Arxiv:2009.03398V2 [Astro-Ph.EP] 12 Sep 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
vDraft version September 15, 2020 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 Physical Parameters of the Multi-Planet Systems HD 106315 and GJ 9827∗y Molly R. Kosiarek,1, z David A. Berardo,2 Ian J. M. Crossfield,3 Cesar Laguna,4 Joseph M. Akana Murphy,1, z Steve B. Howell,5 Gregory W. Henry,6 Howard Isaacson,7, 8 Lauren M. Weiss,9 Erik A. Petigura,10 Benjamin Fulton,11 Aida Behmard,12 Lea A. Hirsch,13 Johanna Teske,14 Jennifer A. Burt,15 Sean M. Mills,16 Ashley Chontos,17, z Teo Mocnik,18 Andrew W. Howard,16 Michael Werner,15 John H. Livingston,19 Jessica Krick,20 Charles Beichman,21 Varoujan Gorjian,15 Laura Kreidberg,22, 23 Caroline Morley,24 Jessie L. Christiansen,20 Farisa Y. Morales,15 Nicholas J. Scott,5 Jeffrey D. Crane,25 Lee J. Rosenthal,16 Samuel K. Grunblatt,26, 27 Ryan A. Rubenzahl,16, z Paul A. Dalba,28, x Steven Giacalone,29 Chiara Dane Villanueva,4 Qingtian Liu,4 Fei Dai,12 Michelle L. Hill,28 Malena Rice,30 Stephen R. Kane,28 Andrew W. Mayo,29, 31 | 1Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA 2Department of Physics, and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 3Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Kansas, 1082 Malott,1251 Wescoe Hall Dr., Lawrence, KS 66045, USA 4Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA 5NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 6Center of Excellence in Information Systems, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, USA 7501 Campbell Hall, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 8Centre for Astrophysics, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia 9Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai`i, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA 10Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 11NASA Exoplanet Science Institute/Caltech-IPAC, MC 314-6, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 12Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 13Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 14Earth & Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington 5241 Broad Branch Road, N.W., Washington, DC 20015, USA 15Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA 16Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 17Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA 18Gemini Observatory, Northern Operations Center, 670 N. A'ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA 19Department of Astronomy, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan 20Caltech/IPAC, 1200 E. California Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91125 21IPAC/NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, Caltech, Jet Propulsion Laboratory 22Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany 23Center for Astrophysics j Harvard & Smithsonian, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA 24University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA 25The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA, USA 91107 26American Museum of Natural History, 200 Central Park West, Manhattan, NY 10024, USA arXiv:2009.03398v2 [astro-ph.EP] 12 Sep 2020 27Center for Computational Astrophysics, Flatiron Institute, 162 5th Avenue, Manhattan, NY 10010, USA 28Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA 29Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA 30Department of Astronomy, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA 31Centre for Star and Planet Formation, Natural History Museum of Denmark & Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, ster Voldgade 5-7, DK-1350 Copenhagen K., Denmark Corresponding author: Molly R. Kosiarek [email protected] ∗ Based on observations obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated jointly by the University of California and the California Institute of Technology. y This paper includes data gathered with the 6.5 meter Magellan Telescopes located at Las Campanas Observatory, Chile. 2 Kosiarek et al. 2020 ABSTRACT HD 106315 and GJ 9827 are two bright, nearby stars that host multiple super-Earths and sub- Neptunes discovered by K2 that are well suited for atmospheric characterization. We refined the planets' ephemerides through Spitzer transits, enabling accurate transit prediction required for future atmospheric characterization through transmission spectroscopy. Through a multi-year high-cadence observing campaign with Keck/HIRES and Magellan/PFS, we improved the planets' mass measure- ments in anticipation of HST transmission spectroscopy. For GJ 9827, we modeled activity-induced radial velocity signals with a Gaussian process informed from the Calcium II H&K lines in order to more accurately model the effect of stellar noise on our data. We found planet masses of Mb=4:87±0:37 M⊕,Mc=1:92 ± 0:49 M⊕, and Md=3:42 ± 0:62 M⊕. For HD 106315, we found that such activity-radial velocity decorrelation was not effective due to the reduced presence of spots and speculate that this may extend to other hot stars as well (Teff > 6200 K). We found planet masses of Mb=10:5 ± 3:1 M⊕ and Mc=12:0 ± 3:8 M⊕. We investigated all of the planets' compositions through comparing their masses and radii to a range of interior models. GJ 9827 b and GJ 9827 c are both consistent with an Earth-like rocky composition, GJ 9827 d and HD 106315 b both require additional volatiles and are consistent with moderate amounts of water or hydrogen/helium, and HD 106315 c is consistent with 10% hydrogen/helium by mass. 1. INTRODUCTION K2 photometry, and ground-based photometry in Sec- Small planets cover a wide variety of compositions tion4. We refine the planet masses through radial veloc- ranging from dense, iron-rich planets to low density ity analyses and explore the stability of including non- planets with large hydrogen/helium envelopes. Mass zero eccentricities with N-body simulations in Section5. and radius are degenerate with many potential compo- Finally, we examine potential interior compositions in sitions; measurements of atmospheric compositions can Section6 by comparing the masses and radii with com- help break this degeneracy (Figueira et al. 2009; Rogers position models, before concluding in Section7. & Seager 2010). 1.1. GJ 9827 In this paper, we characterize two planetary systems, HD 106315 and GJ 9827. These systems both con- GJ 9827 (K2-135) is a bright (V=10.3 mag, K=7.2 sist of multiple planets transiting bright, nearby host mag), nearby (distance=30 pc) K6 dwarf star hosting stars. Both systems contain promising targets for atmo- three planets discovered in K2 Campaign 12 (Niraula spheric composition studies through transmission spec- et al. 2017; Rodriguez et al. 2018). Planets b and c troscopy; three of the planets are being observed by orbit near a 3:1 resonance at 1.2 days and 3.6 days, with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) in GO-15333 (Krei- planet d at 6.2 days. These three planets span the gap dberg et al. 2020, Benneke et al. in prep) and GO-15428 seen in the radius distribution of small planets (Fulton (Hedges et al. in prep). These three planets are addi- et al. 2017) sized at 1.529±0.058R⊕, 1.201±0.046R⊕, tionally compelling targets for the James Webb Space and 1.955±0.075R⊕ respectively. Niraula et al.(2017) Telescope (JWST) as determined by their transmission collected 7 radial velocity observations with the FIbrefed spectroscopy metric values (TSM, Kempton et al. 2018, Echelle Spectrograph (FIES; Frandsen & Lindberg 1999; HD 106315 c: 91, GJ 9827 b: 95, GJ 9827 d: 144). Pre- Telting et al. 2014) to vet the system and to derive stellar cise mass measurements (∼20% precision) are needed to parameters. support the ongoing HST analyses and potential JWST The mass of planet b was first determined with radial observations as mass directly affects the observability of velocity observations from the Carnegie Planet Finder features and inferred properties from spectra (Batalha Spectrograph (PFS, Crane et al. 2006, 2008, 2010) et al. 2019). on Magellan II by Teske et al.(2018) (M b ∼8 M⊕), We measure the planet radii and update their who placed upper limits on planets c and d (Mc <2.5 ephemerides with Spitzer transit observations in Sec- M⊕,Md <5.6 M⊕). Through additional measurements tion2. We describe our spectroscopy, imaging data, with the High Accuracy Radial velocity Planet Searcher and update stellar parameters in Section3. We investi- (HARPS, Mayor et al. 2003) and the High Accuracy gate stellar activity in our radial velocity observations, Radial velocity Planet Searcher for the Northern hemi- sphere (HARPS-N), Prieto-Arranz et al.(2018) deter- mined the masses of all three planets (Mb=3.74±0.50 z NSF Graduate Research Fellow M ,M =1.47±0.59 M , and M =2.38±0.71 M ). The x ⊕ c ⊕ d ⊕ NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellow masses of planets b and d were further refined by Rice HD 106315 & GJ 9827 3 et al.(2019) with new HARPS-N radial velocity mea- 1.003 surements and a Gaussian process informed from the K2 1.002 GJ 9827 b 1.001 light curve (Mb=4.91±0.49M⊕and Md=4.04±0.84M⊕). Both Prieto-Arranz et al.(2018) and Rice et al.(2019) 1.000 0.999 discuss how the inner planets have a high density and Normalized Flux 0.998 the outer planet has a lower density, suggesting that 0.997 0.500 0.525 0.550 0.575 0.600 0.625 0.650 0.675 photoevaporation or migration could have played a role Time (BJD-2458188) in the evolution of this system; we discuss this possibility 1.003 GJ 9827 c further in Section6.