DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report, Volume 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report, Volume 1 TRANSMISSION GRID STRENGTHENING PROJECT CONSTRUCTION OF AKHALTSIKHE - BATUMI 220KV POWER TRANSMISSION LINE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Volume 1 - Main Text Revision V15 28th of March, 2014 DG Consulting Ltd Address: 10, Mirza Gelovani Street, 0160, Tbilisi, Georgia; Reg No 205 280 998; Tel: +995 322 380 313; +995 599 500 778;e‐mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng_V15 Page 2 of 345 Signatures chapter Prepared by: DG Consulting Ltd Prepared for: AGL- Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC Revision Table chapter Revised Part of Revision # Reason of Revision Document 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - Elaboration of missing sections _V03 - QC/QA procedure of DG Consulting - Comments of AGL 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - Comments of AGL, WB and _V04 GSE 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - QC/QA procedure of DG _V05/V06 Consulting 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - Comments of AGL, WB and _V07 GSE 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - QC/QA procedure of DG _V08/V09 Consulting 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Section 5 – ESIA WB comments _V10 Methodology Section 7 – Sensitive Receptors and Potential Impacts Section 8 – Impact Mitigation 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Entire document - QC/QA procedure of DG _V11 Consulting 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Section 10 - Public The section elaborated on ALG _V12 Consultation Activities request 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng Signatures chapter ALG comments _V13 Revision Table Chapter 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng The cover page has been ALG comments _V14 changed DG Consulting Ltd 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng_V15 Page 3 of 345 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 9 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 21 1.1 Project Background ............................................................................................................................ 21 1.2 Development and Structure of the ESIA Report ................................................................................ 21 2. Legal and Policy framework ..................................................................................................... 24 2.1 Georgian Legislation .......................................................................................................................... 24 2.2 World Bank and IFC Policy Requirements and Guidelines ................................................................. 28 2.3 EU Regulations and International Conventions ................................................................................. 30 2.4 Technical and Environmental Standards and Regulations ................................................................. 31 2.5 The Gaps between Georgian legislation and WB requirements ........................................................ 33 3. Project Description .................................................................................................................. 34 3.1 Need for the Project .......................................................................................................................... 34 3.2 General Project Description ............................................................................................................... 34 3.3 Location and RoW .............................................................................................................................. 35 3.4 Associated transmission lines and connections ................................................................................. 37 3.5 Technical Standards and Norms applied ........................................................................................... 37 3.6 Project Components .......................................................................................................................... 37 3.6.2 Transmission Towers .................................................................................................................................... 38 3.7 Project Activities ................................................................................................................................ 45 4. Analysis of Project Alternatives ............................................................................................... 52 4.1 No‐action Alternative ........................................................................................................................ 52 4.2 System Alternatives ........................................................................................................................... 52 4.3 Design Alternatives ............................................................................................................................ 52 4.4 Route Alternatives ............................................................................................................................. 53 4.5 Tower Location Alternatives .............................................................................................................. 59 5. ESIA Methodology ................................................................................................................... 60 5.1 Methodology for screening and scoping process .............................................................................. 60 5.2 Public Participation ............................................................................................................................ 60 5.3 Methodology for baseline study ........................................................................................................ 61 5.4 Impact identification .......................................................................................................................... 64 5.5 Methodology for impact rating ......................................................................................................... 65 6. Physical and Natural environment ‐ Baseline Conditions .......................................................... 67 6.1 Physical Environment ........................................................................................................................ 67 6.1.1 Climate and Meteorological Conditions ........................................................................................... 67 6.1.2 Landscapes and Land Use ................................................................................................................. 71 6.1.3 Geology and Geohazards .................................................................................................................. 78 6.1.4 Soil cover .......................................................................................................................................... 91 6.2 Biological Environment ...................................................................................................................... 93 6.2.1 Protected areas and areas of special environmental importance .................................................... 93 6.2.2 Flora .................................................................................................................................................. 96 6.2.3 Fauna .............................................................................................................................................. 151 6.2.4 Protected Animal Species in Project Corridor ................................................................................ 169 6.2.5 Summary of Wildlife Sensitivities ................................................................................................... 173 6.3 Socio‐Economic Environment .......................................................................................................... 178 DG Consulting Ltd 41166_ABOHL_ESIA_Vol1_Eng_V15 Page 4 of 345 6.3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 178 6.3.2 General Overview of Project Region .............................................................................................. 178 6.3.3 Demography ................................................................................................................................... 181 6.3.4 Economics ....................................................................................................................................... 184 6.3.5 Agriculture and land availability ..................................................................................................... 187 6.3.6 Industry and Non‐Agricultural sector ............................................................................................. 189 6.3.7 Labour Force and Employment ...................................................................................................... 190 6.3.8 Structure of Incomes and Expenses of Population ......................................................................... 191 6.3.9 Socio‐Economic Profile of Project Corridor .................................................................................... 193 6.3.10 Demography ................................................................................................................................... 196 6.3.11 Education .......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment
    REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA National Urban Assessment ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA NATIONAL URBAN ASSESSMENT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2016 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2016. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-352-2 (Print), 978-92-9257-353-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT168254 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Realizing the urban potential in Georgia—National urban assessment. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2016. 1. Urban development.2. Georgia.3. National urban assessment, strategy, and road maps. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication was finalized in November 2015 and statistical data used was from the National Statistics Office of Georgia as available at the time on http://www.geostat.ge The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Update to the Market Analysis Samtskhe Javakheti
    UPDATE TO THE MARKET ANALYSIS SAMTSKHE JAVAKHETI ALLIANCES LESSER CAUCASUS PROGRAMME ALLIANCES LESSER CAUCASUS PROGRAMME INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 3 SUMMARY MARKET ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................ 3 THE KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ALLIANCES-SJ PROGRAMME AREA ............................................................ 9 The Programme Area ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Summary of the poulation ........................................................................................................................... 11 CORE MARKET SYSTEMS ................................................................................................................................ 11 DAIRY: COWS, BUFFALO, SHEEP ............................................................................................................................... 11 Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 12 Womens roles in the dairy sector ................................................................................................................. 12 MEAT .................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Separation of Powers Program
    PROMOTING RULE OF LAW IN GEORGIA (PROLoG) CA # AID-114-A-15-00004 QUARTERLY REPORT YEAR THREE APRIL 1, 2017 – JUNE 30, 2017 1 PROMOTING RULE OF LAW IN GEORGIA ACTIVITY (PROLoG) QUARTERLY REPORT YEAR THREE APRIL 1, 2017 – JUNE 30, 2017 Prepared under the USAID’s Promoting Rule of Law in Georgia (PROLoG) Activity, Cooperative Agreement Number AID-114-A-15-00004 Submitted to: USAID/Georgia as of July 28, 2017 Implementer East-West Management Institute, Inc. Responsible Parties: Giorgi Chkheidze, Chief of Party, Tbilisi, [email protected] Mark Dietrich, Project Director, Washington, D.C. [email protected] Disclaimer This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of East-West Management Institute, Inc. and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government 2 TABLE OF ACRONYMS ACCESS Advancing CSO Capacities and Engaging Society for Sustainability ADR Alternative Dispute Resolution CA Cooperative Agreement CEPEJ European Community for the Efficiency of Justice CIDA Civil Development Agency CRRC Caucasus Resource Research Center CLE Continuing Legal Education COE Council of Europe COP Chief of Party DCOP Deputy Chief of Party ECtHR European Court of Human Rights EHRAC European Human Rights Advocacy Centre EMC Human Rights Education and Monitoring Center EWMI East-West Management Institute Free-Uni Free University of Tbilisi GDI Georgian Democracy Imitative GBA Georgian
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Project Proposal on Development of Tourism in the Javakheti National Park Support Zone
    Detailed Project Proposal on Development of Tourism in the Javakheti National Park Support Zone 2012 - 2013 Content: 1. Project Primary Information and Situational Analysis 2. Description of the Problem and Project Objectives Subsequent from the Problems 3. Project Objectives and Feasible Outcomes 4. Link between Planned Components and the Establishment of the Javakheti National Park in Georgia Project 5. Criteria and Methods for Selection of Beneficiaries 6. Number of Beneficiaries and its Substantiation in accordance with Poverty, Gender Balance and Other Factors 7. Project Implementation Stages and Activities 8. Project Implementation Detailed Schedule (Chart for Summarising Distribution of Activities in Timeline) 9. Detailed Budget of the Project 10. Economic Indicators and Calculation 11. Risks and Assumptions that May Impact on Achieving Goals and Mitigation Strategies 12. Project Implementation Methodology Responsibilities of Implementing Parties 13. Substantiation of Project Sustainability 14. Efficiency Indicators of Project Implementation 15. Project Implementation Monitoring Chart and Methods 16. Additional Information 17. Appendices: Appendix 1 – Study Programmes in Accordance with Training Courses Appendix 2 – Chart for Summarising Distribution of Activities in Timeline Appendix 3 - Questionnaire on Public Perception and Monitoring and Evaluation of Social Impact Appendix 4 - List of Potential Guides Appendix 5 – Business Plans Appendix 6 – Project Budget 2 1. Project Primary Information and Situational Analysis Javakheti is located in the southern part of Georgia. Geographically, it is located in the extreme northern part of the country’s Middle East Highland. The north of Javakheti is bordered by the Trialeti Ridge Slopes while the eastern and southern parts are surrounded by the Abul-Samsar and Javakheti Ranges which gradually transform into Turkey’s north-eastern plateau (the Childir “Çildir” Lake area).
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    SFG2732 Public Disclosure Authorized THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT OF THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM DEVELOPMENT STARTEGIES OF SAMTSKHE-JAVAKHETI AND MTSKETA-MTIANETI Public Disclosure Authorized Third Regional Development Project Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized December, 2016 Abbreviations GNTA Georgia National Tourism Administration EIA Environnemental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan RDS Regional Development Strategy RTDS Regional Tourism Development Strategy MDF Municipal Development Fund of Georgia MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoENRP Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia MoCMP Ministry of Culture and Monument Protection MESD Ministry of Economic and Sustaineble Developmnet NACHP National Agency for Cultural Heritage Protection PIU Project Implementation Unit RDP Regional Development Project SECHSA Strategic Environmental, Cultural Heritage and Social Assessment WB World Bank Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 THIRD REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (RDP III) ..................................................... 12 1.2 REGIONAL AND SECTORAL CONTEXT: RDS AND RTDS FOR SAMTSKHE- JAVAKHETI AND MTSKHETA-MTIANETI REGIONS ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Agency: Social Service Agency, LEPL
    Chapter V Affordable, Quality Healthcare and Social Security 1.1. Social Security of Population (Program Code: 35 02) Implementing Agency: Social Service Agency, LEPL 1.1.1. Pension Payments to Population (Program Code: 35 02 01) • Beneficiaries of state pensions and state compensations envisaged in Laws of Georgia on State pension, State Commensations and State Academic Bursaries have been paid pensions through financing the commitments made by the State on pension payments; • State pensions have been paid in January to over 708.1 thousand individuals, in February – to over 708.6 thousand individuals, in March – to over 709.4 thousand individuals, in April – to over 710.6 thousand individuals, in May – to over 711.5 thousand individuals, in June – to over 713.0 thousand individuals, in July – to over 714,2 thousand individuals, in August – to over 716.3 thousand individuals, in September – to over 717.8 thousand individuals, while state compensations have been paid in January-February to over 20.7-20.7 thousand beneficiaries, in March – to over 20.8 thousand beneficiaries, in April-May – to over 20.9-20.9 thousand beneficiaries, in June – to over 20.8 thousand beneficiaries and July-September - to over 20.9-20.9 thousand beneficiaries. Total expenditure towards this end in the reporting period has been 1 153.1 MLN GEL. 1.1.2. Social Security of Targeted Groups of Population (Program Code: 35 02 02) • Number of beneficiaries getting subsistance minimum in January has amounted over 407.3 thousand individuals, February – over 422.0 thousand
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1. Baseline Survey for Akhalkalaki LDS Development
    Appendix 1: Baseline Survey for Akhalkalaki LDS Development Study of the Community Problems and Needs Baseline Survey for Akhalkalaki LDS Development Study of the Community Problems and Needs Prepared by GRDD of GIPA Tbilisi, 2017 Appendix 1: Baseline Survey for Akhalkalaki LDS Development Study of the Community Problems and Needs Table of Contents 1. Background of the baseline survey .............................................................................. 3 2. Survey design and methodology .................................................................................. 3 2.1. Overall baseline survey design and methodology ................................................................ 3 2.2. Survey sites ....................................................................................................................... 3 2.3. Data Collection ................................................................................................................. 4 2.3.1. Study population and sampling strategy .............................................................................. 4 2.3.2. Group discussion .................................................................................................................. 5 2.3.3. Key informant interview ....................................................................................................... 5 2.3.4. Data collection, registration, processing, and analysis ....................................................... 5 2.3.5. Survey team and organization .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Assessment of Georgian Municipalities (2019)
    RESULTS FOR 2019 1 61% Batumi 60 9% Samtredia 2 57% Rustavi 61 8% Adigeni 3 56% Lagodekhi 62 7% Aspindza NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF 4 55% Zugdidi 63 7% Ninotsminda GEORGIAN MUNICIPALITIES 5 52% Tetritskaro 64 6% Akhalkalaki (2019) 4 60 3 1 61 5 2 62 64 63 28% % 21% 31% % 24% 19% 25% 2017 2019 2017 2019 AVERAGE SCORE 2017 2019 MUNICIPAL COUNCIL CITY HALL Municipalities with Biggest Improvements Compared to 2017 www.lsgindex.org +34% +26% +25% +24% +23% Batumi City Senaki Tsageri Tetritskaro Tsalenjikha Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality RESULTS FOR 2019 1 61% Batumi 60 9% Samtredia 2 57% Rustavi 61 8% Adigeni 3 56% Lagodekhi 62 7% Aspindza NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF 4 55% Zugdidi 63 7% Ninotsminda GEORGIAN MUNICIPALITIES 5 52% Tetritskaro 64 6% Akhalkalaki (2019) 4 60 3 1 61 5 2 62 64 63 28% 31% 21% 24% 19% 25% 2017 2019 2017 2019 AVERAGE SCORE 2017 2019 MUNICIPAL COUNCIL CITY HALL Municipalities with Biggest Improvements Compared to 2017 www.lsgindex.org +34% +26% +25% +24% +23% Batumi City Senaki Tsageri Tetritskaro Tsalenjikha Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Municipality Proactive Disclosure of Public Information Participation and Accountability Administrative General The Council of Civil Advisors 7% Expenses 50% Information is yet to be created in MUNICIPALITIES 11% 11 Legal 40% Entities Legal Acts and Court Decisions 19% 33% Budget Property Only 26 MAYORS MAJORITY OF MEMBERS of only 15 held public hearings of their municipal councils held public hearings of 29% performance reports their performance
    [Show full text]
  • Bilingual Educational Policy in Georgia: Can It Benefit the Process of the Integration of Society?
    c e p s Journal | Vol.9 | No1 | Year 2019 61 doi: 10.26529/cepsj.660 Bilingual Educational Policy in Georgia: Can it Benefit the Process of the Integration of Society? Shalva Tabatadze1 • This article reviews the educational policy for the integration of society in Georgia. It is an analytical research paper on the current situation of ethnic minority education in Georgia. The problems and opportuni- ties of bilingual education policy are analysed in the article. The content analysis research method was utilised in the study. The author argues that bilingual education is a crucial tool for the integration of Georgian society; however, local control, involvement, and context are crucial in the implementation of a national bilingual educational programme. The changes on the political, institutional and pedagogical levels of bilingual education are necessary for the successful implementation of bilingual education reform. Keywords: bilingual education, ethnic minorities, non-Georgian language schools, Georgia 1 East European University, Georgia ; [email protected]. 62 bilingual educational policy in georgia Ali lahko politika dvojezičnega izobraževanja v Gruziji prispeva k integracijskim procesom v družbi? Shalva Tabatadze • Članek obravnava izobraževalno politiko za integracijo družbe v Gruzi- ji. Gre za analitični znanstveni članek o trenutnem stanju izobraževanja etničnih manjšin v Gruziji. V njem so analizirane težave in priložnosti dvojezične izobraževalne politike. V raziskavi je bila uporabljena razi- skovalna metoda, ki zajema analizo vsebine. Avtor trdi, da je dvojezično izobraževanje ključno orodje za integracijo gruzijske družbe, čeprav so lokalni nadzor, vključenost in kontekst ključnega pomena pri imple- mentiranju nacionalnega dvojezičnega izobraževalnega programa. Za uspešno izvajanje dvojezične reforme izobraževanja so nujne spremem- be na politični, institucionalni in na pedagoški ravni.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Information About the Capital Project Implementation
    Information about the Capital Project Implementation 2015 Next Plan 2015 Code Name Actual 2014 approved cash basis Year 25 02 02 01 Regular reconstruction and rehabilitation of roads 1,045,815.10 110,848.40 110,842.80 435,000.00 25 02 02 07 coastal protection works 19,421.90 6,814.40 6,808.40 40,000.00 Tianeti -Zaridzeebi- Zhinvali road construction, reconstruction 25 02 02 08 and rehabilitation work 5,450.00 7,730.00 7,724.80 5,000.00 25 02 02 09 Secondary and local Road project II (WB) 102,379.20 9,084.00 8,434.90 10,000.00 25 02 02 10 Secondary and local Road project III (WB) 7,387.50 27,444.00 26,461.10 105,000.00 25 02 02 11 01 Kakheti Regional Roads Development Project (WB) 45,261.40 8,400.00 7,988.80 0 Kutaisi (Nikea str.) - Geguti node section reconstruction- 25 02 02 12 modernization 807.8 1,975.00 1,973.20 3,000.00 Stepantsminda- Sameba Church Road 1-6 st-km section 25 02 02 13 construction- reconstruction 63 95 94.5 4,000.00 25 02 03 01 East-West transit autobahn III (Sveneti Ruisi)(WB) 304,084.70 2,930.00 2,897.60 0 Additional Financing for the Third East-West Highway 25 02 03 02 Improvement Project (Ruisi-Agara) (WB) 52,335.20 28,520.00 27,116.30 5,000.00 25 02 03 03 Fourth East-West Highway Improvement Project (WB) 31,106.50 33,039.20 32,427.90 85,000.00 25 02 03 05 Road Corridor Investment Program (Kobuleti Bypass Road) 01 (ADB) 247,338.60 49,747.00 49,625.80 120,000.00 East-West Highway Improvement Project (Zestafoni - Kutaisi - 25 02 03 06 Samtredia) (JICA) 246,408.60 99,910.00 98,640.50 50,000.00 East-West Highway Improvement
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Law of Georgia on Changes to the Election
    Strasbourg, 13 January 2016 CDL-REF(2016)001 Opinion No. 834 / 2016 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ORGANIC LAW OF GEORGIA ON CHANGES TO THE ELECTION CODE OF GEORGIA (ON REDRAWING OF CONSTITUENCIES) ADOPTED ON 8 JANUARY 2016 This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2016)001 - 2 - Article 1. Organic Law of Georgia on the "Election Code of Georgia" (Legislative Herald of Georgia (www.matsne.gov.ge), 10.01.2012, registration code: 010190020.04.001.016032) shall be amended as follows: 1. Article 14, paragraph 1, subparagraph "e" shall be formed as follows: „e) by an ordinance, set up election districts and/or specify their boundaries in accordance with the procedures prescribed by this Law; ". 2. Article 18 shall be formed as follows: "Article 18. Election Districts 1. Election districts, their boundaries, titles and numbers shall be determined in accordance with this Law by a CEC ordinance, except for cases defined by paragraph 2 of this Article. 2. For the elections of the Parliament of Georgia, majoritarian districts shall be set up, their boundaries and numbers shall be determined in accordance with this Law and based on the procedures set by Articles 110 and 1101 of this Law." 3. Paragraph 2 of Article 19 shall be formed as follows: "2. The CEC is authorized to set up, by an ordinance, one DEC within boundaries of one or more self-governing units and 10 DECs in Tbilisi.". 4. Article 110 shall be formed as follows: "Article 110.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Guide Small.Indd
    samcxe-javaxeTis gzamkvlevi Samtskhe-Javakheti Travel Guide Georgia Tbilisi Tbilisi 2012 gamocemulia asociacia `elkanas~ mier Sveicariis ganviTarebisa da TanamSromlobis saagentos xelSewyobiT © yvela ufleba daculia avtorebi: Tamaz dundua, lela xartiSvili recenzentebi: dimitri axvlediani, istoriis mecnierebaTa doqtori, profesori; petre nasyidaSvili, soflis meurneobis mecnierebaTa doqtori, profesori, erovnuli akademiis wevr-korespondenti; elvard zazaZe, istorikosi; dali nikolaiSvili, iv. javaxiSvilis saxelobis Tbilisis saxelmwifo universitetis geografiis departamentis asocirebuli profesori. saredaqcio kolegia: mariam jorjaZe, manana gigauri, nodar ebraliZe dizaini da dakabadoneba: nikoloz daTeSiZe (edsTeiSen/ogilvi) fotoebis avtorebi: Tamaz dundua, goga Canadiri, ivane goliaZe, ivane nazRaiZe, kote gabriCiZe, giorgi darCiaSvili, laSa suxiSvili, una nasiaSvili, maia axalkaci, kaxa zazaZe, ia ebraliZe, daviT TarxniSvili, daculi teritoriebis saagento. fotoebi ydaze: Tamaz dundua, goga Canadiri, maia axalkaci, ia ebraliZe Published by Association Elkana with the support of the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation Copyright © Elkana Authors: Tamaz Dundua, Lela Khartishvili Reviewers: Dimitri Akhvlediani, Professor of Historical Sciences; Petre Naskidashvili, Professor of Agricultural Sciences, Associated Member of National Academy; Elvard Zazadze, Historian; Dali Nikolaishvili, Associated Professor of the Department of Geography at Tbilisi State University. Editorial Board: Mariam Jorjadze, Manana Gigauri, Nodar Ebralidze English Editing:
    [Show full text]