DOCSLIB.ORG

6. the Barents Sea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

6. The Barents Sea Eva K. Halland (Project Leader), Andreas Bjørnestad, Ine Tørneng Gjeldvik, Maren Bjørheim, Christian Magnus, Ida Margrete Meling, Jasminka Mujezinović, Fridtjof Riis, Rita Sande Rød, Van T. H. Pham, Inge Tappel 107 6.1 Geology of the Barents Sea 2z°EwEME 5E°EwEME 5z°EwEME 1E°EwEME 20°0'0"E 25°0'0"E ! ! ! Stappen-High ! Hoop-Fault-Complex ! Fingerdjupet-Sub°basin Mercurius-High ! ! 73°0'0"N ! Bjarmeland-Platform ! Svalis-Dome ! ! ! Bjørnøya-Basin Maud-Basin I1°EwEMN ! ! ! ! ! ! Norvarg-Dome ! ! ! ! Nordkapp-Basin ! ! ! ! Swaen-Graben ! ! ! ! Bjørnøyrenna-Fault-Complex ! ! Loppa-High 72°0'0"N ! ! ! Sørvestsnaget-Basin Norsel-High ! ! !! Samson-Dome ! !! ! Veslemøy-HighPolhem-Sub°platform ! Nysleppen-Fault-Complex ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! I5°EwEMN ! ! ! ! ! A' ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! Nysleppen-Fault-Complex ! ! !! ! ! ! ! Måsøy-Fault-Complex 71°0'0"N ! Hammerfest-Basin ! ! Senja-RidgeTromsø-Basin Finnmark-Platform ! Ringvassøy°Loppa-Fault-Complex Cretaceous-High A Deep-Cretaceous-Basin Marginal-Volcanic-High Hammerfest I2°EwEMN # Palaeozoic-High-in-Platform Troms°Finnmark-Fault-Complex Platform Pre°Jurassic-Basin-in-Platform 70°0'0"N Harstad-Basin Shallow-Cretaceous-Basin-in-Platform Terraces-and-Intra°Basinal-Elevations Hammerfest # Volcanics Hammerfest Basin well panel Structural elements of the Southern Barents Sea. Transect from the Harstad Basin to the Måsøy Fault Complex (AA`). A AI HEKKINGEN FM REALGRUNNEN SUBGP FRUHOLMEN FM SNADD FM Well section panels (AA`) showing gamma and neutron/density logs reflecting thickness variations of the different formations. CO2STORAGEATLAS NORWEGIAN CONTINENTAL SHELF 108 6.1 Geology of the Barents Sea BARENTS SEA N Sentralbanken High Kong Karl Barents Sea Hammerfest Basin Nordkapp Basin Gardarbanken High Platform Margin Loppa High Finnmark Platform Bjarmeland Platform Olga Basin CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHY GROUP SUBGROUP FORMATION QUATERNARY PLIOCENE NORDLAND MIOCENE NEOGENE OLIGOCENE EOCENE SOTBAKKEN Torsk ALEOGENE P PALEOCENE MAA . LATE CEN NYGRUNNEN Kveite Kolmule Kviting T E APT - ALB Kolje EARLY CR BRM ADVENT- Knurr RYA DALEN Hekkingen - LATE OXF VOL S Fuglen A MIDDLE CLV R AAL SIC Stø TOA JU EARLY HET Nordmela RHÆTIAN REALGRUNNEN Tubåen KAPP Fruholmen LATE NORIAN TOSCANA CARNIAN STORFJORDEN LADINIAN Snadd MIDDLE Kobbe ANISIAN TRIASSIC Steinkobbe SASSEN- SPATHIAN INGØYDJUPET Klappmyss Shallow shelf EARLY SMITHIAN DALEN DIENERIAN GRIESBACHIAN Havert TATARIAN Fluvial/tidal delta LATE UFIMIAN - KAZANIAN TEMPEL- KUNGURIAN FJORDEN Delta plain ARTINSKIAN EARLY SAKMARIAN Deep shelf PERMIAN ASSELIAN GIPSDALEN GZE PENNSYLVANIAN BSH ALENTER * SPK V VI ARBON MISSISSIPPIAN K C TOU BILLEFJORDEN FAMMENIAN E VONIAN E D Carbonates Shale and siltstone Sandstone Evaporites Spiculite Carbonate build-ups ** Lithost Lithostratigraphicratigraphic nomencl nomenclatureature for The Baren tsfor Sea The Pale oBarentszoic is in p Searepar aPaleozoiction (NPD). Lithostratigraphic nomenclature The lithostratigraphic nomenclature for the post-Caledonian successions of the southern Barents Sea has been a matter of discussion since the southern Barents Sea was opened for hydrocarbon exploration and the first well was drilled in 1980. N In NPD Bulletin No 4 (Dalland et.al. 1988) a lithostratigraphic scheme was defined for the Mesozoic and Cenozoic successions offshore mid- and northern Norway. Dallmann et.al (1999) suggested a revised lithostratigraphic scheme for the Upper Paleozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic successions from the Svalbard area including the southern Barents Sea. Conceptual sketch of an early stage in the development of the Stø formation NPD Bulletin No 9 (Larssen et.al 2002) presented a formalized Upper Paleozoic in the southern parts of the Barents Sea. lithostratigraphy for the southern Norwegian Barents Sea. The official stratigraphic nomenclature for the Barents Sea is as follows: The CO2 Storage Atlas for the Norwegian Continental Shelf has followed the definitions from Dallmann et.al (1999) and suggested a revised lithostratigraph- ic scheme for the Mesozoic. For the Upper Paleozoic successions, the official nomenclature from NPD Bulletin No 9 (Larssen et.al 2002) has been used. For the Cenozoic, we follow NPD Bulletin No 4. 109 6.1 Geology of the Barents Sea The Barents Sea is located in an intracratonic setting The area evaluated for CO2 storage is defined to Finnmark Fault Complex); to the north against between the Norwegian mainland and Svalbard. It the west by the N-S to NNE-SSW trending Ringvassøy- the Loppa High (Asterias Fault Complex) and the has been affected by several tectonic episodes after Loppa and Bjørnøyrenna Fault Complexes, to the Bjarmeland Platform. Internally E-W to WNW-ESE the Caledonian orogeny ended in Late Silurian/Early south/southeast by the Troms-Finnmark Fault Complex trending faults dominates. Devonian. and the Finnmark Platform, to the north by an east- The basin was probably established by Early to Late There is a marked difference, both in time, trend west line approximately along the 73o N parallel, and Carboniferous rifting. Two wells have penetrated the and magnitude, between the tectonic and stratigraphic to the east by a north-south line running approximately Upper Paleozoic succession. Well 7120/12-2, drilled on development in the western and eastern parts of the along the 28oE meridian. the southern margin, penetrated a 1000m thick Upper southern Barents Sea. This boundary is defined by The southern Barents Sea shelf is divided into sev- Permian sequence overlying Lower Permian dolomites the dominantly N-S to NNE-SSW trending Ringvassøy- eral main structural elements. The most important and Red beds resting on Precambrian/Caledonian Loppa and Bjørnøyrenna Fault Complexes. The area to ones are: The Hammerfest and Nordkapp Basins, the basement. Well 7120/9-2 in the central part of the the west of this boundary was tectonically very active Finnmark and Bjarmeland Platforms and the Loppa basin reached TD 117m into the Upper Permian Røye throughout Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic times, with High. There are also several smaller structural elements, Formation. deposition of enormous thicknesses of Cretaceous, like the Polheim Sub-platform, Senja Ridge, Veslemøy, Major subsidence occurred in the Triassic, Jurassic Paleogene and Neogene sediments in the Harstad, Norsel High. Bordering and partly defining the main and Early Cretaceous, overlain by a thin, highly Tromsø and Bjørnøya Basins. NNE-SSW, NE-SW and structural elements are a series of complex fault zones: condensed sequence of Late Cretaceous and Early locally N-S trending faults dominate in this western Troms-Finnmark, Ringvassøy-Loppa, Bjørnøyrenna, Paleocene shale. There is no evidence for diapirism part. In contrast, the southeastern Barents Sea is domi- Måsøy, Nysleppen and Asterias Fault Complexes. of Upper Paleozoic evaporites as seen in the Tromsø nated by thick Upper Paleozoic and Mesozoic sequenc- The Hammerfest Basin is fault-controlled: To the Basin to the west and the Nordkapp Basin to the east. es, where E-W, WNW-ESE to ENE-SSW fault trends domi- west against the Ringvassøy-Loppa Fault Complex; Internally the basin is characterized by a central E-W nate. to the south against the Finnmark Platform (Troms– trending faulted dome-structure, related to the Late I A A Ringvassøy 7 Polheim Sørvestsnaget Basin Veslemøy High Loppa High Bjarmeland Platform Nordkapp Basin Finnmark Platform Loppa Fault Sub7 Norsel High Nysleppen Complex platform Fault Complex Måsøy Fault Complex TA° TQ° TU° Tc° Tw° W4° WT° WW° W(° W)° WA° WQ° WU° Wc° Ww° (4° (T° (W° T W ( ) Quaternary Triassic Neogene Upper Permian A Paleogene Lower Permian Upper Cretaceous Carboniferous Lower Cretaceous Basement Upper Jurassic Salt Q Jurassic TWT °s1 UWT4 7 UUA UW4U(4 7 c) UWT4 7 UQ UWT4 7 Uw UWT4 7 UQ CO2STORAGEATLAS NORWEGIAN CONTINENTAL4 T4 W4 (4 )4 A4SHELF km 110 6.1 Geology of the Barents Sea 16°2R2AE 02°2R2AE 06°2R2AE 32°2R2AE Jurassic tectonic episode. western part of the platform was transgressed. Edgeøya Platform Kong Karl Platform Kong Karl Platform Sørkapp Basin Gardarbanken High The Nordkapp Basin is fault-controlled and Late Permian and Late Jurassic movements fol- Sentralbanken High "6°2R2AN located along a SW-NE trending Upper Paleozoic lowed by Cenozoic tectonism, and uplift result- Gardarbanken High rift. It is bounded by the Bjarmeland Platform ed in a gentle northward tilt of the Finnmark Hopenbanken Arch to the northwest and the Finnmark Platform to Platform. In the northeastern part of the Stappen High "5°2R2AN the southeast. The northwestern boundary is Platform, thick sequences of Mesozoic, mainly Bjarmeland Platform Vestbakken volcanic province Hoop Fault Complex Fingerdjupet SubEbasin defined by the Nysleppen Fault Complex, and Triassic rocks have been drilled. Mercurius High the southeastern boundary is defined by the The Bjarmeland Platform is part of an exten- Svalis Dome Bjørnøya Basin Maud Basin "3°2R2AN Måsøy Fault Complex. sive platform area east of the Loppa High and Norvarg Dome Nordkapp Basin Swaen Graben During the Late Paleozoic (Late north of the Nordkapp Basin. The platform AR Loppa High Norsel High A Carboniferous to Early Permian), thick sequences was established in the Late Carboniferous and Sørvestsnaget Basin Composite Profile "012 Composite Pofile "0°2R2AN Veslemøy High BR Nysleppen Fault Complex of halite were deposited (Gipsdalen Gp) giving Permian, but subsequent Paleogenetectonism Nysleppen Fault Complex Hammerfest Basin rise to pronounced salt diapirism, beginning
Recommended publications
  • A Post-Caledonian Dolerite Dyke from Magerøy, North Norway: Age and Geochemistry

    A Post-Caledonian Dolerite Dyke from Magerøy, North Norway: Age and Geochemistry

    A post-Caledonian dolerite dyke from Magerøy, North Norway: age and geochemistry DAVID ROBERTS, JOHN G. MITCHELL & TORGEIR B. ANDERSEN Roberts. D., Mitchell, J. G. & Andersen, T. B.: A post-Caledonian dolerite dyke from Magerøy, North Norway: age and geochemistry. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, Vol. 71, pp. 28�294. Oslo 1991 . ISSN 0029-196X. A post-Caledonian, NW-SE trending, dolerite dyke on Magerøy has a geochemicalsignature comparable to that of continental tholeiites. Clinopyroxenes from three samples of the dolerite gave K-Ar ages of ca. 312, ca. 302 and ca. 266 Ma, suggesting a Perrno-Carboniferous age. In view of low K20 contents of the pyroxenes and the possible presence of excess argon, it is argued that the most reliable estimate of the emplacement age of the dyke is provided by the unweighted mean value, namely 293 ± 22 Ma. This Late Carboniferous age coincides with the later stages of a major phase of rifting and crustal extension in adjacent offshore areas. The dyke is emplaced along a NW-SE trending fault. Parallel or subparallel faults on Magerøy and in other parts of northem Finnmark may thus carry a component of Carboniferous crustal extension in their polyphase movement histories. David Roberts, Geological Survey of Norway, Post Box 3006-Lade, N-7(}()2 Trondheim, Norway; John G. Mitchell, Department of Physics, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, England; Torgeir B. Andersen, Institutt for geologi, Post Box 1047, University of Oslo, N-41316 Oslo 3, Norway. In the Caledonides of northernmost Norway, maficdy kes tolites indicate an Early Silurian (Llandovery) age (Hen­ are common in many parts of the metamorphic allochthon ningsmoen 1961; Føyn 1967; Bassett 1985) for part of the and are invariably deformed and metamorphosed, locally succession.
  • Petroleum, Coal and Research Drilling Onshore Svalbard: a Historical Perspective

    Petroleum, Coal and Research Drilling Onshore Svalbard: a Historical Perspective

    NORWEGIAN JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY Vol 99 Nr. 3 https://dx.doi.org/10.17850/njg99-3-1 Petroleum, coal and research drilling onshore Svalbard: a historical perspective Kim Senger1,2, Peter Brugmans3, Sten-Andreas Grundvåg2,4, Malte Jochmann1,5, Arvid Nøttvedt6, Snorre Olaussen1, Asbjørn Skotte7 & Aleksandra Smyrak-Sikora1,8 1Department of Arctic Geology, University Centre in Svalbard, P.O. Box 156, 9171 Longyearbyen, Norway. 2Research Centre for Arctic Petroleum Exploration (ARCEx), University of Tromsø – the Arctic University of Norway, P.O. Box 6050 Langnes, 9037 Tromsø, Norway. 3The Norwegian Directorate of Mining with the Commissioner of Mines at Svalbard, P.O. Box 520, 9171 Longyearbyen, Norway. 4Department of Geosciences, University of Tromsø – the Arctic University of Norway, P.O. Box 6050 Langnes, 9037 Tromsø, Norway. 5Store Norske Spitsbergen Kulkompani AS, P.O. Box 613, 9171 Longyearbyen, Norway. 6NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Fantoftvegen 38, 5072 Bergen, Norway. 7Skotte & Co. AS, Hatlevegen 1, 6240 Ørskog, Norway. 8Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7803, 5020 Bergen, Norway. E-mail corresponding author (Kim Senger): [email protected] The beginning of the Norwegian oil industry is often attributed to the first exploration drilling in the North Sea in 1966, the first discovery in 1967 and the discovery of the supergiant Ekofisk field in 1969. However, petroleum exploration already started onshore Svalbard in 1960 with three mapping groups from Caltex and exploration efforts by the Dutch company Bataaffse (Shell) and the Norwegian private company Norsk Polar Navigasjon AS (NPN). NPN was the first company to spud a well at Kvadehuken near Ny-Ålesund in 1961.
  • 50582-NGT Innmat Nr.4-03

    50582-NGT Innmat Nr.4-03

    NORWEGIAN JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY Carboniferous palynology of the Loppa High, Barents Sea 333 Carboniferous palynology of the Loppa High, Barents Sea, Norway Sofie Lindström Lindström, S.: Carboniferous palynology of the Loppa High, Barents Sea, Norway. Norwegian Journal of Geology,Vol. 83, pp. 333-349. Lund 2003. ISSN 029-196X. Nine palynological intervals, A-I in ascending order, are recognised in the Carboniferous succession of the well 7120/2-1 on the Loppa High in the western Barents Sea. Within the Billefjorden Group intervals A-E are correlated with the early Viséan to Serpukhovian Pu to TK Miospore Zones of western Europe. The known sedimentation break between the Billefjorden and Gipsdalen groups occurred in the Serpukhovian, as interval G of the lower part of the Gipsdalen Group is equivalent to the late Serpukhovian SO Miospore Zone. Lycospora pusilla and Densosporites spp. dominate these assemblages, indicating humid conditions. The topmost interval I correlates with early Moscovian palynofloras of the Arctic. It is at the oldest equivalent with the NJ Miospore Zone. Assemblages within this interval are dominated by the monosaccate pollen Florinites and Potonieisporites, with abundant taeniate and non-taeniate bisaccate pollen, indicating deposition under a dry climatic regime. S. Lindström, Department of Geology, University of Lund, Sölvegatan 12, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden (E-mail: [email protected]). Introduction ding basins and more stable platforms (Stemmerik & Worsley 2000). The Atlantic rift system between Green- The Carboniferous palynostratigraphy of Western land and Norway was first initiated during the latest Europe presented by Clayton et al. (1977) is well esta- Devonian and earliest Carboniferous (Stemmerik et al.
  • Fylkesmannen I Troms Og Finnmark

    Fylkesmannen I Troms Og Finnmark

    Vår dato: Vår ref: 20.06.2019 2019/5959 Deres dato: Deres ref: 12.04.19 2017/484-143/411 Forsvarsbygg Saksbehandler, innvalgstelefon Postboks 405 Sentrum Oddvar Brenna, 77642174 0103 OSLO Statlig reguleringsplan med konsekvensutredninger for Evenes flystasjon og Harstad/Narvik lufthavn – uttalelse fra Fylkesmannen i Troms og Finnmark. Fylkesmannen i Troms og Finnmark viser til nevnte plan med forlenget høringsfrist til den 20.06.19. Stortinget har bestemt at Evenes flystasjon skal ha funksjon som beredskapsbase for noen av Norges nye F-35 jagerfly. Stortinget har også bestemt at de fem nye marine overvåkingsflyene skal stasjoneres på Evenes. Forsvarsbygg er tiltakshaver og har utarbeidet en statlig reguleringsplan. Status som statlig reguleringsplan, innebærer at ingen statsetater kan reise innsigelse, men gi råd og innspill. Samordningsrutinen for regionale statsetater vil derfor ikke gjelde for denne planen. Planen er drøftet i Planforum i både Troms og Nordland, og ved to anledninger også i et felles Planforum mellom fylkene Troms og Nordland; den 14.09.17 og 20.11.18. Planforslaget er presentert på en informativ måte for berørte offentlige instanser og plandokumentene gir et godt grunnlag for å vurdere utbyggingsplanene. Fylkesmannen i Troms og Finnmark vil gi følgende innspill til det videre arbeidet med planen: Miljøhensyn: Naturmangfold, avrenning og eutrofiering Det vesentligste av planområdet ligger i Evenes kommune i Nordland fylke. Fylkesmannen i Nordland har vurdert og utredet hensyn til miljøinteresser og avgitt uttalelse i brev datert den 11.06.19. Uttalelsen om naturmangfold, avrenning og eutrofiering er representativt også for arealene og forholdene i Skånland kommune i Troms fylke. Fylkesmannen i Troms og Finnmark viser til uttalelsen fra Fylkesmannen i Nordland for fagområdene naturmangfold, avrenning og eutrofiering, og kan slutte seg til vurderingene for de nevnte fagområdene.
  • Liquefied Natural Gas Production at Hammerfest: a Transforming Marine Community

    Liquefied Natural Gas Production at Hammerfest: a Transforming Marine Community

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Wageningen University & Research Publications Liquefied natural gas production at Hammerfest: A transforming marine community van Bets, L. K. J., van Tatenhove, J. P. M., & Mol, A. P. J. This article is made publically available in the institutional repository of Wageningen University and Research, under article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, also known as the Amendment Taverne. Article 25fa states that the author of a short scientific work funded either wholly or partially by Dutch public funds is entitled to make that work publicly available for no consideration following a reasonable period of time after the work was first published, provided that clear reference is made to the source of the first publication of the work. For questions regarding the public availability of this article, please contact [email protected]. Please cite this publication as follows: van Bets, L. K. J., van Tatenhove, J. P. M., & Mol, A. P. J. (2016). Liquefied natural gas production at Hammerfest: A transforming marine community. Marine Policy, 69, 52-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.03.020 You can download the published version at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.03.020 Marine Policy 69 (2016) 52–61 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol Liquefied natural gas production at Hammerfest: A transforming marine community Linde K.J. van Bets n, Jan P.M. van Tatenhove, Arthur P.J. Mol Environmental Policy Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 8130, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands article info abstract Article history: Global energy demand and scarce petroleum resources require communities to adapt to a rapidly Received 10 February 2016 changing Arctic environment, but as well to a transforming socio-economic environment instigated by Received in revised form oil and gas development.
  • Te Tauihu O Ngā Wānanga

    Te Tauihu O Ngā Wānanga

    Tracing of old settlements and place names in a Sea Sámi region1 Marit B. Henriksen Sámi University College, Norway [email protected] Introduction The basis for this article is my work with an old land surveying document from Finnmark, in the north of Norway. The document is named Finnmarken Sorenskriveri Landmaalerprotokol, which in English would be The Landsurveying protocol of the County of Finnmark. The main objective for this presentation is to introduce some preliminary results of my work with the protocol and I will present parts of the process, as well as maps, figures and photos showing how the process turns out. About the region Finnmark is the northernmost county of Norway. Finnmark was the last area that became part of the Norwegian territory. The border between the Norwegian and Swedish area was drawn in 1751 and the border between the Norwegian and Russian area was drawn in 1826. Before the closing of the borders, several nation states were interested in this area, that is for taxation purposes. Because of this, the (mainly Sámi) population of the area had to pay taxes to at least three different nation states in periods (Denmark/Norway, Sweden and Russia). Norway was a dependency (satellite state) of Denmark from 1537 to 1814. From 1814, Norway was in union with Sweden, until Norway was declared an independent nation state in 1905. About the Sámi people and the Sámi languages The Sámi area covers parts of four different nation states, Norway, Sweden, Finland and Russia. There are ten different Sámi languages: South Sámi, Ume Sámi, Pite Sámi, Lule Sámi, North Sámi, Inari Sámi, Skolt Sámi, Akkala Sámi, Kildin Sámi and Ter Sámi.
  • Høringsinstanser I H.T

    Høringsinstanser I H.T

    Saksbehandler: Hilde Wahl Moen Direkte tlf.: 73567134 Dato: 20.04.2021 Saksnr.: 21/663 - 4 Arkivkode: - Deres ref.: Til høringsinstanser i h.t. liste Balsfjord kommune Høring - rettssted for Hålogaland lagmannsrett i Finnmark lagsogn 1 Innledning og problemstilling Behovet for fast rettssted i Finnmark for Hålogaland lagmannsrett har blitt aktualisert som følge av avgjørelsen i Høyesterett (HR 2020-1913-U). Her behandlet Høyesterett en anke over lagmannsrettens beslutning om å holde ankeforhandlingen i en straffesak i et annet lagsogn enn der hovedforhandlingen i tingretten ble avholdt. Høyesteretts ankeutvalg uttaler at det er uheldig at Hålogaland lagmannsrett ikke har fast rettssted i Finnmark og at det er problematisk at meddommere fra Finnmark langt på vei utelukkes fra å gjøre tjeneste fordi lagmannsretten ikke har fast rettssted eller egnede lokaler der. Dette høringsnotatet tar utgangspunkt i den nye domstolstrukturen slik at det fra 26.4.2021 vil være to tingretter i Finnmark med til sammen fire lokasjoner. Jordskifteretten i Finnmark er ikke omfattet av de pågående strukturendringene. Høringsnotatet tar utgangspunkt i lagmannsrettens behov for et fast rettssted i Vest-Finnmark. Domstoladministrasjonen ber samtidig om synspunkter på om det også bør etableres et rettssted i Øst-Finnmark lokalisert til Tana. Eventuelle høringsuttalelser merkes med saksnummer 21/663 og sendes til [email protected] innen 20.mai 2021. 2 Bakgrunn – dagens situasjon 2.1 Rettssteder og øvrige lokaliteter for Hålogaland lagmannsrett Hålogaland lagdømme omfatter fylkene Nordland, Troms og Finnmark samt Svalbard og Jan Mayen. Hålogaland lagmannsrett er ankeinstans for de seks tingrettene i lagdømmet, samt for seks jordskifteretter. I tillegg er lagmannsretten første instans for rettslig overprøving av avgjørelser fra Trygderetten.
  • Svar På Høring Av Forslag Til Lopphavet Marine Verneområde I Hasvik, Loppa, Hammerfest Og Alta Kommuner

    Svar På Høring Av Forslag Til Lopphavet Marine Verneområde I Hasvik, Loppa, Hammerfest Og Alta Kommuner

    Direktoratet for mineralforvaltning med Bergmesteren for Svalbard Fylkesmannen i Finnmark Dato:21.06.2017 Statens hus 17/00701 -2 9815 VADSØ Deres ref: Svar på høring av forslag til Lopphavet marine verneområde i Hasvik, Loppa, Hammerfest og Alta kommuner Leiv Erikssons vei 39 Direktoratet for mineralforvaltning med Bergmesteren for Svalbard (DMF) viser til Postboks 3021 Lade ovennevnte sak, datert 6. april 2017. N-7441 Trondheim TELE ON + 47 73 90 46 00 Om saken E-2:1.151: [email protected] Fylkesmannen i Finnmark har, på oppdrag fra Miljødirektoratet, utarbeidet et forslag www.dirmin.no til verneplan for deler av sjøområdene i og utenfor Alta, Loppa, Hasvik og Hammerfest 0 7694.05.05883 kommuner, kalt Lopphavet marine verneområde. Forslaget om Lopphavet marine DNBANOKK verneområde er et ledd i arbeidet med 2rne et representativt utvalg av norsk natur N05376940505883 NO 974 760 282 for kommende generasjoner. SVALBARDKONTOR Formålet med vernet er å ta vare på et område som representerer bestemte typer TELEFO +47 79 02 12 92 natur, inneholder truet, sjelden og sårbar natur og som er representativt for denne delen av kysten. Det er en målsetting å beholde verneverdiene uten større grad av ytre påvirkning. Området skal kunne tjene som referanseområde for forskning og overvåking. Det er spesielt viktig å beskytte sjøbunnen mot store inngrep, som for eksempel utfylling, mudring, uttak av masser, deponering av masser, sprengning, boring og plassering av konstruksjoner på sjøbunnen. For slike aktiviteter vil det være restriksjoner, slik at naturverdiene får en økt beskyttelse. Uttalelse fra DMF Det drives med uttak av nefelinsyenitt på Stjernøy. Dette er uttak som har vært drevet 610#3569:6dd0b3f2-0706-4384-bfb5-0672bfc76675:3 siden 1961.
  • Hele Troms Og Finnmark Hele Harstad

    Hele Troms Og Finnmark Hele Harstad

    Fylkestingskandidater Kommunestyrekandidater 1 2 3 1 2 3 Ivar B. Prestbakmo Anne Toril E. Balto Irene Lange Nordahl Espen A. Ludviksen Anne M. Eneberg Birger J. Theodorsen Salangen Karasjok Sørreisa 4 5 6 4 5 6 Fred Johnsen Rikke Håkstad Kurt Wikan Alf Marius Fagerheim Merethe Lyngen Arild Kulseng-Hansen Tana Bardu Sør-Varanger Hele Hele 7. Marlene Bråthen, 10. Hugo Salamonsen, 13. Kurt Michalsen, 7. Ken Erik Aasheim 14. Stig Solheim 21. Ellen Anette Slettmo Tromsø Nordkapp Skjervøy 8. Simen Lindgaard 15. Adolf Ursin 22. Anders Røgeberg 8. Jan Martin Rishaug, 11. Linn-Charlotte 14. Grethe Liv Olaussen, Troms og Finnmark Harstad 9. Eddmar Osvoll 16. Monica Lyngen 23. Steinar J. Jakobsen Alta Nordahl, Sørreisa Porsanger 10. Espen Flosand 17. Per K. Killengreen 24. Maurid Kristiansen 9. Karin Eriksen, 12. Klemet Klemetsen, 15. Gunnleif Alfredsen, 11. Gudbrand Chruickshank 18. Arne W. Theodorsen 25. Karstein Osvoll Kvæfjord Kautokeino Senja senterpartiet.no/troms senterpartiet.no/harstad 12. Sigrid Furu Bergersen 19. Morten Bakken 26. Øyvind Pedersen 13. Kristian Kulseng 20. Roald Rasmussen 27. Brit Stabursvik VÅR POLITIKK VÅR POLITIKK Fullstendig program finner du på Fullstendig program finner du på For hele Harstad senterpartiet.no/harstad for hele Troms og Finnmark senterpartiet.no/troms • Vil legge tilrette for økoturisme. Harstad Senterparti ønsker å styrke det lokale selvstyret, slik Helse & omsorg Mulighetenes landsdel Helse og beredskap • Øke antallet lærlingeplasser. nord, for å styrke vår identitet og • Sikre rekruttering og stabil lege- • Gratis parkering I sentrum på at flere får delta i utviklingen av vår kommune og det loka- Senterpartiet vil: Senterpartiet vil: • Utvide borteboerstipendet, øke stolthet.
  • Status, Utfordrings- Og Intensjonsbilde

    Status, Utfordrings- Og Intensjonsbilde

    Status, utfordrings- og intensjonsbilde Mulighetsutredning kommunestruktur Evenes, Harstad, Ibestad, Kvæfjord, Lødingen, Skånland og Tjeldsund Innhold Sammendrag ........................................................................................................................................... 7 1 Regjeringens mål for kommunereformen ....................................................................................... 9 2 Regjeringens kriterier for god kommunestruktur ......................................................................... 10 ................................................. 10 4 Kartlegging og analyse demografiske og sosioøkonomiske forhold ............................................. 11 4.1 Befolkningsutvikling .............................................................................................................. 11 4.2 Befolkningssammensetning .................................................................................................. 13 4.3 Privat og offentlig sysselsetting ............................................................................................. 15 4.4 Næringssammensetting ........................................................................................................ 16 4.5 Flyttemønster i kommunene ................................................................................................. 20 4.6 Avstand, kommunikasjon og senterfunksjoner ..................................................................... 22 4.7 Lokalisering og arealbruk .....................................................................................................
  • Troms Og Finnmark

    Troms Og Finnmark

    Kommunestyre- og fylkestingsvalget 2019 Valglister med kandidater Fylkestingsvalget 2019 i Troms og Finnmark Valglistens navn: Partiet De Kristne Status: Godkjent av valgstyret Kandidatnr. Navn Fødselsår Bosted Stilling 1 Svein Svendsen 1993 Alta 2 Karl Tobias Hansen 1992 Tromsø 3 Torleif Selseng 1956 Balsfjord 4 Dag Erik Larssen 1953 Skånland 5 Papy Zefaniya 1986 Sør-Varanger 6 Aud Oddrun Grønning 1940 Tromsø 7 Annbjørg Watnedal 1939 Tromsø 8 Arlene Marie Hansen 1949 Balsfjord 04.06.2019 12:53:00 Lister og kandidater Side 1 Kommunestyre- og fylkestingsvalget 2019 Valglister med kandidater Fylkestingsvalget 2019 i Troms og Finnmark Valglistens navn: Høyre Status: Godkjent av valgstyret Kandidatnr. Navn Fødselsår Bosted Stilling 1 Christine Bertheussen Killie 1979 Tjeldsund 2 Jo Inge Hesjevik 1969 Porsanger 3 Benjamin Nordberg Furuly 1996 Bardu 4 Tove Alstadsæter 1967 Sør-Varanger 5 Line Fusdahl 1957 Tromsø 6 Geir-Inge Sivertsen 1965 Senja 7 Kristen Albert Ellingsen 1961 Alta 8 Cecilie Mathisen 1994 Tromsø 9 Lise Svenning 1963 Vadsø 10 Håkon Rønning Vahl 1972 Harstad 11 Steinar Halvorsen 1970 Loppa 12 Tor Arne Johansen Morskogen 1979 Tromsø 13 Gro Marie Johannessen Nilssen 1963 Hasvik 14 Vetle Langedahl 1996 Tromsø 15 Erling Espeland 1976 Alta 16 Kjersti Karijord Smørvik 1966 Harstad 17 Sharon Fjellvang 1999 Nordkapp 18 Nils Ante Oskal Eira 1975 Lavangen 19 Johnny Aikio 1967 Vadsø 20 Remi Iversen 1985 Tromsø 21 Lisbeth Eriksen 1959 Balsfjord 22 Jan Ivvar Juuso Smuk 1987 Nesseby 23 Terje Olsen 1951 Nordreisa 24 Geir-Johnny Varvik 1958 Storfjord 25 Ellen Kristina Saba 1975 Tana 26 Tonje Nilsen 1998 Storfjord 27 Sebastian Hansen Henriksen 1997 Tromsø 28 Ståle Sæther 1973 Loppa 29 Beate Seljenes 1978 Senja 30 Joakim Breivik 1992 Tromsø 31 Jonas Sørum Nymo 1989 Porsanger 32 Ole Even Andreassen 1997 Harstad 04.06.2019 12:53:00 Lister og kandidater Side 2 Kommunestyre- og fylkestingsvalget 2019 Valglister med kandidater Fylkestingsvalget 2019 i Troms og Finnmark Valglistens navn: Høyre Status: Godkjent av valgstyret Kandidatnr.
  • 1 Introduction

    1 Introduction

    Notes 1 Introduction 1. Donald Macintyre, Narvik (London: Evans, 1959), p. 15. 2. See Olav Riste, The Neutral Ally: Norway’s Relations with Belligerent Powers in the First World War (London: Allen and Unwin, 1965). 3. Reflections of the C-in-C Navy on the Outbreak of War, 3 September 1939, The Fuehrer Conferences on Naval Affairs, 1939–45 (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1990), pp. 37–38. 4. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 10 October 1939, in ibid. p. 47. 5. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 8 December 1939, Minutes of a Conference with Herr Hauglin and Herr Quisling on 11 December 1939 and Report of the C-in-C Navy, 12 December 1939 in ibid. pp. 63–67. 6. MGFA, Nichols Bohemia, n 172/14, H. W. Schmidt to Admiral Bohemia, 31 January 1955 cited by Francois Kersaudy, Norway, 1940 (London: Arrow, 1990), p. 42. 7. See Andrew Lambert, ‘Seapower 1939–40: Churchill and the Strategic Origins of the Battle of the Atlantic, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 17, no. 1 (1994), pp. 86–108. 8. For the importance of Swedish iron ore see Thomas Munch-Petersen, The Strategy of Phoney War (Stockholm: Militärhistoriska Förlaget, 1981). 9. Churchill, The Second World War, I, p. 463. 10. See Richard Wiggan, Hunt the Altmark (London: Hale, 1982). 11. TMI, Tome XV, Déposition de l’amiral Raeder, 17 May 1946 cited by Kersaudy, p. 44. 12. Kersaudy, p. 81. 13. Johannes Andenæs, Olav Riste and Magne Skodvin, Norway and the Second World War (Oslo: Aschehoug, 1966), p.