Lung Kwu Tan Reclamation and the Re-Planning of Tuen Mun West Area”
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Three-Dimensional Numerical Model in Orthogonal Curvilinear –Sigma Coordinate System for Pearl River Estuary
This is the Pre-Published Version. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 127, No. 1, 2001, pp. 72-82 3D NUMERICAL MODEL FOR PEARL RIVER ESTUARY K. W. Chau Associate Professor, Department of Civil & Structural Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong Y. W. Jiang Research Assistant, Department of Civil & Structural Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong ABSTRACT: A 3D numerical model with orthogonal curvilinear coordinate in the horizontal direction and sigma coordinate in the vertical direction has been developed. This model is based on POM (the Princeton Ocean Model). In this model a second moment turbulence closure sub-model is embedded, and the stratification caused by salinity and temperature is considered. Furthermore, in order to adapt to estuary locations where flow pattern is complex, the horizontal time differencing is implicit with the use of a time splitting method instead of the explicit method in POM. This model is applied to the Pearl River estuary, which is the largest river system in South China with Hong Kong at eastern side of its entrance. The computation is verified and calibrated with field measurement data. The computed results mimic the field data well. KEY WORDS Three-dimensional, orthogonal curvilinear coordinate, time-splitting, Pearl River estuary INTRODUCTION The Pearl River (Zhujiang) is the largest river system in South China. The Pearl River Delta Region (PRDR), which includes eight cities (Guangzho, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Huizhou, Foshan, Zhongshan, Jiangmen), is one of the most important economic zone in China, even in Asia and the world. With the economic boom of PRDR, the resources of the estuary such as the harbor, channel, reclamation zone etc. -
For Information Legislative Council Panel on Environmental Affairs
CB(1) 516/05-06(01) For Information Legislative Council Panel on Environmental Affairs Legislative Council Panel on Planning, Lands and Works Information Note on Overall Sewage Infrastructure in Hong Kong Purpose This note informs members on the policy behind and progress of sewage infrastructure planning and implementation in Hong Kong. Policy Goals for the Provision of Sewage Infrastructure 2. The policy goals for the provision of sewage infrastructure are the protection of public health and the attainment of the declared Water Quality Objectives for the receiving water environment. The latter are set so as to ensure our waters are of a sufficient quality to sustain certain uses which are valued by the community. These include, variously, abstraction for potable supply, swimming, secondary contact recreation such as yachting, and the ability to sustain healthy marine and freshwater ecosystems. The Sewerage Planning Process 3. The sewerage planning process entails the systematic review of the sewerage needs in each sewerage catchment with the aim of drawing up a series of Sewerage Master Plans (SMPs) devised so as to ensure the above policy goals will be met. A total of 16 SMPs covering the whole of Hong Kong were completed between 1989 and 1996 (Annex 1). The SMPs started with those covering areas where waters were close to or exceeded their assimilative limits, were highly valued, or where excessive pollution had resulted in environmental black spots. For example, Hong Kong Island South SMP covering sensitive beach areas and Tolo Harbour SMP covering nutrient loaded Tolo Harbour were among the earliest conducted SMPs. Each study made recommendations for the appropriate network of sewers, pumping stations and treatment facilities for the proper collection, treatment and disposal of sewage generated in the catchment, with the aim of catering for the present and future development needs. -
Legco Letter 22 April
CB(1)1429/08-09(01) Hon Cheung Hok-ming, SBS, JP Chairman Panel on Transport Legislative Council Legislative Council Building 8 Jackson Road, Central Hong Kong Dear Mr. Cheung, Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge (‘HZMB’) and public opposition to the Hong Kong Link Road (‘HKLR’) route The purpose of this letter is to urgently bring to the attention of the Panel on Transport the extent of public opposition to the proposed route of the HKLR of the HZMB after the bridge ‘lands’ in Hong Kong territory. Tung Chung Sustainable Development and other local organisations working to promote sustainable development have voiced concerns to the Highways Department regarding the impact of the proposed HKLR route and made counter proposals for a viable alternative. We request the Legislative Council Panel on Transport to urgently review the counter proposal and take account of the public opposition to the road route proposed by the Highways Department. Details of the negative impact of the HD / Arup proposed route for the HKLR for the HZMB are in the attached documents. Most importantly, the proposed route will have a huge negative impact on the health of local residents because of the proximity of vehicle emissions from a major highway. As management professionals we favour sustainable development and do not appose the construction of the HZMB, but we do object to the proposed route. We urge you to table the details of the no pollution solution to the Panel on Transport during your meeting on Friday 24th April. Yours sincerely, (Martin Purbrick) for Tung Chung Sustainable Development Alliance c.c. -
The Conservation Programme for the Chinese White Dolphin in Hong Kong
The Conservation Programme for the Chinese White Dolphin in Hong Kong Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................2 II. SPECIES OVERVIEW ...................................................................................4 1. DISTRIBUTION .....................................................................................................4 2. ABUNDANCE .......................................................................................................4 3. HOME RANGE AND GROUP SIZE..........................................................................4 4. BEHAVIOUR ........................................................................................................5 5. GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT.............................................................................5 6. FEEDING AND REPRODUCTION ............................................................................5 7. THREATS.............................................................................................................5 III. HUMAN IMPACTS.........................................................................................7 1. HABITAT LOSS AND DISTURBANCE .....................................................................7 2. POLLUTION .........................................................................................................7 3. DEPLETION OF FOOD RESOURCES .......................................................................8 -