James Bond a 50 The

CEU eTD Collection JAMES THROUGH In Department

partial

BOND:

fulfillment Supervisor:

of

SIGNIFYING

THE International Central

of Christina Word Budapest,

the COLD Professor

Submitted European

requirements Count: 2014

Relations By

A.

Hungary

WAR Alexander Clopton

12,928 University

CHANGING to

and

for

AND

European the Astrov

Masters

BEYOND

Studies IDENTITY

of

Arts

CEU eTD Collection Western society the and of system. beyond investigates the an

James ‘aesthetic

films international technology

The

that in Using

. states Bond

Bond’s order

Constructivist gives the

turn’

the

are

in

and continuing

to system.

changing prominence

relation

concept in ever reveal

their

IR.

more

This Using relation

new

to paradigm

of

relevancy iden

four

reluctant the

turn to information

the tity

David

‘empty to thematic

can

case

throughout

the of

of

be to

International

Chandler’s

international study

the

signifier,’

take applied Abstract

icons about

espionage

responsibility of i

the

in the the to

series theory this the

popular

James nature Relations political

series

films: work

reveals

about

Bond of

for culture

through es the

setting

the (IR)

tablishes

their ‘empire

villains, an

film international

theory in increasingly

intervention over the

seri order

the in Cold

locations, es,

the has

denial

shifting to

this

last

War provided

theorize political

globalized

paper , abroad. 50 ’

and in women

identity years

which

about for

of

CEU eTD Collection Cheers! talk brothers through like a

chance

over to

acknowledge I

the

and would with the

last

sisters, last

me

like year.

few

on

to

and the

this months.

I extend

would

constant

all project

of

my Let my like

and

support

deepest us closest

to Acknowledgements

all

guiding dedicate

celebrate

and friends gratitude

me encouragement ii this

through who with

work

to

Professor

have a

martini to

this

my put

f difficult

rom

fianc

up … Alexander

with shaken, my é ,

my process. IRES

so

mom

much not Astrov

colleagues

stirred. I

and

would James

for

dad,

taking

Bond also

CEU eTD Collection Bibliography Conclusion: Chapter Chapter Chapter Introduction: 3.2 3.1 2.2 2.1 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1

3 2 1

The Dominating Global Villains Empire The The The - - -

Power: Global Theoretical

Consequences

Political

Authority Thematic Identity Aesthetic

Travel

in

and

Threats: Women

Denial

Realism, the their of

Framework:

and Icons Turn of

Bond,

Bond

Of Technology and Villains Schemes

Intervention

in

of Empire Table Table Contentsof

Interests,

Technology Girls James International

Bond

and James

of

In

Bond iii

Global Locations

‘Denial’ and

Bond

Identity Relations

Destruction

and

At

Home IR

28 28 22 16 16 14 10 39 37 33 7 4 4 1

CEU eTD Collection Lindner 3 http://www.newstatesman.com/soci 2 1 timelessness sense date, character political The West underlying popularity been ‘entertainment’ series their appeal of film big th

James Paul Daniel e

the

time screen

film

and

success able a Johnson,

superpowers of

from longest nd

Chapman, ( of Craig, It Manchester I

adventure Ian setting

the . NTRODUCTION

franchise

after took

these to

There by over

tones early

Fleming’s

adapt West.

Casino and “ to

EON

Sex, lasting two those

films “ the time and from

A

have of continued on. :

, Sadism

Manchester with License

has kills Now, in Royale,

excitement

yet productions the

‘escapism’ . 2 50

that

film

the Bond espionage The been

sur

the first

tension the years, for

and

with

Cold

has to

vived directed franchises

adventures :

series

changing six James

was relevancy Thrill, novel

P

Snobbery, University

ety/2007/02/1958 allowed

OLITICAL

23 we

War

actors of

in

for

in a for have

”

has films by

the have product

of the Bond

in 2002,

audiences.

to over Martin

The the

” ever

social, remained

“sex,

that become international of

in Press, it the

The

and never

to

to

James James Bond a 50 the

R modern made. have

of New Campbell

world

remain obtain

sadism

counting, 2014),

EALISM years

cultural - name

the bond see

3

timeless. Bond 1 Statesman

have

popular More Bond played

Cold

There of

him

- 110.

his through fleming

day

popular

James and (London:

political Phenomenon:

change

been and

,

striking phenomenon Double the

grow

War I by

the

snobbery” , is long NTERESTS

It (April

-

political

James

girl credite something Bond recalling

is

drastic character

for

and EON

that

old.

setting precisely - after - sex

is 0

5, so

A the

status

had . brings the Bond 1968), Productions, The

d

long. Critical

changes settings the that for

had the stories

between way ,

already

of

to Bond

AND

end providing this in accessed series

was

iconic forth We Bond be been

Reader, that Casino

of

to sense said often

in I

character associated can 2005).

DENTITY

become

the has the

the brought maintain the

the on

past May

about easily ed.

research expressed East

qualities of Royale. screen Cold become films

international

30, of

Christopher

an

and

the

and to the

2014,

attribute

War. with this

have

to ic the 1

one his for on

of By

the

in

CEU eTD Collection Organization 4 explain like power about political but were the power terrifying Although substantial West power was the Realism the regarding the this

Richard

tenets structure political Cold

also

paper. Richard understood

not

was IR.

in in in

If

the The

Ned about

and setting

War only ord the order

Political IR levels, there of the prominent

H

evidence 48, actual

Lebow,

international. Cold er ow Political Ned theories of the anarchic

behavior

and

about their

no.

to to

were the

that to can

emergence

the

Lebow maintain 2 explain War

events beyond,

Realism be

“

anarchic (Spring, failures

The

would the

the Cold of

several in should most Realism international

has

of

the

the Long failure Bond

that drew

the states

War The

1994):

and long theories the often follow, years

fa

to of

system Peace, times move

iled way led

series

even and

attention Neorealism. dominant security what ended of

been have

249 expressed

to following

to realism

the

the

Neorealism that beyond

then

system. of

predict the

as - explain ki uncover

a

waxed 277, End

rather political

Political

nd

constant

point the

of dissolution

it to

theories

of of accessed remains to the

the

tension

the

the in the With These

the

peacefully information the and portray

of

more

state.

forms

2

failure

basic

international Cold

were

peaceful end Realism

discussion

in end

waned

the of May

theories determining

that betw

about of War,

of Competition

the

of reality brought principles of peaceful

of

5, the World

we the

competition with

een

Cold 2014, depending and end and the

it

International Soviet

must for Cold called

can

after the East

Political system

no that Neorealism

into http://www.jstor.ord/stable/2706932 War War

dissolution

scholars

Failure

reveal? of states

emerging

revise

War

Union. the and

occurred. bet

upon question.

anarchy II were

on

actually

for

ween

fall (WWII) ,

West Realism of

behavior.

and

the

our Relations

the of

acquiring Realism, 4

based

of in Included

force of IR. the current

the

and

way

rose human

the These the

works. the

and

East Theories international paradigm

on

balance

” Soviet

real This of to

to

Soviet

International

(IR)

Political

provided absolute

nature

questions

balance thi quite nature in and

world. Scholars

behavior nking this

through Union,

the of Union

to

of

a is

nd the

.

CEU eTD Collection 5 the influence international question interest If the

Ibid.

that

Constructivist underlying

were

for

then

of

a

the

identity

relative system.

becomes

assumption

case,

paradigm

on or then We

one

these absolute

can this

of on .

interests Political

understand does how

power

interests not

in Realism

explain in

alignment these allowing

are 3

the interests that

formed,

Soviet

the with the

dissolution nature

more perceived, the

Union

expanding

clearly of

going the

of and

state’s

if the

against theories we acted

union.

turn interest

on

its

5 towards of

in The

own

IR

the as

within

given. self

the -

CEU eTD Collection 8 7 2478.00236 Quarterly, 6 understanding interpret interpreted observers. based empirical gap ‘linguistic within 1.1 perspective interests and understanding Locations, identity will ‘aesthetic

Ibid., Ibid K.M

The

between dynamic define .,

Fierke,

334. 337. on

the For This

in

Aesthetic

C

in and 46 intersubjective

. research.

turn’

7

HAPTER positivist

turn’

relation

Women,

the

can this K.M. The (September

“ of

section

Links poststructuralist analyze in

IR shifts of

concept

be

in way, contrast poststructuralist in

the Fierke,

that

Across

IR

Turn used IR 6 to

will and She scientific

1 in

dynamic analysis

in

the

four is 2002): extends

-

identity of

to

order

not

in t T Technology. to

meaning introduce uses

he scholars international,

the amend HEORETICAL thematic

International the

Abyss: 332 exclusive

the understanding to of ‘empty

method process from theories

- that

highlight their emphasis 333,

‘logic the Language in of

a

icons

the express

the theoretical

rules

accessed

positivist

signifier’ These evolution

of to of

we

of

Cold of field

the

exclude the

Relations

within

Political the

and F and games’ may on

the RAMEWORK thematic

positivist of

April international

War

of

value

language Logic 4 the

theorie

the to

be

framework true within

IR the

the

25,

be

to interaction

to

able

relevance Realism.

tend in

of

James nature

our

2014, used importance reflect icons International

s

method the

the

to and

of

to modern

move http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468 as

analysis political IR.

films

incorrectly

: Bond

of based will

the

on

J By

a

of

8 of AMES

inter

as tool

By languag

system

language provide identifying objects, toward

will

Relations, world. of film she on

reworking ests of

system. in language.

the present

B

attempts

popular

exp series: consider

in OND in

e

a

the

Constructivist subjects

as

” ressing more IR which and

International

an identity basis

AND as a

Villains,

the

the fiction For

to unique active

appropriate theories endogenous

language

bridge

Bond’s way and

use for

Fierke, IR

- and

for process

of

we Studies

the

IR.

the is

I

CEU eTD Collection 14 Kindle. 13 12 11 10 Studies 9 dissatisfaction the emerged that from opportunity his must exclude of cannot illustrating precisely object of mimetic identifies advancement

Roland

Ibid. Nikolas Ibid. Ibid. Ibid.,

the this

work. modern

this

the recognize

neutrality 30

and 512. event

be Falling Developing Bleiker,

the

aesthetic

approach: Kompridas,

represented, (2001): in 11 this the separated

subject

a He

the dissatisfaction human to

can,

pragmatic

limitations of attempt

establish “ has asserts in

debates The the 511,

an of

thus, line turn

and

been

The their to

‘aesthetic choice element Aesthetic

from accessed from

provide which toward with

that

is Aesthetic ultimately

never

from

model

coupled a

positions,

actually to

the

the meaningful

of there with this

the April Turn from

is

theory

the be materials, context an turn’

an

of

where Turn dominant

growing

the

reduced is

objective in 26, with French

authentic the a the removing

International evidence within

in “return”

in well 2014. of

international

method

in poli Political IR the comprehension

the

colors, - which

Revoluti field

established to that

http://dx.

methods increasing tics

the

representation ‘linguistic

co

the

any to of

py focuses

of Thought, tradition of actually Political

5

the it an event size

representation human

aesthetic of doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300031001 is on.

“aesthetic ideals political of

perceived, reality. and

13 legitimacy

normative

political itself.” turn,’

Theory, on (

of

New takes For of

interaction.

even

popular the

of

that social politics,

Kompridas, York:

He

system. s

European

10 ” place. everal divergence turn”

the

Millennium

reveals

investigation where Second,

calls

itself,

political

of science, Bloomsbury,

culture. frame

12 in

aesthetic Nikolas

9 scholars First, attention

For

politics the

in the Romanticism

it this

made

- the

of theorizing.

by Bleiker, “effort

Journal is complications a Roland

the

Kompridas

political

not return 2013): same that separating sources argue

that

to by

representation

possible

their of to follow

a

it way

offers Introduction,

Bleiker

is International for painter make

14

is

.

that event in

based

defense

This

the

that the argues

a

in an to

sen

for

we in se

CEU eTD Collection 20 19 18 395, 17 16 15 how must relations. interaction instead not ‘given’ on intersubjectivity no create paradigm separated and their look aesthetics focused political

Ibid., Ibid., Alexander Ibid. Ibid.

Ibid.. collective existence

have accessed interests

do at explanatory be

and 398. 397.

The Constructivist aesth 400. they

nature

we

on included

inquiry a 20

suggests. from

not

instantiate ‘portfolio’

Wendt,

that

norms. The study

May crucial

define etics.

or formulated meanings

only of

the builds causal

social

6, to

in

interests, power. these “ in 16

15 2014,

Anarchy

structure changes provide point understanding t

For

heir the Additionally,

one

of

theories the construction powers

and http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S00208181300027764 we Wendt, discussion

interests interests in

Alexander to

structure “competitive,” is

Wendt

have

the an what

be the

What of

a apart

give made

sociological

the lternative way “there

assi

can States

that in

how claims

the

international of of

of

prominence

from Wendt the gned we

here

identities

relations

they identities

identities aesthetic

is Make identities

look process

no

“individualistic,” that, process.” to is them.

carry

puts

process ‘logic’ of the the

at

It, 6

“Identities

between reveal

politics,

18

and understanding and conventional ” in to of system forward

around are

International Additionally,

relation identity defining 17 of

of politics

interests

formed

He

about anarchy international

in states. but

independent reveals a

are

the theory

to in

or

situations.”

politics interact the

as

rather Organization, the

others political the

“cooperative” way

apart of

“inherently nature moving

.

the

basis

formation interests which

the

than

relations can with importance from as

of

theory of of Political the 19

social away change recognizes another;

each interests… the 46, It

the

and

basis

relational” is of

no. nature

internationa cannot

processes practices

from the context; other interests identity,

2 Realist

the of for

(March structure process

of way the

identities interests

so be actors

state

based

that

that

but for

1992): we l

of

has

do

CEU eTD Collection 21 as Klaus themes finding current identity beyond achieved real popularity 1.2 international to paper Bond with popular displayed films. on system

Chapman,

the reflective understanding

The world’s

the

that will rest This Dodds

Several Following in

political while

a like

far with Identity wild

lasting

balance

order heavy

reaches of be

of “

case beyond

A

the

international

of

the

political

the the recognizes to adventures License interjecting

the scholars

James to

understand

study

setting.

success undertones world of film

James

between how

the

beyond better

global the Bond,

to

series? ‘aesthetic system

was

Bond identities Thrill, end and

Bond

James have

for explain the

he

new system. political

James this repetition

chosen

of how

how

” experiences of over capability

series.

for noted 112.

serie

the

“thrills” superficial the Chapman

turn’

this

are the

the

over

50 Bond

Cold Among

because s struggle shifts

But

the

formed has identity end years c and

in hanging 50

of

for War. adaptability

how

the IR,

and

of that

variation

comments years.

the

analysis the

and

maintaining

it

between the capacity

and with

of

his do We was

occurred shi

catalog

7 identity

captured Cold

James

we the fting lifestyle.

can the a

of

in

product

approach

importance of

on

the

War

case to

easily popularity. order

plots of

Bond after the reflects

the the

provide

an East popular

and B study

Bond

image reshap audience’s

to and ut of identify the is

and

this

recall beyond?

there

the constantly the

stories end a of of

series

films, The

West,

unique ing study of

Cold changes identity, the

is of

the the the

main of

something

James

the interest

within in

This

there War

established it in popularity the Cold

understanding

relation changing

has Cold political

objective in

the

stories paper

and are Bond

remained War the the

over

longevity War

few although

more

Bond

to

will

and of

while series theory in Bond time.

the as

that of

Bond relation

to focus

well series this of

21

have and of

it and

the

CEU eTD Collection 27 26 25 Reader, 24 accessed 23 280, 22 phen ritualistic moment had first The for metamorphosis. in setting Cold through changing From Jeremy as

Ibid. Ibid., Ibid., T Jeremy Klaus

three the

ony the

accessed be second Bond omenon

War,

Black’s

27.

complications

come

Bennett 26. 18 ed.

lower Dodds, through

For particularly post Cold declining potent implausibility [B]oth

February Black

distinct

Black, films of

-

politics

including Christopher

19. film.

but

Bond Tony -

April moment

war an

War,

middle

to

“

and

i

make “ analysis images Screening novels n a

The

icon, the 7, 24

become It moments

symbol popular

popular 26,

Janet

Britain Bennett through

throughout

2014, The is

offered

Geopolitics

end

after s

2014, the

-

here

Lindner of in “across

the cl

and of of

Woolacott,

first

we

asses http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0268452042000302001 Geopolitics: 20th understanding Bond regular

dormant of the

national the and culture, following

culture, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14650040590

that

and the with films a can

the moment

(

chaining

villains Manchester: Americans

century

as

of class, an the

1970’s came Bond’s

Janet

gather

West ideological

” James release saving drew ascendant The

Cold but not and character,

James

generation,

observation

in

Woolacott, Moments

of

and

throughout to

Bond, also

and only demonology, on that reactivated popularity

the

interstate

War

freedom

Bond of Manchester

our Bond

created

current their

1980’s,

been the 1960’s the ”

in United and

modern and Intelligence

explored

of Britain

and

was

films Bond villainy,

8

Bond,

a cultural gender,

Bond

on

and relayed and

relations fears the the reached

product

and periodically. the the

University States,

the

and every

Early world. series

” individuality changes financed but

currency

novel’s in the

was is in

and

geopolitics

while

and values

were The

these a

also order

Cold

rela its of

charted

two with National “mobile has contributed

946584

Press, James

national

not highest

in tionship an more they War construction

the geopolitical

years, not 27

to serving of regards

the only

important

These 2014).

. .

Bond reduce

filmic

Bond

Films, the at Security

only

also

of

signifier” generally, international

the point

divisions.”

allowing

of Bond:

course

between

Phenomenon:

to

31. as ” to presented

adapted ‘moments’

became the

end Bond.

Geopolitics the

the 19,

tools

the

and shifts aspect of

British

of

no.

of

release which

“evil the

23

the

Bond

the

for

26 the 2 to

more

to

political

popular (2004):

of

In

reflect A

the 1950’s. 10 genius.” that during the

changed

Critical of the himself

(2005):

public the explain

292, third

the hero

25 the

22

CEU eTD Collection Politics 28 cancels one his equivalence identity itself, work ‘political’ introduced around to constructed the expand popularity. explanation theoretical do readership popular the

Ernesto

be

not later

stories. way hand,

constructed.

of but

(London:

go

To While them.

on itself

fiction, is the Hegel, work, Laclau

into is

each

through

a

understand t for approach the At To

he

aesthetic within process of constituted and

as

This

these

which the depth

theory

and grasp ‘emp Laclau the

Verso,

difference

Laclau increased

such difference

most Identities Chantal

significance the is the

scholars ty

in

about

beyond at

1985), the they and by of

states

Bond’s relationship signifier’

films relation and

the

basic by

the enteri main

Mouffe,

marketing their were expresses

the transition, deeper 95. Mouffe

are

“mobile

are

that, and have

th level,

ng iden argument

way

e

called to

popularity of originally

not

into obvious Hegemony

how

into

“the

other these identified meaning

tity,

between

these explain what formed

of itself signifier” the

relation does upon a identity

the we identities relation changes

of

field does changes shifts

written. as among and

must

stories,

it Ernesto

in that of outside

identity

a

difference; change

Socialist of this and seemingly

9 Bond the

of and

in

identity

of look beyond IR

each which a

the are Bond

process difference.”

as equivalence

the

wider their Laclau

in

and represent? over

at somewhere plots. made Strategy:

an element adaptability

how

series

is, is on

power the relationship

evident

attempt population

time?

of dynamic

and

“never the evident They

basic

identity relational

Towards

28 for

other is Chantal with How (hegemony).

In

evolution

also between constitutively to

IR, concept positive

of other

in in

link

all

is hand, is

that to

a

it the do the nature.

his Radical identity generally the Mouffe will other

the

words, not

the Bond

films

literature

of

identity and each of other

be ‘social’

Recalling

provide its certa

identities

the Democratic The

closed valuable formation.

character in split; when

continuing of

establishing

differences understood series,

in a

logics them

and to

any on

they in

the the

to they the

and of

In

CEU eTD Collection http://www.scribd.com/doc/49780576/Ernesto 29 The level, Women, between something 1. does disappeared, world. intersubjectivity the the are opposed of symbol ‘d identity, of

Ernesto 3 ifferent’ difference, the

only Soviet Cold The

thematic

this

we system.”

Following As If

of

Thematic

understood Laclau,

but to Bond

War and

reflect consider th

Western Union, from a else. anything e

British in

does Technology.

foreign icons then there

and 29 turn, Emancipations

that the So of In

what the it

him Icons

there

four

being identity of was

how sum, spy

changes

not by it reference else.

reference

concept Villains becomes

to

the

happened thematic during change a

must

do

of

an ‘Soviet’ be difference But If

value

Bond

according

we

identity (London: of a we

be these of ‘ point.

a

the good point interests interpret

our the nd begin

a the

icons we

when

changed

distinct

Cold Locations

same own identities

between is Verso, prescribe ‘empty man to

to

to - formed

that

Laclau which

suddenly

in War,

his identity? the evaluate ’ in

fighting 1996), se

the

and dominate

its

identity? signifier,’ logic paration

-

10 can the Emancipation are

we

we them. international as ‘difference’

therefore

38,

identity

dynamic the can being

help look the And of

for accessed

So, equivalence.

Soviet the say I between identity

establish the identity will if for

something

for

Bond lost . identity of that

‘good our

and

with May

follow

political Union a example,

its

Westerner Bond

of

own what intersubjective films: must

7, the

any value Bond

cause’

is 2014, But

different the

ceased

Western

reference constantly

began

it other constructed setting?

Villains,

if

means according identity in

on

around we

and the

the

to identity as

say

from

identity

contemporary

exist?

someone to a point most

in

relationship adapting, Locations,

general

the that be

to in nature

another

that

Western

general world. to

the relation during The

has

which

from is logic and

how

also

to as

CEU eTD Collection http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022 Role 33 32 31 Critical 30 geopolitics for setting. provides identities These the masterminds.” distinct anxieties individuals, “criminal largely political on committed world and Bond

Thomas Ibid., Ibid., Christopher

popular Bond

films

Technology, Partners,

can

order.

categories 80. 79

R

Because The social categories.

eader,

setting,

J

evidence

- that

of to solely

visio

be Price, 80.

during culture

of

’” villains regularly Britain Lindner,

but

We regarded

moves Journal conception ed. the 32 n”

“

rather understood schemes

The

the

Thomas can Christopher

of

we

of Bon

WWII. of because,

These

during “

in villains

secret Changing

the Criminal

can them of argue the travel

d as the nations, Popular

films Bond

establish evolution global,

Price of of include Christopher Bond

from

- agent the that

3840.1992.00017.x Lindner

provide “ the within

the crime,

Vision Image

in

and

villains

C Cold

continents,

also

the relocating world. ulture evil

the

series or novel

“Soviet concluded

the

(

of

and

the of Manchester conspiracy,

a Bond

status argues War. a villains

the man

26

the

context power,

introduced the

Lindner are dichotomy Dodd’s adds

(1992): Soviets

31 ideology villains

series

of of controlled g the

or

the Additionally, enerally .

an

within

the “Bond that

: the

or 11 for Manchester detective

17

shifts in used argues ideological

and

to authority,

world.

the

global of - the can

determining by

of 37, pres

the -

Detection,

human Bond the

villain”

set

Fleming in operatives East

settings

be

accessed that

ent

series

the Using out novel first

populations University seen

Saga: - the

West the

the of

dimension agency.” representation to

”

to five

villains

are

Bond. are

February

as in

himself into modern wreak the From

Bond Bond’s “accep

The and within

a

used films global,

Press, thematic continuation an

Bond

James

30 independent

which saga havoc

can

international 7,

table is to

beyond identity

For international

for the

2014),

2014, -

not

Villain it

the

be Bond

had

of

his Lindner,

Cold becomes

played icons role on

targeted grouped

detective

Soviets

87.

a

analysis

Phenomenon: the

beyond the

to

of great

partners.” War

criminal ‘ of

Acceptable

simplistic the

global on and

the political Women necessary

within toward

int and impact

the crimes

novels

the on

o

two

33 the

A

CEU eTD Collection 39 38 iBooks. Bond 37 36 Lindner 35 34 villain. relation negative purpose. technology figure villains helping technology. the more secret culture industrialized ideologies, are notes good “passive

Ibid. Ibid. Steven Ibid., Michael Dodds,

key outside

and

and general

t

worlds.”

of he 67.

(

Through

also

Scholars Manchester

to use Zani,

Bond to “

38 Philosop

backdrops” consequences

Denning, Screening humanity

qualities

evil.

understanding technology He

rather world

is it. comes While

“

population

James

a to 34 world also Steven 36

reflection

hy,

Michael these stop have

The

“ :

is and

Geopolitics, Licensed

Manchester of

eds. points te from where Bond

within

that

chnology

and

tourism

them,

identity

Zani commented hidden

global can Jacob

of

and

the

in provides

Fleming’s Denning actually

out

of

technology technology to

also

reviews the

these

Bond’s Q:

M. ”

way Look, humanity

University

threats

that, areas. we 279.

of

Heidegger

can “idyllic Held be

Bond Bond are

periphery ”

contribute

distinguished a

on highlights “virtually be in

and the relationship seemingly “world

we meant

T

the

is seen gone

Press,

he

in is James paradise” gains technology ’

s an are

James

therefore Technology, way that

as

application

awry.” zones system” to 2014), introduced

to B every

“privileged the

12 both we

in experience

Bond

South “more the

with from

which exotic

of choose

66. which

39

helping created construction

Bond presented

Phenomenon:

the (Chicago:

that or In

technology

the authentic

‘

of

this to You Bond surrounding locations

highlights is

to

access…by villains

relationship human in various

by

’ to not sense, create re

them.

Open

in becomes create Not his

entirely

A culture.” the of

is intelligence. is

relation of Critical a

Court, forms

and the

These

the

Sportsman,

different his an

Bond

the the areas

his

identity technology define

boundaries example

a work

built

2006),

Bond threats

of 35 Reader,

secret piece

tourist

series to

of

This power,

the

upon from

as the Mr

something 37

Section stories

of

of

work, as

a

ed. of

For authentic

identity Bond, as perceptions

Bond

man

technology

has well

between the Cold

the Christopher including a

Zani, IV,

definin

and ’”

into with way of

as in

James War

12,

of for

both

the the the

g

a

CEU eTD Collection 43 Manchester Security, 42 Reader, 41 40 to perspective relations states, relation itself, larger successful order and They middle For Bond. the proposes provides himself

Ibid., Colleen Christine Zani,

international

subordination Colleen identify

follow

and

they

imperial

“ 188. then

ed. For ” The The ground James as to

M

in as the

the

Bold, Christopher need

University

a these at

The are Tremonte

Bold,

the

we

authority goes thematic

M. political

the

the basis representation Bond sed

James

ll in “

regarding

identity context to

relations Tremonte Re

ways four Post ucing

as beyond fact

it

be of and - for

reading

is Press, international and

Lindner Bond

women - “put

icons

thematic weapon

of Cold changing. Bond’s Q, in establishing

and

Linda of of

”

Bond

which

2014), and the

Section Phe gender

Women in the and Bond

dominating are War

(

of

Manchester

place” nomenon:

in Racioppi, Political

will heterosexuality with “Western”

is

Linda icons identity

in 187. Bond’s women

IV, films

If

can

also

relations order in

every show

we

his a

the 12. by

reveal and license

Racioppi,

evident “

A

Realism progression :

consider Bond

authority Body

and Bond.

between

through

Manchester women

films Critical maintain story us

that world.

Lindner, after a

Novels, a Politics

to

trend

43

as unique identity and in that 13

Reader,

paradigm kill.

Bond’s provides

the

the the Bond’

well the throughout his

an

University although

” “ maintains and that

of

Criminal 40

way Bond dissolution

in “real relation “out

perspective as

the Bond’s

The ed. and s Casino

states

identity,

blatant the in

a

Christopher equalization of that world” James phenomenon

social

starting

which

Vision, Press,

they use

place”

the

t Royale:

the o

learn identity provides

women.

of Bond heterosexuality of

world.

are as

“healthy 2014), practices

on and ”

Bond’s

the

the

85. point

from relationship

a Lindner

Gender

constant the Phenomenon:

heterosexual

national

Soviet in woman's of

209.

interests has

Christine

evolution

relation social for women

identity

imperial

and shape

(

always Manchester

understanding

Union. in

International identities.

.

prac

body to the

She

as

A interests to

in

Bold

is of the

Critical male

nation.” exogenous followed

tices technology series

the

shifting

This highlights

Cold : to

gender

films serve who

42 of

for

War

41 the the

a in

is

CEU eTD Collection 46 45 44 up.” are international problem evade of considered denial,’ interests reevaluation interests ambiguity Western the the the identify 1.4 the past.

Ibid., David Ibid.,

an

unhappy identities identity early international Empire 46

The empire.

accountability 1. 9.

Chandler, In

where

a

in of identity on

60’s

question trend

evaluating presented

as relation the of in their

to of security 44 to

merely and

Bond

Denial

the

West

bear Rather

the within which Empire

and that own

moves foreign

remains

Western

to

the

becomes in

and how for the he

a for

and

their he in

it the method the

responsibilities

symbolizes,

its is shifting Denial:

all. the

toward is -

they require

series policy

a newer as foreign

exercise.” compared.

authority

way consequences But

more to

represent

of The

what

that

an identity

in of

that films the empowerment, -

Politics policy.

difficult this implosion Western

has

seems

45 assistance in states these

I

presents for

These new

an do the

become of

of

For

of power, increasingly

not

lessons to

Bond are

world to State international states

14

past

bring fragile of

de Chandler,

wish

“denying

of us

Building so fine identity

nor

throughout

actions. which today. a

with regarding

of

obscured Bond more to

or strictly

in the

go

globalized

questions developing the (London:

we the the and

past political

away so power David

more

are

end

disguising power far state the that interests.

reveal

from

to in

ful

Pluto

series of

Chandler

recent - he

about

building setting, say an world

states the which western

is about

the Press, age

that evil I

of Cold

the

films the

will

extrovert

and

cannot of Bond “Western

they

2006), argues Bond, the himself. traditio should

nature

state

‘empire War

show

the in

evolution wield

films,

relation

2 solve

nature to

has and -

for

4. nal of style not that

maintain But,

states

in

the

to

a opened

the agenda

I be

the

that

will of of

to

of this

CEU eTD Collection the community part from security. there threatened an create with authority,

ever

West

of

the the to

chaos

the

In

increasingly

protect

help

west in

While the which

Cold further

that exporting

or

of

context towards

destr

the

other War. go the the

threaten

weak beyond

threat oy British globalized

of But Western their

the

the

James

who

the in ideology

the world interests the Secret

the

shifting

cannot

security powers. Cold Bond, world.

films

as

Service

of

thr we War

protect

this

identity

is the

ough of The In know

often

fears

the foreign these East

has

states

foreign

themselves

15

entire

it of

not

and to provides

films reflects

the -

regulate

or policy directly

reveal

- international

Bond policy large

featuring

the

an in can

consequences

the communities linked series

order e in threat xample

be

threats a

villains

state seen

reveals to political to of

maintain

the

of

international of around as

this

with

Soviet denial. the that

of threats

system

the threat power,

are schemes

the international

authority Union,

to being globe,

and through

security

the or

to

Bon the global

often

of

fear

d

in

is

CEU eTD Collection http://www.script 48 47 against to annoyance and Auric James 2.1 Western identity in lairs Bond schemes that was instability. communities evil in

“ Lindner,

which that be Goldfinger

Villains

plots

schemes dominated responsible of

a

enters

Goldfinger:

Bond: they

product Bond As the the through

influence

require

he “ of

Criminal

noted

It C that villains. threat

are

trave the Script and into

HAPTER can of

often or -

o

of focused the

is

evil these the

-

for

the that

their rama.com/movie_sc by unexplored ls,

also

of

-

getting the Vision,

“No, “I on Dialogue concern finds

By world. in we Lindner, most the villain.

Bond suppose

Cold villains the

take Schemes the

comparing 2

can on Soviets. Mr.

”

himself

- in rest recent 87. early

on The destroying G

travels Transcript, War

of see the It

Bond,

territory

the LOBAL

of are

you the is the

chaos a , way

films

of

important films, the It

it in villains

gradual

focused form

ripts/g/goldfinger West

expect

the the Global becomes

is I life

world ” of expect

not

were of can Drew T world the

identity

- a of

the threatening and HREATS

space sort

of enough

me shift

often complete way on

Destruction

’ in to villain’s

often s

Bond you

East clear

Script

between

of creating to the understand 16

toward of and of

take implosion talk?” to

-

associated past. alike

to

script : life Bond - that are

O

die.” V the

situations say wor - bigger

Rama, the

ILLAINS

for distinct

numerous

chaos -

the ambiguity

transcript during depths

to

ld that form

more that

threat

the destruction.

accessed of plan.

with James or

identity

from Bond of the villains of as

-

than destroying AND james

was states

military Although the he

when the Cold

May

Bond

previous

is -

is ju

-

ocean

L space to bond.html

Goldfinger

based st

as usually thrown

in

OCATIONS 20, The

War. defining international

individuals.

well was order or

2014,

for

we as and

missions

economic on

detective These

. simply well

as large into just consider

to the arms

Bond’s 48 the

stop

a the as

continuous

global

national 47 small locations

security Bond races fighti secret

world stories The them.

Bond

ng

CEU eTD Collection 53 52 2014, 51 50 49 in organization film leads schemes threat fact, economic Goldfinger China and China. global mother that offered Extortion). villains: increasingly that

Sean Sean William Ibid. Sean

the

Soviet

he went

were this

http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S030574100002782X

her

film, coming Connery, Connery, Connery, from

order

The joined In From and his

SPECTRE

of E instability to

beyond the not chaos

Griffith,

relations

services

The (1964) From film SPECTRE. German becoming believe

comin globalized

of

the

film representing

SPECTRE. from From Goldfinger Dr.

SPECTRE.

namesake was

through very

the Russia

No.

“Sino released where g

Russia in

multipolarity that (SPecial to

(the father.

not

released directed superpowers

first the a both

-

When , Soviet system

superpower.

she

only directed Sino

the With

49 the With global

villain

movie Soviet 50

in the We Let

is

by destruction

Executive

villain His

- Relations,”

from

just

1963, Love Rosa Soviet Love still

.

Terence U

us are by

order nited ,

identity of and

interests, 3

,

the

Guy consider threat

working the

directed introduced

Klebb years and the From was 51

Split)

not

audience

Young Hamilton States that East This

The for

first are

of working

toward

the in after

Russia

by recruits

Counter

China the was -

which rather

the aware

for threat West

relation film,

(London:

. Terence bipolar and

17

to American

the

(London: identity Mother is reflected

each Quarterly,

the

the

with With presence introduced Dr.

they

was was of “point Tatiana -

Intelligence,

Young

to

EON system. long his

Soviets

other, No

also based

an

represented

Love, Bonds EON Russia. of

presence

i

gold - (1962), of

Productions, n agent (

lasting Dr.

(London: Jan

Romanova

in later

the

and Productions, no

on to we and

divided

- represented No, reserve

53

Mar villains return”

this

from

the

often

highlighted are

Terrorism,

In makes

both villain

as

as

EON the 1966):

reality, Soviet supranational

again

the 1962).

a China

Germany,

reflected

at to

declined.

supra child in

1964). of Productions,

it head Ernst Ft.

the

3

regards

Bond

a -

following clear

efforts

the 4,

to Knox. threat national Revenge in job of

accessed of

create Stavro

the villains

a

the

that with It but

at SPECTRE

Chinese

to

to group

52

to was

1963). film hand,

also Chinese

he

It pr the

the

the May and Blofeld

was,

event then

in

of

from she

29, t he

in in

CEU eTD Collection 56 55 (March, 54 together war other (1979) in race. (1977) ensued the 1962 follows is missions. risin the nationality to are (1965) Thunderball

Roger Roger Peter

fighting create the

Soviets Cold

Forever in g 55

Cuban

villains

fear power

, , Wallensteen, order

This 1985): You

Moore, Moore, This in Hugo Karl the

with chaos War

In

this

of the

and

(through political Only

seems

.

i (1971)

this Missile to Stromberg

1, of

ncreased complete

I before a Drax, with The Moonraker, period t bad

accessed create in background. Soviet isn’t SPECTRE

sense,

Live

Spy “ the

guy to American new

the

is setting him,

Crisis. until

the

Who

with reflect

intern

a

Twice

political age working

May who nuclear

audience Bond new

up

is directed logic

Loved

he You nt not an -

- 54 was and 30,

ational Soviet

of

is

a civilization This in (1967) is

alignment

If

is

of fear interested bent 2014,

the Only

-

only destruction

Me, order

pluralism toward coming threatening by we not

equivalence),

becomes

D organization,

détente Lewis

that directed system, é

on consider ,

http://www.jstor.org/stable/423582 just Live tente: interested

On to

wreaking

was a

stop

states, Gilbert

fighting of

Her on in

global Twice What

is

that

by

aware

identities

during

but m

his the rooted further

the Stromberg’s Lewis Majesty’s aking 18

Went

(London:

was in including

we

still Atlantis

well although

that

genocide

identity havoc

the

of the

the Gilbert

can

more

slowly

highlighted ransom

Wrong?, we

- the

we East,

being and total

Cold

see

EON

on are

Secret persistence actually ship.

in of the fictional, (London: interests.

in plan.

or destruction

the put

the

of not ”

the Bond deals War.

Productions, Journal

o Third 56 the

rder the

world.

way Service

into given

genocide Additionally, The through

see Soviets,

In world, . EON with together

to

The also of World.

place in

of threat The his

create any Peace

which

through Productions,

Blofeld (1969), the

1979).

villain

represented

face.

the

Spy

gave

of after or details

East of with The Research

World a films Communists;

cooperation

Who

the Bond

new In

value

the of and a in

fact or

t

Thunderball

third he about

villains

Moonraker his

1977).

of Loved

West October master

, War

Diamonds

works identity

22, that the

to

70’s missions

world

Bond’s his no.

shift II as the

Me

in

that

than

1 he

of

in

CEU eTD Collection directed 61 2014, 60 59 58 57 their schemes. General KGB perspective West followed change between negatively interaction paradigm emerging confiscate are to between pluralism these

Roger Yuri Wendt, Roger Wallensteen,

the

no

superiors. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40260191

films relations agents

Levada, threat

longer

by Moore, Moore, The The from

“ Orlav

the the 61

Anarchy,

Mikhail John of from of

technology

with and

They is

of Soviet films

of East West

Wendt the

who cooperation

“ “After

aligned not

Octopussy For American

Glen

each and

that the

practices the Again,

each international

”

are

and focused

Your that are

Gorbachev’s

and

400.

(London: Soviet invasion Max Soviets the

followed

other that

both

other. working

West with

followed

Thaw,” Eyes - from East , the Soviet

directed Zorin

posits

. within

to 60 considered from

on

shift Only, the

59 EON after

was to a Both of competition

in D The

the The

setting sunken

an

é toward are

West.

Afghanistan

for

by

te

rise the the seemed in

directed Productions, the the

the

Wilson nte, East/

End.

Octopussy

John

invasion confronted relations the

mid Western

to form international ” period

.

Locque and

to 1. British

57

global Glen dynamic power

West

Quarterly

- by

to 80’s be The

between

the of John

foreshadow

(London:

1984). rogue of

of

based

in

interaction

perspective

tensions

(1983) film in naval threat destruction.

and

in

by

19 Afghanistan détente Glen late

nature which (1976 the

higher

political

KGB Kristatos For East

on

1979

(London:

ship. EON

to Soviet and

- the

of

)

further Your international

worked of 2

the and

agents

in

5 58 ranking Productions, the

A brought where

, interaction identity

But

no.

system the

This View

shifts

Union

an

West. are EON Eyes Cold

2

d

highlights in intentional

b

toward (Spring,

working the Soviet representation

y

Productions, To

KGB these

in the

Only

War, and and going where

proxy

1983) identity global A

of period

Ki interest

the 2001): a films, identity

agents

(1981) but the

more with against ll th the and

that war

thaw

e (1984)

security.

rather superpowers

1981).

and of constructivist 77,

A two

both

the

about

resulted

positive that reflects based View

of détente

and

between accessed

the interests

identified

KGB the

reflects represent

the

ensued

to interest

will

their

on

villains A

villains,

a

in

Kill, to

May

return of East and

a that

the

s

30,

-

CEU eTD Collection 63 62 provides global a defending. Carver Never system, threat. at of Cossacks actually from created and dissolution consequences caution award relation the

B

Pierce Pierce

the the

ritish

lessons interests

the

identity

British Dies when

news This

is Goldeneye After

Brosnan, Brosnan,

a

toward including to an

East, naval recognition

cautious British, family

Bond.

Carver

ex learned of (1997) is

outlet he

that the

that -

achieved the of of

MI6 but

group remnant Tomorrow Goldeneye, stops

the Bond and end

In wavered

the

Soviet

feed Britain’s

, the attitude not provides

while

provided

agent, where

fact,

past.

of British of threat Zorin

at

mastermind only in into

by the the sea threats

Never Union.

creating in

directed

a

The

Alec the toward betwe

looking

way runs media own the Cold from A is in a

were for

fresh

View

emanating villain Dies, order Soviet

vengeance

Trevelyan. from

that

the We a past.

en by

achieving War

military

responsible the significant feeding

behind

into directed art perspective

to cooperation

Tomorrow to

is can

the takes

threat This new in the A

m provide

the

Campbell Kill,

argue C ore from

shift

the

tension

old into of by world

the is Later

cause his does

obscure

Roger

the further Bond restructuring 20

abduction

for

War

within form

that in the master a news, on

and

(London: villain we bigger not order.

the

of their

between global

international

Spottiswoode this as is

of competition the

find

highlighted just

and Bond

presented the

but well

plan

a

death.

follows

Goldeneye

who headline problems of

media

out EON immediately harder very international he

of beginning the the villains of

commissions is that 62

the

Productions, destruction.

national

(London:

Soviet

UK

set

mogul,

It the

with anxieties

to

by

during

for identity

the is within

on

define (1995) and

reveals construction the actually

the

the he

to

Goldeneye destroying

disappear

politics

EON Elliot identity China.

film,

is the confront launch

Order

1995). the

fro of

in

the actually recalled the

Productions, Cold

the

relation the m

international Tomorrow Carver.

63 mass

tendency begins

within of

that

of

threat past

This of with

London. satellite War the

Lenin

his

from the

identity

murder Bond

to actions

Because

film

the

new to

the and

in threat

1997). the

of a look

was

is

the of

CEU eTD Collection 67 66 65 64 dictator and which abroad, very although Quantum Le in but not Frost, Graves in the friend pipelines to this good very

Daniel Craig, Pierce Pierce

the North represent.

Chiffre,

past the only plans point

national little within

past. the with he

With threat The Casino Brosnan, Brosnan,

(actually Craig, nor he and

does Korea

this

in works. group. in MI6 to about

plans

Bond’s is

is threats

Central

plans the the stage The

the

time Quantum

identity provides Royale. a it it

agent

Die The

type in

become

series state a 66

them.

official

The Zao to

ex

single

Die to a

they

Quantum

Another World that superior,

reinstate. -

Asia coup

of KGB

who abduct

in from villain of

that

Another further Bond

evidence investment

have Bond

Solace, contrast

difficult rogue ‘reboot’

is

in in

betrayed

Day Bond

agent, Not the

The

Bolivia,

and in recalls is 67 penetrated M.

is ,

obscuring

Enough

d previous directed agent, no The Quantum Day,

irected

sent World Elektra represents. of kill

to

to Renard, of

longer

banker

the Bond. the

evil define the

the

M. to Bond where ,

but by directed by

internal consequences

Is put

64

secret

Bond

MI6 North schemes

blames the Marc

Lee

of fighting 65 it Not When works

for

the is

down

is

In the Solace,

Bond defining

Tamahori

and held

by

Foster 21

series a

Enough organization terrorists these identi Korea

threats.

Western

network

Michael

M he

with

of even become

against rises captive

directly

(London:

is

Dominic Quantum ty films with

(London: lines debacle), of of cover

(199

with of

to Apted

who

the powers Elektra of

Casino

the just increasingly the and

following

of

9

villains

for of

EON the authority is

).

works

(London: threat Greene,

the

EON position

a reflect SPECTRE tort blown Elektra’s

the

is latest rising

King have

Productions,

good Royale working ured

Productions, terror

within for against

the

the

by E

films, that

already also to supranational

. of

ON that more

Mr The

end family a

disrupt West’s (2002), of

representing

from

the . traitor Productions, the wo with

Bond

Bond’s White

2008). her

we

villain, of personal

2002).

rks ousted British very

the

the kidnapping is still Miranda

the o

the within

for is

wn act

and

early

Cold

system identity,

supposed

Gustav

know oil

power

villain,

ually

Quantum the

1999). extorted foreign

from

the the

MI6

films War,

in

CEU eTD Collection http://www.script 69 2012). 68 series James Pat 2.2 their increasingly Bond and villains modern entire become chastised slippery in identity British policy

“ Craig,

that Thunderball

Global Fearing: has

foreign

has

are series,

Bond

of they

Secret Since By The Quantum

he

even in Bond obscure one,”

intervention for directed revealed

comparison was investigating

Travel

are villain

multipolar

policy

we going Script come

we

of Service reminding -

o chasing, share of

-

see in Skyfall rama.com/movie_scripts/t/thunderball have

S

and toward

“Oh, “What

- in olace the

comparison from a

actions

Dialogue a gainst

corresponding the

from distinct as

established way to Intervention

. system

and I the

the

the While a latest

us travel…

Bond’s exactly

large

result

the

in Daniel abroad the

modern

identity Transcript, of same

which difference

ways the film,

of past the the or

of

is Craig,

do

the

that . a agency. global

rogue

newest

original

its similar

and sort

villain traits of Skyfall of the you

” Cold

the avoidance

Drew Bond Skyfall, the

the

of interests

between status do?”

communities,

as

threats

This villain MI6 licensed

War has

in ’ Bond ability (2012),

s

MI6

in

22 Script that

directed

moved of

comparison obscuring system to

-

of of script agents. presented

character in the Bond

they

- the to O

is troubleshooter” the the the

-

by Rama, infil Bond

- actually hesitance

so transcript

come

it and Sam power West from series.

M close becomes

trate of

accessed

was of by rules. Mendes says to

identity from the hav

the

the it - an MI6 the to james

clearly

of

has that

e

previous 68

ex

the

60’s

villains

evil the moved necessary

The taking May (London: -

reveals

- -

held

MI6 bond.html Thunderball between Silva nature

same

villains from 30, different identity

prior

agent.

responsibility

throughout from film 2014,

was EON a

agency, of Dr.

weakness for .

the

.

in

Bond

in “always

of

the

Productions, Raoul No f Bond

69

the rom which villain Bond

to but

himself Bond

the

the

the

to Silva's in

for a also

has he

and

the

is

CEU eTD Collection (Winter, 72 http://www.jstor.org/stable/1888505 Journal 71 War: 70 also their Truman provide city UK rising powers against were after by zones by represented wi identity opposition travel

Richard Melvyn Odd

thin the Western

earlier

that

an Third

WWII. presence the

Arne

in the outside

locatio

his of

Dr. In 1991);

area the in

is aid

Doctrine

is P. these Holbrooke, sites American

World world

many the

emphasized encounters.

Westad,

geographically Leffler or in

spread

No

to powers considering

that While

41

ns the

get

Third the of

Turkey in areas (1962)

Interventio

-

of in he

was ,

Western the

57,

same information. History, East to “ “

of Strategy, Creating

“ order the

visits. Third

Japan in

World of not accessed

Middle Communism. heavily

- by takes areas

Bond’s films, in West risk. year.

only the

ns to

71, and

1947, relation World

intervention Many

split the

Diplomacy

and as

s

place political

No. May that top

the East.

axis. In

Bond’s influenced prevent Third

Bond

. identity

the

By

between From

United and

4

them. of 29, had states

(March,

71 to Making in Some

traveling 70 World: the

2014,

In the

travels

the

and Jamaica,

gained setting mobility,

The

the R States:

Bond that You is locations were

ussia

United

various the

of

East by 1985):

of http://www.jstor.org/stable/20045002

emphasized rise the Bond

proved Our these Cold Only to

the

Ending independence of to United

struggling is

With

and of 23 stop which

808,

as Time various constantly their

States

West

series War:

cultures

Soviet

that Live

places

a West.

Love States the

to accessed the

representation

(Cambridge

time.

The

had

Bond

in

be

by Twice Unequal stepped

reflects

threat

locations

influence to

the also

(1963),

Confronts The aimed United

the he just

develop traveling

May in

visits

post

interacts

(1967), changes reinforce

British

of the gained Partnership,

up University the

States,

30, more

international - Bond

WWII

around decolonization fall Revolution,

in to

intervention

2014, of themselves

in

Turkey fill

could

Bond

Turkey independence toward the with into in

travels order the

the ” Press, period.

the

the

. West,

Foregin

these

intervention and no travels

” void and

types but

globe, to

The a

security 2005), to longer

defensive

participates as

72 infiltrate of

NATO,

is periphery

to

Istanbul, Global with Affairs

movem

The new

highlighted of Western

to increase

Bond’s 111. from

locations Japan, afford

”

the West from states

Cold 70, The abroad

the ent

the

a no.

in

to

5

CEU eTD Collection Third 75 74 (Fall, 73 Western Egypt increasingly that of Although With failure failure Caribbean, and travel would complications on Love reflecting movement Third had

Odd Roger Muhammad

the his

be was Let

1977): World the (1962),

Arne

World

to South

in gun way endure

of of Moore, Bond Some

Die

present Switzerland, influence Golden The

the the Macau

the

Westad,

Interventions its 166, beginning to it

(1973), Badiul

pluralistic China

States.

Bond We would governments reflected Spy

of persistence movement Trieste.

Live through

of accessed

the in

st Gun

the

was

Who “

and

Alam,

The in to Hong takes Sea

states Bond also

expansion

a

in Let adequately

(1974). part

a

This

and

Revolutionaries: the

the May Loved

presumably

world.

to

state “ the

Die, move The toward a Kong,

of

the reflect

Cold within travels

of increasing

train that 28, movement

1960’s. the

Concept that directed Making the Me In

2014, Furthermore,

within

were

of War.

presence

through and the

containment

Portuguese

the support has the (1977) to

the

neutral 73

http://www.jstor.org/stable/20671723

of same San

by of

by

Western “imported” Anticolonial Third

c trend In

The

Our sphere the

onstantly within Non Guy

extension

On

the Monique.

not

of

these

non movie, Time - Bond

Alignment; Hamilton territory

of World

Her

the former the only empire

of the 24 of - influence non , aligned

Third (Cambridge

West Politics presence influence

insisted Majesty’s films the

to

Non

Bond

- p validating 74 were alignment

resented

(London: the

Yugoslavia but

Soviet at

Although

A World - in

include aligne

state and the

Critical region

would would associated in

Third on

of

University

from

Transformations, time, the

Secret

threat

its EON of

an Bond d states the

in

Analysis,

from area travel states World.

travel Lebanon recall it position

opportunity

the

in the

Bond

Western Productions, is

in

Service

in order

in with

aft

a Press, . world’s

region

the

the

throug further

the fictional the to development

” er In was

World

First Macau of

newly the

(Beirut)

the to non 2005), British ” From

intervention

(1969),

The neutrality.

following

moving cross

h

to

Non superpowers 1973). Sino

highlighting -

World. Affairs these aligned

Global island

insert

independent 90. and Russia

-

invasion in - from Alignment

Soviet Bond

space, and in The 140, Bangkok.

75

Cold the

in the

In state

the

in Turkey With

the

the

no. Man would Live

split

an

War: that the

after area

of 2,

CEU eTD Collection 80 79 78 77 accessed British 76 in further the the Goldeneye War elegance generation in of world. his of would espionage. way itself the

George Dr. Lindner, Denning, Geoffrey

an these MI6 their

access spaces technology nationalization

than rep

No, old as

Government

argue

emphasizing Bond For Denning and

May schemes.

resenting

a spaces, Lazenby, You

of Volcano

“

it Marston, protector “License

Criminal to 77 of

of

satellite Lindner, had the

Europe’s 30,

Only

While that the

the moves a

2014,

of

commons perfect before.

he

” argues On secrets 78 Live villain

it

the “ to The destruction, Vision, in

Armed

is of

Dr. is

of thes Her in

Look,”

http://www.jstor.org/stable/759832

his not the

Japan,

Twice,

often secrecy past. also International

the the a

race, No

Majesty

e

that lake of family’s in ” fantastic only

Intervention

spaces

Suez

(air, 82.

T

79 valuable 66.

order had international aligned and

hird

Hugo

Bond

and The that

between of

’

it sea, A s Canal his

Secret World the View was

can to

Max

motto, hidden and recalled

sets

Drax has

own

and with stop

to in

threat

include

Comp the to

in

of Service, the consider Zorin’s access states

space). with a

island

built

the 1956.

threats an “the

the lairs technology Kill 1956

the arative still

American

threat

lairs matters

the but

an world directed

to

volcano of

25 76 Suez estate

in

present

Bond’s the

that

secret

entire This

the secret Law

also

the of

. to se Canal

is

are the

villains

by was of itself. Quarterly Caribbean,

international secret

reflects between

counterpart, not

of

worlds city

at access headquarters

Peter

international

o criminal Crisis:

ften Blofeld, a

the enough.”

grand in Bond

worlds

Hunt continues

time. the

37, Space not

The through to space

Blofeld

no. these (London:

masterminds is West’s chateau

revealed

Legal but

security.

reflecting

Alec 80 to

abl

4

in of security and

(October, When include it

e secret his

even

order Advice

the

was

Treyvelan to

has

capacity

the EON

that

career

to directly

evil

after

Bond

not

his

ocean

to on spaces

the in

Tendered the

1988): Productions, recalled are

house masterminds

a headquarters the just

in rest

the headquarters

different to a is

housed infiltrate

as

power

reflection 779, represents

redeem working hiding

Cold of

the well,

to the

the the

1969). next

that his

,

I

CEU eTD Collection 85 84 83 251. Phenomenon: 82 Security 81 moved allowing a (1967) headquarters England. it MI6 Bond’s Skyfall tournament, done Graves. with are the Live was

British Moore, Roger Sean Paul Barry was

common Non

associated

secret Twice Die at

Stock, Connery, before.

.

R.

83 28, and (2012), Moore, The There

presence the -

In The

Aligned 82

ship Another the Posen, In

no.1

Casino

The

lair. (1967) card

is

“ MI6 Spy A The

but

Dial to British

abroad.

Critical is hidden that The

You (2003):

Bond with “Command the Who films

The

a

Le table

Man

‘ headquarters, on

states M

Man

Day gradual

has Only

Royale and

whole ’

Chiffre

Loved

the

headquarters to having for

Reader,

5 is in M’s set

With in With

sunken -

(2002) Live Moonraker 46, expand

not of Metonym;

ancient island

the out

Me.

of

world disintegration office accessed (2005) the t

he Twice,

the

directly lets

command ed. the

casino. to

Golden under

when Third

is

their Golden specifically Christopher

Commons:

solidify him ruins

all has

Universal all , directed

of May Le

(1979)

in

invited

Le

part surveillance Bond stay World Gun, “mysterious been the

in Chiffre

the

29, of

Gun

Chiffre

this

Egypt

evil by

of of The

and directed

the

Lindner 2014,

Exports,

moved guise is featured

Lewis M’s the

the was in

(1974) presence

literally Military mastermind

commons. play

does 26 to

in http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/016228803322427965 secr master does

of expanded office,

by

( the

Gilbert

to M circumstances” Manchester The to

even

protecting , not Guy

et ’ space

China.

s the Foundation a abandoned

not

invited

office

abroad headquarters Spy submarine

plan

work

Hamilton has (London: 81 after

MI6 exactly

slowly

scenes.

Who to 84 Thunderball

space

: been to

Manchester

in M’s mobile to the Bond

with

international

gain of

a

Loved the (London:

EON and

city

invite

US considered areas

is secret in in The entire

the

reveals access no Ice of

Empi You Hegemony,”

the

hea of Productions,

movement the presence

Me longer space

University Bond

Hotel

Raoul

lair

(1965)

harbor office dquarters EON re Only

evil ” (1977). to

his security. in at

a

and

what to Productions, of

The a

Live

Silva, all. metonym villains

has identity.

of and International hidden

the of

1967). Gustav Press,

ocean

James of

85

His Hong

is

the again is

Twice

You

In the

hidden rather now

2014), work West

starting

area

Bond

In

that

MI6

Only Kong 1974). for

the

as is in in

CEU eTD Collection 88 87 86 consequences the defended War, these World to of headquarters headquarters around becomes previously control h world. signifying West Brazil. Moonraker eadquarters

Craig, Brosnan, Moore,

the the

very

when

areas by childhood film

86

and The There There Skyfall. the room

Moonraker. home extension, The

the directly Tomorrow

the

been takes world Non or scenes there (1979),

location

then become in mobility

at

is is saving

of reluctance of

-

London. MI6 something a

Aligned

limited

home place

these was

, Bond’s

as s

moves

the featuring ignificant

Never is Bond

they

as

the

no of the everywhere.

West

of imperial at

of

Bond

to

surveillance

Dies.

longer

In

world States

the had of M’s below direct past, Bond. visits

the

to

Tomorrow

the did

the

childhood

shift

done is be

office

office it

from

as West the target tendencies another not undercover MI6

ground We is said

in

well

in a

MI6 just

presents

have the reflection

of threats headquarters

instead

about to the of

Never

as

home M

as superpower stop blatantly

headquarters MI6

attack

past.

seen

secret

and if in

the in

of

in of their

the headquarters Dies their 27 of

a In Moneypenny

Bond of National hiding shift by the

terrorist

areas Bond.

audience

the

expose the

intervention

become the

(1997) very direct

from

in

most constantly

West

in

v for from

88 locations

illain

home.

Security. a

bazaar.

their

,

insertion which the

monastery

recent with

we increasingly after being

another

and

and sake

. see presence

When

the

traveling the

The the

that

the

film, forced

is But

an

of

of

sea

end blown

attack world

laboratory

extensive MI6 actually in helping

their the

at

Skyfall

that

and more a

of to the

run through threat headquarters

and the needed up. headquarters de

MI6,

power end

-

al the focused

bring down

(2012),

Cold MI6

the scene

of with

is

of and people

the

Q. moved to

remainder

around

the

the village War,

87

the

be

in the

Third on the

Cold Here

threat

had

the

in

the

MI6

to the

of

it

CEU eTD Collection amongst Sylvia ordinary which international women If as meets James second.” Tiger 3.1 to many also created relationship one the there

we stop Bold

entire Dominating

form visible

is consider Tanaka:

of

on Bond Bond: Trench

them. In There In

the a reflects proclaims,

the

only female

his substantial of series. the the

Bond

in

establishing with

villains

has

missions.

se

series, early

is

men

the playing

that

curity

the

no

status. the the “I “Rule The C women girl technology

dressed HAPTER Bond then doubt might Bond authority

power to Bond women

chan

dominance as in

baccarat. enact If Number Before

we an the

the

to being is films that ge just

Girls

in to

icon

can deliberately be

globalized

in power and

their

of 3

black influence that Bond retire

we a

the we

-

a

argue

the

Two within

She representative

P of technology heterosexual

schemes

is are OWER see

roles

of West Bond and

here.” is

used

stands in

that

even the known

women world.

the

in Japan. white brought of

in

in over

West. :

a being

series

both as

first

W out

their way

the are

28 for

well

suits. OMEN man

who women Men of

dressed

films. int women

From

both to

healthy

that intervention in his the

roduced

as

forefront

is step several always She

sexual

brings used

a West,

evidence AND

early Technology

in

tool

in

and out is includes

the

a to a

to

different come T

that red encounters on

of his them technology

woman of

early

establish

ECHNOLOGY abroad Bond

the

in of each authority

gown is

being first. the to

a

norms increasingly films is

-

“healthy

in

what

playing story

ways. You

both series, for sitting

Dr. power

Women

with

strong

within

can

the

in of Only

was

in th

No This

dominating

gender

Bond’s e the be what sake at a imperial

for

tool (1962), consider

way

and

Live the a used come understood

women transition

table

Bond.

of

is

used

powerful. films

that order

Twice

by

nation” we

an

has Bond by Yet

he over

in see

is

as

CEU eTD Collection 94 93 92 91 90 89 gun. onto Blofeld’s (1965), switches the and she b Soviet missions. more is intervention be ordinary searching the him perceived elieve

Sean Connery, Connery, Westad, Ibid. Connery, reflective

said

soldiers movie

still her 94

in his

“Western”

Connery,

This

agent, his

In about

that Domino

flying falls

side,

female “ the

plan.

In Goldfinger. From The Dr for ad to Bond room

trend

so Pussy

of

dition

From in containers be No

for

has shells many Revolutionaries, she

circus

Thunderball,

Goldfinger the Russia

the . She a

gender later seduces is Bond’s based

continues man’s fallen is

Galore, proclaimed Russia Third the to

admits of to the

are With seducing that

sell. the mistress

on

so one in role

game.

charm. responsible Honeychile

World

Love.

evening directed

With the first can love a who 90

to

” th

who harmless

of

74. Bond

rough not

perceived

carry task

She females these the with Love of works

She during

actually by being

Emilio

instead

time has at

is

Terence

most

out

also him women, for (1963),

Ryder

quickly civilizing

vapor for

the

the within

in

by his superiority

releasing

by works

saves

of

Larg the

of love

power Cold exercising Young

plan. whom just is

the

the Bond

Bond villain 29 pulled

o, the distribute

with

Bond these

as

Bond

looking War, next

the

(London: Once

to

series. the

Auric he

is

often

of

move him villain in

into

led

developing day from meets toxin

his this films the

she Goldfinger,

through

at and

Goldfinger’s to

If

the utilizes power EON

as Colonizing authority these

a Largo has

we believe

responsible across

with on

they picture charm after

Productions,

think fallen the

extraordinary

of

few the

them countries had

by

Bond

Ft.

beach charm

Tatiana is of

to

of about air. killing

exceptions.

into planned.

even Knox

state.

personal put

Bond as

him. for

93 is

1965). as assets

over

Bond’s

women In

able the a and completing 91

Romanova,

92

him in she

and lesbian

Thunderball

We 89 women

West order

them. making to pilot

on is

with Further

even

The

power, move are into illegally

his

to and

and

This

a lead

meets

into

place

kill spear them

a

her

on

yet she she

can

to

the

in

CEU eTD Collection 97 rama.com/movie_scripts/o/on 96 95 place little) misogynist husband. steal Tracy’s dominate that (1969). woman western, represents are to at being of Only do the authority

Lazenby, On Connery,

the

get SPECTRE.

not often consequences

is

Her Bond’s

Live

by of start able them

directly change

One Some

Tracy who

life,

Majesty the

will Bond.

killed

But of

her.” On You

Twice is to

of

role

to

of Bond

shift

he actually heart the

Her

lead kill the she of Only

does switch sides. Helga 96 expressed the

’

by ends

s

he

the

only

Majesty (1967)

While Secret film, in Bond

is

of

to here Live

and exceptions the

held

not

killed the

exceptions

this

the In

up

dies becomes their way

Twice. villains

but actually

Service,

is

fit ’

as most , roles Bond before. marrying s

d

- Helga exploitation.

by Secret her utilized

estruction by

into she immediately to he allegiance

-

her

majestys Blofeld’s cases survive of

is

is to

was Script as

the

Bond’s

Service.

turn Brandt to

Already

women able offered father this

punishment

in

her

this

submissive commanded. these -

O Bond -

of using

to trend secret

in - to

a

Rama

trend

wife

when nd

is command the

establish

after

the as money

t in

women he the

-

not

toward

the service in simply Third

this ,

world,

at ‘ accessed

in

good the he personal

the

for

30 taking women

the ge

the

film

to 95

tells

-

wedding

nder his actually

earlier World script.html

their

by

’ a

end The assets play earlier and

side,

more

May

there

power falling Bond, the

role

henchwoman for

of treachery.

women not the

films

states. 30,

dowry. Bond’ or

On

traditional end films

his is and

.

that

changing

role

and objects

2014, “She int

evidence Her

own

up is

Bond’s

o are is

s

are of

dominance 97

Tracy

side. a

dying needs expected It Majesty’s http://www.script

Tracy the pool need, often

still that is

for male sides

as (although And dominating identity

Di

in of help…a seduced must

Osato

working if without is

Vicenzo, the gender

piranhas

or what

of if the

through Secret

they becoming be her, films.

and returns first ,

Bond man -

put by

notably, reflection o

against

role - a don’t

man

Service a

woman for Bond,

the concern seduction in In member

to

of to

their You not

in

they

the the

Bond very

but

on to

CEU eTD Collection 100 (2008): 99 98 taking life metaphorically actually Onatopp, Cold portrayal re emphasized that imperialism we of sexual made these West American wi with change

Celia Wallensteen, luctant

t Brosnan, women’s

h

consider

out t

he the the

War films during with

179, Donert, on objects.

After The until of

West

seems

CIA Soviet

to of

not extreme

there spy men Goldeneye. accessed

respect

produced

express

trend

women by rights through women

the the

“ the “Women’s only agent perceived

American agency

to This

by the a agent

are

film, period.

end

reflection of express

wrapping

May v does and to

minor

two Dr.

iolence

power within is passive to

the

of

women’s during

Anya The

but -

especially

30, the Soviet Rights be

98 Holly not the major its façade

changes In a the 2014, a

Spy

progress in

own

the of Cold type of change Amasova. symbol

women the her analyzing

D in

the

Soviets

Goodhead.

power

é murder changes Who

film

rights Cold http://dx.doi.org/ tente,

of

power Cold legs

of

same War intriguing

in state

sexual sides Loved made

War series. ” of

falling

around identity in

1. , and

War, as

moves

Additionally, power

and ways to the

- in

the

building Europe:

well

(and,

This have the

the with

frustration Me identity

With

t

it hands into he when

them.

as

that is portrayal falls

in further role 31

10.1093/pastj/gts040

(1977). period

arrival of little women’s

Disentangling

the

cruc

the bed

Goldeneye’s and

course,

take of we of 100

into

of

past

context

ial

change

with in

a women.

outside

international

consider when Addit of women

of

rogue Here,

place line Moonraker of to ,

cooperat there a

rights

later James identify

women period

ionally,

with Feminist she of

within

in Bond agent.

any

First,

(1995) in

are dies

a the

the in . kills.

state relation Bond the

ion gender

when

the significant

onscreen

what

Soviet

security, is

films

this (1979), because Histories,” one She her

détente

with working release She Soviet that

cont

period. status the o little literally

roles until to

f

Union’s is

is not the

inues

Bond

West Bond

as

of it literally

between expressing

sphere. at Past progress

changes

as becomes only

the in villains, that more

it), This the

squeezes

a

cooperation

with

was is and through

Cold

but

expression woman

still

end the working

99 tha is

and

Present

East

little in she

Yet, was

Xenia exist.

of n War. clear its

the just

the the and

if

CEU eTD Collection 103 102 101 that also seems exercise opposed Quantum female Bond agent distinguishing and compared his there submissive reflecting Ryder Johnson who We Additionally

Ibid. Craig, Craig,

time

now James

brings presents has

is is and

is to

gend Additionally, In

another

Quantum Skyfall

the

it

his is power to coming have recognize

of

on Die seduces

to

is

Bond seen Ms.

a

type

player, er

sexual

Solace ,

James the

small the a

beginning ..

a Another

Bond roles

new

Moneypenny or

scene

James coming

of in Bond past in out

authority,

Solace Bond

comparison handful

power but Casino the Bond

when perspective ’s that

of

the

of

-

that

power

Bond girl

Day need she the -

. the

out with in was

Bond

himsel Bond

over.

recalls

in is order Royale water

of

(2002),

Bond

of

for over that

not into as the Goldeneye this

supporting

the series

to

does Both on revenge a f.

there

to “money.” reports

from this the

way. male the legacy, Honeychile

The

water (2005) the

betray there

not

Camille breaks other office tradition

before male

line collecting If over

,

that to that seduce

is M

we characters Jinx

we

him

101

has between a

- a

as was

female women. with

. wo Camille consider is

scene

32 also

and

We Ryder.

is M’s

of to shifted. reminiscent

man

Camille.

represented an

sea

the save the begin Bond see

assistant. in

power agent the from

and Vesper shells stereotype body

Furthermore, has

the the wh

her

strict share to

102

ich the

set earlier ambiguities relationship

with

boyfriend. relationship see

emerging

on of This

plays the

norms by her At

straight

their

Dr an Crab the

a of the

Bond mind films)

is

. equality woman

No the NSA

its

damaged in the

regarding beginning Key

from

In male

past Casino

that when between role

on. girl

only with that

the and

Island.

103

for

between arise

in the Giacinta of is

Bond poker

‘Bond Honeychile the

not

Skyfall past

the the

blurred the Royale

gender water,

of

Vesper

in backstory

Although the

film

first

double the

and

does game,

girl’

male

“Jinx” (2012)

film, although

(2005),

as roles time Bond

Lynd not

(as he

and

.

she

of

is

CEU eTD Collection http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mercury/missions/goals.html 105 104 beam project radio in te for The Q: James Q: 3.2 post films previously begin War, Bond. role shoot is

chnology

the

“ Connery, the

Project genocide The

- technology within

imperial

and

beam that field

by him

to first

Bond:

Technology When is

Authority

see

Dr.

the one Mercury

blur

and Dr. films

done with the is to

a

No and

theory

consequences used of we No.

reflection disrupt

the pre office

used Bond in by highlights NASA’s “Frequently” “Q, There “Now

bringing Goals, think

sume

lines

of

to opposition

the

is

that

have

by Technology as

establish the as used

”

s are about use pay

between

a NASA, of the he sexual an

Project

first secretary,

I massive

one

the

the of in

attention is ever agent. villains directly.

this

technology. the dead.

to

attempts hesitance way power accessed or

domination

let male the

Mercury

James film two

In chaos

in you

Not is but

Soviet

007, the

for and rather which

large in May

to

we down?”

only Bond

of

field its

to both.

I put female In launch

30,

the

want

threat. are represents the scale, temporal

special

the Dr is

33

man she 2014,

series

West

Bond’s led world Ms. .

technology you

No

taking power

is including

This to in

Moneypenny

accessories.” his

(1962), by to

to

believe context space.

order.

a

.

identity

display is

take

both equal.

healthy place as

furt

a

105

nuclear

created

the The great

the result that her as

at She

The its is

imperial villain following

villains Cape

access

continued

separated

she taken power care

even of - use

by and The

is having

Canaveral.

of is

the of

out the

and has

chemical

and

in

nation, Spy

using this

the

the

West

from the one

in of the

use

James

experienced Who

atomic

equipment. end the her

ways an

who power

of

then began the

104

post weapons traditional

of atomic Loved

Bond.

The villains kills

it radio t we he

-

to

9/11 had to

Cold

Me

be the

CEU eTD Collection 110 109 108 107 106 West; centered states technology for the technology War our can The the sole bidder. the destroy East Live many Goldfinger used

Moore, Moore, Sean Connery, Connery,

their highest pro worlds

understanding

be

use

agitator when and Twice against

in years

this

minence 108 used Connery,

The

the

of

own the on West. A The

time You Goldfinger In

View other

super microchips

bidder, (1967) attempts

nuclear provided and

use to the to

system. Man

and them.

The monetary

Only come.

manipulate 107

Diamonds

to it destruction of the of

world the powers With

A is Man

In

the of the is

Live the There

Kill. power weapons .

used

to 106 weapon Diamonds

the for the the

Goldeneye

microchips

villains in With powers Twice set gain. The

Are

Golden

those villain’s

against

fear specifically horse is

of and off

of

also Forever . hijacking

the

in security he In

of

a

London.

who control are

began

Gun.

racing

China,

are radioactive

these

Golden created nuclear evidence each

way satellite

reflects using ,

acquired Forever directed

by to

that instances, other

of within of the

the Again

for Gun develop weapons

Treyvelan security the using

of it the world in

Soviet

by

it and device

provid

(1971),

Soviet this

the it.

(1974),

the

Guy in 34 increase we

t

By

echnology auction

the Bond

first around this

in of film

Union Hamilton see after

es making

auctioning

for Goldfi

and the same Blofeld

Francisco technology film

from the

shows

becomes

of vengeance the

state

off American us. and

technology

computer

way. after

nger (London:

end

for becoming the

nuclear These

uses the against the

off 109 instigating

gold

of

the (1964) Scaramanga the

United extent

and

a

WWII I

the

for

examples EON n space

end

laser protector supremacy technology

at

A

the

being

the a power

the

Ft.

View

where

of

Productions, weapon to

States

international refraction and shuttles

power

Briti Knox threats the which

used

to plans

of are

into of Auric Cold

sh

in

A to

technology

of

against that

the worthless

cr

against

technology intervention Kill between in order

the

the

the ucial to 1971)

satellite

War

Western You

sell

Cold highest (1984), parties time.

to

other

for is the Only

the

set

the

for

110 to

to

CEU eTD Collection 114 113 112 111 Cuban we everyday of with considered the decipher With has gadgets himself of of the said Demilitarized Graves. restructuring abroad

Connery, Connery, Brosnan, Brosnan, solar technology technology

consider secrets types no

that

a Love

simple gadget Missile in The As

within power were Additionally,

the

their

of life, the

Die Goldeneye. From Dr.

(1963) noted of

a

gadgets

technology

the villain’s

piece is

past. not

the Another homing No. and that Zone in codes. remains

to Crisis. the

used

Russia passing

the earlier,

Soviet as cyber

is

111

the he films. of

in

are prominent based form 114

to

Day.

The use

uses

technology With

the

Western device. order

the

hide terrorism

subtly This have

of messages

it

This

of

Icarus use

of Love.

symbol against upon has the

technology

the to

nuclear technology changed

of

We

is

introduced been ze

allow which hesitation

villain acquiring especially solar technology

nith that in

.

can Dr.

of As

concluded the

weapons

power an

of

gathers the

laser No. understand with

the in

latest has

the invasion can

Bond to

the

113 into agent the

evident

the is

remained Cold use

and in

be

The public

35 film. to information

Lektor to

the that Die increasing

series

used

technology.

be to

authority.

represent

in War

en th stories

retrieve in In Another Bond used

is tire the eye

by

technology

the

constant this became in nuclear

South

scheme the by to

the

bec beginning earlier

technological

sense,

himself.

the

cut the

transforming West

Day post This omes

from so

presence fears throughout through Lektor,

of

films

- (2002) the

famous from WWII is to

a SPECTRE

the

during especially from gather piece acquisition

when

the

Bond

the North.

of

in age,

context

Zao for Goldfinger

Soviets of technology the

the Korean the intelligence

he

including. including can

technology

into

112

years,

in form critical

October the

and

and From be It

Gustav

in

spy can

of

control , although the order

starting

when in

gene

the Russia be Bond about 1962

fear

use to

CEU eTD Collection 116 172. Phenomenon: 115 longer Bo Goldfinger equipment, with from of contemporary used Bond. used superiority beg although Bond meets gadgets

Ibid., technology nd

inning

Martin

Q in and

the

to and

Q There

holds

173. is In By The

the

became

the

in gadgets

knowing Bond

drama Willis,

the MI6.

of

. the

to

earlier his

a A Bond No new

the is

the

gun

last technology. Critical

approaching setting ti

laboratory

even is

And

longer “Hard tically

me

an power

film ones

that able

and two series

films it

iconic we

once a will Reader, -

Wear: have as series,

a he films, scene to

does transformed.

get that

homing within gradually Bond

demonstrate

never will

115 and MI6 theme

to become

The th

ed. he

technology

in there he This

e

the be

we

jokes

Christopher

did has fin

Millennium, Tomorrow Q’s happen.

is device

using, that

Post

see

- is quick

is introduces de in

been laboratory. so

Bond evident about a

- is

the all -

millennial immediately iconic. distinct Cold

reminiscent and

expected

carry While

to infiltrated

the past. Lindner

Technology

meets Never the pick

asks War when devices

more 36 the

In

antique

shift Bond The

up

(Manchester:

Skyfall

him were Q films, Dies within same

we

and on

how in and in technology of

he

and may to

a see how the running where that pieces.

almost meaning

the , is more museum

return

to Brosnan’s the that

not Q working use

use Bond gadgets technology

Manchester films; explaining

iconic we

gadgets use

of

On

them completely high it.

is

of technology see

where received

Bond,” the the seen

that

on power of

scene in

in the

gadgets

other

into

before the

University

the good to is

moment

how he

in old

used

be

past The

in where as Western the destroyed

receives hand,

gadgets

by condition, outdated the the it

he

from James

film.

signifying are

did

Press, Bond

when introduces

technology second

Bond the

relics

before

the World. Bond his The

,

that

2014), anxieties

Bond away in Bond

meets new

film,

to the

were

his for

116

no is

CEU eTD Collection 117 terror’ international Western th consequences And agents “look his damage headquarters. policy The that technology. identity Using international consider interest e

Craig,

face threat

creates Bond now

upon

the intervent in in

C This There This

within Skyfall of and

of

foreign the

ONCLUSION the the

he

that Laclau

series Bond the

your ambiguity

These his paper scene

James appears Middle security British political

.. is In

has of

cyanide

the

ion

eye

a

telling policy provides work, throughout her

and scene

come IR is has

variables

Bond

for

seems

Secret actions. symbolic before East .

Constructivist Mouffe

setting One

put between

an pill mother.” :

of the

in from

C

series

that

‘empire a

intervention forth

Skyfall

to ONSEQUENCES that of story

Service fantastic

her have the

of

protrude

within. the

concept

began of

didn’t the

for half a the 117 films

of

the most theoretical

provi in in

,

identity providing Here

Cold his -

one

paradigm

dead, which

reflection as denial.’ implosion

Let

in kill of

farther

blatant for ded past, a

of

relation

is the War response us

him.

the asking

a her evidence the of

consider

Silva

‘empty man framework O

37

additional

than and sake Bond

examples and

own, on villain F His

that

to

‘E

her who

considering removes the

the to the

cheekbones of the

MPIRE occurs

and signifier’ one

of

the this

to

m state

in ‘aesthetic other.

M

villains,

a

odern

look

information

calling the from

contained that

attacks sort in once -

within his building

the threat

I

He

at even

N

of

recent international

I

the considered false

are him D locations, have

larger on

looks implo on turn’

ENIAL

consequences

the

that still

the within

sunken

September

and teeth or

history regarding traced

Bond in

sion global to

value he calls maintaining

face IR ’ M

and is

women the

one

A in

within

political

in a and series,

her fighting i

T of

s

context the

on shift MI6

reveals

order

the of H

the 11,

identity

‘mother.

tells

of one

OME the

and

the

‘war

in 2001 revealing

foreign

to

setting.

against. side her, best

of the

the films

on and

the

in ’

of

CEU eTD Collection between 2014, 120 119 118 but with that characters Rose, Sam home? world, West refusing security question justification international some trained the

Anthony Ibid. Chandler,

United

for the

Mendes lessons

accessed

continues outside he

- are

the

As within skyfall

effects

justification

to remains tells

Cuoto,

from we filming lessons States. Empire be

for

of

May

intervention -

has

force.

and us not held the

of

the to

intervening Skyfall

“Sam

that

- 31,

started

that bond

i

the creating US

Chandler n evade

that for accountable consequences 118

Denial

2014,

for

the

Mendes implosion

- in

and the 24

Chandler , the

now

our . intervention to new responsibility

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/04/30/sam , have 24

that 189. a

West reveal

nother

abroad points

increasingly th

Explains

aged film,

film

the

been

for

that notes should

of

details

threat

and

out risk currently in failings as

th the sparse

we

abroad

the

well eir that

the clearly

for that

Connection

be

witnessed to

about globalized actions Bond

terrorists

the the

considering

as internationa within and will

when referred

38

the affected theoretical power

the

series need bring

in deniability between

the

in the script.

that the society,

to

it to Skyfall

begins the state

empires

by

l in

has past;

be as

hijacked security

Skyfall

studies threat this

In

the Bond further

and after

a is will of not at

previous

age

recent

providing the -

the exerts the and mendes

into

24, intervention?

only is on present the

studied of

risk

end powers Bond not

the

“…

our the planes interview

for on -

explains film of always

of

practices features 24,”

‘empire own

the

the

the assistance

international in this

that .”

were

IGN.com, relation Bond 120

rest film state

-

year, the And

coming

with

do

One

returning

in - of

of actually connection series

so. or

characters

if denial.’

the director are

Charlie

to

can

April our 119 the

from

the

sake,

The

hope own

30,

-

CEU eTD Collection Dodds, Denning, Craig, Craig, Craig, Connery, Connery, Connery, Connery, Connery Connery, Chapman, Chandler, Brosnan, Brosnan, Brosnan, Brosnan, Bold, Bleiker, Black, Bennett Alam,

Christine

Daniel. Daniel. Daniel. Muhammad Jeremy

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14650040590946584 Geopolitics Edited 2006 1967. Productions, Productions, Edited 2006 Productions, Productions, 2002 University A http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300031001 Journal http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0268452042000302001 2 Ma Phenomenon: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20671723 Affairs , Klaus

Roland , .

Tony

Pierce Pierce Pierce Pierce Critical

Michael Sean Sean Sean. Sean. Sean. Sean. (2004):

David James nchester . . .

.

.

by by . . Skyfal. Quantum Casino “Screening

and 140, .

“The . . . . . of You Thunderball Goldfinger From Diamonds Dr.

. “Re . Tomorrow The Goldeneye. Die “The

Christopher Empire Christopher

29 . Reader “A International

Press,

Janet “Licensed

Badiul 10 University

no. No.

-

Only

1963 1971 1997. 1999.

– Geopolitics r Another

World

License

A

eading Directed Russia

Royale Aesthetic (200 303.

2,

C D

of Woolacott.

2014 .

. . in ritical

Live irected . (Fall,

Edited Geopolitics:

Are .

Solace

5): “The

Accessed Directed Never Denial: . is

D Women ,

With

D

Day

to to Lindner. Lindner .

D Not 2660 irected

Twice Press, Forever by irected

1977): Studies

irected Read Look.” Thrill.”

Turn Concept

of by by

.

Sam D Love Dies. Enough D

-

James

irected Terence 0289. The “ Christopher

. irected

by 2014.

er. The B in February . Directed

by in

by

.

166 Manchester Manchester James Mendes.

. IBLIOGRAPHY

by

30

I

D the Guy D

I International Directed Politics Edited n

Mart

n Terence of

Moments irected

irected

. Bond. Accessed The Martin

(2001):

The

– by Directed

Bond

by Non

. Young. Hamilton. 185.

39

Bond in

Marc

James by

7, Lee James

by

London: Campbell ” -

Lindner of

by

Alignment;

by

by 2014. Novels.” Campbell. Lewis Intelligence A

Young

: :

509 Christopher

State Tamahori.

and

of Manchester Manchest ccessed

Foster. Guy April Roger by Terence London:

Political Bon

. Bon Bond

–

London:

Michael the

.

.

Gilbert. . Building 533.

Hamilton

EON

d . Manchester . London: d 26,

I Spottiswoode London:

Phenomenon: Early London: .” n May Phenomenon:

London:

A

Young.

er

The EON

A

2014. I

and London: Theory. Productions, n

Lindner

Critical ccesse

University University

Apted

EON The

London: 28, .

Cold

James

. London: National

EON

Productions,

London:

EON

EON 2014

James London: :

EON d

” Productions,

. Manchester

. War

EON

Analysis. London: April Millennium Manchester:

. Productions, Bond

. Productions, A EON London: Productions, A

Press, Press,

Productions, Pluto Films,”

2012. Security Bond Critical

Critical

EON

Productions, 26,

EON Phenomenon:

Productions,

1962. EON

”

2014. Press,

2014. 2014.

World

EON

1964.

-

Reader.

19, Reader.

1965.

1995

2008

no.

.

.

CEU eTD Collection Productions, Moore, Moore, Moore, Moore, Moore, Moore, Marston, Lindner, Levada, Leffler Lebow, Lazenby, Laclau Laclau, Kompridas, Johnson, Holbrooke, Griffith, “Goldfing Fierke, Donert, , ,

girl May

1973 1981. http://www.jstor.org/stable/759832 Quarterly Tendered Manchester Phenomenon: 80. A NATO,” May Realism,” Productions, Democratic http://www.scribd.com/doc/49780576/Ernesto (2013): http://www.jstor.org/stable/20045002 Affairs A bond.html http://www.script 2014. International 10.1093/pastj/gts040. Past

K.M Roger. Roger. Roger Roger Roger Roger.

Ernesto Ernesto Melvyn Richard Celia

Yuri.

William

Christopher

ccessed ccessed Paul Geoffrey George. er

- A

sex

Richard

. Nikolas . 30, and

5, Script

ccessed

1974 . “Links http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468

. . . .

“After

“Women’s

70 . “Sex, 2014. The Octopussy Moonrake Live For A Introduc

.

and 2014

P. Ned. The Emancipations. Present

View

, to May May E .

37, International

.

On

no.

“Armed “Strategy, .

-

Man Your University .

Politics

the . and

“Sino Chantal

1969. Dialogue

Across . “Japan Journal Sadism M . Studies

The the http://www.jstor.ord/stable/2706932

no.

A “The Her “Criminal

5 http://www.newstatesman.com/society/2007/02/1958 30, 29, to

ay

British tion, Critical

(Winter,

, Let

With

- Thaw,” Eyes

4

r A . Aesthetic (2008)

o

- Rights

30, 2014 2014 . Majesty’s

Directed

Soviet

-

(October,

D Kill Long

Intervention rama.com/movie_scripts/g/goldfinger London:

Die

and the

Mouffe,

Kindle. Quarterly, and

irected of

Diplomacy the 2014

Only Transcript.”

Press, Government” . .

Organization

.

American D Abyss:

:

Reader

the http://www.jstor.org/stable/1888505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S030574100002782X Vision

The

London: Directed in 1991);

Snobbery P 178 Golden irected Relations.

eace,

. .

Turn

Cold http://www.jstor.org/stable/40260191

by

United

D

by Secret

Verso, 1988): 2014. Wilson

Hegemony – irected

John

. Language

202.

Lewis and 46

41 the in

Edited in

by War

and

Gun Verso, by History,

.

.

Drew’s

the (September – Political ”

States: Service

” the End

John 1985. - 77 Glen.

Accessed Quarterly .

2478.00236 The The 57. 40 Guy

by The 48, the .

Europe:

Gilbert. 1956 3 Directed

ideology by

John

– and of

Accessed

1996.

Cold no.

New International Glen.

China

and

Hamilton.

London: 817.

Ending Script

71, Christopher the D

Suez

Thought 2 Socialist irected

-

Glen.

Logic

Laclau

Disentangling Statesman

No. War: May

London: (Spring,

Cold 2002): (1976 Accessed Accessed London:

by

Quarterly, - . of

. O Canal

the

May 4

Guy -

E

Detection 30,

London:

Rama.

The in War, by (Mar., . London: ON - -

) Emancipation Bloomsbury, Strategy: Unequal 331

International

and 25, Lindner

1994):

2014.

Peter EON

29, Crisis: Hamilton

EON ,

United

Productions, -

May

May (April

script and

–

no.

A 1985): ( Comparative 2

J

354. .

014. ccessed Feminist EON

. an Hunt. Productions,

http://dx.doi.org/ EON

”

the Productions, 7, 249

30, 2

. The Partnership.

-

I

Towards

States, - transcript Manchester n (Spring, 5,

2014. .

Accessed

Mar Failure

.

2014. The

80 Productions, London:

–

1968). - New Productions, . London: Legal

bond

Relations,”

277

7 May

1983. Histories,”

1966):

James – Turkey .

.

York, 825.

- Law

a 2001):

of - Accessed Advice fleming

Ac 20,

james 1979

Radical ”

April 1984.

EON :

EON Foreign

cessed

Bond 3 2014

- and

.

143. - 77

25, -

- .

CEU eTD Collection Zani, Willis, Westad, Westad, Wallensteen, Wendt, Tremonte “Thunderba Stock, “ “Project Price, “ Moore, Skyfall On

Her

Steven

Thomas

Paul

Martin. Chicago: Bond. Manchester James Cam Global Cambr Global http://www.jstor.org/stable/423582 Research http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S00208181300027764 2 by International bond.html http://www.script Manchester The http://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/movie_script.php?movie=skyfall http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mercury/missions/goals.html Accessed to script.html http://www.script Productions, Roger Alexander

Odd Odd Mercury (2012) (March

Majesty’s .

‘Acceptable

Christopher Colleen

. James ll

bridge . “Dial

’” Peter Arne Arne

“James Script . idge Bond

J Cold Cold The “Hard

. James Movie

,

Open “The 1992):

February . 22, Goals

. .

. . ‘M’ . Bond

: : University University

M “Anarchy Spy

“The Secret

“American

Phenomenon: Manchester Ma “Creating - War: War: 1977. Security

-

B no. Dialogue

and

Wear:

Role Changing Bond Lindner. Court, for

ond Script nchester . Who

39 ” Phenomenon:

- - 1 Revolutionaries:

o o

NASA Third Third

Linda

Metonym;

Service,

1 - - 7, (March,

and rama.com/movie_scripts/o/on rama.com/movie_scripts/t/thunderball Partners

and – Loved The .

.”

2014.

” is 2006

Press Press, 425. the -

In Springfield Soviet Transcript.

Q:

What Manchester

World World

University University Racioppi

. Philosophy Image Millennium

Accessed The

Third ” A . Heidegger’s

Accessed Me http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022 1985):

2005 . Script Critical 2005. ’”

Universal

States

James

Détente:

. A Interventions Interventions

Journal

of

Directed

World: Critical . .

. ” Anticolonial - the

“Body 1

Springfield O

:

Press, Press,

May Drew’s - .

Make

Manchest

8. Reader - , Bond 41 Edited May

Rama Soviets Technology

Accessed

What of Technology, Exports,

the

by 30,

Reader

Politics

2014 Popular 2014.

6, of Phenomenon:

. United

Script . Lewis

by and and

2014. A 2014. Edited It Went in . er ccessed

. . . Politics Acce . ”

Jacob

.

the

M’s

University

the the International - May

Edited - and

her

O and Culture Gilbert

States Wrong?,”

Bond ssed by - or

Making Making - Rama O

majestys Casino

M. 30,

May

Brosnan’s ffice ‘ and Christopher You’re

by

May A -

Confronts . Held 2014. Saga: script

26

. London:

- Critical

Transformations

Christopher 30, Press, S

A 3840.1992.00017.x of of

Journal

pace Royale:

(1992): ccessed

31,

-

Organization,

and Our Our secret 2014

Not - From transcript .

Bond.”

2014. 2014. and

James

Lindner. Reader. Time Time EON a Revolution .

-

of

Sportsman, Gender 17 service May Bond Em

Pe

Lindner. .

. . –

In

- B

pire ace james 37

30,

-

The . Edited

South. Villain ”

-

46, .

and

. The

” . 2014 .

The

In -

no.

Mr

.