DOCSLIB.ORG

Incomplete Asset Declarations and Incompatible Activities of Public Officials in Samtskhe – Javakheti Municipalities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Incomplete Asset Declarations and Incompatible Activities of Public Officials in Samtskhe – Javakheti Municipalities Incomplete asset declarations and incompatible activities of public officials in Samtskhe – Javakheti municipalities Transparency International Georgia reviewed the declarations of public officials in Samtskhe-Javakheti municipalities (Akhaltsikhe, Ninotsminda, Akhalkalaki, Aspindza, Adigeni and Borjomi) for 2020-2021. For the research, we examined the declarations of 144 public officials of the City Halls and City Councils. We have revealed that 49 of the declarations have violations and factual inaccuracies, as well as we found out about 27 cases of incompatibility / incompatible activities for the public office. It is also noteworthy that some of the companies associated with the public officials are involved in public procurements. If the public official has a connection with an enterprise that didn’t have a turnover for 6 or for more than 6 years before the declaration filling date, or had a turnover of no more than GEL 500 during the whole year, then s/he has no obligation to indicate such enterprise in the declaration. Due to the fact that information about the turnover of the enterprise is a tax secret, Transparency International Georgia lacks the ability to check whether the companies mentioned in the research had turnover or not. Nevertheless, Transparency International Georgia believes that in order to maintain high standards of transparency and reduce the risks of corruption, it should include all the undeclared enterprises of public officials with active in its research. We have also identified alleged cases of nepotism in frames of the following research - after being appointed in the office in five municipalities of the region, family members of five high-ranking officials were employed in self-governments or in subordinate legal entities. Results of declaration monitoring ] Ninotsminda Municipality Out of 22 public officials in Ninotsminda municipality, 5 filled in the declarations with violations. Konstantin Vardanian Deputy Chairman of Ninotsminda City Council In the declaration filled out in June 2020, Konstantin Vardanian did not indicate that his wife, Albina Vartanian, is an acting director and owns a 100% share of Parvana TV LTD, founded in 2015. Giorgi Zmoyan Chairman of Ninotsminda City Council faction “Georgian Dream - Democratic Georgia” Giorgi Zmoyan did not indicate in his declaration which was filled out in October 2020, that he has been the Director of the Javakheti Association for the Promotion and Development of Agriculture N(N)LE since 2011. According to the Law on Conflict of Interest and Corruption in Public Institutions, a public servant has no right to hold another position in any public institution or in a legal entity of private law. Andranik Karapetyan Chairman of Ninotsminda City Council faction “Georgian Dream – Conservatives” Andranik Karapetyan did not indicate that he is an individual entrepreneur since 2011 in his declaration filled out in August 2020. David Durgaryan Chairman of Ninotsminda City Council faction “Georgian Dream – Youth” David Durgaryan did not indicate that he is an individual entrepreneur since 2016 in his declaration filled out in February 2021. Vaginak Arzumanyan Chairman of Ninotsminda City Council faction “Georgian Dream – Majoritarians” Vaginak Arzumanyan did not indicate that his wife, Ani Arzumanyan is an individual entrepreneur since March 2013, in the declaration filled out in September 2020. ] Akhalkalaki Municipality 11 out of 28 public officials in Akhalkalaki municipality have various violations. Stephan Ezoyan Head of Administrative Service of Akhalkalaki City Hall Stephan Ezoyan did indicate in the declaration filled out in August 2020 that his wife, Jemma Karoyan is a Director at Javakheti Professional College LTD, however he did not indicate that she owns 90% of shares in the same company. Furthermore, Ezoyan did not indicate that his son, Satenik Ezoyan is an individual entrepreneur since November 2017. Rosa Yordanyan Head of Akhalkalaki City Hall Procurement Service Rosa Yordanyan did not indicate in the declaration filled out in September 2020 that her husband, Vladimer Gogoladze is a Director of “Elgi” LTD and owner of 100% shares there since February 2014. Magda Amirshadyan Head of Akhalkalaki City Hall Infrastructure, Spatial Planning, Architecture and Construction Service Magda Amirshadyan also works at the Akhalkalaki Education Center N(N)LE as an accountant, which is incompatible under the Law on Conflict of Interest and Corruption in Public Institutions. Artashes Abgaryan Head of Internal Audit and Inspector Service at Akhalkalaki City Hall Artashes Abgaryan did not indicate in his declaration filled out in May 2020, that he is registered as anindividual entrepreneur since 2011. Ruben Abajyan Head of Military Registration and Conscription Service of Akhalkalaki City Hall Ruben Abajyan did not indicate in his declaration filled out in September 2020 that his wife, Asia Abajyan is anindividual entrepreneur since 2001. According to Ruben Abajyan’s declarations, he is also working at “Victoria Security” LTD at the managerial position since 2018, which is incompatible activity according to the Law on Conflict of Interest and Corruption in Public Institutions. Gaioz Lomsadze Deputy Chairman of Akhalkalaki City Council Gaioz Lomsadze, who is a Deputy Chairman of the City Council, also works as a Financial Manager at “Meeki” LTD. He indicated this information in his declaration, which is incompatible activity according to the Law on Conflict of Interest and Corruption in Public Institutions. “Meeki” LTD belongs to the family of Enzel Mkoyan, former majoritarian MP from Ninotsminda – Akhalkalaki. Since 2010, Akhalkalaki municipality LLCs and N(N)Les were buying fuel from “Meeki” LTD with simplified procurements. Transparency International Georgia wrote about the possible cases of corruption related to this company in January 2020. Gaioz Lomsadze was a Director of “Meeki” LTD before being elected at the City Council. Koba Gokhadze Chairman of Akhalkalaki City Council faction “Georgian Dream – Greens” Koba Gokhadze did not indicated in the declaration filled out in March 2021, that he is an individual entrepreneur since 2010. He also did not mention that his son, Zura Gokhadze is also an individual entrepreneur since 2018. Seda Melkumyan Chairman of Akhalkalaki City Council Finance – Budgetary Commission Seda Melkumyan, heads two N(N)Les in addition to holding a position at City Council: “Friendship of the People of Samtskhe – Javakheti” N(N)LE and “Civic Education for the Rule of Law” N(N)LE, which is an incompatible activity according to the Law on Conflict of Interest and Corruption in Public Institutions. She did not indicate this information in thedeclaration in January 2021. Sipan Shipaktsian Chairman of the Mandate, Procedural and Legal Issues and Ethics Commission at Akhalkalaki City Council Sipan Shipaktsian did not indicate in the declaration filled out in January 2021 that his father, Pavel Shipatskian and mother, Kishmish Tsormutian founded a cooperative “Azavreti” in 2016 and are its directors. Moreover, he did not indicate in the declaration that his mother is an individual entrepreneur since 2007. Andranik Muradyan Chairman of Municipal Property Management, Natural Recourses and Agrarian Issues Commission at Akhalkalaki City Council Andranik Muradyan did not indicate in the declaration filled out in December 2020 that he is a director of the cooperative “Ruben 2014”. He also did not indicate that his son, Ruben Muradyan is an individual entrepreneur. Sarkis Melikyan Chairman of Social Affairs, Culture, Education, Sports and Youth Affairs Commission at Akhalkalaki City Council Sarkis Melikyan did not indicate in his declaration filled out in January 2021 that he founded a cooperation “Mimoza” along with his brother Gevorik Melikyan. Gevorik Melikyan is a director of the cooperative. Furthermore, Meilikyan did not indicate that his brother - Gevorik Melikyan, his father – Ashot Melikyan and mother – Anait Melikyan are individual entrepreneurs. It is worth mentioning that Akhalkalaki City Hall signed a simplified procurement worth of GEL 19,999 with Gevorik Melikyan in July 2019 in frames of Rural Support Program. ] Aspindza Municipality 9 out of 24 public officials filled out declarations with violations in Aspindza Municipality. Rostom Magrakvelidze Mayor of Aspindza Municipality Rostom Magrakvelidze did not indicate in the declaration filled out in February 2021, that he is a Director of the cooperative “Tsekavshiri”. Anzor Alelishvili Head of Infrastructure, Spatial Planning, Architecture and Construction Supervision Service at Aspindza City Hall Anzor Alelishvili did not indicate in his declaration filled out in December 2020 that his wife – Marine Londaridze is the founder and the member of cooperative “Vardzia 2015”. Irakli Jvaridze Head of Control and Internal Audit Service at Aspindza City Hall Irakli Jvaridze did not indicate in his declaration filled out in March 2021 that he was an individual entrepreneur before November 2020. Otar Tsinadze Head of Culture, Education, Sports, Monument Protection, Youth Affairs and Tourism Development Service at Aspindza City Hall Otar Tsinadze did not indicate in the declaration filled out in March 2021 that his wife Irma Zazadze – Tsinadze is an individual entrepreneur since 2016. Roin Vacharidze Head of Military Registration and Conscription Service at Aspindza Municipality Roin Vacharidze did not indicate in his declaration filled out in May 2020 that he is a board member of cooperative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Georgia Armenia Azerbaijan 4
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd 317 Behind the Scenes SEND US YOUR FEEDBACK We love to hear from travell ers – your comments keep us on our toes and help make our books better. Our well- travell ed team reads every word on what you loved or loathed about this book. Although we cannot reply individually to postal submissions, we always guarantee that your feedback goes straight to the appropriate authors, in time for the next edition. Each person who sends us information is thanked in the next edition – the most useful submissions are rewarded with a selection of digital PDF chapters. Visit lonelyplanet.com/contact to submit your updates and suggestions or to ask for help. Our award-winning website also features inspirational travel stories, news and discussions. Note: We may edit, reproduce and incorporate your comments in Lonely Planet products such as guidebooks, websites and digital products, so let us know if you don’t want your comments reproduced or your name acknowledged. For a copy of our privacy policy visit lonelyplanet.com/privacy. Stefaniuk, Farid Subhanverdiyev, Valeria OUR READERS Many thanks to the travellers who used Superno Falco, Laurel Sutherland, Andreas the last edition and wrote to us with Sveen Bjørnstad, Trevor Sze, Ann Tulloh, helpful hints, useful advice and interest- Gerbert Van Loenen, Martin Van Der Brugge, ing anecdotes: Robert Van Voorden, Wouter Van Vliet, Michael Weilguni, Arlo Werkhoven, Barbara Grzegorz, Julian, Wojciech, Ashley Adrian, Yoshida, Ian Young, Anne Zouridakis. Asli Akarsakarya, Simone
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Cases on Restriction of Religious Freedoms and Discrimination
    Overview of Cases on Restriction of Religious Freedoms and Discrimination The present report was prepared in the framework of the project – “Increasing Access to Justice for დოკუმენტი მომზადებულია პროექტის „მართლმსაჯულების ხელმისაწვდომობის გაძლიერება Discriminated Religious Communities“ - financed by the program “Promoting Rule of Law in Georgia დისკრიმინირებული რელიგიური თემებისთვის” ფარგლებში, რომელიც ხორციელდება (PROLoG) implemented by the East-West Management Institute (EWMI). ამერიკის შეერთებული შტატების საერთაშორისო განვითარების სააგენტოს (USAID) მხარდაჭერით, აღმოსავლეთ - დასავლეთის მართვის ინსტიტუტის (EWMI)-ის პროგრამის The report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the US Agency for „კანონის უზენაესობის მხარდაჭერა საქართველოში“ (PROLoG) ფარგლებში. International Development (USAID). Responsibility for the content of the report lies entirely with the authors.მიმოხილვაში Views expressedგამოთქმული in this მოსაზრება publication შესაძლოაdo not necessarily არ გამოხატავდეს reflect the viewsUSAID of -theის U.Sპოზიციას Government. orშესაბამისად United States, USAID Agency არ forარის International პასუხისმგებელი Development. მასალის შინაარსზე. ხელმძღვანელი: თამთა მიქელაძე ავტორები: მარიამ ბეგაძე, ეთო გვრიტიშვილი, ქეთი ჩუთლაშვილი რედაქტორი: ლაშა ქავთარაძე დიზაინერი: თორნიკე ლორთქიფანიძე გარეკანი: სალომე ლაცაბიძე აკრძალულია აქ მოყვანილი მასალების გადაბეჭდვა, გამრავლება ან გავრცელება კომერციული მიზნით, ცენტრის წერილობითი ნებართვის გარეშე. ადამიანის უფლებების სწავლებისა და მონიტორინგის ცენტრი (EMC) მისამართი:
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Historical and Environmental Route
    Georgia Historical and Environmental route: Samtskhe - Javakheti 1. Depart from Bavra (Armenia) and arrival to Samtshke-Javakheti Transboundary protected area and Ramsar site 2. Kumudo Dome Church, 964 AD., Kurmodo Village (Akhalkalaki Municipality) 3. Vardzia Cave City, XII-XIII Century, Tmogvi Village (Aspindza Municipality) 4. Kertvisi Castle 5. Sapara Monastery, X; XII-XIV Century, Greli Village (Akhaltsikhe Municipality) 6. Atskuri Virgin Mary Church, Middle Centuries, Atskuri Village 7. Atskuri Prision, X-XIV Century, Atskuri Village (Akhaltsikhe Municipality) 8. Vale Virgin Mary Church, X Century, Vale Village (Akhaltsikhe Municipality) 9. Akhaltsike Archeological Museum 10. Green Monastery Church, IX-XIV Century, Likani Village (Borjomi Municipality) 11. Tabatskuri Red Church, Middle Centuries, Tabatskuri Village 12. Ktsia-Tabtskuri Proteced Areas 13. Timotesubani, 1204 A.D., Timotesubani Village (Borjormi Municipality) 14. Kharagauli National Park (Borjormi Municipality) 15. Ubisa Monastery, IX- XII Century, Ubisa Village (Kharagauli Municipality) 16. Tsromi cathedral, 626-635 A.D., Tsromi Village (Kashuri municipality) 17. Tskhisis’natlismcemli Church, 1002 A.D., Tskhisi Village (Kashuri municipality) 18. Kashuri (Nazuki bakers) (Tkibuli municipality) Imereti 19. Bagrati Cathedral, 1003 A.D., Ukimerioni Hill, Kutaisi 20. Gelati Monastery, XII Century, Gelati Village (UNESCO Cultural Heritage site) (Tkiuli Municipality) 21. Martyr’s Monastery, VII-XIX Century, Mitsameta Village 22. Vani Archeological Museum (Kolkheti expedition) 23. Sataplia and Promethe cave protected area Dinosaurs path 24. Tsivi and Tsia archeological excavation Samegrelo-Zemo Svaneti 25. Zugdidi City 26. Proposed UNESCO Natural World Heritage and Ramsar sites - Colchis - Country of Argonauts (Medea and Aieti), habitat of Phasianus colchicus NATURE 2000 and Emerald Network species and habitat 27. Martvili monastery, VII Century, Martveli (Martveli Muncipality) 28.
    [Show full text]
  • Adjara, Imereti and Samtskhe-Javakheti
    PRE-ELECTION ENVIRONMENT IN THE REGIONS OF GEORGIA Adjara, Imereti and Samtskhe-Javakheti 2020 Pre-election environment in the regions of Georgia (Adjara, Imereti and Samtskhe-Javakheti) HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER NGO HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER (HRC) was established on December 10, 1996 in Tbilisi. The objectives of HRC is to strengthen the respect for human rights, fundamental freedoms and to promote peace processes in Georgia. In order to achieve the above objectives it is of utmost importance that the awareness of the public is raised and human rights are observed, further the government respects the rule of law and principles of transparency and distribution of power and ensures the elimination of discrimination at all levels. HRC is a member to the following international networks: International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH); www.fidh.org World Organization Against Torture (OMCT - SOS Network - Torture); www.omct.org Human Rights House Network www.humanrightshouse.org Coalition of NGOs for the International Criminal Court (CICC); www.coalitionfortheicc.org Pre-election environment in the regions of Georgia (Adjara, Imereti and Samtskhe-Javakheti) AUTHOR: NINO TSAGAREISHVILI EDITOR: ALEKO TSKITISHVILI PARTICIPATED IN THE MONITORING: ANA CHAPIDZE RUSUDAN SAKHECHIDZE GIORGI BERIDZE RESPONSIBLE FOR TRANSLATION: NICK JASHI The report was prepared with the financial support of the Black Sea Trust, a project of the German Marshall Fund of the United States. Opinions expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent those of the Black
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Hazards in Samtskhe-Javakheti Region (Georgia)
    International Journal of Geosciences, 2016, 7, 311-324 Published Online March 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ijg http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2016.73024 Geological Hazards in Samtskhe-Javakheti Region (Georgia) Gaprindashvili George1,2, Gerkeuli Tamaz1, Tsereteli Emil1,2, Gaprindashvili Merab1 1Department of Geology, National Environmental Agency, Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection, Tbilisi, Georgia 2Vakhushti Bagrationi Institute of Geography, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia Received 17 February 2016; accepted 19 March 2016; published 22 March 2016 Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Hundreds of settlements, agricultural lands, roads, oil and gas pipelines’ routes, towers of high voltage transmission lines, hydro-technical-meliorative objects, mountain resorts, etc. are period- ically experiencing strong influence of landslide-gravitational and debris flow/mudflow processes (often with catastrophic results). Almost all landscape-geographic zones—from Black Sea coastal region, to mountainous-nival, where geo-ecological situation is severely complicated, are located in dangerous area of disaster. Negative social-economic, demographic and ecological consequences caused by debris flow/mudflows and landslide-gravitational processes, are seen in all spheres of human activity. In mountainous regions there is especially complicated situation, where in condi- tions of extreme activation of disaster, in many cases population displacement and transfer to other regions is needed. Because of it, in second half of 20th century, tens of villages in mountain- ous regions were desolated and agricultural lands were abandoned.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Citizen Engagement Practices in the Municipalities of Batumi, Kutaisi and Akhaltsikhe
    Assessment of Citizen Engagement Practices in the Municipalities of Batumi, Kutaisi and Akhaltsikhe The assessment has been conducted by the Institute for Development of Freedom of Information (IDFI), within the framework of the project “New E-Governance Initiatives to meet OGP Commitments in Georgia”, funded by the Good Governance Initiative (GGI) in Georgia project of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Estonia. The study has been prepared by the Institute for Development of Freedom of Information (IDFI) and the opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Good Governance Initiative (GGI) in Georgia project, the United States government or the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Estonia. Author: Saba Buadze Editor: Levan Avalishvili Reviewed by: Mamuka Abuladze March 2017 Tbilisi 1 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 General Context & Legal Framework ........................................................................................................... 4 Main Observations ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Public Participation Practices in Batumi .................................................................................................. 8 Public
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIA Handbook on Transparency and Citizen Participation
    GEORGIA Handbook on Transparency and Citizen Participation Council of Europe Original: Handbook on Transparency and Citizen Participation in Georgia (English version) The opinions expressed in this work are the responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Council of Europe. The reproduction of extracts (up to 500 words) is authorised, except for commercial purposes as long as the integrity of the text is preserved, the excerpt is not used out of context, does not provide incomplete information or does not otherwise mislead the reader as to the nature, scope or content of the text. The source text must always be acknowledged as follows All other requests concerning the reproduction/translation of all or part of the document, should be addressed to the Directorate of Communications, Council of Europe (F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex or [email protected]). All other requests concerning this publication should be addressed to the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe. Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe Cover design and layout: RGOLI F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex France © Council of Europe, December 2020 E-mail: [email protected] (2nd edition) Acknowledgements This Handbook on Transparency and Citizen Participation in Georgia was developed by the (2015-2017) in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus. It was implemented as part of the Partnership for Good Governance 2015-2017 between the Council of Europe and the European Union. The research work and writing of this updated edition was carried out by the Institute for Development of Freedom of Information (IDFI), a Georgian non-governmental organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Project Catalogue September 2020
    INVESTINGEORGIA.ORG INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES 2020 A PLEASURE DOING BUSINESS Located in the Caucasus region, on the coast of The country's ambitious objectives to be one of the Black Sea, Georgia is geographically well the best investment locations on the world map positioned as a gateway between Europe and are reflected in number of different Asia. The country is perfectly situated for easy well-recognized international rankings, where access to most major European, Central Asian Georgia maintains strong positions. For and Middle Eastern markets and has free trade example, Georgia holds 7th position in World agreements (FTAs) with most of them. In this Bank’s 2020 “Ease of Doing Business Index”. way, Georgia already boasts majority of the Foreign-owned businesses make significant preconditions required to become a regional contribution to the Georgian economy and its financial and business centre. great position for deepening links between Europe and Asia will further raise country’s Today, Georgia has a strong investment offer - productivity - via the transfer of technology, by it has liberal and free market oriented economic increased export-oriented investments and policy, access to 2.3 billion consumer market stronger regional competition positions. through its solid FTA network including both EU and China, educated, skilled and competitively Georgia is a great destination for companies priced workforce, 6 types of low and flat taxes, from all around the world, whether it’s to enter significantly decreased number of licenses and the regional market itself, the European market, permissions, well developed, integrated and or the broader Asian markets. It is a country full multimodal transport infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Does Georgia Stand? Hidden Gem of Georgia
    Issue no: 1141 • APRIL 12 - 15, 2019 • PUBLISHED TWICE WEEKLY PRICE: GEL 2.50 In this week’s issue... SovLab Calls for Autopsy of 150 Corpses Found in Batumi NEWS PAGE 2 De Facto Abkhazia to Deprive Georgians of Right FOCUS to Inherit Property ON JACK SHEPHERD'S POLITICS PAGE 4 LAST GEORGIA INTERVIEW Georgian Wine Shows Find out Jack's last Great Potential on the words and thoughts before being put behind Japanese Market bars in British prison PAGE 6 SOCIETY PAGE 7 Samtskhe-Javakheti: a A Europe in Crisis: Where Does Georgia Stand? Hidden Gem of Georgia tarian yoke and thirty years of democratic progress, our European aspi- Preserving an Ancient ration is inseparable from the consolidation of liberal democracy.” Zurabishvili believes that Europe will both protect and progress Geor- Megalithic Culture gia by bringing improvements such as new commercial opportunities, access to Erasmus programs, and the introduction of European regula- tions for health and safety. In addition, Europe plays an integral part in preventing Russia from continuing to encroach on Georgian territory. Georgians predominantly support the European idea: “Georgians have been supporting EU membership with 80% for years,” writes Zurabish- vili. However, despite Georgia’s pro-Europe stance, many EU member states are becoming increasingly eurosceptic and turning towards pop- ulism and nationalism. Since the turn of the century, the number of Europeans voting for populist parties in national votes has risen from 7% to more than 25%, according to research by The Guardian. In 1998, only Switzerland and Slovakia had populist governments. Two decades later, another nine countries do.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report, Volume 1
    TRANSMISSION GRID STRENGTHENING PROJECT CONSTRUCTION OF AKHALTSIKHE - BATUMI 220KV POWER TRANSMISSION LINE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Volume 1 - Main Text Revision V15 28th of March, 2014 DG Consulting Ltd Address: 10, Mirza Gelovani Street, 0160, Tbilisi, Georgia; Reg No 205 280 998; Tel: +995 322 380 313; +995 599 500 778;e‐mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng_V15 Page 2 of 345 Signatures chapter Prepared by: DG Consulting Ltd Prepared for: AGL- Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC Revision Table chapter Revised Part of Revision # Reason of Revision Document 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - Elaboration of missing sections _V03 - QC/QA procedure of DG Consulting - Comments of AGL 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - Comments of AGL, WB and _V04 GSE 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - QC/QA procedure of DG _V05/V06 Consulting 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - Comments of AGL, WB and _V07 GSE 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - QC/QA procedure of DG _V08/V09 Consulting 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Section 5 – ESIA WB comments _V10 Methodology Section 7 – Sensitive Receptors and Potential Impacts Section 8 – Impact Mitigation 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - QC/QA procedure of DG _V11 Consulting 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Section 10 - Public The section elaborated on ALG _V12 Consultation Activities request 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Signatures chapter ALG comments _V13 Revision Table Chapter 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng The cover page
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM): Georgia Progress Report 2016- 2017
    Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM): Georgia Progress Report 2016- 2017 Lasha Gogidze, Independent Researcher Tamar Gzirishvili, Independent Researcher Table of Contents Executive Summary: Georgia 3 1. Introduction 15 II. Context 16 III. Leadership and Multistakeholder Process 22 IV. Commitments 29 1. Adapting the Public Service Hall to the needs of people with disabilities 32 2. Launch of the unified healthcare system information portal 35 3. Introduction of electronic licensing system in the field of natural resource application 38 4. Creation of spatial (geographic) data web-portal for the energy sector 41 5. Creation of innovation ecosystem 44 6. Electronic portal for registering and disposal of state property – Customer’s Module 48 7. Development of the Freedom of Information Law 50 8. Development of a monitoring and assessment system of the Government policy and legislative acts 53 ✪ 9. Introduction of the public officials’ asset declarations monitoring system 56 10. Establishing unified regulations to publish court decisions 59 11. Development of transparency and integrity strategy and action plan in the field of regional development and infrastructure 62 12. Improvement of the database of the convicted and transfer of the penitentiary department entirely onto the electronic workflow management 66 13. Publication of phone tapping data according to the nature of the crime and geographic area 69 ✪14. Increasing citizen participation in supervision of public finances (public audit) 72 15. Electronic innovations for more transparency and efficiency of public procurement 77 ✪16. Adoption of the Environmental Assessment Code 81 17. Introduction of a mobile app as an alternative channel to connect to “112” 84 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Indicators of the State Budget of Georgia
    STATE BUDGET OF GEORGIA FOR 2012 CHAPTER I: INDICATORS OF THE STATE BUDGET OF GEORGIA ARTICLE 1. BALANCE SHEET OF THE STATE BUDGET OF GEORGIA Balance sheet of the state budget of Georgia shall be defined as following: in thousands GEL o/w Line Item 2010 Actual 2011 Proj. 2012 Proj. Budget Donor Funding Revenues 5,421,474.0 6,471,545.2 6,839,399.4 6,674,800.0 164,599.4 Taxes 4,592,367.6 5,775,000.0 6,300,000.0 6,300,000.0 0.0 Grants 471,422.9 306,545.2 239,399.4 74,800.0 164,599.4 Other Revenues 357,683.4 390,000.0 300,000.0 300,000.0 0.0 Expenses 5,466,466.8 6,029,421.0 6,554,288.3 6,167,827.7 386,460.6 Compensation of Employees 993,483.9 1,020,552.0 1,133,426.0 1,133,426.0 0.0 Goods and Services 881,586.6 924,387.0 918,801.6 918,801.6 0.0 Interest 200,663.3 284,620.3 335,358.0 335,358.0 0.0 Subsidies 196,306.9 203,510.9 212,009.1 172,406.7 39,602.4 Grants 1,099,637.0 1,252,331.4 1,185,748.9 1,182,782.8 2,966.1 Social Security 1,481,067.6 1,580,670.9 1,691,160.9 1,691,160.9 0.0 Other Expenses 613,721.6 763,348.5 1,077,783.9 733,891.8 343,892.1 Operating Balance -44,992.9 442,124.2 285,111.1 506,972.3 -221,861.2 Changes in Non-Financial Assets 873,489.0 804,402.6 742,223.7 390,331.9 351,891.8 Increase 1,020,265.0 974,402.6 812,223.7 460,331.9 351,891.8 Reduction 146,775.9 170,000.0 70,000.0 70,000.0 0.0 Overall Balance -918,481.9 -362,278.4 -457,112.6 116,640.4 -573,753.0 Changes in Financial Assets 357,438.5 377,097.7 369,508.1 63,230.5 306,277.6 Increase 423,338.8 437,097.7 429,508.1 123,230.5 306,277.6 Currency and Deposits 109,050.9 56,823.9 100,000.0 100,000.0 0.0 Loans 231,696.2 217,418.0 308,008.1 1,730.5 306,277.6 Shares and other Equity 82,591.7 162,855.8 21,500.0 21,500.0 0.0 Reduction 65,900.3 60,000.0 60,000.0 60,000.0 0.0 Loans 65,882.6 60,000.0 60,000.0 60,000.0 0.0 Other Debit Liabilities 17.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o/w Line Item 2010 Actual 2011 Proj.
    [Show full text]