DOCSLIB.ORG

2008 Solar Technologies Market Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2008 Solar Technologies Market Report Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy 2008 SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES MARKET REPORT JANUARY 2010 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... i Figures ........................................................................................................................................... iii Tables ............................................................................................................................................. v Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................ vi List of Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... vii Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... ix Notes .............................................................................................................................................. xi 1. Installation Trends, Photovoltaic and Concentrating Solar Power ..................................... 1 1.1 Global Installed PV Capacity................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Cumulative Installed PV Capacity Worldwide .................................................................. 1 1.1.2 Growth in Cumulative and Annual Installed PV Capacity Worldwide ............................. 2 1.1.3 Worldwide PV Installations by Interconnection Status and Application .......................... 4 1.2 U.S. Installed PV Capacity ................................................................................................... 6 1.2.1 Cumulative U.S. Installed PV Capacity ............................................................................. 6 1.2.2 U.S. PV Installations by Interconnection Status ................................................................ 6 1.2.3 U.S. PV Installations by Application and Sector ............................................................... 7 1.2.4 U.S. States with the Largest PV Markets ........................................................................... 9 1.3 Global and U.S. Installed CSP Capacity ............................................................................. 10 1.3.1 Cumulative Installed CSP Worldwide ............................................................................. 10 1.3.2 Major non-U.S. International Markets for CSP ............................................................... 10 1.3.3 U.S. Installed CSP Capacity ............................................................................................ 11 1.4 References ........................................................................................................................... 13 2. Industry Trends, Photovoltaic and Concentrating Solar Power ........................................ 15 2.1 PV Production Trends ......................................................................................................... 15 2.1.1 Global PV Production ...................................................................................................... 15 2.1.2 U.S. PV Production .......................................................................................................... 18 2.2 Global and U.S. PV Shipments and Revenue ..................................................................... 20 2.2.1 Global PV Shipments ....................................................................................................... 20 2.2.2 Global PV Cell/Module Revenue .................................................................................... 23 2.2.3 U.S. PV Shipments .......................................................................................................... 24 2.2.4 U.S. PV Cell/Module Revenue ........................................................................................ 26 2.2.5 U.S. PV Imports and Exports ........................................................................................... 27 2.3 CSP Manufacturer and Shipment Trends ........................................................................... 29 2.3.1 CSP Manufacturers .......................................................................................................... 29 2.3.2 CSP Shipments................................................................................................................. 29 2.4 Material and Supply Chain Issues....................................................................................... 30 2.4.1 Polysilicon Supply for PV ............................................................................................... 30 2.4.2 Rare Metals Supply and Demand for PV ......................................................................... 36 2.4.3 Glass Supply for PV ......................................................................................................... 36 2.4.4 Material and Water Constraints for CSP ......................................................................... 37 2.4.5 Land and Transmission Constraints for Utility-Scale Solar ............................................ 38 2.5 Solar Industry Employment Trends .................................................................................... 39 2.5.1 Types of Jobs in the PV and CSP Industries.................................................................... 40 2.5.2 Current and Projected Employment in the Solar Industry, Global and U.S. ................... 41 2.5.3 Labor Intensity in the PV Industry, Global and U.S. ....................................................... 43 2.5.4 Employment and Labor Intensity in the U.S. and Global CSP Industry ......................... 44 i 2.5.5 Quality Assurance and Certification for Solar PV Installation ........................................ 45 2.5.6 DOE Response to Current Barriers in Workforce Development ..................................... 45 2.6 References ........................................................................................................................... 46 3. Cost, Price, and Performance Trends ................................................................................... 50 3.1. Levelized Cost of Energy, PV and CSP............................................................................. 50 3.2. Solar Resource and Capacity Factor, PV and CSP ............................................................ 51 3.2.1. Solar Resource for PV .................................................................................................... 51 3.2.2 Solar Resource for CSP ................................................................................................... 53 3.2.3 Capacity Factor, PV and CSP .......................................................................................... 54 3.3 PV Cell, Module, and System Efficiency ........................................................................... 55 3.3.1 PV Cell Type and Efficiency ........................................................................................... 56 3.3.2 PV Module Efficiency ..................................................................................................... 57 3.3.3 PV System Efficiency and Derate Factor ........................................................................ 58 3.4 PV Module Reliability ........................................................................................................ 58 3.5 PV Module Price Trends ..................................................................................................... 59 3.6 PV Installation Cost Trends ................................................................................................ 61 3.7 PV Operations and Maintenance ........................................................................................ 69 3.7.1 PV Operations and Maintenance Not Including Inverter Replacement ........................... 69 3.7.2 PV Inverter Replacement and Warranty Trends .............................................................. 72 3.8 CSP Installation and Operations and Maintenance Cost Trends ........................................ 73 3.9 CSP Technology Characteristics and System Performance................................................ 73 3.9.1 Parabolic Trough Technology .......................................................................................... 73 3.9.2 Power Tower Technology ................................................................................................ 74 3.9.3 Dish-Engine Technology ................................................................................................. 74 3.9.4 Linear Fresnel Reflector Technology .............................................................................. 74 3.9.5 Storage ............................................................................................................................. 74 3.9.6 Heat-Transfer Fluid .......................................................................................................... 74 3.9.7 Water Use ......................................................................................................................... 75 3.9.8 Land Requirements .......................................................................................................... 75 3.10 References ........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Konarka Technologies
    Colorado Renewable Energy Collaboratory Partners for Clean Energy Center for Revolutionary Solar Photoconversion updateSummer 2010 CRSP Research Profile Plasma Sheds Light on Mysteries of PV Efficiency Stars are made of plasma, an ionized gas comprising a complex mixture of gas-phase species. So it’s remarkable that CRSP researchers are using plasmas to create photovoltaic (PV) devices that can better convert energy from our own star, the sun, into power we can use here on Earth. A CRSP research team, made up of re- searchers from CSU and NREL, has been using plasmas to modify PV materials and improve the interfaces between the layers of materials in thin-film solar cells. The goal is to increase efficiency in PV devices. Ellen Fisher is an analytical/materials The CRSP plasma processing project team Ina Martin (left) and Ellen Fisher are shown chemist and the project’s principle investiga- includes Ina Martin, an analytical chemist at in the laboratory with a low-pressure rf plasma reactor. The two chemists work to- tor at CSU. “We know we can use plasmas NREL. Her role is to extend the character- gether on a CRSP project that uses plasmas to change materials and get different device ization of the modified materials and evalu- results, but we need to know exactly how it to modify PV materials and improve the ate the resulting devices under real-world interfaces between the layers of materials in works,” she says. conditions. The rest of the team includes thin-film solar cells. Credit: Jeff Shearer. The team is developing new materials for Michael Elliott, a CSU electrochemist with solar cells by taking known materials, such a background in PV device testing; Patrick McCurdy, a CSU staff scientist who special- chemistry, applying these results to as titanium dioxide (TiO2), and improv- ing their properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and Safety Impacts of Solar Photovoltaics
    Filed with the Iowa Utilities Board on September 16, 2019, GCU-2019-0004 Health and Safety Impacts of Solar Photovoltaics The increasing presence of utility-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) systems (sometimes referred to as solar farms) is a rather new development in North Carolina’s landscape. Due to the new and unknown nature of this technology, it is natural for communities near such developments to be concerned about health and safety impacts. Unfortunately, the quick emergence of utility-scale solar has cultivated fertile grounds for myths and half-truths about the health impacts of this technology, which can lead to unnecessary fear and conflict. Photovoltaic (PV) technologies and solar inverters are not known to pose any significant health dangers to their neighbors. The most important dangers posed are increased highway traffic during the relative short construction period and dangers posed to trespassers of contact with high voltage equipment. This latter risk is mitigated by signage and the security measures that industry uses to deter trespassing. As will be discussed in more detail below, risks of site contamination are much less than for most other industrial uses because PV technologies employ few toxic chemicals and those used are used in very small quantities. Due to the reduction in the pollution from fossil-fuel-fired electric generators, the overall impact of solar development on human health is overwhelmingly positive. This pollution reduction results from a partial replacement of fossil-fuel fired generation by emission-free PV-generated electricity, which reduces harmful sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5).
    [Show full text]
  • Are DOE Loan Guarantees an Energy Policy Mistake?
    Greentech Media http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/print/Are-DOE-Loan-Guarantee... RESEARCH & ANALYSIS | POLICY ERIC WESOFF: JUNE 2, 2011 Are DOE Loan Guarantees an Energy Policy Mistake? It’s the Liberals versus the Libertarians: Is the DOE Loan Guarantee Program a righteous creator of jobs and new industry or a wrongful use of taxpayer money? The United States DOE Loan Guarantee Program has disbursed $30.7 billion and claims to have created or saved 62,350 jobs. The loan program has three categories: Section 1703 of Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 authorizes the DOE to support innovative clean energy technologies that are typically unable to obtain conventional private financing due to high technology risks. Section 1705 is a temporary program designed to address the current economic conditions of the nation. It authorizes loan guarantees for certain renewable energy systems, electric power transmission systems and leading edge biofuels projects that commence construction no later than September 30, 2011. The Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) Loan Program consists of direct loans to support the development of advanced technology vehicles and associated components in the U.S. The more publicized loan guarantee recipients include Solyndra , BrightSource Energy , Ford, Fisker , and Tesla. (See the more complete list of loan recipients at the end of this article.) The Loan Program Office (LPO) has issued conditional commitments to 13 power generation projects with cumulative project costs of over $27 billion. This represents a greater investment in clean energy generation projects than the entire private sector made in 2009 ($10.6 billion), and almost as much as was invested in such projects in 2008 -- the peak financing year to date ($22.6 billion), according to the DOE.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar ABS 101
    Project Bond Focus U.S. Residential Solar ABS 101 U.S. Residential Solar ABS 101 ABC Introduction and PPAs contracts is typically responsible for the installation and maintenance of the solar equipment throughout the term of the contract. Asset-backed securities (ABS) secured by residential solar financing contracts continue to emerge as a new sector of Leases the U.S. securitization market. The key drivers of expansion are the overall growth of the U.S. rooftop solar market, as Customers pay a fixed amount per month, generally well as institutional investors' increasing comfort for this escalating every year and benefiting from the production of new asset class. the panels installed by the developer providing the lease, regardless of actual consumption. The contracts typically The residential solar sector has experienced solid growth in include a minimum production guarantee to mitigate the risk recent years, with a peak of more than 2.5GW of capacity of equipment underperformance. The minimum production installed in 2016, representing approximately 325 thousand guarantee payments are typically made by the installers to households. After a 16% decrease in installation in 2017 the homeowner and do not reduce lease payments (no due to lower customer acquisition in California and netting). In some contracts, true-up payments at year-end Northeastern states, as well as regulatory uncertainty in may be required for over/under performance. Nevada, the residential solar market grew by 7% in 2018. Historically leading states seem to be transitioning to more PPAs stable growth rates, while Texas, Florida and Nevada are Homeowners pay every month for the actual solar energy experiencing higher growth.
    [Show full text]
  • WHAT IS the FUTURE ENERGY JOBS ACT? an In-Depth Look Into Illinois’ New Energy Legislation
    CUB WHAT IS THE FUTURE ENERGY JOBS ACT? An in-depth look into Illinois’ new energy legislation The Future Energy Jobs Act (Senate Bill of negotiations between energy companies, 2814) is one of the most signifi cant pieces consumer advocates, and environmental groups. of energy legislation ever to pass the Illinois This fact sheet is designed to show you how General Assembly. It followed nearly two years the new law will impact electric customers. MAIN FEATURES OF THE ACT HOW DO THESE CONSUMER PROTECTIONS HELP ME? ENERGY EFFICIENCY Energy Effi ciency • Requires Commonwealth Edison and Ameren Illinois— What the act does: the state’s two biggest electric utilities—to dramatically It requires Illinois’ largest electric utilities to launch one of expand their energy effi ciency programs and reduce the nation’s most ambitious plans for customer electricity electricity waste, lowering Illinois power bills by billions savings. By 2030, ComEd must expand and enhance custom- of dollars through 2030. er effi ciency programs to cut electricity waste by a record • Expands the defi nition of “low income” beyond just 21.5 percent, and Ameren by 16 percent. people who qualify for state assistance, and it directs the utilities to engage with economically disadvantaged communities in designing and delivering new programs 21.5% 16% for customers most challenged to pay bills. RENEWABLE ENERGY Why that’s important: For years, Illinois effi ciency standards have required utilities to • Fixes Illinois’ renewable energy laws, which will spark offer a whole menu of helpful programs—such as refrigerator billions of dollars in new investment to develop wind and recycling and rebates on effi cient appliances—that allow cus- solar power in Illinois.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact: Kevin Thornton for IMMEDIATE RELEASE 1-800-331-0085
    Contact: Kevin Thornton FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 1-800-331-0085 WAL-MART ANNOUNCES SOLAR POWER PILOT PROJECT Pilot Project marks major step toward its goal of being supplied by 100 percent renewable energy BENTONVILLE, Ark., May 7, 2007 – Today Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE:WMT), announced a major purchase of solar power from three solar power providers, BP Solar, SunEdison LLC, and PowerLight, a subsidiary of SunPower Corporation, for 22 combined Wal- Mart stores, Sam’s Clubs and a distribution center in Hawaii and California. As part of a pilot project to determine solar power viability for Wal-Mart, the total solar power production from the 22 sites is estimated to be as much as 20 million kWh (kilowatt-hours) per year. When fully implemented, the aggregate purchase could be one of the U.S., if not the world’s, top-10 largest ever solar power initiatives. “We are taking aggressive steps towards our goal of being supplied by 100 percent renewable energy,” said Kim Saylors-Laster, vice president of energy for Wal-Mart. “The pilot project is yet another example of Wal-Mart’s commitment to making decisions that are good for business and the environment.” “We applaud Wal-Mart's drive to increase its use of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies and look forward to the long-term positive impact their efforts will have on our environment,” said Ron Judkoff, director of the Buildings and Thermal Systems Center at the U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). “Wal-Mart's decision to take advantage of the economic and environmental benefits of solar power and energy efficiency technologies is a great step in the right direction.” The solar power pilot project is a major step toward Wal-Mart’s goal of being supplied by 100 percent renewable energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy
    Projects Projects Renewable Energy Representative Engagements • Represented the project sponsor in connection with • Advised client on a significant investment in Nemaska the non-recourse project financing of the development, Lithium Inc., a Canadian lithium company, in a trans- installation, operation and maintenance of over 150,000 formational market transaction involving a key input in small-scale solar kits in areas of Peru not connected to lithium batteries which are a key component in electric the grid. cars and other technologies as well as renewables • Represented the Buyer acquiring 100 percent of the storage projects. equity interests of two project companies that have two • Advised the underwriters in DTE Electric Company’s solar photovoltaic projects with a combined rating of milestone $525 million green bond offering. Proceeds 6.5MWac/8MWdc on Oahu, Hawaii. of the bonds will support the development and • Represented a multinational energy corporation in construction of low-carbon, clean energy projects like connection with the acquisition of, and its tax equity solar arrays and wind farms, as well as the transmission investment in, solar power generating facilities in infrastructure to support related renewable facilities. California, Texas and Arizona valued from $16 million Solar to $25 million, including one project located on a • Represented Duke Energy in connection with a $360 military base under the U.S. military’s renewable energy million non-recourse project financing of a portfolio procurement initiative. of 24 operating solar farms in North Carolina under • Represented one of the world’s largest solar energy contract with various utility and non-utility offtakers. project companies in its entry into Japan and projects The facility includes a $330 million term loan, a $105 utilizing the Japanese Feed-In Tariff.
    [Show full text]
  • Setting the PACE: Financing Commercial Retrofits
    Setting the PACE: Financing Commercial Retrofits Issue Brief Katrina Managan Program Manager, Institute for Building Efficiency, Johnson Controls Kristina Klimovich Associate, PACENow This report is the result of collaboration by the Johnson Controls Institute for Building Efficiency, PACENow, and the Urban Land Institute. February 2013 Table of Contents Introduction . 3 The Opportunity . 4 Background on PACE . 4 Early History of PACE . 5 PACE Market Activity Today . 6 PACE Financing . 7 Advantages of PACE Financing . 8 Financing Models . 10 Municipal Bond Funded Model (Figure 4) . 10 Privately Funded Model (Figure 5) . 11 Model Examples and Implications . 12 Program Administration . .13 Eligible Technologies and Projects . 14 Technologies and Measures . 14 Toledo, Ohio . 15 Transaction Size . 15 Loading Order Requirements . 16 Minimum Energy Savings Requirement . 17 Eligible Asset Classes, Target Market . 18 Building Owner Engagement . 18 Marketing and Outreach . 19 PACE Project Process . 20 Prologis HQ in San Francisco . 21 Conclusion. 22 Appendix 1: Research Methodology and Interview Questions . 23 Appendix 2: Active PACE Programs as of January 2013 . 24 Appendix 3: Building Efficiency Financing Options . 25 Appendix 4: Efficiency Measures Eligible in Each Program . 26 Appendix 5: Acknowledgements. 27 2 Institute for Building Efficiency www.InstituteBE.com Introduction Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) finance is a new and growing municipal approach to support energy efficiency and renewable energy upgrades in commercial buildings in the United States. As of February 2013, there were 16 commercial PACE programs accepting applications to finance building efficiency projects. Most of these have been active for less than a year, and some are just now working on their first projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Solyndra: Examining the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program Hilary Kao
    William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review Volume 37 | Issue 2 Article 4 Beyond Solyndra: Examining the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program Hilary Kao Repository Citation Hilary Kao, Beyond Solyndra: Examining the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program, 37 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 425 (2013), http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr/vol37/iss2/4 Copyright c 2013 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr BEYOND SOLYNDRA: EXAMINING THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY’S LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM HILARY KAO* ABSTRACT In the year following the Fukushima nuclear disaster in March 2011, the renewable and clean energy industries faced significant turmoil— from natural disasters, to political maelstroms, from the Great Recession, to U.S. debt ceiling debates. The Department of Energy’s Loan Guarantee Program (“DOE LGP”), often a target since before it ever received a dollar of appropriations, has been both blamed and defended in the wake of the bankruptcy filing of Solyndra, a California-based solar panel manufac- turer, in September 2011, because of the $535 million loan guarantee made to it by the Department of Energy (“DOE”) in 2009.1 Critics have suggested political favoritism in loan guarantee awards and have questioned the government’s proper role in supporting renewable energy companies and the renewable energy industry generally.2 This Article looks beyond the Solyndra controversy to examine the origin, structure and purpose of the DOE LGP. It asserts that loan guaran- tees can serve as viable policy tools, but require careful crafting to have the potential to be effective programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Leo Solar Project
    DRAFT Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration LEO Solar Project November 2019 Lead Agency: Kings County 1400 West Lacey Boulevard, Building. #6 Hanford, California 93230 Prepared for: Apex Energy Solutions, LLC 604 Sutter Street, Suite 250 Folsom, California 95630 (916) 985-9461 Prepared by: 2525 Warren Drive Rocklin, California 95677 Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Leo Solar Project DRAFT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION LEO SOLAR PROJECT Lead Agency: Kings County Community Development Agency, Kings County Government Center, 1400 West Lacey Boulevard, Hanford, California 93230 Project Proponent: Apex Energy Solutions, LLC, 604 Sutter Street Suite 250, Folsom, California 95630 Project Location: The proposed Leo Solar Project (Project) occupies ±30 acres of a 40-acre parcel located near 25th Avenue 15 miles south of unincorporated Kettleman City, California (Assessor’s Parcel Number [APN] 048-350-016- 000). The project site is situated in the unincorporated area of Kings County, California, along the Kings County/Kern County border, between California State Route (SR) 33 and Interstate 5 (I-5), approximately 0.5 mile east of 25th Avenue. The site corresponds to a portion of Section 36, Township 24 South, and Range 19 East of the Mount Diablo Base and Meridian (MDBM) of the “Avenal Gap” topographic quadrangles 7.5- minute quadrangle (U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] 2015). Project Description: The Project includes the development of up to a 5-megawatt (MW) solar photovoltaic (PV) energy generating facility and battery storage system (BESS) facility on ±30 acres of 40 undeveloped acres. The facility would consist of solar PV modules mounted on stationary fixed-tilt, ground- mounted racking or single-axis trackers and would include up to 5-MW alternating current (AC) maximum capacity, four-hour battery energy storage system.
    [Show full text]
  • Cadmium Telluride Photovoltaics - Wikipedia 1 of 13
    Cadmium telluride photovoltaics - Wikipedia 1 of 13 Cadmium telluride photovoltaics Cadmium telluride (CdTe) photovoltaics describes a photovoltaic (PV) technology that is based on the use of cadmium telluride, a thin semiconductor layer designed to absorb and convert sunlight into electricity.[1] Cadmium telluride PV is the only thin film technology with lower costs than conventional solar cells made of crystalline silicon in multi-kilowatt systems.[1][2][3] On a lifecycle basis, CdTe PV has the smallest carbon footprint, lowest water use and shortest energy payback time of any current photo voltaic technology. PV array made of cadmium telluride (CdTe) solar [4][5][6] CdTe's energy payback time of less than a year panels allows for faster carbon reductions without short- term energy deficits. The toxicity of cadmium is an environmental concern mitigated by the recycling of CdTe modules at the end of their life time,[7] though there are still uncertainties[8][9] and the public opinion is skeptical towards this technology.[10][11] The usage of rare materials may also become a limiting factor to the industrial scalability of CdTe technology in the mid-term future. The abundance of tellurium—of which telluride is the anionic form— is comparable to that of platinum in the earth's crust and contributes significantly to the module's cost.[12] CdTe photovoltaics are used in some of the world's largest photovoltaic power stations, such as the Topaz Solar Farm. With a share of 5.1% of worldwide PV production, CdTe technology accounted for more than half of the thin film market in 2013.[13] A prominent manufacturer of CdTe thin film technology is the company First Solar, based in Tempe, Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Indiana Renewable Energy Resources Study
    September 2011 2011 Indiana Renewable Energy Resources Study Prepared for: Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission and Regulatory Flexibility Committee of the Indiana General Assembly Indianapolis, Indiana State Utility Forecasting Group | Energy Center at Discovery Park | Purdue University | West Lafayette, Indiana 2011 INDIANA RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES STUDY State Utility Forecasting Group Energy Center Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana David Nderitu Tianyun Ji Benjamin Allen Douglas Gotham Paul Preckel Darla Mize Forrest Holland Marco Velastegui Tim Phillips September 2011 2011 Indiana Renewable Energy Resources Study - State Utility Forecasting Group 2011 Indiana Renewable Energy Resources Study - State Utility Forecasting Group Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... v Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................ vi Foreword ............................................................................................................................ ix 1. Overview ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Trends in renewable energy consumption in the United States ................ 1 1.2 Trends in renewable energy consumption in Indiana
    [Show full text]