DOCSLIB.ORG

Written Submission to NEB 15-05-27 Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Written Submission to NEB 15-05-27 Final Hearing order OH - 001 – 2014 Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Written submission Yarrow Ecovillage May 27, 2015 Table of Contents I. Introduction and overview ............................................................................. 3 1.1 Brief history of the Yarrow Ecovillage ................................................................ 3 1.2 Components of the Ecovillage (interrelationships) ......................................... 4 II. NEB Issues #6, #7, #11, #12 .......................................................................... 5 2.1 General route and land requirements (issue #6) ............................................... 5 2.1.1 Severe risk and threat to organic certification ................................................. 6 2.1.2 Disruption of critical waste water treatment system ........................................ 7 2.1.3 Disruption of irrigation system ......................................................................... 7 2.1.4 Disruption of hothouse operations .................................................................. 7 2. 2 Suitability of the design of the proposed project (issue #7) ........................... 9 2.3 Contingency planning for spills, accidents or malfunctions during construction and operation of the project (issue #11) ............................................ 9 2.4 Safety and security during construction of the proposed project and operation of the project, including emergency response planning and third- party damage prevention. (issue #12) ...................................................................... 9 2.4.1 Trans Mountain has not provided adequate emergency services ................. 10 2.4.2 Local First responders not adequately qualified ............................................ 10 III. NEB Issues #3, #4, #10 ............................................................................... 12 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 12 3.2 Field and soil disturbance ................................................................................. 12 3.3 Biodiversity and pest control ........................................................................... 14 3.4 Organic Certification, Branding, and Marketing ............................................. 15 3.4.1 Organic Certification ....................................................................................... 15 3.4.2 Branding and Marketing ................................................................................. 16 3.5 Other concerns .................................................................................................. 18 3.5.1 Access ........................................................................................................... 18 3.5.2 Contamination during construction ................................................................. 18 3.5.3 Spills ............................................................................................................... 18 3.6 The specific values and importance of the Ecovillage site to farmers ........ 18 3.6.1 Access and Stability ....................................................................................... 19 3.6.2 Permaculture .................................................................................................. 20 3.7 Amenity landscape values ................................................................................ 21 3.8 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 24 3.9 Works Cited ........................................................................................................ 24 IV. Appendices ................................................................................................. 29 4.1 Yarrow EcoVillage Vision, Principles and Strategies ..................................... 29 4.2 Map of South Field ............................................................................................. 33 4.3 Yarrow Ecovillage Information Request 2014-05-12 ....................................... 34 4.4 Selected sections for reference from CAN/CGSB-32.310-2006, Organic Production Systems General Principles and Management Standards ............... 36 4.5 Biographies of Researchers .............................................................................. 39 Hearing order OH - 001 – 2014 Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Written submission Yarrow Ecovillage May 27, 2015 I. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 1.1 Brief history of the Yarrow Ecovillage In 2002 a group of people purchased a twenty-five acre (ten hectare) property in Yarrow, a small rural edge community within the boundaries of Chilliwack, B.C. The intent of the founding group was to create a sustainable community. In August, 2002 the group incorporated as the Yarrow Ecovillage Society (YES) Cooperative. At a workshop that Fall, the members of the cooperative established their “Vision, Principles and Strategies,” to guide sustainable development. The group also initiated a consultation process with the local community and the City of Chilliwack to develop and refine their plans. In 2003 members of the cooperative started an organic farm, which was granted “third year transitional organic” status. The farm was granted full organic status in 2004. In July, 2004 a small parcel at the front (north) of the property was rezoned “Commercial (C2) to enable mixed use (commercial/residential) development. In 2006 the remainder of the five acres outside the Agricultural Land Reserve was rezoned from “Rural Residential” to “Ecovillage” (EV) zoning. The zone description permitted up to 50 residences, cottage industries, and retail businesses on the five-acre parcel. The mayor announced that this was the first such zoning in Canada. In 2008 a construction loan was granted by Vancity Capital Corporation and construction began on two duplexes using green building methods. A third duplex and two domes were added as part of that phase. In 2010 Charles Durrett, an internationally-renown cohousing consultant, was hired to complete the first cohousing development. That year, the Cooperative approved subdivision of the property into three entities: The twenty acre organic farm, a strata-titled cohousing development on 2.3 acres and a future mixed use development including businesses, a second cohousing community and a learning centre on 1.7 acres. Groundswell Cohousing, consisting of thirty-three strata-titled units, was completed in 2014. Hearing order OH - 001 – 2014 Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC: Written submission - Yarrow Ecovillage The vision of the Yarrow Ecovillage from 2002 has, at its core, supporting the growth of sustainable community where people can live and work and be relatively self-sufficient into the foreseeable future. The vision is as follows: “A community living and working in harmony with neighbours and nature.”1 The Ecovillage community has grown to nearly one hundred people in 2014 with the completion of eighteen cohousing units, added to the previously-built fifteen units. The ecovillage community is a response to threats of peri-urbanization2 to rural edge communities. It is a positive example of medium density housing clustered so as to retain needed agricultural land. The City of Chilliwack gave Canada’s first designated “ecovillage zoning” to the Yarrow Ecovillage, recognizing the importance of respectful land use, and unique sustainable waste water treatment. Research has shown that intentional communities are an important aspect of sustainable development diffusion. As Dale, Ling and Newman (2010) conclude in their study of thirty-five communities formed with sustainable development goals: “Community vitality both provides the needed resilience to weather social, economic, and environmental change, and also provides a site for innovation where problems can be addressed iteratively with a process- based approach through the active engagement of diverse social actors. Community vitality, however, has been badly damaged in the industrial world by the suburbanization of the second half of the twentieth century.3 1.2 Components of the Ecovillage (interrelationships) Two key components of the Ecovillage, which are put at risk by the proposed expansion, are the organic farms, which form the backbone of the Ecovillage, and the people who live in close proximity to the proposed bitumin-carrying pipeline, including thirty-five children. The Ecovillage is comprised of many young families who have made their homes at this location with the intention of creating a healthy cooperative environment for raising their young children. Industrial disruption in the form of the proposed pipeline expansion not only threatens the livelihood of many farmers, it also negatively affects all the 1 Yarrow Ecovillage. “Vision, Principles and Strategies,” (see Section 4.1). 2 Peri-urbanisation relates to those processes of dispersive urban growth that creates hybrid landscapes of fragmented urban and rural characteristics.—Wikipedia 3 Ann Dale, Chris. Ling and Lenore. Newman (2010). “Community Vitality: The Role of Community-Level Resilience Adaptation and Innovation in Sustainable Development.” Sustainability, 2, 228; doi:10.3390/su2010215 http://crcresearch.org/sites/default/files/u641/sustainability-02-00215.pdf 15/05/12 4 Hearing order OH - 001 – 2014 Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC: Written submission - Yarrow Ecovillage residents of the Ecovillage, it is further inimical to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eco-Collaboration Between Higher Education and Ecovillages A
    Partnerships for Sustainability: Eco-Collaboration between Higher Education and Ecovillages A PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Kiernan Jeanette Gladman IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF LIBERAL STUDIES February 2014 ©Kiernan Jeanette Gladman 2014 For John May the soles of our shoes wear down together. i Paradise (John Prine) When I was a child, my family would travel Down to western Kentucky where my parents were born And there's a backwards old town that's often remembered So many times that my memories are worn Chorus: And Daddy, won't you take me back to Muhlenberg County Down by the Green River where Paradise lay Well, I'm sorry, my son, but you're too late in asking Mister Peabody's coal train has hauled it away Well sometimes we'd travel right down the Green River To the abandoned old prison down by Adrie Hill Where the air smelled like snakes and we'd shoot with our pistols But empty pop bottles was all we would kill Chorus And the coal company came with the world's largest shovel And they tortured the timber and stripped all the land Well, they dug for their coal till the land was forsaken Then they wrote it all down as the progress of man Chorus When I die let my ashes float down the Green River Let my soul roll on up to the Rochester dam I'll be halfway to Heaven with Paradise waitin' Just five miles away from wherever I am Chorus ii CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Introduction In Creating a Life Together, Diana Leafe Christian estimates that 90 percent of attempts to start an intentional community do not survive past the initial stages. Similarly, many personal searches for intentional community fizzle out due to lack of adequate information, guidance, or exposure to fellow travelers’ stories. In both cases, ignorance of the wide array of options possible, and of the breadth of resources and support available through the Fellowship for Intentional Community and allied groups, undoubtedly contributes to the “failure” rate. This volume on “Starting a Community” and the next volume in this series, on “Finding a Community,” address the need for one-stop collections of stories to help founders and seekers. They are meant to complement the Communities Directory (available in print and online: ic.org/directory), COMMUNITIES magazine, a quarterly publication focused on Life in Cooperative Culture, and educational resources available through Community Bookstore (ic.org/bookstore). These books should broaden anyone’s outlook on what is possible and how to pursue their dreams of community. Within each section we hear from a range of voices spanning a great diversity of perspectives and experiences. In this volume, following more general “overview” articles, we dive into on-the-ground stories from founders, arranged roughly chronologically, followed by a separate roughly chronological flow about experiences of community that don’t fit the classic intentional community definition but are nonetheless powerful for their creators and participants. Most articles are drawn from the past decade of COMMUNITIES magazine, with several excerpted from the Communities Directory and a few from older issues of COMMUNITIES that were also excerpted in our Best of collections, Volumes I and II.
    [Show full text]
  • Sweden and Kollektivhus NU, [email protected] Kollektivhuskonf2010:Layout 1 10-09-08 00.50 Sida 5
    Kollektivhuskonf2010:Layout 1 10-09-08 00.49 Sida 1 Living together – Cohousing Ideas and Realities Around the World Kollektivhuskonf2010:Layout 1 10-09-08 00.49 Sida 2 Kollektivhuskonf2010:Layout 1 10-09-08 00.49 Sida 3 Div of Urban and Regional Studies Living together – Cohousing Ideas and Realities Around the World Proceedings from the international collaborative housing conference in Stockholm 5–9 May 2010 DICK URBAN VESTBRO (editor) Report Division of Urban and Regional Studies, Royal Institute of Technology in collaboration with Kollektivhus NU Stockholm 2010 Kollektivhuskonf2010:Layout 1 10-09-08 00.50 Sida 4 Living together – Cohousing Ideas and Realities Around the World Proceedings from the international collaborative housing conference in Stockholm 5–9 May 2010 Report Division of Urban and Regional Studies in collaboration with Kollektivhus NU. Keywords: Cohousing, housing policy, communal living, eco-villages, demographic change The International Collaborative Housing Conference was supported by the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning, Formas, and the housing companies shown below. Research grant Other sponsors Main sponsor Kollektivhuset Trädet, Göteborg © Division of Urban and Regional Studies, KTH, and Kollektivhus NU, 2010. Cover photo by Charles Durrett Graphic design: Ingrid Sillén, Migra Grafiska TRITA-SoM 2010-09 ISSN 1653-6126 ISRN KTH-SoM/R-10-09/SE ISBN: 978-91-7415-738-3 Printed by: Universitetsservice US AB, Stockholm 2010 Distribution: Division of Urban and Regional
    [Show full text]
  • From Xwelítem Ways Towards Practices of Ethical Being in Stó:Lō Téméxw: a Narrative Approach to Transforming Intergenerational White Settler Subjectivities
    From Xwelítem Ways Towards Practices of Ethical Being in Stó:lō Téméxw: A Narrative Approach to Transforming Intergenerational White Settler Subjectivities by Robyn Heaslip Master of Resource Management, Simon Fraser University, 2008 Bachelor of Science, University of Victoria, 2003 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Indigenous Governance © Robyn Heaslip, 2017 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee From Xwelítem Ways Towards Practices of Ethical Being in Stó:lō Téméxw: A Narrative Approach to Transforming Intergenerational White Settler Subjectivities by Robyn Heaslip Master of Resource Management, Simon Fraser University, 2008 Bachelor of Science, University of Victoria, 2003 Supervisory Committee Dr. Taiaiake Alfred, Indigenous Governance Program Supervisor Dr. Jeff Corntassel, Indigenous Governance Program Departmental Member Dr. Wenona Hall, Indigenous Studies, History, and Criminology Additional Member Dr. James Tully, Political Science, Law, Philosophy and Indigenous Governance Outside Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. Taiaiake Alfred, Indigenous Governance Program Supervisor Dr. Jeff Corntassel, Indigenous Governance Program Departmental Member Dr. Wenona Hall, Indigenous Studies, History and Criminology Additional Member Dr. James Tully, Political Science, Law, Philosophy and Indigenous Governance Outside Member What must we transform in ourselves as white settlers to become open to the possibility of ethical, respectful, authentic relationships with Indigenous peoples and Indigenous lands? Situating this research in Stó:lō Téméxw (Stó:lō lands/world) and in relationships with Stó:lō people, this question has become an effort to understand what it means to be xwelítem and how white settlers might transform xwelítem ways of being towards more ethical ways of being.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecovillages Around the World
    INSIDE THE GLOBAL ECOVILLAGE MOVEMENT Life in Cooperative Culture ECOVILLAGES around the World Local Solutions for Global Problems • Ecovillage Strategies in Areas of Crisis Creating Carbon-Negative Communities • True Sustainability: Indigenous Pathways Cohousing as a Building Block to the Ecovillage Summer 2016 • Issue #171 $7.00 / $8.00 Canada communities.ic.org SUBSCRIBE TO COMMUNITIES MAGAZINE Your source for the latest information, issues, and ideas about intentional communities and cooperative living today! Each issue is focused around a theme: • Ecovillages around the World • Finding or Starting a Community • Community and the Law • Food and Community • Community for Baby Boomers • Technology: Friend or Foe? • Business Ventures in Community • Gender Issues • Renewable Energy • Youth in Community • Diversity • Spirituality • Permaculture • Right Livelihood ... • Reach listings—helping communities looking for people and people looking for communities find each other. love Communities magazine. I’ve read and kept every issue ommunity has to be the future if we are to survive. Communities I since 1972. Deciding to be communal is the best decision Cplays such a critical role in moving this bit of necessary culture I’ve ever made in my life. Communities has been there from change along. Thank you Communities for beating the drum and the beginning. helping us see. — , The Cohousing Company, McCamant & Durrett Architects —Patch Adams, M.D., author and founder of the Gesundheit Institute Chuck Durrett ur mission at Utne Reader is to search high and low for new or more than 40 years Communities has done an outstanding Fjob of promoting the communitarian spirit to a public in need of Oideas and fresh perspectives that aim to start conversations and that message, as well as serving intentional communities and other cure ignorance.
    [Show full text]
  • NEB Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion Hearing Transcript, Vol
    NATIONAL ENERGY BOARD OFFICE NATIONAL DE L’ÉNERGIE Hearing Order OH-001-2014 Ordonnance d’audience OH-001-2014 Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Trans Mountain Expansion Project Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Projet d’agrandissement du réseau de Trans Mountain VOLUME 33 Hearing held at L’audience tenue à Delta Burnaby Hotel and Conference Centre 2nd floor, 4331 Dominion Street Burnaby, British Columbia January 27, 2016 Le 27 janvier 2016 International Reporting Inc. Ottawa, Ontario (613) 748-6043 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2016 © Sa Majesté du Chef du Canada 2016 as represented by the National Energy Board représentée par l’Office national de l’énergie This publication is the recorded verbatim transcript Cette publication est un compte rendu textuel des and, as such, is taped and transcribed in either of the délibérations et, en tant que tel, est enregistrée et official languages, depending on the languages transcrite dans l’une ou l’autre des deux langues spoken by the participant at the public hearing. officielles, compte tenu de la langue utilisée par le participant à l’audience publique. Printed in Canada Imprimé au Canada HEARING ORDER/ORDONNANCE D’AUDIENCE OH-001-2014 IN THE MATTER OF Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Application for the Trans Mountain Expansion Project HEARING LOCATION/LIEU DE L'AUDIENCE Hearing held in Burnaby, British Columbia, Wednesday, January 27, 2016 Audience tenue à Burnaby (Colombie-Britannique), mercredi, le 27 janvier 2016 BOARD PANEL/COMITÉ D'AUDIENCE DE L'OFFICE D. Hamilton Chairman/Président P. Davies Member/Membre A. Scott Member/Membre Transcript Hearing Order OH-001-2014 APPEARANCES/COMPARUTIONS Applicant/Demandeur Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC - Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Yarrow Ecovillage Opening Statement NEB Re-Review Of
    The National Energy Board’s TMX Reconsideration Opening Statement by the Yarrow Ecovillage 2018-14–05 It is our understanding that this reconsideration review by the National Energy Board, of Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion, was ordered by cabinet in relation to the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal released on August 30, 2018. (Tsleil-Waututh Nation et al. v. Attorney General of Canada et al., 2018 FCA 153). A succinct overview of the findings of the Court are contained in the Federal Court of Appeal’s (unofficial) Executive Summary: “The validity of the Order in Council was challenged on two main grounds: first, the Board’s process and findings were so flawed that the Governor in Council could not reasonably rely on the Board’s report; second, the Government of Canada failed to fulfil the legal duty to consult Indigenous peoples. The Court accepted both grounds.” ( http://www.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/pdf/ Executive_Summary_Trans_Mountain_(English)_clean.pdf Our concern is with the first of the two grounds stated above: “…The unjustified exclusion of project-related marine shipping from the definition of the project rendered the Board’s report impermissibly flawed: the report did not give the Governor in Council the information and assessments it needed in order to properly assess the public interest, including the project’s environmental effects…” (Ibid.) We are part of a bioregion here in the Lower Mainland. This bioregion extends from the Salish Sea to the Eastern Fraser Valley. We are also part of the larger Fraser River watershed which has its headwaters near Mount Robson in Northeastern British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Environmental Practices and Impacts Of
    ASSESSING THE ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICES AND IMPACTS OF INTENTIONAL COMMUNITIES: AN ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT COMPARISON OF AN ECOVILLAGE AND COHOUSING COMMUNITY IN SOUTHWESTERN BRITISH COLUMBIA by WALEED GIRATALLA B.Sc., The University of Alberta, 2004 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in PLANNING in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) October 2010 © Waleed Giratalla, 2010 Abstract The ecological footprint of the average Canadian is three times greater than the global per capita biocapacity of the planet. The purpose of this research is to gain insights from intentional communities on how to reduce household ecological footprints in Canada. Intentional community is an inclusive term for a variety of community types, including ecovillages and cohousing, where residents have come together to achieve a common purpose. Studies show that intentional communities have per capita ecological footprints that are less than those of conventional communities. I corroborate these findings through my own ecological footprint analyses of Quayside Village and OUR Ecovillage, in southwestern British Columbia. These communities have per capita ecological footprints that are smaller than some conventional averages. Overall, Quayside Village and OUR Ecovillage also have comparatively similar per capita ecological footprints, suggesting that residents of both urban and rural intentional communities may demonstrate similar environmental behaviours. Intentional community living is currently confined to small‐scale grassroots initiatives so even the aggregate environmental benefits are insignificant. Municipalities and land developers can help to advance the pro‐environmental practices of intentional communities by increasing incentives for this community model and adapting intentional community practices to a conventional context.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Introduction Volumes 1 and 2 in this series address how to find your place in intentional community by either creating or joining one. But how can this experience—and communities themselves—last past the “honeymoon” phase? How can groups turn long-term ideals into reality within their lives together? A combination of “soft” and “hard” skills and systems must be present for intentional communities and their members to endure, evolve, and thrive. Sustainability in both human and ecological relationships is key to developing a cooperative culture that lasts— and is the focus of Wisdom of Communities Volumes 3 and 4. The stories in this final volume focus on the “hard,” practical skills and approaches that allow communitarians to live more ecologically now while preparing for the future. Authors share experiences, tools, advice, and perspectives that will benefit anyone who wants to help their community endure through changing local and planetary conditions. Articles explore the nuts and bolts of developing eco-resilience: food, water, and permaculture; shelter and eco-building; energy and ecological footprint; ecovillage design and implementation; eco-education; and finding resilience in cooperative culture. These areas will prove more and more essential in allowing communities to navigate changing circumstances on our planet while growing into new, regenerative ways of living. Learning about these “hard” sustainability skills from others engaged in similar work can help communities immeasurably. All articles are drawn from the past decade of Communities magazine. For this volume we drew heavily from our specifically eco-themed issues, of which we publish at least one a year. Some of these issues proved so popular that they are out of print and available (until now) only digitally.
    [Show full text]
  • Gen-International
    GEN – connecting communities for a sustainable world GEN-INTERNATIONAL Annual Report 2013 The Global Ecovillage Network is a registered charity: SC043796 and has consultative status in the UN – ECOSOC. WEB: GEN International, GEN Europe, CASA, GENOA, GEN Africa, Next GEN GEN – connecting communities for a sustainable world GENERAL INDEX I. Global Dimension – GEN-International Message from GEN International President ………………………………………….………...3 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………...6 Organization…………………………………………………………………………………………..6 - Organizational Chart 1……………………………………………………………………..8 - Organizational Chart 2……………………………………………………………………...9 - Priorities, strategic goals, targets…………………………………………………………10 - Adaptative Governance Cycle …………………………………………………………12 - Friends Of GEN……………………………………………………………………………….13 - More Info: Link to Resources ………….………………………………………....………..18 II. Global Dimension – Reports from Regions GEN-Africa…………………………………….………………………………………….……….....16 Council of sustainable Settlements of the Americas (CASA)………………………….…...25 Ecovillage Network of America (ENA) and of Canada (ENC) ……………………………33 GEN-Europe………………………………….………………………………………….…………...44 GEN Oceania & Asia (GENOA)…………………………………………………………............53 NextGEN…………………………………….………………………………………………………..62 III. GEN Information Services: Information Technology Overview 2013……………………………………………………....70 III. Financial Dimension - Financial Report 2013 Overview Gaia Trust Grants 2013………………………………………………………………..80 Financial Report Global Ecovillage Network (GEN International)………………………..81
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Agenda
    REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN REGIONAL AGRICULTURAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, January 23, 2014 6:00 pm REGULAR AGENDA A. ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR B. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 1. Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee Meeting – January 23, 2014 (Opportunity for Introduction of Late Items) RECOMMENDATION 1 That the agenda of the January 23, 2014 regular meeting of the Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee be approved as presented. C. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 1. Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee Meeting – November 21, 2013 RECOMMENDATION 2 Page 1 That the minutes of the November 21, 2013 meeting of the Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee be adopted as circulated. D. DELEGATIONS 1. Upland Consulting Group Ione Smith Agricultural Area Plan E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Agricultural Land Commission Application GODDARD, Gwyllyn c/o Simpson Notary [File No. 13-0412-D-ALR] - Application dated November 14, 2013 FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT Page 5 Regional Agricultural Advisory Committee Agenda – Regular - 2 - January 23, 2014 2. Zoning Text Amendment Bylaw No. 2589, 2013 [Agri-Tourism Accommodation Provisions] - Staff report dated, 2013 FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT Page 92 3. Zoning Text Amendment Bylaw No. 2592, 2013 [Secondary Suites] - Staff report dated, 2013 FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT Page 102 4. Zoning Text Amendment Bylaw No. 2606, 2013 [Medical Marihuana Production Facilities - Staff report dated, 2013 FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT Page 108 F. BUSINESS ARISING FROM DELEGATIONS 1. Upland Consulting Group G. ADJOURNMENT RAAC - REGULAR AGENDA January 23, 2014 - ITEM C.1 REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN MINUTES of a REGULAR meeting of the REGIONAL AGRICULTURAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE held in the Board Room at the Regional District Office on Thursday, November 21, 2013 Members: Director M.
    [Show full text]
  • Elderberry Senior Cohousing Chillwack, BC
    Housing Study: Elderberry Senior Cohousing Chillwack, BC Prepared By M’akola Development Services October, 2014 M’akola Development Services (MDS) is a member of the M’akola Group of Societies. Incorporated in 1988, Mis’Kow’aao has provided development and project management services for over 30 affordable housing projects for aboriginal and non-aboriginal clients. Contact Information: Kevin Albers, Chief Executive Officer [email protected] (250) 880-1666 Kaela Schramm, Development Services Planner [email protected] (778) 677-8843 ii Table of Contents Introduction . 3 Cohousing . 3 Scope of Study . 4 Study Area . 5 Population . 7 Housing and Income . 8 Senior Cohousing Need and Demand . 12 Conclusion. 17 iii This Page is Intentionally Left Blank iv Executive Summary In this report, the need and demand for senior cohousing in the Chilliwack area is explored by examining current community and housing profiles, as well as by examining total and senior population projections over the next decade. We also research and explicate the benefits of senior cohousing in contrast to other continuums of care by identifying the limitations of current service provisions for seniors in the Chilliwack area. After reviewing all of the data, it is clear that the total and senior population of the City of Chilliwack is increasing, as it is across Canada as the “baby boomer” generation ages. In addition, based on past growth patterns, population projections indicate that the population will continue to growth over the next decade. Senior cohousing provides cost-effective solutions to healthy aging in place. Moreover, cohousing supports physical and emotional security, as well as a sense of community, or of belonging.
    [Show full text]