Statement on the Assassination of Afghanistan's High Peace Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Statement on the Assassination of Afghanistan's High Peace Council

PC.DEL/885/11 22 September 2011 Original: ENGLISH United States Mission to the OSCE Statement on the Assassination of Afghanistan’s High Peace Council Head, Professor Burhanuddin Rabbani As delivery by Political Counselor Christopher Robinson to the Permanent Council, Vienna September 22, 2011 Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The delegation of the United States would like to draw the attention of the Permanent Council to the statement made by United States Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on the tragic occasion of the assassination of the Chairman of the Afghan High Peace Council, Professor Burhanuddin Rabbani, on September 20, in which Secretary Clinton said: "The United States condemns in the strongest terms the assassination in Kabul of Professor Rabbani, the former President of Afghanistan and head of the High Peace Council. We extend our condolences to his family, and to all the people of Afghanistan, including those who were injured, and the families of those who lost their lives. "We will support the Afghan Government as they pursue the ones responsible for this cowardly attack and bring them to justice. And we will continue to increase pressure on al- Qaida and the Taliban. We have always known that there are those who will do all they can to undermine the cause of peace and reconciliation… But the Afghan people will not be deterred from pursuing a more peaceful, democratic future for their country and we will continue to stand with them and support their efforts." At this time the United States wishes to reaffirm that the international community and Afghan people share a desire for peace and security in Afghanistan, and will continue to work together to rebuild the country after decades of war. Now is a time for all Afghans to join together and forge the national unity that all Afghans yearn for. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Obersteinergasse 11/1 Vienna, Austria A-1190 Tel: (+43-1) 31339-3201 Fax: (+43-1) 31339-3255 [email protected] Page 1 of 1 http://osce.usmission.gov .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Afghanistan, 1989-1996: Between the Soviets and the Taliban
Afghanistan, 1989-1996: Between the Soviets and the Taliban A thesis submitted to the Miami University Honors Program in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for University Honors with Distinction by, Brandon Smith May 2005 Oxford, OH ABSTRACT AFGHANISTAN, 1989-1996: BETWEEN THE SOVIETS AND THE TALIBAN by, BRANDON SMITH This paper examines why the Afghan resistance fighters from the war against the Soviets, the mujahideen, were unable to establish a government in the time period between the withdrawal of the Soviet army from Afghanistan in 1989 and the consolidation of power by the Taliban in 1996. A number of conflicting explanations exist regarding Afghanistan’s instability during this time period. This paper argues that the developments in Afghanistan from 1989 to 1996 can be linked to the influence of actors outside Afghanistan, but not to the extent that the choices and actions of individual actors can be overlooked or ignored. Further, the choices and actions of individual actors need not be explained in terms of ancient animosities or historic tendencies, but rather were calculated moves to secure power. In support of this argument, international, national, and individual level factors are examined. ii Afghanistan, 1989-1996: Between the Soviets and the Taliban by, Brandon Smith Approved by: _________________________, Advisor Karen L. Dawisha _________________________, Reader John M. Rothgeb, Jr. _________________________, Reader Homayun Sidky Accepted by: ________________________, Director, University Honors Program iii Thanks to Karen Dawisha for her guidance and willingness to help on her year off, and to John Rothgeb and Homayun Sidky for taking the time to read the final draft and offer their feedback.
[Show full text]
Afghan Presidential Election: Potential Candidates and Powerbrokers
Afghan Presidential Election: Open Source Center As of March Potential Candidates and Powerbrokers15, 2009 Presidential Election Scheduled for 20 August Article 61 of Afghanistan's Constitution1 states that the presidential election should be held "thirty to sixty days prior to the expiration of the current president's term," which ends on 22 May. However, Afghanistan's Independent Powerbrokers Election Commission on 4 March announced that it would push back the date of the election to 20 August in order A number of prominent Afghan figures appear to be powerbrokers in Afghanistan's political scene. to address funding, security, and weather challenges to organizing a nationwide free and fair election (iec.org.af). Many of these men acquired their influence as Jihadi leaders with authority and arms, which they Afghan media have highlighted potential candidates and powerbrokers who may be influential in the election. parlayed into backing from religious, ethnic, regional, or party coalitions that continue to support them. They could prove influential in this year's elections by supporting and mobilizing their political, religious, tribal, regional, and ethnolinguistic constituencies to support preferred Potential Candidates for 2009 candidates. Abdullah Abdullah, Afghanistan's minister of foreign affairs from 2001 to 2006, is running as the candidate for the National Front. In a 2 February interview with Jawedan.com, he supported the presence of international forces to improve the security situation in the country. Regarding the Taliban, he said that the door for negotiation should be "kept open to anyone willing to lay down their arms and join the peace process, except for Mullah Omar and Gulbuddin Hekmatyar," whom he claimed were "pushing Afghanistan to war and destruction." Once a special adviser and chief Abdul Hadi Arghandiwal is the current chairman of the Islamic Party of Afghanistan, formed in 2008 by .
[Show full text]
The Road to Afghanistan
Introduction Hundreds of books—memoirs, histories, fiction, poetry, chronicles of military units, and journalistic essays—have been written about the Soviet war in Afghanistan. If the topic has not yet been entirely exhausted, it certainly has been very well documented. But what led up to the invasion? How was the decision to bring troops into Afghanistan made? What was the basis for the decision? Who opposed the intervention and who had the final word? And what kind of mystical country is this that lures, with an almost maniacal insistence, the most powerful world states into its snares? In the nineteenth and early twentieth century it was the British, in the 1980s it was the Soviet Union, and now America and its allies continue the legacy. Impoverished and incredibly backward Afghanistan, strange as it may seem, is not just a normal country. Due to its strategically important location in the center of Asia, the mountainous country has long been in the sights of more than its immediate neighbors. But woe to anyone who arrives there with weapon in hand, hoping for an easy gain—the barefoot and illiterate Afghans consistently bury the hopes of the strange foreign soldiers who arrive along with battalions of tanks and strategic bombers. To understand Afghanistan is to see into your own future. To comprehend what happened there, what happens there continually, is to avoid great tragedy. One of the critical moments in the modern history of Afghanistan is the period from April 27, 1978, when the “April Revolution” took place in Kabul and the leftist People’s Democratic Party seized control of the country, until December 27, 1979, when Soviet special forces, obeying their “international duty,” eliminated the ruling leader and installed 1 another leader of the same party in his place.
[Show full text]
Street Named After Ahmad Shah Massoud
AFGHAN NEWS Street named after Ahmad Shah Massoud Afghan President Hamid Karzai, unveiling the naming plaque of Ahmad Shah Massoud Marg in New Delhi on April 5. External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee and Chief Minister of Delhi Sheila Dikshit are also seen in the photo. Mukherjee described Massoud as visionary-friend of India and ‘Lion of Panjshir’. ndia on April 5 underscored its special ties with Afghanistan by rorists destroyed the World Trade Center in New York and the naming a street in the Indian capital in honour of Ahmad Shah Pentagon in Washington. Massoud had earlier played a leading role I Massoud, the legendary Afghan com- in driving the Soviet Army out of mander and ‘Lion of Panjshir’. The crossroad “This road is a symbol of ties Afghanistan. He was the country’s defence No. 1 between Niti Marg and Shantipath, near minister under the presidentship of the Afghanistan Embassy in the diplomatic that bind India and Burhanuddin Rabbani. enclave of Chanakyapuri, has been named the Afghanistan and I am “Afghanistan is honoured to have him as Ahmad Shah Massoud Marg. our hero. Afghanistan is honoured to have A plaque bearing the name of the Afghan confident that it will pave the the road here, in a very important part of leader, revered as a hero in the war on the way for even stronger ties Delhi, named after him. We are very very hardliner Taliban militia, was unveiled by grateful to you,” said Karzai, who thanked Afghan President Hamid Karzai and Indian between our two countries and India for this special gesture and remem- External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee.
[Show full text]
The Northern Alliance Prepares for Afghan Elections in 2014
August 2013 Mara Tchalakov AFGHANISTAN REPORT 10 THE NORTHERN ALLIanCE PREpaRES FOR AFGHan ELECTIONS IN 2014 Cover Photo: Salahuddin Rabbani (C) prays after he was introduced as the care taker to Jamiat-e Islami party during a gathering at the Kabul Intercontinental Hotel October 4, 2011. The party’s leader Burhanuddin Rabbani, former Afghan president and head of the government’s peace council, was killed on Sept 20, 2011. Salahuddin Rabbani, son of Burhanuddin Rabbani, was appointed as the care taker to Jamiat-e Islami party during the gathering in Kabul. REUTERS/Ahmad Masood. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. ©2013 by the Institute for the Study of War. Published in 2013 in the United States of America by the Institute for the Study of War. 1400 16th Street NW, Suite 515 Washington, DC 20036. http://www.understandingwar.org Mara Tchalakov AFGHANISTAN REPORT 10 THE NORTHERN ALLIanCE PREpaRES FOR AFGHan ELECTIONS IN 2014 ABOUT THE AUTHOR Mara Tchalakov is a doctoral candidate in International Relations at the University of Oxford. She completed her undergraduate studies at Princeton University, graduating with a B.A. summa cum laude from the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, and her MPhil in International Relations from the University of Oxford. She has worked for a variety of government agencies, having served on the Secretary of State’s Policy Planning Staff at the U.S.
[Show full text]
Hezb-E Islami's
[PEACEW RKS [ THE POLITICAL DEAL WITH HEZB-E ISLAMI WHAT IT MEANS FOR TALKS WITH THE TALIBAN AND PEACE IN AFGHANISTAN Casey Garret Johnson Making Peace Possible ABOUT THE REPORT The September 2016 agreement between Afghanistan’s National Unity Government and Hezb-e Islami called for the militant group to renounce violence and accept the Afghan constitution in return for the government freeing Hezb-e Islami prisoners, incorporating cadres into the Afghan National Security Forces, and resettling thou- sands of Afghan refugees living in camps inside Pakistan. This report examines how the deal was negotiated, how it has been received in the provinces beyond Kabul, what progress has been made on the implementation of specific provisions, and what lessons can be applied to prospective peace talks with the Taliban. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Casey Garret Johnson is a researcher focusing on politics and conflict in Afghanistan. Cover photo: Former members of Hezb-e Islami’s insurgency meet with political counterparts in Asadabad, Kunar, to discuss a unified party strategy during the summer of 2017. (Photo courtesy of The Liaison Office) The views expressed in this report are those of the author alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Institute of Peace. United States Institute of Peace 2301 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20037 Phone: 202.457.1700 Fax: 202.429.6063 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.usip.org Peaceworks No. 139. First published 2018. ISBN: 978-1-60127-727-5 © 2018 by the United States Institute of
[Show full text]
Revisiting Afghanistan's Modern
REVISITING AFGHANISTAN’S MODERN POLITICAL HISTORY: THE ROLE OF ETHNIC INCLUSION ON REGIME STABILITY A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts By RAHIMULLAH AKRAMI B.A., Berea College, 2014 2019 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL December 6, 2018 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Rahimullah Akrami ENTITLED Revisiting Afghanistan’s Modern Political History: The Role of Ethnic Inclusion on Regime Stability BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Arts. ______________________________ Liam D. Anderson, Ph.D. Thesis Director ______________________________ Laura M. Luehrmann, Ph.D. Director, Master of Arts Program in International and Comparative Politics Committee on Final Examination: ___________________________________ Liam D. Anderson, Ph.D. ___________________________________ Pramod Kantha, Ph.D. ___________________________________ Carlos E. Costa, Ph.D. ___________________________________ Barry Milligan, Ph.D. Interim Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Akrami, Rahimullah. M.A. Department of Political Science, Wright State University, 2019. Revisiting Afghanistan’s Modern Political History: The Role of Ethnic Inclusion on Regime Stability This study examines the role of ethnic inclusion as a factor of regime stability in Afghanistan through an historical case analysis from 1880 until 2009. By utilizing case study research methods, the goal of the study is to examine all the past regimes in order to show whether there is a relationship between the dependent variable regime stability and the independent variable ethnic inclusion. The study assumes the hypothesis that an ethnically inclusive regime will be stable while an ethnically exclusive regime will be unstable.
[Show full text]
HISTORY of the WAR the US- Led Military Intervention in Afghanistan
BACKGROUNDER ON AFGHANISTAN: HISTORY OF THE WAR The U.S- led military intervention in Afghanistan marks the fourth phase in the country’s twenty-three-year-old civil war. In every phase foreign powers have intensified the conflict by supporting one side against another. The First Phase: The Saur Revolution and Soviet Occupation Before civil war erupted in 1978, Afghanistan was a monarchy under Muhammad Zahir Shah, who had come to power in 1933. After World War II, both the U.S. and the Soviet Union used economic assistance to compete for influence. After the US established military ties with Pakistan in 1954, Afghanistan increasingly turned to the Soviet Union support. In 1964 Zahir Shah convened a Loya Jirga, or Grand Council, of tribal leaders to debate a draft constitution that would provide for a more representational government. However, Zahir Shah did not relinquish any power; political parties were permitted to organize but not to contest elections. Zahir Shah was overthrown by his cousin Daoud Khan in 1973; the king has remained in exile in Rome ever since. In staging the coup, Daoud had allied himself with the Parcham faction of the People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA), a Marxist-Leninist party that had been formed in 1965. In 1967 the PDPA split into two factions, Parcham (“flag”) which drew its support from urban, educated Pashtuns along with other ethnic groups, and Khalq (“masses”) which had the support of educated rural Afghans, also predominantly Pashtun. (Pashtuns comprise the largest ethnic group in Afghanistan and have dominated the government for centuries.
[Show full text]
Warlords, Drugs and the 'War on Terror' in Afghanistan
Warlords, Drugs and the ‘War on Terror’ in Afghanistan: The Paradoxes Vishal Chandra Abstract The US-led ‘war on terror’ in Afghanistan has led to the re-establishment of the warlords, and has failed to adequately address the issue of drug menace in an effective manner. As the Bonn process ended with the September 2005 elections, and the US forces are likely to partially withdraw this year, it is pertinent to evaluate the ‘war on terror’ in Afghanistan and its implications for the post-election Afghanistan. This article seeks to argue that the contradictions inherent in the ongoing political process, primarily due to the paradoxes in the US’ ‘war on terror’, is largely responsible for perpetuating both warlordism and the drug menace in Afghanistan. The apparent failure of the Bonn process in terms of building institutions of governance has reinforced the regressive tendencies in the Afghan polity. This has far-reaching consequences, especially for the crucial reforms process. The answer to the Afghan malaise lies in prioritising the issues of governance and institution-building. Given the history of Afghan civil war, mere holding of elections and pledging of huge funds cannot be the rationale for the international community to re-abandon Afghanistan. These (Afghan mujahideen) are the moral equivalent of America’s founding fathers 1 Former US President Ronald Reagan referring to a group of Afghan mujahideen who visited White House in 1985. President Hamid Karzai commenced his presidential election campaign in July 2004 by deriding the private militias of the warlords2 as the biggest threat to Afghanistan, greater than the Taliban insurgency.3 On December 9, 2004, two days after his inauguration as an elected President, he declared jihad against drugs during a national counter-narcotics conference in Kabul, Strategic Analysis, Vol.
[Show full text]
Taliban Views on a Future State
TALIBAN VIEWS ON A FUTURE STATE BORHAN OSMAN AND ANAND GOPAL Introduction by Barnett Rubin N Y U CENTER ON INTERNATIONAL C I C COOPERATION July 2016 CENTER ON INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION The world faces old and new security challenges that are more complex than our multilateral and national institutions are currently capable of managing. International cooperation is ever more necessary in meeting these challenges. The NYU Center on International Cooperation (CIC) works to enhance international responses to conflict and insecurity through applied research and direct engagement with multilateral institutions and the wider policy community. CIC’s programs and research activities span the spectrum of conflict insecurity issues. This allows us to see critical inter-connections between politics, security, development and human rights and highlight the coherence often necessary for effective response. We have a particular concentration on the UN and multilateral responses to conflict. TABLE OF CONTENTS TALIBAN VIEWS ON A FUTURE STATE By Borhan Osman and Anand Gopal ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 ABOUT THE AUTHORS 5 INTRODUCTION 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 KEY FINDINGS 6 INTRODUCTION 8 POWER SHARING: WHO BELONGS IN THE NEW ORDER? 10 Power Sharing Today 12 ISLAM AND THE FUTURE STATE 16 Political Representation 19 WHOSE ISLAM? 22 Evolution 25 CONCLUSION 30 ENDNOTES 33 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Edmund Haley for helping conceive of this project and the Foreign & Commonwealth Office (UK) for its support. The Afghanistan-Pakistan Regional Program of the Center on International Cooperation would like to thank the government of Norway for its support, without which it would not have been able to publish this report.
[Show full text]
The Case of Ismail Khan of Herat in Afghanistan
War, Peace and the Warlords: The Case of Ismail Khan of Herat in Afghanistan Gulshan Dietl* Distribution of power in a political entity is a compromise. It reflects the strengths and weaknesses in the line of command vertically and the reach of power horizontally. It could be embodied in a written constitution, a set of conventions, informal understandings or facts on the ground. A weak center results in the rise of competitive centers of power in the periphery. Eventually, the center may prevail, an uneasy equilibrium may continue, or the entity may split into two or more units. In uncertain times and strife-torn places, the periphery challenges the center’s right to exclusive ownership and use of coercive power. Private militias spring up to protect the local leaders, rule over local populations and guard the local realms. The phenomenon of warlord is in place at that point.1 The paper proposes to scrutinize the role and relevance of warlords in times of war and peace with special reference to Ismail Khan of Herat. Qawms and Their Leaders in Afghanistan: An Overview Afghanistan has always been a country composed of autonomous “village states”. The Afghans identify themselves by “Qawm” - a sub-national identity based on kinship, residence and occupation. This instinctive social cohesiveness includes tribes, clans, ethnic Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, Vol.3, No.2&3, Summer&Fall 2004 41 subgroups, religious sects, locality-based groups and groups united by interests. Outside the family, Qawm is the most important focus of individual loyalty.2 For a quarter of a century, Afghanistan has been in turmoil.
[Show full text]
The Afghanistan Conflict, International Terrorism and the Us Response*
THE AFGHANISTAN CONFLICT, INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM AND THE US RESPONSE* AMIN SAIKAL Amin Saikal is Professor of Political Science and Director of the Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies (the Middle East and Central Asia) at the Australian National University. * Opinions expressed in this paper are author’s personal views only. The crisis of international terrorism emanating from Afghanistan might have been avoided had Washington heeded the now-slain leader of the Afghan anti-Taliban forces, the legendary commander Ahmad Shah Masood, who repeatedly warned that a dangerous triangular alliance between the Taliban, Osama bin Laden and Pakistan was turning Afghanistan into a major source of instability in world politics. Washington’s failure to help Masood to limit the menace eventually cost both the commander and the US dearly. Masood died on 15 September 2001 of wounds inflicted on him in a suicide bombing by two Arabs, apparently organised by bin Laden, only two days before the US fell victim to the apocalyptic terrorist attacks on 11 September. Why did the US fail to act earlier over Afghanistan, and is it now capable of addressing effectively the root-causes of the present crisis? The axis of Osama bin Laden, Taliban and Pakistan (or more specifically Pakistan’s Interservices Intelligence Directorate (ISI), which operated as a government within a government) was not an over-night development. It dated from mid-1994 when Pakistan orchestrated the extremist Taliban militia, made up of mostly ethnic Pashtuns from both sides of the Afghan-Pakistan border, as the most appropriate geo-political force to secure a compliant government in Kabul.
[Show full text]