Ottoman Empire – History and Culture
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Florentine and Ottoman Women of the 14Th-16Th Centuries, a Comparative
For more resources, visit the CMES Website For more educational resources, visit the CMES Outreach Website `FLORENTINE and OTTOMAN WOMEN OF THE 14th - 16th CENTURIES - - A COMPARATIVE CURRICULUM UNIT Louise Forsyth Poly Prep Country Day School Teach Ottoman Empire Travel Seminar 2009 Length: One to two periods (forty-five to ninety minutes) Level: high school (9-12) When best to use it: at the end of the Italian Renaissance unit in European or world history classes or while studying the early Ottoman Empire Aims: . to evaluate what the Renaissance meant for Italian women, particularly in Florence . to provide a comparison to the conditions of European women with non- European women . to have students examine stereotypical images of Eastern and Western women . to expose students to the social history of the early Ottoman Empire . to introduce students to a variety of issues that are barely touched upon in most textbooks (sumptuary laws, European slavery, prostitution, etc.) . to have students use primary and secondary sources as the basis for learning Lessons: The following materials may be used in one of two ways. A. The teacher can make a handout of the documents and give students a homework assignment, along the lines of the sample assignment at the end of this packet. The next day student responses can be the basis for class discussion. B. Use the documents for in-class activities on Italian and Ottoman women. See below. USING THE DOCUMENTS IN CLASS [minimum: 45 minutes] Introduction: (5 minutes) • Introduce the topic by eliciting student images of the general differences between the lives of Western Christian women and (Ottoman or Turkish) Muslim women. -
Jo in T Crisis Committees
TMUN JOINT CRISIS COMMITTEES GOVERNMENT THE SULTAN AND THE IMPERIAL COUNCIL To a larger extent than the kings of contemporary Western governments, the Sultan is central to the Ottoman system.1 His theoretical powers are absolute; he is the only one authorized to pass binding laws, and, as commander in chief of all armies and appointer of his own government, he can enforce them (McCarthy 109).2 In practice, the Sultan’s powers are checked by the people around him: having spent his life within the walls of theTopkapi palace, he relies on bureaucrats and scribes to inform him; he is influenced by members of his harem, who are politically savvy and leverage their close relationship with him; and he must consider the interests of powerful institutions, such as the Janissaries.3 Perhaps wary of these interests, Mahmud II has so far presented himself as conservative and pious.4 However, he is gradually filling government posts with people loyal to him, suggesting hemaybe consolidating power.5 J The Sultan’s authorityS is acted upon by hisImperial Council--the central government O E I N of the Ottoman Empire.E It is composed mainly of viziers, and headed by the Grand Vizier, who TT T I 6 C represents the Sultan’s interests in the council. Other members of the Imperial Council have R I MM SIS CvariedO over time, but for the purpose of this committee, all delegates will be considered part of the Imperial Council. 1 Justin McCarthy, The Ottoman Turks: An Introductory History to 1923(New York: Routledge, 2013), 107. -
The Ottoman Policy Towards Non-Muslim Communities and Their Status in the Ottoman Empire During the 15Th & 16Th Centuries: Interaction of Civilizations Mughul, M
2137 THE OTTOMAN POLICY TOWARDS NON-MUSLIM COMMUNITIES AND THEIR STATUS IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE DURING THE 15TH & 16TH CENTURIES: INTERACTION OF CIVILIZATIONS MUGHUL, M. Yakub* PAKİSTAN/PAKISTAN/ПАКИСТАН ABSTRACT This paper focuses on Ottomans liberal policy and tolerance towards the non- Muslims and other religious communities during 15th, 16th century. In particular, it explores the key role of Sultan Mohammad-II in consolidating and harmonizing different cultures and religions across Europe and Asia. The paper also addresses the Islamic attitude towards inter-religious relations, which was at that time quite unknown in rest of Europe, where they were burning its heretics at the stake, whereas races and religions coexisted under the Ottoman rule. It will highlight how the advent of Ottoman Rule in Eastern Europe brought the Muslim and European Civilizations face to face, which ultimately created an interaction among them. Finally, it will describe the image of the millet system introduced during this period, which brought all non-Muslim communities within the Turkish commonwealth, and allowed them to govern itself by its own laws and live in peace in the Ottoman Empire. Key Words: Ottoman, policy, Empire, Constantinople, Turkish, history. INTRODUCTION The Ottoman Empire1 would be defined as a mosaic of different cultures and religions, which provided peace and harmony among members of society without distinction between Muslim and non-Muslim, race, and color. The story of Ottoman history involves not only the Ottoman dynasty but the many peoples who ruled the Empire and were ruled by it: Turks, Arabs, Serbs, Greeks, Armenians, Jews, Bulgarians, Hungarians, Albanians, North Africans and others. -
Islamic Gunpowder Empires : Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals / Douglas E
“Douglas Streusand has contributed a masterful comparative analysis and an up-to- S date reinterpretation of the significance of the early modern Islamic empires. This T book makes profound scholarly insights readily accessible to undergraduate stu- R dents and will be useful in world history surveys as well as more advanced courses.” —Hope Benne, Salem State College E U “Streusand creatively reexamines the military and political history and structures of the SAN Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires. He breaks down the process of transformation and makes their divergent outcomes comprehensible, not only to an audience of special- ists, but also to undergraduates and general readers. Appropriate for courses in world, early modern, or Middle Eastern history as well as the political sociology of empires.” D —Linda T. Darling, University of Arizona “Streusand is to be commended for navigating these hearty and substantial historiogra- phies to pull together an analytical textbook which will be both informative and thought provoking for the undergraduate university audience.” GUNPOWDER EMPIRES —Colin Mitchell, Dalhousie University Islamic Gunpowder Empires provides an illuminating history of Islamic civilization in the early modern world through a comparative examination of Islam’s three greatest empires: the Otto- IS mans (centered in what is now Turkey), the Safavids (in modern Iran), and the Mughals (ruling the Indian subcontinent). Author Douglas Streusand explains the origins of the three empires; compares the ideological, institutional, military, and economic contributors to their success; and L analyzes the causes of their rise, expansion, and ultimate transformation and decline. Streusand depicts the three empires as a part of an integrated international system extending from the At- lantic to the Straits of Malacca, emphasizing both the connections and the conflicts within that AMIC system. -
Kivunim Academic Booklet 2015-16
KIVUNIM ACADEMIC PROGRAM 2015-16 STUDY THE PAST • EXPERIENCE THE PRESENT • BUILD THE FUTURE 300 Central Park West Suite 12J2 New York, NY 10024 917-930-3092 Israel Office: Beit Shmuel. 6 Eliyahu Shama Street, Jerusalem 94108 [email protected] WWW.KIVUNIM.ORG BUILDING WORLD CONSCIOUSNESS Table of Contents INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................. 1 ACADEMIC PROGRAM – Credit Distribution............................................... 4 THE JEW IN HISTORY: HOMELANDS IN EXILE? ........................................ 5 Unit I -- Medieval Spain and Portugal • Ancient & Modern Greece Ottoman Empire and Turkey……………………………….7 Unit II -- India .......................................................................................... 17 Unit III -- Morocco ................................................................................... 20 Unit IV – Central Europe: Bulgaria • Hungary • The Czech Republic German……………………………………………………………….26 LAND, PEOPLE, IDEAS: THE CHALLENGE OF ZIONISM......................... 32 ARABIC AND HEBREW LANGUAGES........................................................ 45 Arabic Language....................................................................................... 46 Arabic Language and Arab Culture ........................................................ 49 Hebrew Language..................................................................................... 54 VISUAL THINKING: THE ART OF SEEING……………………………………60 KIVUNIM AND THE ARTS: MUSIC AND FILM -
The Ottoman-Venetian Border (15Th-18Th Centuries)
Hilâl. Studi turchi e ottomani 5 — The Ottoman-Venetian Border (15th-18th Centuries) Maria Pia Pedani Edizioni Ca’Foscari The Ottoman-Venetian Border (15th-18th Centuries) Hilâl Studi turchi e ottomani Collana diretta da Maria Pia Pedani Elisabetta Ragagnin 5 Edizioni Ca’Foscari Hilâl Studi turchi e ottomani Direttori | General editors Maria Pia Pedani (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia) Elisabetta Ragagnin (Freie Universität, Berlin) Comitato scientifico | Advisory board Bülent Arı (TBMM Milli Saraylar, Müzecilik ve Tanıtım BaŞkanı, İstanbul, Türkiye) Önder Bayır (TC BaŞbakanlık Devlet ArŞivi Daire Başkanlığı, Osmanlı Arşivi Daire Başkanlığı, İstanbul, Türkiye) Dejanirah Couto (École Pratique des Hautes Études «EPHE», Paris, France) Mehmet Yavuz Erler (Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Samsun, Türkiye) Fabio Grassi ( «La Sapienza» Università di Roma, Italia) Figen Güner Dilek (Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye) Stefan Hanß (University of Cambridge, UK) Baiarma Khabtagaeva (Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Magyarország) Nicola Melis (Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Italia) Melek Özyetgin (Yildiz Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye) Cristina Tonghini (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia) Direzione e redazione Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia Dipartimento di Studi sull’Asia sull’Africa mediterranea Sezione Asia Orientale e Antropologia Palazzo Vendramin dei Carmini Dorsoduro 3462 30123 Venezia http://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/it/edizioni/collane/hilal/ The Ottoman-Venetian Border (15th-18th Centuries) Maria Pia Pedani translated by Mariateresa Sala Venezia Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing 2017 The Ottoman-Venetian Border (15th-18th Centuries) Maria Pia Pedani © 2017 Maria Pia Pedani for the text © 2017 Mariateresa Sala for the translation © 2017 Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing for the present edition Qualunque parte di questa pubblicazione può essere riprodotta, memorizzata in un sistema di recupero dati o trasmessa in qualsiasi forma o con qualsiasi mezzo, elettronico o meccanico, senza autorizzazione, a condizione che se ne citi la fonte. -
Was Suleiman?
NEW YORK STATE SOCIAL STUDIES RESOURCE TOOLKIT 9th Grade Suleiman Inquiry How “Magnificent” Was Suleiman? Titian, painting of Suleiman, c1530 ©World History Archive/Newscom Supporting Questions 1. How was Suleiman characterized during his reign? 2. How did Suleiman expand the Ottoman Empire? 3. What changes did Suleiman make to the governance of the Ottoman Empire? 4. To what extent did Suleiman promote tolerance in the Ottoman Empire? THIS WORK IS LICENSED UNDER A CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION- NONCOMMERCIAL- SHAREALIKE 4.0 INTERNATIONAL LICENSE. 1 NEW YORK STATE SOCIAL STUDIES RESOURCE TOOLKIT 9th Grade Suleiman Inquiry How “Magnificent” Was Suleiman? 9.7 OTTOMANS AND MING PRE-1600: Christianity, Islam, and Neo-Confucianism influenced the New York State development of regions and shaped key centers of power in the world between 1368 and 1683. The Social Studies Ottoman Empire and Ming Dynasty were two powerful states, each with a view of itself and its place in the Framework Key world. Idea & Practices Gathering, Using, and Interpreting Evidence Comparison and Contextualization Staging the Students read an excerpt from the National Geographic (2014) article “After 450 Years, Archaeologists Still Question Hunting for Magnificent Sultan’s Heart.” Discuss what reasons might explain the fascination with finding Suleiman’s remains. Supporting Question 1 Supporting Question 2 Supporting Question 3 Supporting Question 4 How was Suleiman How did Suleiman expand What changes did Suleiman To what extent did Suleiman characterized during his the -
Türk Mitleri Yok Etmek: Kadınlar Saltanatı Örneği Üzerinde Avrupa'da
T.C. FATĠH SULTAN MEHMET VAKIF ÜNĠVERSĠTESĠ MEDENĠYETLER ĠTTĠFAKI ENSTĠTÜSÜ YÜKSEK LĠSANS TEZĠ TÜRK MİTLERİ YOK ETMEK: KADINLAR SALTANATI ÖRNEĞİ ÜZERİNDE AVRUPA’DA OSMANLI AMINA SMITS 130401012 TEZ DANIġMANI: YRD. DOÇ. DR. NAGĠHAN HALĠLOĞLU ĠSTANBUL 2017 FSMVÜ Medeniyetler İttifakı Enstitisü Medeniyet Araştırmaları Anabilim Dalı yüksek lisans programı 130401012 numaralı öğrencisi Amina SMITS’ın ilgili yönetmeliklerin belirlediği tüm şartları yerine getirdikten sonra hazırladığı “Türk Miti Yok Etmek: Kadınlar Saltanatı Örneği Üzerinde Avrupa Bakış Açısından Osmanlı” başlıklı tezi aşağıda imzaları olan jüri tarafından 5/1/2017 tarihinde oybirliğiyle kabul edilmiştir. Prof. Dr. Recep ŞENTÜRK Medeniyetler İttifakı Enstitisü Müdür Yrd . Doç. Dr. Nagihan Yard. Doç. Dr. Enes BAYRAKLI HALILOĞLU (Jüri Üyesi) (Jüri Başkanı-Danışman) Türk-Alman Üniversitesi Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Bilal KUŞPINAR (Jüri Üyesi) Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi BEYAN Bu tezin yazımında bilimsel ahlâk kurallarının gözetildiğini, baĢkalarının eserlerinden yararlanırken bilimsel normlara uygun olarak kaynak gösteriminin yapıldığını, kullanılan veriler üzerinde herhangi bir değiĢiklik yapılmadığını, tezin herhangi bir kısmının bu üniversite veya baĢka bir üniversitedeki baĢka bir tez çalıĢmasına ait olarak sunulmadığını beyan ederim. AMINA SMITS ÖZET Bu tezde “Kadınlar Saltanatı” olarak bilinen dönemdeki karmaĢık Osmanlı-Avrupa iliĢkilerine Edward Said‟in Oryantalizm adlı eserinin ve “Türk Miti”nin ıĢığında yakından bakılacaktır. Bu süreçte, bu iliĢkilerin Said‟in iddia ettiğinden daha da karmaĢık olduğunu ve, tekerrür eden olumsuz imajlara rağmen Osmanlılar hakkında, Avrupa‟da yaygın Ģekilde birçok olumlu görüĢlerin de olduğunu gözler önüne sermeyi ve dolayısıyla yalnızca Batı cephesinin Osmanlılar hakkındaki önyargıları değil, aynı zamanda Doğu‟da Batı-karĢıtı fikirleri de aĢmayı hedeflenmektedir. Bunun için ise, öncelikle bu dönemin ve politik aktörlerinin önemini göstermek için “Kadınlar Saltanatı” yakından incelenecektir. -
The Ottoman Empire in the Time of Suleiman the Magnificent
HARVARD HISTORICAL STUDIES PUBLISHED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY FROM THE INCOME OF THE HENRY WARREN TORREY FUND VOLUME XVIII HARVARD HISTORICAL STUDIES of the American Slave X The Administration of «»« African By Louis Clikton I. The Suppression ^JvolutionaxyArmy. $1.50 net. Hatch, Ph.D. 8vo. 8vo. $i.Sonet. and the Patronage. of "The Crisis." XI The Civil Service Mitor Ph.D., Professor of the By CARL RUSSELL FISH, »T T»,» rnntest over the RatlficaOon Un.versay of American History in the in Massachusetts of' nei. %IderS ConSion 8vo. $2.00 Professor of Euro- Wisconsin. Iv S B Harding. Ph.D., of the in Indiana Development of Freedom ^n^tory Universay.^8vo.^ Xn. The ^- Press m Massachusetts. By y^ the U-v«- Ph.D., President of DuNmAV, net. 8vo. $1.50 sity of Wyoming. Apiculture- L^rrsecrel^/of in Canada. S" Xra. The Seigniorial System 8vo. Professor of By W. B. MUNRO. Ph.D., in Harvard Univer- M^unTcipal Government sity. 8vo. By Wa r».ATuuj...b..«..beM.s».8vo. »' » The Frankpledge System. chusetts Senate. XIV. Assistant TT4M Alfred Morris, Ph.D., British Municipal in the Umvcr V A Biblioeraphy of Pr«'of English History 8vo. $1.50 net. sity of California. 8vo. , . 8vo. Relne YVT Memoire de Marie Caroline, Edited by ROBERT MATTESON ' ^5 ^"JeSs Professor of College. 8vo. A.M., Assistant liams TOHNSTON, Umvers.y. Cm History in Harvard Colonies 8vo. llsh "VfEEVE Ph.D., Professor professor of Ancient 8vo. '.?:fPh D., M^S rdMarn'HistoryinHarvardUn.v..ty. 8vo. G. T. net. of the Ottonwin LA'-^^^.'/^-^o'8vo. -
Empress of the East: How a European Slave Girl Became Queen of the Ottoman Empire'
H-Women Masson on Peirce, 'Empress of the East: How a European Slave Girl Became Queen of the Ottoman Empire' Discussion published by Jessie Frazier on Thursday, December 6, 2018 The following book review from H-War may be of interest to some H-Women list members. Author: Leslie Peirce Reviewer: Gemma Masson Leslie Peirce. Empress of the East: How a European Slave Girl Became Queen of the Ottoman Empire. New York: Basic Books, 2017. 368 pp. $32.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-465-03251-8. Reviewed by Gemma Masson (University of Birmingham)Published on H-War (November, 2018) Commissioned by Margaret Sankey (Air War College) Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=53223 Leslie Peirce is well known as a historian whose work reveals the lives of Ottoman women. Her previous work on the Ottoman Imperial Harem (The Imperial Harem: Women and Sovereignty in the Ottoman Empire [1993]) is a staple on Ottoman reading lists as is her work on women in the courts of Aintab (Morality Tales: Law and Gender in the Ottoman Court of Aintab [2003]), both of which bring the lives of the wider female population into the historical narrative. With the success of the Turkish television series Magnificent Century (2011-14), which focused on the reign of Süleyman the Magnificent (also known as The Lawgiver) and his family, there had never been a better time for a new assessment of the concubine Hurrem Sultan, also known as Roxelana. Roxelana rose to become the first, and only, wife of an Ottoman sultan for centuries, achieving the status of queen, previously unknown in the empire. -
The Ottoman Way of Governing Multi-Ethnic and Multi-Religious Communities Osmanlının Çoklu Etnik Ve Dini Toplumları Yönetme Metodu
THE OTTOMAN WAY OF GOVERNING MULTI-ETHNIC AND 135 MULTI-RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES The Ottoman Way of Governing Multi-Ethnic and Multi-Religious Communities Osmanlının Çoklu Etnik ve Dini Toplumları Yönetme Metodu Memet Yetişgin∗ Abstract Although ruling over multi-ethnic and multi-religious communities for many centuries in some of the most troubled regions in the world was not an easy task, the Ottoman Turks had pretty much succeeded in doing this. For this, the administrative methods of the Ottomans were allowed to be shaped by geographic, ethnic, religious and cultural environments and needs. Even though the Ottoman Turks strictly adhered to the Islamic laws, they did not hesitate to introduce new laws shaped by a long Turkish history and tradition to create better opportunities to both the ruler and the ruled. Despite some shortcomings, the Ottoman ruling practices had its merit in dealing with mixed communities quite different from each other. Until the modern times, the Ottoman administration was understandable and acceptable to the whole subjects. In the modern times, because of the rise of Europe in political, military, economic and cultural matters, the minorities in the Empire increasingly became dissatisfied with their conditions and demanded new reforms and rebelled against the state for separation. In this stage, though the Ottoman administration tried to satisfy the whole subjects by introducing new reforms, it failed to hold its subjects and territories intact because of great obstacles. Key Words: The Ottoman Governance, Minorities, Non-Muslims, Millet, the Balkans, the Turks. Özet Asırlarca dünyanın en zorlu bölgelerinde yaşayan çok dinli ve etnik yapılı toplumları yönetmek kolay bir iş olmasa da, bunu Osmanlı Türkleri büyük ölçüde başarmıştır. -
How the Ottoman Empire Finally Ended the Byzantine Empire
The Means of Destruction: How the Ottoman Empire Finally Ended the Byzantine Empire Benjamin Donovan Donovan 1 The year 1453 brought with its passing two of the most important historical events of the early modern period: the end of the 100 Years War, and the Conquest of Constantinople by the Ottoman Turks. While both events had a drastic effect on Europe, the Ottoman’s conquest arguably had a greater effect in Eastern Europe, since the Ottoman Turks dominated the diplomatic efforts of the states there for the greater part of the next 200 years. However, no European had any reason to believe that the Ottomans would capture Constantinople, since they had tried two times previously and had failed in both of those attempts. Despite those failures, many factors contributed to significant changes within the Ottoman State that put them in a position to effectively assault the city, and thus establish themselves as an empire worthy of recognition by Europeans. The Ottomans conquered Constantinople and ended the Byzantine Empire by military conquests and diplomatic treaties by Mehmet II’s predecessors Bayezid I and Murat II. In addition, Mehmet II’s desire to prove himself an adequate leader plus western influences on Ottoman military technology and improvements on more traditional Ottoman tactics meant that the Byzantine Empire was brought to its knees. Bayezid I (r. 1389-1402) and his military actions had a profound impact on the later Ottoman conquest of Constantinople since he launched the first Ottoman siege of the city. Bayezid made an earnest attempt to conquer the city, instigating both an eight-year siege and an eight-year blockade of Constantinople in an attempt to bring the rebellious Emperor Manuel II back into submission.1 Although the Ottoman Empire under Bayezid did not have the proper means to capture the city his siege still has relevance because it instilled a general desire in succeeding Ottoman sultans to conquer the city and make good on Bayezid’s adoption of the title Sultan of Rum, or Rome and hence overlord of Byzantium.