DOCSLIB.ORG

Industry Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry V3.2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Industry Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry V3.2 | PAGE 1 Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Email: [email protected] Visit our website www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2021 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ - This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for non-commercial redistribution, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2021) Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry (Version 3.2 – 2021) Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. This project has been funded by Hort Innovation, using the vegetable research and development levy and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not for profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture. Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific and independent professional advice. Plant Health Australia and all persons acting for Plant Health Australia in preparing this publication, expressly disclaim all and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or in part, on this publication. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of Plant Health Australia. | PAGE 2 Acknowledgements The Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry was coordinated by Plant Health Australia and developed through a partnership approach with government and industry. The following organisations and agencies were involved in the development and finalisation of the plan: | PAGE 3 Endorsement The Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry (Version 3.0) was formally endorsed by the vegetable industry (through AUSVEG) in October 2017, and all state and territory governments (through the Plant Health Committee) in March 2018. The Australian Government endorses the document without prejudice for the purposes of industry’s planning needs and meeting the Department’s obligations under Clause 13 of the EPPRD. In providing this endorsement the Department notes page 102 of the Plan which states: “This Document considers all potential pathways by which a pest might enter Australia, including natural and assisted spread (including smuggling). This is a broader view of potential risk than the IRA conducted by the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources which focus only on specific regulated import pathways.” Reporting suspect pests Any unusual plant pest should be reported immediately to the relevant state/territory agriculture department through the Exotic Plant Pest Hotline (1800 084 881). Early reporting enhances the chance of effective control and eradication. | PAGE 4 Table of contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 10 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 11 SIGNIFICANT BIOSECURITY THREATS ............................................................................... 13 Document overview ............................................................................................................... 14 High priority exotic pests, established pests and weeds of biosecurity significance ......... 14 Implementing biosecurity for the Australian Vegetable industry 2017-2022 ...................... 14 Threat identification and pest risk assessments ................................................................ 15 Risk mitigation and preparedness ...................................................................................... 15 Response management ..................................................................................................... 15 Pests and Weeds of Biosecurity Significance Overview ....................................................... 17 Vegetable industry high priority exotic pests ...................................................................... 18 Established pests of biosecurity significance ..................................................................... 32 Established weeds of biosecurity significance ................................................................... 40 Implementing biosecurity for the Australian Vegetable industry 2017-2022 ......................... 44 Australian Vegetable industry - biosecurity preparedness ................................................. 70 AUSVEG Ltd. industry biosecurity statement..................................................................... 89 NATIONAL BIOSECURITY SYSTEM ...................................................................................... 90 What is biosecurity and why is it important? ......................................................................... 91 The plant biosecurity system in Australia .............................................................................. 91 Vegetable Peak Industry Body ........................................................................................... 92 Plant Health Australia ......................................................................................................... 93 The Biosecurity Plan .............................................................................................................. 93 Biosecurity planning ........................................................................................................... 94 Biosecurity Plan development ............................................................................................ 95 Review processes .............................................................................................................. 96 THREAT IDENTIFICATION AND PEST RISK ASSESSMENTS ............................................ 98 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 99 Exotic pests of the vegetable industry ................................................................................. 100 Threat identification .......................................................................................................... 100 Pest risk assessments ...................................................................................................... 100 Ranking pest threats ........................................................................................................ 102 Description of terms used in pest risk tables .................................................................... 102 RISK MITIGATION AND PREPAREDNESS ......................................................................... 106 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 107 Barrier quarantine ................................................................................................................ 108 National level – importation restrictions ........................................................................... 108 State and regional level – movement restrictions ............................................................ 113 Farm level – exclusion activities ....................................................................................... 117 Surveillance ......................................................................................................................... 117 National surveillance programs ........................................................................................ 118 State surveillance programs ............................................................................................. 119 Farm surveillance activities .............................................................................................. 122 | PAGE 5 Training ................................................................................................................................ 123 National EPP Training Program ....................................................................................... 123 Awareness ........................................................................................................................... 124 High priority plant pest threat-related documents ............................................................ 124 Further information on high priority pests ......................................................................... 125 Further information/relevant web sites ............................................................................. 126 Farm biosecurity .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Morphological Systematics of the Nightshade Flea Beetles Epitrix
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 8-2016 Morphological Systematics of the Nightshade Flea Beetles Epitrix Foudras and Acallepitrix Bechyné (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Alticini) in America North of Mexico Anthony Martin Deczynski Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Recommended Citation Deczynski, Anthony Martin, "Morphological Systematics of the Nightshade Flea Beetles Epitrix Foudras and Acallepitrix Bechyné (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Alticini) in America North of Mexico" (2016). All Theses. 2479. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/2479 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MORPHOLOGICAL SYSTEMATICS OF THE NIGHTSHADE FLEA BEETLES EPITRIX FOUDRAS AND ACALLEPITRIX BECHYNÉ (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE: GALERUCINAE: ALTICINI) IN AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Entomology by Anthony Martin Deczynski August 2016 Accepted by: Dr. Michael Caterino, Committee Chair Dr. Peter Adler Dr. J. Antonio Baeza ABSTRACT The flea beetle genera Epitrix and Acallepitrix are revised for America North of Mexico, building on a prior preliminary revision of the genus Epitrix by the author (Deczynski 2014). Four new species are described: Epitrix cuprea sp. nov., E. rileyi sp. nov., E. latifrons sp. nov., and E. vasinoda sp. nov., bringing the North American Epitrix fauna to a total of 26 species. A key is provided to adults of all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Experi2ant Station Potato Flea Beetle
    AGRICULTURAL EXPERI2ANT STATION Oregon State College Win. A. Schoenfeld, Director Corvallis Circular of Information No. 227 December, 1940 POTATO FLEA BEETLE CONTROL By K. W. Gray, Assistant Entomologist Joe Schuh, Assistant in Entomology Don C. Mote, Head, Departmentof Entomology The potato flea-beetle, Epitrix cucumeris Harris,can be controlled by a well-executed dusting program. The information as to whatmaterial to use, when to apply it, and how much to use as based on experiments conductedto date will be found in the followingpages. Calcium Arsenate is MostEfficient Poison: A dust containing 20% calcium arsenate and 3% powderedsugar is suggested. The following is the mostconsistently efficient formula found: Calcium arsenate 20 pounds Powdered sugar 3 pounds iatomaceous earth 10 pounds Talc 67 pounds Insecticides other than calciumarsenate have given good results recommended because they but are not are more expensive and haveproven no more effective. Some of these are: roterione,cryolite, copper arsenate, green. sodium fluosilicate, and Paris Sprays containing calcium arsenate or the other aforementionedsubstances are as effective as the dusts containing these insecticides.They, however, are more expensive to apply because of the much greater cost ofspray machines and the time required in refilling thetank. Caution. Calcium arsenate is poisonousto man and animals as wellas flea- beet:les and for thatreason must be handled with ing. care to prevent accidental poison- Laboratory and field tests both indicate that hydratedlime is an inferior carrier for calcium arsenate when used to combatflea-beetles. Time of Applications is theMost Important Factor: 1. Potatoes Before 15 Do Not Require Dusting before 15 to 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry
    Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry A shared responsibility between government and industry Version 3.0 May 2018 Plant Health AUSTRALIA Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2018 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2018) Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry (Version 3.0 – 2018) Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. This project has been funded by Hort Innovation, using the vegetable research and development levy and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not for profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies
    Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa, USA Printed in the United States of America Cover design by Lynn Ekblad, Different Angles, Ames, Iowa Graphics and layout by Richard Beachler, Instructional Technology Center, Iowa State University, Ames ISBN 1-887383-23-9 ISSN 0194-4088 06 05 04 03 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging–in–Publication Data Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies. p. cm. -- (Task force report, ISSN 0194-4088 ; no. 140) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-887383-23-9 (alk. paper) 1. Pests--Integrated control. I. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. II. Series: Task force report (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology) ; no. 140. SB950.I4573 2003 632'.9--dc21 2003006389 Task Force Report No. 140 June 2003 Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Ames, Iowa, USA Task Force Members Kenneth R. Barker (Chair), Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Esther Day, American Farmland Trust, DeKalb, Illinois Timothy J. Gibb, Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Maud A. Hinchee, ArborGen, Summerville, South Carolina Nancy C. Hinkle, Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens Barry J. Jacobsen, Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman James Knight, Department of Animal and Range Science, Montana State University, Bozeman Kenneth A. Langeland, Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville Evan Nebeker, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State David A. Rosenberger, Plant Pathology Department, Cornell University–Hudson Valley Laboratory, High- land, New York Donald P.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Eleven Plant Species As Potential Banker Plants to Support Predatory Orius Sauteri in Tea Plant Systems
    insects Article Evaluation of Eleven Plant Species as Potential Banker Plants to Support Predatory Orius sauteri in Tea Plant Systems Ruifang Zhang, Dezhong Ji, Qiuqiu Zhang and Linhong Jin * State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Huaxi District, Guiyang 550025, China; [email protected] (R.Z.); [email protected] (D.J.); [email protected] (Q.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +186-8517-4719 Simple Summary: The tea plant is an economically significant beverage crop globally, especially in China. However, tea green leafhoppers and thrips are key pests in Asian tea production systems, causing serious damage to its yield and quality. With growing concerns about pesticide residues on tea and their adverse effects on natural enemies of tea pests, biological pest control is gaining more importance in tea plantations. Orius sauteri is a polyphagous predator used as a biological control agent. Here, we reported 11 plants as banker plants to support the predatory Orius sauteri in tea plant systems. Among them, white clover, red bean, mung bean, peanut, soybean, kidney bean, bush vetch, smooth vetch, and common vetch were found suitable; red bean performed relatively better than the others. Abstract: Tea green leafhoppers and thrips are key pests in tea plantations and have widely invaded those of Asian origin. Pesticides are currently a favorable control method but not desirable for frequent use on tea plants. To meet Integrated Pest Management (IPM) demand, biological control Citation: Zhang, R.; Ji, D.; Zhang, Q.; with a natural enemy is viewed as the most promising way.
    [Show full text]
  • Whiteflies in the Greenhouse Jen White
    Entfact-456 Whiteflies in the greenhouse Jen White General Biology Worldwide, there are over 1500 Whiteflies are “true bugs” (Hemiptera) species of whitefly, most of which are that feed on plant sap, much like aphids. inconspicuous and never reach densities Adults are very small (1/16 - 1/10 inch) high enough to cause damage to their host with powdery white wings. Females lay plants. A few species, however, are major eggs directly on the undersides of plant pests. Here in Kentucky, the most notable leaves. The eggs hatch into tiny are 1) the sweetpotato whitefly (Bemisia “crawlers” that walk a short distance before settling at a tabaci), and 2) the greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes feeding location. These nymphs lose their ability walk, and vaporarorium). The former is a confusing complex of remain in the same location for the rest of their development “biotypes” (currently considered multiple species) that are until they pupate and emerge as winged adults (Figure 1). The physically indistinguishable, but which have distinct biological entire whitefly life cycle takes about 3 weeks under favorable differences. For example, B biotype is also sometimes known as conditions, allowing populations to build quickly. Whiteflies do the silverleaf whitefly (also known as Bemisia argentifolii) not have a dormant stage that can withstand freezing because of the distinctive silvering damage it inflicts on plant temperatures. In climates that have winter freezes, such as leaves. B biotype is currently the most common in North Kentucky, whiteflies are year-round pests only in greenhouses. America, but a second biotype, Q biotype, is also present, and of particular concern because Q biotype is highly resistant to many classes of insecticide.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional IPPC Workshops 2015 Surveillance: Working Together to Strengthen Implementation
    International Plant Protection Convention Surveillance: Working together to strengthen implementation Regional IPPC Workshops 2015 Surveillance: Working together to strengthen implementation The CPM agreed for an increased emphasis on surveillance in the next several years. This will take place through an Implementation Pilot Programme on Surveillance, which will be a coordinated effort with active participation from contracting parties and RPPOs. The Regional IPPC Workshops are an opportunity to share experiences with surveillance activities such as: current status, upcoming plans, and successes and challenges of surveillance activities within your country. In 2015, Member Countries answered a questionnaire on surveillance circulated by the IPPC Secretariat, and presented a summary on surveillance activities undertaken during the regional workshop. The data provided by Member Countries were extremely rich and useful to define activities to be set in the framework of the Implementation Pilot Programme on Surveillance. The content of the questionnaire for the regions in which an IPPC regional workshop was organized are provided below: Near East and North Africa, Pacific, Central Asia and Eastern Europe, Caribbean and Latin America (in Spanish). Surveillance: An official process which collects and records data on pest presence or absence by survey, monitoring or other procedures (ISPM 5) Question 1: What general surveillance activities take place in your country? (General surveillance is a process whereby information on particular pests which are of concern for an area is gathered from many sources, wherever it is available and provided for use by the NPPO – ISPM 6) 1. NEAR EAST AND NORTH AFRICA Egypt: The general surveillance applied is the mainly through the weed institute which the institute apply on general basis based on the ISPM 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Tubulinosema Loxostegi Sp. N. (Microsporidia: Tubulinosematidae) from the Beet Webworm Loxostege Sticticalis L
    Acta Protozool. (2013) 52: 299–308 http://www.eko.uj.edu.pl/ap ACTA doi:10.4467/16890027AP.13.027.1319 PROTOZOOLOGICA Tubulinosema loxostegi sp. n. (Microsporidia: Tubulinosematidae) from the Beet Webworm Loxostege sticticalis L. (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Western Siberia Julia M. MALYSH1, Yuri S. TOKAREV1, Natalia V. SITNICOVA2, Vyacheslav V. MARTEMYA- NOV3, Andrei N. FROLOV1 and Irma V. ISSI1 1 All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, St. Petersburg, Pushkin, Russia; 2 Institute of Zoology, Chisinau, Moldova; 3 Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Novosibirsk, Russia Abstract. Adults of beet webworm Loxostege sticticalis were collected in Western Siberia in 2009 and 2010. A microsporidium was found infecting 12 of 50 moths in 2010. The parasite develops in direct contact with host cell cytoplasm, sporogony is presumably disporoblastic. The spores are ovoid, diplokaryotic, 4.2 × 2.4 µm in size (fresh), without a sporophorous vesicle. Electron microscopy showed: (a) tubules on the surface of sporoblasts and immature spores; (b) slightly anisofilar polar tube with 10–14 coils, last 2–3 coils of lesser electron density; (c) bipartite polaroplast with anterior and posterior parts composed of thin and thick lamellae, respectively; (d) an indentation in the region of the anchoring disc; (e) an additional layer of electron-dense amorphous matter on the exospore surface. The spore ultrastructure is char- acteristic of the genus Tubulinosema. Sequencing of small subunit and large subunit ribosomal RNA genes showed 98–99.6% similarity of this parasite to the Tubulinosema species available on Genbank. A new species Tubulinosema loxostegi sp. n. is established. Key words: Beet webworm, microsporidia, taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics, Tubulinosema.
    [Show full text]
  • Eight New State Records of Aleyrodine Whiteflies Found in Clark County, Nevada and Three Newly Described Taxa (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae, Aleyrodinae)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 10-15-2010 Eight new state records of aleyrodine whiteflies found in Clark County, Nevada and three newly described taxa (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae, Aleyrodinae) John W. Dooley III Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, [email protected] Susan Lambrecht San Jose State University, [email protected] Jeffrey Honda San Jose State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Dooley, John W. III; Lambrecht, Susan; and Honda, Jeffrey, "Eight new state records of aleyrodine whiteflies found in Clark County, Nevada and three newly described taxa (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae, Aleyrodinae)" (2010). Insecta Mundi. 660. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/660 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0140 Eight new state records of aleyrodine whiteflies found in Clark County, Nevada and three newly described taxa (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae, Aleyrodinae) John W. Dooley III United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine 389 Oyster Point Blvd, Suite 2A South San Francisco, CA 94080 Susan Lambrecht Department of Biological Science San Jose State University One Washington Square San Jose, CA 95192-0100 Jeffrey Honda Biological Science San Jose State University One Washington Square San Jose, CA 95192-0100 Date of Issue: October 15, 2010 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL John W.
    [Show full text]
  • Flea Beetles
    Problem: Flea Beetles Hosts: Watermelons, pumpkins, peas, beans, eggplants, sweet potatoes, beets, spinach, strawberries and potatoes. Description: "Flea beetle" is a generic name applied to many species of small jumping beetles commonly seen early in the gardening season. Some species are general feeders while others have a more restricted host range. All flea beetle life stages are completed underground. Only the adults are commonly seen by gardeners and vegetable producers. Flea beetles may be somewhat elongate to oval in shape, and vary in color, pattern, and size. For instance, potato flea beetles (Epitrix cucumeris) tend to be more oval, blackish, and about 1/16-inch long. Striped flea beetles (Phyllotreta striolata) are more elongate and dark with yellowish crooked stripes, and measure about 1/12-inch long. Spinach flea beetles (Disonycha xanthomelaena) are both oval and elongate. They have a black head, antennae and legs. The collar behind the head is yellow to yellowish-orange. Wing covers have blackish-blue luster. They approach 1/5 inch in body length. With most species of flea beetle, the adults overwinter underground or beneath plant debris. During April and May, they become active, mate, and deposit eggs. Egg laying varies depending upon species. Some deposit individual eggs while others deposit them in clusters. Egg sites may be in soil, on leaves, on leaf petioles, or within holes chewed into stems. Eggs typically hatch in 10 days. Larval and pupal development take place during the summer. "New" adults emerge and feed during late summer and fall before seeking overwintering sites. Larvae feeding on underground portions of plants may result in decreased plant vigor.
    [Show full text]
  • Release, Establishment, and Monitoring of Bemisia Tabaci Natural
    58 Hoelmer and Goolsby ___________________________________________________________________ RELEASE, ESTABLISHMENT AND MONITORING OF BEMISIA TABACI NATURAL ENEMIES IN THE UNITED STATES K. Hoelmer1 and J. Goolsby2 1USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Campus International de Baillarguet, Montferrier- sur-Lez, France 2USDA, Agricultural Research Service, c/o Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Entomology, Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia INTRODUCTION Severe infestations of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) [Biotype ‘B’] (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) (=Bemisia argentifolii Bellows and Perring) occurred following its introduction into the United States in the mid-to-late 1980s. Bemisia tabaci’s broad host range and its multivoltine development overwhelmed the then-current management practices and the ability of native natural enemies to limit whitefly populations. In response, a multi-agency national research and action plan was developed with par- ticipation by U.S. Department of Agriculture agencies (Agricultural Research Service, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, and Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service), State departments of agriculture, universities, and private industry (Faust, 1992; Henneberry et al., 1998). Biological control was a major component of the plan. Colonization of new, non-indigenous natural enemies of B. tabaci in the United States was complicated by these various factors: (1) the host range of B. tabaci included a large number of species of crops, ornamentals, weeds,
    [Show full text]
  • EPPO Reporting Service
    ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE EUROPEAN AND ET MEDITERRANEENNE MEDITERRANEAN POUR LA PROTECTION DES PLANTES PLANT PROTECTION ORGANIZATION EPPO Reporting Service NO. 4 PARIS, 2018-04 General 2018/068 New data on quarantine pests and pests of the EPPO Alert List 2018/069 Quarantine lists of Kazakhstan (2017) 2018/070 EPPO report on notifications of non-compliance 2018/071 EPPO communication kits: templates for pest-specific posters and leaflets 2018/072 Useful publications on Spodoptera frugiperda Pests 2018/073 First report of Tuta absoluta in Tajikistan 2018/074 First report of Tuta absoluta in Lesotho 2018/075 First reports of Grapholita packardi and G. prunivora in Mexico 2018/076 First report of Scaphoideus titanus in Ukraine 2018/077 First report of Epitrix hirtipennis in France 2018/078 First report of Lema bilineata in Italy 2018/079 Eradication of Anoplophora glabripennis in Brünisried, Switzerland 2018/080 Update on the situation of Anoplophora glabripennis in Austria Diseases 2018/081 First report of Ceratocystis platani in Turkey 2018/082 Huanglongbing and citrus canker are absent from Egypt 2018/083 Xylella fastidiosa eradicated from Switzerland 2018/084 Update on the situation of Ralstonia solanacearum on roses in Switzerland 2018/085 First report of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma fragariae’ in Slovenia Invasive plants 2018/086 Ambrosia artemisiifolia control in agricultural areas in North-west Italy 2018/087 Optimising physiochemical control of invasive Japanese knotweed 2018/088 Update on LIFE project IAP-RISK 2018/089 Conference: Management and sharing of invasive alien species data to support knowledge-based decision making at regional level (2018-09-26/28, Bucharest, Romania) 21 Bld Richard Lenoir Tel: 33 1 45 20 77 94 E-mail: [email protected] 75011 Paris Fax: 33 1 70 76 65 47 Web: www.eppo.int EPPO Reporting Service 2018 no.
    [Show full text]