DOCSLIB.ORG

Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Report September 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Report September 2017 STAGE 1: ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT 3129 LAUZON ROAD PART OF LOT 127 CONCESSION 2 GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF SANDWICH CITY OF WINDSOR ESSEX COUNTY, ONTARIO Prepared for: Melanie Muir DILLON CONSULTING LIMITED 3200 Deziel Drive Suite 608 Windsor, Ontario N8W 5K8 Phone: (519) 948-5000 Fax: (519) 948-5054 E-mail: [email protected] Prepared by: Sarah Ingram, MA, RPA Archaeologist R1116 W. Bruce Stewart, MA, CAHP, RPA Project Director P109 Cultural Resource Management Group Limited 6040 Almon Street Halifax, Nova Scotia B3K 1T8 Phone: (902) 453-4972 Fax: (902) 446-3066 E-mail: [email protected] Archaeological License No.: P109 PIF No: P109-0065-2017 Date: September 2017 - Original Report 3129 Lauzon Road, Windsor ON Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Report September 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the summer of 2017, Cultural Resource Management (CRM) Group was retained by Dillon Consulting Limited (Dillon) on behalf of 2516053 Ontario Inc. to undertake a Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of a property measuring approximately 1.5 hectares (3.7 acres) (Land Registry Office). Located at 3129 Lauzon Road in the City of Windsor, the study area is legally described as Part of Lot 127 Concession 2, Township of Sandwich East, City of Windsor, Essex County, Ontario (Figures 1 & 2). This report addresses the Stage 1 archaeological assessment carried out in advance of the proposed redevelopment of 3129 Lauzon Road in order to meet the intent of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13 (Government of Ontario 1990) and the County of Essex Official Plan (County of Essex 2014). Based on the historical research portion of the background study, it is evident that the study area has been utilized for generalized agricultural practices in the past. There are 3 registered historic archaeological sites within 2 kilometres of the study area. Based on the evidence for Euro-Canadian settlement in Essex County and Township of Sandwich East from the mid nineteenth century, the study area is considered to have moderate potential for historic Euro-Canadian archaeological resources. The study area reflects a number of factors which suggest moderate to high archaeological potential for encountering historic resources (MTCS S&G 1.3.1). The study area is situated directly east of Little River. The study area is situated within an area highly desirable for hunting and fishing, as well as agricultural subsistence. The presence of previously identified Aboriginal archaeological sites in the close proximity would increase the potential for Precontact Aboriginal resource within the study area, and Aboriginal trails are documented to the north of the study area. The potential for Precontact Aboriginal archaeological resources within the study area is considered to be high. According to the MTCS Standards and Guidelines, any indication of archaeological potential within the study area, requires a Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment (MTCS S&G 1.3 Standard 1). Consequently, a Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment is recommended. The Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport is asked to review the results and recommendations presented in this Stage 1 report, accept the report into the Provincial Register of archaeological reports and issue a standard letter of concurrence with the findings presented herein. CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT GROUP LIMITED Page i PROJECT PERSONNEL Licensed Archaeologist W. Bruce Stewart, M.A., CAHP, RPA (P109) Licensed Field Director Barbara Johnson, B.Sc. (R1103) Report Preparation Sarah Ingram, M.A., RPA (R1116) Archaeologist Barbara Johnson, B.Sc. (R1103) Research Kyle Cigolotti, B.A. Drafting W. Bruce Stewart, MA, CAHP, RPA (P109) Project Director Sara Pardy Office Administrator ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Proponent Contact Melanie Muir Dillon Consulting Limited Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport Robert Von Bitter Archaeological Data Coordinator CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT GROUP LIMITED Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 PROJECT CONTEXT ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Development Context ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Historical Context .................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Aboriginal Land Use History .................................................................................. 2 1.2.2 Euro-Canadian Land Use History ............................................................................ 7 1.2.3 Farm Lot 22, Concession 1 East Boundary Property .............................................. 7 1.3 Archaeological Context ......................................................................................................... 8 1.3.1 Geography and the Natural Environment ................................................................ 8 1.3.2 Previous Archaeological Research .......................................................................... 9 1.3.3 Historic Properties and Plaques ............................................................................. 10 2.0 FIELD METHODS ........................................................................................................................ 11 3.0 ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................. 12 3.1 Archaeological Potential ...................................................................................................... 12 3.1.1 Potential for Precontact Aboriginal Archaeological Resources ............................ 13 3.1.2 Potential for Precontact Euro-Canadian Resources ............................................... 13 3.1.3 Areas Where Archaeological Potential has Been Removed .................................. 14 3.2 Stage 2 Field Methods ......................................................................................................... 14 3.2.1 First Nation Engagement ....................................................................................... 14 3.2.2 Pedestrian Survey .................................................................................................. 15 3.2.3 Test Pit Survey ...................................................................................................... 15 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................... 16 5.0 ADVICE ON COMPLIANCE WITH LEGISLATION ................................................................. 17 6.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SOURCES ............................................................................................. 18 7.0 IMAGES ......................................................................................................................................... 21 8.0 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ 26 List of Images Plate 1: View from southeast corner of study area along southern edge of property .............. 21 Plate 2: View from southeast corner of study area towrds northwest corner of study ............ 21 Plate 3: Little River at western boundary of study area .......................................................... 22 Plate 4: Metal drum discarded next to Little River along western boundary ......................... 22 Plate 5: View from western boundary towards Lauzon Road. ................................................ 23 Plate 6: Northern area with evidence of dumping, concrete blocks, wood chips, piping ........ 23 Plate 7: Dumping of garbage center of the northern boundary. .............................................. 24 Plate 8: View of cement pad and looped driveway. ................................................................ 24 Plate 9: View from Lauzon Road of front of house and utilities ............................................. 25 CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT GROUP LIMITED Page iii Plate 10: View from Lauzon Road of looped driveway and house. .......................................... 25 List of Figures Figure 1: Windsor Area Topographical Map............................................................................. 27 Figure 2: Detailed Study Area ................................................................................................... 28 Figure 3: Conceptual Site Plan .................................................................................................. 29 Figure 4: Historical Atlas 1881 ................................................................................................. 30 Figure 5: 1954 Essex County Aerial Photo .............................................................................. 31 Figure 6: Soil Map ..................................................................................................................... 32 Figure 7: Windsor Archaeological Master Plan. ....................................................................... 33 Figure 8: Photo Directions ......................................................................................................... 34 Figure 9: Stage 2 Field Methods. ............................................................................................... 35 CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT GROUP LIMITED Page iv
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stages 1-3 Archaeological Assessment Of
    Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment for the Proposed Development of 5155 Mississauga Road Within Part of Lot 1, Concession 4 WHS In the Geographic Township of Toronto (New Survey) Historical County of Peel City of Mississauga Regional Municipality of Peel Ontario Project #: 053-MI1606-16 Licensee (#): Nimal Nithiyanantham (P390) PIF#: P390-0173-2016 Original Report April 29th, 2016 Presented to: City Park (Old Barber) Homes Inc. 950 Nashville Road Kleinburg, Ontario L0J 1C0 T: 905.552.5200 Prepared by: Archeoworks Inc. 16715-12 Yonge Street, Suite 1029 ARCHEOWORKS INC. Newmarket, Ontario L3X 1X4 T: 416.676.5597 F: 647.436.1938 STAGE 1-2 AA FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF BARBER HOUSE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA, R.M. OF PEEL, ONTARIO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Archeoworks Inc. was retained by City Park (Old Barber) Homes Inc. to conduct a Stage 1-2 AA in support of the proposed commercial and residential development of common element townhouses at municipal address 5155 Mississauga Road, which will herein be referred to as the “study area”. The study area is located within part Lot 1, Concession 4 West of Hurontario Street (WHS) (or Centre Street), in the Geographic Township of Toronto (New Survey), historical County of Peel, City of Mississauga, Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario The Stage 1 AA identified elevated potential for the recovery of archaeologically significant materials within the study area. Elevated archaeological potential was determined based on the close proximity (within 300 metres) of: historic structures, historic transportation routes, designated and listed cultural heritage resources, a cultural heritage landscape, a commemorative marker, a registered archaeological site and secondary water sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 2-3 Archaeological Assessments Report(PDF)
    Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et du Sport Sport Culture Programs Unit Unité des programmes culturels Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture 435 S. James Street, Suite 334 435, rue James sud, bureau 334 Thunder Bay ON P7E 6S7 Thunder Bay ON P7E 6S7 Tel.: 807-475-1628 Tél.: 807-475-1628 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] February 1, 2013 Dr. Dean Knight Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. 154 Otonabee Drive Kitchener, ON N2C 1L7 Dear Dr. Knight, RE: Review and Entry into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports: Archaeological Assessment Report Entitled Stage 2 and 3 Archaeological Assessments Port Ryerse Wind Power Project (FIT F-001579-WIN-130-601) Part of Lots 3–5, Broken Front Geographic Township of Woodhouse Norfolk County, Ontario, Revised Report Dated January 14, 2013, Filed by MTCS Toronto Office January 16, 2013, MTCS Project Information Form Number P089-014-2012 & P089- 018-2012, MTCS File Number HD00097 This office has reviewed the above-mentioned report, which has been submitted to this ministry as a condition of licensing in accordance with Part VI of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c 0.18.1 This review has been carried out in order to determine whether the licensed professional consultant archaeologist has met the terms and conditions of their licence, that the licensee assessed the property and documented archaeological resources using a process that accords with the 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists set by the ministry, and that the archaeological fieldwork and report recommendations are consistent with the conservation, protection and preservation of the cultural heritage of Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Interpreting the Nodwell Site
    mSTORICAL CONTEXT AND THE FORAGERIFARMER FRONTIER: RE-INTERPRETING THE NODWELL SITE By Lisa K. ~ B.A., M.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School ofGraduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment ofthe Requirements for the Degree Doctor ofPhilosophy McMaster University to CopYright by Lisa Rankin, June 1998 mSTORICAL CONTEXT AND THE FORAGERIFARl\JIER FRONTIER Doctor ofPhilosophy (1998) McMaster University (Anthropology) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Historical Context and the ForagerlFanner Frontier: Re-Interpreting the Nodwell Site. Author: Lisa K. Rank:in, B.A (University ofBritish Columbia) M.A (Trent University) Supervisor: Dr. Peter Ramsden Number ofPages: 275 11 Abstract This thesis examines the socio-economic transition from foraging to farming in Bruce County, Ontario which culminates with the appearance ofthe NodweU village. The near complete excavation ofthis site determined that the NodweU village had both the fonn (settlement pattern) and contents (material culture and subsistence remains) representative ofa small-scale farming community, and was therefore distinct from the earlier forager habitations in the region. As recently as AD 1000 this region was occupied by mobile hunter-gatherers who followed an annual cycle, inhabiting numerous smaIl sites, in nuclear family units. This strategy allowed the foragers ofBruce county to exploit various natural resources throughout the region during the course ofthe year. In contrast, the Nodwell village was occupied by a much more sedentary community ofpeople, living in extended family groups, and producing domesticated crops. This transition occurred in a maximum of350 years. Until recently, this transition was explained using a migration model which suggested that an intact horticultural community had migrated into Bruce county in the mid-fourteenth century and replaced the indigenous foragers.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology Stage 1
    Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Pinnacle View Subdivision Development Prepared for: Kevin Mooder Jp2g Consultants Inc. 1150 Morrison Dr, Suite 410 Ottawa, ON K2H 8S9 Phone: 613-828-7800 Fax: 613- email:[email protected] Prepared by: Cameron Heritage Consulting 5021-25 Civic Centre Road Petawawa, ON K8H 0B1 Phone (613) 281-3838 email: [email protected] C.H.C. Project #2017011A PIF Number:P371-0017-2017 Courtney Cameron (License Number P371) ORIGINAL REPORT March 2, 2018 Cameron Heritage Consulting Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Pinnacle View Subdivision Development EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment was completed under the scope of the Planning Act in preparation for the construction of a housing development in Renfrew, ON. The Proposed Development Area (PDA) is located within Lot 14 Concession 1, Horton Township (Geo.), Town of Renfrew, County of Renfrew, Ontario. The PDA is approximately 15 ha and is bounded on the southwest by an old rail bed, to the southeast and northeast by the backyards of houses along Aberdeen Street, Mason Avenue and McAndrew Ave, and to the northwest an agricultural field. The Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment included consultation with local heritage organizations, reviews of aerial imagery, archaeological potential maps, national topographic maps, physiographic maps and early maps of the area. In addition, information regarding known archaeological sites in the vicinity, land grants, and historical reference books for the PDA was reviewed. A site visit to assess archaeological potential was conducted November 29, 2017. Based upon the review of background material and the site visit, there are areas with and without potential for the presence of archaeological resources within the PDA.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessment
    Original Report: Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessment Proposed Residential Plan of Subdivision 29845 Pioneer Line, Dutton, Part of Lot 13, Concession A, Township of Dunwich, Elgin County, Ontario Project # SCL191301 Archaeological Consulting License # P066 (O’Neal) P.I.F. # P066-0322-2019 (Stage 1 & 2) Prepared for: Titan Group Construction Inc. 29845 Pioneer Line Dutton, Ontario, N0L1J0 8-Jan-20 Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessment Proposed Residential Plan of Subdivision 29845 Pioneer Line, Dutton, Part of Lot 13, Concession A, Township of Dunwich, Elgin County, Ontario Project # SCL191301 Prepared for: Titan Group Construction Inc. 29845 Pioneer Line Dutton, Ontario, N0L1J0 Prepared by: Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, a Division of Wood Canada Limited 8-Jan-20 Copyright and non-disclosure notice The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright owned by Wood (© Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, a Division of Wood Canada Limited). save to the extent that copyright has been legally assigned by us to another party or is used by Wood under license. To the extent that we own the copyright in this report, it may not be copied or used without our prior written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be disclosed or copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of Wood. Disclosure of that information may constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below.
    [Show full text]
  • Visibility Analysis of the Rice Lake Burial Mounds and Related Sites
    NOTE TO USERS This reproduction is the best copy available. UMI VISIBILITY ANALYSIS OF THE RICE LAKE BURIAL MOUNDS AND RELATED SITES A Thesis Submitted to the Committee on Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Science TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada > Copyright by Jeffrey Bryan Dillane 2009 Anthropology M. A. Graduate Program January 2010 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 OttawaONK1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-53559-2 Our We Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-53559-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Diet-Breadth and the Middle to Late Woodland Transition in Southcentral Ontario (Ca
    FROM FORAGING TO FARMING: CHANGING DIET-BREADTH AND THE MIDDLE TO LATE WOODLAND TRANSITION IN SOUTHCENTRAL ONTARIO (CA. 1450–650 BP) A Thesis Submitted to the Committee of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Science TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Daniel Worby, 2018 Anthropology M.A. Graduate Program May 2018 ABSTRACT From Foraging to Farming: Changing Diet-Breadth and the Middle to Late Woodland Transition in Southcentral Ontario (ca. 1450–650 B.P.) Daniel Worby This study examines foraging strategies during the Middle Woodland Period’s Sandbanks Phase (A.D. 700–1000) on Boyd Island, Pigeon Lake, Ontario. The faunal remains analyzed in this study were recovered from a site associated with the procurement of aquatic and terrestrial taxa. Detailed taphonomic analyses have revealed that the Boyd Island faunal remains were affected by weathering and human transport decisions. White-tailed deer was the most frequently acquired prey at Boyd Island, followed by black bear. Using the central place forager prey choice model as a framework, the analysis of diet breadth and carcass transport patterns suggests that most animal resources were acquired from both aquatic and terrestrial habitats, at moderate distances from the site. Incomplete carcasses of large game appear to have been transported away from the site, where they were subsequently processed for provisioning or consumption. Comparisons with other Sandbanks faunal assemblages and those dating to later periods indicate significant differences in terms of taxonomic composition, while continuing to emphasize the use of fish.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unusual Slate Gorget Fragment from Oxford County, Ontario
    22 Ontario Archaeology No. 74, 2002 An Unusual Slate Gorget Fragment from Oxford County, Ontario Christopher Ellis This paper reports on a fragment of a slate gorget from Oxford County, southwestern Ontario, that most likely dates to the Early to Middle Woodland (ca. 2,800 to 1,500 B.P.). Usually stone gorgets are undeco- rated or have simple incised geometric motifs but this fragment has representational images, on both faces, in the form of several line engravings of animals that most closely resemble wolves or dogs. The orientation of the representations also provides information on how gorgets might have been suspended. Marked dif- ferences in engraving style suggest use by more than one individual, indicating that some of these items were heirlooms. Gorgets with representational images occur on shell, cannel coal and stone, but their rarity and the depiction of animals that were particularly important in the ethnographically documented spiritual beliefs of Great Lakes area Native peoples reinforce the idea that gorgets were important in the sacred and social life of the makers. Résumé à la fin de l’article. I hope that the publication of this paper will the late Mr. Croft Garnham, donated to the result in bringing to light other examples of University of Western Ontario by his grandchil- drawings on archaeological artifacts which dren in 1996. Mr. Garnham was an informed avo- may be buried in obscure private collections cational archaeologist and historian with a deep (Wintemberg 1924:34). passion for the history of Straffordville and the surrounding area of Elgin and Oxford Counties. This paper presents a description of a unique slate His interest led him to amass a regional artifact object fragment from Oxford County in south- collection over the years from about 1915 to western Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Vaughan Official Plan Archaeological and First Nations Policy Study
    City of Vaughan Official Plan Archaeological and First Nations Policy Study Prepared for: City of Vaughan Policy Planning and Urban Design Department 2141 Major Mackenzie Drive Vaughan, ONL6A 1T1 Tel. 905.832.2281 Fax. 905.832.8595 ASI File 08SP-32 March 2010 City of Vaughan Official Plan Archaeological and First Nations Policy Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY An Archaeological and First Nations Policy Study is an important response to an old problem – how to deal with evidence of the past that is, for the most part, not visible because it is buried underground. The City of Vaughan has a long cultural history that begins approximately 11,000 years ago and continues to the present. The archaeological sites that are the physical remains of this lengthy settlement history represent a fragile and non-renewable cultural heritage resource. The common response of “out of sight, out of mind,” however, is no longer possible in today’s political and legal climate. Recent court cases involving Aboriginal land claims, not to mention stop- work orders issued when human remains are uncovered on a development site, are but two examples of the ways in which archaeological resources affect property owners and the municipalities in which they are located. Policy initiatives, such as those found in the report of the Ipperwash inquiry, recommending that every municipality in Ontario adopt a master plan for archaeological resources so as to identify their flashpoints and put in place a way of dealing with them before they happen, coupled with more stringent heritage resource conservation policies in the Provincial Policy Statement (Planning Act), the Ontario Cemeteries Act, and the Ontario Heritage Act, require municipalities to more wisely plan for the conservation of archaeological resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Executive
    ISSN 0228-4111 Neal Ferris life 55 Wimbledon Court London, Ontario N6C 5C9 NEWSLETTER OF THE LONDON CHAPTER, .IV ONTARIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY c/o Museum of Ontario Archaeology OAS 1600 Attawandaron Road, London, ON N6G 3M6 September 2007 07-5 The April meeting of the London Chapter will be held on Thursday, April 11, 2008. Dana Poulton of D. R. Poulton & Assoc. Inc. will be talking about his work on the assessment of an airline disaster, the 1970 crash of Air Canada Flight 621 in Brampton, Ontario. Look for announcements in the upcoming issues of KEWA for exciting summertime activities, such as the London Chapter Picnic! ********* The meetings will be held at 8 pm at the Museum of Ontario Archaeology, 1600 Attawandaron Road, near the corner of Wonderland & Fanshawe Park Road, in the northwest part of the city. Chapter Executive President Vice-President Nancy Van Sas (473-1360) Darcy Fallen ANNUAL RATES 1600 Attawandaron Rd, London N6G 3M6 32 Pleasant Ave., Delaware, nvansas @uwo.ca ON NOL 1EO Student $15.00 Individual $18.00 Editors Treasurer Christopher Ellis (858-9852) Christopher Ellis Institutional $21.00 [email protected] [email protected] Subscriber $20.00 Christine Dodd (434-8853) drpoulton @ r o g e r s . c o m Directors Secretary Holly Martelle Chris Dalton Lindsay Foreman Jake Anderson THE HOOVER I SITE (AfHi-328): A SMALL LATE SUMMER/FALL STATION IN SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO By James T. Sherratt and Dana R. Poulton INTRODUCTION Our understanding of seasonally occupied sites of the Early and Middle Woodland periods in southwestern Ontario has greatly increased since Spence et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Lands Wp 4174-15-00 Preliminary Design and Class Environmental Assessment
    APPENDIX H ARCHAEOLOGY REPORTS MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT HIGHWAY 35/115 INTERCHANGE ADDITIONAL LANDS WP 4174-15-00 PRELIMINARY DESIGN AND CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PIF P365-0134-2020 DOUGLAS YAHN – P365 STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT HIGHWAY 35/115 INTERCHANGE ADDITIONAL LANDS MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION, EASTERN REGION PART OF LOTS 19, AND 21-24, CONCESSION 9, PART OF LOTS 21 TO 23, CONCESSION 10, CLARKE TOWNSHIP, AND PART OF LOTS 12 AND 13, CONCESSION 1, MANVERS TOWNSHIP, MUNICIPALITY OF CLARINGTON, REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM, IN THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO ORIGINAL REPORT PROJECT NO.: 17M-01712-01 DATE: SEPTEMBER 02, 2020 WSP 1269 PREMIER WAY THUNDER BAY, ON CANADA P7B 0A3 T: +1 807 625-6700 F: +1 807 625-4491 WSP.COM WSP Canada Group Limited September 02, 2020 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Highway 35/115 Interchange Additional Lands Part of Lots 19, and 21-24, Concession 9, Part of Lots 21 to 23, Concession 10, Clarke Township, and Part of Lots 12 and 13, Concession 1, Manvers Township, Municipality of Clarington, Regional Municipality of Durham, in the Province of Ontario Prepared for: Ministry of Transportation, Eastern Region 1355 John Counter Boulevard Kingston, ON K7K 0E5 Original Report 1269 Premier Way Thunder Bay, ON Canada P7B 0A3 T: +1 807 625-6700 F: +1 807 625-4491 wsp.com WSP Canada Group Limited SIGNATURES AND DISCLAIMERS PREPARED BY REVIEWED BY Andrew Turner, H.B.A. Douglas Yahn, MES, CAHP Archaeologist Professional Archaeologist WSP Canada Inc. (“WSP”) prepared this report solely for the use of the intended recipient, Ministry of Transportation, Eastern Region, in accordance with the professional services agreement between the parties.
    [Show full text]
  • David, Here Is the Requested Report. Frank King Mr. King, the Deep
    From: King, Frank <email address removed> Sent: August 9, 2013 11:19 AM To: Haddon,David [CEAA] Cc: Allan Webster; Myles,Debra [CEAA]; McGee, Kelly: CNSC; Virtue,Robyn-Lynne [CEAA]; a.webster<email address removed> Subject: RE: Document Request from the DGR Joint Review Panel David, Here is the requested report. Frank King From: Haddon,David [CEAA] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: August-08-13 10:14 AM To: King, Frank Cc: Allan Webster; Myles,Debra [CEAA]; McGee, Kelly; Virtue,Robyn-Lynne [CEAA] Subject: Document Request from the DGR Joint Review Panel Mr. King, The Deep Geologic Repository Joint Review Panel is requesting that the document below be provided so that it can be reviewed and posted on the public registry for the Project: 1. Stage 1 – 2 Archaeological Assessment OPG 's Deep Geologic Repository Project for Low & Intermediate Level Waste, Part Lots 18-23, Lake Range, Geographic Township of Bruce, Now Municipality of Kincardine, Bruce County, Ontario. Golder Associates, June 14, 2013 As described in your letter of June 17, 2013 (CEAR #1183), this report was submitted to the Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport, but has not been provided to the Panel. If you have any questions about the above request, please do not hesitate to contact me at the coordinates below. Regards, David Haddon A/ Panel Manager Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency CEAA, 160 Elgin St., 22nd Floor, Ottawa ON K1A 0H3 [email protected] Telephone - 613-957-0716 Facsmile - 613-957-0935 Government of Canada June 14, 2013 STAGE 1 – 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OPG's Deep Geologic Repository Project for Low & Intermediate Level Waste Part Lots 18-23, Lake Range Geographic Township of Bruce, Now Municipality of Kincardine Bruce County, Ontario Prepared for: Nuclear Waste Management Organization 22 St.
    [Show full text]