DOCSLIB.ORG

Oil and Gas Delivery to Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oil and Gas Delivery to Europe OIL AND GAS DELIVERY TO EUROPE An Overview of Existing and Planned Infrastructures New Edition GOUVERNANCE EUROPEENNE ET GEOPOLITIQUE DE L’ENERGIE 11 Susanne NIES The Institut Français des Relations Internationales (IFRI) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental and a non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, IFRI sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Using an interdisciplinary approach, IFRI brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. With offices in Paris and Brussels, IFRI stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. The Program aims to contribute to the emergence of a coherent and sustainable energy and climate policy through seminars, debates, and publications. This series of works covers the principal issues in the energy sector. Tome 1: Abatement of CO2 Emissions in the European Union (2007) Tome 2: L’énergie nucléaire et les opinions publiques européennes (2008) Tome 3: The External Energy Policy of the European Union (2008) Tome 4: Gaz et pétrole vers l’Europe. Perspectives pour les infra-structures (2008) Tome 5: La gouvernance mondiale de l’énergie : enjeux et perspec-tives (2009) Tome 6: Governance of Oil in Africa: Unfinished Business (2009) Tome 7: Energy in India's Future: Insights (2009) Tome 8: At the Speed of Light? Electricity Interconnections for Europe (2009) Tome 9: Ukraine: a Transit Country in Deadlock? (2010) Tome 10: The EU’s Major Electricity and Gas Utilities since Market Liberalization (2010) © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2011 ISBN: 978-2-86592-817-0 ISSN: 1962-610X Ifri Ifri-Bruxelles 27 rue de la Procession Rue Marie-Thérèse, 21 75740 Paris Cedex 15 – France 1000 Brussels – Belgium Phone: +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 Phone : +32 (0)2 238 51 10 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: Ifri.org Abstract The European Union‟s hydrocarbon energy supply depends heavily on imports. While the European Commission has recommended diversifying and increasing domestic resources, notably with rene- wable resources which should grow to 20% by 2020, dependence on hydrocarbon imports will remain not only substantial, but will increase. Particular attention must thus be paid to the question of trans- portation, and also to the countries of origin, investments in infrastruc- ture, their protection, relations with transit countries, „competing con- sumers‟ (notably China and emerging countries, but also the United States), energy wastefulness in producing countries, and, finally, price. Security of supply depends on adequate and reliable infra- structure, and must always be thought of in the long term. This entirely revised edition of the fourth study conducted by the European Governance and Geopolitics of Energy program at Ifri includes discussions about pipeline routes and potential outputs, their current use and financial requirements for transportation, ongoing projects and those planned for the future, their cost, their financing, and their probable operational start-up date. While all infrastructures are necessarily included (including Norway, the United Kingdom, and North Africa), particular attention is paid to transportation infras- tructure that connects Europe with Russia and the former Soviet Union (Central Asia, Caspian Sea). It will be immediately clear that the issue of gas is dominant in current discussions. 1 © Ifri S. Nies / Oil and Gas to Europe Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 4 Methods and Sources ................................................................ 7 SETTING UP GAS AND OIL INFRASTRUCTURES IN EUROPE ................... 10 Developing Infrastructures in the Soviet Bloc, and their Extension to Western Europe .................................. 15 Sorting Out Transit Countries: the Federal Republic of Germany and Austria ....................... 16 Continuity and Ruptures .......................................................... 18 Hydrocarbon Transport and the Consequences of the Fall of the Soviet Union ................................................. 18 EU ACTIONS ON GAS AND OIL INFRASTRUCTURE ............................... 23 Normative Actions, the Domestic Market, and the Impact on Third Countries .......................................... 25 Lines with TPA Exemption ....................................................... 26 Gas Security in the EU ............................................................. 27 Gas security legislation: endorsement in autumn 2010 ......... 28 System Security and Renewables (RES): the Intermittency Challenge ..................................................... 29 Priority Projects and Interconnectors ..................................... 30 OIL TRANSPORT TO THE EU .............................................................. 31 Introduction: Origins of Resources and European Supply ... 31 The EU’s Principal Suppliers ................................................... 36 Summary and Conclusion ........................................................ 51 GAS FROM THE NORTH, SOUTH AND EAST EUROPEAN DEMAND FOR GAS AND SOURCES OF SUPPLY .................................... 52 Introductory Remarks on Gas Markets and Gas Transport ... 55 Future Supplies: Looking to the North, South, and East ....... 62 Norway and the Baltic Region: Northern Dynamics ............... 65 Russia and the CIS ................................................................... 68 2 © Ifri S. Nies / Oil and Gas to Europe Case Study: Nord Stream ......................................................... 73 Gas Resources in the Caspian and Central Asia .................... 77 Case Study: the Southern Corridor ......................................... 83 The South: Algeria and Nigeria ................................................ 90 TURKEY AND UKRAINE: TWO MAJOR TRANSIT COUNTRIES FOR EU ..... 95 Transit Country at the East-West Crossroads: Ukraine ......... 95 The Transit Country at the Crossroads of the Southern Corridor: Turkey .......................................... 101 Conclusion .............................................................................. 107 CONCLUSION AND PROSPECTS ........................................................ 108 The Overhaul of our Energy Mix ............................................ 108 The Community Context ........................................................ 109 ANNEXES ................................................................................... ....112 3 © Ifri S. Nies / Oil and Gas to Europe Introduction The European Union‟s hydrocarbon energy supply depends heavily on imports. While the European institutions have set the 20/20/20 targets for 2020 (20% of energy to come from renewable sources; a 20% increase in energy efficiency; and a 20% reduction in green- house-gas emissions), European dependence on hydrocarbon imports will not only remain important but will continue to increase. This is also the case with the reduction in consumption induced by the recession, which is expected to continue affecting consumption until 2015/16. Particular attention must thus be paid to the question of transportation of oil and gas, to the countries of origin, the invest- ments in infrastructure, the protection of such infrastructures, rela- tions with transit countries, the „competing consumers‟ (notably China, emerging countries, and the United States), inefficient use of energy in producing countries, and, finally, the price involved in each case. Security of supply depends on adequate and reliable infra- structure, and must always be thought of in the long term. However, it is interesting to note that the EU-27 currently considers itself quite vulnerable, and opinions are divided about relations with its largest supplier, Russia. Excessive dependence and beneficial interdepen- dence are the buzz-words on both sides of the debate. Escalation in the bidding to secure potential routes for Russian and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) gas delivery to Western Europe is putting the two schools of thought into conflict. In addition, Russia‟s domi- nance in the debate, as presented by the media, means that the role of the second largest exporter of natural gas to the EU – Norway – is often forgotten or pushed to the side. When creating new oil and gas infrastructure it is imperative to pay special attention to geopolitical issues and „energy diplomacy‟: pipelines are not only commercial concerns but also fall into the political realm and can sometimes become overly politicized. These energy links, which include interconnectors in addition to massive oil pipelines spanning thousands of kilometers such as Druzhba and the BTC (Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan), in many cases replace dependence with interdependence. An oil or gas pipeline can be as much a factor for peace and stabilization as for war. For example, during the Afghan- Soviet War, the Soviet gas pipeline to Kabul became a target for multiple attacks, but its parts today are used in the construction of private houses in the Afghan capital. It is also important to remember that the construction of one such link allows others to be added onto 4 © Ifri S. Nies / Oil and Gas to Europe it. The construction of Yamal, for example,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geopolitical Impact on Transformation of Territorial Organization of Russian Pipeline Transport in the Post-Soviet Time
    International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy ISSN: 2146-4553 available at http: www.econjournals.com International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2016, 6(4), 782-788. Geopolitical Impact on Transformation of Territorial Organization of Russian Pipeline Transport in the Post-Soviet Time Tatyana I. Pototskaya1*, Alexander P. Katrovskiy2, Vladimir I. Chasovskiy3 1Department of Geography, Natural-Geographical Faculty, Smolensk State University, Smolensk Oblast, Russia, 2Department of Service and Tourism, Smolensk Humanitarian University, Smolensk, Russia, 3Department of Geography, Land Use and Spatial Planning, Institute of Environmental Management, Territorial Development and Urban Construction, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Russia. *Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The article presents the research on transformation of territorial organization of Russian pipeline transport in the post-Soviet time, considering its relations with neighbouring countries. The research identifies general ways of such transformation: The influence of Russia’s desire to escape from the dictate of the transit countries exporting energy; the impact of Russia’s struggle for the transportation of gas and oil extracted in the Caspian Sea basin; the influence of the struggle for the transportation of oil and gas in the Asia-Pacific region. A new database including the main pipelines and sea ports in Russia, revealed correlations in the development of pipeline transport in the post-Soviet period with the development of infrastructure of the country’s sea transport. The article identifies positive changes in the transport infrastructure (construction of Russian alternative pipeline projects), which will reduce the degree of Russian dependence on relations with neighbouring countries, as well as negative changes (construction of alternative Russian pipeline projects).
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Oil and Gas Challenges
    Order Code RL33212 Russian Oil and Gas Challenges Updated June 20, 2007 Robert Pirog Specialist in Energy Economics and Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Russian Oil and Gas Challenges Summary Russia is a major player in world energy markets. It has more proven natural gas reserves than any other country, is among the top ten in proven oil reserves, is the largest exporter of natural gas, the second largest oil exporter, and the third largest energy consumer. Energy exports have been a major driver of Russia’s economic growth over the last five years, as Russian oil production has risen strongly and world oil prices have been very high. This type of growth has made the Russian economy dependent on oil and natural gas exports and vulnerable to fluctuations in oil prices. The Russian government has moved to take control of the country’s energy supplies. It broke up the previously large energy company Yukos and acquired its main oil production subsidiary. The Duma voted to give Gazprom, the state- controlled natural gas monopoly the exclusive right to export natural gas; Russia moved to limit participation by foreign companies in oil and gas production and Gazprom gained majority control of the Sakhalin energy projects. Russia has agreed with Germany to supply Germany and, eventually, the UK by building a natural gas pipeline under the Baltic Sea, bypassing Ukraine and Poland. In late 2006 and early 2007, Russia cut off and/or threatened to cut off gas or oil supplies going to and/or through Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, and Belarus in the context of price and/or transit negotiations — actions that damaged its reputation as a reliable energy supplier.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armadollar-Petrodollar Coalition and the Middle East
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Rowley, Robin; Bichler, Shimshon; Nitzan, Jonathan Working Paper The Armadollar-Petrodollar Coalition and the Middle East Working Papers, Department of Economics, McGill University, No. 10/89 Provided in Cooperation with: The Bichler & Nitzan Archives Suggested Citation: Rowley, Robin; Bichler, Shimshon; Nitzan, Jonathan (1989) : The Armadollar-Petrodollar Coalition and the Middle East, Working Papers, Department of Economics, McGill University, No. 10/89, The Bichler and Nitzan Archives, Toronto, http://bnarchives.yorku.ca/134/ This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/157847 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an
    [Show full text]
  • Boat Accident
    DREF operation final report Russian Federation: Boat Accident DREF operation n° MDRRU012 GLIDE n° AC-2011-000086-RUS 12th April 2012 The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent (IFRC) Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) is a source of un-earmarked money created by the Federation in 1985 to ensure that immediate financial support is available for Red Cross Red Crescent response to emergencies. The DREF is a vital part of the International Federation’s disaster response system and increases the ability of National Societies to respond to disasters. Summary: The cruise ship “Bulgaria” was caught in a storm on the Volga river in Tatarstan on Sunday, 10th July 2011, at about 14.00 and sank within minutes at one of the widest points of the river claiming the lives of 130 people. The Russian Red Cross provided psychosocial support to the affected families of the deceased and to the survivors in order to minimize the psychological effects in the aftermath of the boat accident. Most of the victims are Survivors of "Bulgaria" resqued by "Arabella" cruiser ship are brought ashore residents of Tatarstan. This Photo: Reuters operation was implemented over six months and was completed by the 15th January 2012. CHF 25,358 was allocated from the International Federation’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) to support the Russian Red Cross in delivering immediate psychosocial assistance to some 200 families. Following the implementation of the operation, there is a balance of CHF 911 that needs to be returned to the DREF funds. The
    [Show full text]
  • Security Aspects of the South Stream Project
    BRIEFING PAPER Policy Department External Policies SECURITY ASPECTS OF THE SOUTH STREAM PROJECT FOREIGN AFFAIRS October 2008 JANUARY 2004 EN This briefing paper was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs. It is published in the following language: English Author: Zeyno Baran, Director Center for Eurasian Policy (CEP), Hudson Institute www.hudson.org The author is grateful for the support of CEP Research Associates Onur Sazak and Emmet C. Tuohy as well as former CEP Research Assistant Rob A. Smith. Responsible Official: Levente Császi Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union Policy Department BD4 06 M 55 rue Wiertz B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] Publisher European Parliament Manuscript completed on 23 October 2008. The briefing paper is available on the Internet at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/studies.do?language=EN If you are unable to download the information you require, please request a paper copy by e-mail : [email protected] Brussels: European Parliament, 2008. Any opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. © European Communities, 2008. Reproduction and translation, except for commercial purposes, are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and provided the publisher is given prior notice and supplied with a copy of the publication. EXPO/B/AFET/2008/30 October 2008 PE 388.962 EN CONTENTS SECURITY ASPECTS OF THE SOUTH STREAM PROJECT ................................ ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................iii 1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................... 1 2. THE RUSSIAN CHALLENGE................................................................................... 2 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain, British Petroleum, Shell and the Remaking of the International Oil Industry, 1957-1979
    Empires of Energy: Britain, British Petroleum, Shell and the Remaking of the International Oil Industry, 1957-1979 Author: Jonathan Robert Kuiken Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:104079 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2013 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of History EMPIRES OF ENERGY: BRITAIN, BRITISH PETROLEUM, SHELL AND THE REMAKING OF THE INTERNATIONAL OIL INDUSTRY, 1957-1979 [A dissertation by] JONATHAN R. KUIKEN submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August, 2013 © copyright by JONATHAN ROBERT KUIKEN 2013 Empires of Energy: Britain, British Petroleum, Shell and the remaking of the international oil industry, 1957-1979 Jonathan R. Kuiken Dissertation Advisor - James E. Cronin Dissertation Abstract This dissertation examines British oil policy from the aftermath of the Suez Crisis in 1956-1957 until the Iranian Revolution and the electoral victory of Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative Party in 1979. It was a period marked by major transitions within Britain’s oil policy as well as broader changes within the international oil market. It argues that the story of Britain, and Britain’s two domestically-based oil companies, BP and Shell, offers a valuable case study in the development of competing ideas about the reorganization of the international oil industry in the wake of the rise of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting countries and the companies’ losing control over the production of oil.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Energy Reserves, Pipeline Routes and the Legal Regime in the Caspian Sea
    3. Energy reserves, pipeline routes and the legal regime in the Caspian Sea John Roberts I. The energy reserves and production potential of the Caspian The issue of Caspian energy development has been dominated by four factors. The first is uncertain oil prices. These pose a challenge both to oilfield devel- opers and to the promoters of pipelines. The boom prices of 2000, coupled with supply shortages within the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), have made development of the resources of the Caspian area very attractive. By contrast, when oil prices hovered around the $10 per barrel level in late 1998 and early 1999, the price downturn threatened not only the viability of some of the more grandiose pipeline projects to carry Caspian oil to the outside world, but also the economics of basic oilfield exploration in the region. While there will be some fly-by-night operators who endeavour to secure swift returns in an era of high prices, the major energy developers, as well as the majority of smaller investors, will continue to predicate total production costs (including carriage to market) not exceeding $10–12 a barrel. The second is the geology and geography of the area. The importance of its geology was highlighted when two of the first four international consortia formed to look for oil in blocks off Azerbaijan where no wells had previously been drilled pulled out in the wake of poor results.1 The geography of the area involves the complex problem of export pipeline development and the chicken- and-egg question whether lack of pipelines is holding back oil and gas pro- duction or vice versa.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazan Kremlin (Russian Federation) No
    Category of property Kazan Kremlin (Russian Federation) In terms of the categories of cultural property set out in Article 1 of the 1972 World Heritage Convention, this is a group of buildings. No 980 History and Description History The first human occupation in the Kazan area goes back to Identification the 7th and 8th millennia BCE; there are traces of the Bronze Age (2nd to 1st millennia, late Kazan area settlement), early Nomination Historical and Architectural Complex of Iron Age (8th to 6th centuries BCE, Ananin culture), and the Kazan Kremlin early medieval period (4th–5th centuries CE, Azelin culture). From the 10th to 13th centuries Kazan was a pre-Mongol Location Republic of Tatarstan, City of Kazan Bulgar town. Today’s Kremlin hill consisted then of a fortified trading settlement surrounded by moats, State Party Russian Federation embankments, and a stockade. A stone fortress was built in the 12th century and the town developed as an outpost on the Date 29 June 1999 northern border of Volga Bulgaria. The so-called Old Town extended eastward, on the site of the former Kazan Monastery of Our Lady. The fortress was demolished on the instructions of the Mongols in the 13th century. A citadel was then built as the seat of the Prince of Kazan, including the town’s administrative and religious institutions. By the Justification by State Party first half of the 15th century, the town had become the capital The Kazan Kremlin is a unique and complex monument of of the Muslim Principality of Bulgaria, with administrative, archaeology, history, urban development, and architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • ( Publication Date: 4 April 2015
    THE PIPELINE MAZE OF THE WIDER BLACK SEA REGION Claudiu-Nicolae Sonda (Postgraduate student in the M.A. Program - the International and European Relations-in the Linkoping University, Sweden) Copyright: Research Institute for European and American Studies (www.rieas.gr) Publication date: 4 April 2015 No discussion over the Black Sea region can be complete without referring to the energy field, more specifically oil and gas resources, pipelines, and transit routes. The energy sector is crucial not only in economic terms, but also for security. By security we mean energy security, defined as ‘the uninterrupted availability of energy sources at an affordable price’1. Furthermore, we are talking about security in traditional terms, mainly the danger of inter-state conflict over the control /access to natural resources. A properly informed conversation about energy in the Black Sea region demands a knowledge of the fundamentals. A lot has been written on the topic of energy pipelines, but we felt that a gap still exists. We find it essential to put together a clear and concise presentation of the major oil and gas pipelines running through the area. This paper has precisely such an aim. We will sort out the complex pipeline network into oil and gas pipelines, and the latter into operating and planned pipelines. Each pipeline will be dealt with shortly, leaving the analyses for 1 IEA.org: http://www.iea.org/topics/energysecurity/ 1 another time. As we mentioned, it is beyond the aim of this paper to delve into detailed accounts. Such accounts are already available elsewhere. Finally, we will not present the interconnectors, and the smaller pipelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Document 2008
    REFERENCE DOCUMENT 2008 REDISCOVERING ENERGY REFERENCE DOCUMENT 2008 Incorporation by reference Pursuant to Article 28 of European Regulation No. 809/2004 of April 29, 2004, this Reference Document incorporates by reference the following information to which the reader is invited to refer: • with regard to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 for Gaz de France: management report, consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with IFRS accounting principles and the related Statutory Auditors’ reports found on pages 113 to 128 and pages 189 to 296 of the Reference Document, registered on May 15, 2008 with l’Autorité des Marchés Financiers (French Financial Markets Authority, or AMF), under R. 08-056; • with regard to the fiscal year endedD ecember 31, 2007 for SUEZ: management report, consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with IFRS accounting principles and the related Statutory Auditors’ reports found on pages 117 to 130 and pages 193 to 312 of the Reference Document, filed onM arch 18, 2008 with l’Autorité des Marchés Financiers (French Financial Markets Authority, or AMF), under D. 08-0122 as well as its update filed on June 13, 2008 under D. 08-0122-A01; • with regard to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 for Gaz de France: management report, consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with IFRS accounting principles and the related Statutory Auditors’ reports found on pages 105 to 118 and pages 182 to 294 of the Reference Document, registered on April 27, 2007 with l’Autorité des Marchés Financiers (French Financial Markets Authority, or AMF), under R. 07-046; • with regard to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 for SUEZ: management report, consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with IFRS accounting principles and the related Statutory Auditors’ reports found on pages 117 to 130 and pages 194 to 309 of the Reference Document, filed on April 4, 2007 withl’Autorité des Marchés Financiers (French Financial Markets Authority, or AMF), under D.
    [Show full text]
  • Snam Rete Gas
    TEN-YEAR DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF THE NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION NETWORK 2016-2025 SNAM RETE GAS Snam Rete Gas Snam Rete Gas Ten-year network development plan Ten-year network development plan 2016-2025 2016-2025 Reference period 2016 – 2025 Reference period 2016 – 2025 Document prepared by Snam Rete Gas S.p.A. Document prepared by Snam Rete Gas S.p.A. In compliance with the D.L. 93 of 11 June 2011 and In compliance with the D.L. 93 of 11 June 2011 and subsequent amendments and additions subsequent amendments and additions TEN-YEAR NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PLAN | 3 Snam Rete Gas publishes the third edition of the Ten-Year Development Plan of its natural gas Snam Rete Gas publishes the third edition of the Ten-Year Development Plan of its natural gas transportation network, following the second publication of the 2015 in accordance with the Legislative transportation network, following the second publication of the 2015 in accordance with the Legislative Decree n. 93 of June 1, 2011, issued to transpose the directive 2009/73/EC, as modified by the law n. 115 of Decree n. 93 of June 1, 2011, issued to transpose the directive 2009/73/EC, as modified by the law n. 115 of 29 July 2015. 29 July 2015. The Plan highlights the commitment of Snam Rete Gas to develop the transportation service, with the aim The Plan highlights the commitment of Snam Rete Gas to develop the transportation service, with the aim to encourage the process of network integration at European level. This commitment is realized through the to encourage the process of network integration at European level.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Management in South East Europe (Achievements and Prospects)
    Venelin Tsachevsky Energy management in South East Europe (Achievements and Prospects) Electronic Publications of Pan-European Institute 2/2013 ISSN 1795 - 5076 Energy management in South East Europe (Achievements and Prospects) Venelin Tsachevsky1 2/2013 Electronic Publications of Pan-European Institute http://www.utu.fi/pei Opinions and views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the Pan-European Institute or its staff members. 1 Venelin Tsachevsky was born in 1948 in Sofia. In 1975 he got a Ph.D. degree on international economic relations and in 1989 a second Ph.D. on international relations. Professor of political studies in several Bulgarian Universities. In 2007 - 2009 he was a guest professor at Helsinki University on South Eastern and Bulgaria’s development and foreign policy. VenelinTsachevsky is author of around 300 publications about the development and foreign policy of Bulgaria, the regional cooperation and integration of the Balkan countries to the European Union and NATO. In 2003 - 2006 he was Ambassador of Bulgaria to Finland. Venelin Tsachevsky PEI Electronic Publications 2/2013 www.utu.fi/pei Contents PART I: SOUTH EAST EUROPE AT THE START OF 21st CENTURY ........................ 1 1. Which countries constitute South East Europe? ..................................................... 1 2. Specific place of the region in Europe .................................................................... 5 3. Governance and political transformation ...............................................................
    [Show full text]