Application of Holding and Crew Interventions to Improve Service Regularity on a High Frequency Rail Transit Line
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Conceptual Plan
About the Cover Photo The photo on the cover of this report was taken on December 17, 2010, around 8:00 AM. The view is from the Savin Hill Avenue overpass and looks almost directly south. This overpass is shown in Figure 3-3 of the report, and the field of view includes land shown in Figure 3-2. At the right is the recently completed headhouse of the Savin Hill Red Line station. Stopped at the station platform is an inbound Red Line train that started at Ashmont and will travel to Alewife. The station is fully ADA-compliant, and the plan presented in this report requires no modification to this station. Next to the Red Line train is an inbound train from one of the three Old Colony commuter rail branches. There is only one track at this location, as is the case throughout most of the Old Colony system. This train has a mixed consist of single-level and bi-level coaches, and is being pushed by a diesel locomotive, which is mostly hidden from view by the bi-level coaches. Between the two trains is an underpass beneath the Ashmont branch of the Red Line. This had been a freight spur serving an industrial area on the west side of the Ashmont branch tracks. Sections A-2.3 and A-2.4 of this report present an approach to staging railroad reconstruction that utilizes the abandoned freight spur and underpass. The two tracks to the left of the Old Colony tracks serve the Braintree Red Line branch. -
Metro Rail Design Criteria Section 10 Operations
METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA SECTION 10 OPERATIONS METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA SECTION 10 / OPERATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS 10.1 INTRODUCTION 1 10.2 DEFINITIONS 1 10.3 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN 5 Metro Baseline 10- i Re-baseline: 06/15/10 METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA SECTION 10 / OPERATIONS OPERATIONS 10.1 INTRODUCTION Transit Operations include such activities as scheduling, crew rostering, running and supervision of revenue trains and vehicles, fare collection, system security and system maintenance. This section describes the basic system wide operating and maintenance philosophies and methodologies set forth for the Metro Rail Projects, which shall be used by designer in preparation of an Operations and Maintenance Plan. An initial Operations and Maintenance Plan (OMP) is developed during the environmental phase and is based on ridership forecasts produced during this early planning phase of a project. From this initial Operations and Maintenance plan, headways are established that are to be evaluated by a rail operations simulation upon which design and operating headways can be established to confirm operational goals for light and heavy rail systems. The Operations and Maintenance Plan shall be developed in order to design effective, efficient and responsive transit system. The operations criteria and requirements established herein represent Metro’s Rail Operating Requirements / Criteria applicable to all rail projects and form the basis for the project-specific operational design decisions. They shall be utilized by designer during preparation of Operations and Maintenance Plan. Any proposed deviation to Design Criteria cited herein shall be approved by Metro, as represented by the Change Control Board, consisting of management responsible for project construction, engineering and management, as well as daily rail operations, planning, systems and vehicle maintenance with appropriate technical expertise and understanding. -
Headway and Speed Data Acquisition Using Video
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1225 Headway and Speed Data Acquisition Using Video M. A. P. TayroR, W. YouNc, eNp R. G. THonlpsoN Accurate knowledge of vehicle speeds headways and on trallÌc ment (such as a freeway) before this study, so there was an networks is a fundamental part of transport systems modelling. excellent opportunity to evaluate the system and suggest mod- Video and recently developed automatic data-extraction tecñ- ifications to it. This equipment also made niques have the potential to provide a cheap, quick, easy, and it feasible to inves- accurate method of investigating traflic systems. This paper pre- tigate the relationship between vehicle speeds and location in sents two studies that use video-based equipment to investigate the car parks. character of vehicle speeds and headways. Investigation oÌ head- rvays on freeway traffic allows the potential of this technology in a high-speed environment to be determined. Its application to the THE VIDEO SYSTEM study ofspeeds in parking lots enabled its usefulneis in low-speed environments to be studied. The data obtained from the video was Using film equipment compared to traditional methods of collecting headway and speed to obtain a permanent record of vehicle data. movements is not a new concept. However, considerable recent developments have occurred in collecting data using video. Digital image-processing applications offer the potential to In particular, ARRB has developed a trailer-mounted video automate a large number of traffic surveys. It is, therefore, recording system (3). This relatively new equipment has until not surprising that considerable interest has been directed at recently experienced only a limited range of applications. -
Headway Adherence. Detection and Reduction of the Bus Bunching Effect
HEADWAY ADHERENCE. DETECTION AND REDUCTION OF THE BUS BUNCHING EFFECT Josep Mension Camps Director Central Services and Deputy Chief Officer of Bus Network. Transports Metropolitans de Barcelona (TMB). Miquel Estrada Romeu Associate Professor. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya- BarcelonaTECH. 1. INTRODUCTION Transit systems should provide a good performance to compete against the wide usage of cars in metropolitan areas. The level of service of these systems relies on a proper temporal and spatial coverage provision (high frequencies, low stop spacings) as well as significant regularity and comfort. In this way, bus systems in densely populated cities usually operate at short headways (10 minutes or less). However, in these busy routes, any delay suffered by a single bus is propagated to the whole bus fleet. This fact causes vehicle bunching and unstable time-headways. In real bus lines, we usually see that two or more vehicles arrive together or in close succession, followed by a long gap between them. There are many sources of potential external disruptions in the service of one bus: illegal parking in the bus lane, failure in the doors opening system, traffic jams, etc. However, some intrinsic characteristics of transit systems and traffic management may also induce delays at specific vehicles such as traffic signal coordination and irregular passenger arrivals at stops. These facts make the bus motion unstable. Therefore, bus bunching is a common problem in the real operation of buses all over the world that must be addressed. The crucial issue is that bus bunching has a great impact on both users and agency cost. From a passenger perspective, the bus bunching phenomena increases the travel time of passengers (riding and waiting time) and worsens the vehicle occupancy. -
Making Headway, Capital Investments to Keep Transit Moving
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN Making Headway Capital Investments to Keep Transit Moving 2019–2033 headway (/ˈhed wā/) noun 1. forward movement or progress, especially when the way is difficult. 2. the average interval between trains, streetcars, or buses. The shorter the headway, the more passengers carried per hour. Making Headway — Capital Investments to Keep Transit Moving January 2019 From the Chief Executive Officer In January 2018, the TTC published a new Corporate Plan that clearly laid out our priorities for the next five years. At the top of the list was transforming for financial sustainability. “Fiscal sustainability,” we said, “depends on our ability to fund what the TTC is being asked to deliver over the long term.” We committed to providing better budget information for improved long-term decision-making. Over the past 12 months, we have undertaken a massive, multi-department review of all of our assets. The result is this Capital Investment Plan. Toronto’s transit system is hailed as among the most multi- modal systems in the world, with seamless integration between buses, streetcars, Wheel-Trans and the subway. The TTC’s interdependent network of fleet, track, power, maintenance and other infrastructure moves more than half a billion people annually. Funding for critical maintenance and system improvements is necessary. Projects that have been approved are still awaiting funding. Line 2 Capacity Enhancement is unfunded. Buses past 2021 are unfunded. The expansion of Bloor-Yonge Station, which is needed to accommodate ridership growth even before planned transit expansion, is unfunded. The TTC Way, which was introduced in our Corporate Plan, establishes clear guidelines for how we at the TTC work with each other, with customers and with our partners, including our funding partners. -
Make Your Space at 960 Mass Ave. - 68,500 SF AVAILABLE - Overview & Specifications
Make Your Space at 960 Mass Ave. - 68,500 SF AVAILABLE - Overview & Specifications 960 Mass Ave offers 68,500 SF of available open floor plates with unlimited possibilities. From industrial to flex-tech, the expansive layout and building infrastructure offer tenants ultimate flexibility to meet any use. With immediate access to highways, commuter rail, and immediate adjacency to Boston’s urban core, 960 Mass Ave is located in the heart of urban Boston with unbeatable regional accessibility. Image is inspirational and does not reflect the current conditions of the building 960 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE | BOSTON MA Overview & Specifications Property Specifications Total Building Size Signage ±97,929 SF Highly-visible canopy signage opportunities; over 12,000 daily car count Basement: ±1,500 SF 1st Floor: ±34,194 SF Land Area 2nd Floor: ±37,484 SF ±1.83 acres 3rd Floor: ±24,751 SF Loading Docks Available Space Shared loading available with freight ±68,637 SF elevator access at both the north and south sides of the building 1st Floor: ±6,402 SF 2nd Floor: ±37,484 SF Sprinklers 3rd Floor: ±24,751 SF Wet system Clear Height Utilities 1st floor: 10' typical Electric: Eversource 2nd floor: 11'8" typical Gas: National Grid 3rd floor: 10' typical Water & Sewer: City of Boston Fiber: Comcast and Verizon Floor Poured concrete up to Power 150 lb/square foot load capacity 3000 Amps Building Exterior Year Built New CMU block and glass 1952; renovated 2019-2020 exterior walls; metal panels Parking Ratio Column Spacing 0.8/1,000 SF 20' x 20' typical Access -
1995 Headway-Control.Pdf
A HEADWAY CONTROL STRATEGY FOR RECOVERING FROM TRANSIT VEHICLE DELAYS Peter G. Furth I ASCE Transportation Congress, San Diego October 24, 1995 Abstract Suppose a subway train is delayed due to, say, a medical emergency. What adjustments to the following trains' itineraries should be made in order for the schedule to recover from this initial delay? An optimization framework for finding the optimal schedule adjustments is devised. It accounts for the impact of those adjustments on ride time and waiting time, and has as its objective the minimization of total passenger time. Optimality conditions and a solution algorithm are developed. Realistic constraints such as a safety headway, vehicle capacity, and maximum delay at the start ofthe line are explicitly incorporated. Examples illustrate the main features of the optimal adjustment pattern. After adjustment, a train will follow its leader by the scheduled headway minus an amount called that train's schedule recovery. Because the optimal solution involves a tradeoff between minimizing the ride time impact, which is accomplished by immediately recovering from the initial delay, and the wait time impact, which is minimized by spreading the recovery over a large number of following trains, the optimal recovery pattern lies between these two extremes. In general, there is an S-shaped pattern to the recovery distribution: large recovery for the first one or two trains following the initially delayed train, then rapidly diminishing recoveries per train, and finally small recoveries for the last few trains. The location of the initial delay influences the recovery pattern. Delays that occur on a boarding section, where many waiting passengers will be affected, tend to benefit most from an optimal recovery as opposed to a policy of immediate recovery. -
Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964. -
Broadway House / 181 Broadway Somerville Community Preservation Committee (CPC) Application Narratives
Broadway House / 181 Broadway Somerville Community Preservation Committee (CPC) Application Narratives September 14, 2020 Table of Contents Project Description 2 Measuring Success 4 Financial 5 Project Management 6 Historic Resources - Rehabilitation Project 10 Accessibility Requirements 10 Project Description 1) Describe the project, including the project location and property involved Broadway House (181 Broadway) is a significant community asset, a historic building providing affordable housing for disabled young adults experiencing chronic mental illness. These residents are among the most vulnerable people in the City; Broadway House provides much needed stability for individuals who lived previously in foster care or homeless shelters, with extremely low incomes at or below 30% of Area Median Income (AMI) ($26,850). We are requesting Historic Resources for rehabilitation of the building’s exterior and window replacement, improving energy efficiency and preserving historic details. The planned scope of work falls in two categories: 1) historic exterior improvements and 2) interior renovations, enhancing the accessibility and durability of the common areas and associated equipment. Cascap Inc. (Cascap) is applying for CPA funds for the eligible historic scope and will contribute the property’s replacement reserve funds to support the accessibility updates at building interior and side entrance (see attached Project Budget for more detail on scope and sources). Broadway House is located at 181 Broadway in East Somerville, directly on the 87 MBTA bus route, less than a mile from Sullivan Square Station, and within walking distance of the planned Green Line Extension and bus routes to Lechmere and MBTA Red Line stations (see attached Map and Photos of Project Site). -
Directions to the Complex Fluids Workshop at Harvard University
Directions to the Complex Fluids Workshop at Harvard University The workshop will be held in Maxwell Dworkin, 33 Oxford Street, Cambridge MA 02138 For Questions, email Christina Andujar at [email protected] By Train Amtrak, commuter rail, or bus into South Station Follow signs at South Station for the T (subway). Take the Red Line inbound, past Downtown Crossing and Park Street where the same direction becomes known as outbound, to the Harvard stop. Continue with the directions "by subway" below. The travel time on the subway should be 15-20 minutes. By commuter rail into North Station Once you arrive at North Station, head for the T (subway). Take the Green Line inbound/westbound to Park Street, then change to the Red Line downstairs for the train to Alewife via Harvard. Get off at Harvard. Continue with the directions "by subway" below. The travel time on the subway should be 20-30 minutes. By commuter rail (Fitchburg line) into Porter station No need to go to North Station! Get off at Porter (the penultimate stop), then walk south (turn left as you come to street level by escalator) along Mass Ave. You will pass the Porter Exchange Building and a City Sports store on your left. Keep going for about 10 blocks until you come to Everett Street on your left. Turn left onto Everett Street, then right onto Oxford Street at the next light. Maxwell Dworkin is the second building to your right, before the driveway. By subway ("T") Take the Red Line to the Harvard Square T stop. -
Directions to Boston University Center for Biomedical Imaging Address
Directions to Boston University Center for Biomedical Imaging Address: Evans Biomedical Research Center (X-Building) 650 Albany Street, X-B01 Boston, MA 02118 • Check in with the security service at the front desk. • ask them to call extension 42370 or 42380 for you to be picked up in the lobby or • take elevator on the far right to floor "BR" (the button inside the elevator is marked with a sign for “MRI”). Remark: Some security employees do not know CBI personnel’s names or might want to send you to the clinical MRI of Boston Medical Center. Show them the information you have and have them call the above numbers for you! Campus Map: North DIRECTIONS BY CAR The Medical Area is located parallel to the expressway. APPROACHING THE BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS From the North: Follow Route 1 (Via Mystic/ Tobin Bridge) to Route 93 South. Take Exit 18 (Mass Ave). At traffic light, take right onto access road; stay in right lane. At end of access road, turn right onto Massachusetts Ave. From Logan Airport: Go through the Ted Williams Tunnel to I-93 South. Take the first exit (Exit 18 Mass Ave). At traffic light, take right onto access road; stay in right lane. At end of access road, turn right onto Massachusetts Ave. From the South: Take Expressway North (Route 93/3). Take Exit 18. Watch for signs. At second traffic light, take left onto access road stay in right lane. At end of access road, turn right onto Massachusetts Ave. From the West: Take the Massachusetts Turnpike (Route 90) East to end. -
Open PDF File, 501.12 KB, for 2016 SIP Annual Report
Charles D. Baker, Governor Karyn E.. Polito, Lieutenant Governor massDOT Stephanie Pollack, MassDOT Secretary & CEO Massachusetts Department of Transportation June 30, 2016 Mr. Martin Suuberg Commissioner Department of Environmental Protection 1 Winter Street Boston, MA 02108 Dear Commissioner Suuberg: The Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT), in conjunction with the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), is submitting the attached report to_ the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) in order to fulfill the requirements of 310 CMR 7.36, Transit System Improvements. This annual report provides a project description and status information for each of the outstanding public transit projects required under the amended State Implementation Plan (SIP). Please do not hesitate to contact me at (857) 368-8865 if you would like to discuss further. Sincerely, David J. Mohler Executive Director Office of Transportation Planning cc: Christine Kirby, DEP Ten Park Plaza, Suite 4150.Boston.MA 021 16 Tel: 857-368-4636, TIY:857-368-0655 www.mass.gov;massdot Massachusetts Department of Transportation Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority State Implementation Plan – Transit Commitments 2016 Status Report Submitted to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection June 30, 2016 For questions on this document, please contact: Massachusetts Department of Transportation Office of Transportation Planning 10 Park Plaza, Boston, Massachusetts 02116 [email protected] MassDOT Office of Transportation Planning June 30, 2016 INTRODUCTION This report is submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT), in conjunction with the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) in order to fulfill the requirements of 310 CMR 7.36(7), Transit System Improvements.