DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON THE PORTSMOUTH DOCKYARD WORKFORCE 1880-1914. A Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the degree of M.Phil. by FETER WILLIAM GALLIVER, B.A. (Oxon) M.A. (Lancaster) CXMrnsTTS nfTRDDUCTION Chapter Page Nurttoer 1. THE DOCKYARD WORKING ENVIRONMENT 1 2. THE DOCKYARD SHIPWRIGHTS, THE S.C.A. AND THE A.S.S. 4&2 3. THE PETITIONS OF 1911. WD? 4. THE ENGINEERS AND THE DOCKYARD UNREST OF 1913. 123 5. THE SAILMAKERS. 165 6. THEJUMXXIKERS. 176 7. THE DOCKYARD, LEISURE, SELF-HELP AND EDUCATION. 197 8. CONSERVATIVES, LIBERALS AND LABOUR: Z%5 DOCKYARDMEN AND POLITICS. 9. CONCLUSION - DOCKYARDMEW, THE MAKING OF THE 294 WORKING CLASS AND THE LABOUR ARISTOCRACY. BIBLIOGRAPHY UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF ARTS HISTORY Master of Philosophy THE PORTSMOUTH DOCKYARD WORKFORCE, 1880-1914. by Peter William Galliver. The Portsmouth Dockyard workforce, 1880 to 1914, represents a community of state employees in an overwhelmingly capitalist econony and society. The core of this study is an examination of the conditions of work provided by the state, via the Admiralty, in this period, and the response of the Dockyardmen to these. However, the relation- ship between the Dockyardmen and movements affecting the working class nationally, particularly the Trade Union movement and the emerging Labour Party, is also considered. The overall argument of this work is that 1880-1914, from the various perspectives of Admiralty-irtposed employment conditions, and the workers' trade union, political and cultural responses, was a formative period in Dockyard history. Moreover, this was a period which saw a closing of the gap between Dockyardmen and the wider labour movement. The opening section focuses on the key features of Admiralty employment as they developed 1880-1914: the function of the establish- ment system, pay, demarcation, the petitioning process and management structures. The response of the workers to this, enccnpassing Admiralty, worker interaction, the internal dynamics of the Dockyard workforce and contacts between Dockyardmen and the wider labour movement, is pursued through studies of trade union development amongst trades, the shipwrights, engineers and Sailmakers, and the Labourers. Supple- menting this is a chapter on the Dockyard as a focal point for a distinctive workplace-based culture. From this the political responses of the Dockyardmen are considered; the nature of Dockyard-based, working - class Conservatism, Liberalism and the emergence from this of independent Labour politics. Finally, there is a discussion of Dockyard findings in a national context, with particular reference to the utility of the labour qfistocracy concept. INTR3DUCTICM This study is concerned with the experience of the men onployed in Portsmouth Dockyard from 1880 to 1914. The choice of place was 1 dictated partly by personal connexion and interest, but, more importantly because of the range of historical questions raised by Portsmouth Dockyard as a major irdustrial centre, probably the largest single industrial unit in the land during the period of this study, and its status as a state-owned, and administered, enterprise in a capitalist ecancrny. The choice of period was decided hy the welter of changes apparent in British working- class history from 1880 to the outbreak of the Great War; the extension of the trade union movement, the proliferation of the institutions of collective self-help, the emergence of a distinctive working-class-based popular leisure culture, and the creation of independent labour politics. The challenge was to see how the Dockyardmen with their virtually unique status as state industrial employees (Woolwich Arsenal workers and, in a slightly different working envirorment. Postmen, apart) coped with this period. In an ideal historian' s world, the pursuit of this theme would generate a ccmprdiens ive work of social history, analysing the conditions of employment offered by the Admiralty at the start of the period, subsequent alteration in these, and the response of the Dockyardmen to their working envircnment. From this the Dockyardmen should be set in their wider social context, with an examination being made of patterns of residence, inter-marriage and occupational mobility between generations as it affected the internal sub-divisions of the Dockyard workforce, and the interaction between Dockyard families and those of Portsmouth's Non-Dockyard working-class, ard its bourgeoisie. However, in the real world such a ccmpr^ensive study has to remain, for the time being at least, an unattainable ideal. Study of the relationship between the Dockyard ccrrmunity and other social groups in Portsmouth on a quantitative basis depends tpon access to census enumerators' data, and the records of the Registrar General. The only Census data available relevant to the period of this study is 1881, and a single year is of liinit«3 utility without the opportunity to examine later years and the nature of changes made over time. Moreover, the R^istrar General will no lorger permit access to marriage, birth and death certificates en masse, so the prospect of making quantitatively-bas«3 historical-sociological studies, such as have been produced for other British industrial towns, principally concerned with the mid-nineteenth century, in a Portsmouth context is precluded. Given this, the focus of this work has narrowed from its original aim, and has concentrated on the interacticn between the Admiralty and its employees. Where the interaction between Dockyard- men and mon-Dockyardmen, v^ether working class or middle class, has been touched on it has been en a qualitative rather than quantitative basis. The thane, and structure, of this study has been largely dictated by the available source material, principally the local press and Admiralty records; both rich, albeit inconsistently so, sources for the developing conditions of Admiralty employment imposed on the Dockyardmen and their responses, formal and informal, to these. The opening chapter deals with the Admiralty's structuring of its workforce, its management techniques, and its pay policies. Subsequent chapters cover the response of the workforce to these conditions as they developed from 1880 to 1914. These chapters concentrate on the development and practice of trades unionism amongst the principal trades, the shipwrights and the engineering trades, with something of a ooda on a minor trade, the sailmakers, occasioned by the survival of the Federation of Sailmakers records. There are also chapters on trades unionism amongst the Dockyard labourers, and on the range of issues animating the Dockyard workforce against its Admiralty employers as shown in the petitions sent to the Admiralty in 1911. This groijp of chapters concludes with an examination of Dockyaaxhnen's or Dockyardmen-based, non-trade union organisations, ranging from formally organised friendly societies, and sport clubs, to less formal leisure pursuits such as gambling. The remaining chapters deal with the political responses of Dockyardmen, and the relationship between the findings here, and published work dealing with other working-class ccmnunities of the period. Footnotes to Introducticai 1. Ihe Galliver family has worked in Ftortsmouth Dockyard for four generations. The first Galliver to work in the Dockyard was my great-grandfather, William Galliver, a shipwright from Barry Dock vAio came to the Dockyard via Harland and Wolff Belfast. He appears in the A.S.S. Annual Report of 1900 by virtue of having taken 15 days sick leave at 12/- pw sick pay. He was a member of Portsmouth C Branch, number 18471. List of Abbreviations P.P. Parliamentary Papers. E.N. Portsmouth Evening News. H.T. Hampshire "Telegraph. P.T. Portsmouth Times. P R O PuGHC RECoRb OFFICE . MODERN S-ruDiCJ CENiTRt - UN WER OP WARWICK WesB weafe con-ec-now - L S E. L&B —1— THE KXZKYARD WORKING EHVIRDNMENT Chapter I The Structure of the Dockyard Workforce. The number of men anployed in Portsmouth Dockyard each year is given in the Health of the Navy Reports of the Mmiralty. ITie structure of this workforce, its breakdown by occupation, is less well docimented. Itiis occupational structure, however, can be seen for 1891 and 1900 in an Admiralty dcxzunent. In 1900 the Admiral Superintendents of the Heme Dockyards were required to make a return to the Cfcntroller of the Navy listing the categories, and numbers of workmen employed in their 'yards at the end of April 1891, and their proposed employment figures for 1900. Examination of this return provides a statistical background against vJiich to set the development of Dockyardmen' s attitudes, as these existed towards the Admiralty and fellow workers, and organisations. The Dockyard workforce came under five departments, the Staff Captain's, the Chief Constructor's, the Chief Engineer's, the Storekeeper's, and the Yard Craft. Overall responsibility for the Dockyard rested with the Admiral Superintendent; the principal departmaits for shipbuilding and ship repairing operations were those of the Chief Constructor and the Chief Engineer. The Chief Constructor was a quasi-civilian, a member of the Royal Corps of Naval Constructors whose ranks were supplied by promoted Dockyard shipwright apprentices who had risen through the Dockyard apprentice schools to 1 Greenwich.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922
    Cover: During World War I, convoys carried almost two million men to Europe. In this 1920 oil painting “A Fast Convoy” by Burnell Poole, the destroyer USS Allen (DD-66) is shown escorting USS Leviathan (SP-1326). Throughout the course of the war, Leviathan transported more than 98,000 troops. Naval History and Heritage Command 1 United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922 Frank A. Blazich Jr., PhD Naval History and Heritage Command Introduction This document is intended to provide readers with a chronological progression of the activities of the United States Navy and its involvement with World War I as an outside observer, active participant, and victor engaged in the war’s lingering effects in the postwar period. The document is not a comprehensive timeline of every action, policy decision, or ship movement. What is provided is a glimpse into how the 20th century’s first global conflict influenced the Navy and its evolution throughout the conflict and the immediate aftermath. The source base is predominately composed of the published records of the Navy and the primary materials gathered under the supervision of Captain Dudley Knox in the Historical Section in the Office of Naval Records and Library. A thorough chronology remains to be written on the Navy’s actions in regard to World War I. The nationality of all vessels, unless otherwise listed, is the United States. All errors and omissions are solely those of the author. Table of Contents 1914..................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • The Referendum on Separation for Scotland
    House of Commons Scottish Affairs Committee The Referendum on Separation for Scotland Written evidence Only those submissions written specifically for the Committee and accepted by the Committee as evidence for the inquiry into the referendum on separation for Scotland are included. List of written evidence Page 1 Professor Bernard Ryan, Law School, University of Kent 1 2 Francis Tusa, Editor, Defence Analysis 8 3 Professor Jo Shaw, University of Edinburgh 14 4 Dr Phillips O’Brien, Scottish Centre for War Studies, University of Glasgow 21 5 Electoral Commission 24 6 Rt Hon Michael Moore MP, Secretary of State for Scotland 28 7 Ministry of Defence 29 8 Brian Buchan, Chief Executive, Scottish Engineering 46 9 Babcock 47 Written evidence from Professor Bernard Ryan, Law School, University of Kent Introduction If Scotland were to become independent, its relationship with the United Kingdom would have to be defined in the fields of nationality law and immigration law and policy. This note offers a summary of the relationship between the Irish state1 and the United Kingdom in those fields, and some thoughts on possible implications for Scottish independence. 1. Nationality Law 1.1 The Irish case A new nationality The nationality law of a new state must necessarily provide for two matters: an initial population of nationals on the date of independence, and the acquisition and loss of nationality on an ongoing basis. In the case of the Irish state, the initial population was defined by Article 3 of the Irish Free State Constitution of 1922. Article 3 conferred Irish Free State citizenship upon a person if they were domiciled in the “area of the jurisdiction of the Irish Free State” on the date the state was founded (6 December 1922), provided (a) they had been resident in that area for the previous seven years, or (b) they or one of their parents had been born in “Ireland”.2 A full framework of nationality law, covering all aspects of acquisition and loss of nationality, was not then adopted until the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1935.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mammoth Cave ; How I
    OUTHBERTSON WHO WAS WHO, 1897-1916 Mails. Publications : The Mammoth Cave ; D'ACHE, Caran (Emmanuel Poire), cari- How I found the Gainsborough Picture ; caturist b. in ; Russia ; grandfather French Conciliation in the North of Coal ; England ; grandmother Russian. Drew political Mine to Cabinet ; Interviews from Prince cartoons in the "Figaro; Caran D'Ache is to Peasant, etc. Recreations : cycling, Russian for lead pencil." Address : fchological studies. Address : 33 Walton Passy, Paris. [Died 27 Feb. 1909. 1 ell Oxford. Club : Koad, Oxford, Reform. Sir D'AGUILAR, Charles Lawrence, G.C.B ; [Died 2 Feb. 1903. cr. 1887 ; Gen. b. 14 (retired) ; May 1821 ; CUTHBERTSON, Sir John Neilson ; Kt. cr, s. of late Lt.-Gen. Sir George D'Aguilar, 1887 ; F.E.I.S., D.L. Chemical LL.D., J.P., ; K.C.B. d. and ; m. Emily, of late Vice-Admiral Produce Broker in Glasgow ; ex-chair- the Hon. J. b. of of School Percy, C.B., 5th Duke of man Board of Glasgow ; member of the Northumberland, 1852. Educ. : Woolwich, University Court, Glasgow ; governor Entered R. 1838 Mil. Sec. to the of the Glasgow and West of Scot. Technical Artillery, ; Commander of the Forces in China, 1843-48 ; Coll. ; b. 13 1829 m. Glasgow, Apr. ; Mary served Crimea and Indian Mutiny ; Gen. Alicia, A. of late W. B. Macdonald, of commanding Woolwich district, 1874-79 Rammerscales, 1865 (d. 1869). Educ. : ; Lieut.-Gen. 1877 ; Col. Commandant School and of R.H.A. High University Glasgow ; Address : 4 Clifton Folkestone. Coll. Royal of Versailles. Recreations: Crescent, Clubs : Travellers', United Service. having been all his life a hard worker, had 2 Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Dockyards Society
    20TH CENTURY NAVAL DOCKYARDS: DEVONPORT AND PORTSMOUTH CHARACTERISATION REPORT Naval Dockyards Society Devonport Dockyard Portsmouth Dockyard Title page picture acknowledgements Top left: Devonport HM Dockyard 1951 (TNA, WORK 69/19), courtesy The National Archives. Top right: J270/09/64. Photograph of Outmuster at Portsmouth Unicorn Gate (23 Oct 1964). Reproduced by permission of Historic England. Bottom left: Devonport NAAFI (TNA, CM 20/80 September 1979), courtesy The National Archives. Bottom right: Portsmouth Round Tower (1843–48, 1868, 3/262) from the north, with the adjoining rich red brick Offices (1979, 3/261). A. Coats 2013. Reproduced with the permission of the MoD. Commissioned by The Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England of 1 Waterhouse Square, 138-142 Holborn, London, EC1N 2ST, ‘English Heritage’, known after 1 April 2015 as Historic England. Part of the NATIONAL HERITAGE PROTECTION COMMISSIONS PROGRAMME PROJECT NAME: 20th Century Naval Dockyards Devonport and Portsmouth (4A3.203) Project Number 6265 dated 7 December 2012 Fund Name: ARCH Contractor: 9865 Naval Dockyards Society, 44 Lindley Avenue, Southsea, PO4 9NU Jonathan Coad Project adviser Dr Ann Coats Editor, project manager and Portsmouth researcher Dr David Davies Editor and reviewer, project executive and Portsmouth researcher Dr David Evans Devonport researcher David Jenkins Project finance officer Professor Ray Riley Portsmouth researcher Sponsored by the National Museum of the Royal Navy Published by The Naval Dockyards Society 44 Lindley Avenue, Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO4 9NU, England navaldockyards.org First published 2015 Copyright © The Naval Dockyards Society 2015 The Contractor grants to English Heritage a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, perpetual, irrevocable and royalty-free licence to use, copy, reproduce, adapt, modify, enhance, create derivative works and/or commercially exploit the Materials for any purpose required by Historic England.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship Shape As We Embark Upon a Project to Replace THV Patricia, We Take a Look at the Project Set-Up, Fact-Finding Missions and Progress So Far AUTUMN 2019 | ISSUE 31
    The Trinity House journal // Autumn 2019 // Issue 31 Ship shape As we embark upon a project to replace THV Patricia, we take a look at the project set-up, fact-finding missions and progress so far AUTUMN 2019 | ISSUE 31 9 10 1 Welcome from Deputy Master, Captain Ian McNaught 13 2-4 Six-month review 5 News in brief 6 Coming events 7-8 Appointments/obituaries 9 27 Staff profile 10-12 THV Patricia replacement 13-14 Royal Sovereign decommissioning 15 Lundy North modernisation 16-17 Portland Bill upgrade 18 38 Swansea Buoy Yard lift 19-21 World Marine AtoN Day 22-24 Investments on the way IALA and the inception of an IGO Welcome to another edition of Flash; our staff have been hard at work driving forward 25 a number of projects with a great deal of progress to show for it. Many thanks are due IALA AtoN Manager course to everyone who contributed news and features to the issue, as always. Multi-skilled project teams have been working on two significant projects: one to 26-31 procure a vessel to replace the 1982-built THV Patricia, and another to manage the Charity update safe removal of the now-deteriorating Royal Sovereign Lighthouse. Elsewhere it was great to see the twin successes of Maritime Safety Week and 32-35 World Marine Aids to Navigation Day—both on 1 July—as our maritime partners at Partner profile: UK the Department for Transport and IALA further commit themselves to raising the Hydrographic Office profile of the national and global maritime sector.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Admiralty War Staff and Its Influence on the Conduct of The
    ‘The Admiralty War Staff and its influence on the conduct of the naval between 1914 and 1918.’ Nicholas Duncan Black University College University of London. Ph.D. Thesis. 2005. UMI Number: U592637 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U592637 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 CONTENTS Page Abstract 4 Acknowledgements 5 Abbreviations 6 Introduction 9 Chapter 1. 23 The Admiralty War Staff, 1912-1918. An analysis of the personnel. Chapter 2. 55 The establishment of the War Staff, and its work before the outbreak of war in August 1914. Chapter 3. 78 The Churchill-Battenberg Regime, August-October 1914. Chapter 4. 103 The Churchill-Fisher Regime, October 1914 - May 1915. Chapter 5. 130 The Balfour-Jackson Regime, May 1915 - November 1916. Figure 5.1: Range of battle outcomes based on differing uses of the 5BS and 3BCS 156 Chapter 6: 167 The Jellicoe Era, November 1916 - December 1917. Chapter 7. 206 The Geddes-Wemyss Regime, December 1917 - November 1918 Conclusion 226 Appendices 236 Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval, Or Maritime, Museum on Haulbowline Cork Harbour
    The Potential To Create A Naval, Or Maritime, Museum On Haulbowline Cork Harbour Scoping Study for Irish Naval Service and The Heritage Council of Ireland by Ian Parkin Allan Randall Parkin Heritage and Tourism Focused Learning Hill Cottage Dittisham Glebe House Ashby Road Dartmouth Devon TQ6 0HR Ticknall Derbyshire DE73 1JJ Tel: 01803 722 585 Fax: 01803 722586 Tel: 01332 862975 Fax: 01332 862993 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.IanParkin.co.uk Web: www.focusedlearning.co.uk Niall Phillips Dennis Brennan Niall Phillips Architects Limited Brennan Design LLP 35 King Street Bristol BS1 4DZ 131 Kingston Road London SW19 1LT Tel: 0117 927 7396 Tel. 020 8543 1884 Fax: 020 8543 7970 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.brennanwhalley.co.uk February 2007 Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction And Context 2. Strategic Context 3. Appraisal Of Block 9 4. The Collection And The Potential 5. Tourism Context And Market Potential 6. Is There A Case To Create A Maritime Museum? 7. Educational And Interpretive Potential 8. Maximising The Potential 9. How Does It Relate To Other Maritime Museums Across Ireland? 10. Potential Audiences And How They Can Be Developed 11. Potential Financial Implications 12. Conclusions And Next Steps Appendices A. List Of Consultees B. Bibliography C. Appraisal Of Block 9 D. Major Components Of Ireland’s Maritime Heritage E. The Heritage In Schools Scheme F. Visiting Museums For Learning G. Inventory Of The Existing Naval Service Collection H. Boats In National Museum Of Ireland Folk Life Division Collection (2006) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cork Harbour Ebook, Epub
    CORK HARBOUR PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Cal McCarthy | 300 pages | 27 Jan 2020 | Merrion Press | 9781785373015 | English | Dublin 4, Ireland Cork Harbour PDF Book It was absolutely brilliant and would highly recommend. Cork Harbour fire was second at facility in past four months Locals and environmental activists express concern after blaze at depot in Ringaskiddy Sun, Jan 10, , Updated: Sun, Jan 10, , For conservation and navigation purposes, the harbour is often separated into "Upper Cork Harbour" following the River Lee from Cork city to the towns of Passage West and Monkstown and "Lower Cork Harbour" separated from the upper harbour by Great Island. Possibly as a result, their understanding of the topic was not as strong as for other areas e. The process culminated in the preparation of an Adaptation Strategy for Cork Harbour, focusing on the desired future for flood management to Pat's Harbour Story. This case describes the steps taken towards achieving more balanced management of a multi-use environment such as Cork Harbour. Although the Royal Navy appreciated the location of Cork Harbour, particularly for submarines, which had a significantly shorter range in the s, maintenance of the fortifications became an issue after Ireland became independent. Filter reviews. As of , Cobh had a population of about 12, They lay eggs. Also take the time to explore the island and enjoy the view of Cobh from a different perspective. Flood management to emerged as the most important issue in the Cork Harbour area. The Integrated Management Strategy does not have a statutory legal basis but rather is based on a voluntary partnership between key statutory agencies and local stakeholders who focus their attention on the Harbour as a whole and deliver a set of agreed actions to enhance the future management of the coastal zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Water and Marine Advisor the Department of Defence Proposes Maintenance Dredging Works at the Naval Base, Haulbowline, Co. Cork
    Water and Marine Advisor The Department of Defence proposes maintenance dredging works at the Naval Base, Haulbowline, Co. Cork. The dredging works will consist of dredging 14,000m3 from the inner basin at the naval base (Area A, Foreshore Approval Map) and 3000m3 from an approach channel (Area B, Foreshore Licence Map 1) to 5.5m below chart datum. The dredged spoil will be dumped at sea (Dump Site, Foreshore Licence Map 2). The works are required to ensure the proper and continued operation of the Naval Base and are in the public interest. The works will be completed by Trailer Suction Hopper Dredging with some subsequent bed leveling. The inner basin at Haulbowline is privately owned foreshore so approval under section 10 of the Foreshore Act is required. The approach channel and dump site are on state owned foreshore so a licence under Section 3 of the Foreshore Act is required. Dumping at Sea Permit Reg No S0005-02 has been granted by the EPA for the Loading and Dumping. Recommendation I recommend approval of this application subject to, The following maps shall be attached to and referenced in the consent document, o Foreshore Approval Map, Drg.No.: DRAWING 01 Revision: D02, Date:12/09/2016 o Foreshore Licence Map 1, Drg.No.: DRAWING 02 Revision: D02, Date:12/09/2016 o Foreshore Licence Map 2, Drg.No.: DRAWING 03 Revision: D02, Date:12/09/2016 The dredging works shall be conducted in accordance with documents submitted and specifically drawings, o Foreshore Licence Application Scope of Works, Drg.No.: DRAWING 04 Revision: Draft, Date:08/10/2015 A valid Dumping At Sea Permit for the dredging works shall be in place for the duration of the works and a copy of the permit shall be submitted to this department prior to the works proceeding.
    [Show full text]
  • An Bord Pleanála Inspector's Report
    An Bord Pleanála Inspector’s Report Reference: PL04.MT0001 Title: State Foreshore Development: East Tip Remediation Project Location: Haulbowline Island, Co. Cork Applicant: Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine PA: Cork County Council Date of Site Visit: 18 th March 2014 Inspector: Philip Davis PL04.MT0001 An Bord Pleanála Page 1 of 28 1. Introduction This planning approval is submitted for the approval of the Board under the provisions of 181(3) of the Planning & Development Acts 2000- 2010 for the remediation of East Tip on Haulbowline Island. The request was made by RPS consultants on behalf of Cork County Council. This proposal is also subject to a waste license application to the EPA under Section 40 the Waste Management Acts 1996-2013. Foreshore consents may also be required. An oral hearing into this proposal was heard on the 19 th March 2014 at the Clarion Hotel, Cork. 2. Site Description Photographs of the site and environs are attached in the appendix to this report. Cork Harbour Haulbowline Island is a prominent feature within the Inner Harbour of Cork. The Inner Harbour is roughly the area enclosed by the headland of Ringaskiddy to the south and Cobh to the north. The area is accessed by sea from the Outer Harbour, which is separated from the Inner harbour by Spike Island with a channel on either side – the eastern channel being the main navigable entrance. Passage to Lough Mahon and Cork Harbour is through the Inner Harbour via West Passage, a channel some 300 metres wide. The area has a long maritime history with long established historic moorings at Cobh and Haulbowline Island and modern deepwater harbours at Ringaskiddy and Whitegate.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxic Island
    TOXIC ISLAND INDUSTRIAL CONTAMINATION AT THE FORMER SITE OF THE IRISH STEEL PLANT AT HAULBOWLINE ISLAND, COUNTY CORK A Report by Friends of the Irish Environment January 2009 This Report contains sensitive information and photographs. It has been prepared solely to enable Friends of the Irish Environment and the wider public to consider collectively how best to ensure the long term protection of the environment at the industrial site at Haulbowline Island in Cork Harbour. Annotated lists of the referenced documents form a companion ‘Briefing Document’ in the FIE online library: http://www.friendsoftheirishenvironment.net/cmsfiles/files/library/haulbowline_briefing_document_30.01.09.pdf Above: Home of the first sailing club in the world in 1720, Haulbowline Island is a unique Irish example of a predominantly 19th century purpose built naval dockyard complex. It was established during 1806 – 1822; the Irish Government acquired ownership in 1923 but only took control in 1938. The East Tip made ground is at the right. Cover: Waste from many years of steel plant operations was bagged and buried in ‘cells’ on the large East Tip and in two smaller historic tips. Legislative changes in the UK during the plant’s operation led to UK landfills no longer accepting the most toxic dust cake from the dust extraction system, which was then also mixed with waste refractory materials and disposed on in the East Tip. Below: The island has an intrinsic relationship with Cobh, Spike Island, Fort Camden and Fort Carlisle. While currently unzoned, it is an Architectural Conservation Area and contains Protected Structures. It houses the Navy’s 1100 personnel and part of University College Cork’s Marine Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • British Military Recruitment in Ireland During the Crimean War, 1854-56
    British Journal for Military History, Volume 2, Issue 1, November 2015 British Military Recruitment in Ireland during the Crimean War, 1854-56 PAUL HUDDIE University of West London Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Ireland has a diverse military historiography, principally within the confines of the British Army. Much has been written to date in relation to Ireland’s relationship with that service, particularly in recent years and with a focus upon the Great War. Yet significant gaps still remain in relation to the nineteenth century. By analysing the relationship between Irish society and the British Armed Forces, through the lens of recruitment, this article illustrates how and why the Crimean War years represent the positive pinnacle of Ireland’s relationship with the empire and the British Army and Royal Navy. As Tom Bartlett and Keith Jeffery highlighted in A Military History of Ireland, the island of Ireland has a diverse military historiography, yet even today substantial gaps exist which serve to limit the wider understanding of Irish society’s and Irish individuals’ interactions with the Armed Forces of the United Kingdom and British Empire.1 Even though substantial focus has to date been given to the Irish interactions with the British Army, especially in the early twentieth century and principally during the Great War, comparatively little has been done in relation to the nineteenth century.2 No effort has been made to investigate the Napoleonic Wars in the same way that Bartlett and Jeffery have done for the Irish soldier in general and there is only minimal concern to place the Crimean War within its wider ‘social and political contexts’.3 Even the Boer War remains neglected with Donal McCracken’s important works being focused on nationalism.4 In Britain, and in relation to the Crimean War, Myna Trustrum, Helen Rappaport, Olive Anderson, H.J.
    [Show full text]