DOCSLIB.ORG

The Pollination of Cultivated Plants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Pollination of Cultivated Plants This publication provides an approach for the socio-economic valuation of pollinator-friendly practices at a landscape/farm level. The text was prepared as part of the Global Environment Fund (GEF) supported project ‘Conservation and management of pollinators for sustainable agriculture, through an ecosystem approach’ implemented in seven countries – Brazil, Ghana, India, Kenya, Nepal, Pakistan and South Africa. blurb to be provided The project is coordinated by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) with implementation support from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). EXTENSION OF KNOWLEDGE BASE ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT CAPACITY BUILDING MAINSTREAMING backcover photos to be selected cover photo/s to be selected GLOBAL ACTION ON POLLINATION SERVICES FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE THE POLLINATION OF CULTIVATED PLANTS A COMPENDIUM FOR PRACTITIONERS Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Volume 1 Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy www.fao.org/pollination www.fao.org/agriculture/crops/agp-home e-mail: [email protected] logos to be confirmed POLLINATION SERVICES FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE POLLINATOR SAFETY IN AGRICULTURE THE POLLINATION OF CULTIVATED PLANTS A COMPENDIUM FOR PRACTITIONERS Volume 1 Edited by David Ward Roubik Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Ancon, Republic of Panama FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS ROME 2017 disclaimer to be provided CONTENTS contents pages to be laid out The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion Acknowledgements whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development List of tables status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these List of figures have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. List of contributors Preface to the second edition The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. Part I ISBN xxx-xx-x-xxxxxx-x INTRODUCTION © FAO, 2017 Chapter 1. LESSONS LEARNED OVER THE LAST 20 YEARS (DAVID W. ROUBIK) 1.1 Sustainable pollination and pollinators FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, 1.1.1 Tropical and temperate zones material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial 1.1.2 Pollinator backup and restoration products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s 1.2 The extent of progress to date endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. 1.2.1 An ecological overview All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/ 1.2.2 Major shifts in pollination landscapes contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected]. 1.3 The pollination factor in croplands FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased through publications- 1.3.1 Crop harvest constraints [email protected]. 1.3.2 The nature of agricultural sustainability 1.3.3 A taxonomic impediment for crops 1.3.4 Crop pollination ecology Cover photos 1.3.5 Prospects in pollination biology left to right: 1.4 How to use this book © author, References Further reading Back cover photos left to right: © author, © author, © author, © author Chapter 2. POLLINATION, POLLINATORS AND POLLINATION MODES: ECOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE 2.1 Pollination: a general overview (R.C. Sihag) 2.1.1 The flower 2.1.2 Pollination modes and pollinators This publication provides information on the management of bee pollinators in apple orchards. 2.1.3 The ecological importance of pollinators and pollination modes The text was prepared as part of the Global Environment Fund (GEF) supported project ‘Conservation 2.1.4 The economic importance of pollinators and management of pollinators for sustainable agriculture, through an ecosystem approach’ 2.1.5 Conclusion implemented in seven countries – Brazil, Ghana, India, Kenya, Nepal, Pakistan and South Africa. 2.2 Conserving pollinators for agriculture, forestry and nature (P.G. Kevan) The project is coordinated by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 2.2.1 Pesticides with implementation support from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2.2.2 Habitat destruction THE POLLINATION OF CULTIVATED PLANTS: A COMPENDIUM FOR PRACTITIONERS - Volume 1 iii 2.2.3 Pollinator diseases 4.6 IPM recommendations for conserving wild pollen bees for tree fruit pollination 2.2.4 Pollinator competition 4.7 The institutionalization of pollinator health protection 2.2.5 Diversification of pollinators References 2.2.6 Conclusion References Chapter 5. A NATIVE GROUND NESTING BEE (NOMIA MELANDERI) SUSTAINABLY MANAGED TO POLLINATE ALFALFA ACROSS AN INTENSIVELY AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE (J.H. CANE) 3. SUSTAINABLE YIELDS, SUSTAINABLE GROWTH OR NEITHER? 5.1 Introduction 3.1 The potential for insect pollinators to alleviate global pollination deficits and enhance 5.2 Description of survey methodologies yields of fruit and seed crops (L.A. Garibaldi, S.A., Cunningham, M.A. Aizen, L. Packer and 5.2.1 Nesting aggregations L.D. Harder) 5.2.2 Population measurement 3.1.1 Introduction 5.2.3 Nest hole utilization 3.1.2 Pollen as a resource that limits crop yield 5.3 Survey results 3.1.3 Pollinator dependence in fruit and seed crops 5.3.1 Nest hole utilization 3.1.4 Are pollination deficits common? 5.3.2 Population variability 3.1.5 Can honey bee management alone reduce pollination deficits? 5.3.3 Aggregation and metapopulation growth 3.1.6 Why do wild insects contribute to crop yield? 5.3.4 Subsurface moisture and aggregation growth 3.1.7 Sound practices that reduce pollination deficits 5.4 Discussion 3.1.8 Natural history of bees and their potential for crop pollination 5.5 Conclusions 3.1.9 Bee introductions References 3.1.10 Conclusion References Chapter 6. BUCKWHEAT POLLINATION IN A COMPLEX TEMPERATE LANDSCAPE (H. TAKI) 6.1 Introduction 3.2 Alternatives to artificial pollinator populations (R. Krell) 6.2 Buckwheat plants and flowers 3.2.1 Introduction 6.3 Buckwheat as a food 6.4 Pollination studies of buckwheat 3.2.2 Mechanical pollination and chemical pollination 6.4.1 Pollination bagging experiments 3.2.3 Habitat management for wild pollinators 6.4.2 Buckwheat pollination success and pollinator flight range 3.2.4 Crop selection 6.4.3 Buckwheat pollination and landscape matrix quality 3.2.5 Pesticides 6.5 Conclusion 3.2.6 Cultivation practices References 3.2.7 Conclusion References Chapter 7. SMALLHOLDER POLLINATION PERSPECTIVES 7.1 Experiences promoting pollination technology among smallholder farmers in Kenya, through Part II Farmer Field Schools (M. Kasina) APPLIED POLLINATION: BASIC APPROACHES 7.1.1 Introduction and initial results 7.1.2 Field studies Chapter 4. INTEGRATING POLLINATOR HEALTH INTO TREE FRUIT IPM – A CASE STUDY OF 7.1.3 Conclusion and recommendations PENNSYLVANIA APPLE PRODUCTION (D.J. BIDDINGER, E.G. RAJOTTE AND N.K. JOSHI) References 4.1 IPM and the recent pollinator crisis 7.2 Pollination services and melon in family farming areas, northeastern Brazil (L.H.P Kiill, M.F. 4.2 The importance of pollinators in apple production Ribeiro, K.M.M. Siqueira and E.M.S. Silva) 4.2.1 Non-honey bee pollinators providing insurance for sustainable apple pollination 7.2.1 Introduction 4.2.2 Pollinator diversity during apple bloom 7.2.2 Cultivation expansion 4.2.3 Roles of landscape and floristic diversity in support of apple orchard pollinators 7.2.3 Pollination ecology 4.3 IPM, pesticides and pollinators in apple 7.2.4 Pollination service in family farming areas 4.4 Pesticide recommendations in apple IPM to protect pollinators 7.2.5 Conclusion 4.5 Fungicides References contents pages to be laid out contents pages to be laid out iv THE POLLINATION OF CULTIVATED PLANTS: A COMPENDIUM FOR PRACTITIONERS - Volume 1 THE POLLINATION OF CULTIVATED PLANTS: A COMPENDIUM FOR PRACTITIONERS - Volume 1 v 7.3 Pollination in some Kenyan smallholder crops (D.J. Martins) 8.10 Vitaceae 7.3.1 Hawkmoth and skipper butterfly pollination of papaya 8.10.1 Grapes 7.3.2 Honey bee pollination of irrigated dry season passionfruit 8.11 Fabaceae 7.3.3 Native insect and bee pollination of coriander 8.11.1 White clover 7.3.4 Native bee pollination of eggplant 8.11.2 Berseem References 8.11.3 Lucerne/Alfalfa 8.11.4 Field, faba, tick or horse beans Part III 8.11.5 Red clover APPLIED POLLINATION: CROP REQUIREMENTS 8.12 Asteraceae 8.12.1 Sunflower Chapter 8. TEMPERATE AND SUBTROPICAL AREAS (R.D. MACFARLANE) 8.13 Solanaceae 8.1 Ericaceae (J.H. Cane) 8.13.1 Tomatoes 8.1.1 Cranberry and lingonberry References 8.1.2 Floral biology of cranberry 8.1.3 Pollination of cranberry Chapter 9. APPLIED POLLINATION AND SELECTED STUDIES 8.1.4 Pollinators of cranberries 9.1 Applied pollination in America (D.W. Roubik) 8.1.5 Blueberry 9.1.1 Overview 8.1.6 Floral biology of blueberry 9.1.2 Plant genera and pollination 8.1.7 Pollination of blueberry 9.2 Applied pollination in Asia and Africa (P.G. Kevan and J.K.S. Mbaya) 8.1.8 Pollinators of blueberry 9.2.1 Applied pollination in Asia – crop types 8.2 Brassicaceae 9.2.2 Applied pollination in Africa – overview 8.2.1 Swede rape 9.2.3 Pollination studies in African countries – by region 8.3 Rosaceae 9.2.4 Recommendations for future work 8.3.1 Almonds References 8.3.2 Peaches and nectarines 9.3 Selected studies 8.3.3 Plums and cherries 9.3.1 Brazil nut (Bertholletia) in the Amazon (M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evolutionary Ecology of Pollination and Reproduction of Tropical Plants
    TROPICAL BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT - Vol. V - Evolutionary Ecology af Pollination and Reproduction of Tropical Plants - M. Quesada, F. Rosas, Y. Herrerias-Diego, R. Aguliar, J.A. Lobo and G. Sanchez-Montoya EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY OF POLLINATION AND REPRODUCTION OF TROPICAL PLANTS M. Quesada and F. Rosas Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México. Y. Herrerias-Diego Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Michoacán, México. R. Aguilar IMBIV - UNC - CONICET, C.C. 495,(5000) Córdoba, Argentina J.A. Lobo Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica G. Sanchez-Montoya Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México. Keywords: Pollination, tropical plants, diversity, mating systems, gender, conservation. Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. The Life Cycle of Angiosperms 1.2. Overview of Angiosperm Diversity 2. Degree of specificity of pollination system 3. Diversity of pollination systems 3.1. Beetle Pollination (Cantharophily) 3.2. Lepidoptera 3.2.1. Butterfly Pollination (Psychophily) 3.2.2. Moth Pollination (Phalaenophily) 3.3. Hymenoptera 3.3.1. Bee PollinationUNESCO (Melittophily) – EOLSS 3.3.2. Wasps 3.4. Fly Pollination (Myophily and Sapromyophily) 3.5. Bird Pollination (Ornitophily) 3.6. Bat PollinationSAMPLE (Chiropterophily) CHAPTERS 3.7. Pollination by No-Flying Mammals 3.8. Wind Pollination (Anemophily) 3.9. Water Pollination (Hydrophily) 4. Reproductive systems of angiosperms 4.1. Strategies that Reduce Selfing and/or Promote Cross-Pollination. 4.2. Self Incompatibility Systems 4.2.1. Incidence of Self Incompatibility in Tropical Forest 4.3. The Evolution of Separated Sexes from Hermaphroditism 4.3.1. From Distyly to Dioecy ©Encyclopedia Of. Life Support Systems (EOLSS) TROPICAL BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT - Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Trials for Hybrid Seed Production and Estimation of Wheat F1 Hybrids
    ©2019 Scienceweb Publishing Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research Vol. 7(7), pp. 119-126, July 2019 doi: 10.33495/jacr_v7i7.19.132 ISSN: 2384-731X Research Paper Trials for hybrid seed production and estimation of wheat F1 hybrids produced by outcrossing using photoperiod-sensitive cytoplasmic male sterile (PCMS) system with elite lines Koji Murai1* • Haruka Ohta2 • Yu Takenouchi2 • Masatomo Kurushima3 • Naoyuki Ishikawa4 • Vladimir Meglič5 • Primož Titan5 1Faculty of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Fukui Prefectural University, 4-1-1 Matsuoka-Kenjojima, Eiheiji-cho, Yoshida-gun, Fukui 910-1195, Japan. 2Agricultural Research Institute, HOKUREN Federation of Agricultural Co-operative, Minami 2, Higashi 9, Naganuma-cho, Hokkaido 069-1316, Japan. 3Hokkaido Research Organization, Agriculture Research Department, Kitami Agricultural Experiment Station, 52 Yayoi, Kunneppu- cho, Tokoro-gun, Hokkaido 099-1496, Japan. 4Western Region Agricultural Research Center, NARO, 6-12-1 Nishifukatsu-cho, Fukuyama, Hiroshima 721-8514, Japan. 5Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, Hacquetova ulica 17, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]. Tel. +81-776-61-6000. Fax. +81-776-61-6015. Accepted 4th July, 2019. Abstract. In previous studies, we presented a two-line system for producing hybrid varieties in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based on photoperiod-sensitive cytoplasmic male sterility (PCMS) caused by the cytoplasm of relative wild species Aegilops crassa L. We have developed several promising elite PCMS lines with the genetic background of Japanese wheat cultivars, which showed high cross-pollination fertility and high male sterility under long-day conditions and high seed fertility under short-day conditions. Here, we performed an F1 seed production trial between eight elite PCMS lines and the pollinator variety ‘Fortunato’, which has high combining ability with the PCMS elite lines, under long- day conditions in Hokkaido, Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Bee Species Increase Tomato Production and Respond Differently to Surrounding Land Use in Northern California
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 133 (2006) 81– 87 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Wild bee species increase tomato production and respond differently to surrounding land use in Northern California Sarah S. Greenleaf*, Claire Kremen1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Pollination provided by bees enhances the production of many crops. However, the contri- Received 11 December 2005 bution of wild bees remains unmeasured for many crops, and the effects of anthropogenic Received in revised form change on many bee species are unstudied. We experimentally investigated how pollina- 5 May 2006 tion by wild bees affects tomato production in northern California. We found that wild bees Accepted 16 May 2006 substantially increase the production of field-grown tomato, a crop generally considered Available online 24 July 2006 self-pollinating. Surveys of the bee community on 14 organic fields that varied in proximity to natural habitat showed that the primary bee visitors, Anthophora urbana Cresson and Keywords: Bombus vosnesenskii Radoszkowski, were affected differently by land management prac- Agro-ecosystem tices. B. vosnesenskii was found primarily on farms proximate to natural habitats, but nei- Crop pollination ther proximity to natural habitat nor tomato floral abundance, temperature, or year Ecosystem services explained variation in the visitation rates of A. urbana. Natural habitat appears to increase Bombus vosnesenskii B. vosnesenskii populations and should be preserved near farms. Additional research is Anthophora urbana needed to determine how to maintain A. urbana. Species-specific differences in depen- Habitat conservation dency on natural habitats underscore the importance of considering the natural histories of individual bee species when projecting population trends of pollinators and designing management plans for pollination services.
    [Show full text]
  • Selfing Can Facilitate Transitions Between Pollination Syndromes
    vol. 191, no. 5 the american naturalist may 2018 Selfing Can Facilitate Transitions between Pollination Syndromes Carolyn A. Wessinger* and John K. Kelly Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045 Submitted August 17, 2017; Accepted November 2, 2017; Electronically published March 14, 2018 Online enhancements: appendixes. Dryad data: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8hc64. fi abstract: Pollinator-mediated selection on plants can favor tran- (Herrera 1987). When pollen is limiting, pollinator ef ciency sitions to a new pollinator depending on the relative abundances and can determine fruit set per visit (Schemske and Horvitz efficiencies of pollinators present in the community. A frequently ob- 1984). Since pollinators differ in their receptiveness to floral served example is the transition from bee pollination to humming- signals and rewards as well as in how they interact with bird pollination. We present a population genetic model that examines flowers, pollinator-mediated selection has led to the wide- whether the ability to inbreed can influence evolutionary change in spread convergent evolution of pollination syndromes—sets fi traits that underlie pollinator attraction. We nd that a transition to of floral traits associated with certain types of pollinators a more efficient but less abundant pollinator is favored under a broad- ened set of ecological conditions if plants are capable of delayed selfing (Faegri and Van der Pijl 1979; Fenster et al. 2004; Harder rather than obligately outcrossing. Delayed selfing allows plants carry- and Johnson 2009). Pollinator communities vary over space ing an allele that attracts the novel pollinator to reproduce even when and time, leading to repeated evolutionary transitions in pol- this pollinator is rare, providing reproductive assurance.
    [Show full text]
  • Tamires De Oliveira Andrade an INTEGRATIVE APPROACH TO
    Tamires de Oliveira Andrade AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH TO DELIMIT SPECIES IN THE EULAEMA CINGULATA AND EULAEMA PSEUDOCINGULATA PAIR (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE) USING MORPHOMETRIC AND MOLECULAR EVIDENCE UMA ABORDAGEM INTEGRATIVA PARA DELIMITAR ESPÉCIES NO PAR EULAEMA CINGULATA E EULAEMA PSEUDOCINGULATA (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE) UTILIZANDO EVIDÊNCIA MORFOMÉTRICA E MOLECULAR SÃO PAULO 2021 Tamires de Oliveira Andrade An integrative approach to delimit species in the Eulaema cingulata and Eulaema pseudocingulata pair (Hymenoptera: Apidae) using morphometric and molecular evidence Uma abordagem integrativa para delimitar espécies no par Eulaema cingulata e Eulaema pseudocingulata (Hymenoptera: Apidae) utilizando evidência morfométrica e molecular Original Version Dissertation submitted to the Graduate Program of the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Systematics, Animal Taxonomy and Biodiversity). Advisor: Prof. Dr. Carlos Roberto Ferreira Brandão Co-advisor: Dr. Kelli dos Santos Ramos Catalogação na Publicação Serviço de Biblioteca e Documentação Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo Andrade, Tamires de Oliveira An integrative approach to delimit species in the Eulaema cingulata and Eulaema pseudocingulata pair (Hymenoptera: Apidae) using morphometric and molecular evidence.= Uma abordagem integrativa para delimitar espécies no par Eulaema cingulata e Eulaema pseudocingulata (Hymenoptera:Apidae) utilizando evidência morfométrica e molecular/ Tamires de Oliveira Andrade; orientador Carlos Roberto Ferreira Brandão; co-orientadora Kelly dos Santos Ramos. São Paulo, 2021. 51p. Dissertação de Mestrado – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sistemática, Taxonomia e Biodiversidade, Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, 2021. Versão original Volume único 1. Hymenoptera - Apidae. 2. Eulaema cingulata.3. Eulaema pseudocingulata.. I. Brandão, Carlos Roberto Ferreira, orient.; II.
    [Show full text]
  • Malpighia Glabra L
    Malpighia glabra L. Malpighiaceae LOCAL NAMES English (West Indian cherry); French (cerise-antillaise); Thai (choeri); Vietnamese (so'ri) BOTANIC DESCRIPTION Malpighia glabra is a shrub or small evergreen tree, 2-3(-6) m tall, with spreading, more or less drooping branches on a short trunk. Leaves opposite, ovate to elliptic-lanceolate, 2-8 cm x 1-4 cm, entire or undulating, dark green and glossy above, petiole short. Fruits and foliage (USDA GRIN) Inflorescences sessile or short-peduncled axillary cymes with 3-5 flowers; flowers bisexual, 1-2 cm in diameter, pinkish to reddish; calyx with 6-10 large sessile glands; petals 5, fringed, slender-clawed; stamens 10, filaments united below. Fruit a bright-red, juicy drupe, depressed-ovoid, 1-3 cm in diameter and weighing 3-5 g, usually in pairs or threes, obscurely 3-lobed; skin thin, flesh soft, orange, acid to subacid. Seeds 3, triangular, ridged. In Florida, 'Florida Sweet' is a high-yielding cultivar. A distinction is sometimes made in nomenclature between wild and cultivated (improved) plants, the latter being called M. punicifolia L. It is now, however, generally accepted that both taxa belong to M. glabra. M. coccigera L. and M. urens L. are incidentally cultivated in South-East Asia for the same purposes as M. glabra. BIOLOGY In Puerto Rico flowering appeared to be independent of the daylength and several cropping periods are possible per year, especially with alternating dry and rainy periods. The flowers are pollinated by insects; honey bees substantially improve fruit set. Self- and cross-incompatibiliy have been reported. Fruits ripen completely 3-4 weeks after flowering.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of the Apidae (Hymenoptera)
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Mi Bee Lab 9-21-1990 Classification of the Apidae (Hymenoptera) Charles D. Michener University of Kansas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/bee_lab_mi Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Michener, Charles D., "Classification of the Apidae (Hymenoptera)" (1990). Mi. Paper 153. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/bee_lab_mi/153 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Bee Lab at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 4 WWvyvlrWryrXvW-WvWrW^^ I • • •_ ••^«_«).•>.• •.*.« THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCIENC5;^ULLETIN LIBRARY Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 75-164 Sept. 21,1990 OCT 23 1990 HARVARD Classification of the Apidae^ (Hymenoptera) BY Charles D. Michener'^ Appendix: Trigona genalis Friese, a Hitherto Unplaced New Guinea Species BY Charles D. Michener and Shoichi F. Sakagami'^ CONTENTS Abstract 76 Introduction 76 Terminology and Materials 77 Analysis of Relationships among Apid Subfamilies 79 Key to the Subfamilies of Apidae 84 Subfamily Meliponinae 84 Description, 84; Larva, 85; Nest, 85; Social Behavior, 85; Distribution, 85 Relationships among Meliponine Genera 85 History, 85; Analysis, 86; Biogeography, 96; Behavior, 97; Labial palpi, 99; Wing venation, 99; Male genitalia, 102; Poison glands, 103; Chromosome numbers, 103; Convergence, 104; Classificatory questions, 104 Fossil Meliponinae 105 Meliponorytes,
    [Show full text]
  • Well-Known Plants in Each Angiosperm Order
    Well-known plants in each angiosperm order This list is generally from least evolved (most ancient) to most evolved (most modern). (I’m not sure if this applies for Eudicots; I’m listing them in the same order as APG II.) The first few plants are mostly primitive pond and aquarium plants. Next is Illicium (anise tree) from Austrobaileyales, then the magnoliids (Canellales thru Piperales), then monocots (Acorales through Zingiberales), and finally eudicots (Buxales through Dipsacales). The plants before the eudicots in this list are considered basal angiosperms. This list focuses only on angiosperms and does not look at earlier plants such as mosses, ferns, and conifers. Basal angiosperms – mostly aquatic plants Unplaced in order, placed in Amborellaceae family • Amborella trichopoda – one of the most ancient flowering plants Unplaced in order, placed in Nymphaeaceae family • Water lily • Cabomba (fanwort) • Brasenia (watershield) Ceratophyllales • Hornwort Austrobaileyales • Illicium (anise tree, star anise) Basal angiosperms - magnoliids Canellales • Drimys (winter's bark) • Tasmanian pepper Laurales • Bay laurel • Cinnamon • Avocado • Sassafras • Camphor tree • Calycanthus (sweetshrub, spicebush) • Lindera (spicebush, Benjamin bush) Magnoliales • Custard-apple • Pawpaw • guanábana (soursop) • Sugar-apple or sweetsop • Cherimoya • Magnolia • Tuliptree • Michelia • Nutmeg • Clove Piperales • Black pepper • Kava • Lizard’s tail • Aristolochia (birthwort, pipevine, Dutchman's pipe) • Asarum (wild ginger) Basal angiosperms - monocots Acorales
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Sampling and Monitoring Methods for Beneficial Arthropods
    insects Review A Review of Sampling and Monitoring Methods for Beneficial Arthropods in Agroecosystems Kenneth W. McCravy Department of Biological Sciences, Western Illinois University, 1 University Circle, Macomb, IL 61455, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-309-298-2160 Received: 12 September 2018; Accepted: 19 November 2018; Published: 23 November 2018 Abstract: Beneficial arthropods provide many important ecosystem services. In agroecosystems, pollination and control of crop pests provide benefits worth billions of dollars annually. Effective sampling and monitoring of these beneficial arthropods is essential for ensuring their short- and long-term viability and effectiveness. There are numerous methods available for sampling beneficial arthropods in a variety of habitats, and these methods can vary in efficiency and effectiveness. In this paper I review active and passive sampling methods for non-Apis bees and arthropod natural enemies of agricultural pests, including methods for sampling flying insects, arthropods on vegetation and in soil and litter environments, and estimation of predation and parasitism rates. Sample sizes, lethal sampling, and the potential usefulness of bycatch are also discussed. Keywords: sampling methodology; bee monitoring; beneficial arthropods; natural enemy monitoring; vane traps; Malaise traps; bowl traps; pitfall traps; insect netting; epigeic arthropod sampling 1. Introduction To sustainably use the Earth’s resources for our benefit, it is essential that we understand the ecology of human-altered systems and the organisms that inhabit them. Agroecosystems include agricultural activities plus living and nonliving components that interact with these activities in a variety of ways. Beneficial arthropods, such as pollinators of crops and natural enemies of arthropod pests and weeds, play important roles in the economic and ecological success of agroecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnomedicinal Profile of Flora of District Sialkot, Punjab, Pakistan
    ISSN: 2717-8161 RESEARCH ARTICLE New Trend Med Sci 2020; 1(2): 65-83. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ntms Ethnomedicinal Profile of Flora of District Sialkot, Punjab, Pakistan Fozia Noreen1*, Mishal Choudri2, Shazia Noureen3, Muhammad Adil4, Madeeha Yaqoob4, Asma Kiran4, Fizza Cheema4, Faiza Sajjad4, Usman Muhaq4 1Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Sialkot, Punjab, Pakistan 2Department of Statistics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Sialkot, Punjab, Pakistan 3Governament Degree College for Women, Malakwal, District Mandi Bahauddin, Punjab, Pakistan 4Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Gujrat Sialkot Subcampus, Punjab, Pakistan Article History Abstract: An ethnomedicinal profile of 112 species of remedial Received 30 May 2020 herbs, shrubs, and trees of 61 families with significant Accepted 01 June 2020 Published Online 30 Sep 2020 gastrointestinal, antimicrobial, cardiovascular, herpetological, renal, dermatological, hormonal, analgesic and antipyretic applications *Corresponding Author have been explored systematically by circulating semi-structured Fozia Noreen and unstructured questionnaires and open ended interviews from 40- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, 74 years old mature local medicine men having considerable University of Sialkot, professional experience of 10-50 years in all the four geographically Punjab, Pakistan diversified subdivisions i.e. Sialkot, Daska, Sambrial and Pasrur of E-mail: [email protected] district Sialkot with a total area of 3106 square kilometres with ORCID:http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-2568 population density of 1259/km2, in order to unveil botanical flora for world. Family Fabaceae is found to be the most frequent and dominant family of the region. © 2020 NTMS.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination and Evolution of Plant and Insect Interaction JPP 2017; 6(3): 304-311 Received: 03-03-2017 Accepted: 04-04-2017 Showket a Dar, Gh
    Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017; 6(3): 304-311 E-ISSN: 2278-4136 P-ISSN: 2349-8234 Pollination and evolution of plant and insect interaction JPP 2017; 6(3): 304-311 Received: 03-03-2017 Accepted: 04-04-2017 Showket A Dar, Gh. I Hassan, Bilal A Padder, Ab R Wani and Sajad H Showket A Dar Parey Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology, Shalimar, Jammu Abstract and Kashmir-India Flowers exploit insects to achieve pollination; at the same time insects exploit flowers for food. Insects and flowers are a partnership. Each insect group has evolved different sets of mouthparts to exploit the Gh. I Hassan food that flowers provide. From the insects' point of view collecting nectar or pollen is rather like fitting Sher-e-Kashmir University of a key into a lock; the mouthparts of each species can only exploit flowers of a certain size and shape. Agricultural Science and This is why, to support insect diversity in our gardens, we need to plant a diversity of suitable flowers. It Technology, Shalimar, Jammu is definitely not a case of 'one size fits all'. While some insects are generalists and can exploit a wide and Kashmir-India range of flowers, others are specialists and are quite particular in their needs. In flowering plants, pollen grains germinate to form pollen tubes that transport male gametes (sperm cells) to the egg cell in the Bilal A Padder embryo sac during sexual reproduction. Pollen tube biology is complex, presenting parallels with axon Sher-e-Kashmir University of guidance and moving cell systems in animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Native and Adapted Plants for Central Texas
    9/13/2016 Native and Adapted Plants for Central Texas Meredith O’Reilly 4-H CAPITAL Youth Gardening Specialist [email protected] Standing Cypress, Black-eyed Susan, Horsemint Class Topics Part I: The Basics A. Why Native and Adapted? Native plants (why important) Adapted plants (benefits, considerations) Other terms (cultivars, invasives) B. Eco-regions, Adaptations, and Wildlife Value of Native Texas Plants Part II: Getting to Know the Guide Part III: Plant Selections for Specific Garden Needs 1 9/13/2016 Why Native and Adapted? For the benefit of our Austin and Texas wildlife and landscape, it is helpful to select plants that: Are water-wise Are drought-tolerant Have wildlife value (esp. natives) Are naturally resistant to pests and diseases (esp. natives) Need less maintenance and fertilizing Also, higher survivability saves money! Bumblebee on Shrubby Boneset, or White Mistflower What is native? A native species is one that exists naturally in an eco-region without human introduction, direct or indirect. Native flora and fauna in an ecological community, having evolved together, are often interdependent. Autumn Sage (Cherry Sage), Datura, Blackfoot Daisy 2 9/13/2016 Why Are Native Plants Important? They protect Texas’ biodiversity They gain back natural ecosystems for our native flora and fauna wildlife interdependence They are specially adapted to handle Texas soil and weather They use less water and require less maintenance, fertilizing, and pest control They protect our watersheds They keep Texas beautiful! Adapted Plants Adapted plants are non-invasive, non-native plants that are able to thrive in the local climate and soil conditions.
    [Show full text]