The Road to Afghanistan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Road to Afghanistan Introduction Hundreds of books—memoirs, histories, fiction, poetry, chronicles of military units, and journalistic essays—have been written about the Soviet war in Afghanistan. If the topic has not yet been entirely exhausted, it certainly has been very well documented. But what led up to the invasion? How was the decision to bring troops into Afghanistan made? What was the basis for the decision? Who opposed the intervention and who had the final word? And what kind of mystical country is this that lures, with an almost maniacal insistence, the most powerful world states into its snares? In the nineteenth and early twentieth century it was the British, in the 1980s it was the Soviet Union, and now America and its allies continue the legacy. Impoverished and incredibly backward Afghanistan, strange as it may seem, is not just a normal country. Due to its strategically important location in the center of Asia, the mountainous country has long been in the sights of more than its immediate neighbors. But woe to anyone who arrives there with weapon in hand, hoping for an easy gain—the barefoot and illiterate Afghans consistently bury the hopes of the strange foreign soldiers who arrive along with battalions of tanks and strategic bombers. To understand Afghanistan is to see into your own future. To comprehend what happened there, what happens there continually, is to avoid great tragedy. One of the critical moments in the modern history of Afghanistan is the period from April 27, 1978, when the “April Revolution” took place in Kabul and the leftist People’s Democratic Party seized control of the country, until December 27, 1979, when Soviet special forces, obeying their “international duty,” eliminated the ruling leader and installed 1 another leader of the same party in his place. This twenty-month period is the key to unlocking an understanding of many of the events and on-going developments in the Middle East. The bloody coup d’état of April 1978, in the course of which revolutionaries killed President Mohammad Daoud, his family, and his allies, was the first link in a lengthy chain of plots, intrigues, and murders over the next years. It was the April Revolution’s suppression of Islamic fundamentalist forces that both stymied the Islamists’ reach for power and subsequently facilitated their consolidation of forces. It also fostered international support for their cause from both eastern and western states. The April Revolution was the world’s last (and for the time being) social coup, the executors of which proclaimed noble aspirations but suffered a devastating defeat. The agents of the coup to a large extent dug their own graves. Why were the masses unsupportive of, and often even tremendously resistant to, the revolutionaries’ aspirations to lead Afghanistan out of the darkness of the medieval ages, to conduct economic reforms, and to transform the country by instilling democratic principles? How is it that the Kremlin, quite pleased with the prior bourgeois feudal regime of Mohammad Daoud, and at first quite nonchalant about the April Revolution, became the revolution’s de facto hostage? Who were the agents responsible for the murder of Adolf Dubs, and what motivated the assassination? Was Hafizullah Amin an agent of the CIA? What were the various roles of the politicians, military personnel, special services, and diplomats behind those events? To this day there are more questions than answers. 2 When the Kremlin’s “international duty”/intervention began in 1979, only a “limited contingent of Soviet troops” was envisaged. The operation very quickly escalated into a prolonged regional engagement, which led to direct conflicts between the Soviet Union and a broad coalition of Western countries, the Islamic East, and China. By the time the conflict was concluded nearly ten years later, it had made an indelible impact on the world. It can be considered the final note of the great standoff that comprised the essence of global politics during the preceding decades. The debate over whether Soviet troops should have crossed their southern borders in those years will not die down any time soon. Was the intervention an inevitable response to dangerous threats posed by external enemies or was it a fatal mistake? Were there other means to prevent the dangerous machinations of Islamic radicals and retain Afghanistan in the sphere of Soviet influence? Supporters on either side have weighty arguments to justify their positions. One thing, however, is obvious. The enemies of the Soviet Union capitalized on the strategic opportunity afforded by the intervention brilliantly, first by enmeshing Moscow in an exhaustive war of attrition and then by labeling the USSR an “evil empire,” a designation that would stay with the nation for a long time. The perspective that contends that the war in Afghanistan expedited the processes that eventually led to the destruction of the Soviet project and state is widely accepted and disseminated. It cannot be denied that the war had a terribly negative impact on the Soviet economy, corrupted the moral foundation of the state, and drastically reduced the number of the USSR’s international allies. 3 However, if one examines the military activity of the Fortieth Army, as well as the measures implemented by thousands of Soviet advisors in Afghanistan, it should be acknowledged that by the time of the “limited contingent’s” departure from the DRA*, many of their goals had been accomplished. It can be said with confidence that were it not for the chaos that marked the minds and actions of the Russian leaders following the collapse of the USSR, and were it not for their abandonment of the Afghan president Najibullah, who was left to face his powerful enemies on his own, the history of the Middle East would have developed very differently. There would be no Talibs, drugs, terrorists, or subsequent invasion by NATO coalition forces. This, however, is conjecture. It is obvious that the Soviet Union was not led into Afghanistan by the capricious desires of individual politicians within the USSR’s Communist Party, but rather by the confluence of a great deal of both objective and subjective circumstances, the logical result of geopolitical positioning over the preceding three decades of the Cold War. For the authors of this book, Afghanistan and the tragic events that we describe do not belong to some fantastic and abstract story, but to our very lives. One of us, as a staff member of the Soviet embassy in Kabul, witnessed the first stage of the April Revolution first-hand and even directly participated in the events. The other author, as a journalist and historian, has visited the mystical country many times and has written countless articles, books, and a dissertation on the subject. In our work we naturally rely upon not only our own memories, but on open sources (books, articles, and monographs published in Russia and abroad), archival documents (many of which are quoted here for the first time), as well as invaluable eyewitness accounts and reports from those who participated in the events (a * The official name of the state of Afghanistan from Apr. 30, 1978-Nov. 30, 1987 4 full listing of which is provided at the end of the book). We would like to express our enormous gratitude to all of our sources. Despite our backgrounds as historians, we intentionally decided against relating a dry point-by-point account of what transpired, and opted instead for the more ambitious approach of political investigation in the form of a belles-lettres narrative. We believe that such a format will attract a broad readership interested in the key moments of modern history. All of the situations described in the book are real. The conversations in which the authors did not directly participate have been reconstructed based on archival documents and the narratives of the actual participants. During our work on the book we verified every oral account. There is not one fabricated character in the book. A few names of KGB operatives who were working undercover in Kabul have been changed at their request. 5 Chapter 1: VIRUS: How the invasion of Afghanistan infected us. How we were infected by the invasion of Afghanistan Springtime brings the roar of thunderstorms to the capital of Afghanistan. The clear and sunny morning skies darken perceptibly as the lengthening days draw towards noon and heavy black clouds creep over the mountain ranges, encompassing the city. The faint glean of heat that shimmers on the ground is sensed by the whole human organism before the sight recognizes it as the signal of the day’s transition from a radiant morning to a sweltering afternoon. As the storm approaches, the lack of oxygen creates the impression that the encroaching thunderclouds are wringing out any remaining fresh air. In these moments the earlier polyphonic harmony of the city loses cohesion and the noises of pedestrian activity begin to sound discordantly amplified and distorted by the incipient gloom. The wind picks up as nascent dust devils carry discarded papers, plastic bags, and other trash, all the while stinging skin and eyes with irritating sand. Suddenly a flash of light, a delayed report of thunder, and a few ripe, warm drops fall scattered in the dusty streets, announcing the imminent downpour. Soon lightning will flash almost incessantly. The heavy storm clouds, laden with electricity, rapidly approach the capital until bolts of lightning seem to strike from directly overhead. Thunder becomes a continuous rumble. The storm will continue for an hour or two before the thunder relents and the black clouds begin to disperse. The fallen rainwater forms puddles that are sucked into the greedy soil right before your eyes.
Recommended publications
  • Justice & Security Practices, Perceptions, and Problems in Kabul and Nangarhar
    Justice & Security Practices, Perceptions, and Problems in Kabul and Nangarhar M AY 2014 Above: Behsud Bridge, Nangarhar Province (Photo by TLO) A TLO M A P P I N G R EPORT Justice and Security Practices, Perceptions, and Problems in Kabul and Nangarhar May 2014 In Cooperation with: © 2014, The Liaison Office. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the publisher, The Liaison Office. Permission can be obtained by emailing [email protected] ii Acknowledgements This report was commissioned from The Liaison Office (TLO) by Cordaid’s Security and Justice Business Unit. Research was conducted via cooperation between the Afghan Women’s Resource Centre (AWRC) and TLO, under the supervision and lead of the latter. Cordaid was involved in the development of the research tools and also conducted capacity building by providing trainings to the researchers on the research methodology. While TLO makes all efforts to review and verify field data prior to publication, some factual inaccuracies may still remain. TLO and AWRC are solely responsible for possible inaccuracies in the information presented. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cordaid. The Liaison Office (TL0) The Liaison Office (TLO) is an independent Afghan non-governmental organization established in 2003 seeking to improve local governance, stability and security through systematic and institutionalized engagement with customary structures, local communities, and civil society groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Fcaglp, Unlp, 2018
    Scientific Philosophy Gustavo E. Romero IAR-CONICET/UNLP, Argentina FCAGLP, UNLP, 2018 Epistemology Episteme, as distinguished from techne, is etymologically derived from the Ancient Greek word ἐπιστήμη for knowledge or science, which comes from the verb ἐπίσταμαι, "to know". In Plato's terminology episteme means knowledge, as in "justified true belief", in contrast to doxa, common belief or opinion. The word epistemology, meaning the study of knowledge, is derived from episteme. Plato Epistemology is the general study of cognitive processes and their outcome: knowledge. Knowledge is the product of cognitive operations made by an inquiring subject. It is not a thing or a substance, but a series of brain changes in the knower. Knowledge is not independent of the knowing subject, although we often feign it is for practical reasons. Knowledge is different from belief: I can know a story, for instance, but do not believe it. Belief implies a psychological adherence to some propositions. It is possible to believe something without understanding it, so belief is not necessary associated with neither truth nor justification. Knowledge acquisition requires a modification of the brain of the knower. This can be done in different ways, hence there are different kinds of knowledge. (i) Sensory-motor knowledge: the result of learning from actions. (ii) Perceptual knowledge: the result of perceiving events, either internal or external to the subject. (iii) Conceptual or propositional knowledge: the result of ideation, conjecturing, testing, correcting. Notice that not all knowledge is beneficial: we can learn trivialities, falsehoods, or highly harmful habits The three kind of knowledge are interrelated: conceptual knowledge can improve motor skills and perception; perception is used to evaluate conjectures; motor skills can help to improve perception and build instruments such as books, that enhance the ability to learn.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan, 1989-1996: Between the Soviets and the Taliban
    Afghanistan, 1989-1996: Between the Soviets and the Taliban A thesis submitted to the Miami University Honors Program in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for University Honors with Distinction by, Brandon Smith May 2005 Oxford, OH ABSTRACT AFGHANISTAN, 1989-1996: BETWEEN THE SOVIETS AND THE TALIBAN by, BRANDON SMITH This paper examines why the Afghan resistance fighters from the war against the Soviets, the mujahideen, were unable to establish a government in the time period between the withdrawal of the Soviet army from Afghanistan in 1989 and the consolidation of power by the Taliban in 1996. A number of conflicting explanations exist regarding Afghanistan’s instability during this time period. This paper argues that the developments in Afghanistan from 1989 to 1996 can be linked to the influence of actors outside Afghanistan, but not to the extent that the choices and actions of individual actors can be overlooked or ignored. Further, the choices and actions of individual actors need not be explained in terms of ancient animosities or historic tendencies, but rather were calculated moves to secure power. In support of this argument, international, national, and individual level factors are examined. ii Afghanistan, 1989-1996: Between the Soviets and the Taliban by, Brandon Smith Approved by: _________________________, Advisor Karen L. Dawisha _________________________, Reader John M. Rothgeb, Jr. _________________________, Reader Homayun Sidky Accepted by: ________________________, Director, University Honors Program iii Thanks to Karen Dawisha for her guidance and willingness to help on her year off, and to John Rothgeb and Homayun Sidky for taking the time to read the final draft and offer their feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • SSC-SUPPL-2018-RESULT.Pdf
    FBISE - Computer Section FEDERAL BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, ISLAMABAD 1 RESULT GAZETTE OF SSC-II SUPPL. EXAMINATION 2018 SALIENT FEATURES OF RESULT ALL AREAS G r a d e W i s e D i s t r i b u t i o n Pass Sts. / Grp. / Gender Enrolled Absent Appd. R.L. UFM Fail Pass A1 A B C D E %age G.P.A EX/PRIVATE CANDIDATES Male 6965 132 6833 16 5 3587 3241 97 112 230 1154 1585 56 47.43 1.28 Female 2161 47 2114 12 1 893 1220 73 63 117 625 335 7 57.71 1.78 1 SCIENCE Total : 9126 179 8947 28 6 4480 4461 170 175 347 1779 1920 63 49.86 1.40 Male 1086 39 1047 2 1 794 252 0 2 7 37 159 45 24.07 0.49 Female 1019 22 997 4 3 614 380 1 0 18 127 217 16 38.11 0.91 2 HUMANITIES Total : 2105 61 2044 6 4 1408 632 1 2 25 164 376 61 30.92 0.70 Total : 11231 240 10991 34 10 5888 5093 171 177 372 1943 2296 124 46.34 1.27 Grand Total : 11231 240 10991 34 10 5888 5093 171 177 372 1943 2296 124 46.34 1.27 FBISE - Computer Section FEDERAL BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, ISLAMABAD 2 RESULT GAZETTE OF SSC-II SUPPL. EXAMINATION 2018 ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE GAZETTE Subjects EHE:I ESSENTIAL OF HOME ECONOMICS - I PST-II PAKISTAN STUDIES - II (HIC) AMD:I ART AND MODEL DRAWING - I EHE:II ESSENTIAL OF HOME ECONOMICS - II U-C:I URDU COMPULSORY - I AMD:I ART AND MODEL DRAWING - I (HIC) F-N:I FOOD AND NUTRITION - I U-C:I URDU COMPULSORY - I (HIC) AMD:II ART AND MODEL DRAWING - II F-N:II FOOD AND NUTRITION - II U-C:II URDU COMPULSORY - II AMD:II ART AND MODEL DRAWING - II (HIC) G-M:I MATHEMATICS (GEN.) - I U-C:II URDU COMPULSORY - II (HIC) ARB:I ARABIC - I G-M:II MATHEMATICS (GEN.) - II U-S URDU SALEES (IN LIEU OF URDU II) ARB:II ARABIC - II G-S:I GENERAL SCIENCE - I WEL:I WELDING (ARC & GAS) - I BIO:I BIOLOGY - I G-S:I GENERAL SCIENCE - I (HIC) WEL:II WELDING (ARC AND GAS) - II BIO:II BIOLOGY - II G-S:II GENERAL SCIENCE - II WWF:I WOOD WORKING AND FUR.
    [Show full text]
  • RC Approves DKA Basic Principles
    1 VOL. XVIH, NO. 22 TUESDAY, APRIL, 15, 1980 (IIAMAL, 26, 1359, A.II.) Price Afs. 6 RC Approves DKA Basic Principles HI: tell" 1 fllllfllffift -1 ; ,.- V V. .. M'4m& film 4' Babrak Karmal, General Secretary of PDPA CC, President of RC and Prime Minister addressing the RC meeting. KABUL, April 15, (Bak-htar- ). The great and hi- storic meeting of the Rev- olutionary Council of the Kurmul's message passed Karmal Afghan-Sovi- et Youth Friendship Democratic Republic of Afghanistan was held at RC headquarters yesterday to Kabul Hindus, Sikhs Greeted . by Park to be built in Kabul afternoon under the cha- irmanship of Babrak Ka- KABUL, April 15, (Bakhtar). Cong- KABUL, April 15, (Bakhtar). In order to further consolidate frien- Secretary Organisation for Afghan Youth and the rmal, General ratulations and sincere wishes of Babrak Kar- Cea usescu dship between the Democratic of PDPA CC, President Soviet Komsomol, a memorial friendship park is being built in Kabul to PDPA CC, Pre- of RC and Prime Minis- mal, General Secretary of the KABUL, April 15, (Ba- be called the Friendship Park of Afghan and Soviet Youth on a 138 acre ter of DBA. At this meet- sident' of RC and Prime Minister, leading khtar). According to plot along the Darulaman Avenue. ing the DBA Basic Princi- members of the DRA Party and government Information Department ples were unanimously ap- were conveyed yesterday by Information and of the Ministry of Foreign proved in an atmosphere, Culture Minister to Hindu and Sikh compat- Affairs, a message sent to of sincerity and solidar- Babrak Karmal, General a 1 ity.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan: Arrival and Departure
    01-2180-2 CH 01:0545-1 10/13/11 10:47 AM Page 1 stephen p. cohen 1 Pakistan: Arrival and Departure How did Pakistan arrive at its present juncture? Pakistan was originally intended by its great leader, Mohammed Ali Jinnah, to transform the lives of British Indian Muslims by providing them a homeland sheltered from Hindu oppression. It did so for some, although they amounted to less than half of the Indian subcontinent’s total number of Muslims. The north Indian Muslim middle class that spearheaded the Pakistan movement found itself united with many Muslims who had been less than enthusiastic about forming Pak- istan, and some were hostile to the idea of an explicitly Islamic state. Pakistan was created on August 14, 1947, but in a decade self-styled field marshal Ayub Khan had replaced its shaky democratic political order with military-guided democracy, a market-oriented economy, and little effective investment in welfare or education. The Ayub experiment faltered, in part because of an unsuccessful war with India in 1965, and Ayub was replaced by another general, Yahya Khan, who could not manage the growing chaos. East Pakistan went into revolt, and with India’s assistance, the old Pakistan was bro- ken up with the creation of Bangladesh in 1971. The second attempt to transform Pakistan was short-lived. It was led by the charismatic Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, who simultaneously tried to gain control over the military, diversify Pakistan’s foreign and security policy, build a nuclear weapon, and introduce an economic order based on both Islam and socialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Conflict and Animal Welfare Lecture Notes
    Module 28 Human Conflict and Animal Welfare Lecture Notes Slide 1: This lecture was first developed for World Animal Protection by Dr David Main (University of Bristol) in 2003. It was revised by World Animal Protection scientific advisors in 2012 using updates provided by Dr Caroline Hewson. Slide 2: This module will introduce you to the ways in which collective human conflict affects animals. By human conflict, we mean fighting or war in a very broad sense, not domestic violence or aggression between private individuals. We will start by clarifying terminology because there are different kinds of human conflict. We will then focus on how animals may be affected by conflict. That is: • the ways in which animals are affected when conflict occurs in the region where they live • the ways in which animals are used actively in a conflict or the planning for conflict. We will conclude with examples of how we can help to improve animal welfare in areas where there is conflict. Slide 3: Starting with terminology: the Department of Peace and Conflict Research at Uppsala University in Sweden provides the online UCDP Conflict Encyclopedia. The following definitions are taken from there. Conflict has several characteristics, shown on the slide: • there is disagreement between at least two parties • the demands of each side cannot be met by the same resources at the same time. Typically, the resource is territory which contains a commodity needed for economic survival and growth, e.g. grazing for livestock; oil; minerals; water • the parties use armed force to solve their disagreement • this causes at least 25 battle-related human deaths in one year.
    [Show full text]
  • Week 7: Military Action II: the Bad and Ugly
    Week 7: Military Action II: The Bad and Ugly Afghanistan Afghanistan was a feudal/pastoral monarchy before 1973 Mohammed Zahir Shah, last king of Afghanistan King Zahir overthrown by Daoud in 1973 Daoud overthrown and killed by communist PDPA in 1978 New President: Nur Muhammad Taraki of PDPA Khalq faction ...Taraki overthrown and killed by Hafizullah Amin in 1979. Radical reforms lead to insurgency Soviets invade, assassinate Amin, install Babrak Karmal (Parcham) Why did the Soviets invade? Why did the Soviets invade? ● Oil? ● Domino Theory? ● Bureaucratic Isolation ● Iron Curtain intervention? Insurgency intensifies, Soviets employ brutal tactics US funds and arms Afghan mujahedin Mujahedin were representative of Afghan society Gulbuddin Hekmatyar Ahmed Shah Massoud Peace Talks between Pakistan, Soviets and Afghans stall ● Soviets incur heavy casualties. ● Refugee crisis in Pakistan and Iran. ● Soviet leader turnover 1983-85. Gorbachev Takes Power in USSR ● Nationalist Muhammad Najibullah becomes Afghan President. ● Anti-insurgent operations shift to Afghan Army. Soviets withdrew in 1988 Why did the Soviets get involved in a quagmire? Why did the Soviets get involved in a quagmire? ● Continued Bureaucratic Isolation ● Factionalism in Soviet regime ● Misinformation from the ground ● Fear of rapid withdrawal Afghan Civil War continues after Soviets leave Najibullah overthrow in 1992; mujahedin fragment Taliban forms in 1994; captures most of the country Did US support for the mujahedin create the Taliban and bin Laden? Discussion Was the invasion strategically justified? What were the positive/negative effects? Alternative strategies? Next Week... Intervention and the End of the Cold War + Comprehensive Exam.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Habits, New Consequences Old Habits, New Khalid Homayun Consequences Nadiri Pakistan’S Posture Toward Afghanistan Since 2001
    Old Habits, New Consequences Old Habits, New Khalid Homayun Consequences Nadiri Pakistan’s Posture toward Afghanistan since 2001 Since the terrorist at- tacks of September 11, 2001, Pakistan has pursued a seemingly incongruous course of action in Afghanistan. It has participated in the U.S. and interna- tional intervention in Afghanistan both by allying itself with the military cam- paign against the Afghan Taliban and al-Qaida and by serving as the primary transit route for international military forces and matériel into Afghanistan.1 At the same time, the Pakistani security establishment has permitted much of the Afghan Taliban’s political leadership and many of its military command- ers to visit or reside in Pakistani urban centers. Why has Pakistan adopted this posture of Afghan Taliban accommodation despite its nominal participa- tion in the Afghanistan intervention and its public commitment to peace and stability in Afghanistan?2 This incongruence is all the more puzzling in light of the expansion of insurgent violence directed against Islamabad by the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), a coalition of militant organizations that are independent of the Afghan Taliban but that nonetheless possess social and po- litical links with Afghan cadres of the Taliban movement. With violence against Pakistan growing increasingly indiscriminate and costly, it remains un- clear why Islamabad has opted to accommodate the Afghan Taliban through- out the post-2001 period. Despite a considerable body of academic and journalistic literature on Pakistan’s relationship with Afghanistan since 2001, the subject of Pakistani accommodation of the Afghan Taliban remains largely unaddressed. Much of the existing literature identiªes Pakistan’s security competition with India as the exclusive or predominant driver of Pakistani policy vis-à-vis the Afghan Khalid Homayun Nadiri is a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghan Presidential Election: Potential Candidates and Powerbrokers
    Afghan Presidential Election: Open Source Center As of March Potential Candidates and Powerbrokers15, 2009 Presidential Election Scheduled for 20 August Article 61 of Afghanistan's Constitution1 states that the presidential election should be held "thirty to sixty days prior to the expiration of the current president's term," which ends on 22 May. However, Afghanistan's Independent Powerbrokers Election Commission on 4 March announced that it would push back the date of the election to 20 August in order A number of prominent Afghan figures appear to be powerbrokers in Afghanistan's political scene. to address funding, security, and weather challenges to organizing a nationwide free and fair election (iec.org.af). Many of these men acquired their influence as Jihadi leaders with authority and arms, which they Afghan media have highlighted potential candidates and powerbrokers who may be influential in the election. parlayed into backing from religious, ethnic, regional, or party coalitions that continue to support them. They could prove influential in this year's elections by supporting and mobilizing their political, religious, tribal, regional, and ethnolinguistic constituencies to support preferred Potential Candidates for 2009 candidates. Abdullah Abdullah, Afghanistan's minister of foreign affairs from 2001 to 2006, is running as the candidate for the National Front. In a 2 February interview with Jawedan.com, he supported the presence of international forces to improve the security situation in the country. Regarding the Taliban, he said that the door for negotiation should be "kept open to anyone willing to lay down their arms and join the peace process, except for Mullah Omar and Gulbuddin Hekmatyar," whom he claimed were "pushing Afghanistan to war and destruction." Once a special adviser and chief Abdul Hadi Arghandiwal is the current chairman of the Islamic Party of Afghanistan, formed in 2008 by .
    [Show full text]
  • 19Th Presidium of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union March 5Th
    19th Presidium of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union March 5th, 1953 Honorable Comrades members of the Soviet Presidium, It is with the deepest regret that I announce you the death of our beloved Comrade and Leader Joseph Stalin. At the age of 74, our Comrade Stalin was found dead in the Kuntsevo Dacha after suffering a stroke. With his departure, our Union mourns for the loss of the greatest of our men, however we must act quickly and consistently as the governing body over the nation. We have several tasks that we must tackle to ensure the continuity of our great nation among which the most important one is establishing a legitimate successor that will consolidate the power of the Union and advance our principles throughout the globe. We must also organize the funeral for the farewell of our great compatriot and address the current situation of fear that our citizens live in. Remember, Stalin had his reasons for the spread of fear, however is upon you to decide the course of the Union’s domestic and foreign policy from this day on. Comrades, remember that history is for you to write in the next session of our Presidium. Best of luck, Dietwin Smoli Chairman of the Historical Crisis Committee Background of the Presidium: The Politburo of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union was the highest policy-making government authority of the Soviet Union. It was formally established in October 1917, and refounded in March 1919, at the 8th Congress of the Bolshevik Party. It was known as the Presidium from 1952 to 1966.
    [Show full text]
  • Prince Nader Opens the Kabul
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Kabul Times Digitized Newspaper Archives 8-23-1967 Kabul Times (August 23, 1967, vol. 6, no. 126) Bakhtar News Agency Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/kabultimes Part of the International and Area Studies Commons Recommended Citation Bakhtar News Agency, "Kabul Times (August 23, 1967, vol. 6, no. 126)" (1967). Kabul Times. 1545. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/kabultimes/1545 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Digitized Newspaper Archives at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kabul Times by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ., , . ,v ", " , . ,I , , , I , '. , "" . i 'J' \ "r ) . PAGE 4 II ';.:...i:.i;2...~~;.:.:t;~':.,+',.~'"::':"~--,.-"-,.:."i,~~~7~ ~Z:;,::",,:,,..:.._~ ..:......,..,;._..:..--,---.:....~_~-,-_,....,..... .. --.:....~·_~".-:-:_...,......:.,:-;--'--:'-~"....,.,...'i\ic:¥fii7~..;:.'-":~,f~~"...~. ,, '" }' I •• J\ Ii • ~ :I,~" ~ ~ .tV:~. \ t .\ I , III \ 1 1 '(. I ,eI , I' cl '/ , . ' B. f I ..,MA:OWNEG:lJN A~5:i' ~ .. ~ " , 0, Home rle s. ' ~l: .t.!'b ~lf§.:Ii1MBi\SSl! ~' ~, :':.,'> 'J ,- ' .~,r - KABUL, Aug. '22. (Bakht",).- " ,• ,QR'~T Of. CR~.KS' 'E'S' . .~ ,.. 'rhe chief of the UOlted Natlon3 LOi'lOON:, Aug. 22, ,(Routcl).- L ~~ -: Development Programme in Af· Vnltcd States tifficlals ,~ye'slcrd3Y i~tan, di.~riiisscd· mlic~incgun H'~" 'I' \"'~ - Arsenne' Shahbn,.. a .midnight· ~~.. ~4" 1.. '" ./~as · ,''\0' ;.!r ("";'1, rio! 'p' Specla en , V;:'JtiS!lce IMinister Dr. Mo· raid aD their embassy here as tile ·;t,Piitilfr~f.' Et;Inioii .:X-lh, 4111", " 1',1 " ) p " ,'\(' l~ ""J.,d EhsilO Taraki Stjn'day \v\)rk ,of cranks ana left'aU'iovesli.
    [Show full text]