DOCSLIB.ORG

Forensic Science Assessments: a Quality and Gap Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

REPORT 2 09/15/2017 FORENSICSCIENCE ASSESSMENTS A Quality and Gap Analysis Latent Fingerprint Examination AUTHORS: William Thompson, John Black, Anil Jain and Joseph Kadane CONTRIBUTING AAAS STAFF: Deborah Runkle, Michelle Barretta and Mark S. Frankel The report Latent Fingerprint Examination is part of the project Forensic Science Assessments: A Quality and Gap Analysis. The opinions, findings, recommendations expressed in the report are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the official positions or policies of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. © 2017 AAAS This material may be freely reproduced with attribution. Published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science Scientific Responsibility, Human Rights, and Law Program 1200 New York Ave NW, Washington DC 20005 United States The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) is the world’s largest general scientific society and publisher of the Science family of journals. Science has the largest paid circulation of any peer-reviewed general science journal in the world. AAAS was founded in 1848 and includes nearly 250 affiliated societies and academies of sciences, serving 10 million individuals. The non-profit AAAS is open to all and fulfills its mission to “advance science and serve society” through initiatives in science policy, international programs, science education, public engagement, and more. Cite as: AAAS, Forensic Science Assessments: A Quality and Gap Analysis- Latent Fingerprint Examination, (Report prepared by William Thompson, John Black, Anil Jain, and Joseph Kadane), September 2017. DOI: 10.1126/srhrl.aag2874 i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AAAS is especially grateful to the Latent Fingerprint Examination Working Group, Dr. William Thompson, Chair, Mr. John Black, Dr. Anil Jain, and Dr. Jay Kadane, for their expertise, tireless work, and dedication in the preparation of this report. AAAS benefitted considerably from the advice and contributions of the Advisory Committee. See Appendix F for a list of its members. A special acknowledgment is due to Jessica Wyndham, Interim Director of the AAAS Scientific Responsibility, Human Rights and Law Program, for her feedback on the report, and for seeing it to its completion. AAAS appreciates the contributions of Drs. Simon Cole, Jason Tangen, and forensic scientists Heidi Eldridge, Carey Hall and others for their review and insightful comments on a previous draft of this report. Carey Hall, from the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, contributed to the report primer prepared by Mr. Black. AAAS acknowledges the Journal of Forensic Identification, Alan McRoberts, IAI Editor, and forensic scientist Alice Maceo, for granting permission to reproduce an image from Qualitative Assessment of Skin Deformation: A Pilot Study (2009). During part of the period that he worked on this report, William Thompson was a visiting fellow at the Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge as part of its program Probability and Statistics in Forensic Science which was supported by EPSRC Grant Number EP/K032208/1. AAAS Marketing staff member, Elaine Jarrett, in collaboration with designers at Eyedea Advertising & Design Studio, created the cover design for this report. Appreciation is also expressed for the assistance of several other AAAS colleagues-Bethany Spencer, Nicolle Rutledge, Joshua Ettinger, Ellen Platts, and Joel Ericsen -- who provided administrative and logistical support for the Working Group meeting, contributed to and edited content for the project website. ii FORENSIC SCIENCE ASSESSMENTS: A QUALITY AND GAP ANALYSIS LATENT FINGERPRINT EXAMINATION Disclaimer............................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgments................................................................................................................ ii Table of Contents List of Abbreviations............................................................................................................. iv Preface............................................................................................................................ 1 Genesis of this Report..................................................................................................... 1 Conclusions and Recommendations............................................................................... 5 Scientific Foundation for Latent Fingerprint Examination.............................................. 13 Question I: Is there an adequate scientific foundation for understanding the degree of variability of fingerprints: (a) among unrelated individuals; and (b) among relatives?........... 17 Question II: Is there an adequate scientific foundation for understanding the degree of variability among prints made by the same finger: (a) on different surfaces, under different environmental conditions; and (b) over time as a person ages or is subject to injury?........... 24 Question III: Is there an adequate scientific foundation for understanding the accuracy of automated fingerprint identification systems (AFIS)?.............................................................. 29 Question IV: Is there an adequate scientific foundation for understanding the potential for contextual bias in latent print analysis and how might it be addressed?................................ 35 Question V: Is there an adequate scientific foundation for understanding the accuracy of human fingerprint examiners and how their accuracy is affected by: (a) level of training and experience; (b) individual differences in perceptual ability; (c) analytic procedures and standards of practice; (d) quality control and quality assurance procedures; and (e) the quality of prints? If not, what kinds of research are needed to improve understanding of these issues?............................................................................................................................ 43 Question VI: In light of the existing scientific literature, what kind of statements might fingerprint examiners reasonably make in reports and testimony in order to appropriately convey both the strength and uncertainty associated with fingerprint evidence?.................. 60 References...................................................................................................................... 74 Appendices A. Methods.................................................................................................................... 93 B. Latent Fingerprint Examination - A Primer............................................................... 95 C. Bibliography and Questions...................................................................................... 99 D. Working Group Roster.............................................................................................. 151 E. Working Group Bios.................................................................................................. 152 F. Project Advisory Committee and Staff..................................................................... 154 iii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ACE- V Analysis, Comparison, Evaluation and Verification AFIS Automatic Fingerprint Identification System CNM Close Nonmatch CTS Collaborative Testing Service DFSC Defense Forensic Science Center DOJ Department of Justice ELFT-EFS Evaluation of Latent Fingerprint Technologies- Extended Feature Sets ENFSI European Network of Forensic Science Institutes FNIR False Negative Identification Rate FPIR False Positive Identification Rate FpVTE Fingerprint Vendor Technology Evaluation IAI International Association for Identification LQAS Latent Quality Assessment Software NAS/NRC National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology NSTC SoFS National Science and Technology Council Subcommittee on Forensic Science OSAC Organization of Scientific Area Committees PCAST President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology PiAnoS Picture Annotation System PRC Probability of Random Correspondence RDTE-IWG Research, Development, Testing and Evaluation – Interagency Working Group ROI Region of Interest SIVV Spectral Image Validation and Verification SWGFAST Scientific Working Group on Friction Ridge Analysis, Study and Technology iv PREFACE Forensic science is an essential tool for investigating crime and helping to determine guilt or innocence at trial but questions have been raised about the validity and reliability of many forensic science disciplines. In some cases, reports and testimony based on substandard science have contributed to the convictions of individuals later proven innocent This report addresses latent fingerprint examination, setting forth what is known about fingerprint examination and what remains unknown. Following the section on the Genesis of this Report, is a summary of conclusions and recommendations. Each conclusion is accompanied by a page number(s) referring to the location in the body of the report where support for it can be found. The body of the report then provides a detailed analysis of the scientific foundations for latent print examination, identifying strengths and weaknesses, and making suggestions for further research. The body of the report is followed by appendices that: (1) describe the methods that were used to prepare this report; (2) provide a primer on latent print examination; (3) provide a bibliography and questions prepared
Recommended publications
  • Forensic Biology 205 Administration Building • 419-372-2015

    Forensic Biology 205 Administration Building • 419-372-2015

    Fall 2020 Bachelor of Science in Forensic Science Specialization in Forensic Biology 205 Administration Building • 419-372-2015 BG Perspective (BGP) Requirements FSCI Major Core Requirements (38 Hrs.) Must complete at least 1 course in each of the following: Hrs Grade English Composition and Oral Communication 4 BIOL 2040 Concepts in Biology I Course Credits 4 BIOL 2050 Concepts in Biology II 4 BIOL 3310 Human Anatomy & Physiology Quantitative Literacy 4 BIOL 3320 Human Anatomy & Physiology II _____________________________ ________ 3 CHEM 1770 Intro to Forensic Science 3 CRJU 4400 Law, Evidence, & Procedures in Must Complete at least 2 courses in each of the following: Forensic Science Humanities and the Arts 3 CRJU 4510 Criminal Justice Ethics 3 MATH 2470 Fund. of Statistics 5 PHYS 2010 or 2110 University Physics I 5 PHYS 2020 or 2120 University Physics II Natural Sciences - at least one Lab Science required FSCI Forensic Biology Specialization Requirements (16 hrs.) Social and Behavioral Sciences 4 BIOL 3500 Genetics 3 BIOL 4080 Molecular Biology 3 BIOL 4230 OR FSCI 4230 Forensic Biology Complete total required BGP credit hours by selecting courses from any 3 BIOL 4240 OR FSCI 4240 Forensic DNA Analysis of the above categories: 3 FSCI 4890 Internship OR FSCI 4990 Capstone Additional Requirements (25-26 Hrs.) These courses also fulfill the requirements for a minor in chemistry. Consult with an advisor about declaring the minor. University Requirements Designated courses in Humanities and the Arts and the Social and Behavorial Sciences
  • Cognitive Human Factors and Forensic Document Examiner Methods and Procedures Author(S): Mara L

    Cognitive Human Factors and Forensic Document Examiner Methods and Procedures Author(S): Mara L

    The author(s) shown below used Federal funding provided by the U.S. Department of Justice to prepare the following resource: Document Title: Cognitive Human Factors and Forensic Document Examiner Methods and Procedures Author(s): Mara L. Merlino, Chandler Al Namer, Taleb Al Namer, La’Quida Smith, Veronica Blas Dahir, Charles Edwards, Derek L. Hammond Document Number: 254581 Date Received: March 2020 Award Number: 2015-DN-BX-K069 This resource has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. This resource is being made publically available through the Office of Justice Programs’ National Criminal Justice Reference Service. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Cognitive Human Factors and Forensic Document Examination Methods and Procedures 1 Cognitive Human Factors and Forensic Document Examiner Methods and Procedures Final Summary Overview NIJ Award Number 2015-DN-BX-K069 Principal Investigator: Mara L. Merlino Research Assistants: Chandler Al Namer, Taleb Al Namer, La’Quida Smith Kentucky State University Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 Subaward Principal Investigator: Veronica Blas Dahir Research Assistants: Charles Edwards University of Nevada, Reno Reno, Nevada 89557 Expert Consultant: Derek L. Hammond U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Laboratory Forest Park, Georgia Acknowledgements: Bryan J. Found, Victoria Police Forensic Services Department Adrian Dyer, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Kentucky State University: Piarre Easley, Robert Olson University of Nevada, Reno: Mauricio Alvarez, J. Guillermo Villalobos, Denise Schaar Buis, Emily Wood, Chris Swinger, Chris Sanchez, Katherine Caufield Submitted to the U.S.
  • Associate of Science to B.S. in Forensic Biology

    Associate of Science to B.S. in Forensic Biology

    Guilford College Bi-Lateral Transfer Agreement Proposal Guilford Technical Community College ASSOCIATE OF SCIENCE TO B.S. IN FORENSIC BIOLOGY GENERAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS FOUNDATIONS ENGL 102 ENG 111 = ENGL 102 (3T) Historical Perspectives ENG 112 = ENGL 150 + HIST 131 = HIST 103 (6T) Foreign Language SPA 111 = SPAN 101 (3T) Quantitative Literacy MAT 152 = MATH 112 (4T) EXPLORATIONS – BREADTH Arts MUS 110 = MUS 111 (3T) Business and Policy Studies BUS 110= BUS 120 (3T) Humanities ENG 232 = ENGL 226 (3T) Natural Science BIO 112 = BIOL 112 (4T) Social Science ECO 251=ECON 222 (3T) EXPLORATIONS – CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES Intercultural REL 110 = REL 150 (3T) Social Justice/Environmental Responsibility PHI 240= PHIL 111 (3T) Diversity in the U.S. ENG 232 = ENGL 226 INTERDISCIPLINARY CAPSTONE COURSE IDS 400-level One approved Guilford course MAJOR: FORENSIC BIOLOGY BIO 111 = BIOL 111 Int. Biol.: Molecules & Cells (4T) BIOL 245 Introduction to Forensic Science BIOL 246 Forensic Chemistry BIOL 313 Cell Biology BIOL 341 Human Anatomy and Physiology I Two courses from: BIOL 115 General Botany BIOL 342 Human Anatomy and Physiology II BIOL 434 Biochemistry BIOL 443 Genetics CHM 151=CHEM 111 Chemical Principles I (4T) CHM 152=CHEM 112 Chemical Principles II (4T) PHYS 211 College Physics I PHYS 212 College Physics II One course from MATH 115 Elementary Functions MATH 271=MATH 121 (4T) MATH 122 Calculus II MATH 123 Accelerated Calculus ELECTIVES: MAT 172 = MATH 150 (4T) PED 110= SPST 109 (2T) ACA 122= GST 150 (1T) One Guilford elective at 4 credit hours One Guilford elective at 4 credit hours One Guilford elective at 4 credit hours One Guilford elective at 3 credit hours Students must satisfy all General Education, major, and minor requirements and complete a minimum of 128 credits with at least a “C” (2.0) average in order to earn a baccalaureate degree.
  • BIOLOGY (Forensic Science Concentration), B.S. 40 Courses of Three Or More Credits and 3 One-Credit PE Courses

    BIOLOGY (Forensic Science Concentration), B.S. 40 Courses of Three Or More Credits and 3 One-Credit PE Courses

    Name: ______________________________________ BIOLOGY (Forensic Science Concentration), B.S. 40 courses of three or more credits and 3 one-credit PE courses GENERAL EDUCATION CORE MAJOR BASIC REQUIREMENTS (2 courses and 3 one- (16 required courses) credit PE courses) Composition and Rhetoric BI 151: Introductory Biology I EN 103 Composition and Rhetoric I BI 152: Introductory Biology II EN 104 Composition and Rhetoric II BI 255: Molecular Biology Physical Education Courses BI 330: Genetics PE 100 BI/CH 305: Forensic Toxicology PE ____ BI 355: Human Structure and Function I PE ____ BI 356: Human Structure and Function II BI 455: Research Seminar MODES OF THINKING (3 courses) CH 101: General Chemistry I Literature (Select one) CH 102: General Chemistry II EN 110, EN 112, EN 115 CH 231: Organic Chemistry I Mathematics (Satisfied by Major – MA 121) CH 232: Organic Chemistry II Natural Science (Satisfied by Major) MA 121: Calculus I Philosophy MA 122: Calculus II PL 109 PH 201: Gen. Phys. I: Mechanics and Heat Social Sciences (Satisfied by Required PH 202: Gen. Phys. II: Wave Phenomena and Electives) Electromagnetism CULTURAL LITERACY (6 courses) Humanities I and II. Preferably select a set (e.g., REQUIRED ELECTIVES HI 201/202). However, a combination (e.g., PO (6 courses) 201 + HI 214) is acceptable. Hum. I: HI 201, PO 201, HI 213 CJ 109: Crime and Society Hum. II: HI 202, PO 202, HI 214, HI 262 CJ 208: Crime Lab Humanities III: Great Works of Art & Music CJ 260: Law Enforcement (See Master Schedule of Day Classes) CJ 360: Forensics and Criminal
  • Forensic Entomology: the Use of Insects in the Investigation of Homicide and Untimely Death Q

    Forensic Entomology: the Use of Insects in the Investigation of Homicide and Untimely Death Q

    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. Winter 1989 41 Forensic Entomology: The Use of Insects in the Investigation of Homicide and Untimely Death by Wayne D. Lord, Ph.D. and William C. Rodriguez, Ill, Ph.D. reportedly been living in and frequenting the area for several Editor’s Note weeks. The young lady had been reported missing by her brother approximately four days prior to discovery of her Special Agent Lord is body. currently assigned to the An investigation conducted by federal, state and local Hartford, Connecticut Resident authorities revealed that she had last been seen alive on the Agency ofthe FBi’s New Haven morning of May 31, 1984, in the company of a 30-year-old Division. A graduate of the army sergeant, who became the primary suspect. While Univercities of Delaware and considerable circumstantial evidence supported the evidence New Hampshin?, Mr Lordhas that the victim had been murdered by the sergeant, an degrees in biology, earned accurate estimation of the victim’s time of death was crucial entomology and zoology. He to establishing a link between the suspect and the victim formerly served in the United at the time of her demise. States Air Force at the Walter Several estimates of postmortem interval were offered by Army Medical Center in Reed medical examiners and investigators. These estimates, Washington, D.C., and tire F however, were based largely on the physical appearance of Edward Hebert School of the body and the extent to which decompositional changes Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland. had occurred in various organs, and were not based on any Rodriguez currently Dr.
  • The Role and Impact of Forensic Evidence in the Criminal Justice System, Final Report

    The Role and Impact of Forensic Evidence in the Criminal Justice System, Final Report

    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: The Role and Impact of Forensic Evidence in the Criminal Justice System, Final Report Author: Tom McEwen, Ph.D. Document No.: 236474 Date Received: November 2011 Award Number: 2006-DN-BX-0095 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Institute for Law and Justice, Inc. 1219 Prince Street, Suite 2 Alexandria, Virginia Phone: 703-684-5300 The Role and Impact of Forensic Evidence in the Criminal Justice System Final Report December 13, 2010 Prepared by Tom McEwen, PhD Prepared for National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.
  • A Simplified Guide to DNA Evidence Introduction

    A Simplified Guide to DNA Evidence Introduction

    A Simplified Guide To DNA Evidence Introduction The establishment of DNA analysis within the criminal justice system in the mid-1980s revolutionized the field of forensic science. With subsequent refinement of DNA analysis methods in crime laboratories, even minute amounts of blood, saliva, semen, skin cells or other biological material may be used to develop investigative leads, link a perpetrator or victim to a crime scene, or confirm or disprove an account of the crime. Because of the accuracy and reliability of forensic DNA analysis, this evidence has also become an invaluable tool for exonerating individuals who have been wrongfully convicted. The successes of DNA evidence in criminal trials has captured more than headlines, however—it has captured the public’s imagination as well. Jurors now increasingly expect DNA evidence to be presented in a wider array of cases, even when other types of evidence may be more valuable to the investigation. Principles of DNA Evidence DNA is sometimes referred to as a “genetic blueprint” because it contains the instructions that govern the development of an organism. Characteristics such as hair color, eye color, height and other physical features are all determined by genes that reside in just 2% of human DNA. This portion is called the coding region because it provides the instructions for proteins to create these features. The other 98% of human DNA is considered non- coding and the scientific community has only recently begun to identify its functions. Forensic scientists, however, use this non-coding DNA in criminal investigations. Inside this region of DNA are unique repeating patterns that can be used to differentiate one person from another.
  • Crime Scene Investigation

    Crime Scene Investigation

    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Crime Scene Investigation A Guide for Law Enforcement research report U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs 810 Seventh Street N.W. Washington, DC 20531 Janet Reno Attorney General Daniel Marcus Acting Associate Attorney General Laurie Robinson Assistant Attorney General Noël Brennan Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jeremy Travis Director, National Institute of Justice Department of Justice Response Center 800–421–6770 Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice World Wide Web Site World Wide Web Site http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij Cover photograph of man on the ground by Corbis Images. Other cover photographs copyright © 1999 PhotoDisc, Inc. Crime Scene Investigation: A Guide for Law Enforcement Written and Approved by the Technical Working Group on Crime Scene Investigation January 2000 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Jeremy Travis, J.D. Director Richard M. Rau, Ph.D. Project Monitor Opinions or points of view expressed in this document are a consensus of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Justice. NCJ 178280 The National Institute of Justice is a component of the Office of Jus- tice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Assistance, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime. Message From the Attorney General ctions taken at the outset of an investigation at a crime scene can Aplay a pivotal role in the resolution of a case.
  • Application of Entomology in Forensic Sciences

    Application of Entomology in Forensic Sciences

    DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.16969/teb.90382 Türk. entomol. bült., 2016, 6(3): 269-275 ISSN 2146-975X Review (Derleme) Application of entomology in forensic sciences Adli bilimlerde entomolojinin uygulanması Meltem KÖKDENER1* Summary Forensic entomology is the use of the insects in legal purposes is becoming increasingly more valuable in criminal investigations. Insects are attracted to the body immediately after death and lay eggs in it. Forensic entomologist use knowledge of insect to solve crimes and insect evidences may shed light on different aspects of the crimes. This science emerged as a major discipline in the developed countries and its role in criminal investigations became more widespread. Nowadays, forensic entomologists are called upon more frequently to refer their knowledge and expertise and to collaborate in criminal investigations and to become important part of forensic investigation teams. Unfortunately, it has not received much attention in Turkey as an important investigative tool. In spite of this major potential, however, the field of forensic entomology uncertain in our country, largely. There are lack of knowledge of the benefits, application and hesitation on practically in our country. This study aims to describe the principles and concept of forensic entomology, to determine the usefulness and applicability of insect evidence, to develop awareness of insect and to attract attention of forensic medicine professionals to the issue. Key words: Forensic entomology, decomposition, postmortem interval, arthropods Özet Böceklerin adli amaç için kullanımı olan adli entomoloji olay yeri incelemelerinde oldukça artan bir öneme sahiptir. Böcekler ölümden sonra cesede hemen ulaşırlar ve yumurtlarlar. Adli entomolog suçları çözmek için böcek bilgisini kullanır ve böcek delilleri suçun farklı yönlerine ışık tutabilirler.
  • SWGDOC Standard Terminology for Expressing Conclusions of Forensic Document Examiners

    SWGDOC Standard Terminology for Expressing Conclusions of Forensic Document Examiners

    SWGDOC Standard Terminology for Expressing Conclusions of Forensic Document Examiners SWGDOC Standard Terminology for Expressing Conclusions of Forensic Document Examiners 1. Scope 1.1 This terminology is intended to assist forensic document examiners in expressing conclusions or opinions based on their examinations. 1.2 The terms in this terminology are based on the report of a committee of the Questioned Document Section of the American Academy of Forensic Science that was adopted as the recommended guidelines in reports and testimony by the Questioned Document Section of the American Academy of Forensic Science and the American Board of Forensic Document Examiners.1 2. Referenced Documents 2.1 Standards SWGDOC Standard for Scope of Work of Forensic Document Examiners 3. Significance and Use 3.1 Document examiners begin examinations from a point of neutrality. There are an infinite number of gradations of opinion toward an identification or toward an elimination. It is in those cases wherein the opinion is less than definite that careful attention is especially needed in the choice of language used to convey the weight of the evidence. 3.2 Common sense dictates that we must limit the terminology we use in expressing our degrees of confidence in the evidence to terms that are readily understandable to those who use our services (including investigators, attorneys, judges, and jury members), as well as to other document examiners. The expressions used to differentiate the gradations of opinions should not be considered as strongly defined “categories”. These expressions should be guidelines without sharply defined boundaries. 3.3 When a forensic document examiner chooses to use one of the terms defined below, the listener or reader can assume that this is what the examiner intended the term to mean.
  • Forensic DNA Analysis

    Forensic DNA Analysis

    FOCUS: FORENSIC SCIENCE Forensic DNA Analysis JESSICA MCDONALD, DONALD C. LEHMAN LEARNING OBJECTIVES: Television shows such as CSI: Crime Scene 1. Discuss the important developments in the history Investigation, Law and Order, Criminal Minds, and of DNA profiling. many others portray DNA analysis as a quick and 2. Compare and contrast restriction fragment length simple process. However, these portrayals are not polymorphism and short tandem repeat analyses in accurate. Since the discovery of DNA as the genetic the area of DNA profiling. material in 1953, much progress has been made in the Downloaded from 3. Describe the structure of short tandem repeats and area of forensic DNA analysis. Despite how much we their alleles. have learned about DNA and DNA analysis (Table 1), 4. Identify the source of DNA in a blood sample. our knowledge of DNA profiling can be enhanced 5. Discuss the importance of the amelogenin gene in leading to better and faster results. This article will DNA profiling. discuss the history of forensic DNA testing, the current 6. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of science, and what the future might hold. http://hwmaint.clsjournal.ascls.org/ mitochondrial DNA analysis in DNA profiling. 7. Describe the type of DNA profiles used in the Table 1. History of DNA Profiling Combined DNA Index System. 8. Compare the discriminating power of DNA 1953 Franklin, Watson, and Crick discover structure of DNA 1983 Kary Mullis develops PCR procedure, ultimately winning profiling and blood typing. Nobel Prize in Science in 1993
  • So You Want to Be a Forensic Scientist?

    So You Want to Be a Forensic Scientist?

    So you want to be a Forensic Scientist? What should you major in? Crime labs are looking for people with a “hard science” background. Preferred majors are Chemistry and Biology DNA specialists must take: biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology and statistics Accredited Forensic Science programs* require a minimum of: 1 biology course, 4 chemistry courses, 2 physics courses—each with lab 3 advanced science courses, 5 forensic science courses—most with lab What about an advanced degree? Regardless of degree, substantial job specific training after hiring is required Many jobs require only a bachelors degree (very few accept lower educational levels) All jobs will require continuing education with yearly minimum credits Several schools offer a Masters degree in Forensic Science* NIJ recommends these schools require a BS in chemistry or biology to enter the program Are the any other requirements? The FBI sites “honesty, integrity and scientific objectivity” thus you will undergo a background check Including: drug tests, drug use history, criminal history, personal associations, driving record, credit history Disqualifers: felony, failure of drug test, default on student loan, failure to register for selective service Since you have to serve as an expert witness, excellent communication skills are required Other “soft skills”: critical thinking, good and safe laboratory practices, time management, attention to detail Is it like CSI ? NO. Few forensic scientists actually go to crime scenes. None make arrests. Most of their time is spent in the lab, usually doing routine experiments. A significant amount of time is spent on paperwork, reporting on samples and validating results and equipment. You must also serve as an expert witness where all your paperwork will be evidence.