnias cst un homme (jui ne mnnquo ni de bon sens inoins a st-s tlioux." hnniie t'oi. inais i}iii rn>it ou au voudrait croire ( 'HAMTAiiNT. : ftEOROE BELL AND SONS. YOUK STIIKKT. COVKNT (iAKDKX. 188t). CHISWICK PRESS \ C. WHITTINGHAM AND CO., TOOKS COURT, CHANCEKV LANE. fA LC >. iV \Q V.2- CONTEXTS. PAGE Book VII. ACHAIA 1 VIII. ARCADIA .61 IX. BtEOTIA 151 -'19 X. PHOCIS . ERRATA. " " " Volume I. Page 8, line 37, for Atte read Attes." As vii. 17. 2<i. (Catullus' Aft is.) ' " Page 150, line '22, for Auxesias" read Anxesia." A.-> ii. 32. " " Page 165, lines 12, 17, 24, for Philhammon read " Philanimon.'' " " '' Page 191, line 4, for Tamagra read Tanagra." " " Pa ire 215, linu 35, for Ye now enter" read Enter ye now." ' " li I'aijf -J27, line 5, for the Little Iliad read The Little Iliad.'- " " " Page ^S9, line 18, for the Babylonians read Babylon.'' " 7 ' Volume II. Page 61, last line, for earth' read Earth." " Page 1)5, line 9, tor "Can-lira'" read Camirus." ' ; " " v 1'age 1 69, line 1 , for and read for. line 2, for "other kinds of flutes "read "other thites.'' ;< " " Page 201, line 9. for Lacenian read Laeonian." " " " line 10, for Chilon read Cliilo." As iii. 1H. Pago 264, " " ' Page 2G8, Note, for I iad read Iliad." PAUSANIAS. BOOK VII. ACIIAIA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arms of Achilles: Re-Exchange in the Iliad
    The Arms of Achilles: Re-Exchange in the Iliad by Eirene Seiradaki A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Classics University of Toronto © Copyright by Eirene Seiradaki (2014) “The Arms of Achilles: Re-Exchange in the Iliad ” Eirene Seiradaki Doctor of Philosophy Department of Classics University of Toronto 2014 Abstract This dissertation offers an interpretation of the re-exchange of the first set of Achilles’ arms in the Iliad by gift, loan, capture, and re-capture. Each transfer of the arms is examined in relation to the poem’s dramatic action, characterisation, and representation of social institutions and ethical values. Modern anthropological and economic approaches are employed in order to elucidate standard elements surrounding certain types of exchange. Nevertheless, the study primarily involves textual analysis of the Iliadic narratives recounting the circulation-process of Achilles’ arms, with frequent reference to the general context of Homeric exchange and re-exchange. The origin of the armour as a wedding gift to Peleus for his marriage to Thetis and its consequent bequest to Achilles signifies it as the hero’s inalienable possession and marks it as the symbol of his fate in the Iliad . Similarly to the armour, the spear, a gift of Cheiron to Peleus, is later inherited by his son. Achilles’ own bond to Cheiron makes this weapon another inalienable possession of the hero. As the centaur’s legacy to his pupil, the spear symbolises Achilles’ awareness of his coming death. In the present time of the Iliad , ii Achilles lends his armour to Patroclus under conditions that indicate his continuing ownership over his panoply and ensure the safe use of the divine weapons by his friend.
    [Show full text]
  • Pelops Hippodamia Pelops Pelops Hippodamia Zeus
    Tantalus = X Œnomaüs = Y Niobe Pelops = Hippodamia Chrysippus Lydia Pisa Mycenæ & Argos Peloponnese Hippodamia Pelops Hippodamia Pelops Pelops Hippodamia Zeus Œnomaüs Temple of Zeus, Olympia Tantalus = X Œnomaüs = Y Niobe Pelops = Hippodamia Pittheus Chysippus Atreus Thyestes Thebes Pisa Mycenæ & Argos Peloponnese Atreus vs Thyestes Sign 1: Golden Fleece Aëropē Sign 2: The Sun Delphic Oracle: Must beget child by own daughter, Pelopia Atreus = Aëropē Thyestes = X Pelopia Agamemnon Menelaus Ægisthus Mycenæ & Argos Sparta Recognition token: sword Leda wife of Tyndareus Leda Icarius Tyndareus = Leda Zeus Penelope Clytemnestra Castor Helen Polydeuces Clytemnestra = Agamemnon Helen = Menelaus Clytemnestra = Agamemnon Helen = Menelaus Iphigenia Orestes Electra Hermione Mycenæ / Argos Sparta Castor and Polydeuces Helen’s Suitors Oath of Tyndareus devised by Odysseus Winner: Menelaus Æacus = X (Ægina) Thetis = Peleus Telamon Phocus Achilles Telamonian Ajax (“The Greater”) (Phthia) (Salamis) Myrmidons = ant-men Phthia Salamis Ægina Peleus Thetis Eris Wedding of Peleus and Thetis Judgment of Paris Judgment of Paris Etruscan mirror Uni = Juno = Hera Menrfa = Minerva = Athena Turan = Venus = Aphrodite Georges Dumézil idéologie tripartite (three-part ideology) Sovereignty Kings Sanctity Hera Priests Law Warriors Military Power Athena Economy Peasants Fertility Aphrodite Production Priam = Hecuba Paris Hector many many (Alexander) (50+) (10+) other daughters sons Heinrich Schliemann discovered Troy (Wilusa) 1871 wife in “Helen’s Jewels” Where’s Odysseus? Odysseus = Penelope Telemachus Prophecy: Troy will not fall until/unless Achilles fights for the Greeks. Peleus = Thetis Achilles Achilles and Chiron Prophecy: Troy will not fall until/unless Achilles fights for the Greeks. Achilles on Scyros If I remain here, attacking city of the mighty Trojans, I lose my nostos, but I will have undying kleos.
    [Show full text]
  • Inspiration and Τέχνη: Divination in Plato's
    AARON LANDRY | 85 Inspiration INTRODUCTION and Τέχνη: In Plato’s Ion, inspiration functions in con- Divination in tradistinction to technē.1 Since Ion’s rhapso- dic expertise does not stand up to Socrates’ Plato’s Ion epistemological critique, his performances of Homer cannot stem from knowledge, but from elsewhere, from divine inspiration. The two are presented as a strict disjunction. Yet in both cases there is an appeal to divination. If rhapsody, and poetry by extension, cannot synthesize the two, why does Socrates seem 2 Aaron Landry to think that divination can? This puzzle has Humber College caused quite a bit of consternation about the 3 [email protected] value and subject matter of the dialogue. In particular, it is unclear what Socrates thinks about the nature of poetic and rhapsodic ins- piration. In this essay, I will argue that divi- nation constitutes an alternate, and improved, framework for Ion to model his expertise on. By clarifying the role and scope of divination in the Ion, I aim to show that Socrates’ disjunctive account – inspiration or technē – can actually be integrated. In so doing, I argue that there are in fact positive philosophical theses latent ABSTRACT in the dialogue. In part I, I rehearse the contrasting accoun- In Plato’s Ion, inspiration functions in ts of divination in the dialogue. In the first argumentative exchange, divination is refe- contradistinction to technē. Yet, paradoxically, in both cases, there is an appeal to divination. renced as a paradigmatic technē. The seer is I interrogate this in order to show how these best equipped to speak about the contrasting two disparate accounts can be accommodat- depictions of divination given by Homer and ed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy of a Complex Astronomical Phenomenon Described in the ODYSSEY
    6_PREKAS2_Layout 1 31/12/2013 9:04 πμ Page 1 Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, Vol. 13, No 2, pp. 69-82 Copyright @ 2013 MAA Printed in Greece. All rights reserved. ThE AnATOmY Of A COmplEx ASTROnOmiCAl phEnOmEnOn DESCRibED in ThE ODYSSEY St. p. papamarinopoulos1, p. preka-papadema2, p. Antonopoulos3*, h. mitropetrou1, A.Tsironi1 and p. mitropetros2 1University of Patras, Department of Geology, 26504 Rio Patras, Greece 2University of Athens, Department of Astrophysics, Astronomy and Mechanism, Faculty of Physics, 15784 Athens, Greece 3University of Patras, Department of Physics, 26504 Rio Patras, Greece Received; 1/6/2012 Corresponding author:[email protected] Accepted: 28/11/2012 AbSTRACT An intense meteor shower is described as dove’s feathers falling down during the Telemachus’ arrival in Ithaca mentioned by the Homeric epic. Additionally, in the next days, there are some other descriptions which are regarded from us as meteor activity (bolides, a meteorite, many erupted meteors in the atmosphere, and a glimmering in the sky due to intense dust). In accordance with the proposed by us new astronomical dating of Odysseus’ return to Ithaca (25 October 1207 B.C.), this meteor shower occurred in the last days of October 1207 B.C. The radiant point was near to Pleiades nebula of Taurus constellation. Consequently, two astronomical phenomena (a solar eclipse and a meteor shower) were hidden in the two Theoclymenus’ prophecies, marking clearly, the Odysseus’s return to Ithaca. KEYWORDS: Homer’s Odyssey; Theoclymenus’ prophecy; Meteor Shower 6_PREKAS2_Layout 1 31/12/2013 9:04 πμ Page 2 70 St. P. PAPAMAriNoPouloS et al 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection of Hesiod Homer and Homerica
    COLLECTION OF HESIOD HOMER AND HOMERICA Hesiod, The Homeric Hymns, and Homerica This file contains translations of the following works: Hesiod: "Works and Days", "The Theogony", fragments of "The Catalogues of Women and the Eoiae", "The Shield of Heracles" (attributed to Hesiod), and fragments of various works attributed to Hesiod. Homer: "The Homeric Hymns", "The Epigrams of Homer" (both attributed to Homer). Various: Fragments of the Epic Cycle (parts of which are sometimes attributed to Homer), fragments of other epic poems attributed to Homer, "The Battle of Frogs and Mice", and "The Contest of Homer and Hesiod". This file contains only that portion of the book in English; Greek texts are excluded. Where Greek characters appear in the original English text, transcription in CAPITALS is substituted. PREPARER'S NOTE: In order to make this file more accessable to the average computer user, the preparer has found it necessary to re-arrange some of the material. The preparer takes full responsibility for his choice of arrangement. A few endnotes have been added by the preparer, and some additions have been supplied to the original endnotes of Mr. Evelyn-White's. Where this occurs I have noted the addition with my initials "DBK". Some endnotes, particularly those concerning textual variations in the ancient Greek text, are here ommitted. PREFACE This volume contains practically all that remains of the post- Homeric and pre-academic epic poetry. I have for the most part formed my own text. In the case of Hesiod I have been able to use independent collations of several MSS. by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Divine and Human Action in Euripides' Helen
    DIVINE AND HUMAN ACTION IN EURIPIDES’ HELEN Eleni KornaroU Hellenic Open University [email protected] ABSTRACT This article discUsses the interplay of divine and hUman action in EUripides’ Helen . DUe to their limited Understanding and the deception of the gods, mortals are often led to miscalcUlations and errors. Yet this does not mean that they cannot act as free agents. The plot of the play indicates t hat within the limits of their hUmanity, men can determine their fortUnes by their own decisions and attitUde to life, despite the fact that the motives and the natUre of the gods remain ambigUoUs. KEYWORDS : EUripides’ Helen , divine - hUman action, illUsion - reality. ACCIÓN DIVINA Y HUMANA EN LA HELENA DE EURÍPIDES RESUMEN Este artícUlo discUte la interacción hUmana y divina en la Helena de EUrípides. Debido a sU limitada comprensión y al engaño de los dioses, los mortales a menUdo son llevados a conclUsiones erróneas y a errores de jUicio. AUn así, esto no significa qUe no pUedan actUar 3 8 con libertad. La trama de la obra indica qUe dentro de los límites de sU hUmanidad, el hombre 2 4 pUede determinar sU sUerte por sUs propias decisiones y actitUd ante la vida, a pesar del hecho 9 2 de qUe los motivos y la natUraleza de los dioses sigan siendo ambigUos . - 3 8 2 PALABRAS CLAVE : Helena de EUrípides, acción divina - hUmana, ilUsión - realidad. P P , ) 2 ( 0 EUripides’ Helen mUst have made a striking impression on its aUdience in 2 0 2 412 B.C., as is made evident in its extensive parody in Aristophanes’ Thesmophoria- ; 1 2 3 zusae , which was prodUced the following year .
    [Show full text]