Verdeckte PR in Wikipedia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Akkreditierungakkreditierung
Z 12916 F Postvertriebsstück Entgelt bezahlt Wienands PrintMedien GmbH hlb Linzer Straße 140 Hochschullehrerbund e.V. 53604 Bad Honnef ISSN 0340-448 x Band 44 G Heft 5 G Okt. 2003 Die neue Hochschule für anwendungsbezogene Wissenschaft und Kunst AKKREDITIERUNGAKKREDITIERUNG I Hans-Jürgen Brackmann Akkreditierung I Lothar Schüssele Qualitätssicherung durch Akkreditierung I Nikolas P. Sokianos Akkreditierung zum Master of Science I H. F. Binner Systematische Qualitätsentwicklung I Mathias Graumann Qualitätssicherung und Qualitätskontrolle I Herman Blom Managementparadoxien NACHRICHTEN G MEINUNGEN G BERICHTE Die Riester-Rente Das Versorgungsniveau sinkt Private Vorsorge wird immer wichtiger Ab dem 1. Januar 2003 gilt, dass sich die Versorgungsbezüge bei den Besoldungs- und Versorgungsanpassungen in den 8 Jah- ren von 2003 bis 2010 abflachen. Hierzu werden die jährlichen Steigerungen von Besoldung und Versorgung jeweils abge- senkt. Somit würden die aktiven und die Ruhestandsbeamten zum Beispiel bei einer Erhöhung der Bezüge um 2% nur rund 1,6 % erhalten. Änderungen der Beamtenversorgung ab 2003 G Senkung des Versorgungsniveaus auf 71,75% G Senkung des Steigerungssatzes auf 1,79375 % G Senkung der Hinterbliebenenversorgung auf 55 % Der hlb hat mit der Bayerischen Beamten Lebensversicherung (BBV) ein Riester-Renten-Angebot für hlb-Mitglieder ausge- arbeitet, das eine höhere Rente als ein Einzelvertrag garantiert. Das hlb-Modell sieht einen konstanten Beitrag in der Höhe vor, der gesetzlich erst für 2008 vorgeschrieben ist. Der Vorteil: Höhere -
Documento Completo Descargar Archivo
Clasificación de las recomendaciones obtenidas del BlueFinder para la propiedad semántica birthPlace Lic. Andrea Noemí Alende Directora: Dra. Alicia Díaz Trabajo Final Integrador para obtener el grado de Especialista en Ingeniería de Software Facultad de Informática Universidad Nacional de La Plata Mayo, 2015 Resumen ikipedia es una gran enciclopedia editada colaborativamente por usuarios de todo el mundo. DBpedia es un proyecto desarrollado para extraer información estructurada de Wikipedia. La W información semántica extraída de facilita la búsqueda de información que en algunos casos no es posible obtener navegando por Wikipedia. Para resolver este gap de información entre la web semántica y la web social, podemos aplicar el algoritmo BlueFinder que devuelve un conjunto de recomendaciones en forma de caminos navegacionales para una propiedad semántica de DBpedia en Wikipedia. En este artículo se analizará el nivel de precisión de los resultados de la aplicación de dicho algoritmo. Se propondrá entonces una taxonomía que permita clasificar un conjunto de recomendaciones para luego determinar la validez de las mismas. Índice Resumen ........................................................................................................................................................ ii Índice ............................................................................................................................................................ iii Índice de Figuras ........................................................................................................................................... -
Trust in Collaborative Web Applications
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (CIS) Department of Computer & Information Science 2012 Trust in Collaborative Web Applications Andrew G. West University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Jian Chang University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Krishna Venkatasubramanian University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Insup Lee University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/cis_papers Recommended Citation Andrew G. West, Jian Chang, Krishna Venkatasubramanian, and Insup Lee, "Trust in Collaborative Web Applications", Future Generation Computer Systems 28(8), 1238-1251. January 2012. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.future.2011.02.007 Based in part on UPENN MS-CIS-10-33 http://repository.upenn.edu/cis_reports/943/ This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/cis_papers/733 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Trust in Collaborative Web Applications Abstract Collaborative functionality is increasingly prevalent in web applications. Such functionality permits individuals to add - and sometimes modify - web content, often with minimal barriers to entry. Ideally, large bodies of knowledge can be amassed and shared in this manner. However, such software also provide a medium for nefarious persons to operate. By determining the extent to which participating content/agents can be trusted, one can identify useful contributions. In this work, we define the notion of trust for Collaborative Web Applications and survey the state-of-the-art for calculating, interpreting, and presenting trust values. Though techniques can be applied broadly, Wikipedia's archetypal nature makes it a focal point for discussion. Keywords Collaborative web applications, trust, reputation, Wikipedia Comments Based in part on UPENN MS-CIS-10-33 http://repository.upenn.edu/cis_reports/943/ This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/cis_papers/733 Trust in Collaborative Web Applications Andrew G. -
The Culture of Wikipedia
Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia Good Faith Collaboration The Culture of Wikipedia Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. Foreword by Lawrence Lessig The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Web edition, Copyright © 2011 by Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. CC-NC-SA 3.0 Purchase at Amazon.com | Barnes and Noble | IndieBound | MIT Press Wikipedia's style of collaborative production has been lauded, lambasted, and satirized. Despite unease over its implications for the character (and quality) of knowledge, Wikipedia has brought us closer than ever to a realization of the centuries-old Author Bio & Research Blog pursuit of a universal encyclopedia. Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia is a rich ethnographic portrayal of Wikipedia's historical roots, collaborative culture, and much debated legacy. Foreword Preface to the Web Edition Praise for Good Faith Collaboration Preface Extended Table of Contents "Reagle offers a compelling case that Wikipedia's most fascinating and unprecedented aspect isn't the encyclopedia itself — rather, it's the collaborative culture that underpins it: brawling, self-reflexive, funny, serious, and full-tilt committed to the 1. Nazis and Norms project, even if it means setting aside personal differences. Reagle's position as a scholar and a member of the community 2. The Pursuit of the Universal makes him uniquely situated to describe this culture." —Cory Doctorow , Boing Boing Encyclopedia "Reagle provides ample data regarding the everyday practices and cultural norms of the community which collaborates to 3. Good Faith Collaboration produce Wikipedia. His rich research and nuanced appreciation of the complexities of cultural digital media research are 4. The Puzzle of Openness well presented. -
COI Editing and Its Discontents
Wikipedia @ 20 Paid With Interest: COI Editing and its Discontents William Beutler Published on: Jun 10, 2019 Updated on: Jun 19, 2019 License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0) Wikipedia @ 20 Paid With Interest: COI Editing and its Discontents Image credit: Jim Pennucci. 1. Everyone involved with Wikipedia has some kind of interest in what it says. In the classic formulation, its volunteer editors are inspired to empower a global audience by compiling information in an accessible format. Practically speaking, though, most participate because the project appeals to their personality, their sense of justice, or there's an ego boost in deciding what the world knows about their pet subject. Its readers care simply because they want to learn something. For the most part, this works very well. Things are rather different when the motivation is financial. Most contributors consider editing Wikipedia to promote a business a morally different endeavor, and its readers, too, may be alarmed to learn some edits are made not to benevolently share knowledge with the world, but because the writer has a material stake in how the topic is represented. And yet the structure of Wikipedia makes this tension inevitable. The site's vast influence owes something to the fact that anyone can influence it, so when those described in its virtual pages decide to do exactly that, the result is one of Wikipedia's most challenging existential dilemmas. Wikipedia's favored terminology for this is "conflict of interest", referred to in shorthand as "COI"— although other terms such as "paid editing" or "paid advocacy" are often encountered. -
The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It the Harvard Community Has
The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Jonathan L. Zittrain, The Future of the Internet -- And How to Stop It (Yale University Press & Penguin UK 2008). Published Version http://futureoftheinternet.org/ Accessed February 18, 2015 9:54:33 PM EST Citable Link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4455262 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University's DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms- of-use#LAA (Article begins on next page) YD8852.i-x 1/20/09 1:59 PM Page i The Future of the Internet— And How to Stop It YD8852.i-x 1/20/09 1:59 PM Page ii YD8852.i-x 1/20/09 1:59 PM Page iii The Future of the Internet And How to Stop It Jonathan Zittrain With a New Foreword by Lawrence Lessig and a New Preface by the Author Yale University Press New Haven & London YD8852.i-x 1/20/09 1:59 PM Page iv A Caravan book. For more information, visit www.caravanbooks.org. The cover was designed by Ivo van der Ent, based on his winning entry of an open competition at www.worth1000.com. Copyright © 2008 by Jonathan Zittrain. All rights reserved. Preface to the Paperback Edition copyright © Jonathan Zittrain 2008. Subject to the exception immediately following, this book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. -
Reliability of Wikipedia 1 Reliability of Wikipedia
Reliability of Wikipedia 1 Reliability of Wikipedia The reliability of Wikipedia (primarily of the English language version), compared to other encyclopedias and more specialized sources, is assessed in many ways, including statistically, through comparative review, analysis of the historical patterns, and strengths and weaknesses inherent in the editing process unique to Wikipedia. [1] Because Wikipedia is open to anonymous and collaborative editing, assessments of its Vandalism of a Wikipedia article reliability usually include examinations of how quickly false or misleading information is removed. An early study conducted by IBM researchers in 2003—two years following Wikipedia's establishment—found that "vandalism is usually repaired extremely quickly — so quickly that most users will never see its effects"[2] and concluded that Wikipedia had "surprisingly effective self-healing capabilities".[3] A 2007 peer-reviewed study stated that "42% of damage is repaired almost immediately... Nonetheless, there are still hundreds of millions of damaged views."[4] Several studies have been done to assess the reliability of Wikipedia. A notable early study in the journal Nature suggested that in 2005, Wikipedia scientific articles came close to the level of accuracy in Encyclopædia Britannica and had a similar rate of "serious errors".[5] This study was disputed by Encyclopædia Britannica.[6] By 2010 reviewers in medical and scientific fields such as toxicology, cancer research and drug information reviewing Wikipedia against professional and peer-reviewed sources found that Wikipedia's depth and coverage were of a very high standard, often comparable in coverage to physician databases and considerably better than well known reputable national media outlets. -
Modulkatalog Für Die Studienvariante „Recht Und Wirtschaft“ (LL.B.)
Studiengang Recht und Wirtschaft/Wirtschaft und Recht der Juristischen Fakultät und der Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder) Modulkatalog für die Studienvariante „Recht und Wirtschaft“ (LL.B.) I. Modulübersicht für die Studienvariante „Recht und Wirt- schaft“ (LL.B.) II. Beschreibung der Module und Lehrveranstaltungen für die Studienvariante „Recht und Wirtschaft“ (LL.B.) Stand: Juli 2013 Wichtiger Hinweis: Maßgeblich für das konkrete Studienangebot sind die aktuellen Veranstaltungsankündigungen im Vorlesungsverzeichnis des jeweiligen Semesters. Die dortigen Angaben können und werden insbesondere hinsichtlich der Lehrenden, der konkreten Ausgestaltung der Lehrveranstaltungen und der empfohlenen Literatur von diesem Modulkatalog abweichen. Studiengang Recht und Wirtschaft/Wirtschaft und Recht der Juristischen Fakultät und der Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder) I. Modulübersicht für die Studienvariante Recht und Wirtschaft (LL.B.) (Stand 13.5.2013) Modul Zugeordnete Lehrveranstaltungen Semester Selbst- Arbeits- ECTS Prüfung (LVS) studium aufwand (Summe) Juristische Grundausbildung Modul 1: Grundlagen des Zivil- Grundkurs I Zivilrecht (4) 1. 135 180 6 Klausur zu GK I rechts I Arbeitsgemeinschaft zum Grund- 67,5 90 3 kurs I Zivilrecht (2) Methodik Zivilrecht (2) 67,5 90 3 (270) (360) (12) Modul 2: Grundlagen des Zivil- Grundkurs II Zivilrecht (4) 2. 135 180 6 Klausur zu GK II rechts II AG zum GK II Zivilrecht (2) 67,5 90 3 (202,5) (270) (9) Modul 3: Einführung in das öffent- Einführung in das öffentliche Recht 2. 67,5 90 3 Klausur liche Recht (2) Modul 4: Grundlagen des Verwal- Grundkurs III Öff. Recht (2) 3. 67,5 90 3 Klausur zu GK III tungsrechts AG zum GK III Öff. -
Jonathan Zittrain's “The Future of the Internet: and How to Stop
The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Jonathan L. Zittrain, The Future of the Internet -- And How to Stop It (Yale University Press & Penguin UK 2008). Published Version http://futureoftheinternet.org/ Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4455262 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA YD8852.i-x 1/20/09 1:59 PM Page i The Future of the Internet— And How to Stop It YD8852.i-x 1/20/09 1:59 PM Page ii YD8852.i-x 1/20/09 1:59 PM Page iii The Future of the Internet And How to Stop It Jonathan Zittrain With a New Foreword by Lawrence Lessig and a New Preface by the Author Yale University Press New Haven & London YD8852.i-x 1/20/09 1:59 PM Page iv A Caravan book. For more information, visit www.caravanbooks.org. The cover was designed by Ivo van der Ent, based on his winning entry of an open competition at www.worth1000.com. Copyright © 2008 by Jonathan Zittrain. All rights reserved. Preface to the Paperback Edition copyright © Jonathan Zittrain 2008. Subject to the exception immediately following, this book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. -
Genealogische Betrachtungen Der Jüdischen Familien in Bergheim/Erft
Genealogien der Bergheimer Jüdischen Familien Unter Einbeziehung der jüdischen Einwohner aus denn ehemaligen Gemeinden Büsdorf, Glessen, Fliesteden, Kenten, Niederaussem, Oberaussem, Paffendorf , Quadrath, Ichendorf und Zieverich. Sefer Sikaron Das Buch der Erinnerung an die ehemaligen Juden der heutigen Bügermeisterei Bergheim, Paffendorf und Hüchelhoven. Ihre Seelen seien eingebunden im Bündel des Lebens Gerd Friedt, München 2013 Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Fotomechanische Wiedergabe auch auszugsweise, nur mit ausdrücklicher Genehmigung des Verfassers. Nachdruck verboten. Copyright Inhaltsverzeichniss Vorwort Einleitung Juden seit 1603 in Bergheim Juden 1799 – 1801 in Bergheim und Nachbarorten Namensannahme der Juden in Paffendorf 1808 Hausvorstände 1810 Juden 1815 im heutigen Stadtgebiet von Bergheim Hausvortsände 1847 Juden in der Bürgermeisterei Paffendorf 1849 Steuerpflichtige Juden 1876 Juden im Adressbuch 1898 Juden in Adressbuch 1911 Juden in Adressbuch 1934 Beschneidungen im Raume Bergheim Beschreibung der Stammtafeln / Description Familie Ajacoby, Bergheim Familie Baum, Heidt, Lucas, Paffendorf u. Niederaussem Familie Blum; Kenten Familie Brünell, Oberaussem Familie Cohen I, Bergheim- Kenten Familie Harff und Fleck Einschub Familie Cohen II, Bergheim-Kenten Familie Cohen III und Schallenberg, Kenten Familie Cohen IV, Bergheim Familie Cohen / Cahn V, Bergheim und Quadrath Familie Dahl, Bergheim Familie Falk, Bergheim Familie Heumann Büsdorf Familie Levy; Bergheim Familie Levi / Gordon, Bergheim Familie Horn in Bergheim und Niederembt -
The Case of Wikipedia Jansn
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system Niederer, S.; van Dijck, J. DOI 10.1177/1461444810365297 Publication date 2010 Document Version Submitted manuscript Published in New Media & Society Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Niederer, S., & van Dijck, J. (2010). Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system. New Media & Society, 12(8), 1368-1387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365297 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:27 Sep 2021 Full Title: Wisdom of the Crowd or Technicity of Content? Wikipedia as a socio-technical system Authors: Sabine Niederer and José van Dijck Sabine Niederer, University of Amsterdam, Turfdraagsterpad 9, 1012 XT Amsterdam, The Netherlands [email protected] José van Dijck, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 210, 1012 VT Amsterdam, The Netherlands [email protected] Authors’ Biographies Sabine Niederer is PhD candidate in Media Studies at the University of Amsterdam, and member of the Digital Methods Initiative, Amsterdam. -
Critical Point of View: a Wikipedia Reader
w ikipedia pedai p edia p Wiki CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader 2 CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW 3 Critical Point of View: A Wikipedia Reader Editors: Geert Lovink and Nathaniel Tkacz Editorial Assistance: Ivy Roberts, Morgan Currie Copy-Editing: Cielo Lutino CRITICAL Design: Katja van Stiphout Cover Image: Ayumi Higuchi POINT OF VIEW Printer: Ten Klei Groep, Amsterdam Publisher: Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam 2011 A Wikipedia ISBN: 978-90-78146-13-1 Reader EDITED BY Contact GEERT LOVINK AND Institute of Network Cultures NATHANIEL TKACZ phone: +3120 5951866 INC READER #7 fax: +3120 5951840 email: [email protected] web: http://www.networkcultures.org Order a copy of this book by sending an email to: [email protected] A pdf of this publication can be downloaded freely at: http://www.networkcultures.org/publications Join the Critical Point of View mailing list at: http://www.listcultures.org Supported by: The School for Communication and Design at the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (Hogeschool van Amsterdam DMCI), the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS) in Bangalore and the Kusuma Trust. Thanks to Johanna Niesyto (University of Siegen), Nishant Shah and Sunil Abraham (CIS Bangalore) Sabine Niederer and Margreet Riphagen (INC Amsterdam) for their valuable input and editorial support. Thanks to Foundation Democracy and Media, Mondriaan Foundation and the Public Library Amsterdam (Openbare Bibliotheek Amsterdam) for supporting the CPOV events in Bangalore, Amsterdam and Leipzig. (http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/cpov/) Special thanks to all the authors for their contributions and to Cielo Lutino, Morgan Currie and Ivy Roberts for their careful copy-editing.