DOCSLIB.ORG

Origin of the Cell Nucleus, Mitosis and Sex: Roles of Intracellular Coevolution Thomas Cavalier-Smith*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Origin of the Cell Nucleus, Mitosis and Sex: Roles of Intracellular Coevolution Thomas Cavalier-Smith* Cavalier-Smith Biology Direct 2010, 5:7 http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/7 RESEARCH Open Access Origin of the cell nucleus, mitosis and sex: roles of intracellular coevolution Thomas Cavalier-Smith* Abstract Background: The transition from prokaryotes to eukaryotes was the most radical change in cell organisation since life began, with the largest ever burst of gene duplication and novelty. According to the coevolutionary theory of eukaryote origins, the fundamental innovations were the concerted origins of the endomembrane system and cytoskeleton, subsequently recruited to form the cell nucleus and coevolving mitotic apparatus, with numerous genetic eukaryotic novelties inevitable consequences of this compartmentation and novel DNA segregation mechanism. Physical and mutational mechanisms of origin of the nucleus are seldom considered beyond the long- standing assumption that it involved wrapping pre-existing endomembranes around chromatin. Discussions on the origin of sex typically overlook its association with protozoan entry into dormant walled cysts and the likely simultaneous coevolutionary, not sequential, origin of mitosis and meiosis. Results: I elucidate nuclear and mitotic coevolution, explaining the origins of dicer and small centromeric RNAs for positionally controlling centromeric heterochromatin, and how 27 major features of the cell nucleus evolved in four logical stages, making both mechanisms and selective advantages explicit: two initial stages (origin of 30 nm chromatin fibres, enabling DNA compaction; and firmer attachment of endomembranes to heterochromatin) protected DNA and nascent RNA from shearing by novel molecular motors mediating vesicle transport, division, and cytoplasmic motility. Then octagonal nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) arguably evolved from COPII coated vesicle proteins trapped in clumps by Ran GTPase-mediated cisternal fusion that generated the fenestrated nuclear envelope, preventing lethal complete cisternal fusion, and allowing passive protein and RNA exchange. Finally, plugging NPC lumens by an FG-nucleoporin meshwork and adopting karyopherins for nucleocytoplasmic exchange conferred compartmentation advantages. These successive changes took place in naked growing cells, probably as indirect consequences of the origin of phagotrophy. The first eukaryote had 1-2 cilia and also walled resting cysts; I outline how encystation may have promoted the origin of meiotic sex. I also explain why many alternative ideas are inadequate. Conclusion: Nuclear pore complexes are evolutionary chimaeras of endomembrane- and mitosis-related chromatin-associated proteins. The keys to understanding eukaryogenesis are a proper phylogenetic context and understanding organelle coevolution: how innovations in one cell component caused repercussions on others. Reviewers: This article was reviewed by Anthony Poole, Gáspár Jékely and Eugene Koonin. Background associated with that membrane, and ribosomes start Cells are of only two fundamental kinds: bacteria (=pro- translating messenger RNA (mRNA) even during tran- karyotes; cells with DNA segregated by surface mem- scription. Eukaryote chromosomes are normally multiple brane motors) and eukaryotes (nucleated cells dividing and linear and never attach directly to the surface by mitosis) [1,2]. In bacteria the typically single and cir- plasma membrane. Instead they are fixed to and sur- cular DNA chromosome is attached to the surface cyto- rounded by a specialised part of the endomembrane sys- plasmic membrane and segregated by protein motors tem (the nuclear envelope, NE) during interphase, the part of the cell cycle when the cell grows, genes are * Correspondence: [email protected] transcribed, and DNA replicated. During cell division, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK by contrast, eukaryotic chromosomes are compacted, © 2010 Cavalier-Smith; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Cavalier-Smith Biology Direct 2010, 5:7 Page 2 of 78 http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/7 precluding transcription or replication, and attach by selective advantages. However, the phylogenetic context their centromeres to microtubules of the mitotic spindle, has changed dramatically with our now much more which moves them into daughter cells. The problem of robust understanding of cell phylogeny (1) [3,7,8,12,13]. nuclear origins therefore requires understanding coevo- Moreover, genomics has enabled molecular origins of lution of about 27 cell components (Appendix 1) and many key eukaryotic constituents, including NPCs, to be how they became functionally interlinked into the fun- traced [14-17], whilst advances in molecular cell biology damentally novel eukaryoticlifecycle[3-5],approxi- tell us how nuclei actually assemble [18,19] and func- mately 850 My ago, at least two billion years after tion. Building on these insights, I now propose the first bacteria evolved [6]. Not only mitosis, but also sex, i.e. specific physical mechanism for evolving nuclear envel- meiosis and syngamy (cell and nuclear fusion), must ope architecture and explain its major genetic conse- have evolved at the same time. This conclusion follows quences and why other theories are inadequate. irrespective of whether the eukaryote tree is between As the field of eukaryogenesis has been confused by a unikonts (animals, fungi and three protozoan phyla) and plethora of contradictory ideas, some not compatible bikonts (plants, chromists and all other protozoan phyla with established evidence, before presenting the novel [7,8] or is instead between Euglenozoa and all other explanations I summarise two areas to put them in con- eukaryotes as shown in Fig. 1 in line with recent argu- text: (1) the phylogenetic origin of the eukaryotic com- ments for the root lying within Eozoa (Euglenozoa plus ponents, and (2) the origin of the endomembrane excavates), most likely between Euglenozoa and exca- system and cytoskeleton. I only outline the conclusions, vates sensu stricto [9]. Peroxisomes, mitochondria, cen- giving references for details, as most of the evidence and trioles, cilia, and Golgi dictyosomes must also have arguments is not new, being already published. Because originated prior to the last common ancestor of all the nature of molecular changes during major evolution- extant eukaryotes, whichever of these positions of the ary transitions is more diversified and complex than root is correct [6]. This radical transformation of cell some molecular evolutionists have realised, I also pre- structure (eukaryogenesis) is the most complex and face my original explanations of the origin of the extensive case of quantum evolution in the history of nucleus with an outline of some basic but widely life [2,3,6]. Beforehand earth was a sexless, purely bac- neglected evolutionary principles that apply to all such terial and viral world. Afterwards sexy, endoskeletal major innovations in body plan. This background is eukaryotes evolved morphological complexity: diatoms, rather long because the proper evolutionary context is butterflies, corals, whales, kelps, and trees. so important: the nucleus did not evolve on its own; Evolution of complex characters typically involves pre- explanations of its origin make no sense without under- adaptation, radical mutational innovation, and different standing the prior evolution of the endomembrane sys- selective forces acting in succession [3,6,10]. Here I tem of which its envelope is a specialised part. paint an integrated picture of how the nucleus, sex, and Intracellular coevolution of about a 100 novel properties the eukaryotic cell cycle originated and congealed into a is at the core of understanding eukaryogenesis. novel, unified, and very conservative cellular lifestyle during later stages of the conversion of a bacterium into Phylogenetic context for eukaryogenesis a eukaryote. In addition to establishing the phylogenetic Eukaryote cells are all evolutionary chimaeras of an context (Fig. 1) there are three crucial problems for ancestrally phagotrophic host cell with nucleus, endo- understanding the origin of the nucleus [5]: (1) assembly membranes, and endoskeleton [3] and an enslaved a- of endomembranes around chromatin (the DNA-histone proteobacterium converted into a mitochondrion close complex); (2) evolution of the nuclear pore complex to the time when the nucleus itself originated, i.e. prior (NPC), which crucially allows a channel between nucleo- to divergence of any extant eukaryotic lineages (Fig. 1) plasm and cytoplasm; and (3) origin of centromeres and [20]. Contrary to some assumptions [17,21], the host for mitotic spindle, without which nuclear chromosomes that symbiogenesis was not an archaebacterium, but an cannot be stably inherited. As first argued 30 years ago otherwise fully developed early eukaryote with NE and [11], origin of the cell nucleus cannot be understood in cilium (a protoeukaryote) or else an intermediate stage isolation from other major innovations of the eukaryotic (prekaryote) that had already evolved rudiments of pha- cell; intracellular coevolution among different cell con- gocytosis (the likely means of engulfing the a-proteo- stituents that interact physically or that profoundly bacterium) and internal membranes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Card Uses a Minor Groove Wedge Mechanism to Stabilize the RNA
    1 CarD uses a minor groove wedge mechanism to stabilize the RNA 2 polymerase open promoter complex 3 4 Brian Bae1, James Chen1, Elizabeth Davis1, Katherine Leon1, Seth A. Darst1,*, 5 Elizabeth A. Campbell1,* 6 7 1The Rockefeller University, Laboratory for Molecular Biophysics, 1230 York Avenue, New York, 8 NY 10065, USA. 9 10 *Correspondence to: E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 11 12 Present Address: Elizabeth Davis, The University of Minnesota School of Medicine, 13 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Katherine Leon, Department of 14 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Chicago, 929 East 57th Street, GCIS 15 W219 Chicago, IL 60637, USA. 16 17 2 18 Abstract A key point to regulate gene expression is at transcription initiation, and 19 activators play a major role. CarD, an essential activator in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, 20 is found in many bacteria, including Thermus species, but absent in Escherichia coli. To 21 delineate the molecular mechanism of CarD, we determined crystal structures of 22 Thermus transcription initiation complexes containing CarD. The structures show CarD 23 interacts with the unique DNA topology presented by the upstream double- 24 stranded/single-stranded DNA junction of the transcription bubble. We confirm that our 25 structures correspond to functional activation complexes, and extend our understanding 26 of the role of a conserved CarD Trp residue that serves as a minor groove wedge, 27 preventing collapse of the transcription bubble to stabilize the transcription initiation 28 complex. Unlike E. coli RNAP, many bacterial RNAPs form unstable promoter 29 complexes, explaining the need for CarD.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in the Human Skin Microbiome Over One Year's Time
    American Journal of Microbiology 3 (2): 18-30, 2012 ISSN 1948-982x © 2012 Science Publications doi:10.3844/ajmsp.2012.18.30 Published Online 3 (2) 2012 (http://www.thescipub.com/ajm.toc) Changes in the Human Skin Microbiome Over One Year’s Time 1,2 Richard W. Hyman, 1Farbod Babrzadeh, 1Curtis Palm, 1Chunlin Wang, 1Marilyn Fukushima and 1,2,3 Ronald W. Davis 1Stanford Genome Technology Center, 855 S California Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA 2Department of Biochemistry, 3Department of Genetics, Stanford University College of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA ABSTRACT Human skin comprises a large number of distinguishable ecological niches. To describe fully the human skin microbiome, it will be necessary to identify the bacteria in each niche and to distinguish the commensal bacteria from the temporary residents. To contribute to the description of the human skin microbiome and employing a gene-based technology, we have identified the bacteria in two niches: the front and back of the base of the neck and over the course of one year. There were 50 volunteers and a total of 232 neck skin swabs. Roche 454 Tag pyrosequencing was employed to sequence a short hypervariable sequence region (V6) of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene. To identify the bacteria corresponding to the front and back of the neck for each volunteer, the “Classifier” software in the “Pyrosequencing” section of the Ribosomal Database Project was employed. The bacteria on virtually all 232 neck skin swabs were classified into bacterial Class. The skin microbiome of these two niches was composed principally of a mixture of five Classes of bacteria: Actinobacteria , Alphaproteobacteria , Bacilli , Betaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria .
    [Show full text]
  • An Abstract of the Thesis Of
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Kaitlin Mae McConnell, for the degree of Master of Science in Microbiology presented on September 6, 2019. Title: Reef Microbiomes of Mo’orea, French Polynesia, a Socio-Ecological Island System Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Andrew R. Thurber At a time of rapid global change, a socio-ecological system (SES) approach can provide a framework through which to quantify and communicate the risks and uncertainties of coupled human-natural systems. Islands, and tropical coral reef islands in particular, can be excellent models for SES research since they may be considered as both closed and open systems, where agents-- both human and non- human-- and their interactions, may be considered at a variety of spatial and temporal scales and with diverse levels of complexity. Bacteria and Archaea communities are the executants of biochemical cycling in systems, and alterations in the structure of microbial communities can provide indications of system-wide metabolic shifts driven by natural and human forces. In this thesis, I first present patterns of spatial and temporal variability in microbial communities across a tropical coral island reefscape, where I hypothesized: Microbiome host, habitat and sampling location will house distinct microbiomes (beta diversity) that differ between seasons. Microbiomes were primarily host specific, and host specificity varied with structural scale: microbiomes of reef sediment, seawater and corals were different from each other. Zooming in, the three species of corals examined also had distinct microbial communities associated with them. These host- specific microbiomes varied differentially across spatial scale, such as island side, reef habitat (fore, back and fringing reefs) and sampling locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Systema Naturae. the Classification of Living Organisms
    Systema Naturae. The classification of living organisms. c Alexey B. Shipunov v. 5.601 (June 26, 2007) Preface Most of researches agree that kingdom-level classification of living things needs the special rules and principles. Two approaches are possible: (a) tree- based, Hennigian approach will look for main dichotomies inside so-called “Tree of Life”; and (b) space-based, Linnaean approach will look for the key differences inside “Natural System” multidimensional “cloud”. Despite of clear advantages of tree-like approach (easy to develop rules and algorithms; trees are self-explaining), in many cases the space-based approach is still prefer- able, because it let us to summarize any kinds of taxonomically related da- ta and to compare different classifications quite easily. This approach also lead us to four-kingdom classification, but with different groups: Monera, Protista, Vegetabilia and Animalia, which represent different steps of in- creased complexity of living things, from simple prokaryotic cell to compound Nature Precedings : doi:10.1038/npre.2007.241.2 Posted 16 Aug 2007 eukaryotic cell and further to tissue/organ cell systems. The classification Only recent taxa. Viruses are not included. Abbreviations: incertae sedis (i.s.); pro parte (p.p.); sensu lato (s.l.); sedis mutabilis (sed.m.); sedis possi- bilis (sed.poss.); sensu stricto (s.str.); status mutabilis (stat.m.); quotes for “environmental” groups; asterisk for paraphyletic* taxa. 1 Regnum Monera Superphylum Archebacteria Phylum 1. Archebacteria Classis 1(1). Euryarcheota 1 2(2). Nanoarchaeota 3(3). Crenarchaeota 2 Superphylum Bacteria 3 Phylum 2. Firmicutes 4 Classis 1(4). Thermotogae sed.m. 2(5).
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Topic 1. Introduction to Microbiology. the Subject and Tasks
    Contents Topic 1. Introduction to microbiology. The subject and tasks of microbiology. A short historical essay………………………………………………………………5 Topic 2. Systematics and nomenclature of microorganisms……………………. 10 Topic 3. General characteristics of prokaryotic cells. Gram’s method ………...45 Topic 4. Principles of health protection and safety rules in the microbiological laboratory. Design, equipment, and working regimen of a microbiological laboratory………………………………………………………………………….162 Topic 5. Physiology of bacteria, fungi, viruses, mycoplasmas, rickettsia……...185 TOPIC 1. INTRODUCTION TO MICROBIOLOGY. THE SUBJECT AND TASKS OF MICROBIOLOGY. A SHORT HISTORICAL ESSAY. Contents 1. Subject, tasks and achievements of modern microbiology. 2. The role of microorganisms in human life. 3. Differentiation of microbiology in the industry. 4. Communication of microbiology with other sciences. 5. Periods in the development of microbiology. 6. The contribution of domestic scientists in the development of microbiology. 7. The value of microbiology in the system of training veterinarians. 8. Methods of studying microorganisms. Microbiology is a science, which study most shallow living creatures - microorganisms. Before inventing of microscope humanity was in dark about their existence. But during the centuries people could make use of processes vital activity of microbes for its needs. They could prepare a koumiss, alcohol, wine, vinegar, bread, and other products. During many centuries the nature of fermentations remained incomprehensible. Microbiology learns morphology, physiology, genetics and microorganisms systematization, their ecology and the other life forms. Specific Classes of Microorganisms Algae Protozoa Fungi (yeasts and molds) Bacteria Rickettsiae Viruses Prions The Microorganisms are extraordinarily widely spread in nature. They literally ubiquitous forward us from birth to our death. Daily, hourly we eat up thousands and thousands of microbes together with air, water, food.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phagotrophic Origin of Eukaryotes and Phylogenetic Classification Of
    International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2002), 52, 297–354 DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.02058-0 The phagotrophic origin of eukaryotes and phylogenetic classification of Protozoa Department of Zoology, T. Cavalier-Smith University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK Tel: j44 1865 281065. Fax: j44 1865 281310. e-mail: tom.cavalier-smith!zoo.ox.ac.uk Eukaryotes and archaebacteria form the clade neomura and are sisters, as shown decisively by genes fragmented only in archaebacteria and by many sequence trees. This sisterhood refutes all theories that eukaryotes originated by merging an archaebacterium and an α-proteobacterium, which also fail to account for numerous features shared specifically by eukaryotes and actinobacteria. I revise the phagotrophy theory of eukaryote origins by arguing that the essentially autogenous origins of most eukaryotic cell properties (phagotrophy, endomembrane system including peroxisomes, cytoskeleton, nucleus, mitosis and sex) partially overlapped and were synergistic with the symbiogenetic origin of mitochondria from an α-proteobacterium. These radical innovations occurred in a derivative of the neomuran common ancestor, which itself had evolved immediately prior to the divergence of eukaryotes and archaebacteria by drastic alterations to its eubacterial ancestor, an actinobacterial posibacterium able to make sterols, by replacing murein peptidoglycan by N-linked glycoproteins and a multitude of other shared neomuran novelties. The conversion of the rigid neomuran wall into a flexible surface coat and the associated origin of phagotrophy were instrumental in the evolution of the endomembrane system, cytoskeleton, nuclear organization and division and sexual life-cycles. Cilia evolved not by symbiogenesis but by autogenous specialization of the cytoskeleton.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology 1015 General Biology Lab Taxonomy Handout
    Biology 1015 General Biology Lab Taxonomy Handout Section 1: Introduction Taxonomy is the branch of science concerned with classification of organisms. This involves defining groups of biological organisms on the basis of shared characteristics and giving names to those groups. Something that you will learn quickly is there is a lot of uncertainty and debate when it comes to taxonomy. It is important to remember that the system of classification is binomial. This means that the species name is made up of two names: one is the genus name and the other the specific epithet. These names are preferably italicized, or underlined. The scientific name for the human species is Homo sapiens. Homo is the genus name and sapiens is the trivial name meaning wise. For green beans or pinto beans, the scientific name is Phaseolus vulgaris where Phaseolus is the genus for beans and vulgaris means common. Sugar maple is Acer saccharum (saccharum means sugar or sweet), and bread or brewer's yeast is Saccharomyces cerevisiae (the fungus myces that uses sugar saccharum for making beer cerevisio). In taxonomy, we frequently use dichotomous keys. A dichotomous key is a tool for identifying organisms based on a series of choices between alternative characters. Taxonomy has been called "the world's oldest profession", and has likely been taking place as long as mankind has been able to communicate (Adam and Eve?). Over the years, taxonomy has changed. For example, Carl Linnaeus the most renowned taxonomist ever, established three kingdoms, namely Regnum Animale, Regnum Vegetabile and Regnum Lapideum (the Animal, Vegetable and Mineral Kingdoms, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Phylogeny, Ancestral Groups and the Four Ages of Life
    Downloaded from rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org on July 31, 2010 Deep phylogeny, ancestral groups and the four ages of life Thomas Cavalier-Smith Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2010 365, 111-132 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0161 References This article cites 73 articles, 28 of which can be accessed free http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/365/1537/111.full.html#ref-list-1 Article cited in: http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/365/1537/111.full.html#related-urls This article is free to access Rapid response Respond to this article http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/letters/submit/royptb;365/1537/111 Subject collections Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections evolution (1878 articles) Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the top Email alerting service right-hand corner of the article or click here To subscribe to Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B go to: http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/subscriptions This journal is © 2010 The Royal Society Downloaded from rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org on July 31, 2010 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B (2010) 365, 111–132 doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0161 Review Deep phylogeny, ancestral groups and the four ages of life Thomas Cavalier-Smith* Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK Organismal phylogeny depends on cell division, stasis, mutational divergence, cell mergers (by sex or symbiogenesis), lateral gene transfer and death. The tree of life is a useful metaphor for organis- mal genealogical history provided we recognize that branches sometimes fuse. Hennigian cladistics emphasizes only lineage splitting, ignoring most other major phylogenetic processes.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Repair: Lessons from the Evolution of Ionizing-Radiation-Resistant Prokaryotes – Fact and Theory
    7 DNA Repair: Lessons from the Evolution of Ionizing-Radiation-Resistant Prokaryotes – Fact and Theory Haïtham Sghaier Research Unit UR04CNSTN01 "Medical and Agricultural Applications of Nuclear Techniques", National Center for Nuclear Sciences and Technology (CNSTN), Sidi Thabet Technopark, Sidi Thabet, Tunisia 1. Introduction At the outset, I believe that the concept of ionizing-radiation (IR) resistance needs to be clarified in a tangible manner for readers of this chapter. I propose the following general definition adopted in a previous paper (Sghaier et al., 2008): An ionizing-radiation-resistant prokaryotes (IRRP) is any vegetative prokaryote that can thrive after exposure to high, acute IR (generally, with a D10 value - the dose necessary to effect a 90% reduction in Colony Forming Units - greater than 1 kGy) using efficient physiological, genetic and proteic protection and repair mechanisms to fully amend its DNA DSBs. IR resistance has been observed in a broad range of prokaryotic groups (Kopylov et al., 1993), including hyperthermophilic Archaea (P. abyssi, P. furiosus, Thermococcus marinus, Thermococcus radiotolerans and Thermococcus gammatolerans) (DiRuggiero et al., 1997; Jolivet et al., 2003a; Jolivet et al., 2003b; Jolivet et al., 2004), halophilic Archaea (Halobacterium sp.) (Kottemann et al., 2005), the Deinococcus-Thermus group (many Deinococcus sp. and Truepera radiovictrix) (Albuquerque et al., 2005), Actinobacteria (Rubrobacter radiotolerans, Rubrobacter xylanophilus and Kineococcus radiotolerans) (Yoshinaka et al., 1973; Ferreira et al., 1999; Phillips et al., 2002; Chen et al., 2004), Proteobacteria (Methylobacterium radiotolerans and Acinetobacter radioresistens) (Ito and Iizuka, 1971; Nishimura et al., 1994), Cyanobacteria (Chroococcidiopsis sp.) (Billi et al., 2000), and Sphingobacteria (Hymenobacter actinosclerus) (Collins et al., 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • The Neomuran Revolution and Phagotrophic Origin of Eukaryotes and Cilia in the Light of Intracellular Coevolution and a Revised Tree of Life
    Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on October 4, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press The Neomuran Revolution and Phagotrophic Origin of Eukaryotes and Cilia in the Light of Intracellular Coevolution and a Revised Tree of Life Thomas Cavalier-Smith Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom Correspondence: [email protected] Three kinds of cells exist with increasingly complex membrane-protein targeting: Uni- bacteria (Archaebacteria, Posibacteria) with one cytoplasmic membrane (CM); Negibacte- ria with a two-membrane envelope (inner CM; outer membrane [OM]); eukaryotes with a plasma membrane and topologically distinct endomembranes and peroxisomes. I combine evidence from multigene trees, palaeontology, and cell biology to show that eukaryotes and archaebacteria are sisters, forming the clade neomura that evolved 1.2 Gy ago from a posibacterium, whose DNA segregation and cell division were destabilized by murein wall loss and rescued by the evolving novel neomuran endoskeleton, histones, cytokinesis, and glycoproteins. Phagotrophy then induced coevolving serial major changes making eu- karyote cells, culminating in two dissimilar cilia via a novel gliding–fishing–swimming scenario. I transfer Chloroflexi to Posibacteria, root the universal tree between them and Heliobacteria, and argue that Negibacteria are a clade whose OM, evolving in a green posibacterium, was never lost. THE FIVE KINDS OF CELLS mechanisms of the radical transitions between them. Figure 1 highlights three fundamentally he eukaryotic cell originated by the most different kinds of prokaryote differing great- Tcomplex set of evolutionary changes since ly in membrane topology and membrane and life began: eukaryogenesis. Their complexity wall chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Oxygen Sensing May Have Origins in Prokaryotic Elongation Factor Tu Prolyl-Hydroxylation
    Human oxygen sensing may have origins in prokaryotic elongation factor Tu prolyl-hydroxylation John S. Scottia, Ivanhoe K. H. Leunga,1,2, Wei Gea,b,1, Michael A. Bentleyc, Jordi Papsd, Holger B. Kramere, Joongoo Leea, WeiShen Aika, Hwanho Choia, Steinar M. Paulsenc,3, Lesley A. H. Bowmanf, Nikita D. Loika,4, Shoichiro Horitaa,e, Chia-hua Hoa,5, Nadia J. Kershawa,6, Christoph M. Tangf, Timothy D. W. Claridgea, Gail M. Prestonc, Michael A. McDonougha, and Christopher J. Schofielda,7 aChemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TA, United Kingdom; bChinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100005, China; cDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RB, United Kingdom; dDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom; eDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QX, United Kingdom; and fDepartment of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom Edited by Gregg L. Semenza, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, and approved August 5, 2014 (received for review May 30, 2014) The roles of 2-oxoglutarate (2OG)-dependent prolyl-hydroxylases Results in eukaryotes include collagen stabilization, hypoxia sensing, and Pseudomonas spp. Contain a Functional PHD. To investigate the role translational regulation. The hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) sensing of a putative PHD homolog in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PPHD), system is conserved in animals, but not in other organisms. How- we initially characterized a PPHD insertional mutant strain. ever, bioinformatics imply that 2OG-dependent prolyl-hydroxy- Metabolic screening studies revealed that the PPHD mutant strain lases (PHDs) homologous to those acting as sensing components displays impaired growth in the presence of iron chelators (e.g., for the HIF system in animals occur in prokaryotes.
    [Show full text]
  • Association Between Algal Productivity and Phycosphere Composition in an Outdoor Chlorella Sorokiniana Reactor Based on Multiple Longitudinal Analyses
    Association between algal productivity and phycosphere composition in an outdoor Chlorella sorokiniana reactor based on multiple longitudinal analyses Seth Steichen University of Arizona https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2267-7026 Song Gao Pacic Northwest National Laboratory Peter Waller University of Arizona Judith Brown ( [email protected] ) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4669-8443 Research Keywords: 16S rRNA gene, benzalkonium chloride, biocide, Health Index, Melainabacteria, microalgal cultivation, microbiome, Vampirovibrionales Posted Date: January 24th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.21781/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Version of Record: A version of this preprint was published at Microbial Biotechnology on May 25th, 2020. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13591. Page 1/25 Abstract Background Microalgae as a biofuel source are of great interest. The outdoor Regional Algal Feedstock Testbed (RAFT) was established to optimize algal biomass production in the U.S. sunbelt states. The phycosphere inhabitants, consisting in part of the bacterial community within algal cultures, are hypothesized to contribute to algal productivity. However, little is known about their identity or specic contributions. In this study the bacterial composition of the Chlorella sorokiniana phycosphere was determined over several production cycles in different growing seasons by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and identication using the SILVA database. Results The C. sorokiniana bacterial phycosphere was sampled during 41 RAFT testbed cycles in two consecutive growing seasons. Eight reactors were sampled twice daily to establish baseline community composition, determined by high-throughput sequencing of 16S ribosomal RNA amplicons.
    [Show full text]