DOCSLIB.ORG

Bedtime for Democracy: the Power Elite As Sovereign

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bedtime for Democracy: the Power Elite As Sovereign CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Texas A&M Repository BEDTIME FOR DEMOCRACY: THE POWER ELITE AS SOVEREIGN ARISTOCRACY IN NEOLIBERAL AMERIKA A Thesis by PATRICK D. ANDERSON Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Chair of Committee, Terence Hoagwood Committee Members, Robert Griffin Daniel Conway Head of Department, Maura Ives August 2016 Major Subject: English Copyright 2016 Patrick Anderson ABSTRACT Leftist political theory in Amerika has struggled to understand the two most important issues facing us today: sovereignty and neoliberalism. In their efforts to understand neoliberalism, most scholars rely on either neo-Marxist or poststructuralist (Foucault) approaches, and in their efforts to understand sovereignty, scholars commonly turn to Carl Schmitt’s legalistic notion of sovereignty. Unfortunately, these approaches cannot produce a sufficiently descriptive account of sovereignty in neoliberal Amerika, which is why I turn to the sociological political theory of C. Wright Mills, articulating a power elite theory of neoliberalism that provides a ground for identifying the aristocratic structure of sovereignty in our historical period. First, I provide an empirically-supported account of the development of the Amerikan power elite from the 1950s to today. Rather than consisting of three directorates as Mills observed in the 1950s – political, economic, and military – the power elite today rules from only two directorates: the Corporate-Juridical Directorate and the Military-Juridical Directorate. Second, I turn to early modern political theory to identify two modes of sovereignty: legislative sovereignty and executive sovereignty, the latter of which consists of two principles, executive enforcement (of law) and executive prerogative. Third, I argue that, in neoliberal Amerika, the Corporate-Juridical Directorate wields legislative sovereignty and the Military-Juridical Directorate wields executive sovereignty. Ultimately, the Left should abandon its reliance on pluralistic and legalistic notions in order to understand the aristocratic sovereignty of the power elite. ii “America’s history, her aspirations, her peculiar triumphs, her even more peculiar defeats, and her position in the world – yesterday and today – are all so profoundly and stubbornly unique that the very word ‘America’ remains a new, almost completely undefined and extremely controversial proper noun. No one in the world seems to know exactly what it describes, not even we motley millions who call ourselves Americans.” – James Baldwin, Nobody Knows My Name (3) “To be sure, at this decisive turn in the history of American life and thought, [American intellectuals] did grouse a bit, in a literary way, but, it was a grousing about a society with which in actual practice they were well satisfied. Now… they have come to celebrate this society. In reality, they know very little about it; in reality, they are not trying very hard to find out.” – C. Wright Mills, “The Decline of the Left” (215) For all those who lost their lives fighting for democracy, equality, and justice. Though the victors have attempted to relegate your struggle to the dustbins of history, no amount of defamation and propaganda can prohibit history from absolving you. You will not be been forgotten. All Power to the People! iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee chair, Dr. Hoagwood, for not only encouraging my research but also for ensuring my ambitious project did not grow beyond my capabilities. His comments on many drafts made possible the success of this thesis. I also thank the other committee members, Dr. Griffin and Dr. Conway, for taking the time and energy to provide thought feedback at various stages in the project. Your collective approval of this work means a great deal to me. Thanks also go to my friends and colleagues at Texas A&M University, especially Rocio Alvarez and John “Curry” O’Day, for listening to my ideas and helping me develop them over countless hours of conversation. I also want to extend my gratitude to the University Writing Center, especially Tommy Pfannkoch and Katelyn Werner, two amazing consultants who listened to me talk for hours and provided help feedback on chapter drafts. In addition, thanks to Dr. Tommy Curry and Dr. Dwayne Tunstall for being my mentors from my undergraduate days to today. I would not be the scholar I am today without both of you. Finally, thanks to my family – all of you – for you endless love and support. And for anyone I may have forgotten, please put your name here ______________________. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... ii DEDICATION ................................................................................................................ iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................................. v CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION: C. WRIGHT MILLS AND THE LEGACY OF THE LEFT ............................................ 1 The Liberal Mood of the New New Left .............................................................. 3 Reviving the New Left: Mills and The Sociological Imagination ...................... 10 From the Overture to the Movements, or, The Plan of the Work ....................... 15 CHAPTER II OVERCOMING THE LIBERAL MOOD: THE POWER ELITE AND NEOLIBERAL AMERIKA............................................... 20 The Rise of the Power Elite ................................................................................ 23 The Neoliberal Power Elite I: The Corporate-Juridical Directorate ................... 30 The Neoliberal Power Elite II: The Military-Juridical Directorate .................... 38 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 43 CHAPTER III THIS AIN’T YOUR GRANDPAPPY’S SOVEREIGN: RETHINKING THE HISTORY OF SOVEREIGNTY FROM JEAN BODIN TO THE FEDERALIST ......................................................................................................... 46 Legislative and Executive Sovereignty in Early Modern Political Theory ........ 48 Social Ontology and the Separation of Powers .................................................. 55 The Legacy of Early Modern Political Theory in The Federalist ...................... 62 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 71 CHAPTER IV TRIUMPH OF THE SWILL: SEPARATION THEORY, SOVEREIGN POWER, AND THE NEOLIBERAL POWER ELITE .............................................................................................................. 74 Separation Anxiety: On the Bifurcation of Sovereignty and the State ............... 76 Legislative Sovereignty and the Neoliberal Corporate-Juridical Directorate ..... 81 Executive Sovereignty and the Neoliberal Military-Juridical Directorate ......... 90 v Page Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 97 CHAPTER V CONCLUSION: LETTER TO THE NEW NEW LEFT ......................................................................... 100 Liberal Mood, Liberal Fascism: The Imitation of Strife .................................. 102 Mood Swings: Research Agendas for a Revival of the Radical Left ............... 109 Democracy Goes to College ............................................................................. 114 NOTES.......................................................................................................................... 119 WORKS CITED ........................................................................................................... 129 vi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION: C. WRIGHT MILLS AND THE LEGACY OF THE LEFT “The ‘60s weren’t all failure. It’s the ‘70s that stunk.” – Dead Kennedys, “Chickenshit Conformists” “[T]he moral cowardice of the American intelligentsia is virtually complete.” – C. Wright Mills, “Letter to Walter Klink, March 1961” (328) In Amerika today, there is a crisis of the Left – if we can be called that any longer.1 It is not clear that our social theories are sufficiently descriptive, and it is not clear that we have developed sufficiently radical normative ideals. A descriptive account of social structures requires a holistic investigation into the political and economic organization of society and an analysis of these relations, all while suspending moral judgment. A normative critique requires a juxtaposition of a developed descriptive model of society with a set of ideal values, a comparison that allows for moral criticism based on the divergence between the actual and the ideal. Insofar as reality diverges from our ideals, we can criticize the status quo and fight for structural change. Unfortunately, structural accounts of the whole no longer constitute our descriptive theories of society, for we have replaced total views of society with a series of local views of the parts. Many on the Left believe it is no longer desirable – or even possible – to criticize society as a whole. Likewise, economic equality and substantive political power no longer constitute our normative ideals, for we have replaced these demands
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ELITES, POWER SOURCES and DEMOCRACY by DENZ YETKN
    ELITES, POWER SOURCES AND DEMOCRACY by DEN İZ YETK İN Submitted to the Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University 2008 ELITES, POWER SOURCES AND DEMOCRACY APPROVED BY: Asst. Prof. Dr.Nedim Nomer: ……………………. (Dissertation Supervisor) Prof. Sabri Sayarı: ……………………. Prof. Tülay Artan: ……………………. DATE OF APPROVAL: …………………… To my parents... © Deniz Yetkin 2008 All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………vi Abstract...……………………………………………………………………………..…vii Özet…….……………………………………………………………………………….viii INTRODUCTION .…………………………………………………….......…………....1 CHAPTER 1..……………………………………………………………………………6 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF ELITE DISCUSSION 1.1 Machiavelli and His Followers……………………………………………....7 1.2 The Classical Elite Theorists……………………………………………......8 1.2.1 Vilfredo Pareto (1848-1923) and the ‘Governing Elite’…………..…….....8 1.2.2 Gaetano Mosca (1858- 1941) and the ‘Ruling Class’……….………...….21 1.2.3 Robert Michels (1876-1936) and the ‘Dominant Class’……………...…..23 1.2.4 C. Wright Mills (1916-1962) and ‘The Power Elite’………..……………26 1.3 Who are Elites? ……………………………………………………………30 CHAPTER 2 ..……………………………………………………………….………….32 POWER SOURCES, POWER SCOPE OF ELITES, AND THE POSSIBILITY OF DEMOCRACY 2.1 Power and Democracy in Classical Elite Theories...……………………….33 2.2. A New Approach to Elites, Power Sources and Democracy...…………….38 CONCLUSION ..……………………………………………………………………….47 BIBLIOGRAPHY ……………………………………………………………….……..49 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I would like to thank my thesis supervisor Asst. Prof. Nedim Nomer. I believe that without his support and guidance the writing of this thesis would have been difficult. Moreover, I am grateful to Prof. Sabri Sayarı and Prof. Tülay Artan for their precious comments. Apart from academic realm, I also would like to thank all my friends: I am grateful to my friends at Sabancı University for making my study enjoyable.
    [Show full text]
  • Giants: the Global Power Elite
    Secrecy and Society ISSN: 2377-6188 Volume 2 Number 2 Teaching Secrecy Article 13 January 2021 Giants: The Global Power Elite Susan Maret San Jose State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/secrecyandsociety Part of the Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Other Sociology Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, and the Public Affairs, Public olicyP and Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Maret, Susan. 2021. "Giants: The Global Power Elite." Secrecy and Society 2(2). https://doi.org/10.31979/2377-6188.2021.020213 https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/ secrecyandsociety/vol2/iss2/13 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Information at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Secrecy and Society by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Giants: The Global Power Elite Keywords human rights, C. Wright Mills, openness, power elite, secrecy, transnational corporations, transparency This book review is available in Secrecy and Society: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/ secrecyandsociety/vol2/iss2/13 Maret: Giants: The Global Power Elite Review, Giants: The Global Power Elite by Peter Philips Reviewed by Susan Maret Giants: The Global Power Elite, New York: Seven Stories Press, 2018. 384pp. / ISBN: 9781609808716 (paperback) / ISBN: 9781609808723 (ebook) https://www.sevenstories.com/books/4097-giants The strength of Giants: The Global Power Elite lies in its heavy documentation of the "globalized power elite, [a] concept of the Transnationalist Capitalist Class (TCC), theorized in the academic literature for some twenty years" (Phillips 2018, 9).
    [Show full text]
  • Who Rules Cincinnati?
    Who Rules Cincinnati? A Study of Cincinnati’s Economic Power Structure And its Impact on Communities and People By Dan La Botz Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Published by Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Copyright ©2008 by Dan La Botz Table of Contents Summary......................................................................................................... 1 Preface.............................................................................................................4 Introduction.................................................................................................... 7 Part I - Corporate Power in Cincinnati.........................................................15 Part II - Corporate Power in the Media and Politics.....................................44 Part III - Corporate Power, Social Classes, and Communities......................55 Part IV - Cincinnati: One Hundred Years of Corporate Power.....................69 Discussion..................................................................................................... 85 Bibliography.................................................................................................. 91 Acknowledgments.........................................................................................96 About the Author...........................................................................................97 Summary This investigation into Cincinnati’s power structure finds that a handful of national and multinational corporations dominate
    [Show full text]
  • Media Sociology: the Dominant Paradigm Author(S): Todd Gitlin Source: Theory and Society, Vol
    Media Sociology: The Dominant Paradigm Author(s): Todd Gitlin Source: Theory and Society, Vol. 6, No. 2 (Sep., 1978), pp. 205-253 Published by: Springer Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/657009 Accessed: 30/11/2009 07:24 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=springer. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Theory and Society. http://www.jstor.org 205 MEDIA SOCIOLOGY: The Dominant Paradigm TODD GITLIN Since the Second WorldWar, as mass media in the United States have become more concentratedin ownership,more centralizedin operations,more national in reach, more pervasivein presence,sociological study of the media has been dominated by the theme of the relative powerlessnessof the broadcasters.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Papers of the Center for Research on Social
    WORKING PAPERS OF THE CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON SOCIAL ORGANIZATION DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Copies Available Through: Center for Research on Paper #53 Social Organization University of Michigan April, 1970' 219 Perry Building 330 Packard Street Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 CIVIL-MILITARY DIFFERENTION IN THE NEW INDUSTRIAL STATE* David R. Segal The University of Michigan *Paper prepared for the VII World Congress of Sociology, Varna, Bulgaria, September 1970. I am grateful to Edward Lipson and Jean Schneider for research assistance. I am indebted to Mr. Richard Massar of the Air Force Military Personnel Center, and to Dr. Ernest Tupes of the Air Personnel Laboratory for their cooperation. INTRODUCTION Recent literature on military structure posits a convergence between civilian and military modes of organ- ization as management skills become increasingly important for promotion to the upper echelons of the armed forces. Analysis of careers of generals in the United States Air Force, which has the most complex technology of the American armed forces and hence faces the most difficult organizational task, however, indicates that combat skills still take precedence over management skills as criteria for promotion to general officer grade. Such skills serve as the basis for a "bureaucratic" career in the.military context. At the same time, contemporary theories of formal organization suggest that corporate bodies in the civilian economy have adopted "post-bureaucratic" structural forms, and that the bureaucratic model is now inadequate for des- cribing management careers in this context. Thus, there seem to be factors mitigating against structural convergence. These factors have implications for theories regarding the development of a "military-industrial complex" in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Punk Lyrics and Their Cultural and Ideological Background: a Literary Analysis
    Punk Lyrics and their Cultural and Ideological Background: A Literary Analysis Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Magisters der Philosophie an der Karl-Franzens Universität Graz vorgelegt von Gerfried AMBROSCH am Institut für Anglistik Begutachter: A.o. Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Hugo Keiper Graz, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 3 INTRODUCTION – What Is Punk? 5 1. ANARCHY IN THE UK 14 2. AMERICAN HARDCORE 26 2.1. STRAIGHT EDGE 44 2.2. THE NINETEEN-NINETIES AND EARLY TWOTHOUSANDS 46 3. THE IDEOLOGY OF PUNK 52 3.1. ANARCHY 53 3.2. THE DIY ETHIC 56 3.3. ANIMAL RIGHTS AND ECOLOGICAL CONCERNS 59 3.4. GENDER AND SEXUALITY 62 3.5. PUNKS AND SKINHEADS 65 4. ANALYSIS OF LYRICS 68 4.1. “PUNK IS DEAD” 70 4.2. “NO GODS, NO MASTERS” 75 4.3. “ARE THESE OUR LIVES?” 77 4.4. “NAME AND ADDRESS WITHHELD”/“SUPERBOWL PATRIOT XXXVI (ENTER THE MENDICANT)” 82 EPILOGUE 89 APPENDIX – Alphabetical Collection of Song Lyrics Mentioned or Cited 90 BIBLIOGRAPHY 117 2 PREFACE Being a punk musician and lyricist myself, I have been following the development of punk rock for a good 15 years now. You might say that punk has played a pivotal role in my life. Needless to say, I have also seen a great deal of media misrepresentation over the years. I completely agree with Craig O’Hara’s perception when he states in his fine introduction to American punk rock, self-explanatorily entitled The Philosophy of Punk: More than Noise, that “Punk has been characterized as a self-destructive, violence oriented fad [...] which had no real significance.” (1999: 43.) He quotes Larry Zbach of Maximum RockNRoll, one of the better known international punk fanzines1, who speaks of “repeated media distortion” which has lead to a situation wherein “more and more people adopt the appearance of Punk [but] have less and less of an idea of its content.
    [Show full text]
  • Order Form Full
    PUNK ARTIST TITLE LABEL RETAIL 100 DEMONS 100 DEMONS DEATHWISH INC RM90.00 4-SKINS A FISTFUL OF 4-SKINS RADIATION RM125.00 4-SKINS LOW LIFE RADIATION RM114.00 400 BLOWS SICKNESS & HEALTH ORIGINAL RECORD RM117.00 45 GRAVE SLEEP IN SAFETY (GREEN VINYL) REAL GONE RM142.00 999 DEATH IN SOHO PH RECORDS RM125.00 999 THE BIGGEST PRIZE IN SPORT (200 GR) DRASTIC PLASTIC RM121.00 999 THE BIGGEST PRIZE IN SPORT (GREEN) DRASTIC PLASTIC RM121.00 999 YOU US IT! COMBAT ROCK RM120.00 A WILHELM SCREAM PARTYCRASHER NO IDEA RM96.00 A.F.I. ANSWER THAT AND STAY FASHIONABLE NITRO RM119.00 A.F.I. BLACK SAILS IN THE SUNSET NITRO RM119.00 A.F.I. SHUT YOUR MOUTH AND OPEN YOUR EYES NITRO RM119.00 A.F.I. VERY PROUD OF YA NITRO RM119.00 ABEST ASYLUM (WHITE VINYL) THIS CHARMING MAN RM98.00 ACCUSED, THE ARCHIVE TAPES UNREST RECORDS RM108.00 ACCUSED, THE BAKED TAPES UNREST RECORDS RM98.00 ACCUSED, THE NASTY CUTS (1991-1993) UNREST RM98.00 ACCUSED, THE OH MARTHA! UNREST RECORDS RM93.00 ACCUSED, THE RETURN OF MARTHA SPLATTERHEAD (EARA UNREST RECORDS RM98.00 ACCUSED, THE RETURN OF MARTHA SPLATTERHEAD (SUBC UNREST RECORDS RM98.00 ACHTUNGS, THE WELCOME TO HELL GOING UNDEGROUND RM96.00 ACID BABY JESUS ACID BABY JESUS SLOVENLY RM94.00 ACIDEZ BEER DRINKERS SURVIVORS UNREST RM98.00 ACIDEZ DON'T ASK FOR PERMISSION UNREST RM98.00 ADICTS, THE AND IT WAS SO! (WHITE VINYL) NUCLEAR BLAST RM127.00 ADICTS, THE TWENTY SEVEN DAILY RECORDS RM120.00 ADOLESCENTS ADOLESCENTS FRONTIER RM97.00 ADOLESCENTS BRATS IN BATTALIONS NICKEL & DIME RM96.00 ADOLESCENTS LA VENDETTA FRONTIER RM95.00 ADOLESCENTS
    [Show full text]
  • "Cosmopolitans" and "Locals" in Contemporary Community Politics
    Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science Volume 31 Number 2 Article 20 1964 "Cosmopolitans" and "Locals" in Contemporary Community Politics Daniel J. Elazar University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Douglas St. Angelo Florida State University, Tallahassee Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.morris.umn.edu/jmas Part of the American Politics Commons Recommended Citation Elazar, D. J., & St. Angelo, D. (1964). "Cosmopolitans" and "Locals" in Contemporary Community Politics. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science, Vol. 31 No.2, 171-178. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.morris.umn.edu/jmas/vol31/iss2/20 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Minnesota Morris Digital Well. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science by an authorized editor of University of Minnesota Morris Digital Well. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLITICAL SCIENCE "Cosmopolitans" and "Locals" in Contemporary Community Politics DANIEL J. ELAZAR and DOUGLAS ST. ANGELO University of Minnesota, Minneapolis and Florida State University, Tallahassee Numerous products of recent social science research use the cosmopolitan-local concept to distinguish between have revealed the reemergence of what seems to be a individual influentials in the local community, in his study traditional pattern in American history, the lack of class of "Patterns of Influence: Local and Cosmopolitan In­ consciousness in the political behavior of most Ameri­ fluentials." In that study he applied a non-class oriented cans (Banfield 1961, Coleman 1957, Rogoff 1951: 406- typology to study the influence of mass communications 420, Rogoff 1953: 347-357, Warner, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. the Stratification Trilogy
    4 The Stratification Trilogy he New Men of Power (1948), White Collar (1951), and The Power T Elite (1956) constitute C. Wright Mills’s stratification trilogy, or those studies dedicated to analyzing the American class structure and power sys- tem. These studies attempt to relate the psychological characteristics of cer- tain groups and their individual members—labor leaders; white-collar workers; and the political directorate, the chief executives of large corpora- tions, and the warlords—to the stratified American milieu of the 1940s and 1950s. These three volumes, which marked Mills as a scholar of the first rank, “stand relatively alone as a comprehensive corpus of social criticism in the decade following the Second World War” (Jamison & Eyerman, 1994, p. 16), and through them Mills is able to express a unique vision of America at mid-century, a time when social science readily accepted the pluralist understanding of class and democracy, and subsequently attempted to blur all social divisions. Mills (1959b), in strong autobiographical tones, explains his motivations for producing the three-volume series on social stratification: I wrote a book on labor organizations and labor leaders—a politically moti- vated task; then a book on the middle classes—a task primarily motivated by the desire to articulate my own experience in New York City since 1945. It was thereupon suggested by friends that I ought to round out a trilogy by writing a book on the upper classes. (p. 200) Simply put, in each of these books—which are self-consciously written in a new literary style, “sociological poetry,” characterized by “an uneven mix- ture of empirical social science and radical political analysis” (Geary, 2009, 61 62——The Social Thought of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Wright Mills and "The Power Elite"
    THE ECONOMIC WEEKLY August 22, 1964 Wright Mills and "the Power Elite" Edwin Harwood Samir Dasgupta When C Wright Mills talks of the growing trend towards centralisation in the United States, the monopoli­ sation of power in the three major arenas of social leadership, the corporate, military and political, he chooses as his point of departure America of the mid-fifties. Oddly, not a word suggests that the New Deal thirties contributed the major impulse to these ominous developments. Is Mills' hypothesis a sound one? We are presented with the picture of the slow culmination of historical trends which reach their apogee in the mid-fifties. A fair appraisal of the historical situation, on the other hand, would lead to the conclusion that the power elite of the New Deal thirties was more centralised than the Republican administration of the fifties, the centralised administrative apparatus of which was, in any case, the legacy of the thirties. Apparently, not centralisation and growing consolulation of power are at issue, but rather the changed poli­ tical landscape, the decline of left centralisation and the emergence of a party more representative of bourgeois interests. MILLS once declared that the intel- work can leave no doubt but that this ... The American public is neither lectual's politics should be the was the case. There are a number of a sandheap of individuals each politics of truth. The intellectual should prominent instances where scientific making up his own mind, nor a search for the most adequate definition investigation became subordinate to the regimented mass manipulated by of reality.1 Not the politicization of tasks of Mills' ideological struggles.
    [Show full text]
  • Bab Ii Perkembangan Ideologi Punk Sebagai Bentuk
    BAB II PERKEMBANGAN IDEOLOGI PUNK SEBAGAI BENTUK RESISTENSI TERHADAP PERMASALAHAN SOSIAL-POLITIK. Dalam Bab ini, peneliti menjelaskan mengenai awal kelahiran atau kemunculan ideologi Punk di Inggris , yang kemudian berkembang menjadi sebuah gerakan subkultur yang besar, dan menggambarkan musik Punk sebagai salah satu bentuk perlawanan, kritik atau protes terhadap pemerintah yang dirasa bertanggung jawab terhadap permasalahan sosial politik yang terjadi. Hingga penyebaran ideologi Punk ke Amerika Serikat. 2.1 Awal Kemunculan Ideologi Punk di Inggris Gerakan anak muda yang diawali dari kelas-kelas pekerja ini dilatarbelakangi oleh masalah ekonomi dengan tingkat pengangguran dan kriminalitas yang tinggi. Pada tahun 1970 an, Inggris mengalami krisis ekonomi sehingga muncul perkembangan kapitalisme, yang telah membuat Pemerintah Inggris mengeksploitasi, menindas, dan menekan kelas pekerja, demi usaha pemulihan ekonomi.1 Ideologi Punk kemudian lahir sebagai bentuk ketidakpuasan akan sistem dan peraturan yang berlaku di Inggris, serta sebagai bentuk ide dan perlawanan kelas pekerja terhadap pemerintahan yang menerapkan sistem kapitalisme, dengan melakuan berbagai tindakan eksploitasi, penindasan, dan diskriminasi terhadap para pekerja industri. 1 Fajar Munggah Pramdani, ( 106032201102 ), 2012, Profil Komunitas Punk Marginal Dan Faktor Pendorong Menjadi Punk . Skripsi Jurusan Sosiologi – FISIP UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Diakses dalam http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/24010/3/FAJAR%20MUNGGAH%20PRAMDANI.p df (12 /6 /2016) 12.21 WIB. 27 Punk merupakan ideologi yang lahir dari suatu komunitas yang berasal dari orang-orang yang merasa hidupnya tertindas (kaum pekerja/golongan bawah) oleh pemerintah atau oleh golongan atas (bangsawan) yang pertama kali terjadi di kota London, Inggris pada tahun 1970 an. Berawal dari ketidaksukaan terhadap Pemerintahan Ratu Elzabeth II dan sistem monarki yang dianggap menjadi penyebab terjadinya ketimpangan ekonomi terhadap kelas pekerja.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great American Public, Mass Society, and the New Constitutional Order
    The Great American Public, Mass Society, and the New Constitutional Order Richard Boldt “It is not impossible to conceive the surprising liberty that the Americans enjoy; some idea may likewise be formed of their extreme equality; but the political activity that pervades the United States must be seen in order to be understood. No sooner do you set foot upon American ground than you are stunned by a kind of tumult; a confused clamor is heard on every side, and a thousand simultaneous voices demand the satisfaction of their social wants. Everything is in motion around you; here the people of one quarter of a town are met to decide upon the building of a church; there the election of a representative is going on; a little farther, the delegates of a district are hastening to the town in order to consult upon some local improvements; in another place, the laborers of a village quit their plows to deliberate upon the project of a road or a public school. Meetings are called for the sole purpose of declaring their disapprobation of the conduct of government; while in other assemblies citizens salute the authorities of the day as the fathers of their country. .” Alexis de Tocqueville, DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA, Vol. I, p. 259 (Alfred A. Knopf, 1945). “Publics live in milieux but they can transcend them – individually by intellectual effort; socially by public action. By reflection and debate and by organized action, a community of publics comes to feel itself and comes in fact to be active at points of structural relevance.
    [Show full text]