DOCSLIB.ORG

Saturday November 18, 2017 7:00

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Saturday November 18, 2017 7:00 Saturday November 18, 2017 7:00 AM 301016 7:00 AM to 7:45 AM Sheraton State Room 4 - Third Floor (Conference Center) Community College Section Business Meeting - Part II Sponsor: Community College Section Presenters: Jeannie Hunt, Northwest College Terry L. Rogers, Casper College Jessica R. Hurless, Skyline College 301044 7:00 AM to 7:45 AM Sheraton Majestic 3 - 37th Floor (Center Tower) Freedom of Expression Division Business Meeting Sponsor: Freedom of Expression Division Presenters: Kevin A. Johnson, California State University, Long Beach Adria Battaglia, University of Texas, Austin Paula T. McKenzie, Bethune-Cookman University Billie Murray, Villanova University Paul Siegel, University of Hartford Alvin Primack, University of Pittsburgh 301066 7:00 AM to 7:45 AM Marriott Nice - Third Floor National States Advisory Council Business Meeting Sponsor: National States Advisory Council Presenters: Douglas Marshall, Southern University at New Orleans Janie Harden Fritz, Duquesne University Eric Grabowsky, Dickinson State University John H. Saunders, University of Alabama, Huntsville Kimberly Weismann, Williston State College Randy K. Dillon, Missouri State University Susan Tomasovic, George Mason University 8:00 AM Dallas Ballroom A1 - First Floor (Conference 303001 8:00 AM to 9:15 AM Sheraton Center) Examining the Role of Visuals in Communicating Health Information to Audiences Sponsor: Health Communication Division Chair: Julie E. Volkman, Bryant University "Adding Multichannel Cues to Medical Providers’ Online Biographies: Do pictures, video, and b-roll matter?" Evan Perrault, Purdue University "Comprehending the Impacts of Visuals in Cancer Risk Communication: A Meta-analysis of Visual Communication Experiments" Manusheela Pokharel, University of Utah "How Color and Visual Complexity Affects the Evaluation of Skin Cancer Infographics: An Experiment Study" Sung-Eun Stella Park, University of Alabama; Lu Tang, Texas A&M University "Roadblock to Vaping among Smokers or Gateway to Smoking among E-cigarette Users: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Visual Vaping Cue Effects on Harm Perceptions" Sijia Yang, University of Pennsylvania; Andy S.L. Tan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Kelsey Hamilton, Kent State University; Rebecca Fischbein, Kent State University; Deric Kenne, Kent State University "When the Visual Collide with the Verbal: Using Moral Foundations Theory to Explain Multimodal Persuasive Messages’ Effects on Policy Opinions" Sijia Yang, University of Pennsylvania; Erin Maloney, University of Pennsylvania; Andy S.L. Tan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Joseph N. Cappella, University of Pennsylvania Dallas Ballroom A2 - First Floor (Conference 303002 8:00 AM to 9:15 AM Sheraton Center) Real World Relevance, Theoretical Legacies Sponsor: Interpersonal Communication Division Chair: Bo Feng, University of California, Davis "Cultural Differences in Parental Advice Giving from the Perspective of First-Year College Students: Comparing Ratings of Advice Acceptance, Challenge, and Specificity" Elizabeth Dorrance Hall, Michigan State University; Marshall Grimm, Utah State University; Jenna McNallie, Augsburg College; Elisabeth Timmermans, Purdue University; Loretta Beaty, Utah State University "The influence of self-disclosure in online support seeking on quality of received advice" V. Skye Wingate, University of California, Davis; Bo Feng, University of California, Davis; JooYoung Jang, University of California, Davis; Wenjing Pan, University of California, Davis; Chelsea Kim, University of California, Davis "The use and misuse of automated advice: From algorithm aversion to reliance" Andrew Prahl, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Lyn M. Van Swol, University of Wisconsin-Madison "Young adult perceptions of parent motivation behind exercise advice: Working out to look good versus be healthy" Lisa Guntzviller, University of Illinois; Karissa Conrad, University of Illinois "“Watchful waiting” advice for pediatric ear infections: A descriptive analysis of doctor-parent interactions" Erina L. MacGeorge, Penn State University; Emily Caldes, Penn State University; Kasey Foley, Penn State University; Amber Worthington, Penn State University; Rachel E. Reymann, Penn State University Dallas Ballroom A3 - First Floor (Conference 303003 8:00 AM to 9:15 AM Sheraton Center) Reflecting on Our Relevance: How, What and Why Critical Scholars Teach in and about Prisons Sponsors: Activism and Social Justice Division; Critical and Cultural Studies Division Chair: Bryan J. McCann, Louisiana State University Presenters: Lindsey N. Badger, Indiana University Patrycja Humienik, University of Colorado-Denver Adam Key, Texas A&M University Karen E. Lovaas, San Francisco State University Bryan J. McCann, Louisiana State University Eleanor Novek, Monmouth University Dallas Ballroom B - First Floor (Conference 303004 8:00 AM to 10:00 AM Sheraton Center) Legislative Assembly II Sponsor: NCA National Office Presenters: Stephen J. Hartnett, University of Colorado, Denver Aubrie Serena Adams, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Tamara D. Afifi, University of California, Santa Barbara Rukhsana Ahmed, University of Ottawa John M. Allison, University of North Texas Lindsey Susan Aloia, University of Arkansas Reynaldo Anderson, Harris-Stowe State University Pat Arneson, Duquesne University Ahmet Atay, College of Wooster Omotayo O. Banjo, University of Cincinnati Jaime Banks, West Virginia University Adria Battaglia, University of Texas, Austin Anna-Carrie Beck, University of Kentucky Christina S. Beck, Ohio University Stephenson J. Beck, North Dakota State University Leeanne M. Bell McManus, Stevenson University Elena Bessarabova, University of Oklahoma Keith Cyril Bistodeau, Hamline University Kristen C. Blinne, State University of New York, Oneonta Jaime E. Bochantin, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Graham D. Bodie, University of Mississippi Don M. Boileau, George Mason University Galina Bolden, Rutgers University Justin P. Boren, Santa Clara University Jonathan M. Bowman, University of San Diego Ross Brinkert, Penn State University, Abington Lori Leonard Britt, James Madison University Robert Brookey, Ball State University Michael Butterworth, Ohio University Kerry Byrnes-Loinette, Collin College Bernadette Calafell, University of Denver Michelle Calka, Manchester University Peter Odell Campbell, University of Pittsburgh Martin Carcasson, Colorado State University Andrea Carlile, South Dakota State University Kristy Cates, Lowndes County High School Yea-Wen Chen, San Diego State University Dana L. Cloud, Syracuse University Kevin Coe, University of Utah Lora Cohn, Park University April E. Copes, Anne Arundel Community College Angela M. Corbo, Widener University Lisa M. Corrigan, University of Arkansas Joy L. Daggs, Northwest Missouri State University Lindy Grief Davidson, University of South Florida Rebecca de Souza, University of Minnesota, Duluth D. Robert DeChaine, California State University, Los Angeles Becky L. DeGreeff, Kansas State University Sarah Dempsey, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Paul M. Denvir, Albany College of Pharmacy Megan R. Dillow, West Virginia University Patrick Shaou-Whea Dodge, University of Colorado, Denver Theresa A. Donofrio, Coe College Bonnie J. Dow, Vanderbilt University Shirley K. Drew, Pittsburg State University Ashley Paige Duggan, Boston College Kathleen M. Edelmayer, Madonna University Mary M. Eicholtz, Kutztown University Deanna L. Fassett, San Jose State University Mindy Fenske, University of South Carolina Nicole Files-Thompson, Lincoln University Donald A. Fishman, Boston College Lisa A. Flores, University of Colorado, Boulder Seth S. Frei, Texas State University Lawrence R. Frey, University of Colorado, Boulder Patricia E. Friel, University of Cincinnati Brandi N. Frisby, University of Kentucky Janie Harden Fritz, Duquesne University Rachel Mayer Furman, Carlow University Monica L. Gallegos, Northern Kentucky University Jessica N. Gasiorek, University of Hawaii, Manoa Allison Scott Gordon, University of Kentucky Jeffrey A. Hall, University of Kansas Lisa K. Hanasono, Bowling Green State University Heather Harris, Stevenson University Karen L. Hartman, Idaho State University Leandra Hinojosa Hernandez, National University Jon A. Hess, University of Dayton Kathryn Hobson, James Madison University Kristen E. Hoerl, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Andrea B. Hollingshead, University of Southern California Mark C. Hopson, George Mason University Dakota C. Horn, Illinois State University Jeannie Hunt, Northwest College Meryl Irwin, James Madison University Ronald L. Jackson, University of Cincinnati Eric S. Jenkins, University of Cincinnati Min Jiang, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Kevin A. Johnson, California State University, Long Beach Linda Jurczak, Valdosta State University Jennifer A. Kam, University of California, Santa Barbara Casey Ryan Kelly, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Michael L. Kent, University of Tennessee Lisa Keranen, University of Colorado, Denver Joann Keyton, North Carolina State University Stephanie R. Klatzke, Northern Kentucky University Jessica Kratzer, Northern Kentucky University Nyia Lacey, Delaware County Community College Andrea L. Lambert South, Northern Kentucky University Pamela Lannutti, La Salle University Michael Lechuga, University of Texas, El Paso Andrew M. Ledbetter, Texas Christian University Laurie K. Lewis, Rutgers University Ashley Noel Mack, Louisiana State University Katheryn C. Maguire, Wayne State University Jimmie Manning,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ELITES, POWER SOURCES and DEMOCRACY by DENZ YETKN
    ELITES, POWER SOURCES AND DEMOCRACY by DEN İZ YETK İN Submitted to the Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University 2008 ELITES, POWER SOURCES AND DEMOCRACY APPROVED BY: Asst. Prof. Dr.Nedim Nomer: ……………………. (Dissertation Supervisor) Prof. Sabri Sayarı: ……………………. Prof. Tülay Artan: ……………………. DATE OF APPROVAL: …………………… To my parents... © Deniz Yetkin 2008 All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………vi Abstract...……………………………………………………………………………..…vii Özet…….……………………………………………………………………………….viii INTRODUCTION .…………………………………………………….......…………....1 CHAPTER 1..……………………………………………………………………………6 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF ELITE DISCUSSION 1.1 Machiavelli and His Followers……………………………………………....7 1.2 The Classical Elite Theorists……………………………………………......8 1.2.1 Vilfredo Pareto (1848-1923) and the ‘Governing Elite’…………..…….....8 1.2.2 Gaetano Mosca (1858- 1941) and the ‘Ruling Class’……….………...….21 1.2.3 Robert Michels (1876-1936) and the ‘Dominant Class’……………...…..23 1.2.4 C. Wright Mills (1916-1962) and ‘The Power Elite’………..……………26 1.3 Who are Elites? ……………………………………………………………30 CHAPTER 2 ..……………………………………………………………….………….32 POWER SOURCES, POWER SCOPE OF ELITES, AND THE POSSIBILITY OF DEMOCRACY 2.1 Power and Democracy in Classical Elite Theories...……………………….33 2.2. A New Approach to Elites, Power Sources and Democracy...…………….38 CONCLUSION ..……………………………………………………………………….47 BIBLIOGRAPHY ……………………………………………………………….……..49 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I would like to thank my thesis supervisor Asst. Prof. Nedim Nomer. I believe that without his support and guidance the writing of this thesis would have been difficult. Moreover, I am grateful to Prof. Sabri Sayarı and Prof. Tülay Artan for their precious comments. Apart from academic realm, I also would like to thank all my friends: I am grateful to my friends at Sabancı University for making my study enjoyable.
    [Show full text]
  • Free, Hateful, and Posted: Rethinking First Amendment Protection of Hate Speech in a Social Media World
    Boston College Law Review Volume 60 Issue 7 Article 6 10-30-2019 Free, Hateful, and Posted: Rethinking First Amendment Protection of Hate Speech in a Social Media World Lauren E. Beausoleil Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the First Amendment Commons, and the Internet Law Commons Recommended Citation Lauren E. Beausoleil, Free, Hateful, and Posted: Rethinking First Amendment Protection of Hate Speech in a Social Media World, 60 B.C.L. Rev. 2100 (2019), https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol60/iss7/6 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FREE, HATEFUL, AND POSTED: RETHINKING FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION OF HATE SPEECH IN A SOCIAL MEDIA WORLD Abstract: Speech is meant to be heard, and social media allows for exaggeration of that fact by providing a powerful means of dissemination of speech while also dis- torting one’s perception of the reach and acceptance of that speech. Engagement in online “hate speech” can interact with the unique characteristics of the Internet to influence users’ psychological processing in ways that promote violence and rein- force hateful sentiments. Because hate speech does not squarely fall within any of the categories excluded from First Amendment protection, the United States’ stance on hate speech is unique in that it protects it.
    [Show full text]
  • What Echo Chamber? Reviewing the Evidence
    Echo Chamber? What Echo Chamber? Reviewing the Evidence Prof. Axel Bruns Digital Media Research Centre Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, Australia [email protected] @snurb_dot_info Abstract The success of political movements that appear to be immune to any factual evidence that contradicts their claims – from the Brexiteers to the ‘alt‐right’, neo‐fascist groups supporting Donald Trump – has reinvigorated claims that social media spaces constitute so‐called ‘filter bubbles’ or ‘echo chambers’. But while such claims may appear intuitively true to politicians and journalists – who have themselves been accused of living in filter bubbles (Bradshaw 2016) –, the evidence that ordinary users experience their everyday social media environments as echo chambers is far more limited. For instance, a 2016 Pew Center study has shown that only 23% of U.S. users on Facebook and 17% on Twitter now say with confidence that most of their contacts’ views are similar to their own. 20% have changed their minds about a political or social issue because of interactions on social media (Duggan and Smith 2016). Similarly, large‐scale studies of follower and interaction networks on Twitter (e.g. Bruns et al., 2014) show that national Twitterspheres are often thoroughly interconnected and facilitate the flow of information across boundaries of personal ideology and interest, except for a few especially hardcore partisan communities. Building on new, comprehensive data from a project that maps and tracks interactions between 4 million accounts in the Australian Twittersphere, this paper explores in detail the evidence for the existence of echo chambers in that country. It thereby moves the present debate beyond a merely anecdotal footing, and offers a more reliable assessment of the ‘echo chamber’ threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Filter Bubbles and Echo Chambers: the Integrative Potential of the Internet Mahrt, Merja
    www.ssoar.info Beyond Filter Bubbles and Echo Chambers: The Integrative Potential of the Internet Mahrt, Merja Erstveröffentlichung / Primary Publication Habilitationsschrift / habilitation treatise Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Mahrt, M. (2019). Beyond Filter Bubbles and Echo Chambers: The Integrative Potential of the Internet. (Digital Communication Research, 5). Berlin. https://doi.org/10.17174/dcr.v5.0 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Mahrt Are online audiences today fragmented into echo chambers or ilter Merja Mahrt bubbles? Do users only see what digital platforms (like search engines or social media) let them see? And if so, what are the consequences for the cohesion of a society? Concerns like these abound in recent years. They attest to widely held assumptions about a negative inluence of digital media or even the Internet in general on society. Empirical stud- ies on these phenomena are, however, not as unequivocal. To under- stand why results from previous research are so far inconclusive, this study investigates the role of the Internet for social integration from a more general point of view. The integrative potential of the Internet is assessed to compare it with other media and ultimately better understand to what degree and due to which factors the Internet may or may not help bring society to- Beyond Filter Bubbles gether.
    [Show full text]
  • Giants: the Global Power Elite
    Secrecy and Society ISSN: 2377-6188 Volume 2 Number 2 Teaching Secrecy Article 13 January 2021 Giants: The Global Power Elite Susan Maret San Jose State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/secrecyandsociety Part of the Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Other Sociology Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, and the Public Affairs, Public olicyP and Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Maret, Susan. 2021. "Giants: The Global Power Elite." Secrecy and Society 2(2). https://doi.org/10.31979/2377-6188.2021.020213 https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/ secrecyandsociety/vol2/iss2/13 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Information at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Secrecy and Society by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Giants: The Global Power Elite Keywords human rights, C. Wright Mills, openness, power elite, secrecy, transnational corporations, transparency This book review is available in Secrecy and Society: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/ secrecyandsociety/vol2/iss2/13 Maret: Giants: The Global Power Elite Review, Giants: The Global Power Elite by Peter Philips Reviewed by Susan Maret Giants: The Global Power Elite, New York: Seven Stories Press, 2018. 384pp. / ISBN: 9781609808716 (paperback) / ISBN: 9781609808723 (ebook) https://www.sevenstories.com/books/4097-giants The strength of Giants: The Global Power Elite lies in its heavy documentation of the "globalized power elite, [a] concept of the Transnationalist Capitalist Class (TCC), theorized in the academic literature for some twenty years" (Phillips 2018, 9).
    [Show full text]
  • Echo Chambers
    Echo Chambers J. Anthony Cookson, Joseph E. Engelberg and William Mullins* October 7, 2020 Abstract We find evidence of selective exposure to confirmatory information among 300,000 users on the investor social network StockTwits. Self-described bulls are 5 times more likely to follow a user with a bullish view of the same stock than self-described bears. This tendency exists even among professional investors and is strongest for investors who trade on their beliefs. Selective exposure generates differences in the newsfeeds of bulls and bears: over a 50-day period, a bull will see 70 more bullish messages and 15 fewer bearish messages than a bear over the same period. Moreover, beliefs formed in these “echo-chambers” are associated with lower ex- post returns. Finally, we show that selective exposure creates “information silos” in which the diversity of received signals is high across users’ newsfeeds but is low within users’ newsfeeds and that this siloing of information is positively related to trading volume. *Cookson is at the Leeds School of Business at University of Colorado-Boulder ([email protected]). En- gelberg is at the Rady School of Management, UC San Diego ([email protected]). Mullins is at the Rady School of Management, UC San Diego ([email protected]). This draft has benefited from workshop and conference presentations at Georgetown University, Finance in the Cloud III, University of Colorado, and UC San Diego. 1 Introduction Traditional models in finance – where investors have common priors, observe the same public sig- nals, and update their beliefs according to Bayes’ rule – have a difficult time explaining the high trading volume observed in financial markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Opinion Forming in the Digital Age
    Opinion Forming in the Digital Age Fake News, Echo Chambers and Populism - Key Themes, Concerns & Recommendations for European Research and Innovation Version 1.0 – October 2018 Editors: Steve Taylor1, Brian Pickering, Paul Grace, Michael Boniface University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre, UK Expert Panel2: Vian Bakir Andrew McStay danah boyd Hugo Mercier Sven Engesser Miriam Metzger Robert Epstein Francesca Polletta Nayla Fawzi Walter Quattrociocchi Philip Fernbach Steven Sloman Dana R. Fisher Dan Sperber Beth Gharrity Gardner Niels Spierings Kristof Jacobs Claire Wardle Susan Jacobson Fabiana Zollo Benjamin Krämer Arkaitz Zubiaga Adam Kucharski 1 Contact author: [email protected] 2 Full positions and affiliations of the expert panel are included within. The Internet provides fast and ubiquitous communication that enables all kinds of communities and provides citizens with easy access to vast amounts of information, although the information is not necessarily verified and may present a distorted view of real events or facts. The Internet’s power as an instant source of mass information can be used to influence opinions, which can have far- reaching consequences. This report’s purpose is to provide input into the advisory processes that determine European support for research into the effects and management of Fake News (e.g. deliberate misinformation), Echo Chambers (e.g. closed communities where biases can be reinforced through lack of diversity in opinions), and the Internet’s influence on social and political movements such as Populism; to provide insight into how innovation that takes these aspects into account can be supported. To address this aim, this report concerns socio-technical implications of the Internet related to the impact of closed communities and misinformation and makes recommendations derived from a consultation with domain experts concerning the research needed to address specific challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Decoupling Search Topic and Popularity Ranking: Insights on Online Echo Chambers
    MIT IDE RESEARCH BRIEF VOL. 2017.8 DECOUPLING SEARCH TOPIC AND POPULARITY RANKING: INSIGHTS ON ONLINE ECHO CHAMBERS Sagit Bar-Gill and Neil Gandal Just as sound reverberates in an enclosed space, so do online environment for content exploration, we broke down opinions and information “bounce” among social circles. search into two dimensions — content topic and content Since “birds of a feather flock together,” these social popularity. We then looked at the ways individuals moved circles consist mostly of like-minded individuals, making through the material. We observed, for instance, the weight it harder for dissenting views to permeate our discourse, that users placed on their own interests versus those of and creating an echo of our own information and views the crowd, and how these patterns relate to an individual’s (1). This echo chamber phenomenon has drawn growing characteristics, such as how social they regard themselves concern in post-election USA, post-Brexit UK, and pretty and whether they try to influence others in their social much everywhere in our increasingly connected world (2– circles (what we term “opinion leaders”). 4). Echo chambers have always been around as a natural result of our homophilous social choices. But as our social In our experimental environment, susceptibility to echo networking continues its shift online, the echoes seem to be chambers is well-proxied by: (I) conducting relatively getting worse (2, 4, 5). little exploration in the search process, and (II) relying on popularity in content choice. Who is responsible for our online echo chambers – ourselves or filtering and ranking algorithms beyond our Therefore, users who conduct little exploration and rely control? Filtering and ranking algorithms are implemented more heavily on the crowd’s previous choices will, over in many of our online environments, creating much- time, see less diverse content.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Rules Cincinnati?
    Who Rules Cincinnati? A Study of Cincinnati’s Economic Power Structure And its Impact on Communities and People By Dan La Botz Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Published by Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Copyright ©2008 by Dan La Botz Table of Contents Summary......................................................................................................... 1 Preface.............................................................................................................4 Introduction.................................................................................................... 7 Part I - Corporate Power in Cincinnati.........................................................15 Part II - Corporate Power in the Media and Politics.....................................44 Part III - Corporate Power, Social Classes, and Communities......................55 Part IV - Cincinnati: One Hundred Years of Corporate Power.....................69 Discussion..................................................................................................... 85 Bibliography.................................................................................................. 91 Acknowledgments.........................................................................................96 About the Author...........................................................................................97 Summary This investigation into Cincinnati’s power structure finds that a handful of national and multinational corporations dominate
    [Show full text]
  • Ventriloquism Or an Echo Chamber? Measuring the Strength of House Members’ Rhetoric in Local Newspapers
    Ventriloquism or an Echo Chamber? Measuring the Strength of House Members’ Rhetoric in Local Newspapers. Michael K. Romano Department of Political Science Georgia Southern University P.O. Box 8101, Carroll Building 2205 Statesboro, GA 30460 (912) 478-0838 (phone) (912) 478-5348 (fax) [email protected] Paper prepared for the 2015 Midwest Political Science Association Meeting. Chicago IL. April15-19, 2014 Ventriloquism or an Echo Chamber? Measuring the Strength of House Members’ Rhetoric in Local Newspapers. Political elites have been shown to excel at manipulating the information environment. Theories about press control by elites vary. Some argue that actors manipulate the media like a ventriloquist, using the press to restate their rhetoric verbatim, while others argue that journalists act with more agency when deciding the news. I examine the ability of members of the House of Representatives to manipulate news about their work in Washington. Members have an incentive to promote themselves in order to control the public's perception and attempt to leverage the local press through mediated homestyles; cultivating news agencies as a constituency using press releases that are ready-made for news consumption. The extent to which news articles echo press statements will vary depending on the complexity of the issue and the clarity of a member's expressed agenda. To test this relationship, data on press releases is gathered and is matched with corresponding district news coverage. Press releases and matched articles are examined using plagiarism detection software to evaluate overlapping use of representatives' rhetoric. The media system in the United States is tasked with taking the millions of signals, events, actions and non-actions of political actors and condensing them down into meaningful and understandable stories that can be absorbed easily by the populace.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Sociology: the Dominant Paradigm Author(S): Todd Gitlin Source: Theory and Society, Vol
    Media Sociology: The Dominant Paradigm Author(s): Todd Gitlin Source: Theory and Society, Vol. 6, No. 2 (Sep., 1978), pp. 205-253 Published by: Springer Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/657009 Accessed: 30/11/2009 07:24 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=springer. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Theory and Society. http://www.jstor.org 205 MEDIA SOCIOLOGY: The Dominant Paradigm TODD GITLIN Since the Second WorldWar, as mass media in the United States have become more concentratedin ownership,more centralizedin operations,more national in reach, more pervasivein presence,sociological study of the media has been dominated by the theme of the relative powerlessnessof the broadcasters.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Papers of the Center for Research on Social
    WORKING PAPERS OF THE CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON SOCIAL ORGANIZATION DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Copies Available Through: Center for Research on Paper #53 Social Organization University of Michigan April, 1970' 219 Perry Building 330 Packard Street Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 CIVIL-MILITARY DIFFERENTION IN THE NEW INDUSTRIAL STATE* David R. Segal The University of Michigan *Paper prepared for the VII World Congress of Sociology, Varna, Bulgaria, September 1970. I am grateful to Edward Lipson and Jean Schneider for research assistance. I am indebted to Mr. Richard Massar of the Air Force Military Personnel Center, and to Dr. Ernest Tupes of the Air Personnel Laboratory for their cooperation. INTRODUCTION Recent literature on military structure posits a convergence between civilian and military modes of organ- ization as management skills become increasingly important for promotion to the upper echelons of the armed forces. Analysis of careers of generals in the United States Air Force, which has the most complex technology of the American armed forces and hence faces the most difficult organizational task, however, indicates that combat skills still take precedence over management skills as criteria for promotion to general officer grade. Such skills serve as the basis for a "bureaucratic" career in the.military context. At the same time, contemporary theories of formal organization suggest that corporate bodies in the civilian economy have adopted "post-bureaucratic" structural forms, and that the bureaucratic model is now inadequate for des- cribing management careers in this context. Thus, there seem to be factors mitigating against structural convergence. These factors have implications for theories regarding the development of a "military-industrial complex" in the United States.
    [Show full text]