DOCSLIB.ORG

West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Item 6 Eco-Rapid Transit, formerly known as the Orangeline A G E N D A R E P O R T Development Authority, is a joint powers authority (JPA) created to pursue development of a transit system that moves as rapidly as TO: Members of Eco-Rapid Transit possible, uses grade separation as appropriate, and is environmentally friendly and FROM: Michael Kodama, Executive Director energy efficient. The system is designed to enhance and increase transportation options for riders of this region utilizing safe, DATE: October 14, 2015 advanced transit technology to expand economic growth that maximizes ridership in Southern SUBJECT: UPDATE AND/OR ACTION REGARDING WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH California. The Authority is composed of the TECHNICAL REFINEMENT STUDY AND PRESENTATION BY METRO STAFF following public agencies: ISSUE City of Artesia City of Bell The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (METRO) Board of Directors approved its consultant final report on the West Santa Ana Branch (WSAB). City of Bell Gardens Chair Maria Davila and others attended the September 16, 2015 Metro Planning and City of Bellflower Programming Committee meeting on behalf of Eco-Rapid Transit. City of Cudahy City of Downey Metro staff (Renee Berlin and Fanny Pan) will provide an update to the Board of City of Glendale Directors. City of Huntington Park City of Maywood DISCUSSION City of Paramount The Pacific Electric West Santa Ana Branch is an important part of the proposed Eco- City of South Gate Rapid Transit Corridor transit improvement program. This is what is considered the City of Vernon Southern Corridor of the transit services being planned by the Joint Powers Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Authority. The 20 mile right of way between Paramount and Santa Ana is jointly Airport Authority owned by METRO and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). The route Chair includes alignment options from Paramount to Downtown Los Angeles. Maria Davila Council Member The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) finalized its Alternatives City of South Gate Analysis Report on the Pacific Electric/West Santa Ana Branch rail right of way in Vice Chair January, 2013. SCAG concluded with a preliminary assessment of ridership for Zareh Sinanyan Mayor several alternatives and recommended METRO and OCTA go forward with additional City of Glendale study for transit service along this abandoned right of way. The Orange County Secretary Transit Authority (OCTA) commented to SCAG that they were not interested in Cristian Markovich pursuing the study at that time. METRO decided to go ahead with further study, as Mayor City of Cudahy this project is part of the Los Angeles County Measure R projects. Currently, $240 million is appropriated to WSAB under the Measure R projects programming. Treasurer Michael McCormick Mayor There were some unanswered technical issues from the SCAG study. In May, 2013 City of Vernon METRO executed a contract with its consultant Parsons Brinkerhoff (PB) to prepare a Internal Auditor focused analysis of the key unresolved issues. Eco-Rapid Transit participated with its Ali Sajjad Taj member cities through a third party agreement. Council Member City of Artesia Executive Director Michael R. Kodama General Counsel Teresa L. Highsmith Ex-Officio Rene Bobadilla City Manager Representative 16401 Paramount Boulevard ▪ Paramount ▪ California 90723 (562) 663-6850 www.eco-rapid.org Item 6 Eco-Rapid Transit, formerly known as the Orangeline The key technical issues addressed by the consultant study include: Development Authority, is a joint powers authority (JPA) created to pursue development of a transit system that moves as rapidly as 1. How to get into Los Angeles Union Station Terminal (LAUST) possible, uses grade separation as appropriate, and is 2. Options for going into Downtown Los Angeles – east of the Los Angeles River environmentally friendly and (East Bank) or west of the Los Angeles River (West Bank) energy efficient. The system is designed to enhance and 3. A request by the City of Huntington Park to examine the station at Randolph increase transportation options for riders of this region utilizing safe, and Pacific Avenue and consider other locations and route options advanced transit technology to expand economic growth that 4. Transfer station with METRO’s Green Line in the I-105 Freeway maximizes ridership in Southern 5. Southern terminus station in Artesia California. The Authority is composed of the following public agencies: Member cities have commented on the various interim technical reports for this study. On July 30, 2015 METRO staff and its consultant presented the draft final City of Artesia report to Eco-Rapid Transit and its City Working Group (CWG). City of Bell Major conclusions of the report are as follows: City of Bell Gardens City of Bellflower 1. LAUST options have been detailed with feasible alternatives to be coordinated City of Cudahy with the future high speed rail options and the existing Gold Line train station City of Downey platform. The connection to Union Station is extremely desirable as it City of Glendale increases the estimated ridership on the line to approximately 70,000 riders City of Huntington Park per day. City of Maywood 2. Four additional alternatives have been detailed. The West Bank options seems to be better alternatives. City of Paramount 3. The City of Huntington Park station made requests regarding the two stations City of South Gate in its city. An alternative station on Randolph Street, east of Pacific Avenue is City of Vernon found to be feasible which works with alternatives to continue north on Pacific Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority Avenue or north on Santa Fe. The second request was to evaluate changing the Salt Lake Avenue/Gage Avenue Station to a location south of Florence Chair Avenue which has impacts to Bell, Bell Gardens, Cudahy and Maywood. This Maria Davila was also found to be feasible. Council Member 4. Two alternatives were considered and it has been determined that a station City of South Gate connecting to the Green Line rail line is feasible. Vice Chair 5. The City of Cerritos indicated that it did not want to have the southern Zareh Sinanyan Mayor terminus station within its City Boundaries. The consultant study defined a City of Glendale configuration for a new Southern terminus station in the City of Artesia, which Secretary has been found as feasible. Cristian Markovich Mayor City of Cudahy All of the above conclusion are based upon limited engineering (5% level) of analysis and are subject to further review in final design. Treasurer Michael McCormick Mayor One additional issue discussed with the CWG was the 96 “at-grade” rail crossings – City of Vernon where automobiles must cross the tracks under automated gate control. METRO staff Internal Auditor indicated the upgrade of any of these crossing to grade separation configuration Ali Sajjad Taj would be subject to METRO’s existing policies applied uniformly to all of its rail Council Member City of Artesia projects. Executive Director Michael R. Kodama METRO staff reported that the estimated cost of the project, as currently evaluated would be between $2.5 and $4 billion. General Counsel Teresa L. Highsmith Ex-Officio Rene Bobadilla City Manager Representative 16401 Paramount Boulevard ▪ Paramount ▪ California 90723 (562) 663-6850 www.eco-rapid.org Item 6 Eco-Rapid Transit, formerly known as the Orangeline The report does not report the “preferred” alternatives. This would be subject to the Development Authority, is a joint powers authority (JPA) created to next step – the project EIR/EIS. pursue development of a transit system that moves as rapidly as possible, uses grade separation as appropriate, and is RECOMMENDATION environmentally friendly and energy efficient. The system is designed to enhance and It is recommended that the Board: increase transportation options for riders of this region utilizing safe, advanced transit technology to expand economic growth that 1. Discuss information presented and offer action items; and/or maximizes ridership in Southern California. The Authority is composed of the 2. Receive and file the report. following public agencies: City of Artesia City of Bell City of Bell Gardens City of Bellflower City of Cudahy City of Downey City of Glendale City of Huntington Park City of Maywood City of Paramount City of South Gate City of Vernon Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority Chair Maria Davila Council Member City of South Gate Vice Chair Zareh Sinanyan Mayor City of Glendale Secretary Cristian Markovich Mayor City of Cudahy Treasurer Michael McCormick Mayor City of Vernon Internal Auditor Ali Sajjad Taj Council Member City of Artesia Executive Director Michael R. Kodama General Counsel Teresa L. Highsmith Ex-Officio Rene Bobadilla City Manager Representative 16401 Paramount Boulevard ▪ Paramount ▪ California 90723 (562) 663-6850 www.eco-rapid.org Metro Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza 3rd Floor Board Room Los Angeles, CA Agenda - Final Revised Wednesday, September 16, 2015 2:00 PM One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012, 3rd Floor, Metro Board Room Planning and Programming Committee Mike Bonin, Chair Sheila Kuehl, Vice Chair James Butts Jacquelyn Dupont-Walker Hilda Solis Carrie Bowen, non-voting member Phillip A. Washington, Chief Executive Officer METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD RULES (ALSO APPLIES TO BOARD COMMITTEES) PUBLIC INPUT A member of the public may address the Board on agenda items, before or during the Board or Committee’s consideration of the item for one (1) minute per item, or at the discretion of the Chair. A request to address the Board should be submitted in person at the meeting to the Board Secretary. Individuals requesting to speak on more than three (3) agenda items will be allowed to speak up to a maximum of three (3) minutes per meeting. For individuals requiring translation service, time allowed will be doubled. The public may also address the Board on non-agenda items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board during the public comment period, which will be held at the beginning and/or end of each meeting.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blue Line First/Last Mile Plan Project Team
    First/Last Mile: A Community-Based Process and Plan March 2018 Blue Line First/Last Mile Plan Project Team Los Angeles Metro Transit Oriented Communities Jenna Hornstock, Deputy Executive Officer Jacob Lieb, Senior Director Katie Lemmon, Transportation Planning Manager Community / Consultants Fehr & Peers Here Design Studio (Here LA) Gensler LA County Bicycle Coalition T.R.U.S.T South LA Asian Pacific Islander Forward Movement Multicultural Communities for Mobility This report represents over a year of Ride On! Bike Co-op work by Metro and the project team. Special thanks to the Community East Side Riders Bike Club Groups listed to the right, who were invaluable members of the project Healthy Active Streets team. Pueblo (primary Plan author) Sumire Gant Consulting (primary Plan author) ProForma Blue Line First/Last Mile Plan Blue Line First/Last Mile Plan Contents i Executive Summary iii Key Findings of the Plan iv Contents of the Plan 01 11 21 Introduction Context Process 04 First/Last Mile Defined 012 History of Redlining 025 Phase 1: Walk Audits Phase 2: Community Events 04 Vision & Policy 014 History of Blue Line 027 Planning and Development 033 Phase 3: Drafting the Report First/Last Mile & the Blue 06 033 Phase 4: Sharing Findings Line 017 Social Context Today 035 039 043 Recommendations Implementation Lessons Learned 044 Ensuring Equity in Future First/Last Mile Plans Appendices A Station Area Summaries B Project List & Cost Estimation Methodology Memo C First/Last Mile Note on Wayfinding Signage Plans D Comments Blue Line First/Last Mile Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i Executive Summary - Blue Line First/Last Mile Plan his First/Last Mile (FLM) Plan, prepared for all 22 stations on the Metro Blue Line (MBL), is a groundbreaking effort for Metro and its project team, composed of transportation planners and Community-Based Organizations (CBOs).
    [Show full text]
  • Torrance Bus Service Reliability and Improvement Strategies
    TORRANCE BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY AND IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master In Urban and Regional Planning By Jose M. Perez 2019 i SIGNATURE PAGE PROJECT: TORRANCE BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY AND IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES AUTHOR: Jose M. Perez DATE SUBMITTED: Spring 2019 Department of Urban and Regional Planning Dr. Alvaro M. Huerta Project Committee Chair Professor of Urban Planning Richard Zimmer Committee Member Lecturer of Urban Planning David Mach Senior Transportation Planner Torrance Transit i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author thanks the Torrance Transit Employees for the data they furnished and their participation in the client project, especially Senior Transportation Planner David Mach. The author would also like to thank the City of Torrance for providing information on future development and specific goals of their circulation plan. Special thanks to Dr. Alvaro M. Huerta and Professor Richard Zimmer for their help and guidance in completing the client project. i ABSTRACT A city’s transportation infrastructure directly affects the mobility of the people, goods, and services, of all who live within its’ limits. Bus transit lines are a key element of a balanced transportation system that can improve or detract from the quality of life of its’ populous. Transit networks that are poorly implemented eventually become impractical and difficult to maintain; and thus, a burden upon the city it’s meant to help. In addition the service reliability of a transit line is critical to both the transit agency and its users in order to maintain a healthy transportation system.
    [Show full text]
  • West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project
    Draft EIS/EIR Appendix F Final Safety and Security Impact Analysis Report WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH TRANSIT CORRIDOR PROJECT Draft EIS/EIR Appendix F Final Safety and Security Impact Analysis Report Prepared for: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Prepared by: WSP 444 South Flower Street Suite 800 Los Angeles, California 90071 July 2021 Authors AUTHORS Charlie Hetland, Jacobs John Simon, Jacobs Ryo Nagai, Jacobs Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Study Background ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Alternatives Evaluation, Screening and Selection Process .................................... 1-1 1.3 Report Purpose and Structure .............................................................................. 1-2 1.4 General Background ............................................................................................. 1-3 1.4.1 Safety .................................................................................................... 1-3 1.4.2 Security ................................................................................................. 1-4 1.4.3 Impact Criteria and Thresholds ............................................................ 1-5 1.5 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 1-6 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Art Guide a Tour of Metro’S Artwork Metro Commissions Artists to Create Engaging and Thought-Provoking Artworks to Make Your Journey More Inviting and Pleasurable
    metro.net Art Guide A tour of Metro’s artwork Metro commissions artists to create engaging and thought-provoking artworks to make your journey more inviting and pleasurable. The artworks weave a multi-layered cultural tapestry that mirrors Los Angeles County’s rich contemporary and popular cultures. Established in 1989, the Metro Art program has commissioned over 250 artists for a wide variety of both temporary and permanent projects. explore Artists are selected through a peer review process with community input; all works are created especially for their transit related sites. This guide is intended to help you discover artworks throughout the Metro system. For more detailed information on the artwork and the artists, please visit metro.net/art. Artwork copyrighted, all rights reserved. Metro Lines and Transitways Metro Contents Art’s a Trip. Art’s a Trip Metro Environments Free Metro Rail Tours Tours are o=ered the >rst Saturday, > Thursdays – Meet at 7pm at Sunday and Thursday of each month. the street level entrance to the Metro Rail Metro Customer Center It’s free. It’s provocative. The tours are roundtrip and last Hollywood/Highland Metro l Metro Red Line Metro Vehicles It’s a great ride. approximately two hours. Rail Station. Union Station Bus Plaza l Metro Purple Line Tours for groups of 15 or more are > Saturdays – Meet at 10am at > Each tour is unique, visits l Metro Gold Line Metro Headquarters available by special arrangement. the street level entrance to the di=erent stations and is led Metro Division 3 Hollywood/Highland Metro by a member of the Metro Art l Metro Blue Line Call 213 .922.2738 for information Rail Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Report Los Angeles, CA
    Los Angeles County Metro Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza 3rd Floor Board Room Board Report Los Angeles, CA File #: 2016-0230, File Type: Contract Agenda Number: 25 CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE JUNE 16, 2016 SUBJECT: CRENSHAW/LAX TRANSIT PROJECT ACTION: AUTHORIZE THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) TO EXECUTE CONTRACT MODIFICATION RECOMMENDATION CONSIDER: A. AUTHORIZING the CEO to execute a Contract Modification to Contract No. C0988 with Walsh/Shea Corridor Constructors (WSCC), to design and construct a bus transfer facility for $2,200,000, increasing the total contract price from $1,294,476,149.38 to $1,296,676,149.38 for the Crenshaw/LAX Transit Project; B. APPROVING an increase in Contract Modification Authority (CMA) for Contract No. C0988, in the amount of $2,200,000, increasing the total CMA from $134,699,993 to $136,899,993; C. ADOPTING a Life-of-Project (LOP) Budget of $2,200,000 for the Bus Transfer Facility; and D. AUTHORIZING the execution of this Contract Modification subject to final execution of the 3% Local Match funding agreement between Metro and the City of Inglewood. ISSUE A notice-to-proceed was issued to Walsh/Shea Corridor Constructors (WSCC) on September 10, 2013 for Contract No. C0988. The C0988 contract included three park- and-ride facilities: Expo/Crenshaw Station, Fairview Heights Station, and Downtown Inglewood Station. The Metro Board approved a bus transit facility at the Downtown Inglewood light rail station during the November 2015 Board meeting. This was also approved by the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (COG) in November 2015. Changing the park-and-ride facility at the Downtown Inglewood station into a bus transit facility is a change to the Contract No.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Programming Committee Agenda
    Metro Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza 3rd Floor Board Room Los Angeles, CA Agenda - Final Wednesday, November 14, 2018 2:00 PM One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012, 3rd Floor, Metro Board Room Planning and Programming Committee Jacquelyn Dupont-Walker, Chair Mark Ridley-Thomas, Vice Chair Mike Bonin Janice Hahn Ara Najarian John Bulinski, non-voting member Phillip A. Washington, Chief Executive Officer METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD RULES (ALSO APPLIES TO BOARD COMMITTEES) PUBLIC INPUT A member of the public may address the Board on agenda items, before or during the Board or Committee’s consideration of the item for one (1) minute per item, or at the discretion of the Chair. A request to address the Board should be submitted in person at the meeting to the Board Secretary . Individuals requesting to speak on more than three (3) agenda items will be allowed to speak up to a maximum of three (3) minutes per meeting. For individuals requiring translation service, time allowed will be doubled. Notwithstanding the foregoing, and in accordance with the Brown Act, this agenda does not provide an opportunity for members of the public to address the Board on any Consent Calendar agenda item that has already been considered by a Committee, composed exclusively of members of the Board, at a public meeting wherein all interested members of the public were afforded the opportunity to address the Committee on the item, before or during the Committee’s consideration of the item, and which has not been substantially changed since the Committee heard the item.
    [Show full text]
  • Master List of Mta Divisions Locations Stations 073009
    METRO DIVISIONS, LOCATIONS, TERMINALS FACILITY CODE NAME Address City State Zip DIVISIONS - LOCATIONS - TERMINALS DIVISION 0001 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 1130 E. 6TH ST LOS ANGELES CA 90021 DIVISION 0002 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 720 E. 15TH ST. LOS ANGELES CA 90021 DIVISION 0003 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 630 W. AVENUE 28 LOS ANGELES CA 90065 DIVISION 0004 NON-REVENUE VEHICLE DIVISION 7878 TELEGRAPH RD. DOWNEY CA 90240 DIVISION 0005 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 5425 VAN NESS AVE. LOS ANGELES CA 90062 DIVISION 0006 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 100 SUNSET AVE. VENICE CA 90291 DIVISION 0007 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 8800 SANTA MONICA BLVD. LOS ANGELES CA 90069 DIVISION 0008 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 9201 CANOGA AVE. CHATSWORTH CA 91311 DIVISION 0009 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 3449 SANTA ANITA AVE. EL MONTE CA 91731 DIVISION 0010 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 742 N. MISSION RD. LOS ANGELES CA 90033 DIVISION 0011 BLUE LINE MAIN YARD 4350 E. 208th ST. LONG BEACH CA 90810 DIVISION 0012 INACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 970 W. CHESTER PL. LONG BEACH CA 90813 LOCATION 0014 SOUTH PARK SHOPS 5413 AVALON BLVD. LOS ANGELES CA 90011 DIVISION 0015 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 11900 BRANFORD ST. SUN VALLEY CA 91352 TERMINAL 0017 MAPLE LOT - BUS LAYOVER 632 MAPLE AVE. LOS ANGELES CA 90014 DIVISION 0018 ACTIVE BUS OPERATING DIVISION 450 W. GRIFFITH ST. GARDENA CA 90248 TERMINAL 0019 EL MONTE STATION 3501 SANTA ANITA AVE. EL MONTE CA 91731 DIVISION 0020 RED LINE MAIN YARD 320 SO. SANTA FE AVE. LOS ANGELES CA 90013 DIVISION 0021 PASADENA GOLD LINE YARD(MIDWAY) 1800 BAKER ST.
    [Show full text]
  • SLAUSON BLUE LINE STATION Transit Oriented Development Technical Assistance Panel (TAP) Program
    SLAUSON BLUE LINE STATION Transit Oriented Development Technical Assistance Panel (TAP) Program September 2010 A ULI Advisory Services Technical Assistance Panel Report About the ULI Los Angeles Technical Assistance Panel In keeping with the Urban Land Institute mission, Technical Assistance Panels are convened to provide pro-bono planning and development assistance to public officials and local stakeholders of communities and nonprofit organizations who have requested assistance in addressing their land use challenges. A group of diverse professionals representing the full spectrum of land use and real estate disciplines typically spend one day visiting and analyzing the built environments, identifying specific planning and development issues, and formulating realistic and actionable recommendations to move initiatives forward in a fashion consistent with the applicant’s goals and objectives. Staff and Panel Members TAP Client TAP Committee Chair County of Los Angeles Jonathan Curtis Department of Regional Planning Principal, Trevear Holdings LLC Panel Chair TOD Summit TAP Advisor Jonathan Watts Robert Gardner Principal, Cuningham Group Managing Director, RCLCO Panelists ULI Project Staff Ryan Aubry Katherine Perez Sr. Consultant, Kosmont Companies Executive Director, ULI Los Angeles Brent Gaulke Christine Aure Vice President, Acquisitions/Development, Project Manager, ULI Los Angeles Gerding Edlen Ciara Contreras Taylor Mammen Project Manager, ULI Los Angeles Vice President, RCLCO Stephen Sampson Sunil Parab Intern, ULI Los Angeles Project Architect, HNTB John Dlugolecki Paul Silvern Photographer Partner, HR&A Advisors, Inc. Table of Contents Executive Summary 2 Assignment & Process 4 Background 6 Analysis 9 Findings 12 Recommendations 14 Implementation 17 Funding Sources 24 Acknowledgements 24 Panel Members 25 1 The Metro Blue line opened in 1990 and has 22 stations along its 22-mile long route from downtown Los Angeles south to downtown Long Beach.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles EAP Final
    LOS ANGELES COUNTY ELECTION ADMINISTRATON PLAN 1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ELECTION ADMINISTRATON PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………….. 3 VOTER’S CHOICE ACT………………………………………………………………………. 3 VOTING SOLUTIONS FOR ALL PEOPLE…………………………………………………. 4 SECTION 1 – VOTER EDUCATION AND OUTREACH PLAN…………………………… 6 1-A MEDIA OUTREACH………………………………………………………….... 7 1-B VOTE BY MAIL EXPANSION……………………………………….………. 12 1-C COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT……………………………………………… 15 1-D WEBSITE INFORMATION…………………………………………………... 44 1-E LANGUAGE ASSISTANCE…………………………………………………. 44 1-F ACCESSIBILITY SUPPORT………………………………………………… 47 1-G MEDIA AND OUTREACH BUDGET……………………………………….. 51 1-H ANTICIPATED COST SAVINGS…………………………………………… 52 1-I PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS…………………………………... 52 1-J DIRECT CONTACTS……………………………………………………….... 53 SECTION 2 – VOTE CENTERS AND VOTE BY MAIL DROP-OFF LOCATIONS……. 53 2-A VOTE CENTER PLACEMENT PROJECT……………………………….... 53 2-B VOTE CENTERS……………………………………………………………... 62 2-C VOTE BY MAIL DROP-OFF LOCATIONS……………………………….... 65 SECTION 3 – VOTE CENTER LAYOUT, EQUIPMENT AND STAFFING……………... 66 3-A STAFFING LOGISTICS AND MULTILINGUAL SERVICES…………….. 66 3-B VOTE CENTER ASSISTANCE……………………………………………... 67 3-C VOTE CENTER LAYOUT……………………………………………………. 68 SECTION 4 – SECURITY AND CONTINGENCY PLAN…………………………………. 69 4-A SECURITY METHODS AND STANDARDS………………………………. 69 4-B VOTE CENTER SUPPORT………………………………………………….. 69 4-C CYBERSECURITY……………………………………………………...……. 70 4-D CONTINGENCY PLAN………………………………………………………. 70 ADDENDA…………………………………………………………………………………….. 72 2 LOS ANGELES
    [Show full text]
  • Program Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting
    Program Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting February 25, 2019 Public Scoping Meeting Overview • Introductions • Purpose of Public Scoping Meeting • Roles & Responsibilities • Proposed Project Description • CEQA’s Purpose, Process, Schedule • Topics to be Addressed in Environmental Impact Report • Contact Information • Public Comments Introductions • CITY OF DOWNEY • COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES • LOS ANGELES COUNTY METRO • Specific Plan/CEQA Consultant – Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Purpose of Scoping Meeting • Inform public of proposed Project and City’s intent to prepare Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) • Present overview of CEQA PEIR process • Review topics to be addressed in PEIR • Receive input from public on issues of concern/topics to be addressed in PEIR • Project merits • Not focus of Scoping Meeting • Future opportunities to discuss- at future Public Hearings before Planning Commission and City Council Roles & Responsibilities • City of Downey is “Lead Agency” responsible for preparing Project’s CEQA documentation • City is responsible for • Adequacy/objectivity of Project’s CEQA document • Considering Project’s CEQA document prior to acting upon/approving Project • City has retained Kimley-Horn and Associates to prepare Project Specific Plan and PEIR Proposed Project Project Location Regional Context Local Context Existing Land Uses Project Description The Specific Plan will provide long-term guidance for growth and change in the Specific Plan area to enhance the quality of life in Downey and the region. The
    [Show full text]
  • Line 611 (12/13/20)
    Monday through Friday Effective Dec 13 2020 611 Clockwise (Approximate Times / Tiempos Aproximados) CUDAHY HUNTINGTON PARK FLORENCE LOS ANGELES VERNON MAYWOOD CUDAHY 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 Cecelia & Atlantic Florence & Pacific Florence Station Vernon Station Pacific & Atlantic & Slauson Cecelia & Atlantic Santa Fe — — — 5:15A 5:19A 5:35A 5:51A 5:40A 5:57A 6:03A 6:17 6:21 6:37 6:54 6:35 6:53 6:59 7:14 7:18 7:34 7:51 7:34 7:53 7:59 8:15 8:19 8:35 8:52 8:36 8:54 9:00 9:15 9:19 9:34 9:51 9:35 9:53 9:59 10:14 10:18 10:33 10:50 10:34 10:52 10:58 11:13 11:17 11:32 11:49 11:33 11:51 11:57 12:12P 12:16P 12:31P 12:48P 12:31P 12:50P 12:56P 1:11 1:15 1:30 1:47 1:30 1:49 1:55 2:10 2:14 2:30 2:47 2:30 2:50 2:56 3:12 3:17 3:33 3:50 3:29 3:48 3:55 4:12 4:17 4:33 4:50 4:27 4:47 4:54 5:11 5:16 5:32 5:50 5:28 5:49 5:56 6:13 6:17 6:33 6:51 6:30 6:49 6:55 7:11 7:15 7:29 7:46 7:30 7:48 7:54 8:08 8:11 8:24 8:40 8:30 8:47 8:53 9:07 9:10 9:23 9:39 9:30 9:47 9:53 10:07 — — — Monday through Friday 611 CounterClockwise (Approximate Times / Tiempos Aproximados) CUDAHY MAYWOOD VERNON LOS ANGELES FLORENCE HUNTINGTON PARK CUDAHY 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 Cecelia & Atlantic Atlantic & Slauson Vernon & Vernon Station Florence Station Florence & Pacific Cecelia & Atlantic Santa Fe — — — 5:39A 5:52A 5:57A 6:10A 6:05A 6:20A 6:35A 6:39 6:52 6:57 7:11 7:05 7:20 7:36 7:40 7:53 7:59 8:14 8:01 8:16 8:32 8:36 8:49 8:55 9:10 9:02 9:17 9:32 9:36 9:50 9:56 10:10 10:01 10:16 10:31 10:35 10:49 10:56 11:10 11:00 11:15 11:30 11:34 11:48 11:55 12:09P 11:59 12:14P 12:30P 12:34P 12:48P 12:55P 1:09 1:00P 1:15
    [Show full text]
  • SCAG#LA County TOD Access Study
    nt Hawthorne Rosa Parks Florence Fire stone Slauson Sierra Madre Villa Carso n Los Angeles County Aviation/LAX Ve rmont Transit Oriented Districts Hawtho rne Access Study Rosa Parks Florence restone Slauson Sierra Madre Villa Cars n Aviation/LAX Vermont Hawthorne Ro sa Parks Florence Firestone Slauson S ierra Madre Villa Carson Aviation/LAX V ermont Hawthorne Rosa Parks Florenc e Firestone Slauson Sierra Madre Villa C arson Aviation/LAX Vermont Hawthorn e Rosa Parks Florence Firestone Slaus on Sierra Madre Villa Carson Aviation/L AX Vermont Hawthorne Rosa Parks Av iation/LAX Vermont Hawthorne Rosa P arks Florence Firestone Slauson Sierra Madre Villa Carson Aviation/LAX Vermo nt Hawthorne Rosa Parks Florence Fire stone Slauson Sierra Madre Villa Carso n Aviation Aviation/LAX Vermont LA County TOD Access Study Table of Contents Introduction | 1 Overview of Conceptual Infrastructure Plans | 2 A. Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Challenges Overview | 5 B. Guiding Principles & Assumptions | 6 - Pedestrian Improvements | 6 - Intersection Improvements | 8 - Bicycle Improvements | 9 - Bike Parking | 11 - Circular Intersection Improvements | 14 C. Bikeway Types | 15 D. Recommendations That Will Require Additional Study | 24 E. Cost Estimates & Feasibility Assessments | 25 F. Potential Funding Sources | 29 Conceptual Infrastructure Plans A. LAX/Aviation | A-1 B. Vermont | B-1 C. Hawthorne | C-1 D. Imperial-Wilmington Rosa Parks | D-1 E. Florence | E-1 F. Firestone | F-1 G. Slauson | G-1 H. Sierra Madre Villa | H-1 I. I-110 West Carson | I-1 End Notes Appendices (A-I) LA County TOD Access Study Introduction The County of Los Angeles’ Department of Regional Planning has proposed a Transit Oriented Districts (TODs) Program as part of the County’s General Plan Update.
    [Show full text]