Quick viewing(Text Mode)

Mosaics of the Greek and Roman World

Mosaics of the Greek and Roman World

MOSAICS OF THE GREEK AND ROMAN WORLD

KATHERINE M. D. DUNBABIN           The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge  ,

   The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge,  , UK http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk  West th Street, New ,  –, USA http://www.cup.org  Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne , Australia

© Cambridge University Press 

This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.

First published 

Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge

 Typeset in / ⁄pt Minion in QuarkXPress™ []

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library

Library of Congress cataloguing in publication data Dunbabin, Katherine M. D. of the Greek and Roman World / Katherine M. D. Dunbabin. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index.    x hardback . Mosaics, Ancient. I. Title. .  .Ј–dc – 

 hardback

Publication of this book has been aided by a grant from the Millard Meiss Publication Fund of the College Art Association Contents

List of plates viii PART I: Historical and regional development List of figures x   List of maps xx . Origins and pebble mosaics . The invention of tessellated mosaics: Preface xxi Hellenistic mosaics in the east  Introduction  . Hellenistic mosaics in Italy  . Mosaics in Italy: Republican and Imperial  . The north-western provinces  . Britain  . The North African provinces  . under the Empire: Piazza Armerina  . The  . Syria and the east  . Palestine and Transjordan  . Greece: the Imperial period  . Asia Minor, ,  . Wall and vault mosaics  . Opus sectile 

PART II: Technique and production . Craftsmen and workshops  . Techniques and procedures  . The repertory  . Architectural context and function  . The patrons 

Conclusions  Plates – Maps  between pp.  and  Glossary of ornamental patterns  Plates – General glossary  between pp.  and  Abbreviations and bibliography   Plates – Index of sites and monuments between pp.  and  General index 

vii Plates

plate  , House of the Mosaics, Nereid panel from detail showing hunter and beasts. Courtesy R. J. A. threshold. Ecole Suisse d’Archéologie Grèce, cour- Wilson. tesy P. Ducrey. plate  Piazza Armerina, room , Erotes fishing, detail. plate  Pella, House ., Lion Hunt, detail of lion’s head. Courtesy R. J. A. Wilson. Ekdotike Athenon. plate  Italica, geometric with bust of Dionysus. plate  Pella, House ., Lion Hunt, detail of hunter. Photo Mario Producciones, courtesy Museo Ekdotike Athenon. Arqueológico, Seville. plate  Thmuis, Sophilos Mosaic, central panel. After plate  Emerita, Cosmological Mosaic, detail of Nubs Daszewski pl., courtesy DAI Cairo. (Cloud) with Wind. DAI Madrid, photo P. Witte. plate  , House of Dionysus, emblema with tiger- plate  Pedrosa de la Vega, Villa de la Olmeda, room , rider, detail of tiger. Photo Z. Welch. geometric mosaic. Photo J. Cortes, courtesy J. Cortes, P. plate   ,, , Alexander de Palol. Mosaic, detail of Darius. Alinari/Art Resource, NY; plate  Pedrosa de la Vega, Villa de la Olmeda, room , . border of panel with Achilles on Skyros, detail. Photo J. plate  Pompeii  ,, House of the Faun, Marine Scene, Cortes, courtesy J. Cortes, P. de Palol. detail. Erich Lessing/Art Resource, NY. plate  Pedrosa de la Vega, Villa de la Olmeda, room , plate  Pompeii  ,, portrait of woman. Scala/Art Achilles on Skyros, detail with heads of Achilles and Resource, NY. daughter of Lykomedes. Photo J. Cortes, courtesy J. plate  Praeneste, Sanctuary of Fortuna, crustae-pave- Cortes, P. de Palol. ment. Courtesy R. J. A. Wilson. plate  Shahba-Philippopolis, mosaic of Artemis and plate  Vienne, floral mosaic. Courtesy J. Lancha. Actaeon, detail of border. KMDD. plate  Orbe, mosaic of planetary deities, detail showing plate  , mosaic of Green Carpet, detail. Byzantine chariot of Sun-god. Courtesy R. J. A. Wilson. Collection, Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC. plate  Valence-sur-Baïse (Gers), vine pavement, detail plate  Sepphoris, Dionysiac mosaic, detail showing of band of fruit trees. Photo M.-P. Raynaud, courtesy Drunkenness of Heracles. Photo Zeev Radovan, cour- C. Balmelle. tesy Z. Weiss. plate  Loupian, Villa, apse , detail of scroll. Courtesy plate  Shavei Zion, church, detail of cross in north aisle. H. Lavagne. KMDD. plate  Woodchester, Villa, Orpheus and the beasts, plate  Madaba, Church of Map, detail of map of Holy detail of leopard. Crown Copyright NMR /. Land, showing area around Jericho and river Jordan. plate  Hinton St Mary, central medallion with bust of KMDD. Christ. Crown Copyright NMR /. plate  Hagios Taxiarchis, Mosaic of Seasons, panel with plate  Thysdrus, House of the Dionysiac Procession, Winter. Courtesy Z. Welch. Room , vegetal designs, detail of scrolls. KMDD. plate  Nea Paphos, House of Aion, triclinium, plate  Thuburbo Maius, House of Protomai, trifolium Presentation of infant Dionysus. Courtesy W. A. sector, rooms –, geometric-floral mosaics. CMT Daszewski, Polish Archaeological Mission, with the ., nos.–, pl., photo W. Graham, courtesy kind permission of the Director of the Department of M. Alexander. Antiquities, Cyprus. plate  Carthage, House of the Horses, Mosaic of plate  Pompeii  ,, House of the Small Fountain, Horses, detail of border. KMDD. aedicula-fountain, detail. KMDD. plate  Thamugadi, House of Piscina, mosaic of acan- plate  Pompeii  (Ins.Occ.),, House of the thus rosettes. Courtesy R. J. A. Wilson. Wedding of Alexander, fountain-, detail of plate  Thamugadi, Ilot , mosaic of acanthus scrolls, apse and garden scene. Photo Stanley Jashemski detail. Courtesy R. J. A. Wilson. ––, courtesy W. Jashemski (after Jashemski, plate  Piazza Armerina, corridor of Great Hunt (), Gardens , fig.). detail showing capture of rhinoceros. Courtesy R. J. A. plate  Rome, of Junius Bassus, opus sectile Wilson. panel with Hylas and the Nymphs. Soprintendenza plate  Piazza Armerina, corridor of Great Hunt (), Archeologica di Roma, neg.. viii List of plates

plate  Ostia, Building outside Porta Marina, hall with plate  Ostia, Building outside Porta Marina, hall with opus sectile, detail of frieze with floral scroll. opus sectile, panel with lion attacking stag. Soprintendenza Archeologica di Ostia. Soprintendenza Archeologica di Ostia.

ix Figures

figure  , Centaur Bath, general view. American figure  Morgantina, House of Ganymede, detail School of Classical Studies at , Corinth showing lower body of Ganymede. Department of Art Excavations no.––, photo I. Ioannidou. page  and Archaeology, Princeton University.  figure  Corinth, Centaur Bath, detail of Centaur. Amer- figure  , Shatby Stag Hunt. DAI Cairo Inst. ican School of Classical Studies at Athens, Corinth Neg., photo D. Johannes.  Excavations no.––, photo L. Bartziotou.  figure  Alexandria, Shatby Stag Hunt, detail of Eros. figure  Olynthos, House of the Comedian, andron DAI Cairo Inst. Neg., photo D. Johannes.  mosaic. After Olynthus , pl.,.  figure  Alexandria, Shatby Stag Hunt, detail of figure  Olynthos, Villa of Good Fortune, plan. After D. animal frieze. DAI Cairo Inst. Neg., photo D. M. Robinson, AJA , , fig..  Johannes.  figure  Olynthos, Villa of Good Fortune, Dionysiac figure  Thmuis, mosaic signed by Sophilos. DAI Cairo mosaic from andron. After D. M. Robinson, AJA , Inst. Neg., photo D. Johannes.  , pl..  figure  Rome, mosaic of asarotos , signed by figure  Eretria, House of the Mosaics, anteroom and Heraklitos, detail. Musei Vaticani Archivio Fotografico, andron. Ecole Suisse d’Archéologie en Grèce, courtesy Neg..xxxiv...  P. Ducrey.  figure  Tibur, ’s Villa, Doves of Sosos. Archivio figure  Eretria, House of the Mosaics, griffins and Fotografico dei Musei Capitolini, photo A. Idini.  Arimasps from andron. Ecole Suisse d’Archéologie en figure  , Palace , Altar Room, Parrot Grèce, courtesy P. Ducrey.  Mosaic, detail of garland. Antikensammlung, Staat- figure  Sikyon, floral mosaic. DAI Athens, neg./, liche Museen zu Berlin–Preussischer Kulturbesitz, photo G. Hellner.  Neg.Nr. , courtesy I. Kriseleit.  figure  Pella, House ., Lion Hunt. TAP Service, figure  Pergamon, Palace , mosaic with signature of Athens.  Hephaistion, detail of signature. Antikensammlung, figure  Pella, House ., Dionysus on leopard. TAP Staatliche Museen zu Berlin–Preussischer Kulturbesitz, Service, Athens.  Neg.Nr. , courtesy I. Kriseleit.  figure  Pella, House ., Dionysus, detail of head of figure  Delos, House  , Room , tessellated panel at Dionysus. Courtesy A.-M. Guimier-Sorbets.  centre of chip-pavement. KMDD.  figure  Pella, House ., Stag Hunt signed by Gnosis. figure  Delos, House  N, room , tessellated panel at TAP Service, Athens.  centre of chip-pavement. Ecole française d’Athènes, figure  Pella, House ., Stag Hunt, detail of border. no. .bis.  Courtesy A.-M. Guimier-Sorbets.  figure  Delos, of the Italians, niche , geometric figure  Vergina, Palace, room , drawing of floral mosaic. Ecole française d’Athènes, no. ..  mosaic. After M. Andronikos et al., To Anaktoro tes figure  Delos, House of Dionysus, emblema with tiger- Bergines (Athens ) pl..  rider. Ecole française d’Athènes, no..  figure  , Bellerophon and Chimaira. KB’ figure  Delos, House of the Dolphins, courtyard. Ecole Ephoreia Proïstorikon kai Klasikon Arkhaioteton française d’Athènes, no. ..  Dodekanesou, courtesy I. Papachristodoulou.  figure  Delos, House of the Dolphins, courtyard, detail figure  Lebena, Asklepieion, irregular mosaic. After showing dolphins in north-west corner. Ecole française Salzmann, pl., courtesy D. Salzmann.  d’Athènes, no. ..  figure  Pergamon, chip-mosaic. DAI Istanbul, figure  Delos, House of the Dolphins, courtyard, detail Pergamon-Grabung neg.., photo R. Braun.  of border with signature. Ecole française d’Athènes, figure  Selinus, temple , mortar pavement (signinum) no. ..  with bull’s head in wreath. KMDD.  figure  Delos, House of the Masks, plan. After J. figure  Morgantina, House of Ganymede, Ganymede Chamonard, Délos  (), pl..  and eagle. Department of Art and Archaeology, figure  Delos, House of the Masks, Room , emblema Princeton University.  with Dionysus. Ecole française d’Athènes, no..  figure  Morgantina, House of Ganymede, detail figure  Delos, House of the Trident, dolphin from peri- showing head and arm of Ganymede. Department of style. Ecole française d’Athènes, no. ..  Art and Archaeology, Princeton University.  figure  Pompeii  ,, House of the Labyrinth, cubic- x List of figures

ulum , emblema with Theseus and Minotaur in situ. figure  Pompeii  ,, , mosaic DAI Berlin Inst. Neg....  from entrance with watchdog and cave canem. figure  Pompeii  ,, House of the Faun, Alexander Ministero per i Beni Culturali e Ambientali, ICCD,  Mosaic. Alinari/Art Resource, NY;  .  .  figure  Pompeii  ,, House of the Faun, Alexander figure  Ostia .., Insula of the Muses, plan. Mosaic, detail of Alexander. Alinari/Art Resource, NY; Soprintendenza Archeologica di Ostia, Archivio  .  Fotografico .  figure  Pompeii  ,, House of the Faun, Tiger-rider. figure  Ostia .., House of Apuleius, geometric pave- Alinari/Art Resource, NY;  .  ment. Soprintendenza Archeologica di Ostia, Archivio figure  Pompeii, ‘Villa of ’, Women at Breakfast Fotografico  .  (from Synaristosai of ) by Dioskourides figure  Ostia .., Caseggiato of Bacchus and of . Alinari/Art Resource, NY;  Ariadne, Dionysus and Ariadne in arabesque design. .  Soprintendenza Archeologica di Ostia, Archivio figure  Pompeii, ‘Villa of Cicero’, scene from Theo- Fotografico  .  phoroumene of Menander by Dioskourides of Samos. figure  Ostia .., Baths of Neptune, central hall with Alinari/Art Resource, NY;  .  Neptune mosaic. Soprintendenza Archeologica di figure  Pompeii  ,, Marine scene. Alinari/Art Ostia, Archivio Fotografico  .  Resource, NY; s .  figure  Ostia .., Baths of the Lighthouse, marine figure  Praeneste, Nile Mosaic. Alinari/Art Resource, creatures and lighthouse. Soprintendenza Archeo- NY; .  logica di Ostia, Archivio Fotografico .  figure  Praeneste, Nile Mosaic, detail of upper section figure  Ostia .., Square of the Corporations, booth showing Nile landscape and fauna. Courtesy P. no., mosaic with inscription of shippers and busi- Meyboom, photo P. Jongste.  nessmen of Karalis. Soprintendenza Archeologica di figure  Praeneste, Nile Mosaic, detail of central section Ostia, Archivio Fotografico /–.  showing inundation of Nile and Egyptian temple with figure  Ostia .., Square of the Corporations, booth Nilometer. Courtesy P. Meyboom, photo P. Jongste.  no.. Soprintendenza Archeologica di Ostia, Archivio figure  , Samnite House, signinum pave- Fotografico .  ment in tablinum. Soprintendenza Archeologica di figure  Ostia .., Mithraeum of the Seven Spheres. , neg..  Soprintendenza Archeologica di Ostia, Archivio figure  Pompeii, , room , Fotografico /.  crustae-pavement. KMDD.  figure  Ostia .., House of the Dioscuri, marine figure  Pompeii  ,, House of the Faun, crustae- scene, drawing of whole. Soprintendenza Archeologica pavement in ala. DAI Rome ..  di Ostia, Archivio Fotografico .  figure  Pompeii ,, House of the beautiful figure  Tibur, Hadrian’s Villa, Hospitalia, black-and- Impluvium, atrium, pavement of mixed techniques. white mosaics in cubiculum. Ministero per i Beni Ministero per i Beni Culturali e Ambientali, ICCD Culturali e Ambientali, ICCD ..  .  figure  Tibur, Hadrian’s Villa, Hospitalia, black-and- figure  Lucus Feroniae, Villa of Volusii Saturnini, room white mosaics in cubiculum. Ministero per i Beni , late Republican polychrome geometric mosaic. DAI Culturali e Ambientali, ICCD ..  Rome ..  figure  Tibur, Hadrian’s Villa, emblema with centaurs figure  Lucus Feroniae, Villa of Volusii Saturnini, room fighting wild beasts. Antikensammlung, Staatliche , early Imperial black-and-white geometric mosaic. Museen zu Berlin–Preussischer Kulturbesitz, DAI Rome ..  Neg.Nr.Ant , courtesy I. Kriseleit.  figure  Lucus Feroniae, Villa of Volusii Saturnini, room figure  Rome, Baths of Caracalla, Mosaic of Athletes, , early Imperial black-and-white geometric mosaic. reconstruction. Musei Vaticani, Archivio Fotografico DAI Rome ..  Neg..xxxv../.  figure  Pompeii ,, House of the Menander, caldar- figure  Desenzano, Villa, plan with mosaics in situ. ium mosaic. After A. Maiuri, La e il After G. Ghislanzoni, La villa romana di Desenzano suo tesoro di argenteria (Rome ) fig..  (Milan ). 

xi List of figures

figure  Desenzano, Villa, vestibule (), fishing Erotes, figure  Corinium, Barton Farm Villa, Orpheus and the detail. Courtesy R. J. A. Wilson.  Beasts. Crown Copyright NMR /.  figure  Glanum, House of the Capricorn (), signinum figure  Woodchester, villa, Orpheus and the Beasts. pavement with mosaic panel at centre. Photo A. Chêné, Crown Copyright NMR /.  Centre Camille Jullian, no., CNRS Aix-en- figure  Woodchester, villa, Orpheus and the Beasts, Provence.  detail of stag. Crown Copyright NMR /.  figure  Ouzouër-sur-Trézée, multiple decor mosaic, figure  Hinton St Mary, general view. Crown Copyright drawing. After RecGaule ., pl. no..  NMR /.  figure  Ouzouër-sur-Trézée, mosaic with head of figure  Hinton St Mary, detail, panel with hound pur- Ocean. After B. Gitton, ‘Visite des mosaïques gallo- suing deer. Crown Copyright NMR /.  romaines de Pont-Chevron à Ouzouër-sur-Trézée’, figure  Low Ham, scenes of Dido and Aeneas. Somerset CMGR , –, fig..  County Museums Service, Taunton.  figure  Vienne, multiple decor mosaic with central figure  Lullingstone, villa, mosaic showing Europa and panel showing Drunkenness of Hercules; drawing of the Bull, and Bellerophon and the Seasons. © English original state. After InvGaule .  Heritage Photo Library.  figure  Saint-Romain-en-Gal, mosaic with floral motifs figure  Isurium Brigantum (Aldborough), mosaic of in hexagons. After RecGaule ., no., pl., Wolf and Twins. Leeds Museums and Galleries (City drawing R. Prudhomme, courtesy J. Lancha.  Museum).  figure  Saint-Romain-en-Gal, Rustic Calendar, general figure  Rudston, Venus mosaic. Hull City Museums, view. After InvGaule .  Art Gallery and Archives.  figure  Saint-Romain-en-Gal, Rustic Calendar, detail figure  Kerkouane, Punic pavement of mortar and showing baker at bread oven. Musée des Antiquités aggregate decorated with tesserae, including ‘sign of nationales, Saint-Germain-en-Laye, MAN  Tanit’. KMDD.  .  figure  Carthage, rue Astarte, Punic pavements of opus figure  Vienne, Sainte-Colombe, Lycurgus and the vine, figlinum and tessellated threshold. Courtesy F. Chelbi, reconstruction drawing. Drawing R. Prudhomme, Institut National du Patrimoine, Tunis.  courtesy J. Lancha.  figure  Carthage, rue Astarte, Punic pavements, detail figure  Orbe, Mosaic of the Planetary Deities. Photo of tessellated threshold. Courtesy F. Chelbi, Institut Hine, Allschwil (CH), courtesy Mme C. M. Castella.  National du Patrimoine, Tunis.  figure  Cologne, mosaic of Dionysus. Rheinisches figure  Carthage, Floral Style design with busts of Bildarchiv, no..  Muses. Courtesy Trustees of the British Museum figure  Nennig, villa, amphitheatre mosaic. Photo Th. (no.).  Zühmer, courtesy Rheinisches Landesmuseum, Trier, figure  Acholla, Baths of Trajan, drawing of frigidar- no. .  ium. After G. Ch. Picard, ‘Les mosaïques d’Acholla’, figure  Trier, Mysteries mosaic from Kornmarkt. Etudes d’Archéologie classique , , pls., , cour- Rheinisches Landesmuseum, Trier, no.-..  tesy G. Ch. Picard.  figure  Valence-sur-Baïse (Gers), vine pavement. Photo figure  Acholla, Baths of Trajan, frigidarium, detail of M.-P. Raynaud, courtesy C. Balmelle.  central section. KMDD.  figure  Fishbourne, geometric mosaic in room . figure  Acholla, House of the Triumph of Neptune, /Sussex Archaeological cubiculum . Courtesy S. Gozlan.  Society, courtesy D. Rudkin.  figure  Thysdrus, House of the Dionysiac Procession, figure  , geometric mosaic, no.. The plan. After L. Foucher, La Maison de la Procession Dio- Verulamium Museum.  nysiaque à El Jem (Paris ) pl..© PUF, .  figure  Verulamium, mosaic of Ocean, no.. The figure  Thysdrus, House of the Dionysiac Procession, Verulamium Museum.  detail of triclinium. KMDD.  figure  Fishbourne, room , mosaic with Cupid. figure  Thysdrus, House of the Dionysiac Procession, Fishbourne Roman Palace/Sussex Archaeological room , vegetal designs with bust of personification of Society, courtesy D. Rudkin.  the year. KMDD.  xii List of figures

figure  Thuburbo Maius, House with Domestic Quar- figure  Sabratha, Basilica of Justinian, nave, with ters, rooms  and , geometric mosaics. CMT ., design of vine scrolls. DAI Rome ..  no., photo W. Graham, courtesy M. Alexander.  figure  Tyndaris, Baths, crustae-pavement, framing figure  Thuburbo Maius, House of Bound Animals, black-and-white mosaic panel with triskeles. Courtesy cubiculum , geometric mosaic. CMT ., no., D. von Boeselager.  photo W. Graham, courtesy M. Alexander.  figure  Lilybaeum, Floral Style mosaic with busts of figure  Thuburbo Maius, House of Protomai, Room the Seasons. Museo Archeologico Regionale di , mosaic of animal protomai. CMT ., no., Palermo, no., courtesy Dott.ssa C. Di Stefano.  photo W. Graham, courtesy M. Alexander.  figure  Piazza Armerina, villa, plan. Adapted from figure  Thysdrus, House of the Months, Calendar Filosofiana Ill., Flaccovio Editore, .  mosaic. DAI Rome ..  figure  Piazza Armerina, corridor of Great Hunt (). figure  La Chebba, Neptune and the Seasons. After Drawing after Gentili, Villa Erculia fig..  InvTun .  figure  Piazza Armerina, Circus Races (). Drawing figure  Althiburus, Hunting Scenes. Institut National after Gentili, Villa Erculia fig..  du Patrimoine (Tunisie), courtesy M. Ennaïfer.  figure  Piazza Armerina, Small Hunt (). Fototeca figure  Althiburus, Hunting Scenes, detail. Institut Unione no..  National du Patrimoine (Tunisie), courtesy M. figure  Piazza Armerina, vestibule to baths (), family Ennaïfer.  and attendants entering baths. Fototeca Unione.  figure  Neapolis, House of the Nymphs, Chryses figure  Piazza Armerina, triconch (). Drawing after before Agamemnon. Courtesy R. J. A. Wilson.  Gentili, Villa Erculia fig..  figure  Smirat, Amphitheatre Mosaic. KMDD.  figure  Piazza Armerina, triconch, apse with wounded figure  Carthage, House of the Horses, Mosaic of giants. Ministero per i Beni Culturali e Ambientali, Horses. KMDD.  ICCD,  .  figure  Carthage, House of the Horses, Mosaic of figure  Piazza Armerina, portico of peristyle (d). Horses, panel of horse accompanied by fowling equip- Fototeca Unione  , courtesy G. Benedettini.  ment. KMDD.  figure  Piazza Armerina, corridor of the Great Hunt figure  Caesarea (Cherchel), Agricultural Labours. (), detail showing animal cage loaded on ox-cart. KMDD.  Ministero per i Beni Culturali e Ambientali, ICCD,  figure  Carthage, Mosaic of Dominus Julius. DAI .  Rome ..  figure  Piazza Armerina, corridor of the Great Hunt figure  Zliten, villa, amphitheatre mosaic, frieze with (), detail showing capture of rhinoceros and bison. gladiator scenes. DAI Rome ..  Ministero per i Beni Culturali e Ambientali, ICCD,  figure  Zliten, villa, amphitheatre mosaic, frieze with .  gladiator scenes. DAI Rome ..  figure  Piazza Armerina, semi-circular portico (b), figure  Zliten, villa, mosaic of Volutes. DAI Rome Erotes fishing. Drawing after Gentili, Villa Erculia fig.. ..   figure  Silin, villa, mosaic of Aion and the Seasons. figure  Piazza Armerina, Hunting Children (a), After O. Al Mahjub, CMGR , unnumbered col.pl.  detail. Courtesy R. J. A. Wilson.  figure  Silin, Villa, scene with bull tossing victims. After figure  Piazza Armerina, triconch (), victims of Herc- O. Al Mahjub, CMGR , unnumbered colour plate.  ules, detail of Bistonian Horseman and Bull. Ministero figure  Thamugadi, House west of baths of Philadel- per i Beni Culturali e Ambientali, ICCD,  .  phi, Floral mosaic. Centre Camille Jullian, no., figure  Tellaro, villa, Hunting Scenes, detail with CNRS Aix-en-Provence.  tigress attacking fallen hunter. Soprintendenza ai Beni figure  Thamugadi, Ilot , mosaic of acanthus scrolls, Culturali e Ambientali, Siracusa, by authorisation of central panel with marine Venus. Courtesy S. Germain. the Assessorato dei Beni Culturali e Ambientali e P.I.  della Regione Sicilia, courtesy G. Voza.  figure  Sabratha, Basilica of Justinian, aisle, with figure  Emporiae, Neapolis, signinum pavement with designs of pine-trees and palmettes. KMDD.  Greek inscription Hedykoitos. KMDD. 

xiii List of figures

figure  Emporiae, House , black-and-white mosaic. figure  Antioch, Atrium House, triclinium, Judgement KMDD.  of Paris. Musée du Louvre, photo M. Chuzeville.  figure  Emporiae, emblema with Sacrifice of Iphigeneia. figure  Antioch, House of Drinking Contest, triclin- DAI Madrid  ––, photo P. Witte.  ium, central panel showing drinking contest of figure  Marbella, villa, plan of preserved section. Drawing Dionysus and Heracles. Department of Art and by A. García y Bellido, after CMEsp , fig..  Archaeology, Princeton University, neg..  figure  Italica, House of Neptune, mosaic of Neptune figure  Drawing of chevrons in rainbow style. and pygmies. KMDD.  Computer-assisted drawing by Tanya Kane.  figure  Emerita, House of the Mithraeum, figure  Antioch, Constantinian Villa, Room , general Cosmological Mosaic. Drawing after Uwe Städtler in A. view in situ. Department of Art and Archaeology, Alföldi, Aion in Mérida and Aphrodisias (Mainz am Princeton University,  .  Rhein ), Beilage.  figure  Antioch, Constantinian Villa, detail showing figure  Emerita, Cosmological Mosaic, detail of top. hunting scene between two Seasons. Department of DAI Madrid  ––, photo P. Witte.  Art and Archaeology, Princeton University,  . figure  Emerita, Cosmological Mosaic, detail of left  side. DAI Madrid ––, photo P. Witte.  figure  Shahba-Philippopolis, mosaic of Artemis and figure  Italica, House of the Planetarium, mosaic with Actaeon. Courtesy J. Balty.  busts of the planetary deities. KMDD.  figure  Shahba-Philippopolis, mosaic of marine figure a Conimbriga, House of the Fountains, view of Aphrodite. Courtesy J. Balty.  rooms around small peristyle. Instituto Português de figure  Shahba-Philippopolis, mosaic of Tethys. Museus, Arquivo Nacional de Fotografia.  Courtesy J. Balty.  figure b Conimbriga, House of the Fountains, triclin- figure  Shahba-Philippopolis, allegorical mosaic of ium, mosaic . Instituto Português de Museus, Aion. Courtesy J. Balty.  Arquivo Nacional de Fotografia.  figure  Apamea, building under cathedral, mosaic figure  Complutum, House of Bacchus, plan of from corridor with panel of dancing maidservants mosaics. After D. Fernández-Galiano, Complutum  (with label Therapenides) greeting the return of (), fig..  Odysseus. ACL Brussels, courtesy J. Balty.  figure  Complutum, House of Bacchus, corridor with figure  Apamea, building under cathedral, frieze with servants offering drinks. Courtesy D. Fernández- Judgement of Nereids. Drawing after J. Ch. Balty, ‘Une Galiano.  version orientale méconnue du mythe de Cassiopée’, figure  Pedrosa de la Vega, Villa de la Olmeda, room , in L. Kahil, C. Augé eds., Mythologie gréco-romaine, Hunting Scene. Photo J. Cortes, courtesy J. Cortes, P. de mythologies périphériques (Paris ), –, fig..  Palol.  figure  Apamea, building under cathedral, frieze with figure  Pedrosa de la Vega, Villa de la Olmeda, room , Judgement of Nereids, detail showing Kassiopeia. Achilles on Skyros. Photo J. Cortes, courtesy J. Cortes, Courtesy J. Balty.  P. de Palol.  figure  Mariamin, mosaic of Musicians. Courtesy Prof. figure  Carranque, villa, basin with head of Ocean. Dr Sultan Muhesen, Directeur Général des Antiquités KMDD.  et des Musées, Damascus.  figure  Emerita, mosaic of Dionysus and Ariadne, with figure  Mariamin, mosaic of Musicians, detail signature of workshop of Anniponus. M.N.A.R. showing dancer with castanets. Courtesy J. Balty.  Archivo Fotográfico, courtesy J. M. Alvarez Martinez figure  Mariamin, mosaic of Musicians, detail and A. Velázquez Jiménez.  showing flautist. Courtesy J. Balty.  figure  Antioch, Atrium House, triclinium. figure  Palmyra, House of Kassiopeia, reconstruction. Department of Art and Archaeology, Princeton Drawing after H. Stern, Les mosaïques des Maisons University, neg..  d’Achille et de Cassiopée à Palmyre (Paris ), fig..  figure  Antioch, Atrium House, triclinium, Drinking figure  Edessa, Family Portrait mosaic. Drawing after J. Contest of Dionysus and Heracles. Department of Art Segal, Edessa, ‘The Blessed City’ (Oxford ), pl., and Archaeology, Princeton University, neg..  Courtesy of Thames and Hudson.  xiv List of figures

figure  Edessa, Funerary Couch mosaic. Drawing after J. mosaic. Courtesy of Gideon Foerster and the Institute of Segal, Edessa, ‘The Blessed City’ (Oxford ), pl., Archaeology, the Hebrew University of , and Courtesy of Thames and Hudson.  by permission of the Israel Exploration Society.  figure  Edessa, Mosaic of Barsimya with portrait of figure  Sepphoris, general view of triclinium with Abgar. Courtesy Prof. Dr H. J. W. Drijvers.  Dionysiac mosaic. Photo Zeev Radovan, courtesy Z. figure  Bishapur, palace of Sapor, panel with Dionysiac Weiss.  heads. After R. Ghirshman, Bîchâpour , Les Mosaïques figure  Hammath Tiberias, synagogue, general view. Sassanides (Paris ), pl...  After M. Dothan, Hammath Tiberias (Jerusalem ), figure  Bishapur, palace of Sapor, Harpist. After R. pl., courtesy of Israel Exploration Society.  Ghirshman, Bîchâpour , Les Mosaïques Sassanides figure  Beth Alpha, synagogue, panel with signs of (Paris ), pl...  zodiac. After E. Sukenik, The Ancient Synagogue of Beth figure  Bishapur, palace of Sapor, Woman with Alpha (Jerusalem, ), pl..  garland. After R. Ghirshman, Bîchâpour , Les figure  ‘En-Gedi, synagogue, panel with Hebrew and Mosaïques Sassanides (Paris ), pl...  Aramaic inscriptions. Israel Antiquities Authority figure  Antioch, Qaousiye church, north aisle. no., courtesy S. Durocher.  Department of Art and Archaeology, Princeton figure  Ma‘on-Nirim, synagogue, pavement of nave with University, neg. .  vine scrolls. Drawing after M. Avi-Yonah, ‘The Mosaic figure  Antioch, mosaic with bust of Ananeosis at centre Pavement’, in Rabinowitz Bulletin , , fig..  of geometric carpet-pattern. Department of Art and figure  Shavei Zion, church, pavement of nave. Archaeology, Princeton University, neg. .  KMDD.  figure  Antioch, mosaic of Striding Lion. Department figure  et-Tabgha, Church of Multiplication, Nilotic of Art and Archaeology, Princeton University, neg. panel from left transept. After A. M. Schneider, The .  Church of the Multiplication of the loaves and fishes at figure  Antioch (Daphne), House of the Phoenix, Tabgha on the Lake of Gennesaret and its mosaics Phoenix mosaic in situ. Department of Art and ( ), pl..  Archaeology, Princeton University, neg. .  figure  Ma‘ale Adummim, refectory, ornamental figure  Antioch (Daphne), Phoenix mosaic, after res- mosaic. Drawing after Y. Magen, in Y. Tsafrir ed., toration. Musée du Louvre, photo M. Chuzeville.  Ancient Churches Revealed (Jerusalem ), p., cour- figure  Antioch (Seleucia), Quatrefoil church (so-called tesy of Israel Exploration Society and Y. Magen.  Martyrion), animal carpet. Department of Art and figure  Gerasa, Church of SS. Cosmas and Damianos, Archaeology, Princeton University, neg. .  panel showing Georgia wife of Theodoros as donor. figure  Antioch, Yakto complex, Megalopsychia Archive Studium Biblicum Franciscanum, courtesy M. mosaic. Drawing after J. Lassus, in G. Elderkin ed., Piccirillo.  Antioch-on-the-Orontes  (Princeton ),  fig..  figure  Nebo, Church of SS. Lot and Procopius, view figure  Antioch, Yakto complex, Megalopsychia mosaic, of nave. Archive Studium Biblicum Franciscanum, detail of topographical border. Department of Art and courtesy M. Piccirillo.  Archaeology, Princeton University, neg.–.  figure  Nebo, Church of SS. Lot and Procopius, detail figure  Apamea, Triclinos building, mosaic of Hunt. of vine scrolls. Archive Studium Biblicum ACL Brussels, courtesy J. Balty.  Franciscanum, courtesy M. Piccirillo.  figure  Apamea, Triclinos building, mosaic of Hunt, figure  Madaba, Church of Apostles, mosaic with bust detail. ACL Brussels neg. , courtesy J. Balty.  of Thalassa and signature of Salamanios. Archive figure  Sarrîn, Dionysiac panel from mythological Studium Biblicum Franciscanum, courtesy M. mosaic, detail showing Silenus and nurse. Courtesy J. Piccirillo.  Balty.  figure  Madaba, Hall of Hippolytus, eastern section figure  Deir el-‘Adas, church of St George, panel from showing scenes of Phaedra and Hippolytus (below), nave with camel-driver. Photo Donceel, courtesy P. Aphrodite and Adonis (above). Archive Studium Donceel-Voûte.  Biblicum Franciscanum, courtesy M. Piccirillo.  figure  Masada, Western Palace, Oecus , Herodian figure  Madaba, Hall of Hippolytus, city personifi-

xv List of figures

cations outside border. Archive Studium Biblicum Theophoroumene. K’ Ephoreia Proïstorikon kai Franciscanum, courtesy M. Piccirillo.  Klasikon Arkhaioteton, Mytilene, no., courtesy A. figure  Madaba, Church of Map, map of Holy Land. Arkhontidou-Argyre.  Archive Studium Biblicum Franciscanum, courtesy M. figure  , portrait of Alkibiades. Photo N. Kontos, Piccirillo.  for TAP Service, Athens, courtesy Th. Spyropoulos, E’ figure  Madaba, Church of Map, detail showing Ephoreia Proïstorikon kai Klasikon Arkhaioteton.  Jerusalem. KMDD.  figure  Nikopolis, Basilica , north transept, panel figure  Kastron Mefaa, Church of St Stephen, view of with inscription of Dometios. Ephoreia Byzantinon nave and aisles. Archive Studium Biblicum Arkhaioteton, Ioannina.  Franciscanum, courtesy M. Piccirillo.  figure  Argos, Villa of the Falconer, mosaic of Months, figure  Kastron Mefaa, Church of St Stephen, panel panels showing January to June. After G. Åkerström- from intercolumniation showing vignette of Kastron Hougen, The Calendar and Hunting Mosaics of the Villa Mefaa. Archive Studium Biblicum Franciscanum, of the Falconer at Argos (Stockholm ), pl., courtesy courtesy M. Piccirillo.  G. Åkerström-Hougen.  figure  Ma‘in, Church, scene originally figure  Argos, Villa of the Falconer, drawing of room showing lion and ox but with iconoclastic restorations. with stibadium and Dionysiac mosaic. Drawing O. Archive Studium Biblicum Franciscanum, courtesy M. Söndergard, courtesy G. Åkerström-Hougen.  Piccirillo.  figure  Pergamon, Peristyle House , room , drawing figure  Khirbet el-Mafjar, Palace, view of hall. Israel of reconstructed mosaic. DAI Istanbul, Pergamon- Antiquities Authority, courtesy S. Durocher.  Grabung /–.  figure  Khirbet el-Mafjar, Palace, apse of dı¯wãn. Israel figure  Pergamon, Building , mosaic of Silenus with Antiquities Authority, no., courtesy S. Durocher. child Dionysus. DAI Istanbul, Pergamon-Grabung  /–, photo E. Steiner.  figure  Corinth, Anaploga Villa, mosaic in situ. figure  Pergamon, Building , mosaic of masks. DAI American School of Classical Studies, Corinth excava- Istanbul, Pergamon-Grabung /–, photo E. tions no.––.  Steiner.  figure  Isthmia, Baths, great hall, black-and-white figure  Ephesos, Terrace House , Dwelling , south mosaic. Isthmia Excavations, courtesy T. Gregory.  wing, mosaic of Nereid and Triton. Courtesy W. Jobst, figure  Olympia, Kladeos Baths, restored plan showing Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.  mosaics in situ. After H. Schleif, IV Bericht über die figure  Nea Paphos, House of Dionysus, general view Ausgrabungen in Olympia (Berlin ), pl..  of triclinium. With the kind permission of the Director figure  Corinth, Roman Villa, drawing showing of the Department of Antiquities, Cyprus.  mosaics in situ. After T. L. Shear, Corinth , The Roman figure  Nea Paphos, House of Dionysus, west portico Villa (Cambridge, Mass. ), pl..  of peristyle, panel showing Dionysus and Ikarios. With figure  Thessalonica, mosaic of Dionysus and the kind permission of the Director of the Department Ariadne. I⌺T’ Ephoreia Proïstorikon kai Klasikon of Antiquities, Cyprus.  Arkhaioteton, courtesy E. Trakosopoulou.  figure  Nea Paphos, House of Dionysus, peristyle, figure  Kos, House of Silenus Mosaic, panel with glad- friezes with hunting scenes of arena. With the kind per- iators. KMDD.  mission of the Director of the Department of figure  Mytilene, House of Menander, triclinium, Antiquities, Cyprus.  panel with bust of Menander. K’ Ephoreia Proïstorikon figure  Nea Paphos, House of Aion, triclinium, general kai Klasikon Arkhaioteton, Mytilene, courtesy A. view of mosaics. Drawing by S. Medeksza, courtesy W. Arkhontidou-Argyre.  A. Daszewski.  figure  Mytilene, House of Menander, panel with figure  Nea Paphos, House of Aion, triclinium, Synaristosai. K’ Ephoreia Proïstorikon kai Klasikon Judgement of the Nereids, detail showing crowning of Arkhaioteton, Mytilene, no., courtesy A. Kassiopeia. With the kind permission of the Director of Arkhontidou-Argyre.  the Department of Antiquities, Cyprus.  figure  Mytilene, House of Menander, panel with figure  Constantinople, Great Palace, mosaics from xvi List of figures

peristyle, detail of border. St Andrews University figure  Caesarea (Cherchel), fountain basin with Library, ms , courtesy Dr Norman Reid.  Ulysses and the Sirens. KMDD.  figure  Constantinople, Great Palace, mosaics from figure  Salamis, Cyprus, Gymnasium Baths, detail of peristyle, detail of north-west portico. St Andrews wall mosaic showing the river-god Eurotas. With the University Library, ms , courtesy Dr Norman kind permission of the Director of the Department of Reid.  Antiquities, Cyprus.  figure  Constantinople, Great Palace, mosaics from figure  Rome, Mausoleum of Constantia, ambulatory peristyle, detail of north-west portico. St Andrews vault, panel with Erotes and birds. DAI Rome ..  University Library, Walker Trust Album, Baxter Papers, figure  Rome, Mausoleum of Constantia, ambulatory courtesy Dr Norman Reid.  vault, panel with strewn branches. DAI Rome ..  figure  Constantinople, Great Palace, mosaics from figure  Rome, Necropolis under St Peter’s, Tomb  peristyle, detail of boy with geese. St Andrews University (Mausoleum of Julii), mosaic of vault, with Christ as Library, ms , courtesy Dr Norman Reid.  Sun-god. Archivio Fotografico, Fabbrica di San Pietro, figure  Constantinople, Great Palace, mosaics from neg., courtesy Dr A.M. Pergolizzi.  peristyle, detail of man feeding mule. St Andrews figure  Ephesos, Terrace House , Dwelling , mosaic University Library, Walker Trust Album, Baxter Papers, of vault, vines enclosing busts of Dionysus and courtesy Dr Norman Reid.  Ariadne. Courtesy W. Jobst, Österreichische Akademie figure  Formiae, ‘Villa of Cicero’, nymphaeum, der Wissenschaften.  drawing of vault. After C. Giuliani, M. Guaitoli, figure  Centcelles, Mausoleum, general view of dome. RömMitt , , fig. p..  DAI Madrid neg..––, photo P. Witte.  figure  Formiae, ‘Villa of Cicero’, nymphaeum, detail figure  Centcelles, Mausoleum, detail of hunting of vault. Courtesy F. Sear, neg...  frieze. DAI Madrid neg..––, photo P. Witte.  figure  Rome, Via degli Annibaldi, nymphaeum, eleva- figure  Pompeii  ,, House of the Faun, tablinum, tion drawing. After Sear fig., courtesy Amanda sectile pavement with pattern of lozenges forming per- Claridge.  spective cubes. DAI Rome ..  figure  Rome, Via degli Annibaldi, nymphaeum, detail. figure  Pompeii ,, House of the Ephebe, triclinium, Courtesy F. Sear, neg...  sectile pavement. Ministero per i Beni Culturali e figure  Rome, Columbarium of Pomponius Hylas, Ambientali, ICCD, neg. .  mosaic plaque. Fototeca Unione,  , courtesy G. figure  Carthage, House of the Greek Charioteers, Benedettini.  bedding of amphora fragments for sectile pavement, figure  Rome, Palatine Hill, structures beneath the Horti showing lay-out of design. Courtesy J. Humphrey.  Farnesiani, wall mosaic frieze. Soprintendenza Archeo- figure  Drawing showing fabrication process of sec- logica di Roma, AFS  , photo E. Monti.  tions of sectile pavements in various forms, illustrating figure  Rome, Domus Aurea, nymphaeum (room ), positions of support/bedding elements on reverse: vault mosaic, central octagon with Ulysses and based on examples from Hadrian’s Villa. Drawing L. Cyclops. DAI Rome ..  Fabiani, after Guidobaldi, Villa Adriana, fig., courtesy figure  Pompeii  ,, House of the Small Fountain, F. Guidobaldi.  aedicula-fountain. Photo Stanley Jashemski ––, figure  Drawing showing fabrication process of sectile courtesy W. Jashemski.  pavement with simple square-in-square design. After figure  Pompeii  ,?, Columned Fountain. DAI Guidobaldi, Pavimenti fig., courtesy F. Guidobaldi.  Rome ..  figure  Sample patterns of opus sectile based on square figure  Pompeii  ,?, Columned Fountain, detail. module. After Guidobaldi, Pavimenti fig., courtesy F. Courtesy F. Sear, neg...  Guidobaldi.  figure  Herculaneum ., House of Neptune and figure  Ostia .., House of the Nymphaeum, sectile Amphitrite, courtyard with nymphaeum. Alinari/Art pavement, central section. Soprintendenza Archeo- Resource, NY:  .  logica di Ostia, Archivio Fotografico  .  figure  Pompeii  ,, House of Apollo, nymphaeum, figure  Rome, Domus Aurea (or Domus Transitoria), wall panel with Achilles on Skyros. DAI Rome ..  aula porticata, reconstruction drawing of sectile pave-

xvii List of figures

ment. After MosAntIt Palatium fig., courtesy Istituto showing painted and incised guidelines on nucleus. Poligrafico dello Stato.  Courtesy Prof. C. Robotti.  figure  Tibur, Hadrian’s Villa, Valley of Tempe, sectile figure  , Villa Arianna, black-and-white mosaic, pavement of alabaster lozenges. After Guidobaldi, Villa detail of guidelines. Courtesy Prof. C. Robotti.  Adriana no., pl., courtesy Istituto Poligrafico figure  Utica, House of the Cascade, room , dello Stato.  guidelines for maeander painted on setting-bed of figure  Ostia .., House of Amor and Psyche, sectile mosaic. CMT ., no., courtesy M. Alexander.  pavement, central section. Soprintendenza Archeo- figure  Carthage, House of the Horses, Mosaic of logica di Ostia, Archivio Fotografico .  Horses, detail of border with head of boy. KMDD.  figure  Rome, Palatine, nymphaeum of Domus figure  Thuburbo Maius, House of the Bound Transitoria, fragments of Erotes from decoration in Animals, triclinium , composite photograph. incrustation technique. DAI Rome ..  CMT ., no. and , pl., photo W. Graham, cour- figure  Pompeii  ,/, House of the Coloured tesy M. Alexander.  Capitals, Dionysiac frieze in incrustation technique. figure  Delos, House , Room , drawing of geometric DAI Rome ..  mosaic. Ecole française d’Athènes, no..  figure  Ostia, Building outside Porta Marina, hall with figure  Selection of black-and-white patterns from Rome opus sectile, reconstruction drawing. After Ostia , and Ostia. After Décor a, f, a, e, a, f.  pl..  figure  Ostia .., House of Apuleius, shield of trian- figure  Kenchreai, glass opus sectile panel with harbour gles with Gorgoneion superimposed on earlier sectile scene. American School of Classical Studies at Athens. pavement. Soprintendenza Archeologica di Ostia,  Archivio Fotografico  .  figure  Kenchreai, glass opus sectile panel with . figure  Variants on pattern of adjacent octagons American School of Classical Studies at Athens.  forming squares. After Décor a, b, d, b, figure  Mascula, geometric mosaic with signature of c, b, d, c, e, c. – workshop of Iunior. Centre Camille Jullian, CNRS Aix- figure  Selection of Floral Style patterns from Africa en-Provence.  Proconsularis. After Décor i, e, d, c, c, figure  Thebes, mosaic with inscription containing g.  signatures of Demetrios and Epiphanes. Courtesy P. figure  Selection of looped patterns from late antiq- Assimakopoulou-Atzaka.  uity. After Décor g, f, a, d, e, c.  figure  Sidi bou Ali, Enfidaville (Africa Proconsularis), figure  Mola di Gaeta, emblema with Theseus and repaired mosaic signed by Sabinianus, ‘without a Minotaur. DAI Rome ..  painter’. After L. Foucher, Karthago , , pl.a.  figure  Chieti, emblema with Theseus and Minotaur. figure  Ostia, fragmentary grave stele showing mosai- DAI Rome ..  cists preparing tesserae. DAI Rome ..  figure  Pompeii ,, House of the Silver Wedding, figure  Diagram of mosaic foundations. Computer- cubiculum z. Ministero per i Beni Culturali e assisted drawing by Tanya Kane.  Ambientali, ICCD .  figure  Francolise, Villa San Rocco, threshold mosaic of figure  Delos, House of the Trident, plan. After J. tablinum. Photo M. A. Cotton, courtesy G. Métraux.  Chamonard, Délos , Le quartier du théâtre (Paris ), figure  Francolise, Villa San Rocco, threshold mosaic pl..  of tablinum, detail showing laying-out lines and guide- figure  Pompeii  ,–, House of the Labyrinth, lines scored on nucleus. Photo J.B. Ward Perkins, cour- plan of section around colonnaded oecus (Rooms tesy G. Métraux.  –). After Strocka, CdelLab fig., courtesy Prof. figure  Francolise, Villa San Rocco, threshold mosaic V. M. Strocka.  of tablinum, diagram showing construction of laying- figure  Pompeii  ,–, House of the Bear, plan. out lines. Drawing G. Métraux, after M. Cotton, G. After Ehrhardt, Cdell’Orso fig., courtesy Prof. V. M. Métraux, The San Rocco Villa at Francolise (British Strocka.  School at Rome ) fig., courtesy G. Métraux.  figure  Acholla, House of the Triumph of Neptune, figure  Stabiae, Villa Arianna, black-and-white mosaic plan. Drawing R. Prudhomme, courtesy S. Gozlan.  xviii List of figures

figure  Antioch, House of the Buffet Supper, mosaic figure  Pompeii  (Ins.Occ.), –, House of from dining-room showing food laid out for banquet. Umbricius Scaurus, garum jar from atrium. Courtesy Department of Art and Archaeology, Princeton R. Curtis.  University, neg..  figure  Emerita, mosaic with charioteer Marcianus. figure  Antioch, House of the Evil Eye, mosaic from Museo Nacional de Arte Romano, Mérida, Archivo entrance. Department of Art and Archaeology, Fotográfico, courtesy J. M. Alvarez Martínez and A. Princeton University, neg..  Velázquez Jiménez.  figure  Kephallonia, mosaic from entrance to house. figure  Ivailovgrad, villa, portrait of man with two KMDD.  children. DAI Rome ., .  figure  Ostia .., Hall of the Measurers, scene of the figure  Kissufim, church, portraits of Lady Silthous measurement of grain. Soprintendenza Archeologica and another female donor. After Y. Tsafrir ed., Ancient di Ostia, Archivio Fotografico  .  Churches Revealed (Jerusalem ), p., courtesy of figure  Antioch, House of the Boat of Psyches, mosaic Israel Exploration Society.  from triclinium. Department of Art and Archaeology, Princeton University, neg.. 

xix Maps

. Greece and Asia Minor  . Italy and Sicily  . Gaul and the Germanies  . Britain  . North Africa  . Iberian peninsula  . Syria, Palestine, Arabia, and Cyprus  . The east 

xx PART I: Historical and regional development 1 Origins and pebble mosaics

THE ORIGINS of decorative mosaics in Greece have These include several chequer patterns of squares, and been much disputed. Earlier theories traced them back in many motifs which later formed a standard part of the the east as far as the coloured cones of terracotta used for mosaicists’ repertory: simple maeander, lozenges, wall decoration by the Sumerians at Uruk-Warka in the rosettes, the . Later buildings at Gordion show fourth millennium ;1 but a search for so distant a deri- the tradition continuing in the sixth and fifth centuries; vation has long been discarded, and the technique may the patterns now were clearly laid out in repetitive che- rather be seen as an indigenous development in Greece. quers and maeanders.4 Other examples of pebble floors Floors paved with plain or coloured pebbles set into clay with simple patterns dating from the eighth century have or plaster are found there from a very early date; the prac- been found further East, at Altintepe in eastern Anatolia, tice probably arose wherever suitable materials were avail- and in the Palaces of Arslan Tash and Til Barsib in able from riverbed or seashore. Simple examples of such Assyria.5 floors are found in as early as the Neolithic period, The earliest decorated mosaics to survive in Greece date and were used by both Minoans and Mycenaeans; on one from the late fifth century . It must remain doubtful late Mycenaean example, from a house at Tiryns, the whether they were influenced by the early examples of pebbles are set to form a rudimentary pattern.2 After the decorated pebble mosaics in Asia Minor and Assyria; an Bronze Age there is a gap in our knowledge, and undeco- independent evolution is perhaps more likely. Although rated pebble floors appear next in temples and sanctuar- precise dates are often lacking, there are enough which ies of the seventh and sixth centuries , for instance in possess termini established on archaeological or historical the Sanctuary of Artemis Orthia at Sparta, and the grounds to permit a general outline of their development. Temple of Athena Pronaia at .3 In the latter, pebbles The largest group consists of the pavements from the New of several colours are combined indiscriminately, but Town at Olynthos in northern Greece, founded in  , there is no sign of the use of patterns on such floors at this and destroyed by Philip of Macedon in ; these general date. On the fringes of the Greek world, however, pat- limits may be accepted for the mosaics.6 Other early exam- terned pebble floors were in use earlier among peoples ples come from the , from Attica and Euboea; with whom the Greeks were in contact. They have been there is no reason to assign their invention to any one found at Gordion in Asia Minor, in three houses of the region of the Greek world. The earliest stage is represented Phrygian period dating from the late eighth century . by a mosaic from the Centaur Bath in Corinth, a building In the best preserved, the west Phrygian House, dark blue, constructed in the last quarter of the fifth century7 (figures dark red and white pebbles were laid in a clay bed to form , ). The centre of the floor is occupied by a large, four- a variety of geometric motifs without any overall design. spoked wheel, the spaces between the spokes alternately

11 E.g. Gauckler –, followed by many later authors. For the Uruk- 15 Salzmann ,  no.,  no.,  nos.–, with refs. Warka mosaics, cf. A. Parrot, Sumer (London/New York ), , 16 Olynthus , –; Olynthus , –, –; Salzmann . W. Hoepfner, figs.a–b; M. Brandes, Untersuchungen zur Komposition der E.-L. Schwandner, Haus und Stadt im klassischen Griechenland Stiftmosaiken an der Pfeilerhalle der Schicht IVa in Uruk-Warka (BaM (Wohnen in der klassischen , nd edn Munich ), , –, Beiheft , Berlin ).  n., conclude that all the Olynthos mosaics are to be placed 12 C. Podzuweit, D. Salzmann, ‘Ein mykenischer Kieselmosaik- after the beginning of the fourth century, including one from the Old fussboden aus Tiryns’, AA , –; Salzmann ,  no.. Town often considered to be earlier (Olynthus , ; Salzmann , 13 R. Dawkins, The Sanctuary of Artemis Orthia at Sparta (London –,  no.). Recent discussions about the later history of ), –; R. Demangel, FdD , , Le Sanctuaire d’Athéna Pronaia , Olynthos appear to indicate only very limited later occupation of the Les Temples de Tuf (Paris ), , fig.. site; cf. Hoepfner, Schwandner, ibid., . 14 R. Young, ‘Early mosaics at Gordion’, Expedition ,, /, –; 17 C.K. Williams II, J. Fisher, Hesperia , , –, pls., ; Salzmann –, – nos.–, for the dates. Williams, Hesperia , , –, pl..

  :    

 Olynthos, House of the Comedian, andron mosaic. . mϫ. m; entrance panel . mϫ. m. First half of the fourth century .

Following this initial stage, a group may be distin- guished which belongs to the late Classical period, from    Corinth, Centaur Bath, general view. Original size . the early fourth century down to c. . It is best repre- ϫ  fi  m . m. End of the fth century . sented by most of the mosaics from Olynthos, by several pavements from Corinth and Sikyon, and by the House of the Mosaics at Eretria. The pavements of this period are composed of smooth natural pebbles; the average sizes vary from as little as one centimetre in diameter in some floors to five centimetres or more in others; most are between one and two centimetres. They are set in a layer of fine mortar on top of a coarser layer, which in turn rests on a foundation of larger stones, much as in the later tes- sellated mosaics. The designs are normally laid in white against a dark ground, though examples of dark-on-light are found occasionally. Some floors are strictly bichrome, others use pebbles of additional colours, yellow, red, and green, for details, or scatter them at random among the stones of the background. The mosaics of this period are found almost exclu- sively in private houses, in contrast to the plain pebble  Corinth, Centaur Bath, detail of centaur (north-east floors of the Archaic period, which were found in corner). temples. Their use here testifies to the increasing demand of the wealthier citizens for elegance and comfort in their black and white; around it are circular borders of triangles, domestic surroundings. They were evidently a luxury; a maeander, and a waveband. In the angles between this even at Olynthos, the site where the greatest single circular design and the outer square are figures, shown in number has been found, they are confined to a small per- white silhouette against a plain black ground: two survive, centage of houses. Their use within the house is also a centaur chasing a spotted feline, and an ithyphallic limited. A few occur in courtyards and corridors, where donkey. Within the figures black lines are used to show their practical, water-resistant and hard-wearing qualities overlapping limbs and the main features of the centaur; were evidently valued. Most often, however, they are there is no attempt to render musculature. A few red and found in dining-rooms (andrones)(figure ). A decorated tan pebbles are scattered at random on the black ground, portion in the centre of the room is usually surrounded but colour is not used for deliberate effect. Although the by a plain raised band for the dining couches, and often treatment of the figures is simple, the floor is well designed accompanied by a separate panel at the threshold, and and the geometric motifs competently handled except for sometimes by a similarly decorated anteroom. These con- an error in laying out the waveband. This is not an art in its stitute the reception area of the house, where the master infancy, even if we cannot trace it back any earlier. entertained his friends at dinner and the symposium;

 Origins and pebble mosaics

 Olynthos, Villa of Good Fortune, plan. First half of the fourth century . decoration is concentrated where it will impress the visi- sometimes as part of a very irregular design;10 they are tors.8 found also in the Centaur Bath at Corinth, and on later On some of these pavements, the choice of motifs does pebble mosaics in Athens, , and Eretria.11 In the not appear to be governed primarily by ornamental con- Villa of Good Fortune, one of the grandest houses at siderations. On one floor at Olynthos (), in a court- Olynthos, two small rooms decorated with motifs of this yard, motifs are scattered at random, with even less sort give an indication of their probable significance organisation than those of the Gordion floor several cen- (figure ). In the first, a large and a small wheel are placed turies earlier.9 Prominent among them are , con- immediately above an inscription reading Agathe Tyche, centric circles and circles divided into four quadrants ‘Good fortune’. Other motifs are scattered at random forming a wheel-pattern, and a double axe. Circles or around this and the adjoining room, which has inscrip- wheel-patterns occur on several other floors at Olynthos, tions reading Eutychia kale, ‘Success is fair’, and (around a

18 Cf. K. Dunbabin, ‘Triclinium and stibadium’, in W.J. Slater ed., Schwandner, Haus und Stadt (cit.n.), –). Dining in a Classical Context (Ann Arbor ), –. Practical con- 10 Olynthus , –, pls., ; Olynthus , , fig.; Olynthus , , siderations also encouraged the use of mosaics in dining-rooms, –, pls., b, b; Salzmann – nos., , , . since they allowed the floor to be flushed down with water to remove 11 Athens: H. Thompson, R. Wycherley, The Athenian Agora , The the débris of the meal. Agora of Athens (Princeton ), –, pl.; Salzmann  no.. 19 D.M. Robinson, AJA , , , pl.; Olynthus , ; Salzmann Megara: Salzmann  no., with refs. Eretria, gymnasium, among ,  no.. The absence of organised design is not a sign of early other good luck symbols: K. Schefold, AntK , , –; Salzmann date; the house, which is one of the few that apparently continued in – no.. use after , may owe its present form to late rebuilding (Hoepfner,

  :    

central square) Aphrodite kale, ‘Aphrodite is fair’; among circle, while a separate threshold panel shows griffins with the motifs are a double axe, a swastika, and at the entrance their prey.14 The most elaborate design of the group is a large ‘A’. Although the function of the rooms is not clear found in the andron complex of the Villa of Good (suggestions have ranged from a gaming-den or brothel Fortune at Olynthos (figures , ). In the anteroom Thetis to – more probably – a shrine of Aphrodite), the inscrip- leads a procession of Nereids mounted on sea-monsters tions suggest that the motifs serve as lucky or apotropaic to bring new arms to Achilles; they are placed in a long symbols, reinforcing the allusions to Good Fortune; and rectangular panel, surrounded by a series of borders. A the wheel/circle is probably the Wheel of Fortune.12 It small panel with two Pans confronted across a crater may therefore be suggested that one function of the floor- occupies the threshold. In the andron itself further decoration was the attraction of good luck, and the exclu- borders surround a large central panel, which combines a sion of hostile influences from the house or some portion figured frieze, of maenads and satyrs, with a central panel of it; where ordered design is entirely lacking, this role showing Dionysus driving his leopard-chariot.15 may be taken to be dominant. The figures on the mosaics of this group are essentially Most of the mosaics in this late Classical group are two-dimensional, light against a dark ground. Dark much more decorative than these. They are usually figures on light occur once, on a fragmentary mosaic designed with a series of borders or friezes around a from Sikyon, but seem to be used there simply as a varia- central element; many compositions are based on a circle- tion.16 Interior details are indicated by lines of dark in-square design. Border-patterns include the maeander, pebbles. A development may be traced from a minimum wave-band, scroll, palmette frieze, and rows of triangles. of interior detail on the figures of the earliest mosaics of Figures sometimes form a frieze, most often with rows of the group to a fuller rendering on those presumably to be animals, real or fabulous; others may be placed in rectan- placed later in the fourth century: thus the Bellerophon gular panels, or in the angles between a circle and an mosaic at Olynthos belongs to a slightly earlier phase in enclosing square. Some of the finest examples of this the development than those in the Villa of Good Fortune. group come from the House of the Mosaics at Eretria, There are, however, few precise dates to support this rela- which has a terminus post quem of the early fourth tive chronology, and the evolution was not necessarily century13 (figures , ; plate ). An andron is decorated uniform in different regions. Additional colours are used with a central circle with a star surrounded by a lotus- tentatively at first, then with increasing confidence, to and-palmette frieze, with eagles and ox-skulls filling the highlight specific parts of a figure or to pick out objects angles of the enclosing square. Then comes a figured and details. A griffin on a threshold at Sikyon has uniform frieze with Arimaspians fighting griffins on two sides, red patches on its wing and body, and a red tongue (figure lions attacking horses on the other two; and an outer );17 the Nereid from the House of the Mosaics at Eretria border of maeander. A panel at the entrance shows a rides a sea-horse with red fins, wears yellow shoes and a Nereid riding a sea-horse; in the anteroom are sphinxes red-bordered cloak, and carries a yellow shield rimmed in and felines in a border of lotus-and-palmette. In this red (plate ). Figures, human and animal, are in rigorous group of mosaics animal scenes and friezes are common; profile in the earliest examples, and faces continue to be mythological scenes are comparatively rare, and usually in profile throughout this period; but later examples show occupy central panels. In the andron of House at freer movement of the rest of the body. The Maenads in Olynthos Bellerophon is neatly placed in a circle, the Villa of Good Fortune, for example, twist and turn in mounted on Pegasus and striking at the Chimaira a variety of poses, though the lines that indicate their beneath; numerous concentric borders surround the swirling drapery are coarse and simplified; the

12 Robinson, ‘The Villa of Good Fortune at Olynthus’, AJA , , 15 Robinson, AJA , , –, pls.–; Olynthus , –, –, figs.–; Robinson, CP , , – (gambling-parlour); pls., ; Olynthus , –, pls.–; Salzmann –,  nos.–. Salzmann  nos.–; Hoepfner, Schwandner, Haus und Stadt Salzmann dates the mosaics c.– , on the basis, among other (cit.n.),  (suggesting that the rooms had a cult function and the criteria, of the character of the scroll border on the mosaic of Achilles building as a whole was a club-house). and Thetis. 13 P. Ducrey, I. Metzger, K. Reber, Eretria , Le quartier de la Maison aux 16 D. Salzmann, AA , –; Salzmann –,  no.. Mosaïques (Lausanne ), esp.–. They propose a date around 17 From the threshold of the room with the scroll, discussed below,  (against Salzmann , – nos.–, who proposed c.–). n.: Salzmann ,  no.. 14 Olynthus , –, pls., ; Salzmann ,  no..

 Origins and pebble mosaics

 Olynthos, Villa of Good Fortune, Dionysiac mosaic from andron. . mϫ. m.

Arimaspians at Eretria, brought to their knees by the and two-dimensional; and conventional designs such as attacking griffins, move freely in complex positions. the palmette continue to be treated in this way. The Overlapping of figures or parts of figures is avoided at scrolls, however, acquire a greater richness, and begin to first, then it too comes to be rendered more confidently. be treated in a more three-dimensional manner. An espe- In the Villa of Good Fortune, Dionysus’ pair of panthers cially fine example from Sikyon covers the whole floor overlap, and the paws of one are seen against the running with a design of interlaced scrolls around a central rosette, satyr, while the Nereids in the anteroom sit somewhat symmetrical and artificial in overall composition, but precariously on the coils of the sea-monsters. A second increasingly realistic in individual details (figure ). The mosaic of Nereids from Olynthos, presumably slightly leaves curling back from the stems and the great trumpet- later, places the Nereids much more freely and firmly on flowers in which the scrolls end are now rendered three- the sea-monsters’ backs, and coils the creatures’ tails into dimensionally, and red is used to enhance the effect. The spirals.18 In none of this group is there any use of model- mosaic looks forward to the magnificent floral designs ling or shading;19 nor do the figures have any indication of that are characteristic of the early .20 spatial setting. These early pebble mosaics have often been compared Floral and vegetal elements – rosettes, palmettes, acan- to textiles; but in fact the mosaicists clearly drew their thus and ivy scrolls – occupy a prominent place on many inspiration from many sources. The designs of the floors of the mosaics. A development may be seen here more with their multiple borders, usually slightly set in from clearly than with the figures. Early examples are stylised the edges of the room, are indeed reminiscent of a carpet,

18 Olynthus , –, figs., ; Olynthus , –, pls., ; Salzmann , same mosaic, volume is occasionally suggested by the lines in which  no.. the pebbles are set. 19 The shield carried by the Nereid in the House of the Mosaics at 20 Orlandos, Praktika –, , fig.; Salzmann ,  no., suggest- Eretria gives a slight hint of shading through the admixture of red ing a date c.–; cf. below, n.. and yellow pebbles, but it is done in a very unsystematic way; in the

  :    

in fact have much in common. The rendering of the figures on the earlier pavements is infinitely less sophisti- cated than on contemporary vase-painting, and seems to revert to a level of anatomical knowledge typical in that medium of a century or more earlier. The evolution within the handling of the figures which has just been dis- cussed is an internal evolution, as the mosaicists grew more confident in the handling of their material; it does not run parallel to any similar evolution in vase-painting, but rather aims to catch up with achievements mastered there much earlier. Only in the treatment of vegetal orna- ment is there a comparable development in mosaic and vase-painting, which does suggest a relationship, though perhaps in the sense that both drew on a common source.22 The influence of major painting is hardly to be dis- cerned in these early mosaics. Written sources suggest that painters in the late fifth and fourth centuries were  Eretria, House of the Mosaics, anteroom and andron. pre-occupied with questions of naturalism, the represen- Mid-fourth century . tation of space and handling of the third dimension, and the use of shading to model form in figures and objects. with the threshold panel acting as a rug at the door; and These concerns are foreign to the mosaics of the late they share with textiles their essentially two-dimensional Classical period, though a few tentative steps in this direc- character as a decoration of a flat surface. Some of the tion are to be seen on some of the finest examples, those common ornamental motifs are among those found in from the House of the Mosaics at Eretria or the Sikyon textile decoration or suitable for weaving; and it has been scroll. Only at the end of the fourth century is an attempt argued that the (apparently) sudden appearance of such to imitate or rival the achievements of painting percep- floors should be seen as a translation into permanent tible in the mosaics, and then in a very specific group. forms of the luxurious textiles from the Near East fash- This next group belongs to the early Hellenistic period, ionable in the later fifth century.21 But many motifs, such approximately the last third of the fourth century . Its as the maeander, wave-band, and palmette frieze, form outstanding products are the mosaics from two large part of the standard repertory shared by architecture, houses in the Macedonian capital of Pella, dated on vase-painting, and other crafts. Other parallels have been archaeological grounds to the closing decades of the drawn with red-figure vase-painting, with which the century.23 House . contained figured mosaics of a Lion mosaics share the representation of light figures on a dark Hunt and of Dionysus (figures , ), both occupying the ground, as well as the iconography of some figured centre of large andrones, while threshold panels repre- scenes. But it seems unlikely that a small-scale art such as sented a griffin with its prey and a pair of centaurs. vase-painting would have acted as a primary inspiration Coarser geometric designs of lozenges and squares paved for work in a very different medium; and the two do not the anterooms to the andrones.24 In House . there were

21 F. von Lorenz, ‘Barbaron hyphasmata’, RömMitt , , –; Ph. tions under the mosaics in both houses revealed an identical system Bruneau, Archeologia (Warszawa) , , . of bedding, and ceramic and numismatic material which gave a ter- 22 Cf. M. Robertson, ‘Early Greek mosaic’, in Studies in the History of minus post quem of – for both: I. Touratsoglou, ArchDelt , Art , and Greece in Late Classical and Early Hellenistic , , –. The variations in style and technical means between Times (Washington ), –, for a comparison of the floral the mosaics in the two houses should not be ascribed to a difference designs on the mosaics to the ‘flower-paintings’ ascribed by Pliny, in date, but to one of workmanship, and perhaps also of models H.N. .; ., to Pausias of Sikyon in the mid-fourth century; being imitated. Touratsoglou suggests a date early in the reign of Salzmann – for parallels between vegetal ornament in vase- as the most likely. painting and other media and that on mosaics. 24 Makaronas, Giouri –; Ph. Petsas, ‘Mosaics from Pella’, CMGR , 23 Makaronas, Giouri –,  (for the date). Stratigraphic excava- –, figs.–; Salzmann –, –, nos.–.

 Origins and pebble mosaics

 Eretria, House of the Mosaics, griffins and Arimasps from andron. . mϫ. m.

 Sikyon, floral mosaic. Sikyon Museum. . mϫ. m; entrance panel . mϫ. m. Mid-fourth century .

  :    

 Pella, House ., Lion Hunt. Pella Museum. . mϫ. m. Late fourth century .

three figured mosaics, showing respectively the Rape of Helen by Theseus, a Stag Hunt (figure ), and an Amazonomachy, as well as fragments of two other floral designs.25 All differ in a striking manner from even the most advanced stylistically of the previous group; new techniques are adopted, and there are signs of a new con- ception of the nature of the medium. Figured friezes have almost totally disappeared; most of the floors still use the design of multiple borders around a central rectangular panel, but this panel has become much more important. The largest, the Rape of Helen, measures . m by. m, the Lion Hunt . m by . m. The figure scenes in these panels are composed with a concern for movement and the third dimension quite different from any of the mosaics previously discussed. The figures stand on shallow uneven strips of yellow-brown ground; and they are represented with free use of foreshortening. In the Lion Hunt, overlapping is kept to a minimum; but in the Stag Hunt the two hunters, hound, and stag form a densely set group, with a real sense of depth. Even more ambitious is the composition in the Rape of Helen: the charioteer Phorbas drives a four-horse chariot, whose overlapping horses advance in three-quarter view, and fi  Pella, House ., Dionysus on leopard. Pella Museum. looks back at the intertwined gures of Theseus and . mϫ. m. Late fourth century . Helen, while at the end of the panel Helen’s companion Deianeira turns as she flees and holds out a hand towards her friend. The poses are complex and convincing; faces are in three-quarter view as well as profile. Other changes are to be seen in the treatment of the 25 Makaronas, Giouri –; Petsas, ibid., figs.–; Salzmann –, figures. Details are no longer purely linear; shading is nos.–. used extensively, with clusters of grey and brown pebbles

 Origins and pebble mosaics

indicating the musculature of the human body, the folds of the cloaks, the pelts of the animals. Colour is used more freely; though the figures are still light on a dark ground, the stag’s pelt is brownish, human hair and animal manes are rendered in red and yellow, several shades of red, brown, and yellow pick out details such as the harness of the horses, the belt and scabbard of a sword, and the tongue of stag and hound. Features are carefully delineated: eyebrows, eyelashes, the curl of a nostril. To achieve these effects, new techniques in the setting of the stones are employed. The pebbles are much more carefully sorted, not only for colour but also for size, with the pebbles in the figures more densely set than in the background. In addition, several of the floors use various artificial means to improve the rendering. In the Lion Hunt, large areas of the outlines of the figures and many interior details are marked off by strips of terra- cotta, for instance the eyes and nose of the hunters, the outlines of their faces, fingers, toes, and genitals; the curls of human hair and of the lion’s mane are individually out- lined (plates , ). Traces in the mortar show that these strips must have been set in place first, and the outlines then filled up with pebbles; red lines from a preliminary sketch on the mortar were also visible in places.26 The Rape of Helen also uses terracotta strips for details, but  Pella, House ., Dionysus, detail of head of Dionysus. adds thin strips of lead for specific places such as the eye sockets and fingernails. The eyes of all the figures are Although the interior detail of the god’s body is more missing, and are likely to have been of semi-precious linear than on those of the hunters, shadows are indicated stones. In the Stag Hunt, in contrast, no use is made of on his arm and leg and on the further legs of the leopard. such strips; but there is a similar striving for sharp Both lead and terracotta strips are used for outlines and definition and clear detail. This is achieved through the details, especially in the faces of god and beast, and for use of much smaller pebbles where fine detail is required; hands and feet. In addition, artificial beads of green clay the eyebrows, eyelashes, and fingernails of the hunters, for were used for Dionysus’ wreath of vine-leaves and the example, and the eyes of stag and dog are all outlined by a head of the thyrsus. His eye, and that of the leopard, were single row of small black pebbles. again probably formed by a single semi-precious stone. The mosaic of Dionysus in House . differs from the There can be little doubt that the enormous difference rest in its renunciation of three-dimensional effects and between the Pella mosaics and their predecessors is due to in its much simpler composition. The andron had the the influence of an art which up to this time appears to usual raised platform for the couches around the edge. have had little impact on mosaic: major painting. The The central area was paved with plain white pebbles, advances in the handling of depth and the use of shading instead of the usual borders around the panel. Here reflect developments in fourth-century Greek painting, as Dionysus, holding a thyrsus, rides on the back of his we see them, for instance, in the Macedonian tombs of leopard (or is it a cheetah?), against a completely plain Vergina and Lefkadia. Thus the hunting scenes may be black ground. The heads of god and beast are in profile, compared in several respects with that on the façade of though Dionysus’ body is in foreshortened three-quarter the ‘Tomb of Philip’ at Vergina, the four-horse chariot on view, and the effect of the whole is of a classicising sim- the Rape of Helen with that in the Tomb of Persephone; it plicity. The technical means, however, do not differ greatly from the Lion Hunt in the same house (figure ). 26 Cf. Petsas, ibid., , , figs.,; see below, ch., n..

  :    

 Pella, House ., Stag Hunt signed by Gnosis. Central panel . mϫ. m. Late fourth century . also looks forward (though it is simpler) to that on the in achieving remarkable results without the use of Alexander mosaic from Pompeii, whose original is artificial materials, the labour involved must have been believed to have been a painting of the end of the fourth extremely demanding. The other mosaics, with their use century.27 The mosaics are no longer conceived as a two- of lead and terracotta strips and of artificial beads, show dimensional design spread over the surface of the floor, the pursuit of effects beyond the limitations of the natural but as a pictorial figure scene, to which borders are subor- medium. The terracotta strips in particular must have dinate. Only the Dionysus mosaic lacks this three-dimen- been baked to the required shape before use; this implies sional quality, but it differs even more from the mosaics of the existence of full-scale cartoons for the design, in addi- Olynthos or Corinth in its concentration upon a single, tion to the preliminary sketch visible in places on the isolated figure group. It seems likely that it too imitates a mortar. painting, but in this case the model will have been a clas- Floral motifs on the Pella floors show the culmination sicising work, looking back in composition at least to the of the tendency observed on earlier fourth-century art of the fifth century. There is another indication of the mosaics. Around the Stag Hunt mosaic runs a border of new status of the craft of mosaic: along the top of the Stag extraordinary richness: scrolls spring from acanthus Hunt mosaic is written Gnosis epoesen, ‘Gnosis made this’, clumps in the angles, and unfurl along the sides in a series the first known signature of a mosaicist. The new tech- of spiralling tendrils ending in a wide variety of flowers niques which are used reveal the mosaicists pushing the and leaves (figure ). Though the whole is artificial, indi- art of pebble mosaic to its uttermost limits, in the search vidual forms are often highly naturalistic; the overall for effects finer and more sophisticated than could readily design is three-dimensional, and polychromy is freely be achieved with natural pebbles. While Gnosis succeeded used to enhance the effect. Equally rich scrolls once

27    framed the Lion Hunt mosaic, and two fragmentary M. Andronikos, Vergina. The Royal Tombs (Athens ), – ; fl   fl Alexander mosaic, below, ch., ns.–. Cf. also Makaronas, Giouri, oors in House . ; and elaborate all-over oral designs of –. the same type cover two further mosaics from Pella, from

 Origins and pebble mosaics

 Vergina, Palace, room , drawing of floral mosaic. . mϫ. m. End of the fourth century .

found on South Italian vases of the late fourth century, which shows the same sense of depth and luxuriant growth, and often frames a female protome like that on the Dyrrhachion mosaic. Floral ornament of this type occurs in other media of the same period, notably metalware, and at least once in major painting, in a Macedonian tomb.31 All attest to a common repertory, and a shared  Pella, House ., Stag Hunt, detail of border. interest in vegetal ornament, rather than direct influence from one medium to another. The Macedonian mosaics a circular building (tholos) and an andron in the Kanali appear in this respect too to show a local development, district.28 They are also found outside Pella, on a frag- perhaps the result of the activity of a single workshop, mentary mosaic at Dyrrhachion (Epidamnos), where operating also in Dyrrhachion presumably for a special they frame a magnificent female head in three-quarter contract. It is an attractive hypothesis that its origins are view, about a metre high.29 Perhaps the finest of all deco- to be connected with the artists who, two generations rate a room in the Palace at Vergina (ancient Aigai), filling earlier, produced the floral mosaic at Sikyon discussed a circle around a central rosette, while female protomai above.32 ending in scrolls occupy the outer corners30 (figure ). The high pictorial quality of the Pella mosaics is The scrolls are more regular and symmetrical here than unique; no later pebble mosaics even begin to approach it. on the Pella borders, in part because of their use as an all- The reason is surely in part economic, in view of the over design, but the three-dimensional character of spiral amount of labour which they must have required; no tendrils and individual flower forms is as strong. The others have been found in any context comparable to the design has been compared to the shoulder-decoration palatial dwellings of the Macedonian capital. On our

28 Tholos, late fourth century: Ch. Makaronas, ArchDelt , , , Ferrand  (Paris )), –; Salzmann ,  no.. –, pls.–, ; M. Lilimbaki-Akamati, ‘Ανασκα}ικη!ε!ρευνα 30 M. Andronikos, Ch. Makaronas, N. Mpoutsopoulos, G. Balakakis, στην περιοχη! του καναλιου! Πε!λλα|’, AEMTH , , –; So' a0 ma!jsoqo sg4| Beqci!mg| (Athens ), –, pls.,, –; Salzmann , ,  no.. Andron, beginning of the third century: M. Andronikos, Vergina. The Prehistoric Necropolis and the Hellenistic Lilimbaki-Akamati, ‘Ενα νε!ο ψηφιδωτο!τη| Πε!λλα|’, in 'Algso|. Palace (SIMA , Lund ), , fig.; Salzmann , ,  no.. Silgsijo!|so!lo| cia som Jahgcgsg!L. Amdqo!mijo ( 31 Refs. in Guimier-Sorbets, ‘La mosaïque hellénistique’ (cit.n.); cf. ) , –, pls.–. also Salzmann –. 29 A.-M. Guimier-Sorbets, ‘La mosaïque hellénistique de Dyrrhachion 32 Above, n., and n. for Robertson’s theory of the association of et sa place dans la série des mosaïques grecques à décor végétal’, in these floral mosaics with the flower-paintings of Pausias of Sikyon. L’Illyrie méridionale et l’Epire dans l’antiquité  (Colloque Clermont-

  :    

 Rhodes, Bellerophon and Chimaira. Rhodes Museum. Probably first half of third century . present knowledge, therefore, they should be seen as an They are mostly plain black and white with a limited use exception, and not used as an index of the prevailing style of grey, sometimes to suggest shading. Lead strips are of the period. The aim to imitate painting which they used in the Bellerophon and centaur mosaics to outline a display was also to be characteristic of later Hellenistic few details (for instance, the shaft of Bellerophon’s spear), mosaics, which used different techniques and materials; but in a much less systematic way than at Pella. Floral but it was extraordinarily difficult and laborious for scrolls form a border around the Bellerophon and Triton mosaicists working with natural pebbles. mosaics; they too are simpler and flatter than those at Pebble mosaics elsewhere in Greece which can be Pella and Vergina, but retain a suggestion of the third assigned to the third century show a predominantly two- dimension. Both the stylistic aims of the Pella mosaicists dimensional and linear style, more in keeping with the and the technical means by which they achieved them limitations of the medium. Several fine examples have were therefore known to those at Rhodes; but they were been found in the city of Rhodes.33 They show large content – probably through a mixture of aesthetic and panels, in which the figures are set in white against a plain economic reasons – with much simpler effects. black ground: Bellerophon and the Chimaira (figure ), a The later history of pebble mosaics represents a decline centaur holding a hare, a Triton. There is no indication of in quality. They continued to be produced throughout the setting, though the figures themselves, especially the third century  and into the second; there was some frontal Triton, use foreshortening and convey a sense of enlargement of the decorative repertory, but the standard depth, and the anatomical rendering is considerably more of execution was seldom high. More interesting is their detailed than on works of the pre-Hellenistic period. geographical expansion in the Hellenistic period. In the fourth century they are found almost exclusively in main- 33 G. Konstantinopoulos, ArchDelt , , B , , pl.; land Greece; early Hellenistic mosaics appear in the Konstantinopoulos, AAA , , , , fig.; Konstantinopoulos, islands and Asia Minor, and the absence of earlier exam-    fi        Ergon , – , gs. – ; Salzmann , – nos. – . The ples here may be due to the accidents of excavation. But mosaics have only a terminus post quem in the foundation of the city in /; on the basis of stylistic criteria Salzmann ascribes them examples dated, certainly or probably, to the third and to the first third of the third century. second centuries are found much further afield: on the

 Origins and pebble mosaics

northern shores of the Black Sea, at and In general, after the early third century pebble mosaics Chersonnesos; on Cyprus, at Kourion and Nea Paphos; represent the survival of a technique which had already and as far east as the palace of Ai Khanoum in passed its prime. Other experiments were underway with Afghanistan.34 Others are found in the west, though it is different methods of paving a floor, many of which indi- difficult here to disentangle local traditions from Greek cate dissatisfaction with the limitations of natural influences. That such independent traditions existed is pebbles: a dissatisfaction towards which the mosaics of shown by the discovery of pebble mosaics with simple Pella had already pointed. patterns in Spain dating from the seventh to the fourth centuries .35 In Italy too there is evidence for a local tra- dition of floors where monochrome pebbles were laid in Bibliography patterns formed by the angle of their setting. But other pebble mosaics in Italy show more Greek influence in Salzmann (who gives a catalogue of all pebble mosaics pub-  composition and choice of motifs, though distinct local lished up to c. ); C.M. Robertson, ‘Greek mosaics’, JHS         characteristics remain. One example in Sicily, at the , , – , pls. – , and ‘Postscript’, JHS , , –, pls.–; Robertson, ‘Early Greek mosaic’, in Studies Carthaginian city of Motya, has often been dated very    in the History of Art , Macedonia and Greece in Late early, since the city was destroyed in / ; however Classical and Early Hellenistic Times (Washington ), more recent research suggests that it belongs to a reoccu- –; A.-M. Guimier-Sorbets, in R. Ginouvès ed., pation of the site.36 A group from Arpi in Apulia show Macedonia, from Philip II to the Roman Conquest animal friezes in black on a light ground, within borders (Princeton ), –. of maeander and wave; the technique is crude, and they seem to represent a local variant.37

34 Black Sea: A. Vostchinina, ‘Mosaïques gréco-romaines trouvées en 35 D. Fernández-Galiano, ‘New light on the origins of floor mosaics’, Union Soviétique’, CMGR , –, figs.–, ; Salzmann –,  AntJ , , –: Cástulo (Jaén) and Pozo Moro (Albacete). no., – nos.–; archaeological evidence points to a date in the 36 Boeselager –, figs.–; Salzmann ,  no.; Boeselager rightly third century  for the mosaics from Olbia, the third to second for says that the provincial character of the floor makes any assignation the one from Chersonnesos. Cyprus: Michaelides, Cypriot Mosaics, , of a chronology on stylistic grounds impossible. – nos.–, pl.; Salzmann –,  nos..–; the Nea Paphos 37 M. Cristofani, DdA , , , figs.–; Salzmann ,  nos.–. mosaic is dated stratigraphically to the end of the fourth/beginning The use of dark-on-light figures does not seem to me, as Salzmann of the third century. Ai Khanoum: P. Bernard, CRAI , –; takes it, to be a characteristic of the third century, but rather to be a Bernard, CRAI , –; Salzmann ,  nos.–; first half to local peculiarity here. mid-second century .

