The Concept of an Inflatable Reusable Launch Vehicle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Concept of an Inflatable Reusable Launch Vehicle The Concept of an Inflatable Reusable Launch Vehicle Valentyn Pidvysotskyi1 1 Independent Researcher, Ukraine (Letava), https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0028-757X Abstract This article discusses the concept of a launch vehicle with an inflatable reusable first stage. The first stage in the form of an inflatable streamlined thin-walled tank with a low bulk density (which may be less than the standard sea-level density of air) is proposed. Compressed light gases (hydrogen, helium) ensure the rigidity of the inflatable thin-walled tank. For return to Earth, the first stage is slows down in the upper atmosphere. In the lower atmosphere, the aerostatic lifting force exceeds the Earth's gravity. Thus, the first stage will float in the air (this will prevents its destruction). Then the first stage returns to the spaceport for reuse. The inflatable first stage of a launch vehicle will be very large. Therefore, the main purpose of this article is to study the influence of aerodynamic losses on the payload. The mass of the inflatable first stage and its vertical and horizontal stiffness will also be calculate (as a first approximation). These are the main questions that need to be answer for the opportunity further developed the concept. Therefore, this article should be consider as a preliminary study, not claiming to be complete. Keywords Inflatable; Reusable; Launch Vehicle; Propellant 1 Introduction Mars, Jupiter, Titan (the moon of Jupiter) (Burke, 2014). Parachutes was use for soft landing The main reason for the high cost of space flights is (splashdown) Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters 1 the single use of flying machines . After the (NASA, 1988, NASA, 2008). One of the most recent acceleration of the spacecraft, the launch vehicle examples the use of this method in astronautics is (which is a technical masterpiece worth millions or return of the reusable Dragon spacecraft (Garcia, even tens of millions of US dollars) falls to Earth, 2018). In most cases, the disadvantages of this repeating the fate of the legendary Icarus. Therefore, method include the need to equip the spacecraft’s the need to create reusable space transport systems is simultaneously with multiple systems: thermal obvious and such projects arouse of great interest. protection, parachute system and soft landing system. Currently, there are several basic methods for returning flying machines to Earth. The third return method is the horizontal (airplane) landing of flying machines (or parts thereof). The The first return method is the vertical landing of the most famous are Space Shuttle (Launius and Jenkins, launch vehicles using their own engines. Projects of 2002, Fernholz, 2018) and Buran (Kogut, 2018, such launch vehicles were develop in the past (for Afanasyev, 2018). Also known projects: MAKS example, Delta Clipper) (SDIO, 1993). The New (Plokhikh at al., 2012), XCOR Lynx (Messier, 2018), Shepard project (Spaceflight101, 2017) is develop NASP (Rockwell X-30) (Heppenheimer, 2009, currently. The Falcon 9 project (SpaceX, 2021) is on Pattillo, 2001), HOTOL (Postlethwaite, 1989), the stage of commercial use. This method of RLV/AVATAR (Martin at al., 2009), RLV-TD returning launch vehicles has good prospects for (Mohan at al., 2017), Skylon (Hyslop at al., 2019, commercial application. The disadvantages include Arefyev at al., 2019), Boeing X-43 (Hanlon, 2004), the high consumption of propellant during landing. It Cold (Rudakov at al., 1999), Dream Chaser (Federal leads to decrease in payload, and the additional Aviation Administration, 2018), SHEFEX (Longo at consumption of the resource of rocket engines. al., 2006), SpaceLiner (Lariviere and Kezirian, 2019) The second return method of the spacecraft’s (or and others. The disadvantages include the need to parts thereof) is to use parachutes. Parachutes are equip spacecraft’s with wings, empennage and widely used in aviation and space technology. They landing gear (which increases aerodynamic losses, repeatedly was use for landing probes on Venus, complexity and mass of the construction). All of these methods can be use individually or 1 If buy a new Red Tesla car for every trip to the store for together (in various combinations). However, their groceries, then transportation costs can become comparable to the application did not lead to a multiple decrease in the costs of delivery to low Earth orbit. cost of spaceflights. Therefore, there is a need to fabric. Based on these measurements, the optimum develop other methods of return (for example, using stitching (or gluing) line of these pieces will be aerostatic force). For this purpose, we can use an calculated. A thin gas-tight film will be glue to the inflatable balloon folded inside a special container. If inner surface of the first stage. A special this balloon is made large enough (and filled with impregnation can use to seal the seams. After light gas), it can keep the spacecraft in the air. The stitching the outer shell, into the first stage can main disadvantage is the long deployment time of the pumped gas (air, etc.). After that, it is necessary to inflatable balloon. For example, during the VEGA sew on internal partitions, install systems and Venus balloon experiment, a balloon with a diameter mechanisms, etc. For made of inflatable first stage ≈ 3.4 m deployed in ≈ 100 s (Sagdeev et al., 1986). can used existing airship hangars. As the size increases, the filling time of the balloon will increase, which complicates their use. To solve the problem of balloon deployment (at 2 Materials and Methods limited time), the concept of an inflatable launch This section considers methods for calculating vehicle will be consider. It is assume that the indicators by which will be determined the main hydrogen balloon will be permanently deploy and is technical characteristics and parameters of the launch part of the launch vehicle. There are various design vehicle with an inflatable reusable first stage. The for multistage launch vehicles. As an example, the methods of calculating the aerodynamic losses, the tandem staging design (with a reusable first stage) mass of the propellant, the strength and mass of the will be consider. First stage as a streamlined thin- body is considered. walled cylindrical tank divided into three sections. These sections store separately: liquid methane, 2. 1 Comparative Calculation of Aerodynamic liquid oxygen and hydrogen gas (Fig. 1). Inside the Losses sections is create an increased pressure (several atmospheres) to maintain a stable shape. The size of Suppose a launch vehicle moves upward at a speed v the first stage2 is calculate so that when it returns to (at time t). The main factors determining the flight Earth, its bulk density is less than that of atmospheric dynamics of the launch vehicle are its mass m, the air. Due to the positive buoyancy, the first stage thrust of rocket engines Ft, the force of gravity Fg, (without propellant) will be able to float in the Earth's and the aerodynamic drag force Fd. Consider the atmosphere3. Then the first stage will move to the changes in speed dv over the time interval dt. The spaceport (using its own rocket engine or special thrust force Ft could provide a speed increase dvh (in tugboats). the absence of other forces). However, the aerodynamic drag force Fd will decrease the speed by dvd, and the gravitational force Fg will reduce the speed by dvg. With this in mind, the actual acceleration a will be: 1 3 5 dv dv−− dv dv a ==h d g (1) dt dt 2 4 The physical meaning of dvh is the change in characteristic speed, dvd is the aerodynamic loss, dvg is the gravitational loss. Aerodynamic and gravitational losses depend from the many interrelated factors, and their determination is a Figure 1. Schematic diagram of an inflatable launch vehicle (in the difficult task. At the preliminary stage, it can diagram, the exact shape and proportions are not respected): 1 – assumed that the gravitational losses of an inflatable nasal section of an inflatable launch vehicle (it includes the second launch vehicle are approximately equal to the stage, third stage and payload); 2 – upper part of the first stage (for gravitational losses of classic launch vehicles. For hydrogen gas); 3 – middle section (for liquid methane); 4 – aft section (for liquid oxygen); 5 – rocket engines aerodynamic losses, it is necessary to make an additional calculation (because of the large size of the inflatable launch vehicle). Suppose that a launch vehicle has mass m, and because of aerodynamic drag For the made of the inflatable first stage, it is propose loses infinitesimal speed dvd for infinitesimal period to use a super-strong fabric (for example, from of time dt. With this in mind, the aerodynamic drag graphene filaments). After cutting out need to force Fd will be: measure, the elasticity coefficient of each piece of mdvd Fd = (2) dt 2 By means of hydrogen section. 3 Upon return, the first stage will drift in the Earth’s atmosphere in a vertical position, since its stern will be heavier (due to the weight of the rocket engines). The aerodynamic drag force Fd depends from drag is Q. Using equation (8), the following equation it is coefficient Cd, drag area S, air density ρa, speed v. obtained: Taking this into account, it is written: 2rlP r QP== (9) C S v2 2ldl dl F = da (3) d 2 Using equations (7; 9), it is obtained: Using equations (2; 3), it is obtained: r m= 2 rl P (10) ttQ C S v2 dt dv = da (4) d 2 m After returning to Earth, the first stage contains inside light gases (hydrogen, helium). The density of For evaluate the aerodynamic losses of an inflatable atmospheric air is ρa, dry mass of the first stage is md launch vehicle, will be use a comparison method with (without propellant).
Recommended publications
  • Spacex Launch Manifest - a List of Upcoming Missions 25 Spacex Facilities 27 Dragon Overview 29 Falcon 9 Overview 31 45Th Space Wing Fact Sheet
    COTS 2 Mission Press Kit SpaceX/NASA Launch and Mission to Space Station CONTENTS 3 Mission Highlights 4 Mission Overview 6 Dragon Recovery Operations 7 Mission Objectives 9 Mission Timeline 11 Dragon Cargo Manifest 13 NASA Slides – Mission Profile, Rendezvous, Maneuvers, Re-Entry and Recovery 15 Overview of the International Space Station 17 Overview of NASA’s COTS Program 19 SpaceX Company Overview 21 SpaceX Leadership – Musk & Shotwell Bios 23 SpaceX Launch Manifest - A list of upcoming missions 25 SpaceX Facilities 27 Dragon Overview 29 Falcon 9 Overview 31 45th Space Wing Fact Sheet HIGH-RESOLUTION PHOTOS AND VIDEO SpaceX will post photos and video throughout the mission. High-Resolution photographs can be downloaded from: http://spacexlaunch.zenfolio.com Broadcast quality video can be downloaded from: https://vimeo.com/spacexlaunch/videos MORE RESOURCES ON THE WEB Mission updates will be posted to: For NASA coverage, visit: www.SpaceX.com http://www.nasa.gov/spacex www.twitter.com/elonmusk http://www.nasa.gov/nasatv www.twitter.com/spacex http://www.nasa.gov/station www.facebook.com/spacex www.youtube.com/spacex 1 WEBCAST INFORMATION The launch will be webcast live, with commentary from SpaceX corporate headquarters in Hawthorne, CA, at www.spacex.com. The webcast will begin approximately 40 minutes before launch. SpaceX hosts will provide information specific to the flight, an overview of the Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon spacecraft, and commentary on the launch and flight sequences. It will end when the Dragon spacecraft separates
    [Show full text]
  • Maintenance Strategy and Its Importance in Rocket Launching System-An Indian Prospective
    ISSN(Online) : 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization) Vol. 5, Issue 5, May 2016 Maintenance Strategy and its Importance in Rocket Launching System-An Indian Prospective N Gayathri1, Amit Suhane2 M. Tech Research Scholar, Mechanical Engineering, M.A.N.I.T, Bhopal, M.P. India Assistant Professor, Mechanical Engineering, M.A.N.I.T, Bhopal, M.P. India ABSTRACT: The present paper mainly describes the maintenance strategies followed at rocket launching system in India. A Launch pad is an above-ground platform from which a rocket or space vehicle is vertically launched. The potential for advanced rocket launch vehicles to meet the challenging , operational, and performance demands of space transportation in the early 21st century is examined. Space transportation requirements from recent studies underscoring the need for growth in capacity of an increasing diversity of space activities and the need for significant reductions in operational are reviewed. Maintenance strategies concepts based on moderate levels of evolutionary advanced technology are described. The vehicles provide a broad range of attractive concept alternatives with the potential to meet demanding operational and maintenance goals and the flexibility to satisfy a variety of vehicle architecture, mission, vehicle concept, and technology options. KEY WORDS: Preventive Maintenance, Rocket Launch Pad. I. INTRODUCTION A. ROCKET LAUNCH PAD A Launch pad is associate degree above-ground platform from that a rocket ballistic capsule is vertically launched. A launch advanced may be a facility which incorporates, and provides needed support for, one or a lot of launch pads.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection of Favorite Reusable Launch Vehicle Concepts by Using the Method of Pairwise Comparison
    Selection of Favorite Reusable Launch Vehicle Concepts by using the Method of Pairwise Comparison Robert A. Goehlich Keio University, Department of System Design Engineering, Ohkami Laboratory, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 223-8522, JAPAN, Mobile: +81-90-1767-1667, Fax: +81-45-566-1778 email: [email protected], Internet: www.Robert-Goehlich.de Abstract The attempt of this paper is to select promising Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) concepts by using a formal evaluation procedure. The vehicle system is divided into design features. Every design feature can have alternative characteristics. All combinations of design features and characteristics are compared pairwise with each other with respect to relative importance for a feasible vehicle concept as seen from technical, economic, and political aspects. This valuation process leads to a ranked list of design features for suborbital and orbital applications. The result is a theoretical optimized suborbital and orbital vehicle each. The method of pairwise comparison allows to determine not only ranking but also assessing the relative weight of each feature compared to others. Keywords: Pairwise Comparison, Reusable Launch Vehicle, Space Tourism Introduction The potential for an introduction of reusable launch vehicles is derived from an expected increasing demand for transportation of passengers in the decades to come. The assumed future satellite market does not justify to operate reusable launch vehicles only for satellites due to a low launch rate. Finding feasible vehicle concepts, which satisfy operator’s, passenger’s, and public’s needs, will be a challenging task. Since it is not possible to satisfy all space tourism markets by one vehicle, different vehicles that are capable to serve one particular segment (suborbital or orbital) are needed.
    [Show full text]
  • EMC18 Abstracts
    EUROPEAN MARS CONVENTION 2018 – 26-28 OCT. 2018, LA CHAUX-DE-FONDS, SWITZERLAND EMC18 Abstracts In alphabetical order Name title of presentation Page n° Théodore Besson: Scorpius Prototype 3 Tomaso Bontognali Morphological biosignatures on Mars: what to expect and how to prepare not to miss them 4 Pierre Brisson: Humans on Mars will have to live according to both Martian & Earth Time 5 Michel Cabane: Curiosity on Mars : What is new about organic molecules? 6 Antonio Del Mastro Industrie 4.0 technology for the building of a future Mars City: possibilities and limits of the application of a terrestrial technology for the human exploration of space 7 Angelo Genovese Advanced Electric Propulsion for Fast Manned Missions to Mars and Beyond 8 Olivia Haider: The AMADEE-18 Mars Simulation OMAN 9 Pierre-André Haldi: The Interplanetary Transport System of SpaceX revisited 10 Richard Heidman: Beyond human, technical and financial feasibility, “mass-production” constraints of a Colony project surge. 11 Jürgen Herholz: European Manned Space Projects 12 Jean-Luc Josset Search for life on Mars, the ExoMars rover mission and the CLUPI instrument 13 Philippe Lognonné and the InSight/SEIS Team: SEIS/INSIGHT: Towards the Seismic Discovering of Mars 14 Roland Loos: From the Earth’s stratosphere to flying on Mars 15 EUROPEAN MARS CONVENTION 2018 – 26-28 OCT. 2018, LA CHAUX-DE-FONDS, SWITZERLAND Gaetano Mileti Current research in Time & Frequency and next generation atomic clocks 16 Claude Nicollier Tethers and possible applications for artificial gravity
    [Show full text]
  • SPEAKERS TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE FAA COMMERCIAL SPACE 15TH ANNUAL John R
    15TH ANNUAL FAA COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE SPEAKERS COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION http://www.faa.gov/go/ast 15-16 FEBRUARY 2012 HQ-12-0163.INDD John R. Allen Christine Anderson Dr. John R. Allen serves as the Program Executive for Crew Health Christine Anderson is the Executive Director of the New Mexico and Safety at NASA Headquarters, Washington DC, where he Spaceport Authority. She is responsible for the development oversees the space medicine activities conducted at the Johnson and operation of the first purpose-built commercial spaceport-- Space Center, Houston, Texas. Dr. Allen received a B.A. in Speech Spaceport America. She is a recently retired Air Force civilian Communication from the University of Maryland (1975), a M.A. with 30 years service. She was a member of the Senior Executive in Audiology/Speech Pathology from The Catholic University Service, the civilian equivalent of the military rank of General of America (1977), and a Ph.D. in Audiology and Bioacoustics officer. Anderson was the founding Director of the Space from Baylor College of Medicine (1996). Upon completion of Vehicles Directorate at the Air Force Research Laboratory, Kirtland his Master’s degree, he worked for the Easter Seals Treatment Air Force Base, New Mexico. She also served as the Director Center in Rockville, Maryland as an audiologist and speech- of the Space Technology Directorate at the Air Force Phillips language pathologist and received certification in both areas. Laboratory at Kirtland, and as the Director of the Military Satellite He joined the US Air Force in 1980, serving as Chief, Audiology Communications Joint Program Office at the Air Force Space at Andrews AFB, Maryland, and at the Wiesbaden Medical and Missile Systems Center in Los Angeles where she directed Center, Germany, and as Chief, Otolaryngology Services at the the development, acquisition and execution of a $50 billion Aeromedical Consultation Service, Brooks AFB, Texas, where portfolio.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flight to Orbit
    There are numerous ways to get there— Around the Corner Th As then–US Space Command chief from rocket The Gen. Howell M. Estes III said to launch to space defense writers just before his re- tirement in August, “This is going maneuver to come along a lot quicker than we vehicles—and the think it is. ... We tend to think this stuff is way out there in the future, Air Force is but it’s right around the corner.” keeping its Flight The Air Force and NASA have divided the task of providing the options open. US government with a means of reliable, low-cost transportation to Earth orbit. The Air Force, with the largest immediate need, is heading to up the effort to revamp the Expend- to able Launch Vehicles now used to loft military and other government satellites. Called the Evolved ELV, this program is focused on derivatives of existing rockets. Competitors have been invited to redesign or value- engineer their proven boosters with new materials and technologies to provide reliable launch services at a he Air Force would like to go Orbit far lower price than today’s bench- back and forth to Earth orbit as bit mark of around $10,000 a pound to T O easily as it goes back and forth to Low Earth Orbit. The reasoning is 30,000 feet—routinely, reliably, and that an “evolved”—rather than an relatively cheaply. Such a capability all-new—vehicle will yield cost sav- goes hand in hand with being a true ings while reducing technical risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Launch System (Sls) Motors
    Propulsion Products Catalog SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM (SLS) MOTORS For NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS), Northrop Grumman manufactures the five-segment SLS heavy- lift boosters, the booster separation motors (BSM), and the Launch Abort System’s (LAS) launch abort motor and attitude control motor. The SLS five-segment booster is the largest solid rocket motor ever built for flight. The SLS booster shares some design heritage with flight-proven four-segment space shuttle reusable solid rocket motors (RSRM), but generates 20 percent greater average thrust and 24 percent greater total impulse. While space shuttle RSRM production has ended, sustained booster production for SLS helps provide cost savings and access to reliable material sources. Designed to push the spent RSRMs safely away from the space shuttle, Northrop Grumman BSMs were rigorously qualified for human space flight and successfully used on the last fifteen space shuttle missions. These same motors are a critical part of NASA’s SLS. Four BSMs are installed in the forward frustum of each five-segment booster and four are installed in the aft skirt, for a total of 16 BSMs per launch. The launch abort motor is an integral part of NASA’s LAS. The LAS is designed to safely pull the Orion crew module away from the SLS launch vehicle in the event of an emergency on the launch pad or during ascent. Northrop Grumman is on contract to Lockheed Martin to build the abort motor and attitude control motor—Lockheed is the prime contractor for building the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle designed for use on NASA’s SLS.
    [Show full text]
  • The SKYLON Spaceplane
    The SKYLON Spaceplane Borg K.⇤ and Matula E.⇤ University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA This report outlines the major technical aspects of the SKYLON spaceplane as a final project for the ASEN 5053 class. The SKYLON spaceplane is designed as a single stage to orbit vehicle capable of lifting 15 mT to LEO from a 5.5 km runway and returning to land at the same location. It is powered by a unique engine design that combines an air- breathing and rocket mode into a single engine. This is achieved through the use of a novel lightweight heat exchanger that has been demonstrated on a reduced scale. The program has received funding from the UK government and ESA to build a full scale prototype of the engine as it’s next step. The project is technically feasible but will need to overcome some manufacturing issues and high start-up costs. This report is not intended for publication or commercial use. Nomenclature SSTO Single Stage To Orbit REL Reaction Engines Ltd UK United Kingdom LEO Low Earth Orbit SABRE Synergetic Air-Breathing Rocket Engine SOMA SKYLON Orbital Maneuvering Assembly HOTOL Horizontal Take-O↵and Landing NASP National Aerospace Program GT OW Gross Take-O↵Weight MECO Main Engine Cut-O↵ LACE Liquid Air Cooled Engine RCS Reaction Control System MLI Multi-Layer Insulation mT Tonne I. Introduction The SKYLON spaceplane is a single stage to orbit concept vehicle being developed by Reaction Engines Ltd in the United Kingdom. It is designed to take o↵and land on a runway delivering 15 mT of payload into LEO, in the current D-1 configuration.
    [Show full text]
  • World Relieved by Safe Splashdown
    COSP' TH2 LI33AH? OF 3 R BOCA BAIOI^ FL*\ 33432 Vol. 15, No. 95 BOCA RATON NEWS Sunday^April 19, 1970 30 Pages 10 Cents Wr? Telegrams pouring in World relieved by safe splashdown By United Press International immediately sent President Nixon boulevards as the spacecraft flashed Hundreds of persons gathered in front downtown Tehran, when the news nations applauded, cheered and raised It was a rare example of world unity "assurance of deep admiration . ." into view on television screens. of the U.S. Embassy to watch a series came. United Nations Secretary General glasses of champagne to toast the born of monumental relief and At the American Embassy in Lon- of placards telling of progress in the hi Moscow, the Soviet news agency United States. gratitude at the safe return Friday of Thant was among the first to send don, callers jammed the switchboard, spacecraft's return. Tass praised the "courage and cool U.S. Apollo 13 astronauts James Nixon his congratulations. congratulating the United States on the In Beirut, roars of approval erupted heads" of the Americans. Moscow Sirens of the Buenos Aires Lovell, Fred Haise and Jack Swigert. "The entire world is thankful and all safe return of the astronauts. from Arab cafes, jammed with people radio cut into its regular domestic newspapers La Prensa, Clarin and La Vatican aides said the Pope had men will long marvel at the un- "Most of the people were so who heard the landing on transistor newscast to report on Apollo 13's Nation blared at the moment the seldom looked so happy.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Session IA-Shuttle-C Heavy-Lift Vehicle of the 90'S
    The Space Congress® Proceedings 1989 (26th) Space - The New Generation Apr 25th, 2:00 PM Paper Session I-A - Shuttle-C Heavy-Lift Vehicle of the 90's Robert G. Eudy Manager, Shuttle-C Task Team, Marshall Space Flight Center Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Eudy, Robert G., "Paper Session I-A - Shuttle-C Heavy-Lift Vehicle of the 90's" (1989). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 5. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1989-26th/april-25-1989/5 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SHUTTLE-C HEAVY-LIFT VEHICLE OF THE 90 ' S Mr. Robert G. Eudy, Manager Shuttle-C Task Team Marshall Space Flight Center ABSTRACT United States current and planned space activities identify the need for increased payload capacity and unmanned flight to complement the existing Shuttle. To meet this challenge the National Aeronautics and Space Administration is defining an unmanned cargo version of the Shuttle that can give the nation early heavy-lift capability. Called Shuttle-C, this unmanned vehicle is a natural, low-cost evolution of the current Space Shuttle that can be flying 100,000 to 170,000 pound payloads by late 1994. At the core of Shuttle-C design philosophy is the principle of evolvement from the United State's Space Transportation System.
    [Show full text]
  • Upgraded Inflatable Tire Foldable Commuter, Suitable for Adult & Kids
    S10 8 Inch Foldable Electric Scooter Upgraded Inflatable Tire Foldable Commuter, Suitable for Adult & Kids For optimum performance and safety, please read these instructions carefully before operating the product. Please keep this manual for future reference. CONTENTS 1. General Information 3 2. Product Overview 4 2.1 General Information 4 2.2 What you need to know 4 3. Product Description 4 3.1 How to Unfold 4 3.2 How to Assemble 5 3.3 How to Fold 5 4. How to Ride 6 5. SCOOTER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS 8 6. Weight and Speed Limitations 10 6.1 Weight Restrictions 10 6.2 Speed Limits 10 7. Operating Range 10 8. Battery Information and Specications 11 9. Charging your Scooter 12 10. Inspection, Maintenance, and Storage 13 11. Scooter Specications 14 2 www.PyleUSA.com 1. General Information LCD Display Handle Folding Hook LED Light Long Pole Hook Hole Accelerate Throttle Back Fender Rear Brake Buckle Lock Electric Brake Folding Wrench Motor Deck Charging Port Kickstand Front Wheel www.PyleUSA.com 3 2. Product Overview 2.1 General information The original scooter is an intuitive, technologically advanced solution. Using the latest technology and production processes, each scooter undergoes strict testing for quality and durability. With its lightweight, portable design, ease of use, range, and low carbon footprint. 2.2 What you need to know Before you rst experience your scooter, please read the USER MANUAL thoroughly and learn the basics to ensure your safety and the safety of others. The power will be shut down if nobody operate in ve minutes, you need press power button before you ride.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of S.P
    ANNUAL REPORT OF S.P. KOROLEV ROCKET AND SPACE PUBLIC CORPORATION ENERGIA FOR 2019 This Annual Report of S.P.Korolev Rocket and Space Public Corporation Energia (RSC Energia) was prepared based upon its performance in 2019 with due regard for the requirements stated in the Russian Federation Government Decree of December 31, 2010 No. 1214 “On Improvement of the Procedure to Control Open Joint-Stock Companies whose Stock is in Federal Ownership and Federal State Unitary Enterprises”, and in accordance with the Regulations “On Information Disclosure by the Issuers of Outstanding Securities” No. 454-P approved by the Bank of Russia on December 30, 2014 Accuracy of the data contained in this Annual Report, including the Report on the interested-party transactions effected by RSC Energia in 2019, was confirmed by RSC Energia’s Auditing Committee Report as of 01.06.2020. This Annual Report was preliminary approved by RSC Energia’s Board of Directors on August 24, 2020 (Minutes No. 31). This Annual Report was approved at RSC Energia’s General Shareholders’ Meeting on September 28, 2020 (Minutes No 40 of 01.10.2020). 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ABOUT RSC ENERGIA ............................. 6 1.1. Company background .........................................................................................................................6 1.2. Period of the Company operation in the industry ...............................................................................6 1.3. Information about the purchase and sale contracts for participating interests, equities, shares of business partnerships and companies concluded by the Company in 2019 ..............................................7 1.4. Information about the holding structure and the organizations involved ...........................................8 2. PRIORITY DIRECTIONS OF RSC ENERGIA OPERATION ........................ 11 2.1.
    [Show full text]