DOCSLIB.ORG

Indexing Inferables and Organizational Shifts: 'No'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indexing Inferables and Organizational Shifts: 'No' INDEXING INFERABLES AND ORGANIZATIONAL SHIFTS: ‘NO’-PREFACES IN ENGLISH CONVERSATION by JOSHUA RACLAW B.A., Richard Stockton College, 2003 M.A., University of Colorado, 2008 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Linguistics 2013 This thesis entitled: Indexing Inferables and Organizational Shifts: ‘No’-Prefaces in English Conversation written by Joshua Raclaw has been approved for the Department of Linguistics ____________________________________ Barbara Fox ____________________________________ Ceci Ford ____________________________________ Kira Hall ____________________________________ Andrew Cowell ____________________________________ Karen Tracy Date 7-18-2013__ The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we Find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards Of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. IRB protocol # ______11-0332______ iii Raclaw, Joshua (Ph.D., Linguistics) Indexing Inferables and Organizational Shifts: ‘No’-Prefaces in English Conversation Thesis directed by Professor Barbara Fox This dissertation uses conversation analysis to examine three non-disagreeing functions of the token ‘no’ when it prefaces a turn at talk. In the first function, ‘no’-prefaces index and respond to an inferential component of a prior turn. This practice entails a number of sub- practices, in which speakers use ‘no’-prefaced responses to deny face-threatening actions produced through “off-record” formulations, display affiliation with a recipient by managing incongruent stance displays, manage inferences regarding the speaker’s epistemic stance or rights, deny an inference conveyed through a prior polar question, or produce a preferred response to delicate formulations that index a recipient’s accountability, blame, or guilt. In the second function, ‘no’-prefaces mark a shift in how the turn is organized with regard to the speaker’s footing. In this practice, speakers employ ‘no’-prefaced turns to shift between non- serious and serious interactional frames, or retroactively assert the serious footing of a prior utterance. In the third function, ‘no’-prefaces mark a shift in how the turn is organized with regard to the surrounding talk. In this practice, ‘no’-prefaced turns may be used to mark a unit of talk as hearably “misplaced”, connect back to a prior segment of talk, or close an extended telling sequence. As a study situated within the framework of interactional linguistics, this dissertation examines these functions of ‘no’-prefaces in the context of naturally-occurring English conversation. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation, and the years of education and research behind it, would not have been possible without the assistance of a great many people. I would like to first express my deepest gratitude to my dissertation chair, Barbara Fox, who has so freely given her support and guidance throughout my graduate career. My thanks also goes to my other committee members, Ceci Ford, Kira Hall, Andrew Cowell, and Karen Tracy, for their feedback and advice both throughout the dissertation and before this project had even begun. I owe so much of this dissertation to my fellow students at the University of Colorado, who were always there to talk theory and data and helped make long Saturdays in the lab all the more enjoyable. Thanks to Rich Sandoval, Yumiko Endo, Nick Williams, Velda Khoo, and Matt Ingram for being such amazing colleagues and insightful analysts of language and interaction, and especially for all of our talks and data sessions. Thanks too to Jenny Davis, Lal Zimman, Susanne Stadlbauer, Aous Mansouri, Jessica Holman, Marcus Avelar, and Alec Buchner for our countless discussions about sociolinguistics over the years and for keeping our office full of laughter, and to Jena Hwang, Kevin Gould, Will Styler, Christy-Dale Sims, Kate Phelps, and Steve Duman for doing the same for the rest of the building. To all of the teachers and mentors who furthered my education in conversation analysis and the field at large – especially Makoto Hayashi, Jenny Mandelbaum, Laura Visapää, Marja- Leena Sorjonen, Betty Couper-Kuhlen, Jack Sidnell, Geoff Raymond, and Tanya Stivers – I offer my very heartfelt thanks. My gratitude also goes out to the many people who have offered feedback and insights into this project as it was presented at the NCA, CLASP, LISO, and CLIC conferences. To my family and friends, thank you so much for not only being there for me and helping v to keep me sane, but for putting up with more than a few canceled plans and delayed visits home when the dissertation was calling. To my mother and sisters especially, I love you, and I hope you're all thrilled to finally have a doctor in the family. To my fiancée Lindsay, words cannot express how much you’ve contributed to this project, from listening to me go on about particles and preference to always being there with a hug and some tea when I had a deadline to meet. Thank you for everything. vi CONTENTS CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION TO THE DISSERTATION .........................................1 1.1 Introduction to Chapter 1 ..............................................................1 1.2 Prior Work on ‘No’-Prefaced Turns at Talk ..................................5 1.3 Methods: Conversation Analysis ................................................10 1.4 Data .............................................................................................13 II. INDEXING INFERABLES THROUGH ‘NO’-PREFACED TURNS ...................................................................................................15 2.1 Introduction to Chapter 2 ............................................................15 2.2 Previous Work on Inferences in Interaction ................................16 2.3 Responding to Off-Record Actions .............................................18 2.4 Managing Incongruent Stance Displays .....................................30 2.4.1 Managing Prior Disaffiliation ............................................34 2.4.2 Responding to the Pursuit of a Stance Display ..................40 2.5 Responding to Issues of Epistemic Incongruence ......................56 2.6 Responding to Claims of Accountability, Guilt, and Self-Blame ..................................................................................74 2.6.1 Responses to Claims of Accountability and Self-Blame ...77 2.6.2 Responses to Claims of Accountability and Guilt .............87 2.7 Responding to an Inference in a Polar Question .........................99 2.8 Summary and Discussion of Chapter 2 .....................................100 III. INDEXING SHIFTS IN FOOTING AND FRAME .............................102 3.1 Introduction to Chapter 3 ..........................................................102 vii 3.2 Shifting Between Non-Serious and Serious Interactional Frames .......................................................................................104 3.2.1 Reformulating a Non-Serious Action with a Serious Footing .........................................................................105 3.2.2 Responding in a Serious Way to a Non-Serious First Turn ................................................................................... 110 3.2.3 Returning to a Seriously-Framed Main Sequence ........... 115 3.3 Retroactive Assertions of Serious Footing ................................127 3.4 Discussion of Chapter 3 ............................................................136 IV. INDEXING SHIFTS IN SEQUENTIAL ORGANIZATION ...............140 4.1 Introduction to Chapter 4 ..........................................................140 4.2 Marking a Misplaced Turn at Talk ............................................141 4.3 Skip-Connecting to a Prior-Prior Segment of the Talk .............148 4.3.1 Restarting or Extending a Prior-Prior Turn ......................151 4.3.2 Returning to a Prior-Prior Topic of Talk ..........................167 4.4 Closing an Extended Telling .....................................................170 4.5 Summary of Chapter 4 ..............................................................175 V. CONCLUSIONS...................................................................................177 5.1 Summary of the Dissertation ....................................................177 5.2 Inferences and Action Formation ..............................................179 5.3 Examining Complex Prefaces ...................................................181 5.4 Implications of the Dissertation ................................................187 BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………..………………………………………… ....190 APPENDIX viii A. TRANSCRIPTION CONVENTIONS..................................................196 ix TABLES Table 2.1 ‘No’-Prefaced Response at Line 15 in Excerpt 1 ..........................................23 2.2 ‘No’-Prefaced Response at Line 21 in Excerpt 1 ..........................................23 2.3 ‘No’-Prefaced Responses in Excerpt 2 .........................................................27 2.4 ‘No’-Prefaced Responses in Excerpt 3 .........................................................30 2.5 ‘No’-Prefaced Responses to Claims of Guild and Self-Blame .....................74 3.1 Practices for Shifting Between Serious and Non-Serious Frames ..............104 3.2 Retroactive Assertions of Serious Footing ..................................................127 4.1 ‘No’-Prefaced Practices
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Use of Tactical Absurdity in (Post-)Conceptual Art Practice
    University of Southampton Faculty of Arts and Humanities Winchester School of Art The Use of Tactical Absurdity in (Post-)Conceptual Art Practice by Dave Ball Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Sep 2020 1 University of Southampton Abstract Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Winchester School of Art The Use of Tactical Absurdity in (Post-)Conceptual Art Practice by Dave Ball The ‘tactical absurdity’ forwarded in this research emerged out of my own practice. I, like many other artists working in a conceptual tradition, was producing work that appeared to operate through some sort of absurdity, and with some sort of intentionality. There was, however, almost nothing in the literature that could account for this approach. The term ‘absurdity’ is deployed by artists, critics, and curators alike with little precision or consistency; usages borrowed from literature or existential philosophy sit alongside everyday understandings, and frequently fail to discriminate between absurdity as a formal device and absurdity as a subject-matter. Its meaning is treated as self-evident. Adopting an emergent and autoethnographic practice-based methodology, this research furnishes a practical and theoretical understanding of the operation of tactical absurdity deployed as a device in (post-)conceptual art practice. Over the course of the research, five objectives are achieved: (i) to define the concept of absurdity; (ii) to establish a context for the use of tactical absurdity in contemporary (post-)conceptual art practice; (iii) to develop a body of work that operates through tactical absurdity; (iv) to account for its emergence within a practice; and (v) to forward a theoretical analysis of its functionality and value modelled through notions of relativity, generativity, and criticality.
    [Show full text]
  • (Updated: 12/01/2020) Department of Philosophy SO
    MARINA PAOLA BANCHETTI CURRICULUM VITAE (Updated: 12/01/2020) Department of Philosophy SO 283 – P.O. Box 3091 Florida Atlantic University 777 Glades Road Boca Raton, Florida 33431-0991 [email protected] ________________________________________________________________________ EDUCATION Ph.D. Philosophy (1991) University of Miami Dissertation: “Edmund Husserl: Intentionality and Meaning” Master of Arts Philosophy (1990) University of Miami Bachelor of Arts English, Philosophy (1985) Minors: History, Chemistry University of Miami MAJOR FIELDS • Phenomenology • Philosophy of Science • Philosophy of Language • Philosophy of Mind • Philosophical Orientation: Analytico-Phenomenological 2 LANGUAGES • Italian (Native/bilingual speaking, reading, and writing proficiency) • French (Native/bilingual speaking, reading, and writing proficiency) • Spanish (Native/bilingual speaking, reading, and writing proficiency) • Portuguese (Full reading proficiency) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2001- Associate Professor Present Department of Philosophy Florida Atlantic University 1995- Assistant Professor 2001 Department of Philosophy Florida Atlantic University 1993- Visiting Assistant Professor 1995 Department of Philosophy Florida Atlantic University Summer Adjunct Professor of Humanities 1993 Miami-Dade Community College 1992- Adjunct Professor of Philosophy 1993 Florida A&M University 1990- Instructor, Dept. of Philosophy 1991 University of Miami 1986- Teaching Assistant, Dept. of Philosophy 1989 University of Miami ADMINISTRATIVE EXPERIENCE 2017- Chair 2019 Department
    [Show full text]
  • The Reader and the Poet
    THE READER AND THE POET THE TRANSFORMATION OF LATIN POETRY IN THE FOURTH CENTURY A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Aaron David Pelttari August 2012 i © 2012 Aaron David Pelttari ii The Reader and the Poet: The Transformation of Latin Poetry in the Fourth Century Aaron Pelttari, Ph.D. Cornell University 2012 In Late Antiquity, the figure of the reader came to play a central role in mediating the presence of the text. And, within the tradition of Latin poetry, the fourth century marks a turn towards writing that privileges the reader’s involvement in shaping the meaning of the text. Therefore, this dissertation addresses a set of problems related to the aesthetics of Late Antiquity, the reception of Classical Roman poetry, and the relation between author and reader. I begin with a chapter on contemporary methods of reading, in order to show the ways in which Late Antique authors draw attention to their own interpretations of authoritative texts and to their own creation of supplemental meaning. I show how such disparate authors as Jerome, Augustine, Servius, and Macrobius each privileges the work of secondary authorship. The second chapter considers the use of prefaces in Late Antique poetry. The imposition of paratextual borders dramatized the reader’s involvement in the text. In the third chapter, I apply Umberto Eco’s idea of the open text to the figural poetry of Optatianus Porphyrius, to the Psychomachia of Prudentius, and to the centos from Late Antiquity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theater of the Absurd in Europe and America: Sartre, Beckett, Pinter, Albee and Drama Criticism Sheila O'brien Mcguckin University of New Hampshire, Durham
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 1996 The Theater of the Absurd in Europe and America: Sartre, Beckett, Pinter, Albee and drama criticism Sheila O'Brien McGuckin University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation McGuckin, Sheila O'Brien, "The Theater of the Absurd in Europe and America: Sartre, Beckett, Pinter, Albee and drama criticism" (1996). Doctoral Dissertations. 1895. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/1895 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Kierkegaard, Literature, and the Arts
    Kierke gaard, Literature, and the Arts Engraving, ca. 1837, by Carl Strahlheim showing the Gendarmenmarkt in Berlin, with what was then the Schauspielhaus, or Theater (center)— now the concert house of the Konzerthausorchester Berlin— flanked by the German Cathedral (left) and the French Cathedral (right). Pictured in the background to the immediate right of the theater is the building, still standing today, in which Kierkegaard lodged during his four stays in Berlin, in 1841– 42, 1843, 1845, and 1846. It was there, as noted by a plaque outside, that Kierkegaard wrote the first drafts of Either/Or, Repetition, and Fear and Trembling. Kierkegaard, Literature, and the Arts Edited by Eric Ziolkowski northwestern university press evanston, illinois Northwestern University Press www.nupress.northwestern.edu Copyright © 2018 by Northwestern University Press. Published 2018. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Ziolkowski, Eric Jozef, 1958– editor. Title: Kierkegaard, literature, and the arts / edited by Eric Ziolkowski. Description: Evanston, Illinois : Northwestern University Press, 2018. | Includes index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017029795 | ISBN 9780810135970 (cloth : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780810135963 (pbk. : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780810135987 (e-book) Subjects: LCSH: Kierkegaard, Søren, 1813–1855. | Kierkegaard, Søren, 1813– 1855—Aesthetics. | Literature—Philosophy. | Music and philosophy. | Art and philosophy. | Performing arts—Philosophy. Classification: LCC B4377 .K4558 2018 | DDC 198.9—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017029795 Except where otherwise noted, this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
    [Show full text]
  • Purity of Heart Is to Will One Thing by Sören Kierkegaard
    Purity of Heart Is to Will One Thing by Sören Kierkegaard This book was first published by Harper in 1938. It was translated from the Danish and contains an introductory essay by Douglas V. Steere. Prepared for Religion Online by Ted and Willie Brock. Translator’s Introduction by Douglas V. Steere A helpful summary of Kierketaard's basic positions, written by an outstanding scholar of his work. Douglass Steere was Professor of philosophy at Haverford College. Preface A woman doing needlework on an altar cloth does not want the work admired or criticized, but rather that the intent of the work is that it be seen for its higher purpose. Kierkegaard desires his writing receive the same attention. Chapter 1: Introduction: Man and the Eternal In relation to the eternal, a man ages neither in the sense of time nor in the sense of an accumulation of past events. There is something eternal in a man, and the eternal must be able to exist and to be grasped within every change. Chapter 2: Remorse, Repentance, Confession: Eternity’s Emissaries to Man Remorse is a guide that calls out to the wanderer that he should take care. In confession one becomes at one with himself. Chapter 3: Barriers to Willing One Thing: Variety and Great Moments Are Not One Thing To will one thing can only mean to will the good, because every other object is not a unity. The will that only wills that another object, therefore, must become double-minded. Chapter 4: Barriers to Willing One Thing: The Reward-Disease If a man can will one thing, then he must will the Good, for the Good alone is one.
    [Show full text]
  • Konturen VII (2015) 1 Introduction: Kierkegaard and German
    Konturen VII (2015) 1 Introduction: Kierkegaard and German Thought Michael Stern University of Oregon Moods, Voicing, and Anticipation Et Forord er Stemningen. At skrive et Forord er ligesom at hvæsse Leen, ligesom at stemme Guitaren, ligesom at snake med et Barn, ligesom at spytte af Vinduet. (Kierkegaard, SKS 4, 469) A preface is a mood. Writing a preface is like sharpening a scythe, like tuning a guitar, like talking with a child, like spitting out of the window.1 (Kierkegaard, Prefaces 5) If it would please you, dear reader, recall the vocabulary of the Kierkegaardian preface. Remember its lexicon, its love of secrets and self-effacements. Give heed to its masks, its pseudonymous authors who write pamphlets at their leisure, its editors who find manuscripts in secret compartments, its thieves in the night who copy diaries in anxious haste. Conjure up its sly seductions, its misdirections, its Chinese boxes, and its celebration of the chance occurrence. Bring to mind the aesthetics of a beginning that is never an origination for it is not possible for a thinker such as Kierkegaard to forward first principles or doctrines. Kierkegaard seemed to relish the activity of composing introductions so much that he once wrote a book consisting of nothing but prefaces, introductions introducing nothing at all. He published Forord (Prefaces) in 1844, on the same day as Begrebet Angest (The Concept of Anxiety)⎯the first book conveying empty promises and the second possibilities without discernable objects. In the very first of Forord’s (Prefaces) series of prefatory pieces, Kierkegaard’s pseudonym, Nicolaus Notabene explains that his young wife’s jealousy inspired the structure of the text.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT the Legitimacy of the Comic: Kierkegaard and The
    ABSTRACT The Legitimacy of the Comic: Kierkegaard and the Importance of the Comic for His Ethics and Theology Will Williams, Ph.D. Mentor: Paul Martens, Ph.D. While some consider the comic to be a trivial subject, fit mainly for amusement or distraction, Søren Kierkegaard disagrees. This dissertation examines Kierkegaard’s understanding of the nature of the comic and how he believes even the triviality of comic jest to be deeply tied to ethical and theological earnestness. First, I examine Kierkegaard’s understanding of the comic, irony, and humor, drawing primarily from Concluding Unscientific Postscript (1846). I argue that, for Kierkegaard, the comic is a contradiction or misrelation that is essentially though not absolutely painless, providing a “way out.” The comic is a contradiction between norms, suggesting that it springs from one’s perspective in a way that holds important implications for one’s ethical and theological worldview. Kierkegaard believes that subjective development is closely tied to one’s capacity to perceive the comic, making the comic both diagnostic of and formative for one’s subjective state. For him, the Christian is far from humorless, instead having the maximum human capacity to perceive the comic. Next, I show that the previously argued conception of the comic can be found in other works by Kierkegaard: Prefaces (1844), Upbuilding Discourses in Various Spirits (1847), and the Corsair affair (c.1845-1848). Then, I examine representatives of the Deconstructionist tradition of reading Kierkegaard, namely Louis Mackey, Roger Poole, Elsebet Jegstrup, and Mark C. Taylor. I argue that, while they accurately perceive the widespread irony in Kierkegaard’s corpus, they incorrectly conclude that such irony is a sign of his lack of earnest interest in philosophy and theology.
    [Show full text]
  • Nietzsche's Preface to Philosophy
    NIETZSCHE’S PREFACE TO PHILOSOPHY YONI MOLAD SUBMITTED IN TOTAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY M AY 2 0 1 4 SCHOOL OF SOCIAL AND POLITICAL SCIENCES THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE Thesis Abstract Nietzsche's philosophical practice is best understood as a set of practical exercises in preparation for the transformation of modern social life. Rather than providing pedagogical dogma or verifiable theses about the world, Nietzsche's life and work serve as an example of an attempt to abolish philosophy as an autonomous practice. His writings are examples of experiments and spiritual exercises with the aim of positing new tasks for his readers who are tasked with embarking on an adventure of subjective metamorphosis. As the title of this thesis asserts, Nietzsche’s work is best understood as a preface to a new philosophy, to which, after a thorough re-evaluation of the philosophical tradition, Nietzsche only provides some basic foundational co-ordinates. The thesis elaborates this by focusing on Nietzsche’s earliest philosophical writings, which serve as orienting guidelines to interpret his more mature re-elaborations of similar ideas, and hence as a foundation upon which to begin philosophizing in a different way. In addition, the thesis discusses Nietzsche’s own Prefaces to some of his books, in which he articulates his philosophical practice most clearly in order to re-affirm the experimental and provisional nature of most of his central ideas. The thesis itself is therefore also a preface to this future philosophy, and future inquiry, insofar as it highlights the preliminary and preparatory nature of Nietzsche’s philosophical practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Kierkegaard's Writings
    CHRONOLOGY OF KIERKEGAARD'S WRITINGS Because of the thematic nature of this essay, it might be helpful for the reader to note the chronology of Kierkegaard's writ­ ings at the outset of the investigation.1 I have listed biblio­ graphical information for the English texts used throughout the study, and have specified the way in which these works are indicated in the footnotes of the essay. Sept. 7, 1837 From the Papers of One Still Living (not translated) Sept. 16, 1841 The Concept of Irony, with Constant Refer­ ence to Socrates, trans. by Lee N. Capel, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1968. (The Concept of Irony) Feb.2o, 1843 Either-Or, vol. I trans. by David F. and Lil­ lian M. Swenson, vol. n trans. by W alter Lowrie, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971. (Either-Or, 1; Either-Or, n) May 16,1843 Two Edifying Discourses2 Oct. 16, 1843 Repetition, trans. by W alter Lowrie, New York: Harper T orchbooks, 1964. (Repeti- tion) Fear and Trembling, trans. by Waiter Lowrie, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970. (Fear and Trembling) 1 Howard and Edna Hong's table at the beginning of the first vol­ ume of their S;>ren Kierkegaard's fournals and Papers (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1967) has been helpful in arranging this list. 2 Kierkegaard's Edifying Discourses are collected in a four-volume series: Edifying Discourses, trans. by David F. and Lillian M. Swenson (Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1943ff.). xi CHRONOLOGY Oct. r6, r843 Three Edifying Discourses Dec. 6, r843 Four Edifying Discourses March 5, 1844 Two Edifying Discourses June 8, r844 Three Edifying Discourses June 13, r844 Philosophical Fragments, trans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Actual Author of This Dissertation
    Henrik Jøker Bjerre The Actual Author of This Dissertation Groucho Marx once told an audience that before he would begin to speak, he had something important to say. On the face of it, this decla- ration describes rather precisely what it means to write a preface: You state some introductory or clarifying remarks before moving on to the actual subject at hand. Groucho’s expression has a certain comical efect, however, because it also postulates a rather paradoxical ability: being able to “say” something before, and thus without, “speaking”, as if there is a saying that is somehow qualitatively diferent from speak- ing. But how can you say anything without speaking? By miming it? And what does it mean for that which follows? Is speaking somehow less than saying something, or, on the contrary, the only case where anything really gets across at all? A preface contains a similarly asymmetric relation to the text it intro- duces. It states something that is not really part of the text itself, but has to be stated before the actual writing begins. Sometimes, a pref- ace can solemnly summarize a work’s world-historical signifcance, like when Wittgenstein in the preface of the Tractatus claimed to have “solved the problems of philosophy and shown how little was thereby 131 accomplished”1. At other times, it is the preface which is profane or immaterial, giving only dull information about the bureaucratic con- ditions of the appearance of the text. In any case, the expression “before I speak, I have something import- ant to say” shows something about an urgency of getting the opening right, of approaching the text in the right manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Theatrical Doubling and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2011 The "Opposite of People": Theatrical Doubling and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead Megan Behm College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Theatre and Performance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Behm, Megan, "The "Opposite of People": Theatrical Doubling and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead" (2011). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 360. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/360 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The “Opposite of People”: Theatrical Doubling and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelors of Arts in Theatre from The College of William and Mary by Megan Behm Accepted for (Honors, High Honors, Highest Honors) Laurie Wolf, Director Elizabeth Wiley Dr. Richard Palmer Brett D. Wilson Williamsburg, VA April 15, 2011 Behm Page 2 Abstract Tom Stoppard is a modern playwright who is concerned with absurdism, metatheatricality, and language as tools to explore the nature and definitions of reality. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, Stoppard‘s first major work, focuses on all of these themes—and is specifically one of Stoppard‘s most theatrical plays. Doubling is a longstanding theatrical tradition in which one actor portrays multiple characters within a dramatic work.
    [Show full text]