DOCSLIB.ORG

Elderberry Senior Cohousing Chillwack, BC

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elderberry Senior Cohousing Chillwack, BC Housing Study: Elderberry Senior Cohousing Chillwack, BC Prepared By M’akola Development Services October, 2014 M’akola Development Services (MDS) is a member of the M’akola Group of Societies. Incorporated in 1988, Mis’Kow’aao has provided development and project management services for over 30 affordable housing projects for aboriginal and non-aboriginal clients. Contact Information: Kevin Albers, Chief Executive Officer [email protected] (250) 880-1666 Kaela Schramm, Development Services Planner [email protected] (778) 677-8843 ii Table of Contents Introduction . 3 Cohousing . 3 Scope of Study . 4 Study Area . 5 Population . 7 Housing and Income . 8 Senior Cohousing Need and Demand . 12 Conclusion. 17 iii This Page is Intentionally Left Blank iv Executive Summary In this report, the need and demand for senior cohousing in the Chilliwack area is explored by examining current community and housing profiles, as well as by examining total and senior population projections over the next decade. We also research and explicate the benefits of senior cohousing in contrast to other continuums of care by identifying the limitations of current service provisions for seniors in the Chilliwack area. After reviewing all of the data, it is clear that the total and senior population of the City of Chilliwack is increasing, as it is across Canada as the “baby boomer” generation ages. In addition, based on past growth patterns, population projections indicate that the population will continue to growth over the next decade. Senior cohousing provides cost-effective solutions to healthy aging in place. Moreover, cohousing supports physical and emotional security, as well as a sense of community, or of belonging. Given that absorption rates of new housing stocks are high, and that current housing compositions reveal a strong desire amongst seniors to live with family members (i.e. a support structure), there is both an identifiable need as well as demand for senior cohousing in Chilliwack. 1 This Page is Intentionally Left Blank 2 Introduction Cohousing Research indicates that as seniors’ age and experience History a loss in mobility, they often suffer from social isolation and from separation from community. This often The concept of cohousing originated in Denmark results in feelings of loneliness, disempowerment back in the 1960’s, with the aim of creating and even depression and thus profoundly effects intergenerational communities by developing seniors’ mental, physical and spiritual well being. private homes around shared facilities. Residents Senior cohousing diminishes barriers to inclusion of cohousing would design, own and manage by means of creating community within ones the entire community. At this time, the concept of living space. Not only does cohousing provide cohousing primarily attracted younger families, as opportunities for seniors to develop meaningful designs were often less than “senior-friendly”. Due relationships, but it provides opportunities for them to this, the concept of senior cohousing emerged in to receive care from trusted individuals, rather than the 1990’s in Denmark, which empowered seniors to from strangers or from individuals merely “doing drive the cohousing development, so that designs their job.” could be uniquely planned and implemented, so as to support their diverse needs and thus support Notions to explore the need and demand for senior them to healthily age in place. Although cohousing cohousing in the Chilliwack area emerged after the communities have now emerged in varying parts successful development of Yarrow Ecovillage, which of North America, senior cohousing remains a proved to be an effective social and economical relatively new concept in Canada; there is only one living arrangement for families. In light of this, operating senior cohousing community, with three founders of Elderberry Cohousing engaged M’akola new projects underway (Globe and Mail, 2012). Development Services to understand if there is both a need and demand for seniors cohousing to be included in the Yarrow Ecovillage. Features of Cohousing The key feature of cohousing is “co-caring”. Co-caring can be defined as residents supporting each other’s daily activity needs – from laundry, to errands, to providing personal care and more, so as to limit the need of requiring support from health care professionals. Not only does cohousing diminish economic burdens on our health care system, but it also provides an array of health benefits to residents, which will be discussed shortly. Residents of cohousing own their own private dwelling unit, but share a common house, which provides spaces for common dining, kitchen, laundry, offices, guest rooms, and recreational opportunities, to name a few. Research indicates that cohousing supports better physical, mental, emotional and spiritual health, provides opportunities to develop meaningful friendships and engage in social contact, promotes safety, security and affordability and in addition, 3 enhances utilization of shared resources (Charles Durnett, 2009). Scope of Study Elderberry The scope of this study is limited to seniors residing Elderberry is an elder cohousing community in the City of Chilliwack. It is important to note, intended for individuals and couples who want to however, that senior cohousing has been proven to live in a beautiful rural physical environment, as well draw people to relocate from broader regions, even as in a supportive and co-caring social environment, from outside the country and thereby, the needs in an energy efficient home as they grow older. and demands delineated in this report likely expand Elderberry cohousing is intended for those who to seniors residing in other cities across the province “want to live in the country but have the advantages and country, as well as to seniors residing in other of a village.” Elderberry is made up of regular people countries. who are passionate about finding a better way to live their lives. Methodology The Elderberry vision is to “create a thriving senior For this study, we utilized data obtained from the cohousing community where members work Canadian Census Subdivision for the years 1996, together on activities of interest (farming, gardening, 2001, 2006, and 2011, as well as from a geometric food preservation, cooking, crafts, etc) and continue population projection, which was incorporated to to contribute to one another and to our wider determine the potential population for the years community/world as long as they are able.” 2016, 2021 and 2026. These years were chosen for purposes of forecasting the general housing needs and demand, as well as the cohousing market, amongst the estimated senior population in the City of Chilliwack over the next decade to come. The basis of this study was formed by integrating population projection data, socio-economic data collected from the 2006 Canadian Census (there is limited data available from 2011 census), and housing/rental market data collected from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). CMHC data was used to understand homeownership and rental market conditions, vacancies and costs, in order to further evaluate the viability of senior cohousing in Chilliwack. Further, data was also collected through an interview with the Executive Director of the Seniors Resource Society in the City of Chilliwack, for purposes of collecting qualitative data to support quantitative findings, as a means to present a complete, comprehensive discussion regarding senior cohousing need and demand in the City of Chilliwack. 4 Limitations Study Area Unfortunately, we were unable to engage in conversation with seniors residing in the City of Chilliwack, which requires this study to rely on, and The study area for this report is the City of Chilliwack, to extrapolate from, information collected from the British Columbia, which is located in the upper Executive Director of the Seniors Resource Society – Fraser Valley, approximately 100 kilometres east with regards to seniors’ health care and home care of Vancouver, along the Trans Canada Highway. needs and demands. This means that we are relying Chilliwack is the third oldest municipality in on perceived needs, as opposed to actual needs. British Columbia; the Township of Chilliwack was In addition, only a limited amount of 2011 census incorporated in 1873 – a time when steamboats were subdivision data is available, particularly in regards the main mode of transportation for both goods and to income, which requires this study to utilize and passengers in the area. See map on following page. draw upon data available from 2006, as opposed to current data. In 1881 a large subdivision titled Centreville was developed, which became re-named as “Chilliwhack” in 1887. In 1908 the area was incorporated as a separate municipality, the City of Chilliwack, which Definition of Terms co-exited with the Township for 72 years. In 1980 the City and Township merged to form the District The terms outlined below are used throughout of Chilliwack, and in 1999 (fairly recently) the District the study. Definitions are provided to clarify their of Chilliwack became, and currently remains, the meaning, so as to prevent misunderstandings or City of Chilliwack. The term “Chilliwack” came from a lack of credibility. local Indian tribe as well as a geographic description of the area. Originally spelled “Chilliwhack”, this Core Housing Need: Households are in core housing “Halkomelem” word means “quieter water at the need if they live in housing that is inadequate, head” or travel by way of a backwater. unsuitable, or unaffordable and would have to spend 30% or more of their total before-tax household Chilliwack has long been known for its rich income to pay the median rent/mortgage of a agricultural capacity and boundless outdoor suitable alternative in the local housing market recreational activities, such as hiking, horseback (CMHC, 2014). riding, fishing, golfing and biking; to this day, it is still recognized for its parks, recreation and culture. The Seniors: Unless otherwise noted, the term “seniors” Yarrow area (the proposed Elderberry location) is 12 refers to individuals aged 65 and over.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eco-Collaboration Between Higher Education and Ecovillages A
    Partnerships for Sustainability: Eco-Collaboration between Higher Education and Ecovillages A PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Kiernan Jeanette Gladman IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF LIBERAL STUDIES February 2014 ©Kiernan Jeanette Gladman 2014 For John May the soles of our shoes wear down together. i Paradise (John Prine) When I was a child, my family would travel Down to western Kentucky where my parents were born And there's a backwards old town that's often remembered So many times that my memories are worn Chorus: And Daddy, won't you take me back to Muhlenberg County Down by the Green River where Paradise lay Well, I'm sorry, my son, but you're too late in asking Mister Peabody's coal train has hauled it away Well sometimes we'd travel right down the Green River To the abandoned old prison down by Adrie Hill Where the air smelled like snakes and we'd shoot with our pistols But empty pop bottles was all we would kill Chorus And the coal company came with the world's largest shovel And they tortured the timber and stripped all the land Well, they dug for their coal till the land was forsaken Then they wrote it all down as the progress of man Chorus When I die let my ashes float down the Green River Let my soul roll on up to the Rochester dam I'll be halfway to Heaven with Paradise waitin' Just five miles away from wherever I am Chorus ii CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Introduction In Creating a Life Together, Diana Leafe Christian estimates that 90 percent of attempts to start an intentional community do not survive past the initial stages. Similarly, many personal searches for intentional community fizzle out due to lack of adequate information, guidance, or exposure to fellow travelers’ stories. In both cases, ignorance of the wide array of options possible, and of the breadth of resources and support available through the Fellowship for Intentional Community and allied groups, undoubtedly contributes to the “failure” rate. This volume on “Starting a Community” and the next volume in this series, on “Finding a Community,” address the need for one-stop collections of stories to help founders and seekers. They are meant to complement the Communities Directory (available in print and online: ic.org/directory), COMMUNITIES magazine, a quarterly publication focused on Life in Cooperative Culture, and educational resources available through Community Bookstore (ic.org/bookstore). These books should broaden anyone’s outlook on what is possible and how to pursue their dreams of community. Within each section we hear from a range of voices spanning a great diversity of perspectives and experiences. In this volume, following more general “overview” articles, we dive into on-the-ground stories from founders, arranged roughly chronologically, followed by a separate roughly chronological flow about experiences of community that don’t fit the classic intentional community definition but are nonetheless powerful for their creators and participants. Most articles are drawn from the past decade of COMMUNITIES magazine, with several excerpted from the Communities Directory and a few from older issues of COMMUNITIES that were also excerpted in our Best of collections, Volumes I and II.
    [Show full text]
  • Sweden and Kollektivhus NU, [email protected] Kollektivhuskonf2010:Layout 1 10-09-08 00.50 Sida 5
    Kollektivhuskonf2010:Layout 1 10-09-08 00.49 Sida 1 Living together – Cohousing Ideas and Realities Around the World Kollektivhuskonf2010:Layout 1 10-09-08 00.49 Sida 2 Kollektivhuskonf2010:Layout 1 10-09-08 00.49 Sida 3 Div of Urban and Regional Studies Living together – Cohousing Ideas and Realities Around the World Proceedings from the international collaborative housing conference in Stockholm 5–9 May 2010 DICK URBAN VESTBRO (editor) Report Division of Urban and Regional Studies, Royal Institute of Technology in collaboration with Kollektivhus NU Stockholm 2010 Kollektivhuskonf2010:Layout 1 10-09-08 00.50 Sida 4 Living together – Cohousing Ideas and Realities Around the World Proceedings from the international collaborative housing conference in Stockholm 5–9 May 2010 Report Division of Urban and Regional Studies in collaboration with Kollektivhus NU. Keywords: Cohousing, housing policy, communal living, eco-villages, demographic change The International Collaborative Housing Conference was supported by the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning, Formas, and the housing companies shown below. Research grant Other sponsors Main sponsor Kollektivhuset Trädet, Göteborg © Division of Urban and Regional Studies, KTH, and Kollektivhus NU, 2010. Cover photo by Charles Durrett Graphic design: Ingrid Sillén, Migra Grafiska TRITA-SoM 2010-09 ISSN 1653-6126 ISRN KTH-SoM/R-10-09/SE ISBN: 978-91-7415-738-3 Printed by: Universitetsservice US AB, Stockholm 2010 Distribution: Division of Urban and Regional
    [Show full text]
  • From Xwelítem Ways Towards Practices of Ethical Being in Stó:Lō Téméxw: a Narrative Approach to Transforming Intergenerational White Settler Subjectivities
    From Xwelítem Ways Towards Practices of Ethical Being in Stó:lō Téméxw: A Narrative Approach to Transforming Intergenerational White Settler Subjectivities by Robyn Heaslip Master of Resource Management, Simon Fraser University, 2008 Bachelor of Science, University of Victoria, 2003 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Indigenous Governance © Robyn Heaslip, 2017 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee From Xwelítem Ways Towards Practices of Ethical Being in Stó:lō Téméxw: A Narrative Approach to Transforming Intergenerational White Settler Subjectivities by Robyn Heaslip Master of Resource Management, Simon Fraser University, 2008 Bachelor of Science, University of Victoria, 2003 Supervisory Committee Dr. Taiaiake Alfred, Indigenous Governance Program Supervisor Dr. Jeff Corntassel, Indigenous Governance Program Departmental Member Dr. Wenona Hall, Indigenous Studies, History, and Criminology Additional Member Dr. James Tully, Political Science, Law, Philosophy and Indigenous Governance Outside Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. Taiaiake Alfred, Indigenous Governance Program Supervisor Dr. Jeff Corntassel, Indigenous Governance Program Departmental Member Dr. Wenona Hall, Indigenous Studies, History and Criminology Additional Member Dr. James Tully, Political Science, Law, Philosophy and Indigenous Governance Outside Member What must we transform in ourselves as white settlers to become open to the possibility of ethical, respectful, authentic relationships with Indigenous peoples and Indigenous lands? Situating this research in Stó:lō Téméxw (Stó:lō lands/world) and in relationships with Stó:lō people, this question has become an effort to understand what it means to be xwelítem and how white settlers might transform xwelítem ways of being towards more ethical ways of being.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecovillages Around the World
    INSIDE THE GLOBAL ECOVILLAGE MOVEMENT Life in Cooperative Culture ECOVILLAGES around the World Local Solutions for Global Problems • Ecovillage Strategies in Areas of Crisis Creating Carbon-Negative Communities • True Sustainability: Indigenous Pathways Cohousing as a Building Block to the Ecovillage Summer 2016 • Issue #171 $7.00 / $8.00 Canada communities.ic.org SUBSCRIBE TO COMMUNITIES MAGAZINE Your source for the latest information, issues, and ideas about intentional communities and cooperative living today! Each issue is focused around a theme: • Ecovillages around the World • Finding or Starting a Community • Community and the Law • Food and Community • Community for Baby Boomers • Technology: Friend or Foe? • Business Ventures in Community • Gender Issues • Renewable Energy • Youth in Community • Diversity • Spirituality • Permaculture • Right Livelihood ... • Reach listings—helping communities looking for people and people looking for communities find each other. love Communities magazine. I’ve read and kept every issue ommunity has to be the future if we are to survive. Communities I since 1972. Deciding to be communal is the best decision Cplays such a critical role in moving this bit of necessary culture I’ve ever made in my life. Communities has been there from change along. Thank you Communities for beating the drum and the beginning. helping us see. — , The Cohousing Company, McCamant & Durrett Architects —Patch Adams, M.D., author and founder of the Gesundheit Institute Chuck Durrett ur mission at Utne Reader is to search high and low for new or more than 40 years Communities has done an outstanding Fjob of promoting the communitarian spirit to a public in need of Oideas and fresh perspectives that aim to start conversations and that message, as well as serving intentional communities and other cure ignorance.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Submission to NEB 15-05-27 Final
    Hearing order OH - 001 – 2014 Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Written submission Yarrow Ecovillage May 27, 2015 Table of Contents I. Introduction and overview ............................................................................. 3 1.1 Brief history of the Yarrow Ecovillage ................................................................ 3 1.2 Components of the Ecovillage (interrelationships) ......................................... 4 II. NEB Issues #6, #7, #11, #12 .......................................................................... 5 2.1 General route and land requirements (issue #6) ............................................... 5 2.1.1 Severe risk and threat to organic certification ................................................. 6 2.1.2 Disruption of critical waste water treatment system ........................................ 7 2.1.3 Disruption of irrigation system ......................................................................... 7 2.1.4 Disruption of hothouse operations .................................................................. 7 2. 2 Suitability of the design of the proposed project (issue #7) ........................... 9 2.3 Contingency planning for spills, accidents or malfunctions during construction and operation of the project (issue #11) ............................................ 9 2.4 Safety and security during construction of the proposed project and operation of the project, including emergency response planning and third- party damage prevention. (issue #12) .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NEB Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion Hearing Transcript, Vol
    NATIONAL ENERGY BOARD OFFICE NATIONAL DE L’ÉNERGIE Hearing Order OH-001-2014 Ordonnance d’audience OH-001-2014 Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Trans Mountain Expansion Project Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Projet d’agrandissement du réseau de Trans Mountain VOLUME 33 Hearing held at L’audience tenue à Delta Burnaby Hotel and Conference Centre 2nd floor, 4331 Dominion Street Burnaby, British Columbia January 27, 2016 Le 27 janvier 2016 International Reporting Inc. Ottawa, Ontario (613) 748-6043 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2016 © Sa Majesté du Chef du Canada 2016 as represented by the National Energy Board représentée par l’Office national de l’énergie This publication is the recorded verbatim transcript Cette publication est un compte rendu textuel des and, as such, is taped and transcribed in either of the délibérations et, en tant que tel, est enregistrée et official languages, depending on the languages transcrite dans l’une ou l’autre des deux langues spoken by the participant at the public hearing. officielles, compte tenu de la langue utilisée par le participant à l’audience publique. Printed in Canada Imprimé au Canada HEARING ORDER/ORDONNANCE D’AUDIENCE OH-001-2014 IN THE MATTER OF Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Application for the Trans Mountain Expansion Project HEARING LOCATION/LIEU DE L'AUDIENCE Hearing held in Burnaby, British Columbia, Wednesday, January 27, 2016 Audience tenue à Burnaby (Colombie-Britannique), mercredi, le 27 janvier 2016 BOARD PANEL/COMITÉ D'AUDIENCE DE L'OFFICE D. Hamilton Chairman/Président P. Davies Member/Membre A. Scott Member/Membre Transcript Hearing Order OH-001-2014 APPEARANCES/COMPARUTIONS Applicant/Demandeur Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC - Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Yarrow Ecovillage Opening Statement NEB Re-Review Of
    The National Energy Board’s TMX Reconsideration Opening Statement by the Yarrow Ecovillage 2018-14–05 It is our understanding that this reconsideration review by the National Energy Board, of Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion, was ordered by cabinet in relation to the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal released on August 30, 2018. (Tsleil-Waututh Nation et al. v. Attorney General of Canada et al., 2018 FCA 153). A succinct overview of the findings of the Court are contained in the Federal Court of Appeal’s (unofficial) Executive Summary: “The validity of the Order in Council was challenged on two main grounds: first, the Board’s process and findings were so flawed that the Governor in Council could not reasonably rely on the Board’s report; second, the Government of Canada failed to fulfil the legal duty to consult Indigenous peoples. The Court accepted both grounds.” ( http://www.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/pdf/ Executive_Summary_Trans_Mountain_(English)_clean.pdf Our concern is with the first of the two grounds stated above: “…The unjustified exclusion of project-related marine shipping from the definition of the project rendered the Board’s report impermissibly flawed: the report did not give the Governor in Council the information and assessments it needed in order to properly assess the public interest, including the project’s environmental effects…” (Ibid.) We are part of a bioregion here in the Lower Mainland. This bioregion extends from the Salish Sea to the Eastern Fraser Valley. We are also part of the larger Fraser River watershed which has its headwaters near Mount Robson in Northeastern British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Environmental Practices and Impacts Of
    ASSESSING THE ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICES AND IMPACTS OF INTENTIONAL COMMUNITIES: AN ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT COMPARISON OF AN ECOVILLAGE AND COHOUSING COMMUNITY IN SOUTHWESTERN BRITISH COLUMBIA by WALEED GIRATALLA B.Sc., The University of Alberta, 2004 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in PLANNING in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) October 2010 © Waleed Giratalla, 2010 Abstract The ecological footprint of the average Canadian is three times greater than the global per capita biocapacity of the planet. The purpose of this research is to gain insights from intentional communities on how to reduce household ecological footprints in Canada. Intentional community is an inclusive term for a variety of community types, including ecovillages and cohousing, where residents have come together to achieve a common purpose. Studies show that intentional communities have per capita ecological footprints that are less than those of conventional communities. I corroborate these findings through my own ecological footprint analyses of Quayside Village and OUR Ecovillage, in southwestern British Columbia. These communities have per capita ecological footprints that are smaller than some conventional averages. Overall, Quayside Village and OUR Ecovillage also have comparatively similar per capita ecological footprints, suggesting that residents of both urban and rural intentional communities may demonstrate similar environmental behaviours. Intentional community living is currently confined to small‐scale grassroots initiatives so even the aggregate environmental benefits are insignificant. Municipalities and land developers can help to advance the pro‐environmental practices of intentional communities by increasing incentives for this community model and adapting intentional community practices to a conventional context.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Introduction Volumes 1 and 2 in this series address how to find your place in intentional community by either creating or joining one. But how can this experience—and communities themselves—last past the “honeymoon” phase? How can groups turn long-term ideals into reality within their lives together? A combination of “soft” and “hard” skills and systems must be present for intentional communities and their members to endure, evolve, and thrive. Sustainability in both human and ecological relationships is key to developing a cooperative culture that lasts— and is the focus of Wisdom of Communities Volumes 3 and 4. The stories in this final volume focus on the “hard,” practical skills and approaches that allow communitarians to live more ecologically now while preparing for the future. Authors share experiences, tools, advice, and perspectives that will benefit anyone who wants to help their community endure through changing local and planetary conditions. Articles explore the nuts and bolts of developing eco-resilience: food, water, and permaculture; shelter and eco-building; energy and ecological footprint; ecovillage design and implementation; eco-education; and finding resilience in cooperative culture. These areas will prove more and more essential in allowing communities to navigate changing circumstances on our planet while growing into new, regenerative ways of living. Learning about these “hard” sustainability skills from others engaged in similar work can help communities immeasurably. All articles are drawn from the past decade of Communities magazine. For this volume we drew heavily from our specifically eco-themed issues, of which we publish at least one a year. Some of these issues proved so popular that they are out of print and available (until now) only digitally.
    [Show full text]
  • Gen-International
    GEN – connecting communities for a sustainable world GEN-INTERNATIONAL Annual Report 2013 The Global Ecovillage Network is a registered charity: SC043796 and has consultative status in the UN – ECOSOC. WEB: GEN International, GEN Europe, CASA, GENOA, GEN Africa, Next GEN GEN – connecting communities for a sustainable world GENERAL INDEX I. Global Dimension – GEN-International Message from GEN International President ………………………………………….………...3 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………...6 Organization…………………………………………………………………………………………..6 - Organizational Chart 1……………………………………………………………………..8 - Organizational Chart 2……………………………………………………………………...9 - Priorities, strategic goals, targets…………………………………………………………10 - Adaptative Governance Cycle …………………………………………………………12 - Friends Of GEN……………………………………………………………………………….13 - More Info: Link to Resources ………….………………………………………....………..18 II. Global Dimension – Reports from Regions GEN-Africa…………………………………….………………………………………….……….....16 Council of sustainable Settlements of the Americas (CASA)………………………….…...25 Ecovillage Network of America (ENA) and of Canada (ENC) ……………………………33 GEN-Europe………………………………….………………………………………….…………...44 GEN Oceania & Asia (GENOA)…………………………………………………………............53 NextGEN…………………………………….………………………………………………………..62 III. GEN Information Services: Information Technology Overview 2013……………………………………………………....70 III. Financial Dimension - Financial Report 2013 Overview Gaia Trust Grants 2013………………………………………………………………..80 Financial Report Global Ecovillage Network (GEN International)………………………..81
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Agenda
    REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN REGIONAL AGRICULTURAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, January 23, 2014 6:00 pm REGULAR AGENDA A. ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR B. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 1. Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee Meeting – January 23, 2014 (Opportunity for Introduction of Late Items) RECOMMENDATION 1 That the agenda of the January 23, 2014 regular meeting of the Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee be approved as presented. C. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 1. Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee Meeting – November 21, 2013 RECOMMENDATION 2 Page 1 That the minutes of the November 21, 2013 meeting of the Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee be adopted as circulated. D. DELEGATIONS 1. Upland Consulting Group Ione Smith Agricultural Area Plan E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Agricultural Land Commission Application GODDARD, Gwyllyn c/o Simpson Notary [File No. 13-0412-D-ALR] - Application dated November 14, 2013 FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT Page 5 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee Agenda – Regular - 2 - January 23, 2014 2. Zoning Text Amendment Bylaw No. 2589, 2013 [Agri-Tourism Accommodation Provisions] - Staff report dated, 2013 FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT Page 92 3. Zoning Text Amendment Bylaw No. 2592, 2013 [Secondary Suites] - Staff report dated, 2013 FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT Page 102 4. Zoning Text Amendment Bylaw No. 2606, 2013 [Medical Marihuana Production Facilities - Staff report dated, 2013 FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT Page 108 F. BUSINESS ARISING FROM DELEGATIONS 1. Upland Consulting Group G. ADJOURNMENT RAAC - REGULAR AGENDA January 23, 2014 - ITEM C.1 REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN MINUTES of a REGULAR meeting of the REGIONAL AGRICULTURAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE held in the Board Room at the Regional District Office on Thursday, November 21, 2013 Members: Director M.
    [Show full text]