DOCSLIB.ORG

Rightsto Results

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rightsto Results FROM RIGHTS TO RESULTS An Examination of Agreements between International Mining and Petroleum Companies and Indigenous Communities in Latin America ABOUT RESOLVE RESOLVE builds strong, enduring solutions to environmental, social, and health challenges. We help community, business, government, and NGO leaders get results and create lasting relationships through collaboration. RESOLVE is an independent non-profit organization with a thirty-eight year track record of success. RESOLVE was founded in 1977 to promote the effective use of collaboration and consensus building in public decisions and to help people with diverse interests engage in dialogue to achieve outcomes. RESOLVE helped institutionalize the use of dispute resolution in policymaking. RESOLVE continues to support critical policy initiatives and designs and implements solutions-focused programs. From Rights to Results © RESOLVE. July 2015. For more information contact: [email protected]. pg. 2 From Rights to Results (Sept 2015) TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents About RESOLVE ............................................................................................................................................. 2 About the Research Team ............................................................................................................................. 6 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Forward by the President of RESOLVE .......................................................................................................... 9 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Introduction to the Report. ......................................................................................................................... 17 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 17 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................... 17 Extractive Resource Development and Indigenous Rights: The Scale of the Issue ................................ 18 Today’s International Norms and Standards .......................................................................................... 19 1. Governance ............................................................................................................................................. 21 The Importance of Governance .............................................................................................................. 22 Policy Frictions ........................................................................................................................................ 24 The Critical Role of the State .................................................................................................................. 24 The Role of Courts ................................................................................................................................... 26 Economic Priorities and Indigenous Rights ............................................................................................. 26 Governance and the Project Cycle .......................................................................................................... 27 The Role of Home Jurisdictions ............................................................................................................... 28 Analysis ................................................................................................................................................... 29 2. Rights and Norms .................................................................................................................................... 30 Macro-Political Drivers ............................................................................................................................ 30 The Impact and Operation of International Norms ................................................................................ 31 Agreements, FPIC, and Community Veto................................................................................................ 34 Illegal Actors and Violence ...................................................................................................................... 35 Awareness and Expectations .................................................................................................................. 36 The Example of First Nations in Canada ................................................................................................. 37 Influence of the UN and the Convention on Biological Diversity ........................................................... 38 Analysis ................................................................................................................................................... 39 From Rights to Results (Sept 2015) pg. 3 3. Relationships ........................................................................................................................................... 40 Relationships are Complex ...................................................................................................................... 41 Observed Tensions .................................................................................................................................. 43 Resetting the Relationship ...................................................................................................................... 44 Examples of Resetting the Relationship ................................................................................................. 45 Community Capacity ............................................................................................................................... 46 Maturity, Sector, and Corporate Standards Matter ............................................................................... 47 Analysis ................................................................................................................................................... 48 4. Character and Content of Agreements ................................................................................................... 49 The Purposes of Agreements .................................................................................................................. 49 Morally or Legally Binding? ..................................................................................................................... 50 When Companies Operate Without Agreements ................................................................................... 50 Legitimacy of Community Signatories .................................................................................................... 51 Non-Financial Compensation and Benefits ............................................................................................. 52 Financial Agreements .............................................................................................................................. 52 “Other” Types of Financial Arrangements .............................................................................................. 53 Calculating Financial Arrangements........................................................................................................ 53 Benefits and Compensation Issues ......................................................................................................... 53 Agreement Duration ............................................................................................................................... 54 Management and Monitoring................................................................................................................. 55 Reasons for Success ................................................................................................................................ 56 Challenges and Reasons for Failure ........................................................................................................ 57 Failure is mostly for Predictable and Avoidable Reasons ....................................................................... 58 Good Practices ........................................................................................................................................ 58 Leading Practice ...................................................................................................................................... 59 Analysis ................................................................................................................................................... 60 5. Challenges and Suggested Priorities for Future Work ............................................................................ 61 Annex 1. Country Briefs A. Bolivia ................................................................................................................................................. 63 B. Brazil ................................................................................................................................................... 69 C. Colombia ...........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evolutionary Biology and Health of Hunter-Gatherer Populations
    9 Evolutionary biology and health of hunter-gatherer populations ALi\lN FROMENT Introduction Hunter-gatherers display a wide variety of morphological and physiological characteristics, and should provide a good model for the evolution of human biological characters across a considerable range of environments in presumably isolated situations. This chapter examines both ecological and genetic aspects of the evolu­ tion of present-day hunter-gatherers and also comments on what the future will hold for those who now face or soon will face cultural and technological transition through contact with dominant groups. Hunter-gatherers are not recognisable by their biological character­ istics - they are defined by their way of life, namely their relation to nature, which is a cultural, not a biological, definition (see Panter­ Brick, Layton and Rowley-Conwy, this volume). However their close interaction with the physical and animal environment, their small and mobile groups, their dietary and work patterns, did create ecological and evolutionary characteristics which shaped biological outcomes. Existing variation in biological traits will be examined as evolutionary responses to climate, diet and disease. Some partially unanswered questions related to evolution and transition can be listed. Concerning morphology, is small stature an adaptation to hunting and gathering? What is the genetic basis for anatomical characteristics and what room is there for modulation by nutritional and infectious variables? Is there a secular trend modifying these
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous and Tribal People's Rights Over Their Ancestral Lands
    INTER‐AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 56/09 30 December 2009 Original: Spanish INDIGENOUS AND TRIBAL PEOPLES’ RIGHTS OVER THEIR ANCESTRAL LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCES Norms and Jurisprudence of the Inter‐American Human Rights System 2010 Internet: http://www.cidh.org E‐mail: [email protected] OAS Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data Derechos de los pueblos indígenas y tribales sobre sus tierras ancestrales y recursos naturales: Normas y jurisprudencia del sistema interamericano de derechos humanos = Indigenous and tribal people’s rights over their ancestral lands and natural resources: Norms and jurisprudence of the Inter‐American human rights system / [Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights.] p. ; cm. (OEA documentos oficiales ; OEA/Ser.L)(OAS official records ; OEA/Ser.L) ISBN 978‐0‐8270‐5580‐3 1. Human rights‐‐America. 2. Indigenous peoples‐‐Civil rights‐‐America. 3. Indigenous peoples‐‐Land tenure‐‐America. 4. Indigenous peoples‐‐Legal status, laws, etc.‐‐America. 5. Natural resources‐‐Law and legislation‐‐America. I. Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights. II Series. III. Series. OAS official records ; OEA/Ser.L. OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc.56/09 Document published thanks to the financial support of Denmark and Spain Positions herein expressed are those of the Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights and do not reflect the views of Denmark or Spain Approved by the Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights on December 30, 2009 INTER‐AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS MEMBERS Luz Patricia Mejía Guerrero Víctor E. Abramovich Felipe González Sir Clare Kamau Roberts Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro Florentín Meléndez Paolo G. Carozza ****** Executive Secretary: Santiago A.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazil's São Luiz Do Tapajós
    www.water-alternatives.org Volume 8 | Issue 3 Fearnside, P.M. 2015. Brazil’s São Luiz do Tapajós dam: The art of cosmetic Environmental Impact Assessments. Water Alternatives 8(3): 373-396 Brazil’s São Luiz do Tapajós Dam: The Art of Cosmetic Environmental Impact Assessments Philip M. Fearnside National Institute for Research in Amazonia (INPA), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil; [email protected] ABSTRACT: Brazil’s planned São Luiz do Tapajós dam is a key part of a massive plan for hydropower and navigable waterways in the Tapajós basin and on other Amazon River tributaries. The dam’s Environmental Impact Study (EIA) illustrates the fragility of protections. EIAs are supposed to provide input to decisions on development projects, but in practice these studies tend to become formalities in legalizing prior decisions made in the absence of information on or consideration of project impacts. The EIA has a tendency to minimize or ignore significant impacts. Loss of fisheries resources is likely to be critical for Munduruku indigenous people and for traditional riverside dwellers (ribeirinhos), but the EIA claims that there is "low expectation that natural conditions of aquatic environments will be significantly altered". The destruction of Munduruku sacred sites is simply ignored. The Brazilian government’s priority for the dam has resulted in blocking creation of the Munduruku’s Sawré Muybu indigenous land and other indigenous lands throughout Brazilian Amazonia. With the exception of one legally recognized community (Montanha e Mangabal), non-indigenous ribeirinhos are considered as not 'traditional people'. Even the one recognized community is not considered to require free, prior and informed consent.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Principles of the Use of Macro-Areas Language Dynamics &A
    Online Appendix for Harald Hammarstr¨om& Mark Donohue (2014) Some Principles of the Use of Macro-Areas Language Dynamics & Change Harald Hammarstr¨om& Mark Donohue The following document lists the languages of the world and their as- signment to the macro-areas described in the main body of the paper as well as the WALS macro-area for languages featured in the WALS 2005 edi- tion. 7160 languages are included, which represent all languages for which we had coordinates available1. Every language is given with its ISO-639-3 code (if it has one) for proper identification. The mapping between WALS languages and ISO-codes was done by using the mapping downloadable from the 2011 online WALS edition2 (because a number of errors in the mapping were corrected for the 2011 edition). 38 WALS languages are not given an ISO-code in the 2011 mapping, 36 of these have been assigned their appropri- ate iso-code based on the sources the WALS lists for the respective language. This was not possible for Tasmanian (WALS-code: tsm) because the WALS mixes data from very different Tasmanian languages and for Kualan (WALS- code: kua) because no source is given. 17 WALS-languages were assigned ISO-codes which have subsequently been retired { these have been assigned their appropriate updated ISO-code. In many cases, a WALS-language is mapped to several ISO-codes. As this has no bearing for the assignment to macro-areas, multiple mappings have been retained. 1There are another couple of hundred languages which are attested but for which our database currently lacks coordinates.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Enteroparasitosis in the Indigenous Communit Y of Mato Grosso, Brazil: a Look Into the Sanitation and Ethno-Development
    Saúde e Pesquisa, Maringá (PR) DOI: 10.17765/2176-9206.2019v12n2p253-264 PREVALENCE OF ENTEROPARASITOSIS IN THE INDIGENOUS COMMUNIT Y OF MATO GROSSO, BRAZIL: A LOOK INTO THE SANITATION AND ETHNO-DEVELOPMENT Leonir Evandro Zenazokenae ABSTRACT: The intestinal parasitic diseases directly affect the qual- Enfermeiro. Egresso da Universidade do Estado de ity of life of indigenous populations, because of vulnerabilities they Mato Grosso - UNEMAT, Tangará da Serra/MT, Brasil. experience. This study aimed to understand the prevalence of intes- tinal parasites among the Haliti-Paresí and relate with sanitation and Ana Cláudia Pereira Terças-Trettel ethno-development. It is a quantitative and cross-sectional study on indigenous Utiaritiland where reside the Haliti-Paresí, in the middle Doutora em Medicina Tropical IOC/Fiocruz, Brasil. region northern Mato Grosso, Brazil. Data collection occurred in 2015, from interview with application of semi-structured form and collection Vagner Ferreira do Nascimento of feces for coprological survey.Forty-three indigenous people partici- pated in the study, of an average age of 30.9 years old, mostly women, Doutor em Bioética pelo Centro Universitário São Camilo, Brasil. and a predominance of basic education. The prevalence of enteropar- asitosis was 46.6%, predominantly among men, reaching all adoles- Thalise Yuri Hattori cents, followed by children, without the influence of schooling in the rate of infection. Nine species were detected, being six pathogenic, Mestre em Ciências da Saúde pela Universidade Fed- Giardia duodenalis, Entamoebahistolytica, Ancilostomídeo, Blasto- eral da Grande Dourados - UFGD, Brasil. cystishominis, Hymenolepis nana and Rodentolepis nana, in addition to three non-pathogenic, Iodamoebabutschlii, Entamoeba coli and Mariana Atanaka Endolimax nana.The sanitation conditions, associated with cultur- Doutora em Saúde Pública pela Escola Nacional de al habits, point to the need for improvement in sanitation, since we Saúde Pública, Brasil.
    [Show full text]
  • Peoples in the Brazilian Amazonia Indian Lands
    Brazilian Demographic Censuses and the “Indians”: difficulties in identifying and counting. Marta Maria Azevedo Researcher for the Instituto Socioambiental – ISA; and visiting researcher of the Núcleo de Estudos em População – NEPO / of the University of Campinas – UNICAMP PEOPLES IN THE BRAZILIAN AMAZONIA INDIAN LANDS source: Programa Brasil Socioambiental - ISA At the present moment there are in Brazil 184 native language- UF* POVO POP.** ANO*** LÍNG./TRON.**** OUTROS NOMES***** Case studies made by anthropologists register the vital events of a RO Aikanã 175 1995 Aikanã Aikaná, Massaká, Tubarão RO Ajuru 38 1990 Tupari speaking peoples and around 30 who identify themselves as “Indians”, RO Akunsu 7 1998 ? Akunt'su certain population during a large time period, which allows us to make RO Amondawa 80 2000 Tupi-Gurarani RO Arara 184 2000 Ramarama Karo even though they are Portuguese speaking. Two-hundred and sixteen RO Arikapu 2 1999 Jaboti Aricapu a few analyses about their populational dynamics. Such is the case, for RO Arikem ? ? Arikem Ariken peoples live in ‘Indian Territories’, either demarcated or in the RO Aruá 6 1997 Tupi-Mondé instance, of the work about the Araweté, made by Eduardo Viveiros de RO Cassupá ? ? Português RO/MT Cinta Larga 643 1993 Tupi-Mondé Matétamãe process of demarcation, and also in urban areas in the different RO Columbiara ? ? ? Corumbiara Castro. In his book (Araweté: o povo do Ipixuna – CEDI, 1992) there is an RO Gavião 436 2000 Tupi-Mondé Digüt RO Jaboti 67 1990 Jaboti regions of Brazil. The lands of some 30 groups extend across national RO Kanoe 84 1997 Kanoe Canoe appendix with the populational data registered by others, since the first RO Karipuna 20 2000 Tupi-Gurarani Caripuna RO Karitiana 360 2000 Arikem Caritiana burder, for ex.: 8,500 Ticuna live in Peru and Colombia while 32,000 RO Kwazá 25 1998 Língua isolada Coaiá, Koaiá contact with this people in 1976.
    [Show full text]
  • CLIMATE CHANGE and INDIGENOUS PERCEPTIONS INDIGENOUS PERCEPTIONS OPAN - 2018 / 2 ND EDITION Produced by Sponsorship
    CLIMATE CHANGE AND CLIMATE CHANGE AND INDIGENOUS PERCEPTIONS INDIGENOUS PERCEPTIONS 2 OPAN - 2018 / OPAN ND EDITION Produced by Sponsorship 2ND EDITION OPERAÇÃO AMAZÔNIA NATIVA – OPAN Production and editing Artema Lima Andreia Fanzeres Lívia Alcântara Revision Andreia Fanzeres CLIMATE Artema Lima Ivar Luiz Vendruscolo Busatto CHANGE AND OPAN Executive Coordination INDIGENOUS Ivar Luiz Vendruscolo Busatto Vinicius Benites Alves PERCEPTIONS Mato Grosso Program/ Project Berço das Águas Artema Lima Production: Tarcísio dos Santos ARTEMA LIMA Edemar Treuherz ANDREIA FANZERES Liliane Xavier LÍVIA ALCÂNTARA Lívia Alcântara Translation Translation Melissa Harkin and Nayana Fernandez MELISSA HARKIN Frontpage photo Adriano Gambarini/OPAN Layout Marina Lutfi / cacumbu ISBN: 978-85-67133-14-0 ND OPERAÇÃO AMAZÔNIA NATIVA 2 EDITION Av. Ipiranga, 97 Bairro Goiabeiras, Cuiabá - MT Brasil CEP: 78032-035 OPERAÇÃO AMAZÔNIA NATIVA – OPAN Telefone: 55 (65) 3322-2980 / FAX: 55 (65) 3322-4161 Mato Grosso. Brasil. 2018 www. amazonianativa.org.br 9 PRESENTATION 13 IT’S TIME TO LISTEN TO INDIGENOUS PEOPLES TARCÍSIO DA SILVA SANTOS JÚNIOR AND LUCIANA REBELLATO 20 ANOTHER NAME FOR CLIMATE CHANGE AILTON KRENAK 24 CLIMATE CHANGE, INDIGENOUS PEOPLES, EDUCATIONS AND DEEP ECOLOGY SEVERIÁ IDIORIÊ 30 CLIMATE CHANGE FOR MUNDURUKU PEOPLE FROM JUARA MARCELO MANHUARI MUNDURUKU 36 WE MUST PRESERVE NATURE TO KEEP EXISTING TIPUICI MANOKI 40 RÓ NA WAHÖIMANAZÁ - TO LIVE IN CERRADO CAIMI WAIASSÉ XAVANTE 46 CLIMATE CHANGE FOR MANOKI PEOPLE MANOEL KANUNXI 52 MEHINAKO PEOPLE AND CLIMATE CHANGE MAYAWARI MEHINAKO 58 CLIMATE CHANGE FOR KAYABI-KAWAIWETÉ PEOPLE PIKURUK CAVALCANTE KAYABI 62 WAURÁ OF XINGU AND CLIMATE CHANGE PIRATÁ WAURÁ 66 THE JURUENA RIVER: THE ROAD OF THE FOREST PEOPLES PAULO HENRIQUE MARTINHO SKIRIPI 70 THE RIKBAKTSA PEOPLE AND CLIMATE CHANGE JUAREZ PAIMY Photo: Adriano Gambarini/OPAN PRESENTATION OPERATION AMAZÔNIA NATIVA (OPAN), with its almost five decades work- ing in the field of Indigenismo, has contributed in a relevant way to the pro- motion and guarantee of indigenous rights in Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Peoples and Development Projects in Brazilian Amazonia
    SÉRIE ANTROPOLOGIA 364 THE CHALLENGES OF INTERCULTURALITY: Indigenous Peoples and Sustainable Development Subprojects in Brazilian Amazonia Paul E. Little Brasília 2004 2 THE CHALLENGES OF INTERCULTURALITY: Indigenous Peoples and Sustainable Development Subprojects in Brazilian Amazonia Paul E. Little University of Brasilia Introduction The Pilot Program for the Protection of Brazilian Tropical Forests (hereafter “Pilot Program”) grew out of national and international concern over the accelerated destruction of the world’s tropical rain forests and currently represents the most ambitious ongoing effort in Brazil to protect its Amazon and Atlantic tropical forests. Based upon a proposal originally made by then German Chancellor Helmut Kohl at the 1990 Group of Seven Industrialized Countries1 (G-7) meeting in Houston, the Pilot Program began operation in 1995, after several years of intense negotiations and program design initiatives, with joint financing by the G-7 countries and the Brazilian government (see Fatheuer 1994). The PD/A (Demonstrative Projects Type A) Project, which will be analyzed here, promotes innovative development initiatives at the local level through the financing of small-scale sustainable development subprojects.2 The Project also seeks to disseminate those experiences that have proven to be successful, thereby providing a positive “demonstrative” effect for the implementation of environmentally sustainable production techniques. The PD/A Project is one of the few spaces within the entire Pilot Program that directly involves local civil society associations, organizations and cooperatives as an integral part of its programming. In its first nine years of operation, the PD/A Project financed a total of 194 sustainable development subprojects, of which 21 involved, directly or indirectly, Indigenous peoples: 16 in the Amazon region and 5 in the Atlantic forest region.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO AMAPÁ Pró-Reitora De Pesquisa E Pós-Graduação Mestrado Em Direito Ambiental E Políticas Públicas
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO AMAPÁ Pró-Reitora de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação Mestrado em Direito Ambiental e Políticas Públicas JUSSARA DE PINHO BARREIROS IDENTIDADE, TERRITÓRIO E POLÍTICAS SOCIOAMBIENTAIS: ESTUDO DE CASO DA ETNIA KARIPUNA, NA ALDEIA MANGA, NO MUNICÍPIO DO OIAPOQUE/AMAPÁ. Macapá - AP 2012 JUSSARA DE PINHO BARREIROS IDENTIDADE, TERRITÓRIO E POLÍTICAS SOCIOAMBIENTAIS: ESTUDO DE CASO DA ETNIA KARIPUNA, NA ALDEIA MANGA, NO MUNICÍPIO DO OIAPOQUE/AMAPÁ. Dissertação de Mestrado, apresentada a Banca Examinadora do Programa de Pós Graduação em Direito Ambiental e Políticas Públicas, da Universidade Federal do Amapá, para o 2º semestre de 2012, orientado pela Prof.ª Drª. Simone Pereira Garcia, como requisito obrigatório para a obtenção do título de mestre. Macapá - AP 2012 ii JUSSARA DE PINHO BARREIROS IDENTIDADE, TERRITÓRIO E POLÍTICAS SOCIOAMBIENTAIS: ESTUDO DE CASO DA ETNIA KARIPUNA, NA ALDEIA MANGA, NO MUNICÍPIO DO OIAPOQUE/AMAPÁ. Data de Aprovação: Macapá, ____/____/____. BANCA __________________________________________ Profª. Drª. Simone Pereira Garcia (Orientadora) __________________________________________ Prof.ª Drª. Daguinete Maria Chaves Brito (Membro) __________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Edinaldo Pinheiro Nunes Filho (Membro) __________________________________________ Prof. Dr. João Batista Gomes de Oliveira (Membro) Macapá - AP 2012 iii Dedico a Jorge dos Santos Barreiros (In Memoriam) e Terezinha de Pinho Barreiros meus pais, pela herança de vida e de educação a mim e aos meus irmãos e irmãs; Aos colegas professores João Beneilson Maia Gatinho e Sandra do Socorro Almeida Monteiro (In Memoriam) que contribuíram para a criação do Curso de Educação Escolar Indígena, da Universidade Federal do Amapá, minha eterna gratidão; A João Wilton Ribeiro Alvino, meu marido e meus filhos: Wellington, João Júnior e Welton com amor, dedicação e compreensão.
    [Show full text]
  • CAJETANO VERA .Pdf
    CAJETANO VERA LARVAS DE ARAMANDAY GUASU Rhynchophorus palmarum Linnaeus, 1958 (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE) COMO ALIMENTO TRADICIONAL ENTRE OS GUARANI ÑANDÉVA, NA ALDEIA PIRAJUÍ, MUNICÍPIO DE PARANHOS, MATO GROSSO DO SUL: UMA VISÃO DE SEGURANÇA ALIMENTAR E SUSTENTABILIDADE SOCIAL CAMPO GRANDE - MS 2011 CAJETANO VERA LARVAS DE ARAMANDAY GUASU Rhynchophorus palmarum Linnaeus, 1958 (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE) COMO ALIMENTO TRADICIONAL ENTRE OS GUARANI ÑANDÉVA, NA ALDEIA PIRAJUÍ, MUNICÍPIO DE PARANHOS, MATO GROSSO DO SUL: UMA VISÃO DE SEGURANÇA ALIMENTAR E SUSTENTABILIDADE SOCIAL Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Desenvolvimento Local Mestrado Acadêmico, como requisito para obter o título de mestre, sob a orientação do Prof: Dr. Antonio Jacó Brand e co- orientação da Profª Dra. Marney Cereda. CAMPO GRANDE - MS 2011 FOLHA DE APROVAÇÃO Título: Larvas de Aramanday Guasu Rhynchophorus palmarum Linnaeus, 1958 (coleoptera: curculionidae) como alimento tradicional entre os Guarani Ñandéva, na Aldeia Pirajuí, município de Paranhos, Mato Grosso do Sul: uma visão de segurança alimentar e sustentabilidade social Área de concentração: Desenvolvimento local em contexto de territorialidade Linha de Pesquisa: Desenvolvimento, cultura, identidade, diversidade Dissertação submetida à Comissão Examinadora designada pelo Colegiado do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Desenvolvimento Local - Mestrado Acadêmico da Universidade Católica Dom Bosco, como requisito final para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Desenvolvimento Local. Dissertação aprovada
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    IPP264 Paraguay Community Development Project Indigenous Peoples Development Framework Introduction Public Disclosure Authorized 1. Indigenous Peoples (IP) in Paraguay represent only 1.7% of the total population (about 87,100) people, according to the most recent Indigenous Peoples Census (2002). Notwithstanding, IP, show a higher population growth rate (3.9%) than the average for the national population (2.7%). Therefore, it is possible to expect that the proportion of IP will continue to grow for some time, even though they will continue to be a small proportion of the total population. 2. There are 19 different ethnic groups1 belonging to five linguistic families2, being the most numerous those belonging to the Guarari linguistic family3 (46,000 or 53%), followed by the Maskoy linguistic family groups4 (21,000 or 24%). The four largest IP groups are the Ava-Guarani (13,400 or 15.5%), Mbyá (14,300 or 16.7%), Pâí Tavyterâ (13,100 or 15.2%), and the Nivacle (12,000 or 13.9%). Most indigenous peoples speak Public Disclosure Authorized their own language and have a limited command of Spanish. Table 1: Distribution of Indigenous Population by Department Department Indigenous Population Absolute % of total 90 0.1 Asunción Concepción 2,670 3.09 San Pedro 2,736 3.16 Cordillera Guairá 1,056 1.22 Caaguazú 6,884 7.95 Caazapá 2,528 2.92 Public Disclosure Authorized Itapúa 2,102 2.43 Misiones Paraguarí Alto Paraná 4,697 5.43 Central 1,038 1.20 Ñeembucú Amambay 10,519 12.16 Canindeyú 9,529 11.01 Pte. Hayes 19,751 22.82 Boquerón 19,754 22.83 Alto Paraguay 3,186 3.68 1 According to the II Indigenous Census, there are 19 ethnic groups: Guaraní Occidental, Aché, Ava- Guaraní, Mbya, Pai-Tavytera, Ñandeva, Maskoy, Enlhet norte, Enxet sur, Sanapaná, Toba, Angaité, Guaná, Nivaclé, Maká, Manjui, Ayoreo, Chamacoco(Yvytoso & Tomaraho), Toba-Qom.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of the Pan-Amazon Region
    OAS/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 176 29 September 2019 Original: Spanish INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Situation of Human Rights of the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of the Pan-Amazon Region 2019 iachr.org OAS Cataloging-in-Publication Data Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Situation of human rights of the indigenous and tribal peoples of the Pan-Amazon region : Approved by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on September 29, 2019. p. ; cm. (OAS. Official records ; OEA/Ser.L/V/II) ISBN 978-0-8270-6931-2 1. Indigenous peoples--Civil rights--Amazon River Region. 2. Indigenous peoples-- Legal status, laws, etc.--Amazon River Region. 3. Human rights--Amazon River Region. I. Title. II. Series. OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc.176/19 INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Members Esmeralda Arosemena de Troitiño Joel Hernández García Antonia Urrejola Margarette May Macaulay Francisco José Eguiguren Praeli Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva Flávia Piovesan Executive Secretary Paulo Abrão Assistant Executive Secretary for Monitoring, Promotion and Technical Cooperation María Claudia Pulido Assistant Executive Secretary for the Case, Petition and Precautionary Measure System Marisol Blanchard a.i. Chief of Staff of the Executive Secretariat of the IACHR Fernanda Dos Anjos In collaboration with: Soledad García Muñoz, Special Rapporteurship on Economic, Social, Cultural, and Environmental Rights (ESCER) Approved by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on September 29, 2019 INDEX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 INTRODUCTION 19 CHAPTER 1 | INTER-AMERICAN STANDARDS ON INDIGENOUS AND TRIBAL PEOPLES APPLICABLE TO THE PAN-AMAZON REGION 27 A. Inter-American Standards Applicable to Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in the Pan-Amazon Region 29 1.
    [Show full text]