DOCSLIB.ORG

Flora and Vegetation Gap Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Flora and Vegetation Survey Gap Analysis Woodie Woodie Mine Prepared By Prepared For MBS Environmental and Consolidated Minerals Date January 2020 DOCUMENT STATUS VERSION TYPE AUTHOR/S REVIEWER/S DATE DISTRIBUTED V1 Internal review E.M. Mattiske - - V2 Draft for client E.M. Mattiske E. Mattiske 17/12/2019 FINAL Final report L. Rowles/E. Mattiske E. Mattiske 15/01/2020 (ACN 063 507 175, ABN 39 063 507 175) PO Box 437 Kalamunda WA 6926 Phone: +61 8 9257 1625 Email: [email protected] COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER Copyright The information contained in this report is the property of Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd. The use or copying of the whole or any part of this report without the written permission of Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd is not permitted. Disclaimer This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of MBS Environmental, and is subject to and issued in accordance with the agreement between MBS Environmental and Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd. This report is based on the scope of services defined by MBS Environmental, the budgetary and time constraints imposed by MBS Environmental, and the methods consistent with the preceding. Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd has utilised information and data supplied by MBS Environmental (and its agents), and sourced from government databases, literature, departments and agencies in the preparation of this report. Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd has compiled this report on the basis that any supplied or sourced information and data was accurate at the time of publication. Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for the use of, or reliance upon, the whole or any part of this report by any third party. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 1 1. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE ........................................................................................................ 3 2. METHODS ...................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1. Desktop Assessment ............................................................................................................. 3 2.2. Field Survey ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.3. Survey Limitations ................................................................................................................. 4 2.4. Summarising Flora Survey Results .......................................................................................... 7 3. DESKTOP ASSESSMENT RESULTS ................................................................................................ 7 3.1. Location ............................................................................................................................... 7 3.2. Geology, landforms and soils .................................................................................................. 7 3.3. Land Systems ....................................................................................................................... 7 3.4. Pre-European Vegetation Associations ..................................................................................... 7 3.5. Flora .................................................................................................................................... 8 3.6. Vegetation ............................................................................................................................ 8 3.7. Other Matters of Conservation Significance .............................................................................. 8 4. FIELD SURVEY RESULTS ............................................................................................................... 8 4.1. Flora .................................................................................................................................... 8 4.1.1. Threatened and Priority Flora ................................................................................................. 8 4.1.2. Introduced (Weed) Species and Declared Pest (Plant) Organisms ............................................ 13 4.2. Vegetation .......................................................................................................................... 13 4.2.1. Vegetation Communities ...................................................................................................... 13 5. DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................... 16 5.1. Compliance with Guidelines .................................................................................................. 16 5.2. Survey Effort ...................................................................................................................... 16 5.3. Flora and Vegetation ........................................................................................................... 16 6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................... 17 7. PERSONNEL ................................................................................................................................ 17 8. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 18 TABLES 1: Summary of Flora and Vegetation Surveys 2007 to 2019 Summary of Priority Flora Species recorded on the Woodie Woodie lease areas, 2007 to 2: 2019 3: Summary of Vegetation Communities recorded on the Woodie Woodie Lease areas FIGURES 1: Survey Areas 2: Sampling plots and Transects 3: Priority Flora Locations 4: Vegetation APPENDICES A1: Threatened and priority flora definitions A2: Threatened and priority ecological community definitions A3: Categories and control measures of declared pest (plant) organisms in Western Australia A4: Other definitions A5: NVIS Structural Formation Terminology Likelihood Of Conservation Significant Plant Species Potentially Occurring Within The Woodie B: Woodie Project Area Summary Of Potential And Recorded Vascular Plant Species In The C: Woodie Woodie Project Area (2019) And Records Of Previous Mattiske Surveys (2007-2013; 2018) LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS BAM Act: Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007 (WA) BC Act: Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (WA) BOM: Bureau of Meteorology DotEE: Department of the Environment and Energy DBCA: Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions DPaW: Department of Parks and Wildlife (now under DBCA) DPIRD: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (includes Agriculture and Food) EP Act: Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA) EPA: Environmental Protection Authority EPBC Act: Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) IBRA: Interim Biogeographical Regionalisation for Australia PEC: Priority ecological community TEC: Threatened ecological community WAH: Western Australian Herbarium (PERTH) WC Act: Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 (WA) (superseded by BC Act as of 01 January 2010) Vegetation Gap Analysis – Woodie Woodie mine 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following is a gap analysis of surveys undertaken to date at the Woodie Woodie Project and larger survey area between 2007 and 2019. This report summarises the flora surveys previously undertaken, the flora recorded or potentially occurring and the conservation significant flora recorded. The report reviews whether the surveys have met the current requirements under State and Federal guidance documents, including whether the flora and vegetation surveys have adequately covered the whole site, whether conservation significant taxa have been adequately surveyed, and identified any gaps in coverage of flora and vegetation surveys and addressed what survey work, if any, is required to fill any gaps in coverage. Methodology A desktop assessment was conducted using databases such as previous survey datasets; FloraBase, Protected Matters Search Tool (PMST), the NatureMap database and the Atlas of Living Australia. For each flora survey the following was summarised): Year and month of survey, Survey area, Survey type, Key Methods used and any conservation significant flora recorded. At each site the following environmental parameters were recorded: GPS location, local site topography; Soil type and colour; outcropping rocks and their type; percentage litter cover and percentage bare ground; approximate time since fire; and Vegetation condition Survey Limitations The majority of the surveys have been taken in April to June enabling coverage of the maximum range of flora values. Some years rainfall prior to the field work has been limited, as the work has been undertaken intensely and over multiple years this is not considered a limitation in achieving compliance. All survey botanists were experienced with Pilbara flora. The surveys have covered the entire mining and corridor areas and as such was more than adequate. The survey plots comply with the 50m x 50m standard and replicates have been undertaken in all communities where possible. The adequacy of previous flora surveys was determined by comparing the surveys to the requirements set out in the current Guiding EPA documents Desktop survey results Location- The Woodie Woodie Mine project area are located
Recommended publications
  • Additional Information

    Additional Information

    Current Survey Introduced Flora Records Vegetation Condition *Acetosa vesicaria Excellent 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000
  • Rail Development Vegetation and Flora Survey

    Rail Development Vegetation and Flora Survey

    JANUARY 2012 BROCKMAN RESOURCES LIMITED RAIL DEVELOPMENT VEGETATION AND FLORA SURVEY This page has been left blank intentionally BROCKMAN RESOURCES LIMITED RAIL DEVELOPMENT VEGETATION AND FLORA SURVEY Brockman Resources Limited Vegetation and Flora Survey Rail Corridor Document Status Approved for Issue Rev Author Reviewer Date Name Distributed To Date A Rochelle Renee 02/12/2011 Carol Macpherson Glenn Firth 02/12/2011 Haycock Tuckett Carol Macpherson B Carol 21.12.11 Carol Macpherson Glen Firth 23.12.11 Macpherson ecologia Environment (2011). Reproduction of this report in whole or in part by electronic, mechanical or chemical means including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, in any language, is strictly prohibited without the express approval of Brockman Resources Limited and/or ecologia Environment. Restrictions on Use This report has been prepared specifically for Brockman Resources Limited. Neither the report nor its contents may be referred to or quoted in any statement, study, report, application, prospectus, loan, or other agreement document, without the express approval of Brockman Resources Limited and/or ecologia Environment. ecologia Environment 1025 Wellington Street WEST PERTH WA 6005 Phone: 08 9322 1944 Fax: 08 9322 1599 Email: [email protected] December 2011 i Brockman Resources Limited Vegetation and Flora Survey Rail Corridor TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny

    Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny

    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
  • (A) Journals with the Largest Number of Papers Reporting Estimates Of

    (A) Journals with the Largest Number of Papers Reporting Estimates Of

    Supplementary Materials Figure S1. (a) Journals with the largest number of papers reporting estimates of genetic diversity derived from cpDNA markers; (b) Variation in the diversity (Shannon-Wiener index) of the journals publishing studies on cpDNA markers over time. Figure S2. (a) The number of publications containing estimates of genetic diversity obtained using cpDNA markers, in relation to the nationality of the corresponding author; (b) The number of publications on genetic diversity based on cpDNA markers, according to the geographic region focused on by the study. Figure S3. Classification of the angiosperm species investigated in the papers that analyzed genetic diversity using cpDNA markers: (a) Life mode; (b) Habitat specialization; (c) Geographic distribution; (d) Reproductive cycle; (e) Type of flower, and (f) Type of pollinator. Table S1. Plant species identified in the publications containing estimates of genetic diversity obtained from the use of cpDNA sequences as molecular markers. Group Family Species Algae Gigartinaceae Mazzaella laminarioides Angiospermae Typhaceae Typha laxmannii Angiospermae Typhaceae Typha orientalis Angiospermae Typhaceae Typha angustifolia Angiospermae Typhaceae Typha latifolia Angiospermae Araliaceae Eleutherococcus sessiliflowerus Angiospermae Polygonaceae Atraphaxis bracteata Angiospermae Plumbaginaceae Armeria pungens Angiospermae Aristolochiaceae Aristolochia kaempferi Angiospermae Polygonaceae Atraphaxis compacta Angiospermae Apocynaceae Lagochilus macrodontus Angiospermae Polygonaceae Atraphaxis
  • 503 Flora V7 2.Doc 3

    503 Flora V7 2.Doc 3

    Browse LNG Precinct ©WOODSIDE Browse Liquefied Natural Gas Precinct Strategic Assessment Report (Draft for Public Review) December 2010 Appendix C-18 A Vegetation and Flora Survey of James Price Point: Wet Season 2009 A Vegetation and Flora Survey of James Price Point: Wet Season 2009 Prepared for Department of State Development December 2009 A Vegetation and Flora Survey of James Price Point: Wet Season 2009 © Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2009 ABN 49 092 687 119 Level 1, 228 Carr Place Leederville Western Australia 6007 Ph: (08) 9328 1900 Fax: (08) 9328 6138 Project No.: 503 Prepared by: P. Chukowry, M. Maier Checked by: G. Humphreys Approved for Issue: M. Maier This document has been prepared to the requirements of the client identified on the cover page and no representation is made to any third party. It may be cited for the purposes of scientific research or other fair use, but it may not be reproduced or distributed to any third party by any physical or electronic means without the express permission of the client for whom it was prepared or Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd. This report has been designed for double-sided printing. Hard copies supplied by Biota are printed on recycled paper. Cube:Current:503 (Kimberley Hub Wet Season):Doc:Flora:503 flora v7_2.doc 3 A Vegetation and Flora Survey of James Price Point: Wet Season 2009 4 Cube:Current:503 (Kimberley Hub Wet Season):Doc:Flora:503 flora v7_2.doc Biota A Vegetation and Flora Survey of James Price Point: Wet Season 2009 A Vegetation and Flora Survey of James Price
  • Kingdom Class Family Scientific Name Common Name I Q a Records

    Kingdom Class Family Scientific Name Common Name I Q a Records

    Kingdom Class Family Scientific Name Common Name I Q A Records plants monocots Poaceae Paspalidium rarum C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Aristida latifolia feathertop wiregrass C 3/3 plants monocots Poaceae Aristida lazaridis C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Astrebla pectinata barley mitchell grass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Cenchrus setigerus Y 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Echinochloa colona awnless barnyard grass Y 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Aristida polyclados C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Cymbopogon ambiguus lemon grass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Digitaria ctenantha C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Enteropogon ramosus C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Enneapogon avenaceus C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Eragrostis tenellula delicate lovegrass C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Urochloa praetervisa C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Heteropogon contortus black speargrass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Iseilema membranaceum small flinders grass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Bothriochloa ewartiana desert bluegrass C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Brachyachne convergens common native couch C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Enneapogon lindleyanus C 3/3 plants monocots Poaceae Enneapogon polyphyllus leafy nineawn C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Sporobolus actinocladus katoora grass C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Cenchrus pennisetiformis Y 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Sporobolus australasicus C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Eriachne pulchella subsp. dominii C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Dichanthium sericeum subsp. humilius C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Digitaria divaricatissima var. divaricatissima C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Eriachne mucronata forma (Alpha C.E.Hubbard 7882) C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Sehima nervosum C 1/1 plants monocots Poaceae Eulalia aurea silky browntop C 2/2 plants monocots Poaceae Chloris virgata feathertop rhodes grass Y 1/1 CODES I - Y indicates that the taxon is introduced to Queensland and has naturalised.
  • Volume 5 Pt 3

    Volume 5 Pt 3

    Conservation Science W. Aust. 7 (1) : 153–178 (2008) Flora and Vegetation of the banded iron formations of the Yilgarn Craton: the Weld Range ADRIENNE S MARKEY AND STEVEN J DILLON Science Division, Department of Environment and Conservation, Wildlife Research Centre, PO Box 51, Wanneroo WA 6946. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT A survey of the flora and floristic communities of the Weld Range, in the Murchison region of Western Australia, was undertaken using classification and ordination analysis of quadrat data. A total of 239 taxa (species, subspecies and varieties) and five hybrids of vascular plants were collected and identified from within the survey area. Of these, 229 taxa were native and 10 species were introduced. Eight priority species were located in this survey, six of these being new records for the Weld Range. Although no species endemic to the Weld Range were located in this survey, new populations of three priority listed taxa were identified which represent significant range extensions for these taxa of conservation significance. Eight floristic community types (six types, two of these subdivided into two subtypes each) were identified and described for the Weld Range, with the primary division in the classification separating a dolerite-associated floristic community from those on banded iron formation. Floristic communities occurring on BIF were found to be associated with topographic relief, underlying geology and soil chemistry. There did not appear to be any restricted communities within the landform, but some communities may be geographically restricted to the Weld Range. Because these communities on the Weld Range are so closely associated with topography and substrate, they are vulnerable to impact from mineral exploration and open cast mining.
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland

    Southern Gulf, Queensland

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • Adoption, Use and Perception of Australian Acacias Around the World

    Adoption, Use and Perception of Australian Acacias Around the World

    Diversity and Distributions, (Diversity Distrib.) (2011) 17, 822–836 S BIODIVERSITY Adoption, use and perception of PECIAL ISSUE RESEARCH Australian acacias around the world Christian A. Kull1*, Charlie M. Shackleton2, Peter J. Cunningham3, Catherine Ducatillon4, Jean-Marc Dufour-Dror5, Karen J. Esler6, James B. Friday7, Anto´nio C. Gouveia8, A. R. Griffin9, Elizabete Marchante8, Stephen J. :H Midgley10, Anı´bal Pauchard11, Haripriya Rangan1, David M. Richardson12, Tony Rinaudo13, Jacques Tassin14, Lauren S. Urgenson15, Graham P. von Maltitz16, Rafael D. Zenni17 and Matthew J. Zylstra6 UMAN - MEDIATED INTRODUCTIONS OF 1School of Geography and Environmental Science, ABSTRACT Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 2Department of Environmental Science, Rhodes Aim To examine the different uses and perceptions of introduced Australian University, Grahamstown, South Africa, 3Sowing acacias (wattles; Acacia subgenus Phyllodineae) by rural households and Seeds of Change in the Sahel Project, SIM, communities. Maradi, Niger Republic, 4INRA, Jardin Thuret, Antibes, France, 5Environmental Policy Center, Location Eighteen landscape-scale case studies around the world, in Vietnam, Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies, Jerusalem, India, Re´union, Madagascar, South Africa, Congo, Niger, Ethiopia, Israel, France, Israel, 6Department of Conservation Ecology and Portugal, Brazil, Chile, Dominican Republic and Hawai‘i. A Journal of Conservation Biogeography Entomology and Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University, South Africa, 7University
  • SIS) – 2017 Version

    SIS) – 2017 Version

    Information Sheet on EAA Flyway Network Sites Information Sheet on EAA Flyway Network Sites (SIS) – 2017 version Available for download from http://www.eaaflyway.net/about/the-flyway/flyway-site-network/ Categories approved by Second Meeting of the Partners of the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Partnership in Beijing, China 13-14 November 2007 - Report (Minutes) Agenda Item 3.13 Notes for compilers: 1. The management body intending to nominate a site for inclusion in the East Asian - Australasian Flyway Site Network is requested to complete a Site Information Sheet. The Site Information Sheet will provide the basic information of the site and detail how the site meets the criteria for inclusion in the Flyway Site Network. When there is a new nomination or an SIS update, the following sections with an asterisk (*), from Questions 1-14 and Question 30, must be filled or updated at least so that it can justify the international importance of the habitat for migratory waterbirds. 2. The Site Information Sheet is based on the Ramsar Information Sheet. If the site proposed for the Flyway Site Network is an existing Ramsar site then the documentation process can be simplified. 3. Once completed, the Site Information Sheet (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Flyway Partnership Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the Information Sheet and, where possible, digital versions (e.g. shapefile) of all maps. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • Endemism in Recently Diverged Angiosperms Is Associated with Chromosome Set Duplication

    Endemism in Recently Diverged Angiosperms Is Associated with Chromosome Set Duplication

    Endemism in Recently Diverged Angiosperms Is Associated With Chromosome Set Duplication Sara Villa University of Milan: Universita degli Studi di Milano Matteo Montagna Universita degli Studi di Milano Simon Pierce ( [email protected] ) Università degli Studi di Milano: Universita degli Studi di Milano https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1182- 987X Research Article Keywords: adaptative radiation, apo-endemics, diversity creation, genome doubling, neo-endemism, speciation mechanism Posted Date: June 17th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-550165/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/22 Abstract Chromosome set duplication (polyploidy) drives instantaneous speciation and shifts in ecology for angiosperms, and is frequently observed in neo-endemic species. However, the extent to which chromosome set duplication is associated with endemism throughout the owering plants has not been determined. We hypothesised that across the angiosperms polyploidy is more frequent and more pronounced (higher evident ploidy levels) for recent endemics. Data on chromosome counts, molecular dating and distribution for 4210 species belonging to the major clades of angiosperms were mined from literature-based databases. As all clades include diploid taxa, with polyploids representing a possible ‘upper limit’ to the number of chromosomes over evolutionary time, upper boundary regression was used to investigate the relationship between the number of chromosomes and time since taxon divergence, both across clades and separately for families, with endemic and non-endemic species compared. A signicant negative exponential relationship between the number of chromosomes and taxon age was 2 evident across angiosperm clades (R adj=0.48 with endemics and non-endemics considered together, 2 2 R adj=0.46 for endemics; R adj=0.44 for non-endemics; p ≤0.0001 in all cases), which was three times stronger for endemics (decay constant=0.12, cf.
  • Great Northern Highway Intersection Reconnaissance Flora and Fauna Survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Pty Ltd

    Great Northern Highway Intersection Reconnaissance Flora and Fauna Survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Pty Ltd

    Great Northern Highway Intersection reconnaissance flora and fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Pty Ltd Great Northern Highway Intersection reconnaissance flora and fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Pty Ltd November 2020 Final 1 Great Northern Highway Intersection reconnaissance flora and fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Pty Ltd Great Northern Highway Intersection reconnaissance flora and fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Pty Ltd Version history Author/s Reviewer/s Version Version Date Submitted to number submitted S.Findlay, J.Clark and G.Wells Draft for client 0.1 27-Nov-20 D.Temple-Smith C.Woods and comments M.Clunies-Ross J.Clark G.Wells Final, client 1.0 04-Dec-20 D.Temple-Smith comments addressed © Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2020 The use of this report is solely for the client for the purpose in which it was prepared. Phoenix Environmental Sciences accepts no responsibility for use beyond this purpose. All rights are reserved and no part of this report may be reproduced or copied in any form without the written permission of Phoenix Environmental Sciences or the client. Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2/3 King Edward Road OSBORNE PARK WA 6017 P: 08 6323 5410 E: [email protected] Project code: 1377-WON-MRL-BOT; 1378-WON-MRL-VER i Great Northern Highway Intersection reconnaissance flora and fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Pty Ltd EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Wonmunna Iron Ore Project (the Project)is located approximately 74 km WNW of the town of Newman, Western Australia.