ILS3 – Book of Abstract

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ILS3 – Book of Abstract INTERNATIONAL LEGUME SOCIETY INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENETICS, POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Third International Legume Society Conference ILS3 2019 Legumes for human and planet health BOOK OF ABSTRACTS POZNAŃ 2019 Scientific Coordinator ILS3 Kevin McPhee Scientific Committee Organizing Committee Adrian Charlton Matt Nelson Bogdan Wolko (Chairman) Alfonso Clemente Paolo Annicchiarico Barbara Naganowska Bernadette Julier Pedro Fevereiro Jorge Paiva Cezary Mądrzak Ping Wan Anna Stachowiak-Szrejbrowska Diego Rubiales Ram Nair Karolina Susek Eric Von Wettberg Richard Thompson Michał Książkiewicz Fred Stoddard Shiv Kumar Magdalena Kroc Laurent Gentzbittel Wojciech Święcicki Magdalena Gawłowska Maria Carlotta Vaz Patto Tom Warkentin Sandra Rychel Wojciech Bielski Editorial office Biuro Organizacji Konferencji Poznański Park Naukowo-Technologiczny Fundacja UAM w Poznaniu ul. Rubież 46 61-612 Poznań, Polska e-mail: [email protected] This volume has been compiled from files supplied by the Authors Cover design Akcygraf DTP/Technical Editor Reginaldo Cammarano ISBN 978-83-950380-1-3 Publisher Fundacja UAM w Poznaniu ul. Rubież 46 61-612 Poznań, Polska e-mail: [email protected] Printed and bound by Totem – druk cyfrowy ul. Jacewska 12, 88-100 Inowrocław, Polska CONTENTS ORAL SESSIONS Opening Lecture Challenges and opportunities for innovative research on legume nutrition and stress adaptation: an ecophysi- ologist’s and phenotyping point of view ...................................................................................................................... 15 C. Salon, V. Bourion, C. Jeudy, D. Moreau, M. Prudent, A. Tixier, A.S. Voisin Oral Session 1. Legume Biodiversity and Genetic Resource Exploitation 1.1 Golden age of genebanks: using genetic diversity in the genomic era ..................................................................... 16 P. Smýkal 1.2 Development of genomic resources for narrow-leafed lupin .................................................................................... 17 L.G. Kamphuis, G. Garg, R. Foley, K.B. Singh 1.3 The origin and distribution of faba bean (Vicia faba) – new insight from the past ................................................ 18 V. Caracuta 1.4 Walking on the wild side: widening the genetic & adaptive diversity of domestic chickpea ................................. 19 J. Berger, A. Kahraman, A. Aydogan, P. Raju, S. Parsons, K. Whisson, F. Basdemir, P. Smykal, E.J. von Wettberg, S. Nuzhdin, D.R. Cook 1.5 The strange case of beans: Phaseolus domestication and convergent evolution ..................................................... 20 R. Papa, L. Rocchetti, E. Bellucci, G. Cortinovis, V. Di Vittori, G. Frascarelli, L. Nanni, M. Rodriguez, T. Gioia, G. Attene, D. Rau, E. Bitocchi 1.6 Development of orphan legumes for sub-Saharan Africa ......................................................................................... 21 M. Abberton, R. Paliwal, B. Faloye, O. Olaniyi 1.7 Soybean breeding for early maturity groups ............................................................................................................. 22 G. Schwertfirm, B. Büttner, C. Riedel, J. Eder, G. Schweizer Oral Session 2. Advances in Legume Genetics, Genomics and other – omics 2.1 Translational genomics for accelerating genetic gains in legumes ........................................................................... 23 R.K. Varshney 2.2 Long non-coding RNA landscape of soybean and identification of lncRNAs potentially associated with agronomic traits ............................................................................................................................................................................... 24 M.B. Singh, A.A. Golicz, P.L. Bhalla 2.3 Lupin evolutionary stories through chromosome and transcriptome analyses ...................................................... 25 K. Susek, B. Abernathy, W. Bielski, K.B. Czyż, M. Tomaszewska, W. Ulaszewski, M. Kroc, S.A. Jackson, B. Naganowska 3 2.4 Genetic analysis and gene identification of seed coat color integrating GWAS and mapping population in adzuki bean ................................................................................................................................................................................ 26 P. Wan, L.W. Chu, P. Zhao, K. Yang, R.X. Fan, L.X.Yin, Y.F. Hu, B. Zhao, Y.S. Li 2.5 Using genomic resources in grasspea (Lathyrus sativus) and pea (Pisum sativum) for comparative trait discovery 27 A. Sarkar, C. Moreau, J. Cheema, A. Edwards, P.M.F. Emmrich, B. Steuernagel, G.G. Kaithakottil, D. Swarbreck, J. Clarke, T.L. Wang, C. Domoney, C. Martin 2.6 Seed development in Phaseolus vulgaris L.: post-transcriptional regulation mediated by miRNAs .................... 28 J.R. Parreira, M. Cappuccio, P. Beck, A. Balestrazzi, P. Fevereiro, S.S. Araújo 2.7 Developing molecular markers for herbicide tolerance traits for the Australian pulse industry ......................... 29 S. Michelmore, D. Mao, L. McMurray, J. Paull, C. Preston, T. Sutton Oral Session 3. New Strategies and Tools for Legume Breeding 3.1 The pea genome and beyond ........................................................................................................................................ 30 J. Burstin, K. Avia, A. Klein, N. Tayeh, G. Aubert, J. Kreplak, M. Leveugle, H. Duborjal, J.P. Pichon, J.F. Herbommez, P. Declerck, M. Floriot, C. Lecomte, H. Houtin, M. Chabert-Martinello, C. Rond-Coissieux, E. Vieille, C. Cruaud, M.C. Le Paslier, The Pea Genome Consortium 3.2 Using molecular marker diversity to infer morphophysiological and adaptive diversity of germplasm accessions: an alfalfa case study ...................................................................................................................................................... 31 P. Annicchiarico, E.C. Brummer, M. Carelli, N. Nazzicari 3.3 Application of genomic selection in Australian Pulse Breeding Programs .............................................................. 32 G.M. Rosewarne, H.V. Kahrood, A.S.K. Shunmugam, S. Sudheesh, B. Pandey, G.C. Spangenberg, S. Kaur 3.4 Individual-based modelling as a tool to identify combinations of traits promoting overyielding in grass-legume mixtures ......................................................................................................................................................................... 33 G. Louarn, R. Baillot, D. Combes, A. Escobar-Guttiérrez 3.5 A rapid gene-introgression platform to transfer Cicer wild alleles to cultivars (or a geneticist’s paradise for legume evolution and adaptation studies) .................................................................................................................. 34 M. Pazos-Navarro, S. Wells, J. Lichtenzveig, J.S. Croser 3.6 Genes underlying early flowering trait in white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) and yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus L.) 35 P. Plewiński, S. Rychel, M. Książkiewicz, M. Tomaszewska, W. Bielski, M.N. Nelson, B. Naganowska, B. Wolko 3.7 Grain legume plant breeding in the EU ...................................................................................................................... 36 F. Muel Oral Session 4. Legume Contribution to Sustainable Agriculture 4.1 Diversification of feed protein sources for the food security – facts and myths ...................................................... 37 W. Święcicki 4.2 Paradox and puzzle: legume-based agri-food and -feed systems in Europe ........................................................... 38 P.P.M. Iannetta, A. Kolmans, A. Trajanov, B. Balázs, B. Howard, D. Savvas, D. Styles, E. Kelemen, F. Tran, G. Ntatsi, H. Maaß, K.T. Hamann, L. Toma, M. Debeljak, M. Williams, M.W. Vasconcelos, R. Vickers, S. Shrestha, G.R. Squire 4.3 Strategies for production of organic winter peas in Germany and Austria ............................................................ 39 W. Vogt-Kaute, I. Jacob, U. Quendt 4.4 Legume cover crops for soil conservation ................................................................................................................... 40 B. Cupina, S. Vujic, D.J. Krstic 4.5 Improved grain yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting bacteria in a field trial under different water regimes .............................................................. 41 S. Laranjeira, S. Reis, C. Torcato, L. Ferreira, F. Raimundo, V. Carnide, A. Fernandes-Silva, G. Marques 4.6 Benefits of legumes/non-legumes intercropping: improved symbiotic N2 fixation, nutrient use efficiency and soil fertility ........................................................................................................................................................................... 42 L. Li, N. Yang, J.D. Zhang, X.G. Bao 4.7 Intercropping of grain legumes with spring oat (Avena sativa L.) increases weed control and total yields in organic farming ........................................................................................................................................................ 43 N. Rinke, H. Böhm 4 Oral Session 5. Legumes for Human and Animal Nutrition and Health 5.1 Legumes in nutrition: understanding and applying scientific data today ............................................................... 44 A. Scarafoni, A. Spadaro, I. Riccardi 5.2 Chemical, nutritional and functional characterization of Apulian black chickpeas .............................................. 45 C. Summo, D. De Angelis,
Recommended publications
  • Final Report Template
    Native Legumes as a Grain Crop for Diversification in Australia RIRDC Publication No. 10/223 RIRDCInnovation for rural Australia Native Legumes as a Grain Crop for Diversification in Australia by Megan Ryan, Lindsay Bell, Richard Bennett, Margaret Collins and Heather Clarke October 2011 RIRDC Publication No. 10/223 RIRDC Project No. PRJ-000356 © 2011 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-74254-188-4 ISSN 1440-6845 Native Legumes as a Grain Crop for Diversification in Australia Publication No. 10/223 Project No. PRJ-000356 The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Botany, Genetics and Plant Breeding
    BSCBO- 302 B.Sc. III YEAR Economic Botany, Genetics And Plant Breeding DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY SCHOOL OF SCIENCES UTTARAKHAND OPEN UNIVERSITY Economic Botany, Genetics and Plant Breeding BSCBO-302 Expert Committee Prof. J. C. Ghildiyal Prof. G.S. Rajwar Retired Principal Principal Government PG College Government PG College Karnprayag Augustmuni Prof. Lalit Tewari Dr. Hemant Kandpal Department of Botany School of Health Science DSB Campus, Uttarakhand Open University Kumaun University, Nainital Haldwani Dr. Pooja Juyal Department of Botany School of Sciences Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani Board of Studies Prof. Y. S. Rawat Prof. C.M. Sharma Department of Botany Department of Botany DSB Campus, Kumoun University HNB Garhwal Central University, Nainital Srinagar Prof. R.C. Dubey Prof. P.D.Pant Head, Department of Botany Director I/C, School of Sciences Gurukul Kangri University Uttarakhand Open University Haridwar Haldwani Dr. Pooja Juyal Department of Botany School of Sciences Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani Programme Coordinator Dr. Pooja Juyal Department of Botany School of Sciences Uttarakhand Open University Haldwani, Nainital Unit Written By: Unit No. 1. Prof. I.S.Bisht 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (ICAR) & 8 Regional Station, Bhowali (Nainital) Uttarakhand UTTARAKHAND OPEN UNIVERSITY Page 1 Economic Botany, Genetics and Plant Breeding BSCBO-302 2-Dr. Pooja Juyal 04 Department of Botany Uttarakhand Open University Haldwani 3. Dr. Atal Bihari Bajpai 9 & 11 Department of Botany, DBS PG College Dehradun-248001 4-Dr. Urmila Rana 10 & 12 Department of Botany, Government College, Chinayalisaur, Uttarakashi Course Editor Prof. Y.S. Rawat Department of Botany DSB Campus, Kumaun University Nainital Title : Economic Botany, Genetics and Plant Breeding ISBN No.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List for an Area
    Wildlife Online Extract Search Criteria: Species List for a Selected Area Species: All Status: All Area: Townsville City Email: [email protected] Date submitted: Monday 26 Sep 2005 11:41:00 Date extracted: Monday 26 Sep 2005 11:46:10 The number of records retrieved = 1932 Kingdom Class Family Scientific Name Common Name NCA EPBC Recs animals amphibians Bufonidae Bufo marinus cane toad . 139 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria peronii emerald spotted treefrog C . 2 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria rothii northern laughing treefrog C . 20 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria rubella ruddy treefrog C . 31 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria nasuta striped rocketfrog C . 20 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria infrafrenata white lipped treefrog C . 1 animals amphibians Hylidae Cyclorana novaehollandiae eastern snapping frog C . 9 animals amphibians Hylidae Cyclorana alboguttata greenstripe frog C . 32 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria caerulea common green treefrog C . 62 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria bicolor northern sedgefrog C . 46 animals amphibians Hylidae Cyclorana brevipes superb collared frog C . 9 animals amphibians Hylidae Cyclorana sp. 1 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria lesueuri sensu lato stony creek frog C . 5 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria inermis bumpy rocketfrog C . 36 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria gracilenta graceful treefrog C . 12 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria fallax eastern sedgefrog C . 22 animals amphibians Microhylidae Cophixalus sp. 2 animals amphibians Microhylidae Cophixalus ornatus ornate nurseryfrog C . 1 animals amphibians Microhylidae Cophixalus mcdonaldi Mount Elliot nurseryfrog R . 6 animals amphibians Myobatrachidae Uperoleia lithomoda stonemason gungan C . 2 animals amphibians Myobatrachidae Crinia deserticola chirping froglet C . 4 animals amphibians Myobatrachidae Limnodynastes terraereginae scarlet sided pobblebonk C . 2 animals amphibians Myobatrachidae Limnodynastes ornatus ornate burrowing frog C .
    [Show full text]
  • 136-019-2558-ตี
    orlly6S NRC Genetic diversity and population structure of pencil yarlr (Vigna lanceolata) (Phaseoleae, Fabaceae), a wild herbaceous legume endemic to Australia, revealed by microsatellite markers Phakchana Nubank6h, sarocha Pimtong, Prakit somta, Sujinna Dachapak, and Peerasak Srinives Abstrac! pencil yaDr (yi8no lan(eoldto Benth.) (Phaseoteae, Fabaceae) is a herbaceous legume endemic to Austmlia. A Pr-evious DorpholoSical study sufLested that pencil yam is a complex species of two or more related t:xa with seven distinct nrorPho genetic diversity and deter' logiial typrs lmorphorypes) and, thus, taxonomic levision is nec€ssary. ID this study, we assessed accessions fiom seveD morphotyPes using 18 microsateUite (simple o mined tire geneti. structure ofa pencilyam collection of62 sequence ipeatl markers with the aim to provide information for taxonomic study. In total. 138 alleles were d€tected with a ofo.61, mean of7.6i alleles per locus. polymorphism infornation content per marker vaded betwe€n 0.06 and 0.90 with a mean while the overall gene diversity was 0.62. Bayesian clustering, principal coordilate, and neighborjoining analyses consistently revealed that these accessions are grouped into two subpopulations with differenc€ in number ofllleles, allelic richness, and genc diversity. The population structure was not related to either morphotype or geographical origin. Gene diversity of yi8ro compaEble i. Ianceolata was higherih.r. that ofwild vigaa rodiata (1.)Wilczek and wild utnbell@ta (Thunb.)Ohwi & Ohashi, withthatofwild yiSno nungo (1.)Hepper, yiSna erilis Tateishi & Ma-xted, andvigna gfandifiora lPIain)Tateishi & Maxted and lowe! than that of wild rigra o[Arhrir (Willd.]Ohwi & Ohashi. These results indicated that the taxonomy ofy.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Fitzroy River Infrastructure Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    Not government policy Commercial in confidence Appendix 1. Vascular plant species recorded from the Lower Dawson River study area. Nomenclature according to Henderson (2002). ACANTHACEAE ARECACEAE Brunoniella australis Livistona decipiens Cabbage palm Dipteracanthus australasicus subsp. australasicus Pseuderanthemum variabile Love Flower ASCLEPIADACEAE *Asclepias curassavica Redhead cottonbush ADIANTACEAE *Cryptostegia grandiflora Rubbervine Cheilanthes sieberi Rock Fern *Gomphocarpus physocarpus Balloonbush Marsdenia viridiflora AIZOACEAE Sarcostemma viminale subsp brunonianum Caustic vine Tetragonia tetragonioides box burr Zaleya galericulata subsp. galericulata ASTERACEAE *Ageratum houstonianum Blue billygoat weed AMARANTHACEAE Bracteantha bracteata Achyranthes aspera Chaff flower *Bidens pilosa Coblers peg Alternanthera denticulata Lesser joyweed Calotis cuneata Blue burr daisy Alternanthera nana Hairy joyweed Cassinia laevis Coughbush Alternanthera nodiflora Centipeda minima var. minima Amaranthus interruptus Chrysocephalum apiculatum Yellow buttons Amaranthus viridus Green amaranth *Cirsium vulgare Spear thistle *Gomphrena celosioides Gomphrena *Conyza canadiensis Fleabane Nyssanthes diffusa Barb wire weed Cyanthillium cinereum Veronia *Emilia sonchifolia Emilia AMARYLLIDACEAE *Lactuca serriola Prickly lettuce Crinum flaccidum Murray lily Olearia sp *Parthenium hysterophorus Parthenium ANACARDIACEAE Pluchea dioscoridis Pleiogynium timorense Burdekin plum Pterocaulon redolens Toothed ragwort Pterocaulon serrulatum *Senecio lautus
    [Show full text]
  • Rangelands, Western Australia
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lose the Plot: Cost-Effective Survey of the Peak Range, Central Queensland
    Lose the plot: cost-effective survey of the Peak Range, central Queensland. Don W. Butlera and Rod J. Fensham Queensland Herbarium, Environmental Protection Agency, Mt Coot-tha Botanic Gardens, Mt Coot-tha Road, Toowong, QLD, 4066 AUSTRALIA. aCorresponding author, email: [email protected] Abstract: The Peak Range (22˚ 28’ S; 147˚ 53’ E) is an archipelago of rocky peaks set in grassy basalt rolling-plains, east of Clermont in central Queensland. This report describes the flora and vegetation based on surveys of 26 peaks. The survey recorded all plant species encountered on traverses of distinct habitat zones, which included the ‘matrix’ adjacent to each peak. The method involved effort comparable to a general flora survey but provided sufficient information to also describe floristic association among peaks, broad habitat types, and contrast vegetation on the peaks with the surrounding landscape matrix. The flora of the Peak Range includes at least 507 native vascular plant species, representing 84 plant families. Exotic species are relatively few, with 36 species recorded, but can be quite prominent in some situations. The most abundant exotic plants are the grass Melinis repens and the forb Bidens bipinnata. Plant distribution patterns among peaks suggest three primary groups related to position within the range and geology. The Peak Range makes a substantial contribution to the botanical diversity of its region and harbours several endemic plants among a flora clearly distinct from that of the surrounding terrain. The distinctiveness of the range’s flora is due to two habitat components: dry rainforest patches reliant upon fire protection afforded by cliffs and scree, and; rocky summits and hillsides supporting xeric shrublands.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Refuges Eubenangee Swamp, Hann Tableland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) National Parks Upper Bridge Creek Queensland 29 April–27 May · 26–27 July 2010
    BUSH BLITZ SPECIES DISCOVERY PROGRAM Brooklyn, Cloudland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) Nature Refuges Eubenangee Swamp, Hann Tableland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) National Parks Upper Bridge Creek Queensland 29 April–27 May · 26–27 July 2010 Australian Biological Resources Study What is Contents Bush Blitz? Bush Blitz is a four-year, What is Bush Blitz? 2 multi-million dollar Abbreviations 2 partnership between the Summary 3 Australian Government, Introduction 4 BHP Billiton and Earthwatch Reserves Overview 6 Australia to document plants Methods 11 and animals in selected properties across Australia’s Results 14 National Reserve System. Discussion 17 Appendix A: Species Lists 31 Fauna 32 This innovative partnership Vertebrates 32 harnesses the expertise of many Invertebrates 50 of Australia’s top scientists from Flora 62 museums, herbaria, universities, Appendix B: Threatened Species 107 and other institutions and Fauna 108 organisations across the country. Flora 111 Appendix C: Exotic and Pest Species 113 Fauna 114 Flora 115 Glossary 119 Abbreviations ANHAT Australian Natural Heritage Assessment Tool EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) NCA Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Queensland) NRS National Reserve System 2 Bush Blitz survey report Summary A Bush Blitz survey was conducted in the Cape Exotic vertebrate pests were not a focus York Peninsula, Einasleigh Uplands and Wet of this Bush Blitz, however the Cane Toad Tropics bioregions of Queensland during April, (Rhinella marina) was recorded in both Cloudland May and July 2010. Results include 1,186 species Nature Refuge and Hann Tableland National added to those known across the reserves. Of Park. Only one exotic invertebrate species was these, 36 are putative species new to science, recorded, the Spiked Awlsnail (Allopeas clavulinus) including 24 species of true bug, 9 species of in Cloudland Nature Refuge.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Channels, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Details/Summary/ 197892/0]
    2017 LanguaL proposals from Australian NUTTAB2010 The Australian NUTTAB2010 data set includes 484 indigenous foods, which presents is a particular challenge for LanguaL indexing, as most of these plants and animals are absent from facet B of the thesaurus. 1. ANIMAL USED AS FOOD SOURCE Proposals for new animal food sources in facet B are pretty straightforward. ANIMAL USED AS FOOD SOURCE> ANIMAL (MAMMAL) [B1134] BT proposed AI synonyms NUTTAB2010 proposed descriptor ANIMAL POSSUM Phalangeriformes, or possums, any of a number brushtail Trichosurus (MAMMAL) of arboreal marsupial species native to possum, arnhemensis, [B1134] Australia, New Guinea, and Sulawesi: trichosuru northern - Phalangeridae (possums and cuscuses), a s, brushtail family of mammals native to Australia and New pseudoch possum, flesh Guinea containing most of the species referred eirus, cooked; to as "possums" in Australia phalanger Northern - Common brushtail possum (Trichosurus idae Brushtail vulpecula), a common possum in Australian Possum urban areas, invasive in New Zealand [15A20119] - Common ringtail possum (Pseudocheirus Trichosurus peregrinus), also common in Australian urban arnhemensis, areas, absent from New Zealand northern [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Possum] brushtail possum, kidney cooked; Northern Brushtail Possum [15A20120] Trichosurus arnhemensis, northern brushtail possum, liver cooked; Northern Brushtail Possum [15A20121] MARINE SEA COW <SCINAM>Sirenia Illiger, 1811 [ITIS 180676] sirenia, Dugong MAMMAL sirens [B1122] Sirenia, commonly referred to
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Vegetation Gap Analysis
    Flora and Vegetation Survey Gap Analysis Woodie Woodie Mine Prepared By Prepared For MBS Environmental and Consolidated Minerals Date January 2020 DOCUMENT STATUS VERSION TYPE AUTHOR/S REVIEWER/S DATE DISTRIBUTED V1 Internal review E.M. Mattiske - - V2 Draft for client E.M. Mattiske E. Mattiske 17/12/2019 FINAL Final report L. Rowles/E. Mattiske E. Mattiske 15/01/2020 (ACN 063 507 175, ABN 39 063 507 175) PO Box 437 Kalamunda WA 6926 Phone: +61 8 9257 1625 Email: [email protected] COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER Copyright The information contained in this report is the property of Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd. The use or copying of the whole or any part of this report without the written permission of Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd is not permitted. Disclaimer This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of MBS Environmental, and is subject to and issued in accordance with the agreement between MBS Environmental and Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd. This report is based on the scope of services defined by MBS Environmental, the budgetary and time constraints imposed by MBS Environmental, and the methods consistent with the preceding. Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd has utilised information and data supplied by MBS Environmental (and its agents), and sourced from government databases, literature, departments and agencies in the preparation of this report. Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd has compiled this report on the basis that any supplied or sourced information and data was accurate at the time of publication. Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for the use of, or reliance upon, the whole or any part of this report by any third party.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phytopharmacological Review on Vigna Species
    ISSN 0976 - 3090 (Print) 2231 - 0541 (Online) PHARMANEST A PHYTOPHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEW ON VIGNA SPECIES Gangarao Battu1, Ch.K.V.L.S.N.Anjana Male1*, T.Hari priya2, Venna Naga Malleswari2, Sk.Reeshma2 1A.U.College of pharmaceutical sciences, Andhra university, Visakhapatnam Andhra Pradesh, India. 2Narsaraopet Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences,Narsaraopet, Guntur Dist, Andhra Pradesh, India. ABSTRACT Plants are the almost exclusive source of drugs for a majority of the world’s population. Therefore, it remains a challenge for scientists to provide efficient, safe and cheap medications, especially for rural areas, with the available resources at the nearest. In the present review an attempt has been made to gather the information regarding taxanomical characters, various species, climatic conditions, various folklore usages, and some of phytochemical, pharmacological, antimicrobial studies conducted so far on these vigna genus plants which belongs to leguminosae family. This review reveals that legumes can be used as antioxidant in treating various ailments like liver diseases, cancer, diabetes, kidney disorders and for curing various microbial infections. These legumes acts as good nutritive as well as cures various ailments hence these legumes comes under nutraceuticals. With this review we conclude that there is a need of conducting further studies for isolation of individual constituents, to find our their pharmacognostic characters, and going for different formulations and screening of various activities on these genus plants Key words: vigna species, vigna mung, vigna radiate, phytochemical work INTRODUCTION and sometimes still, especially in non-scholarly Man and Animals depend on the plants for their very sources — included in the genus Phaseolus. Common existence.
    [Show full text]