DOCSLIB.ORG

O New Marine Propulsion Concept with Booster Motor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
O New Marine Propulsion Concept with Booster Motor MARINE PROPULSION groups, a more streamlined forebody and New marine a higher power rating for the propeller. Extensive calculations and tests were carried out by the shipyard at the marine propulsion concept test institute HSVA in Hamburg to make sure that the higher speed of 21 knots would actually be achieved. An increase with booster motor in the drive power rating would be necessary in any case, as would modifi- cations to the shape of the forebody. The Three US container ships were upgraded at the Hamburg shipyard of dimensions of the shortened container Blohm + Voss GmbH by shortening the vessels and installing a new ma- ship are also given in Table 1. rine propulsion system. The innovative drive system, which has an ABB The changes that had to be made to motor and generator, has boosted the speed of the ships considerably. the body of the ship called for precision Instead of ‘power take off’, it makes use of the ‘power take in’ concept work of a kind that could only be carried to transmit electrical energy to the main shaft. ABB Industrietechnik AG out by a shipyard as experienced as supplied the complete 4-MW electrical booster plants as well as the Blohm + Voss GmbH. For example, dur- electrical equipment for the bow thrusters. ing removal of the midbody (with three hatch groups) a flame-cut with a length of 330 m had to be made in one operation Operators of container ships have was to reduce their length by three hatch and with an accuracy that would ensure had to adjust to a vastly changed situ- groups and to equip each of them with that no remachining of the ships’ storage tation in recent years. The need today a new forebody and afterbody plus a structures would be necessary after the is for faster, smaller container vessels new propulsion plant. The idea, however, forebody and afterbody had been floated with a capacity of 2,500 to 6,000 TEU was rejected as being economically unvi- back together 2 . In addition, the electri- (equivalent unit for 20-foot containers) able. cal power connections between the two and able to travel at a speed of at least Alternative solutions also fell through halves of the ship, involving about 350 21 knots. as they could not be fitted into time cables and large numbers of pipes, had schedules, for example, for the construc- to be separated. tion of new parts in other countries. After the midbody had been cut out Modernization of ECON ships and temporary bulkheads had been Recognizing the trend, the Sea-Land fitted, the forebody and the midbody Division of CSX Corporation in the USA SL-31 – a brand new concept were floated and pulled out of the dock began looking for ways to modernize its The shipyard and shipowner eventually by tugs. Afterwards, the forebody was large and relatively slow container ships. agreed on a completely new concept. moved to within about 300 mm of the These were built in Korea in the early The project name that was chosen was afterbody. The dock was then floated 1980s as so-called ECON ships for SL-31 (SL stands for Sea-Land, 3 for again and the forebody pushed up United States Lines (USL). 3,000 TEU and 1 for 21 knots) 1 . It pro- against the afterbody, aligned, tacked, The vessels, which when new were posed a reduction in the length of the and welded in place. The most critical among the most economical container ACV container ships by three hatch part of this operation was the maneuvring ships in service, originally had a storage and alignment of the two halves. Very capacity of approximately 3,900 TEU and high precision was necessary, as a devi- a speed of 18 knots. USL operated the ation of just a few millimeters from the ships as Atlantic Class Vessels (ACV). original longitudinal axis would translate Table 1 shows their as-built dimensions. into a loss of speed. Optical measuring Ten years later, speed had become the equipment was used to ensure a perfect dominating factor for these vessels, with Thomas Fetzberger fit. large container capacities given only a Carola Kuhrau It is worth remembering that the parts second priority [2]. The most obvious ABB Industrietechnik AG being maneuvred weighed several thou- way to increase the speed of the ships sand tonnes, and that they had to be 28 ABB Review 3/1997 MARINE PROPULSION a b ACV container ship conversion based on the SL-31 concept 1 a Forebody cut away and mid-body removed b Shortened ship with new forebody moved by tugs to precise positions in the Reversal of the conventional 6.6-kV electric motor to the main drive dock. This part of the modernization shaft generator concept shaft by means of tunnel gearing which is alone was a considerable achievement To raise the drive power rating to the flanged via a Vulcan coupling to the fly- on the part of the shipyard. required level, Blohm + Voss GmbH de- wheel of the main machine 6 , 7 . The veloped a new, unconventional concept electric motor is fed with 4,860 kW that ‘reverses’ the standard shaft gener- (100 %) or 4,374 kW (90 %) from an addi- Increasing the drive power ator system commonly in use. Previously, tional Wärtsilä-Diesel generator set with A new approach was also necessary electrical power has been fed into the on- 6-MVA alternator of type 12 R 32. The for the upgrade of the container ships’ board power system from the main ma- high-voltage switchgear and diesel-gen- propulsion. The installed machines, chine by means of a gear system with at- erator set are installed in a new engine Sulzer 7 RLB 90 engines, were rated tached generator. The new drive makes room on the main deck. Many new, inno- at 20,590 kW (100 %) and 18,530 kW use of the ‘power take in’ instead of vative control features were required to (90 %). In order to run the ships at ‘power take off’ concept 5 . In this link the slow-speed main machine to the 21 knots without converting the vessels, method, 4,000 kW is transmitted via a electric motor via the tunnel gearing. it would have been necessary to increase the engine power to about 40,000 kW. By streamlining the forebody through hy- drodynamic improvements, an initial Table 1: power saving of 3,700 kW could be Main dimensions and speed of the container ships achieved 3 . Also, the reduction in length Before conversion After conversion by three hatchgroups reduced the ships’ Atlantic Class Vessel SL-31 frictional resistance, allowing a further saving of 1,500 kW 4 . Together, these Length 279.00 m 248.26 m Beam 32.20 m unchanged modifications improved the power by Height 21.50 m unchanged 5,200 kW. Therefore, to achieve the Draught, full load 11.676 m unchanged required 21 knots in service, an addi- Speed tional 3,800 to 4,000 kW would have to (draught = 10 m) 18.0 knots 21.0 knots be fed into the propeller shaft system. ABB Review 3/1997 29 MARINE PROPULSION Tests with a draught of 10 m and a speed of 21 knots showed the power de- mand to be 18,639 kW, giving a safety margin of 521 kW. Converting this extra power into speed, the maximum speed which is possible is 21.2 knots. Two alternative concepts for increas- ing the drive output had also been con- sidered, but were rejected after detailed discussions: • Two additional diesel-mechanical Z-type propellers with one diesel en- gine as primary drive system, plus di- rect transmission of the power via gearing to port and starboard pro- pellers. The two side propellers in this concept would have produced con- Sea-Land Pride (formerly Galveston Bay) in Dock 10 after the forebody 2 siderable turbulence, influencing the had been cut away. The midbody is being prepared for removal. water flow at the main propeller and Photo: Blohm + Voss GmbH reducing its efficiency. • Two diesel-electric drive systems in which each propeller is driven by an The power is transmitted to the water propeller is 0.5 m smaller in diameter electric motor and electrical energy is by a new KaMeWa controllable pitch pro- than the original one, its special shape generated by diesel-generators. This peller with a diameter of 7.1 m. This pro- enables it to produce 20 percent more method would have incurred even peller can absorb up to 24,400 kW, power. Using the machine data as basis, higher system costs than the first which is also the maximum power trans- the propeller power was calculated to be method. mitted to the shaft. Although the new 19,160 kW. Booster drive system is patented The new forebody is brought into position. 3 The concept with the booster drive unites Photo: Blohm + Voss GmbH proven components in a completely new way to obtain PTO instead of PTI. The described system has meanwhile been patented [2]. Power transmission to the main shaft has never been realized before in this form. As with many seemingly simple sol- utions, it was the small details that caused the main problems. A slow-speed diesel engine with oscillating torque had never before been combined with a con- stant-torque electric motor on a propeller shaft. To protect the electric motor and gearing system from the vibrations caused by the main machine, tunnel gearing was chosen. This transmits the electric motor power via a multi-disc clutch to the gear system and then via 30 ABB Review 3/1997 MARINE PROPULSION The Sea-Land Pride in Dock 10 4 after conversion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Booster Rookie Book Typical Kicker Layout
    BOOSTER Table of Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction................................................................................................................................ 4 Booster History and Design........................................................................................................ 5 Injection ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Gradient Magnets and Power Supplies......................................................................................17 Magnets .....................................................................................................................................18 GMPS........................................................................................................................................23 RF..............................................................................................................................................27 High Level.................................................................................................................................31 Low Level/Feedback..................................................................................................................32 Notching and Cogging...............................................................................................................37
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Techniques for Effective Maintainability
    W..e_: NASA Technical Memorandum 4628 Recommended Techniques for Effective Maintainability A Continuous Improvement Initiative of the NASA Reliability and Maintainability Steering Committee December 1994 = # \ (NASA-TM-4628) RECOMMENOEO N95-31530 TECHNIQUES FOR EFFECTIVE MAINTAINABILITY. A CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE OF THE NASA Unclas RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY STEERING COMMITTEE (NASA) 105 p H1/38 0060399 | w = J J Ira! J] ii U mmm mini mJ r - w J _J W IL u h_ PREFACE Current and future NASA programs face the challenge of achieving a high degree of mission success with a minimum degree of technical risk. Although technical risk has several . , w elements, such as safety, reliability, and performance, a proven track record of overall system effectiveness ultimately will be the NASA benchmark. This will foster the accomplishment of r mission objectives within cost and schedule expectations without compromising safety or w program risk. A key CharaCteristic of systems effeci_veness is the impiementation of appropriate levels of maintainability throughout the program life cycle. Maintainability is a process for assuring the ease by which a system can be restored to operation following a failure. It is an essential consideration for any program requiring ground n and/or on-orbit maintenance. TheiOffice of S_._ty"and Mission Assurance (OSMA) has undertaken a continuous improvement initiative to develop a technical roadmap that will provide a path toward achieving the desired degree of maintainability while realizing cost and schedule benefits. Although early life cycle costs are a characteristic of any assurance program, operational cost savings and improved system availability almost always result from __° a properlY administered maintainability assurance program.
    [Show full text]
  • Excitation Systems
    Excitation Systems 10 kVA - 35 MVA alternators REGULATORS AND EXCITATION SYSTEMS ARE AT THE HEART OF INDUSTRIAL ALTERNATORS PERFORMANCE AND RELIABILITY. At Leroy-Somer, we design, test and qualify our electronic products to meet the challenges of power generation systems. Using our experience and field expertise, we provide regulation features that help protect installations from outage and failures, and our excitation systems are optimized to provide the best performance levels for any situation. EXCITATION SYSTEMS Leroy-Somer offers different excitation systems to match application requirements. An excitation system uses the alternator output to build an excitation current that is then used to power the rotating magnetic field of the rotor. This principle allows for the control of the output power. To build excitation current, a regulator needs both a supply voltage to provide power, and a measured reference voltage at output terminals to pilot the excitation. Alternator Alternator Main power outputMain power User input N Exciter output User input N Exciter U Sensing + U AVRSensing power supply + V AVR power supply AVR V AVR W W AVR outputAVR + - output + - Exciter current STATOR Exciter current STATOR Exciter Diode Exciter bridgeDiode stator bridge stator Prime Power Exciter Power systemPrime ROTOR supply system rotorExciter supply ROTOR rotor Voltage Voltage - sensing - Control sensing Comp. PID Control Exciter Comp. PID command Exciter Ref + command Main power External Ref + Main power referenceExternal reference Diagram of a complete excitation system SHUNT The SHUNT excitation system can also be completed by a booster system for larger installations to allow In SHUNT excitation systems, the AVR power supply for short circuit capability.
    [Show full text]
  • ADVERC BM Ltd 245 Trysull Road, Merry Hill, Wolverhampton, West Midlands WV3 7LG Tel: 01902 380494 Fax: 01902 380435 [email protected]
    MARINE DOCUMENT PACK ADVERC BM Ltd 245 Trysull Road, Merry Hill, Wolverhampton, West Midlands WV3 7LG Tel: 01902 380494 Fax: 01902 380435 [email protected] www.adverc.co.uk ADVERC - FUNCTIONAL BACK GROUND. Twenty-seven years of study and development have gone into optimising alternator battery charging which, presently, permits only 60% - 70% state-of-charge using conventional voltage regulation. The result is the well-proven ADVERC Battery Management System. The underlying principle is that batteries should be charged fully, quickly, safely and without damage to batteries and alternator. This is achieved, firstly, by cycling the battery voltages to an established programme, at a nominal 14.0-14.4v (12v systems) or 27.5-28.5v (24v systems). The cycling programme is normally: 5 minutes @ 14.0 volts, followed by 15 minutes @ 14.4 volts. After four 20 minute cycles, there is a 'rest period' of up to 40 minutes i.e. at the lower voltage, depending on the battery state-of-charge and electrical duty-cycle. These voltage values lie either side of the battery gassing voltage, ensuring rapid charging without the battery actually gassing. Voltage settings will accommodate most battery types including gel. Ni-cads etc., require a special setting. The charging voltages will automatically adjust for ambient temperature variations around the batteries, an important consideration e.g. increased with cold ambient temperature and vice versa. The net result is efficient alternator performance, compensation for voltage losses in the system (including that across blocking-diodes), accompanied by considerably reduced engine running time e.g. 50%. NOTE: ADVERC is a controller not a booster.
    [Show full text]
  • LOOK CLOSELY at THIS PHOTOGRAPH Awjhkb
    V o l. CXXXV. No. 3515. F r id a y , October 12, 1945. Sis {Registered at the General Post Office. Entered as Second Glass at the Nets York U.S.A. Post 0$cs,} LOOK CLOSELY AT THIS PHOTOGRAPH aWjHKB HE girls are working under Mazda Fluorescent Lamps, in open-top fittings. NoteT the almost complete absence of shadows — even under the benches. M40S4 THE ELECTRICIAN October 12, 1945 INSTRUMENT WIRES TELEPHONEE RADIO CORDS STRANDSCBRAIDS CABLESE FLEXIBLES ELECTRICAL C°L« ALPERTON WEMBLEY MIDDLESEX t e l : PERIVALE 5621-2 g r a m s : ENGINEYOR PHONE LONDON October 12, 1945 THE ELECTRICIAN iii The simplest form of flexible coupling for transmitting rotary movement is shown above. The Metalastik rubber-to-metal weld permits the transmission of heavy loads, with a torsional cushioning effect which extends over an appreciable angle. Note the ‘V ’ section which gives uniform stress. These couplings are used for many purposes and can be supplied with natural or synthetic rubber of various degrees of flexibility; and in any ordinary metals, including light alloys. Other Metalastik couplings shown are — on the left, the'ZPU’ type; on the right, the 'Z V S', both have vanes which give a positive drive beyond a certain deflection and are capable of accommodating angular and parallel mis-allgnment. All these patent couplings are of great value in damping out torsional vibrations, in fact many of them are used expressly for this purpose where all other expedients have failed. A THE ELECTRICIAN' October 12, 1945 Have you heard about the new KANTARK' H.R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • EMEC 1 LAB Laboratory Manual
    DEV BHOOMI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CHAKRATA ROAD,NAVGAOUN MANDUWALA,UTTARAKHAND Programs: B.TECH. (Electrical and Electronics Engineering) EMEC 1 LAB Laboratory Manual PREPARED BY Saurabh Rajvanshi ASST.PROFESSOR, ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1 LIST OF EXPERIMENTS Electrical machine 1 Lab (PEE‐352) 1. To obtain magnetization characteristics of a d.c. shunt generator 2. To obtain load characteristics of a d.c. shunt generator and compound generator (a) Cumulatively compounded (b) Differentially compounded 3. To obtain efficiency of a dc shunt machine using Swinburn’s test 4. To perform Hopkinson’s test and determine losses and efficiency of DC machine 5. To obtain speed control of dc shunt motor using (a) armature resistance control (b) field control 6. To obtain speed-torque characteristics of a dc shunt motor 7. To obtain speed control of dc separately excited motor using Conventional Ward-Leonard/ Static Ward –Leonard method. 8. To study polarity and ratio test of single phase and 3-phase transformers 9. To obtain equivalent circuit, efficiency and voltage regulation of a single phase transformer using O.C. and S.C. tests. 10 To obtain efficiency and voltage regulation of a single phase transformer by Sumpner’s test 2 Dev Bhoomi Institute Of Technology LABORATORY MANUAL Department of Computer Science & Engineering PRACTICAL INSTRUCTION SHEET EXPERIMENT NO. 1 ISSUE NO. : ISSUE DATE: REV. NO. : REV. DATE : PAGE: 3 LABORATORY Name & Code: PEE-352 EMEC 1Lab SEMESTER: III Experiment No-1 Theory and Concept Objective: To conduct an experiment on a D.C shunt generator and draw the magnetization characteristics (OCC) and to determine the critical field resistance and critical speed.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Machines (Professional Elective – Iv)
    R16 B.TECH EEE. EE744PE: SPECIAL MACHINES (PROFESSIONAL ELECTIVE – IV) B.Tech. IV Year I Sem. L T P C 3 0 0 3 Prerequisite: Electrical Machines - I & Electrical Machines - II Course objectives: To understand the working and construction of special machines To know the use of special machines in different feed-back systems To understand the use of micro-processors for controlling different machines Course Outcomes: Upon the completion of this subject, the student will be able To select different special machines as part of control system components To use special machines as transducers for converting physical signals into electrical signals To use micro-processors for controlling different machines To understand the operation of different special machines UNIT – I Special Types of DC Machines - I: Series Booster-Shunt Booster-Non-reversible boost- Reversible booster Special Types of DC Machines – II: Armature excited machines—Rosenberg generator- The Amplidyne and metadyne— Rototrol and Regulex-third brush generator-three-wire generator-dynamometer. UNIT – II Stepper Motors: Introduction-synchronous inductor (or hybrid stepper motor), Hybrid stepping motor, construction, principles of operation, Energisation with two phase at a time- essential conditions for the satisfactory operation of a 2-phase hybrid step motor- very slow- speed synchronous motor for servo control-different configurations for switching the phase windings-control circuits for stepping motors-an open-loop controller for a 2-phase stepping motor. UNIT – III Variable
    [Show full text]
  • Section 5: Technology Characterization-Microturbines
    Section 5. Technology Characterization – Microturbines U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Combined Heat and Power Partnership March 2015 Disclaimer The information contained in this document is for information purposes only and is gathered from published industry sources. Information about costs, maintenance, operations, or any other performance criteria is by no means representative of EPA, ORNL, or ICF policies, definitions, or determinations for regulatory or compliance purposes. The September 2017 revision incorporated a new section on packaged CHP systems (Section 7). This Guide was prepared by Ken Darrow, Rick Tidball, James Wang and Anne Hampson at ICF International, with funding from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Energy. Catalog of CHP Technologies ii Disclaimer Section 5. Technology Characterization – Microturbines 5.1 Introduction Microturbines, as the name implies, are small combustion turbines that burn gaseous or liquid fuels to drive an electrical generator, and have been commercially available for more than a decade. Today’s microturbine technology is the result of development work in small stationary and automotive gas turbines, auxiliary power equipment, and turbochargers, much of which took place in the automotive industry beginning in the 1950s. The development of microturbine systems was accelerated by the similarity of design to large engine turbochargers, and that provided the basis for the engineering and manufacturing technology of microturbine components. During the 1990s several companies developed competing microturbine products and entered, or planned to enter, the market. As the market matured, the industry underwent a consolidation phase during which companies merged, changed hands, or dropped out of the market.
    [Show full text]
  • Soft Starter Catalog 2018 Release N
    • 380 to 600V • Nominal current 6 to 200A • ST with Soft Start SOFT STARTER • STO with Soft Start + Overload Relay • Internal by pass relay CD AUTOMATION POWERED BY INNOVATION We are delivering Real Cost Benefits www.cdautomation.com Soft Starter Catalog 2018 Release n. 2 1 Soft Starter family STB - STO 2 1 3 Control Types Available Voltage ramp (torque ramp) U Soft Starter start from a setted initial voltage, and ramp up to the nominal U one in a setted time. N N In addiction on all family products is possible to start high friction load I with kickstart that gives to the motor for 100÷300 msec 80% of full voltage, without current limit. When is started, the motor reach the full speed and remain there, up to when stopped and it can reach zero speed by inerthia or via setted I ramp down. t As an option is also available the dynamic braking with an external device. RAMP PLUS CURRENT LIMIT Current ramp Soft starter start from a setted initial current and ramp up to the nominal value in a setted time. This type of control is available on STO family. U U N I N Current limit This parameter sets the current at which to start. This value depend on the application and must not exceed the soft starter I sizing (see on next two pages). t Initial current limit KICKSTART (BOOSTER) This parameter sets the initial start current for the current ramp mode. t(s) Motor protection 1000 Inside STO soft starter families, has been implemented electronic motor thermal protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Oct 2000\STA Paper Oct 2000.Wpd
    1 Gun Launch to Space - A Discussion of Technology Options F. Douglas Witherspoon and David L. Kruczynski* UTRON, Inc., Manassas, VA ABSTRACT After nearly half a century of space flight, the cost of putting payloads in orbit hovers around $4000 per pound for commercial launchers and about $10,000 per pound for the Space Shuttle. Such high costs are the single most important limiting factor to expanded business and exploitation of space.1 Because of the history of difficulties in reducing the cost of rocket launch, researchers have been investigating alternative methods using hypervelocity gun launch systems. The idea goes all the way back to Isaac Newton in his Principia, and was later popularized in a fictional account by Jules Verne in 1865 in his novel "From the Earth to the Moon." While Verne took some literary license in launching people with his gun, technology has now progressed to the point where launch of more robust payloads to orbit is technically feasible. Gun launches of fuel, water, food, solar panels, building materials and other supplies, and even constellations of small robust satellites, could be accomplished, saving not only billions of dollars, but enabling near term industrialization of space by reducing launch costs of such payloads by one to perhaps two orders of magnitude. A brief review of the major gun launch systems under consideration is presented with primary attention to two likely candidates, distributed hydrogen side injection and ram accelerators. Gun Launch to Space (GLTS) has great promise for reducing launch costs, but some technical issues still need to be resolved, and demonstrations of the technologies at a scale size beyond the laboratory is required before significant private investment seems likely.
    [Show full text]
  • Electromagnetic Launcher Gun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH EXPLORER ISSN NO: 2347-6060 Electromagnetic Launcher Gun 1 Asso. Pro. H. P. Tiple, 2 Prakash V. Gaikwad, 3 Yograj S. Gavankar 1,2,3 Electronics & Telecommunication Engineering, Mumbai University S.S.P.M’s College Of Engineering, Kankavli, Maharashtra, India 1 [email protected], 2 [email protected], [email protected] Abstract— Electromagnetism has greater amount of energy than the conventional chemical fuels energy. Here is a Gun that uses the Electromagnetic energy to launch payload at a speed ranging from 1000m/sec to 6000m/sec at low cost. It is the Electromagnetic Launcher Gun or Electromagnetic Projectile Launcher EMPL. In this paper, we have concentrated on payload launching using coilgun. By building this, the payload can be launched more efficiently and the payload to mass ratio can be increased and the cost of launching can be decreased. The main advantage of using this Electromagnetic Gun is that it replaces the initial huge fuel boosters used in the conventional chemical rockets. The challenges faced by Electromagnetic Launcher Gun are thermal effect, air drag, high gravitational attack etc. This paper reveals the various ways to overcome these challenges. Keywords— Launch, coilgun, payload, projectile, coil, fuel I. INTRODUCTION Conventional rockets are driven by the combustion of liquid and solid chemicals propellant and an oxidizer. The speed and acceleration of the rocket are relatively low after lift-off, but they are continuously increased over a long time period until the rocket reaches the required end velocity. The disadvantage of all the staged rockets employed so far is their non- reusability and the very small ratio of the payload to the fuel mass which is generally termed as propellant mass fraction which is less than 1%.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Fire Control System Part 2
    T.O. I 8-268-2-9 Secrion ll TROUBLE P RO BABL E CAUSE REMEDY TLRRET HL\TS CONTINLOUSLY, Reversed cooneclions oo output Correcr conneclions. Ill-N*TI\G CE\TEIthD 180' FIIOI1 terminals of amllidvne ecneraror. PROI)E It Z[RO- Reversed coonections (B & F) to Cotrect connections. l control 6eld of amplidyne geoeraror. d, TLRRET tlU.\-TS CO\TINLIOUSLY, \lis-alignment of l1-speed and Zero seisvns. llllNTING ABOUT FlXEll POln"T one-speed selsln zeros. BUT INCORRECTLY ALIG*-ED. Revised I December 1956 50A T.0. 18.268-2.9 Secrion tl TROUBLE PROBABLE CAUSE R EMEDY TLilRhl llli^-'fS (-O\TINLOL.SL\', Open selsvn s.ator leed. Corrcct..,nn..tr,,r HI.\TI\C A-I' (-E'{TAIN POSI'I'IONS o\L\. Reversed sel sYn stator le:ds r orrcL t cL'nrr a rlun. on one selsvn. (Remove onc seis;-'n cap and check direction d, in ehich rurrct follo*s sighr ro determine * hich selsvn is reversed.) TIiRRET ROT.{ThS 180' FROV Reversed .urre! motor {ield. Cc,rrecr conneccrons, I)ROPE II. ZERO PO[\'T, FOL. iiL'HT Lou: DIRI'TIo\ oF R.r'crse.r c.nnLr !ron\ to rrrrrct I crc, I onn(.:ron.. DOES II I}I-'f \OT L\T. motor arnrature. Reversed connecrions (C & [)) Correct connectiorts. to primrrv of servo-ampii6er FO\r'l] r rraostormer. Reversed coonections (R1 & R2) Correcr connectrons. ro rorors of both one-sPeed and I 1-speed selsvn Felrerators. Reversed connections (R1 & R2) Correct connecrions. ro borh one-speed and J1-speed control lransfotmer rotofs.
    [Show full text]