DOCSLIB.ORG

Commercial Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Commercial Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY CLEAN ENERGY FINANCE GUIDE Chapter 12. Commercial Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing Third Edition Update, March 2013 Introduction Summary The property-assessed clean energy (PACE) model is an innovative mechanism for financing energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements on private property. PACE programs allow local governments, state governments, or other inter-jurisdictional authorities, when authorized by state law, to fund the up-front cost of energy improvements on commercial and residential properties, which are paid back over time by the property owners. PACE financing for clean energy projects is generally based on an existing structure known as a “land- secured financing district,” often referred to as an assessment district, a local improvement district, or other similar phrase. In a typical assessment district, the local government issues bonds to fund projects with a public purpose such as streetlights, sewer systems, or underground utility lines. The recent extension of this financing model to energy efficiency (EE) and renewable energy (RE) allows a property owner to implement improvements without a large up-front cash payment. Property owners voluntarily choose to participate in a PACE program repay their improvement costs over a set time period—typically 10 to 20 years—through property assessments, which are secured by the property itself and paid as an addition to the owners’ property tax bills. Nonpayment generally results in the same set of repercussions as the failure to pay any other portion of a property tax bill. The PACE Process *Depending upon program the structure, the lender may be a private capital provider or the local jurisdiction A PACE assessment is a debt of property, meaning the debt is tied to the property as opposed to the property owner(s), so the repayment obligation may transfers with property ownership depending upon state legislation. This eliminates a key disincentive to investing in energy improvements, since many property owners are hesitant to make property improvements if they think they may not stay in the property long enough for the resulting savings to cover the upfront costs. While residential PACE programs have faced regulatory opposition from the Federal Housing Finance Administration (FHFA) that has caused many programs to suspend operations, commercial PACE programs have not been directly affected and the model continues to offer governments an innovative way to support clean energy projects in the private sector. Clean Energy Finance Guide 12-1 March 2013 Update on Commercial PACE programs PACE programs have been launched in several regions of the U.S. and have utilized a variety of financing structures. While a few of the more established programs like Sonoma County’s Energy Independence Program (SCEIP) or Boulder County’s Climate Smart Loan Program have financed millions of dollars of improvements, most programs are new and have not yet financed significant volumes. At this point in the development of the commercial PACE market, there are several key policy discussions that are occurring around program design. These issues are outlined below: Program Standardization— PACE programs are somewhat fragmented since they are established at the municipal, regional, or state level. While programs often draw upon best practices, PACE programs have utilized a diversity of underwriting criteria, financing structures, and program procedures. Unfortunately the lack of uniformity of commercial PACE program creates an obstacle for contractors, mortgage lenders, and project lenders that serve larger geographies. For example, the state of California is already home to ten separate commercial PACE programs. Lender Consent— The vast majority of PACE programs require participating properties to secure either the consent or affirmative acknowledgement of any existing mortgage holders, because the assessment impacts the property’s debt burden, and in many cases may violate existing loan covenants. While many lenders ranging from community banks to major mortgage lenders have granted consent, the process of securing it is often a significant obstacle. The difficulty and time associated with securing consent has led some PACE program administrators to forego the requirement and simply notify lenders of the PACE assessment. However, controversy remains regarding the legal ramifications of placing the assessment without lender consent. In December 2012, PACENow published a survey of mortgage lenders1 that was funded by the Urban Sustainability Directors Network. While mortgage lenders did not broadly oppose PACE assessments, they strongly supported consent requirements and indicated they are generally more likely to consent to projects that improve the net operating income or value of the property. Unsurprisingly, lenders also noted that the overall debt load of a building and the pre-existing relationship with the owner would be key factors in granting consent. More insight into the best ways to approach lenders and standardize the consent/acknowledgement process is available in the PACENow report. Closed vs. Open Market— Programs have employed a variety of financing structures and have used both public and private sources of funding. Programs can generally be categorized either as 1) closed market programs that secure a line of credit from a financial institution or use public funds to provide project financing, or 2) open market programs which allow participants to choose among competing capital providers. More detailed comparison of these funding approaches can be found in Section 3 of this Chapter, Choose Capital Sourcing Approach(es). Demand— Although there is significant market interest in PACE, many commercial programs have experienced slow demand. This is likely partially due to the novelty of PACE as a financing mechanism. In order to jumpstart property owner interest, programs are utilizing a variety of marketing strategies ranging from free or subsidized audits, outreach to property owner associations, and marketing directly to commercial contractors. 1 Lender Support Study: http://pacenow.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Lender-Support-Guide-12.28.20121.pdf. Clean Energy Finance Guide 12-2 March 2013 Is PACE the Right Choice? A summary of the key advantages and disadvantages of PACE for property owners is presented below. PACE Advantages PACE Disadvantages + Allows for secure financing of comprehensive — Available only to property owners; renters cannot projects over terms up to 20 years access programs directly — Cannot finance portable items + Repayment obligation passes with ownership, overcoming hesitancy to invest in longer payback — Requires dedicated staff time measures — High legal and administrative expenses to set up + Senior lien municipal financing may lead to low — Not appropriate for investments below $50,000 interest rates — Some resistance by lenders whose priority in default + The interest portion of assessment repayments are may be reduced. tax-deductible + Lower transaction costs compared to private loans + Allows municipalities to encourage energy efficiency and renewable energy without putting their general funds at risk + Taps into private capital, such as the municipal bond markets Overview of Steps to Launch Commercial PACE Local governments may follow these key steps to implement a commercial PACE program: 1. Review and Address Issues: Become familiar with issues related to PACE and factor their impact into program design and implementation. 2. Establish Supporting Framework: Lay a solid foundation for the program in the areas of team composition, goals, legislation, and assessment district formation. 3. Choose Capital Sourcing Approach(es): Choose whether the projects will be funded using private capital and if so whether the program will employ an open or closed market approach. 4. Determine if and how to Deploy Credit Enhancement: Decide how to achieve the best interest rates for the program and how best to apply and leverage any available funds to fit the program’s design. 5. Choose Eligible Property Types: Select the commercial property types eligible for the program. 6. Assemble Eligible Project Measures: Determine what types of improvements can be financed based on enabling legislation and program goals. 7. Choose Energy Audit Requirements: Decide the types of energy audits applicants will be required to undergo to assess expected project energy/cost savings. 8. Choose Program Eligibility Criteria: Determine the program underwriting/eligibility criteria that applicants and their properties must meet. Clean Energy Finance Guide 12-3 March 2013 9. Leverage Existing Utility Rebate/Incentive Programs: Investigate local utility rebate/incentive programs and how best to leverage them. 10. Plan Quality Assurance/Quality Control: Decide how the program will ensure that project work meets program quality standards and how to guard against fraud. 11. Design Application Processing Procedures: Design the process for reviewing applications and either approving or rejecting them. 12. Specify Contractor Requirements: Specify the requirements for energy auditors and contractors to participate in the program. 13. Market and Launch Program: Decide what kind of outreach will be made to property owners and contractors and launch the program. Note that many steps will be carried out concurrently and not necessarily in this exact order. In many cases, an additional step for a procurement process will be appropriate to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Social Welfare Strategies
    Throughout the world, societies are reexamining, reforming, and restructuring their social welfare systems. New ways are being sought to manage and finance these systems, and new approaches are being developed that alter the relative roles of government, private business, and individ- uals. Not surprisingly, this activity has triggered spirited debate about the relative merits of the various ways of structuring social welfare systems in general and social security programs in particular. The current changes respond to a vari- ety of forces. First, many societies are ad- justing their institutions to reflect changes in social philosophies about the relative responsibilities of government and the individual. These philosophical changes are especially dramatic in China, the former socialist countries of Eastern Europe, and the former Soviet Union; but The Advantages and Disadvantages they are also occurring in what has tradi- of Different Social Welfare Strategies tionally been thought of as the capitalist West. Second, some societies are strug- by Lawrence H. Thompson* gling to adjust to the rising costs associated with aging populations, a problem particu- The following was delivered by the author to the High Level American larly acute in the OECD countries of Asia, Meeting of Experts on The Challenges of Social Reform and New Adminis- Europe, and North America. Third, some trative and Financial Management Techniques. The meeting, which took countries are adjusting their social institu- tions to reflect new development strate- place September 5-7, 1994, in Mar de1 Plata, Argentina, was sponsored gies, a change particularly important in by the International Social Security Association at the invitation of the those countries in the Americas that seek Argentine Secretariat for Social Security in collaboration with the ISSA economic growth through greater eco- Member Organizations of that country.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Property for Rent Shelbyville Ky
    Commercial Property For Rent Shelbyville Ky Richmond waded poutingly while working-class Walden heathenise galvanically or rinsed thievishly. Clemens is nocturnal: she recrystallized inerrable and explant her mitrailleuse. Resonant Jackson wreathes that butyl exsect stiff and Balkanise peaceably. The complete project for rent listings that you have higher than what you Pirtle Realtors in sustaining progress in Louisville by walking the path of flexible and responsible commercial and residential real estate development and brokerage. Have your attorney look up cases where Anchor Loans was the defendant and you will see the trend. Start to finish, the cycle was so smooth for what commonly would be an upsetting and critical trade. If I ever needed help from them. But numerical ones and surrounding area for the dr is redeemable for little money and commercial property for rent shelbyville ky area, no gathering worked with minimal hassle. Xpress credits regards the hour of others. Shelbyville healthcare properties for sale or lease, Shelbyville special purpose properties for sale or lease and Shelbyville development property for sale or lease. How can settle on property for rent, ky and property for commercial rent shelbyville ky? Thank you for your inquiry! Provides shelter or storing old files should have shown respect and property for commercial rent shelbyville ky area who have benefited from experiencing a kissimmee, i feel like? Main component in commercial property for rent shelbyville ky. Send you can be added feature of patient care along arterial routes. Company skilled in proposing optional solutions. Very efficient work with rent, ky commercial property for rent shelbyville ky commercial hard money loans.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar ABS 101
    Project Bond Focus U.S. Residential Solar ABS 101 U.S. Residential Solar ABS 101 ABC Introduction and PPAs contracts is typically responsible for the installation and maintenance of the solar equipment throughout the term of the contract. Asset-backed securities (ABS) secured by residential solar financing contracts continue to emerge as a new sector of Leases the U.S. securitization market. The key drivers of expansion are the overall growth of the U.S. rooftop solar market, as Customers pay a fixed amount per month, generally well as institutional investors' increasing comfort for this escalating every year and benefiting from the production of new asset class. the panels installed by the developer providing the lease, regardless of actual consumption. The contracts typically The residential solar sector has experienced solid growth in include a minimum production guarantee to mitigate the risk recent years, with a peak of more than 2.5GW of capacity of equipment underperformance. The minimum production installed in 2016, representing approximately 325 thousand guarantee payments are typically made by the installers to households. After a 16% decrease in installation in 2017 the homeowner and do not reduce lease payments (no due to lower customer acquisition in California and netting). In some contracts, true-up payments at year-end Northeastern states, as well as regulatory uncertainty in may be required for over/under performance. Nevada, the residential solar market grew by 7% in 2018. Historically leading states seem to be transitioning to more PPAs stable growth rates, while Texas, Florida and Nevada are Homeowners pay every month for the actual solar energy experiencing higher growth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Cantonese in the Education Policy of Hong Kong Kwai Sang Lee and Wai Mun Leung*
    Lee and Leung Multilingual Education 2012, 2:2 http://www.multilingual-education.com/2/1/2 RESEARCH Open Access The status of Cantonese in the education policy of Hong Kong Kwai Sang Lee and Wai Mun Leung* * Correspondence: waimun@ied. Abstract edu.hk Department of Chinese, The Hong After the handover of Hong Kong to China, a first-ever policy of “bi-literacy and Kong Institute of Education, Hong tri-lingualism” was put forward by the Special Administrative Region Government. Kong Under the trilingual policy, Cantonese, the most dominant local language, equally shares the official status with Putonghua and English only in name but not in spirit, as neither the promotion nor the funding approaches on Cantonese match its legal status. This paper reviews the status of Cantonese in Hong Kong under this policy with respect to the levels of government, education and curriculum, considers the consequences of neglecting Cantonese in the school curriculum, and discusses the importance of large-scale surveys for language policymaking. Keywords: the status of Cantonese, “bi-literacy and tri-lingualism” policy, language survey, Cantonese language education Background The adjustment of the language policy is a common phenomenon in post-colonial societies. It always results in raising the status of the regional vernacular, but the lan- guage of the ex-colonist still maintains a very strong influence on certain domains. Taking Singapore as an example, English became the dominant language in the work- place and families, and the local dialects were suppressed. It led to the degrading of both English and Chinese proficiency levels according to scholars’ evaluation (Goh 2009a, b).
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate Developers & Owners
    www.bowditch.com INDUSTRY Real Estate Developers & Owners KEY CONTACTS OVERVIEW Paul C. Bauer REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS & OWNERS T. 617-757-6535 The commercial development community understands the importance of having lawyers with an E. [email protected] innovative, solutions-focused approach to clients’ business needs and financial performance. Our Leah Rochwarg team members are, therefore, powerful allies to their clients, bringing a fresh, practical perspective to T. 617-757-6509 helping owners and developers of commercial real estate property, regardless of the size, type or E. [email protected] location of a client’s interests or projects. Joshua Lee Smith We understand that property developers and owners have unique needs for information, specialized T. 508-926-3464 legal services and informed counsel. With decades of experience, our Developers and Owners Industry E. [email protected] Group members help their developer clients manage risk and protect their financial future. Our clients rely on us for a comprehensive array of tailored services and support, including: PARTNERS • Ownership structuring and estate and family succession planning Louis M. Ciavarra Robert D. Cox, Jr. • Property acquisition, sale and leasing Katherine Garrahan • Debt and equity financing Brian S. Grossman James D. Hanrahan • Construction contracting and litigation Jane V. Hawkes • Environmental services, permitting and regulatory compliance Joshua A. Lewin Robert E. Longden We remain on the cutting edge of the complexities of property ownership – beyond the strict confines Samantha P. McDonald of a legal perspective – to provide the most supportive and useful guidance possible. We maintain our Timothy C. Monahan focus on each property owner’s goals and communicate fully at all times, meeting the unique needs of Julie K.
    [Show full text]
  • Will Virginia's New Eminent Domain Amendment Protect Private Property?
    WILL VIRGINIA’S NEW EMINENT DOMAIN AMENDMENT PROTECT PRIVATE PROPERTY? INTRODUCTION Most toddlers respect private property as private until they want it, at which point they feel justified in asserting their superior rights. The Norfolk Housing Authority recently has not behaved much differently. In fact, the Housing Authority is forcing local businessman Bob Wilson to give up his private property for an approved redevelopment plan to provide “retail space” for Old Dominion University student housing.1 Bob’s property is neither primarily residential nor an object of blight in the neighborhood. On the contrary, Bob has owned and operated Central Radio Company on the property for fifty years, employing 100 taxpaying citizens to produce radio and surveillance parts for the United States Navy. In Mr. Wilson’s words, “You shouldn’t be able to take land from one business and give it to another. That’s not fair. It’s not morally correct, it’s not legally correct.”2 Nevertheless, the Housing Authority may legally be able to proceed because the Supreme Court in Kelo v. City of New London defined public use as encompassing economic development.3 The Supreme Court’s opinion in Kelo strayed far from the intention of the constitutional Framers and early judicial adherence to a narrow, more literal interpretation of the public use requirement of the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause. The idea that the government cannot take from A and give it to B has been an established, bedrock principle since the nation’s founding.4 The trend toward a broad view of public use that culminated in Kelo has triggered an overwhelming response from 1 Rob Bell, Preventing Abuses of Eminent Domain, VIRGINIAN-PILOT, Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Vs Residential Transactions the Complexities & Needed Due Diligence
    A Division of American Surveying & Mapping, Inc. Commercial vs Residential Transactions The Complexities & Needed Due Diligence National Marketing Director Service Provider to the David Herrin, Fidelity National Title Group Cindy Jared, SVP, Major Accounts Family of Companies Thank You Thank You • Thank you to ALTA and to Fidelity National Title Group for sponsorship of this Webinar and the opportunity to present to ALTA members • My name is David Herrin the National Marketing Director of National Due Diligence Services (NDDS) • NDDS is a Division of American Surveying & Mapping, Inc. • We are a national land surveying and professional due diligence firm • Established in 1992 with over 25 years of service • One of the nation's largest, private sector, survey firms • Staff of 150 dedicated & experienced professionals ® 2 Commercial vs Residential Transactions • Residential Transactions – Systematic and Regulated • Commercial Transaction – Complexities • Commercial - Due Diligence Phase – ALTA Survey – Related Title Endorsements • Other Commercial Due Diligence Needs – Environmental Site Assessments – Property Condition Assessments, – Seismic Risk Assessments (PML) – Zoning ® 3 Subject Matter Expert Speakers may include: David Herrin, National Marketing Director, NDDS Mr. Herrin offers over 35 years real estate experience including 10 years as a Georgia licensed Real Estate Broker (prior GRS & CCIM designates), regional manager for a national title insurance company & qualified MCLE instructor in multiple states. Brett Moscovitz, President,
    [Show full text]
  • Blended Concessional Finance: Governance Matters for Impact by Kruskaia Sierra-Escalante, Arthur Karlin & Morten Lykke Lauridsen
    www.ifc.org/thoughtleadership NOTE 66 • MAR 2019 Blended Concessional Finance: Governance Matters for Impact By Kruskaia Sierra-Escalante, Arthur Karlin & Morten Lykke Lauridsen Blended concessional finance, the combination of concessional funds with other types of finance on commercial terms, has great potential to mobilize capital and accelerate high-impact private sector investments in new and challenging markets. Yet full development of these efforts requires strong governance. IFC has been working for some time to develop a robust governance system for blended concessional finance, guided by the Development Finance Institutions Enhanced Principles, a set of principles that employ special operating procedures and checks and balances when using blended concessional finance for private sector projects. While no universal approach will fit all implementers of blended concessional finance, good governance is a common challenge. These institutions need to learn from each other to ensure good governance, as the sharing of experiences is crucial to building global trust in the use of concessional funds. And to work well, governance structures need to be transparent and focus on solving potential conflicts of interest. The combination of concessional funds and other types of launch important private projects and crowd in sources of finance on commercial terms is called blended concessional commercial finance. These first demonstration projects can finance.1 It can play a central role in creating and help unlock new markets. reinforcing markets in developing countries and can help Commercial finance and development finance institution these countries reach their development goals. This type of (DFI) finance at commercial terms can address the finance has great potential for development impact through financing needs of many projects (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Setting the PACE: Financing Commercial Retrofits
    Setting the PACE: Financing Commercial Retrofits Issue Brief Katrina Managan Program Manager, Institute for Building Efficiency, Johnson Controls Kristina Klimovich Associate, PACENow This report is the result of collaboration by the Johnson Controls Institute for Building Efficiency, PACENow, and the Urban Land Institute. February 2013 Table of Contents Introduction . 3 The Opportunity . 4 Background on PACE . 4 Early History of PACE . 5 PACE Market Activity Today . 6 PACE Financing . 7 Advantages of PACE Financing . 8 Financing Models . 10 Municipal Bond Funded Model (Figure 4) . 10 Privately Funded Model (Figure 5) . 11 Model Examples and Implications . 12 Program Administration . .13 Eligible Technologies and Projects . 14 Technologies and Measures . 14 Toledo, Ohio . 15 Transaction Size . 15 Loading Order Requirements . 16 Minimum Energy Savings Requirement . 17 Eligible Asset Classes, Target Market . 18 Building Owner Engagement . 18 Marketing and Outreach . 19 PACE Project Process . 20 Prologis HQ in San Francisco . 21 Conclusion. 22 Appendix 1: Research Methodology and Interview Questions . 23 Appendix 2: Active PACE Programs as of January 2013 . 24 Appendix 3: Building Efficiency Financing Options . 25 Appendix 4: Efficiency Measures Eligible in Each Program . 26 Appendix 5: Acknowledgements. 27 2 Institute for Building Efficiency www.InstituteBE.com Introduction Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) finance is a new and growing municipal approach to support energy efficiency and renewable energy upgrades in commercial buildings in the United States. As of February 2013, there were 16 commercial PACE programs accepting applications to finance building efficiency projects. Most of these have been active for less than a year, and some are just now working on their first projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6. Innovative Business Models and Financing Mechanisms
    Chapter 6 Innovative Business Models and Financing Mechanisms for Distributed Solar Photovoltaic (DSPV) Deployment in China Sufang Zhang April 2016 This chapter should be cited as Zhang, S. (2015), ‘Innovative Business Models and Financing Mechanisms for Distributed Solar Photovoltaic (DSPV) Deployment in China’, in Kimura, S., Y. Chang and Y. Li (eds.), Financing Renewable Energy Development in East Asia Summit Countries. ERIA Research Project Report 2014-27, Jakarta: ERIA, pp.161-191. Chapter 6 Innovative Business Models and Financing Mechanisms for Distributed Solar Photovoltaic (DSPV) Deployment in China17 Sufang Zhang Abstract Following my report ‘Analysis of Distributed Solar Photovoltaic (DSPV) Power Policy in China’, this report looks into innovative business models and financing mechanisms for distributed solar photovoltaic power in China by reviewing existing literature and conducting interactive research, including discussions with managers from China’s policy and commercial banks, and photovoltaic projects. It first provides a comprehensive review of literature on business models and financing mechanisms. Then, the paper looks into the rapidly evolving business models and financing mechanisms in the United States, one of the countries leading the deployment of DSPV. The emerging innovative business models and financing mechanisms for DSPV projects in China are next discussed. The report concludes that: (a) innovative business models and financing mechanisms are important drivers for the growth of DSPV power in the United States; (b) enabling policies are determinant components of innovative business models and financing mechanisms in the country; (c) innovative business models and financing mechanisms in the Chinese context have their advantages and disadvantages; and (d) support through government policies is imperative to address the challenges in the emerging innovative business models and financing mechanisms in China.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Ownership Composition on Property Prices and Rents: Evidence from Chinese Investment Boom in US Housing Markets
    Effect of Ownership Composition on Property Prices and Rents: Evidence from Chinese Investment Boom in US Housing Markets Jung Sakong August 16, 2021 WP 2021-12 https://doi.org/10.21033/wp-2021-12 *Working papers are not edited, and all opinions and errors are the responsibility of the author(s). The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago or the Federal Reserve System. FederalReserve Bank Chicagoof Effect of Ownership Composition on Property Prices and Rents: Evidence from Chinese Investment Boom in US Housing Markets Jung Sakong∗ August 16, 2021 Abstract A capital influx into local housing markets would be expected to increase house prices, but the spillover effect onto rental prices is theoretically ambiguous. I estimate both price impacts in U.S. residential housing markets using data from a boom in real estate purchases by buyers from China, which amounted to $200 billion of purchases made between 2010 and 2019. Using a novel method to measure these purchases and an instrumental variable for where purchases are made, I find a large positive house price impact. Consistent with investment q-theory, rents fall as constructions rise, especially in areas with elastic housing supply. ∗Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (email: [email protected]). These views are those of the author and do not reflect those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago or the Federal Reserve System. I am extremely grateful to my committee chair Amir Sufi and members Marianne Bertrand, Raghuram Rajan and Luigi Zingales for their continuous guidance and support.
    [Show full text]
  • PACE) Financing
    Frequently Asked Questions about Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing General Questions What is PACE? Property assessed clean energy, or PACE, financing allows property owners to fund energy efficiency, water efficiency and renewable energy projects with little or no up-front costs. With PACE, eligible property owners living within a local government area that has adopted PACE can finance up to 100% of their project and pay it back over time as a voluntary property tax assessment through their existing property tax bill. Who administers PACE programs in Minnesota? Two public entities operate PACE programs: [1] the St. Paul Port Authority (SPPA) and the [2] Rural Minnesota Energy Board (RMEB). The St. Paul Port Authority is authorized to administer a PACE program after a city or county enters into a joint powers agreement with the SPPA. While the St. Paul Port Authority’s primary mission is to finance business expansion in the east metropolitan region, the authority operates a PACE program statewide, on behalf of the state Department of Commerce. Learn more about the Saint Paul Port Authority program. The Rural Minnesota Energy Board is an 18 county Joint Powers Board staffed by the Southwest Regional Development commission (SRDC). RMEB operates a separate PACE program for its member counties. RMEB counties include Cottonwood, Jackson, Lincoln, Lyon, Murray, Nobles, Pipestone, Redwood, Rock, Renville, Sibley, Brown, Watonwan, Blue Earth, Mower, Freeborn, Faribault and Martin. Learn more about the Rural Minnesota Energy Board program. How is this different from a traditional loan? PACE is a special assessment, commonly referred to as a PACE assessment, for a benefit tied to the property.
    [Show full text]