DOCSLIB.ORG

Forensics Under Fire.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forensics Under Fire.Pdf Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page i Forensics under Fire Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page ii Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page iii ≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈ Forensics under Fire Are Bad Science and Dueling Experts Corrupting Criminal Justice? JIM FISHER ≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈≈ RUTGERS UNIVERSITY PRESS NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW JERSEY, AND LONDON Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page iv LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Fisher, Jim, – Forensics under fire : are bad science and dueling experts corrupting criminal justice? / Jim Fisher. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN ‒‒‒‒ (hardcover : alk. paper) . Criminal investigation—United States. Crime scene searches—United States. Forensic sciences—United States. Evidence, Criminal—United States I. Title. HV.F .—dc CIP A British Cataloging-in-Publication record for this book is available from the British Library. Copyright © by Jim Fisher All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the publisher. Please contact Rutgers University Press, Joyce Kilmer Avenue, Piscataway, NJ –. The only exception to this prohibition is “fair use” as defined by U.S. copyright law. Visit our Web site: http://rutgerspress.rutgers.edu Manufactured in the United States of America Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page v It is through clues that we form our opinion about the facts of a case. There is only one alternative: to catch the culprit red-handed. —Theodore Reik, The Compulsion to Confess, 1959 Clues are tangible signs which prove—or seem to prove—that no crime can be committed by thought only and that we live in a world regulated by mechanical laws. The dead man was not killed by a ghostly hand but by a murderer of flesh and blood. —Theodore Reik, The Unknown Murderer, 1945 Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page vi Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page vii CONTENTS Preface ix Acknowledgments xi Introduction 1 PART ONE Diagnosing Death: Problems in the Science and Practice of Forensic Pathology 9 1 Forensic Pathologists from Hell: Bungled Autopsies, Bad Calls, and Blown Cases 13 2 A Question of Credibility: Bad Reputations and the Politics of Death 29 3 The Sudden Infant Death Debate: Dr. Roy Meadow, Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy, and Meadow’s Law 47 4 Infants Who Can’t Breathe: Illness or Suffocation? 67 5 Swollen Brains and Broken Bones: Disease or Infanticide? 79 PART TWO Crime-Scene Impression Identification: Forensic Science or Subjective Analysis? 101 6 Fingerprint Identification: Trouble in Paradise 103 7 Fingerprints Never Lie: Except in Scotland 123 8 Shoe-Print Identification and Foot Morphology: The Lay Witness and the Cinderella Analysis 139 9 Bite-Mark Identification: Do Teeth Leave Prints? 153 vii Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page viii viii CONTENTS 10 Ear-Mark Identification: Emerging Science or Bad Evidence? 169 PART THREE Hired Guns, Smoke Blowers, and Phonies: The Expert Witness Problem 179 11 Expert versus Expert: The Handwriting Wars in the Ramsey Case 182 12 John Mark Karr: DNA Trumps the Graphologists in the Ramsey Case 206 13 Hair and Fiber Identification: An Inexact Science 218 14 DNA Analysis: Backlogs, Sloppy Work, and Unqualified People 231 15 Bullet Identification, FBI Style: Overselling the Science 244 16 The Celebrity Expert: Dr. Henry Lee 253 Conclusion 275 Notes 287 Sources 291 Index 317 Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page ix PREFACE I’ve spent most of my adult life investigating crime, teaching criminal inves- tigation, writing about the subject, and trying to figure out why so many seri- ous crimes in the United States either go unsolved or lead to wrongful convictions. I’ve concluded that the law enforcement wars on drugs and ter- rorism have militarized the police and marginalized criminal investigation as a law enforcement function. Since forensic science is mainly in service to criminal investigation, scientific crime detection is not being fully utilized and so hasn’t lived up to its full criminal justice potential. In the 1920s forensic science pioneers and their supporters believed that one day scientific criminal investigation would significantly increase crime solution rates and at the same time reduce the dependence on the unreliable evidence produced by the third degree, eyewitness testimony, and jailhouse informants. This has not happened, at least not to a great enough extent, and to that degree, forensic science is a failed promise. While the failure of forensic science to fully achieve its potential involves many realities beyond its control, there are problems within the profession that can be fixed by the practitioners themselves. Thinking about the nature and severity of these problems, how they affect the criminal justice system, and how they might be solved led me to write this book. Jim Fisher February 13, 2007 ix Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page x Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page xi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful for the help of Karl Kageff, who read an early draft of the manu- script and made helpful and important suggestions. At Rutgers University Press, Doreen Valentine’s strong editorial hand helped transform a flawed manuscript into a better book. Even experienced writers can learn from a truly outstanding editor. I am indebted to criminal investigator and author Robert L. Snow, whose review of the manuscript led to significant improvements. I would also like to thank Dr. James D. Fisher for his editorial suggestions. And finally, thanks to Veronica Fisher for her computer expertise. xi Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page xii Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page xiii Forensics under Fire Prelims.qxd 11/14/07 2:28 PM Page xiv Intro.qxd 11/9/07 11:34 AM Page 1 Introduction A crime-scene photographer is snapping shots of a dead woman lying face- down in her kitchen. The blood pooled on the floor has been tracked around the house by someone wearing a pair of men’s shoes. A detective is sketching the scene while a fingerprint technician examines the . caliber pistol lying next to the woman’s body. A second criminalist gathers up the shell casing and, from the kitchen table, the handwritten suicide note. Another investigator is placing paper lunch bags over the hands of the victim’s husband, who had made the call. At the request of this detective, this man—let’s call him Bill Smith—has changed out of his shoes, socks, and trousers. These items have been placed into separate evidence containers. Uniformed officers are sealing off the house and standing guard to keep unauthorized visitors from the site. At the police station someone from the crime laboratory using a wad of cotton and a special solution swabs Smith’s hands for traces of gunshot residue. Then the detectives who were at the crime scene question him. Smith says that his wife, Mary, had been depressed and threatening suicide. Also, she had been drinking heavily and taking sleeping pills. When he left for work that morning at eight she was still in bed. He had called her from the office at two in the afternoon, and other than sounding a little intoxicated, she seemed okay. The firearm, purchased two weeks earlier for home protec- tion, was his. He tells the detectives that he arrived home at five o’clock, entered the house through the front door, took a couple of steps and then spotted his wife’s body on the floor. He says he knew at once she was dead and did not approach her body or walk into the kitchen. Instead, he ran out of the house and called . A detective asks if he’d be willing to take a polygraph 1 Intro.qxd 11/9/07 11:34 AM Page 2 2 FORENSICS UNDER FIRE test. Smith says no, he doesn’t believe in lie detectors. He does agree to pro- vide samples of his handwriting and to be fingerprinted. He assures the detec- tives that he has nothing to hide and that he wants to help the police in their investigation. The autopsy reveals that Mary Smith had been shot once in the chest. The powder-burn pattern on her skin suggests that the shot came from between six and twelve inches away from her. Based on early signs of postmortem lividity— light purple discoloration on the anterior plane (front) of her body caused by the settling of her blood—the forensic pathologist believes that she has been dead much longer than three hours. This means that Bill Smith could not have talked to his wife that afternoon at two o’clock. Early stages of rigor mortis— body stiffening—also suggest a time of death inconsistent with Smith’s alibi that he was at work when she killed herself. The pathologist has also found, on the edge of Mary Smith’s right hand, a nick made by a bullet, trauma referred to as a defense wound, evidence that belies suicide. As far as the pathologist can determine without a full toxicological analysis, the victim had not been under the influence of alcohol or drugs when she died. The next day the crime lab issues the gunshot residue report, which reveals that Mary Smith’s hands tested negative for traces of gunpowder. But it’s a different story for her husband: his right hand tested positive, which means that he, not the victim, had recently fired a handgun. The serological analysis of his shoes, socks, and trousers reveals traces of AB negative blood, which happens to be his wife’s blood type.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE IMPACT of STATE V. SWINTON on the AUTHENTICATION of DIGITAL IMAGES∗
    File: Guthrie.362.GALLEY(f).doc Created on: 9/21/2007 3:34:00 PM Last Printed: 9/26/2007 9:54:00 AM THE SWINTON SIX: THE IMPACT OF STATE v. SWINTON ON THE AUTHENTICATION OF DIGITAL IMAGES∗ Catherine Guthrie∗∗ Brittan Mitchell∗∗∗ I. INTRODUCTION “[T]he machine does not isolate man from the great problems of nature but plunges him more deeply into them.”1 Nowhere is this more apparent than in the struggle between rules of law and scientific and technological advances. Our court system’s response to this challenge is scrutiny and adaptability, two traits evidenced by the ebb and flow of requirements for authentication of digital images. This Article examines the evolution of authentication re- quirements for digital images, with particular emphasis on the impact of State v. Swinton.2 Part II of this Article provides an overview of digital images as well as the general rationale for their authentication. Part III reviews past statutory and common law rules for establishing the authenticity of such evidence. Part IV summarizes Swinton, a 2004 case from Connecticut which represents a major development in this area of law. Part V ap- plies the holding from Swinton to a new type of digital evidence, virtual autopsies, in a theoretical context. The Article concludes in Part VI. ∗ © 2007, Catherine Guthrie and Brittan Mitchell. All rights reserved. ∗∗ Catherine Guthrie is a graduate of Stetson University College of Law and an ac- tive member of The Florida Bar. She is currently working for the National Clearinghouse for Science, Technology and the Law as a Research Attorney.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 International Perspectives on Wrongful
    CHAPTER 2 INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON WRONGFUL CONVICTION 2.1 Introduction Judicial Error or miscarriage of justice will ―invariably identify at least some element of an earlier conviction as a mistake: whether evidential, procedural or material irregularity‖. - Edmond73 Wrongful conviction, as a major concern, was recognized initially in the United States beginning in the early 1930s. The subject of wrongful conviction caught the public and scholarly attention primarily based on individual cases in the U.S.; including cases like the ―Dreyfus affair in the nineteenth century, the infamous case of the ‗Scottsboro boys‘ in te 1920s, the case of Randall Dale Adams, Sam Sheppard case, the ‗Birmingham Six‘ case and the wrongful conviction of Michael and Lindy Chamberlain for the death of their daughter in Australia‖74 These cases had attracted much public attention due to the injustice suffered by the innocents and their families. Several books, article and research papers focussed on these cases, providing reasons and suggestions for the same. This led to exonerations of most of the cases that came under media limelight, where the jury was compelled to reconsider the facts and decide the case thoughtfully based on correct evidence. Most of the people who got exonerated, were sentenced to death. The exoneration of the wrongfully convicted individuals was, indeed, the major factor for identification of wrongful conviction as an impediment to criminal justice system. Numerous reasons can be attributed to the exonerations of individuals. The progress and development made in the field of forensic science such as the DNA testing of the evidence has contributed immensely to the convictions being overturned.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health British Paediatric Surveillance Unit
    Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health British Paediatric Surveillance Unit 14th Annual Report 1999/2000 The British Paediatric Surveillance Unit always welcomes invitations to give talks describing the work of the Unit and makes every effort to respond to these positively. Enquiries should be directed to our office. The Unit positively encourages recipients to copy and circulate this report to colleagues, junior staff and medical students. Additional copies are available from our office, to which any enquiries should be addressed. Published September 2000 by the: British Paediatric Surveillance Unit A unit within the Research Division of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health 50 Hallam Street London W1W 6DE Telephone: 44 (0) 20 7307 5680 Facsimile: 44 (0) 20 7307 5690 E-mail: [email protected] Registered Charity No. 1057744 ISBN 1 900954 48 6 © British Paediatric Surveillance Unit British Paediatric Surveillance Unit - 14 Annual Report 1999-2000 Compiled and edited by Richard Lynn, Angus Nicoll, Jugnoo Rahi and Chris Verity Membership of Executive Committee 1999/2000 Dr Christopher Verity Chairman Dr Angus Clarke Co-opted Professor Richard Cooke Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Research Division Dr Patricia Hamilton Co-opted Professor Peter Kearney Faculty of Paediatrics, Royal College of Physicians of Ireland Dr Jugnoo Rahi Medical Adviser Dr Ian Jones Scottish Centre for Infection and Environmental Health Dr Christopher Kelnar Co-opted Dr Gabrielle Laing Co-opted Mr Richard Lynn Scientific Co-ordinator
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Analysis of Medical Opinion Evidence in Child Homicide Cases
    A critical analysis of medical opinion evidence in child homicide cases Sharmila Betts B.A. (Hons.), University of Sydney, 1985 M. Psychol., University of Sydney, 1987 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Law, The University of New South Wales (Sydney). i ii iii Acknowledgements No way of thinking or doing, however ancient, can be trusted without proof. Henry David Thoreau I am a Clinical Psychologist practicing since 1987. My time at a tertiary level Child Protection Team at The Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, Australia brought to my attention the pivotal role of medical opinion evidence in establishing how children sustained injuries, which were sometimes fatal. This thesis began in a Department of Psychology, but I transferred to a Law Faculty. Though I am not a lawyer, the thesis endeavours to examine medico-legal and psychological aspects of sudden unexplained infant deaths. It sets itself the task of addressing important questions requiring rigorous and critical analysis to ensure accuracy and justice is achieved. I hope my thesis sheds light on this complex issue. Gary Edmond has been a mentor, guide and staunch critic. I am deeply grateful that he trusted a novice to navigate this perplexing field of inquiry. Emma Cunliffe has provided clarity in an area shrouded in uncertainty. Their patience, support and faith have enabled me to crystalise and formulate my fledgling insights into a dissertation. I am indebted to Natalie Tzovaras, Monique Ross, Katie Poidomani, and Janet Willinge for their administrative support. My husband, Grant, posed the question that started my journey - ‘how do doctors know the injuries were deliberately inflicted?’ Through my many doubts and fears, he iv maintained a trust in my ability to address this question and helped me return time and again to the seemingly overwhelming task before me.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pulitzer Prizes 2020 Winne
    WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Orthodontics in Forensic Odontology- a Social Responsibility Dentistry Section
    DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/15798.7633 Review Article Role of Orthodontics in Forensic Odontology- A Social Responsibility Dentistry Section GIRIDHAR REDDY1, VINAY P REDDY2, MEENAKSHI SHARMA3, MONIKA AGGARWAL4 ABSTRACT Orthodontics like any other specialty has much to offer law enforcement in the detection and solution of crime or in civil proceedings. Forensic odontology often requires an interdisciplinary approach towards dentistry for the purpose of proper diagnosis of cases. In cases where the forensic odontologist has to establish a person’s identity, an orthodontist can be of great help at times. Teeth, with their anatomic/physiologic variations and therapy such as orthodontic treatment, restorations and prosthesis may record information that remains throughout life and beyond. The teeth may also be used as weapons for defense or offense and as such may leave information about the identity of the biter at the time of crime. Forensic odontology also plays an important role in the recognition of crime and abuse among people of all ages. Orthodontists like all other dental professionals can play a major role by maintaining proper dental records and thus providing important or vital information or clues to the legal authorities in order to help them in their search. Keywords: Bite marks, Cephalometric software, Forensic science, Orthodontic scars INTRODUCTION cases, virtually a certain identification tool. Even when data are Forensic science is the application of a broad spectrum of sciences sparse, it may result in recognized identification that can later be used in order to answer questions of interest to a legal system confirmed by more scientific techniques such as the DNA samping related to crime or civil action [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • Csi: Forensic Challenge
    ACTIVITY OPTION CSI: FORENSIC CHALLENGE Step into the world of crime scene investigation to unravel a true crime using some of the latest forensic detective technology. Teams are presented with the facts and visual evidence of a real life crime. Their challenge, using a real process of investigation, is to solve the mystery and identify the murderer and motive. Our head of investigation will teach your team how to properly examine a simulated crime scene. Your team will also use their observational skills to create a composite sketch of a suspect using the same software used by police agencies around the world. They will then implicate the suspect after carrying out a variety of forensic techniques including simulated blood typing, blood spatter analysis, fingerprint analysis, glass analysis, luminol detection of simulated blood and DNA analysis. At the start of the event each team will be given their own "Crime File", which contains everything they need to know about the investigation. Each person is also given their own examination kit, comprising of a one piece white body suit, masks and gloves. After kitting up it is time for the RUNNING TIME: The ideal length of time for this activity is 2-3 investigation to commence! Your task is to investigate the crime, using hours. forensics to prove it. Participants will need to use a variety of forensic techniques to solve the MIN/MAX GROUP SIZE: Suitable for 15-150 participants. murder, including ballistics, blood spatter pattern analysis, fingerprint dusting, forensic dentistry, hair and fibre, photofit, and DNA. PEOPLE PER TEAM: We would recommend 8-10 participants per team.
    [Show full text]
  • How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty
    Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 30 Issue 2 Article 2 December 2012 How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty Rob Warden Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Rob Warden, How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty, 30(2) LAW & INEQ. 245 (2012). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol30/iss2/2 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. 245 How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty Rob Wardent Introduction The late J. Paul Getty had a formula for becoming wealthy: rise early, work late-and strike oil.' That is also the formula for abolishing the death penalty, or at least it is a formula-the one that worked in Illinois. When Governor Pat Quinn signed legislation ending capital punishment in Illinois on March 9, 2011, he tacitly acknowledged the early rising and late working that preceded the occasion. "Since our experience has shown that there is no way to design a perfect death penalty system, free from the numerous flaws that can lead to wrongful convictions or discriminatory treatment, I have concluded that the proper course of action is to abolish it." 2 The experience to which the governor referred was not something that dropped like a gentle rain from heaven upon the place beneath and seeped into his consciousness by osmosis. Rather, a cadre of public defenders, pro bono lawyers, journalists, academics, and assorted activists, devoted tens of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands, of hours, over more than three decades, to the abolition movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Jews Control U.S.A., Therefore the World – Is That a Good Thing?
    Jews Control U.S.A., Therefore the World – Is That a Good Thing? By Chairman of the U.S. based Romanian National Vanguard©2007 www.ronatvan.com v. 1.6 1 INDEX 1. Are Jews satanic? 1.1 What The Talmud Rules About Christians 1.2 Foes Destroyed During the Purim Feast 1.3 The Shocking "Kol Nidre" Oath 1.4 The Bar Mitzvah - A Pledge to The Jewish Race 1.5 Jewish Genocide over Armenian People 1.6 The Satanic Bible 1.7 Other Examples 2. Are Jews the “Chosen People” or the real “Israel”? 2.1 Who are the “Chosen People”? 2.2 God & Jesus quotes about race mixing and globalization 3. Are they “eternally persecuted people”? 3.1 Crypto-Judaism 4. Is Judeo-Christianity a healthy “alliance”? 4.1 The “Jesus was a Jew” Hoax 4.2 The "Judeo - Christian" Hoax 4.3 Judaism's Secret Book - The Talmud 5. Are Christian sects Jewish creations? Are they affecting Christianity? 5.1 Biblical Quotes about the sects , the Jews and about the results of them working together. 6. “Anti-Semitism” shield & weapon is making Jews, Gods! 7. Is the “Holocaust” a dirty Jewish LIE? 7.1 The Famous 66 Questions & Answers about the Holocaust 8. Jews control “Anti-Hate”, “Human Rights” & Degraded organizations??? 8.1 Just a small part of the full list: CULTURAL/ETHNIC 8.2 "HATE", GENOCIDE, ETC. 8.3 POLITICS 8.4 WOMEN/FAMILY/SEX/GENDER ISSUES 8.5 LAW, RIGHTS GROUPS 8.6 UNIONS, OCCUPATION ORGANIZATIONS, ACADEMIA, ETC. 2 8.7 IMMIGRATION 9. Money Collecting, Israel Aids, Kosher Tax and other Money Related Methods 9.1 Forced payment 9.2 Israel “Aids” 9.3 Kosher Taxes 9.4 Other ways for Jews to make money 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic Biology 205 Administration Building • 419-372-2015
    Fall 2020 Bachelor of Science in Forensic Science Specialization in Forensic Biology 205 Administration Building • 419-372-2015 BG Perspective (BGP) Requirements FSCI Major Core Requirements (38 Hrs.) Must complete at least 1 course in each of the following: Hrs Grade English Composition and Oral Communication 4 BIOL 2040 Concepts in Biology I Course Credits 4 BIOL 2050 Concepts in Biology II 4 BIOL 3310 Human Anatomy & Physiology Quantitative Literacy 4 BIOL 3320 Human Anatomy & Physiology II _____________________________ ________ 3 CHEM 1770 Intro to Forensic Science 3 CRJU 4400 Law, Evidence, & Procedures in Must Complete at least 2 courses in each of the following: Forensic Science Humanities and the Arts 3 CRJU 4510 Criminal Justice Ethics 3 MATH 2470 Fund. of Statistics 5 PHYS 2010 or 2110 University Physics I 5 PHYS 2020 or 2120 University Physics II Natural Sciences - at least one Lab Science required FSCI Forensic Biology Specialization Requirements (16 hrs.) Social and Behavioral Sciences 4 BIOL 3500 Genetics 3 BIOL 4080 Molecular Biology 3 BIOL 4230 OR FSCI 4230 Forensic Biology Complete total required BGP credit hours by selecting courses from any 3 BIOL 4240 OR FSCI 4240 Forensic DNA Analysis of the above categories: 3 FSCI 4890 Internship OR FSCI 4990 Capstone Additional Requirements (25-26 Hrs.) These courses also fulfill the requirements for a minor in chemistry. Consult with an advisor about declaring the minor. University Requirements Designated courses in Humanities and the Arts and the Social and Behavorial Sciences
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Human Factors and Forensic Document Examiner Methods and Procedures Author(S): Mara L
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funding provided by the U.S. Department of Justice to prepare the following resource: Document Title: Cognitive Human Factors and Forensic Document Examiner Methods and Procedures Author(s): Mara L. Merlino, Chandler Al Namer, Taleb Al Namer, La’Quida Smith, Veronica Blas Dahir, Charles Edwards, Derek L. Hammond Document Number: 254581 Date Received: March 2020 Award Number: 2015-DN-BX-K069 This resource has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. This resource is being made publically available through the Office of Justice Programs’ National Criminal Justice Reference Service. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Cognitive Human Factors and Forensic Document Examination Methods and Procedures 1 Cognitive Human Factors and Forensic Document Examiner Methods and Procedures Final Summary Overview NIJ Award Number 2015-DN-BX-K069 Principal Investigator: Mara L. Merlino Research Assistants: Chandler Al Namer, Taleb Al Namer, La’Quida Smith Kentucky State University Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 Subaward Principal Investigator: Veronica Blas Dahir Research Assistants: Charles Edwards University of Nevada, Reno Reno, Nevada 89557 Expert Consultant: Derek L. Hammond U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Laboratory Forest Park, Georgia Acknowledgements: Bryan J. Found, Victoria Police Forensic Services Department Adrian Dyer, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Kentucky State University: Piarre Easley, Robert Olson University of Nevada, Reno: Mauricio Alvarez, J. Guillermo Villalobos, Denise Schaar Buis, Emily Wood, Chris Swinger, Chris Sanchez, Katherine Caufield Submitted to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecutors' Perspective on California's Death Penalty
    California District Attorneys Association Prosecutors' Perspective on California's Death Penalty Produced in collaboration with the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation MARCH 2003 GILBERT G. OTERO LAWRENCE G. BROWN President Executive Director Prosecutors' Perspective on California's Death Penalty MARCH 2003 CDAA BOARD OF DIRECTORS OFFICERS DIRECTORS PRESIDENT John Paul Bernardi, Los Angeles County Gilbert G. Otero Imperial County Cregor G. Datig, Riverside County SECOND VICE-PRESIDENT Bradford Fenocchio, Placer County David W. Paulson Solano County James P. Fox, San Mateo County SECRETARY-TREASURER Ed Jagels, Kern County Jan Scully Sacramento County Ernest J. LiCalsi, Madera County SERGEANT-AT-ARMS Martin T. Murray, San Mateo County Gerald Shea San Luis Obispo County Rolanda Pierre Dixon, Santa Clara County PAST PRESIDENT Frank J. Vanella, San Bernardino County Gordon Spencer Merced County Terry Wiley, Alameda County Acknowledgments The research and preparation of this document required the effort, skill, and collaboration of some of California’s most experienced capital-case prosecutors and talented administration- of-justice attorneys. Deep gratitude is extended to all who assisted. Special recognition is also deserved by CDAA’s Projects Editor, Kaye Bassett, Esq. This paper would not have been possible without the hard work and dedication of the California District Attorneys Association’s Death Penalty White Paper Ad Hoc Committee. CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION DEATH PENALTY WHITE PAPER AD HOC COMMITTEE JIM ANDERSON ALAMEDA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE TAMI R. BOGERT CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION SUSAN BLAKE CRIMINAL JUSTICE LEGAL FOUNDATION LAWRENCE G. BROWN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION WARD A. CAMPBELL CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE BRENDA DALY SAN DIEGO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE DANE GILLETTE CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE DAVID R.
    [Show full text]