APPENDIX-I Form-9 Abstract of Eligible Assignments of Key

Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

APPENDIX-I

Form-9 Abstract of Eligible Assignments of Key Personnel (Refer Clause 3.1)

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, AIA Designation: Chief Architect/Team Leader S. Name of Project Name of Estimated Name of Designatio Date of Mandays No. Client capital cost firm for n of the completion of spent of project (in which the Key the Rs crore./ Key Personnel assignment US$ million) Personnel on the worked assignmen t (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) 1. Regional Connector Los Angeles $1.76 billion Anil Verma Chief July 2017 384 Transit Corridor, County (life of Associates, Urban (design Design-Build, LA Metropolitan Project Inc. Designer/ complete & Metro, Transportation Budget) Planner construction in Los Angeles, CA Authority Team progress) Leader 2. Kamehameha Honolulu $120 million Anil Verma Chief August 2015 288 Highway Stations Authority for (approx.) Associates, Architect Group, Honolulu Rapid Inc. Design Authority for Rapid Transportation complete & Transit (HART), (HART) Construction Honolulu, HI in progress- June 2019 3. California High California $1.6 billion Anil Verma October 2016 192 Stations Speed Rail High Speed (estimated) Associates, Team Downtown Los Rail Authority Inc. Leader/ Angeles to Palmdale Segment, CA Principal Architect 4. Crenshaw EXPO Los Angeles Cost: USD Anil Verma Stations Design Phase 192 Line Station County $2.7 billion Associates, Team & Metropolitan Inc. Leader/ Construction Crenshaw - LAX Transportation USD $290 Principal in progress – Transit Corridor- Authority million Architect June 2020 Light Rail Transit (LACMTA) (Station Cost) (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA

5. Crenshaw/ Martin Los Angeles Cost: USD Anil Verma 192 Stations Design Phase Luther King (MLK) County $2.7 billion Associates, Team & Station Metropolitan Inc. Leader/ Construction Transportation USD $300 in progress – Crenshaw - LAX Authority million Principal June 2020 Airport Transit (Station Cost) Architect Corridor-Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

6. Crenshaw Los Angeles Cost: USD Anil Verma Stations Design Phase 192 Vernon/Station County $2.7 billion Associates, Team & Metropolitan Inc. Leader/Prin Construction LAX Airport Transit Transportation USD $250 cipal in progress – Corridor-Light Rail Authority million Architect June 2020 Transit (LRT) (Station Cost) Project, Los Angeles, CA

7. Crenshaw/ Slauson, Los Angeles Cost: USD Anil Verma Stations Design Phase 192 Florence/West, County $2.7 billion Associates, Team & Florence, LA Brea, Metropolitan Inc. Leader/ Construction Florence/Hindry Transportation USD $60 Principal in progress – Stations Authority million Architect June 2020 CRENSHAW/SLA (Station Cost) USON;

Crenshaw - LAX Airport Transit Corridor-Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA

8. Aviation Century Los Angeles Cost: USD Anil Verma Stations Design Phase 192 Station County $2.7 billion Associates, Team & Metropolitan Inc. Leader/ Construction Crenshaw - LAX Transportation USD $110 Principal in progress – Airport Transit Authority million Architect June 2020 Corridor-Light Rail (Station Cost) Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA

9. BART – Extension Santa Clara US$5.6 Anil Verma Team February2007 384 Conceptual Valley billion Associates, Leader/ Engineering Transportation dollars. Inc. Architect (EIS/EIR PHASE) Authority of Record – and Preliminary Undergrou Engineering Phases nd Stations SVRT, San Jose, CA

Stations were:  Alum Rock Station  Civic Center Station  Market Street Station  Amtrak Diridon Station

10. Diridon Arena Santa Clara US$310 Anil Verma Design April 2010 480 BART Underground Valley million Associates, Manager Station, SVRT, San Transportation dollars. Inc. /Architect Jose, CA Authority of Record (VTA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

11. Downtown San Jose Santa Clara US$420 Anil Verma Design April 2010 480 BART Underground Valley million Associates, Manager Station, SVRT, San Transportation dollars. Inc. /Architect Jose, CA Authority of Record (VTA) 12. Silicon Valley Santa Clara US$4.46 Anil Verma Principal December 208 Rapid Transit Valley billion Associates, Architect/ 2017 (SVRT) BART Transportation dollars. Inc. Design Heavy Rail Authority Manager Extension to San (VTA) Jose – Tunnel, Cross Passages, Portals, Station Ventilation Structures, & Ancillary Equipment Structures, San Jose, CA

 Alum Rock Station  Downtown San Jose Station  Diridon Station

13. Berryessa & Santa Clara USD $26 Anil Verma Principal February 50 Milpitas Station Valley Transit million Associates, Architect/ 2018 Campus roadway & Authority Inc. Design Parking Structures (VTA) Manager Design and Engineering Services for SVBX Project, D720 BART/SVRT, San Jose, CA

14. Milpitas Station Santa Clara Anil Verma Principal 360 Project Cost: June 2016 Valley Transit Associates, Architect/ US$840 (Underground Authority Inc. Design Design Phase million Station) (VTA) Manager Construction dollars Silicon Valley Phase – July Rapid Transit Station 2018 (SVRT) BART Cost:US$280 Extension Project- million C700 Line Track, dollars Stations and Systems, A Design- Build Contract BART/SVRT, San Jose, CA

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

15. Berryessa Station Santa Clara Estimated Anil Verma Principal 280 June 2016 Valley Transit Cost $840 Associates, Architect/ Silicon Valley Authority million Inc. Design Design Phase Rapid Transit (VTA) dollars Manager Construction (SVRT) BART Phase – July Extension Project- Station Cost: 2018 C700 Line Track, $220 million Stations and dollars Systems, A Design- Build Contract, BART/SVRT, San Jose, CA 16. BART-General Bay Area Estimated Anil Verma Principal February2019 360 Engineering Rapid Transit Cost: $20 Associates, Architect/ Services for BART District million (fee) Inc. Design Projects-Operations (BART) dollars for Manager Control Facility, multiple Livermore Heavy projects Rail Expansion,, Oakland, CA

17. Rio Piedras Heavy Puerto Rico US$574 Anil Verma Design October 2009 270 Rail Underground Highways & million Associates, Manager/ Station, Tren Transportation dollars. Inc. Architect of Urbano, San Juan, Authority Record/ Puerto Rico Urban Designer/Ins pector of Record

18. University of Puerto Puerto Rico US$448 Anil Verma Design October 2009 240 Rico Heavy Rail Highways & million Associates, Manager/ Underground Transportation dollars. Inc. Architect of Station, Tren Authority Record/Urba Urbano, San Juan, n Puerto Rico Designer/Ins pector of Record 19. PMOC Project USD $22 Anil Verma Project February2007 125 US Management billion dollars Associates, Manager/ Department of Oversight, Inc. Planner Transportation New York, NY (estimate of Federal Transit all projects) Administration East Side Access- (FTA) Grand Central Terminal Station – Extension of Long Island Railroad into Manhattan’s Grand Central Station in deep tunnel and cavern configurations; Fulton Street Underground Station – Connecting multiple rail lines, including the World Trade Center; Staten

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Island Ferry Intermodal Terminal Station ; Atlantic Avenue Intermodal Station & Line Segment – Connecting (4) MTA subway lines, and the Long Island Commuter line.; South Ferry Intermodal Terminal Station

20. San Fernando Los Angeles US$ 461.9 Anil Verma Chief December 350 Valley Rail Transit County million Associates, Architect/ 2006 with 14 Stations Metropolitan dollars. Inc. Team later converted to Transportation Leader Bus Rapid Transit Authority Corridor (ORANGE LINE) Los Angeles, CA

21. Ramona Boulevard Alameda USD $60.32 Anil Verma Principal-in- May 2008 30 Grade Separation Corridor East million Associates, Charge Project, Construction Inc. Alameda Corridor Authority East Construction (ACE) Authority, El Monte, CA 22. Brea Canyon Road Alameda USD $61.8 Anil Verma Principal-in- March2007 30 Grade Separation Corridor East million Associates, Charge Project, Construction Inc. Alameda Corridor Authority East Construction (ACE) Authority , Irwindale, CA 23. Nogales Grade Alameda USD $73.63 Anil Verma Principal-in- December 30 Separation Project, Corridor East million Associates, Charge 2006 Alameda Corridor Construction Inc. East Construction Authority Authority , (ACE) Irwindale, CA 24. Auburn Commuter Central Puget USD $29.7 Anil Verma Project July2006 320 Rail Station and Sound million Associates, Manager/ Transit Center, Regional dollars. Inc. Principal Auburn, WA Transit Architect Authority (Sound Transit) 25. Inspection of Los Angeles USD $9.4 Anil Verma Principal-in- March2017 150 Structures– County million Associates, Charge PS39241892 Metropolitan Inc. LACMTA, Los Transportation Angeles, CA Authority (LACMTA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

26. Metro, MQ055, Los Angeles USD $13.89 Anil Verma Principal-in- March2006 125 Architectural and County million Associates, Charge/ Structural Inspection Metropolitan dollars. Inc. Project Project, Tunnels, Transportation Manager Stations, and Authority Bridges, Los (LACMTA) Angeles, CA 27. Totem Lake Mixed Fairfield USD $85 Anil Verma Principal-in- November 350+on Use Development, Development Million Associates, Charge 2020 going Kirkland, WA Inc.

28. Marshall Squares Fairfield USD $125 Anil Verma Principal-in- November 25+on Mixed Use TOD Development Million Associates, Charge 2019 going Apartments, Inc. MARSHALL, San Jose, CA 29. Aviation apartment Fairfield USD $125 Anil Verma Principal-in- February2017 20+on Development / Development Million Associates, Charge going Transit Oriented Inc. Development (TOD), Inglewood, CA

30. Vista Canyon City of Santa US$26 Anil Verma Principal-in- January 2021 Multimodal Center Clarita Million Associates, Charge (Design & 65+on (Metrolink Station) 23920 Inc. Construction going Santa Clarita, CA Valencia Blvd. Phases) Santa Clarita, CA 91355

31. Regional Intermodal Burbank- USD $169 Anil Verma Principal-in- July 2011 120 Transportation Glendale- Million Associates, Charge (Design & Center, Project No. . Pasadena Inc. Construction E10-07, Burbank, Airport completed CA Authority November 200 N. 2014) Clybourn Burbank, CA 91505 32. Los Angeles Trade Los Angeles US $748 Anil Verma Principal-in- October 2014 240 Technical College Community million Associates, Charge (LATTC) College Inc. District (LACCD) 33. Building “A” USD $45 Anil Verma Principal-in- May 2017 120 Los Angeles Modernization Million Associates, Charge Trade Restoration Project, Inc. Technical LATTC, Los College Angeles, CA (LATTC)

34. Learning Resource USD $60 Anil Verma Principal-in- February2015 70 Los Angeles Center, Million Associates, Charge Trade LATTC, Los Inc. Technical Angeles, CA College (LATTC)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

35. Culinary Arts USD $60 Anil Verma Principal-in- July 2014 50 Los Angeles Facility Project, , Million Associates, Charge Trade LATTC, Los Inc. Technical Angeles, CA College (LATTC)

36. Olive Street Parking USD $14 Anil Verma Principal-in- December 60 Los Angeles Structure, Million Associates, Charge 2008 Trade Olive Street Parking Inc. Technical Structure College Design/Build (LATTC) LATTC, 400 West Los Angeles, CA Washington Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90015 37. South Campus USD $111.38 Anil Verma Principal-in- March2010 120 Los Angeles Project million Associates, Charge Trade Administation Inc. Technical Building & College Technology (LATTC) Building, 400 West LATTC, Los Washington Angeles, CA Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90015 38. Child Development USD $12.6 Anil Verma Principal-in- November 40 Los Angeles Center, million Associates, Charge 2012 Trade LATTC, Los Inc. Technical Angeles, CA College (LATTC) 400 West Washington Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90015 39. Construction USD $120 Anil Verma Principal-in- On going till 20 Los Angeles Technology million Associates, Charge January 2023 Trade Building (CTB), Inc. Technical Los Angeles, CA College (LATTC) 400 West Washington Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90015 40. East Parking USD $55 Anil Verma Principal-in- June 2017 20 Los Angeles Structure (EPS), million Associates, Charge Trade LATTC, Inc. Technical Los Angeles, CA College (LATTC) 400 West Washington Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90015

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

APPENDIX-I

Form-9 Abstract of Eligible Assignments of Key Personnel (Refer Clause 3.1)

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA Designation: Station Planning Expert S.No. Name of Project Name of Estimated Name of Designation Date of Manda Client capital firm for of the Key completion of ys spent cost of which the Personnel the project (in Key on the assignment Rs crore./ Personnel assignment US$ worked million)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) 1. Regional Los Angeles USD $1.7 Anil Verma Project 720 July 2017 Connector Transit County billion Associates, Manager/ (design Corridor, Design- Metropolitan Inc. Lead complete & Build, LA Metro, Transportation Architect construction in Los Angeles, CA Authority progress)

2. Kamehameha Honolulu USD: $120 Anil Verma Chief 2016 (design 288 Highway Stations Authority for million Associates, Architect/ complete, Group, Honolulu Rapid (approx.) Inc. Planner construction in Authority for Transportation process) Rapid Transit (HART) (HART), Honolulu, HI 3. Crenshaw – LAX Los Angeles Anil Verma Lead Station 96 USD: $2.7 October, 2012 Corridor-Light County Associates, Planner/ Billion Rail Transit (LRT) Metropolitan Inc. Architect Design Phase with (8) Stations, Transportation USD $290 & Los Angeles, CA Authority Million Construction (LACMTA) Station in progress – Cost June 2020 4. Crenshaw/ Vernon Los Angeles Anil Verma Lead Station 120 USD $2.7 October, 2012 Station- LAX County Associates, Planner/ Billion Transit Corridor- Metropolitan Inc. Architect Design Phase Light Rail Transit Transportation USD $290 & (LRT) Project, Los Authority Million Construction Angeles, CA (LACMTA) Station in progress – Cost June 2020 5. Crenshaw/ Martin Los Angeles USD $2.7 Anil Verma Lead Station 120 October, 2012 Luther King County billion Associates, Planner/ Station- LAX Metropolitan Inc. Architect Design Phase Transit Corridor- Transportation USD $300 & Light Rail Transit Authority million Construction (LRT) Project, Los (LACMTA) (Station in progress – Angeles, CA Cost) June 2020

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

6. Crenshaw/ Vernon Los Angeles USD $2.7 Anil Verma Lead Station 80 October, 2012 Station- LAX County billion Associates, Planner/ Transit Corridor- Metropolitan Inc. Architect Design Phase Light Rail Transit Transportation USD $250 & (LRT) Project, Los Authority million Construction Angeles, CA (LACMTA) (Station in progress – Cost) June 2020 7. Crenshaw/Slauson Los Angeles US $2.7 Anil Verma Lead Station 20 October, 2012 Florence/West; County billion Associates, Planner/ Florence/La Brea; Metropolitan (total for 7 Inc. Architect Design Phase Florence/Hindry Transportation stations) & Stations (Four (4) Authority Construction At Grade Stations) (LACMTA) USD $30 in progress – Crenshaw - LAX million June 2020 Airport Transit (Station Corridor-Light Cost) Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA

8. Aviation/Century Los Angeles USD $2.7 Anil Verma Lead Station 60 January 2010- Station (An Aerial County billion Associates, Planner/ October, 2012 Station with future Metropolitan (total for 7 Inc. Architect (Design Phase) interface with an Transportation stations) Airport People Authority Construction Mover System and (LACMTA USD $110 Phase-2020 a Consolidated million Rental Car (Station Facility) Cost) Crenshaw – LAX/Airport Transit Corridor- Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA

9. Silicon Valley Santa Clara US $5.6 Anil Verma Lead Station February2007 576 Rapid Transit Valley billion Associates, Planner/ (SVRT) BART Transportation Inc. Architect Extension to San Authority Jose, Planning, (VTA) Conceptual Engineering (EIS/EIR), and Preliminary Phases, SVRT, San Jose, CA Stations were:  Alum Rock Station  Civic Center Station  Market Street Station  Amtrak Diridon Station

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

10. Diridon/Arena Santa Clara US$310 Anil Verma Lead April 2010 380 BART Valley million Associates, Architect/ Underground Transportation dollars. Inc. Planner Station, SVRT, Authority San Jose, CA (VTA) 11. Downtown San Santa Clara US$420 Anil Verma Lead April 2010 428 Jose BART Valley million Associates, Architect/ Underground Transportation dollars. Inc. Planner Station w/ Authority Crossover, SVRT, (VTA) San Jose, CA 12. Silicon Valley Santa Clara US$4.46 Anil Verma Lead Station December 180 Rapid Transit Valley billion Associates, Planner/ 2017 (SVRT) BART Transportation dollars. Inc. Architect Heavy Rail Authority Extension to San (VTA) Jose – Tunnel, Cross Passages, Portals, Vent Structures, & other Equipment Structures, San Jose, CA 13. Berryessa and Santa Clara Anil Verma Lead 2018 360 USD $26 Milpitas Station Valley Associates, Architect/ (projected) Million Campus Roadway Transportation Inc. Design and Parking Authority Manager Structures-Design (VTA) and Engineering Services for SVBX Project, D720 BART/SVRT, San Jose, CA 14. Milpitas Santa Clara USD: $840 Anil Verma Lead 516 Underground Valley million Associates, Architect/ February 2012 Station-Silicon Transportation USD: Inc. Design – June 2016 Valley Rapid Authority Station Manager (Design Phase) Transit (SVRT) (VTA) Cost: $280 Project-C700- million Construction Line, Track, Phase: July Stations, and 2018 Systems, A Design-Build Contract, San Jose, CA 15. Berryessa Aerial Santa Clara USD: $840 Anil Verma Lead 50 February 2012 Stations-Silicon Valley million Associates, Architect/ – June 2016 Valley Rapid Transportation USD: Inc. Design Transit (SVRT) Authority Station Manager Design Phase Project-C700- (VTA) Cost: $220 Construction Line, Track, million Phase – July Stations, and 2018 Systems, A Design-Build Contract, San Jose, CA

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

16. Rio Piedras Heavy Puerto Rico US$574 Anil Verma Senior October 2009 516 Rail Underground Highways & million Associates, Station Station, Tren Transportation dollars. Inc. Architect/ Urbano, San Juan, Authority Planner Puerto Rico

17. University of Puerto Rico USD $448 Anil Verma Senior October 2009 344 Puerto Rico Heavy Highways & million Associates, Station Rail Underground Transportation Inc. Architect/ Station, Tren Authority Planner Urbano, San Juan, Puerto Rico 18. Auburn Commuter Central Puget US$29.7 Anil Verma Lead July2006 525 Rail Station and Sound million Associates, Planner/ Transit Center, Regional dollars. Inc. Architect Auburn, WA Transit Authority (Sound Transit) 19. LAX Interim West Los Angeles US $10.9 Anil Verma Lead 2010 125 Bus Terminal, Los World Airport million Associates, Architect Angeles, CA (LAWA) dollars. Inc. Interim West Bus Terminal (IWBT) 20. San Fernando Los Angeles USD $1 Anil Verma Design 2006 144 Valley Light Rail County billion Associates, Architect Line Planning and Metropolitan dollars. Inc. Design, Los Transportation Angeles, CA Authority (LACMTA) 21. Regional Burbank- Anil Verma Project July 2011 84 USD $169 Intermodal Glendale- Associates, Manager/ Million Transportation Pasadena Inc. Lead Center, Project Airport Architect No. E10-07, Authority Burbank, CA 2800 N. Clybourn Burbank, CA 91505 22. Los Angeles Trade Los Angeles US $748 Anil Verma Lead October 2014 120 Technical College Trade million Associates, Architect (LATTC) Technical Inc. College (LATTC)

23. Building “A” Los Angeles US $45 Anil Verma Lead May 2017 160 Modernization & Trade million Associates, Architect Restoration Project Technical Inc. (LATTC) College (LATTC)

24. Learning Resource Los Angeles USD $60 Anil Verma Lead February2015 40 Center, LATTC Trade million Associates, Architect Technical Inc. College (LATTC)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

25. Culinary Arts Los Angeles US $60 Anil Verma Lead July 2014 20 Facility Project Trade million Associates, Architect (LATTC) Technical Inc. College (LATTC)

26. Olive Street Los Angeles US $14 Anil Verma Lead December 20 Parking Structure Trade million Associates, Architect 2008 (LATTC) Technical Inc. College (LATTC)

27. South Campus Los Angeles US Anil Verma Lead March2010 180 Project- Trade $111.38 Associates, Architect Administration Technical million Inc. Building & College Technology (LATTC) Building (LATTC) 28. Child Los Angeles US$12.6 Anil Verma Lead November 20 Development Trade million Associates, Architect 2012 Center (DCD) Technical Inc. (LATTC) College (LATTC)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

APPENDIX-I

Form-9 Abstract of Eligible Assignments of Key Personnel (Refer Clause 3.1)

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA Designation: Station Planning Expert S. Name of Name of Estimated Name of Designation Date of Mandays No. Project Client capital cost firm for of the Key completio spent of project (in which the Personnel on n of the Rs crore./ Key the assignme US$ million) Personnel assignment nt worked (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) 1. BART to San Francisco Estimated Anil Verma Project June 2014 320 Livermore Bay Area Cost US Associates, Manager – – On Extension Rapid Transit $2.09 billion Inc. Stations, going Project (BART) dollars Wayside & (BLVX), Maintenance Livermore, CA Facility 2. New BART San Francisco Estimated Anil Verma Design February 300 Operations Bay Area Project Cost: Associates, Manager/ 2014 – On Control Center Rapid Transit $54 million Inc. Project going Facility, (BART) dollars Manager Lake Merritt Plaza, Oakland, CA, USA 3. Berryessa Santa Clara Estimated Anil Verma Project 300 June 2016 Aerial Stations- Valley Project Cost: Associates, Manager Silicon Valley Transportation $840 million Inc. Design Berryessa Authority dollars Phase and Extension (VTA) Constructi (SVBX), Station Cost: on Phase Project-C700- $220 million – July Line, Track, dollars 2018 Stations, and Systems, A Design-Build Contract, San Jose, CA 4. Milpitas Santa Clara Estimated Anil Verma Project 340 June 2016 Underground Valley Cost $840 Associates, Manager Station-Silicon Transportation million Inc. Design Berryessa Authority dollars Phase and Extension (VTA) Constructi (SVBX), Station Cost: on Phase Project-C700- $280 million – July Line, Track, dollars 2018 Stations, and Systems, A Design-Build Contract, San Jose, CA

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

5. South Calaveras Santa Clara Station Cost: VBN Architectural October 100 Station, SVRT Valley $40 million Architects Design 2004 Planning & Transportation dollars Manager Preliminary Authority Engineering (VTA) Design 6 Montague Santa Clara Station Cost: VBN Architectural October 120 Station, SVRT Valley $280 million Architects Design 2008 Planning & Transportation dollars Manager Preliminary Authority Engineering (VTA) Design 7 Berryessa Santa Clara Station Cost: VBN Architectural October 120 Station, SVRT Valley $220 million Architects Design 2008 Planning & Transportation dollars Manager Preliminary Authority Engineering (VTA) Design 8 Santa Clara Santa Clara Station Cost: VBN Architectural October 100 Station, SVRT Valley $40 million Architects Design 2008 Planning & Transportation dollars Manager Preliminary Authority Engineering (VTA) Design 9 South Calaveras Santa Clara $120 million VBN Architectural October 100 Station Campus Valley (Station, Architects Design 2006 Master Plan, Transportation Commercial, Manager SVRT Corridor Authority Residential, - 01010 (VTA) & Parking Structure) 10 Montague Santa Clara $390 million VBN Architectural October- 100 Station Campus Valley (Station, Architects Design 2006 Master Plan Transportation Commercial, Manager Authority Residential, (VTA) & Parking Structure) 11 Berryessa Santa Clara $310 million VBN Architectural October- 100 Station Campus Valley (Station, Architects Design 2006 Master Plan Transportation Commercial, Manager Authority Residential, (VTA) & Parking Structure) 12 Alum Rock Santa Clara $240 million VBN Architectural October- 120 Station Campus Valley (Station, Architects Design 2006 Master Plan Transportation Commercial, Manager Authority Residential, (VTA) & Parking Structure) 13 Civic Center Santa Clara Civic Center VBN Architectural October- 160 Station & Valley Station - Architects Design 2006 Market Street Transportation US$340 Manager Station - Authority million & Master Plan (VTA) Market Street Station US$ 360 million

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

14 Santa Clara Santa Clara US$40 VBN Architectural October- 100 Station Campus Valley million Architects Design 2006 Master Plan Transportation (Station, Manager Authority Commercial, (VTA) Residential, & Parking Structure) 15 Oakland Airport Bay Area US$484 VBN Lead Project December 160 Connector – Rapid Transit million Architects Designer 2008 People Mover (BART) (Guideway, Train, Bay Area stations & Rapid Transit Maintenance (BART), Facility) Oakland, CA

16 West Bay Area US $60 VBN Lead Project November 140 Dublin/Pleasant Rapid Transit million Architects Designer 2007- on BART (BART) (Station & (2) Station Bay Pedestrian Area Rapid Overcrossing Transit BART), s) Dublin, CA

17 New Doha State of Qatar US $14B Overseas Design December 520 International (Total for all Bechtel, Inc. Package Lead 2010 Airport (NDIA), facilities) (OBI) - CP14, CP63 Doha, State of & CP64 Qatar

18 San Bruno Bay Area US $90 PB-GR&A Lead Project Jan 2001 520 Station, Bay Rapid Transit million, International, Designer Area Rapid (BART) station and Inc. Transit parking (BART), San structure Bruno 19 San Francisco City & County US $186 GR&A Design September 520 International of San million International, Lead/PM 2002 Airport (SFO) Francisco, CA Inc. “Boarding Area A” City and County of San Francisco, CA

20 United Airlines United Airlines US $62 GR&A Design February 390 Red Carpet / City & million International, Lead/PM 2002 Club & Flight County of San Inc. Operations Francisco, CA Offices, San Francisco International Airport Pier F Hub & Thumb Expansion Project, City of San Francisco, CA

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

21 Mission Bay Avalon Bay US$ 59 GR&A Project February 182 Housing Corporation million International, Designer 2002 Development Inc. Avalon Bay Corporation, San Francisco, CA

22 Waikiki Shimizu & $1.2 billion DMJM Project October 120 International TSA, Inc / Designer 1990 Convention Horita-WWC Design Plaza, Waikiki Inc. District, Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii 23 Moscone City of San $237.15 DMJM Project June 1989 120 Convention Francisco, CA million Designer (Design) Center Expansion 2, City of San Francisco, CA

24 City Square Bramalea US $74.4 IDG Project March 240 Office Retail Pacific million Architects Designer 1987 Complex (6 Development$ (Design) blocks), Bramalea Pacific Development, Oakland, CA

25 Salvio Pacheco Concord US $68 Hope Project November 280 Square - Properties million Consulting Designer 1982 Commercial/Re Development, Group, Inc (Design) sidential Project Inc Concord, CA

26 Opera Plaza Pacific Union US $58 John Carl Design December 250 Multi-use Development million Warnecke & Team/Job 1980 Development (6 Corporation Associates Captain (Design) blocks) San Francisco, CA

*The names and chronology of projects included here should conform to the project-wise details submitted in Form-8 of Appendix-I.

Note: The Applicant may attach separate sheets to provide brief particulars of other relevant experience of the Key Personnel.

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

APPENDIX-I

Form-9 Abstract of Eligible Assignments of Key Personnel (Refer Clause 3.1)

Name of Key Personnel: Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE Designation: Structural Engineer/Construction Expert S.No. Name of Name of Estimated Name of Designation Date of Mandays Project Client capital cost firm for of the Key completion spent of project (in which the Personnel of the Rs crore./ Key on the assignment US$ million) Personnel assignment worked (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) 1. Kamehameha Honolulu Estimated Anil Verma Structural August 2015 288 Highway Authority for Project Cost: Associates, Lead/ (design Stations Rapid $120 million Inc. Construction complete Group, Transportation dollars Expert and Honolulu (HART) construction Authority for in progress) Rapid Transit (HART), Honolulu, HI 2. New BART San Francisco Estimated Anil Verma February 360 Operations Bay Area Project Cost: Associates, Structural 2014 – On Control Center Rapid Transit $54 million Inc. Design Lead going Facility, (BART) dollars Lake Merritt Plaza, Oakland, CA, USA 3. The BART- Valley $840 Million Anil Verma Lead 04/2015 2,500 VTA Silicon Transportation (USD) Associates, Structural Valley Authority Inc. Engineer/Co Berryessa nstruction Extension Expert (SVBX), Design Build Contract C700 Line Stations, Wayside Facilities Structures & Systems, San Jose, CA 4. BART Warm Bay Area $261 Million Parsons Lead 12/2010 1,500 Springs Rapid Transit (USD) Brinckerhoff Structural Extension, Engineer Fremont Central Park Subway Project 5. Surveillance Raytheon $150 Million Parsons Lead 08/2007 1,200 Radar Company (USD) Brinckerhoff Structural Program (SRP) Engineer

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

APPENDIX-I

Form-9 Abstract of Eligible Assignments of Key Personnel (Refer Clause 3.1)

Name of Key Personnel: Ram Kumar, PhD, TE Designation: Transport Planning Expert S.No. Name of Project Name of Estimated Name of firm Designation Date of Mandays Client capital cost for which the of the Key completion spent of project Key Personnel on of the (in Rs Personnel the assignment crore./ US$ worked assignment million)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) 1. Consultant to School of Planning School of Assistant 1980 100 CEPT and Planning; and Studies Planning; and Professor of Vastu Shilpa on Transportation Transportation Transportation several Consultant Consultant Planning Transportation CEPT and CEPT and Projects Vastushilpa, Vastu Shilpa, Ahmedabad Ahmedabad

2. Several projects Mumbai (then Planning Mumbai (then Head of 1982 200 in the Mumbai Bombay) Studies Bombay) Traffic (then Bombay) Metropolitan Metropolitan Planning and Metropolitan Region Region Transportation Region – Development Development Planner including Authority Authority Kalyan Complex 3. Research Operations Planning Operations Senior 1983 100 Projects Research Studies Research Consultant, Group (ORG), Group (A Operations Division of division of Research Ambalal ASE) Group Sarabhai Enterprises, Vadodara 4. E Street BRT San $100 million Iteris, Inc. Project 2009 40 Project, Bernardino (USD) Manager Omnitrans Associated Government (SANBAG) Public 5. Virginia Street Regional 12-mile Iteris, Inc. Project 2009 60 RAPID Transportation BRT Project Manager Implementation, Commission, - $100 Washoe million County – Reno 4-mile Metro Rapid Project - $25 million 6. Boulder Regional Over $50 Parsons 2006 40 Project Highway BRT Transportation million Brinkerhoff Manager Operations Commission (now WSP)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Analysis and of Southern Station Design Nevada 7. Downtown Southern $25 million Parsons 10 Task Manager Connector BRT Nevada Brinkerhoff 2006 Implementation Regional (now WSP) Transportation Commission 8. Conversion of Orange $100 million Parsons 10 Task Leader Proposed Center County (USD) Brinkerhoff 2006 Line LRT Transportation (now WSP) Project to Bus Authority Rapid Transit (OCTA) (BRT) Public 9. Sloan-Ivanpah Southern Planning Parsons Task Leader Corridor Nevada Study Brinkerhoff 2006 15 Transit Regional (now WSP) Feasibility Study Transportation Commission of Southern California – Las Vegas Public 10. Green Line Rail Los Angeles $250 Los Angeles Project 1993 100 Transit Metropolitan million County Manager Extension to Transportation (USD) Transportation Norwalk Authority Commission Transportation Public (now LA Center Metro) 11. Hollywood City of Los Planning Barton- TaskLeader 1991 20 Transportation Angeles, CA Study Aschman Plan Public Associates (now Parsons Corporation) 12. Long Range City of Long Planning Barton- TaskLeader 1991 20 Transportation Beach, CA Study Aschman Plan for Long Public Associates Beach (now Parsons Corporation) 13. Community City of Los Planning Barton- Project 1991 30 Plan Revision Angeles Study Aschman Manager Circulation Public Associates Element (now Parsons Corporation)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

APPENDIX-I

Form-9 Abstract of Eligible Assignments of Key Personnel (Refer Clause 3.1)

Name of Key Personnel: Betsy Lindsay Designation: Environmental Expert S.No. Name of Name of Estimated Name of firm Designation Date of Mandays Project Client capital cost for which the of the Key completio spent of project Key Personnel on n of the (in Rs Personnel the assignme crore./ US$ worked assignment nt million)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) 1. California California More than UltraSystems Lead December 100 High-Speed High-Speed US $50 Environmental Environmental 2009 (approx.) Rail, Anaheim Rail Authority Million Inc. Expert to Los Angeles c/o STV Inc. Section 2. On-Call Metropolitan More than UltraSystems Lead March 250 Environmental Transportation US $50 Environmental Environmental 2006 (approx.) Services Authority Million Inc. Expert Contract (45+ Task Orders) 3. Metro Orange Metropolitan More than UltraSystems Lead December 45 Line (Revised Transportation US $50 Environmental Environmental 2006 (approx.) Final EIR) Authority Million Inc. Expert 4. Warner Center Metropolitan Not Known UltraSystems Lead July 2006 35 Park and Ride Transportation Environmental Environmental (approx.) Facility Authority Inc. Expert (Addendums and Modified Initial Studies) 5. Crenshaw/LAX Metropolitan More than UltraSystems Lead August 35 Transit Transportation US $50 Environmental Environmental 2014 (approx.) Corridor Authority Million Inc. Expert (Environmental Support) 6. Heart of the City of San More than UltraSystems Lead June 2007 40 City Amended Marcos US $50 Environmental Environmental (approx.) Specific Plan, Million Inc. Expert Mixed-Use Development (EIR) 7. University City of San More than UltraSystems Lead July 2008 40 Business Park Marcos US $50 Environmental Environmental (approx.) Specific Plan Million Inc. Expert (EIR) 8. Emerald County of More than UltraSystems Lead May 2007 40 Meadows Riverside c/o US $50 Environmental Environmental (approx.) Ranch Specific EMR Million Inc. Expert Plan (EIR) Residential Properties, LLC.

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. APPENDIX-I

Form-11 Eligible Assignments of Key Personnel (Refer Clause 3.1.4)

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Station Team Leader/Principal Architect

Name of the Project: Regional Connector Transit Corridor, Design-Build, LA Metro, Los Angeles, CA

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Responsible for the design of three (3) underground Description of services performed by the Key stations in downtown Los Angeles for Regional Personnel (including designation): Connector, 1st/Central, 2nd/Broadway and 2nd/Hope.

 Responsible for doing a Value Engineering exercise for all 3 stations. Based upon his experience and expertise, he was able to reduce the construction footprints of all three (3) underground stations. Type of Project Transportation: 3 Underground Stations & Tunnel Segments (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Name of client and Address: One Gateway Plaza (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90012

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs. $1.7 billion (life of Project Budget) million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 18.25 million (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 3-mile light rail tunnelled corridor with (3) underground stations.

Start date and finish date of the services April 2014- July 2017 (design complete & construction in (month/ year): progress)

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 384

Brief description of the project: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. is responsible for the design of three (3) underground stations in downtown Los Angeles. This $1.7 Billion project is a continuation of the Long Beach – Los Angeles Blue Line Transit System from the 7th and Flower Street Metro Red & Blue Line intermodal station to the Union Station in Downtown Los Angeles. It runs along Flower Street turns eastwards below 2nd Street and follows Alameda into eastern side of Union Station, in underground cut and cover and tunnel configurations. This system will ultimately connect the gold line from Pasadena/Claremont to Culver City/Santa Monica, and also to City of Long Beach and to East Los Angeles from 1st/Central (Little Tokyo/Arts District) Station, as a single ride. The challenge is to design all (3) underground stations to respond to the communities surrounding them. 2nd/Hope Station is close to the music center and the Financial Hub of Bunker Hill and will be connected from the Underground to a Plaza level by high-speed elevators, and eventually a pedestrian bridge will connect to Disney Hall and upper level of Bunker Hill. 2nd and Broadway Station lies in the historic district of Los Angeles between Spring and Broadway Streets. It serves the old financial, entertainment, and the retail district of downtown. This station also crosses over Metro Red Line tunnels posing challenges to underground station layouts, and will potentially have TOD tower above its main 2nd street entrance. 1st /Central Station lies in

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. the Little Tokyo area of Los Angeles very close to the Art District. It is surrounded by three of the most well- known Buddhist Japanese American Temples and the oldest Christian Japanese American Church. It’s in the midst of a thriving retail commercial and growing high density residential center of downtown Los Angeles. All three (3) Stations are major challenges for the layout ancillary equipment rooms and public concourses and entrances. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Design Manager and Architect of Record

Name of the Project: Kamehameha Highway Stations Group, Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transit (HART), Honolulu, HI Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

 Responsible for architecture & engineering final design Description of services performed by the Key services for Kamehameha Highway Stations Group, which Personnel (including designation): consists of: Pearl Highlands Station, Pearlridge Station and Aloha Stadium Station and H-1/H-2 Ramp.  Active in reconfiguration of structural system and architectural/engineering design, directing aesthetics and art, while ensuring constructability.  Value engineering studies at the request of the Client. Type of Project 3 Aerial Stations & Guideway Segments (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation (HART) Name of client and Address: 1099 Alakea St., Suite 1700 (indicate whether public or private) Honolulu, Hawaii 96813

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs. $120 Million (approx.) million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 11.6 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only): Part of 20-mile grade separated fixed guideway transit Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) system. November 2012-August 2015 Start date and finish date of the services (month/ year): Design complete & Construction in progress- June 2019 288 No. of days spent on the assignment

Brief description of the project: Prime Consultant responsible for architecture, structural, mechanical and electrical engineering, with civil, landscape and other engineering services done locally. The KHSG Contract consists of: Pearl Highlands Stations, Pearlridge Station, Aloha Stadium Station and the H2R2 Ramp. HART Project is a twenty (20) mile grade separated fixed guideway transit system running between East Kapolei and Ala Moana. Final Design of three complex aerial stations & a freeway ramp & coordination with guideway & systems contractors.

 Pearl Highlands Station has an elevated station structure with two-hundred forty (240)-foot long side platforms located on the triangular property bounded by Kamehameha Highway, Farrington Highway, and the H-1/H-2 interchange in the vicinity of Kuala Street at the western limits of Pearl City. This station complex includes a rail station, a bus transit center, and a parking structure that is to be constructed in two (2) phases. The first phase has the aerial station structure, transit guideway and an aerial station/bus deck 46’ above a river, making it environmentally and structurally challenging. A bus stop and kiss-and-ride is located on the shoulder of eastbound Kamehameha Highway. The station platform is at an elevation of 84’0”, the station/bus deck at 46’0” and the Farrington Highway approximately at 28’0” - in other words the platforms are 55 feet or more above street level. Other improvements include a pedestrian crossing at the Kamehameha Highway/Kuala Street intersection, sidewalks, stairs, and ramps. The Ramp H2R2 will connect in-bound Farrington Hwy to in-bound Kamehameha Hwy and provide access to the bus stop and kiss-and-ride.

 Pearlridge Station’s platform structure spans over the thirty (30) foot wide concourse bridge which

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. connects to the at-grade station entrance structures located on either side of Kamehameha Highway. A Traction Power Substation (TPSS) and a separate ancillary building housing the train control and communications room are on the site. Other equipment rooms are located on the parcel containing the Makai entrance building. The station entrance structures are connected to the platforms by this elevated pedestrian concourse bridge which straddles Kamehameha Hwy several levels above the street. The site design includes site landscaping, construction of both TPSS station ancillary facilities, driveways, site drainage and utility service connected at an interface point coordinated with the guideway design-build contractor.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Stations Team Leader/Principal Architect

Name of the Project: California High Speed Rail – Downtown Los Angeles to Palmdale Segment, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Station area master plans, urban design & site dev.  Architectural and engineering design concepts. Name of client and Address: California High Speed Rail Authority 925 L ST., Ste 1425, Sacramento, CA 95814 (indicate whether public or private)

Type of Project Metro Heavy Rail Station (Intermodal Station) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US $$1.6 billion million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 10 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Palmdale Station site - 73.17 hectares and Burbank Airport Station site – 61.3 hectares 40-mile-high speed rail corridor in tunnel, aerial, and at-grade configurations, with underground, aerial, and at-grade stations.

Start date and finish date of the services February 2010 – October 2016 (Planning and Design Phases) (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 192 Brief Description:

Palmdale Station is a multimodal station, which will potentially interface with the Western Express High Speed Rail System (in the future from Las Vegas), and the Metrolink Commuter Rail System. An adjacent Freight Rail System is its own Right of Way (ROW). This station must serve not only the city of Palmdale, but the entire surrounding regional cities.

Burbank Airport Station has (3) potential options next to the potential new Burbank Airport Terminal with the possibility of Transit Oriented Development (TOD). It has two (2) underground options and one at-grade along San Fernando Road. Developed preliminary criteria for the underground ancillary equipment areas. Resolved multiple interface issues.

After AVA completed the designs for five station sites, the Burbank to LA segment was redefined for Public Scoping in 2014 and subsequently the project section was split into two, Palmdale to Burbank and Burbank to LA. Following this, the proposed station locations were refined and included two stations, one at Palmdale and one at Burbank. The site area for the Burbank Station is approximately 90 acres, with generous portions allocated for station parking allowing up to 7,100 stalls and for potential development opportunities. The areas targeted for transit-oriented development are along the existing Hollywood Way and Winona Ave corridors, providing desirable street frontage as well as easy access to the station and adjacent parking areas. Opportunities also exist for more direct connections between the station and parking components and the transit-oriented development. Three site plan options were studied based upon different rail alignments above and below grade. Similarly, several site plans were studied for Palmdale to accommodate up to 11,300 parking stalls on approximately 180 acres. For reason to promote TOD on both sides of the alignment, a connection to both sides of the track were incorporated into the planning via a pedestrian/passenger bridge.

The stations have been designed to facilitate smooth, uninterrupted movement, with as few conflicts as

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. possible. The station layout is typically based upon right-hand movement of patrons into and out of the station, with unidirectional escalators (vertical circulation points) recommended in the direction of travel to keep the departure and arrival passenger sequences separate and conflict-free. Pedestrian paseos with easy connections between the HSR Station, future airport terminal, and the Metrolink Station were studied in the site plan for easy pedestrian and bicycle circulation.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA Designation of Key Personnel: Stations Team Leader/Principal Architect Name of the Project: Crenshaw/Expo Line Station- LAX Transit Corridor- Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Description of services performed by the Key  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Personnel (including designation):  Station area master plans, urban design, site planning and development  Architectural and engineering design concepts.  Art coordination and landscape design.  Name of client and Address: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (indicate whether public or private) (LACMTA) One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012

Type of Project Transportation: Metro Heavy Rail Station (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) (Intermodal Station)

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $2.7 Billion million or US$ million) USD $290 Million Station Cost

Capacity in million passengers per annum 5.4 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only): Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 8.5 mile light rail corridor with (3) underground stations, (4) at grade and (1) aerial station interfacing with the Los Angeles Airport People Mover. Start date and finish date of the services January, 2010-October, 2012 (month/ year): Design Phase & Construction in progress – June 2020

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 192 Brief description of the project:

Our firm is responsible for three (3) underground, (1) aerial and (4) at grade stations along a 8 ½ mile project corridor alignment. These stations interface with various ethnic neighbourhoods, and the team is preparing architectural and engineering designs to respond to the local environment. The Exposition Light Rail Line will connect to the Crenshaw LRT system to transfer passengers south for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) or north to the Purple Line Heavy Rail System. The Crenshaw LRT will connect with the existing Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport People Mover System, planned to connect various air terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Stations Team Leader/Principal Architect Crenshaw/ Martin Luther King Station- LAX Transit Name of the Project: Corridor-Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Station area master plans, urban design & site dev.  Architectural and engineering design concepts.  Art coordination and landscape design. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Name of client and Address: (LACMTA) (indicate whether public or private) One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012

Transportation: Metro Heavy Rail Station Type of Project (Intermodal Station) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) USD $$2.7 billion Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs million or US$ million) USD $300 million (Station Cost) Capacity in million passengers per annum 5.4 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 8.5 mile light rail corridor with (3) underground stations, (4) at grade and (1) aerial station interfacing with the Los Angeles Airport People Mover.

Start date and finish date of the services January, 2010-October, 2012 (month/ year): Design Phase & Construction in progress – June 2020

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 192

Brief description of the project: AVA is responsible for an underground station adjacent to the Crenshaw Retail mall and has other streetside retail uses. It is at the intersection of two (2) major roads and this generating intermodal bus transfers. The project alignment has seven or more stations in at grade, aerial and underground configurations. The Crenshaw Light Rail Transit (LRT) system is an integral part of the Regional Transportation Plan of Los Angeles County. Connectivity and mobility for the diverse Crenshaw communities are key attributes to the success. The Exposition Light Rail Line’s connectivity to the Crenshaw LRT system is a major challenge, as transit passengers from Santa Monica, Culver City and Downtown LA will transfer south for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) or north to the Purple Line Heavy Rail System. The other challenge is to connect the Crenshaw LRT to the existing Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport People Mover System planned to connect various air terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. Also, the Harbor Subdivision Transit Corridor currently under study may provide express Commuter Rail, DMU or Rapid Bus system connection between Los Angeles Union Station, LAX, and the Ports of LA and Long Beach, and ultimately the Orange County. This system would parallel the Crenshaw LRT along part of the Harbor Subdivision Corridor. There is also a possibility of a High Speed Rail connection to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) which could use part of this corridor. The challenge is the development of intermodal stations at the route terminals. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Stations Team Leader/Principal Architect

Name of the Project: Crenshaw/ Vernon Station- LAX Transit Corridor-Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Station area master plans, urban design & site dev.  Architectural and engineering design concepts.  Art coordination and landscape design. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Name of client and Address: (LACMTA) (indicate whether public or private) One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012 Transportation: Metro Heavy Rail Station Type of Project (Intermodal Station) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) US$ 2.7 billion Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs million or US$ million) US$ 250 million (Station Cost)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 5.4 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 8.5 mile light rail corridor with (3) underground stations, (4) at grade and (1) aerial station interfacing with the Los Angeles Airport People Mover.

Start date and finish date of the services January, 2010-October, 2012 (month/ year): Design Phase & Construction in progress – June 2020

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 192

Brief description AVA is responsible for an underground station with center platform, adjacent to Leimert Park and the historic Leimert Village. This is a Music and Arts District and is fast becoming an entertainment district with restaurants and retail uses. The project alignment has seven or more stations in at grade, aerial and underground configurations. The Crenshaw Light Rail Transit (LRT) system is an integral part of the Regional Transportation Plan of Los Angeles County. Connectivity and mobility for the diverse Crenshaw communities are key attributes to the success. The Exposition Light Rail Line’s connectivity to the Crenshaw LRT system is a major challenge, as transit passengers from Santa Monica, Culver City and Downtown LA will transfer south for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) or north to the Purple Line Heavy Rail System. The other challenge is to connect the Crenshaw LRT to the existing Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport People Mover System planned to connect various air terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. Also, the Harbor Subdivision Transit Corridor currently under study may provide express Commuter Rail, DMU or Rapid Bus system connection between Los Angeles Union Station, LAX, and the Ports of LA and Long Beach, and ultimately the Orange County. This system would parallel the Crenshaw LRT along part of the Harbor Subdivision Corridor. There is also a possibility of a High Speed Rail connection to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) which could use part of this corridor. The challenge is the development of intermodal stations at the route terminals. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Stations Team Leader/Principal Architect Crenshaw/Slauson; Florence/West; Florence/La Brea; Name of the Project: Florence/Hindry Stations (Four (4) At Grade Stations) Crenshaw - LAX Airport Transit Corridor-Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Station area master plans, urban design & site dev.  Architectural and engineering design concepts.  Art coordination and landscape design.

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Name of client and Address: (LACMTA) (indicate whether public or private) One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012 Transportation: Metro Heavy Rail Station Type of Project (Intermodal Station) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) USD $2.7 billion Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs million or US$ million) USD $60 million (Station Cost) Capacity in million passengers per annum 5.4 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 8.5 mile light rail corridor with (3) underground stations, (4) at grade and (1) aerial station interfacing with the Los Angeles Airport People Mover.

Start date and finish date of the services January, 2010-October, 2012 (month/ year): Design Phase & Construction in progress – June 2020

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 192

Brief description: AVA is responsible for four (4) at grade stations with center platform, along a 13.6 km rail corridor connecting to the International Airport. This is a school and residential district and is fast becoming a partial commercial district with restaurants and retail uses. The project alignment has seven or more stations in at grade, aerial and underground configurations. The Crenshaw Light Rail Transit (LRT) system is an integral part of the Regional Transportation Plan of Los Angeles County. Connectivity and mobility for the diverse Crenshaw communities are key attributes to the success. The Exposition Light Rail Line’s connectivity to the Crenshaw LRT system is a major challenge, as transit passengers from Santa Monica, Culver City and Downtown LA will transfer south for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) or north to the Purple Line Heavy Rail System. The other challenge is to connect the Crenshaw LRT to the existing Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport People Mover System planned to connect various air terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. Also, the Harbor Subdivision Transit Corridor currently under study may provide express Commuter Rail, DMU or Rapid Bus system connection between Los Angeles Union Station, LAX, and the Ports of LA and Long Beach, and ultimately the Orange County. This system would parallel the Crenshaw LRT along part of the Harbor Subdivision Corridor. There is also a possibility of a High Speed Rail connection to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) which could use part of this corridor. The challenge is the development of intermodal stations at the route terminals. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Stations Team Leader/Principal Architect AVIATION/CENTURY STATION Name of the Project: (An Aerial Station with future interface with an Airport People Mover System and a Consolidated Rental Car Facility) Crenshaw - LAX Airport Transit Corridor-Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Station area master plans, urban design & site dev.  Architectural and engineering design concepts.  Art coordination and landscape design. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Name of client and Address: (LACMTA) (indicate whether public or private) One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012

Transportation: Metro Heavy Rail Station Type of Project (Intermodal Station) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) USD $2.7 billion Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs million or US$ million) USD $110 million (Station Cost) Capacity in million passengers per annum 5.4 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 8.5 mile light rail corridor with (3) underground stations, (4) at grade and (1) aerial station interfacing with the Los Angeles Airport People Mover.

Start date and finish date of the services January, 2010-October, 2012 (month/ year): Design Phase & Construction in progress – June 2020

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 192

Brief description of the project: Our firm is responsible for three (3) underground, (1) aerial and (4) at grade stations along a 8 ½ mile project corridor alignment. These stations interface with various ethnic neighbourhoods, and the team is preparing architectural and engineering designs to respond to the local environment. The Exposition Light Rail Line will connect to the Crenshaw LRT system to transfer passengers south for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) or north to the Purple Line Heavy Rail System. The Crenshaw LRT will connect with the existing Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport People Mover System, planned to connect various air terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Team Leader/Architect of Record – Underground Station BART – EXTENSION, PRELIMINARY AND FINAL Name of the Project: ENGINEERING PHASE SVRT, San Jose, CA

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Managing the planning/design for the four (4) proposed Description of services performed by the Key underground transit stations. Personnel (including designation):  Master planning around station areas.  Coordinated all engineering issues with other consultants and developed the ancillary equipment space system.  Presented the aesthetic design concepts to Clients, Community, and Stakeholders

Type of Project Metro Heavy Rail (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).)

Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) (indicate whether public or private) 3331 North 1st Street, San Jose, CA 95134

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US $5.6 billion million or US$ million)  Alum Rock Station  Civic Center Station  Market Street Station  Amtrak Diridon Station Capacity in million passengers per annum 51 million passengers per year (system capacity) (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 7.5-mile heavy rail subway corridor

Start date and finish date of the services March 2001-February 2007 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 384 Brief Description of the Project:

Conceptual Engineering Design / MIS / EIS / EIR Phase: AVA worked closely with community groups and stakeholders on issues of route alignment, station location, entrances, traffic circulation, multi-level parking, and transit oriented development, during the conceptual engineering phase for four (4) underground stations. AVA supported the Environmental Planning phase by evaluating the proposed alternative alignments, station locations, entrances, site and station concepts for this project. Preliminary Engineering: AVA was involved with architecture and engineering design for the underground stations and tunnel, and station area planning. Station concepts, entrances, ancillary spaces, transit-oriented development, traffic circulation work and urban design scenarios are completed as a part of the Preliminary Engineering work for the system. AVA designed the complex maze of ancillary equipment spaces for each of the four underground stations and coordinated with Engineering and Systems team, developed architectural design themes for the stations. At a later stage two of the underground stations were consolidated into one Grand Downtown San Jose Station with a crossover. Stations are:  Alum Rock Station  Civic Center Station  Market Street Station  Amtrak Diridon Station

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Final Engineering: This work for final design and construction documentation began in January 2007. AVA is responsible for design and systems coordination for underground stations and for preparing aesthetic concepts for the consolidated Downtown San Jose and Diridon/Arena Stations and developing ancillary space design and coordinating contract documents for Alum Rock.

This Silicon Valley Rapid Transit (SVRT) project will extend the existing heavy rail Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) network from Fremont to the City of San Jose and to the San Jose Airport, California. This corridor is heavily congested with vehicular traffic. The MIS/EIS/EIR phase of the project evaluated twelve alternative transportation options for this project. A recommendation of a preferred alternative was approved, and the project has completed the preliminary engineering design and final design (65% Phase) has began this January 2007. Anil Verma Associates (AVA), Inc., as a part of a project engineering team, is responsible for the planning, architectural design, ancillary space design, and systems coordination of proposed underground transit stations in San Jose, California. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Design Manager/Architect of Record Diridon/Arena BART Underground Station, SVRT, San Name of the Project: Jose, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Presentation of the Diridon /Arena Stations’ Architectural Description of services performed by the Key Design Concepts and Details to Client, City, Community Personnel (including designation): Leaders and Stakeholders.  Directed the development of a three-dimensional fly thru animation.  Client coordination and design development.

Transportation: Metro Heavy Rail, Light Rail, Commuter Type of Project Rail, High Speed Rail & Bus Transit Center (Major (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Intermodal Hub) Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) (indicate whether public or private) 3331 North 1st Street, San Jose, CA 95134

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US $310 million (Station Cost) million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 1 .4 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Underground heavy rail station spanning (3) city blocks

Start date and finish date of the services February 2007 – April 2010 (month/ year):

No. of days spent on the assignment 480

Brief description of the project: This Station, at the edge of downtown takes its theme from the two major elements at its location, the HP Pavilion and the historic Diridon Station. The existing immediate environment at this station will be the result of a major redevelopment project which will be influenced by the adjacent Diridon Station and HP Pavilion. For the new Station thee functions of these existing facilities helped to guide the design themes of waves and circles evocative of movement in both transit and sports. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Design Manager/Architect of Record

Name of the Project: Downtown San Jose BART Underground Station with Crossover, SVRT, San Jose, CA

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Description of services performed by the Key  Presentation of the Downtown San Jose Stations’ Personnel (including designation): Architectural Design Concepts and Details to Client, City, Community Leaders and Stakeholders.  Aesthetic design development and engineering coordination.  Client coordination and design development.

Type of Project Metro Heavy Rail + Light Rail Interface (Intermodal (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Transfer Station)

Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) (indicate whether public or private) 3331 North 1st Street, San Jose, CA 95134

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs Approximate US $420 Million (station cost) million or US$ million) Capacity in million passengers per annum 10.8 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only): Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Underground heavy rail station and crossover spanning 4 city blocks

Start date and finish date of the services February 2007 – April 2010 (month/ year): No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 480

Brief description of the project:

The design of the Station reflects San Jose as the creative and cultural center of the city in technology and the arts as well as its rich social, cultural and architectural history. Each portal will be uniquely designed with materials, forms and scale appropriate to its context. The concourse is the space through which passengers move on their way to the boarding platform. To enrich this area a perforated metal panel ceiling displaying a continuous wave extends through the length of the concourse and symbolizes the rhythmic dynamic change over time in Silicon Valley. Passenger will move under this undulating ceiling to the elliptical openings of the stairs and escalators which will whisk them to the platform level. Enclosing the openings are curved glass guardrails that add to the smooth flow of passengers and symbolize openness to the flow of new ideas. The floor’s terrazzo finish will display an undulating pattern that is sympathetic to the curved elements in the concourse ceiling. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA Designation of Key Personnel: Principal Architect/Design Manager Name of the Project: Silicon Valley Rapid Transit (SVRT) BART Heavy Rail Extension to San Jose – Tunnel, Cross Passages, Portals, Ventilation Structures & Ancillary Equipment Structures, San Jose, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Description of services performed by the Key  Developed Architectural/Engineering Layout of two Personnel (including designation): tunnel ventilation structures, for BART Tunnel Assignment  Presented Architectural design concepts of the Tunnel Ventilation Fan, headhouses to Client, City, Community and other Stakeholders.  Design of emergency ventilation system, electrical rooms, gap breaker, and communication equipment rooms layout  Type of Project Metro Heavy Rail Ventilation Structures, Crossover & (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Ancillary Equipment Structures, Metro Heavy Rail Station

Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) (indicate whether public or private) 3331 N. 1st Street San Jose, CA 95134

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US $4.46 billion million or US$ million) Capacity in million passengers per annum 40,150,000 (for railway/metro station or airport only): Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not Applicable Start date and finish date of the services April 2004 - December 2017 (month/ year): No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 208 Brief description of the project:

The Mid-Tunnel Ventilation Structure houses two (2) Ventilation Fans, each with a 300 HP motor to ventilate tunnels during emergency and prevent accumulation of any hazardous gases. The Mid-Tunnel Ventilation Structure also houses a 1000Volt DC Switchgear which breaks the power at the Gap Breaker points for Third Rail in both tunnels to isolate Tunnels during emergency. Communications and Uninterruptible power supply equipment that provides power for Communications and Systems, and for tunnel lighting are also located at basement level. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal Architect/Design Manager

Name of the Project: Berryessa and Milpitas Station Campus Roadway and Parking Structures-Design and Engineering Services for SVBX Project, D720 BART/SVRT, San Jose, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Station area master plans, urban design & site development.  Architectural and engineering design concepts.  Art coordination and landscape design Metro Heavy Rail Intermodal Campus + Bus Transit Type of Project (Intermodal Terminal) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) Name of client and Address: 3331 N. 1st Street (indicate whether public or private) San Jose, CA 95134

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $26 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 23.6 million passengers per year (system capacity) (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not Applicable

Start date and finish date of the services February 2012 – 2018 (projected) (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 50

Brief description of the project: Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) is a heavy rail system serving the bay area communities around San Francisco. The Silicon Valley BART Extension (SVBX) Project is a current Valley Transit Authority’s Design-Build project which extends the BART system from Warm Springs to Berryessa. Under this contract AVA is planning and designing facilities within the BART station campus sites, at the Berryessa and Milpitas stations. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal Architect/Design Manager

Name of the Project: Milpitas Station - Silicon Valley Berryessa Extension (SVBX) Project-C700- Line, Track, Stations, and Systems, A Design-Build Contract, San Jose, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Station area master plans, urban design & site development.  Architectural and engineering design concepts.  Art coordination and landscape design.

Transportation: Metro Heavy Rail, Bus Transit & Light Rail Type of Project Interface (Intermodal Station, major intermodal hub) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) Name of client and Address: 3331 N. 1st Street (indicate whether public or private) San Jose, CA 95134 Estimated Cost $840 million Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs million or US$ million) Station Cost: $280 million

Capacity in million passengers per annum 37,000 (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not Applicable

Start date and finish date of the services February 2012 – June 2016 (Design Phase) (month/ year): Construction Phase: July 2018

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 360

Brief description of the project: This Milpitas Heavy Rail Station is situated on a 27-acre campus, consisting of the grade level concourse with the below grade split level boarding platforms. A pedestrian over-crossing bridge will connect the station to the existing elevated VTA light rail station. The station campus consists of a 16-bus bay transit center, the bike storage/bus operator’s facility, and the station related ancillary facilities. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal Architect/Design Manager Berryessa Station-Silicon Valley Rapid Transit (SVRT) Name of the Project: Project-C700- Line, Track, Stations, and Systems, A Design-Build Contract, San Jose, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Station area master plans, urban design & site development.  Architectural and engineering design concepts.  Art coordination and landscape design

Transportation: Metro Heavy Rail, Bus Transit Center & Type of Project Light Rail Interface (Major Intermodal Hub) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) Name of client and Address: 3331 N. 1st Street (indicate whether public or private) San Jose, CA 95134

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US $840 million million or US$ million) Station Cost: US $220 million

Capacity in million passengers per annum 25,000 daily passengers projected thru 2030 (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not Applicable

Start date and finish date of the services February 2012 – June 2016 (month/ year): Design Phase Construction Phase – July 2018 No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 280

Brief description of the project: This Berryessa Heavy Rail Station sits on fifty two (52) acre- station campus, encompassing the street level concourse with an aerial boarding center boarding platform thirty five (35) feet above ground. This BART station is the End-of-Line Facility, and has station related ancillary facilities on the site. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal Architect/Design Manager

Name of the Project: BART General Engineering Services Upgrade of Underground and Aerial Stations, Maintenance Facilities, Line Segments Station Campus Facilities, Wayside Structures, and Systems Engineering Oakland, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Architectural and engineering design concepts.  Design Review  Stakeholder Outreach Presentations Transportation: Metro Heavy Rail, Bus Transit Center & Type of Project Light Rail Interface (Major Intermodal Hub) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) Name of client and Address: 300 Lakeside Drive, 23rd Floor (indicate whether public or private) Oakland, CA 94612 Estimated Cost USD: $20 million (design only) Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not Applicable September 2011- February 2019 Start date and finish date of the services (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 280

Brief description of the project: AVA is the prime consultant on this five (5) year multiple discipline contract. The Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) heavy rail system commenced service on its first 28-mile section in September 1972. It has grown to 104 miles to serving Alameda, San Francisco, San Mateo and Contra Costa Counties and is currently being extended toward San Jose in Santa Clara County. The system is now approaching forty (40) years of service. Although modernization and upgrade projects have been in progress since the 1990’s the system is in continual need of further repair, modernization and upgrade to meet the needs of the expanding system and the growth in ridership. Accordingly, AVA’s assembled a qualified and highly experienced multi-disciplinary team to meet BART’s ongoing needs. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Design Manager/Architect of Record/Urban Designer/Inspector of Record

Name of the Project: Rio Piedras Heavy Rail Underground Station, Tren Urbano, San Juan, Puerto Rico

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Developed Architectural concepts and presented to State Description of services performed by the Key Historic Preservation Office, Community Leaders and Personnel (including designation): Stakeholders.  Coordinated three (3) levels of ancillary equipment rooms to curtail the size of underground station structures, which resulted in reducing station sizing by over eighty (80) feet and there by reducing construction costs.  Managed design activities with the Systems Consultants, Engineers and Construction Contractors, and producing detailed design documents to work with construction sequencing.  Presented design concepts to Puerto Rico’s Secretary of Transportation and Community Leaders, and Tren Urbano office to successfully keep project on schedule.

Transportation: Metro Heavy Rail Station Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Puerto Rico Highways & Transportation Authority, TUO Name of client and Address: Office (indicate whether public or private) 110 Ponce De Leon, San Juan, PR 00925 Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs. Station Cost: US $574 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 14.6 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects Deep stacked drift tunnel station spanning 3 city blocks only)

Start date and finish date of the services July 1997 – October 2009 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 270

Brief description of the project: The Rio Piedras Station is a stacked drift tunnel station with deep shafts and cut-and-cover entrances at each end. This station lies right across from the Rio Piedras Plaza in a congested part of the Historic District of the City and this has several historic and urban design considerations. AVA was responsible for the architectural design of the entire facility in the context of the existing city. The headhouses were designed to blend with the historic buildings in the vicinity, while the internal system reflected the state of the art equipment, lighting, finishes, signage etc. Our team completely redesigned the ancillary equipment spaces to cut eighty (80’) of cut-and-cover construction length from a proposed nine hundred and sixteen (916) foot station box. This had a major impact on reducing construction costs. AVA worked closely with the local Community and State Historic Preservation office to implement façade design in the station headhouse fronting this historic Plaza de Recreo. Other headhouses were designed to blend with the context of the mixed commercial and residential uses of the neighborhood. AVA had an extensive involvement during the construction phase of this station in

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. this congested neighborhood, to ensure quality and durability. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Design Manager/Architect of Record/Urban Designer/Inspector of Record

Name of the Project: University of Puerto Rico Heavy Rail Underground Station, Tren Urbano, San Juan, Puerto Rico

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Developed Architectural concepts and presented to State Description of services performed by the Key Historic Preservation Office, Community Leaders and Personnel (including designation): Stakeholders.  Coordinated the design elements with the surroundings, historical walls, fences, gates and buildings.  Worked with University of Puerto Rico staff and students to coordinate campus projects.  Managed engineers and contractors to produce construction documents which worked with construction sequencing. Metro Heavy Rail Station Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Puerto Rico Highways & Transportation Authority, TUO Name of client and Address: Office (indicate whether public or private) 110 Ponce De Leon, San Juan, PR 00925 Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs Station Cost: US $448 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 10.9 million passenger per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects Cut and Cover Underground Station spanning 3 city blocks only)

Start date and finish date of the services July 1997 – October 2009 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 240

Brief description of the project: The University of Puerto Rico (UPR) Station was a cut and cover station, with a center platform and entrances at both ends. One entrance provides access from the street level to a concourse (mezzanine with ticketing functions) and then access to the platform. This entrance is sensitively designed in the context of old historic walls and buildings. The second entrance has direct access from the street level headhouse (which has ticketing functions) to the platform. This entrance was a modern glass, steel and concrete structure which complements the newer university buildings. The ancillary equipment spaces are housed beyond the platform ends and at the mezzanine levels. The entire station configuration was changed to allow for a better ventilation system and to consolidate the station cut and cover box size. The station lies in the historic section of the University of Puerto Rico Campus and has several historic and urban design considerations.It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge

Name of the Project: Project Management Oversight (PMO) Contract  East Side Access-Grand Central Terminal Station – Extension of Long Island Railroad into Manhattan’s Grand Central Station in deep tunnel and cavern configurations  Fulton Street Underground Station – Connecting multiple rail lines, including the World Trade Center  Staten Island Ferry Intermodal Terminal Station  Atlantic Avenue Intermodal Station & Line Segment – Connecting (4) MTA subway lines, and the Long Island Commuter line.  South Ferry Intermodal Terminal Station

NYC: DOT and MTA programs/projects that received federal funds Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Responsible to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Description of services performed by the Key for the Project Management Oversight of the TEX Rail Personnel (including designation): Project connecting Fort Worth to DFW International Airport, being built by Fort Worth Transportation Authority.  Performed reviews of design criteria, Basis of Design, project scope, plans and specifications at PE and FD stages, participated in the development of project delivery methods, and recommended the use of Design-Bid-Build method of delivery.  Reviewed RFP for CMGC services and recommended the use of Independent Cost Estimator.  Reviewed the project sponsor’s technical/management capacity and capability to successfully complete the project through design, construction and commissioning, the proposed PMP for the project.  Conducted a Risk Assessment Review covering the project scope, cost and schedule, and recommended the FFGA Award. Transportation: Metro Light Rail, Commuter Rail, High Type of Project Speed Rail & Bus Transit Center (Major Intermodal Hub) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: US Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Region II (indicate whether public or private) One Bowling Green Rm 429 New York, NY 10004

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs. USD $22 billion (estimate of all projects) million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum  Staten Island Ferry Terminals, NYCDOT (for railway/metro station or airport only): 21 million passengers per year  Atlantic Avenue, Intermodal Stations, NYCT 15 million passengers per year  Fulton Street Transit Center (FSTC), MTAACCC 20 million passengers per year  South Ferry Terminal (SoFe), MTACCC

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. 6 million passengers per year  East Side Access (ESA), MTACCC 42.2 million passengers per year

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not applicable October 1990 – February 2007 Start date and finish date of the services (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 125

Brief description of the project: Project Management Oversight (PMO) Contract – NYC: DOT and MTA Programs/Projects: East Side Access – Grand Central Terminal - East Side Access project will connect Long Island Rail Road’s (LIRR) Main and Port Washington lines in Queens to a new LIRR terminal beneath Grand Central Terminal in Manhattan in a deep tunnel and cavern (station) configuration. This will increase LIRR’s capacity into Manhattan, shorten travel time for Long Island and eastern Queens commuters travelling to Manhattan, provide a new commuter rail station in Sunnyside Queens.

Staten Island Ferry Terminals – New Whitehall Ferry Terminal is an 180,000-square-foot intermodal terminal on the southern tip of Manhattan, incorporating 3 slips for the Staten Island Ferry and marine craft facilities, including connections to 2 subway stations, a terminal for 3 bus lines, taxis space for 96 bicycles. St. George Ferry Terminal occupies approximately 7 acres incorporates mass transit and commuter services.

Atlantic Avenue – One of the largest intermodal stations within NYCT’s subway system interfacing with the LIRR. The project included reconstruction of Atlantic Avenue stations on IRT and BMT lines, Pacific Street Station at 4th Avenue, transfer passageway between 3 stations & rehabilitation of LIRR terminal station at Flatbush avenue. South Ferry Terminal – The SoFe project consists of the design & construction of a 2 level station on a new alignment to replace the functionally deficit station on the IRT Nos. 1 & 9 lines. The existing station is used by 5 million people each year, & the projected ridership for 2025 is over 6 million. The primary segments include the Tunnel Bellmouth – A reconstruction, widening of existing subway to support new track alignment, Approach tunnel & the Terminal Station.

Fulton Street Transit Center – Subway station connecting (12) existing heavy rail lines with the World Trade Center Path and MTA Station.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Chief Architect/Team Leader San Fernando Valley Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Corridor, Name of the Project: Orange Line, Los Angeles, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Landscape Architecture Design Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Construction Contract Documents  Owners Representative Transportation: Railway Station, Metro Station, Bus Rapid Type of Project Transit Terminal/ Station (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Name of client and Address: One Gateway Plaza (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90012

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $461.9 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 7.7 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 14-mile Bus Rapid Transit Corridor with 12 stations only)

Start date and finish date of the services May 2001– December 2006 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 350

Brief description of the project: This a fourteen (14) mile Bus Rapid Transit Corridor-Design Build Contract, connecting North Hollywood Metro Rail Station to Warner Center in the San Fernando Valley. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge Ramona Boulevard Grade Separation Project Name of the Project:

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Reviewed design and construction sequencing Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Reviewed progress of work in comparison to established base schedules  Ensured Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) procedures were followed  Metro Rail, Commuter Rail, High Speed Rail & Bus Type of Project Transit Stations (Intermodal) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority (ACE) Name of client and Address: 4900 Rivergrade Road, Suite A120 (indicate whether public or private) Irwindale, CA 91706

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $60.32 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects Not applicable only)

Start date and finish date of the services April 2004 – May 2008 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 30

Brief description of the project: The Ramona Boulevard Grade Separation Project will require Ramona Boulevard be lowered approximately 26 feet beneath the existing railroad tracks. Two bridges will be built to carry railroad traffic over the depressed Ramona Boulevard, which includes pedestrian, and motorist safety improvements and walkways with protective railing It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge Brea Canyon Raod Grade Separation Project Name of the Project:

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $61.8 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 4.8 hectares only) February 2006 -March 2007 Start date and finish date of the services (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 30

Brief description of the project: The Brea Canyon Road grade separation project will require Brea Canyon Road to be lowered beneath the existing railroad tracks with a railroad bridge constructed to carry trains over the roadway. Portions of Washington Street and Currier Road will be lowered at their intersections with Brea Canyon Road. The newly configured Brea Canyon road will include several pedestrian and motorist safety improvements, such as walkways with protective railing It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge Nogales Street Grade Separation Project Name of the Project:

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD: $73.63 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects Not applicable only)

Start date and finish date of the services March 2005 – December 2006 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 30

Brief description of the project: The grade separation of Nogales Street under the railroad tracks and Valley Boulevard required Nogales Street to be lowered approximately 20 feet. Two bridges were built to carry motorists and trains over Nogales Street. A loop connector road replaced the former intersection of Nogales and Valley. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Team Leader/Chief Architect

Name of the Project: Auburn Commuter Rail Station and Transit Center

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Interfaced with City officials, Community Task Force, Description of services performed by the Key County Bus Agency, and Sound Transit (Client) Personnel (including designation):  Presented architectural design concepts to all groups and other stakeholders for approval.  Directed design efforts and engineering coordination Transportation: Railway Station, Metro Station, Commuter Type of Project Rail Bus Terminal/Station (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Sound Transit Name of client and Address: 401 S. Jackson St. (indicate whether public or private) Seattle, WA 98104

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $29.7 million million or US$ million) 2.1 million passengers per year Capacity in million passengers per annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects Not Applicable only)

Start date and finish date of the services July 1998-July 2006 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 320

Brief description of the project: The station and transit center was a joint development project which consists of a major commuter rail station, a bus transit center, retail shops, kiss-n-ride areas, two parking structures for over 1,000 cars and commercial redevelopment adjacent to several new access ramps to Freeway SR18. A pedestrian bridge soaring 28’0” clear above the rail tracks connects the parking structures on the east and west sides of the track. A plaza becomes the center point of development by aligning with First Street and by using an architecturally imposing canopy structure to become a focal point of the station. The canopy structure is composed of multiple glass and steel pyramids cascading up to support an elegant four (4) sided clock. The base of the glass pyramids is surrounded by corbels which house lighting fixtures, creating a very dramatic and festive effect at night. The theme of the pyramid is derived form the teepees (tents) of American Indian tribes which lived in the region, and are also reflective of the European and Japanese influences. This theme is followed throughout the station complex It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge

Name of the Project: INSPECTION OF STRUCTURES – PS39241892 LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Description of services performed by the Key AVA responsibilities included: In-service structural, and Personnel (including designation): safety inspection services for LACMTA’s heavy and light rail transit facilities. LACMTA’s transit facilities include four major public rail lines in across Los Angeles County (Redline, Blueline, Greenline and Goldline).

Type of Project Transportation: Railway Station, Metro Station, Bus (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Terminal/Station

Name of client and Address: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (indicate whether public or private) (LACMTA) – formerly (LACTC) One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles 90012

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $11.4 million million or US$ million) Capacity in million passengers per annum 99.79 million passengers per year systemwide (for railway/metro station or airport only): Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects Not applicable only) Start date and finish date of the services September 2011 - March 2017 (month/ year): No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 150 Brief description of the project:

Scope of work included the structural inspection, evaluation, and reporting of all underground and above ground railroad structures including cut-and-cover concrete box and circular tunnels, underground stations and aerial stations with canopies, retaining walls, pedestrian overpass bridges, aerial structures, and steel and reinforced concrete bridges.

All structures and related elements were visually inspected during rail operation and non-operation hours during day time for above ground facilities and night time for below grade facilities. Observations and findings were professionally documented, and detailed structural observation/structural defect reports were generated to update the previously generated database. This is a PUC requirement that requires agencies (LACMTA) to retain such services periodically to assure the quality and safety of the transit system. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge MQ055 Structural Inspection Services Light Rail and Name of the Project: Heavy Rail Systems, Metro Red, Blue, Green Lines, LACMTA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Description of services performed by the Key Overseeing AVA’s: Personnel (including designation):  Review and inspections of underground stations, ancillary equipment spaces, tunnels, cross passages of Metro Red Line Heavy Rail System.  Review and inspection of aerial and at-grade stations bridges and tracks of Green, Blue and Gold Line Light Rail Systems.  Detailed reporting of architectural/structural flaws determined by inspections. Transportation: Railway Station, Metro Station, Bus Type of Project Terminal/Station (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Name of client and Address: (LACMTA) – formerly (LACTC) (indicate whether public or private) One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles 90012

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$ 13.89 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 99,791,000 in all systems (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects Not applicable only)

Start date and finish date of the services September 2002-March 2006 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 125

Brief description of the project: Projects included inspection of heavy rail and light rail transit facilities to verify the structural integrity of operating and non-operating segment rail structures, trackways, parking structures, intermodal facilities, maintenance shops and storage facilities, underground and overhead structures, passenger stations, train and yard control facilities, central controls and communications facilities, transmission support structures, including steel bridges and reinforced concrete bridges. All structures were meticulously inspected during rail operation and non-operation hours during the day time and night time. Detailed-Inspection findings were used to create a database for remedial action and deficiency removal. This is a PUC requirement that mandates LACMTA to perform periodic inspections to ensure structural soundness for safe operations.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge Name of the Project: TOTEM LAKE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, Kirkland, WA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Description of services performed by the Key Overseeing: Personnel (including designation):  Planning  Architecture  Landscape Design  Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing (MEP) Engineering  LEED Sustainability Compliance Services

Type of Project Urban Planning: Mixed Use Development (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Planning, Architecture, Landscape Design, Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing (MEP) Engineering, & LEED Sustainability Compliance Services

Name of client and Address: Fairfield Development (indicate whether public or private) 5510 Morehouse Road San Diego, CA 92121

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $85 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 4.2 Hectares only)

Start date and finish date of the services February 2016 – On-going till November 2020 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 18

Brief description of the project: Totem Lake is a five-story infill housing project at an old commercial retail mall that has been demolished to make room for 700 apartment homes on a 4.2 hectare sites. This complex is designed to have ground level retail along the street frontage with a central public gathering plaza, a multiplex movie theatre, and five large amenity courtyards above a below grade parking structure.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge

Name of the Project: Marshall Squares Mixed Use TOD Apartments, San Jose, CA

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Description of services performed by the Key Overseeing: Personnel (including designation):  Planning  Architecture  Landscape Design  Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing (MEP) Engineering  LEED Sustainability Compliance Services

Name of client and Address: Fairfield Development (indicate whether public or private) 5510 Morehouse Road San Diego, CA 92121

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $125 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 2.5 hectares only)

Start date and finish date of the services April 2014 – ongoing till November 2019 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 25 Brief description of the project:

Marshall Squares Mixed-Use Transit Oriented Development (TOD) (Apartments and retail) is a four-story infill apartment project with two-stories of below ground parking and street level retail. This project is located close to the San Jose Light Rail Transit Station and providing direct access to commuters to Downtown.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge Aviation Apartment Development/Transit Oriented Name of the Project: Development (TOD), Inglewood, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Overseeing: Description of services performed by the Key  Planning Personnel (including designation):  Architecture  Landscape Design  Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing (MEP) Engineering  LEED Sustainability Compliance Services Urban Planning: Mixed Use Development Type of Project Planning, Architecture, Landscape Design, Mechanical, (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Electrical and Plumbing (MEP) Engineering, & LEED Sustainability Compliance Services Fairfield Development Name of client and Address: 5510 Morehouse Road (indicate whether public or private) San Diego, CA 92121

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US $125 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 2.3 hectares only)

Start date and finish date of the services October 2013 – February 2017 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 20

Brief description of the project: Aviation Apartments is a five-story infill housing project located within the County of Los Angeles. This is located adjacent to LA Metro’s Aviation Green Line Light Rail Transit (LRT) Station on Aviation Boulevard, and close to Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), which created an opportunity to redevelop and provide Transit Oriented Development (TOD) housing. The area is quickly transforming into a significant hub as the Crenshaw LAX Light Rail Corridor line. AVA also lead station design and helped study Transit Oriented Development (TOD) opportunities, and the future connection to Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). The site is approximately 5.75 Acres and has a total of 265 Units in a 5-Story Apartment building wrapped around a 6-story parking garage. Courtyard spaces are enhanced with decorative concrete patterns and animated with colorful furniture and large custom container pots creating an eclectic flare. Outside the recreation center, a swimming pool, spa, and barbecue areas are provided. Plant materials were selected for year-round color and ease of maintenance. Trees and shrubs were placed for public space canopy and to provide privacy for those ground floor tenants. AVA provided design services to the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) developer and directed the open space planning and site design for the Aviation Apartment project. Our multi-family housing projects go the extra mile in design, featuring beautiful courtyards with tall and mature gardens that have an immediate aesthetic impact as well as long-lasting appeal. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge

Name of the Project: VISTA CANYON MULTIMODAL CENTER (METROLINK STATION), Santa Clarita, CA

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Overseeing: Description of services performed by the Key  Planning Personnel (including designation):  Architecture  Landscape Design  Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing (MEP) Engineering  LEED Sustainability Compliance Services Urban Planning: Mixed Use Development/ Transit Oriented Type of Project Development (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) City of Santa Clarita Name of client and Address: 23920 Valencia Blvd. (indicate whether public or private) Santa Clarita, CA 91355

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$26 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 10,950,000 projected by 2030 (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 4.2 hectares only)

Start date and finish date of the services December 2016 – January 2021 (Design & Construction (month/ year): Phases)

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 65

Brief description of the project: As one of the first location in California where gold was found, and it occurred near this station site. The design character reflects a gold strike theme as well as California rustic architectural detailing reflecting the surrounding Master Plan Community. The “California Gold Rush” theme for the station design reflects it unique location in Southern California, and becomes a nucleus for development of new communities within the Master Plan. As part of changing to a double track project, a center platform has been designed including planting, canopies, ramps and stairs, and accessed by a pedestrian underpass. The entrance plaza, site lighting, landscape irrigation and drainage are also included. AVA provided Architecture, Landscape design, Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing (MEP), and LEED Compliance services. AVA is preparing paperwork for the station in anticipation to submit for a Gold LEED Sustainability rating. Anil Verma Associates, Inc. (AVA) is contracted by the City of Santa Clarita to design this new station as a part of the Vista Canyon Master Plan Community. AVA provided station architectural, lighting, signage, and landscape design, as well as Mechanical, Plumbing, and Electrical engineering

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge

Name of the Project: REGIONAL INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION CENTER, PROJECT NO. E10-07, Burbank, CA

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Overseeing: Description of services performed by the Key Planning; Architecture, Landscape Design,; Mechanical, Personnel (including designation): Electrical and Plumbing (MEP) Engineering; LEED Sustainability Compliance Services Urban Planning: Transit Oriented Development Type of Project Commercial/Retail? (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority Name of client and Address: 2800 N. Clybourn (indicate whether public or private) Burbank, CA 91505

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $169 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 30 hectares only)

Start date and finish date of the services July 2010 – July 2011 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 65

Brief description of the project: The Regional Intermodal Transportation Center (RITC) project consists of (8) primary components, a combined Consolidated Rental Car Facility and Transit Center, a Replacement Parking Structure, a sloping elevated covered Pedestrian Walkway with a moving sidewalk, an Elevated Bridge over Empire Avenue, an accessible Compressed Natural Gas Facility, dedicated parking for Metrolink and Amtrak passengers, a Ground Access Center, and a series of bicycle racks. The Consolidated Rental Car Facility accommodates (6) or more rental car companies and rental car counter space, public restrooms, vertical access (including elevators, escalators and stairways), ready-return spaces, and a common Quick-Turn-Around (QTA) facility for vehicle fueling, washing and cleaning. The Transit Center will provide an elevated drop-off for Metro Transit buses, Amtrak buses, local buses, and rental car buses. Solar panels are provided on the roof to reduce electrical demands by the facility. The total building area is 836,174 sq. ft. The Replacement Parking is a concrete structure with several levels consisting of 220,600 sq. ft. The elevated covered Pedestrian Walkway interconnects the existing Airport Passenger Terminal to the Replacement Parking Structure and the RITC. The total area of the walkways is 46,633 sq. ft. An elevated bridge over Empire Avenue and the adjacent railway tracks connects the RITC with the Metrolink/Amtrak Train Station. Dedicated parking for Metrolink and Amtrak passengers is provided through the acquisition of Union Pacific Railroad land, and the project includes the improvement of the Runway Safety Area associated with Runway 15-33. Prime Consultant for this (30) acre fast track Regional Intermodal Transportation Center (RITC) which includes local and regional buses, Rental Car Facility, Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility, and Pedestrian Bridges/Walkways connecting the RITC and Commercial Parking Structure to the Airport and the Metrolink Commuter Rail Train Station. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC), Los Name of the Project: Angeles CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Construction Management  Selection of appropriate, durable and maintainable finish materials, and the development of creative detailing.  Project Controls, Scheduling, Estimating, and Cost Description of services performed by the Key Engineering. Personnel (including designation):  Architectural and engineering constructability reviews.  Client liaison and coordination.  Contract Management, Office Engineering, Inspection, Contractibility reviews, Value Engineering, RFI reviews, Project Close-out. Type of Project Educational Institution (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC) 400 West Washington Boulevard (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90015

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $748 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 25,000 students (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 18.2 hectares only)

Start date and finish date of the services May 2002 – October 2014 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 240

Brief description of the project: Los Angeles Trade Technical College is one of nine Los Angeles Community College District campuses undergoing extensive modernization under the $2.1B Proposition A / AA and $3.5B Measure J Bond Programs in order to accommodate increased student enrollment. The funding for LATTC includes $650M under Proposition A / AA Bond and $350M under the Measure J Bond Program. AVA is responsible for all design and construction phase project management services for LATTC. At LATTC, AVA is currently managing the design and construction of four major sustainable projects, which between them are proceeding forward to obtain LEED certifications for a total of five (5) buildings, including two (2) Gold or Platinum, one (1) Silver and two (2) Certified. The LATTC campus Bond Program work will be designed and built in several phases. This includes programming, schematic design, design development, construction document preparation and construction management. The specific assignments for AVA include selection and management of design teams followed by the selection and management of the construction contractors. The AVA Team provides supervision of contractors to ensure that the projects are built in strict adherence to quality control and are completed within budget and schedule constraints. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge

Name of the Project: Building “A” Modernization and Restoration Project

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Architectural/Engineering Description of services performed by the Key  Constructability Reviews. Personnel (including designation):  Construction sequencing and coordination.  Phasing construction during campus operating hours. Type of Project Educational Institution (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC) 400 West Washington Boulevard (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90015

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $45 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 25,000 students (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 3 hectares only)

Start date and finish date of the services June 2008-December 2010 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment AllLATTCprojectscombinedwere756-mandays

Brief description of the project: Building ‘A’ consists of three contiguous buildings constructed at different times from 1924 through 1935 and for multiple purposes. The building currently houses an historic theater, a classroom wing and an administration building. The scope of work consists of remodeling and seismic upgrade of the existing 73,000 gross square foot building together with the addition of new north and south courtyards and utilities, including a structural upgrade of the existing Grand Avenue Theater. In addition, Building ‘A’ is considered a Historic Resource Structure for the purposes of CEQA. Therefore, the repair of any portion of Building ‘A’ is to be conducted in a manner consistent with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards. The AVA management team will closely monitor the project schedule and all historic compliance requirements throughout the duration of the project to meet critical deadlines. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge

Name of the Project: Learning Resource Center, LATTC

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Planning  Programming  Concept design Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Final design  Managing the construction and delivery of LEED Certified Library / Learning Resource Center (70,000 sq. ft. - major renovation and 15,000 sq. ft. - new construction). Type of Project Urban Planning: Educational Institution (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC) 400 West Washington Boulevard (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90015 Dr. Roland Chapdelaine Name, telephone no. and fax no. of client’s (Former College President-Retired) representative: Tel: (213) 703-0370 Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $60 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 2 hectares only)

Start date and finish date of the services February 2007 – February 2015 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 70

Brief description of the project: The LATTC Library / Learning Resource Center building renovation will allow for more efficient utilization of space to meet demands of future student enrollment. The project includes approximately 70,000 sq. ft. of major renovation and 15,000 sq. ft of new construction. Major components of the LRC project include the proposed build-out of new enclosed floor area at the first and second floors, updated restroom facilities as well as removal of the existing south wall of the basement to provide for new entry access and natural light. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and corresct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge

Name of the Project: Culinary Arts Facility Project, LATTC

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Architectural/Engineering Description of services performed by the Key  Constructability reviews. Personnel (including designation):  Construction sequencing and coordination.  Phasing construction during campus operating hours Type of Project  Urban Planning: Educational Institution (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC) 400 West Washington Boulevard (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90015 Dr. Roland Chapdelaine Name, telephone no. and fax no. of client’s (Former College President-Retired) representative: Tel: (213) 703-0370 Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $60 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 3 hectares only)

Start date and finish date of the services November 2008-July 2014 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 50

Brief description of the project: The Culinary Arts at the LATTC Campus is an internationally award winning popular program. The facilities are is in need of modernization and expansion to meet projected increased student enrollment. Currently the building houses classrooms for other programs. The proposed renovation dedicates the entire building to Culinary Arts, Baking and Hospitality, including new instruction studios and state-of-the-art culinary equipment along with a restaurant at the street level.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge

Name of the Project: Olive Street Parking Structure Design/Build, LATTC

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $14 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 1.5 hectares only)

Start date and finish date of the services October 2003-December 2008 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 60

Brief description of the project: The LATTC Campus student population has grown over the past two decades but parking spaces have not. This is the first design/build above ground parking structure project being built to mitigate parking shortage. The structure is a five story (six level) parking structure with 804 parking spaces. This is a Type 1, post tensioned concrete structure. The total square footage per floor is 42,000 sq ft. with a total of 250,000 sq. ft. for the entire structure. A z-blade screen adorns sections of the façade along Olive Street above the vehicular entrance to the parking structure. The roof top has been designed to carry photovoltaic panels in the future. The parking structure has two elevators facing the campus entrance on Grand Avenue. The parking structure has equipped comprehensive communication system, including telephone, data, and security systems to ensure emergency communication to sheriff station for the safety of the students and faculties at all times with emergency blue phones and CCTV monitoring cameras at each parking level. The parking structure also has fire alarm system connecting to main campus command control center. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge

South Campus Project – Administration Building & Name of the Project: Technology Building, LATTC

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Planning  Programming Description of services performed by the Key  Concept design Personnel (including designation):  Final design  Managing the construction and delivery of two (2) five (5) story state of the art building projects. Type of Project  Urban Planning: Educational Institution (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC) 400 West Washington Boulevard (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90015

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $111.38 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 4 hectares only)

Start date and finish date of the services January 2006-March 2010 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 120

Brief description of the project: The design-bid build delivery project consisted of two five-story buildings with more than 124,000 square feet of administrative offices, admissions and records, student services, personnel and payroll, lecture halls, classrooms, auditoriums, faculty offices, department offices, computer facilities & preparation kitchen. The project consisted of the Technology Classroom building (66,228 sq. ft) & Student Services building (56,302 sq/ ft.) Other features of the South Campus project include a utility building (1,800 sq. ft.) & extensive landscaping all across the site which is several acres at southeast corner of the Campus. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge

Name of the Project: Child Development Center (CDC)

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Architectural/Engineering Description of services performed by the Key  Constructability Reviews. Personnel (including designation):  Construction sequencing and coordination.  Phasing construction during campus operating hours. Type of Project  Urban Planning: Educational Institution (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC) 400 West Washington Boulevard (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90015

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $12.6 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 100 Children (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 1 hectare only)

Start date and finish date of the services September 2002-September 2012 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 40

Brief description of the project: The LATTC CDC is a 14, 500 square feet, two stories, Type V, steel framed new construction project, which will operate as a teaching facility as well as a Child Care Center. It is comprised of classrooms, administrative offices, food service and playground areas. The entire building will house the Child Development Program and will expand to have infant care as well. AVA has temporarily located the CDC in trailers in another location on Campus, while the new facility is under construction. The Child Development Center project is on an aggressive schedule to meet deadlines required to utilize appropriated State funds. The AVA management team will closely monitor the project schedule and all state child care facility compliance requirements throughout the duration of the project to meet critical deadlines. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge

Name of the Project: Construction Technology Building (CTB)

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Architectural/Engineering Description of services performed by the Key  Constructability Reviews. Personnel (including designation):  Construction sequencing and coordination.  Phasing construction during campus operating hours. Type of Project  Urban Planning: Educational Institution (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC) 400 West Washington Boulevard (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90015

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $120 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 2.38 hectares only)

Start date and finish date of the services November 2008 – on-going until January 2023 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 20

Brief description of the project: The CTB is a 160,000 SF 3-story LEED Gold Building with fully a occupied roof on a 3.5 acre urban site. The various façades of the building include face brick, aluminum panels, cement plaster storefront glazing, and metal sun shades connects uniformly with the other new campus buildings across a major street. Building contains main lobby, administration, 20 laboratories and 23 classrooms with maximum flexibility without structural changes.

Anil Verma Associates, as Campus Project Manager, specifically worked through planning, Design and Construction Management phases for this $120M Design-Build project, including preparation of Request for Proposals, Design-builder selection and award, and issuance of Notice to Proceed with Design on November 15, 2012. AVA managed the Design-build process through design milestone submittals with agency approval and specialty service design consultants, including technical and constructability reviews. AVA managed construction of this project through site work and of building structures, including relocation of operational facilities and partial closeout of services. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Anil Verma, FAIA Name of Key Personnel: Principal-in-Charge Designation of Key Personnel: East Parking Structure (EPS), LATTC Name of the Project: Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Architectural/Engineering Description of services performed by the Key  Constructability Reviews. Personnel (including designation):  Construction sequencing and coordination.  Phasing construction during campus operating hours. Type of Project  Urban Planning: Educational Institution (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC) Name of client and Address: 400 West Washington Boulevard (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90015

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs million or US$ million) USD $55 million

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 1 hectares only)

Start date and finish date of the services (month/ year): May 2009-June 2017

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 20

Brief description of the project: The EPS is 1,000 stall 6-story parking structure net zero energy building with storage on a 1.48 acre (hectare) urban site. By its material palette, it visually connects with construction technology building and new campus building across a major street A car counting system is provided with no parking on access ramps.

Anil Verma Associates, as Campus Project Manager, specifically worked thru planning, design and Construction Management phases for this $55-million Design-build project, including preparation of Request for Proposal, Design-builder selection and award, and issuance of Notice to Proceed with design on November 15, 2012. AVA managed the Design-Build process through design milestone submittals through agency approval with specialty service design consultants, including technical and constructability reviews and managing the construction through site work and completion of building structures, including relocation and closeout

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Anil Verma, FAIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

APPENDIX-I

Form-11 Eligible Assignments of Key Personnel (Refers to Clause 3.1.4)

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Project Manager/Lead Architect Regional Connector Transit Corridor, Design-Build, LA Name of the Project: Metro, Los Angeles, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

 Responsible for the design of three (3) underground Description of services performed by the Key stations in downtown Los Angeles for Regional Personnel (including designation): Connector, 1st/Central, 2nd/Broadway and 2nd/Hope.  Responsible for doing a Value Engineering exercise for all 3 stations and was, based upon his experience and expertise, able to reduce the footprints of the stations significantly by simplifying the design by reconfiguring the Ancillary Room without sacrificing the functionality or violating the Metro Design Criteria.  Supervised the progress of the Architectural Drawings from the beginning to the end and was heavily involved in not only the Intra Discipline coordination but also in the Inter Discipline coordination and dealing with Civil, Structure, Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Fire Protection, Fire Detection and Communications  Actively involved with the Construction Administration of the above-mentioned stations. 3 Underground Stations and Tunnel Segments Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Name of client and Address: One Gateway Plaza (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90012

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs. $1.7 billion (life of Project Budget) million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 18.25 million (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not applicable Start date and finish date of the services April 2014- July 2017 (design complete & construction in (month/ year): progress)

720 No. of days spent on the assignment

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Long Beach and to East Los Angeles from 1st/Central (Little Tokyo/Arts District) Station, as a single ride.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Chief Architect/Planner Kamehameha Highway Stations Group, Honolulu Name of the Project: Authority for Rapid Transit (HART), Honolulu, HI

Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Name of Consulting Firm where employed:

 Architecture and Engineering final design services for Description of services performed by the Key Pearl Highlands Station, Pearlridge Station, and Aloha Personnel (including designation): Stadium Stations.  Responsible for the entire design and construction contract documents for the Pearl Highlands Station, as this is a very complex facility, from the architectural design and structural engineering stand point. Transportation: 3 Aerial Stations and Guideway Segments Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation (HART) Name of client and Address: 1099 Alakea St., Suite 1700 (indicate whether public or private) Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Cost: $120 million (approx.) Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs. million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 34,675,000 (forecasted) (for railway/metro station or airport only): Part of 20-mile grade separated fixed guideway transit Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) system. November 2012-August 2015 Start date and finish date of the services (month/ year): Design complete & Construction in progress- June 2019 288 No. of days spent on the assignment

Brief description of the project: AVA is the Prime Consultant responsible for architecture, structural, mechanical and electrical engineering, with civil, landscape and other engineering services done locally. The KHSG Contract consists of: Pearl Highlands Stations, Pearlridge Station, Aloha Stadium Station and the H2R2 Ramp. HART Project is a twenty (20) mile grade separated fixed guideway transit system running between East Kapolei and Ala Moana. AVA was responsible for the Final Design of three complex aerial stations & a freeway ramp & coordination with guideway & systems contractors.  Pearl Highlands Station has an elevated station structure with two-hundred forty (240)-foot long side platforms located on the triangular property bounded by Kamehameha Highway, Farrington Highway, and the H-1/H-2 interchange in the vicinity of Kuala Street at the western limits of Pearl City. This station complex includes a rail station, a bus transit center, and a parking structure that is to be constructed in two (2) phases. The first phase has the aerial station structure, transit guideway and an aerial station/bus deck 46’ above a river, making it environmentally and structurally challenging. A bus stop and kiss-and-ride is located on the shoulder of eastbound Kamehameha Highway. The station platform is at an elevation of 84’0”, the station/bus deck at 46’0” and the Farrington Highway approximately at 28’0” - in other words the platforms are 55 feet or more above street level. Other improvements include a pedestrian crossing at the Kamehameha Highway/Kuala Street intersection, sidewalks, stairs, and ramps. The Ramp H2R2 will connect in-bound Farrington Hwy to in-bound Kamehameha Hwy and provide access to the bus stop and kiss-and-ride.

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

communications room are on the site. Other equipment rooms are located on the parcel containing the Makai entrance building. The station entrance structures are connected to the platforms by this elevated pedestrian concourse bridge which straddles Kamehameha Hwy several levels above the street. The site design includes site landscaping, construction of both TPSS station ancillary facilities, driveways, site drainage and utility service connected at an interface point coordinated with the guideway design-build contractor.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Station Planner/ Architect Crenshaw/Expo Line Station- LAX Transit Corridor- Name of the Project: Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

 Developing station designs & area master plans. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Locating stations and developing layouts.  Aerial and underground station concepts.  Developing construction methodology for underground stations. Transportation: Metro Heavy Rail Station Type of Project (Intermodal Station) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Name of client and Address: (LACMTA) (indicate whether public or private) One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $2.7 Billion million or US$ million) USD $290 Million Station Cost 5.4 million passengers per year Capacity in million passengers per annum (for railway/metro station or airport only): 8.5 mile light rail corridor with (3) underground stations, (4) Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) at grade and (1) aerial station interfacing with the Los Angeles Airport People Mover. Start date and finish date of the services January, 2010-October, 2012 (month/ year): Design Phase & Construction in progress – June 2020 96 No. of days spent on the assignment Brief description of the project:

Our firm is responsible for three (3) underground, (1) aerial and (4) at grade stations along a 8 ½ mile project corridor alignment. These stations interface with various ethnic neighbourhoods, and the team is preparing architectural and engineering designs to respond to the local environment. The Exposition Light Rail Line will connect to the Crenshaw LRT system to transfer passengers south for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) or north to the Purple Line Heavy Rail System. The Crenshaw LRT will connect with the existing Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport People Mover System, planned to connect various air terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. . It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Planner/Architect Crenshaw/ Martin Luther King Station- LAX Transit Name of the Project: Corridor-Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Developing station designs & area master plans. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Locating stations and developing layouts. Transportation: Metro Heavy Rail Station Type of Project (Intermodal Station) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Name of client and Address: (LACMTA) (indicate whether public or private) One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012 USD $2.7 billion Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs million or US$ million) USD $300 million (Station Cost) Capacity in million passengers per annum 5.4 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 8.5 mile light rail corridor with (3) underground stations, (4) at grade and (1) aerial station interfacing with the Los Angeles Airport People Mover.

Start date and finish date of the services January, 2010-October, 2012 (month/ year): Design Phase & Construction in progress – June 2020 No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 120

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Planner/Architect Crenshaw/ Vernon Station- LAX Transit Corridor-Light Name of the Project: Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Developing station designs & area master plans. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Locating stations and developing layouts. Transportation: Metro Heavy Rail Station Type of Project (Intermodal Station) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Name of client and Address: (LACMTA) (indicate whether public or private) One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012 USD $2.7 billion Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs. million or US$ million) USD $250 million (Station Cost) Capacity in million passengers per annum 5.4 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not Applicable

Start date and finish date of the services January, 2010-October, 2012 (month/ year): Design Phase & Construction in progress – June 2020

No. of days spent on the assignment 80

Brief description of the project: AVA is responsible for an underground station with center platform, adjacent to Leimert Park and the historic Leimert Village. This is a Music and Arts District and is fast becoming an entertainment district with restaurants and retail uses. The project alignment has seven or more stations in at grade, aerial and underground configurations. The Crenshaw Light Rail Transit (LRT) system is an integral part of the Regional Transportation Plan of Los Angeles County. Connectivity and mobility for the diverse Crenshaw communities are key attributes to the success. The Exposition Light Rail Line’s connectivity to the Crenshaw LRT system is a major challenge, as transit passengers from Santa Monica, Culver City and Downtown LA will transfer south for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) or north to the Purple Line Heavy Rail System. The other challenge is to connect the Crenshaw LRT to the existing Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport People Mover System planned to connect various air terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. Also, the Harbor Subdivision Transit Corridor currently under study may provide express Commuter Rail, DMU or Rapid Bus system connection between Los Angeles Union Station, LAX, and the Ports of LA and Long Beach, and ultimately the Orange County. This system would parallel the Crenshaw LRT along part of the Harbor Subdivision Corridor. There is also a possibility of a High Speed Rail connection to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) which could use part of this corridor. The challenge is the development of intermodal stations at the route terminals. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Planner/Architect Crenshaw/Slauson; Florence/West; Florence/La Brea; Name of the Project: Florence/Hindry Stations (Four (4) At Grade Stations) Crenshaw - LAX Airport Transit Corridor-Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Developing station designs & area master plans. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Locating stations and developing layouts.  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team.  Station area master plans, urban design & site dev.  Architectural and engineering design concepts. Metro Heavy Rail Station Type of Project (Intermodal Station) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Name of client and Address: (LACMTA) (indicate whether public or private) One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012 USD $2.7 billion Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs million or US$ million) USD $60 million (Station Cost) Capacity in million passengers per annum 5.4 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 8.5 mile light rail corridor with (3) underground stations, (4) at grade and (1) aerial station interfacing with the Los Angeles Airport People Mover.

Start date and finish date of the services January, 2010-October, 2012 (month/ year): Design Phase & Construction in progress – June 2020

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 20 Brief description of the project:

AVA is responsible for four (4) at grade stations with center platform, along a 13.6 km rail corridor connecting to the International Airport. This is a school and residential district and is fast becoming a partial commercial district with restaurants and retail uses. The project alignment has seven or more stations in at grade, aerial and underground configurations. The Crenshaw Light Rail Transit (LRT) system is an integral part of the Regional Transportation Plan of Los Angeles County. Connectivity and mobility for the diverse Crenshaw communities are key attributes to the success. The Exposition Light Rail Line’s connectivity to the Crenshaw LRT system is a major challenge, as transit passengers from Santa Monica, Culver City and Downtown LA will transfer south for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) or north to the Purple Line Heavy Rail System. The other challenge is to connect the Crenshaw LRT to the existing Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport People Mover System planned to connect various air terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. Also, the Harbor Subdivision Transit Corridor currently under study may provide express Commuter Rail, DMU or Rapid Bus system connection between Los Angeles Union Station, LAX, and the Ports of LA and Long Beach, and ultimately the Orange County. This system would parallel the Crenshaw LRT along part of the Harbor Subdivision Corridor. There is also a possibility of a High Speed Rail connection to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) which could use part of this corridor. The challenge is the development of intermodal stations at the route terminals.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Planner/Architect Aviation/Century Station (An Aerial Station with future Name of the Project: interface with an Airport People Mover System and a Consolidated Rental Car Facility) Crenshaw – LAX/Airport Transit Corridor-Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Developing station designs & area master plans. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Locating stations and developing layouts.  Aerial station concepts. Metro Aerial Rail Station Type of Project (Intermodal Station) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Name of client and Address: (LACMTA) (indicate whether public or private) One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012 USD $2.7 billion Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs million or US$ million) USD $110 million (Station Cost) Capacity in million passengers per annum 5.4 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 8.5 mile light rail corridor with (3) underground stations, (4) at grade and (1) aerial station interfacing with the Los Angeles Airport People Mover.

Start date and finish date of the services January, 2010-October, 2012 (month/ year): Design Phase & Construction in progress – June 2020

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 60

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Station Planner/Architect

Name of the Project: Silicon Valley Rapid Transit (SVRT) BART Extension, Conceptual Engineering (EIS/EIR) and Preliminary Engineering Phases, SVRT, San Jose, CA

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Managing the planning/design for the four proposed Description of services performed by the Key underground transit stations. Personnel (including designation):  Master planning around station areas.  Coordinated all engineering issues with other consultants and developed the ancillary equipment space system for each station, and developed the aesthetic design concepts. Type of Project Metro Rail Heavy Rail (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) (indicate whether public or private) 3331 North 1st Street, San Jose, CA 95134

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$ 5.6 billion million or US$ million)  Alum Rock Station  Civic Center Station  Market Street Station  Amtrak Diridon Station Capacity in million passengers per annum 40,150,000 (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects Not Applicable only)

Start date and finish date of the services March 2001-February 2007 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 576 Brief description of the project:

Final Engineering: This work for final design and construction documentation began in January 2007. AVA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. is responsible for design and systems coordination for underground stations and for preparing aesthetic concepts for the consolidated Downtown San Jose and Diridon/Arena Stations and developing ancillary space design and coordinating contract documents for Alum Rock.

Description: This Silicon Valley Rapid Transit (SVRT) project will extend the existing heavy rail Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) network from Fremont to the City of San Jose and to the San Jose Airport, California. This corridor is heavily congested with vehicular traffic. The MIS/EIS/EIR phase of the project evaluated twelve alternative transportation options for this project. A recommendation of a preferred alternative was approved, and the project has completed the preliminary engineering design and final design (65% Phase) has began this January 2007. Anil Verma Associates (AVA), Inc., as a part of a project engineering team, is responsible for the planning, architectural design, ancillary space design, and systems coordination of proposed underground transit stations in San Jose, California. Size: Four 1,000-foot underground stations each with 700 foot platforms, with bus transit centers, parking structures, bridges, intermodal connections, with collateral property development during the Conceptual and early Preliminary Engineering Phase. Two 1000’ and one 1550’ consolidated station during the Preliminary and Final Engineering Phases. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Architect/Planner Diridon/Arena BART Underground Station, SVRT, San Name of the Project: Jose, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Architectural design concepts and details. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Design development and engineering coordination.  Directed the development of a three-dimensional fly thru animation and graphics design.

 Transportation: Metro Heavy Rail, Light Rail, Commuter Type of Project Rail, High Speed Rail & Bus Transit Center (Major (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Intermodal Hub)

Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) st (indicate whether public or private) 3331 North 1 Street, San Jose, CA 95134

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US $310 Million (Station Cost) million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 16,425,000 (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects Underground heavy rail station spanning (3) city blocks only)

Start date and finish date of the services February 2007 – April 2010 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 380 Brief description of the project: This Station, at the edge of downtown takes its theme from the two major elements at its location, the HP Pavilion and the historic Diridon Station. The existing immediate environment at this station will be the result of a major redevelopment project which will be influenced by the adjacent Diridon Station and HP Pavilion. For the new Station thee functions of these existing facilities helped to guide the design themes of waves and circles evocative of movement in both transit and sports. One enters the Station through glass-covered portals that exhibit a cutting-edge design of steel and glass. The glass roof of the portals is elegantly diaphanous in that the glass is supported only at the four corners of each sheet and has no edge mullions. Two flanking towers clad in metal and translucent glass act as supports for the glass canopy and also serve as enclosures for the accessible elevator and air intake and exhaust shafts. From the portals passengers arrive in a space that is open to the full height of the station box with a ceiling of closely spaced thin vertical perforated metal panels shaped in the form of a wave continuing from one end of the concourse to the other. The walls are clad in white porcelain enamel panels with crystallized glass accents. The walls can be used for backlit graphic displays, advertisements, and/or art opportunities. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Architect/Planner Downtown San Jose BART Underground Station with Name of the Project: Crossover, SVRT, San Jose, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Architectural design concepts and details. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Design development and engineering coordination.  Presentation drawings for the Downtown San Jose Stations’ Architectural Design Concepts and Details.

Type of Project Metro Heavy Rail and Light Rail Interface (Intermodal Station) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).)

Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) st (indicate whether public or private) 3331 North 1 Street, San Jose, CA 95134

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$ 420 Million (station cost) million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 12,775,000 (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects Underground heavy rail station and crossover spanning 4 city only) blocks

Start date and finish date of the services February 2007 – April 2010 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 428

Brief description of the project: The design of the Station reflects San Jose as the creative and cultural center of the city in technology and the arts as well as its rich social, cultural and architectural history. Each portal will be uniquely designed with materials, forms and scale appropriate to its context. The concourse is the space through which passengers move on their way to the boarding platform. To enrich this area a perforated metal panel ceiling displaying a continuous wave extends through the length of the concourse and symbolizes the rhythmic dynamic change over time in Silicon Valley. Passenger will move under this undulating ceiling to the elliptical openings of the stairs and escalators which will whisk them to the platform level. Enclosing the openings are curved glass guardrails that add to the smooth flow of passengers and symbolize openness to the flow of new ideas. The floor’s terrazzo finish will display an undulating pattern that is sympathetic to the curved elements in the concourse ceiling. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Station Planner/Architect Silicon Valley Rapid Transit (SVRT) BART Heavy Rail Name of the Project: Extension to San Jose – Tunnel, Cross Passages, Portals, Ventilation Structures & Ancillary Equipment Structures- Serving Alum Rock Station, Downtown San Jose Station, and Diridon/Arena Station, San Jose, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Architectural Layout of the vent structures. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Architectural design of the part commercial head house.  Design of emergency ventilation equipment room, electrical rooms, gap breaker equipment room, and communication room layouts.  Emergency exiting system.

Type of Project Metro Heavy Rail Ventilation Crossover & Ancillary Structures , Metro Heavy Rail Station (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) 3331 N. 1st Street (indicate whether public or private) San Jose, CA 95134

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $4.46 billion million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 40,150,000 (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects Not Applicable only)

Start date and finish date of the services April 2004 - December 2017 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 180

Brief description of the project: The Mid-Tunnel Ventilation Structure houses two (2) Ventilation Fans, each with a 300 HP motor to ventilate tunnels during emergency and prevent accumulation of any hazardous gases. The Mid-Tunnel Ventilation Structure also houses a 1000Volt DC Switchgear which breaks the power at the Gap Breaker points for Third Rail in both tunnels to isolate Tunnels during emergency. Communications and Uninterruptible power supply equipment that provides power for Communications and Systems, and for tunnel lighting are also located at basement level. Tunnel Ventilation Structures served Alum Rock Station, Downtown San Jose Station, and Diridon/Arena Station, San Jose, CA It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Architect/Design Manager Berryessa and Milpitas Station Campus Roadway and Name of the Project: Parking Structures-Design and Engineering Services for SVBX Project, D720 BART/SVRT, San Jose, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Station area master plans, urban design & site development.  Architectural and engineering design concepts. Metro Heavy Rail Intermodal Campus + Bus Transit Type of Project (Intermodal Terminal) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) Name of client and Address: 3331 N. 1st Street (indicate whether public or private) San Jose, CA 95134

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $26 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 61,800 (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not Applicable

Start date and finish date of the services February 2012 – 2018 (projected) (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 360

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Architect/Design Manager Milpitas Station - Silicon Valley Berryessa Extension Name of the Project: (SVBX) Project-C700- Line, Track, Stations, and Systems, A Design-Build Contract, San Jose, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Station area master plans, urban design & site development.  Architectural and engineering design concepts. Transportation: Metro Heavy Rail, Bus Transit & Light Rail Type of Project Interface (Intermodal Station, major intermodal hub) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) Name of client and Address: 3331 N. 1st Street (indicate whether public or private) San Jose, CA 95134 USD: $840 million Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs million or US$ million) USD: Station Cost: $280 million

Capacity in million passengers per annum 37,000 (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not Applicable

Start date and finish date of the services February 2012 – June 2016 (Design Phase) (month/ year): Construction Phase: July 2018

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 516

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Architect/Design Manager Berryessa Station-Silicon Valley Rapid Transit (SVRT) Name of the Project: Project-C700- Line, Track, Stations, and Systems, A Design-Build Contract, San Jose, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Station area master plans, urban design & site development.  Architectural and engineering design concepts.

Capacity in million passengers per annum 25,000 daily passengers projected thru 2030 (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not Applicable

Start date and finish date of the services February 2012 – June 2016 (month/ year): Design Phase Construction Phase – July 2018 No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 50

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Senior Station Architect/Planner Rio Piedras Heavy Rail Underground Station, Tren Name of the Project: Urbano, San Juan, Puerto Rico Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Designed and built heavy patronage stations in the midst Description of services performed by the Key of sensitive historical buildings and extensively Personnel (including designation): coordinating three (3) levels of ancillary equipment rooms to curtail the size of underground station structures.  Coordinated all engineering disciplines to organize ancillary spaces which resulted in reducing station sizing by over eighty (80) feet and there by reducing construction costs.  Coordinated design activities with the Systems Consultants, Engineers and Contractors, and producing detailed design documents to work with construction sequencing.  Responsible for the design of two underground heavy rail stations  Responsible for coordinating all engineering disciplines to organize ancillary spaces which resulted in reducing station sizing by over 80 feet and thereby reducing construction costs.  Responsible for coordinating design activities with the Systems Consultants, Engineers and Contractors, and producing detailed design documents to work with construction sequencing.  Responsible for coordinating the design elements with the surroundings historical walls, fences, gates and buildings and coordinating with engineers and contractors to produce detailing which worked with construction sequencing for the University of Puerto Rico Station. Type of Project Metro Heavy Rail (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Puerto Rico Highways & Transportation Authority, Name of client and Address: TUO Office (indicate whether public or private) 110 Ponce De Leon, San Juan, PR 00925 Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US $574 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 40,000,000 (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects Deep stacked drift tunnel station spanning 3 city blocks only)

Start date and finish date of the services July 1997 – October 2009 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 516

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Brief description of the project:

This is a stacked drift tunnel station with deep shafts and cut-and-cover entrances at each end. This station lies right across from the Rio Piedras Plaza in a congested part of the Historic District of the City and this has several historic and urban design considerations.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Senior Station Architect/Planner

Name of the Project: University of Puerto Rico Heavy Rail Underground Station, Tren Urbano, San Juan, Puerto Rico

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Designed and built heavy patronage in the midst of a Description of services performed by the Key College Campus. Personnel (including designation):  Coordinated the design elements with the surroundings, historical walls, fences, gates and buildings, and  Coordinated with engineers and contractors to produce detailing which worked with construction sequencing. Type of Project Metro Heavy Rail Station (Underground Station) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Puerto Rico Highways & Transportation Authority, TUO Name of client and Address: Office (indicate whether public or private) 110 Ponce De Leon, San Juan, PR 00925 Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $448 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 10,950,000 (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects Cut and Cover Underground Station spanning 3 city blocks only)

Start date and finish date of the services July 1997 – October 2009 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 344

Brief description of the project: The University of Puerto Rico (UPR) Station was a cut and cover station, with a center platform and entrances at both ends. One entrance provides access from the street level to a concourse (mezzanine with ticketing functions) and then access to the platform. This entrance is sensitively designed in the context of old historic walls and buildings. The second entrance has direct access from the street level headhouse (which has ticketing functions) to the platform. This entrance was a modern glass, steel and concrete structure which complements the newer university buildings. The ancillary equipment spaces are housed beyond the platform ends and at the mezzanine levels. The entire station configuration was changed to allow for a better ventilation system and to consolidate the station cut and cover box size. The station lies in the historic section of the University of Puerto Rico Campus and has several historic and urban design considerations. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Planner/Architect Auburn Commuter Rail Station and Transit Center, Name of the Project: Auburn, WA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Developed Architectural/Planning ideas for community Description of services performed by the Key and stakeholders. Personnel (including designation):  Developed architectural concept design.  Coordinated all engineering disciplines.  Developed Architectural/Engineering design

Type of Project Transportation: Railway Station, Metro Station, Commuter Rail Bus Terminal/Station (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Sound Transit 401 S. Jackson St. (indicate whether public or private) Seattle, WA 98104

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $29.7 million million or US$ million) 1,120,000 Capacity in million passengers per annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects Not Applicable only)

Start date and finish date of the services July 1998-July 2006 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 525

Brief description of the project: The station and transit center was a joint development project which consists of a major commuter rail station, a bus transit center, retail shops, kiss-n-ride areas, two parking structures for over 1,000 cars and commercial redevelopment adjacent to several new access ramps to Freeway SR18. A pedestrian bridge soaring 28’0” clear above the rail tracks connects the parking structures on the east and west sides of the track. A plaza becomes the center point of development by aligning with First Street and by using an architecturally imposing canopy structure to become a focal point of the station. The canopy structure is composed of multiple glass and steel pyramids cascading up to support an elegant four (4) sided clock. The base of the glass pyramids is surrounded by corbels which house lighting fixtures, creating a very dramatic and festive effect at night. The theme of the pyramid is derived form the teepees (tents) of American Indian tribes which lived in the region, and are also reflective of the European and Japanese influences. This theme is followed throughout the station complex. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Architect LAX Interim West Bus Terminal, Los Angeles, CA Name of the Project: Interim West Bus Terminal (IWBT)

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Managed design and construction documents. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Managed project conceptual design through construction documentation.  Coordination with City’s Cultural Affairs Commission.  Coordination with LAWA and City Agencies. Type of Project  Airport Bus Terminal (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Los Angeles World Airport 700 World Way West (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90045

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$10.9 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects Not Applicable only)

Start date and finish date of the services 2009 - 2010 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 125

Brief description of the project: The Interim West Bus Terminal (IWBT) will replace current bus gates in the existing Tom Bradley International Terminal (TBIT), and is a key component of Los Angeles World Airport (LAWA’s) strategy to modernize LAX facilities to accommodate larger aircraft. The IWBT serves as a waiting area for international passengers prior to their boarding buses to planes located away from TBIT, and an airport entry point for passengers arriving in buses from planes in remote taxiway locations.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Design Architect

San Fernando Valley Light Rail Line Preliminary, Los Name of the Project: Angeles, CA

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Description of services performed by the Key  Station planning and engineering studies. Personnel (including designation):  Station design and engineering, conceptual site planning.

Type of Project Transportation: Metro Light Rail (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) – formerly (LACTC) (indicate whether public or private) One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles 90012

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs Project estimated at $1 billion. million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects Not Applicable only)

Start date and finish date of the services 2003-2006 (month/ year):

No. of days spent on the assignment 144

Brief description of the project: Five alternative light rail alignments with seventy-five potential station sites.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Project Manager/Lead Architect

Name of the Project: Regional Intermodal Transportation Center, Project No. E10-07, Burbank, CA

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Developed Architectural/Planning ideas for community and Description of services performed by the Key stakeholders Personnel (including designation):  Developed Architectural/Engineering design  Developed architectural concept design  Coordinated all engineering disciplines Urban Planning: Transit Oriented Development Type of Project Commercial/Retail (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority Name of client and Address: 2800 N. Clybourn (indicate whether public or private) Burbank, CA 91505

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $169 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 30 hectares only)

Start date and finish date of the services July 2010 – July 2011 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 84

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Architect Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC), Los Name of the Project: Angeles CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Lead Architect.  Selection of appropriate, durable and maintainable finish materials, and the development of creative detailing.  Design and Design Review Description of services performed by the Key  Architectural and engineering constructability reviews. Personnel (including designation):  Client liaison and coordination.  Contract Management, Office Engineering, Contractibility reviews, Value Engineering, RFI reviews, Project Close-out.  Construction Management Type of Project  Urban Planning: Educational Institution (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC) 400 West Washington Boulevard (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90015

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $748 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 25,000 students (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 25 acres only)

Start date and finish date of the services May 2002 – October 2014 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 120

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Architect

Name of the Project: Building “A” Modernization and Restoration Project

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Lead Architect Description of services performed by the Key  Architectural/Engineering Constructability Reviews. Personnel (including designation):  Construction sequencing and coordination.  Phasing construction during campus operating hours. Type of Project  Urban Planning: Educational Institution (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC) 400 West Washington Boulevard (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90015

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $45 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 25,000 students (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 3 hectares only)

Start date and finish date of the services June 2008-December 2010 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 160

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Architect

Name of the Project: Learning Resource Center, LATTC

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Lead Architect  Planning  Programming Description of services performed by the Key  Concept design Personnel (including designation):  Final design  Managing the construction and delivery of LEED Certified Library / Learning Resource Center (70,000 sq. ft. - major renovation and 15,000 sq. ft. - new construction). Type of Project  Urban Planning: Educational Institution (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC) 400 West Washington Boulevard (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90015

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $60 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects Not Applicable only)

Start date and finish date of the services February 2007 – February 2015 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 40

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Architect

Name of the Project: Culinary Arts Facility Project, LATTC

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Lead Architect Description of services performed by the Key  Architectural/Engineering constructability views. Personnel (including designation):  Construction sequencing and coordination.  Phasing construction during campus operating hours Type of Project  Educational facility in an urban environment (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC) 400 West Washington Boulevard (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90015

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $60 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 3 hectares only)

Start date and finish date of the services November 2008-July 2014 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 20

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Architect

Name of the Project: Olive Street Parking Structure Design/Build, LATTC

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Lead Architect Description of services performed by the Key  Architectural/Engineering constructability views. Personnel (including designation):  Construction sequencing and coordination.  Phasing construction during campus operating hours Type of Project  Urban Planning: Educational Institution (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC) 400 West Washington Boulevard (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90015

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD $14 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 1.5 hectares only)

Start date and finish date of the services October 2003-December 2008 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 20

Brief description of the project: The LATTC Campus student population has grown over the past two decades but parking spaces have not. This is the first design/build above ground parking structure project being built to mitigate parking shortage. The structure is a five stories (six level) parking structure with 804 parking spaces. This is a Type 1, post tensioned concrete structure. The total square footage per floor is 42,000 sq ft with a total of 250,000 sq. ft for the entire structure. A z-blade screen adorns sections of the façade along Olive Street above the vehicular entrance to the parking structure. The roof top has been designed to carry photovoltaic panels in the future. The parking structure has two elevators facing the campus entrance on Grand Avenue. The parking structure has equipped comprehensive communication system, including telephone, data, and security systems to ensure emergency communication to sheriff station for the safety of the students and faculties at all times with emergency blue phones and CCTV monitoring cameras at each parking level. The parking structure also has fire alarm system connecting to main campus command control center. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Architect

South Campus Project – Administration Building & Name of the Project: Technology Building, LATTC

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Lead Architect  Planning  Programming Description of services performed by the Key  Concept design Personnel (including designation):  Final design  Managing the construction and delivery of two (2) five (5) story state of the art building projects. Type of Project  Educational facility in an urban environment (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC) 400 West Washington Boulevard (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90015

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD 111.38 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 10 acres only)

Start date and finish date of the services Jan 2006-March 2010 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 180

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Architect

Name of the Project: Child Development Center (CDC)

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Lead Architect Description of services performed by the Key  Architectural/Engineering Constructability Reviews. Personnel (including designation):  Construction sequencing and coordination.  Phasing construction during campus operating hours. Type of Project  Educational Institution (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC) 400 West Washington Boulevard (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90015

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs USD 12.6 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 100 Children (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects 1 hectare only)

Start date and finish date of the services September 2002-September 2012 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 20

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Somesh Debnath, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. APPENDIX-I Form-11 Eligible Assignments of Key Personnel (Refer Clause 3.1.4)

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Design Manager – Stations, Wayside &Maintenance Facility BART to Livermore Extension Project (BLVX), Name of the Project: Livermore, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Responsibilities involved management, development, and Description of services performed by the Key review of design deliverables (program definition, related Personnel (including designation): technical reports & preliminary engineering design drawings) including resolution of major design issues, quality assurance implementation, risk analysis, provided input and review of the overall project schedule, adherence to identified delivery milestones, including identification of work scope creep, design coordination with the various engineering discipline leads, design and constructability review, internal and external design interfaces, meetings with other public agencies & stakeholders.

Metro Heavy and Light Rail Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) 300 Lakeside Drive, (indicate whether public or private) Oakland, CA 94612, USA

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US $2.09B million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum BART Option: Isabel Station – 8,100 daily (2040 projection) (for railway/metro station or airport only): DMU Option: Isabel Station – 4,800 daily (2040 projection)

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not Applicable

Start date and finish date of the services June 30, 2014-On going (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 320

Brief description of the project: Preliminary Engineering Design services involving (4) transit alternatives being considered for the 5 mile extension of BART service to Livermore. Enhanced Bus Service, Express Bus (XB) / Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) with Direct Transfer from East Dublin Pleasanton Station, Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU)/Electric Multiple Unit (EMU) with a transfer station at East Dublin Pleasanton Station and an end-of-Line station at Isabel / I-580 interchange, and a medium-full service Maintenance Yard Facility located northeast of Portola / I-580 interchange, and a BART station east of Isabel Avenue along the 580 corridor. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Design Manager Designation of Key Personnel: New BART Operations Control Center Facility, Name of the Project: Lake Merritt Plaza, Oakland, CA, USA

Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Name of Consulting Firm where employed: He is overseeing the overall design & management of the Description of services performed by the Key project. These include the evaluation of the existing OCC Personnel (including designation): facility, development of the program definition, visioning & oversight of the aesthetic design, resolution of the major design issues and constraints, review of project deliverables and quality assurance implementation, providing input and adherence to the project milestone schedule, identification of scope creep, participation in community outreach activities, coordination and responses to design review comments, interface with BART planning staff and OCC staff to ensure incorporation of users’ input into the design. Design coordination with the various engineering discipline leads, internal and external design interfaces with the other contract packages.

Type of Project Metro Heavy and Light Rail (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Name of client and Address: 300 Lakeside Drive, (indicate whether public or private) Oakland, CA 94612, USA US $64 Million (bldg.only) Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 2.2 hectares Start date and finish date of the services February 2014 – On going (month/ year): No. of days spent on the assignment 300

Brief description of the project: Architectural & engineering design services for the new Operations Control Center BART facility located at the Lake Merritt station plaza level. The new $64M, 27,000 SF plus facility when completed will serve as the hub for BART operations which is expanded to include existing and the extension of the BART operations to the Silicon Valley and Livermore. Estimated completion dates for design, construction, and Systems Integration and Testing is late 2021. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel –Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Project Manager Berryessa Aerial Station, Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Name of the Project: (SVRT) Project-C700 Line, Track, Stations, and Systems, A Design-Build Contract, San Jose, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Responsibilities involved management, development, and Description of services performed by the Key review of design deliverables by the Design Contractors Personnel (including designation): including resolution of major design issues, quality assurance implementation, risk analysis, review of the overall project schedule, adherence to identified delivery milestones, including identification of work scope creep, design coordination with the various engineering discipline leads, design and constructability review, value engineering & technical concept alternatives (TCAs), internal and external design interfaces with the other contract packages, incorporation of design changes/scope thru client directive letters (DLs), design services during construction (DSDC).

Type of Project Metro Heavy Rail Intermodal Station (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) 3331 N. 1st Street (indicate whether public or private) San Jose, CA 95134 Estimated Cost US $840 million Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs million or US$ million) Station Cost: US $220 million

Capacity in million passengers per annum 10.2 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 21 hectares

Start date and finish date of the services February 2012 – On-going (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 300

Brief description of the project: The second of two stations along the Phase 1 10-mile extension and located on a 52 acre site in San Jose, California. A multi-modal facility consisting of a BART aerial station, BART Police Zone Facility, 5 storey parking structure, an 8-bay VTA Bus Transit Center and future Transit Oriented Development (TOD) adjacent to the station campus. This station is one of six planned BART Stations along the BART to Silicon Valley Extension project extending to the City Santa Clara. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Project Manager Milpitas Underground Station, Silicon Valley Rapid Name of the Project: Transit (SVRT) Project C700 Line, Track Stations, and Systems, A Design-Build Contract, San Jose, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Responsibilities involved management, development, and Description of services performed by the Key review of design deliverables by the Design Contractors Personnel (including designation): including resolution of major design issues, quality assurance implementation, risk analysis, review of the overall project schedule, adherence to identified delivery milestones, including identification of work scope creep, design coordination with the various engineering discipline leads, design and constructability review, value engineering & technical concept alternatives (TCAs), internal and external design interfaces with the other contract packages, incorporation of design changes/scope thru client directive letters (DLs), design services during construction (DSDC). Type of Project Metro Heavy Rail, Bus Transit & Light Rail Interface (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) (Intermodal Station) Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) 3331 N. 1st Street (indicate whether public or private) San Jose, CA 95134

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs Project Cost: US$840 million million or US$ million) Station Cost:US$280 million

Capacity in million passengers per annum 13.5 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 10.9 hectares

Start date and finish date of the services February 2012 – On-going (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 340

Brief description of the project: The first of two stations along the Phase 1 10-mile extension, Milpitas station is situated on a 27-acre campus, consisting of the grade level concourse with the below grade split level boarding platforms. A pedestrian overcrossing bridge will connect the station to the existing elevated VTA light rail station. The station campus consists of a 16-bus bay transit center, the bike storage/bus operators facility, and the station related ancillary facilities It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment

Name of the Project: South Calaveras Station, SVRT Planning & Preliminary Engineering Design

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: VBN Architects Station Planning and Design Services for a BART Station Description of services performed by the Key with 700 foot platforms in an at grade configuration with Personnel (including designation): access from an upper level aerial concourse. Type of Project Metro Rail & Bus Transit (Intermodal Station.) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) (indicate whether public or private) 3331 N. 1st Street San Jose, CA 95134 Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$40 million dollar million or US$ million) 4 million passengers per year Capacity in million passengers per annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 4 hectares

Start date and finish date of the services February 2002 –October 2004 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 100

Brief description of the project: The SVRT Project is a 16-mile extension the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) System to the Silicon Valley starting from the Warm Springs Station. This station is located midway between Warm Springs and Berryessa in an at grade configuration with an aerial concourse and a pedestrian bridge to serve the concourse. The campus site will allow for Bus Transit Facilities, Parking Structures and some commercial retail and residential as a part of Transit Oriented Development (TOD)

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment

Name of the Project: Montague Station, SVRT Planning & Preliminary Engineering Design

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: VBN Architects Station Planning and Design Services for a BART Station Description of services performed by the Key with 700 foot platforms in an underground configuration with Personnel (including designation): access from an upper level at grade concourse. Type of Project Metro Rail & Bus Transit (Intermodal Station.) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) (indicate whether public or private) 3331 N. 1st Street San Jose, CA 95134 Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$280 million dollar million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 13.5 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 10.5 hectares

Start date and finish date of the services February 2002 –October 2008 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 120

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment

Name of the Project: Berryessa Station, SVRT Planning & Preliminary Engineering Design

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: VBN Architects Station Planning and Design Services for a BART Station Description of services performed by the Key with 700 foot platforms in an underground configuration with Personnel (including designation): access from an upper level at grade concourse. Type of Project Metro Rail & Bus Transit (Intermodal Station.) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) (indicate whether public or private) 3331 N. 1st Street San Jose, CA 95134 Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$220 million dollar million or US$ million) 10.2 million passenger per year Capacity in million passengers per annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 21 hectares

Start date and finish date of the services February 2002 –October 2008 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 120

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment

Name of the Project: Santa Clara Station, SVRT Planning & Preliminary Engineering Design

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: VBN Architects Station Planning and Design Services for a BART Station Description of services performed by the Key with 700 foot platforms in an underground configuration with Personnel (including designation): access from an upper level at grade concourse. Type of Project Metro Rail & Bus Transit (Intermodal Station.) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) (indicate whether public or private) 3331 N. 1st Street San Jose, CA 95134 Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$40 million dollar million or US$ million) 5 million passenger per year Capacity in million passengers per annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 5 hectares

Start date and finish date of the services February 2002 –October 2008 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 100

Brief description of the project: This is the end of the line station located in the Caltrain yards in San Jose, CA. It is in an at grade configuration very close to the Caltrain and Amtrak tracks and potentially a future a high speed rail station track. An aerial concourse serve this station with a pedestrian bridge crossing over to the access side of the station. Please note the station is designed to allow a third level platform with would serve the international airport by an aerial People Mover Train System. There is potential for join development to allow for a parking structure and some retail commercial facilities as a part of Transit Oriented Development (TOD). It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment

Name of the Project: South Calaveras Station Campus Master Plan, SVRT Corridor - 01010

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: VBN Architects Station Planning and Design Services for a BART Station Description of services performed by the Key with 700 foot platforms in an at grade configuration with Personnel (including designation): access from an upper level aerial concourse. Type of Project Metro Rail & Bus Transit (Intermodal Station.) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) (indicate whether public or private) 3331 N. 1st Street San Jose, CA 95134 Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$120 million dollar campus cost million or US$ million) 5 million passenger per year Capacity in million passengers per annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 5 hectares

Start date and finish date of the services February 2002 –October 2006 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 100

Brief description of the project: This station campus is being planned to serve transit dependant users, therefore the campus contains retail commercial and residential facilities along with parking structures. This BART station located midway between Warm Springs and Berryessa in an at grade configuration with an aerial concourse and a pedestrian bridge to serve the concourse. The campus site will allow for Bus Transit Facilities, Parking Structures and some commercial retail and residential as a part of Transit Oriented Development (TOD). It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment

Name of the Project: Montague Station, SVRT Planning & Preliminary Engineering Design

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: VBN Architects Station Planning and Design Services for a BART Station Description of services performed by the Key with 700 foot platforms in an underground configuration with Personnel (including designation): access from an upper level at grade concourse. Type of Project Metro Rail & Bus Transit (Intermodal Station.) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) (indicate whether public or private) 3331 N. 1st Street San Jose, CA 95134 Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$390 million dollar campus cost million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 13.5 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 10.5 hectares

Start date and finish date of the services February 2002 –October 2006 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 100

Brief description of the project: Milpitas station campus is being designed to accommodate bus transit center, parking structure with some retail activity an a pedestrian overpass which connects to an existing BART light rail station. This station situated on a 27-acre campus, consisting of the grade level concourse with the below grade split level boarding platforms. A pedestrian over-crossing bridge will connect the station to the existing elevated VTA light rail station. The station campus consists of a 16-bus bay transit center, the bike storage/bus operators facility, and the station related ancillary facilities It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment

Name of the Project: Berryessa Station Campus Master Plan

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: VBN Architects Station Planning and Design Services for a BART Station Description of services performed by the Key with 700 foot platforms in an aerial configuration with access Personnel (including designation): from an lower level at grade concourse. Type of Project Metro Rail & Bus Transit (Intermodal Station.) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) (indicate whether public or private) 3331 N. 1st Street San Jose, CA 95134 Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$310 million dollar campus cost million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 10.2 million passenger per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 21 hectares

Start date and finish date of the services February 2002 –October 2006 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 100

Brief description of the project: Berryessa station campus is being designed to accommodate a bus transit center, parking structure with some retail activity and a BART Police Facility. The second of two stations along the Phase 1 10-mile extension and located on a 52 acre site in San Jose, California. A multi-modal facility consisting of a BART aerial station, BART Police Zone Facility, 5 storey parking structure, an 8-bay VTA Bus Transit Center and future Transit Oriented Development (TOD) adjacent to the station campus. This station is one of six planned BART Stations along the BART to Silicon Valley Extension project extending to the City Santa Clara.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment

Name of the Project: Alum Rock Station Campus Master Plan

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: VBN Architects Station Planning and Design Services for a BART Station Description of services performed by the Key with 700 foot platforms in an aerial configuration with access Personnel (including designation): from an lower level at grade concourse. Type of Project Metro Rail & Bus Transit (Intermodal Station.) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) (indicate whether public or private) 3331 N. 1st Street San Jose, CA 95134 Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$240 million dollar campus cost million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 7 million passenger per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 18 hectares

Start date and finish date of the services February 2002 –October 2006 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 120

Brief description of the project: Alum Rock station campus is being designed to accommodate an existing master plan which has been prepared by the city to replace industrial facilities with a new retail/commercial complex. This station is an underground configuration running diagonally across the site. The master plan was redesign to accommodate station entrances from the underground concourse below as well as address a newly configured public plaza. This public plaza becomes an activity center for the Portuguese Church on the westside and the Christian Church on the south side. A hotel with some commercial activities and a major 7 storey parking structure is planned to serve the commuters from the neighbouring towns as well as the immediate neighborhoods of alum Rock. The bus transit center, is located along the major street with stops close to the underground station entrances. The entire station campuses is conceived as a Transit Oriented Development (TOD). It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment

Name of the Project: Civic Center Station & Market Street Station - Master Plan

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: VBN Architects Station Planning and Design Services for a 2 BART Description of services performed by the Key Underground Stations with 700 foot platforms with concourse Personnel (including designation): above them, in the heart of Downtown San Jose Type of Project Metro Rail & Bus Transit (Intermodal Station.) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) (indicate whether public or private) 3331 N. 1st Street San Jose, CA 95134 Civic Center Station - US$340 million Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs Market Street Station- US$ 360 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 5 million passenger per year - Civic Center Station (for railway/metro station or airport only): 5.8 million passenger per year - Market Street Station Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 10 hectares Market Street Station 2 hectares - Civic Center Station

Start date and finish date of the services February 2002 –October 2006 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 160

Brief description of the project: Civic Center Underground Station is located next to the new civic center of City of San Jose. The station campus is weave in with the Civic Center facilities and some of the local under utilized parcels of land. The Market Street Underground Station is right in the heart of Downtown. VTA owns a large parcel of land on the north side and plans to use it for station entrances, bus transit facilities and other high density Transit Oriented Development (TOD) facilities. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment

Name of the Project: Santa Clara Station Campus Master Plan

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: VBN Architects Station Planning and Design Services for a BART Station Description of services performed by the Key with 700 foot platforms in an at grade configuration with Personnel (including designation): access from an upper level aerial concourse. A 3rd level People Mover Platform is considered as a future connection to San Jose International Airport. Type of Project Metro Rail & Bus Transit (Intermodal Station.) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) (indicate whether public or private) 3331 N. 1st Street San Jose, CA 95134 Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$40 million dollar million or US$ million) 5 million passenger per year Capacity in million passengers per annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 5 hectares

Start date and finish date of the services February 2002 –October 2006 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 100

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Project Designer – Stations & Maintenance Facility Oakland Airport Connector Bay Area Rapid Transit Name of the Project: (BART), Oakland, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: VBN Architects Responsibilities involved management and review of design Description of services performed by the Key deliverables by various Design Contractors including Personnel (including designation): resolution of major design issues, quality assurance implementation, provided input and review of the overall project schedule, adherence to identified delivery milestones, including identification of work scope creep, design coordination with the various engineering discipline leads, design and constructability review, internal and external design interfaces with the other contract packages. Airport Connection – Commuter Rail to Heavy Rail Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) San Francisco Bay Area Rapi Transit (BART) Name of client and Address: 300 Lakeside Drive, (indicate whether public or private) Oakland, CA 94612, USA

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US $702 million (Guideway, Stations & Maintenance million or US$ million) Facility)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Unknown at this time (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not Applicable

Start date and finish date of the services Feb 2004 – Mar 2008 (Design) (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 160

Brief description of the project: Conceptual design and design-build procurement documentation for the 3.4 mile automated people mover project consisting of two end stations, one located at the existing Coliseum BART station and the other located at the Oakland International Airport Terminal, and a 50.000 sf storage and maintenance facility at Doolittle. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Project Designer

Name of the Project: West Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station, Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), Dublin, CA

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: VBN Architects As Design Manager, he led the design team that won the 2003 Description of services performed by the Key competition for the design of the new $20M West/Dublin Personnel (including designation): Pleasanton BART Station which is located along the freeway 580 corridor. This design-build in-fill station serves riders from the cities of Dublin and Pleasanton. This project was constructed along the busy highway corridor and has been operation since 2011.

Type of Project Metro Heavy Rail (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) 300 Lakeside Drive, (indicate whether public or private) Oakland, CA 94612, USA

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$159 million (Station & two Pedestrian Overcrossings) million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 4.7 million passengers per year (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not Applicable

Start date and finish date of the services 2004-2007 (design) (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 140

Brief description of the project: This design-build in-fill station serves riders from the cities of Dublin and Pleasanton. This project consists of the BART station with two pedestrian overcrossing over the busy 580 freeway which connects to the parking structures on each side of the freeway, and the Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) bus transit center. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan, AIA)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Design Package Lead CP14, CP63 & CP64 New Doha International airport (NDIA) Name of the Project: Doha, State of Qatar Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Overseas Bechtel, Inc. (OBI)

Managing the design the Airport Operations Facilities Description of services performed by the Key contract packages (CP-15, CP61, CP63, & CP64). Other Personnel (including designation): responsibilities involved management and review of design deliverables by the Design Contractors including resolution of major design issues, quality assurance implementation, provided input and review of the overall project schedule, adherence to identified delivery milestones, including identification of work scope creep, design coordination with the various engineering discipline leads, design and constructability review, internal and external design interfaces with the other contract packages, preparation of tender documents and review and evaluation of tenders, response to RFIs, review of design contractor invoices

Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Airport Name of client and Address: State of Qatar NDIA, Ras Abu Aboud Rd. (indicate whether public or private) Doha, Qatar

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$14 billion (Total for all Facilities) million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 54M per year (Projected when completed) (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) unknown

Start date and finish date of the services February 2008 – December 2010 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 520

Brief description of the project: Airport Operations Facilities contract packages (CP-15, CP61, CP63, & CP64), a bid-build contract package consisting of more than 28 facilities which include the General Aviation Terminal building, General Aviation Maintenance Hangar, Main & Satellite Fire Stations, Ground services Equipment Building, Facilities Maintenance Facility, North and South Telecommunications Interface Buildings, Airport Surveillance Radar Building, Solid Waste Handling Facility, Midfield Telecommunications Building, Medical Center Building, Administration Buildings A & B, Employee village, and including all related ancillary buildings It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Design Lead/Project Manager GR&A San Francisco International airport (SFO) “Boarding Name of the Project: Area A”, San Francisco, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: GR&A International, Inc./Gerson Overstreet Architects Urban Planning and terminal design and development of Description of services performed by the Key construction documents and other bid documents. Other Personnel (including designation): responsibilities include resolution of major design issues, quality assurance implementation, provided input and review of the overall project schedule, adherence to identified delivery milestones, including identification of work scope creep, design coordination with the various engineering discipline leads, design and constructability review, internal and external design interfaces with the other contract packages

Type of Project Airport (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) San Francisco International Airport Authority (SFIA) Name of client and Address: City and County of San Francisco, CA (indicate whether public or private) PO Box 8097. San Francisco, CA 94123

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$186 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Unknown (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 3 hectares

Start date and finish date of the services March1997- September2003 (design) (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 520

Brief description of the project: 12-gate boarding wing of SFO's new International Terminal. The project included passenger boarding bridges, 400 Hertz ground power, baggage conveyors, special systems and furniture. This was designed and constructed without disruption to airport operations. (Completed in 2001). It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Design Lead/PM San Francisco International Airport Pier F Expansion, Name of the Project: United Airlines/City of San Francisco, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: GR&A International, Inc. Responsibilities included coordination with SFIA airport Description of services performed by the Key authorities & stakeholders, review of design deliverables by Personnel (including designation): the design team and related sub-consultants, and DSDC services. Other responsibilities include resolution of major design issues, quality assurance implementation, provided input and review of the overall project schedule, adherence to identified delivery milestones, including identification of work scope creep, design coordination with the various engineering discipline leads, design and constructability review, internal and external design interfaces with the other contract packages. Type of Project Airport (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).)

Name of client and Address: San Francisco International Airport Authority (SFIA) (indicate whether public or private) City and County of San Francisco, CA

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$62 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Unknown at this time (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not Applicable

Start date and finish date of the services 1999 – February 2002 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 390

Brief description of the project: 55,200 SF addition to the existing Pier F hub and thumb. The hub addition will house the new United Airlines Flight Operations offices, the Red Carpet Club at the boarding level and the maintenance offices at the ground level. This was constructed during airport operations without incident. The thumb addition now provides much needed retail spaces to serve the passengers at the departure lounge at the boarding level. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Project Designer/Project Manager Mission Bay Housing Development Avalon Bay Name of the Project: corporation, San Francisco, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: GR&A International, Inc./ BAR Architects

Description of services performed by the Key Development of the design and preparation of construction Personnel (including designation): documents. Type of Project Urban Project – Residential /Commercial Development (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).)

Name of client and Address: Avalon Bay Corporation (indicate whether public or private) San Francisco, CA

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$59 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 2.3 hectares

Start date and finish date of the services 2001-2001 (design) (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 182

Brief description of the project: A two-city block, mixed-use development project at 5th & King Street & across the Caltrain Terminal, consisting of a 21-story, luxury housing condominium tower surrounded by 5-6-story, market rate town house units with complete recreational facilities over a 2-story retail/office podium, and multi-level parking structure. (Completed construction document phase but project was put on hold by client) It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Project Designer Moscone Convention Center Expansion 2 Project Name of the Project: City of San Francisco, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: DMJM / Gensler Planning and coordination with top side Architects & Description of services performed by the Key Designers, City authorities & stakeholders, development and Personnel (including designation): review of design deliverables by the design team and related sub-consultants. Other responsibilities include resolution of major design issues, quality assurance implementation, provided input and review of the overall project schedule, adherence to identified delivery milestones, including identification of work scope creep, design coordination with the various engineering discipline leads, design and constructability review, internal and external design interfaces with the other contract packages

Type of Project Urban Design – Exhibition Complex (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) City & County of San Francisco Name of client and Address: San Francisco, CA (indicate whether public or private) 2099 Kearny St, San Francisco, CA 94133

Rudy Nothenberg Name, telephone no. and fax no. of client’s Chief Administrative Officer representative: City of San Francisco, CA Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US$237.15 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 4.6 hectares

Start date and finish date of the services 1987-June 1989 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 520

Brief description of the project: A 560,000 square feet expansion of the original convention center located in the heart of San Francisco at the Yerba Buena Center. The expansion involved four city blocks of exhibition space and meeting rooms below the Yerba Buena Center esplanade and one city block of banquet facility/function rooms on top of the existing original convention facility. (Completed 1992) It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Project Designer City Square Office Retail Complex, Bramalea Pacific Name of the Project: Development, Oakland, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: IDG Architects, Inc Design, planning, and development of procurement drawings. Description of services performed by the Key Meetings and presentation to various stakeholders. Personnel (including designation): Coordination with various engineering disciplines. External and internal interface with other developments within the vicinity of the project. Type of Project Urban Project – Shopping Mall (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).)

Name of client and Address: Bramalea Pacific Development, Inc th (indicate whether public or private) Chlorox Building, 12 Street, Oakland, CA

Name, telephone no. and fax no. of client’s Unknown at this time representative: US$74 million Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 4.6 hectares

Start date and finish date of the services 1986-1988 (Design) (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 520

Brief description of the project: This $74million project consists of four buildings designed on the deck of the existing City Center Parking Garage, for 235,000 SF of retail and office space in a three-story, low-rise configuration around a sunny outdoor square at the entrance to the BART 12th Street Station. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Project Designer Salvio Pacheco Square Name of the Project: Concord, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Hope Consulting Group, Inc Design, planning, and development of procurement drawings. Description of services performed by the Key Meetings and presentation to various stakeholders. Personnel (including designation): Coordination with various engineering disciplines. External and internal interface with other developments within the vicinity of the project. Type of Project Urban Project – Commercial/Residential (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Private Developer (indicate whether public or private)

Name, telephone no. and fax no. of client’s Unknown at this time representative: 2.3 hectare Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 1 super city block

Start date and finish date of the services 1981-1982 (Design) (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 280

Brief description of the project: A one super city block multi-use development project located in front of the historical Todos Los Santos Plaza in Concord. The Mission Style Architecture project is composed of a 2-3 storey office/retail, and 4-storey market rate medium density condominium residential buildings. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

Designation of Key Personnel: Design Team/Job Captain Opera Plaza Development Name of the Project: San Francisco, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: John Carl Warnecke and Associates Responsibilities involved development, and review of design Description of services performed by the Key deliverables by the design team including resolution of major Personnel (including designation): design issues, quality assurance implementation. As Job Captain, was responsible for production and coordination of the construction documents drawings for bidding. Type of Project Urban Project - Multi-use commercial development (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).)

Name of client and Address: Pacific Union Development Corporation (indicate whether public or private) San Francisco, CA

Name, telephone no. and fax no. of client’s representative:

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs Unknown million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum N.A (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 3.3 hectare

Start date and finish date of the services March 1979 – April 1980 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 250

Brief description of the project: A six-block multi-use development project located adjacent to the San Francisco Opera House, composed of three 12-14 story market rate housing, 6-story podium housing and related amenities including a garden plaza at the roof level, restaurants, movie theatres and other various commercial retail facilities at the ground level.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Rolando Barlaan)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

APPENDIX-I

Form-11 Eligible Assignments of Key Personnel (Refer Clause 3.1.4) Name of Key Personnel: Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE Designation of Key Personnel: Structural Lead/Construction Expert Kamehameha Highway Stations Group, Honolulu Name of the Project: Authority for Rapid Transit (HART), Honolulu, HI Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Structural Engineering final design services Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Responsible for the entire design and construction contract documents for the Pearl Highlands Station, as this is a very complex facility, from the architectural design and structural engineering stand point.  DSDC Services 3 Aerial Stations & Guideway Segments Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation (HART) Name of client and Address: 1099 Alakea St., Suite 1700 (indicate whether public or private) Honolulu, Hawaii 96813

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs Cost: $120 Million (approx.) million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only): Part of 20-mile grade separated fixed guideway transit Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) system. November 2012- August 2015 (design complete and Start date and finish date of the services construction in progress) (month/ year):

Noofdaysspentontheassignment 288

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel –Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE Designation of Key Personnel: Structural Design Lead New BART Operations Control Center Facility, Name of the Project: Lake Merritt Plaza, Oakland, CA, USA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Schematic Design Program Definition – the structural Description of services performed by the Key design criteria, preliminary framing plans, structural Personnel (including designation): sections, framing elevations Metro Heavy Rail Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Name of client and Address: 300 Lakeside Drive, (indicate whether public or private) Oakland, CA 94612, USA

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs Approximately $54 Million (bldg.. only) million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum Not Applicable (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not Applicable

Start date and finish date of the services February 2014 – On going (month/ year):

360 No of days spent on the assignment Brief description of the project: The work performed in these two conceptual designs included Schematic Design Program Definition – the structural design criteria, preliminary framing plans, structural sections, framing elevations and a comprehensive 3-D computer model for the two-story OCC, which is used in the analysis for gravity loads, wind and seismic forces. For the three-story option of the OCC structure, a comprehensive 3-D computer model had been developed to perform the preliminary design of the structural including dynamic analysis for seismic forces. This 3-D computer model of the Option 2 was also used for the soil-structure interaction (SSI) analysis of the existing underground station in order to ascertain its structural capability to carry the New OCC structure. The SSI analysis of the existing station structure is performed by others. The new 38,000 SF plus, 3- storey, LEED silver facility when completed will serve as the new hub for BART operations which is expanded to include both existing and the extension of the BART operations to the Silicon Valley and Livermore. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel –Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Mee Shing, Owyang, PE, SE

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Structural Engineer/Construction Expert

Name of the Project: The BART-VTA Silicon Valley Berryessa Extension (SVBX), Design Build Contract C700 Line Stations, Wayside Facilities Structures & Systems, San Jose, CA

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.  Structural Engineering analysis and design of various Description of services performed by the Key segments of the heavy rail contract, including Milpitas and Personnel (including designation): Berryessa Station. Using SAP2000  Responsible for SSI analysis and design of the underground open trench/channel housing two BART tracks and 700 ft. long platforms  Responsible for the design of a 268 ft. long pedestrian overpass crossing (POC) bridge over the Capital Expressway connecting the Milpitas Station and the existing light rail Montague Station and the associated LRT Station modification to accommodate the new stairs and escalators and a new canopy structure over the new stairs and escalator well, and platform supporting one end of the POC Bridge.  Overall supervision for the design of these facilities which included roof framing with steel joists, masonry shear walls design and foundations design.  Metro Heavy Rail Type of Project  Bus Transit and & Light Rail Interface (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) (Intermodal station) Name of client and Address: Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) (indicate whether public or private) 3331 North 1st Street, San Jose, CA 95134

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US $840 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 30.4 million (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not applicable

Start date and finish date of the services Jan. 2012 – April 2015 (month/ year): No of days spent on the assignment 2500

Brief description of the project:  Berryessa Station sits on fifty-two (52) acre- station campus, consisting of the structural street interstitial facilities at the concourse level, a 700 ft long, 29’-6” wide elevated cast-in-place concrete center platform thirty-five (35) feet above ground. Seismic design of all the structures and structural components was based on the modified earthquake response spectrum with a maximum spectral acceleration of 7g. Structural engineering analyses were performed using SAP2000 finite element computer program. Moreover, both the north and south entrance canopies have highly structural design challenges in order to meet the stringent architectural requirements of highly aesthetical appearance. This BART station is the End-of-the-Line structure with all the rapid transit station related ancillary facilities on the site.

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

 Milpitas Station: Responsible for the soil-structure interaction (SSI) analysis and design of the underground open trench/channel housing two BART tracks and 700 ft long platforms. Also responsible for the design of a 268 ft. long pedestrian overpass crossing (POC) bridge over the Capital Expressway connecting the Milpitas Station and the existing light rail Montague Station and the associated LRT Station modification to accommodate the new stairs and escalators and a new canopy structure over the new stairs and escalator well, and platform supporting one end of the POC Bridge. Work also included the new emergency exist stairs connecting the existing LRT Montague Station platform. The design of this POC Bridge was based on the latest AASHTO and Caltrans Bridge Design criteria.

 Wayside System Facilities for Milpitas, San Jose, and Fremont sites. Overall supervision for the design of these facilities which included roof framing with steel joists, masonry shear walls design and foundations design. Seismic design of these facilities was based on the site-specific ground response spectrum generated with a maximum ground acceleration of 0.57g and a maximum response spectral acceleration of 1.34g.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE

Designation of Key Personnel: Structural Engineer/Construction Expert BART Warm Springs Extension, Fremont Central Park Name of the Project: Subway Project Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Parsons Brinckerhoff  Lead Structural Engineer for the Design of the Fremont Description of services performed by the Key Central Park Subway Project Personnel (including designation):  Heavy Rail Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Bay Area Rapid Transit District Name of client and Address: 300 Lakeside, 21st floor, Oakland, California 94612 (indicate whether public or private)

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US $261 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum 124.2 million (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) Not applicable

Start date and finish date of the services May 2008 – Dec. 2010 (month/ year): No of days spent on the assignment 1500

Brief description of the project: Structural Design Lead for the 1.3-mile-long (2-kilometer-long) two-track underground subway project. This project is the first part of the BART Warm Springs Extension (WSX) in the city of Fremont. This cut-and- cover subway portion of the WSX project is used to cross under Stevenson Boulevard, Fremont Central Park, Lake Elizabeth, and the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks. It consists of 1,100 feet (335 meters) of the northern transition section, 4,600 feet (1,402 meters) of the subway section and 1,000 feet (304 meters) of the southern transition section, for a total of 6,700 feet long (2,042 meters long). This subway section is located right next to the Hayward Fault even though it does not cross it. The Hayward Fault is capable of generating severe seismic ground motion with a magnitude of seven or greater on the Richter scale. Besides the subway section, this portion of the WSX project also includes two ventilation structures which are located directly on top of the subway box with a footprint of about 60 feet by 210 feet (18 meters by 64 meters) each and extend 25 feet (7.6 meters) above the subway box.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Structural Engineer

Name of the Project: Surveillance Radar Program (SRP)

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: Parsons Brinckerhoff  Lead structural engineer for the design of the Phased Array Description of services performed by the Key Radar Building Personnel (including designation): Multi-story structural framed building Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Raytheon Company Name of client and Address: 528 Boston Post Road, Sudbury, MA 01776 (indicate whether public or private) Loreto D. Mancini Name, telephone no. and fax no. of client’s 978-440-2841 representative: [email protected]

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs US $150 million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum N/A (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Projects N/A only)

Start date and finish date of the services June/2005 – Aug. 2007 (month/ year): No of days spent on the assignment 1200

Brief description of the project: Structural lead for the design of the multi-story structural steel-framed building. The building is designed to resist a horizontal earthquake ground motion that induces 1.0g seismic base shear and also designed to resist the wind induced pressures from two design wind speeds—120 knots (138 miles per hour) under the operating condition and 200 knots (230 miles per hour) under the survival condition with an importance factor of 1.7 for both cases. These are equivalent to a wind speed of 234.6 miles per hour and 391 miles per hour respectively. Besides the strong seismic ground motions and extremely high wind, the building has also been designed to meet an extremely stringent deflection criterion of 0.25 inches (0.006 meters) maximum at the upper roof of the building under the operating wind condition. This PAR building consists of nine levels: ground floor, second floor, third floor, lower roof, fourth floor, fifth floor, sixth floor, seventh floor, eighth floor and upper roof. The top six stories form a radar tower, which rises above the lower roof forming a truncated six-sided pyramid. The major function of this tower is to provide the supports for the phase array radar panels. These radar panels are mounted on three sides of the tower. The lower three stories of the building have a rectangular plan with dimensions of 153 feet (46.7 meters) long by 116 feet (35.3 meters) wide. The total height of the building is 112 feet (34.1 meters). Chevron and inverted V-types of braced frames are used to provide sufficient stiffness required of the building in order to meet the stringent deflection criterion of 0.24 inches (0.006 meters) and to act as lateral force resistant elements for either seismic forces or wind forces. The typical floor framing consists of 5.9-inch-thick (0.15-meter-thick) concrete slab over steel metal deck which in turn is supported by floor beams and girders. The foundation system consists of a 4.8-foot-thick (1.5-meter-thick) mat slab supported by 229 drilled shafts with a diameter of 30 inches (0.76 meters) each. The drilled shafts are about 65 feet (20 meters) long with an embedment of 19 feet (6 meters) into the rock. The building is located

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. at the top of a mountain which is about 11,483 feet (3,500 meters) high. The building has been designed to behave within the elastic limit under the seismic as well as the wind forces. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Form-11 Eligible Assignments of Key Personnel (Refer Clause 3.1.4)

Name of Key Personnel: Ram Kumar, PhD, TE Assistant Professor of Transportation Planning Designation of Key Personnel: Advisor on several graduate research projects; Consultant to Name of the Project: CEPT and Vastu Shilpa on several Transportation Projects. School of Planning; and Transportation Consultant CEPT and Name of Consulting Firm where Vastu Shilpa, Ahmedabad employed:  Teaching graduate level transportation planning and Description of services performed by engineering courses the Key Personnel (including  Advising graduate students’ research projects designation):  Transportation Consultant to CEPT and Vastu Shilpa  Urban and regional transportation planning studies Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Vastu Shilpa, Ahmedabad (private) Name of client and Address: CEPT, Ahmedabad (private) (indicate whether public or private)

Estimated capital cost of the Project Government Sponsored Studies (in Rs million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per Not Applicable annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Not Applicable Projects)

Start date and finish date of the Start: January 1976 services (month/ year): End: March 1980

No of days spent on the assignment 100

Brief description of the project: Several transportation (highways and transit) studies in urban and rural areas in Gujarat.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. RamKKumar

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Ram Kumar, PhD, TE)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Ram Kumar, PhD, TE Head of Traffic Planning Group and Transportation Planner Designation of Key Personnel: Several projects in the Mumbai (then Bombay) Name of the Project: Metropolitan Region – including Kalyan Complex Mumbai (then Bombay) Metropolitan Region Development Name of Consulting Firm where Authority employed:  Conducting transportation planning studies: eg. Kalyan Description of services performed by Complex Transit Plan. the Key Personnel (including  Review and coordination of several projects with designation): MSRTC, BEST, Bombay Municipal Corp., New Bombay.  Urban and Regional Transportation Planning Studies Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Mumbai (then Bombay) Metropolitan Region Development Name of client and Address: Authority (indicate whether public or private) (Public)

Estimated capital cost of the Project Planning Studies (in Rs million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per Not applicable annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Mumbai Metropolitan Region Projects)

Start date and finish date of the Start: April 1980 services (month/ year): End: March 1982

No of days spent on the assignment 200

Brief description of the project:

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

RamKKumar

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Ram Kumar, PhD, TE)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Ram Kumar, PhD, TE Senior Consultant, Transportation Designation of Key Personnel: Several Research Projects Name of the Project: Operations Research Group (ORG), Division of Ambalal Name of Consulting Firm where Sarabhai Enterprises, Vadodara employed:  Developing transportation planning practice at ORG Description of services performed by  Pursuing transportation planning business nationally the Key Personnel (including designation):  Urban and Regional Transportation Planning / Research Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) ORG, Vadodara (then Baroda) Name of client and Address: Private (indicate whether public or private)

Estimated capital cost of the Project Planning Studies (in Rs million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per Not applicable annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Not applicable Projects)

Start date and finish date of the Start: April 1982 services (month/ year): End: August 1983

No of days spent on the assignment 100

Brief description of the project:

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

RamKKumar

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Ram Kumar, PhD, TE)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Ram Kumar, PhD, TE

Designation of Key Personnel: Vice President E Street BRT Project, Omnitrans, San Bernardino Name of the Project: County – San Bernardino, CA (sbX Green Line) Name of Consulting Firm where Iteris. Inc. employed:  Project Manager for ITS Planning and Design associated Description of services performed by with implementation of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project the Key Personnel (including in a 15.7-mile corridor along E Street in the Cities of San designation): Bernardino and Loma Linda in California  BRT Implementation (including stations) Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).)

Name of client and Address: San Bernardino Associated Government (SANBAG) (indicate whether public or private) Public

Estimated capital cost of the Project $100 million (USD) (in Rs million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per 60-passenger articulated bus, 10-15 minute frequency, 17 annum (for railway/metro station or hours per day (M-F) airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Not applicable Projects)

Start date and finish date of the 2006-2009 services (month/ year):

No of days spent on the assignment 40

Brief description of the project: The effort includes definition and design of Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Technology and queue jump lanes; and preparing performance specifications for signal upgrade to incorporate TSP.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. RamKKumar

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Ram Kumar, PhD, TE)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Ram Kumar, PhD, TE

Designation of Key Personnel: Vice President Virginia Street RAPID Implementation, Regional Name of the Project: Transportation Commission, Washoe County – Reno, NV Name of Consulting Firm where Iteris, Inc. employed:  Project Manager for a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project in Description of services performed by a 12-mile corridor along Virginia Street in Reno, NV. the Key Personnel (including  Preparing an environmental document and preferred designation): alignment  Preparing operational plan for 4-mile segment and obtaining WC RTC Board Approval.  BRT Study and Metro Rapid Implementation Plan Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Washoe County Regional Transportation Commission, Reno, NV (indicate whether public or private)

Estimated capital cost of the Project 12-mile BRT Project - $100 million (in Rs million or US$ million) 4-mile Metro Rapid Project - $25 million

Capacity in million passengers per 10-15 minute frequency, 16 hours per day, 7 days a week. annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects)

Start date and finish date of the Start: May 2006 services (month/ year): End: May 2009

No of days spent on the assignment 60

Brief description of the project: This effort included Alternatives Analysis, NEPA Process and Project Development. A financially constrained Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) was developed and adopted by the RTC. An application was submitted to FTA for funding under the Very Small Starts Program. The alternatives analysis process includes BRT Operations; ridership estimates; capital and operating cost estimates; planning and design of stations; and ITS infrastructure. Dr. Kumar’s involvement in the project established a viable system a part of which was implemented by Washoe County RTC.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. RamKKumar

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Ram Kumar, PhD, TE)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Ram Kumar, PhD, TE

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal Transportation Planner Boulder Highway BRT Operations Analysis and Station Name of the Project: Design, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada – Las Vegas, NV Name of Consulting Firm where Parsons Brinkerhoff (now WSP) employed:  Project Manager for BRT Operations Analysis and Description of services performed by Station Location Simulation for approximately 16 miles the Key Personnel (including of BRT Operations in dedicated lane and 23 Stations designation):  BRT Operations and Implementation Plan (including Type of Project stations) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Southern Nevada RTC, Clark County, NV (indicate whether public or private) Public

Estimated capital cost of the Project Over $50 million (in Rs million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects)

Start date and finish date of the Start: 2005 services (month/ year): End: 2006

No of days spent on the assignment 40

Brief description of the project: Micro-simulation of BRT and traffic operations was performed using VISSIM for the entire length of the corridor which has over 40 signalized intersections and driveways to major retail centers, casinos and mixed- use developments. Effect of Traffic Signal Optimization and Transit Signal Priority (TSP) on auto and BRT Travel times, and delays were analyzed. Transit ridership projections were developed.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. RamKKumar

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Ram Kumar, PhD, TE)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Ram Kumar, PhD, TE

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal Transportation Planner Downtown Connector BRT Implementation, Regional Name of the Project: Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada – Las Vegas, NV Name of Consulting Firm where Parsons Brinkerhoff (now WSP) employed:  Task Manager for Traffic Analysis and Transit Operations Description of services performed by for a 3½ mile BRT Corridor the Key Personnel (including designation):  BRT Implementation Plan (including stations) Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Southern Nevada RTC Name of client and Address: Public (indicate whether public or private) $25 million Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects)

Start date and finish date of the Start: 2005 services (month/ year): End: 2006

No of days spent on the assignment 10

Brief description of the project: Traffic operations analysis for proposed lane configurations was performed, and traffic volume projections were made. Future traffic conditions for an NEPA document were also analyzed.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

RamKKumar

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Ram Kumar, PhD, TE

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Ram Kumar, PhD, TE

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal Transportation Planner Conversion of Proposed CenterLine LRT Project to Bus Name of the Project: Rapid Transit (BRT), Orange County Transportation Authority – Orange County, CA Name of Consulting Firm where Parsons Brinkerhoff (now WSP) employed:  Task Leader for alignment planning and ridership Description of services performed by modeling; developed alternative BRT alignments with the Key Personnel (including connections to county-wide BRT service, and estimated designation): BRT ridership and service based on the OCTAM Model for two alternatives.  LRT to BRT Conversion Study (including alignment and Type of Project stations) (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Name of client and Address: Public (indicate whether public or private)

Estimated capital cost of the Project $100 Million (USD) (in Rs million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per Not applicable annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Not applicable Projects)

Start date and finish date of the Start: 2004 services (month/ year): End: 2006

No of days spent on the assignment 10

Brief description of the project: Conducted alternatives analysis for alignment, with ridership modeling to convert a previously developed LRT Project to a BRT Service. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

RamKKumar

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Ram Kumar, PhD, TE)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Ram Kumar, PhD, TE

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal Transportation Planner

Name of the Project: Sloan-Ivanpah Corridor Transit Feasibility Study, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern California – Las Vegas, NV

Name of Consulting Firm where Parsons Brinkerhoff (now WSP) employed:  Task Leader involved in developing alignment Description of services performed by alternatives for bus and rail rapid transit (BRT/LRT) for a the Key Personnel (including 10-mile corridor along South Las Vegas Boulevard; designation): estimating capital and operating cost for the alignments and adapting BRT service characteristics from international experience.

 BRT Planning Study Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Southern Nevada RTC, Clark County, NV Name of client and Address: Public (indicate whether public or private)

Estimated capital cost of the Project Planning Study. (in Rs million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per Not applicable annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Not applicable Projects)

Start date and finish date of the Start: 2005 services (month/ year): End: 2006

No. of days spent on the assignment 15

Brief description of the project: Developed alignment alternatives and conducted transit capacity studies for a proposed BRT Corridor. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. RamKKumar

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Ram Kumar, PhD, TE)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Ram Kumar, PhD, TE

Designation of Key Personnel: Project Manager Green Line Rail Transit Extension to Norwalk Name of the Project: Transportation Center, LACMTA – Los Angeles, CA Name of Consulting Firm where Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (now LA employed: Metro)  Project Manager responsible for directing the Route Description of services performed by Refinement Analysis and Environmental Document for the Key Personnel (including the 2.7 mile (4.3-kilometer) rail transit extension from the designation): current terminus to the Norwalk Transportation Center.  Rail Transit Route Refinement Study and Environmental Type of Project Document (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (now LA Name of client and Address: Metro) and City of Norwalk (indicate whether public or private) Public

Estimated capital cost of the Project $250 million (in 1993) (in Rs million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per Not applicable annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Not applicable Projects)

Start date and finish date of the Start: 1991 services (month/ year): End: 1993

No of days spent on the assignment 100

Brief description of the project: Directed the route refinement analysis and environmental document for 2.7 mile rail transit extension (underground) from I-605 to Norwalk Transportation Center. RR and EIR approved by LACTC Board.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. RamKKumar

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Ram Kumar, PhD, TE)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Ram Kumar, PhD, TE

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal Consultant Hollywood Transportation Plan – Hollywood CA Name of the Project:

Name of Consulting Firm where Barton-Aschman Associates (now Parsons Corporation) employed:  Task leader responsible for transportation modeling and Description of services performed by analysis of alternatives. the Key Personnel (including designation):  Comprehensive Transportation Plan Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) City of Los Angeles, CA Name of client and Address: Public (indicate whether public or private)

Estimated capital cost of the Project Planning Study (in Rs million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per Not applicable annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Not applicable Projects)

Start date and finish date of the Start: 1987 services (month/ year): End: 1991

No of days spent on the assignment 20

Brief description of the project: A sub-regional model was developed to analyze traffic conditions associated with land-use and roadway changes as a part of the redevelopment plan for Hollywood. The travel demand forecasting model was used to develop “what-if” scenarios to easily understand the traffic implications of regional, sub-regional and local changes to roadway networks, operations, and land use changes.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. RamKKumar

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Ram Kumar, PhD, TE)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Ram Kumar, PhD, TE

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal Consultant

Name of the Project: Long Range Transportation Plan for Long Beach – Long Beach, CA

Name of Consulting Firm where Barton-Aschman Associates (now Parsons Corporation) employed:  Task leader responsible for transportation modeling and Description of services performed by analysis of alternatives the Key Personnel (including designation):  Comprehensive Transportation Plan Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) City of Long Beach, CA Name of client and Address: Public (indicate whether public or private)

Estimated capital cost of the Project Transportation Planning Study (in Rs million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per Not applicable annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Not applicable Projects only)

Start date and finish date of the Start: 1987 services (month/ year): End: 1991

No of days spent on the assignment 20

Brief description of the project: A sub-regional model was developed to analyze traffic and transportation conditions associated with land-use and roadway network changes; and to recommend several capital and operational alternatives to improved traffic flow and circulation in the Long Beach region. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. RamKKumar

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Ram Kumar, PhD, TE)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Ram Kumar, PhD, TE

Designation of Key Personnel: Principal Consultant Community Plan Revision Circulation Element – Los Name of the Project: Angeles, CA

Name of Consulting Firm where Barton-Aschman Associates (now Parsons Corporation) employed:  Project Manager responsible for the development of the Description of services performed by transportation modeling and analysis framework for the the Key Personnel (including Community Plan Revisions in the City of Los Angeles. designation):  Travel demand forecasting Type of Project (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) City of Los Angeles Name of client and Address: Public (indicate whether public or private)

Estimated capital cost of the Project Transportation Planning Study (in Rs million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per Not applicable annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (for Urban Planning Not applicable Projects only)

Start date and finish date of the Start: 1988 services (month/ year): End: 1991

No of days spent on the assignment 30

Brief description of the project: Analyses for 22 different community plans were based on the modeling and analysis framework developed by Dr. Kumar and his team. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Ram K Kumar

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – Ram Kumar, PhD, TE)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

APPENDIX-I

Form-11 Eligible Assignments of Key Personnel (Refer Clause 3.1.4)

Name of Key Personnel: Betsy, Lindsay

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Environmental Expert California High-Speed Rail, Anaheim to Los Angeles Name of the Project: Section, Orange and Los Angeles Counties, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: UltraSystems Environmental Incorporated

Description of services performed by the Key  Managed preparation of Technical Studies to support Personnel (including designation): preparation of an Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Impact Assessment (EIR/EIS).  Provided QA/QC for all technical reports and the Draft EIR/EIS.  Contractual oversight for the environmental team.  Attended all Interagency Coordination Meetings, coordinated efforts with Engineering, Public Outreach, and multiple public and private agencies

Type of Project Development of a high-speed rail segment. (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) $1B California High-Speed Rail Authority (Public Agency), c/o Name of client and Address: STV Inc. (indicate whether public or private) 770 L Street, Suite 620 Sacramento, CA 95814 Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs More than US $50 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum More than 10 million passengers per annum (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) NA

Start date and finish date of the services January 2007 to December 2009 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 3years

Brief description of the project: The California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority), in cooperation with the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) certified its Final Program Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) in 2005 for a high-speed train (HST) system in California. The Authority and FRA are now preparing a Project-level EIR/EIS to evaluate the environmental effects of constructing and operating a HST between Anaheim (Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center [ARTIC]) and Los Angeles (Union Station), along the LOSSAN corridor. The corridor proposed for use by High-Speed trains between Anaheim and Los Angeles is a combination of three segments, with three owners: The River Corridor, The BNSF San Bernardino Subdivision, and The Orange Subdivision. The document deliverable for this project:

 Tiers from an approved statewide program EIR/EIS  Addresses State/federal environmental requirements  Considers environmental impacts at a site-specific level of detail  Evaluates the corridor alignment selected in Program EIR/EIS  Analyzes various project alternatives (including numerous local grade separation projects)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

 Provides for three Transit Hubs / Intermodal Centers at: Union Station, Norwalk, Anaheim UltraSystems was part of the environmental team preparing a Project-level EIR for this proposed high-speed train (HST) segment. A series of public scoping meetings to educate local communities and stakeholders about the project and potential impacts which may result from daily and construction operations were held. UltraSystems also held interagency meetings in Los Angeles on this project, with various key stakeholders.

UltraSystems was responsible for preparing the environmental setting sections for the following technical sections: biological resource surveys, monitoring, and mitigation planning; wetlands/waters of the US – Section 404; air quality studies, analysis, and technical documentation; land use planning; socioeconomic and community impact analysis; cumulative impact assessments; parks and recreational facilities – Section 4(f); and historical and archaeological resource studies – Section 106.

Project Achievements: Provided information on existing environmental setting in all major impact categories, for use in subsequent environmental documentation. Provided initial outreach and scoping activities to all local jurisdictions along the corridor, approximately 30 entities. Outreach activities also involved technical scoping documents. Prepare initial environmental baseline document for the EIR/EIS. Prepared regulatory agency coordination plan for the corridor. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – BETSY LINDSAY)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Betsy, Lindsay

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Environmental Expert On-Call Environmental Services Contract, 45+ Task Name of the Project: Orders, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: UltraSystems Environmental Incorporated

Description of services performed by the Key  Managed the environmental impact assessment efforts of Personnel (including designation): the Team.  Assisted the Senior Project Manager and Technical Task Order Managers (for Biology, Cultural/Historical, Air and Noise, and Water Quality) in the implementation and maintenance of Quality Assurance/Quality Check programs.  Attended all public meetings held for different projects.  Organized the UltraSystems professional staff to ensure all projects were completed on time and within budget.  Assisted with the technical review of environmental documents to ensure compliance with California Environmental Quality Act/National Environmental Policy Act guidelines and regulatory agency requirements.

Type of Project Heavy Rail, Light Rail, Bus Rapid Transit, Environmental Compliance. (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) $3.6M Name of client and Address: Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Public Agency) One Gateway Plaza MS 99-17-2, (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90012

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs More than US $50 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum NA (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) NA

Start date and finish date of the services April 2001 to March 2006 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 5.5years

Brief description of the project: UltraSystems held the On-Call Environmental Compliance Services Contract with Metro for six years. Our responsibilities included the successful management of environmental work to ensure compliance with CEQA, NEPA, Caltrans, FHWA, CDFG, Section 106 of ACHP, Section 4(f) of the DOT Act, as well as other applicable local, State, and federal laws and regulations related to the potential impacts that Metro projects may have on the environment. Metro projects within Los Angeles County region often require changes in design, leading to the reassessment of environmental impacts. Our project management involved a broad range of environmental document contingencies, ranging from the Determination of Exemption to complete Supplemental Environmental Assessments. Our professionals provided Metro with a preliminary review of proposed projects; assessed environmental and cultural impacts; prepared technical reports for noise and vibration, traffic, parking, air quality, safety, land use, and biological resources; provided a liaison between potential contractors and Metro; assisted in project coordination and permitting processes; assisted in federal scoping; ensured CEQA and NEPA compliance; conducted hydrological and bio-monitoring of wells, springs, and other natural areas; and completed planning and engineering studies, as well as providing other related

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. professional environmental services. Work under this contract included, but was not limited to, preparation of analyses, studies, surveys, models, predictions, or reports related to the categories of impact normally found in the CEQA guidelines, or extraordinarily required by conditions that develop on projects as they are planned, developed, designed, cleared, constructed, operated, or closed out.

Selected projects completed under this contract included Environmental Impact Reports, Environmental Impact Assessments, Technical Studies, Environmental Permitting and Construction Mitigation Monitoring for Metro project including construction of light rail lines and transit stations, bus transit facilities and transit maintenance facilities, including but not limited to the following:

. Initial Study: New Bus Layover Facility at the Northwest Corner of Temple Street & Beaudry Avenue . Initial Study for the New Subway Entrance at Lankershim Boulevard and Chandler Boulevard (North) . Support MGLEE Mitigation Measures Status Report (MMSR) Project . Hydrological/Biological Field Monitoring Red Line Segment #3, Santa Monica Mountains . Archaeological Monitoring Support for the Widening of Lankershim Boulevard . Metro Pasadena Gold Line Traction Power Sub-Station (TPSS) At the U-Haul Site . Metro East-West Transit Corridor . Phase I Cultural Resources Study for the Zanja Madre at Midway Yard

The strength of our work ethic and the broad scope of our technical expertise enabled UltraSystems to provide Metro with reliable, viable, and quality solutions in a timely and cost-effective manner. Over the course of our contract, UltraSystems was awarded over 42 Metro Task Orders, and Metro extended the UltraSystems contract on five separate occasions.

In accomplishing the assigned tasks, UltraSystems provided the necessary professional, in-house staff and resources, equipment, software, supplies, and services including the design, installation, operation, maintenance, and repair of facilities and equipment. UltraSystems also arranged for the services of qualified subconsultants as deemed necessary, and assured their performance.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – BETSY LINDSAY)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Betsy, Lindsay

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Environmental Expert

Name of the Project: Revised Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Metro Orange Line, Orange County, CA

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: UltraSystems Environmental Incorporated  Managed preparation of the EIR. Description of services performed by the Key Personnel (including designation):  Provided QA/QC for all technical studies and the Draft EIR.  Contractual oversight for the environmental team.  Attended all Interagency Coordination Meetings, coordinated efforts with Engineering, Public Outreach, and multiple public and private agencies. Type of Project Light Rail Line, Environmental Documents (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).)

Name of client and Address: Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Public Agency) One Gateway Plaza MS 99-17-2, (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90012

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs More than US $50 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum NA (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) NA

Start date and finish date of the services August 2006 to December 2006 (month/ year):

Noofdaysspentontheassignment 1.5years

Brief description of the project: UltraSystems prepared a Final Revised EIR for the Metro Orange Line project. On July 19, 2004, the Court of Appeals filed a decision for Citizens Organized for Smart Transit v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. This deficiency was related to Metro’s oversight in not evaluating several suggested multiple route Rapid Bus alternatives to the BRT Alternative. To correct this inadequacy, three additional Multiple Route Rapid Bus Alternatives were considered in a Revised FEIR, in addition to the other alternatives set forth in the Final EIR. The three new alternatives were: Three East-West Rapid Bus Routes Alternative (RB-3), Five East-West Rapid Bus Routes Alternative (RB-5), and Rapid Bus Network Alternative (RB-Network). The corridor was approximately 14 miles long and connected major activity areas through the San Fernando Valley, including Warner Center, the Sepulveda Basin Recreation Area, the Van Nuys Government Center, Pierce College, Valley College, and North Hollywood.

UltraSystems coordinated and directed the activities of a project team of leading environmental and transportation consulting firms to produce a comprehensive environmental document (Revised FEIR) under a very compressed, five-month time schedule. The members of the project team were all recognized industry leaders known to the Metro from their past performance on previous Metro projects. UltraSystems coordinated all phases of the FEIR process with Metro’s fundamental staff.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – BETSY LINDSAY)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Betsy, Lindsay

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Environmental Expert Warner Center Park and Ride Facility, Addendums and Name of the Project: Modified Initial Studies, Los Angeles, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: UltraSystems Environmental Incorporated

Description of services performed by the Key  Managed the environmental impact assessment efforts of Personnel (including designation): the Team.  Provided QA/QC for all the Draft Addendums and Modified Initial Studies.  Contractual oversight for the environmental team.  Attended all Interagency Coordination Meetings, coordinated efforts with Engineering, and multiple public and private agencies.

Type of Project Park and Ride Facility, near Light Rail, Environmental (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Public Agency) One Gateway Plaza MS 99-17-2, (indicate whether public or private) Los Angeles, CA 90012

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs Not Known million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum NA (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) NA

Start date and finish date of the services May 2003 to July 2006 (month/ year):

No. of days on the assignment 6 months

Brief description of the project: UltraSystems prepared the following three California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Addendums and Modified Initial Studies (Modified IS) to evaluate the environmental impacts of project modifications to the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report for the San Fernando Valley East-West Transit Corridor (FEIR). UltraSystems coordinated closely with Metro staff to complete these assignments:  In July 2003, a Modified IS and Addendum to the FEIR was prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of installing fiber optic communications trunk routing in three segments of the Original Project area. These three segments were not analyzed as fiber optic routes by the approved FEIR, although the intervening portions of the linear project were evaluated.  In December 2003, a Modified IS and Addendum was prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of developing a park-and-ride facility at one of three site alternatives near the planned Warner Center Transit Hub and implementing three other minor project modifications. One of the three site alternatives is a triangular-shaped parcel of land owned by Boeing North American, Inc. This parcel, referred to as the “Boeing site,” was determined the most suitable of the three site alternatives for the park-and-ride facility. The three minor modifications that were also examined in the December 2003 Modified IS and an Addendum were: (1) possible substitution of rubberized asphalt concrete pavement for the currently planned portland cement concrete and/or regular asphalt at select busway segments, (2) adding a recycled water pipeline to irrigate landscaping along the busway and the bike path/pedestrian walkway, and (3) incorporating a surfacing option to differentiate the bike path from the pedestrian walkway. In July 2004, a Modified IS and Addendum was prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. constructing a park-and-ride facility that would span two properties: (1) the Boeing site identified in the December 2003 Modified IS and Addendum, and (2) an adjacent property referred to as the “North Parking Lot.” The North Parking Lot is located at the northeast corner of Vanowen Street and Canoga Avenue, north of the Boeing site. It is expected that the North Parking Lot would contribute 236 parking spaces in addition to the 662 parking spaces planned for the Boeing site, for a total of 898 parking spaces in the park-and-ride facility as a whole. The Modified IS and Addendum also evaluated the potential environmental impacts of a second minor project modification to the Original Project: modification of a small portion of the planned pedestrian path along Chandler Boulevard between the Laurel Canyon Boulevard Metro Station and the Valley College Metro Station (located at the intersection of Fulton Avenue and Burbank Boulevard). The Pedestrian Path Modification would involve deleting a small portion of the pedestrian path planned for construction along the south side of the Metro ROW, and replacing it with sidewalk along the north side of Chandler Boulevard North. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – BETSY LINDSAY)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Betsy, Lindsay

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Environmental Expert

Name of the Project: Environmental Support, Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor, Los Angeles, CA

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: UltraSystems Environmental Incorporated

Description of services performed by the Key  Managed the environmental analysis efforts of the Team. Personnel (including designation):  Provided QA/QC for all the environmental documents prepared in support of the Phase 1 design submittal  Contractual oversight for the environmental team.  Attended all Interagency Coordination Meetings, coordinated efforts with Engineering, and multiple public and private agencies.

Type of Project Light Rail, Environmental (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: Hatch Mott McDonald (Private Agency), c/o Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Public Agency) (indicate whether public or private)

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs More than US $50 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum NA (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) NA

Start date and finish date of the services April 2010 to August 2014 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysspentontheassignment 1year

Brief description of the project: The Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor extends from the Metro Green Line station at Imperial Highway and Aviation Boulevard, travels north and then east on the Harbor Subdivision railroad right-of-way to Crenshaw Boulevard. From there, the route leaves the railroad right-of-way and travels north to a transfer point with the EXPO Light Rail Transit at the intersection of Crenshaw and Exposition Boulevards.

The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority’s (Metro) Environmental Consultant circulated the Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIS/DEIR) in September 2009 for this project. The Hatch Mott MacDonald Project Team was selected to prepare the Phase I Advanced Conceptual Engineering (ACE), Phase II Preliminary Engineering (PE), and Phase III Design Services during Construction. For Phase I, UltraSystems assisted by identifying potential environmental impacts due to changes in the project design resulting from more detailed engineering, increased understanding of existing physical conditions, and input from the public regarding desired features that they would like to see implemented by Metro.

UltraSystems contributed to HMM submittals including the Basis of Design Report, Design Criteria, Compliance with Environmental Policy & Sustainable Principles, Environmental Policy Compliance Strategy Technical Memorandum & Compliance Checklist, and Physical and Visual Impact Study Report. UltraSystems also worked closely with the Noise Consultant for preparation of the Noise and Vibration Impact Study Report. The Physical and Visual Impact Study Report and Noise and Vibration Impact Study Report was used by Metro’s Environmental Consultant in the preparation of the Final EIS/Final EIR. UltraSystems provided continued assistance to the HMM Project Team characterizing potential environmental issues and identifying resource agency permitting activities. RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – BETSY LINDSAY)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Betsy, Lindsay

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Environmental Expert

Name of the Project: Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Heart of the City Amended Specific Plan, Mixed-Use Development, San Marcos, CA

Name of Consulting Firm where employed: UltraSystems Environmental Incorporated

Description of services performed by the Key  Managed the environmental impact assessment efforts of Personnel (including designation): the Team.  Provided QA/QC for all the Technical studies and draft EIR.  Contractual oversight for the environmental team.  Attended all Interagency Coordination Meetings, coordinated efforts with Architects, Engineering, and multiple public and private agencies.

Type of Project Mixed Use Development, environmental (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: City of San Marcos (Public Agency) 1 Civic Center Drive (indicate whether public or private) San Marcos, CA 92069

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs More than US $50 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum NA (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 80 Hectares

Start date and finish date of the services August 2005 to June 2007 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysontheassignment 1.5years

Brief description of the project: The City of San Marcos proposed to amend its adopted Heart of the City Specific Plan for the development of approximately 200 acres. The proposed project site is in the geographic center of the City, and is strategically located in proximity to California State University, San Marcos (CSUSM), a future commuter light rail line (North County Sprinter, which is currently in operation), and a large Kaiser medical office facility, which has the potential of becoming a North County hospital. The proposed project site also enjoys excellent access from multiple regional roadways. Due to these factors, the City believed that this area is well-suited to becoming an important employment center, with the potential for the regional-serving retail to transition to a mixed-use area. In addition to an existing business park component on the western portion of the site, the City envisioned the site transitioning into either additional business park usage or for the development of a “lifestyle center” (approximately one million square feet of regionally-serving retail and one million square feet of office development) along with supporting hotel opportunities and higher density residential development. For the eastern portion of the site, the City envisioned a university urban village with mixed use and vertical integration of residential, retail, office and entertainment development with a “main street” orientation.

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. the requirements of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). UltraSystems’ personnel also prepared several technical studies to support the EIR, including noise, biological resources, and air quality. UltraSystems’ scientists also conducted the professional peer reviews of the geotechnical and hydrological reports prepared by the City or other Stakeholders. The land use changes proposed in the Specific Plan Amendment called for a much greater intensity in the level of development on the project site. Due to the magnitude of the changes, UltraSystems prepared a comprehensive EIR that addressed all the environmental issue areas identified in CEQA. UltraSystems assised the City throughout the CEQA process, including participation at Scoping activities and public meetings, preparation and circulation of the EIR, preparation of the Response to Comments and any revisions to the EIR, preparation of the mitigation monitoring program, and the preparation of the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, as needed. All legally-required notices were also prepared, including the Notice of Preparation, Notice of Completion, Notice of Draft EIR Availability, and Notice of Determination. This EIR was prepared on an expedited schedule to meet the City’s requirements. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – BETSY LINDSAY)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Betsy, Lindsay

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Environmental Expert Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the University Name of the Project: Business Park Specific Plan, San Marcos, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: UltraSystems Environmental Incorporated

Description of services performed by the Key  Managed the environmental impact assessment efforts of Personnel (including designation): the Team.  Provided QA/QC for all the Technical studies and draft EIR.  Contractual oversight for the environmental team.  Attended all Interagency Coordination Meetings, coordinated efforts with Architects, Engineering, and multiple public and private agencies.

Type of Project Business Park, Environmental (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: City of San Marcos (Public Agency) 1 Civic Center Drive (indicate whether public or private) San Marcos, CA 92069

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs More Than US $50 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum NA (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 44 Hectares

Start date and finish date of the services March 2006 to July 2008 (month/ year):

No. of days on the assignment 1 year

Brief description of the project: The proposed project was located in the City of San Marcos, in the northern portion of San Diego County. The project site included approximately 87 acres in the central portion of the City, bound by San Marcos Boulevard and State Route (SR) 78 to the north; Twin Oaks Valley Road to the east; Craven Road to the south; and Craven Road/Bent Avenue to the west. The proposed project included 22 acres of off-site infrastructure improvements, for a total project area of approximately 109 acres. The project applicant, H.G. Fenton Company, proposed to amend the Scripps Memorial Hospital Specific Plan and develop the University Office and Medical Park (proposed project). The proposed project involved the development of approximately 87 acres with medical offices, professional offices, a smaller specialized hospital, a helipad landing site located on the south side of Discovery Street, and support retail as allowed by the existing Specific Plan. It also included the potential for a partial future school site. Discovery Street was proposed to be re-aligned throughout the project site, and sensitive habitat areas associated with San Marcos Creek were proposed to be preserved as open space. The project also proposed onsite and offsite infrastructure improvements. The implementation and development of the proposed project included the Tentative Subdivision Map (TSM 465) and associated regulatory approvals such as a General Plan Amendment (GPA 08-42) to the Circulation Element for the realignment of Discovery Street, Development Agreement (DA 91-05 [08m]) and Conditional Use Permit (CUP 08-746) (for a temporary rock crushing facility).

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. throughout the CEQA process, including participation at Scoping activities and public meetings, preparation and circulation of the EIR, preparation of the Response to Comments and any revisions to the EIR, preparation of the mitigation monitoring program, and the preparation of the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, as needed. It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – BETSY LINDSAY)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Name of Key Personnel: Betsy, Lindsay

Designation of Key Personnel: Lead Environmental Expert Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Emerald Name of the Project: Meadows Ranch Specific Plan, Riverside County, CA Name of Consulting Firm where employed: UltraSystems Environmental Incorporated

Description of services performed by the Key  Managed the environmental impact assessment efforts of Personnel (including designation): the Team.  Provided QA/QC for all the Technical studies and draft EIR.  Contractual oversight for the environmental team.  Attended all Interagency Coordination Meetings, coordinated efforts with Architects, Engineering, and multiple public and private agencies.

Type of Project Large Residential Development, Environmental (As per Cl. 3.1.4 (i) & (ii).) Name of client and Address: County of Riverside (Public Agency), Planning Department, c/o EMR Residential Properties, LLC. (Private Agency) (indicate whether public or private) 4080 Lemon St. Riverside, CA 92501

Estimated capital cost of the Project (in Rs More than US $50 Million million or US$ million)

Capacity in million passengers per annum NA (for railway/metro station or airport only):

Area in hectares (Urban Planning Projects) 112 Hectares

Start date and finish date of the services July 2003 to May 2007 (month/ year):

No.ofdaysontheassignment 1.5years

Brief description of the project: UltraSystems prepared the Emerald Meadows Ranch Environmental Impact Report No.00473 (EIR), on behalf of the County of Riverside, to evaluate potential environmental impacts resulting from the implementation of the proposed Emerald Meadows Ranch Specific Plan No. 337 (Specific Plan). The EIR was in accordance with the CEQA Statute, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the State CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq., as amended, and the County of Riverside requirements for preparing Environmental Impact Reports. The proposed Emerald Meadows Ranch development includes approximately 279 acres and is bounded by Rubidoux Boulevard to the west, 34th Street to the south, State Route 60 to the north, and the Santa Ana River to the east. The co-applicants for the project are EMR Residential Properties, LLC and the Redevelopment Agency for the County of Riverside. The proposed uses include those on the Land Use Plan and Statistical Summary in the Specific Plan Application. Based on the UltraSystems’ initial feasibility analysis, the project will provide a major benefit to the area, producing jobs, a variety of housing alternatives, and a major increase in the tax base for the area.

The proposed Specific Plan will provide a level of flexibility regarding the commercial portion of the property. The Plan will include provisions for the development of a commercial retail center of approximately 50 acres. However, should the +/-50 acre commercial retail center be deemed impracticable by either of the co- applicants, a smaller 17-acre commercial center will be permitted, with the remaining 33 acres to be developed for residential uses, subject to the requirements of the Specific Plan. The total maximum estimated residential dwelling units will be 1,350. The Specific Plan may involve the relocation and/or abandonment of existing streets and utilities within the project boundary. The objectives for the proposed project include reinforcing the goals of the County of Riverside General Plan and Jurupa Area Plan; promoting the area revitalization in RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc. coordination with the Riverside Economic Development Agency; providing a variety of quality housing of various styles/prices responsive to the needs of the community; providing a well-integrated elementary school site and parks; providing opportunities for walking/bicycling between residential neighborhoods and shopping, parks, and the local church and elementary school; and providing connections to the future regional trail system along the Santa Ana River corridor. Planned regulatory approvals associated with the project include a General Plan Amendment, a Specific Plan, an Environmental Impact Report, a Fiscal Impact Report, a Development Agreement, Tentative Tract Maps, and Site Plans and Conditional Use Permits/Variances (as required). It is certified that the aforesaid information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

(Signature and name of Key Personnel – BETSY LINDSAY)

RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Form-12

Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Professional Personnel

1. Proposed Position: Chief Architect/Team Leader

2. Name ofPersonnel: Anil Verma, FAIA

3. DateofBirth: September 8, 1951

4. Nationality: Citizen of the United States of America

5. Educational Qualifications:  Master of Landscape Architecture, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA  Master of Architecture in Urban Design, New Delhi School of Planning and Architecture  Bachelor of Architecture, Regional College of Engineering, Nagpur, India  Film Making Courses, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA  Economic Development Courses, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA  Registered Architect in CA #C21756, WA #7499, AZ #35761, CT #9630, MA #9565, MN #40490, NV #2470, PR # 16932, HI #13696, and NY #027906  A & B Contractor License in California #676854  NCARB Certificate No. 4629  Fellow of the American Institute of Architects  Washington Association of Building Officials  International Conference of Building Officials  Construction Management Association of America (CMAA) Member  American Public Transportation Association (APTA) Member  WTS Member

Awards/Recognition

American Institute of Architects (AIA) Declaration that Anil Verma, FAIA, Advancement to Fellowship by the Jury of Fellows for notable contribution to the Advancement of the profession of Architecture

Vision 2020 Award from the Puget Sound Regional Council for the Planning & Design of the Auburn Commuter Rail Station, & Transit Center, Seattle, Washington

AVA won the Top Honor Award (The Top Prize) from the American Institute of Architects (AIA), for the San Clemente Commuter Rail Station in Orange County, California (USA).

The Best South Asian American Entrepreneur, South Asian Business Alliance Network, SABAN, Anil Verma, President & CEO of Anil Verma Associates, Inc., 2013

Certificate of Appreciation, California Community Connection Corporation, LA Construction Awareness Day

Construction Management Association (CMAA), Project Achievement Award for Los Angeles Community College District (LACCD) Proposition A/AA Bond Program, for the Modernization and Redevelopment of a 100-year-old college campus in Los Angeles, CA, 2010

Los Angeles Trade Technical College Learning Assistance Center Library Renovation Recognition Award

Consultant Recognition Ceremony, JFK-IAT for the Redevelopment and Expansion of the $1.4 billion (USD)

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

International Arrivals Terminal, JFK International Airport Terminal, New York, New York.

Alameda Corridor East (ACE) Construction Authority, Ramona Blvd, Grade Separation Project, 2008

Certificate of Appreciation for Anil Verma, FAIA, Featured Speaker at Art of Sustaining Public Transport – Planning, Designing, Constructing Transportation Projects by Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) American Institute of Architects, Women’s Transportation Seminar (WTS) – a joint symposium, 2006

South Sacramento Light Rail Corridor – Award by Regional Transit District, Sacramento, 2003

Building Bridges for Success Award, Transit Affairs Committee American Public Transit Association (APTA) and Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA) International Public Transit Exposition

Certificate of Appreciation, International Society of Explosives Engineers (ISEE) Architecture and Engineering

Award of Excellence in honor of outstanding vision, dedication, and professionalism, Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC) Academic Senate, Los Angeles, CA

Papers and Publications International  American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) - International Chinese Transportation Professionals Association, Beijing, China, May 2014: Impacts of Rail Technology in 21 Century U.S.

 Rail India Technical and Economic Services (RITES) and Ministry of Tourism and Transportation, New Delhi, India, 1997: Urban Design Guidelines and their influence on station design.

 CODATU VIIth Conference on Urban Transport in Developing Countries, CODATU France/New Delhi, India, February 1996: Aesthetics of Rail Transit Systems. Passenger experience from initiation to completion of journey.

 Ministry of Railways, Northern India Headquarters, New Delhi, India, Feb. 1995: Joint and collateral Development on Railway Owned and Station Area Properties. Concepts of air rights transfers, property tax assessment zones, incremental financing and the long and short-term benefits of Transit Oriented Development.

 8th Road Engineering Association of Asia and Australia (REAAA) Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, April 1995: Mass Transit Use of Road Facilities for Commuter, Heavy and Light Rail Transit. Benefits of pedestrianizing urban city centers with the use of transit would enhance neighborhoods and propagate growth of TOD communities.

 Indian Institute of Planning and the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), India, Sept. 1992: Impact of Developing a Metro Light or Heavy Rail System in Metropolitan Delhi. Developing rail systems thru the congested neighborhoods of the city, immediate social impacts, displacement, land acquisition and long term benefits.

 Ministry of Tourism and Transportation, Delhi, India, March 1990: Urban Rail Transportation Systems in Urban India. The need for the development of Heavy and/or Light Rail systems in the metropolitan cities.

 Cities 2000: Transportation & Urban Design Conference, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), 1989: Anil was the organizer, moderator and speaker of a Transportation / Urban Design Conference - focused on transportation, land use, and city building.

National - USA  Federal Transit Administration (FTA), 31st Capital Project Management Workshop, June 2016: Presentation on “TEX Rail DMU, Lessons Learned”: Compares discusses the impact of Diesel Multiple Units (DMU) versus the Diesel Locomotives on the Urban Environment.

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 28th Annual Engineers Training and Development Conference, Washington D.C., June 2012: Constructability Reviews- Scope, Timing, Responsibility – Analysis of 3 major projects–What went wrong? Who is responsible? Could it have been avoided? Review of major design/construction disasters in recent rail transit industry.

 American Public Transit Association (APTA) Rail Transit Conference, Dallas, TX, June 2012: Branding the Crenshaw/LAX Light Rail Transit Corridor through Sustainable Community Based Design, as the line passes thru low and middle income mixed ethnic communities, posing challenges of design acceptance and construction.

 MTA/NYCT Sr. VP – Fred Smith, Chief Engineer and his Management Staff, May 2013: Invited Anil to present the challenges of alternative delivery methods, with design-bid-build, design-build or fast-track turnkey forms of contracts on major construction contracts, specially related to public and private Rail Transit projects.

 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 27th Annual Engineers Meeting, Washington D.C., June 2011: Challenges of Designing and Constructing Underground Rail Transit Stations – Review of “Cut and Cover’ and ‘Tunnel’ Stations and Tunnel Ventilation Structures and the integral relationship between stations’ spaces.

 American Institute of Architects 2006 National Convention and Design Expo, Los Angeles, CA, June 2006: Transit Architecture on the Edge: Meeting 21st Century Demands – History of Los Angeles Transit Systems since 1850 and current trends in station design and Transit Oriented Development.

 American Institute of Architects/Construction Specification Institute/Women’s Transportation Seminar - a joint symposium, Oakland, CA, February 2006: Art of Sustaining Public Transport – Planning, Designing, & Constructing Tren Urbano’s Rio Piedras heavy rail subway system in San Juan, Puerto Rico.

 American Public Transit Association (APTA) Rail Transit Conference, Miami, FL, June 2004: Challenges of building a Metro Heavy Rail Subway System in the dense and congested environment of Los Angeles.

 MTA/NYCT Chief Architect’s Office/Infrastructure Group, Sept. 2003: Anil Verma was invited to make a formal presentation on design and construction of rail transit projects in Metropolitan cities by NYCT’s Chief Architect, Porie Saikia-Eapen and her team of architects and engineers to discuss in detail the benefits of design- build (turnkey) project delivery versus the traditional design-bid-build delivery method.

 American Public Transit Association (APTA) Rail Transit Conference, San Jose, CA, March 2003: Underground Station Layout & Functional Criteria – Current Concepts and Fire-Life-Safety Requirements. This specifically addressed transit criteria and building codes related to NFPA 130 exiting requirements.

 Design Build Institute of America (DBIA-APTA) Denver, CO, October 2002: Surviving a Design/Build Project - Tren Urbano Transit Project, Puerto Rico - A Designer’s Perspective. Anil described in detail how San Juan Heavy Rail Subway system was built, examining the political issues and social impacts in the City’s Historic District. Anil discussed issues related to tunnel and cut-n-cover underground stations, systems integration, construction sequencing and other factors, which made the project a success.

 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LA Metro), Los Angeles, CA 1993: Metro Transit System Planning Guide Book, - An Overview of Monorail & People Movers, Light & Heavy Rail Systems & Commuter & High Speed Rail development process. Anil designed a pictorial book describing graphically the influence of different modes of transit.

 American Public Transportation Association (APTA), Miami, Florida, 1993: Aesthetics of Heavy Rail Systems Around the World – Review of projects from London, New York City, Moscow, St. Petersburg, Stockholm, Paris, Calcutta, Kobe, Singapore, etc. Anil described in detail how different systems were built, digging deep in to the political environment, social issues, construction and cost overruns.

 American Planning Association, Los Angeles, CA 1993: Research on Rail Development History and its Influence on the Growth of Los Angeles, CA.

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

 American Society of Civil Engineers Conference in Orlando, Florida, 1992: Aesthetics of High Speed Ground Transportation Systems.

 Updated Versions are presented to professional organizations and educational institutions around the world since 1983: Research on Rail Transit projects around the World since the building of the first heavy rail transit system in London in the 1850s.

 Presented to various professional organizations and educational institutions around the world and its influence on Los Angeles, CA since 1982: Rail Development History – 1850 through 1980, discussing how the growth of rail transit influenced development and population growth in Los Angeles and its impact on the urban landscape, followed by a decentralization process with the coming of automobile.

6. Employment Record: Period Firm Position 1985-Present AnilVermaAssociates,Inc.(AVA) PrincipalArchitect/TeamLeader,PresidentofAVA 1981-1985 MetroRailTransitConsultants ProjectManager/PrincipalArchitect–SpecialStudies 1980-1981 DMJM(nowAECOM) SeniorArchitect/UrbanDesigner 1976-1978 GNSInternational,Tehran,Iran Planner/UrbanDesigner Non-Governmental Delegate – Human Settlements 1976 – 4 months United Nations – Habitat Forum, Canada Conference 7. List of projects on which the Personnel has worked

Project Name Description of Responsibilities Regional Connector Transit Corridor, Design-Build, LA Stations Team Leader/Principal Architect Metro, Los Angeles, CA  Responsible for the design of (3) underground stations in downtown Los Angeles for Regional Connector, Anil Verma Associates, Inc. is responsible for the design of 1st/Central, 2nd / Broadway and 2nd / Hope. three (3) underground stations in downtown Los Angeles. This $1.7 Billion project is a continuation of the Long  Responsible for doing a Value Engineering exercise for Beach – Los Angeles Blue Line Transit System from the 7th all (3) stations. Based upon his experience and expertise, and Flower Street Metro Red & Blue Line intermodal he was able to reduce the construction footprints of all station to the Union Station in Downtown Los Angeles. It (3) underground stations. runs along Flower Street turns eastwards below 2nd Street  Design Services During Construction and follows Alameda into eastern side of Union Station, in  Responding to field inquiries underground cut and cover and tunnel configurations. This  Reviewing and analyzing Contractor’s shop drawings, system will ultimately connect the gold line from and submittals Pasadena/Claremont to Culver City/Santa Monica, and also  Providing directions for resolving field issues to City of Long Beach and to East Los Angeles from  Processing Change Orders 1st/Central (Little Tokyo/Arts District) Station, as a single ride.

Kamehameha Highway Stations Group, Honolulu Design Manager and Architect of Record Authority for Rapid Transit (HART), Honolulu, HI AVA is the Prime Consultant responsible for architecture,  Responsible for architecture & engineering final design structural, mechanical and electrical engineering, with services for Kamehameha Highway Stations Group, civil, landscape and other engineering services done which consists of: Pearl Highlands Station, Pearlridge locally. The KHSG Contract consists of: Pearl Highlands Station, and Aloha Stadium Station and H-1/H-2 Ramp. Stations, Pearlridge Station, Aloha Stadium Station and  Active in design, directing aesthetics and art, while the H2R2 Ramp. HART Project is a twenty (20) mile ensuring constructability. grade separated fixed guideway transit system running  Value engineering studies at the request of the Client. between East Kapolei and Ala Moana. AVA was responsible for the Final Design of three complex aerial Construction Administration (CA) Phase stations & a freeway ramp & coordination with guideway  Responding to field inquiries & systems contractors.  Reviewing and Analyzing Contractor’s shop drawings, and submittals  Pearl Highlands Station has an elevated station

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

structure with two-hundred forty (240)-foot long side  Providing directions for resolving field issues platforms located on the triangular property bounded  Processing Change Orders by Kamehameha Highway, Farrington Highway, and  Claims Avoidance and Mitigation the H-1/H-2 interchange in the vicinity of Kuala Street at the western limits of Pearl City. This station complex includes a rail station, a bus transit center, and a parking structure that is to be constructed in two (2) phases. The first phase has the aerial station structure, transit guideway and an aerial station/bus deck 46’ above a river, making it environmentally and structurally challenging. A bus stop and kiss-and-ride is located on the shoulder of eastbound Kamehameha Highway. The station platform is at an elevation of 84’0”, the station/bus deck at 46’0” and the Farrington Highway approximately at 28’0” - in other words the platforms are 55 feet or more above street level. Other improvements include a pedestrian crossing at the Kamehameha Highway/Kuala Street intersection, sidewalks, stairs, and ramps. The Ramp H2R2 will connect in-bound Farrington Hwy to in-bound Kamehameha Hwy and provide access to the bus stop and kiss-and-ride.

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

California High Speed Rail – Downtown Los Angeles to Stations Team Leader/Principal Architect Palmdale Segment, CA  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Palmdale Station is a multimodal station, which will  Station area master plans, urban design & site dev. potentially interface with the Western Express High Speed  Architectural and engineering design concepts. Rail System (in the future from Las Vegas), and the Metrolink Commuter Rail System. An adjacent Freight Rail System is its own Right of Way (ROW). This station must serve not only the city of Palmdale, but the entire surrounding regional cities. After AVA completed the designs for five station sites, the Burbank to LA segment was redefined for Public Scoping in 2014 and subsequently the project section was split into two, Palmdale to Burbank and Burbank to LA. Following this, the proposed station locations were refined and included two stations, one at Palmdale and one at Burbank. The site area for the Burbank Station is approximately 90 acres, with generous portions allocated for station parking allowing up to 7,100 stalls and for potential development opportunities. The areas targeted for transit-oriented development are along the existing Hollywood Way and Winona Ave corridors, providing desirable street frontage as well as easy access to the station and adjacent parking areas. Opportunities also exist for more direct connections between the station and parking components and the transit- oriented development. Three site plan options were studied based upon different rail alignments above and below grade. Similarly, several site plans were studied for Palmdale to accommodate up to 11,300 parking stalls on approximately 180 acres. For reason to promote TOD on both sides of the alignment, a connection to both sides of the track were incorporated into the planning via a pedestrian/passenger bridge.

The stations have been designed to facilitate smooth, uninterrupted movement, with as few conflicts as possible. The station layout is typically based upon right-hand movement of patrons into and out of the station, with unidirectional escalators (vertical circulation points) recommended in the direction of travel to keep the departure and arrival passenger sequences separate and conflict-free. Pedestrian paseos with easy connections between the HSR Station, future airport terminal, and the Metrolink Station were studied in the site plan for easy pedestrian and bicycle circulation.

Crenshaw/Expo Line Station- LAX Transit Corridor- Stations Team Leader/Principal Architect. Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA The  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. project alignment has seven or more stations alternatives in  Station area master plans, urban design & site at-grade, aerial and/or underground configurations. AVA is development. planning and preparing architectural, mechanical and  Architectural and engineering design concepts. electrical engineering designs for these stations. The  Art coordination and landscape design Exposition Light Rail Line will connect to the Crenshaw  Stations: LRT system to transfer passengers south for Los Angeles . Aviation/Century International Airport (LAX) or north to the Purple Line . Florence/La Brea Heavy Rail System. The Crenshaw LRT will connect with . Florence/West the existing Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport . Crenshaw/Slauson People Mover System, planned to connect various air . Crenshaw/Vernon

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. . Crenshaw/MLK Estimated cost at $2.7 billion dollars. . Crenshaw/Expo

Crenshaw/ Martin Luther King Station- LAX Transit Stations Team Leader/Principal Architect. Corridor-Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Angeles, CA  Station area master plans, urban design & site AVA is responsible for an underground station adjacent to development. the Crenshaw Retail mall and has other street-side retail  Architectural and engineering design concepts. uses. It is at the intersection of two (2) major roads and this  Art coordination and landscape design generating intermodal bus transfers. The project alignment has seven or more stations in at grade, aerial and underground configurations. The Crenshaw Light Rail Transit (LRT) system is an integral part of the Regional Transportation Plan of Los Angeles County. Connectivity and mobility for the diverse Crenshaw communities are key attributes to the success. The Exposition Light Rail Line’s connectivity to the Crenshaw LRT system is a major challenge, as transit passengers from Santa Monica, Culver City and Downtown LA will transfer south for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) or north to the Purple Line Heavy Rail System. The other challenge is to connect the Crenshaw LRT to the existing Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport People Mover System planned to connect various air terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. Also, the Harbor Subdivision Transit Corridor currently under study may provide express Commuter Rail, DMU or Rapid Bus system connection between Los Angeles Union Station, LAX, and the Ports of LA and Long Beach, and ultimately the Orange County. This system would parallel the Crenshaw LRT along part of the Harbor Subdivision Corridor. There is also a possibility of a High Speed Rail connection to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) which could use part of this corridor. The challenge is the development of intermodal stations at the route terminals. Crenshaw/ Vernon Station- LAX Transit Corridor- Stations Team Leader/Principal Architect. Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. AVA is responsible for an underground station with center  Station area master plans, urban design & site platform, adjacent to Leimert Park and the historic Leimert development. Village. This is a Music and Arts District and is fast  Architectural and engineering design concepts. becoming an entertainment district with restaurants and  Art coordination and landscape design retail uses. The project alignment has seven or more stations in at grade, aerial and underground configurations. The Crenshaw Light Rail Transit (LRT) system is an integral part of the Regional Transportation Plan of Los Angeles County. Connectivity and mobility for the diverse Crenshaw communities are key attributes to the success. The Exposition Light Rail Line’s connectivity to the Crenshaw LRT system is a major challenge, as transit passengers from Santa Monica, Culver City and Downtown LA will transfer south for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) or north to the Purple Line Heavy Rail System. The other challenge is to connect the Crenshaw LRT to the existing Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport People Mover System planned to connect various air terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. Also, the Harbor Subdivision Transit Corridor currently under study may

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

provide express Commuter Rail, DMU or Rapid Bus system connection between Los Angeles Union Station, LAX, and the Ports of LA and Long Beach, and ultimately the Orange County. This system would parallel the Crenshaw LRT along part of the Harbor Subdivision Corridor. There is also a possibility of a High Speed Rail connection to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) which could use part of this corridor. The challenge is the development of intermodal stations at the route terminals. Crenshaw/Slauson; Florence/West; Florence/La Brea; Stations Team Leader/Principal Architect. Florence/Hindry Stations (Four (4) At Grade Stations)  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Crenshaw - LAX Airport Transit Corridor-Light Rail  Station area master plans, urban design & site Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA development. AVA is responsible for four (4) at grade stations with center  Architectural and engineering design concepts. platform, along a 13.6 km rail corridor connecting to the  Art coordination and landscape design International Airport. This is a school and residential district and is fast becoming a partial commercial district with restaurants and retail uses. The project alignment has seven or more stations in at grade, aerial and underground configurations. The Crenshaw Light Rail Transit (LRT) system is an integral part of the Regional Transportation Plan of Los Angeles County. Connectivity and mobility for the diverse Crenshaw communities are key attributes to the success. The Exposition Light Rail Line’s connectivity to the Crenshaw LRT system is a major challenge, as transit passengers from Santa Monica, Culver City and Downtown LA will transfer south for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) or north to the Purple Line Heavy Rail System. The other challenge is to connect the Crenshaw LRT to the existing Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport People Mover System planned to connect various air terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. Also, the Harbor Subdivision Transit Corridor currently under study may provide express Commuter Rail, DMU or Rapid Bus system connection between Los Angeles Union Station, LAX, and the Ports of LA and Long Beach, and ultimately the Orange County. This system would parallel the Crenshaw LRT along part of the Harbor Subdivision Corridor. There is also a possibility of a High-Speed Rail connection to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) which could use part of this corridor. The challenge is the development of intermodal stations at the route terminals.

Aviation/Century Station (An Aerial Station with future Stations Team Leader/Principal Architect. interface with an Airport People Mover System and a  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Consolidated Rental Car Facility), Crenshaw - LAX  Station area master plans, urban design & site Airport Transit Corridor-Light Rail Transit (LRT) development. Project, Los Angeles, CA  Architectural and engineering design concepts. Our firm is responsible for three (3) underground, (1) aerial  Art coordination and landscape design and (4) at grade stations along a 8 ½ mile project corridor alignment. These stations interface with various ethnic neighbourhoods, and the team is preparing architectural and engineering designs to respond to the local environment. The Exposition Light Rail Line will connect to the Crenshaw LRT system to transfer passengers south for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) or north to the Purple Line Heavy Rail System. The Crenshaw LRT will connect

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

with the existing Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport People Mover System, planned to connect various air terminals at Los Angeles International Airport.

Bart – Extension, Conceptual Engineering (EIS/EIR Phase) Silicon Valley Rapid Transit (SVRT) BART Extension Team Leader/Architect of Record – Underground to San Jose, Planning, Conceptual Design, and Stations. Preliminary Engineering Phases, San Jose, CA  Managing the planning/design for the four proposed Four (4) Underground transit stations estimated at underground transit stations. $5.6 billion dollars. Station sare:  Master planning around station areas.  Alum Rock - $120 million (station cost)  Coordinated all engineering issues with other  Civic Center - $150 million (station cost) consultants and developed the ancillary equipment  Market Street - $180 million (station cost) space system.  Amtrak Diridon - $150 million (station cost)  Presented the aesthetic design concepts to Clients, Community, and Stakeholders. Diridon/Arena BART Underground Station, SVRT, San Design Manager/Architect of Record. Jose, CA  Presentation of the Diridon /Arena Stations’ This Station, at the edge of downtown takes its theme from Architectural Design Concepts and Details to Client, the two major elements at its location, the HP Pavilion and City, Community Leaders and Stakeholders. the historic Diridon Station. The existing immediate  Directed the development of a three-dimensional fly environment at this station will be the result of a major thru animation. redevelopment project which will be influenced by the  Client coordination and design development. adjacent Diridon Station and HP Pavilion. For the new Station thee functions of these existing facilities helped to guide the design themes of waves and circles evocative of movement in both transit and sports.

Downtown San Jose BART Underground Station, Design Manager/Architect of Record. SVRT, San Jose, CA  Presentation of the Downtown San Jose Stations’ Estimated Cost at $420 million dollars (station cost). The Architectural Design Concepts and Details to Client, design of the Station reflects San Jose as the creative and City, Community Leaders and Stakeholders. cultural center of the city in technology and the arts as well  Aesthetic design development and engineering as its rich social, cultural and architectural history. Each coordination. portal will be uniquely designed with materials, forms and  Client coordination and design development. scale appropriate to its context. The concourse is the space through which passengers move on their way to the boarding platform. To enrich this area a perforated metal panel ceiling displaying a continuous wave extends through the length of the concourse and symbolizes the rhythmic dynamic change over time in Silicon Valley. Passenger will move under this undulating ceiling to the elliptical openings of the stairs and escalators which will whisk them to the platform level. Enclosing the openings are curved glass guardrails that add to the smooth flow of passengers and symbolize openness to the flow of new ideas. The floor’s terrazzo finish will display an undulating pattern that is sympathetic to the curved elements in the concourse ceiling.

Silicon Valley Rapid Transit (SVRT) BART Heavy Rail Principal Architect/Design Manager. Extension to San Jose – Tunnel, Cross Passages, Portals,  Developed Architectural/Engineering Layout of two Station Ventilation Structures & Ancillary Equipment tunnel ventilation structures. Structures, San Jose, CA  Presented Architectural design concepts of the part Structures are estimated at $4.46 billion (estimated cost). commercial headhouse to Client, City, Community and The Mid-Tunnel Ventilation Structure houses two (2) other Stakeholders. Ventilation Fans, each with a 300 HP motor to ventilate  Design of emergency ventilation system, electrical tunnels during emergency and prevent accumulation of any rooms, gap breaker, and communication equipment

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

hazardous gases. The Mid-Tunnel Ventilation Structure rooms layout. also houses a 1000Volt DC Switchgear which breaks the power at the Gap Breaker points for Third Rail in both tunnels to isolate Tunnels during emergency. Communications and Uninterruptible power supply equipment that provides power for Communications and Systems, and for tunnel lighting are also located at basement level.

Berryessa and Milpitas Station Campus Roadway & Principal Architect/Design Manager Parking Structures - Design and Engineering Services  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. for SVBX Project, D720, BART, SVRT San Jose, CA  Station area master plans, urban design & site Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) is a heavy rail system development. serving the bay area communities around San Francisco.  Architectural and engineering design concepts. The Silicon Valley BART Extension (SVBX) Project is a Art coordination and landscape design current Valley Transit Authority’s Design-Build project which extends the BART system from Warm Springs to Berryessa. Under this contract AVA is planning and designing facilities within the BART station campus sites, at the Berryessa and Milpitas stations.

Milpitas Station - Silicon Valley Berryessa Extension Principal Architect/Design Manager. (SVBX) Project-C700- Line, Track, Stations, and  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Systems, A Design-Build Contract, San Jose, CA  Station area master plans, urban design & site Estimated Cost $840 million development. Station Cost: $220 million  Architectural and engineering design concepts. An underground station with a grand concourse at grade. It  Art coordination and landscape design. has a complex roof structure and 700’ underground  Design Services During Construction platform. A pedestrian bridge connects to an operating light  Responding to field inquiries rail system  Reviewing and analyzing Contractor’s shop drawings, and submittals  Providing directions for resolving field issues  Processing Change Orders Berryessa Aerial Stations-Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Principal Architect/Design Manager. (SVRT) Project-C700- Line, Track, Stations, and  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Systems, A Design-Build Contract, San Jose, CA  Station area master plans, urban design & site Estimated Project Cost: $840 million development. Station Cost: $220 million  Architectural and engineering design concepts. An aerial station supported by guideways with complex  Art coordination and landscape design. canopies on 700’ long platforms.  Design Services During Construction This Berryessa Heavy Rail Station sits on fifty two (52)  Responding to field inquiries acre- station campus, encompassing the street level  Reviewing and Analyzing Contractor’s shop drawings, concourse with an aerial boarding center boarding platform and submittals thirty five (35) feet above ground. This BART station is the  Providing directions for resolving field issues End-of-Line Facility, and has station related ancillary Processing Change Orders facilities on the site. BART-General Engineering Services for BART Principal Architect/Design Manager. Projects-Agreement No. 6M8043-2011,  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Oakland, CA  Station area master plans, urban design & site Principal-in-Charge and Design Manager responsible for development. upgrade & rehabilitation of multiple stations, transit  Architectural and engineering design concepts. facilities, trackwork, train control automation,  Art coordination and landscape design. communications and other station campus facilities such as Bus Centers, Parking Structures, Transit Oriented Development site planning and urban design for this 48 year old Heavy Rail Transit System.

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Key Projects  Operation Control Center  BART Heavy Rail Extension to Livermore  Hayward Maintenance Facility Expansion  BART Powell Street Station Modernization  Others

Estimated Cost: $20 million (AVA fee)

Rio Piedras Heavy Rail Underground Station, Tren Design Manager/Architect of Record/Urban Urbano, San Juan, Puerto Rico Designer/Inspector of Record during Construction. A Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Demonstration  Developed Architectural concepts and presented to Project estimated at $574 million. State Historic Preservation Office, Community This is a stacked drift tunnel station with deep shafts and Leaders and Stakeholders. cut-and-cover entrances at each end. This station lies right  Coordinated three (3) levels of ancillary equipment across from the Rio Piedras Plaza in a congested part of the rooms to curtail the size of underground station Historic District of the City and this has several historic and structures, which resulted in reducing station sizing urban design considerations. by over eighty (80) feet and there by reducing Anil Verma was designated the Architect of Record, the construction costs. Urban Designer and Inspector of Record during  Managed design activities with the Systems construction for the Construction Contractor’s (KKZ) Consultants, Engineers and Construction Contractors, Design Build Team. and producing detailed design documents to work with construction sequencing.  Presented design concepts to Puerto Rico’s Secretary of Transportation and Community Leaders, and Tren Urbano office to successfully keep project on schedule. University of Puerto Rico Heavy Rail Underground Design Manager/Architect of Record/Urban Station, Tren Urbano, San Juan, Puerto Rico Designer/Inspector of Record. A Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Demonstration  Developed Architectural concepts and presented to Project estimated at $448 million. This is a cut and cover State Historic Preservation Office, Community station center platform and entrances at both ends built in the Leaders and Stakeholders. midst of sensitive historical buildings on the University of  Coordinated the design elements with the Puerto Rico Campus. surroundings, historical walls, fences, gates and Anil Verma was designated the Architect of Record, the buildings. Urban Designer and Inspector of Record during construction  Worked with University of Puerto Rico staff and for the Construction Contractor’s (KKZ) Design Build students to coordinate campus projects. Team. Managed engineers and contractors to produce construction documents which worked with construction sequencing. Project Management Oversight (PMO) Services Technical Stations Expert Contract, Federal Transit Administration (FTA), New  Evaluated project feasibility from planning, York, NY architectural engineering design, and The PMO evaluates the feasibility, planning, design, project constructability. management capabilities of the grantees for billions of  Reviewed documents for to see if they met transit dollars of capital spending by FTA, for five individual design criteria, fire life safety. projects for two different transportation agencies. The  Reviewed costs and schedules. Agencies within the MTA include Long Island Railroad, New Jersey Transit, Triborough Bridge Authority, and Metro North. Size: NYDOT and MTA programs/projects that received federal funds. Cost: $22,000,000,000.

Project includes:  Staten Island Ferry Terminals, NYCDOT  Atlantic Avenue, Intermodal Stations, NYCT

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

 Fulton Street Transit Center (FSTC), MTACCC  South Ferry Terminal (SoFe), MTACCC  East Side Access (ESA), MTACCC San Fernando Valley Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Chief Architect/Team Leader Corridor, Orange Line, Los Angeles, CA  Landscape Architecture Design This a fourteen (14) mile Bus Rapid Transit Corridor-Design  Construction Contract Documents Build Contract, connecting North Hollywood Metro Rail  Owners Representative Station to Warner Center in the San Fernando Valley. Project estimated cost: $461.9 million

Ramona Boulevard Grade Separation Project, El Monte, Principal-in-Charge CA  Reviewed design and construction sequencing The Ramona Boulevard Grade Separation Project will  Reviewed progress of work in comparison to require Ramona Boulevard be lowered approximately 26 established base schedules feet beneath the existing railroad tracks. Two bridges will  Ensured Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) be built to carry railroad traffic over the depressed Ramona procedures were followed Boulevard, which includes pedestrian, and motorist safety improvements and walkways with protective railing.

Brea Canyon Road Grade Separation Project, Irwindale, Principal-in-Charge CA  Reviewed design and construction sequencing The Brea Canyon Road grade separation project will require  Reviewed progress of work in comparison to Brea Canyon Road to be lowered beneath the existing established base schedules railroad tracks with a railroad bridge constructed to carry  Ensured Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) trains over the roadway. Portions of Washington Street and procedures were followed Currier Road will be lowered at their intersections with Brea Canyon Road. The newly configured Brea Canyon road will include several pedestrian and motorist safety improvements, such as walkways with protective railing.

Nogales Street Grade Separation Project, Irwindale, CA Principal-in-Charge The grade separation of Nogales Street under the railroad  Reviewed design and construction sequencing tracks and Valley Boulevard required Nogales Street to be  Reviewed progress of work in comparison to lowered approximately 20 feet. Two bridges were built to established base schedules carry motorists and trains over Nogales Street. A loop  Ensured Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) connector road replaced the former intersection of Nogales procedures were followed and Valley.

Terminal 4, John F Kennedy International Airport Principal-in-Charge International Arrivals Terminal, New York, NY  Project Management Services. The new International Arrivals Terminal (IAT) at John F.  Design and Construction Documents Review. Kennedy Airport, in Jamaica, New York. This was a  Project Controls, Scheduling, Estimating, and Design, Build, Operate, and Maintain (DBOM) project, a Cost Engineering. $2.94 billion Public-Private-Partnership (P3) project. The new IAT consists of 16 gates, a centralized check-in facility, and central passenger passport control and customs area. This 1,000,000 sq.ft. facility includes, a two-level headhouse with dining, shopping, and entertainment areas, office space, a chapel, east and west concourses, retain areas, baggage handling facilities, and elevated and at-grade roadways. On the air side the new facility consists of plane gate areas and jet bridges, plane taxiways and taxi lanes, plane hardstands, jetfuel storage facilities and plane fueling islands. During construction, a temporary headhouse and temporary roadways were built to accommodate passengers. The project was conducted in phases as the terminal was required to remain fully operational during construction.

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Construction of the IAT was privately financed by LCOR Incorporated and Schiphol USA Incorporated, who are the owners and operators of the facility.

Auburn Commuter Rail Station and Transit Center, Project Manager/Principal Architect. Auburn, WA  Interfaced with City officials, Community Task A joint development project consisting of a commuter rail Force, County Bus Agency, and Sound Transit station, a major bus transit center, retail shops, kiss n’ ride (Client). areas, two parking structures for over 600 cars and  Presented architectural design concepts to all commercial redevelopment adjacent to several new access groups and other stakeholders to seek approval. ramps to Freeway SR18.  Directed design efforts and engineering coordination. Inspection of Structures – PS39241892 LACMTA, Los Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager. Angeles, CA  In-service structural, and safety inspection Scope of work included the structural inspection, services for LACMTA’s heavy and light rail evaluation, and reporting of all underground and above transit facilities. LACMTA’s transit facilities ground railroad structures including cut-and-cover include four major public rail lines in across Los concrete box and circular tunnels, underground stations Angeles County (Redline, Blueline, Greenline and and aerial stations with canopies, retaining walls, Goldline). pedestrian overpass bridges, aerial structures, and steel and reinforced concrete bridges. All structures and related elements were visually inspected during rail operation and non-operation hours during daytime for above ground facilities and night time for below grade facilities. Observations and findings were professionally documented, and detailed structural observation/structural defect reports were generated to update the previously generated database. This is a PUC requirement that requires agencies (LACMTA) to retain such services periodically to assure the quality and safety of the transit system.

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager. Authority, MQ055, Architectural and Structural  Review and inspections of underground stations, Inspection Project, Los Angeles, CA ancillary equipment spaces, tunnels, cross Project consists of eleven (11) miles of the tunnelled Metro passages of Metro Red Line Heavy Rail System. Red Line Heavy Rail System, twenty (20) miles of  Review and inspection of aerial and at-grade Greenline light rail, twenty-two (22) miles of Blue line light stations bridges and tracks of Green, Blue and rail and fourteen (14) miles of Gold Line Light Rail gold Line Light Rail Systems. Systems.  Detailed reporting of architectural/structural flaws determined by inspections. Totem Lake Mixed Use Development, Kirland, WA Principal-in-Charge Totem Lake is a five-story infill housing project at an old  Planning commercial retail mall that has been demolished to make  Architecture room for 700 apartment homes on a 4.2 hectare sites. This  Landscape Design complex is designed to have ground level retail along the  Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing street frontage with a central public gathering plaza, a (MEP) Engineering multiplex movie theatre, and five large amenity courtyards  LEED Sustainability Compliance Services above a below grade parking structure. Marshall Squares Mixed Use -TOD Apartments, San Principal-in-Charge Jose, CA  Planning Marshall Squares Mixed-Use Transit Oriented Development  Architecture (TOD) (Apartments and retail) is a four-story infill  Landscape Design apartment project with two-stories of below ground parking  Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing and street level retail. This project is located close to the (MEP) Engineering San Jose Light Rail Transit Station and providing direct  LEED Sustainability Compliance Services access to commuters to Downtown.

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Aviation Apartment Development/Transit Oriented Principal-in-Charge Development (TOD), Inglewood, CA  Planning Aviation Apartments is a five-story infill housing project  Architecture located within the County of Los Angeles. This is located  Landscape Design adjacent to LA Metro’s Aviation Green Line Light Rail  Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Transit (LRT) Station on Aviation Boulevard, and close to (MEP) Engineering Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), which created an  LEED Sustainability Compliance Services opportunity to redevelop and provide Transit Oriented Development (TOD) housing. The area is quickly transforming into a significant hub as the Crenshaw LAX Light Rail Corridor line. AVA also lead station design and helped study Transit Oriented Development (TOD) opportunities, and the future connection to Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). The site is approximately 5.75 Acres and has a total of 265 Units in a 5-Story Apartment building wrapped around a 6-story parking garage. Courtyard spaces are enhanced with decorative concrete patterns and animated with colorful furniture and large custom container pots creating an eclectic flare. Outside the recreation center, a swimming pool, spa, and barbecue areas are provided. Plant materials were selected for year-round color and ease of maintenance. Trees and shrubs were placed for public space canopy and to provide privacy for those ground floor tenants. AVA provided design services to the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) developer and directed the open space planning and site design for the Aviation Apartment project. Our multi-family housing projects go the extra mile in design, featuring beautiful courtyards with tall and mature gardens that have an immediate aesthetic impact as well as long-lasting appeal. Vista Canyon Multimodal Center (Metrolink Station), Principal-in-Charge Santa Clarita, CA  Planning As one of the first location in California where gold was  Architecture found, and it occurred near this station site. The design  Landscape Design character reflects a gold strike theme as well as California  Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing rustic architectural detailing reflecting the surrounding (MEP) Engineering Master Plan Community. The “California Gold Rush”  LEED Sustainability Compliance Services theme for the station design reflects it unique location in Southern California, and becomes a nucleus for development of new communities within the Master Plan. As part of changing to a double track project, a center platform has been designed including planting canopies, ramps and stairs, and accessed by a pedestrian underpass. The entrance plaza, site lighting, landscape irrigation and drainage are also included. AVA provided Architecture, Landscape design, Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing (MEP), and LEED Compliance services. AVA is preparing paperwork for the station in anticipation to submit for a Gold LEED Sustainability rating. Anil Verma Associates, Inc. (AVA) is contracted by the City of Santa Clarita to design this new station as a part of the Vista Canyon Master Plan Community. AVA provided station architectural, lighting, signage, and landscape design, as well as Mechanical, Plumbing, and Electrical

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

engineering.

Regional Transportation Center, Project No. E10-07, Principal-in-Charge Burbank, CA  Architecture The Regional Intermodal Transportation Center (RITC) project consists of (8) primary components, a combined Consolidated Rental Car Facility and Transit Center, a Replacement Parking Structure, a sloping elevated covered Pedestrian Walkway with a moving sidewalk, an Elevated Bridge over Empire Avenue, an accessible Compressed Natural Gas Facility, dedicated parking for Metrolink and Amtrak passengers, a Ground Access Center, and a series of bicycle racks. The Consolidated Rental Car Facility accommodates (6) or more rental car companies and rental car counter space, public restrooms, vertical access (including elevators, escalators and stairways), ready-return spaces, and a common Quick-Turn-Around (QTA) facility for vehicle fueling, washing and cleaning. The Transit Center will provide an elevated drop-off for Metro Transit buses, Amtrak buses, local buses, and rental car buses. Solar panels are provided on the roof to reduce electrical demands by the facility. The total building area is 836,174 sq. ft. The Replacement Parking is a concrete structure with several levels consisting of 220,600 sq. ft. The elevated covered Pedestrian Walkway interconnects the existing Airport Passenger Terminal to the Replacement Parking Structure and the RITC. The total area of the walkways is 46,633 sq. ft. An elevated bridge over Empire Avenue and the adjacent railway tracks connects the RITC with the Metrolink/Amtrak Train Station. Dedicated parking for Metrolink and Amtrak passengers is provided through the acquisition of Union Pacific Railroad land, and the project includes the improvement of the Runway Safety Area associated with Runway 15-33. Prime Consultant for this (30) acre fast track Regional Intermodal Transportation Center (RITC) which includes local and regional buses, Rental Car Facility, Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility, and Pedestrian Bridges/Walkways connecting the RITC and Commercial Parking Structure to the Airport and the Metrolink Commuter Rail Train Station.

Los Angeles Trade Technical College, Los Angeles CA Principal-in-Charge. Los Angeles Trade Technical College is one of nine Los  Construction Management Angeles Community College District campuses undergoing  Selection of appropriate, durable and maintainable extensive modernization under the $2.1B Proposition A / finish materials, and the development of creative AA and $3.5B Measure J Bond Programs in order to detailing. accommodate increased student enrollment. The funding for  Project Controls, Scheduling, Estimating, and LATTC includes $650M under Proposition A / AA Bond Cost Engineering. and $350M under the Measure J Bond Program. AVA is  Architectural and engineering constructability responsible for all design and construction phase project reviews. management services for LATTC.  Client liaison and coordination. At LATTC, AVA is currently managing the design and  Contract Management, Office Engineering, construction of four major sustainable projects, which Inspection, Contractibility reviews, Value between them are proceeding forward to obtain LEED Engineering, RFI reviews, Project Close-out. certifications for a total of five (5) buildings, including two

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

(2) Gold or Platinum, one (1) Silver and two (2) Certified.

Building “A” Modernization and Restoration Project, Principal-in-Charge. Los Angeles CA  Architectural/Engineering Constructability Building ‘A’ consists of three contiguous buildings reviews. constructed at different times from 1924 through 1935 and  Construction sequencing and coordination. for multiple purposes. The building currently houses an  Phasing construction during campus operating historic theater, a classroom wing and an administration hours. building. The scope of work consists of remodeling and seismic upgrade of the existing 73,000 gross square foot building together with the addition of new north and south courtyards and utilities, including a structural upgrade of the existing Grand Avenue Theater. In addition, Building ‘A’ is considered a Historic Resource Structure for the purposes of CEQA. Therefore, the repair of any portion of Building ‘A’ is to be conducted in a manner consistent with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards. The AVA management team will closely monitor the project schedule and all historic compliance requirements throughout the duration of the project to meet critical deadlines.

Learning Resource Center, Los Angeles CA Principal-in-Charge. The LATTC Library / Learning Resource Center building  Planning renovation will allow for more efficient utilization of space  Programming to meet demands of future student enrollment. The project  Concept design includes approximately 70,000 sq. ft. of major renovation  Final design and 15,000 sq. ft of new construction. Major components of  Managing the construction and delivery of the LRC project include the proposed build-out of new LEEDtm Certified Library / Learning Resource enclosed floor area at the first and second floors, updated Center (70,000 sq. ft. - major renovation and restroom facilities as well as removal of the existing south 15,000 sq. ft. - new construction). wall of the basement to provide for new entry access and natural light.

Culinary Arts Facility Project, Los Angeles CA Principal-in-Charge. The Culinary Arts at the LATTC Campus is an  Architectural/Engineering constructability views. internationally award winning popular program. The  Construction sequencing and coordination. facilities are in need of modernization and expansion to meet  Phasing construction during campus operating projected increased student enrollment. Currently the hours building houses classrooms for other programs. The proposed renovation dedicates the entire building to Culinary Arts, Baking and Hospitality, including new instruction studios and state-of-the-art culinary equipment along with a restaurant at the street level. Olive Street Parking Structure Design-Build, Los Principal-in-Charge. Angeles CA  Architectural/Engineering constructability views. The LATTC Campus student population has grown over the  Construction sequencing and coordination. past two decades but parking spaces have not. This is the  Phasing construction during campus operating first design/build above ground parking structure project hours. being built to mitigate parking shortage. The structure is five stories (six level) parking structure with 804 parking spaces. This is a Type 1, post tensioned concrete structure. The total square footage per floor is 42,000 sq. ft with a total of 250,000 sq. ft for the entire structure. The roof top has been designed to carry photovoltaic panels in the future. The parking structure has two elevators facing the campus entrance on Grand Avenue. The parking structure has

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

equipped comprehensive communication system, including telephone, data, and security systems to ensure emergency communication to sheriff station for the safety of the students and faculties at all times with emergency blue phones and CCTV monitoring cameras at each parking level.

South Campus Project – Administration Building & Principal-in-Charge. Technology Building, Los Angeles CA  Planning The design-bid build delivery project consisted of two five-  Programming story buildings with more than 124,000 square feet of  Concept design administrative offices, admissions and records, student  Final design services, personnel and payroll, lecture halls, classrooms,  Managing the construction and delivery of two (2) auditoriums, faculty offices, department offices, computer five (5) story state of the art building projects. facilities & preparation kitchen. The project consisted of the Technology Classroom building (66,228 sq. ft) & Student Services building (56,302 sq/ ft.) Other features of the South Campus project include a utility building (1,800 sq. ft.) & extensive landscaping all across the site which is several acres at southeast corner of the Campus Child Development Center, Los Angeles CA Principal-in-Charge. The LATTC CDC is a 14, 500 square feet, two stories, Type  Architectural/Engineering Constructability V, steel framed new construction project, which will operate Reviews. as a teaching facility as well as a Child Care Center. It is  Construction sequencing and coordination. comprised of classrooms, administrative offices, food  Phasing construction during campus operating service and playground areas. The entire building will house hours. the Child Development Program and will expand to have infant care as well. AVA temporarily located the CDC in trailers in another location on Campus, while the new facility was under construction.

Construction Technology Building (CTB), Los Angeles, Principal-in-Charge. CA  Architectural/Engineering Constructability The CTB is a 160,000 SF 3-story LEED Gold Building with Reviews. a fully occupied roof on a 3.5 acre urban site. The various  Construction sequencing and coordination. façades of the building include face brick, aluminum panels,  Phasing construction during campus operating cement plaster, storefront glazing, and metal sun shades hours. which connect uniformly with the other new campus buildings across a major street. The building contains a main lobby, administration, 20 laboratories, and 23 classrooms with maximum flexibility without structural changes.

Anil Verma Associates, as Campus Project Manager, specifically worked through Planning, Design and Construction Management phases for this $120M Design- Build project, including preparation of Request for Proposals, Design-builder selection and award, and issuance of Notice to Proceed with Design on November 15, 2012. AVA managed the Design-build process through design milestone submittals with agency approval and specialty service design consultants, including technical and constructability reviews. AVA managed construction of this project through site work and of building structures, including relocation of operational facilities and partial closeout of services.

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

East Parking Structure (EPS), LATTC, Los Principal-in-Charge. Angeles, CA The EPS is a 1,000 stall, 6-story parking  Architectural/Engineering Constructability Reviews. structure, net zero energy building with storage on a  Construction sequencing and coordination. 1.48 acre (hectare) urban site. By its material palette,  Phasing construction during campus operating hours. it visually connects with construction technology building and new campus building across a major street. A car counting system is provided with no parking on access ramps.

Details of the current assignment and the time duration for which services are required for the current assignment.  Current Assignment : Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation, Authority, Regional Connector 8. Project, Los Angeles, CA  Time Duration : Average 5-10 hrs. per month during the construction phase.

Certification: 1. I am willing to work o the Project and I will be available for entire duration of the project assignment as required. 2. I, the undersigned, certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, this CV correctly describes me, my qualifications and my experience.

Anil Verma, FAIA (Signature and name of the Key Personnel)

Place Los Angeles

(Signature and name of the authorised signatory of the Applicant)

Notes: 1. Separate forms are used for each Key Personnel. 2. The names and chronology of assignments included here conforms to the project-wise details submitted in Form-8 of Appendix-I. 3. Each page of the CV is signed in ink and dated by both the Personnel concerned and by the Authorised Representative of the Applicant firm.

Anil Verma, FAIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Form-12 Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

1 Proposed Position: Station Planning Expert .

2 Name of Personnel: Somesh Debnath, AIA .

3 Date of Birth: March 28, 1946 .

4 Nationality: Citizen of the United States of America .

5 Educational Qualifications: .  Master of Architecture & Urban Design, Washington University, St. Louis Missouri, USA, 1980  Diploma in Computer Programming & Systems Analysis, Institute of Computer Technology, Los Angeles, USA, 1983  Bachelor of Architecture, School of Planning & Architecture, New Delhi, India, 1969  Registered Architect in CA #C21523, NV #2261  American Institute of Architects

6 Employment Record: . Period Firm Position 1989 - Present Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Lead Architect/Planner – Transit Practice 1985 - 1989 The Luckman Partnership Project Architect Designer 1982 - 1985 Harry Weese Design Team Senior Architect Designer 1980 - 1982 DMJM (now AECOM) Architect Designer 1978 - 1980 Skidmore Owings & Merrill (SOM) Architect Designer 7 List of projects on which the Personnel has worked . Project Name Description of Responsibilities Regional Connector Transit Corridor, Design- Project Manager/Lead Architect Build, LA Metro, Los Angeles, CA  Responsible for the design of three (3) underground stations in downtown Los Angeles for Regional Anil Verma Associates, Inc. is responsible for the Connector, 1st/Central, 2nd/Broadway and 2nd/Hope. design of three (3) underground stations in downtown Los Angeles. This $1.7 Billion project is  Responsible for doing a Value Engineering exercise for a continuation of the Long Beach – Los Angeles all 3 stations and was, based upon his experience and Blue Line Transit System from the 7th and Flower expertise, able to reduce the footprints of the stations Street Metro Red & Blue Line intermodal station to significantly by simplifying the design by reconfiguring the Union Station in Downtown Los Angeles. It the Ancillary Room without sacrificing the runs along Flower Street turns eastwards below 2nd functionality Street and follows Alameda into eastern side of or violating the Metro Design Criteria. Union Station, in underground cut and cover and  Supervised the progress of the Architectural Drawings tunnel configurations. This system will ultimately from the beginning to the end and was heavily connect the gold line from Pasadena/Claremont to involved in not only the Intra Discipline coordination Culver City/Santa Monica, and also to City of Long but also in the Inter Discipline coordination and dealing Beach and to East Los Angeles from 1st/Central with Civil, Structure, Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, (Little Tokyo/Arts District) Station, as a single ride. Fire Protection, Fire Detection and Communications  Actively involved with the Construction Administration of the above-mentioned stations. Kamehameha Highway Stations Group, Chief Architect Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transit (HART),  Architecture and Engineering final design services for Honolulu, HI AVA is the Prime Consultant Pearl Highlands Station, Pearlridge Station, and Aloha

Somesh Debnath, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel responsible for architecture, structural, mechanical Stadium Stations. and electrical engineering, with civil, landscape  Responsible for the entire design and construction and other engineering services done locally. The contract documents for the Pearl Highlands Station, as KHSG Contract consists of: Pearl Highlands this is a very complex facility, from the architectural Stations, Pearlridge Station, Aloha Stadium design and structural engineering stand point. Station and the H2R2 Ramp. HART Project is a twenty (20) mile grade separated fixed guideway transit system running between East Kapolei and Ala Moana. AVA was responsible for the Final Design of three complex aerial stations & a freeway ramp & coordination with guideway & systems contractors.  Pearl Highlands Station has an elevated station structure with two-hundred forty (240)-foot long side platforms located on the triangular property bounded by Kamehameha Highway, Farrington Highway, and the H-1/H-2 interchange in the vicinity of Kuala Street at the western limits of Pearl City. This station complex includes a rail station, a bus transit center, and a parking structure that is to be constructed in two (2) phases. The first phase has the aerial station structure, transit guideway and an aerial station/bus deck 46’ above a river, making it environmentally and structurally challenging. A bus stop and kiss-and-ride is located on the shoulder of eastbound Kamehameha Highway. The station platform is at an elevation of 84’0”, the station/bus deck at 46’0” and the Farrington Highway approximately at 28’0” - in other words the platforms are 55 feet or more above street level. Other improvements include a pedestrian crossing at the Kamehameha Highway/Kuala Street intersection, sidewalks, stairs, and ramps. The Ramp H2R2 will connect in-bound Farrington Hwy to in-bound Kamehameha Hwy and provide access to the bus stop and kiss-and-ride.

Somesh Debnath, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

Parking Lot at Aloha Stadium. The elevated side platforms are accessed directly from the at- grade entrance structures via stairs, elevators, and escalators. A single station entrance is provided to serve Aloha Stadium and the adjacent park-and-ride lot/bus transit center. Train Control and Communications Room and other ancillary equipment rooms are housed in a separate building at ground level. The site design includes a public plaza, the park-and-ride facility, bus transit center, and landscaping of the station site. Crenshaw - LAX Transit Corridor-Light Rail Lead Station Planner/Architect. Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. The project alignment has seven or more stations  Station area master plans, urban design & site alternatives in at-grade, aerial and/or underground development. configurations. AVA is planning and preparing  Architectural and engineering design concepts. architectural, mechanical and electrical  Developing station designs & area master plans. engineering designs for these stations. The  Locating stations and developing layouts. Exposition Light Rail Line will connect to the  Aerial and underground station concepts. Crenshaw LRT system to transfer passengers  Developing construction methodology for south for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) underground stations. or north to the Purple Line Heavy Rail System.  Stations: The Crenshaw LRT will connect with the existing . Aviation/Century Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport . Florence/La Brea People Mover System, planned to connect various . Florence/West air terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. . Crenshaw/Slauson Estimated cost at $2.7 billion dollars. . Crenshaw/Vernon . Crenshaw/MLK . Crenshaw/Expo Lead Station Planner/Architect. Crenshaw/ Martin Luther King Station- LAX  Developing station designs & area master plans. Transit Corridor-Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA AVA is responsible for  Locating stations and developing layouts. an underground station adjacent to the Crenshaw  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Retail mall and has other streetside retail uses. It is  Station area master plans, urban design & site at the intersection of two (2) major roads and this development generating intermodal bus transfers. The project  Architectural and engineering design concepts. alignment has seven or more stations in at grade, aerial and underground configurations. The Crenshaw Light Rail Transit (LRT) system is an integral part of the Regional Transportation Plan of Los Angeles County. Connectivity and mobility for the diverse Crenshaw communities are key attributes to the success. The Exposition Light Rail Line’s connectivity to the Crenshaw LRT system is a major challenge, as transit passengers from Santa Monica, Culver City and Downtown LA will transfer south for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) or north to the Purple Line Heavy Rail System. The other challenge is to connect the Crenshaw LRT to the existing Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport People Mover System planned to connect various air terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. Also, the Harbor Subdivision Transit Corridor currently under study may provide express Commuter Rail, DMU or Rapid Bus system connection between Los Angeles Union Station, LAX, and the Ports of LA and Long Beach, and ultimately the Orange County. This system would parallel the Crenshaw LRT along part of the Harbor Subdivision Corridor. There is also a possibility of a

Somesh Debnath, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

High Speed Rail connection to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) which could use part of this corridor. The challenge is the development of intermodal stations at the route terminals. Crenshaw/ Vernon Station- LAX Transit Lead Station Planner/Architect. Corridor-Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los  Developing station designs & area master plans. Angeles, CA  Locating stations and developing layouts. AVA is responsible for an underground station with  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. center platform, adjacent to Leimert Park and the  Station area master plans, urban design & site historic Leimert Village. This is a Music and Arts development. District and is fast becoming an entertainment  Architectural and engineering design concepts. district with restaurants and retail uses. The project alignment has seven or more stations in at grade, aerial and underground configurations. The Crenshaw Light Rail Transit (LRT) system is an integral part of the Regional Transportation Plan of Los Angeles County. Connectivity and mobility for the diverse Crenshaw communities are key attributes to the success. The Exposition Light Rail Line’s connectivity to the Crenshaw LRT system is a major challenge, as transit passengers from Santa Monica, Culver City and Downtown LA will transfer south for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) or north to the Purple Line Heavy Rail System. The other challenge is to connect the Crenshaw LRT to the existing Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport People Mover System planned to connect various air terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. Also, the Harbor Subdivision Transit Corridor currently under study may provide express Commuter Rail, DMU or Rapid Bus system connection between Los Angeles Union Station, LAX, and the Ports of LA and Long Beach, and ultimately the Orange County. This system would parallel the Crenshaw LRT along part of the Harbor Subdivision Corridor. There is also a possibility of a High Speed Rail connection to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) which could use part of this corridor. The challenge is the development of intermodal stations at the route terminals. Crenshaw/Slauson; Florence/West; Florence/La Lead Station Planner/Architect. Brea; Florence/Hindry Stations (Four (4) At  Developing station designs & area master plans. Grade Stations)  Locating stations and developing layouts. Crenshaw - LAX Airport Transit Corridor-Light  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA  Station area master plans, urban design & site AVA is responsible for four (4) at grade stations development with center platform, along a 13.6 km rail corridor  Architectural and engineering design concepts. connecting to the International Airport. This is a school and residential district and is fast becoming a partial commercial district with restaurants and retail uses. The project alignment has seven or more stations in at grade, aerial and underground configurations. The Crenshaw Light Rail Transit (LRT) system is an integral part of the Regional Transportation Plan of Los Angeles County. Connectivity and mobility for the diverse Crenshaw communities are key attributes to the success. The Exposition Light Rail Line’s connectivity to the Crenshaw LRT system is a major challenge, as transit passengers from Santa Monica, Culver City

Somesh Debnath, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel and Downtown LA will transfer south for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) or north to the Purple Line Heavy Rail System. The other challenge is to connect the Crenshaw LRT to the existing Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport People Mover System planned to connect various air terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. Also, the Harbor Subdivision Transit Corridor currently under study may provide express Commuter Rail, DMU or Rapid Bus system connection between Los Angeles Union Station, LAX, and the Ports of LA and Long Beach, and ultimately the Orange County. This system would parallel the Crenshaw LRT along part of the Harbor Subdivision Corridor. There is also a possibility of a High Speed Rail connection to the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) which could use part of this corridor. The challenge is the development of intermodal stations at the route terminals. Aviation/Century Station (An Aerial Station with Lead Station Planner/Architect. future interface with an Airport People Mover  Developing station designs & area master plans. System and a Consolidated Rental Car Facility)  Locating stations and developing layouts. Crenshaw – LAX/Airport Transit Corridor-Light  Aerial station concepts. Rail Transit (LRT) Project, Los Angeles, CA Our firm is responsible for three (3) underground, (1) aerial and (4) at grade stations along a 8 ½ mile project corridor alignment. These stations interface with various ethnic neighbourhoods, and the team is preparing architectural and engineering designs to respond to the local environment. The Exposition Light Rail Line will connect to the Crenshaw LRT system to transfer passengers south for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) or north to the Purple Line Heavy Rail System. The Crenshaw LRT will connect with the existing Green Line Light Rail and the LAX Airport People Mover System, planned to connect various air terminals at Los Angeles International Airport. Silicon Valley Rapid Transit (SVRT) BART Lead Station Planner/Architect. Extension, Conceptual Engineering (EIS/EIR)  Managing the planning/design for the four proposed and Preliminary Engineering Phases, SVRT, San underground transit stations. Jose, CA  Master planning around station areas. US$ 5.6 billion  Coordinated all engineering issues with other consultants and developed the ancillary equipment space  Alum Rock Station – US$ 120 million system for each station, and developed the aesthetic  Civic Center Station – US$ 150 million design concepts.  Market Street Station – US$ 180 million  Amtrak Diridon Station – US$ 150 million Diridon/Arena BART Underground Station, SVRT, Lead Architect/Planner. San Jose, CA  Architectural design concepts and details. Estimated Cost at $310 million dollars (station  Design development and engineering coordination. cost).This Station, at the edge of downtown takes its  Directed the development of a three-dimensional fly theme from the two major elements at its location, the thru animation and graphics design. HP Pavilion and the historic Diridon Station. The existing immediate environment at this station will be the result of a major redevelopment project which will be influenced by the adjacent Diridon Station and HP Pavilion. For the new Station thee functions of these existing facilities helped to guide the design themes of waves and circles evocative of movement in both

Somesh Debnath, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

transit and sports. One enters the Station through glass-covered portals that exhibit a cutting-edge design of steel and glass. The glass roof of the portals is elegantly diaphanous in that the glass is supported only at the four corners of each sheet and has no edge mullions. Two flanking towers clad in metal and translucent glass act as supports for the glass canopy and also serve as enclosures for the accessible elevator and air intake and exhaust shafts. From the portals passengers arrive in a space that is open to the full height of the station box with a ceiling of closely spaced thin vertical perforated metal panels shaped in the form of a wave continuing from one end of the concourse to the other. The walls are clad in white porcelain enamel panels with crystallized glass accents. The walls can be used for backlit graphic displays, advertisements, and/or art opportunities. Downtown San Jose BART Underground Station Lead Architect/Planner. with Crossover, SVRT, San Jose, CA  Architectural design concepts and details. Estimated Cost at $420 million dollars (station cost).  Design development and engineering coordination. The design of the Station reflects San Jose as the  Presentation drawings for the Downtown San Jose creative and cultural center of the city in technology Stations’ Architectural Design Concepts and Details. and the arts as well as its rich social, cultural and architectural history. Each portal will be uniquely designed with materials, forms and scale appropriate to its context. The concourse is the space through which passengers move on their way to the boarding platform. To enrich this area a perforated metal panel ceiling displaying a continuous wave extends through the length of the concourse and symbolizes the rhythmic dynamic change over time in Silicon Valley. Passenger will move under this undulating ceiling to the elliptical openings of the stairs and escalators which will whisk them to the platform level. Enclosing the openings are curved glass guardrails that add to the smooth flow of passengers and symbolize openness to the flow of new ideas. The floor’s terrazzo finish will display an undulating pattern that is sympathetic to the curved elements in the concourse ceiling.

Silicon Valley Rapid Transit (SVRT) BART Heavy Lead Station Planner/Architect. Rail Extension to San Jose – Tunnel, Cross  Architectural Layout of the vent structures. Passages, Portals, Vent Structures, & other  Architectural design of the part commercial head house. Equipment Structures, San Jose, CA  Design of emergency ventilation equipment room, The Mid-Tunnel Ventilation Structure houses two (2) electrical rooms, gap breaker equipment room, and Ventilation Fans, each with a 300 HP motor to ventilate communication room layouts. tunnels during emergency and prevent accumulation of  Emergency exiting system. any hazardous gases. The Mid-Tunnel Ventilation Structure also houses a 1000Volt DC Switchgear which breaks the power at the Gap Breaker points for Third Rail in both tunnels to isolate Tunnels during emergency. Communications and Uninterruptible power supply equipment that provides power for Communications and Systems, and for tunnel lighting are also located at basement level. Tunnel Ventilation Structures served Alum Rock Station, Downtown San Jose Station, and Diridon/Arena Station, San Jose, CA

Berryessa and Milpitas Station Campus Roadway Lead Architect/Design Manager and Parking Structures-Design and Engineering  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Services for SVBX Project, D720 BART/SVRT, San

Somesh Debnath, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

Jose, CA Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) is a heavy  Station area master plans, urban design & site rail system serving the bay area communities around development. San Francisco. The Silicon Valley BART Extension  Architectural and engineering design concepts. (SVBX) Project is a current Valley Transit Authority’s Design-Build project which extends the BART system from Warm Springs to Berryessa. Under this contract AVA is planning and designing facilities within the BART station campus sites, at the Berryessa and Milpitas stations. Milpitas Station - Silicon Valley Berryessa Lead Architect/Design Manager Extension (SVBX) Project-C700- Line, Track,  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Stations, and Systems, A Design-Build Contract,  Station area master plans, urban design & site San Jose, CA This Milpitas Heavy Rail Station is development. situated on a 27-acre campus, consisting of the grade  Architectural and engineering design concepts. level concourse with the below grade split level boarding platforms. A pedestrian over-crossing bridge will connect the station to the existing elevated VTA light rail station. The station campus consists of a 16- bus bay transit center, the bike storage/bus operator’s facility, and the station related ancillary facilities. Berryessa Aerial Stations-Silicon Valley Rapid Lead Architect/Design Manager. Transit (SVRT) Project-C700- Line, Track,  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. Stations, and Systems, A Design-Build Contract,  Station area master plans, urban design & site San Jose, CA development. This Berryessa Heavy Rail Station sits on fifty two  Architectural and engineering design concepts. (52) acre- station campus, encompassing the street level concourse with an aerial boarding center boarding platform thirty five (35) feet above ground. This BART station is the End-of-Line Facility, and has station related ancillary facilities on the site. Rio Piedras Heavy Rail Underground Station, Tren Senior Station Architect/ Planner. Urbano, San Juan, Puerto Rico  Designed and built heavy patronage stations in the midst This is a stacked drift tunnel station with deep shafts of sensitive historical buildings and extensively and cut-and-cover entrances at each end. This station coordinating three (3) levels of ancillary equipment lies right across from the Rio Piedras Plaza in a rooms to curtail the size of underground station congested part of the Historic District of the City and structures. this has several historic and urban design  Coordinated all engineering disciplines to organize considerations. ancillary spaces which resulted in reducing station sizing by over eighty (80) feet and thereby reducing construction costs.  Coordinated design activities with the Systems Consultants, Engineers and Contractors, and producing detailed design documents to work with construction sequencing.  Responsible for the design of two underground heavy rail stations  Responsible for coordinating all engineering disciplines to organize ancillary spaces which resulted in reducing station sizing by over 80 feet and thereby reducing construction costs.  Responsible for coordinating design activities with the Systems Consultants, Engineers and Contractors, and producing detailed design documents to work with construction sequencing.  Responsible for coordinating the design elements with the surroundings historical walls, fences, gates and buildings and coordinating with engineers and contractors to produce detailing which worked with construction sequencing for the University of Puerto Rico Station.

Somesh Debnath, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

University of Puerto Rico Heavy Rail Senior Station Architect/ Planner. Underground Station, Tren Urbano, San Juan,  Designed and built heavy patronage in the midst of a Puerto Rico College Campus. This is a cut and cover station center platform and  Coordinated the design elements with the surroundings, entrances at both ends built in the midst of sensitive historical walls, fences, gates and buildings, and historical buildings on the University of Puerto Rico  Coordinated with engineers and contractors to produce Campus. detailing which worked with construction sequencing. Auburn Commuter Rail Station and Transit Lead Planner/Architect. Center, Auburn, WA  Developed Architectural/Planning ideas for community A joint development project consisting of a commuter and stakeholders. rail station, a major bus transit center, retail shops,  Developed architectural concept design. kiss n’ ride areas, two parking structures for over 600  Coordinated all engineering disciplines. cars and commercial redevelopment adjacent to  Developed Architectural/Engineering design several new access ramps to Freeway SR18. LAX Interim West Bus Terminal, Los Angeles, CA Lead Architect. Interim West Bus Terminal (IWBT)  Managed design and construction documents. The Interim West Bus Terminal (IWBT) will replace  Managed project conceptual design through construction current bus gates in the existing Tom Bradley documentation. International Terminal (TBIT), and is a key  Coordination with City’s Cultural Affairs Commission. component of Los Angeles World Airport (LAWA’s)  Coordination with LAWA and City Agencies. strategy to modernize LAX facilities to accommodate larger aircraft. The IWBT serves as a waiting area for international passengers prior to their boarding buses to planes located away from TBIT, and an airport entry point for passengers arriving in buses from planes in remote taxiway locations. San Fernando Valley Light Rail Line Preliminary, Design Architect Los Angeles, CA  Station planning and engineering studies. Five alternative light rail alignments with seventy-five  Station design and engineering, conceptual site potential station sites. planning. Regional Intermodal Transportation Center Project Manager and Lead Architect (RITC) Project, Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena  Developed Architectural/Planning ideas for community Airport Authority, CA and stakeholders 30 acre fast track Regional Intermodal Transportation  Developed Architectural/Engineering design Center (RITC) (836,174 sq. ft.) which includes Local  Developed architectural concept design and Regional Buses, Rental Car Facility, and  Coordinated all engineering disciplines Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility and Pedestrian Bridges/Walkways (46,633 sq. sf.) connecting the RITC and Commercial Parking Structure (220,600 sq. ft.) to the Airport and the Metrolink Commuter Rail Train Station. An elevated bridge over Empire Avenue and the adjacent railway tracks connects the RITC with the Metrolink/Amtrak Train Station. Dedicated parking for Metrolink and Amtrak passengers is provided through the acquisition of Union Pacific Railroad land, and the project includes the improvement of the Runway Safety Area associated with Runway 15-33.

Los Angeles Trade Technical College (LATTC), Lead Architect. Los Angeles CA  Selection of appropriate, durable and maintainable Los Angeles Trade Technical College is one of nine finish materials, and the development of creative Los Angeles Community College District campuses detailing. undergoing extensive modernization under the $2.1B  Design and Design Review Proposition A / AA and $3.5B Measure J Bond  Architectural and engineering constructability Programs in order to accommodate increased student reviews. enrollment. The funding for LATTC includes $650M under Proposition A / AA Bond and $350M under the  Client liaison and coordination. Measure J Bond Program. AVA is responsible for all  Contract Management, Office Engineering, design and construction phase project management Contractibility reviews, Value Engineering, RFI services for LATTC. reviews, Project Close-out.

Somesh Debnath, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

 Construction Management

Building “A” Modernization and Restoration Project Building ‘A’ consists of three contiguous buildings constructed at different times from 1924 through 1935 and for multiple purposes. The building currently Lead Architect houses an historic theater, a classroom wing and an  Architectural/Engineering Constructability Reviews. administration building. The scope of work consists of  Construction sequencing and coordination. remodeling and seismic upgrade of the existing  Phasing construction during campus operating hours 73,000 gross square foot building together with the addition of new north and south courtyards and utilities, including a structural upgrade of the existing Grand Avenue Theater. Learning Resource Center, LATTC The LATTC Library / Learning Resource Center Lead Architect building renovation will allow for more efficient  Planning utilization of space to meet demands of future student  Programming enrollment. The project includes approximately  Concept design 70,000 sq. ft. of major renovation and 15,000 sq. ft of new construction. Major components of the LRC  Final design project include the proposed build-out of new  Managing the construction and delivery of LEED enclosed floor area at the first and second floors, Certified Library / Learning Resource Center (70,000 updated restroom facilities as well as removal of the sq. ft. - major renovation and 15,000 sq. ft. - new existing south wall of the basement to provide for new construction entry access and natural light. Culinary Arts Facility Project, LATTC The Culinary Arts at the LATTC Campus is an internationally award winning popular program. The facilities are is in need of modernization and Lead Architect expansion to meet projected increased student  Architectural/Engineering constructability views enrollment. Currently the building houses classrooms  Construction sequencing and coordination for other programs. The proposed renovation dedicates the entire building to Culinary Arts, Baking  Phasing construction during campus operating hours and Hospitality, including new instruction studios and state-of-the-art culinary equipment along with a restaurant at the street level. Olive Street Parking Structure Design/Build, LATTC The structure is a five stories (six level) parking structure with 804 parking spaces. This is a Type 1, post tensioned concrete structure. The total square footage per floor is 42,000 sq ft with a total of 250,000 sq. ft for the entire structure. A z-blade screen adorns sections of the façade along Olive Street above the vehicular entrance to the parking structure. The roof top has been designed to carry photovoltaic Lead Architect panels in the future.  Architectural/Engineering constructability views.  Construction sequencing and coordination. The parking structure has two elevators facing the campus entrance on Grand Avenue. The parking  Phasing construction during campus operating hours structure has equipped comprehensive communication system, including telephone, data, and security systems to ensure emergency communication to sheriff station for the safety of the students and faculties at all times with emergency blue phones and CCTV monitoring cameras at each parking level. The parking structure also has fire alarm system connecting to main campus command control center. South Campus Project – Administration Building Lead Architect & Technology Building, LATTC  Planning

Somesh Debnath, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

 Programming The design-bid build delivery project consisted of two five-story buildings with more than 124,000 square  Concept design feet of administrative offices, admissions and records,  Final design student services, personnel and payroll, lecture halls,  Managing the construction and delivery of two (2) classrooms, auditoriums, faculty offices, department five (5) story state of the art building projects. offices, computer facilities & preparation kitchen. The project consisted of the Technology Classroom building (66,228 sq. ft) & Student Services building (56,302 sq/ ft.) Other features of the South Campus project include a utility building (1,800 sq. ft.) & extensive landscaping all across the site which is several acres at southeast corner of the Campus. Child Development Center (CDC) Lead Architect The LATTC CDC is a 14, 500 square feet, two stories,  Architectural/Engineering Constructability Reviews. Type V, steel framed new construction project, which  Construction sequencing and coordination. will operate as a teaching facility as well as a Child  Phasing construction during campus operating hours. Care Center. It is comprised of classrooms, administrative offices, food service and playground areas. The entire building will house the Child Development Program and will expand to have infant care as well. AVA has temporarily located the CDC in trailers in another location on Campus, while the new facility is under construction.

Luckman Arts Complex at California State Senior Architect. University, Los Angeles, CA  Planning and concept design. A 1,200-seat college auditorium.  Architectural Design and construction drawings entailing all engineering disciplines including electronics, lighting and acoustical systems.

Los Angeles Downtown People Mover Project, Senior Architect Los Angeles, CA  Responsible for the design and design development.  Interfaced with various historical and new building developments along the way, in order to coordinate and match station architecture with these developments.

Orange County Commuter Rail Program, Senior Planner Orange County, CA  Responsible for the preparation of all the planning and Eighty eight (88) miles of track linking Los Angeles architectural guidelines for the commuter rail program, to Oceanside with a Commuter Rail system consisting and the detailed architecture of several stations. of 13 passenger stations, maintenance facilities,  Significant tasks included; Commuter Rail design structure, utility and control systems. guidelines, for all stations, site development issues, interface issues with other modes of transportation, urban design features.  Station site planning and bus interface circulation studies at all stations.

Burbank Airport Amtrak / Metrolink Commuter Lead Planner/Architect Rail Station, Burbank, CA  Design and preparation of the final bid construction documents.  Cost estimating, and construction scheduling during operations.  Interfacing with the Federal Aviation Authority, Caltrans, Amtrak, Southern Pacific Railway, & Southern California Regional Rail Authority.

Los Angeles Unified School District, Senior Architect Los Angeles, CA  Renovation and upgrading of elementary schools ranging from 45,000 sf to 65,000 sf in size.  Architectural design and engineering coordination.

Somesh Debnath, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

Arlington Heights Elementary School, Lead Architect Los Angeles Unified School District,  Renovation and upgrading of Arlington Heights Los Angeles, CA Elementary School.  The architectural design and engineering coordination.

6th Avenue Elementary School, Los Angeles Lead Architect Unified School District, Los Angeles, CA  Renovation and upgrading of the elementary school which was approximately 45,000 sf. in size.  The architectural design and engineering coordination.

Royal Saudi Air Force Maintenance Facilities, Senior Architect Saudi Arabia  Architectural conceptual design, design development of terminal structure, control tower, hangers, machine shops, maintenance and repair facilities.  Designed housing for the Airport staff of over 2000 personnel.

US Air Force Facilities, Guam Lead Architect Air Force station on Guam  Responsible for design addition to the Air Force station on Guam. These facilities included hanger modifications, maintenance buildings, repair shops, administrative buildings, fuel storage, security systems, parking areas, electric power, HAVC, and utility systems.

Skidmore Owings & Merrill (SOM) Tehran, Iran Architect and Designer Multifunctional complex at Ziste Khavar.  Architectural concept design. Twelve (12) storey office building in Tehran, Iran.  Design development and engineering design  Construction document package

DAZ Architects, Iran Architect and Designer A mosque and retail shops in Mashad, Iran.  Architectural concept design. Port structure at the Port of Bandar Abbas, Iran.  Design development and engineering design  Construction document package

8 Details of the current assignment and the time duration for which services are required for the current assignment. .  Current Assignment : Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation, Authority, Regional Connector Project, Los Angeles, CA  Time Duration : . Somesh’s services are required until July 2018 on a part time basis.

Somesh Debnath, AIA (Signature and name of the Key Personnel)

Place Los Angeles

(Signature and name of the authorised signatory of the Applicant)

Somesh Debnath, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Form-12

Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Professional Personnel 1. Proposed Position: Station Planning Expert

2. Name ofPersonnel: Rolando Barlaan, AIA

3. Date of Birth: September 13, 1953

4. Nationality: Citizen of the United States of America

5. Educational Qualifications:  Bachelor of Architecture, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines Thesis: Zamboanga Alternate International Airport Terminal, College of Architecture, Cebu Institute of Technology, Cebu City, Philippines 6. Employment Record: Period Firm Position 2011-Present AnilVermaAssociates,Inc.(AVA) SeniorArchitect/ProjectManager 2008-2010 OverseasBechtel,Inc(OBI) DesignPackageLead(DPL 2002-2008 VBNArchitects,Inc.(nowSTV) SeniorArchitect/ProjectManager 1994-2002 GR&AInternational,Inc. SeniorArchitect/ProjectManager 1991-1994 Williams+Tanaka,Architects ArchitecturalConsultant–Design&Production 1989-1991 Stone,Maraccini&PattersonArchitects ProjectArchitect/SeniorDesigner 1987-1989 DMJMArchitects(nowAECOM) SeniorArchitecturalDesigner 1985-1987 IDGArchitects,Inc(becameVBN) ProjectArchitect/ProjectDesigner 1980-1985 HopeConsultingGroup SeniorArchitecturalDesigner/ProjectArchitect 1979-1980 JohnCarlWarnecke&Associates Designer/JobCaptain 7. List of projects on which the Personnel has worked

Project Name Description of Responsibilities BART to Livermore Extension Project (BLVX), Design Manager – Stations, Wayside &Maintenance MIS/EIS/EIR, Preliminary Engineering, Livermore, CA Facility Preliminary Engineering Design services involving (4)  Managing the planning/design efforts of the Team. transit alternatives being considered for the 5 mile extension  Station area master plans, urban design & site of BART service to Livermore. Enhanced Bus Service, development Express Bus (XB) / Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) with Direct  Architectural and engineering design concepts Transfer from East Dublin Pleasanton Station, Diesel  Development of various technical reports and studies. Multiple Unit (DMU)/Electric Multiple Unit (EMU) with a  Client contact transfer station at East Dublin Pleasanton Station and an  Internal & external interface with related design end-of-Line station at Isabel / I-580 interchange, and a packages done by others. medium-full service Maintenance Yard Facility located  northeast of Portola / I-580 interchange, and a BART station east of Isabel Avenue along the 580 corridor.

New BART Operations Control Center Facility (OCC), Design Manager/Architect Lake Merritt Plaza, Oakland, CA, USA  Responsible for managing the planning/design The new 38,000 SF plus, 3-storey, LEED silver facility  Project definition, visioning and aesthetic design when completed will serve as the new hub for BART  Architectural, Structural, MEP Engineering operations which is expanded to include both existing and  Client contact including presentations, 3-d the extension of the BART operations to the Silicon Valley visualization

Rolando Barlaan, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

and Livermore. Estimated completion dates for design is  Internal & external interface with related design 2018 contracts by others  Public outreach support and stakeholder coordination. Berryessa Aerial Station, Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Project Manager/Architect (SVRT) Project-C700 Line, Track, Stations, and  Responsible for managing the planning/design for the Systems, A Design-Build Contract, San Jose, CA station, ancillary buildings and station campus. Located in San Jose, California, a multi-modal facility  Development of technical concept alternatives and consisting of a BART aerial station, BART Police Zone value engineering exercises Facility, 5 storey parking structure, an 8-bay VTA Bus  Responding to major design changes thru client Transit Center and future Transit Oriented Development directives (DLs). (TOD) adjacent to the station campus. This station is the  Internal and external interface with other design second of six planned BART Stations along the BART to packages by others Silicon Valley Extension project.  Design Services During Construction (DSDC)

Milpitas Underground Station, Silicon Valley Rapid Project Manager/Architect Transit (SVRT) Project C700 Line, Track Stations, and  Responsible for managing the planning/design for the Systems, A Design-Build Contract, San Jose, CA station, ancillary buildings and station campus. A multi-modal facility consisting of the below-grade BART  Development of technical concept alternatives and station, 8 story parking structure, VTA (14) bay bus transit value engineering exercises center (with 22 articulated bus parking spaces) and 2-  Responding to major design changes thru client layover parking, ACE commuter bus transit area, and future directives (DLs). Transit Oriented Development (TOD) within the station  Internal and external interface with other design campus. This station is the first of six planned BART packages by others Stations along the BART to Silicon Valley Extension  Design Services During Construction (DSDC) project. South Calaveras Station, SVRT Planning & Preliminary Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment Engineering Design The SVRT Project is a 16-mile  Responsible for managing the planning/design for the extension the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) System to station, ancillary buildings and station campus. the Silicon Valley starting from the Warm Springs Station.  Development of technical concept alternatives and This station is located midway between Warm Springs and value engineering exercises Berryessa in an at grade configuration with an aerial  Responding to major design changes thru client concourse and a pedestrian bridge to serve the concourse. directives (DLs). The campus site will allow for Bus Transit Facilities,  Internal and external interface with other design Parking Structures and some commercial retail and packages by others residential as a part of Transit Oriented Development  Design Services During Construction (DSDC) (TOD) Montague Station, SVRT Planning & Preliminary Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment Engineering Design  Responsible for managing the planning/design for the The first of two stations along the Phase 1 10-mile station, ancillary buildings and station campus. extension, Montague station is situated on a 27-acre  Development of technical concept alternatives and campus, consisting of the grade level concourse with value engineering exercises the below grade split level boarding platforms. A  Responding to major design changes thru client pedestrian over-crossing bridge will connect the directives (DLs). station to the existing elevated VTA light rail station.  Internal and external interface with other design The station campus consists of a 16-bus bay transit packages by others center, the bike storage/bus operators facility, and the  Design Services During Construction (DSDC) station related ancillary facilities. Berryessa Station, SVRT Planning & Preliminary Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment Engineering DesignThe second of two stations along the  Responsible for managing the planning/design for the Phase 1 10-mile extension and located on a 52 acre site in station, ancillary buildings and station campus. San Jose, California. A multi-modal facility consisting of a  Development of technical concept alternatives and BART aerial station, BART Police Zone Facility, 5 storey value engineering exercises parking structure, an 8-bay VTA Bus Transit Center and  Responding to major design changes thru client future Transit Oriented Development (TOD) adjacent to the directives (DLs).

Rolando Barlaan, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

station campus. This station is one of six planned BART  Internal and external interface with other design Stations along the BART to Silicon Valley Extension packages by others project extending to the City Santa Clara.  Design Services During Construction (DSDC) Santa Clara Station, SVRT Planning & Preliminary Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment Engineering Design  Responsible for managing the planning/design for the This is the end of the line station located in the Caltrain station, ancillary buildings and station campus. yards in San Jose, CA. It is in an at grade configuration  Development of technical concept alternatives and very close to the Caltrain and Amtrak tracks and potentially value engineering exercises a future a high speed rail station track. An aerial concourse  Responding to major design changes thru client serve this station with a pedestrian bridge crossing over to directives (DLs). the access side of the station. Please note the station is  Internal and external interface with other design designed to allow a third level platform with would serve packages by others the international airport by an aerial People Mover Train  Design Services During Construction (DSDC) System. There is potential for join development to allow for a parking structure and some retail commercial facilities as a part of Transit Oriented Development (TOD).

BART Extension to Milpitas San Jose and Santa Clara Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment MIS/EIS/EIR, Preliminary Engineering, San Jose, CA  Responsible for managing the planning/design for the Station Segment - a $750M (2006 prices) project composed station, ancillary buildings and station campus. of 6 Station campuses including the station and station  Development of technical concept alternatives and ancillary structures such as parking garages, Bus Transit value engineering exercises Centers, TPSS, and others  Responding to major design changes thru client The stations are Milpitas (below-grade), Berryessa (aerial), directives (DLs). Alum Rock (underground), Civic Center (underground),  Internal and external interface with other design Diridon (underground) and Santa Clara (at-grade) packages by others  Design Services During Construction (DSDC) South Calaveras Station Campus Master Plan, SVRT Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment Corridor – 01010  Responsible for managing the planning/design for the This station campus is being planned to serve transit station, ancillary buildings and station campus. dependant users, therefore the campus contains retail  Development of technical concept alternatives and commercial and residential facilities along with parking value engineering exercises structures. This BART station located midway between  Responding to major design changes thru client Warm Springs and Berryessa in an at grade configuration directives (DLs). with an aerial concourse and a pedestrian bridge to serve the  Internal and external interface with other design concourse. The campus site will allow for Bus Transit packages by others Facilities, Parking Structures and some commercial retail  Design Services During Construction (DSDC) and residential as a part of Transit Oriented Development (TOD). Montague Station, SVRT Planning & Preliminary Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment Engineering Design  Responsible for managing the planning/design for the Montague station campus is being designed to station, ancillary buildings and station campus. accommodate bus transit center, parking structure with  Development of technical concept alternatives and some retail activity an a pedestrian overpass which value engineering exercises connects to an existing BART light rail station. This  Responding to major design changes thru client station situated on a 27-acre campus, consisting of the directives (DLs). grade level concourse with the below grade split level  Internal and external interface with other design boarding platforms. A pedestrian over-crossing bridge packages by others will connect the station to the existing elevated VTA  Design Services During Construction (DSDC) light rail station. The station campus consists of a 16- bus bay transit center, the bike storage/bus operators facility, and the station related ancillary facilities.

Rolando Barlaan, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Berryessa Station Campus Master Plan Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment Berryessa station campus is being designed to  Responsible for managing the planning/design for the accommodate a bus transit center, parking structure station, ancillary buildings and station campus. with some retail activity and a BART Police Facility.  Development of technical concept alternatives and The second of two stations along the Phase 1 10-mile value engineering exercises extension and located on a 52 acre site in San Jose,  Responding to major design changes thru client California. A multi-modal facility consisting of a BART directives (DLs). aerial station, BART Police Zone Facility, 5 storey parking  Internal and external interface with other design structure, an 8-bay VTA Bus Transit Center and future packages by others Transit Oriented Development (TOD) adjacent to the station  Design Services During Construction (DSDC) campus. This station is one of six planned BART Stations along the BART to Silicon Valley Extension project extending to the City Santa Clara. Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment Alum Rock Station Campus Master Plan Alum Rock  Responsible for managing the planning/design for the station campus is being designed to accommodate an station, ancillary buildings and station campus. existing master plan which has been prepared by the  Development of technical concept alternatives and city to replace industrial facilities with a new value engineering exercises retail/commercial complex. This station is an  Responding to major design changes thru client underground configuration running diagonally across directives (DLs). the site. The master plan was redesign to  Internal and external interface with other design accommodate station entrances from the underground packages by others concourse below as well as address a newly  Design Services During Construction (DSDC) configured public plaza. This public plaza becomes an activity center for the Portuguese Church on the westside and the Christian Church on the south side. A hotel with some commercial activities and a major 7 storey parking structure is planned to serve the commuters from the neighbouring towns as well as the immediate neighborhoods of Alum Rock. The bus transit center, is located along the major street with stops close to the underground station entrances. The entire station campuses is conceived as a Transit Oriented Development (TOD). Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment Civic Center Station & Market Street Station - Master  Responsible for managing the planning/design for the Plan station, ancillary buildings and station campus. Civic Center Underground Station is located next to  Development of technical concept alternatives and the new civic center of City of San Jose. The station value engineering exercises campus is weave in with the Civic Center facilities  Responding to major design changes thru client and some of the local under utilized parcels of land. directives (DLs). The Market Street Underground Station is right in the  Internal and external interface with other design heart of Downtown. VTA owns a large parcel of land packages by others on the north side and plans to use it for station  Design Services During Construction (DSDC) entrances, bus transit facilities and other high density Transit Oriented Development (TOD) facilities. Architectural Design Manager – Stations Segment Santa Clara Station Campus Master Plan  Responsible for managing the planning/design for the This is the end of the line station located in the Caltrain station, ancillary buildings and station campus. yards in San Jose, CA. It is in an at grade configuration  Development of technical concept alternatives and very close to the Caltrain and Amtrak tracks and potentially value engineering exercises a future a high speed rail station track. An aerial concourse  Responding to major design changes thru client

Rolando Barlaan, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

serve this station with a pedestrian bridge crossing over to directives (DLs). the access side of the station. Please note the station is  Internal and external interface with other design designed to allow a third level platform with would serve packages by others the international airport by an aerial People Mover Train  Design Services During Construction (DSDC) System. There is potential for join development to allow for a parking structure and some retail commercial facilities as a part of Transit Oriented Development (TOD).

Oakland Airport Connector, People Mover, Bay Area Lead Project Designer – Stations and Maintainence Rapid Transit (BART), Oakland, CA Facility A 3.4 mile automated people mover project consisting of  Responsibilities involved management and review of two end stations, one located at the existing Coliseum design deliverables by various Design Contractors BART station and the other located at the Oakland including resolution of major design issues, quality International Airport Terminal, and a 50.000 sf storage and assurance implementation, provided input and review maintenance facility at mid-section. of the overall project schedule, adherence to identified delivery milestones, including identification of work scope creep, design coordination with the various engineering discipline leads, design and constructability review, internal and external design interfaces with the other contract packages. West Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station, Bay Area Rapid Lead Project Designer Transit (BART), Dublin, CA  Final Design documentation including development A $40M, 62,000 sq. ft. project consisting of an at-grade technical concept alternatives. West Dublin Pleasanton BART Station located along the  Presentation to clients and other stakeholders 580 corridor. This developer-sponsored design-build in-fill  Public outreach support station will provide transit service for the cities of Dublin  Value engineering exercises and Pleasanton and the outlying areas. The station consists of an elevated concourse with pedestrian bridges spanning the east and westbound freeway lanes and connecting to the parking structures and transit center. The projected was completed in 2009.

New Doha International Airport, Doha, State of Qatar Design Package Lead (DPL) A completely brand new $14B International Airport facility  Involved in managing the design the Airport sited on reclaimed land and located adjacent to the existing Operations Facilities contract packages (CP-15, CP61, Doha International Airport. The New Doha International CP63, & CP64), a bid-build contract package Airport consist of the International terminal, the Emiri consisting of more than 28 facilities which include the Terminal and the General Aviation terminal and the related General Aviation Terminal building, General Aviation operations ancillary facilities. The airport was projected to Maintenance Hangar, Main & Satellite Fire Stations, serve 54 million annual passengers to the State of Qatar. Ground services Equipment Building, Facilities Maintenance Facility, North and South Telecommunications Interface Buildings, Airport Surveillance Radar Building, Solid Waste Handling Facility, Midfield Telecommunications Building, Medical Center Building, Administration Buildings A & B, Employee village, and including all related ancillary buildings.  Other responsibilities involved management and review of design deliverables by the Design Contractors including resolution of major design issues, quality assurance implementation, providing input and review of the overall project schedule, adherence to identified delivery milestones, including identification of work scope creep, design coordination with the various engineering discipline leads, design and constructability review, internal and external

Rolando Barlaan, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

design interfaces with the other contract packages, preparation of tender documents and review and evaluation of tenders, response to RFIs, review of design contractor invoices.

San Francisco International Airport (SFO) "Boarding Project Manager/Lead Architect Area A", City and County of San Francisco, CA  Responsibilities include development of the design, A $120M, 12-gate boarding wing of SFO’s new presentation of various design concepts to client and International Terminal. The project included passenger other stakeholders, engineering coordination, internal boarding bridges, 400 Hertz ground power, baggage and external interface with adjacent design packages, conveyors, special systems and furnishing. Completed in development of technical reports and special studies, 2003 review of overall design schedule & preliminary design cost estimates, FF&E research and sample approvals, and more.

San Francisco International Airport, Pier F Hub & Project Manager/Lead Designer Thumb Expansion, United Airlines / City of San  Responsibilities involved design, and management, of Francisco, CA: design deliverables including resolution of major 59,000 SF core and shell additions and tenant improvements design issues, quality assurance implementation, to the existing Pier F hub and thumb. The hub addition provided input and review of the overall project housed the new United Airlines Flight Operations offices, schedule, adherence to identified delivery milestones, the Red Carpet Club at the boarding level and the including identification of work scope creep, design maintenance offices at the ground level. The thumb addition coordination with the various engineering discipline provided much needed retail spaces to serve the passengers leads, internal and external design interfaces with the at the departure lounge at the boarding level. Completed in other on-going contract packages, preparation of bid 2002. documents and review and evaluation of bids, responses to RFIs, and DSDC services. Mission Bay Housing Development Avalon Bay Project Designer/Project Manager corporation, San Francisco, CA  Development of the design and preparation of A two-city block, mixed-use development project at 5th & construction documents. King Street & across the Caltrain Terminal, consisting of a 21-story, luxury housing condominium tower surrounded by 5-6-story, market rate town house units with complete recreational facilities over a 2-story retail/office podium, and multi-level parking structure. (Completed construction document phase but project was put on hold by client)

Moscone Convention Center Expansion 2 Project Project Designer City of San Francisco, CA  Responsibilities include development of the design, A $153M, 560,000 sf expansion of the original Convention presentation of various design concepts to client and Center located in the heart of San Francisco at the Yerba other stakeholders, engineering coordination, internal Buena Center. The expansion involved four city blocks of and external interface with adjacent on-going projects exhibition space and meeting rooms below the Yerba Buena on site, development of technical reports and special Center esplanade and one city block of banquet studies, review of overall design schedule & facility/function rooms on top of the existing original preliminary design cost estimates, FF&E research and convention facility. sample approvals, and more.

Rolando Barlaan, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

City Square Office Retail Complex, Bramalea Pacific Project Designer/Project Architect Development, Oakland, CA Oakland, CA • Responsibilities include development of the design, Located at the entrance to the 12th Street BART Station and presentation of various design concepts to client and adjacent to the Oakland City Hall and the Federal Building, other stakeholders, engineering coordination, internal the project involved and external interface with adjacent design projects, a master plan of a 6-block City Center Redevelopment development of technical reports and special studies, Project, and design of the initial retail and office complex. review of overall design schedule & preliminary This $48M project consists of four buildings designed on design cost estimates, FF&E research and sample the deck of the existing City Center Parking Garage, for approvals, and more. 235,000 SF of retail and office space in a three-story, low- rise configuration around a sunny outdoor square.

Salvio Pacheco Square Designer Concord, CA  Responsibilities involved design, planning, and A one super city block multi-use development project development of procurement drawings. Meetings and located in front of the historical Todos Los Santos Plaza in presentation to various stakeholders including the City Concord. The Mission Style Architecture project is of Concord. Coordination with various engineering composed of 2-3 storey office/retail, and 4 storey market disciplines. External and internal interface with other rate medium density condominium residential buildings. developments within the vicinity of the project.

Opera Plaza Designer/Job Captain City of San Francisco, CA  Responsibilities involved development, and review of A six-block multi-use development project located adjacent design deliverables by the design team including to the San Francisco Opera House, composed of three 12-14 resolution of major design issues, quality assurance story market rate housing, 4-story podium housing and implementation. As Job Captain, was responsible for related amenities including a garden plaza at the roof level, production and coordination of the construction restaurants, movie theatres and other various commercial documents drawings for bidding. retail facilities at the ground level.

Waikiki International Convention Plaza, Oahu, Hawaii Project Designer Client: Horita-WWC Inc. & Shimizu & TSA, Inc  Responsibilities include programming, development of A $1.2B, 3 million sq. ft. development located in the heart the design, presentation of various design concepts to of Waikiki District at the famed International Marketplace client and other stakeholders, engineering coordination, Site, consisting of a 600,00 sf convention center, two 1,000- internal and external interface with adjacent design room five-star hotel twin towers, a 43 storey 400-unit packages, development of technical reports and special luxury condominium tower, 250,000 sf of retail space, and studies due to the uniqueness of the site configuration multi-level parking facility to accommodate residents, and environmental concerns. guests and the general public. San Bruno BART Station, Bay Area Rapid Transit Lead Architect, Project Designer/Project Manager (BART), San Bruno, CA  Responsible for design and project management of the The second of four stations planned along the BART San bridging documents which also involved presentation Francisco International Airport (SFO) extension corridor of various design concepts to client and other and located adjacent to the San Bruno Tanforan Shopping stakeholders, public outreach support, engineering Center. This multi-modal project consists of a 9-bay coordination, internal and external interface with SAMTRANS bus transit center with 3-layover parking, a adjacent design packages, development of technical joint City of San Bruno / BART Police station facility, a 6- reports and special studies, review of overall design storey 1200 car capacity parking structure, and the heavy schedule & preliminary design cost estimates, rail rapid transit BART station which serves the City of San specifications, FF&E research and sample approvals,

Rolando Barlaan, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Bruno residents and its outlying towns. This project won a and more. national AIA design award for transportation project and was successfully completed in 2002.

Details of the current assignment and the time duration for which services are required for the current assignment.

Currently assigned as Project Manager for the design phase of the 3-storey BART Transit Operations Control 8. Center project located at Lake Merritt Plaza in Oakland, California. The final design is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2018.

Rolando Barlaan, AIA (Signature and name of the Key Personnel)

Place Oakland, CA

(Signature and name of the authorised signatory of the Applicant)

Rolando Barlaan, AIA RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Form-12

Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Professional Personnel 1. Proposed Position: Structural Engineer/Construction Expert

2. Name ofPersonnel: Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE

3. Date ofBirth: February22, 1948

4. Nationality: Citizen of the United States of America

5. Educational Qualifications:  M.S., Structural Engineering, Canadian Institute of Technology  B.S., Civil Engineering, Southern China University  Additional Studies: Earthquake-Resistant Design of Engineering Structures, University of California, Berkeley Extension Center 6. Employment Record: Period Firm Position 2013-Present AnilVermaAssociates,Inc.(AVA) StructuralLeadEngineer Senior Supervising Structural Engineer/Professional 1979-2012 ParsonsBrinckerhoff(nowWSP/PB) Associate 1973-1979 BechtelCorporation SeniorStructuralEngineer

7. List of projects on which the Personnel has worked

Project Name Description of Responsibilities Structural Lead/Construction Expert Kamehameha Highway Stations Group, Honolulu  Structural Engineering final design services Authority for Rapid Transit (HART), Honolulu, HI  Responsible for the entire design and construction AVA is the Prime Consultant responsible for architecture, contract documents for the Pearl Highlands structural, mechanical and electrical engineering, with Station, as this is a very complex facility, from civil, landscape and other engineering services done the architectural design and structural engineering locally. The KHSG Contract consists of: Pearl Highlands stand point. Stations, Pearlridge Station, Aloha Stadium Station and  DSDC Services the H2R2 Ramp. HART Project is a twenty (20) mile grade separated fixed guideway transit system running between East Kapolei and Ala Moana. AVA was responsible for the Final Design of three complex aerial stations & a freeway ramp & coordination with guideway & systems contractors.  Pearl Highlands Station has an elevated station structure with two-hundred forty (240)-foot long side platforms located on the triangular property bounded by Kamehameha Highway, Farrington Highway, and the H-1/H-2 interchange in the vicinity of Kuala Street at the western limits of Pearl City. This station complex includes a rail station, a bus transit center, and a parking structure that is to be constructed in two (2) phases. The first phase has the aerial station structure, transit guideway and an aerial station/bus deck 46’

Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

above a river, making it environmentally and structurally challenging. A bus stop and kiss-and-ride is located on the shoulder of eastbound Kamehameha Highway. The station platform is at an elevation of 84’0”, the station/bus deck at 46’0” and the Farrington Highway approximately at 28’0” - in other words the platforms are 55 feet or more above street level. Other improvements include a pedestrian crossing at the Kamehameha Highway/Kuala Street intersection, sidewalks, stairs, and ramps. The Ramp H2R2 will connect in-bound Farrington Hwy to in-bound Kamehameha Hwy and provide access to the bus stop and kiss-and-ride.

 Aloha Station has two (2) elevated, two hundred forty (240) foot long side platforms, located within the existing Kamehameha Parking Lot at Aloha Stadium. The elevated side platforms are accessed directly from the at-grade entrance structures via stairs, elevators, and escalators. A single station entrance is provided to serve Aloha Stadium and the adjacent park-and-ride lot/bus transit center. Train Control and Communications Room and other ancillary equipment rooms are housed in a separate building at ground level. The site design includes a public plaza, the park-and- ride facility, bus transit center, and landscaping of the station site. Structural Design Lead BART Operations Control Center (OCC) Capacity  Conceptual design for both the Option 1: two-story and Expansion, Lake Merritt Station, Oakland, CA: The Option 2: three-store OCC structure. work performed in these two conceptual designs included Schematic Design Program Definition – the structural  Client contact including presentations, 3-d visualization design criteria, preliminary framing plans, structural  Internal & external interface with related design sections, framing elevations and a comprehensive 3-D contracts by others computer model for the two-story OCC, which is used in the analysis for gravity loads, wind and seismic forces. For the three-story option of the OCC structure, a comprehensive 3-D computer model had been developed to perform the preliminary design of the structural including dynamic analysis for seismic forces. This 3-D computer model of the Option 2 was also used for the soil-structure

Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

interaction (SSI) analysis of the existing underground station in order to ascertain its structural capability to carry the New OCC structure. The SSI analysis of the existing station structure is performed by others. The new 38,000 SF plus, 3-storey, LEED silver facility when completed will serve as the new hub for BART operations which is expanded to include both existing and the extension of the BART operations to the Silicon Valley and Livermore. Estimated completion dates for design is 2018

The BART-VTA Silicon Valley Berryessa Extension Lead Structural Engineer/Construction Expert (SVBX), Design Build Contract C700 Line Stations,  Responsible for the structural engineering analysis and Wayside Facilities Structures & Systems, San Jose, CA design of various segments of this heavy rail contract including the Berryessa Station and Milpitas Station. Berryessa Station sits on fifty-two (52) acre- station  Structural Engineering analysis and design of various campus, consisting of the structural street interstitial segments of the heavy rail contract, including Milpitas facilities at the concourse level, a 700 ft. long, 29’-6” wide and Berryessa Station. Using SAP2000 elevated cast-in-place concrete center platform thirty-five  Responsible for SSI analysis and design of the (35) feet above ground; a 183’ long by 75.5’ wide by 31.5’ underground open trench/channel housing two BART high space-truss-frame complex steel canopy supported tracks and 700 ft. long platforms directly on the aerial guideway structure and a lower roof  Responsible for the design of a 268 ft. long pedestrian moment-frame-steel canopy supported directly by the overpass crossing (POC) bridge over the Capital concrete center platform. Seismic design of all the Expressway connecting the Milpitas Station and the structures and structural components was based on the existing light rail Montague Station and the associated modified earthquake response spectrum with a maximum LRT Station modification to accommodate the new spectral acceleration of 7g. Structural engineering analyses stairs and escalators and a new canopy structure over were performed using SAP2000 finite element computer the new stairs and escalator well, and platform program. Moreover, both the north and south entrance supporting one end of the POC Bridge. canopies have highly structural design challenges in order  Overall supervision for the design of these facilities to meet the stringent architectural requirements of highly which included roof framing with steel joists, masonry aesthetical appearance. This BART station is the End-of- shear walls design and foundations design. the-Line structure with all the rapid transit station related Development of technical concept alternatives and ancillary facilities on the site. value engineering exercises  Responding to major design changes thru client This 183’ long by 75.5’ wide by 31.5’ high space-truss- directives (DLs). frame complex steel canopy structure consists of six  Internal and external interface with other design transverse space-truss moment frames at 35’ spacing and packages by others two longitudinal braced frames with X-cross tension rods at  DSDC services each bay. Each column of the transverse space-frame comprises of four built-up round HSS elements spaced at 1’-5” square on center at the base splaying upward to 9’-0” square at the top to form a tapering tower with diagonal vertical bracings at each side. The horizontal girder of each space-frame is formed with two vertical and two horizontal trusses with round HSS elements. The rectangular HSS roof beams in the longitudinal direction connecting each transverse space-moment frame at 35’ on center are curved with double curvatures to form a complex architectural feature and aesthetic appeal providing the appearance of the roof structure in motion akin to the waves in the ocean. Using HSS sections for structural elements present many design challenges since the design and all connections must be checked to meet the stringent seismic design requirements of AISC 341 and Chapter K of AISC 360, respectively.

Milpitas Station: Responsible for the soil-structure

Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

interaction (SSI) analysis and design of the underground open trench/channel housing two BART tracks and 700 ft. long platforms. Also responsible for the design of a 268 ft. long pedestrian overpass crossing (POC) bridge over the Capital Expressway connecting the Milpitas Station and the existing light rail Montague Station and the associated LRT Station modification to accommodate the new stairs and escalators and a new canopy structure over the new stairs and escalator well, and platform supporting one end of the POC Bridge. Work also included the new emergency exist stairs connecting the existing LRT Montague Station platform. The design of this POC Bridge was based on the latest AASHTO and Caltrans Bridge Design criteria.

The 268 ft. long POC Bridge is a four span bridge consisting of two 75’ spans, one 60’ span and one 58’ span. Each span comprises of two vertical trusses with 11’-6” high, spaced at 12’-8” on center. In addition to the floor deck, the bridge bottom and top chords are braced with horizontal trusses. The bridge floor deck is a composite concrete with steel metal deck with an average thickness of 6” at the center of the bridge. The roof framing of the bridge consisting of curved-sloping roof joists supporting a built- up roof system of structural metal deck and a standing-seam roof deck. The two sides of the bridge are covered with architectural claddings to form a weather-protected, enclosed structure. The bridge is supported on four single column bents which in turn supported on CIDH pile foundations and the end of the bridge is supported by a cantilevered outrigger which is part of the floor system of the Milpitas Station. This POC Bridge has been designed in strict conformance with the Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria for bridges including the requirements for Fracture Critical Members.

Wayside System Facilities for Milpitas, San Jose, and Fremont sites. Overall supervision for the design of these facilities which included roof framing with steel joists, masonry shear walls design and foundations design. Seismic design of these facilities was based on the site- specific ground response spectrum generated with a maximum ground acceleration of 0.57g and a maximum response spectral acceleration of 1.34g. BART Warm Springs Extension, Fremont Central Park Lead Structural Engineer Subway Project  Lead Structural Engineer for the Design of the Fremont 1.3-mile-long (2-kilometer-long) two-track underground Central Park Subway Project subway project. This project is the first part of the BART Warm Springs Extension (WSX) in the city of Fremont. This cut-and-cover subway portion of the WSX project is used to cross under Stevenson Boulevard, Fremont Central Park, Lake Elizabeth, and the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks. It consists of 1,100 feet (335 meters) of the northern transition section, 4,600 feet (1,402 meters) of the subway section and 1,000 feet (304 meters) of the southern transition section, for a total of 6,700 feet long (2,042 meters long). This subway section is located right next to the Hayward Fault even though it does not cross it. The

Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Hayward Fault is capable of generating severe seismic ground motion with a magnitude of seven or greater on the Richter scale. Besides the subway section, this portion of the WSX project also includes two ventilation structures which are located directly on top of the subway box with a footprint of about 60 feet by 210 feet (18 meters by 64 meters) each and extend 25 feet (7.6 meters) above the subway box. Surveillance Radar Program (SRP) Lead Structural Engineer Structural lead for the design of the multi-story structural  Lead structural engineer for the design of the Phased steel-framed building. The building is designed to resist a Array Radar Building horizontal earthquake ground motion that induces 1.0g seismic base shear and also designed to resist the wind induced pressures from two design wind speeds—120 knots (138 miles per hour) under the operating condition and 200 knots (230 miles per hour) under the survival condition with an importance factor of 1.7 for both cases. These are equivalent to a wind speed of 234.6 miles per hour and 391 miles per hour respectively. Besides the strong seismic ground motions and extremely high wind, the building has also been designed to meet an extremely stringent deflection criterion of 0.25 inches (0.006 meters) maximum at the upper roof of the building under the operating wind condition. This PAR building consists of nine levels: ground floor, second floor, third floor, lower roof, fourth floor, fifth floor, sixth floor, seventh floor, eighth floor and upper roof. The top six stories form a radar tower, which rises above the lower roof forming a truncated six-sided pyramid. The major function of this tower is to provide the supports for the phase array radar panels. These radar panels are mounted on three sides of the tower. The lower three stories of the building have a rectangular plan with dimensions of 153 feet (46.7 meters) long by 116 feet (35.3 meters) wide. The total height of the building is 112 feet (34.1 meters). Chevron and inverted V-types of braced frames are used to provide sufficient stiffness required of the building in order to meet the stringent deflection criterion of 0.24 inches (0.006 meters) and to act as lateral force resistant elements for either seismic forces or wind forces. The typical floor framing consists of 5.9-inch-thick (0.15-meter-thick) concrete slab over steel metal deck which in turn is supported by floor beams and girders. The foundation system consists of a 4.8-foot-thick (1.5-meter- thick) mat slab supported by 229 drilled shafts with a diameter of 30 inches (0.76 meters) each. The drilled shafts are about 65 feet (20 meters) long with an embedment of 19 feet (6 meters) into the rock. The building is located at the top of a mountain which is about 11,483 feet (3,500 meters) high. The building has been designed to behave within the elastic limit under the seismic as well as the wind forces CSO Tunnel Projects Structural Design Lead The tunnel is 9.9 miles (15.9 kilometers) long. The precast  Lead structural engineer for the design East Side segmental tunnel lining consists of rings which are 5 feet Tunnel, Shafts and Pump Station and Shafts for the (1.5 meters) wide with seven segments and a key segment. West side Tunnel projects Two types of reinforcement are employed for the segments  Structural lead for the design of the 14-inch-thick in this project. For the portion of the tunnel located in the (0.35-meter-thick), 22-foot-inside-diameter (6.7-meter- Troudale formation which is about 80% of the total length inside-diameter) tunnel lining.

Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

of the tunnel, the segments are reinforced with steel fiber  Structural lead engineer for the design of the 121-foot- reinforcement; for the portion of the tunnel located in the inside-diameter by 160-foot-deep (36.8-meter-inside- sand/silt alluvium, the segments are reinforced with diameter by 48.7-meter-deep) multilevel concrete deformed steel bars. The tunnel inverts vary from 90 feet to pump station. 130 feet (27 meters to 39 meters) below the ground surface.  Structural engineering and design of the following Works also include the design of the 45-foot-inside- shafts—the 23-foot-inside-diameter (7-meter-inside- diameter (13.7-meter-inside-diameter) Port Center Shaft diameter) by 66-foot-deep (20-meter-deep) Greeley which is located at the lower end of the tunnel with a Connection Shaft; the 47-foot-inside-diameter (14- concrete lining thickness of 2 feet (0.6 meters). Design also meter-inside-diameter) by 133-foot-deep (40.5-meter- includes the 3.5-foot-thick (1-meter-thick) slurry walls for deep) Confluent Shaft; the 42-foot-inside-diameter the six shafts in the project. The outside diameter of the (12.8-meter-inside-diameter) by 127-foot-deep (38.7- slurry walls is 56 feet (17 meters) meter-deep) Clay Street Shaft; the 39-foot-inside- Structural lead engineer for the design of the 121-foot- diameter (12-meter-inside-diameter) by 110-foot-deep inside-diameter by 160-foot-deep (36.8-meter-inside- (33.5-meter-deep) Ankeny Shaft; and the 39-foot- diameter by 48.7-meter-deep) multilevel concrete pump inside-diameter (11.8-meter-inside-diameter) by 120- station. This pump station is connected to a 14-foot-inside- foot-deep (36.5-meter-deep) Upshur Shaft. diameter (4.3-meter-inside-diameter) tunnel and subjected to a 160-foot (48-meter) head of hydrostatic pressure. Besides supporting and housing its own equipment such as pumps, motors, air blowers, 20-ton cranes and miscellaneous valves and piping, this pump station structure is also supporting the operations and maintenance building located at the street level. A three-dimensional computer model was used to analyse the soil-structure interaction due to seismic ground motions and construction stages. Another salient feature of this pump station is the incorporation of the slurry wall with the perimeter concrete wall (liner) of the pump station to act as a composite section for resisting uplift and seismic forces. Because of the size and depth of the pump station, the slurry wall needs to be supported by the liner of the pump station during construction, resulting in the construction staging of the liners to be in sections and from the top down for the lower half of the liner walls. Each section of the liner wall is utilized and acts as a compression ring for the support of the slurry wall. Structural engineering and design of the following shafts— the 23-foot-inside-diameter (7-meter-inside-diameter) by 66-foot-deep (20-meter-deep) Greeley Connection Shaft; the 47-foot-inside-diameter (14-meter-inside-diameter) by 133-foot-deep (40.5-meter-deep) Confluent Shaft; the 42- foot-inside-diameter (12.8-meter-inside-diameter) by 127- foot-deep (38.7-meter-deep) Clay Street Shaft; the 39-foot- inside-diameter (12-meter-inside-diameter) by 110-foot- deep (33.5-meter-deep) Ankeny Shaft; and the 39-foot- inside-diameter (11.8-meter-inside-diameter) by 120-foot- deep (36.5-meter-deep) Upshur Shaft. All these shafts are reinforced concrete structures with structural concrete lining thickness varying from 12 inches to 36 inches (0.3 meters to (0.9 meters) and all were designed with provisions for access from above. Slabs and beams at grade were designed to support HS 20 truck loading and a backfill of 7 feet (2.1 meters) for the Ankeny Shaft. Metro Red Line Tunnel Project, Segment 3, Rail Structural Design Lead Construction Corporation a Subsidiary of the Los  Supervising Structural Engineer for the design of the Angeles County Commission, Los Angeles, CA 2.5-mile (4-kilometer), $126 million twin-tunnel, Tunnels traverse through the Santa Monica Mountain Contract C-311 heavy transit rail project.

Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

crossing several seismic faults, which include the Hollywood and Benedict Canyon faults. The groundwater table is located at 120 to 740 feet (36.5 meters to 225.5 meters) above the crown of the tunnels.

Southern California Light Rail Project, Long Beach/Los Structural Design Lead Angeles, CA  Checking and reviewing the final design of the six multi-span post-tensioned box-girder bridges. Number of spans varied from five spans to seven spans.

Tasman Light Rail Project, Santa Clara County Transit Structural Design Lead District, CA  Structural Coordinator for the design of three box- girder multi-span concrete bridges. AC Transit Parking Structure Seismic Retrofit, Structural Design Lead Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District, Oakland, CA  Responsible for seismic evaluation and retrofit of the The existing parking garage is an essentially rectangular existing two-level AC transit parking structure. structure with a plan dimension of 63.5 feet (19.3 meters) in the transverse direction and a plan dimension of 322 feet (98 meters) in the longitudinal direction. The structure was built in 1983 and was designed in accordance with the requirements of the 1979 Uniform Building Code. The structure consists of a slab-at-grade and an elevated concrete floor with post-tensioned slab and girders. Colma Extension, Bay Area Rapid Transit District Structural Design Lead (BART), CA Bridge span ranged from 75 feet to 130 feet  Structural Engineer for the preliminary design of four (23 meters to 40 meters) in length. Work also included the multi-span and multilane vehicular bridges; one three- final design of the two-span, two-track, 200-foot-long (61- span heavy rail through-girder bridge and one six-span meter-long) post-tensioned box-girder superstructure for the pedestrian bridge Willow Overpass Bridge, which was designed to support BART trains. San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge East Span Seismic Structural Design Lead Safety Project, Oakland, CA:  Responsible Structural Engineer for the design of two reinforced concrete substations which house the mechanical and electrical equipment, computer control paraphernalia, and maintenance facility. Details of the current assignment and the time duration for which services are required for the current assignment. 8. Shing’s services are required until July 2018 on a part time basis. Certification: 1. I am willing to work o the Project and I will be available for entire duration of the project assignment as required. 2. I, the undersigned, certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, this CV correctly describes me, my qualifications and my experience.

Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE (Signature and name of the Key Personnel)

Place Oakland, CA

(Signature and name of the authorised signatory of the Applicant)

Mee Shing Owyang, PE, SE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Form-12

Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Professional Personnel 1. Proposed Position: Transport Planning Expert

2. Name of Personnel: Ram Kumar, PhD, TE

3. Date ofBirth: November 7,1950

4. Nationality: Citizen of the United States of America

5. Educational Qualifications:  Ph.D. Civil Engineering (Transportation), University of Waterloo, Canada  Diploma in Special Studies – Transportation, University of Grenoble, France  Masters in Traffic and Transportation, School of Planning & Architecture, India  Bachelor of Architecture, VR College of Engineering, India

6. Employment Record: Period Firm Position 2010-2016 Arcadis Sr.VicePresident/DirectorofTransportation 2009-2010 KumarConsultingServices Principal 2006-2009 Iteris,Inc. VicePresident/NevadaOperationsDirector 2004-2006 ParsonsBrinkerhoff PrincipalPlanningManager 1993–2004 KumarConsultingServices Principal 1991-1993 Los Angeles CountyMetropolitanAuthority Project Manager 1987–1991 Barton-AshmanAssociates PrincipalAssociate 1982–1983 OperationsResearchGroup,Baroda SeniorConsultant Bombay (now Mumbai) Metropolitan Head of Traffic Planning & Evaluation Group and 1980 – 1982 Region Development Authority Transportation Planner School of Planning; and Transportation 1976 – 1980 Consultant CEPT and Vastu Shilpa, Assistant Professor of Transportation Planning Ahmedabad 7. List of projects on which the Personnel has worked

Project Name Description of Responsibilities Consultant to CEPT and Vastu Shilpa on several Assistant Professor of Transportation Planning Transportation Projects  Teaching graduate level transportation planning and engineering courses Several transportation (highways and transit) studies in urban and rural areas in Gujarat.  Advising graduate students’ research projects Transportation Consultant to CEPT and Vastu Shilpa

Several projects in the Mumbai (then Bombay) Head of Traffic Planning Group and Transportation Metropolitan Region – including Kalyan Complex Planner  Conducting transportation planning studies: eg. Kalyan Complex Transit Plan.  Review and coordination of several projects with MSRTC, BEST, Bombay Municipal Corp., New Bombay

Ram Kumar, PhD, TE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Several Research Projects  Developing transportation planning practice at ORG  Pursuing transportation planning business nationally E Street BRT Project, Omnitrans, San Bernardino  Project Manager for ITS Planning and Design County – San Bernardino, CA (sbX Green Line) associated with implementation of Bus Rapid Transit The effort includes definition and design of Transit Signal (BRT) project in a 15.7-mile corridor along E Street in Priority (TSP) Technology and queue jump lanes; and the Cities of San Bernardino and Loma Linda in preparing performance specifications for signal upgrade to California incorporate TSP. Virginia Street RAPID Implementation, Regional  Project Manager for a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project Transportation Commission, Washoe County – Reno, in a 12-mile corridor along Virginia Street in Reno, NV NV. This effort included Alternatives Analysis, NEPA Process  Preparing an environmental document and preferred and Project Development. A financially constrained alignment Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) was developed and  Preparing operational plan for 4-mile segment and adopted by the RTC. An application was submitted to FTA obtaining WC RTC Board Approval. for funding under the Very Small Starts Program. The alternatives analysis process includes BRT Operations; ridership estimates; capital and operating cost estimates; planning and design of stations; and ITS infrastructure. Dr. Kumar’s involvement in the project established a viable system a part of which was implemented by Washoe County RTC. Boulder Highway BRT Operations Analysis and Station  Project Manager for BRT Operations Analysis and Design, Regional Transportation Commission of Station Location Simulation for approximately 16 Southern Nevada – Las Vegas, NV miles of BRT Operations in dedicated lane and 23 Micro-simulation of BRT and traffic operations was Stations performed using VISSIM for the entire length of the corridor which has over 40 signalized intersections and driveways to major retail centers, casinos and mixed-use developments. Effect of Traffic Signal Optimization and Transit Signal Priority (TSP) on auto and BRT Travel times, and delays were analyzed. Transit ridership projections were developed. Downtown Connector BRT Implementation, Regional  Task Manager for Traffic Analysis and Transit Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada – Las Operations for a 3½ mile BRT Corridor Vegas, NV Traffic operations analysis for proposed lane configurations was performed, and traffic volume projections were made. Future traffic conditions for an NEPA document were also analyzed.  Task Leader for alignment planning and ridership Conversion of Proposed CenterLine LRT Project to Bus modeling; developed alternative BRT alignments with Rapid Transit (BRT), Orange County Transportation connections to county-wide BRT service, and Authority – Orange County, CA Conducted alternatives estimated BRT ridership and service based on the analysis for alignment, with ridership modeling to convert a OCTAM Model for two alternatives. previously developed LRT Project to a BRT Service. Sloan-Ivanpah Corridor Transit Feasibility Study,  Task Leader involved in developing alignment Regional Transportation Commission of Southern alternatives for bus and rail rapid transit (BRT/LRT) California – Las Vegas, NV: Developed alignment for a 10-mile corridor along South Las Vegas alternatives and conducted transit capacity studies for a Boulevard; estimating capital and operating cost for the proposed BRT Corridor. alignments and adapting BRT service characteristics from international experience. Green Line Rail Transit Extension to Norwalk  Project Manager responsible for directing the Route Transportation Center, LACMTA – Los Angeles, CA: Refinement Analysis and Environmental Document for Directed the route refinement analysis and environmental the 2.7 mile (4.3-kilometer) rail transit extension from document for 2.7 mile rail transit extension (underground) the current terminus to the Norwalk Transportation

Ram Kumar, PhD, TE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

from I-605 to Norwalk Transportation Center. RR and EIR Center. approved by LACTC Board.

Hollywood Transportation Plan – Hollywood CA  Task leader responsible for transportation modeling A sub-regional model was developed to analyze traffic and analsysis of alternatives. conditions associated with land-use and roadway changes as a part of the redevelopment plan for Hollywood. The travel demand forecasting model was used to develop “what-if” scenarios to easily understand the traffic implications of regional, sub-regional and local changes to roadway networks, operations, and land use changes.

Long Range Transportation Plan for Long Beach –  Task leader responsible for transportation modeling Long Beach, CA and analysis of alternatives A sub-regional model was developed to analyze traffic and transportation conditions associated with land-use and roadway network changes; and to recommend several capital and operational alternatives to improved traffic flow and circulation in the Long Beach region.

Community Plan Revision Circulation Element – Los  Project Manager responsible for the development of the Angeles, CA transportation modeling and analysis framework for the Analyses for 22 different community plans were based on Community Plan Revisions in the City of Los Angeles. the modeling and analysis framework developed by Dr. Kumar and his team.

Details of the current assignment and the time duration for which services are required for the current assignment: 8. I have no current assignments Certification: 1. I am willing to work on the Project and I will be available for entire duration of the project assignment as required. 2. I, the undersigned, certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, this CV correctly describes me, my qualifications and my experience.

RamKKumar

Ram Kumar, PhD, TE (Signature and name of the Key Personnel)

(Signature and name of the authorised Signatory of the Applicant)

Place: Henderson, NV

Ram Kumar, PhD, TE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Form-12

Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Professional Personnel 1. Proposed Position: Environmental Expert

2. Name ofPersonnel: Betsy, Lindsay

3. Date ofBirth: October 30, 1954

4. Nationality: Citizen of the United States of America

5. Educational Qualifications:  Graduate Program, Public Policy and Administration, California State University, Long Beach, CA  Graduate Program, Business Administration, Pepperdine University, Irvine, CA  M.U.R.P., Master of Urban and Regional Planning, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA  B.A., Geography, California State University, Long Beach, CA 6. Employment Record: Period Firm Position 1994-Present UltraSystemsEnvironmentalInc. President/CEO 1990-1994 UltraSystemsEngineersandConstructors SeniorProjectManager 1989-1990 SaddlebackUnifiedSchoolDistrict AssistantProjectManager 1987-1989 CommunitySystemsAssociates(CSA) AssistantProjectManager 1985-1986 CountyofLosAngeles SeniorPlanner 1985 PhillipsBrandtReddick AssociatePlanner 7. List of projects on which the Personnel has worked

Project Name Description of Responsibilities Technical Studies, California High-Speed Rail Project, Principal-in-Charge of EIS/EIR Anaheim to Los Angeles Section, Orange and Los  Managed preparation of Technical Studies to support Angeles Counties, CA preparation of an Environmental Impact Report/ Services being provided by UltraSystems include Environmental Impact Assessment (EIR/EIS). biological resources, Section 404, and air quality,  Provided QA/QC for all technical reports and the Draft historical, and archaeological resources. In 2005, the EIR/EIS. California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority), in  Contractual oversight for the environmental team. cooperation with the Federal Railroad Administration  Attended all Interagency Coordination Meetings, (FRA) certified its Final Program Environmental Impact coordinated efforts with Engineering, Public Outreach, Report and Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) and multiple public and private agencies. for a high-speed train (HST) system in California. UltraSystems, on behalf of the Authority and FRA, contributed technical studies toward completion of a Project-level EIR/EIS to evaluate the environmental effects of constructing and operating a HST system between the Anaheim Regional Transportation of Intermodal Center and Los Angeles Union Station). The California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority), in cooperation with the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) certified its Final Program Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) in 2005 for a high-speed train (HST) system in California. The Authority and FRA are now preparing a Project-level

Betsy Lindsay RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

EIR/EIS to evaluate the environmental effects of constructing and operating a HST between Anaheim (Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center [ARTIC]) and Los Angeles (Union Station), along the LOSSAN corridor. The corridor proposed for use by High- Speed trains between Anaheim and Los Angeles is a combination of three segments, with three owners: The River Corridor, The BNSF San Bernardino Subdivision, and The Orange Subdivision. The document deliverable for this project:

UltraSystems was part of the environmental team preparing a Project-level EIR for this proposed high-speed train (HST) segment. A series of public scoping meetings to educate local communities and stakeholders about the project and potential impacts which may result from daily and construction operations were held. UltraSystems also held interagency meetings in Los Angeles on this project, with various key stakeholders.

On-Call Environmental Services Contract, 45+ Task Principal-in-Charge of EIS/EIR Orders, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los  Managed the environmental impact assessment efforts Angeles, CA of the Team. UltraSystems successfully completed more than task order  Assisted the Senior Project Manager and Technical projects for Metro. On an as-needed” basis, UltraSystems’

Betsy Lindsay RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

responsibilities included management of environmental Task Order Managers (for Biology, Cultural/Historical, work to ensure compliance with CEQA, NEPA, Section Air and Noise, and Water Quality) in the 106 of ACHP, Section 4(f) of the Department of implementation and maintenance of Quality Transportation (DOT) Act, as well as other applicable Assurance/Quality Check programs. local, State, and federal laws and regulations. As the  Attended all public meetings held for different projects. Principal-in-Charge, Ms. Lindsay negotiated all project  Organized the UltraSystems professional staff to ensure task orders with the agency. She assisted the Senior all projects were completed on time and within budget. Project Manager and Technical Task Order Managers (for  Assisted with the technical review of environmental Biology, Cultural/Historical, Air and Noise, and Water documents to ensure compliance with California Quality) in the implementation and maintenance of Environmental Quality Act/National Environmental QA/QC programs, attending public meetings. She Policy Act guidelines and regulatory agency organized the UltraSystems professional staff to ensure all requirements. projects were completed on time and within budget. Ms. Lindsay also assisted with the technical review of environmental documents to ensure compliance with CEQA/NEPA guidelines and regulatory agency requirements.

Metro Red Line Mid-City Segment Environmental Principal-in-Charge of EIS/EIR Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement  Managed preparation of the EIR/EIS. (EIR/EIS), Los Angeles, CA  Provided QA/QC for all technical reports and the Draft UltraSystems prepared an EIS/EIR on the 22-mile westerly EIR/EIS. extension of the Metro Red Line subway in the western  Contractual oversight for the environmental team. portion of the City of Los Angeles. UltraSystems directed a  Attended all Interagency Coordination Meetings, team that included six subconsulting firms. The EIS/EIR coordinated efforts with Engineering, Public Outreach, analyzed three alternative routes, extending the Red Line and multiple public and private agencies. from its existing terminus station at Wilshire Boulevard/Western Avenue to the intersection of Pico/San Vicente/Venice Boulevards. This project included a major public outreach program (in English, Korean, and Spanish) designed to inform the public, and to ensure concerns were addressed in the EIS/EIR. Significant impacts included the taking of eight single-family homes and an entire block comprised of commercial businesses, three apartment buildings, and a community pool facility.

Ms. Lindsay was Principal-in-Charge for this project to prepare an EIS/EIR on the 22-mile westerly extension of the Metro Red Line subway in the western portion of the City of Los Angeles. Ms. Lindsay directed a team that included six subconsulting firms. Ms. Lindsay provided contractual oversight for the environmental team and QA/QC for all technical reports and the Draft EIR/EIS. She attended all Interagency Coordination Meetings, coordinated efforts with Engineering, Public Outreach, and multiple public and private agencies.

Revised Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Principal-in-Charge of EIS/EIR the Metro Orange Line, Orange County, CA  Managed preparation of the EIR. Ms. Lindsay was Principal-in-Charge for preparation of a  Provided QA/QC for all technical studies and the Draft Final Revised EIR for the Metro Orange Line project. Ms. EIR. Lindsay coordinated and directed the activities of a project  Contractual oversight for the environmental team. team of leading environmental and transportation consulting  Attended all Interagency Coordination Meetings, firms to produce a comprehensive environmental document coordinated efforts with Engineering, Public Outreach, (Revised FEIR) under a very compressed, five-month time and multiple public and private agencies. schedule. Ms. Lindsay provided contractual oversight for the environmental team and QA/QC for all technical reports

Betsy Lindsay RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

and the Draft EIR/EIS. She attended all Interagency Coordination Meetings, coordinated efforts with Engineering, Public Outreach, and multiple public and private agencies. Under Ms. Lindsay’s guidance and leadership, the UltraSystems Team completed the Revised FEIR one month ahead of schedule (within five months) and $50,000 under budget.

UltraSystems prepared a Final Revised EIR for the Metro Orange Line project. On July 19, 2004, the Court of Appeals filed a decision for Citizens Organized for Smart Transit v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. This deficiency was related to Metro’s oversight in not evaluating several suggested multiple route Rapid Bus alternatives to the BRT Alternative. To correct this inadequacy, three additional Multiple Route Rapid Bus Alternatives were considered in a Revised FEIR, in addition to the other alternatives set forth in the Final EIR. The three new alternatives were: Three East-West Rapid Bus Routes Alternative (RB-3), Five East-West Rapid Bus Routes Alternative (RB-5), and Rapid Bus Network Alternative (RB-Network). The corridor was approximately 14 miles long and connected major activity areas through the San Fernando Valley, including Warner Center, the Sepulveda Basin Recreation Area, the Van Nuys Government Center, Pierce College, Valley College, and North Hollywood.

UltraSystems coordinated and directed the activities of a project team of leading environmental and transportation consulting firms to produce a comprehensive environmental document (Revised FEIR) under a very compressed, five- month time schedule. The members of the project team were all recognized industry leaders known to the Metro from their past performance on previous Metro projects. UltraSystems coordinated all phases of the FEIR process with Metro’s fundamental staff.

The UltraSystems Team completed the Revised FEIR one month ahead of schedule (within five months) and $50,000 under budget. The construction of Orange Line facilities was on hold during the period of time the Revised FEIR was being prepared. To complete the Revised FEIR ahead of schedule and under budget saved Metro a substantial amount of money, since they were paying the existing Contractor due to related construction delays. Warner Center Park and Ride Facility, Addendums Principal-in-Charge of EIS/EIR and Modified Initial Studies, Los Angeles, CA Ms. Lindsay was Principal-in-Charge for preparation of  Managed the environmental impact assessment efforts three California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of the Team. Addendums and Modified Initial Studies (Modified IS) to  Provided QA/QC for all the Draft Addendums and evaluate the environmental impacts of project modifications Modified Initial Studies. to the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact  Contractual oversight for the environmental team. Report for the San Fernando Valley East-West Transit  Attended all Interagency Coordination Meetings, Corridor (FEIR). Ms. Lindsay provided contractual coordinated efforts with Engineering, and multiple oversight for the environmental team and QA/QC for all public and private agencies. technical reports and the Draft Addendums and modified Initial Study. She attended all Interagency Coordination

Betsy Lindsay RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Meetings, coordinated efforts with Engineering, Public Outreach, and multiple public and private agencies.

UltraSystems prepared the following three California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Addendums and Modified Initial Studies (Modified IS) to evaluate the environmental impacts of project modifications to the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report for the San Fernando Valley East-West Transit Corridor (FEIR). UltraSystems coordinated closely with Metro staff to complete these assignments:  In July 2003, a Modified IS and Addendum to the FEIR was prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of installing fiber optic communications trunk routing in three segments of the Original Project area. These three segments were not analyzed as fiber optic routes by the approved FEIR, although the intervening portions of the linear project were evaluated.  In December 2003, a Modified IS and Addendum was prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of developing a park-and-ride facility at one of three site alternatives near the planned Warner Center Transit Hub and implementing three other minor project modifications. One of the three site alternatives is a triangular-shaped parcel of land owned by Boeing North American, Inc. This parcel, referred to as the “Boeing site,” was determined the most suitable of the three site alternatives for the park-and-ride facility. The three minor modifications that were also examined in the December 2003 Modified IS and an Addendum were: (1) possible substitution of rubberized asphalt concrete pavement for the currently planned portland cement concrete and/or regular asphalt at select busway segments, (2) adding a recycled water pipeline to irrigate landscaping along the busway and the bike path/pedestrian walkway, and (3) incorporating a surfacing option to differentiate the bike path from the pedestrian walkway. In July 2004, a Modified IS and Addendum was prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of constructing a park-and-ride facility that would span two properties: (1) the Boeing site identified in the December 2003 Modified IS and Addendum, and (2) an adjacent property referred to as the “North Parking Lot.” The North Parking Lot is located at the northeast corner of Vanowen Street and Canoga Avenue, north of the Boeing site. It is expected that the North Parking Lot would contribute 236 parking spaces in addition to the 662 parking spaces planned for the Boeing site, for a total of 898 parking spaces in the park-and-ride facility as a whole. The Modified IS and Addendum also evaluated the potential environmental impacts of a second minor project modification to the Original Project: modification of a small portion of the planned pedestrian path along Chandler Boulevard between the Laurel Canyon Boulevard Metro Station and the Valley College Metro Station (located at the

Betsy Lindsay RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

intersection of Fulton Avenue and Burbank Boulevard). The Pedestrian Path Modification would involve deleting a small portion of the pedestrian path planned for construction along the south side of the Metro ROW, and replacing it with sidewalk along the north side of Chandler Boulevard North.

On-Call Environmental Compliance Support, SFV East- Principal-in-Charge of EIS/EIR West Transit Corridor, Los Angeles, CA  Managed the environmental impact assessment, UltraSystems provided as-needed environmental support environmental permitting and monitoring efforts of the for the SFV MRT alignment, including the construction of Team. the new Los Angeles River Bridge. Monitoring activities  Assisted the Technical Task Order Managers (for involved: Biology, Cultural/Historical, Air and Noise, and Water  Compliance with the Mitigation Monitoring and Quality) in the implementation and maintenance of Reporting Program (MMRP); Quality Assurance/Quality Check (QA/QC) programs.  Permit requirements from regulatory agencies;  Organized the UltraSystems professional staff to ensure  Completing a quarterly Mitigation Measure Status all projects were completed on time and within budget. Report (MMSR); Assisted with the technical review of environmental  Implementing migratory bird deterrent strategies documents to ensure compliance with California for areas along the alignment, including the Los Environmental Quality Act and regulatory agency Angeles River; requirements.  Conducting biological resource analyses, monitoring and evaluation;  Completing noise analyses, consultations, and evaluation;  Reviewing environmental and contract document submittals;  Miscellaneous environmental compliance support.

Eastside Light Rail General Environmental Services, Principal-in-Charge of EIS/EIR Los Angeles, CA  Managed the environmental impact assessment, UltraSystems provided as-needed environmental services environmental permitting and monitoring efforts of the during the pre-construction and construction of the Team. Eastside Light-Rail Transit, including:  Assisted the Technical Task Order Managers (for  Arborist services, such as tree valuations; Biology, Cultural/Historical, Air and Noise, and Water  Archaeological, paleontological and historical Quality) in the implementation and maintenance of evaluation and monitoring; QA/QC programs.  Noise analysis, consultations and evaluations;  Organized the UltraSystems professional staff to ensure  Review of environmental and contract document all projects were completed on time and within budget. submittals;  Assisted with the technical review of environmental  Miscellaneous environmental compliance support. documents to ensure compliance with California Environmental Quality Act and regulatory agency requirements. Environmental Support, Crenshaw/LAX Transit Principal-in-Charge of EIS/EIR Corridor, Los Angeles, CA The Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor extends from the  Managed the environmental analysis efforts of the Metro Green Line station at Imperial Highway and Aviation Team. Boulevard, travels north and then east on the Harbor  Provided QA/QC for all the environmental documents Subdivision railroad right-of-way to Crenshaw Boulevard. prepared in support of the Phase 1 design submittal From there, the route leaves the railroad right-of-way and  Contractual oversight for the environmental team. travels north to a transfer point with the EXPO Light Rail  Attended all Interagency Coordination Meetings, Transit at the intersection of Crenshaw and Exposition coordinated efforts with Engineering, and multiple Boulevards. public and private agencies.

Betsy Lindsay RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Amended Principal-in-Charge of EIS/EIR Specific Plan, Mixed-Use Development, San Marcos, CA  Managed the environmental impact assessment efforts The City of San Marcos proposed to amend its adopted of the Team. Heart of the City Specific Plan for the development of  Provided QA/QC for all the Technical studies and draft approximately 200 acres. The proposed project site is in the EIR. geographic center of the City, and is strategically located in  Contractual oversight for the environmental team. proximity to California State University, San Marcos  Attended all Interagency Coordination Meetings, (CSUSM), a future commuter light rail line (North County coordinated efforts with Architects, Engineering, and Sprinter, which is currently in operation), and a large Kaiser multiple public and private agencies. medical office facility, which has the potential of becoming a North County hospital. The proposed project site also enjoys excellent access from multiple regional roadways. Due to these factors, the City believed that this area is well- suited to becoming an important employment center, with the potential for the regional-serving retail to transition to a mixed-use area. In addition to an existing business park component on the western portion of the site, the City envisioned the site transitioning into either additional business park usage or for the development of a “lifestyle center” (approximately one million square feet of regionally-serving retail and one million square feet of office development) along with supporting hotel opportunities and higher density residential development. For the eastern portion of the site, the City envisioned a university urban village with mixed use and vertical

Betsy Lindsay RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

integration of residential, retail, office and entertainment development with a “main street” orientation.

For this highly visible project, the City was using the services of FORMA, the award-winning land planning and landscape architecture firm, to assist in incorporating the intensity of uses into the Specific Plan Amendment. Due to the complexities of the proposed project, UltraSystems’ highly experienced, full-service staff located in its Irvine office prepared the environmental impact report (EIR) to assist the City in satisfying the requirements of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). UltraSystems’ personnel also prepared several technical studies to support the EIR, including noise, biological resources, and air quality. UltraSystems’ scientists also conducted the professional peer reviews of the geotechnical and hydrological reports prepared by the City or other Stakeholders. The land use changes proposed in the Specific Plan Amendment called for a much greater intensity in the level of development on the project site. Due to the magnitude of the changes, UltraSystems prepared a comprehensive EIR that addressed all the environmental issue areas identified in CEQA. UltraSystems assisted the City throughout the CEQA process, including participation at Scoping activities and public meetings, preparation and circulation of the EIR, preparation of the Response to Comments and any revisions to the EIR, preparation of the mitigation monitoring program, and the preparation of the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, as needed. All legally-required notices were also prepared, including the Notice of Preparation, Notice of Completion, Notice of Draft EIR Availability, and Notice of Determination. This EIR was prepared on an expedited schedule to meet the City’s requirements.

Betsy Lindsay RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the University Principal-in-Charge of EIS/EIR Business Park Specific Plan, San Marcos, CA The proposed project was located in the City of San  Managed the environmental impact assessment efforts Marcos, in the northern portion of San Diego County. The of the Team. project site included approximately 87 acres in the central  Provided QA/QC for all the Technical studies and draft portion of the City, bound by San Marcos Boulevard and EIR. State Route (SR) 78 to the north; Twin Oaks Valley Road to  Contractual oversight for the environmental team. the east; Craven Road to the south; and Craven Road/Bent  Attended all Interagency Coordination Meetings, Avenue to the west. The proposed project included 22 acres coordinated efforts with Architects, Engineering, and of off-site infrastructure improvements, for a total project multiple public and private agencies. area of approximately 109 acres. The project applicant, H.G. Fenton Company, proposed to amend the Scripps Memorial Hospital Specific Plan and develop the University Office and Medical Park (proposed project). The proposed project involved the development of approximately 87 acres with medical offices, professional offices, a smaller specialized hospital, a helipad landing site located on the south side of Discovery Street, and support retail as allowed by the existing Specific Plan. It also included the potential for a partial future school site. Discovery Street was proposed to be re-aligned throughout the project site, and sensitive habitat areas associated with San Marcos Creek were proposed to be preserved as open space. The project also proposed onsite and offsite infrastructure improvements. The implementation and development of the proposed project included the Tentative Subdivision Map (TSM 465) and associated regulatory approvals such as a General Plan Amendment (GPA 08-42) to the Circulation Element for the realignment of Discovery Street, Development Agreement (DA 91-05 [08m]) and Conditional Use Permit (CUP 08-746) (for a temporary rock crushing facility).

UltraSystems prepared the environmental impact report (EIR) and assisted the City in satisfying the requirements of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). UltraSystems’ personnel also prepared several technical studies to support the EIR, including noise and air quality. UltraSystems prepared a comprehensive EIR that addressed all the environmental issue areas identified in CEQA. UltraSystems assisted the City throughout the CEQA process, including participation at Scoping activities and public meetings, preparation and circulation of the EIR, preparation of the Response to Comments and any revisions to the EIR, preparation of the mitigation monitoring program, and the preparation of the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, as needed. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Emerald Principal-in-Charge of EIS/EIR Meadows Ranch Specific Plan, Riverside County, CA UltraSystems prepared the Emerald Meadows Ranch  Managed the environmental impact assessment efforts Environmental Impact Report No.00473 (EIR), on behalf of of the Team. the County of Riverside, to evaluate potential environmental  Provided QA/QC for all the Technical studies and draft impacts resulting from the implementation of the proposed EIR. Emerald Meadows Ranch Specific Plan No. 337 (Specific  Contractual oversight for the environmental team. Plan). The EIR was in accordance with the CEQA Statute,  Attended all Interagency Coordination Meetings, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the State coordinated efforts with Architects, Engineering, and CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, California Code of Regulations multiple public and private agencies.

Betsy Lindsay RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Section 15000 et seq., as amended, and the County of Riverside requirements for preparing Environmental Impact Reports. The proposed Emerald Meadows Ranch development includes approximately 279 acres and is bounded by Rubidoux Boulevard to the west, 34th Street to the south, State Route 60 to the north, and the Santa Ana River to the east. The co-applicants for the project are EMR Residential Properties, LLC and the Redevelopment Agency for the County of Riverside. The proposed uses include those on the Land Use Plan and Statistical Summary in the Specific Plan Application. Based on the UltraSystems’ initial feasibility analysis, the project will provide a major benefit to the area, producing jobs, a variety of housing alternatives, and a major increase in the tax base for the area.

The proposed Specific Plan will provide a level of flexibility regarding the commercial portion of the property. The Plan will include provisions for the development of a commercial retail center of approximately 50 acres. However, should the +/-50 acre commercial retail center be deemed impracticable by either of the co-applicants, a smaller 17-acre commercial center will be permitted, with the remaining 33 acres to be developed for residential uses, subject to the requirements of the Specific Plan. The total maximum estimated residential dwelling units will be 1,350. The Specific Plan may involve the relocation and/or abandonment of existing streets and utilities within the project boundary. The objectives for the proposed project include reinforcing the goals of the County of Riverside General Plan and Jurupa Area Plan; promoting the area revitalization in coordination with the Riverside Economic Development Agency; providing a variety of quality housing of various styles/prices responsive to the needs of the community; providing a well-integrated elementary school site and parks; providing opportunities for walking/bicycling between residential neighborhoods and shopping, parks, and the local church and elementary school; and providing connections to the future regional trail system along the Santa Ana River corridor. Planned regulatory approvals associated with the project include a General Plan Amendment, a Specific Plan, an Environmental Impact Report, a Fiscal Impact Report, a Development Agreement, Tentative Tract Maps, and Site Plans and Conditional Use Permits/Variances (as required).

Details of the current assignment and the time duration for which services are required for the current assignment. Current Assignments primarily include Environmental Consulting Services for the following projects:  Claremont HS Athletic Facilities and Whole Site Moderninzation EIR (Duration: October 2017 to July 2018) 8.  US Army Corps. of Engineers Glendale Narrows EA/FONSI (Duration: September 2017 to May 2018)  City of Fontana DCT Jurupa Logistics Center Addendum (Duration: November 2017 to March 2018)

Betsy Lindsay RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Applicant: Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

Betsy Lindsay (Signature and name of the Key Personnel)

(Signature and name of the authorised Signatory of the Applicant)

Place: Irvine, California

Betsy Lindsay RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Professional Personnel

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL Form-12

Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Professional Personnel

1. Proposed Position: Conservation & Cultural Expert

2. Name of Personnel: Shakeel Hossain

3. Date of Birth: 7 December 1956

4. Nationality: Indian

5. Educational Qualifications:  Master of Science in Architecture Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA, 1986-1988, Thesis: "Paranoia and Nostalgia in Contemporary Architecture "  Bachelor of Architecture, School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi, India, 1974-1979, Thesis: "Urban Conservation: New Market, Calcutta"

Awards  Senior Fellow, Center for the Study of World Religions, Harvard University, 1997-1998  The Indian Government Tourist Office, New York for the workshop "From the Traditional to the Virtual: Urban Ceremonies," MIT in April, 1997.  MIT Council for the Arts and The Office of the Dean, Architecture and Planning, MIT grants for the exhibition "The Ephemeral, the Transient, and the Static: Ritual Architecture and Urbanity" at MIT, November '96 to February '97.  Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage, New Delhi and The Indian Council for Cultural Relations, New Delhi for the exhibition "The Ephemeral, the Transient, and the Static: Ritual Architecture and Urbanity" at Triennale di Milano XIX International Exhibition, February to May, 1996.  Senior Research Fellow, Smithsonian Institution: Foreign Currency Program Grant for the documentation of Muharram in India, 1991-1995.  Visiting Scholar, Department of Architecture, MIT, Fall 1990.  Aga Khan Summer Travel Grant, for the project, Ta’zia, Ephemeral Tombs of Imam Husain, 1987.  Aga Khan Award for Architecture for graduate study at MIT, 1986-1988

Papers and Publications  "New Market, Calcutta" -Silver Jubilee Publication, Delhi School of Planning and Architecture.  “Ta’zia, Ephemeral Architecture of the Shi’a in India”, Mimar 35 - June 1990  "The Ephemeral, the Transient, and the Static: Ritual Architecture and Urbanity", Triennale di Milano XIX International Exhibition Catalogue, 1996.  "Popular Islam in India: A Case Study", The Muslim Almanac, ed. Azim A. Nanji, Gale Research Inc., 1995  “Muharram in India,” an exhibition/lecture, MIT, February 1995  “Between Sinful Innovation and the Ethos of the Land: Sacred Traditions and Art of the Bengali Muslims,” Religion and Ecology Conference, Harvard University, 1998.  “Rubanism: The Ethnic Urban India, Sacred Symbolism in Contemporary Indian Architecture”, Roundtable Discussion, Department of Architecture, MIT, 1998  "Ibadat: Religious Music of Islam in India" Collected, Compiled and Annotated a set of cassettes containing some of the music collected during the "Muharram in India" project, 1991 – 1995  “Continuing Traditions and Changing Cityscapes of India,” lecture at Polytechnics of Bari, Italy, November 2004  “Jashn e Khusrau 2010 and 2013” Cultural festivals with conferences and publications. Publisher: Mapin, Ahmedabad.  “Photo Journey: Sunil Janah, Sambhu Shah, and Cartrier Bresson” – Exhibition and Catalogue. Indra Gandhi National Centre for Arts, New Delhi  “Celebrating Rahim” Cultural festival with conference and publication. Publisher: Mapin, Ahmedabad.  “Ganga: River of Life and Eternity” Exhibitions at National Museum and Crafts Museum, New Delhi

Shakeel Hossain RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Professional Personnel

 Making of Hyderabad within Cultural and Historical Contexts. Conference papers, Salar Jung Museum, Hyderabad.  Sacred Geometry of City Forms. Paper presented at Heritage Cities Trust Conference, IIC, New Delhi

Teaching and Symposiums  As Research Associate, Department of Architecture, MIT, 1990 to 1999, organized several Lecture Series, Symposium and Publications.  History and Theory of Design, Introductory Course, National Institute of Fashion Technology, New Delhi, Fall 1991  Forms and Cultures of Indian Cities, Graduate Level Seminar Course, Department of Architecture, MIT, Spring 1997  Sacred Symbolism in Indo-Muslim Cultures and Architecture, Graduate Level Seminar Course, Department of Architecture, MIT, Spring 1998  Azadari: Karbala in Context, exhibition, lecture and recital, organized at the Harvard Center for the Study of World Religions, May, 1996  Sacred Symbolism in Islamic Art and Architecture, lecture series, MIT, May 1996

6. Employment Record: Period Firm Position 2010 - Present Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Senior Architectural Designer 7. List of projects on which the Personnel has worked

Project Name Description of Responsibilities Silicon Valley Rapid Transit (SVRT) BART Senior Architectural Designer. Extension, Master Planning and Conceptual  Preliminary engineering drawings Design Phase, San Jose, CA  Development of 3-D computer animation studies Underground transit stations estimated at $600 million dollars. Diridon/Arena BART Underground Station, Senior Architectural Designer. SVRT, San Jose, CA  Design development Estimated Cost at $150 million dollars (station cost).  Presentation of the Diridon/Arena Stations’ Design Concepts and Details

Downtown San Jose BART Underground Station, Senior Architectural Designer. SVRT, San Jose, CA  Design development Estimated Cost at $200 million dollars (station cost).  Presentation of the Diridon/Arena Stations’ Design Concepts and Details

Urban Master Plan, Historical Nizamuddin Basti, Urban Conservationist and Architect. New Delhi.  Concept and Design Development 700 years historical settlement with 21 monuments  Urban Renewal Plans and Policies and a shifting population of 14000 families and the  Monuments Areas Conservation Plans most visited Sufi shrine at its heart. Worked with  Sustainability and Promotional Strategies MCD and ASI developing viable urban renewal  Tourism and Transportation Strategies policies and designs.  Roads, Street Furniture, and Lighting Designs

Urban Master Plan, Historic City of Sasaram, Urban Conservationist and Architect. Bihar  Concept and Design Development  Urban Renewal Plans and Policies  Monuments Areas Conservation Plans  Sustainability and Promotional Strategies  Tourism and Transportation Strategies

Shakeel Hossain RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Professional Personnel

Urban Master Plan, Historical Rohtas Fort and Urban Conservationist and Architect. Township, Bihar  Concept and Design Development  Urban Renewal Plans and Policies  Monuments Areas Conservation Plans  Sustainability and Promotional Strategies  Tourism and Transportation Strategies

Kutb Masjid, Billerica, Massachusetts Designer.  Development of the concept design  Development of the site plan  Interior and Exterior special features development and production  Development and production of the special handcrafted features

"Golden Eye — International Designers' Tribute Architect. to Indian Artisans", Cooper Hewitt Museum, New  Design, development and execution of the facade for the York, 1985. exhibition on Indian art and crafts. The project incorporated all the crafts available in  Design development and the production. India in the design and the products developed as references for the architects, designers and the market. The objects were produced across India – the Bidri door from Hyderabad, marblework from Udaipur, the metalwork from Benaras and Jaipur, the woodwork from Delhi, inlay work from Hosyarpur and Pilakua, ceramic from Khurja, glass work from Ferozabad and wood inlay from Mysore.

Master Plan, Air Force National Guards, Rhode Director of Design. Island. With the purchase of new planes the Air  Planning and preparing of the master plan update for Force National Guard base facilities including the base and design of several of the facilities. hangers and aprons were updated. The master plan development was phased out over a period of 10 years.

Wilbur Cohen Building, Washington DC, 2003. Director of Design. Feasibility Study and Concept Designs Development.  Developing concept designs, phasing plans and The Cohen Building houses 1,000,000 SF of federal feasibility study for the renovation of the building office space including the Voice of America. The objective was to evaluate the feasibility of upgrading the building condition, re-organizing the internal layout and increasing the usable/rentable floor area.

"The Ephemeral, the Transient, and the Static: Production and Technical Director. Ritual Architecture and Urbanity", Triennale di  Organized, curated and designed the exhibition, which Milano XIX International Exhibition, Milan, Italy, presented the diverse religious architecture traditions of '96. India. It had documented the rath tradition of Puri, Orissa, the puja pandals of Calcutta, and the ta’zia tradition of northern India. The various ritual architecture structure were made in India for the exhibition – the rath was made in Delhi and Puri, the ta’zia was made in Gwalior, and the pandal was commissioned in Calcutta. "The Ephemeral, the Transient, and the Static: Production and Technical Director. Ritual Architecture and Urbanity", Massachusetts  Concept, design and installation. Institute of Technology, Cambrige, USA, Nov. '96 to Feb '97. The exhibition was transported from Italy to the States and new exhibits were made in India and shipped to USA for the installation in MIT, Cambridge. The

Shakeel Hossain RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Professional Personnel

exhibition was redesigned and accommodated in the gallery at MIT with structures suspended between buildings. Anandgram, New Delhi, 1981. Architect. Project's formulation and initial design - housing for  Research and Urban Design 300 folk artists and street performers in Delhi. The project required research into the indigenous building techniques and material of the artists’ regional background.

Samina Qureshi's "Lahore: the City Within" Production and Technical Coordinator. exhibition at the MIT Museum, 1990. Artifacts like  Organized, curated, designed and installed. doors, archways, tents and shamiana, chatris from India were transported and installed as display props for the exhibition.

"Aditi", an exhibition on the living Indian cultures Architect. and arts, Barbican Centre, London, Festival of  Production and installation of the exhibits. India, 1982. The exhibits were produced in India and installed in London.

Shakeel Hossain (Signature and name of the Key Personnel)

Place Los Angeles

(Signature and name of the authorised signatory of the Applicant)

Shakeel Hossain RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Form-12 Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

1 Proposed Position: Sr. Systems Engineer .

2 Name of Personnel: Leslie Durrant, PE .

3 Date of Birth: September 2, 1944 .

4 Nationality: Citizen of the United States of America .

5 Educational Qualifications: .  Post Graduate Diploma in Management Studies (similar to MBA), West London University, England  Certificate in Mechanical Engineering  Bachelor of Science and Masters of Science Electrical Engineering, London University, United Kingdom

Professional Affiliations  Fellow of the Institute of Advancement of Engineering (USA)

Registrations/Certifications  Professional Engineer, Electrical, State of California 6 Employment Record: . Period Firm Position 2011 - Present Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Systems Director 2009-2011 Halcrow (USA) now Jacobs Inc. Principal Consultant 2006 - 2009 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Assistant Chief Engineer, Vehicles 2003 to 2006 Hampton Roads Transit Director of Engineering 2000-2003 Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. Principal Engineer and Senior Project Manager

1998-2000 Sound Transit, Seattle Manager of Systems Los Angeles County Metropolitan 1983-1988 Systems Engineering Manager Transportation Authority 7 List of projects on which the Personnel has worked

Project Name Description of Responsibilities Federal Transit Administration, (FTA) Project Program Executive and Program Director Management Oversight Consultant (PMOC), Various  Les provided Asset Management for twelve US Locations, US transportation agencies that are recipients of grants  Tex Rail Commuter Rail Project from Fort to setup and expand the asset management systems Worth to Dallas/Fort Worth International and business processes to plan and bring their Airport: Technical oversight of this New Starts assets into a State of Good Repair. project. Responsible for review of communications, systems, vehicles, Operations & Maintenance (O&M), safety and security design elements. This $1 billion project is entering final design.

Leslie Durrant, PE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) for Jacksonville Transit Authority: This is a Small Starts project that will enter service on December 7, 2015. Responsible for technical review of systems, including CAD/AVAL, next bus, and readiness for revenue service.

 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) for Fresno Area Transit Express: Project Manager for this Small Starts Project currently going into construction. Scheduled to open in 2017.

Metro Red Line Segment 2a and 2b and the Systems Engineering Manager East side Extension, Los Angeles County  Helped develop the design of the equipment, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, console layout, and displays for the initial Control LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA Center for Segment 1 that was collocated with the The emergency and auxiliary control panels at Metro Blue Line at Imperial Blvd (which was opened two years earlier, and was designed to stations were also changed from a hard wired system accommodate the Metro Red Line). on Segment 1 to redundant touch screen consoles  Led, managed, and been part of teams performing with graphics to facilitate user friendly interfaces for engineering and construction work on heavy rail, emergency responders. This system was extended to light rail, bus rapid transit vehicles, train control, the rest to the Redline and has served Metro and the SCADA, communications, central control, fare emergency responders well over the years. collection & electrical power systems.  Les was responsible for the design and implementation of system wide elements that included the escalators and elevators on Segment 2, and options for the Metro Red Line extensions.  Les retrofitted the consoles and displays for Segment 1 to ensure user compatibility. To make the system more flexible, and capable of accommodating new technology, the design was changed from a centralized system to a system with distributed intelligence by subsystems that were integrated at the Rail Operation Center (ROC) to provide the console monitoring, control and display capabilities to facilitate incident management.

Replacement Escalators for Metro Red Line Project Manager and the Designer of Record Pershing Square Station, Los Angeles, CA  Les is responsible for the design of electrical, The retrofitted escalators are designed to meet the new mechanical, and systems integration with Otis, the APTA standards. The escalators are operational at two of escalator supplier for replacement escalators for the entrances and the last entrance is scheduled for Pershing Square Station. completion in July, 2015.

Elevator Addition to Metro Red Line Civic Project Manager and the Designer of Record Center and Pershing Square, Stations, Los  Les is responsible for the design of electrical, Angeles, CA mechanical, and systems integration with Otis, the The retrofitted escalators are designed to meet the new escalator supplier for replacement escalators for American Public Transportation Association (APTA) Pershing Square Heavy Rail Underground Station. standards. The escalators are operational at two of the entrances and the last entrance is scheduled for completion in July, 2015.

Leslie Durrant, PE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

Security Kiosk Design, Los Angeles County Project Manager for Electrical and Mechanical Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LA Systems Metro), LACMTA, Los Angeles, CA  Les led coordination with the architectural and This project is for the addition of bullet proof security Metro operations for the location of the kiosks, and kiosks with power, Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) for the wiring runs to the power panels and the monitoring, variable message signs, air conditioning, Train Control and Communications (TC&C) room. telephone and T1 fiber optic communications links to the Sheriff’s datacenter at select stations on all lines. Project is complete.

London Transport, London, England Engineer and later Manager for the Traction Control and Electronics groups. Among these designs were digital wheel slide, speed  Manager for systems on two chopper test trains, sensing, and TDM fault annunciator systems that London each with several prototype sub-systems. Transport disclosed in the technical press to avoid these  Les worked on the new Automatic Train Control designs being patented. system, equipment testing, modification and maintenance.  He designed, built, and tested rail equipment, and solid-state control systems that were used on the next generation of trains.  He designed equipment, tested the interfaces and systems integration between the trains, traction power, and signaling.  8 Details of the current assignment and the time duration for which services are required for the current assignment.

. Current Assignment: Federal Transit Administration, FTA Project Management Oversight Consultant (PMOC), Tex Rail Commuter Rail Project from Fort Worth to Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport: Systems Engineering Manager responsible for systems on this 32 mile corridor with 12 stations. He is responsible for Systems Integration, Vehicle Procurement & Production and enforcement of FTA’s “Buy America” rules. Mr. Durrant leads the effort in ensuring that a modified Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) train is compliant with the Federal Rail road Administration (FRA) rules and regulations, for use in shared railroad corridors.

. Time Duration: Half time thru December 2018.

8. Certification: 1. I am willing to work o the Project and I will be available for entire duration of the project assignment as required. 2. I, the undersigned, certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, this CV correctly describes me, my qualifications and my experience.

Leslie Durrant, PE (Signature and name of the Key Personnel)

Place Los Angeles, CA

(Signature and name of the authorised signatory of the Applicant)

Leslie Durrant, PE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Form-12 Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

1 Proposed Position: Program Manager Public-Private Partnership (P3) .

2 Name of Personnel: Rick Rye .

3 Date of Birth: July 4, 1948 .

4 Nationality: Citizen of the United States of America .

5 Educational Qualifications: .  Bachelor of Science (Concentration in Engineering Science), Arkansas Tech University, Russellville, Arkansas

 Master of Science in Program Management (Concentration in Capital Program Management), The George Washington University, Washington, DC

 Masters Certificate in Project Management (Concentration in Multicultural Project Development),The George Washington University, Washington, DC

 Masters Certificate in Global Business Mgt.,(Concentration in Multinational Business and Finance),The George Washington University, Washington, DC

 Masters Program in International Construction Management (Course Work, Concentration in Strategic Organizational Alignment), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Registrations  Licensed General Engineering Contractor (CA No. 997247)  Board Certified Construction Manager (CMAA No. 950079)  Certified Project Management Professional (PMI No.04386)  Construction Management Association of America (CMAA) (Program Management Committee, Risk Committee)  CMAA Construction Management Certification Institute (National Board of Governors)  International Construction Project Management Assoc. (Honored for 2007ICPMA Research Award for Project Risk)  Construction Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers  American Institute of Constructors Certification Council (Member National Board of Advisors)  Construction Industry Institute (2008-2009 Project Definition and Rating Index Research Team for Infrastructure)  Construction Industry Institute (2008-2009 Front-End Planning for Infrastructure Research Team)  Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) (Program Evaluation Volunteer)  Project Management Institute (PMI)

6 Employment Record: . Period Firm Position 2011 - Present Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Director of Project/Construction Management Program Executive and Deputy Director Regional 2010-2011 Aecom Operations 2009 - 2010 Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Program Manager 2008 to 2009 Hill International, Inc. Senior Vice President – Texas Regional Manager Flour Industrial and Infrastructure Program Director, Project Development and 1980 to 2008 Group, New York City, NY Operations Planning Construction Engineering, Burrough- 1976 to 1980 Project administration and technical liaison Uerling-Brasuell Consulting Engineers Rick Rye RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

1973 to 1976 Metro-Plex Contractors Construction Business Principal

7 List of projects on which the Personnel has worked

Project Name Description of Responsibilities PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT (PMO) Program Manager TASK ORDER NO. 3 – THE TEX RAIL PROJECT  Responsible to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) REGION VI (FTA) for the Project Management Oversight of The TEX Rail Project is a 26.8-mile rapid commuter rail the TEX Rail Project connecting Fort Worth to system between downtown Fort Worth, Texas and DFW International Airport, being built by Fort northeast Tarrant County to the Dallas/Fort Worth Worth Transportation Authority. International Airport. The project consists of 9 stations,  Performed reviews of design criteria, Basis of two of which are existing and would be shared with the Design, project scope, plans and specifications at Trinity Railway Express (TRE) service in downtown Fort PE and FD stages Worth. In addition to the two existing stations in  Participated in the development of project delivery downtown Fort Worth, the TEX Rail line will share the methods, and recommended the use of Design-Bid- DFW Airport-North Station with the future planned Build method of delivery. Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) Cotton Belt East Line  Reviewed RFP for CMGC services and in north Dallas. The project is being constructed using a recommended the use of Independent an Cost single-track alignment, with passing sidings, Estimator. where necessary, to accommodate operations of 30-  Followed FTA Best Practices Procurement Manual minute peak headways and 90-minute off-peak headways in making recommendations. on opening day. Commuter rail service will be provided  Reviewed the project sponsor’s with eight (8) diesel multiple unit (DMU) technical/management capacity and capability to vehicles. Maintenance of the rolling stock will occur at successfully complete the project through design, the new Equipment Maintenance Facility (EMF), which construction and commissioning, the proposed will be located approximately 6 miles northeast of PMP for the project. downtown Fort Worth. Tail tracks will be provided west  Conducted a Risk Assessment Review covering the of the T&P Station to facilitate TEX Rail and TRE project scope, cost and schedule, and recommended operations. the FFGA Award.  AVA studied and proposed the use of Diesel- A Full Funding Grant Agreement was awarded in Multiple-Unit (DMU) vehicles for the system in December 2016. FWTA’s cost estimate is now $1.034 lieu of the existing bi-level trains. billion in Year of Expenditure (YOE) dollars. The Revenue Service Date is December 31, 2018. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) access requirements will be accomplished using level boarding at each station platform. Positive Train Control (PTC) signaling will be implemented.

LOS ANGELES TRADE TECHNICAL Director of Project/Construction Management. COMMUNITY COLLEGE (LATTC), LOS  Responsible for all issues of management from ANGELES, CA. planning thru design and construction. As a major capital improvement program, Rick was  He dealt directly with the Program Office and the responsible for the rehabilitation of and modernization of Campus President on a daily basis resolving issues. a campus that is close to one hundred years old. Some of key projects were multi-million dollar Highlights of this project included the managing design/build projects. planning, development & construction of $600 million  He dealt with contractors on site, reviewed change plus worth of capital improvements for rail transit access orders and processed claims. with FTA and MTA funding, two South Campus  He developed the Risk Register and kept it fully Administration and Technology High Rise Buildings, updated. Learning Resource Center (library), Construction Rick is a team player and kept the process moving. Technology Building, Culinary Arts Building, Fashion Design Center, renovation and modernization of several existing buildings, relocation of childcare center, construction of elevated parking, and specialized infrastructure engineering work campus wide. with all parties. REGIONAL OPERATIONS GREAT SOCIALIST Deputy Regional Director. PEOPLE’S LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA  AECOM Program Executive and Deputy Director TRIPOLI, LIBYA, NORTH AFRICA Regional Operations, responsible for all technical, Government appropriations in Libyan Dinar (LYD) was managerial, and administrative activities for one of

Rick Rye RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel equivalent to over 50-billion USD to improve the largest public infrastructure investments in the housing, roads, bridges, water and utilities to Libyan world. residents.  In-charge for 268 mega-projects, delivered by 188 construction contractors and professional project management consultants.  Directed all AECOM regional offices consisting of over 75 professional engineering, construction, and technical personnel. Key projects included: ● Full City Infrastructure (Tripoli, Benghazi, Misratah, and Sebha). Budgeted at 11-billion L YD design-build for full infrastructure improvements and new construction for storm and sewer collection and treatment with lift stations and effluent, replacement of breakwater treatment, potable water treatment and distribution, electrical distribution systems, telecommunications systems, ring road and secondary/tertiary roads. ● Public Housing Development for over 117,000 living units budgeted for full development from land acquisition to community planning, design- build of housing utility infrastructure, and overseeing geotechnical, structural, and building construction methods to its interior finishes completion. WORLD TRADE CENTER (WTC) Director of Controls, Finance, and Administration TRANSPORTATION HUB PROJECT, for the WTC PATH Terminal. PHOENIX CONSTRUCTORS, JV, PORT  Rick oversaw and managed the functions and AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK & NEW operations for ensuring that all administration, JERSEY, NEW YORK CITY, NY document control and records keeping, personnel The WTC PATH Terminal was being redesigned after the and human resource, performance control systems, 9/11 incident by major engineering consultants and the IT, procurement and contracts, cost and finance, head house by World Famous Architect/Structural and internal quality controls were in place, Engineer., Cala Trava. The management of this complex functioning efficiently and all in compliance with multitalented team was a major challenge in this politically chargedthe provisions of the Port Authority’s contract. and sensitive atmosphere, which Rick managed  Rick was Phoenix Constructors JV (Skanska, successfully. Constructors Joint Venture) direct contact with FTA. U.S. DOT/FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, Program Manager. REGION I, PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT, Rick was responsible for FTA Region I in Boston, NORTH EAST UNITED STATES MA for transit and infrastructure programs and . Stamford Urban Transit (SUT) Project- projects resulting in new and improved community overseeing the design and construction of a $67- services in Stamford, CT and Providence, RI million three-quarter-mile long connector road with Bus Transit service in the central business district of Stamford, CT with a direct connection through to the Stamford Transportation Center. . South County Commuter Rail (SCCR) Extension Project consists of a design-build 20- mile extension of MBTA along Amtrak’s Northeast High-Speed Rail Corridor from Providence, Rhode Island to Wickford, RI in the South County Region of the state. Rhode Island Department of Transportation (RIDOT) project consists of new rail and systems, a platform station, and parking garage LOWER MANHATTAN RECOVERY, PROGRAM Program Director. MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT, U.S. DOT/FEDERAL  Mr. Rye assisted the FTA’s Lower Manhattan TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, NEW YORK, NY Recovery Office (LMRO) in delivering the project U.S. Congress authorized and appropriated under Public development and oversight program for the Law $4.55 billion to FTA and the Federal Emergency economic revitalization of three primary projects: Management Administration (FEMA) to support  Fulton Street Transit Center (FSTC); - a major transportation projects in Lower Manhattan that will help rail transit intermodal hub the economic recovery of the area.  South Ferry Terminal Station (SoFe); and

Rick Rye RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

White Ferry Terminal Station – major rail terminal stations  Permanent World Trade Center Port Authority Trans Hudson (PATH) Terminal  Route 9A Promenade South  Reconstruction of Route 9A  Rick led Fluor to the nomination as the Project Management Oversight Consultant (PMOC) to assist the LMRO in delivering the project development and oversight. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT,Program U.S. Executive and Program Director DOT/FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, NEWResponsible for access and effective YORK CITY, NY communication with executive management of the FTA Region II New York City included programs and FTA, MTA, NYCT, Long Island Rail Road projects that are the largest and most complex of all (LIRR), and the New York City Department of transportation infrastructure in America. All the Transportation (NYCDOT) on needs and concerns projects were dynamic engineering and construction was an important attribute of his role. undertakings that required a high-level program  Responsible to the FTA Region II in New York /construction management application by the responsible City for programs and projects that were the largest agencies. and most complex of all transportation Estimated budgets for the portfolio of assigned capital infrastructure in America. construction and improvement programs totaled over $36.6 billion. Specific projects included the following: ● MTACC Second Avenue Subway (SAS) a $16.8 billion eight and one-half mile new subway line to be located under the Second Avenue in Manhattan. ● NYCT Queens Boulevard Connection project a six year $645 million included 1500 feet of cut-and- cover tunneling and installation of new subway track, heavy tunneling structures, signal systems, tunnel lighting, communications lines, and life safety ventilation systems. ● NYCT Ventilation Plant Rehabilitation Program, $569 million, involved design, construction and rehabilitation of existing ventilation systems to remove smoke during fires in the subway tunnels. ● New Rail Car Procurement Program encompassed the NYCT’s included placing into service, 1,080operating units by 2005. ● Signal and Systems Program, $1.3 billion, a consolidation of NYCT new technology implementation projects and signal modernization programs. ● NYCT Stations Program invested $1.6 billion to repair structural deficiencies, highlight architectural features, enhance lighting and signage, improve security and revenue controls, eliminate deferred maintenance, enhance customer comfort and attract more customers to the subway system. ● The LIRR East Side Access (ESA) Project, $6.5 billion, one of the largest capital improvement projects undertaken by the New York MTACC. The ESA project assignment included the design, procurement, and installation of all track, signal, communications, traction power, life safety work and systems, and real estate and easement acquisitions to support a new service from the LIRR mainline in Sunnyside, Queens to Grand Central Terminal. ● LIRR’s Strategic Capital Improvement Program investing over $235 million to implement diesel yard improvements, track rehabilitation and replacement, signal upgrade, power upgrade and communications infrastructure upgrade.

Rick Rye RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

● NYCDOT is responsible for surface transportation and ferry service, and the associated facilities and infrastructure including: $120 million Whitehall Ferry Intermodal Terminal located; $107 million St. George Ferry Terminal; $37 million West Midtown Intermodal Ferry Terminal; $137 million Ferry Vessel Procurement Program. 8 Details of the current assignment and the time duration for which services are required for the current assignment.

 Current Assignment: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Region 1, Program Management Oversight (PMO), Program Manager. Rick was responsible for FTA Region I in Boston, MA for transit and infrastructure programs and projects resulting in new and improved community services in Stamford, CT and Providence, RI. Projects include:

Stamford Urban Transit (SUT) Project- overseeing the design and construction of a $67-million three- quarter-mile long connector road with Bus Transit service in the central business district of Stamford, CT with a direct connection through to the Stamford Transportation Center.

 Time Duration: Half time thru 2018

Rick Rye (Signature and name of the Key Personnel)

Place Los Angeles, CA

(Signature and name of the authorised signatory of the Applicant)

Rick Rye RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Form-12 Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

1 Proposed Position: Sr. Structural Engineer .

2 Name of Personnel: Philip Shinn, PE, SE .

3 Date of Birth: July 10, 1962 .

4 Nationality: Citizen of the United States of America .

5 Educational Qualifications: .  University of California, Berkeley - B.S. in Civil Engineering 6 Employment Record: . Period Firm Position 2015 - Present Anil Verma Associates, Inc. Sr. Structural Engineer 1985 - 1989 The Luckman Partnership Project Architect Designer 1982 - 1985 Harry Weese Design Team Senior Architect Designer 1980 - 1982 DMJM (now AECOM) Architect Designer 1978 - 1980 Skidmore Owings & Merrill (SOM) Architect Designer 7 List of projects on which the Personnel has worked

Project Name Description of Responsibilities

Kamehameha Highway Stations Group, Honolulu Sr. Structural Engineer Authority for Rapid Transit (HART), Honolulu, HI:  Reviewed shop drawings and responded to RFIs AVA is the Prime Consultant responsible for architecture, for construction support. structural, mechanical and electrical engineering, with civil, landscape and other engineering services done locally. The KHSG Contract consists of: Pearl Highlands Stations, Pearlridge Station, Aloha Stadium Station and the H2R2 Ramp. HART Project is a twenty (20) mile grade separated fixed guideway transit system running between East Kapolei and Ala Moana. AVA was responsible for the Final Design of three complex aerial stations & a freeway ramp & coordination with guideway & systems contractors.  Pearl Highlands Station has an elevated station structure with two-hundred forty (240)-foot long side platforms located on the triangular property bounded by Kamehameha Highway, Farrington Highway, and the H-1/H-2 interchange in the vicinity of Kuala Street at the western limits of Pearl City. This station complex includes a rail station, a bus transit center, and a parking structure that is to be constructed in two (2) phases. The first phase has the aerial station structure, transit guideway and an aerial station/bus deck 46’ above a river, making it environmentally and structurally challenging. A bus stop and kiss-and-ride is located on the shoulder of eastbound Kamehameha Highway. The station platform is at an elevation of 84’0”, the station/bus deck at 46’0” and the Farrington

Philip Shinn, PE, SE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

Highway approximately at 28’0” - in other words the platforms are 55 feet or more above street level. Other improvements include a pedestrian crossing at the Kamehameha Highway/Kuala Street intersection, sidewalks, stairs, and ramps. The Ramp H2R2 will connect in-bound Farrington Hwy to in-bound Kamehameha Hwy and provide access to the bus stop and kiss-and-ride.

 Pearlridge Station’s platform structure spans over the thirty (30) foot wide concourse bridge which connects to the at-grade station entrance structures located on either side of Kamehameha Highway. A Traction Power Substation (TPSS) and a separate ancillary building housing the train control and communications room are on the site. Other equipment rooms are located on the parcel containing the Makai entrance building. The station entrance structures are connected to the platforms by this elevated pedestrian concourse bridge which straddles Kamehameha Hwy several levels above the street. The site design includes site landscaping, construction of both TPSS station ancillary facilities, driveways, site drainage and utility service connected at an interface point coordinated with the guideway design-build contractor.  Aloha Station has two (2) elevated, two hundred forty (240) foot long side platforms, located within the existing Kamehameha Parking Lot at Aloha Stadium. The elevated side platforms are accessed directly from the at-grade entrance structures via stairs, elevators, and escalators. A single station entrance is provided to serve Aloha Stadium and the adjacent park-and-ride lot/bus transit center. Train Control and Communications Room and other ancillary equipment rooms are housed in a separate building at ground level. The site design includes a public plaza, the park-and- ride facility, bus transit center, and landscaping of the station site.

BART OCC, Lake Merritt, Oakland, CA: Sr. Structural Engineer The new OCC building is located and supported directly  Modernize its existing but aging OCC, to a more above the existing Lake Merritt Station which was reliable and sophisticated design catering to the designed in 1967 and constructed in subsequent years. expanding train network that are added and are The Station consists of three levels of combined structural currently projected. steel and reinforced concrete construction and was  Preliminary structural analysis of proposed new constructed entirely underground with the exception of BART operations control center using Sap2000 the minor egress and ventilation facilities and the BART program. administration building which had been demolished in 2009. The three levels of the Station consist of the Plaza or the Street Level, Mezzanine Level and the Foundation Level.

The building and any other structural elements will be designed to meet the applicable codes, industry standards and other criteria such as BART Facility Standards (BFS). The building will be designed to resist a horizontal seismic ground motion of 0.7g. Aside from the seismic force, the building will also be designed to resist explosive blast incident overpressure (IOP) in order to mitigate structural damage or to avoid potential lethal injuries or building collapse due to terrorist attacks. This IOP will be treated as static lateral wind pressure acting on the structure or structure elements. The evaluation of

Philip Shinn, PE, SE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel the damage levels by non-liner dynamic analysis techniques which is very time-consuming and extremely expensive will not be performed.

San Francisco International Airport Rail Bridge Design Engineer Transit Guideway, San Francisco, CA Responsible for: 1.25 miles long loop of elevated dual guideways  Design of a new elevated rail transit system, connecting the existing terminals with the new including hinge reinforcement International Terminal and new Parking Garages, and  Design of PTFE/elastomeric bearings and fixed facilities that comprise station platform structures, longitudinal restrainers for forty expansion joints. equipment rooms, safety walkways and other  Other responsibilities included determining miscellaneous civil/structural installations. material quantities for the cost estimate, and pre- stressing design calculation check.

Bay Bridge Replacement Phase I, San Francisco, CA Bridge Design Engineer The eastern span replacement of the San Francisco–  Responsible for the first phase of the Bay Bridge Oakland Bay Bridge was a construction project to replace Replacement Project a seismically unsound portion of the Bay Bridge with a  Reviewed structural details of the cable suspension new self-anchored suspension bridge and a pair system for mainspan of viaducts.  Prepared quantities and calculations.

Route 4 Widening, Harbor Street Overcrossing, City Bridge Design Engineer of Pittsburg, CA  Bridge design engineer for two span post-tension The design followed the Caltrans displacement based box girder bridge. design criteria and Caltrans Bridge Design Specifications.  Produced all contract drawings and details. Transportation Bond project funded by the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account program. Two span post- tension box girder bridge.

I-880 Widening Project, Santa Clara County, CA Bridge Design Engineer The bridge widening is a 200-foot long bridge over North  Responsible for design of three-bridge widening First Street at I-880. A precast I girder superstructure is and one bridge replacement for this high-profile used to expedite the construction. project.

Caltrans and Local Agency Bridge Seismic Retrofit, Bridge Design Engineer California Department of Transportation  Providing design and independent checks for Caltrans retrofit design requirements, development of various types of bridges for Caltrans bridge retrofit retrofit strategies, independent review and preparation of program. plans, specifications and estimate.  Participated in more than 15 bridge retrofits at Mark Thomas & Co. for both Caltrans and Local Agencies. Residential House Design, CA  Designed new timber framed residential homes and All residential homes were located in seismic zone 4 and additions to existing homes. were designed to meet UBC requirements. Experience included design of plywood diaphragm, plywood and stucco shear walls, development of nailing schedule, glue-laminted beam design, and strip concrete footing design.

School of the Arts Retrofit, San Francisco CA Design Engineer Seismic retrofit design of the historic School of the Arts,  Responsible for seismic retrofit assessment of constructed in 1926. The two- and four-story complex is historic four-story concrete building. the only example of Spanish colonial revival style in the  Conducted detailed dynamic response spectrum Civic Center area. Highly ornamented with terra cotta analysis using ETABS program. tile, it has four major components; the main school, a  Performed element capacity check following UBC gymnasium, an auditorium, and a library. The structures criteria are non-ductile reinforced concrete

Eleventh Street Overcrossing, City of Tracy, CA Project Engineer The 11th Street East Tracy Overhead Bridge  Responsible for design of 369-ft long, two-span Replacement Project would replace the existing bridge cast-in-place pre-stressed concrete box girder with a shorter structure in combination with retaining bridge.

Philip Shinn, PE, SE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel walls and embankment fill at the approaches. The  Provided design details, structural calculations and replacement structure would provide 23 feet four inches quantity calculations. of permanent vertical clearance over the UPRR tracks. The existing structure is approximately 64 feet wide, and the replacement structure would provide for a typical section that is 89 feet wide in order to accommodate AASHTO requirements of 12-foot lanes and eight-foot shoulder widths

San Leandro Creek Bridge Overhead (Widen), City Project Engineer of San Leandro, CA  Responsible for design of 1412-ft long, twenty- This project widened the southbound I-880 mainline to three span steel I-girder bridge to widen the reduce recurrent southbound congestion and delay existing steel I-girder bridge. Design involved during peak periods by improving highway service to seismic evaluation and retrofit the existing bridge carpool and transit riders. to comply the current Caltrans and AASHTO codes.  Provided design details for widening and retrofit and structural calculations. Site Experience:  Resolved unexpected constructability issues in the field by making plan changes.  Prepared contract change orders and responses to Requests for Information during the construction provided alternative solutions to the unexpected construction problems  Reviewed shop drawings. 12th Street Bridge at Lake Merritt, City of Oakland, Project Engineer CA  Responsible for design of 145-ft long, single-span Resolved unexpected constructability issues in the field prestressed concrete box girder bridge by making plan changes; prepared contract change  Provided design details and structural calculations. orders and responses to Requests for Information during Site Experience: the construction; provided alternative solutions to the  Resolved unexpected constructability issues in the unexpected construction problems; reviewed shop field by making plan changes drawings; checked construction load on the bridge; re-  Prepared contract change orders and responses to evaluated capacity of new piles because of close Requests for Information during the construction; proximity to abandoned existing piles. provided alternative solutions to the unexpected Replace existing culvert at the Lake Merritt Channel construction problems with clear spanning vehicle and pedestrian bridge,  Reviewed shop drawings allowing improved tidal circulation into the lake and  Checked construction load on the bridge enhanced water quality and wildlife habitat  Re-evaluated capacity of new piles because of close proximity to abandoned existing piles.

Peninsula Avenue Overcrossing, San Mateo County, Project Engineer CA  Responsible for design of 400-ft long, four-span Design involved two stages bridge construction; remove prestressed concrete box girder bridge to replace portion of the existing bridge; temporary brace the the existing steel I-girder bridge. remaining existing bridge to insure the live load and seismic performance; design abutments to accommodate the future widening.

Trinity Parkway Bridge, City of Stockton, CA Project Engineer 369-ft long, five-span precast prestressed concrete box  Responsible for design of 369-ft long, five-span girder bridge on driven pile caps. Provided design details precast prestressed concrete box girder bridge on and structural calculations. driven pile caps  Provided design details and structural calculations. McCarthy Ranch Pump Station, City of Milpitas, CA Project Engineer This pump station consists of metal deck roof, masonry  Design of privately owned pump station at building, underground concrete tank and foundation. McCarthy Ranch development. Utilized CBC for development of demands and capacity  Responsibilities included seismic design of metal checks. Produced contract drawings using Autocad. deck roof, masonry building, underground concrete tank, masonry retaining wall and foundation.  Utilized UBC for development of demands and

Philip Shinn, PE, SE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant Form-12: Curriculum Vitae (CV) of Key Personnel

capacity checks.  Produced contract drawings using Autocad.

Watt Ave Light Rail Train Grade Separation, City of Independent Design Checker Sacramento, CA  Checked design for five span prestressed post- 540-ft-long, A five-span light-rail bridge that features a tension box girder bridge on CIDH piles. “trough” cross section consisting of three precast,  Design check for Cooper E-80 load and seismic prestressed concrete girders spanning in the longitudinal load direction, and precast, prestressed concrete slabs spanning between adjacent girders in the transverse direction. Redondo Junction Grade Railroad Bridge, Los Independent Design Checker Angeles, CA  Checked design of two-span steel truss railroad The bridge consisted of two 64-meter long steel trusses bridge. which spanned the Los Angeles River and carried Cooper  Responsible for checking capacity of all members E-80 trains. Design and details followed the American and member connections for service loads and Railway Engineering Associates Standards. Utilized seismic loads. capacity design method for connection verification. North Nile Underpass, Alameda County, CA Bridge Design Engineer The design also included a fatigue check of all steel  The design and details of the two-span steel members and connections. through girder railroad bridge with Cooper E-80 train load over Route 238. Two-span steel through girder railroad bridge with  Responsibilities included design of steel Cooper E-80 train load over Route 238, The design also superstructure and concrete substructure in included a fatigue check of all steel members and accordance with American Railway Engineering connections. Associates (AREA) Standards and 1996 and Caltrans seismic design specifications.

8 Details of the current assignment and the time duration for which services are required for the current assignment. .  Current Assignment: Kamehameha Highway Stations Group, Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transit (HART), Honolulu, HI  Time Duration: Philip’s services are required until June 2019 on a part time basis.

Philip Shinn, PE, SE (Signature and name of the Key Personnel)

Place Los Angeles, CA

(Signature and name of the authorised signatory of the Applicant)

Philip Shinn, PE, SE RFE for Empanelment of Architect and Technical Consultant Signature of Applicant