The Institutional Origins of Competitiveness and Hegemony in Post-Cold War Africa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Institutional Origins of Competitiveness and Hegemony in Post-Cold War Africa PARTY MATTERS: THE INSTITUTIONAL ORIGINS OF COMPETITIVENESS AND HEGEMONY IN POST-COLD WAR AFRICA A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government By Yonatan L. Morse, M.A. Washington, DC August 23, 2013 Copyright 2013 by Yonatan L. Morse All Rights Reserved ii PARTY MATTERS: THE INSTITUTIONAL ORIGINS OF COMPETITIVENESS AND HEGEMONY IN POST-COLD WAR AFRICA Yonatan L. Morse, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Marc M. Howard, Ph.D. ABSTRACT What explains differences in electoral authoritarian outcomes? Why are some regimes able to utterly dominate elections with comparatively lower levels of fraud and coercion, while in other cases regimes can only muster slim vote margins? What explains differences in the competitiveness and hegemony of electoral authoritarian elections? This dissertation focuses specifically on Africa’s former single-party regimes and argues that differences in party capacity developed under single-party rule is a primary factor differentiating forms of electoral authoritarianism. Through typological theorizing and case-studies of Tanzania, Kenya, and Cameroon this project shows how single-party regimes that elevated the party as an important decision-making institution, made credible investments into party institutionalization, and kept open avenues for elite recruitment were less likely to experience elite defection during multiparty elections. Likewise, single-party regimes that built strong party-affiliated mobilizing structures and engaged in wide practices of social incorporation were able to rely on persistently large electoral support. In the absence of these party capacities regimes were forced to rely more heavily on fraud and a range of contingent factors to survive. By differentiating these forms of electoral authoritarianism and their variant institutional underpinnings this dissertation has significance importance for our understanding of the durability of authoritarianism and the potential path toward democratization. iii This project could not have been finished without the help, prodding, and support from so many people met along the way. My first thanks go to the members of my Ph.D. committee at Georgetown University’s Department of Government. Marc Howard, Daniel Brumberg, Scott Taylor, and Andrew Bennett’s deep insights and expertise helped shape and sharpen my arguments, and they have all taught me enormously about research and what it means to be a teacher. My thanks also go to the department for their financial support and my peers who have read and influenced significant portions of this dissertation – Hesham Sallam, Beth Mercurio, Michael Koplow, Zacchary Ritter, Cory Julie, David Buckley, Jennifer Raymond, and Anjali Dayal. Outside of Georgetown I have benefitted from the insights of several advisors and friends. Even if our meetings were brief, they have all shaped this dissertation. My sincere thanks go out to Joel Barkan, David Waldner, Steven Heydemann, Steven Levitsky, Thad Dunning, Catherine Kelly, Rachel Riedl, Leonardo Arriola, Keith Weghorst, and Philip Roessler. Big thanks also given to the faculty and students of the Institute for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, and especially David Collier, Jason Seawright, Gary Goertz, and James Mahoney. Without that intensive and invigorating training this dissertation would look very different. Deep thanks also go to the countless people I met while researching and interviewing in Kenya and Tanzania. You are too numerous to list here, but your hospitality and willingness to let me into your worlds and ask deep questions about your lives was one of the highlights of this project for me, to which I am ever grateful. Much gratitude is also deserved to the faculty at the departments of political science at the University of Dar es Salaam and the University of Nairobi, the staff at the Research and Education for Democracy in Tanzania (REDET), and to the faculty of the Institute for International Development in Nairobi. In particular, thanks to Samuel Mushi, Max Mmuya, Mwesiga Baregu, Adams Aloo, Njunga N’gethe, Michael Chege for spending time with me and teaching me so much about your history and politics. Finally, none of this is possible without the support and encouragement of family, friends, and loved ones. You know who you are, and you know that I owe you all big time. Many thanks, Yonatan L. Morse iv TABLE OF CONTENTS! ! Chapter 1 : The Puzzle, Setting, and Argument ............................................................................................ 1 The Puzzle: Electoral Authoritarian Variation .......................................................................................... 2 The Setting: Africa’s former Single-Party Regimes .................................................................................. 7 The Argument and Cases: Divergent Patterns of Party Building and Electoral Authoritarianism ......... 13 Methodological Notes and Research Design ........................................................................................... 15 Plan of the Dissertation ............................................................................................................................ 19 PART I : THE BROADER PICTURE ........................................................................................................ 22 Chapter 2 : Single-Party Regimes and Electoral Authoritarian Variation ................................................... 23 What Do Authoritarian Parties Do? Elite Retention, Social Mobilization, Public Monitoring .............. 25 Conceptualizing Authoritarian Parties and Single-Party Regimes: An Overview of Approaches .......... 29 Developing the Concepts of Structural Articulation and Social Robustness .......................................... 39 How Party Capacity Influences Electoral Authoritarian Outcomes ........................................................ 44 Alternative Theories and Approaches to Electoral Authoritarian Variation ........................................... 47 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................... 55 Chapter 3 - From Single-Parties to Electoral Authoritarian Regimes, a Typological Theory .................... 57 Party Capacity in Single-Party Regimes ................................................................................................. 58 The Role of Economic Performance: Patronage and Voter Grievance ................................................... 65 Opposition Behavior: Eroding Vote Share and Leveling the Playing Field ............................................ 71 Western Linkage and Leverage: Constraining Incumbents, Empowering Oppositions .......................... 77 Putting the Space Together: Pathways to Electoral Authoritarian Outcomes ......................................... 83 PART II – THE EVOLUTION OF PARTIES UNDER SINGLE-PARTY RULE .................................... 86 Chapter 4 – The Evolution of Strong Party Capacity in Tanzania .............................................................. 87 The Nyerere Era: Ujamaa and Party Supremacy .................................................................................... 87 The Mwinyi Era: From Ujamaa to Ruksa ............................................................................................. 102 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 105 Chapter 5 – The Evolution of Weak Party Capacity in Single-Party Kenya ............................................. 107 The Kenyatta Era: The Foundations of Clientelism .............................................................................. 107 The Moi Era: Attempts at Party Revitalization ..................................................................................... 123 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 129 Chapter 6 – The Evolution of Moderate Party Capacity in Single-Party Cameroon ................................ 131 The Ahidjo Era: The Push toward Centralization ................................................................................. 131 The Biya Era: The “New Deal” and Transition to the CPDM .............................................................. 144 v Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 149 PART III – SINGLE-PARTY REGIMES IN COMPETITION ............................................................... 150 Chapter 7 : The CCM and the Path to Competitive Hegemony ................................................................ 151 The Party Resilient: Elite Defection in Multiparty Tanzania ................................................................ 153 The Party Dominant: Patterns of Social Support in Multiparty Tanzania ............................................. 158 Assessing Alternative Explanations in Tanzania ................................................................................... 167 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 185 Chapter 8 – The KANU and the
Recommended publications
  • Support for the International Criminal Court in Africa Evidence from Kenya
    Support for the International Criminal Court in Africa Evidence from Kenya By Rorisang Lekalake and Stephen Buchanan-Clarke Afrobarometer Policy Paper No. 23 | August 2015 Introduction The South African government’s recent refusal to comply with its obligation to detain Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir has sparked renewed debate on the role of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in Africa.1 A number of governments, civil society organisations, and prominent academics have levelled accusations of bias at the ICC, noting that all eight states in which the court is currently intervening are African. Calls for African member states to withdraw from the ICC have often been supported by the argument that a judicial body led by the African Union (AU) would be better placed to fill the role of “court of last resort” on the continent. The AU has called for a unified continental position on the ICC. As Maunganidze and du Plessis (2015) argue, however, African governments’ views on the ICC and its members’ obligations under its founding treaty, the Rome Statute, are not homogenous. As Tladi (2009, p. 57) notes, the growing rift between the ICC and the AU has “placed African states party to the Rome Statute … in the unenviable position of having to choose between their obligation as member states of the AU, on one hand, and their obligations as states party to the Rome Statute, on the other.” Support from African governments was instrumental in the ICC’s formation and survival, and the continent provides the largest regional bloc of states that are party to the Rome Statute.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya Election History 1963-2013
    KENYA ELECTION HISTORY 1963-2013 1963 Kenya Election History 1963 1963: THE PRE-INDEPENDENCE ELECTIONS These were the last elections in pre-independent Kenya and the key players were two political parties, KANU and KADU. KADU drew its support from smaller, less urbanized communities hence advocated majimboism (regionalism) as a means of protecting them. KANU had been forced to accept KADU’s proposal to incorporate a majimbo system of government after being pressured by the British government. Though KANU agreed to majimbo, it vowed to undo it after gaining political power. The majimbo constitution that was introduced in 1962 provided for a two-chamber national legislature consisting of an upper (Senate) and lower (House of Representative). The Campaign KADU allied with the African People’s Party (APP) in the campaign. KANU and APP agreed not to field candidates in seats where the other stood a better chance. The Voting Elections were marked by high voter turnout and were held in three phases. They were widely boycotted in the North Eastern Province. Violence was reported in various parts of the country; four were killed in Isiolo, teargas used in Nyanza and Nakuru, clashes between supporters in Machakos, Mombasa, Nairobi and Kitale. In the House of Representative KANU won 66 seats out of 112 and gained working majority from 4 independents and 3 from NPUA, KADU took 47 seats and APP won 8. In the Senate KANU won 19 out 38 seats while KADU won 16 seats, APP won 2 and NPUA only 1. REFERENCE: NATIONAL ELECTIONS DATA BOOK By Institute for Education in Democracy (published in 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Ranking Rapid Baseline Survey on the Status of Gender Equality in Kenyan Political Parties
    GENDER RANKING RAPID BASELINE SURVEY ON THE STATUS OF GENDER EQUALITY IN KENYAN POLITICAL PARTIES (ZERO DRAFT) © APRIL 2014 1 | P a g e Table of Contents 1 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 4 2 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Why Gender Ranking of Political Parties? .................................................................. 7 3 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 7 4 BARRIERS TO WOMEN’S POLITICAL PARTICIPATION ........................................................ 17 4.1 The Situation of Women in Politics ............................................................................. 17 4.2 Evaluations on the Internal and External Barriers to Women’s Political Participation ............................................................................................................................ 18 5 METHODOLGY ...................................................................................................................... 19 5.1 Survey Design ............................................................................................................... 19 5.2 Limitations of the Survey ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Election Violence in Zanzibar – Ongoing Risk of Violence in Zanzibar 15 March 2011
    Country Advice Tanzania Tanzania – TZA38321 – Revolutionary State Party (CCM) – Civic United Front (CUF) – Election violence in Zanzibar – Ongoing risk of violence in Zanzibar 15 March 2011 1. Please provide a background of the major political parties in Tanzania focusing on the party in power and the CUF. The United Republic of Tanzania was formed in 1964 as a union between mainland Tanganyika and the islands of Unguja and Pemba, which together comprise Zanzibar. Since 1977, it has been ruled by the Revolutionary State Party (Chama Cha Mapinduzi or CCM). In 1992 the government legislated for multiparty democracy, and the country is now a presidential democratic republic with a multiparty system. The first multiparty national elections were held in 1995, and concurrent presidential and parliamentary elections have since been held every 5 years. The CCM has won all elections to date. The CUF, founded in 1991, constituted the main opposition party following the 1995 multiparty elections.1 At the most recent elections in October 2010, the CCM‟s Jakaua Kikwete was re-elected President with 61.7% of the vote (as compared to 80% of the vote in 2005) and the CCM secured almost 80% of the seats. Most of the opposition votes went to the Chadema party, which displaced the Civic United Front (CUF) for the first time as the official opposition. The opposition leader is Chadema‟s Chairman, Freeman Mbowe. Chadema‟s presidential candidate, Willibrod Slaa, took 27% of the vote, while CUF‟s Ibrahim Lipumba received 8%.2 Notwithstanding the CCM‟s election success, the BBC reports that Kikwete‟s “political legitimacy has been seen by some to have been somewhat dented in the 2010 elections”, given the decline in his percent of the vote, and a total election turnout of only 42%, down from 72% in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Owns the Land? Blood and Soil Issues in the Kenyan Rift Valley
    WHO OWNS THE LAND? BLOOD AND SOIL ISSUES IN THE KENYAN RIFT VALLEY PART 1: The passion with which millions of citizens valued their presidential vote in the stolen 2007 presidential elections can be reflected in scenes of the bloody post-election clashes today that engulfed Rift Valley, Nyanza, Coast, Nairobi, Western and to a less extent in other parts of the country. Nakuru was the latest epicenter of inter ethnic murders. The violent reactions to rigged elections may reflect the pain of deep and historically rooted injustices some of which predate Kenya’s independence in 1963. They are in fact motivated and exacerbated by landlessness, joblessness, and poverty believed to be heavily contributed towards by the prevailing political status quo that has dominated Kenya since independence. This is a system that has continuously perpetrated, in successive fashion, socio- economic injustices that have been seamlessly transferred from one power regime to the next. The Land issue With a fast growing population in Kenya, limited resources including land and jobs, have severely been put in extreme pressure. Responsive political operatives cognizant of this reality have appreciated the importance of incorporating progressive policies that seek to aggressively address poverty, landlessness, unequal distribution of resources and unemployment, as a matter of priority (in their party manifestoes) if any social stability is to be maintained in Kenya. Without doubt, the opposition party ODM sold an attractive campaign package that sought to address historic land injustices, unemployment, inequitable resource sharing and poverty through a radical constitutional transformation, under the framework of the people-tailored Bomas Constitution Draft.
    [Show full text]
  • Hii Ni Nakala Ya Mtandao (Online Document)
    Hii ni Nakala ya Mtandao (Online Document) BUNGE LA TANZANIA ________________ MAJADILIANO YA BUNGE _________________ MKUTANO WA NNE Kikao cha Thelathini na Tisa – Tarehe 3 Agosti, 2011 (Mkutano Ulianza Saa Tatu Asubuhi) D U A Mwenyekiti (Mhe. Jenista J. Mhagama) Alisoma Dua HATI ZILIZOWASILISHWA MEZANI Hati zifuatazo ziliwasilishwa Mezani na:- WAZIRI WA UCHUKUZI: Hotuba ya Makadirio ya Mapato na Matumizi ya Wizara ya Uchukuzi kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2011/2012. MWENYEKITI WA KAMATI YA MIUNDOMBINU: Taarifa ya Mwenyekiti wa Kamati ya Miundombinu kuhusu Utekelezaji wa Majukumu ya Wizara ya Uchukuzi kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2010/2011 pamoja na Maoni ya Kamati Kuhusu Makadirio ya Mapato na Matumizi ya Wizara hiyo kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2011/2012. MSEMAJI MKUU WA KAMBI YA UPINZANI KUHUSU WIZARA YA UCHUKUZI: Taarifa ya Msemaji Mkuu wa Kambi ya Upinzani Juu ya Wizara ya Uchukuzi Kuhusu Makadirio ya Mapato na Matumizi ya Wizara hiyo kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2011/2012. MASWALI NA MAJIBU Na. 358 Kuimarisha Huduma Kwenye Hospitali ya Wilaya ya Mufindi MHE. MAHMOUD H. MGIMWA aliuliza:- Hospitali ya Wilaya ya Mufindi ipo karibu sana na Barabara Kuu na inahudumia watu wengi sana wakiwemo Wakazi wa Mufindi wanaotumia hiyo Barabara Kuu hasa yanapotokea matatizo ya ajali, hali ha kuwahudumia wanaokumbwa na ajali hizo huwa ngumu sana hospitalini hapo:- Je, Serikali haioni kuwa ni wakati mwafaka wa kuboresha na kuongeza huduma muhimu katika hospitali hiyo ili iweze kutoa huduma za uhakika kwa wanaokwenda kupata huduma kwenye hospitali hiyo; na je, ahadi hiyo itatekelezeka lini? NAIBU WAZIRI, OFISI YA WAZIRI MKUU, TAWALA ZA MIKOA NA SERIKALI ZA MITAA (TAMISEMI) alijibu:- Mheshimiwa Mwenyekiti, kwa niaba ya Mheshimiwa Waziri Mkuu, ninaomba kujibu swali la Mheshimiwa Mahmoud Hassan Mgimwa, Mbunge wa Mufindi Kaskazini, kama ifuatavyo:- Mheshimiwa Mwenyekiti, ninakubaliana na Mheshimiwa Mbunge kuwa, Hospitali ya Wilaya ya Mufindi ipo karibu na Barabara Kuu na inahudumia wahanga wengi wa ajali kwenye maeneo hayo.
    [Show full text]
  • Voting for the Devil You Know: Understanding Electoral Behavior in Authoritarian Regimes
    VOTING FOR THE DEVIL YOU KNOW: UNDERSTANDING ELECTORAL BEHAVIOR IN AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Natalie Wenzell Letsa August 2017 © Natalie Wenzell Letsa 2017 VOTING FOR THE DEVIL YOU KNOW: UNDERSTANDING ELECTORAL BEHVAIOR IN AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES Natalie Wenzell Letsa, Ph. D. Cornell University 2017 In countries where elections are not free or fair, and one political party consistently dominates elections, why do citizens bother to vote? If voting cannot substantively affect the balance of power, why do millions of citizens continue to vote in these elections? Until now, most answers to this question have used macro-level spending and demographic data to argue that people vote because they expect a material reward, such as patronage or a direct transfer via vote-buying. This dissertation argues, however, that autocratic regimes have social and political cleavages that give rise to variation in partisanship, which in turn create different non-economic motivations for voting behavior. Citizens with higher levels of socioeconomic status have the resources to engage more actively in politics, and are thus more likely to associate with political parties, while citizens with lower levels of socioeconomic status are more likely to be nonpartisans. Partisans, however, are further split by their political proclivities; those that support the regime are more likely to be ruling party partisans, while partisans who mistrust the regime are more likely to support opposition parties. In turn, these three groups of citizens have different expressive and social reasons for voting.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties Office Headquarters and Contacts
    Political Parties Office Headquarters and Contacts CODE PARTYNAME LOCATION CONTACTS EMAIL ADDRESS 001 National Rainbow Coalition-Kenya Woodland Road, Off Lenana Road P.O BOX 34200-00100 [email protected] CELL PHONE:2726783/2726759 [email protected] 002 The National Vision Party Teleposta Towers 19h Floor, Koinange Street P.O BOX 29200-0100 NAIROBI [email protected] Nairobi CELL PHONE:020 310896 003 The Labour Party Of Kenya Kilimani Area, Shiko Road Off Elgeyo P.O BOX 46775-00100 NAIROBI [email protected] Marakwet Road CELL PHONE:0724 308 773, 0203533380 004 Grand National Union Plot No.L.R Ref No.3734/891lavington P.O BOX 54702-00200 NAIROBI Nairobi CELL PHONE: 0721 481 473 005 Chama Mwangaza Daima Thika Road Day Company House Next To P.O BOX 64929-00620 NAIROBI [email protected] Safari Park Hotel Plot 368 CELL PHONE:0722 319 284 006 United Democratic Forum Party Waiyaki Way,Off Riverside Drive Metropolitan P.O BOX 29299-00100 [email protected] Estate House No.6 Chiromo CELL PHONE:0729 351400 007 Party Of Independent Candidates Of Kenya Kenyatta Avenue,Uganda House 2 Nd Floor P.O BOX 21812-00400 [email protected] Room 20 CELL PHONE:0727 360052 / 0727360652 008 Restore And Build Kenya Cedar Clinical Associates,Makasembo Road P.O BOX 2670-30100 [email protected] Eldoret CELL PHONE:0722 807 261 009 Kenya National Congress Mbabane Road,Off James Gichuru Road P.O BOX 1498-00100 [email protected] CELL PHONE:0202604013 010 Mazingira Greens Party Of Kenya Paa Crescent
    [Show full text]
  • Cameroon Assessment
    Cameroon COUNTRY REPORT October 2003 Country Information & Policy Unit IMMIGRATION & NATIONALITY DIRECTORATE HOME OFFICE, UNITED KINGDOM Cameroon October 2003 CONTENTS 1. Scope of document 1.1 - 1.4 2. Geography 2.1 - 2.5 3. Economy 3.1 – 3.2 4. History 4.1 – 4.25 Summary of events since independence (1960) 4.1 – 4.22 - Paul Biya Presidency (1982 - Present) 4.5 – 4.12 - Elections (1996-1997) 4.13 – 4.18 - Elections (2002) 4.19 – 4.22 The Bakassi Issue 4.23 – 4.25 5. State Structures 5.1 – 5.39 The Constitution 5.1 – 5.8 - Citizenship and Nationality 5.3 – 5.8 Political System 5.9 – 5.12 - Relationship with Neighbouring Countries 5.12 Judiciary 5.13 – 5.17 Legal Rights/Detention 5.18 – 5.21 - Death Penalty 5.21 Internal Security 5.22 Prisons and Prison Conditions 5.23 – 5.28 Military Service 5.29 – 5.30 - Conscientious Objectors and Deserters 5.30 Medical Services 5.31 – 5.37 - HIV/AIDS 5.32 – 5.34 - Tuberculosis 5.35 - Mental Health 5.36 - People with disabilities 5.37 The Education System 5.37 – 5.39 Cameroon October 2003 6. HUMAN RIGHTS 6.A HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES 6.1 – 6.59 Overview 6.1 – 6.13 - Arrest and Arbitrary Detention 6.3 – 6.4 - Torture and other Inhumane or Degrading Treatment 6.5 – 6.7 - Disappearances 6.8 - Arbitrary or unlawful killings 6.9 –6.10 - Arbitrary Interference with Privacy 6.11 - 6.12 - Security Forces – Human Rights Training 6.13 Freedom of Speech and the Media 6.14 – 6.25 - Journalists 6.22 – 6.25 Freedom of Religion 6.26 – 6.31 - The Practice of Witchcraft 6.31 Freedom of Assembly and Political Association 6.32
    [Show full text]
  • Afrika Gündemi (Kasim 2010)
    ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ AFRİKA ÇALIŞMALARI ARAŞTIRMA VE UYGULAMA MERKEZİ AFRİKA GÜNDEMİ (KASIM 2010) SİYASET Libya’da AB-Afrika Zirvesi Düzenlendi Tanzanya Seçimlerinin Sonuçları Açıklandı Gine’de Başkanlık Seçimlerinin İkinci Turu Tamamlandı Nijer’de Anayasa Referandumunda Evet Oyu Çıktı Fildişi Sahilleri’nde Başkanlık Seçiminin 2. Turu Yapıldı Burkina Faso’da Seçimler Yapıldı Mısır’da Parlamento Seçimlerinin İlk Turu Tamamlandı Somali’de Yeni Kurulan Hükümet Güvenoyu Aldı Arap Birliği Sudan’ı Ziyaret Etti Ruanda Devlet Başkanı Kagame Kongo Cumhuriyeti’ni Ziyaret Etti Lula’nın Son Afrika Turu Madagaskar’da Darbe Girişimi Bastırıldı Gambiya İran İle Diplomatik İlişkilerini Kesti NATO Moritanya’ya Destek Kararı Aldı Cezayir, İran İle Batı Arasında Arabuluculuk Yapamaya Başladı İran’dan Nijerya’ya Yapılan Yasadışı Silah Sevkiyatı İle İlgili Tartışmalar Sürüyor Fransa’da 3 Afrikalı Lider Sebepsiz Zenginleşmeden Dolayı Soruşturuluyor Fransa, Kamerun Devlet Başkanı Biya’ya Yolsuzluk Suçlamasında Bulundu Orta Afrika Cumhuriyeti’nde Seçim Hazırlıkları Sürüyor Moyo Kentine Saldıran Güney Sudan Ordusu On Dört Kişiyi Kaçırdı Al-Shabab’a Katılmak İçin Yola Çıkan Altı Kenyalı Tutuklandı Mısır’da Kıptilerle Polis Arasında Çatışma Çıktı Zambiya’daki Çinli Maden Yöneticileri Kefaletle Serbest Bırakıldı 1 Ankara Üniversitesi AFRİKA ÇALIŞMALARI ARAŞTIRMA VE UYGULAMA MERKEZİ Kuleli Sokak No:42 Gaziosmanpaşa / ANKARA Telefon:448 05 21 Fax:448 05 89 ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ AFRİKA ÇALIŞMALARI ARAŞTIRMA VE UYGULAMA MERKEZİ KASIM 2010 EKONOMİ
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Kenya Ministry of Foreign Affairs And
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE STRATEGIC PLAN 2018/19 – 2022/23 APRIL 2018 i Foreword The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Trade is mandated to pursue Kenya’s Foreign Policy in accordance with the Constitution of Kenya, with the overarching objective of projecting, promoting and protecting the nation’s interests abroad. Kenya’s Foreign Policy is a tool for pursuing, projecting, promoting and protecting national interests and values across the globe. The underpinning principle of the policy is a strong advocacy for a rule-based international system, environmental sustainability, equitable development and a secure world. This desire and commitment is aptly captured in our vision statement, “A peaceful, prosperous, and globally competitive Kenya” and the mission statement: “To project, promote and protect Kenya’s interests and image globally through innovative diplomacy, and contribute towards a just, peaceful and equitable world”. The overarching goal of this Strategic Plan is to contribute to the country’s development agenda and aspirations under the Kenya Vision 2030, the Third Medium Term Plan and the “Big Four” Agenda on: manufacturing, food and nutrition security, affordable healthcare and affordable housing for Kenyans. We are operating in a period of rapid transition in international relations as exemplified in the unprecedented political and socio-economic dynamism within the global system. A robust and dynamic foreign policy grounded on empirical research and analysis is paramount in addressing the attendant issues presented by globalisation coupled with power shifts towards the newly emerging economies which have redefined the diplomatic landscape. These changing dynamics impose on the Ministry the onerous responsibility of ensuring coherent strategies are developed and deployed to adapt to these global realities while at the same time identifying the corresponding opportunities to enhance Kenya’s global competitiveness in line with the Kenya Vision 2030 and the Third Medium Term Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Document)
    Hii ni Nakala ya Mtandao (Online Document) BUNGE LA TANZANIA ______________ MAJADILIANO YA BUNGE _______________ MKUTANO WA KUMI NA TANO Kikao cha Nne – Tarehe 9 Mei, 2014 (Mkutano Uianza Saa Tatu Asubuhi) D U A Spika (Mhe. Anne S. Makinda) Alisoma Dua HATI ZILIZOWASILISHWA MEZANI Hati zifuatazo ziliwasilishwa Mezani na:- NAIBU WAZIRI WA KILIMO, CHAKULA NA USHIRIKA: Randama za Makadirio ya Matumizi ya Wizara ya Kilimo, Chakula na Ushirika kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2014/2015. WAZIRI WA NCHI, OFISI YA RAIS (MENEJIMENTI YA UTUMISHI WA UMMA) PAMOJA NA (UTAWALA BORA): Hotuba ya Bajeti ya Waziri wa Nchi, Ofisi ya Rais (Menejimenti ya Utumishi wa Umma) pamoja na (Utawala Bora) kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2014/2015. WAZIRI WA NCHI, OFISI YA RAIS (MAHUSIANO NA URATIBU): Hotuba ya Bajeti ya Waziri wa Nchi, Ofisi ya Rais (Mahusiano na Uratibu) kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2014/2015. MHE. JAKU HASHIM AYOUB (K.n.y. MWENYEKITI WA KAMATI YA KATIBA, SHERIA NA UTAWALA): Taarifa ya Kamati ya Katiba, Sheria na Utawala kuhusu utekelezaji wa majukumu ya Ofisi ya Rais (Menejimenti ya Utumishi wa Umma), (Utawala Bora) pamoja na (Mahusiano na Uratibu) kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2013/2014 na maoni 1 Hii ni Nakala ya Mtandao (Online Document) ya Kamati Kuhusu Makadirio ya Mapato na Matumizi ya Ofisi hizo kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2014/2015. MHE. PROF. KULIKOYELA K. KAHIGI - MSEMAJI MKUU WA KAMBI YA UPINZANI KUHUSU OFISI YA RAIS (MENEJIMENTI YA UTUMISHI WA UMMA), (UTAWALA BORA) PAMOJA NA (MAHUSIANO NA UTARATIBU):- Taarifa ya Msemaji Mkuu wa Kambi ya Upinzani wa Ofisi ya Rais (Menejimenti ya Utumishi wa Umma), (Utawala Bora) pamoja na (Mahusiano na Uratibu) kuhusu Makadirio ya Mapato na Matumizi ya Ofisi hizo kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2014/2015 MASWALI NA MAJIBU SPIKA: Waheshimiwa Wabunge, tunaanza Maswali na Ofisi ya Waziri Mkuu.
    [Show full text]