Modernity in Japan and Serbia in the Second Half of the 19Th Century
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE FACULTY OF PHILOLOGY Sava D. Popović MODERNITY IN JAPAN AND SERBIA IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 19TH CENTURY Doctoral Dissertation Belgrade, 2020 UNIVERZITET U BEOGRADU FILOLOŠKI FAKULTET Sava D. Popović MODERNOST U JAPANU I SRBIJI U DRUGOJ POLOVINI XIX VEKA doktorska disertacija Beograd, 2020 УНИВЕРСИТЕТ В БЕЛГРАДЕ ФИЛОЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ ФАКУЛЬТЕТ Сава Д. Попович СОВРЕМЕННОСТЬ В ЯПОНИИ И СЕРБИИ НА ВТОРОЙ ПОЛОВИНЕ XIX ВЕКА Докторская диссертация Белград, 2020 Mentor: Professor Ljiljana Marković, Ph.D. Full Professor, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philology Members of the Commission for the Defense of the Doctoral Dissertation: Date of Defense: ________________________________ I wish to thank my family for their support in my academic journey. I also wish to thank Professor Keiichi Kubo for the conversations in which he helped me channel my research, and for being a mentor and a friend during my reseach at Waseda University in Tokyo. Finally, I wish to express my deepest gratitude to my mentor, Professor Ljiljana Marković, for providing me with the necessary knowledge, support and freedom to pursue my academic interests and for her guidance during my doctoral studies. Their guidance has shaped my reseach. The successes of this work are shared with them, the mistakes are mine alone. This dissertation is dedicated to my wife Janja, without whose love, patience, and support this dissertation would not have been possible. MODERNITY IN JAPAN AND SERBIA IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 19th CENTURY Abstract: The subject of the thesis is a comparative analysis of the influences of modernity in Japan and Serbia in the second half of the 19th century. Modernity is used as the theoretical framework of the research. While modernity is a multifaceted term we use in order to denote a set values, principles and norms that influence social, cultural and political developments of one society and enable the process of modernization; modernity has the driving capacity to move society in the direction of progress. The notion of modernity is applied to societies of Japan and Serbia in the second half of the 19th century having in mind that this was crucial period for the opening of these two states towards the West and modernity. Having in mind the comprehensiveness of the notion of modernity, it is not possible to study this concept in its entirety. Therefore, we decided to narrow our research by focusing on two relevant and intertwined indicators of modernity: education and the intellectual elite. This research was guided by the following hyphotheses: The acceptance of modernity is not possible without the successful implementation of the Western model of education; contact between the intellectual elite and the West is a necessary prerequisite, but insufficient by itself for the ideas of modernity to be successfully implemented; the modern intellectual elite must be included into the political discourse in order for the ideas of modernity to be successfully implemented; the success of modernization depends on the reasons for the acceptance of modernity. The scientific aim of this research is to explain the process of acceptance of the concept and ideas of modernity in Japan and Serbia. This scientific aim was pursuied by using the following research methods: content analysis, comparison, critical qualitative text analysis. Key words: Modernity, Multiple Modernities, Japan, Serbia, Meiji, Education, Intellectual elite, Political elite, 19th century Scientific Field: Philology Scientific Subfield: Japanese Studies UDC Number: MODERNOST U JAPANU I SRBIJI U DRUGOJ POLOVINI XIX VEKA Sažetak: Predmet ove doktorske disertacije jeste uporedna analiza uticaja modernosti u Japanu i Srbiji u drugoj polovini XIX veka. Modernost predstavlja teorijski okvir ovog istraživanja. Modernost je sveobuhvatni pojam koji u istraživanju koristimo da označimo vrednosti, principe i norme koje utiču na društveni, kulturni i politički napredak jednog društva i omogućavaju proces modernizacije; modernost ima pokretačku snagu da društvo vodi u pravcu napretka. Pojam modernosti primenjujemo na društva Japana i Srbije u drugoj polovini XIX veka imajući u vidu da je ovo razdoblje bilo presudno za otvaranje ove dve države prema Zapadu i prema modernosti. Imajući u vidu sveobuhvatnost pojma modernosti, ovaj koncept nije moguće u potpunosti istražiti. Stoga smo se odlučili da naše istraživanje usredsredimo na dva relevantna i povezana pokazatelja modernosti: obrazovanje i intelektualnu elitu. Ovo istraživanje vođeno je sledećim hipotezama: prihvatanje modernosti nije moguće bez uspešne primene Zapadnog modela obrazovanja; kontakt između intelektualne elite i Zapada je neophodan preduslov, ali nedovoljan sam po sebi, da se ideje modernosti uspešno primene; moderna intelektualna elita mora biti uključena u politički diskurs kako bi ideje modernosti bile uspešno primenjene; uspeh modernizacije zavisi od razloga prihvatanja modernosti. Naučni cilj ovog istraživanja jeste da se objasni proces prihvatanja koncepta i ideja modernosti u Japanu i Srbiji. Metode istraživanja su analiza sadržaja, poređenje, i kritička kvalitativna analiza teksta. Ključne reči: Modernost, višestruke modernosti, Japan, Srbija, obrazovanje, intelektualna elita, politička elita, 19. vek Naučna oblast: Filologija Uža naučna oblast: Japanologija UDK broj: Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. FRAMING MODERNITY 9 3. WESTERN EUROPE, JAPAN AND SERBIA AND THE BEGINNINGS OF MODERNITY 20 3.1. Western Europe as a reference culture for modernity 20 3.2. Edo Japan and Early Modernity 26 3.3. Serbia, the Battle for Independence, and Modernity 33 4. JAPAN AND SERBIA AT THE TURN OF THE 20TH CENTURY 39 4.1. Japan in the Wake of the Meiji Restoration 39 4.2. Serbia in the Wake of the Independence 54 5. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MODERNITY THROUGH EDUCATION IN JAPAN AND SERBIA 64 5.1. Educational Policies in Meiji Japan 65 5.2. Development of Education System in Serbia throughout the 19th century 76 6. INTELLECTUAL ELITES AS BEARERS OF MODERNITY IN JAPAN AND SERBIA 88 6.1. Intellectual elite in Japan 90 6.1.1. The Iwakura mission 97 6.2. Intellectual elite in Serbia 104 7. CONCLUSIONS 115 BIBLIOGRAPHY 120 1. INTRODUCTION The subject of the thesis is a comparative analysis of the influences of modernity in Japan and Serbia in the second half of the 19th century. This is a period that is marked with the bloom of modernity in the Western world; a period of innovation, liberal thought and industrialization. This period is also a turning point for both Japan and Serbia, the two countries that will be analyzed in the doctoral dissertation. In 1868 Japan witnessed the reestablishment of Imperial rule in. This was a big political and societal shift that brought about significant changes, having in mind that this was the first time Japan was opening to the West. Before that period, from the beginning of the 17th century Japan was under the self-imposed isolationist rule of the Tokugawa Shogunate. Following the reestablishment of the Imperial government, Japan stepped into the international spotlight, for the first time seeking recognition and equality, however, at a significant lag. Serbia has been openly fighting for independence from the Ottoman Empire since 1804, after centuries of imposed Ottoman rule. In 1878, at the Congress of Berlin, Serbia gained recognition as an independent country. This newly established independence followed by establishment of a constitutional monarchy marks Serbia’s first entrance onto the international scene as a modern nation state, also at a significant lag. As we can see from these short remarks, both Japan and Serbia in the timeframe of the research shifted towards the West. However, they shared the burden of being latecomers to the global scene. The word lag is used in a neutral way, and does not in any way imply a status of lesser value. It only denotes an almost two-century late start in a modern society, a society where democratic institutions, higher education, industrialization and economic progress dictate primacy. In the time of their awakening, both of these societies, Japan and Serbia willingly and consciously accepted the rules of this new global game. Regardless of the pace of implementation, they both adopted the same liberal values, adopted western political institutions, decided to educate their intellectuals at western universities in order to create an intellectual elite and both started the process of modernization through industrialization. Both societies have looked at the West as a successful model for progress, which we can see from the various ways in which Western values affected the society and culture of the day, from large things to small, from the rise of western-style political institutions to fashion. Both nations were two pre-modern societies that have opened up to the West relatively late. Their development processes in the period of modernity are marked with similarities that give us the opportunity and justification to conduct a comparative study of the influences of modernity on these two societies in this given cultural-historical context. Regardless of these similarities in the second half of the 19th century, when both societies started running the race late and seemingly employed similar if not the same “recipe for success” on an institutional level, today it is clear that they did not develop in the same way. However, this does not mean that both countries did not reach modernity. In order to explain this, we will use the theoretical basis of multiple modernities, developed by S. N. Eisenstadt. The theoretical framework of the doctoral dissertation will be based on the notion and idea of modernity. We will use the concept of modernity as a tool: on one hand it is an idea that affects development in a given country; on the other hand it is the subject of the reaction of the societies where it is implemented. Modernity is a term used in the humanities and social sciences to define both a historical period, as well as a collection of particular socio-cultural norms, attitudes and practices that began in post-medieval Europe and have developed since, in various ways and at various times around the world.