DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report of S.P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report of S.P ANNUAL REPORT OF S.P. KOROLEV ROCKET AND SPACE PUBLIC CORPORATION ENERGIA FOR 2019 This Annual Report of S.P.Korolev Rocket and Space Public Corporation Energia (RSC Energia) was prepared based upon its performance in 2019 with due regard for the requirements stated in the Russian Federation Government Decree of December 31, 2010 No. 1214 “On Improvement of the Procedure to Control Open Joint-Stock Companies whose Stock is in Federal Ownership and Federal State Unitary Enterprises”, and in accordance with the Regulations “On Information Disclosure by the Issuers of Outstanding Securities” No. 454-P approved by the Bank of Russia on December 30, 2014 Accuracy of the data contained in this Annual Report, including the Report on the interested-party transactions effected by RSC Energia in 2019, was confirmed by RSC Energia’s Auditing Committee Report as of 01.06.2020. This Annual Report was preliminary approved by RSC Energia’s Board of Directors on August 24, 2020 (Minutes No. 31). This Annual Report was approved at RSC Energia’s General Shareholders’ Meeting on September 28, 2020 (Minutes No 40 of 01.10.2020). 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ABOUT RSC ENERGIA ............................. 6 1.1. Company background .........................................................................................................................6 1.2. Period of the Company operation in the industry ...............................................................................6 1.3. Information about the purchase and sale contracts for participating interests, equities, shares of business partnerships and companies concluded by the Company in 2019 ..............................................7 1.4. Information about the holding structure and the organizations involved ...........................................8 2. PRIORITY DIRECTIONS OF RSC ENERGIA OPERATION ........................ 11 2.1. Information about the Company strategies and development programs (including innovation and investment programs) ............................................................................................................................11 2.2. Prospects for development of the Company .....................................................................................11 2.3. Level of investment with a breakdown by financing sources in 2019 ..............................................12 2.4. Quality Management System in force at the Company ....................................................................13 2.5. Information about non-core assets alienation program .....................................................................15 3. REPORT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON THE RESULTS OF THE RSC ENERGIA DEVELOPMENT IN THE HIGH-PRIORITY AREAS OF ACTIVITY................................................................................................................... 17 3.1. Financial and economic results of activities in 2015-2019, as well as information about available Key Performance Indicators System ............................................................................................17 3.2. Info about Corporation’s standing in the industry. Major competitors of the Corporation in the industry ...................................................................................................................................................19 3.3. The Company’s share in respective market segment in terms of its core business and dynamics of this indicator over the last 3 years ...........................................................................................22 3.4. ISS transportation support .................................................................................................................23 3.5. Flight operation of space systems .....................................................................................................24 3.6. Development and operation of the ISS .............................................................................................28 3.7. Results of scientific programs onboard the ISS RS ..........................................................................29 3.8. Advanced space systems ...................................................................................................................31 3.9. Design engineering of spacecraft, space complexes and launch vehicles ........................................32 3.10. Unmanned space complexes and systems .....................................................................................34 3.11. International activities of the Corporation .....................................................................................34 4. ENERGY EFFICIENCY ........................................................................................ 37 4.1. Measures to enhance energy efficiency ............................................................................................37 4.2. Information about the volume of different types of energy resources used by the Company in 2019 in kind and in ruble terms ...................................................................................................................38 5. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY. PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL POLICY ............................................................................................................. 39 5.1. Personnel policy ................................................................................................................................39 5.2. Personnel motivation.........................................................................................................................42 5.3. Social policy ......................................................................................................................................45 6. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ............................................................................ 48 6.1. Corporate governance concepts and structure ..................................................................................48 3 6.2. Information about the Company General Shareholders’ Meeting held ............................................51 6.3. Information about the Company Board of Directors ........................................................................52 6.3.1. Board of Directors’ Regulations....................................................................................................52 6.3.2. Company Board of Directors membership ....................................................................................53 6.3.3. Background information about the persons who were the members Board of Directors in 2019 54 6.3.4. Regulations on ad hoc Committees at the Company Board of Directors, their memberships and information about the meetings held .....................................................................................................58 6.3.5. Provision on Remuneration of the Company Board of Directors members..................................60 6.3.6. Information about remuneration paid to the Company Board of Directors members in 2019 .....61 6.4. Information about the Company executive bodies ...........................................................................61 6.4.1. Chief Executive Officer of the Company ......................................................................................61 6.4.2. Collective Executive Body of the Company .................................................................................62 6.4.3. Company Management Board membership ..................................................................................62 6.4.4. Background information about the persons serving on the Company Management Board in 2019 63 6.4.5. Provision on remuneration of the Company executive bodies members ......................................69 6.4.6. Information about remuneration paid to the Company executive bodies members in 2019 .........69 7. EQUITY CAPITAL ................................................................................................. 70 7.1. Equity capital structure .....................................................................................................................70 7.2. Dividend Policy.................................................................................................................................71 7.3. Information about distribution and disposition of the profit earned by the 2018 performance in 2019..........................................................................................................................................................74 8. INTERNAL CONTROL AND RISK MANAGEMENT ..................................... 75 8.1. Description of the key risk factors associated with the Company activities .....................................75 8.2. Internal control ......................................................................................................................................83 8.3. Internal audit .........................................................................................................................................83 8.4. Information about the Company Auditing Committee .........................................................................84 8.5. Membership of RSC Energia Auditing Committee during the accounting year ..............................86 8.6. Remuneration paid to the Auditing Committee members in 2019 ...................................................87 9. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 6 M AM Net Established in Michigan Message from the London Amateur
    Message6 M AM N fromet Established the In Michigan London Amateur Radio Club Promoting Amateur Radio in London And surrounding area since 1920 November 7, 2010 L.A.R.C. Executive Next Meeting Topic President Doug Elliott, VA3DAE The next LARC meeting will be on Thursday, November 11, at 7:30 PM. The November meeting will feature a presentation by Mitch Powell, Vice-President VE3OT about his experiments and adventures in LF - where the David Lambert, VE3KGK frequencies and wavelengths both use the "kilo" prefix. Come on out and Past President learn about an amateur band you've never tried. Doug Tompkins, VE3IDT Treasurer Brian Bouckley, VA3ATB Silent Key – Ethel Williamson, VE3DTW Secretary Ruth Dahl, VE3RBO The obituary for Ethel can be found on page 3 of this newsletter. Director, Flea Market Ann Rundle, VA3EOR To this editor’s knowledge, Ethel was the oldest, active female ham in Ontario. She may have been heard locally on the YL Net found on Director, Membership John Visser, VA3MSV VE3TTT/VE3SUE. Thanks to the ladies of that net for bringing to my attention of the passing of this wonderful woman. I know she will be Director missed by all that got to know her. Mike Watts, VE3ACW Non-Voting Director, ARES & 2010 L.A.R.C. Flea Market CANWARN Brett Gilbank, VE3ZBG Thanks for making our Flea Market another great success. We owe an amazing thank you to Ann Rundle, especially for her tireless efforts behind Appointments the scenes. She did a wonderful job. She knew most the vendors by LARC Repeater name and what they had requested.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection of Favorite Reusable Launch Vehicle Concepts by Using the Method of Pairwise Comparison
    Selection of Favorite Reusable Launch Vehicle Concepts by using the Method of Pairwise Comparison Robert A. Goehlich Keio University, Department of System Design Engineering, Ohkami Laboratory, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 223-8522, JAPAN, Mobile: +81-90-1767-1667, Fax: +81-45-566-1778 email: [email protected], Internet: www.Robert-Goehlich.de Abstract The attempt of this paper is to select promising Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) concepts by using a formal evaluation procedure. The vehicle system is divided into design features. Every design feature can have alternative characteristics. All combinations of design features and characteristics are compared pairwise with each other with respect to relative importance for a feasible vehicle concept as seen from technical, economic, and political aspects. This valuation process leads to a ranked list of design features for suborbital and orbital applications. The result is a theoretical optimized suborbital and orbital vehicle each. The method of pairwise comparison allows to determine not only ranking but also assessing the relative weight of each feature compared to others. Keywords: Pairwise Comparison, Reusable Launch Vehicle, Space Tourism Introduction The potential for an introduction of reusable launch vehicles is derived from an expected increasing demand for transportation of passengers in the decades to come. The assumed future satellite market does not justify to operate reusable launch vehicles only for satellites due to a low launch rate. Finding feasible vehicle concepts, which satisfy operator’s, passenger’s, and public’s needs, will be a challenging task. Since it is not possible to satisfy all space tourism markets by one vehicle, different vehicles that are capable to serve one particular segment (suborbital or orbital) are needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasa Johnson Space Center Oral History Project Oral History 2 Transcript
    NASA JOHNSON SPACE CENTER ORAL HISTORY PROJECT ORAL HISTORY 2 TRANSCRIPT FREDERICK H. HAUCK INTERVIEWED BY JENNIFER ROSS-NAZZAL BETHESDA, MARYLAND – 17 MARCH 2004 th ROSS-NAZZAL: Today is March 17 , 2004. This oral history with Rick Hauck is being conducted in Bethesda, Maryland, for the Johnson Space Center Oral History Project. The interviewer is Jennifer Ross-Nazzal. Thank you for meeting with me again today. I know your schedule is busy. HAUCK: Thank you. On St. Paddy’s Day, my father’s mother, Florence Fogerty, would be pleased to know that we’re doing this on St. Paddy’s Day, if she were still with us. ROSS-NAZZAL: Thank you. We appreciate it. I wanted to ask you, in the last interview when we spoke, you mentioned that you were actually told by George [W. S.] Abbey and [Richard H.] Dick Truly that you were going to command the return-to-flight mission, but you were told that you couldn’t actually tell anyone this information. What was your reaction when you heard this? HAUCK: Well, I was absolutely thrilled that I was entrusted with that mission. I think every member of the Astronaut Office, probably without exception, wanted to be on that flight, so I was thrilled with it. The fact that I couldn’t tell people about it or speak about it publicly, any concerns about that were dwarfed by the enthusiasm that I had, knowing that this gift was in my pocket now. I knew that, of course, until something’s announced, it can be changed, and so that 17 March 2004 1 Johnson Space Center Oral History Project Frederick H.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace Dimensions Leader's Guide
    Leader Guide www.capmembers.com/ae Leader Guide for Aerospace Dimensions 2011 Published by National Headquarters Civil Air Patrol Aerospace Education Maxwell AFB, Alabama 3 LEADER GUIDES for AEROSPACE DIMENSIONS INTRODUCTION A Leader Guide has been provided for every lesson in each of the Aerospace Dimensions’ modules. These guides suggest possible ways of presenting the aerospace material and are for the leader’s use. Whether you are a classroom teacher or an Aerospace Education Officer leading the CAP squadron, how you use these guides is up to you. You may know of different and better methods for presenting the Aerospace Dimensions’ lessons, so please don’t hesitate to teach the lesson in a manner that works best for you. However, please consider covering the lesson outcomes since they represent important knowledge we would like the students and cadets to possess after they have finished the lesson. Aerospace Dimensions encourages hands-on participation, and we have included several hands-on activities with each of the modules. We hope you will consider allowing your students or cadets to participate in some of these educational activities. These activities will reinforce your lessons and help you accomplish your lesson out- comes. Additionally, the activities are fun and will encourage teamwork and participation among the students and cadets. Many of the hands-on activities are inexpensive to use and the materials are easy to acquire. The length of time needed to perform the activities varies from 15 minutes to 60 minutes or more. Depending on how much time you have for an activity, you should be able to find an activity that fits your schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • LFIGP LIFE October 2019 Halloween Safety Tips
    LFIGP LIFE October 2019 Halloween Safety Tips Carry a white bag or pillowcase for your candy, and add some reflective tape. Always travel in groups and be sure you have at least one parent with you close by. Don’t visit houses that are not well lit. Never go inside a stranger’s house. Use the sidewalk whenever possible. If there’s no sidewalk, walk on the side of the road facing traffic. Don’t crisscross back and forth across the street. Work your way up one side of the street, and then start on the other. If you have any allergies, tell the person who is giving out the treats. Don’t eat any of your treats before you get home. Once home, ask your parents to look through your treats with you to make sure everything is okay. COSTUME IDEAS The Halloween Party Are you stuck for a Halloween By Kenn Nesbitt costume this year? Don’t worry We’re having a Halloween party at school. we have put together a list of I’m dressed up like Dracula. Man, I look cool! some great costumes for you! I dyed my hair black, and I cut off my bangs. Witch I’m wearing a cape and some fake plastic fangs. Vampire Ghost I put on some makeup to paint my face white, Pirate like creatures that only come out in the night. Princess My fingernails, too, are all pointed and red. Zombie I look like I’m recently back from the dead. Clown Animal My mom drops me off, and I run into school Frankenstein and suddenly feel like the world’s biggest fool.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Program
    Conference Program 24th WRMISS Conference Program: Tuesday 3rd September 2019 08.30 – 09:00 Registration 09.00 – 10:00 Opening 10.00 – 10:30 Scientific Session 1 10.30 – 11.30 Coffee/Tea Break 11.30 – 13:00 Scientific Session 2 13:00 – 14:00 Lunch 14.00 – 15:30 Scientific Session 3 15.30 – 16:30 Coffee/Tea Break 16:30 – 18.15 Scientific Session 4 Major of Athens, Ministry of Ministry of digital policy Ministry of Ministry of Development and Investment Opening speeches President of Hellenic Space Center Greek ESA‐ representative NASA Radiation Health Officer: Edward Semones Guenther Reitz, Marianthi Fragopoulou Welcome and Organisational Issues Scientific Session 1 Reviewing ISS‐member cancer and non‐cancer risk models and their Samy El‐Jaby differences for exploration class missions Scientific Session 2 Xiaojing Xu Validation of Trapped Proton Environments with EFT‐1 Measurements Solar Modulation, Forbush decreases and Solar Particle Events by AMS Claudio Cordi onboard ISS Validation of NASA’s Radiation Analysis Tools with ISS Radiation Martha Clowdsley Environment (REM) Measurements Scientific Session 3 Pawel Bilski Fluorescent Nuclear Track detectors based on LiF single crystals Lawrence Pinsky The Timepix 2 from the Medipix 2 Collaboration – First results The AMS‐02 experiment as a cosmic ray flux and radiation monitor on the Valerie Formato ISS Scientific Session 4 GCR flux and dose rates variations observed experimentally by 13 Liulin Tsvetan Dachev Type instruments between 1991 and 2019 Attila Hirn Pille Measurements on ISS (February
    [Show full text]
  • The International Space Station and the Space Shuttle
    Order Code RL33568 The International Space Station and the Space Shuttle Updated November 9, 2007 Carl E. Behrens Specialist in Energy Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division The International Space Station and the Space Shuttle Summary The International Space Station (ISS) program began in 1993, with Russia joining the United States, Europe, Japan, and Canada. Crews have occupied ISS on a 4-6 month rotating basis since November 2000. The U.S. Space Shuttle, which first flew in April 1981, has been the major vehicle taking crews and cargo back and forth to ISS, but the shuttle system has encountered difficulties since the Columbia disaster in 2003. Russian Soyuz spacecraft are also used to take crews to and from ISS, and Russian Progress spacecraft deliver cargo, but cannot return anything to Earth, since they are not designed to survive reentry into the Earth’s atmosphere. A Soyuz is always attached to the station as a lifeboat in case of an emergency. President Bush, prompted in part by the Columbia tragedy, made a major space policy address on January 14, 2004, directing NASA to focus its activities on returning humans to the Moon and someday sending them to Mars. Included in this “Vision for Space Exploration” is a plan to retire the space shuttle in 2010. The President said the United States would fulfill its commitments to its space station partners, but the details of how to accomplish that without the shuttle were not announced. The shuttle Discovery was launched on July 4, 2006, and returned safely to Earth on July 17.
    [Show full text]
  • 20110015353.Pdf
    ! ! " # $ % & # ' ( ) * ! * ) + ' , " ! - . - ( / 0 - ! Interim Report Design, Cost, and Performance Analyses Executive Summary This report, jointly sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), is the result of a comprehensive study to explore the trade space of horizontal launch system concepts and identify potential near- and mid-term launch system concepts that are capable of delivering approximately 15,000 lbs to low Earth orbit. The Horizontal Launch Study (HLS) has produced a set of launch system concepts that meet this criterion and has identified potential subsonic flight test demonstrators. Based on the results of this study, DARPA has initiated a new program to explore horizontal launch concepts in more depth and to develop, build, and fly a flight test demonstrator that is on the path to reduce development risks for an operational horizontal take-off space launch system. The intent of this interim report is to extract salient results from the in-process HLS final report that will aid the potential proposers of the DARPA Airborne Launch Assist Space Access (ALASA) program. Near-term results are presented for a range of subsonic system concepts selected for their availability and relatively low development costs. This interim report provides an overview of the study background and assumptions, idealized concepts, point design concepts, and flight test demonstrator concepts. The final report, to be published later this year, will address more details of the study processes, a broader trade space matrix including concepts at higher speed regimes, operational analyses, benefits of targeted technology investments, expanded information on models, and detailed appendices and references.
    [Show full text]
  • Johannes Kepler“ Erfolgreich Raumfahrtaktivitäten Zuständig
    Aktuelles aus dem DLR Raumfahrtmanagement I Topics from DLR Space Administration I Heft 2/2011 Mai 2011 I Issue 2/2011 May 2011 I Nr.15 newsLecounttterDown Das DLR im Überblick DLR at a glance Das DLR ist das nationale Forschungszentrum der Bundesrepu- DLR is Germany´s national research centre for aeronautics and blik Deutschland für Luft- und Raumfahrt. Seine umfangreichen space. Its extensive research and development work in Aero- Forschungs- und Entwicklungsarbeiten in Luftfahrt, Raumfahrt, nautics, Space, Energy, Transport and Security is integrated into Energie, Verkehr und Sicherheit sind in nationale und internati- national and international cooperative ventures. As Germany´s onale Kooperationen eingebunden. Über die eigene Forschung space agency, DLR has been given responsibility for the forward Raumfahrtsysteme hinaus ist das DLR als Raumfahrt-Agentur im Auftrag der Bun- planning and the implementation of the German space pro- desregierung für die Planung und Umsetzung der deutschen gramme by the German federal government as well as for the Mission „Johannes Kepler“ erfolgreich Raumfahrtaktivitäten zuständig. Zudem fungiert das DLR als international representation of German interests. Furthermore, Dachorganisation für den national größten Projektträger. Germany’s largest project-management agency is also part of DLR. Space Flight Systems In den 15 Standorten Köln (Sitz des Vorstands), Augsburg, Ber- Approximately 6,900 people are employed at 15 locations in Mission ‘Johannes Kepler‘ Proceeded Successfully lin, Bonn, Braunschweig, Bremen, Göttingen, Hamburg, Lam- Germany: Cologne (headquarters), Augsburg, Berlin, Bonn, Heft 2/2011 Mai 2011 I Issue 2/2011 May 2011 poldshausen, Neustrelitz, Oberpfaffenhofen, Stade, Stuttgart, Braunschweig, Bremen, Goettingen, Hamburg, Lampoldshausen, Seite 6 / page 6 Trauen und Weilheim beschäftigt das DLR circa 6.900 Mitarbei- Neustrelitz, Oberpfaffenhofen, Stade, Stuttgart, Trauen, and terinnen und Mitarbeiter.
    [Show full text]
  • U.A.E. Launches First Arab Interplanetary Mission
    U.A.E. Launches First Arab Interplanetary Mission Business Council Report Authors U.S. - U.A.E. Business Council The U.S.-U.A.E. Business Council is the premier business organization dedicated to advancing bilateral commercial relations. By leveraging its extensive networks in the United States and in the region, the U.S.-U.A.E. Business Council provides unparalleled access to senior decision makers in business and government with the aim of deepening bilateral trade and investment. usuaebusiness.org Hope Probe Technical Information In yet another milestone for the U.A.E. Space Program, the Emirates Mars Mission “Hope Probe” launched on July 20th 2020 for a 7-month journey to the Red Planet, where it will arrive in February 2021 to coincide with the 50th Anniversary of the U.A.E. as a country. This strategic initiative, which was lb = 2,970 lb first announced by U.A.E. President His Highness Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan and U.A.E. Vice President and Prime Minister His Highness Sheikh 9 feet Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum in 2014, is meant to not just achieve important scientific objectives by furthering understanding of the Martian 24 feet atmosphere but also accelerate the U.A.E.’s development of a knowledge economy and inspire a generation of Emirati and Arab Youth to “dream for the stars.” This impressive feat for a space program in its relative infancy is a testament to the U.A.E.’s visionary leadership, its rapid advances in the field, and the power of partnerships, particularly with the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Socio-Technical Issues Affecting the Current Microgravity Research Marketplace
    Understanding Socio-Technical Issues Affecting the Current Microgravity Research Marketplace The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Joseph, Christine and Danielle Wood. "Understanding Socio- Technical Issues Affecting the Current Microgravity Research Marketplace." 2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference, March 2019, Big Sky, Montana, USA, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, June 2019. © 2019 IEEE As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/aero.2019.8742202 Publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Version Author's final manuscript Citable link https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/131219 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Understanding Socio-Technical Issues Affecting the Current Microgravity Research Marketplace Christine Joseph Danielle Wood Massachusetts Institute of Technology Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Ave 77 Massachusetts Ave Cambridge, MA 02139 Cambridge, MA 02139 [email protected] [email protected] Abstract— For decades, the International Space Station (ISS) 1. INTRODUCTION has operated as a bastion of international cooperation and a unique testbed for microgravity research. Beyond enabling For anyone who is a teenager in October 2019, the insights into human physiology in space, the ISS has served as a International Space Station has been in operation and hosted microgravity platform for numerous science experiments. In humans for the entirety of that person’s life. The platform has recent years, private industry has also been affiliating with hosted a diverse spectrum of microgravity, human space NASA and international partners to offer transportation, exploration, technology demonstration, and education related logistics management, and payload demands.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Lesson Plan: Russian Rocket Ships!
    Engineering Lesson Plan: Russian Rocket Ships! Sputnik, Vostok, Voskhod, and Soyuz Launcher Schematics Uttering the text “rocket ship” can excite, mystify, and inspire young children. A rocket ship can transport people and cargo to places far away with awe-inspiring speed and accuracy. The text “rocket scientist” indexes a highly intelligent and admirable person, someone who is able to create, or assist in the creation of machines, vehicles that can actually leave the world we all call “home.” Rocket scientists possess the knowledge to take human beings and fantastic machines to space. This knowledge is built upon basic scientific principles of motion and form—the understanding, for young learners, of shapes and their function. This lesson uses the shape of a rocket to ignite engineering knowledge and hopefully, inspiration in young pupils and introduces them to a space program on the other side of the world. Did you know that the first person in space, Yuri Gagarin, was from the former Soviet Union? That the Soviet Union (now Russia) sent the first spacecraft, Sputnik I, into Earth’s orbit? That today, American NASA-based astronauts fly to Russia to launch and must learn conversational Russian as part of their training? Now, in 2020, there are Russians and Americans working together in the International Space Station (ISS), the latest brought there by an American-based commercial craft. Being familiar with the contributions Russia (and the former Soviet Union) has made to space travel is an integral part of understanding the ongoing human endeavor to explore the space all around us. After all, Russian cosmonauts use rocket ships too! The following lesson plan is intended for kindergarten students in Indiana to fulfill state engineering learning requirements.
    [Show full text]