Karina Stankeviča CHARACTER of SAPROPEL
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Karina Stankeviča Karina Doctoral Thesis Doctoral Doctoral Thesis Riga, 2020 Karina Stankeviča Promocijas darba kopsavilkums darba Promocijas CHARACTER OF SAPROPEL PROPERTIES BASED ON ITS FORMATION CONDITIONS AND POSSIBILITIES OF ITS USE EUROPIAN UNION IEGULDĪJUMS TAVĀ NĀKOTNĒ ISBN 978-9934-18-567-0 Promocijas darba SAPROPEĻA ĪPAŠĪBU RAKSTURS ATKARĪBĀ kopsavilkums NO VEIDOŠANĀS APSTĀKĻIEM UN TĀ IZMANTOŠANAS IESPĒJAS FACULTY OF GEOGRAPHY AND EARTH SCIENCES Karina Stankeviča CHARACTER OF SAPROPEL PROPERTIES BASED ON ITS FORMATION CONDITIONS AND POSSIBILITIES OF ITS USE Doctoral Thesis Submitted for the PhD Degree in Earth Sciences, Physical Geography and Environmental Sciences Subfield – Environmental Sciences Scientific advisors: Prof. Dr. habil. chem. Māris Kļaviņš Dr. geogr. Laimdota Kalniņa RIGA, 2020 The research for Doctoral Thesis was carried out at the University of Latvia, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, Department of Environmental Science, over the period from 2011 to 2020. This work has been supported by: • ESF Project ‘Interdisciplinary Team of Young Scientists for Assessment and Restoration of Soil Quality and Usage Potential in Latvia’ No. 2013/0020/1DP/1.1.1.2.0./13/APIA/VIAA/066 • Latvian Council of Science for providing the grant ‘Properties and structure of peat humic substances and possibilities of their modification’ No. lzp-2018/1-0009 Supervisors: Prof. Dr. habil. chem. Māris Kļaviņš Dr. geogr. Laimdota Kalniņa Reviewers: 1) Doc. Dr. Vaidotas Valskys (Vilnius University, Lithuania) 2) Prof. Dr.sc.ing. Ainis Lagzdiņš (Latvia University o f Life Sciences and Technologies) 3) Asoc. prof. Dr.biol. Gunta Spriņģe (University of Latvia) Doctoral committee: 1) Prof. Dr.biol. Viesturs Melecis, chairman of Council 2) Prof. Dr. geogr. Oļģerts Nikodemus 3) Prof. Dr. habil.chem. Māris Kļaviņš 4) Prof. Dr. habil. paed. Raimonds Ernšteins 5) Assoc. prof. Dr. geogr. Iveta Šteinberga 6) Assoc. prof. Dr.biol. Gunta Spriņģe 7) Doc. Dr.geogr. Juris Burlakovs 8) Doc. Dr.geogr. Oskars Purmalis, secretary of Council The Thesis will be defended at the public session of the Doctoral Committee of Environmental Science, the University of Latvia, at the Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences of the University of Latvia (Jelgavas Street 1, Riga, Latvia) on October 30, room 702 at 10:00. The Thesis is available at the Library of the University of Latvia, Kalpaka Blvd. 4, Riga, Latvia References should be addressed to: Dr.georg. Oskars Purmalis University of Latvia, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences Raina Blvd. 19, Riga LV-1586, Latvia e-mail: [email protected] © Latvijas Universitāte, 2020 © Karina Stankeviča, 2020 ISBN 978-9934-18-567-0 ABSTRACT Within the doctoral thesis, changes in the properties and uses of sapropel depending on the conditions of its formation were investigated by analysing the data on sapropel deposits in Latvia and after a detailed analysis of sapropel profiles in three lakes (Padelis, Pilcine and Pilvelis). A GIS database of freshwater lake sapropel was created, and classification of sapropel types was adapted aiming to systematize and compile the data on sapropel research in Latvia, to determine the total amount of the resource and to conduct the research on the characteristic features of the formation of sapropel resources, as well as evaluate possible ways of sapropel application. For characterisation of the regularities in sapropel accumulation under the influence of climate and environment, the research of three lake profiles was carried out using a multidisciplinary method approach which included the analyses of the palaeobotanical and chemical composition of the sediment profile. Additionally, the age of sediments was determined with the possibility to reconstruct the environmental and climate conditions. The results reveal that the reserves of sapropel identified in the lakes of Latvia (the total number of which is more than 2,200) are currently estimated ~975 million m3 or 530 thsd. t (with a humidity of 60%). The accumulation of sapropel is characteristic to the lakes formed in Upper Pleistocene sediments, and the type of sapropel depends on the nature of these sediments. Sapropel deposits are typical to the lakes of glacigenic origin with flow- through and runoff water regime. The most considerable amount of sapropel deposits can be found in eutrophic and hypereutrophic lakes. The type and composition of sapropel vary within each deposit and depends on the chemical composition, depth and temperature of the water. In recent sediments, a higher concentration of metals was observed in comparison to the background that is associated with the anthropogenic impact. Keywords: freshwater sapropel, gyttja, sediment formation conditions, Holocene, accumulation of metallic elements, pollen, macro- and microfossils, malacofauna, lakes of Latvia 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND GLOSSARY ...........................................................................6 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................7 1. LITERATURE REVIEW........................................................................................... 18 1.1 Definitions, classification of sapropel and history of its research in Latvia ...............................................................................18 1.2 Formation of freshwater sapropel ....................................................................23 1.3 Composition of sapropel ...................................................................................30 1.4 Application possibilities of sapropel ................................................................35 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS .............................................................................. 48 2.1 Study area and research sites.............................................................................48 2.1.1 Lake Padelis .............................................................................................49 2.1.2 Lake Pilcine ..............................................................................................49 2.1.3 Lake Pilvelis .............................................................................................50 2.2 Field studies .........................................................................................................51 2.3 Chronology ..........................................................................................................52 2.4 Analytical methods of sediment analysis ........................................................54 2.4.1 Pollen analysis .........................................................................................54 2.4.2 Plant macrofossils analysis ....................................................................55 2.4.3 Microfossils analysis ...............................................................................55 2.4.4 Malacofauna analysis ..............................................................................56 2.4.5 Bulk density and loss-on-ignition (LOI) .............................................56 2.4.6 Elemental composition ..........................................................................56 2.4.7 Content of humic substances ................................................................57 2.4.8 Quantitative analysis of metallic elements ..........................................57 2.4.9 Content of biogenic phosphorus ..........................................................57 2.4.10 Granulometry ........................................................................................57 2.5 Statistical analysis of the data ...........................................................................58 2.6 Freshwater sapropel database ............................................................................59 4 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ................................................................................ 65 3.1 Typology, amounts, distribution and formation regularities of freshwater sapropel in the territory of Latvia ................................................65 3.1.1 Classification of freshwater sapropel ....................................................65 3.1.2 Estimated amount of lake sapropel deposits in Latvia ......................70 3.1.3 Formation regularities of sapropel deposits ........................................75 3.2 Reconstruction of environmental and lake conditions during the sapropel formation in studied sites ..............................................79 3.2.1 Water composition of studied areas nowadays...................................79 3.2.2 Chronology and lithostratigraphy of studied sites – lakes Padelis, Pilcine and Pilvelis .........................................................80 3.2.3 Lake Padelis .............................................................................................83 3.2.4 Lake Pilcine ..............................................................................................94 3.2.5 Lake Pilvelis .......................................................................................... 101 3.2.6 Similarities of environmental formation conditions in studied lakes ................................................................. 109 3.3. Distribution, chemical associations and factors influencing the accumulation of metals in sapropel .................... 112 CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................................... 126 ACKNOWLEDGMENT