Evaluation of Eleven Plant Species As Potential Banker Plants to Support Predatory Orius Sauteri in Tea Plant Systems

Article Evaluation of Eleven Plant Species as Potential Banker Plants to Support Predatory Orius sauteri in Tea Plant Systems

Ruifang Zhang, Dezhong Ji, Qiuqiu Zhang and Linhong Jin *

State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Huaxi District, Guiyang 550025, China; [email protected] (R.Z.); [email protected] (D.J.); [email protected] (Q.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +186-8517-4719

Simple Summary: The tea plant is an economically signiﬁcant beverage crop globally, especially in China. However, tea green leafhoppers and thrips are key pests in Asian tea production systems, causing serious damage to its yield and quality. With growing concerns about pesticide residues on tea and their adverse effects on natural enemies of tea pests, biological pest control is gaining more importance in tea plantations. Orius sauteri is a polyphagous predator used as a biological control agent. Here, we reported 11 plants as banker plants to support the predatory Orius sauteri in tea plant systems. Among them, white clover, red bean, mung bean, peanut, soybean, kidney bean, bush vetch, smooth vetch, and common vetch were found suitable; red bean performed relatively better than the others.

Abstract: Tea green leafhoppers and thrips are key pests in tea plantations and have widely invaded those of Asian origin. Pesticides are currently a favorable control method but not desirable for frequent use on tea plants. To meet Integrated Pest Management (IPM) demand, biological control Citation: Zhang, R.; Ji, D.; Zhang, Q.; with a natural enemy is viewed as the most promising way. Orius sauteri are slated to be a natural Jin, L. Evaluation of Eleven Plant enemy to tea pests. However, more knowledge of rearing O. sauteri and selecting banker plant systems Species as Potential Banker Plants to is strongly needed. The reproductive biology evaluation of the egg oviposition and population life Support Predatory Orius sauteri in Tea parameters of O. sauteri under laboratory conditions were examined, and the supporting ability of Plant Systems. Insects 2021, 12, 162. 11 plant species—motherwort, white clover, red bean, mung bean, peanut, soybean, kidney bean, https://doi.org/10.3390/ herba violae, bush vetch, smooth vetch, and common vetch—in a greenhouse was assessed. Most of insects12020162 the selected plants, except for herba violae, performed relatively well with high oviposition quantity and survival. The mean fecundity per female on red bean and motherwort was 148.75 eggs and Academic Editor: Rosemary Collier 148.25 eggs, respectively, and 90.20 eggs for tea plants (the smallest); there also were signiﬁcant

Received: 21 January 2021 differences. In an experiment to determine the life parameters of O. sauteri, all the tested plants, Accepted: 9 February 2021 except herba violae, were found to be able to complete the growth and development of the life Published: 14 February 2021 cycle; there also were significant differences. The intrinsic rate of increase of motherwort and red bean was 1.18 and 1.17, respectively, and higher compared to that of the other plants, including tea Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral plants (1.13). This result of the O. sauteri population development index was also confirmed in a with regard to jurisdictional claims in greenhouse with the number of motherwort and red beans being as high as 113.33 and 112.67. Since published maps and institutional affil- motherwort was found to be susceptible to aphids and powdery mildew in each trial, it cannot be iations. used for intercropping in tea gardens. Among the 11 plants, red bean was found to be the most suitable to support O. sauteri in tea plantations.

Keywords: Orius sauteri; plant-based support system; host plant; tea plant; biological control Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and 1. Introduction conditions of the Creative Commons The tea plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) is an economically signiﬁcant beverage Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// crop globally with 5.95 million tons of total tea consumption and around 2.9 million creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ hectares of area harvested [1]. Tea green leafhoppers (Empoasca vitis Gothe) and thrips 4.0/).

Insects 2021, 12, 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12020162 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/insects Insects 2021, 12, 162 2 of 10

(Dendrothrips minowai Priesner) are key pests in Asian tea production systems, including in China [2]. At present, the control of these tea pests is highly dependent on the frequent applications of broad-spectrum insecticides. However, there is a growing concern about pesticide residues in tea, their inconsistent effects on pest populations, and adverse effects on natural enemies of tea pests [3]. At the same time, there is a growing need for sustainable pest management practices and it is necessary to adopt tea pest management practices with a markedly reduced reliance on pesticides [4]; for example, natural enemy-mediated indirect interactions among prey species, the potential for enhancing biocontrol services in agroecosystems [5]. As a result, biological pest control is gaining more importance in tea plantations and selecting a strong breed or utilizing natural enemies can be helpful. A possible solution for natural enemies is a plant-based support system (banker plant systems) as part of “ecological engineering” [3,4]. This includes nectar plants, habitat plants, trapping plants, indicator plants, shelter plants, etc. [6,7]. Plant-based support systems (banker plant systems) involve the promotion of plant diversity and support the survival and reproduction of natural enemies by providing food, covers for overwintering, and breeding for natural enemies to reduce susceptibility of agricultural crops to native and invasive pests, thus reducing the use of pesticides and environmental pollution [8]. In 1977, Stacey was the first to use plants as a habitat for Encarsia formosa and suc- cessfully prevented the whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum) from damaging greenhouse tomatoes [9]. Since then, creating plant-based support systems that protect natural enemies to achieve long-term effective pest control has become a hot topic in biological control research [10,11]. Waite [12] reported that purple flesh pepper was the most suitable “bank plant” for Orius insidiosus to enhance its biocontrol of western flower thrips in greenhouse crops. Zhao [13] used Calendula officinalis to expand the population of Orius sauteri in green- houses and improve its control effect on aphids and thrips. Plant resource is a major factor in changing the living environment of predators in the field by adjusting the development of natural enemies, the survival rate of nymphs, and the reproduction rate of adults [7–10]. Hence, the selectivity of natural enemies for specific host plants plays an important role in biological control [14,15]. Orius sauteri (Poppius) (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) is a polyphagous predator used as a natural enemy [16–20]. For example, O. sauteri possesses a biological control effect on pest insects in pea pushes [17]; it also has been registered as a biocontrol agent and evaluated with respect to prey selection, reproduction, and predation capability on thrips in eggplant [19]. O. sauteri often lays eggs in the petioles, vein tissues, and tender stems of inhabiting plants [21,22]. The life cycle of an O. sauteri involves the laying of an egg, the development through nymph of 5 instars, followed by the emergence of a winged adult [21,22]. The eggs are short eggplant-shaped, white, and the egg cover is white and exposed. The nymph in 1st instar-5th instar stage is around 0.54 mm-1.88 mm long. At the end of development, the male larva is basically formed and the female’s oviposition tube begins to differentiate [21,22]. In order to improve the biological control ability of O. sauteri against pest thrips and green tea leafhoppers in tea plantations, a plant-based support system is expected to be established. The selection of plants suitable for development of O. sauteri populations is fundamental work. In this study, we evaluated the supporting ability of the selected plants, with respect to oviposition or reproductive ability of O. sauteri adults, population life parameters, O. sauteri’s development from first instar to adult stage, and population growth on different plants beside tea plants as a banker plant.

2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Plants The species and sources of plants involved in this experiment are shown in Table1 . All type of plants in the trials were developed from commercially available seeds with no chemical pretreatment. The seeds were hand sown into seedling trays (48 cm × 15 cm × 8 cm) containing general seedling-raising substrate (pH = 5.5–7.0, organic matter ≥ 20%) in a climate- controlled room (25 ± 1 ◦C, 70 ± 5% of relative humidity (RH), 16h:8h light (L)/dark (D) Insects 2021, 12, 162 3 of 10

at Guizhou University. One month later, seedlings 3-4 cm high were transplanted to plastic pots (diameter 8 cm, height 10 cm). All the plants were manually watered with an N P K fertilizer (20%–20%–20%, N–P–K in mass concentration) solution once a day. Two-year-old tea plants transplanted from the Guizhou tea plantation were cultivated in a climate-controlled room to be used.

Table 1. Plant species and source access.

No. Common Name Latin Name/Family Source * 1 Motherwort Leonurus artemisia (Lour.) S. Y. Hu/Labiatae Blue Sky Seed Industry 2 White clover Trifolium repens./Leguminosae Blue Sky Seed Industry 3 Bush vetch Vicia villosa Roth./Leguminosae Blue Sky Seed Industry 4 Common vetch Vicia sativa L./Leguminosae Blue Sky Seed Industry 5 Smooth vetch Vicia glabrescens Koch./Leguminosae Blue Sky Seed Industry 6 Herba violae Viola philippica./Violaceae Blue Sky Seed Industry 7 Soybean Glycine javanica L./Leguminosae Guizhou Dasheng Seed Industry Co., Ltd. 8 Mung bean Vigna radiata (Linn.) Wilczek/Leguminosae Guizhou Dasheng Seed Industry Co., Ltd. Vigna angularis (Willd.) Ohwiet 9 Red bean Guizhou Dasheng Seed Industry Co., Ltd. Ohashi/Leguminosae 10 Peanut Arachis hypogaea Linn./Leguminosae Guizhou Dasheng Seed Industry Co., Ltd. 11 Kidney bean Phaseolus vulgaris Linn./Leguminosae Dezhou De Vegetable Seed Industry Co., Ltd. 12 Tea plant Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Ktze/Theaceae Guizhou Tea plantation * All source locations are within China.

2.2. Insect Colonies and Food Sources O. sauteri colony-originated adults were obtained from Beijing Kuoye Tianyuan Biotechnology Co., Beijing China. Both nymphs and adults were fed with rice meal moth eggs (Corcyra cephalonica) and reared in separate containers in a climate-controlled room (25 ± 1 ◦C, 70 ± 5 % RH, 16: 8 L/D) at Guizhou University. Frozen-fresh rice meal moth eggs were provided by colleagues at Jilin agriculture University and reproduced in our lab by feeding with wheat bran. The accumulated eggs were made into egg cards with embryo killing treatment and stored in a lab refrigerator (at 5 ◦C) until they were ready for use. Each insect cage (25 cm × 25 cm × 25 cm) was enclosed by a 120-mesh colorless transparent nylon net with a zipper on one side for ventilation and ease to observe and operate. This colony had been maintained without any introduction of “wild” individuals for over three consecutive generations. Green bean pods (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) coexisted as an oviposition substrate and also as humidiﬁers. Every three days, green beans pods were transferred to a new cage to produce discrete even-aged cohorts and egg strips. Cages containing adults lay eggs in green beans pods.

2.3. Development of O. sauteri Nymph (Eggs to Adult Stage) in Selected Plant Species Under a microscope (MDG41, Leica Microsystems), we counted and placed 300 O. sauteri eggs laid on the same day in each of the 12 cages (25 cm × 25 cm × 25 cm) with 12 tested plants, in a climate-controlled room (25 ± 1 ◦C, 70 ± 5% RH, 16: 8 L/D). Fresh rice meal moth eggs were added to feed the O. sauteri and the test plants were watered every day. Hatching eggs, development time of O. sauteri nymph (from 1st instar to adult stage), number of nymph and adults, and number of females were recorded daily, and then emergence rate was calculated. During the observation process, the plants with newly laid eggs were replaced by new plants every three days until all the adults were dead. The experiment with three parallel cages for each plant was repeated thrice.

2.4. Evaluation on Reproductive Capacity of O. sauteri Adults on Different Host Plants Adults taken from the rearing colony were sorted according to male and female by observing their abdomen under a microscope (MDG41, Leica Microsystems, Heerbrugg, Insects 2021, 12, 162 4 of 10

Switzerland)—the male and female reproductive organs are different (symmetrical for females and asymmetrical for males) [23]. In order to not miss the oviposition period, a newly emerged pair of adults (1 ± 1 day) were placed in a colorless transparent plastic tetrapod (189 cm × 93 cm × 65 cm) containing a test plant. Sufﬁcient fresh moth egg cards were provided for feeding O. sauteri. If the male was found dead during the experiment, another male was supplemented to make sure the female mated. In order to accurately count the number of newly laid eggs, the host plants with laid eggs were replaced by the same fresh plant every day. The O. sauteri eggs attached to the exchanged host plant was counted and then maintained in another insect cage. All the new eggs were recorded until adult death. Twelve plant species, including tea plants, was tested in three parallel cages and each trial was repeated six times.

2.5. O. sauteri Growth in Tea Plants Intercropped with 11 Tested Plants The plants were evaluated for their suitability to support O. sauteri by intercropping in a greenhouse ﬁeld at Guizhou University. Tea plants intercropped with 11 test plants were set in a 50 cm × 25 cm × 25 cm cage. 3 and 3 O. sauteri adults (1 ± 1 days) were released into the cage with sufﬁcient rice moth♂ eggs as♀ food. On the seventh day, the data was counted and 3 and 3 O. sauteri adults (1 ± 1 days) were released again, and then the number of adults♂ and nymphs♀ of O. sauteri was recorded every two weeks, continuing thus for seven weeks. To record their number accurately, O. sauteri were brushed off the plant, counted, and then released back into the cage for continued development. The plants were regularly watered. The experiment with three parallel cages for each plant was repeated thrice.

2.6. Data Analysis and Calculations Hatching rate = number of hatching nymphs/ number of eggs; Emergence rate = number of emerging adults/number of 3-4 instar nymphs; The life table construction parameters were carried out according to the following formula [20–22]: Population trend index = number of expected next generation eggs/ number of previous generation eggs; Expected oviposition amount of the next generation = standard oviposition amount × normal female adult; The standard oviposition amount was the maximum oviposition amount of a female observed in the actual experiment; Generation survival rate = the adult Lx/the initial egg size of that generation; Net reproductive rate (R0) = ∑Lx Mx; Mean generation time (T) = ∑Lx Mx X/∑Lx Mx Intrinsic rate of increase (rm) = ln R0/T; Finite increase rate (λ) = exp (rm); Population doubling time (d) = ln2/rm; x represents the interval between two observations and a three-day break was set here; Lx is the survival rate at the x day period; Mx is the average number of female offspring per female adult during x period; X represents the developmental stage (egg-nymph-adult); Lx is the number of surviving insects at the beginning of the X period. O. sauteri insect development in every test was investigated and recorded, including fecundity per female (egg number per female), oviposition period, number of new-hatching nymphs, nymph development time (mean time from hatching to adult eclosion), emergence rate. One-way ANOVA in SPSS was used to analyze those data. The means were compared by Tukey’s test at p < 0.05 level; a Type I error rate (a) of 0.05 was used to test for signiﬁcance. Insects 2021, 12, 162 5 of 10

3. Results 3.1. Development of Orius sauteri Nymph (1st Instar to Adult) Each generation of O. sauteri was composed of an egg, nymph (1st instar-5th instar) and adult. We carefully recorded the hatching rate (percentage of the eggs hatched), nymph development time (from 1st instar to adult) and emergence rate. It was showed that hatching rate (F = 1.115; df = 11, 24; p = 0.392) (Table2) in each host plant was at a similar level, and all matched that of the tea plants. Among them, white clover, motherwort, and herba violae supported a higher hatching rate with 93.33%, 91.37%, and 90.30% for O. sauteri. For nymph development time (F = 12.681; df = 11, 24; p < 0.001) (Table2) from 1st instar to adult, a close level was exhibited in the tested plants excepted for herba violae and the difference among them was less than two days. However, the O. sauteri nymph development time in herba violae was as low as around 1.50 days and the nymphs were found dead at around the 1st instar. With regard to emergence rate (F= 22.841; df = 11, 24; p < 0.001) (Table2), they were significantly diverse. Data of the emergence rate (42.35%-76.67%) in different plant species except herba violae were superior than that of the tea plants (33.675%), where the red bean (76.67%), motherwort (74.93%), and mung bean (71.26%) hold a relatively higher rate, but there were no significant differences between them. Due to the short survival time (1.5 day), the O. sauteri nymph development was found to be stagnant; no emergence appeared in the herba violae plant. Therefore, 11 tested plants, except herba violae, possess a better suitability with significant differences compared to the tea plants.

Table 2. Development parameters of O. sauteri nymph on 11 plant species.

Nymph Development Time Test Plants Hatching Rate (%) Emergence Rate (%) (d) Mung bean 87.62 ± 3.06 a 13.00 ± 0.58 a 71.26 ± 1.90 a Red bean 87.62 ± 3.06 a 12.33 ± 0.88 a 76.67 ± 3.16 a Peanut 89.12 ± 1.82 a 11.00 ± 1.45 a 54.55 ± 3.54 bc White clover 93.33 ± 0.66 a 14.00 ± 0.58 a 54.69 ± 6.52 bc Motherwort 91.37 ± 2.39 a 12.33 ± 0.88 a 74.93 ± 3.35 a Herba violae 90.30 ± 2.36 a 1.50 ± 0.50 b 0.00 ± 0.00 f Soybean 86.44 ± 2.23 a 12.33 ± 0.88 a 67.24 ± 3.82 ab Common vetch 86.40 ± 2.36 a 12.33 ± 1.45 a 42.35 ± 4.27 cd Bush vetch 85.72 ± 2.15 a 12.00 ± 1.15 a 45.40 ± 6.57 cd Smooth vetch 86.41 ± 2.00 a 12.33 ± 0.33 a 51.94 ± 3.07 c Kidney bean 88.34 ± 2.64 a 12.00 ± 1.73 a 56.56 ± 7.70 bc * Tea plant 86.50 ± 2.13 a 13.80 ± 0.42 a 32.51 ± 3.71 d The means followed by different letters are signiﬁcantly different from each other (Tukey’s test, p = 0.05). * Tea plants served as the reference plant at 25 ± 1 ◦C, 70 ± 5 % RH, 16h: 8 h L/ D.

3.2. Reproductive Capacity of Orius sauteri Adults One pair of newly emerged adults (1 ± 1day) were placed and reared in different cages (189 cm × 93 cm × 65 cm) containing a different test plant. The number of eggs laid by each female was used as the principal physiological standard of fecundity (eggs per female) reproductive capacity of O. sauteri adults. The plant species did have an significant effect on single-female total fecundity (F = 5.828 df = 11, 38; p < 0.001), oviposition period (F = 5.818; df = 11, 38; p < 0.001) (Table3); taking tea plants (average 90.20 eggs, 12.00 days) (Table3) as a reference, the data of the single-female total fecundity and oviposition period differed greatly, for 10 plant species, except herba violae, which were larger, with red bean (mean 148.75 eggs, 20.50 days) and motherwort (mean 148.25 eggs, 19.25 days) (Table3) being significant, and herba violae not being significant compared to tea plants. The tested plant species had a significant effect on the reproductive capacity of O. sauteri. Insects 2021, 12, 162 6 of 10

Table 3. Reproductive capacity of O. sauteri adults.

Fecundity Test Plants Oviposition Period (Day) (Eggs per Female) Mung bean 124.75 ± 12.99 abc 15.25 ± 1.31 abcd Red bean 148.75 ± 8.06 a 20.50 ± 1.55 a Peanut 121.00 ± 9.46 abc 16.75 ± 1.38 abcd White clover 132.25 ± 10.19 ab 18.00 ± 1.22 abc Motherwort 148.25 ± 11.02 a 19.25 ± 1.93 ab Herba violae 94.60 ± 5.40 bc 11.60 ± 0.75 d Soybean 122.25 ± 5.82 abc 16.00 ± 1.08 abcd Common vetch 103.50 ± 4.63 bc 14.75 ± 0.85 bcd Bush vetch 119.75 ± 8.41 abc 14.75 ± 1.03 bcd Smooth vetch 100.00 ± 6.72 bc 13.25 ± 0.85 cd Kidney bean 117.75 ± 6.80 abc 14.75 ± 0.85 bcd * Tea plants 90.20 ± 4.85 c 12.00 ± 0.71 d The means followed by different letters are signiﬁcantly different from each other (Tukey’s test, p = 0.05). * Tea plants served as the reference plant at 25 ± 1 ◦C, 70 ± 5 % RH, 16h: 8 h L/D.

3.3. Population Life Parameters of Orius sauteri on Different Host Plants The different stages (egg, nymph and adult) of generation development were recorded and the life parameters of O. sauteri were calculated and evaluated, according to the method [24–26] described in Section 2.6. There were significant differences in net reproductive rate (R0) (F = 29.375; df = 11, 22; p < 0.001) (Table4), mean generation time (T) (F = 24.140; df = 11, 22; p < 0.001) (Table4), intrinsic rate of increase (r m) (F = 12.204; df = 11, 22; p < 0.001) (Table4), finite increase rate ( λ) (F = 12.291; df = 11, 22; p < 0.001) (Table4), population doubling time (F = 11.118; df = 11, 22; p < 0.001) (Table4), generation survival rate (F= 15.983; df = 11, 24; p < 0.001) (Figure1), and population development index (F= 54.486; df = 11, 24; p < 0.001) (Figure1). To evaluate significant differences, the life parameters of O. sauteri on different host plants were comprehensively analyzed. Compared to tea plants, the other 10 plants showed a relatively better index value with finite increase rate (λ), intrinsic rate of increase (rm), net reproductive rate (R0) generation survival rate, and population development index. There was no significant difference between the net reproductive rate of red bean (76.74%), motherwort (72.89%), and mung bean (65.01%) though they were obviously higher than those of the other eight plants. With regards to population doubling time, tea plants showed the longest (5.19 d) and motherwort the shortest (3.90 d), with a significant difference. For population doubling time, the longer the population doubling time, the more unfavorable was the population development of O. sauteri. It is easy to see that, for herba violae, the nymphs in that treatment did not survive to complete the life development with zero generation survival. Thus, herba violae is obviously not suitable to be used as a host plant for O. sauteri.

3.4. O. sauteri Growth in Tea Plants Intercropped with 11 Tested Plants Based on the growth capacity of O. sauteri population evaluation, the suitability of plant species as host plants was evaluated by intercropping with tea plants in a greenhouse field. As shown in Figure2, there were significant differences in the populations of O. sauteri developing on different plant species (F = 6.862; df = 11, 26; p < 0.001 (Day 7); F= 16.197; df = 11, 26; p < 0.001 (Day 35); F =15.006; df = 11, 26; p < 0.001 (Day 21) and F = 38.380; df = 11, 26; p < 0.001 (Day 49)). Compared to the tea plants, the number of nymphs and adults was higher on 10 other plant species, except for herba violae. Overall, the population of O. sauteri on each species increased over seven weeks in greenhouse conditions and increased steadily with a significantly higher number on red bean and motherwort than on the other plant species (Figure2). Herba violae had extremely lower populations of O. sauteri throughout the recording period, eventually disappearing completely. Insects 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 11

Table 4. The population life parameters of O. sauteri (whole life) reared on 11 plant species at 25 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 5 % RH, 16h: 8 h L/ D.

Population Net Reproductive Mean Generation Intrinsic Rate of Finite Increase Test Plants Doubling Time Rate (R0) Time (T)/d Increase (rm) Rate (λ) (t)/d Mung bean 65.01 bc 26.87 a 0.15 cd 1.17 cd 4.47 bc Red bean 76.75 a 26.26 ab 0.16 abc 1.18 abc 4.20 c Peanut 44.58 de 22.03 f 0.17 ab 1.19 ab 4.02 d White clover 54.44 cd 25.90 bc 0.15 cd 1.17 cd 4.49 bc Motherwort 72.89 ab 24.08 e 0.18 a 1.19 a 3.90 d Herba violae / / / / / Soybean 64.96 bc 25.41 bc 0.16 bc 1.18 bc 4.23 c Common vetch 40.38 e 23.70 e 0.16 cd 1.17 cd 4.45 de Bush vetch 39.73 ef 25.15 cd 0.15 de 1.16 de 4.74 b Smooth vetch 38.46 ef 25.15 cd 0.14 de 1.16 de 4.79 b Kidney bean 35.86d ef 24.44 de 0.15 de 1.16 de 4.75b * Tea plants 29.35 f 25.21 cd 0.13 e 1.14 e 5.19 a InsectsThe2021 means, 12, 162 followed by different letters are significantly different from each other (Tukey’s test, p = 0.05). * Tea plants7 of 10 served as the reference plant.

Insects 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 11

O. sauteri on each species increased over seven weeks in greenhouse conditions and increased steadily with a significantly higher number on red bean and motherwort than on Orius sauteri Figure 1. Mean generationthe survival other rate plant and species population (Figure development 2). Herba index violae of had extremely(whole lower life) reared populations on 11 plant of O. Figure 1. Mean generation survival rate and population development± index◦ of± Orius sauteri (whole life) reared on 11 plant species (tea plant as the referencesauteri plant) throughout in a growth the chamberrecording at 25period,1 C, eventually 70 5 % RH, disappearing 16h: 8 h L/D. completely. The means followed speciesby different (tea plant letters as are the signiﬁcantly reference plant) different in a growth from each chamber other (Tukey’s at 25 ± 1 test,°C, 70p = ± 0.05).5 % RH, 16h: 8 h L/D. The means followed by different letters are significantly different from each other (Tukey’s test, p = 0.05).

Figure 2. Mean number (±SE) of O. sauteri nymphs and adults reared on 11 different host plants (tea plants as the reference) Figurein a greenhouse 2. Mean number in a climate-controlled (±SE) of O. sauteri roomnymphs at Guizhou and adults University, reared on China,11 different recording host plants from 14(tea December plants as 2018the reference) (day 7) to in31 a Januarygreenhouse 2019 in (day a climate-controlled 49). The means followed room at byGuizhou different Univ lettersersity, are China, signiﬁcantly recording different from 14 from December each other 2018 (Tukey’s (day 7) test,to 31p =January 0.05). 2019 (day 49). The means followed by different letters are significantly different from each other (Tukey’s test, p = 0.05).

Insects 2021, 12, 162 8 of 10

Table 4. The population life parameters of O. sauteri (whole life) reared on 11 plant species at 25 ± 1 ◦C, 70 ± 5 % RH, 16h: 8 h L/ D.

Net Reproductive Mean Generation Intrinsic Rate of Finite Increase Population Test Plants Rate (R0) Time (T)/d Increase (rm) Rate (λ) Doubling Time (t)/d Mung bean 65.01 bc 26.87 a 0.15 cd 1.17 cd 4.47 bc Red bean 76.75 a 26.26 ab 0.16 abc 1.18 abc 4.20 c Peanut 44.58 de 22.03 f 0.17 ab 1.19 ab 4.02 d White clover 54.44 cd 25.90 bc 0.15 cd 1.17 cd 4.49 bc Motherwort 72.89 ab 24.08 e 0.18 a 1.19 a 3.90 d Herba violae / / / / / Soybean 64.96 bc 25.41 bc 0.16 bc 1.18 bc 4.23 c Common vetch 40.38 e 23.70 e 0.16 cd 1.17 cd 4.45 de Bush vetch 39.73 ef 25.15 cd 0.15 de 1.16 de 4.74 b Smooth vetch 38.46 ef 25.15 cd 0.14 de 1.16 de 4.79 b Kidney bean 35.86d ef 24.44 de 0.15 de 1.16 de 4.75b * Tea plants 29.35 f 25.21 cd 0.13 e 1.14 e 5.19 a The means followed by different letters are signiﬁcantly different from each other (Tukey’s test, p = 0.05). * Tea plants served as the reference plant.

4. Discussion The population development of O. sauteri on plants is a necessary prerequisite for establishing a plant-based support system in tea plantations. The life table is an important method to study insect population dynamics, evaluating various pest control measures, for- mulating quantitative forecasting models, and implementing scientific pest control [27–29]. In this experiment, in the category of intrinsic rate of increase of 10 plant species, except herba violae, the minimum was 0.13 (Table4) for tea plants and the maximum was 0.18 for motherwort (Table4), which was a significant difference. This shows that the population development of O. sauteri was different in different host plant environments. When motherwort was used as the host plant, the population of the next generation of O. sauteri had 35.4 times increase in previous generation (the largest compared with other plants, and the red bean second had 33.47 times increase; the smallest was for the tea plants—9.34 times) (Figure1). Generation survival rate of the population was motherwort 69.33%, max; tea plants 31.67%, min (Figure1). These data are sufficient to show that 10 plant species, except Herba violae, can provide supporting conditions for cage bioassay in the development of O. sauteri. Evaluating the plant species for their ability to support O. sauteri population growth over multiple generations in a seven-week period provided practical information on the potential to establish plant-based support systems in tea plantation. When compared to the tea plants, the number of O. sauteri increased and the population in the 10 plants showed a consistently increasing trend when intercropped with tea plants in a greenhouse. In partic- ular, motherwort (mean 113.33, seventh week) and red bean (mean 112.67, seventh week) (Figure2) showed high ability, compared to the other plant species, and were expected to be suitable to be intercropped with tea plants to establish plant-based support systems. It should be mentioned that the motherwort might fall into disuse because it was found to susceptible to aphids and powdery mildew in greenhouse conditions. The susceptibility to pests and diseases should be considered as a factor in the selection of appropriate candidate supporting plant species [30]. Another exception is that no O. sauteri nymphs emerged into adults on herba violae in this study. Almost all the newly hatched nymphs died before the second instar. The finding that utilization of herba violae has a negatively effect on growth parameters in consistent with previous studies [31,32]. There are also other factors affecting the development of O. sauteri on the host plants. For example, studies have shown that the oviposition quantity of O. sauteri was higher in nitrogen-rich plant systems over nitrogen-poor ones [33,34]. The selected plant in the present study, except herba violae and motherwort, is the Leguminosae (Fabeceae) family with potential high nitrogen content and they consistently performed relatively well. Although Insects 2021, 12, 162 9 of 10

motherwort is not a legume plant, its effect is also very good; thus, further research is needed. As discovered in the present study, white clover, red bean, mung bean, peanut, soybean, kidney bean, bush vetch, smooth vetch, common vetch, and red bean supported constant populations of O. sauteri in greenhouse conditions and could be recommended for intercropping in tea plantation to establish plant-based support systems. The effect of red bean was found to be slightly better than the others. This experiment was only carried out in experimental conditions and in a greenhouse, not in a field. Studies have found that there may be differences between experimental data and field data [35]. Therefore, future studies are required to determine the dispersal of O. sauteri through greenhouse and field tests as well as the determining effects on their searching behavior when prey is scarce.

5. Conclusions In this research, we studied 11 plants as banker plants to support predatory O. sauteri in tea plantation systems. Most of the selected plants, except for herba violae, performed relatively well with high oviposition quantity and survival. Since motherwort is susceptible to aphids and powdery mildew, it cannot be a candidate for intercropping in tea gardens. Therefore, it could be concluded that, among the 11 plants studied, white clover, red bean, mung bean, peanut, soybean, kidney bean, bush vetch, smooth vetch, and common vetch were found suitable to support O. sauteri. Of these, red bean had superior performance.

Author Contributions: R.Z. conducted the experiments; R.Z., D.J., and Q.Z. designed and performed the experiments and analyzed the data; L.J. conceived and supervised the project. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. R.Z. & L.J. wrote and revised the manuscript. Funding: This research was funded by the Science and Technology Project of Guizhou Province ([2015]5020) and Scientific Research Projects of Major Agricultural Industries of Guizhou Province ([2019]006). Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable. Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author with reasonable request. Acknowledgments: We are grateful to Xia Zhou, Guizhou University, for the fruitful discussions and helpful comments on an earlier draft and the revised manuscript. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References 1. Singh, H.R.; Hazarika, P. Biotechnological Approaches for Tea Improvement in Biotechnological Progress and Beverage Consumption; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 111–148. 2. Zhou, Z.Y.; Hu, B.J.; Xu, L.; Hu, F.; Li, C.G.; Gao, T.C.; Su, W.H. Selection of high-efﬁcient safe pesticides for controlling tea lesser leafhopper (Empoasca vitis). Agric. Sci. Technol. 2016, 17, 1651–1653. 3. Settele, J.; Biesmeijer, J.; Bommarco, R. Switch to ecological engineering would aid independence. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 456, 570. [CrossRef][PubMed] 4. Gurr, G.M.; Wratten, S.D.; Snyder, W.E.; Read, D.M.Y. Biodiversity and Insect Pests: Key Issues for Sustainable Management; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 214–229. 5. Chailleux, A.; Mohl, E.K.; Alves, M.T.; Messelink, G.J.; Desneux, N. Natural enemy-mediated indirect interactions among prey species: Potential for enhancing biocontrol services in agroecosystems. Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 1769–1779. [CrossRef] 6. Frank, S.D. Biological control of arthropod pests using banker plant systems: Past progress and future directions. Biol. Control. 2010, 52, 8–16. [CrossRef] 7. Chen, X.X.; Liu, Y.Q.; Ren, S.X.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, W.Q.; Ge, F. Plant-mediated support system for natural enemies of insect pests. Chin. J. Appl. Entomol. 2014, 51, 1–12. 8. Jaworski, C.C.; Chailleux, A.; Bearez, P.; Desneux, N. Predator-mediated apparent competition between pests fails to prevent yield loss despite actual pest population decrease. J. Pest Sci. 2015, 88, 793–803. [CrossRef] Insects 2021, 12, 162 10 of 10

9. Stacey, D.L. ’Banker’ Plant Production of Encarsia formosa Gahan and its Use in the Control of Glasshouse Whitefly on Tomatoes. Plant Pathol. 1977, 26, 63–66. [CrossRef] 10. Collier, T.; Steenwyk, R.V. A critical evaluation of augmentative biological control. Biol. Control. 2004, 31, 245–256. [CrossRef] 11. Lu, Y.; Wu, K.; Jiang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Desneux, N. Widespread adoption of Bt cotton and insecticide decrease promotes biocontrol services. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 487, 362–365. [CrossRef] 12. Waite, M.O.; Scott-Dupree, C.D.; Brownbridge, M.; Buitenhuis, R.; Murphy, G. Evaluation of seven plant species/cultivars for their suitability as banker plants for Orius insidiosus (Say). BioControl 2013, 59, 79–87. [CrossRef] 13. Zhao, J.; Guo, X.; Tan, X. Using Calendula officinalis as a floral resource to enhance aphid and thrips suppression by the flower bug Orius sauteri (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 6. [CrossRef][PubMed] 14. Wratten, S.D.; Gillespie, M.; Decourtye, A.; Mader, E.; Desneux, N. Pollinator habitat enhancement: Benefits to other ecosystem services. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 159, 112–122. [CrossRef] 15. Wäckers, F.L.; Van Rijn, P.C.J. Pick and Mix: Selecting Flowering Plants to Meet the Requirements of Target Biological Control Insects. In Biodiversity and Insect Pests; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 139–165. 16. Landis, D.A.; Wratten, S.D.; Gurr, G.M. Habitat Management to Conserve Natural Enemies of Arthropod Pests in Agriculture. Annu. Rev. Èntomol. 2000, 45, 175–201. [CrossRef] 17. Li, H.L.; Li, P.; Zhang, H.; Wang, D.F.; Li, L.D.; Zeng, M.S.; Wu, G.Y.; Wang, Q.S. Predation of Orius sauterion pest insects of pea pushes. Acta Teas Sin. 2019, 60, 38–40. 18. Tan, X.L.; Wang, S.; Liu, T.X. Acceptance and suitability of four plant substrates for rearing Orius sauteri (Hemip.tera: An-thocoridae). Biocontrol Sci. Techn. 2014, 24, 291–302. [CrossRef] 19. Nagai, K.; Yano, E. Predation by Orius sauteri (Poppius) (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) on Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Functional response and selective predation. Appl. Èntomol. Zool. 2000, 35, 565–574. [CrossRef] 20. Yin, J.; Gao, X.G.; Wu, Y.Q. Thrips control on the greenhouse eggplant by releasing Orius sauteri (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). Chin. J. Biol. Control 2013, 29, 459–462. 21. Kiman., Z.B.; Yearga., K.V. Development and reproduction of the predator Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) reared on diets of selected plant material and arthropod prey. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1985, 4, 464–467. [CrossRef] 22. Yoshitaka, N.; Yoshimi, H. Effects of Prey Availability on Longevity, Prey Consumption, and Egg Production of the Insect Predators Orius sauteri and O. tantillus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1999, 92, 537–541. 23. Slater, J.A. Order hemiptera: True bugs, cicadas, hoppers, psyllids, whiteflies, aphids, and scale insects. In Borror and Delong’s Introduction to the Study of Insects, 7th ed.; Triplehorn, C.A., Johnson, N.F., Eds.; Thomson Brooks/Cole: Belmont, CA, USA, 2005; pp. 268–332. 24. Fan, J.S.; Zhang, L.X.; Wang, G.Q.; Ma, X.; Han, X. Life tables for experimental populations of Loxostege sticticalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on five host plants. Plant Prot. 2016, 42, 104–109. 25. Busvine, J.R. Revised method for spider mites and their eggs (e.g., Tetranychus sp. and Panonychus ulmi Koch). FAO method No. 10a. In Recommended Methods for Measurement of Pest Resistance to Pesticides; FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 1980; Volume 21, pp. 49–53. 26. Shih, C.-I.T.; Poe, S.L.; Cromroy, H.L. Biology, Life Table, and Intrinsic Rate of Increase of Tetranychus urticae1. Ann. Èntomol. Soc. Am. 1976, 69, 362–364. [CrossRef] 27. Ding, Y.Q. Population Mathematical Principles and Application of Insect Ecology; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1980. 28. Gao, S.K.; Yang, Z.Q. Application of life table in pest biological control. Chin. J. Biol. Control 2015, 31, 256–263. 29. Sun, R.Y. The Principle of Animal Ecology; Normal University Press: Beijing, China, 2001. 30. Wong, S.K.; Frank, S.D. Pollen increases fitness and abundance of Orius insidiosus Say (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) on banker plants. Biol. Control 2013, 64, 45–50. [CrossRef] 31. Wu, H.; Zhan, Y.; Chen, H.F.; Li, J.; Jian, H.; Zhang, W.G.; Feng, Y.L.; Yang, S.L. Rapid identification of chemical constituents in violayedoensis by UHPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS/MS. China J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae 2016, 22, 70–75. 32. Oshima, N.; Narukawa, Y.; Takeda, T.; Kiuchi, F. Collagenase inhibitors from Viola yedoensis. J. Nat. Med. 2012, 67, 240–245. [CrossRef] 33. Groenteman, R.; Guershon, M.; Coll, M. Effects of leaf nitrogen content on oviposition site selection, offspring performance, and intraspecific interactions in an omnivorous bug. Ecol. Èntomol. 2006, 31, 155–161. [CrossRef] 34. Liman, A.-S.; Dalin, P.; Björkman, C. Enhanced leaf nitrogen status stabilizes omnivore population density. Oecologia 2017, 183, 57–65. [CrossRef] 35. Wong, S.K.; Frank, S.D. Influence of banker plants and spiders on biological control by Orius insidiosus (Heteroptera: Anthocori- dae). Biol. Control 2012, 63, 181–187. [CrossRef]