Military Operations in Waziristan: Public Perceptions in Pakistan on Terra
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
MILITARY OPERATIONS IN WAZIRISTAN: PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS IN PAKISTAN ON TERRA Mirza Jan1, Sajjad Ahmed Paracha2, Muhammad Anwar3 & Muhammad Imran1 1Ddepartment of Mass Communication, Gomal University, D.I.Khan (KPK) Pakistan 2 Department of Media Studies, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur,Pakistan 3 TESCO, Wapda House Peshawar ABSTRACT This empirical study examines the military operation launched by the Government of Pakistan in Waziristan. It will discuss the wide range causes and effects of the military operation. This study discusses the phenomena of military operation in Waziristan and the Taliban targeting US-led forces. This survey reveals the Public opinion regarding drone attacks of NATO forces. This explanatory study reviews the mastermind behind the terra acts and financial support. This study also synthesis the categorical opinion of the tribal flees from their native villages. _________________________________ INTRODUCTION The study is exploratory in nature. This in Afghanistan. Since the fighting began, paper specifically explores the public the Pakistani forces have suffered heavy perception of the migrated and innocent casualties at the hands of the Taliban people from South Waziristan to other militia due to roadside bombs and parts of the country (Pakistan). World ambushes. think tank is of the opinion that The military Operation Rah e Nijat (path Waziristan is a paradise for Taliban. to deliverance) is the latest attempt of Pakistan was stressed that the Taliban Pakistan army to inflict final blows to should be eliminated from this part of the Tehrik- i- Taliban in the world. The ongoing fighting began in Pakistan. Waziristan's new landmarks 2004, when the Pakistan Army entered speak eloquently of the intensity of the the region inhabited by the Waziri tribe conflict that still rages between Taleban in search of al Qaeda and Taliban and al-Qaeda militants and the Pakistani fighters who were using the Waziristan security forces. On 19th of June Pak area as a base for launching deadly army started the gathering of forces attacks against the US-led Allied forces on the border of South Waziristan. After Jan et al., Gomal University Journal of Research 27(1): 93-109 (2011) 94 three months of blockade and minor and, having cleared and consolidated the skirmishes with the Taliban eventually three major approaches to the area, the the army launched a full scale ground final battle will then be fought for the assault on the 19th of October 2009. The capture of Sararogha, the Taliban strong- Pakistan army has a total of 28000 point. Once could also assume that the troops and 500 special commandos on operation will continue as the popular their side while the Taliban have 10 to will is in favor of the military action 15,000 troops and 1500 foreign fighters. (Masood, 2009). Taliban is not a new The fighting is intense and arduous and phenomenon. It is a rebound of Russian each day brings reports of the Pakistan invasion. They have been used as army inching forward another few steps bullfighters. The fighters are the deep into a very difficult and dangerous Pakistan and America. Former President terrain (Global Voices Online, 2009) Pervez Musharraf has played the role of Threat to the U.S. Homeland,” asserted a sponsor while Bush was presented as a forthrightly that al- Qaeda “has protected pious villain and playboy by the western or regenerated key elements of its media. Musharraf’s yes to war on terror homeland attack capability, including: a is still a question mark (Rajat, 2007). safe haven in the Pakistan Federally The conflict began in 2004 as a result Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), Pakistan's search for Al Qaeda members operational lieutenants, and its top in the mountainous Waziristan region as leadership” (Muhammad, 2004). part of the War on Terror. Militant tribes The Pakistan army is conducting who had ruled the area under a de facto Advance-to-Contact operations on three autonomy interpreted the searches as a axes: violation of their territorial claim and • East: Jandola-Kotkai-Sararogha responded with force. The US war on axis. terrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan • South-West: Wana-Shakai axis has created many problems for the • North: Razmak-Makeen- investment community in the region, but Sararogha axis. the US could nothing gain; the people of The three advancing columns should Afghanistan and Pakistan have now eventually link up around Sararogha, filled many difficulties in the American Jan et al., Gomal University Journal of Research 27(1): 93-109 (2011) 95 forces and their so-called operation Public Perceptions in Pakistan on Terra”. against terrorism (Khan, 2003)". Significance of the Study Waziristan is America’s new front line in the war against the Taliban. The last People of Waziristan deserve to have British officer to have served there, now war. They have totally rejected our 81, tells it cannot be tamed by force constitution, because they reject the aloneFew places on earth are as remote values which Pakistan was founded and hostile as Waziristan, part of the upon, and because they are trying to Pakistani tribal belt that the Pentagon stuff a different legal system down the now sees as the new front line in the war throats of unwilling citizens. The on terror(Lamb, 2008). ongoing operation in FATA especially in South Waziristan has, understandably, Statistically speaking, the Pakistani caused heated debate in Pakistan as it security forces have lost more personnel raises issues of political morality and – almost three times more, since the military strategy. This is not the first operation was launched in 2004 – than time that the armed forces have taken the US has since 2001, in its ongoing upon themselves the task of weeding out war on terror in Afghanistan”( `anti-state elements`. Pakistan’s Mir,2004). historical context suggests that the Most of the tribesmen allegedly giving meddling of the armed forces in politics refuge to al-Qaeda and Taliban suspects and policing of the country hasn’t served and now fighting with them against the the country well. But fortunately or Pakistani army belong to the Wazir tribe. unfortunately the operation against the The tribesmen are traditional fighters militants is the dire need of the time. and learn the use of a gun at an early age in keeping with local traditions Objectives of the Study (Yusufzai, 2004). The main objectives of this opinion survey are as under: Statement of the Problem 1 To explore the origin of militants The problem of the study in hand is to activities and to whom Taliban explore the “Military Operations in fights Waziristan: 2 To know who are the Taliban Jan et al., Gomal University Journal of Research 27(1): 93-109 (2011) 96 3 To understand the Public Attribution Theory (Heider, 1958) perception regarding drone Attribution Theory is a humanistic attacks of NATO forces theory. Attribution Theory attempts to 4 To see that who is mastermind explain causes of behavior. It attempts behind Taliban to explain the causes of people's Research Questions behavior and attributing or explaining 1. Does Taliban fighting for reasons as to why people behave the way financial benefits? they do. 2. Why Taliban targeting Pakistani entities? Theory of Terrorism Theoretical Underpinning of Opinion More than one criminologist has pointed The theoretical framework presented out that the disciplines of theology, here guides and structures this study. It religion, and philosophy have had has set the foundation of the theory of important things to say about terrorism the “Military Operations in Waziristan: (Stitt 2003; Kraemer 2004). It is also a Public Perceptions in Pakistan on Terra”. fact that about a quarter of all terrorist The framework of this study has its roots groups and about half of the most in three communication theories: public dangerous ones on earth are primarily opinion, Attribution Theory, and Theory motivated by religious concerns of Terrorism. (Hoffman 1993). They believe that God not only approves of their action, but Public Opinion Theory that God demands their action. Their Public opinion is the aggregate of cause is sacred, and consists of a individual attitudes or beliefs held by the combined sense of hope for the future adult population. Yet conflict situations and vengeance for the past. Of these present their own challenges, and the two components, the backward-looking traditional tools of public opinion desire for vengeance may be the more research cannot simply be imported important trigger for terrorism because (Irwin C 2001). the forward-looking component (called apocalyptic thinking or eschatology) produces wild-eyed fanatics who are Jan et al., Gomal University Journal of Research 27(1): 93-109 (2011) 97 more a danger to themselves and their sensation and perception are virtually own people. impossible to separate, because they are part of one continuous process. Main Concepts Assumptions 1. Military Operation 2. Public perception on terra • Our common-sense Perception is the process by which understanding of militancy. • Our common-sense organisms interpret and organize understanding of belief may be useful predictions sensation to produce a meaningful experience of the world. Sensation Theoretical frameworks are also usually refers to the immediate, important in exploratory studies, where relatively unprocessed result of you really don’t know much about what stimulation of sensory receptors in the is going on, and are trying to learn more. eyes, ears, nose, tongue, or skin. A conceptual framework is a concise